SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2013 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
Note 3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates, which have been made using careful judgment. Actual results may vary from these estimates. |
|
The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below: |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. There was no material effect to the consolidated financial statements as a result of these reclassifications. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of commercial accounts and interest-bearing bank deposits and are carried at cost, which approximates current value. Items are considered to be cash equivalents if the original maturity is three months or less. |
|
Equipment and Facilities |
|
Equipment and facilities are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, ranging from one to twenty-five years. |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
Acquired intangible assets are recognized at cost and are classified as assets with finite useful lives. The Company amortizes the intangible assets with five years using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets. Intangible assets are evaluated for impairment to determine if current circumstances and market conditions indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $69,067 on the intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
The Company records the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which the well is spud or the asset is acquired and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is recognized. |
|
Full Cost Method |
|
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby all costs related to the exploration and development of oil and gas properties are initially capitalized into a single cost center by country ("full cost pool"). At March 31, 2013, the Company had one cost center in the United States. |
|
All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves once proved reserves are determined to exist. At March 31, 2013, there was no amortization of these costs due to there being no production. |
|
Unproved property costs are excluded from the amortization base until determination of the existence of proved reserves on the respective property or until the requirement for impairment. Unproved properties are reviewed at the end of each quarter to determine whether portions of the costs should be reclassified to the full cost pool and thereby subject to amortization. Sales of oil and natural gas properties are accounted for as adjustments to the net full cost pool with no gain or loss recognized, unless the adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. |
|
Capitalized costs are summarized as follows for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively: |
|
| | 31-Mar-13 | | | 31-Dec-12 | | | | | |
Shares issued to acquire the oil and gas properties | | $ | 19,200,000 | | | $ | 19,200,000 | | | | | |
Asset retirement cost | | $ | 1,175,635 | | | $ | 1,175,635 | | | | | |
Accumulated impairment | | $ | -7,815,693 | | | $ | -7,815,693 | | | | | |
Net | | $ | 12,559,942 | | | $ | 12,559,942 | | | | | |
|
Capitalized costs of oil and gas properties (net of related deferred income taxes) may not exceed an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10% per annum, of the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves plus the cost of unproved properties (adjusted for related income tax effects). Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, impairment is recognized. The present value of estimated future net cash flows is computed by applying the arithmetic average first day price of oil and natural gas for the preceding twelve months to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the end of the period, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. Such present value of proved reserves' future net cash flows excludes future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations. Should this comparison indicate an excess carrying value, the excess is charged to earnings as an impairment expense. We recognized $0 and $7,815,693 of impairment costs during the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment |
|
FASB ASC 360-10-35-21 requires that assets to be held and used be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Oil and gas properties accounted for using the full cost method of accounting (which the Company uses) are excluded from this requirement but continue to be subject to the full cost method's impairment rules. |
|
Revenue recognition |
|
The Company recognizes oil and natural gas revenues from our interests in producing wells when production is delivered to, and title has transferred to, the purchaser and to the extent the selling price is reasonably determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Gas-balancing arrangements are accounted for using the sales method. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with the requirements of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: |
|
Level 1- Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued) |
|
Level 2- Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
Level 3- Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information, |
|
The carrying value of all assets and liabilities approximated their fair values as of March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. |
|
The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012: |
|
| Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
None | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short term notes payable | | | - | | | | 121,921 | | | | - | |
Advances from stockholders | | | - | | | | 143,046 | | | | - | |
Total Liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 264,967 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
None | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short term notes payable | | | - | | | | 152,753 | | | | - | |
Advances from stockholders | | | - | | | | 143,046 | | | | - | |
Total Liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 295,799 | | | $ | - | |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company follows the guidance included in ASC 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using the modified prospective transition method. The Company recognizes compensation expense in the financial statements for share-based awards based on the grant date fair value of those awards. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740, Income Taxes . Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statements and tax basis of the assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable or refundable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become known. The estimates on depreciation were based on the estimated useful lives of the Company's assets. Any estimates during the period have had an immaterial effect on earnings. |
|
Earnings or Loss Per Share |
|
The Company accounts for earnings per share pursuant ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which require disclosure on the financial statements of “basic” and “diluted” earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. During the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the Company had no common stock equivalents outstanding. Due to this, as well as the net losses reported for these years, the basic loss per share was the same as the diluted loss per share. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In February 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to: |
|
- | Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
- | Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities , which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. |
|
The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under |
IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |