CASH, CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | CASH, CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash currently consists of money market and demand accounts. The following table provides a reconciliation of total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of March 31, 2020 , December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2019 to the captions within the condensed consolidated balance sheets and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands). March 31, December 31, March 31, 2020 2019 2019 Cash and cash equivalents $ 515,793 $ 745,491 $ 503,240 Restricted cash included within prepaid and other current assets 12,851 10,526 13,372 Restricted cash included within other non-current assets 1,081 1,081 — Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 529,725 $ 757,098 $ 516,612 Concentration of Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and accounts receivable. We place our cash equivalents and short-term investments only in highly rated financial instruments and in United States government instruments. Our accounts receivable and contract assets are derived principally from patent license and technology solutions agreements. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 , five and seven licensees, respectively, comprised 66% and 73% of our net accounts receivable balance, respectively. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our licensees, who generally include large, multinational, wireless telecommunications equipment manufacturers. We believe that the book values of our financial instruments approximate their fair values. Fair Value Measurements We use various valuation techniques and assumptions when measuring the fair value of our assets and liabilities. We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. This guidance established a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of input used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy are described below: Level 1 Inputs — Level 1 includes financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets. Level 2 Inputs — Level 2 includes financial instruments for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the instrument such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets) or model-driven valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including market interest rate curves, referenced credit spreads and pre-payment rates. Level 3 Inputs — Level 3 includes financial instruments for which fair value is derived from valuation techniques including pricing models and discounted cash flow models in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable, including the Company’s own assumptions. The pricing models incorporate transaction details such as contractual terms, maturity and, in certain instances, timing and amount of future cash flows, as well as assumptions related to liquidity and credit valuation adjustments of marketplace participants. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. We use quoted market prices for similar assets to estimate the fair value of our Level 2 investments. Recurring Fair Value Measurements Our financial assets are generally included within short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, unless otherwise indicated. Our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in the tables below as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands): Fair Value as of March 31, 2020 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Money market and demand accounts (a) $ 519,725 $ — $ — $ 519,725 Commercial paper (b) — 88,125 — 88,125 U.S. government securities — 86,189 — 86,189 Corporate bonds, asset backed and other securities — 100,793 — 100,793 Total $ 519,725 $ 275,107 $ — $ 794,832 Fair Value as of December 31, 2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets: Money market and demand accounts (a) $ 757,098 $ — $ — $ 757,098 Commercial paper (b) — — — — U.S. government securities — 105,702 — 105,702 Corporate bonds, asset backed and other securities — 73,502 — 73,502 Total $ 757,098 $ 179,204 $ — $ 936,302 ______________________________ (a) Primarily included within cash and cash equivalents. (b) As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 , zero commercial paper was included within cash and cash equivalents. Level 3 Fair Value Measurements Contingent consideration As discussed in Note 6, " Business Combinations and Other Transactions ," we completed the Technicolor Patent Acquisition during third quarter 2018. In conjunction with the Technicolor Patent Acquisition, we initially recognized a contingent consideration liability which was measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. We utilized a Monte Carlo simulation model to determine the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability through first quarter 2019. A Monte Carlo simulation uses random numbers together with volatility assumptions to generate individual paths, or trials, for variables of interest governed by a Geometric Brownian Motion in a risk-neutral framework. As discussed in Note 6, " Business Combinations and Other Transactions ," we completed the R&I Acquisition during second quarter 2019. The transaction met the definition of an asset acquisition and was accounted for using the cost accumulation and allocation model. As part of the R&I Acquisition, Technicolor reduced its rights to the revenue-sharing arrangement that created the initial contingent consideration liability from the Technicolor Patent Acquisition. We determined that the initial contingent consideration liability from the Technicolor Patent Acquisition was significantly modified in conjunction with the R&I Acquisition, and, as such, the contingent consideration liability will now be accounted for under ASC 450 - Contingencies under the asset acquisition framework when the liability is deemed probable and estimable. Since the contingent consideration liability arising from the amended revenue-sharing arrangement was not probable and estimable as of the acquisition date, the carrying value of the previous contingent consideration liability was derecognized, which resulted in a $20.5 million gain which was included within " Other Income (Expense), Net ” in the condensed consolidated statement of income for second quarter 2019. Therefore, effective as of the completion of the R&I Acquisition on May 31, 2019, the contingent consideration liability was no longer a Level 3 fair value recurring measurement. Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements Investments in Other Entities During first quarter 2020, we recognized a $5.5 million unrealized gain resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions of one of our long-term strategic investments, which was included within “ Other Income (Expense), Net ” in the condensed consolidated statement of income. Lease Assets During first quarter 2020, we recognized a $1.1 million impairment, comprised of $0.8 million of Property, Plant, and Equipment, and $0.3 million of Right of Use Asset related to the abandonment of one of our leased properties, which was included within “ Operating Expense ” in the condensed consolidated statement of income. Fair Value of Long-Term Debt 2024 and 2020 Senior Convertible Notes The principal amount, carrying value and related estimated fair value of the Company's senior convertible debt reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was as follows (in thousands). The aggregate fair value of the principal amount of the senior convertible long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement. March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Principal Amount Carrying Value Fair Value Principal Amount Carrying Fair Value Senior Convertible Long-Term Debt $ 400,000 $ 332,997 $ 366,760 $ 494,909 $ 423,657 $ 492,969 Technicolor Patent Acquisition Long-term Debt As more fully disclosed in Note 6, " Business Combinations and Other Transactions ," we recognized long-term debt in conjunction with the Technicolor Patent Acquisition. The carrying value and related estimated fair value of the Technicolor Patent Acquisition long-term debt reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was as follows (in thousands). The aggregate fair value of the Technicolor Patent Acquisition long-term debt is a Level 3 fair value measurement. March 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Fair Value Technicolor Patent Acquisition Long-Term Debt $ 21,826 $ 24,261 $ 21,101 $ 23,305 |