LITIGATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | LITIGATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ARBITRATIONS AND COURT PROCEEDINGS Lenovo In fourth quarter 2024, the Company reached an agreement with Lenovo Group Limited and certain of its subsidiaries (“Lenovo”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a new patent license agreement, which will be effective from January 1, 2024. As part of the agreement to arbitrate, both parties have agreed to dismiss all pending litigations between them. UK Proceedings In August 2019, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the UK High Court against Lenovo. The claim, as amended, alleged infringement of five of the Company ’s patents relating to 3G and/or 4G/LTE standards. The Company sought, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents or, in the alternative, a determination of the terms of a FRAND license. Between 2021 and 2023, three of the Company’s European Patents were found by UK courts to be valid, essential and infringed by Lenovo. In March 2023, the UK High Court issued an order staying all deadlines with respect to the fourth and fifth technical trials. On March 16, 2023, the UK High Court issued its order regarding judgment in the trial to determine how much Lenovo must pay for a license to the Company’s portfolio of cellular assets, awarding the Company a lump sum of $138.7 million for such license through December 31, 2023. On June 27, 2023, the court issued an order awarding the Company an additional $46.2 million, thus increasing the total award to $184.9 million, which was paid on July 11, 2023. The court also found that the Company should pay a portion of Lenovo’s costs and granted both parties permission to appeal on certain grounds. Both parties appealed certain aspects of the ruling, and in July 2024, the UK Court of Appeal ruled in favor of InterDigital and awarded the Company an additional amount of $55.2 million to a total of approximately $240.1 million. It rejected Lenovo’s appeal in its entirety and confirmed that Lenovo must pay for all of its past sales starting from 2007 through December 31, 2023. The court also found that Lenovo should pay the Company’s costs for the appeal and reduced the costs that Lenovo was awarded from the initial decision. Lenovo sought permission to appeal, and permission to appeal was refused by the UK Court of Appeals. Lenovo filed an application to the UK Supreme Court requesting permission to appeal on August 9, 2024; Lenovo withdrew its application to appeal in October 2024 following entry into the arbitration agreement described above. On September 24, 2023, Lenovo filed a new claim in the UK High Court, which alleged invalidity of two of the Company’s patents relating to 4G/LTE standards. Lenovo sought, among other relief, a declaration that the patents at issue were invalid, not essential, and not infringed, revocation of the patents at issue, and a declaration that, upon expiration of the current license in 2023, Lenovo is licensed under terms to be determined by the UK High Court through 2028 or, in the alternative, a determination of the terms of a FRAND license. In October 2023, Lenovo filed a request for an order that the Company indicate whether it is prepared to give an unconditional undertaking to enter into a global license on terms set by the UK Court, or failing that, a declaration that the Defendants are unwilling licensors; a hearing was held in December 2023 during which Lenovo agreed to stay its application. The Company filed a jurisdiction challenge in October 2023, and a hearing on such challenge took place in April 2024, following which, the jurisdiction challenge was denied. In November 2023, Lenovo filed an application seeking an expedited FRAND trial and an interim license until a FRAND decision is issued in the UK. A hearing on the interim license was held in February 2024; in March 2024 the UK High Court denied Lenovo’s request for the interim license. A FRAND trial was set for June-July 2025. District of Delaware Patent Proceedings In August 2019, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware District Court") against Lenovo alleging that Lenovo infringes eight of the Company’s U.S. patents by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling Lenovo wireless devices with 3G and/or 4G LTE capabilities. As relief, InterDigital sought: (a) a declaration that the Company is not in breach of its relevant FRAND commitments with respect to Lenovo; (b) to the extent Lenovo does not agree to negotiate a worldwide patent license, does not agree to enter into binding international arbitration to set the terms of a FRAND license, and does not agree to be bound by the terms to be set by the UK High Court in the separately filed UK proceedings described above, an injunction prohibiting Lenovo from continued infringement; (c) damages, including enhanced damages for willful infringement and supplemental damages; and (d) attorneys’ fees and costs. In June 2023, the parties requested that the entire case be stayed pending resolution of all appeals in the UK proceedings, and this request was granted. District of Delaware Antitrust Proceedings In April 2020, Lenovo and Motorola Mobility LLC filed a complaint in the Delaware District Court against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, alleging that the Company defendants violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act in connection with, among other things, their licensing of 3G and 4G standards essential patents ("SEPs"). The complaint further alleged that the Company defendants have violated their commitment to the ETSI with respect to the licensing of 3G and 4G SEPs on FRAND terms and conditions. The complaint sought, among other things (i) rulings that the Company defendants have violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and are liable for breach of their ETSI FRAND commitments, (ii) a judgment that the plaintiffs are entitled to a license with respect to the Company’s 3G and 4G SEPs on FRAND terms and conditions, and (iii) injunctions against any demand for allegedly excessive royalties or enforcement of the Company defendants’ 3G and 4G U.S. SEPs against the plaintiffs or their customers via patent infringement proceedings. In June 2020, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Lenovo’s Sherman Act claims with prejudice, and to dismiss Lenovo’s breach of contract claim with leave to re-file as a counterclaim in the Company’s legal proceeding against Lenovo in the Delaware District Court discussed above. In March 2021, the Delaware District Court dismissed the Sherman Act Section 1 claim without prejudice, denied the motion to dismiss the Sherman Act Section 2 claim, and consolidated the Section 2 and breach of contract claims with Company’s Delaware patent proceeding discussed above. International Trade Commission and Companion District Court Proceedings In September 2023, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the United States International Trade Commission (the "International Trade Commission") alleging that Lenovo infringes five of the Company’s U.S. patents by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling certain electronic devices, including smartphones, computers, tablet computers, and components thereof that infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company sought: (a) a limited exclusion order against Lenovo barring from entry into the United States all of Lenovo’s products that infringe the asserted patents; (b) cease and desist orders prohibiting Lenovo from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products; and (c) a bond during the 60-day Presidential review period. An evidentiary hearing was held in August 2024. Also in September 2023, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (the "North Carolina District Court") alleging that Lenovo infringes those same five of the Company’s U.S. patents. As relief, the Company sought: (a) a finding that Lenovo is liable for infringement of the asserted patents; (b) an injunction against further infringement; (c) damages, including enhanced damages for willful infringement and supplemental damages; and (d) costs. Germany Proceedings In September 2023, the Company filed a complaint with the Munich Regional Court against Lenovo and certain of its affiliates, alleging infringement of a European patent relating to cellular 4G/LTE and/or 5G standards. The Company sought, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In May 2024, the Munich Regional Court issued a judgment finding Lenovo infringed the Company’s European patent and that the Company complied with its FRAND obligations while Lenovo did not; the Court ordered Lenovo to cease and desist selling infringing products. The Company served Lenovo with an enforcement note of the judgment in May 2024. Lenovo appealed the judgment and requested a stay of the enforcement of the judgment, and in June 2024, the Munich Regional Court rejected Lenovo’s request. Oppo, OnePlus and realme In fourth quarter 2024, the Company entered into a license agreement with Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. (“Oppo”) and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, (collectively, “Oppo Group”). As part of the license agreement, both parties have agreed to dismiss all pending litigations between them. UK Proceedings In December 2021, the Company filed a patent infringement claim in the UK High Court against Oppo and certain of its affiliates, OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“OnePlus”) and certain of its affiliates, and realme Mobile Telecommunications (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“realme”) and certain of its affiliates, collectively, Oppo Group, alleging infringement of the Company’s European patents relating to cellular 3G, 4G/LTE or 5G standards. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In March 2023, the parties agreed to stay all technical trials. The FRAND trial to determine the royalties to be paid under the license with Oppo was held in March and April 2024; a second hearing was held in September 2024 regarding the parties’ submissions relating to the UK Court of Appeal ’s decision in the Lenovo litigation. India Proceedings In December 2021, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court in New Delhi, India against Oppo and certain of its affiliates, OnePlus and certain of its affiliates, and realme Mobile Telecommunication (India) Private Limited, alleging infringement of certain of the Company’s Indian patents relating to cellular 3G, 4G/LTE, and/or 5G, and HEVC standards. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In February 2024, the Delhi High Court granted the Company’s application for pro tem security, and Oppo appealed. Evidentiary trial proceedings began in October 2024 and were expected to take place through December 2024. Germany Proceedings In December 2021, a subsidiary of the Company filed three patent infringement claims, two in the Munich Regional Court and one in the Mannheim Regional Court, against Oppo and certain of its affiliates, OnePlus and certain of its affiliates, and realme and certain of its affiliates, alleging infringement of certain of the Company’s European patents relating to cellular 3G, 4G/LTE and/or 5G standards. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Regional Court held hearings in March and December 2023, and in December 2023, the Munich Regional Court issued a decision finding infringement and issuing an injunction against Oppo. Oppo appealed this decision. In March and November 2023, the Munich Regional Court entered stays of the proceedings in respect of specific patents. China Proceedings In January 2022, the Company was informed that Oppo had purportedly filed a complaint against the Company in the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court (the “Guangzhou IP Court”) seeking a determination of a global FRAND royalty rate for the Company’s 3G, 4G, 5G, 802.11 and HEVC SEPs. In May 2022, the Company filed an application challenging, among other things, process of service and the jurisdiction of the Guangzhou IP Court. The Guangzhou IP Court denied the application, and the Company appealed that decision. The Supreme People’s Court denied the appeal, and an initial evidentiary hearing was held in October 2023. Spain Proceedings In March 2022, a subsidiary of the Company filed patent infringement claims in the Barcelona Commercial Courts against Oppo and certain of its affiliates, OnePlus and certain of its affiliates, and realme and certain of its affiliates. The Company filed an amended complaint in April 2022, alleging infringement of certain of its European patents relating to cellular 3G, 4G/LTE and/or 5G standards. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. Evidentiary trial proceedings were scheduled to take place in May 2025. Samsung The Company reached an agreement with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Samsung”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a renewed patent license agreement to certain of the Company’s patents, which will be effective from January 1, 2023. The Company and Samsung have also agreed not to initiate certain claims against the other during the arbitration. On March 31, 2023, the Company filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce. On July 21, 2023, the International Chamber of Commerce confirmed the full tribunal for the arbitration. The two-week arbitration hearing was held in July 2024 , and we expect a decision by the end of 2024. Tesla On December 5, 2023, Tesla and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the UK High Court against the Company and Avanci. The claim alleges invalidity of three of the Company’s patents relating to 5G standards: European Patent (UK) Nos. 3,718,369, 3,566,413, and 3,455,985. Tesla sought, among other relief, a declaration that the patents at issue are invalid, not essential, and not infringed, revocation of the patents at issue, a declaration that the terms of the Avanci 5G Connected Vehicle platform license are not FRAND, and a determination of FRAND terms for a license between Tesla and Avanci covering its Avanci’s 5G Connected Vehicle platform. On March 8, 2024, the Company filed a jurisdiction challenge; the jurisdiction challenge was heard on May 24-25 and June 4, 2024, and on July 15, 2024 the UK High Court issued a judgment dismissing Tesla’s FRAND claims against the Company and Avanci, and maintaining Tesla’s patent claims against the Company. The patent claims against the Company were further stayed by the UK High Court, and a hearing on costs and permission to appeal is scheduled for July 30, 2024. On July 16, 2024, Tesla sought permission to appeal the decision; the Company also sought permission to appeal on two limited grounds conditionally, should Tesla’s request for an appeal be granted. The appeal hearing is scheduled to take place on December 2-3, 2024. OTHER We are party to certain other disputes and legal actions in the ordinary course of business, including arbitrations and legal proceedings with licensees regarding the terms of their agreements and the negotiation thereof. We do not currently believe that these matters, even if adversely adjudicated or settled, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. None of the preceding matters have met the requirements for accrual or disclosure of a potential range as of September 30, 2024, except as noted above. |