UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017.
OR |
| |
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to .
Commission file number 001-33748
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Maryland (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.) Maryland (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.) | | 20-8718331 26-0559473 |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | | (IRS employer identification number) |
| |
401 9th Street NW, Suite 600 Washington, D.C. | | 20004 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | Zip Code |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (202) 728-0044
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.: |
| | | | | |
Large accelerated Filer | | x | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
(DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. only) | | | |
Non-accelerated Filer | | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
(DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. only) | | | |
| | | Emerging growth company | | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. |
| | |
Class | | Outstanding at April 21, 2017 |
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share | | 77,836,170 |
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. and DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. References to “DFT” mean DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. and its controlled subsidiaries; and references to the “Operating Partnership” or “OP” mean DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. and its controlled subsidiaries. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our Company” or “the Company” refer to DFT and the Operating Partnership, collectively.
DFT is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s capital includes general and limited common operating partnership units, or “OP units.” As of March 31, 2017, DFT owned 86.9% of the common economic interest in the Operating Partnership, with the remaining interest being owned by investors. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, DFT has exclusive control of the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of DFT and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
| |
• | enhances investors’ understanding of DFT and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business; |
| |
• | eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure in this report applies to both DFT and the Operating Partnership; and |
| |
• | creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports. |
We operate DFT and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of DFT consists of the same employees as the management of the Operating Partnership.
We believe it is important for investors to understand the few differences between DFT and the Operating Partnership in the context of how DFT and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. DFT is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of OP units of the Operating Partnership. As a result, DFT does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. DFT has not issued any indebtedness, but has guaranteed all of the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, holds all the real estate assets of the Company. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by DFT, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP units or preferred units, the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by our business. These sources include the Operating Partnership’s operations, its direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, and the issuance of partnership units.
As sole general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, DFT consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. The presentation of stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of DFT and those of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s capital includes preferred units and general and limited common units that are owned by DFT and the other partners. DFT’s stockholders’ equity includes preferred stock, common stock, additional paid in capital, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The common limited partnership interests held by the limited partners (other than DFT) in the Operating Partnership are presented as “redeemable partnership units” in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as “redeemable noncontrolling interests-operating partnership” in DFT’s consolidated financial statements. The only difference between the assets and liabilities of DFT and the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2017 was a $4.2 million bank account held by DFT that is not part of the Operating Partnership. Net income is the same for DFT and the Operating Partnership.
In order to highlight the few differences between DFT and the Operating Partnership, there are sections in this report that discuss DFT and the Operating Partnership separately, including separate financial statements, controls and procedures sections, and Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications. In the sections that combine disclosure for DFT and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that enters into contracts, holds assets and issues debt, we believe that reference to the Company in this context is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and we operate the business through our Operating Partnership.
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. / DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
| |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands except share data) |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Income producing property: | | | |
Land | $ | 103,304 |
| | $ | 105,890 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 3,019,725 |
| | 3,018,361 |
|
| 3,123,029 |
| | 3,124,251 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | (689,099 | ) | | (662,183 | ) |
Net income producing property | 2,433,930 |
| | 2,462,068 |
|
Construction in progress and property held for development | 493,442 |
| | 330,983 |
|
Net real estate | 2,927,372 |
| | 2,793,051 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 44,980 |
| | 38,624 |
|
Rents and other receivables, net | 9,504 |
| | 11,533 |
|
Deferred rent, net | 121,340 |
| | 123,058 |
|
Deferred costs, net | 24,560 |
| | 25,776 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 50,256 |
| | 46,422 |
|
Total assets | $ | 3,178,012 |
| | $ | 3,038,464 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Line of credit | $ | 197,819 |
| | $ | 50,926 |
|
Mortgage notes payable, net of deferred financing costs | 109,592 |
| | 110,733 |
|
Unsecured term loan, net of deferred financing costs | 249,089 |
| | 249,036 |
|
Unsecured notes payable, net of discount and deferred financing costs | 837,895 |
| | 837,323 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 29,647 |
| | 36,909 |
|
Construction costs payable | 75,884 |
| | 56,428 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 6,273 |
| | 11,592 |
|
Dividend and distribution payable | 46,426 |
| | 46,352 |
|
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | 72,449 |
| | 81,062 |
|
Total liabilities | 1,625,074 |
| | 1,480,361 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | 579,329 |
| | 591,101 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | — |
| | — |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized: | | | |
Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock, 8,050,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 201,250 |
| | 201,250 |
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 77,836,170 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 75,914,763 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 78 |
| | 76 |
|
Additional paid in capital | 773,321 |
| | 766,732 |
|
Retained earnings | — |
| | — |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,040 | ) | | (1,056 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 973,609 |
| | 967,002 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,178,012 |
| | $ | 3,038,464 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in thousands except share and per share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Revenues: | | | |
Base rent | $ | 91,268 |
| | $ | 82,533 |
|
Recoveries from tenants | 45,295 |
| | 38,694 |
|
Other revenues | 2,921 |
| | 2,922 |
|
Total revenues | 139,484 |
|
| 124,149 |
|
Expenses: | | | |
Property operating costs | 40,191 |
| | 35,955 |
|
Real estate taxes and insurance | 5,010 |
| | 5,316 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 |
| | 25,843 |
|
General and administrative | 6,812 |
| | 5,575 |
|
Other expenses | 2,705 |
| | 2,349 |
|
Total expenses | 82,925 |
| | 75,038 |
|
Operating income | 56,559 |
| | 49,111 |
|
Interest: | | | |
Expense incurred | (11,459 | ) | | (11,569 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | (825 | ) | | (845 | ) |
Net income | 44,275 |
| | 36,697 |
|
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | (5,712 | ) | | (5,478 | ) |
Net income attributable to controlling interests | 38,563 |
| | 31,219 |
|
Preferred stock dividends | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
Net income attributable to common shares | $ | 35,230 |
| | $ | 24,408 |
|
Earnings per share – basic: | | | |
Net income attributable to common shares | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 76,670,425 |
| | 66,992,995 |
|
Earnings per share – diluted: | | | |
Net income attributable to common shares | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 77,651,406 |
| | 67,846,115 |
|
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited and in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Net income | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 36,697 |
|
Other comprehensive income: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 18 |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive income | 44,293 |
| | 36,697 |
|
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | (5,712 | ) | | (5,478 | ) |
Other comprehensive income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | (2 | ) | | — |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests | 38,579 |
| | 31,219 |
|
Preferred stock dividends | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
Comprehensive income attributable to common shares | $ | 35,246 |
| | $ | 24,408 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited and in thousands except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred Stock | | Common Shares | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
| | Number | | Amount | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 201,250 |
| | 75,914,763 |
| | $ | 76 |
| | $ | 766,732 |
| | $ | — |
| | (1,056 | ) | | $ | 967,002 |
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests | | | | | | | | | 38,563 |
| | | | 38,563 |
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests - foreign currency translation adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | 16 |
| | 16 |
|
Dividends declared on common stock | | | | | | | (3,688 | ) | | (35,230 | ) | | | | (38,918 | ) |
Dividends earned on preferred stock | | | | | | |
| | (3,333 | ) | | | | (3,333 | ) |
Redemption of operating partnership units | | | 1,773,147 |
| | 2 |
| | 77,892 |
| | | | | | 77,894 |
|
Issuance of stock awards | | | 233,655 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
|
Retirement and forfeiture of stock awards | | | (85,395 | ) | | — |
| | (3,975 | ) | | | | | | (3,975 | ) |
Amortization of deferred compensation costs | | | | | | | 2,609 |
| | | | | | 2,609 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | | | | | | | (66,249 | ) | | | | | | (66,249 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 201,250 |
| | 77,836,170 |
| | $ | 78 |
| | $ | 773,321 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,040 | ) | | $ | 973,609 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited and in thousands) |
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | |
Net income | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 36,697 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 |
| | 25,843 |
|
Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 1,718 |
| | (1,737 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 825 |
| | 845 |
|
Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) |
Compensation paid with Company common shares | 2,536 |
| | 1,769 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | |
Rents and other receivables | 2,029 |
| | (97 | ) |
Deferred costs | (276 | ) | | (1,611 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (3,907 | ) | | 61 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (7,274 | ) | | (4,599 | ) |
Accrued interest payable | (5,319 | ) | | (5,309 | ) |
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | (7,931 | ) | | (407 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 54,612 |
| | 51,339 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities | | | |
Investments in real estate – development | (137,223 | ) | | (52,302 | ) |
Acquisition of real estate – related party | — |
| | (20,168 | ) |
Interest capitalized for real estate under development | (4,051 | ) | | (3,183 | ) |
Improvements to real estate | (186 | ) | | (2,099 | ) |
Additions to non-real estate property | (68 | ) | | (123 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (141,528 | ) | | (77,875 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | |
Line of credit: | | | |
Proceeds | 146,549 |
| | 60,000 |
|
Repayments | — |
| | (60,000 | ) |
Mortgage notes payable: | | | |
Repayments | (1,250 | ) | | — |
|
Payments of financing costs | (34 | ) | | — |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs | — |
| | 275,797 |
|
Equity compensation (payments) proceeds | (3,975 | ) | | 7,007 |
|
Dividends and distributions: | | | |
Common shares | (37,939 | ) | | (31,070 | ) |
Preferred shares | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | (6,746 | ) | | (7,084 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 93,272 |
| | 237,839 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 6,356 |
| | 211,303 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 38,624 |
| | 31,230 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, ending of period | $ | 44,980 |
| | $ | 242,533 |
|
Supplemental information: | | | |
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 16,778 |
| | $ | 16,880 |
|
Deferred financing costs capitalized for real estate under development | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 217 |
|
Construction costs payable capitalized for real estate under development | $ | 75,884 |
| | $ | 21,247 |
|
Redemption of operating partnership units | $ | 77,894 |
| | $ | 6,101 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | $ | 66,249 |
| | $ | 131,582 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands except unit data) |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Income producing property: | | | |
Land | $ | 103,304 |
| | $ | 105,890 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 3,019,725 |
| | 3,018,361 |
|
| 3,123,029 |
| | 3,124,251 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | (689,099 | ) | | (662,183 | ) |
Net income producing property | 2,433,930 |
| | 2,462,068 |
|
Construction in progress and property held for development | 493,442 |
| | 330,983 |
|
Net real estate | 2,927,372 |
| | 2,793,051 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 40,765 |
| | 34,409 |
|
Rents and other receivables, net | 9,504 |
| | 11,533 |
|
Deferred rent, net | 121,340 |
| | 123,058 |
|
Deferred costs, net | 24,560 |
| | 25,776 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 50,256 |
| | 46,422 |
|
Total assets | $ | 3,173,797 |
| | $ | 3,034,249 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Line of credit | $ | 197,819 |
| | $ | 50,926 |
|
Mortgage notes payable, net of deferred financing costs | 109,592 |
| | 110,733 |
|
Unsecured term loan, net of deferred financing costs | 249,089 |
| | 249,036 |
|
Unsecured notes payable, net of discount and deferred financing costs | 837,895 |
| | 837,323 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 29,647 |
| | 36,909 |
|
Construction costs payable | 75,884 |
| | 56,428 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 6,273 |
| | 11,592 |
|
Dividend and distribution payable | 46,426 |
| | 46,352 |
|
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | 72,449 |
| | 81,062 |
|
Total liabilities | 1,625,074 |
| | 1,480,361 |
|
Redeemable partnership units | 579,329 |
| | 591,101 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | — |
| | — |
|
Partners’ capital: | | | |
Limited partners’ capital: | | | |
Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred units, 8,050,000 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 201,250 |
| | 201,250 |
|
Common units, 77,173,797 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 75,252,390 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 761,607 |
| | 754,892 |
|
General partner’s capital, common units, 662,373 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | 6,537 |
| | 6,645 |
|
Total partners’ capital | 969,394 |
| | 962,787 |
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 3,173,797 |
| | $ | 3,034,249 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in thousands except unit and per unit data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Revenues: | | | |
Base rent | $ | 91,268 |
| | $ | 82,533 |
|
Recoveries from tenants | 45,295 |
| | 38,694 |
|
Other revenues | 2,921 |
| | 2,922 |
|
Total revenues | 139,484 |
| | 124,149 |
|
Expenses: | | | |
Property operating costs | 40,191 |
| | 35,955 |
|
Real estate taxes and insurance | 5,010 |
| | 5,316 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 |
| | 25,843 |
|
General and administrative | 6,812 |
| | 5,575 |
|
Other expenses | 2,705 |
| | 2,349 |
|
Total expenses | 82,925 |
| | 75,038 |
|
Operating income | 56,559 |
| | 49,111 |
|
Interest: | | | |
Expense incurred | (11,459 | ) | | (11,569 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | (825 | ) | | (845 | ) |
Net income | 44,275 |
| | 36,697 |
|
Preferred unit distributions | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 40,942 |
| | $ | 29,886 |
|
Earnings per unit – basic: | | | |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Weighted average common units outstanding | 89,095,663 |
| | 82,028,440 |
|
Earnings per unit – diluted: | | | |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Weighted average common units outstanding | 90,076,644 |
| | 82,881,560 |
|
Distributions declared per common unit | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited and in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Net income | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 36,697 |
|
Other comprehensive income: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 18 |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive income | 44,293 |
| | 36,697 |
|
Preferred unit distributions | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
Comprehensive income attributable to common units | $ | 40,960 |
| | $ | 29,886 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(unaudited and in thousands except unit data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Limited Partners’ Capital | | General Partner’s Capital | | |
| Preferred Amount | | Common Units | | Common Amount | | Common Units | | Common Amount | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 201,250 |
| | 75,252,390 |
| | $ | 754,892 |
| | 662,373 |
| | $ | 6,645 |
| | $ | 962,787 |
|
Net income | | | | | 43,898 |
| | | | 377 |
| | 44,275 |
|
Other comprehensive income - foreign currency translation adjustments | | | | | 18 |
| | | |
|
| | 18 |
|
Common unit distributions | | | | | (44,428 | ) | | | | (331 | ) | | (44,759 | ) |
Preferred unit distributions | | | | | (3,305 | ) | | | | (28 | ) | | (3,333 | ) |
Issuance of OP units to DFT when redeemable partnership units redeemed | | | 1,773,147 |
| | 77,894 |
| | | | | | 77,894 |
|
Issuance of OP units for stock awards | | | 233,655 |
| | — |
| | | | | | — |
|
Retirement and forfeiture of OP units | | | (85,395 | ) | | (3,975 | ) | | | | | | (3,975 | ) |
Amortization of deferred compensation costs | | | | | 2,609 |
| | | | | | 2,609 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable partnership units | | | | | (65,996 | ) | | | | (126 | ) | | (66,122 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 201,250 |
| | 77,173,797 |
| | $ | 761,607 |
| | 662,373 |
| | $ | 6,537 |
| | $ | 969,394 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited and in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | |
Net income | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 36,697 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 |
| | 25,843 |
|
Straight-line rent, net of reserve | 1,718 |
| | (1,737 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 825 |
| | 845 |
|
Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) |
Compensation paid with Company common shares | 2,536 |
| | 1,769 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | |
Rents and other receivables | 2,029 |
| | (97 | ) |
Deferred costs | (276 | ) | | (1,611 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (3,907 | ) | | 61 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (7,274 | ) | | (4,599 | ) |
Accrued interest payable | (5,319 | ) | | (5,309 | ) |
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | (7,931 | ) | | (407 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 54,612 |
| | 51,339 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities | | | |
Investments in real estate – development | (137,223 | ) | | (52,302 | ) |
Acquisition of real estate – related party | — |
| | (20,168 | ) |
Interest capitalized for real estate under development | (4,051 | ) | | (3,183 | ) |
Improvements to real estate | (186 | ) | | (2,099 | ) |
Additions to non-real estate property | (68 | ) | | (123 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (141,528 | ) | | (77,875 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | |
Line of credit: | | | |
Proceeds | 146,549 |
| | 60,000 |
|
Repayments | — |
| | (60,000 | ) |
Mortgage notes payable: | | | |
Repayments | (1,250 | ) | | — |
|
Payments of financing costs | (34 | ) | | — |
|
Issuance of common units, net of offering costs | — |
| | 275,797 |
|
Equity compensation (payments) proceeds | (3,975 | ) | | 7,007 |
|
Distributions | (48,018 | ) | | (44,965 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 93,272 |
| | 237,839 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 6,356 |
| | 211,303 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 34,409 |
| | 27,015 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, ending of period | $ | 40,765 |
| | $ | 238,318 |
|
Supplemental information: | | | |
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 16,778 |
| | $ | 16,880 |
|
Deferred financing costs capitalized for real estate under development | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 217 |
|
Construction costs payable capitalized for real estate under development | $ | 75,884 |
| | $ | 21,247 |
|
Redemption of operating partnership units | $ | 77,894 |
| | $ | 6,101 |
|
Adjustments to redeemable partnership units | $ | 66,122 |
| | $ | 130,066 |
|
See accompanying notes
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2017
(unaudited)
1. Description of Business
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., or DFT, through its controlling interest in DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or “OP” and collectively with DFT and their operating subsidiaries, the “Company”), is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed company that owns, acquires, develops and operates wholesale data centers. DFT is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes and is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, and as of March 31, 2017, owned 86.9% of the common economic interest in the Operating Partnership, of which 0.9% is held as general partnership units. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our Company” or “the Company” refer to DFT and the Operating Partnership, collectively. As of March 31, 2017, we held a fee simple interest in the following properties:
| |
• | 11 operating data centers – ACC2, ACC3, ACC4, ACC5, ACC6, ACC7, CH1, CH2, SC1 Phases I-II, VA3, and VA4; |
| |
• | Five data center projects under development – ACC9 Phases I and II, CH3 Phase I, SC1 Phase III and TOR1 Phase IA; |
| |
• | One shell of a data center currently under development – ACC10; |
| |
• | Three data center projects available for future development – CH3 Phase II, TOR1 Phase IB/C and TOR1 Phase II; and |
| |
• | Land that may be used to develop four additional data centers – ACC8, ACC11, OR1 and OR2. |
In April 2017, we commenced development of ACC10 Phase I and CH3 Phase II.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
This report combines the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. and DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. References to “DFT” mean DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. and its controlled subsidiaries; and references to the “Operating Partnership” or “OP” mean DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. and its controlled subsidiaries.
We believe combining the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q of DFT and the Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
| |
• | enhances investors’ understanding of DFT and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business; |
| |
• | eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure in this report applies to both DFT and the Operating Partnership; and |
| |
• | creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports. |
We operate DFT and the Operating Partnership as one business. The management of DFT consists of the same employees as the management of the Operating Partnership.
We believe it is important for investors to understand the few differences between DFT and the Operating Partnership in the context of how DFT and the Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. DFT is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of OP units of the Operating Partnership. As a result, DFT does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. DFT has not issued any indebtedness, but has guaranteed all of the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, holds all the real estate assets of the Company. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by DFT, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP units or preferred units, the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by our business. These sources include the Operating Partnership’s operations, its direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, and the issuance of partnership units.
As sole general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, DFT consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. The presentation of stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital are the main areas of difference
between the consolidated financial statements of DFT and those of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s capital includes preferred units and general and limited common units that are owned by DFT and the other partners. DFT’s stockholders’ equity includes preferred stock, common stock, additional paid in capital, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The common limited partnership interests held by the limited partners (other than DFT) in the Operating Partnership are presented as “redeemable partnership units” in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as “redeemable noncontrolling interests-operating partnership” in DFT’s consolidated financial statements. The only difference between the assets and liabilities of DFT and the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2017 was a $4.2 million bank account held by DFT that is not part of the Operating Partnership. Net income is the same for DFT and the Operating Partnership.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the audited financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2016 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains a complete listing of our significant accounting policies.
We have one reportable segment consisting of investments in data centers located in the United States and Canada. All of our properties generate similar types of revenues and expenses related to customer rent and reimbursements and operating expenses. The delivery of our products is consistent across all properties and although services are provided to a range of customers, the types of services provided to them are limited to a few core principles. As such, the properties in our portfolio have similar economic characteristics and the nature of the products and services provided to our customers and the method to distribute such services are consistent throughout the portfolio.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property
Depreciation on buildings is generally provided on a straight-line basis over 40 years from the date the buildings were placed in service. Building components are depreciated over the life of the respective improvement ranging from 10 to 40 years from the date the components were placed in service. Personal property is depreciated over three to seven years. Depreciation expense was $27.1 million and $24.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
We review each of our properties for indicators of impairment. Examples of such indicators may include a significant decrease in the market price of the property, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which the property is being used in its physical condition, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a property, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the development of a property, a history of operating or cash flow losses of the property or a current expectation that, more likely than not, a property will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. When such impairment indicators exist, we review an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition and compare that estimate to the carrying value of the property. We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of our assets on a property-by-property basis. We consider factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition, potential sales proceeds and other factors. If our undiscounted cash flow evaluation indicates that we are unable to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. No impairment losses were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
We classify a data center property as held-for-sale when it meets the necessary criteria, which include when we commit to and actively embark on a plan to sell the asset, the sale is expected to be completed within one year under terms usual and
customary for such sales, and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Data center properties held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any properties classified as held-for-sale.
Deferred Costs
Deferred costs, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets include both financing and leasing costs.
Financing costs, which represent fees and other costs incurred in obtaining debt, are amortized using the effective-interest rate method, or a method that approximates the effective-interest method, over the term of the loan and are included in amortization of deferred financing costs.
Balances of financing costs for our unsecured revolving credit facility, or Unsecured Credit Facility, net of accumulated amortization, which are presented within deferred costs, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
Financing costs presented within deferred costs, net | March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Financing costs | $ | 12,353 |
| | $ | 12,352 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (6,800 | ) | | (6,376 | ) |
Financing costs, net | $ | 5,553 |
| | $ | 5,976 |
|
Balances of financing costs for our other recognized debt liabilities, net of accumulated amortization, which are presented as a reduction of each of the respective recognized debt liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
Financing costs presented as a reduction of debt liability balances | March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Financing costs | $ | 20,443 |
| | $ | 20,423 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (8,634 | ) | | (7,935 | ) |
Financing costs, net | $ | 11,809 |
| | $ | 12,488 |
|
Leasing costs, which consist of external fees and costs incurred in the successful negotiation of leases, internal costs expended in the successful negotiation of leases and the estimated leasing commissions resulting from the allocation of the purchase price of ACC2, VA3, VA4 and ACC4, are deferred and amortized over the terms of the applicable leases on a straight-line basis. If an applicable lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial term, the carrying amount of the leasing costs are written off to amortization expense. Leasing costs incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Leasing costs incurred for new leases | $ | 276 |
| | $ | 1,600 |
|
Leasing costs incurred for renewals | — |
| | 11 |
|
Total leasing costs incurred | $ | 276 |
|
| $ | 1,611 |
|
Amortization of deferred leasing costs totaled $1.1 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Balances, net of accumulated amortization, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Leasing costs | $ | 53,832 |
| | $ | 53,556 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (34,825 | ) | | (33,756 | ) |
Leasing costs, net | $ | 19,007 |
| | $ | 19,800 |
|
Inventory
We maintain fuel inventory for our generators, which is recorded at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fuel inventory was $4.2 million and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Rental Income
We, as a lessor, have retained substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership and account for our leases as operating leases. For lease agreements that provide for scheduled fixed and determinable rent increases, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease, which commences when control of the space and critical power have been provided to the customer. If the lease contains an early termination clause with a penalty payment, we determine the lease termination date by evaluating whether the penalty reasonably assures that the lease will not be terminated early.
Straight-line rents receivable are included in deferred rent, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Lease inducements, which include cash payments to customers, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the non-cancellable lease term. Lease inducements are included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Lease intangible assets and liabilities that have resulted from above-market and below-market leases that were acquired are amortized on a straight-line basis as decreases and increases, respectively, to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancellable term of the underlying leases. If a lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial term, the unamortized portion of straight-line rents receivable, lease inducements and lease intangibles associated with that lease will be written off to rental revenue. Lease contracts above market value, net are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and lease contracts below market value, net are included in prepaid rents and other liabilities in the accompany consolidated balance sheets.
Balances, net of accumulated amortization, at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Lease contracts above market value | $ | 18,900 |
| | $ | 20,500 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (14,107 | ) | | (15,362 | ) |
Lease contracts above market value, net | $ | 4,793 |
| | $ | 5,138 |
|
| | | |
Lease contracts below market value | $ | 13,575 |
| | $ | 24,175 |
|
Accumulated amortization | (11,361 | ) | | (21,345 | ) |
Lease contracts below market value, net | $ | 2,214 |
| | $ | 2,830 |
|
Our policy is to record an allowance for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible accounts. The estimate is based on our historical experience and a review of the current status of our receivables. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had a note receivable from a former customer of $25.0 million, which resulted from the settlement of our claim in this former customer's bankruptcy proceedings in the fourth quarter of 2016. We are accounting for the note receivable on a non-accrual basis. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had an allowance for this note receivable of $23.6 million, leaving a note receivable, net balance of $1.4 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, which is included within rents and other receivables, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Based on the principal payment schedule in the note that includes semiannual principal payments beginning in June 2017, we continue to be reasonably assured that we will be able to collect the balance of the note receivable.
We also establish an appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts for receivables arising from the straight-lining of rents. These receivables arise from revenue recognized in excess of amounts currently due under the lease and are recorded as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had no material allowances.
Our customer leases generally contain provisions under which the customers reimburse us for a portion of operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred by the property. Recoveries from tenants are included in revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. The majority of our customer leases also provide us with a property management fee based on a percentage of base rent collected and property-level operating expenses, other than charges for power used by customers to run their servers and cool their space. Property management fees are included in base rent in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in the applicable period in which they are earned.
Other Revenue
Other revenue primarily consists of services provided to customers on a non-recurring basis. This includes projects such as the purchase and installation of circuits, racks, circuit breakers and other customer requested items. Revenue is recognized on a completed contract basis when the project is finished and ready for the customer's use. This method is consistently applied for all periods presented. Costs of providing these services are included in other expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership / Redeemable Partnership Units
Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership, as presented on DFT’s consolidated balance sheets, represent the OP units held by individuals and entities other than DFT. These interests are also presented on the Operating Partnership’s consolidated balance sheets, referred to as “redeemable partnership units.” Accordingly, the following discussion related to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership of DFT refers equally to redeemable partnership units of the Operating Partnership.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership, which require cash payment, or allow settlement in shares, but with the ability to deliver the shares outside of the control of DFT, are reported outside of the permanent equity section of the consolidated balance sheets of DFT and the Operating Partnership. Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership are adjusted for income, losses and distributions allocated to OP units not held by DFT (normal noncontrolling interest accounting amount). Adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership are recorded to reflect increases or decreases in the ownership of the Operating Partnership by holders of OP units, including the redemptions of OP units for cash or in exchange for shares of DFT’s common stock. If such adjustments result in redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership being recorded at less than the redemption value of the OP units, redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership are further adjusted to their redemption value. See Note 6. Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership are recorded at the greater of the normal noncontrolling interest accounting amount or redemption value. The following is a summary of activity for redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
| OP Units |
| Number | | Amount |
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 13,455,515 |
| | $ | 591,101 |
|
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | — |
| | 5,712 |
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership - foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | 2 |
|
Distributions declared | — |
| | (5,841 | ) |
Redemption of operating partnership units | (1,773,147 | ) | | (77,894 | ) |
Adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | — |
| | 66,249 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2017 | 11,682,368 |
| | $ | 579,329 |
|
The following is a summary of activity for redeemable partnership units for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands): |
| | | | | | |
| OP Units |
| Number | | Amount |
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 13,455,515 |
| | $ | 591,101 |
|
Redemption of operating partnership units | (1,773,147 | ) | | (77,894 | ) |
Adjustments to redeemable partnership units | — |
| | 66,122 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2017 | 11,682,368 |
| | $ | 579,329 |
|
Net income is allocated to controlling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership. The following is a summary of net income attributable to controlling interests and transfers to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Net income attributable to controlling interests | $ | 38,563 |
| | $ | 31,219 |
|
Transfers from noncontrolling interests: | | | |
Net change in the Company’s common stock and additional paid in capital due to the redemption of OP units and other adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership | 11,645 |
| | (125,481 | ) |
| $ | 50,208 |
| | $ | (94,262 | ) |
Earnings Per Share of DFT
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to common shares for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period using the two class method. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to common shares for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the two class method.
Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership
Basic earnings per unit is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to common units for the period by the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period using the two class method. Diluted earnings per unit is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to common units for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the two class method.
Stock-based Compensation
We periodically award stock-based compensation to employees and members of our Board of Directors in the form of common stock, restricted common stock, options and performance units. For each common stock award granted by DFT, the OP issues an equivalent common unit, which may be referred to herein as a common share, common stock, or a common unit. We estimate the fair value of the awards and recognize this value over the requisite service period. The fair value of restricted stock-based compensation is based on the market value of DFT’s common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of options to purchase common stock is based on the Black-Scholes model. The fair value of performance units is based on a Monte Carlo simulation.
Foreign Currency
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of our consolidated operations in the United States. The functional currency of our consolidated entities outside of the United States is the principal currency of the economic environment in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash. We translate the financial statements of consolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar into U.S. dollars. We translate assets and liabilities at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date and translate income statement accounts using the weighted average exchange rate for the period. We include foreign currency translation adjustments and the effect of exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature as a separate component of stockholders' equity or partners' capital. We report gains and losses from the effect of rate changes on intercompany receivables and payables that are not of a long-term investment nature, as well as gains and losses from remeasuring U.S. dollar transactions for non-U.S. functional currency entities, in other expenses on our consolidated statements of operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we had no foreign currency transaction losses.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and expect to elect the modified retrospective method of application of the standard. Although the standard does not apply to leases, we have assessed the impact on our financial position and results of operations. The standard will change our method of recognizing revenue on service and installation contracts included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from the completed contract method to a method that recognizes revenue over the course of the contract based on the goods or services transferred to date relative to the remaining goods or services promised under the contract. We do not expect that this change will have a material effect on our financial position or results of
operations. In addition, we currently do not believe the standard will have a material impact on how we recognize revenues from tenants with respect to operating expense recoveries on our financial position or results of operations.
Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842). We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2019. The Company’s leases consist of both lease components that will be accounted for under this standard and non-lease components such as operating expense recovery income that will be accounted for under ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard does not fundamentally change the lessor accounting model, and we do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Financial Instruments - In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Under this guidance, a company will be required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model for trade and other receivables that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2020 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Cash Flows - In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The standard provides guidance on eight specific cash flow classification issues including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash - In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18 (Topic 230), Restricted Cash. The standard requires restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending amounts in the statement of cash flows. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Business Combinations - In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition of assets or a business. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. We early-adopted the standard effective January 1, 2017. As a result of this new guidance, acquisitions may now result in an asset purchase rather than a business combination. We do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications
We have combined the previously reported line item for lease contracts above market value, net into the prepaid expenses and other assets line item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation. We have also combined the previously reported line item for lease contracts below market value, net into the prepaid rents and other liabilities line item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 to conform to the current year presentation.
3. Real Estate Assets
The following is a summary of our properties as of March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property | Location | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Construction in Progress and Land Held for Development | | Total Cost (2) |
ACC2 | Ashburn, VA | | $ | 2,500 |
| | $ | 156,505 |
| |
|
| | $ | 159,005 |
|
ACC3 | Ashburn, VA | | 1,071 |
| | 96,080 |
| |
|
| | 97,151 |
|
ACC4 | Ashburn, VA | | 6,600 |
| | 538,869 |
| |
|
| | 545,469 |
|
ACC5 | Ashburn, VA | | 6,443 |
| | 299,016 |
| |
|
| | 305,459 |
|
ACC6 | Ashburn, VA | | 5,518 |
| | 216,829 |
| |
|
| | 222,347 |
|
ACC7 | Ashburn, VA | | 9,753 |
| | 334,172 |
| |
|
| | 343,925 |
|
CH1 | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 21,025 |
| | 359,171 |
| |
|
| | 380,196 |
|
CH2 | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 14,392 |
| | 256,676 |
| |
|
| | 271,068 |
|
SC1 Phases I-II | Santa Clara, CA | | 20,202 |
| | 433,099 |
| |
|
| | 453,301 |
|
VA3 | Reston, VA | | 9,000 |
| | 179,694 |
| |
|
| | 188,694 |
|
VA4 | Bristow, VA | | 6,800 |
| | 149,614 |
| |
|
| | 156,414 |
|
| | | 103,304 |
| | 3,019,725 |
| | — |
| | 3,123,029 |
|
Construction in progress and land held for development (1) | | |
|
| |
|
| | 493,442 |
| | 493,442 |
|
| | �� | $ | 103,304 |
| | $ | 3,019,725 |
| | $ | 493,442 |
| | $ | 3,616,471 |
|
| |
(1) | Properties located in Ashburn, VA (ACC8, ACC9, ACC10, and ACC11), Elk Grove Village, IL (CH3), Santa Clara, CA (SC1 Phase III), Hillsboro, OR (OR1 and OR2) and Vaughan, ON (TOR1). |
| |
(2) | As of March 31, 2017, the total cost of long-lived assets located in the United States totaled $3,547.7 million, and the total costs of long-lived assets located in Canada totaled $68.8 million (TOR1 in Vaughan, ON). |
4. Debt
Debt Summary as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
($ in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Amounts (1) | | % of Total | | Rates | | Maturities (years) | | Amounts |
Secured | $ | 110,000 |
| | 8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.0 |
| | $ | 111,250 |
|
Unsecured | 1,297,819 |
| | 92 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 4.7 |
| | 1,150,926 |
|
Total | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 |
| | $ | 1,262,176 |
|
Fixed Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
Unsecured Notes due 2021 | $ | 600,000 |
| | 42 | % | | 5.9 | % | | 4.5 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
|
Unsecured Notes due 2023 (2) | 250,000 |
| | 18 | % | | 5.6 | % | | 6.2 |
| | 250,000 |
|
Fixed Rate Debt | $ | 850,000 |
| | 60 | % | | 5.8 | % | | 5.0 |
| | $ | 850,000 |
|
Floating Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
Unsecured Credit Facility | 197,819 |
| | 14 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 3.3 |
| | 50,926 |
|
Unsecured Term Loan | 250,000 |
| | 18 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 4.8 |
| | 250,000 |
|
ACC3 Term Loan | 110,000 |
| | 8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.0 |
| | 111,250 |
|
Floating Rate Debt | 557,819 |
| | 40 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 3.5 |
| | 412,176 |
|
Total | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 |
| | $ | 1,262,176 |
|
(1) Principal amounts exclude deferred financing costs.
(2) Principal amount excludes original issue discount of $1.6 million.
Outstanding Indebtedness
Unsecured Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loan
On July 25, 2016, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with a syndicate of banks (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") that includes the following:
| |
• | an unsecured revolving credit facility with a total commitment of $750 million (the "Unsecured Credit Facility"); and |
| |
• | an unsecured term loan facility, which has a total commitment and amount outstanding of $250 million (the ("Unsecured Term Loan"). |
In November 2016, we added a Canadian dollar sublimit of up to $185 million (approximately CAD $250 million) to the Unsecured Credit Facility, which allows us to borrow in Canadian dollars to fund our TOR1 data center development in Vaughan, Ontario. In addition, the Canadian borrowings allow us to hedge our foreign currency investment risk by having these liabilities translate at the same exchange rates as our Canadian assets at the end of each period. To date, we have designated all of the Canadian borrowings on our Unsecured Credit Facility, which totaled CAD $77 million as of March 31, 2017, as a net investment hedge of our Canadian assets. For the effective portion of these net investment hedges, the currency translation effects of these borrowings are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders' equity on our consolidated balance sheets, where they offset the currency translation effects of our investment in our Canadian assets. There has been no ineffectiveness for our net investment hedges to date as of March 31, 2017.
At our option, we may increase the total commitment under the Unsecured Credit Facility and the Unsecured Term Loan to $1.25 billion, if one or more lenders commit to being a lender for the additional amount and certain other customary conditions are met.
The obligations under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by DFT and all of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries that currently guaranty the obligations under the Unsecured Notes due 2021, listed below. We may prepay the Unsecured Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loan at any time, in whole or in part, without penalty or premium.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement requires that DFT, the Operating Partnership and their subsidiaries comply with various covenants, including with respect to restrictions on liens, incurring indebtedness, making investments, effecting mergers and/or asset sales, and certain limits on dividend payments, distributions and purchases of DFT's stock. In addition, the facility imposes financial maintenance covenants relating to, among other things, the following matters:
| |
• | unsecured debt not exceeding 60% of the value of unencumbered assets, subject to an increase up to 65% following a material acquisition; |
| |
• | net operating income generated from unencumbered properties divided by the amount of unsecured debt (net of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents) being not less than 12.5%, subject to a decrease to not less than 10% following a material acquisition; |
| |
• | total indebtedness not exceeding 60% of gross asset value, subject to an increase up to 65% following a material acquisition; |
| |
• | fixed charge coverage ratio being not less than 1.70 to 1.00; and |
| |
• | tangible net worth being not less than $2.3 billion plus 75% of the sum of (i) net equity offering proceeds after July 25, 2016 (but excluding such net offering proceeds that are used within ninety (90) days following the consummation of the applicable equity offering for permitted equity redemptions) and (ii) the value of equity interests issued in connection with a contribution of assets to the Borrower or its subsidiaries; and |
| |
• | until an investment grade unsecured debt credit rating has been achieved, unhedged variable rate debt not exceeding 30% of gross asset value. |
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement includes customary events of default, the occurrence of which, following any applicable cure period, would permit the lenders to, among other things, declare the principal, accrued interest and other obligations of the Operating Partnership under the facility to be immediately due and payable.
We were in compliance with all covenants under the Unsecured Credit Facility and the Unsecured Term Loan as of March 31, 2017.
The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on July 25, 2020 and includes a one-year extension option, subject to the payment of an extension fee equal to 7.5 basis points on the total commitment in effect on such initial maturity date and certain other
customary conditions.
We may elect to have borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate, which is based on the lender's prime rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. Prior to our receiving an investment grade credit rating, the applicable margin added to LIBOR and the base rate is based on the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Applicable Margin |
Pricing Level | | Ratio of Total Indebtedness to Gross Asset Value | | LIBOR Rate Loans | | Base Rate Loans |
Level 1 | | Less than or equal to 35% | | 1.55 | % | | 0.55 | % |
Level 2 | | Greater than 35% but less than or equal to 40% | | 1.65 | % | | 0.65 | % |
Level 3 | | Greater than 40% but less than or equal to 45% | | 1.80 | % | | 0.80 | % |
Level 4 | | Greater than 45% but less than or equal to 52.5% | | 1.95 | % | | 0.95 | % |
Level 5 | | Greater than 52.5% | | 2.15 | % | | 1.15 | % |
The applicable margin is currently set at pricing Level 1. The terms of the Unsecured Credit Facility provide for the adjustment of the applicable margin from time to time according to the ratio of the Operating Partnership’s total indebtedness to gross asset value in effect from time to time.
In the event we receive an investment grade credit rating, borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility will bear interest based on the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Applicable Margin |
Credit Rating Level | | Credit Rating | | LIBOR Rate Loans | | Base Rate Loans |
Level 1 | | Greater than or equal to A- by S&P or A3 by Moody’s | | 0.85 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 2 | | Greater than or equal to BBB+ by S&P or Baa1 by Moody’s | | 0.90 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 3 | | Greater than or equal to BBB by S&P or Baa2 by Moody’s | | 1.00 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 4 | | Greater than or equal to BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody’s | | 1.20 | % | | 0.20 | % |
Level 5 | | Less than BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody’s | | 1.55 | % | | 0.55 | % |
Following the receipt of such investment grade rating, the terms of the Unsecured Credit Facility provide for the adjustment of the applicable margin from time to time according to the rating then in effect.
The amount available for borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility is determined according to a calculation comparing the value of certain unencumbered properties designated by the Operating Partnership at such time relative to the amount of the Operating Partnership's unsecured debt. Up to $35 million of the borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility may be used for letters of credit.
As of March 31, 2017, we had no letters of credit outstanding and borrowings of $197.8 million outstanding under this Unsecured Credit Facility.
The Unsecured Term Loan matures on January 21, 2022, with no extension option.
Under the terms of the Unsecured Term Loan, we may elect to have borrowings under the loan bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate, which is based on the lender's prime rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. Prior to our receiving an investment grade credit rating, the applicable margin added to LIBOR and the base rate is based on the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Applicable Margin |
Pricing Level | | Ratio of Total Indebtedness to Gross Asset Value | | LIBOR Rate Loans | | Base Rate Loans |
Level 1 | | Less than or equal to 35% | | 1.50 | % | | 0.50 | % |
Level 2 | | Greater than 35% but less than or equal to 40% | | 1.60 | % | | 0.60 | % |
Level 3 | | Greater than 40% but less than or equal to 45% | | 1.75 | % | | 0.75 | % |
Level 4 | | Greater than 45% but less than or equal to 52.5% | | 1.90 | % | | 0.90 | % |
Level 5 | | Greater than 52.5% | | 2.10 | % | | 1.10 | % |
The applicable margin is currently set at pricing Level 1. The terms of the Unsecured Term Loan also provide that, in the event we receive an investment grade credit rating, borrowings under the loan will bear interest based on the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Applicable Margin |
Credit Rating Level | | Credit Rating | | LIBOR Rate Loans | | Base Rate Loans |
Level 1 | | Greater than or equal to A- by S&P or A3 by Moody’s | | 0.825 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 2 | | Greater than or equal to BBB+ by S&P or Baa1 by Moody’s | | 0.875 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 3 | | Greater than or equal to BBB by S&P or Baa2 by Moody’s | | 1.00 | % | | 0.00 | % |
Level 4 | | Greater than or equal to BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody’s | | 1.25 | % | | 0.25 | % |
Level 5 | | Less than BBB- by S&P or Baa3 by Moody’s | | 1.65 | % | | 0.65 | % |
Following the receipt of such investment grade rating, the terms of the loan provide for the adjustment of the applicable margin from time to time according to the rating then in effect.
ACC3 Term Loan
We have a $110.0 million term loan facility, the ACC3 Term Loan, that is secured by our ACC3 data center facility and an assignment of the lease agreement between us and the customer of ACC3. The borrower, one of our subsidiaries, may elect to have borrowings under the ACC3 Term Loan bear interest at (i) LIBOR plus 1.55% or (ii) a base rate, which is based on the lender's prime rate, plus 0.55%. The interest rate is currently at LIBOR plus 1.55%. The ACC3 Term Loan matures on March 27, 2018, and we may prepay the ACC3 Term Loan at any time, in whole or in part, without penalty or premium. The Operating Partnership has guaranteed the outstanding principal amount of the ACC3 Term Loan, plus interest and certain costs under the loan.
The ACC3 Term Loan imposes financial maintenance covenants relating to, among other things, the following matters:
| |
• | consolidated total indebtedness of the Operating Partnership not exceeding 60% of gross asset value of the Operating Partnership; |
| |
• | fixed charge coverage ratio of the Operating Partnership being not less than 1.70 to 1.00; |
| |
• | tangible net worth of the Operating Partnership being not less than $1.3 billion plus 80% of the sum of (i) net equity offering proceeds and (ii) the value of equity interests issued in connection with a contribution of assets to the Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries; and |
| |
• | debt service coverage ratio of the borrower not less than 1.50 to 1.00. |
We were in compliance with all of the covenants under the ACC3 Term Loan as of March 31, 2017.
Unsecured Notes due 2021
On September 24, 2013, the Operating Partnership completed the sale of $600 million of 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2021, which we refer to as the Unsecured Notes due 2021. The Unsecured Notes due 2021 were issued at face value and mature on September 15, 2021. We pay interest on the Unsecured Notes due 2021 semi-annually, in arrears, on March 15th and September 15th of each year.
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by DFT and certain of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries, including the subsidiaries that own the ACC2, ACC4, ACC5, ACC6, VA3, VA4, CH1 and SC1 data centers (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), but excluding the subsidiaries that own the ACC3, ACC7, ACC9, ACC10, CH2, CH3 and TOR1 data centers, the ACC8, ACC11, OR1 and OR2 parcels of land, our taxable REIT subsidiary, DF Technical Services LLC and our property management subsidiary, DF Property Management LLC.
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 rank (i) equally in right of payment with all of the Operating Partnership's existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, (ii) senior in right of payment with all of its existing and future subordinated indebtedness, (iii) effectively subordinate to any of the Operating Partnership's existing and future secured indebtedness and (iv) effectively junior to any liabilities of any subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership that do not guarantee the Unsecured Notes due 2021. The guarantees of the Unsecured Notes due 2021 by DFT and the Subsidiary Guarantors rank (i) equally in right of payment with such guarantor's existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, (ii) senior in right of payment with all of such guarantor's existing and future subordinated indebtedness and (iii) effectively subordinate to any of such guarantor's existing and future secured indebtedness.
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 may be redeemed at the Operating Partnership's option, in whole or in part, at any time, at the following redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount thereof) if redeemed during the 12-month
period commencing September 15 of the years indicated below, in each case together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption:
|
| | |
Year | Redemption Price |
2016 | 104.406 | % |
2017 | 102.938 | % |
2018 | 101.469 | % |
2019 and thereafter | 100.000 | % |
If there is a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the Unsecured Notes due 2021) of the Operating Partnership or DFT, we must offer to purchase the Unsecured Notes due 2021 at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, in certain circumstances we may be required to use the net proceeds of asset sales to purchase a portion of the Unsecured Notes due 2021 at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 have certain covenants limiting the ability of or prohibiting the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries from, among other things, (i) incurring secured or unsecured indebtedness, (ii) entering into sale and leaseback transactions, (iii) making certain dividend payments, distributions, purchases of DFT's common stock and investments, (iv) entering into transactions with affiliates, (v) entering into agreements limiting the ability to make certain transfers and other payments from subsidiaries, (vi) engaging in sales of assets or (vii) engaging in certain mergers, consolidations or transfers/sales of all or substantially all assets. However, DFT may pay the minimum dividend necessary to meet its REIT income distribution requirements.
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 also require the Operating Partnership and the Subsidiary Guarantors to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of their unsecured debt on a consolidated basis. The Unsecured Notes due 2021 also have customary events of default, including, but not limited to, nonpayment, breach of covenants, and payment or acceleration defaults in certain other indebtedness of ours or certain of our subsidiaries. Upon an event of default, the holders of the Unsecured Notes due 2021 or the trustee may declare the Unsecured Notes due 2021 due and immediately payable. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Unsecured Notes due 2021 as of March 31, 2017.
Unsecured Notes due 2023
On June 9, 2015, the Operating Partnership completed the sale of $250 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2023, which we refer to as the Unsecured Notes due 2023. The Unsecured Notes due 2023 were issued at 99.205% of par and mature on June 15, 2023. We pay interest on the Unsecured Notes due 2023 semi-annually, in arrears, on June 15th and December 15th of each year.
The Unsecured Notes due 2023 are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by DFT and the same Subsidiary Guarantors as those that guarantee the Unsecured Notes due 2021.
The ranking of the Unsecured Notes due 2023 and the guarantees of these notes are the same as the ranking of the Unsecured Notes due 2021 and the guarantee of those notes.
At any time prior to June 15, 2018, the Operating Partnership may redeem the Unsecured Notes due 2023, in whole or in part, at a price equal to the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Unsecured Notes due 2023 to be redeemed, plus (ii) a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest. The Unsecured Notes due 2023 may be redeemed at the Operating Partnership's option, in whole or in part, at any time, on and after June 15, 2018 at the following redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount thereof) if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing June 15 of the years indicated below, in each case together with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption:
|
| | |
Year | Redemption Price |
2018 | 104.219 | % |
2019 | 102.813 | % |
2020 | 101.406 | % |
2021 and thereafter | 100.000 | % |
If there is a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the Unsecured Notes due 2023) of the Operating Partnership or DFT, we must offer to purchase the Unsecured Notes due 2023 at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, in certain circumstances we may be required to use the net proceeds of
asset sales to purchase a portion of the Unsecured Notes due 2023 at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Unsecured Notes due 2023 have certain covenants limiting or prohibiting the ability of the Operating Partnership and certain of its subsidiaries from, among other things, (i) incurring secured or unsecured indebtedness, (ii) entering into sale and leaseback transactions, (iii) making certain dividend payments, distributions, purchases of DFT's common stock and investments, (iv) entering into transactions with affiliates, (v) entering into agreements limiting the ability to make certain transfers and other payments from subsidiaries, (vi) engaging in sales of assets or (vii) engaging in certain mergers, consolidations or transfers/sales of all or substantially all assets. However, DFT may pay the minimum dividend necessary to meet its REIT income distribution requirements.
The Unsecured Notes due 2023 also require the Operating Partnership and the Subsidiary Guarantors to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of their unsecured debt on a consolidated basis. The Unsecured Notes due 2023 also have customary events of default, including, but not limited to, nonpayment, breach of covenants, and payment or acceleration defaults in certain other indebtedness of ours or certain of our subsidiaries. Upon an event of default, the holders of the Unsecured Notes due 2023 or the trustee may declare the Unsecured Notes due 2023 due and immediately payable. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Unsecured Notes due 2023 as of March 31, 2017.
A summary of our debt maturity schedule as of March 31, 2017 is as follows:
Debt Maturity as of March 31, 2017
($ in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year | | Fixed Rate (1) | | | Floating Rate (1) | | | Total (1) | | % of Total | | Rates |
2017 | | — |
| | | 7,500 |
| (4) | | 7,500 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2018 | | — |
| | | 102,500 |
| (4) | | 102,500 |
| | 7.3 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2019 | | — |
| | | — |
| | | — |
| | — | % | | — | % |
2020 | | — |
| | | 197,819 |
| (5) | | 197,819 |
| | 14.0 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2021 | | 600,000 |
| (2) | | — |
| | | 600,000 |
| | 42.6 | % | | 5.9 | % |
2022 | | — |
| | | 250,000 |
| (6) | | 250,000 |
| | 17.8 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2023 | | 250,000 |
| (3) | | — |
| | | 250,000 |
| | 17.8 | % | | 5.6 | % |
Total | | $ | 850,000 |
| | | $ | 557,819 |
| | | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| |
(1) | Principal amounts exclude deferred financing costs. |
| |
(2) | The 5.875% Unsecured Notes due 2021 mature on September 15, 2021. |
| |
(3) | The 5.625% Unsecured Notes due 2023 mature on June 15, 2023. Principal amount excludes original issue discount of $1.6 million as of March 31, 2017. |
| |
(4) | The ACC3 Term Loan matures on March 27, 2018 with no extension option. Quarterly principal payments of $1.25 million began on April 1, 2016, increased to $2.5 million on April 1, 2017 and continue through maturity. |
| |
(5) | The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on July 25, 2020 with a one-year extension option. |
| |
(6) | The Unsecured Term Loan matures on January 21, 2022 with no extension option. |
5. Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, lawsuits, examinations by various tax authorities and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. We currently believe that the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Contracts related to the development of ACC9 Phases I-II, SC1 Phase III, CH3 Phase I and ACC10 data centers were in place as of March 31, 2017. These contracts are cost-plus in nature whereby the contract sum is the aggregate of the contractor's cost to perform the work and to purchase the equipment plus a contractor fee. Control estimates, which are adjusted from time to time to reflect any contract changes, are estimates of the total contract cost at completion. As of March 31, 2017, the control estimates were as follows for our projects under development:
| |
• | ACC9 Phase I: $168.4 million, of which $155.7 million has been incurred, and an additional $7.3 million has been committed under this contract. |
| |
• | ACC9 Phase II: $63.9 million, of which $34.1 million has been incurred, and an additional $17.5 million has been committed under this contract. |
| |
• | SC1 Phase III: $149.0 million, of which $101.4 million has been incurred, and an additional $34.7 million has been committed under this contract. |
| |
• | CH3 Phase I: $190.7 million, of which $49.1 million has been incurred, and an additional $71.1 million has been committed under this contract. |
| |
• | ACC10 shell: $52.1 million, of which $4.3 million has been incurred, and an additional $9.3 million has been committed under this contract. |
In February 2017, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with an unrelated party to purchase 56.5 acres of undeveloped land in Mesa, Arizona for a purchase price of $12.2 million.
Concurrent with DFT’s October 2007 initial public offering, we entered into tax protection agreements with some of the contributors of the initial properties including our Chairman of the Board and our former CEO. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, we must provide an opportunity for certain of the contributors of the initial properties to guarantee a secured loan and, if we fail to do so, we could be liable for protection on the taxes related to approximately $57 million (unaudited) of remaining minimum liability. The amount of our liability for protection on taxes could be based on the highest federal, state and local capital gains tax rates of the applicable contributor. Any sale by the Company that requires payments to any of DFT’s executive officers or directors pursuant to these agreements requires the approval of at least 75% of the disinterested members of DFT’s Board of Directors.
6. Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership / Redeemable partnership units
Redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership, as presented in DFT’s accompanying consolidated balance sheets, represent the OP units held by individuals and entities other than DFT. These interests are also presented in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated balance sheets, referred to as “redeemable partnership units.” Accordingly, the following discussion related to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership of DFT refers equally to redeemable partnership units of the Operating Partnership.
The redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $579.3 million and $591.1 million, respectively, based on the closing share price of DFT’s common stock of $49.59 and $43.93, respectively, on those dates.
Holders of OP units are entitled to receive distributions in a per unit amount equal to the per share dividends made with respect to each share of DFT’s common stock, if and when DFT’s Board of Directors declares such a dividend. Holders of OP units have the right to tender their units for redemption, in an amount equal to the fair market value of DFT’s common stock. DFT may elect to redeem tendered OP units for cash or for shares of DFT’s common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, OP unitholders redeemed a total of 1,773,147 OP units in exchange for an equal number of shares of common stock. See Note 2.
7. Preferred Stock
Series C Preferred Stock
In May 2016, DFT issued 8,050,000 shares of 6.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, or Series C Preferred Stock, for $201.3 million in an underwritten public offering that resulted in proceeds to the Company, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering costs of $194.3 million. The liquidation preference on the Series C Preferred Stock is $25 per share and dividends are scheduled quarterly. For each share of Series C Preferred Stock issued by DFT, the Operating Partnership issued a preferred unit equivalent to DFT with the same terms.
In 2017, DFT declared the following cash dividends on its Series C Preferred Stock, of which the OP will pay or has paid an equivalent distribution on its preferred units:
| |
• | $0.4140625 per share payable to stockholders of record as of February 1, 2017. This dividend was paid on February 15, 2017. |
| |
• | $0.4140625 per share payable to stockholders of record as of May 1, 2017. This dividend is scheduled to be paid on May 15, 2017. |
Except in instances relating to preservation of our qualification as a REIT or in connection with our special optional redemption right discussed below, our Series C Preferred Stock is not redeemable prior to May 15, 2021. On and after May 15, 2021, we may, at our option, redeem our Series C Preferred Stock, in whole, at any time, or in part, from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but not including, the date of redemption.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control, we have a special optional redemption right that enables us to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock within 120 days after the first date on which a change of control has occurred resulting in neither DFT nor the surviving entity having a class of common shares listed on the NYSE, NYSE MKT, or NASDAQ. For this special redemption right, the redemption price is $25 per share in cash, plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but not including, the redemption date.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control that results in neither DFT nor the surviving entity having a class of common shares listed on the NYSE, NYSE MKT, or NASDAQ, the holder will have the right (subject to our special optional redemption right to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of the Series C Preferred Stock into a number of shares of DFT's common stock equal to the lesser of (A) the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the sum of (x) $25, plus (y) an amount equal to any accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared to, but not including, the date of conversion (unless the date of conversion is after a record date for a Series C Preferred Stock dividend payment and prior to the corresponding Series C Preferred Stock dividend payment date, in which case no additional amount for such accrued and unpaid dividend will be included in this quotient), by (ii) the price of DFT's common stock, and (B) 1.1723 (the Share Cap), subject to certain adjustments and provisions for the receipt of alternative consideration of equivalent value.
8. Stockholders’ Equity of DFT and Partners’ Capital of the OP
In February 2017, DFT announced the establishment of an "at-the-market" equity issuance program, or ATM program, through which it may issue and sell up to an aggregate of $200 million of the Company's shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of common stock have been issued under this program.
The Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program of to acquire up to $100 million of DFT's common shares in 2017. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of common stock have been repurchased under this program.
In 2017, DFT declared and paid the following cash dividends per share on its common stock, of which the OP paid equivalent distributions on OP units:
| |
• | $0.50 per share payable to stockholders of record as of April 3, 2017. This dividend was paid on April 17, 2017. |
9. Equity Compensation Plan
In May 2011, our Board of Directors adopted the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) following approval from our stockholders. The 2011 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. The 2011 Plan allows us to provide equity-based compensation to our personnel and directors in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based awards, unrestricted stock, long term incentive units, or LTIP units, and other awards.
The 2011 Plan authorizes a maximum aggregate of 6,300,000 share equivalents be reserved for future issuances. In addition, under the 2011 Plan, shares of common stock that are subject to awards of options or stock appreciation rights will be counted against the 2011 Plan share limit as one share for every one share subject to the award. Any shares of stock that are subject to awards other than options or stock appreciation rights shall be counted against the 2011 Plan share limit as 2.36 shares for every one share subject to the award.
As of March 31, 2017, 4,502,298 share equivalents were issued under the 2011 Plan, and the maximum aggregate amount of share equivalents remaining available for future issuance was 1,797,702.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards vest over specified periods of time as long as the employee remains employed with the Company. The following table sets forth the number of unvested shares of restricted stock and the weighted average fair value of these shares at the date of grant:
|
| | | | | | |
| Shares of Restricted Stock | | Weighted Average Fair Value at Date of Grant |
Unvested balance at December 31, 2016 | 309,175 |
| | $ | 32.30 |
|
Granted | 174,319 |
| | 47.41 |
|
Vested | (123,419 | ) | | 30.01 |
|
Forfeited | (7,595 | ) | | 36.37 |
|
Unvested balance at March 31, 2017 | 352,480 |
| | $ | 40.01 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we issued 174,319 shares of restricted stock, which had an aggregate value of $8.3 million on the grant date. This amount will be amortized to expense over the respective vesting periods, which are between three and five years. Also during the three months ended March 31, 2017, 123,419 shares of restricted stock vested at a value of $6.3 million on the respective vesting dates.
As of March 31, 2017, total unearned compensation on restricted stock was $12.7 million, and the weighted average vesting period was 2.1 years.
Stock Options
Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of DFT’s common stock at the date of grant and vest over specified periods of time as long as the employee remains employed with the Company. All shares to be issued upon option exercises will be newly issued shares and the options have 10-year contractual terms. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, no options were granted to employees. The last grant of stock options occurred in 2013, and all stock option grants have fully vested.
A summary of our stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is presented in the tables below.
|
| | | | | | |
| Number of Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Under option, December 31, 2016 | 751,479 |
| | $ | 15.83 |
|
Granted | — |
| | — |
|
Exercised | — |
| | — |
|
Forfeited | — |
| | — |
|
Under option, March 31, 2017 | 751,479 |
| | $ | 15.83 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Shares Subject to Option | | Total Unearned Compensation | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term |
As of March 31, 2017 | 751,479 |
| | $ | — |
| | 3.4 years |
The following tables set forth the number of exercisable options as of March 31, 2017 and the weighted average fair value and exercise price of these options at the grant date.
|
| | | | | | |
| Number of Options | | Weighted Average Fair Value at Date of Grant |
Options Exercisable at December 31, 2016 | 751,479 |
| | $ | 4.71 |
|
Vested | — |
| | — |
|
Exercised | — |
| | — |
|
Options Exercisable at March 31, 2017 | 751,479 |
| | $ | 4.71 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exercisable Options | | Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term |
As of March 31, 2017 | 751,479 |
| | $ | 25.4 | million | | $ | 15.83 |
| | 3.4 years |
Performance Units
Performance unit awards are awarded to certain executive employees and have a three calendar-year performance period with no dividend rights. Performance units will be settled in common shares following the performance period as long as the employee remains employed with us on the vesting date, which is the March 1st date following the last day of the applicable performance period. Performance units are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation and are amortized over the approximate three year vesting period from the grant date to the vesting date.
One-half of the recipient's performance unit award is dependent on DFT’s total stockholder return compared to the MSCI US REIT index over the three calendar-year performance period. The other half of the performance unit award is dependent on DFT’s total stockholder return compared to an index of five comparable publicly traded data center companies over the three calendar-year performance period. For each half of the performance unit awards granted, the number of common shares that are ultimately settled could range from 0% to 300%.
For the performance units granted in 2014, based on DFT’s total stockholder return compared to the MSCI US REIT index return for half of the grant and an index of five comparable publicly traded data center companies for the other half of the grant for the period from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2017, 57,177 common shares were issued upon their vesting on March 1, 2017, which represents an aggregate payout of 150%.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used to value, and the resulting fair and maximum values of, the performance units granted during the three months ended March 31, 2017. These performance unit awards will vest in 2020. |
| | | |
| Assumptions |
Number of performance units granted | 69,610 |
|
Expected volatility | 24 | % |
Expected annual dividend | 4.23 | % |
Risk-free rate | 1.50 | % |
Performance unit fair value at date of grant | $ | 73.46 |
|
Total grant fair value at date of grant | $5.1 million |
Maximum value of grant on vesting date based on closing price of DFT's stock at the date of grant | $9.9 million |
A summary of our performance unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is presented in the table below. |
| | | | | | |
| Number of Performance Units | | Weighted Average Fair Value at Date of Grant |
Unvested balance at December 31, 2016 | 196,652 |
| | $ | 37.25 |
|
Granted | 69,610 |
| | 73.46 |
|
Vested | (40,277 | ) | | 33.94 |
|
Forfeited | (5,812 | ) | | 56.00 |
|
Unvested balance at March 31, 2017 | 220,173 |
| | $ | 48.81 |
|
As of March 31, 2017, total unearned compensation on performance units was $7.5 million, and the weighted average vesting period was 2.0 years.
10. Earnings Per Share of DFT
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic and diluted average shares outstanding and net income attributable to common shares used in the computation of earnings per share of common stock (in thousands except for share and per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Basic and Diluted Shares Outstanding | | | |
Weighted average common shares – basic | 76,670,425 |
| | 66,992,995 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities | 980,981 |
| | 853,120 |
|
Weighted average common shares – diluted | 77,651,406 |
|
| 67,846,115 |
|
Calculation of Earnings per Share – Basic | | | |
Net income attributable to common shares | $ | 35,230 |
| | $ | 24,408 |
|
Net income allocated to unvested restricted shares | (176 | ) | | (163 | ) |
Net income attributable to common shares, adjusted | 35,054 |
|
| 24,245 |
|
Weighted average common shares – basic | 76,670,425 |
| | 66,992,995 |
|
Earnings per common share – basic | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Calculation of Earnings per Share – Diluted | | | |
Net income attributable to common shares, adjusted | $ | 35,054 |
| | $ | 24,245 |
|
Weighted average common shares – diluted | 77,651,406 |
| | 67,846,115 |
|
Earnings per common share – diluted | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
The following table sets forth the number of performance units that have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been antidilutive (in millions):
|
| | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Performance Units | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
11. Earnings Per Unit of the Operating Partnership
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic and diluted average units outstanding and net income attributable to common units used in the computation of earnings per unit (in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Basic and Diluted Units Outstanding | | | |
Weighted average common units – basic (includes redeemable partnership units and units of general and limited partners) | 89,095,663 |
| | 82,028,440 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities | 980,981 |
| | 853,120 |
|
Weighted average common units – diluted | 90,076,644 |
| | 82,881,560 |
|
Calculation of Earnings per Unit – Basic | | | |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 40,942 |
| | $ | 29,886 |
|
Net income allocated to unvested restricted units | (176 | ) | | (163 | ) |
Net income attributable to common units, adjusted | 40,766 |
| | 29,723 |
|
Weighted average common units – basic | 89,095,663 |
| | 82,028,440 |
|
Earnings per common unit – basic | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
Calculation of Earnings per Unit – Diluted | | | |
Net income attributable to common units, adjusted | $ | 40,766 |
| | $ | 29,723 |
|
Weighted average common units – diluted | 90,076,644 |
| | 82,881,560 |
|
Earnings per common unit – diluted | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.36 |
|
The following table sets forth the amount of performance units that have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per unit as their effect would have been antidilutive (in millions):
|
| | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Performance Units | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
12. Fair Value
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The authoritative guidance issued by the FASB requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments. Fair value estimates are subjective in nature and are dependent on a number of important assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows, risks, discount rates, and relevant comparable market information associated with each financial instrument. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair value amounts and disclosures for financial instruments as of March 31, 2017:
| |
• | Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments (i.e., less than 90 days). |
| |
• | Rents and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and prepaid rents: The carrying amount of these assets and liabilities reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. |
| |
• | Debt: The combined balance of the Unsecured Notes due 2021, Unsecured Notes due 2023, Unsecured Term Loan, Unsecured Credit Facility and ACC3 Term Loan, excluding the effect of deferred financing costs, was $1,406.2 million with a fair value of $1,433.1 million. The Unsecured Notes due 2021 and the Unsecured Notes due 2023 were valued based on Level 2 data which consisted of a quoted price from Bloomberg. The Unsecured Term Loan, the US dollar-denominated borrowings under the Unsecured Credit facility and ACC3 Term Loan were valued based on Level 3 data which consisted of a one-month LIBOR swap rate coterminous with the maturity of each loan plus a spread consistent with current market conditions. The Canadian dollar-denominated borrowings under the Unsecured Credit facility were valued based on Level 3 data which consisted of a one-month Canadian Dollar Offered Rate swap rate coterminous with the maturity of the Unsecured Credit Facility plus a spread consistent with current market conditions. |
13. Supplemental Consolidating Financial Data for Subsidiary Guarantors of the Unsecured Notes
The Unsecured Notes due 2021 and the Unsecured Notes due 2023 are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by DFT and certain of the Operating Partnership’s subsidiaries, including the subsidiaries that own the ACC2, ACC4, ACC5, ACC6, VA3, VA4, CH1 and SC1 data centers (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), but excluding the subsidiaries that own the ACC3, ACC7, ACC9, ACC10, CH2, CH3 and TOR1 data centers, the ACC8, ACC11, OR1 and OR2 parcels of land, our taxable REIT subsidiary, DF Technical Services LLC and our property management subsidiary, DF Property Management LLC. The following consolidating financial information sets forth the financial position as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 of the Operating Partnership, Subsidiary Guarantors and the Subsidiary Non-Guarantors.
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P. SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands except unit data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
Income producing property: | | | | | | | | | |
Land | $ | — |
| | $ | 78,087 |
| | $ | 25,217 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 103,304 |
|
Buildings and improvements | — |
| | 2,332,796 |
| | 686,929 |
| | — |
| | 3,019,725 |
|
| — |
| | 2,410,883 |
| | 712,146 |
| | — |
| | 3,123,029 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | — |
| | (626,377 | ) | | (62,722 | ) | | — |
| | (689,099 | ) |
Net income producing property | — |
| | 1,784,506 |
| | 649,424 |
| | — |
| | 2,433,930 |
|
Construction in progress and property held for development | — |
| | 113,132 |
| | 380,310 |
| | — |
| | 493,442 |
|
Net real estate | — |
| | 1,897,638 |
| | 1,029,734 |
| | — |
| | 2,927,372 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 37,590 |
| | — |
| | 3,175 |
| | — |
| | 40,765 |
|
Rents and other receivables, net | 1,663 |
| | 4,333 |
| | 3,508 |
| | — |
| | 9,504 |
|
Deferred rent, net | — |
| | 105,489 |
| | 15,851 |
| | — |
| | 121,340 |
|
Deferred costs, net | 5,553 |
| | 10,908 |
| | 8,099 |
| | — |
| | 24,560 |
|
Investment in affiliates | 2,840,296 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,840,296 | ) | | — |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 4,029 |
| | 32,015 |
| | 14,212 |
| | — |
| | 50,256 |
|
Total assets | $ | 2,889,131 |
| | $ | 2,050,383 |
| | $ | 1,074,579 |
| | $ | (2,840,296 | ) | | $ | 3,173,797 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit | $ | 197,819 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 197,819 |
|
Mortgage notes payable, net of deferred financing costs | — |
| | — |
| | 109,592 |
| | — |
| | 109,592 |
|
Unsecured term loan, net of deferred financing costs | 249,089 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,089 |
|
Unsecured notes payable, net of discount and deferred financing costs | 837,895 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 837,895 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2,680 |
| | 20,831 |
| | 6,136 |
| | — |
| | 29,647 |
|
Construction costs payable | — |
| | 14,723 |
| | 61,161 |
| | — |
| | 75,884 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 6,265 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 6,273 |
|
Distribution payable | 46,426 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,426 |
|
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | 234 |
| | 53,210 |
| | 19,005 |
| | — |
| | 72,449 |
|
Total liabilities | 1,340,408 |
| | 88,764 |
| | 195,902 |
| | — |
| | 1,625,074 |
|
Redeemable partnership units | 579,329 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 579,329 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Limited Partners’ Capital: | | | | | | | | | |
Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred units, 8,050,000 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 | 201,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 201,250 |
|
Common units, 77,173,797 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 | 761,607 |
| | 1,961,619 |
| | 878,677 |
| | (2,840,296 | ) | | 761,607 |
|
General partner’s capital, 662,373 common units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 | 6,537 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,537 |
|
Total partners’ capital | 969,394 |
| | 1,961,619 |
| | 878,677 |
| | (2,840,296 | ) | | 969,394 |
|
Total liabilities & partners’ capital | $ | 2,889,131 |
| | $ | 2,050,383 |
| | $ | 1,074,579 |
| | $ | (2,840,296 | ) | | $ | 3,173,797 |
|
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P. SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands except unit data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
Income producing property: | | | | | | | | | |
Land | $ | — |
| | $ | 80,673 |
| | $ | 25,217 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 105,890 |
|
Buildings and improvements | — |
| | 2,332,771 |
| | 685,590 |
| | — |
| | 3,018,361 |
|
| — |
| | 2,413,444 |
| | 710,807 |
| | — |
| | 3,124,251 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | — |
| | (605,488 | ) | | (56,695 | ) | | — |
| | (662,183 | ) |
Net income producing property | — |
| | 1,807,956 |
| | 654,112 |
| | — |
| | 2,462,068 |
|
Construction in progress and property held for development | — |
| | 88,836 |
| | 242,147 |
| | — |
| | 330,983 |
|
Net real estate | — |
| | 1,896,792 |
| | 896,259 |
| | — |
| | 2,793,051 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | 31,781 |
| | — |
| | 2,628 |
| | — |
| | 34,409 |
|
Rents and other receivables, net | 1,390 |
| | 4,743 |
| | 5,400 |
| | — |
| | 11,533 |
|
Deferred rent, net | — |
| | 109,142 |
| | 13,916 |
| | — |
| | 123,058 |
|
Deferred costs, net | 6,066 |
| | 11,632 |
| | 8,078 |
| | — |
| | 25,776 |
|
Investment in affiliates | 2,713,096 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,713,096 | ) | | — |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 3,463 |
| | 32,479 |
| | 10,480 |
| | — |
| | 46,422 |
|
Total assets | $ | 2,755,796 |
| | $ | 2,054,788 |
| | $ | 936,761 |
| | $ | (2,713,096 | ) | | $ | 3,034,249 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit | $ | 50,926 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 50,926 |
|
Mortgage notes payable, net of deferred financing costs | — |
| | — |
| | 110,733 |
| | — |
| | 110,733 |
|
Unsecured term loan, net of deferred financing costs | 249,036 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,036 |
|
Unsecured notes payable, net of discount and deferred financing costs | 837,323 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 837,323 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 6,477 |
| | 22,319 |
| | 8,113 |
| | — |
| | 36,909 |
|
Construction costs payable | — |
| | 10,159 |
| | 46,269 |
| | — |
| | 56,428 |
|
Accrued interest payable | 11,578 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | 11,592 |
|
Distribution payable | 46,352 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,352 |
|
Prepaid rents and other liabilities | 216 |
| | 61,429 |
| | 19,417 |
| | — |
| | 81,062 |
|
Total liabilities | 1,201,908 |
| | 93,907 |
| | 184,546 |
| | — |
| | 1,480,361 |
|
Redeemable partnership units | 591,101 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 591,101 |
|
Commitments and contingencies | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Limited Partners’ Capital: | | | | | | | | | |
Series C cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred units, 8,050,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 201,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 201,250 |
|
Common units, 75,252,390 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 754,892 |
| | 1,960,881 |
| | 752,215 |
| | (2,713,096 | ) | | 754,892 |
|
General partner’s capital, 662,373 common units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 6,645 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,645 |
|
Total partners’ capital | 962,787 |
| | 1,960,881 |
| | 752,215 |
| | (2,713,096 | ) | | 962,787 |
|
Total liabilities & partners’ capital | $ | 2,755,796 |
| | $ | 2,054,788 |
| | $ | 936,761 |
| | $ | (2,713,096 | ) | | $ | 3,034,249 |
|
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, 2017 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Base rent | $ | 4,695 |
| | $ | 66,692 |
| | $ | 24,576 |
| | $ | (4,695 | ) | | $ | 91,268 |
|
Recoveries from tenants | — |
| | 36,093 |
| | 9,202 |
| | — |
| | 45,295 |
|
Other revenues | — |
| | 420 |
| | 2,501 |
| | — |
| | 2,921 |
|
Total revenues | 4,695 |
| | 103,205 |
| | 36,279 |
| | (4,695 | ) | | 139,484 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating costs | — |
| | 35,915 |
| | 8,971 |
| | (4,695 | ) | | 40,191 |
|
Real estate taxes and insurance | — |
| | 3,979 |
| | 1,031 |
| | — |
| | 5,010 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 44 |
| | 21,775 |
| | 6,388 |
| | — |
| | 28,207 |
|
General and administrative | 6,546 |
| | 8 |
| | 258 |
| | — |
| | 6,812 |
|
Other expenses | 512 |
| | 12 |
| | 2,181 |
| | — |
| | 2,705 |
|
Total expenses | 7,102 |
| | 61,689 |
| | 18,829 |
| | (4,695 | ) | | 82,925 |
|
Operating (loss) income | (2,407 | ) | | 41,516 |
| | 17,450 |
| | — |
| | 56,559 |
|
Interest: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Expense incurred | (14,870 | ) | | 1,037 |
| | 2,374 |
| | — |
| | (11,459 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | (1,018 | ) | | 77 |
| | 116 |
| | — |
| | (825 | ) |
Equity in earnings | 62,570 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (62,570 | ) | | — |
|
Net income | 44,275 |
|
| 42,630 |
|
| 19,940 |
|
| (62,570 | ) |
| 44,275 |
|
Preferred unit distributions | (3,333 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,333 | ) |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 40,942 |
| | $ | 42,630 |
| | $ | 19,940 |
| | $ | (62,570 | ) | | $ | 40,942 |
|
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, 2016 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Base rent | $ | 4,402 |
| | $ | 69,366 |
| | $ | 13,204 |
| | $ | (4,439 | ) | | $ | 82,533 |
|
Recoveries from tenants | — |
| | 34,375 |
| | 4,319 |
| | — |
| | 38,694 |
|
Other revenues | — |
| | 464 |
| | 2,482 |
| | (24 | ) | | 2,922 |
|
Total revenues | 4,402 |
| | 104,205 |
| | 20,005 |
| | (4,463 | ) | | 124,149 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Property operating costs | — |
| | 35,605 |
| | 4,776 |
| | (4,426 | ) | | 35,955 |
|
Real estate taxes and insurance | — |
| | 4,696 |
| | 620 |
| | — |
| | 5,316 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 15 |
| | 22,486 |
| | 3,342 |
| | — |
| | 25,843 |
|
General and administrative | 5,433 |
| | 9 |
| | 133 |
| | — |
| | 5,575 |
|
Other expenses | 106 |
| | 139 |
| | 2,141 |
| | (37 | ) | | 2,349 |
|
Total expenses | 5,554 |
| | 62,935 |
| | 11,012 |
| | (4,463 | ) | | 75,038 |
|
Operating (loss) income | (1,152 | ) | | 41,270 |
| | 8,993 |
| | — |
| | 49,111 |
|
Interest: | | | | | | | | | |
Expense incurred | (14,174 | ) | | — |
| | 2,605 |
| | — |
| | (11,569 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | (953 | ) | | — |
| | 108 |
| | — |
| | (845 | ) |
Equity in earnings | 52,976 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (52,976 | ) | | — |
|
Net income | 36,697 |
| | 41,270 |
| | 11,706 |
| | (52,976 | ) | | 36,697 |
|
Preferred unit distributions | (6,811 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,811 | ) |
Net income attributable to common units | $ | 29,886 |
| | $ | 41,270 |
| | $ | 11,706 |
| | $ | (52,976 | ) | | $ | 29,886 |
|
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, 2017 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (21,718 | ) | | $ | 54,701 |
| | $ | 21,629 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 54,612 |
|
Return on investment in subsidiaries | 76,330 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (76,330 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 54,612 |
| | 54,701 |
| | 21,629 |
| | (76,330 | ) | | 54,612 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in real estate – development | (503 | ) | | (13,448 | ) | | (123,272 | ) | | — |
| | (137,223 | ) |
Investments in subsidiaries | (142,768 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 142,768 |
| | — |
|
Interest capitalized for real estate under development | — |
| | (1,036 | ) | | (3,015 | ) | | — |
| | (4,051 | ) |
Improvements to real estate | — |
| | (44 | ) | | (142 | ) | | — |
| | (186 | ) |
Additions to non-real estate property | (54 | ) | | (14 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (68 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (143,325 | ) | | (14,542 | ) | | (126,429 | ) | | 142,768 |
| | (141,528 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit: | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds | 146,549 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 146,549 |
|
Mortgage notes payable: | | | | | | | | | |
Repayments | — |
| | — |
| | (1,250 | ) | | — |
| | (1,250 | ) |
Payments of financing costs | (34 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (34 | ) |
Equity compensation payments | (3,975 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,975 | ) |
Parent financing | — |
| | 14,542 |
| | 128,226 |
| | (142,768 | ) | | — |
|
Distribution to parent | — |
| | (54,701 | ) | | (21,629 | ) | | 76,330 |
| | — |
|
Distributions | (48,018 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (48,018 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 94,522 |
| | (40,159 | ) | | 105,347 |
| | (66,438 | ) | | 93,272 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 5,809 |
| | — |
| | 547 |
| | — |
| | 6,356 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 31,781 |
| | — |
| | 2,628 |
| | — |
| | 34,409 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, ending of period | $ | 37,590 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,175 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 40,765 |
|
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, 2016 |
| Operating Partnership | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Subsidiary Non-Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated Total |
Cash flow from operating activities | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (17,791 | ) | | $ | 52,007 |
| | $ | 17,123 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51,339 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in real estate – development | — |
| | (1,197 | ) | | (51,105 | ) | | — |
| | (52,302 | ) |
Land acquisition costs - related party | — |
| | — |
| | (20,168 | ) | | — |
| | (20,168 | ) |
Investments in subsidiaries | (9,419 | ) | | (48,627 | ) | | 58,046 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Interest capitalized for real estate under development | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (3,181 | ) | | — |
| | (3,183 | ) |
Improvements to real estate | — |
| | (2,099 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,099 | ) |
Additions to non-real estate property | (26 | ) | | (84 | ) | | (13 | ) | | — |
| | (123 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,447 | ) | | (52,007 | ) | | (16,421 | ) | | — |
| | (77,875 | ) |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit: | | | | | | | | |
|
Proceeds | 60,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,000 |
|
Repayments | (60,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (60,000 | ) |
Issuance of common units, net of offering costs | 275,797 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 275,797 |
|
Equity compensation proceeds | 7,007 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,007 |
|
Distributions | (44,965 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (44,965 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 237,839 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 237,839 |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 210,601 |
| | — |
| | 702 |
| | — |
| | 211,303 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 21,697 |
| | — |
| | 5,318 |
| | — |
| | 27,015 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, ending of period | $ | 232,298 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,020 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 238,318 |
|
|
| |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on management's beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result” and similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We caution you that while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
For a detailed discussion of certain of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Part II, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2017. You should also review the risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The risks and uncertainties discussed in these reports are not exhaustive. We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risk factors may emerge from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
Overview
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., or DFT, was formed on March 2, 2007, is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and is headquartered in Washington, D.C. DFT is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed company that owns, acquires, develops and operates wholesale data centers. DFT is the sole general partner of, and, as of March 31, 2017, owned 86.9% of the common economic interest in DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership” or “OP”). Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our Company” or “the Company” refer to DFT and the Operating Partnership, collectively. DFT’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “DFT.” DFT’s Series C Preferred Stock also trades on the NYSE under the symbol “DFTPrC.”
We design and operate innovative, multi-tenant, wholesale data centers, and create solutions with our customers that free them to focus on their core businesses. Our facilities are designed to offer highly specialized, efficient and safe computing environments in a low-cost operating model. Our customers include national and international enterprises across numerous industries, including technology, Internet, content providers, cloud providers, media, communications, healthcare and financial services. Our 11 data centers have a total of 3.3 million gross square feet and 287 megawatts of power available to our customers to operate their servers and computing equipment.
Data centers are facilities that house large numbers of computer servers and related equipment and include the infrastructure necessary to operate this equipment, including systems for power distribution, environmental control, fire suppression and security. We believe that our data centers provide sufficient power to meet the needs of the world's largest technology companies. We lease the computer room square feet, or CRSF, and the available power of our facilities to customers under long-term leases. As of April 27, 2017:
| |
• | We had 32 customers with 127 different lease expirations, with only 13.8% of these expirations occurring through the end of 2018 as measured by annualized base rent; |
| |
• | The weighted average remaining term of our commenced leases was 5.1 years; and |
| |
• | We served five of the Fortune 25 and 20 of the Fortune 1000, which includes private or foreign enterprises of equivalent size. |
Our data centers are strategically located in three major population centers with a history of strong demand for wholesale data center space - Northern Virginia, suburban Chicago, Illinois and Santa Clara, California. We have acquired property and commenced the development of data center facilities in two new markets - the greater Toronto area, and the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area. Each of our current and expansion markets has significant electrical power availability and hubs of extensive fiber network connectivity. As of March 31, 2017, we owned the following properties:
| |
• | 11 operating data centers facilities; |
| |
• | Five phases of existing data center facilities under development; |
| |
• | One shell of a data center currently under development; |
| |
• | Two data center facilities with a phase or phases available for future development; and |
| |
• | Parcels of land held for future development of four data centers. |
In April 2017, we began the development of two additional data centers. We believe that we are well positioned to develop, lease, operate and manage our growing data center portfolio. The following table presents a summary of our operating properties as of April 1, 2017:
Operating Properties
As of April 1, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property | | Property Location | | Year Built/ Renovated | | Gross Building Area (2) | | Computer Room Square Feet ("CRSF") (2) | | CRSF % Leased (3) | | CRSF % Commenced (4) | | Critical Load MW (5) | | Critical Load % Leased (3) | | Critical Load % Commenced (4) |
Stabilized (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ACC2 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2001/2005 | | 87,000 |
| | 53,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 10.4 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
ACC3 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2001/2006 | | 147,000 |
| | 80,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 13.9 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
ACC4 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2007 | | 347,000 |
| | 172,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 36.4 |
| | 97 | % | | 97 | % |
ACC5 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2009-2010 | | 360,000 |
| | 176,000 |
| | 99 | % | | 99 | % | | 36.4 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
ACC6 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2011-2013 | | 262,000 |
| | 130,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 26.0 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
ACC7 | | Ashburn, VA | | 2014-2016 | | 446,000 |
| | 238,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 41.6 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
CH1 | | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 2008-2012 | | 485,000 |
| | 231,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 36.4 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
CH2 | | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 2015-2016 | | 328,000 |
| | 158,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 26.8 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
SC1 Phases I-II | | Santa Clara, CA | | 2011-2015 | | 360,000 |
| | 173,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 36.6 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
VA3 | | Reston, VA | | 2003 | | 256,000 |
| | 147,000 |
| | 94 | % | | 94 | % | | 13.0 |
| | 95 | % | | 95 | % |
VA4 | | Bristow, VA | | 2005 | | 230,000 |
| | 90,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 9.6 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Total Operating Properties | | | | 3,308,000 |
| | 1,648,000 |
| | 99 | % | | 99 | % | | 287.1 |
| | 99 | % | | 99 | % |
| |
(1) | Stabilized operating properties are either 85% or more leased and commenced or have been in service for 24 months or greater. |
| |
(2) | Gross building area is the entire building area, including CRSF (the portion of gross building area where our customers' computer servers are located), common areas, areas controlled by us (such as the mechanical, telecommunications and utility rooms) and, in some facilities, individual office and storage space leased on an as available basis to our customers. |
| |
(3) | Percentage leased is expressed as a percentage of CRSF or critical load, as applicable, that is subject to an executed lease. Leases executed as of April 1, 2017 represent $383 million of base rent on a GAAP basis and $389 million of base rent on a cash basis over the next twelve months. Both amounts include $19 million of revenue from management fees over the next twelve months. |
| |
(4) | Percentage commenced is expressed as a percentage of CRSF or critical load, as applicable, where the lease has commenced under GAAP. |
| |
(5) | Critical load (also referred to as IT load or load used by customers' servers or related equipment) is the power available for exclusive use by customers expressed in terms of megawatt, or MW, or kilowatt, or kW (One MW is equal to 1,000 kW). |
Lease Expirations
As of April 1, 2017
The following table sets forth a summary schedule of lease expirations at our operating properties for each of the ten calendar years beginning with 2017. The information set forth in the table below assumes that customers exercise no renewal options and takes into account customers’ early termination options in determining the life of their leases under GAAP.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year of Lease Expiration | | Number of Leases Expiring (1) | | CRSF of Expiring Commenced Leases (in thousands) (2) | | % of Leased CRSF | | Total kW of Expiring Commenced Leases (2) | | % of Leased kW | | % of Annualized Base Rent (3) |
2017 (4) | | 3 |
| | 19 |
| | 1.2 | % | | 3,846 |
| | 1.3 | % | | 1.5 | % |
2018 | | 20 |
| | 177 |
| | 10.8 | % | | 33,448 |
| | 11.7 | % | | 12.3 | % |
2019 | | 26 |
| | 330 |
| | 20.2 | % | | 57,404 |
| | 20.1 | % | | 21.6 | % |
2020 | | 15 |
| | 182 |
| | 11.1 | % | | 31,754 |
| | 11.1 | % | | 11.4 | % |
2021 | | 17 |
| | 293 |
| | 17.9 | % | | 51,514 |
| | 18.1 | % | | 17.5 | % |
2022 | | 10 |
| | 140 |
| | 8.6 | % | | 24,509 |
| | 8.6 | % | | 8.7 | % |
2023 | | 8 |
| | 92 |
| | 5.6 | % | | 13,305 |
| | 4.7 | % | | 4.2 | % |
2024 | | 9 |
| | 138 |
| | 8.4 | % | | 23,479 |
| | 8.2 | % | | 7.9 | % |
2025 | | 4 |
| | 47 |
| | 2.9 | % | | 7,750 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 3.4 | % |
2026 | | 7 |
| | 55 |
| | 3.4 | % | | 10,134 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 4.0 | % |
After 2026 | | 8 |
| | 164 |
| | 9.9 | % | | 28,244 |
| | 9.9 | % | | 7.5 | % |
Total | | 127 |
| | 1,637 |
|
| 100 | % |
| 285,387 |
|
| 100 | % |
| 100 | % |
| |
(1) | Represents 32 customers with 127 lease expiration dates. One additional customer has executed a pre-lease at ACC9 and will be our 33rd customer. |
| |
(2) | CRSF is that portion of gross building area where customers locate their computer servers. One MW is equal to 1,000 kW. |
| |
(3) | Annualized base rent represents the monthly contractual base rent (defined as cash base rent before abatements) multiplied by 12 for commenced leases as of April 1, 2017. |
| |
(4) | A customer at ACC4 whose lease expires on July 31, 2017 has informed us that it does not intend to renew this lease. This lease is for 1.14 MW and 5,400 CRSF. Additionally, a customer at ACC6, whose lease expires on August 31, 2017, has informed us that it does not intend to renew this lease. This lease is for 0.54 MW and 2,523 CRSF. These leases total 0.9% of Annualized Base Rent. We are marketing these computer rooms for re-lease. |
Top 15 Customers
As of April 1, 2017
The following table presents our top 15 customers based on annualized monthly contractual base rent at our operating properties as of April 1, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer | | Number of Buildings | | Number of Markets | | Average Remaining Term | | % of Annualized Base Rent (1) |
1 | Microsoft | | 9 |
| | 3 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 24.9 | % |
2 | Facebook | | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 21.0 | % |
3 | Fortune 25 Investment Grade-Rated Company | | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 10.9 | % |
4 | Rackspace | | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 8.3 |
| | 8.8 | % |
5 | Fortune 500 leading Software as a Service (SaaS) Provider, Not Rated | | 4 |
| | 2 |
| | 6.2 |
| | 8.4 | % |
6 | Yahoo! (2) | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 5.9 | % |
7 | Server Central | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 2.4 | % |
8 | Fortune 50 Investment Grade-Rated Company | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 1.9 | % |
9 | Dropbox | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 1.6 | % |
10 | IAC | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 1.5 | % |
11 | Symantec | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 2.2 |
| | 1.3 | % |
12 | GoDaddy | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 1.1 | % |
13 | Anexio | | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 1.0 | % |
14 | UBS | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 8.3 |
| | 1.0 | % |
15 | Sanofi Aventis | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 0.9 | % |
Total | | | | | | | | 92.6 | % |
| |
(1) | Annualized base rent represents monthly contractual base rent for commenced leases (defined as cash base rent before abatements) multiplied by 12 for commenced leases as of April 1, 2017. |
| |
(2) | Comprised of a lease at ACC4 that has been fully subleased to another DFT customer. |
Same Store Analysis
As of March 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
The following tables set forth an analysis of our same store and same store, same capital operating property portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Same store properties represent those properties placed into service on or before January 1, 2016 and owned by the company as of March 31, 2017. Accordingly, same store properties represented 287.1 MW, or 100%, of the 287.1 MW of operating properties in service as of March 31, 2017. Same store, same capital properties represent those operating properties that were placed into service on or before January 1, 2016, that were owned by the company as of March 31, 2017 and that have less than 10% of additional critical load developed after January 1, 2016. Accordingly, our same store, same capital properties include all of our operating properties in service as of March 31, 2017, with the exception of ACC7, due to Phase III and Phase IV of this facility being placed into service in June 2016 and October 2016, respectively, each of which increased the critical load of ACC7 by over 10%, and CH2, due to Phase II, Phase III and Phase IV being placed into service April 2016, July 2016 and November 2016, respectively, which increased the critical load at CH2 by over 10%. Same store, same capital properties represented 218.7 MW, or 76%, of the 287.1 MW of operating properties in service as of March 31, 2017.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Same Store Properties | Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-17 | | 31-Mar-16 | | % Change | | 31-Dec-16 | | % Change |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
| Base rent | $ | 91,268 |
| | $ | 79,569 |
| | 14.7 | % | | $ | 90,513 |
| | 0.8 | % |
| Recoveries from tenants | 45,295 |
| | 36,671 |
| | 23.5 | % | | 44,904 |
| | 0.9 | % |
| Other revenues | 632 |
| | 437 |
| | 44.6 | % | | 725 |
| | (12.8 | )% |
Total revenues | 137,195 |
| | 116,677 |
| | 17.6 | % | | 136,142 |
| | 0.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating costs | 40,191 |
| | 33,625 |
| | 19.5 | % | | 40,963 |
| | (1.9 | )% |
| Real estate taxes and insurance | 4,985 |
| | 4,225 |
| | 18.0 | % | | 4,029 |
| | 23.7 | % |
| Other expenses | 58 |
| | 114 |
| | N/M |
| | 52 |
| | 11.5 | % |
Total expenses | 45,234 |
| | 37,964 |
| | 19.1 | % | | 45,044 |
| | 0.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (1) | 91,961 |
| | 78,713 |
| | 16.8 | % | | 91,098 |
| | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 1,718 |
| | (1,964 | ) | | N/M |
| | 1,081 |
| | N/M |
|
| | Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) | | N/M |
| | (91 | ) | | N/M |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash net operating income (1) | $ | 93,408 |
| | $ | 76,633 |
| | 21.9 | % | | $ | 92,088 |
| | 1.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Same Store Properties represent those properties placed into service on or before January 1, 2016. NJ1 is excluded as it was sold in June 2016. |
| | | |
Same Store, Same Capital Properties | Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-17 | | 31-Mar-16 | | % Change | | 31-Dec-16 | | % Change |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
| Base rent | $ | 70,875 |
| | $ | 70,657 |
| | 0.3 | % | | $ | 70,979 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
| Recoveries from tenants | 38,557 |
| | 34,611 |
| | 11.4 | % | | 39,051 |
| | (1.3 | )% |
| Other revenues | 471 |
| | 392 |
| | 20.2 | % | | 466 |
| | 1.1 | % |
Total revenues | 109,903 |
| | 105,660 |
| | 4.0 | % | | 110,496 |
| | (0.5 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating costs | 34,099 |
| | 31,275 |
| | 9.0 | % | | 35,311 |
| | (3.4 | )% |
| Real estate taxes and insurance | 4,127 |
| | 3,889 |
| | 6.1 | % | | 3,440 |
| | 20.0 | % |
| Other expenses | 20 |
| | 107 |
| | N/M |
| | 17 |
| | 17.6 | % |
Total expenses | 38,246 |
| | 35,271 |
| | 8.4 | % | | 38,768 |
| | (1.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (1) | 71,657 |
| | 70,389 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 71,728 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 4,015 |
| | 870 |
| | N/M |
| | 3,858 |
| | 4.1 | % |
| | Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) | | N/M |
| | (91 | ) | | N/M |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash net operating income (1) | $ | 75,401 |
| | $ | 71,143 |
| | 6.0 | % | | $ | 75,495 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Same Store, Same Capital properties represent those properties placed into service on or before January 1, 2016 and have less than 10% of additional critical load developed after January 1, 2016. Excludes ACC7 and CH2. NJ1 is also excluded as it was sold in June 2016.
(1) See next page for a reconciliation of Net Operating Income and Cash Net Operating Income to GAAP measures. |
Same Store Analysis
Reconciliations of Operating Income to Net Operating Income and Cash Net Operating Income (1)
($ in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Same Store Net Operating Income and Cash Net Operating Income |
| | | |
| | | Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-17 | | 31-Mar-16 | | % Change | | 31-Dec-16 | | % Change |
Operating income | $ | 56,559 |
| | $ | 49,111 |
| | 15.2 | % | | $ | 56,386 |
| | 0.3 | % |
Add-back: non-same store operating loss | 7,239 |
| | 4,681 |
| | 54.6 | % | | 6,633 |
| | 9.1 | % |
Same Store: | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | 63,798 |
| | 53,792 |
| | 18.6 | % | | 63,019 |
| | 1.2 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | 28,163 |
| | 24,921 |
| | 13.0 | % | | 28,079 |
| | 0.3 | % |
Net operating income | 91,961 |
| | 78,713 |
| | 16.8 | % | | 91,098 |
| | 0.9 | % |
| | Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 1,718 |
| | (1,964 | ) | | N/M |
| | 1,081 |
| | N/M |
|
| | Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) | | N/M |
| | (91 | ) | | N/M |
|
Cash net operating income | $ | 93,408 |
| | $ | 76,633 |
| | 21.9 | % | | $ | 92,088 |
| | 1.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Same Store, Same Capital Net Operating Income and Cash Net Operating Income |
| | | |
| | | Three Months Ended |
| | | 31-Mar-17 | | 31-Mar-16 | | % Change | | 31-Dec-16 | | % Change |
Operating income | $ | 56,559 |
| | $ | 49,111 |
| | 15.2 | % | | $ | 56,386 |
| | 0.3 | % |
Less: non-same store, same capital operating income | (7,629 | ) | | (1,400 | ) | | N/M |
| | (7,354 | ) | | 3.7 | % |
Same Store, Same Capital: | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | 48,930 |
| | 47,711 |
| | 2.6 | % | | 49,032 |
| | (0.2 | )% |
| Depreciation and amortization | 22,727 |
| | 22,678 |
| | 0.2 | % | | 22,696 |
| | 0.1 | % |
Net operating income | 71,657 |
| | 70,389 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 71,728 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
| | Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 4,015 |
| | 870 |
| | N/M |
| | 3,858 |
| | 4.1 | % |
| | Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) | | N/M |
| | (91 | ) | | N/M |
|
Cash net operating income | $ | 75,401 |
| | $ | 71,143 |
| | 6.0 | % | | $ | 75,495 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
(1) Net Operating Income ("NOI") represents total revenues less property operating costs, real estate taxes and insurance, and other expenses (each as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations) for the properties included in the analysis. Cash Net Operating Income ("Cash NOI") is NOI less straight-line revenues, net of reserve and amortization of lease contracts above and below market value for the properties included in the analysis.
We use NOI and Cash NOI as supplemental performance measures because, in excluding depreciation and amortization, impairment charges on depreciable real estate assets and gains and losses from property dispositions, each provides a performance measure that, when compared period over period, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating expenses. However, because NOI and Cash NOI exclude depreciation and amortization, impairment charges on depreciable real estate assets and gains and losses from property dispositions, and capture neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of NOI and Cash NOI as a measure of our performance is limited.
Other REITs may not calculate NOI and Cash NOI in the same manner we do and, accordingly, our NOI and Cash NOI may not be comparable to the NOI and Cash NOI of other REITs. NOI and Cash NOI should not be considered as an alternative to operating income (as computed in accordance with GAAP).
Development Projects
As of March 31, 2017
($ in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property | | Property Location | | Gross Building Area (1) | | CRSF (2) | | Critical Load MW (3) | | Estimated Total Cost (4) | | Construction in Progress & Land Held for Development (5) | | CRSF % Pre- leased | | Critical Load % Pre- leased |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current Development Projects | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ACC9 Phase I (6) | | Ashburn, VA | | 163,000 |
| | 90,000 |
| | 14.4 |
| | $126,000 - $130,000 | | $ | 114,618 |
| | 20 | % | | 20 | % |
ACC9 Phase II (7) | | Ashburn, VA | | 163,000 |
| | 90,000 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 126,000 - 130,000 | | 95,825 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
CH3 Phase I (8) | | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 153,000 |
| | 71,000 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 136,000 - 142,000 | | 31,926 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
SC1 Phase III | | Santa Clara, CA | | 111,000 |
| | 64,000 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 163,000 - 167,000 | | 113,132 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
TOR1 Phase IA | | Vaughan, ON | | 112,000 |
| | 35,000 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 58,000 - 64,000 | | 12,227 |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| | | | 702,000 |
| | 350,000 |
| | 65.2 |
| | 609,000 - 633,000 | | 367,728 |
| | | | |
Current Development Project - Shell Only | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ACC10 (9) | | Ashburn, VA | | 289,000 |
| | 163,000 |
| | 27.0 |
| | 64,000 - 70,000 | | 14,214 |
| | | | |
| | | | 289,000 |
| | 163,000 |
| | 27.0 |
| | 64,000 - 70,000 | | 14,214 |
| | | | |
Future Development Projects/Phases | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CH3 Phase II (10) | | Elk Grove Village, IL | | 152,000 |
| | 89,000 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 70,000 - 74,000 | | 31,687 |
| | | | |
TOR1 Phase IB/C | | Vaughan, ON | | 225,000 |
| | 78,000 |
| | 12.0 |
| | 82,000 - 90,000 | | 24,455 |
| | | | |
TOR1 Phase II | | Vaughan, ON | | 374,000 |
| | 113,000 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 32,074 | | 32,074 |
| | | | |
| | | | 751,000 |
| | 280,000 |
| | 41.3 |
| | 184,074 - 196,074 | | 88,216 |
| | | | |
Land Held for Development (11) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ACC8 | | Ashburn, VA | | 100,000 |
| | 50,000 |
| | 10.4 |
| | | | 4,252 |
| | | | |
ACC11 | | Ashburn, VA | | 150,000 |
| | 80,000 |
| | 16.0 |
| | | | 4,805 |
| | | | |
OR1 | | Hillsboro, OR | | 765,000 |
| | 329,000 |
| | 48.0 |
| | | | 7,471 |
| | | | |
OR2 | | Hillsboro, OR | | 765,000 |
| | 329,000 |
| | 48.0 |
| | | | 6,756 |
| | | | |
| | | | 1,780,000 |
| | 788,000 |
| | 122.4 |
| | | | 23,284 |
| | | | |
Total | | | | 3,522,000 |
| | 1,581,000 |
| | 255.9 |
| | | | $ | 493,442 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Gross building area is the entire building area, including CRSF (the portion of gross building area where our customers’ computer servers are located), common areas, areas controlled by us (such as the mechanical, telecommunications and utility rooms) and, in some facilities, individual office and storage space leased on an as available basis to our customers. The respective amounts listed for each of the “Land Held for Development” sites are estimates. |
| |
(2) | CRSF is that portion of gross building area where customers locate their computer servers. The respective amounts listed for each of the “Land Held for Development” sites are estimates. |
| |
(3) | Critical load (also referred to as IT load or load used by customers’ servers or related equipment) is the power available for exclusive use by customers expressed in terms of MW or kW (1 MW is equal to 1,000 kW). The respective amounts listed for each of the “Land Held for Development” sites are estimates. |
| |
(4) | Current development projects include land, capitalization for construction and development and capitalized interest and operating carrying costs, as applicable, upon completion. Future development projects/phases include land, shell and underground work through the opening of the phase(s) that are either under current development or in service. |
| |
(5) | Amount capitalized as of March 31, 2017. Future development projects/phases include land, shell and underground work through the opening of the phase(s) that are either under current development or in service. |
| |
(6) | As of April 27, 2017, ACC9 Phase I was 70% pre-leased based on CRSF and critical load. |
| |
(7) | As of April 27, 2017, ACC9 Phase II was 50% pre-leased based on CRSF and critical load. |
| |
(8) | As of April 27, 2017, CH3 Phase I was 100% pre-leased based on CRSF and critical load. |
| |
(9) | In April 2017, we commenced development of ACC10 Phase I, comprising 15.0 MW of critical load. |
| |
(10) | In April 2017, we commenced development of CH3 Phase II. |
| |
(11) | Amounts listed for gross building area, CRSF and critical load are current estimates. |
Leasing
We derive substantially all of our revenue from rents received from customers under existing leases at each of our operating properties. Because we believe that critical load is the primary factor used by customers in evaluating data center requirements, rents are based primarily on the amount of critical power capacity that is made available to customers, rather than the amount of space that they occupy.
From January 1, 2017 through April 27, 2017, we executed six leases and pre-leases totaling 34.42 MW of critical load and 200,765 CRSF of space with a weighted average lease term of 8.1 years. These leases and pre-leases included the following:
| |
• | Two leases at ACC7 Phase IV comprising 4.20 MW of critical load and 29,993 CRSF, |
| |
• | One lease at CH2 Phase II comprising 1.42 MW of critical load and 8,950 CRSF, |
| |
• | One pre-lease at ACC9 Phase I comprising 7.2 MW of critical load and 45,158 CRSF, |
| |
• | One pre-lease at ACC9 Phase II comprising 7.2 MW of critical load and 45,158 CRSF, and |
| |
• | One pre-lease at CH3 Phase I comprising its entire 14.4 MW of critical load and 71,506 CRSF. |
The three pre-leases at ACC9 and CH3 totaling 28.8 MW were all with our third largest customer. All of the leases and pre-leases above are expected to generate approximately $36.7 million of GAAP base rent revenue per year, which is equivalent to a GAAP rate of approximately $89 per kW per month. Including estimated amounts of operating expense recoveries, these leases are expected to generate approximately $46.4 million of revenue per year before recovery of metered power, which results in a rate of approximately $112 per kW per month. The weighted average GAAP base rent rate for these leases and pre-leases represents a 14% decline as compared to the weighted average GAAP rate for leases executed in 2016. The lease rate decline in 2017 is primarily due to the highly competitive market environment, as well as the purchasing power of our third largest customer due to the size of the 28.8 MW commitment.
We generally lease space and power to our customers using a “triple net” lease structure, under which our customers occupy all or a percentage of each of our data centers and, in addition to a monthly base rent fee, are obligated to reimburse us for their share of property-level operating expenses. We also market space and power to customers under a “full service” lease structure, under which the customer's reimbursement for operating expenses is fixed with annual escalators, excluding increases to certain uncontrollable expenses. We believe the rental rates for full service leases will cover these operating expenses and will provide us with an adequate return on our investment. Under all of our leases, customers reimburse us for the cost of the power they use to operate their computer servers and the power that is used to cool their space. We believe that these lease structures, together with the economies of scale resulting from the size of our data centers, result in our customers paying less for power and operating expenses over time than they would in a comparable colocation setting, where power costs are often included in the license fee paid to the provider. Most of our leases provide for annual rent increases, and, as of April 1, 2017, our weighted average remaining lease term for commenced leases was approximately 5.1 years.
Available Data Center Inventory and Current Development Projects
As of April 27, 2017, our operating portfolio was 99% leased and commenced as measured by CRSF and critical load. We have also pre-leased 47.7 MW of available critical load across our ACC9, CH3 and SC1 data centers, which are expected to result in additional revenue for us as those leases commence over the next year. The opportunity for further revenue growth in the near term primarily depends on our ability to lease the vacant space in our operating portfolio and the space under development.
We generally determine when to develop data center properties based on the amount of available space in our operating properties and anticipated demand for data center space in each applicable market. Our development projects as of March 31, 2017 included:
| |
• | ACC9 Phase I - 14.4 MW of available critical load, which was 70% pre-leased as of April 27, 2017, with completion expected in the second quarter of 2017; |
| |
• | ACC9 Phase II - 14.4 MW of available critical load, which was 50% pre-leased as of April 27, 2017 with completion expected in the third quarter of 2017; |
| |
• | SC1 Phase III - 16.0 MW of available critical load, which was 100% pre-leased, with completion expected in the third quarter of 2017; |
| |
• | TOR1 Phase IA - 6.0 MW of available critical load with completion expected in the fourth quarter of 2017; |
| |
• | CH3 Phase I - 14.4 MW of available critical load, which was 100% pre-leased as of April 27, 2017, with completion expected in the first quarter of 2018; and |
| |
• | ACC10 shell, of which we commenced development of the first phase subsequent to March 31, 2017, as described below. |
In April 2017, we began development of two additional projects:
| |
• | ACC10 Phase I - 15.0 MW of available critical load, with completion expected in the second quarter of 2018. |
| |
• | CH3 Phase II - 12.8 MW of available critical load, with completion expected in the second quarter of 2018. |
The remaining phases of TOR1, comprising 28.5 MW, are being held for future development. We also own parcels of land available to develop four additional data centers, two of which are in the Ashburn, Virginia market and the other two are in the Portland, Oregon market.
Market Conditions
Changes in the conditions of any of the markets in which our operating properties are located, including the economic conditions of a market, the financial condition of customers that procure data center space in a market, and the supply of available data center space in a market, will impact the overall performance of our current and future operating properties and our ability to fully lease our properties. The ability of our customers to fulfill their lease commitments could be impacted by future economic or regional downturns in the markets in which we operate or downturns in the industries in which our customers operate.
We take into account various factors when negotiating the terms of our leases, which can vary among leases, including the following factors: the customer’s strategic importance, growth prospects and credit quality, the length of the lease term, the amount of power leased and competitive market conditions. To determine credit quality, if a prospective customer is a publicly held entity, we evaluate its publicly filed financial statements. If a prospective customer is a privately held entity, we request audited financial statements from the customer if they exist, and unaudited financial statements if audited financial statements do not exist. We also consider any relevant news, market or industry data related to a prospective or existing customer. Furthermore, we also evaluate an existing customer's payment history with us.
We have been able to lease space and power at rates that provide a favorable return on the investment we have made in each of our operating data center facilities. There is significant competition in each of the markets in which we operate. Our primary competitors operate and are expanding their presence in our markets, and other data center providers are entering some of our markets, including the Northern Virginia market in particular. This competition, a decrease in redundancy requirements of the hyper scale cloud customers and an increase in the size of leases have impacted the rental rates adversely, which in turn, could impact the rates of return of our investments. The rental rates of a number of leases in our portfolio that we negotiated several years ago are higher than rental rates under current market conditions. If, upon the expiration of the terms of these leases, these customers either vacate their space or negotiate the rental rates that reflect current market conditions, our rates of return would be impacted adversely. We believe that the base rents of our portfolio of operating properties in the aggregate exceed base rents that currently exist in our relevant markets. Because the terms of the leases in our portfolio expire over a weighted average period of 5.1 years as of April 1, 2017, we cannot predict how the base rents of any of our leases will compare to the market rates at the time that the terms of our leases expire. If we are unable to renew leases as their terms expire or lease vacated space with rents equal to or above historic rates, the returns on our investments we have achieved to date at our operating properties would be impacted negatively.
Our taxable REIT subsidiary, DF Technical Services, LLC (the “TRS”) generates revenue by providing certain technical services to our customers on a non-recurring contract or purchase-order basis, which we refer to as “à la carte” services. Such services include the layout design and installation of electrical power circuits, data cabling, server cabinets and racks, computer room airflow analyses and monitoring and other services requested by customers. The TRS generally charges customers for these services on a cost-plus basis. Because revenue generated by the TRS varies from period to period depending on the needs of the customers for technical services, we have limited ability to forecast future revenue from this source. Moreover, as a taxable corporation, the TRS is subject to federal, state and local corporate taxes and is not required to distribute its income, if any, to the Company for purposes of making additional distributions to DFT’s stockholders. However, we routinely assess the cash balance and future liquidity needs of the TRS in determining whether to distribute excess funds to the Company.
Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains stand-alone unaudited financial statements and other financial data for each of DFT and the Operating Partnership. DFT is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of March 31, 2017, owned 86.9% of the common economic interest in the Operating Partnership, of which approximately 0.9% is held as general partnership units. All of our operations are conducted by the Operating Partnership which is consolidated by DFT, and therefore the following information is the same for DFT and the Operating Partnership, except that net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests is not an element of the Operating Partnership’s consolidated statement of operations.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Operating Revenue. Operating revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $139.5 million. This includes base rent of $91.3 million, tenant recoveries of $45.3 million and other revenue of $2.9 million, including revenue from à la carte projects for our customers performed by the TRS. This compares to operating revenue of $124.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase of $15.4 million, or 12.4%, was primarily due to increased revenue from placing CH2 Phases II-IV and ACC7 Phases III-IV into service, partially offset by the cessation of revenue at NJ1 due to its sale in June 2016.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were $82.9 million, compared to $75.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase of $7.9 million, or 10.5%, was primarily due to increased operating costs and depreciation and amortization from placing CH2 Phases II-IV and ACC7 Phases III-IV into service and a $1.2 million increase in general and administrative expenses due to higher company headcount, partially offset by the cessation of operating expenses and depreciation and amortization related to NJ1 due to its sale in June 2016.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $12.3 million compared to interest expense of $12.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Total interest incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $16.7 million, of which $4.4 million was capitalized, as compared to $15.8 million for the corresponding period in 2016, of which $3.4 million was capitalized. The increase in total interest was primarily due to increased borrowings to fund the development of data centers, and an increase in LIBOR-based interest rates, compared to the first quarter 2016. The increase in capitalization is due to more properties under development in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter 2016.
Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling interests – Operating Partnership (DFT only). Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests – operating partnership was $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $5.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase of $0.2 million was primarily due to an increase in net income, partially offset by the redemption of OP units.
Net Income Attributable to Common Shares. Net income attributable to common shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $35.2 million compared to $24.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase of $10.8 million was primarily due to higher revenue described above and a decrease in preferred dividends in 2017, resulting from the 2016 redemption of our 7.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock and our 7.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock and the 2016 issuance of our Series C Preferred Stock. These increases were partially offset by higher operating expenses and higher interest expense, each described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Discussion of Cash Flows
The discussion of cash flows below is for both DFT and the Operating Partnership. The only difference between the cash flows of DFT and the Operating Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was a $4.2 million bank account at DFT that is not part of the Operating Partnership.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $3.3 million, or 6.4%, to $54.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to $51.3 million for the corresponding period in 2016. The increase was due to an increase in income and higher cash rents from tenants, partially offset by a decrease in prepaid rent and other liabilities and higher prepaid expenses and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $63.6 million or 81.6% to $141.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $77.9 million for the corresponding period in 2016. The majority of cash used in investing activities in each period was expenditures for projects under development. Development costs paid during the three months
ended March 31, 2017 were $84.9 million higher than development costs paid during 2016. This increase was partially offset by land acquisition costs and improvements to real estate incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Specifically, there was a $20.2 million purchase of two parcels of undeveloped land in Ashburn, Virginia, which we are using for the current development of our ACC9 and ACC10 data centers and the future development of either a powered base shell or a build-to-suit data center to be known as ACC11, and a $1.9 million decrease in improvements to real estate, which consisted primarily of costs incurred at ACC2 to prepare the space for its new customer during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $93.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to $237.8 million in the corresponding period in 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 consisted of $146.5 million in proceeds from the Unsecured Credit Facility which was primarily used to fund the development of our data centers, partially offset by $48.0 million paid for dividends and distributions, $4.0 million of cash used to pay the withholding taxes for those of our employees who elected to forfeit shares of common stock to cover the withholding obligations upon the vesting of equity-based awards and $1.3 million in principal repayments on our ACC3 term loan. Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 consisted of $275.8 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $9.2 million from option exercises; partially offset by $45.0 million paid for dividends and distributions and $2.2 million of cash used in connection with the payment of withholding taxes for employees upon the vesting of restricted common stock.
Market Capitalization
The following table sets forth our total market capitalization as of March 31, 2017:
Capital Structure as of March 31, 2017
(in thousands except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Line of Credit | | | | | | | $ | 197,819 |
| | |
Mortgage Notes Payable | | | | | | | 110,000 |
| | |
Unsecured Term Loan | | | | | | | 250,000 |
| | |
Unsecured Notes | | | | | | | 850,000 |
| | |
Total Debt | | | | | | | 1,407,819 |
| | 23.3 | % |
Common Shares | 87 | % | | 77,836 |
| | | | | | |
Operating Partnership (“OP”) Units | 13 | % | | 11,683 |
| | | | | | |
Total Shares and Units | 100 | % | | 89,519 |
| | | | | | |
Common Share Price at March 31, 2017 | | | $ | 49.59 |
| | | | | | |
Common Share and OP Unit Capitalization | | | | | $ | 4,439,247 |
| | | | |
Preferred Stock ($25 per share liquidation preference) | | | | | 201,250 |
| | | | |
Total Equity | | | | | | | 4,640,497 |
| | 76.7 | % |
Total Market Capitalization | | | | | | | $ | 6,048,316 |
| | 100.0 | % |
Capital Resources
The development of wholesale data centers is capital intensive. Such development not only requires us to make substantial capital investments, but also increases our operating expenses, which negatively impacts our cash flows from operations until leases are executed and we begin to collect cash rents from these leases. In addition, because DFT has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, to our stockholders annually. Accordingly, we fund a portion of the cost of data center development from additional capital because cash provided by operating activities is not sufficient to fund our development costs after we make the required dividends and distributions to our stockholders and unitholders.
In 2017, we expect to meet our liquidity needs from cash provided by operating activities, from funds available under the Unsecured Credit Facility, by issuing common equity using our "at-the-market" equity issuance program, or ATM program, further described below, and from additional capital from external sources. We expect that our expenditures of capital for the construction of data center facilities currently in development will be approximately $575 - $625 million for the remainder of 2017, which we expect to fund using cash provided from operations after payment of dividends and distributions, the amount available under the Unsecured Credit Facility and equity. During 2017, when market conditions permit, we plan to obtain additional capital and permanent capital financing for the funds drawn under the Unsecured Credit Facility, which we expect to
obtain through unsecured and secured borrowings, construction financings and the issuance of additional preferred and/or common equity.
In February 2017, we announced the establishment of an ATM program through which we may issue and sell up to an aggregate of $200 million of our shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of common stock have been issued under this program.
The Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program of $100 million for 2017. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of common stock have been repurchased under this program.
DFT's ability to pay dividends to its stockholders is dependent on the receipt of distributions from the Operating Partnership, which in turn is dependent on the data center properties generating operating income. The indentures that govern the Unsecured Notes due 2021 and Unsecured Notes due 2023 limit DFT’s ability to pay dividends, but allow DFT to pay the minimum dividends necessary to meet its REIT income distribution requirements.
For a detailed description of our indebtedness, see footnote 4 to our consolidated financial statements. A summary of our indebtedness as of March 31, 2017 is as follows:
Debt Summary as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
($ in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Amounts (1) | | % of Total | | Rates | | Maturities (years) | | Amounts |
Secured | $ | 110,000 |
| | 8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.0 |
| | $ | 111,250 |
|
Unsecured | 1,297,819 |
| | 92 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 4.7 |
| | 1,150,926 |
|
Total | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 |
| | $ | 1,262,176 |
|
Fixed Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
Unsecured Notes due 2021 | $ | 600,000 |
| | 42 | % | | 5.9 | % | | 4.5 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
|
Unsecured Notes due 2023 (2) | 250,000 |
| | 18 | % | | 5.6 | % | | 6.2 |
| | 250,000 |
|
Fixed Rate Debt | $ | 850,000 |
| | 60 | % | | 5.8 | % | | 5.0 |
| | $ | 850,000 |
|
Floating Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | |
Unsecured Credit Facility | 197,819 |
| | 14 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 3.3 |
| | 50,926 |
|
Unsecured Term Loan | 250,000 |
| | 18 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 4.8 |
| | 250,000 |
|
ACC3 Term Loan | 110,000 |
| | 8 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.0 |
| | 111,250 |
|
Floating Rate Debt | 557,819 |
| | 40 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 3.5 |
| | 412,176 |
|
Total | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 4.4 |
| | $ | 1,262,176 |
|
(1) Principal amounts exclude deferred financing costs.
(2) Principal amount excludes original issue discount of $1.6 million.
Presented below is a reconciliation of principal debt amounts outstanding to their respective amounts presented on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 |
| Principal Balance | | Less: Original Issue Discount, net | | Less: Deferred Financing Costs | | Balance Sheet Amount |
Unsecured Credit Facility | $ | 197,819 |
| | $ | — |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 197,819 |
|
ACC3 Term Loan | 110,000 |
| | — |
| | (408 | ) | | 109,592 |
|
Unsecured Term Loan | 250,000 |
| | — |
| | (911 | ) | | 249,089 |
|
Unsecured Notes due 2021 | 600,000 |
| | — |
| | (7,498 | ) | | 592,502 |
|
Unsecured Notes due 2023 | 250,000 |
| | (1,615 | ) | | (2,992 | ) | | 245,393 |
|
Total | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | $ | (1,615 | ) | | $ | (11,809 | ) | | $ | 1,394,395 |
|
A summary of our debt maturity schedule as of March 31, 2017 is as follows:
Debt Maturity as of March 31, 2017
($ in thousands) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year | | Fixed Rate (1) | | | Floating Rate (1) | | | Total (1) | | % of Total | | Rates |
2017 | | — |
| | | 7,500 |
| (4) | | 7,500 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2018 | | — |
| | | 102,500 |
| (4) | | 102,500 |
| | 7.3 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2019 | | — |
| | | — |
| | | — |
| | — | % | | — | % |
2020 | | — |
| | | 197,819 |
| (5) | | 197,819 |
| | 14.0 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2021 | | 600,000 |
| (2) | | — |
| | | 600,000 |
| | 42.6 | % | | 5.9 | % |
2022 | | — |
| | | 250,000 |
| (6) | | 250,000 |
| | 17.8 | % | | 2.5 | % |
2023 | | 250,000 |
| (3) | | — |
| | | 250,000 |
| | 17.8 | % | | 5.6 | % |
Total | | $ | 850,000 |
| | | $ | 557,819 |
| | | $ | 1,407,819 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| |
(1) | Principal amounts exclude deferred financing costs. |
| |
(2) | The 5.875% Unsecured Notes due 2021 mature on September 15, 2021. |
| |
(3) | The 5.625% Unsecured Notes due 2023 mature on June 15, 2023. Principal amount excludes original issue discount of $1.6 million as of March 31, 2017. |
| |
(4) | The ACC3 Term Loan matures on March 27, 2018 with no extension option. Quarterly principal payments of $1.25 million began on April 1, 2016, increased to $2.5 million on April 1, 2017 and continue through maturity. |
| |
(5) | The Unsecured Credit Facility matures on July 25, 2020 with a one-year extension option. |
| |
(6) | The Unsecured Term Loan matures on January 21, 2022 with no extension option. |
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2017, including the maturities assuming extension options are not exercised and scheduled principal repayments of the ACC3 Term Loan (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Obligation | | 2017 | | 2018-2019 | | 2020-2021 | | Thereafter | | Total |
Long-term debt obligations | | $ | 7,500 |
| | $ | 102,500 |
| | $ | 797,819 |
| | $ | 500,000 |
| | $ | 1,407,819 |
|
Interest on long-term debt obligations | | 43,272 |
| | 124,588 |
| | 114,848 |
| | 21,456 |
| | 304,164 |
|
Construction costs payable | | 75,884 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 75,884 |
|
Commitments under development contracts | | 139,904 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 139,904 |
|
Commitment under land purchase agreement, net of deposit paid | | 11,740 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,740 |
|
Operating leases | | 540 |
| | 1,518 |
| | 1,641 |
| | 1,777 |
| | 5,476 |
|
Total | | $ | 278,840 |
| | $ | 228,606 |
| | $ | 914,308 |
| | $ | 523,233 |
| | $ | 1,944,987 |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2017, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following table presents our reconciliations of net income to NAREIT funds from operations, or FFO, normalized funds from operations, or Normalized FFO, and adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO. |
| | | | | | | |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Net income | $ | 44,275 |
| | $ | 36,697 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 28,207 |
| | 25,843 |
|
Less: Non-real estate depreciation and amortization | (204 | ) | | (194 | ) |
NAREIT FFO | 72,278 |
| | 62,346 |
|
Preferred stock dividends | (3,333 | ) | | (6,811 | ) |
NAREIT FFO attributable to common shares and common units | 68,945 |
| | 55,535 |
|
Severance expense and equity acceleration | 532 |
| | — |
|
Normalized FFO attributable to common shares and common units | 69,477 |
| | 55,535 |
|
Straight-line revenues, net of reserve | 1,718 |
| | (1,737 | ) |
Amortization and write-off of lease contracts above and below market value | (271 | ) | | (116 | ) |
Compensation paid with Company common shares | 2,372 |
| | 1,769 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation and amortization | 204 |
| | 194 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 825 |
| | 845 |
|
Improvements to real estate | (186 | ) | | (2,099 | ) |
Capitalized leasing commissions | (276 | ) | | (1,611 | ) |
AFFO attributable to common shares and common units | $ | 73,863 |
| | $ | 52,780 |
|
NAREIT FFO attributable to common shares and common units per share – diluted | $ | 0.76 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
|
Normalized FFO attributable to common shares and common units per share – diluted | $ | 0.77 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
|
Weighted average common shares and common units outstanding – diluted | 90,311.511 |
| | 83,094.266 |
|
(1) Funds from operations, or FFO, is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure for REITs. We calculate FFO in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP, impairment charges on depreciable real estate assets and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus specified non-cash items, such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We also present FFO attributable to common shares and OP units, which is FFO excluding preferred stock dividends. FFO attributable to common shares and OP units per share is calculated on a basis consistent with net income attributable to common shares and OP units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred stock dividends.
We use FFO as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, it provides a performance measure that, when compared period over period, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating expenses. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of equity REITs, FFO may be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because FFO excludes real estate related depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited.
While FFO is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of equity REITs, other equity REITs may use different methodologies for calculating FFO and, accordingly, FFO as disclosed by such other REITs may not be comparable to our FFO. Therefore, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in the consolidated statements of operations. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income or to cash flow from operating activities (each as computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to meet our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.
We present FFO with adjustments to arrive at Normalized FFO. Normalized FFO is FFO attributable to common shares and units excluding severance expense and equity accelerations, gain or loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain or loss on derivative instruments and write-offs of original issuance costs for redeemed preferred shares. We also present FFO with supplemental adjustments to arrive at Adjusted FFO (“AFFO”). AFFO is Normalized FFO excluding straight-line revenue, compensation paid with Company common shares, below market lease amortization and write-offs net of above market lease amortization and write-offs, non real estate depreciation and amortization, amortization of deferred financing costs, improvements to real estate and capitalized leasing commissions. AFFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow provided by operations as a measure of liquidity and is not necessarily indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to pay dividends. In addition, AFFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measurements employed by other companies. We use AFFO in management reports to provide a measure of REIT operating performance that can be compared to other companies using AFFO.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results may differ from these estimates. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon information currently available and on various assumptions we believe are reasonable as of the date hereof. Our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed materially from the discussion of our significant accounting policies found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition - In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and expect to elect the modified retrospective method of application of the standard. Although the standard does not apply to leases, we have assessed the impact on our financial position and results of operations. The standard will change our method of recognizing revenue on service and installation contracts included in other revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from the completed contract method to a method that recognizes revenue over the course of the contract based on the goods or services transferred to date relative to the remaining goods or services promised under the contract. We do not expect that this change will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. In addition, we currently do not believe the standard will have a material impact on how we recognize revenues from tenants with respect to operating expense recoveries on our financial position or results of operations.
Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842). We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2019. The Company’s leases consist of both lease components that will be accounted for under this standard and non-lease components such as operating expense recovery income that will be accounted for under ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard does not fundamentally change the lessor accounting model, and we do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Financial Instruments - In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Under this guidance, a company will be required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model for trade and other receivables that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2020 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Cash Flows - In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The standard provides guidance on eight specific cash flow classification issues including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash - In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18 (Topic 230), Restricted Cash. The standard requires restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending amounts in the statement of cash flows. We are required to apply the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 and do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Business Combinations - In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition of assets or a business. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. We early-adopted the standard effective January 1, 2017. As a result of this new guidance, acquisitions may now result in an asset purchase rather than a business combination. We do not believe that the new standard will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
|
| |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to our financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.
Our variable rate debt consists of the ACC3 Term Loan, the Unsecured Term Loan and the Unsecured Credit Facility. The ACC3 Term Loan, the Unsecured Term Loan and the US dollar-denominated borrowings under the Unsecured Credit facility currently bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The Canadian dollar-denominated borrowings under the Unsecured Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate ("CDOR") plus an applicable margin. If the LIBOR and CDOR interest rates were to increase by 1%, the increase in interest expense on our variable rate debt outstanding as of March 31, 2017 would decrease future net income and cash flows by $5.6 million annually, less the impact of capitalization of interest incurred on net income. Because one-month LIBOR was 0.98% and one-month CDOR was 0.91% as of March 31, 2017, a decrease in each of these rates to zero would increase future net income and cash flows by $5.4 million annually less the impact of capitalization of interest incurred on net income. Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take specific actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure. We believe that we have effectively managed interest rate exposure because the majority of our indebtedness bears a fixed rate of interest. As of March 31, 2017, 60% of our indebtedness was fixed rate debt. We also utilize preferred stock to raise capital, the dividends required under the terms of which have a coupon rate that is fixed.
|
| |
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Controls and Procedures with Respect to DFT
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
DFT’s management, with the participation of DFT’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of DFT’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, DFT’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in DFT’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, DFT’s internal control over financial reporting.
Controls and Procedures with Respect to the Operating Partnership
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
DFT’s management, with the participation of DFT’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
None.
|
| |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. |
None.
|
| |
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
| |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
None.
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
10.1 | | 2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.2 | | Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.3 | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.4 | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.5 | | 2017 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on February 22, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.6* | | Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of March 17, 2017, by and between DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., DF Property Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Brian D. Doricko. |
| | |
10.7* | | 2016 DF Property Management LLC Amended and Restated Sales Incentive Plan.† |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
31.2* | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
31.3* | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
31.4* | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
32.1* | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
32.2* | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
101* | | XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from DFT’s and the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act and Section 18 of the Exchange Act. |
* Filed herewith.
† Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit and confidential portions have been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
| | | |
Date: | April 27, 2017 | By: | /s/ James W. Armstrong |
| | | James W. Armstrong Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | |
| | DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P. |
| | | |
| | By: | DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., its sole general partner |
| | | |
Date: | April 27, 2017 | By: | /s/ James W. Armstrong |
| | | James W. Armstrong Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit Index
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
10.1 | | 2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.2 | | Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.3 | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.4 | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on January 10, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.5 | | 2017 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Registrant on February 22, 2017 (Registration No. 001-33748)). |
| | |
10.6* | | Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of March 17, 2017, by and between DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., DF Property Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Brian D. Doricko. |
| | |
10.7* | | 2016 DF Property Management LLC Amended and Restated Sales Incentive Plan.† |
| | |
31.1* | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
31.2* | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
31.3* | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
31.4* | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
32.1* | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.). |
| |
32.2* | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.). |
| |
101* | | XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from DFT’s and the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act and Section 18 of the Exchange Act. |
* Filed herewith.
† Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit and confidential portions have been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.