Crowd Shares Aftermarket (CRDW) 10-K 2015 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED December 31, 2015
OR
[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from           to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-52769

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA	26-0295367
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
898 N. Sepulveda Suite 475 El Segundo, CA 90245	92660
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(424) 220-6613

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as define in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	[  ]	Accelerated Filer	[  ]
Non-accelerated Filer	[  ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 2015: $0.00.

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [  ] No [X]

As of April 12, 2016, 22,564,000 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

INDEX

PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4
Item 2.	Properties	7
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	7
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	7
		7
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7
Item 6.	Selected Financial Information	8
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8
Item 8.	Financial Statements	12
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	12
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	12
Item 9B.	Other Information	13
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	14
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	17
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	17
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	18
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	19
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	19
Signatures		21

i

CAUTIONARY NOTICE

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Those forward-looking statements include our expectations, beliefs, intentions and strategies regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things our working capital requirements and results of operations; the further approvals of regulatory authorities; overall industry environment; competitive pressures and general economic conditions. These and other factors that may affect our financial results are discussed more fully in Risk Factors” and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this report. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update or revise such statements to reflect new circumstances or unanticipated events as they occur, and we urge readers to review and consider disclosures we make in this and other reports that discuss factors germane to our business. See in particular our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K subsequently filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business.

In addition to the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements concerning: growth and anticipated operating results; developments in our markets and strategic focus; product development and reseller relationships and future economic and business conditions. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-K should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements whenever they appear in this Form 10-K. Our actual results could differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the section captioned “Risk Factors” in Item 1.A. of this Form 10-K as well as those cautionary statements and other factors set forth elsewhere herein.

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this Form 10-K is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. We have not reviewed or included data from all sources, and cannot assure investors of the accuracy or completeness of the data included in this Form 10-K. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

General

The Company’s business operations support securities crowdfunding (“SCF”) activities. SCF in its simplest terms, is a global movement towards broadening the investor base in small businesses by lowering accreditation standards of investors and changing the rules around the marketing of investment opportunities. Steven Case, the former AOL exec, often quips that “an average middle class person can go to Vegas and gamble away $10,000, but that same person can’t invest $10,000 in Facebook before its public.” The SCF movement seeks to change this paradigm.

Reports have been published that suggest fund raising through crowdfunding mechanisms will grow from the current $2B mark in 2012 to over $500B in just the US alone. In essence, this suggests that the fundamental mechanism or process through which angel and seed funding will occur will be through technology-assisted SCF platforms. These platforms standardize the process, make it more transparent for both investors and entrepreneurs, and, most importantly, broaden the investor target reach or visibility. The SCF movement is less about blazing a new trail in new unchartered waters of finance; but rather, a shift towards utilizing technology platforms to make the existing process available to a wider audience less friction for all those involved. As with the first wave of ecommerce, the primary innovation will be simply expanding the potential audience for a given product/offering. No longer will deal access be singularly controlled by the few with deep rolodexes.

The Company believes (and data suggests) that most modern governments will push regulation towards a structure mirroring an environment like that seen in the UK today or the US with the JOBS Act changes. These changes coupled with technology platforms that span geographic boundaries, will enable a truly global network of small business funding. Just like a US consumer can buy products from the UK via the internet, investors will be able to see and access deals regardless of their geographic location.

1

The Company earns revenue by providing outsourced SCF services including due diligence and developing marketing programs for companies looking to utilize technology to reach a broader potential investor base.

The SCF industry is growing at a rapid pace and with regulatory changes promises to significantly enhance the access by lower middle market (“LMM”) companies to financing and investor access to private placements.

Company Background

Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. (“the Company”) was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 24, 2007, under the name Red Oak Concepts, Inc. to serve as a vehicle for a business combination through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination. On December 4, 2007, the Company changed its jurisdiction of domicile by merging with a Nevada corporation titled Red Oak Concepts, Inc. On November 21, 2008, the Company changed its name to Vinyl Products, Inc. in connection with a reverse acquisition transaction with The Vinyl Fence Company, Inc. (“VFC”), a California corporation. On September 26, 2013, the Company formed Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On October 8, 2013, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary, Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. and as part of the merger changed its name to Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

On November 20, 2008, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with VFC. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of VFC from the VFC shareholders in exchange for 22,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on November 21, 2008, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada to change its corporate name to “Vinyl Products, Inc.” to better reflect its business. On October 8, 2013, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary, Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. and as part of the merger changed its name to Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

Brackin O’Connor Transaction

On December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC (“Brackin O’Connor”). Brackin O’Connor operated a passenger transportation business. Its initial operations are focused on servicing the tourism industry in Scottsdale, Arizona. The Company agreed to issue 20,000,000 shares of its common stock to the members of Brackin O’Connor in exchange for the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor (the “Equity Exchange”).

VFC Disposition

Following completion of the Equity Exchange, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to dispose of all of the capital stock of its subsidiaries,VFC and VFC Franchise Corp. to Gordon Knott, formerly the Company’s President and member of its Board of Directors, and Garabed Khatchoyan, formerly a member of its Board of Directors (the “VFC Disposition”). VFC conducts all of the Company’s vinyl product marketing and installation business.

In exchange for the capital stock of VFC and VFC Franchise Corp., Messrs Knott and Khatchoyan agreed to return to the Company 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and to assume up to $75,000 of liabilities arising from periods prior to December 31, 2010. In connection with the VFC Disposition, the Company agreed to reimburse certain expenses incurred by VFC through payment of $12,500 in cash and the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $62,500. The promissory note was paid in full in April 2011.

Brackin O’Connor, LLC was formed as an Arizona limited liability company in February, 2005 for the purpose of acquiring and operating a drinking lounge establishment in Scottsdale, Arizona.

On September 1, 2009, Brackin O’Connor entered into an agreement for sale of the drinking lounge. In 2010, Brackin O’Connor changed focus and entered the passenger transportation business commonly referred to as a chauffeured vehicle service. In accordance with ASC 915, Brackin O’Connor is considered to have re-entered into the development stage as Brackin O’Connor discontinued operations due to the sale of the drinking lounge.

2

On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory note with Doug Brackin for a total of $62,500. The promissory note was not paid by the maturity date of July 31, 2011, and accordingly, the note started to accrue compounding interest at 1.25% per month effective August 1, 2011. Interest expense totaled $750 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. The Company made a partial principal payment in the amount of $50,000 in July 2013 and the final principal payment of $12,500 in April 2015. See Note 4 for further discussion.

Brackin O’Connor Disposition

On April 25, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC for $25,000 which was used to reduce the outstanding Note Payable and accrued interest due to Doug Brackin, the Company’s CEO. Please refer to Note 8 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.

Industry Background

The SCF industry is growing at a rapid pace and with regulatory changes promises to significantly enhance the access by lower middle market (“LMM”) companies to financing and investor access to private placements.

SCF in its simplest terms, is a global movement towards broadening the investor base in small businesses by lowering accreditation standards of investors and changing the rules around the marketing of investment opportunities. Steven Case, the former AOL exec, often quips that “an average middle class person can go to Vegas and gamble away $10,000, but that same person can’t invest $10,000 in Facebook before its public.” The SCF movement seeks to change this paradigm.

Reports have been published that suggest fund raising through crowdfunding mechanisms will grow from the current $2B mark in 2012 to over $500B in just the US alone. In essence, this suggests that the fundamental mechanism or process through which angel and seed funding will occur will be through technology-assisted SCF platforms. These platforms standardize the process, make it more transparent for both investors and entrepreneurs, and, most importantly, broaden the investor target reach or visibility. The SCF movement is less about blazing a new trail in new unchartered waters of finance; but rather, a shift towards utilizing technology platforms to make the existing process available to a wider audience less friction for all those involved. As with the first wave of ecommerce, the primary innovation will be simply expanding the potential audience for a given product/offering. No longer will deal access be singularly controlled by the few with deep rolodexes.

Our Strategy

The Company believes (and data suggests) that most modern governments will push regulation towards a structure mirroring an environment like that seen in the UK today or the US with the JOBS Act changes. These changes coupled with technology platforms that span geographic boundaries, will enable a truly global network of small business funding. Just like a US consumer can buy products from the UK via the internet, investors will be able to see and access deals regardless of their geographic location.

The Company business model provides outsourced SCF services including due diligence and developing marketing programs for companies looking to utilize technology to reach a broader potential investor base. The Company began generating revenue for its SCF business unit during the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

Marketing and Sales

The Company will market its business by attending and presenting at industry conferences. The Company believes this will be the most effective approach to bringing on new clients.

Research and Development

The Company will continue to develop its marketing materials and add additional functionality as resources become available.

3

Competition

As the SCF industry is new, there are currently a few competitors. The Company anticipates additional competition from multiple sources as the industry develops.

Seasonality

The Company believes that seasonality will have a minimal impact on its SCF business.

Compliance with Government Regulation

The Company believes that its SCF business will be highly regulated and is devoting considerable time to ensuring compliance with federal and state securities laws that apply to SCF.

Employees

As of April 12, 2016, we had no full-time employees and no independent contractors.

Patents and Trademarks

We do not own, either legally or beneficially, any patents or trademarks.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, the following factors should be considered in evaluating Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. and our business.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND HAVE NOT GENERATED SUBSTANTIAL REVENUES OR PROFIT TO DATE. THERE IS NO ASSURANCE OUR FUTURE OPERATIONS WILL RESULT IN PROFITABLE REVENUES. IF WE CANNOT GENERATE SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO OPERATE PROFITABLY, WE MAY HAVE TO CEASE OPERATIONS.

We started operations in passenger transportation business in December 2010 and began generating revenue from that business in January 2011. We started our SCF business in September 2013. We have a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our future success or failure can be made. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon our ability to earn profit by marketing and selling our services. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in generating revenues and profit in the future. Failure to generate revenues and profit will cause us to suspend or cease operations.

IF WE DO NOT OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING, OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.

Our business plan calls for ongoing expenses in connection with the marketing and development of our services.

While at December 31, 2015, we had cash on hand of $2, we have accumulated a deficit of $483,772. At this rate, we anticipate that additional funding will be needed for general administrative expenses and marketing costs.

In order to expand our business operations, we anticipate that we will have to raise additional funding. If we are not able to raise the capital necessary to fund our business expansion objectives, we may have to delay the implementation of our business plan.

We do not currently have any arrangements for financing. Obtaining additional funding will be subject to a number of factors, including general market conditions, investor acceptance of our business plan and initial results from our business operations. These factors may impact the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financing available to us. The most likely source of future funds available to us is through the sale of additional shares of common stock or advances from our directors and officers.

4

If Doug Brackin OR KEITH MOORE, our PRINCIPAL officerS, should resign or die, we will not have a chief executive officer OR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER. thIS could result in our operations suspending, AND you could lose your investment.

We depend on the services of our principal officers and a directors, Doug Brackin and Keith Moore, for the future success of our business. The loss of the services of Mr. Brackin or Mr. Moore could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If either should resign or die we will not have a chief executive officer or chief financial officer. If that should occur, until we find another person to act as our chief executive officer or chief financial officer, our operations could be suspended. In that event it is possible you could lose your entire investment. We do not carry any key personnel life insurance policies on Mr. Brackin or Mr. Moore and we do not have a contract for their services.

WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY ATTRACTING AND RETAINING SKILLED PERSONNEL. OUR FAILURE TO DO SO COULD CAUSE US TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled management, sales, marketing, and finance personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. Failure to attract and retain such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition or cause us to go out of business.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OWN A SUBSTANTIAL PERCENTAGE OF OUR OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK, WHICH GIVES THEM CONTROL OVER CERTAIN MAJOR DECISIONS ON WHICH OUR STOCKHOLDERS VOTE, WHICH MAY DISCOURAGE AN ACQUISTION OF US.

Our principal officer beneficially owns approximately 88.6% of our outstanding common stock, and our officers and directors, as a group, beneficially own approximately 88.6% of our outstanding common stock. The interests of our officers and directors may differ from the interests of other stockholders, and they may, by virtue of their ownership stake, be able to exert substantial influence or otherwise control many corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the following actions:

● electing or defeating the election of directors;

● amending or preventing amendment of our articles of incorporation or bylaws;

● effecting or preventing a merger, sale of assets or other corporate transaction; and

● controlling the outcome of any other matter submitted to the stockholders for vote.

The stock ownership of our officers and directors may discourage a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our common stock or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.

THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK IS ILLIQUID AND THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD BE SUBJECT TO VOLATILITY UNRELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including market perception of our ability to achieve the development of our business and otherwise meet our growth projections and expectations, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading volume in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our business and the business of others in our industry. In addition, the stock market itself is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.

5

ANY ADDITIONAL FUNDING WE ARRANGE THROUGH THE SALE OF OUR COMMON STOCK WILL RESULT IN DILUTION TO EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS.

We must raise additional capital in order for our business plan to succeed. Our most likely source of additional capital will be through the sale of additional shares of common stock. Such stock issuances will cause stockholders’ interests in our company to be diluted. Such dilution will negatively affect the value of investors’ shares.

YOUR PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP IN US MAY BE DILUTED BY FUTURE ISSUANCES OF CAPITAL STOCK, WHICH COULD REDUCE YOUR INFLUENCE OVER MATTERS ON WHICH STOCKHOLDERS VOTE.

Our Board of Directors has the authority, without action or vote of our stockholders, to issue all or any part of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock, including shares issuable upon the exercise of options or shares that may be issued to satisfy our payment obligations. Issuances of additional common stock would reduce your influence over matters on which our stockholders vote.

WE DO NOT EXPECT TO PAY DIVIDENDS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE WHICH MAY MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO EARN A RETURN ON YOUR INVESTMENT WITH US.

We have never paid any dividends on our common stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends directly depends upon our future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that our board of directors will consider. Since we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, return on your investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of our common stock. Therefore, you may have difficulty earning a return on your investment with us.

6

Item 2. Description of Properties.

Offices

Our corporate offices are located 898 N Sepulveda, Suite 475 El Segundo, CA 90245. We currently are not assessed any rental charges for the use of this space.

The premises used during the year ended December 31, 2015 were provided to us without charge. We have reviewed the estimated fair market value of the rent for the space used and concluded it to be immaterial to the financial statements individually and taken as a whole, as such, no expense for rent has been recorded for the period shown.

We do not currently own or lease any real property.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

There are no other legal proceedings are currently pending or, to our knowledge, threatened against us that, in the opinion of our management, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

As of February 25, 2013, our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “CRDW”. The following table indicates the quarterly high and low last sale prices for shares of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board for the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively:

2015	Low	High
Fourth Quarter	N/A	N/A
Third Quarter	N/A	N/A
Second Quarter	N/A	N/A
First Quarter	N/A	N/A

2014	Low	High
Fourth Quarter	N/A	N/A
Third Quarter	N/A	N/A
Second Quarter	N/A	N/A
First Quarter	N/A	N/A

Holders of Record

As of April 12, 2016, we had outstanding 22,564,000 shares of common stock, held by 36 shareholders of record.

We do not have an equity compensation plan.

Dividend Policy

We did not pay dividends on our common stock for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and have no plans to do so in the foreseeable future.

7

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On June 14, 2013, the Company issued and sold $215,000 of its 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes due December 31, 2014. These securities were offered to accredited investors in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) under Regulation D. The securities in the offering have not been registered under the Securities Act or any state “blue sky” securities laws, and may not be offered or sold absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. This note is currently in default.

On February 7, 2015, the Company issued and sold a $12,000 Note due May 7, 2015. The proceeds to the Company were $8,000 and the Company recorded an Original Issue Discount (“OID”) of $4,000 which will be amortized over the life of the note. These securities were offered to accredited investors in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) under Regulation D. The securities in the offering have not been registered under the Securities Act or any state “blue sky” securities laws, and may not be offered or sold absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. This note is currently in default.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This Annual Report, other than historical information, may include forward-looking statements, including statements with respect to financial results, product introductions, market demand, sales channels, industry trends, sufficiency of cash resources and certain other matters. These statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1.A. and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

The Company business model provides outsourced SCF services including due diligence and developing marketing programs for companies looking to utilize technology to reach a broader potential investor base.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Revenue

Revenue totaled $21,700 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $0 in the prior year. The increase is due to the Company focusing on new SCF business.

Expenses

Operating expenses totaled $50,304 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $52,627 in the prior year. The decrease in operating expenses was related to website development expenses incurred in 2014. Current year operating expenses included selling, general and administrative expenses.

Interest Expense and Loss from Continuing Operations

Interest expense totaled $28,861 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $26,526 in 2014. The increase in interest expenses was related to the OID described above. Gain from discontinued operations totaled $29 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to loss of $903 in the prior year. The increase in gain from discontinued operations was related to the discontinued operations consisting of only four months in 2015 versus twelve months in 2014.

8

Net Income / Loss

Net losses totaled $57,436 for the year ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to the selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense discussed above. Net losses totaled $80,057 for the year ended December 31, 2014 due to the selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we incurred losses of $57,436 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and have a working capital deficit of $454,861 and an accumulated deficit of $486,250 at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2015, we had cash of $2.

We started to generate revenue in January 2011, however, in order to continue as a going concern, develop a reliable source of revenues, and achieve a profitable level of operations, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Accordingly, management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through sales of common stock and other securities.

Our current funding is not sufficient to continue our operations for the remainder of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. We will require additional debt and/or equity financing to continue our operations. We cannot provide any assurances that additional financing will be available to us or, if available, may not be available on acceptable terms.

If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease or delay development of our operations, sell assets or our business may fail. In each such case, the holders of our common stock would lose all or most of their investment. Please see “Risk Factors” for information regarding the risks related to our financial condition.

Inflation Risk

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, if our costs such as gasoline were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

Capital Resources and Requirements

Our future liquidity and capital requirements will be influenced by numerous factors, including:

● the extent and duration of future operating income;

● the level and timing of future sales and expenditures;

● working capital required to support our growth;

● investment capital for equipment;

● our sales and marketing programs;

● investment capital for potential acquisitions;

● competition; and

● market developments.

9

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

Issuance of Shares for Non-Cash Consideration

The Company accounts for the issuance of equity instruments to acquire goods and/or services based on the fair value of the goods and services or the fair value of the equity instrument at the time of issuance, whichever is more reliably determinable. The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of standards issued by the FASB. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03,Interest–Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)(“ASU 2015-03”), which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entityto present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue tobe reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The new guidancewill be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2015-03on its balance sheets.

In August, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). The amendment in this ASU defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods with that reporting period.

In September, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) (“ASU 2015-16”). Topic 805 requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, during the measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required to also record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provides new guidance that requires share-based compensation to meet a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

10

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had` been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 is permitted which removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the FASB issued guidance to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the standard (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The standard in this Update is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods. The adoption of ASU 2014-16 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

11

In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance to provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-17 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not have any material exposure to market risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents. Our note payables are at a fixed rate and, thus, are not exposed to interest rate risk.

Item 8. Financial Statements.

The information required by this item is included on pages F-2 through F-6.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 for the reasons described below.

Management’s report on internal controls over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as defined under Rule 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. An internal control material weakness is a significant deficiency, or aggregation of deficiencies, that does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that material misstatements in financial statements will be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their work. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and this assessment identified certain material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, including material weaknesses due to our management’s lack of segregation of duties in financial transactions or reporting as a result of the fact that we only have one officer. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

12

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. In the estimation of our senior management, none of the changes in the composition of management have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

13

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

Our executive officer and directors and their ages as of April 12, 2016 are as follows:

Director:

Name	Age
Douglas Brackin	53	CEO and Director
Keith Moore	55	CFO, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Biographical Information

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our officers and our directors for the past five years.

Mr. Brackin is a real estate hospitality entrepreneur. He built his first lodging establishment in 1988 in Payson, Arizona. He operated the Payson Pueblo Inn for 3 ½ years, then sold the property for a profit in March of 1992. His next project was the Majestic Mountain Inn, which was built in 1993. This project was owned by Mr. Brackin for 10 years, and again sold for a profit. During 2000-2001, Mr. Brackin co-developed an office building along with a steakhouse named Fargo’s. In 2004, Mr. Brackin co-developed a 33 lot subdivision in Flagstaff, Arizona. Doug did all the entitlement work for this project and handled all the sales of the 33 lots generating over $7 million in sales. Mr. Brackin renovated a drinking lounge called J.Chew in 2008 and sold this establishment for a profit in 2009. Mr. Brackin earned a B.S. in Hotel, Restaurant, and Tourism at Northern Arizona University. Mr. Brackin also holds an Arizona Real estate license as well as an Arizona Insurance license.

Mr. Moore co-founded Monarch Bay Securities, LLC, and a FINRA member broker dealer in 2006. He has served his entire career founding, growing and financing technology and service companies. Throughout his career Mr. Moore has served in various executive capacities for micro-cap to Russell 1000 companies, including Activision, Inc. and POPcast Communications Corp. Mr. Moore has raised over $100 million for these organizations and has grown collective revenues in excess of $600 million.

From 1996 through 2007, Mr. Moore served in Chief Executive and other executive capacities for POPcast Communications Corp., and iTechexpress, Inc., overseeing their respective strategic growth and capital raises. From 1991 through 1996, Mr. Moore served as President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director and Consultant of Activision, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATVI), recognized as the international market leader in videogames. Mr. Moore is a founder of International Consumer Technologies Corp. and was Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director since its inception in July 1986 until its merger into Activision in December 1991. Mr. Moore, board Emeritus of the Mission Hospital Foundation Board of Directors earned a B.S. in Accounting and a Masters in Finance from Eastern Michigan University.

To the best of our knowledge, our officers and directors have neither been convicted in any criminal proceedings during the past five years nor are parties to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the last five years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining then from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws or commodities laws. No bankruptcy petitions have been filed by or against any business or property of any of our directors or officers, nor has a bankruptcy petition been filed against a partnership or business association in which these persons were general partners or executive officers.

There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

14

Term of Office

Our officers and our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Independent Directors

The rules of the SEC require that we, because we are not listed on any national securities exchange, choose a definition of director “independence” for purposes of determining which directors are independent. We have chosen to follow the definition of independence as determined by the Marketplace Rules of The Nasdaq National Market (“NASDAQ”). Pursuant to NASDAQ’s definition, neither Mr. Brackin nor Mr. Moore is an independent director.

Organization of the Board of Directors

Board Committees.There currently no committees of our board of directors due to our relatively small size. As we implement and achieve our business plan, our board of directors expects to appoint an audit committee, nominating committee and compensation committee, and to adopt charters relative to each such committee. We intend to appoint such persons to the board of directors and committees of the board of directors as are expected to be required to meet the corporate governance requirements imposed by a national securities exchange, although we are not required to comply with such requirements until we elect to seek listing on a securities exchange.

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officers and principal financial officer (or persons performing similar functions) that is designed to comply with Item 406 of Regulation S-K. A copy of our Code of Ethics will also be furnished, without charge, in print to any person who requests such copy by writing to the Company’s Secretary at: Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc., 898 N Sepulveda, Suite 475 El Segundo, CA 90245.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance.When our financial resources, permit, we anticipate that we will obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our directors and officers against liability for acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers, subject to certain exclusions. Such insurance is expected to insure us against losses which we may incur in indemnifying our officers and directors. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our executive officers and directors and such persons also have indemnification rights under applicable laws, and our articles of incorporation and bylaws.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange requires officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities of a company that has a class of common stock registered under the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish us with copies of all forms filed pursuant to Section 16(a).

Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations from our officers, directors and principal stockholders that no other reports were required, to our knowledge, we believe that our all persons required to file reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act complied with all of the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them with respect to 2010, except that the annual statements to report changes in beneficial ownership were filed late.

Compensation of Directors

We do not currently pay any cash fees to our directors, but we pay directors’ expenses in attending board meetings. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no director expenses were incurred.

Significant Employees

There are no persons other than our officers and directors above who are expected by us to make a significant contribution to our business.

15

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our articles of incorporation provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Revised Statutes permits a corporation to indemnify any of its directors, officers, employees or agents against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (except for an action by or in right of the corporation), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, provided that it is determined that such person acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

Section 78.751 of the Nevada Revised Statutes requires that the determination that indemnification is proper in a specific case must be made by (a) the stockholders, (b) the board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding or (c) independent legal counsel in a written opinion (i) if a majority vote of a quorum consisting of disinterested directors is not possible or (ii) if such an opinion is requested by a quorum consisting of disinterested directors.

Our bylaws provide that: (a) no director shall be liable to the Company or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director except with respect to (i) a breach of the director’s loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) liability which may be specifically defined by law or (iv) a transaction from the director derived an improper personal benefit; and (b) the Company shall indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by law each person that such law grants to the Company power to indemnify.

Any amendment to or repeal of our articles of incorporation or by-laws shall not adversely affect any right or protection of any of our directors or officers for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director or officer occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.

We may enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers that are, in some cases, broader than the specific indemnification provisions permitted by Nevada law, and that may provide additional procedural protection. As of April 12, 2016, we have not entered into any indemnification agreements with our directors or officers, but may choose to do so in the future.  Such indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to:

● indemnify officers and directors against certain liabilities that may arise because of their status as officers or directors;

● advance expenses, as incurred, to officers and directors in connection with a legal proceeding, subject to limited exceptions; or

● obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance.

We are permitted to apply for insurance on behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent for liability arising out of his actions.

16

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officer by any person for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Name and Principal Position (a)	Year (b)	Salary (c )		Bonus (d)		Stock Awards (e)		Option Awards (f)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (g)		Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (h)		All Other Compensation (i)		Total (j)
Doug Brackin	2015	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Current Chief Executive Office and Director	2014	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Keith Moore	2015	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Current Chief Financial Officer and Director	2014	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

As of April 12, 2016, there were no outstanding equity awards held by any named executive officer.

Employment Agreements

As of April 12, 2016, we were not a party to any employment agreement with any named executive officer.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Due to the limited number of directors constituting our Board of Directors, the full Board of Directors considers and participates in the compensation of our executive officers.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 12, 2016:

● by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;

● by each of our executive officers and directors; and

● by all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

17

Title of Class	Name and address of beneficial owner	Amount of Beneficial Ownership		Percent of class (1)
Common Stock	Douglas Brackin 755 E. Chaparral Rd, #18 Scottsdale, AZ 85250		10,000,000(2)
Common Stock	Joy Brackin 755 E. Chaparral Rd, #18 Scottsdale, AZ 85250		10,000,000(2)
Common Stock	All Officers and Directors as a group		20,000,000 shares		88.6%

(1)	The percent of class is based on 22,564,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of April 12, 2016.
(2)	Includes 10,000,000 shares owned in the name of Douglas Brackin and 10,000,000 owned in the name of Mr. Brackin’s wife, Joy Brackin.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

On December 31, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC, (“Brackin”) an entity owned by Douglas Brackin, our President and Director, and Joy Brackin, his wife. We issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock to Douglas Brackin and Joy Brackin in exchange for the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor.

On December 31, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to dispose of all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries, VFC and VFC Franchise Corp. to Gordon Knott, formerly our President and member of our Board of Directors, and Garabed Khatchoyan, formerly a member of our Board of Directors. In exchange for the capital stock of VFC and VFC Franchise Corp., Messrs Knott and Khatchoyan agreed to return to us 20,000,000 shares of our common stock and to assume up to $75,000 of our liabilities arising from periods prior to December 31, 2010. In connection with the transaction, we agreed to reimburse certain expenses incurred by VFC through payment of $12,500 in cash and the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $62,500. The promissory note was paid in full in April 2011.

On April 25, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC, for $25,000 which was used to pay the remaining Note Payable principal balance and reduce the accrued interest on the Promissory Note.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Cardiff Partners, LLC, a related party, advanced the Company $1,000, and the Company paid back $15,000 of previous advances to Cardiff Partners. Keith Moore, the Company’s Treasurer, Secretary, and Director, is a managing member and 50% owner of Cardiff Partners. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. The total outstanding advance balance from Cardiff Partners to the Company at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $11,309 and $25,309, respectively. Interest expense totaled $2,447 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. No interest was paid by the Company to Cardiff Partners during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, Doug Brackin, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, did not advance the Company additional money. The Company paid back $8,818 of previous advances owed to Mr. Brackin in 2014, leaving a principal balance due to Mr. Brackin of $0 and interest due of $4,469. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. Interest expense totaled $0 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

18

On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory note with Doug Brackin, a related party, for a total of $62,500. The promissory note was not paid by the maturity date of July 31, 2011, and accordingly, the note started to accrue compounding interest at 1.25% per month effective August 1, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid back $50,000 of principal. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid back the remaining $12,500 of principal, leaving a balance due to Mr. Brackin of interest $13,383. Interest expense totaled $750 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, Keith Moore the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, advanced the Company $4,641. The Company paid back $0 of previous advances owed to Mr. Moore in 2015, leaving a balance due to Mr. Moore of $4,641. The advance does not bear interest.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

On December 31, 2009, our Board of Directors approved the engagement of M&K CPAs, PLLC (“M&K”) to serve as our principal independent public accountant to audit our financial statements. Audit fees billed by our principal independent public accountants for services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements included in Form 10-Q for the last two fiscal years are presented below. Audit-related fees, tax fees, and other fees for services billed by our principal independent public accountant during each of the last two fiscal years are also presented in the following table:

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015		2014
M&K CPAs, PLLC
Audit Fees	$	7,558	$	5,709
Audit-related fees	$	0	$	0
Tax fees	$	0	$	0
All other fees	$	0	$	0

Our Board of Directors established a policy whereby the outside auditors are required to seek pre-approval on an annual basis of all audit, audit-related, tax and other services by providing a prior description of the services to be performed. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 100% of all audit-related services were pre-approved by the Board of Directors, which concluded that the provision of such services by M&K was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

Item 15. Exhibits.

(a)Financial Statements.

The following financial statements of Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. are submitted as a separate section of this report (See F-pages), and are incorporated by reference in Item 8:

Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Balance Sheets – December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-3
Statements of Operations – For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-4
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit – For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-5
Statements of Cash Flows - For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-6
Notes to Financial Statements	F-7

19

(b)Exhibits

The following Exhibits are filed herewith pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K or incorporated herein by reference to previous filings as noted:

Exhibit No.	Identification of Exhibit
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (2)
3.3	By-Laws (1)
10.1	Equity Exchange Agreement dated December 31, 2010(3)
10.2	Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 2010(3)
10.3	Assumption Agreement dated December 31, 2010(3)
10.4	Promissory Note dated December 31, 2010(3)
14.1	Code of Ethics (2)
21.1*	Subsidiaries of Registrant
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension

* Filed herewith

(1) Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s filing on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2008.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 26, 2008.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2011.

** Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.

20

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: April 12, 2016	CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.
	(Registrant)
	By:	/s/ Douglas Brackin
		Chief Executive Officer and Director
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Douglas Brackin	Chief Executive Officer and Director	April 12, 2016
Douglas Brackin	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Keith Moore	Chief Financial Officer and Director	April 12, 2016
Keith Moore	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT BY NON-REPORTING ISSUERS

1.	No annual report to security holders covering the company’s year ended December 31, 2015, has been sent as of the date of this report.
2.	No proxy soliciting material has been sent to the company’s security holders with respect to the 2015 annual meeting of security holders.
3.	If such report or proxy material is furnished to security holders subsequent to the filing of this Report on Form 10-K, the company will furnish copies of such material to the Commission at the time it is sent to security holders.

21

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

ITEM 7

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 and 2014

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	F-6
Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements	F-7

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Management

Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods described above in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company suffered a net loss from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 12, 2016

F-2

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

FORMERLY VINYL PRODUCTS, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2		$	1
Discontinued Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		-			3,147
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		2			3,148
Discontinued Assets
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		-			4,239
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2		$	7,387
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	127,904		$	93,134
Due to related parties		11,309			25,309
Accrued interest, related parties		33,751			43,055
Accrued interest, note payable		54,899			33,399
Note payable, other, net of original issue discount, in default		12,000			-
Note payable, related party, in default		-			12,500
Convertible notes payable, in default		215,000			215,000
Discontinued liabilities associated with discontinued assets
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		-			250
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	$	454,863		$	422,647
TOTAL LIABILITIES		454,863			422,647
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 22,564,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		2,256			2,256
Additional paid-in capital		29,133			11,298
Accumulated deficit		(486,250	)		(428,814	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		(454,861	)		(415,260	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	2		$	7,387

See notes to financial statements

F-3

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

FORMERLY VINYL PRODUCTS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Twelve Months Ending
	December 31,
	2015			2014
Revenue	$	21,700		$	-
Operating expenses		50,304			52,627
Total operating expenses		50,304			52,627
Net operating loss		(28,604	)		(52,627	)
Interest expense		(28,861	)		(26,526	)
Loss from continuing operations		(57,465	)		(79,154	)
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations		29			(903	)
Net loss	$	(57,436	)	$	(80,057	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued operations	$	0.00		$	(0.00	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		22,564,000			22,564,000
Diluted		22,564,000			22,564,000

See notes to financial statements

F-4

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

FORMERLY VINYL PRODUCTS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

					Additional					Total
	Common Stock				Paid-In		Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Equity (Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2013		22,564,000	$	2,256	$	11,298	$	(348,757	)	$	(335,203	)
Net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014		-		-		-		(80,057	)		(80,057	)
Balance, December 31, 2014		22,564,000	$	2,256	$	11,298	$	(428,814	)	$	(415,260	)
Additional Paid-In Capital from Related Party for Gain on Sale of Assets		-		-		17,835		-			17,835
Net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015		-		-		-		(57,436	)		(57,436	)
Balance, December 31, 2015		22,564,000	$	2,256	$	29,133	$	(486,250	)	$	(454,861	)

See notes to financial statements

F-5

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

FORMERLY VINYL PRODUCTS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Twelve Months Ending
	December 31,
	2015			2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(57,436	)	$	(80,057	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of original issue discount		4,000			-
Depreciation		1,487			4,656
Changes in:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			750
Accounts payable		34,770			26,114
Accrued interest, related party		3,196			3,680
Accrued interest, note payable		21,500			21,559
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(250	)		(432	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		7,267			(23,730	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash paid due to related party sale		(4,413	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(4,413	)		-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments to related parties		(15,600	)		(13,109	)
Proceeds from related parties		1,600			28,901
Proceeds from Notes Payable, Net of Original Issue Discount		8,000			-
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities		(6,000	)		15,792
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(3,146	)		(7,938	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of the period		3,148			11,086
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	2		$	3,148
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	1,182
Income taxes		800			-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Related party contribution	$	25,000		$	-

See notes to financial statements

F-6

CROWD SHARES AFTERMARKET, INC.

CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—BACKGROUND AND ORGANIZATION

Organization

Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. (“the Company”) was originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 24, 2007, under the name Red Oak Concepts, Inc. to serve as a vehicle for a business combination through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination. On December 4, 2007, the Company changed its jurisdiction of domicile by merging with a Nevada corporation titled Red Oak Concepts, Inc. On November 21, 2008, the Company changed its name to Vinyl Products, Inc. in connection with a reverse acquisition transaction with The Vinyl Fence Company, Inc. (“VFC”), a California corporation. On September 26, 2013, the Company formed Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On October 8, 2013, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary, Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. and as part of the merger changed its name to Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

On November 20, 2008, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with VFC. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of VFC from the VFC shareholders in exchange for 22,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on November 21, 2008, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada to change its corporate name to “Vinyl Products, Inc.” to better reflect its business. On October 8, 2013, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary, Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc. and as part of the merger changed its name to Crowd Shares Aftermarket, Inc.

Brackin O’Connor Transaction

On December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC (“Brackin O’Connor”). Brackin O’Connor operated a passenger transportation business. Its initial operations are focused on servicing the tourism industry in Scottsdale, Arizona. The Company agreed to issue 20,000,000 shares of its common stock to the members of Brackin O’Connor in exchange for the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor (the “Equity Exchange”).

VFC Disposition

Following completion of the Equity Exchange, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to dispose of all of the capital stock of its subsidiaries,VFC and VFC Franchise Corp. to Gordon Knott, formerly the Company’s President and member of its Board of Directors, and Garabed Khatchoyan, formerly a member of its Board of Directors (the “VFC Disposition”). VFC conducts all of the Company’s vinyl product marketing and installation business.

In exchange for the capital stock of VFC and VFC Franchise Corp., Messrs Knott and Khatchoyan agreed to return to the Company 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and to assume up to $75,000 of liabilities arising from periods prior to December 31, 2010. In connection with the VFC Disposition, the Company agreed to reimburse certain expenses incurred by VFC through payment of $12,500 in cash and the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $62,500. The promissory note was paid in full in April 2011. See Note 4 for further discussion.

Brackin O’Connor, LLC was formed as an Arizona limited liability company in February, 2005 for the purpose of acquiring and operating a drinking lounge establishment in Scottsdale, Arizona.

On September 1, 2009, Brackin O’Connor entered into an agreement for sale of the drinking lounge. In 2010, Brackin O’Connor changed focus and entered the passenger transportation business commonly referred to as a chauffeured vehicle service. In accordance with ASC 915, Brackin O’Connor is considered to have re-entered into the development stage as Brackin O’Connor discontinued operations due to the sale of the drinking lounge.

F-7

On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory note with Doug Brackin for a total of $62,500. The promissory note was not paid by the maturity date of July 31, 2011, and accordingly, the note started to accrue compounding interest at 1.25% per month effective August 1, 2011. Interest expense totaled $750 for twelve months ended December 31, 2015, respectively. The Company made the final principal payment in the amount of $12,500 in April, 2015. See Note 4 for further discussion.

Brackin O’Connor Disposition

On April 25, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC for $25,000 which was used to reduce the outstanding Note Payable and accrued interest due to Doug Brackin, the Company’s CEO. Please refer to Note 8 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.

Business Overview

The Company’s business operations support securities crowdfunding (“SCF”) activities. SCF in its simplest terms, is a global movement towards broadening the investor base in small businesses by lowering accreditation standards of investors and changing the rules around the marketing of investment opportunities. Steven Case, the former AOL exec, often quips that “an average middle class person can go to Vegas and gamble away $10,000, but that same person can’t invest $10,000 in Facebook before its public.” The SCF movement seeks to change this paradigm.

Reports have been published that suggest fund raising through crowdfunding mechanisms will grow from the current $2B mark in 2012 to over $500B in just the US alone. In essence, this suggests that the fundamental mechanism or process through which angel and seed funding will occur will be through technology-assisted SCF platforms. These platforms standardize the process, make it more transparent for both investors and entrepreneurs, and, most importantly, broaden the investor target reach or visibility. The SCF movement is less about blazing a new trail in new unchartered waters of finance; but rather, a shift towards utilizing technology platforms to make the existing process available to a wider audience less friction for all those involved. As with the first wave of ecommerce, the primary innovation will be simply expanding the potential audience for a given product/offering. No longer will deal access be singularly controlled by the few with deep rolodexes.

The Company believes (and data suggests) that most modern governments will push regulation towards a structure mirroring an environment like that seen in the UK today or the US with the JOBS Act changes. These changes coupled with technology platforms that span geographic boundaries, will enable a truly global network of small business funding. Just like a US consumer can buy products from the UK via the internet, investors will be able to see and access deals regardless of their geographic location.

The Company earns revenue by providing outsourced SCF services including due diligence and developing marketing programs for companies looking to utilize technology to reach a broader potential investor base.

The SCF industry is growing at a rapid pace and with regulatory changes promises to significantly enhance the access by lower middle market (“LMM”) companies to financing and investor access to private placements.

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Company maintains its accounting records on an accrual basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company incurred a net loss from continuing operations of $54,958 during the year December 31, 2015 and an accumulated deficit of $483,772 since inception. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

F-8

In order to continue as a going concern, develop a reliable source of revenues, and achieve a profitable level of operations the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through sales of common stock and or a debt financing. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are adjusted to reflect actual experience when necessary. Significant estimates and assumptions affect many items in the financial statements. These include allowance for doubtful trade receivables, asset impairments, and contingencies and litigation. Significant estimates and assumptions are also used to establish the fair value and useful lives of depreciable tangible and certain intangible assets. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions, and such results may affect income, financial position or cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash balances at credit-worthy financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. Deposits with these banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, these deposits typically may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company did not have any cash equivalents at December 31, 2015 or 2014.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated using straight line methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The Company reviews the carrying value of long-term assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Major overhaul that extends the useful life of existing assets is capitalized. When equipment is retired or disposed, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting profit or loss is recognized in income.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s current revenue stream consists of fee for services provided. Such revenue is recognized when the services are performed.

Revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees to be paid by the customer are fixed or determinable, collection of the fees is probable, delivery of the service and or product has occurred, and no other significant obligations on the part of the Company remain.

During 2015, the Company recognized revenue from marketing services. Revenue received from marketing customers consists of payments via credit cards, checks and cash and is deposited into the Company’s bank account when received, either directly or through the Company’s merchant account.

F-9

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements using the fair value method in accordance with the accounting provisions relating to share-based payments (“Codification Topic 718”). The company accounts for the stock options issued to non-employees in accordance with these provisions. Stock options are valued using a Black-Scholes options pricing model which requires estimates such as expected term, discount rate and stock volatility.

Issuance of Shares for Non-Cash Consideration

The Company accounts for the issuance of equity instruments to acquire goods and/or services based on the fair value of the goods and services or the fair value of the equity instrument at the time of issuance, whichever is more reliably determinable. The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of standards issued by the FASB. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under standards issued by the FASB. Under those standards, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax benefits or consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized through future operations.

No provision for federal income taxes has been recorded due to the net operating loss carry forwards totaling approximately $435,000 as of December 31, 2015 that will be offset against future taxable income.  The available net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $435,000 will expire in various years through 2035.  No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements because the Company believes there is a 50% or greater chance the carry forwards will expire unused.TheincometaxbenefitdiffersfromtheamountcomputedbyapplyingtheUSfederalincometax rateof35%tonetlossbeforeincometaxes forthe yearended December 31, 2015and 2014 and had nouncertaintaxpositionsasatDecember 31,2015 and 2014:

	31-Dec 2015			31-Dec 2014
Net operating loss carry forward	$	(434,806	)	$	(377,369	)
Statutory rate		35	%		35	%
Deferred tax Asset	$	152,182		$	132,079
Valuation allowance	$	(152,182	)	$	(132,079	)
Income tax provision	$	-		$	-

F-10

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”). ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. ASC 820-10 delays, until the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the effective date for ASC 820-10 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operations, but does require that the Company disclose assets and liabilities that are recognized and measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, presented in a three-tier fair value hierarchy, as follows:

● Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

● Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

● Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

No assets were valued at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014, respectively.

Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”) and Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10”), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Neither of these statements had an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and short-term borrowings, as reflected in the balance sheets, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03,Interest–Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)(“ASU 2015-03”), which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entityto present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue tobe reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The new guidancewill be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2015-03on its balance sheets.

In August, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). The amendment in this ASU defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods with that reporting period.

In September, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) (“ASU 2015-16”). Topic 805 requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, during the measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required to also record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-11

In June 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provides new guidance that requires share-based compensation to meet a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had’ been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 is permitted which removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the FASB issued guidance to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the standard (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The standard in this Update is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

F-12

In November 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods. The adoption of ASU 2014-16 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance to provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-17 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3—PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Components of property, plant and equipment were as follows:

	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Vehicles	$	-	$	23,243
Total property, plant and equipment		-		23,243
Less: accumulated depreciation		-		(19,004	)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	-	$	4,239

Depreciation expense totaled $1,487 and $4,656 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company’s parent Company has issued a promissory note and this promissory note is secured by a vehicle owned by Brackin O’Connor. See Note 8 for further discussion.

NOTE 4—NOTES PAYABLE

On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory note with Doug Brackin, a related party, for a total of $62,500. The promissory note was not paid by the maturity date of July 31, 2011, and accordingly, the note started to accrue compounding interest at 1.25% per month effective August 1, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid back $50,000 of principal. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid back the remaining $12,500 of principal, leaving a balance due to Mr. Brackin of interest $13,383. Interest expense totaled $750 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Cardiff Partners, LLC, a related party, advanced the Company $1,000, and the Company paid back $15,000 of previous advances to Cardiff Partners. Keith Moore, the Company’s Treasurer, Secretary, and Director, is a managing member and 50% owner of Cardiff Partners. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. The total outstanding advance balance from Cardiff Partners to the Company at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $11,309 and $25,309, respectively. Interest expense and accrued interest totaled $2,447 and $15,899 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and $2,332 and $13,542 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. No interest was paid by the Company to Cardiff Partners during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, Doug Brackin, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, did not advance the Company additional money. The Company paid back $8,818 of previous advances owed to Mr. Brackin in 2014, leaving a principal balance due to Mr. Brackin of $0 and interest due of $4,469. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. Interest expense totaled $0 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

F-13

On June 14, 2013, the Company entered into a convertible note for a total of $215,000 due on December 31, 2014. The convertible note started to accrue compound interest at 1.0% per month and have a conversion price equal to $1.00 per share. Interest expense and accrued interest totaled $21,500 and $54,899 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and $21,559 and $33,339 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. The convertible note was not paid by the maturity date of December 31, 2014. The Company undertook an evaluation of the convertible note and determined the convertible note did not have any beneficial conversion features due to the conversion price being greater than the fair value of the shares on the date of the note. The convertible note is in default.

On February 7, 2015, the Company issued and sold a $12,000 Note due May 7, 2015. The proceeds to the Company were $8,000 and the Company recorded an Original Issue Discount (“OID”) of $4,000 which will be amortized over the life of the note. Interest expense from amortizing the OID totaled $4,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. The unamortized OID balance at December 31, 2015 was $ 0. The note is in default.

NOTE 5—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value common stock, and had 22,564,000 and 22,564,000 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value preferred stock. The Company has never issued any shares of preferred stock.

The Company did not record any stock based compensation charges during the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the Company were segregated in the balance sheet and appropriately labeled as discontinued. The net amount of the components of the discontinued assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $17,835 and were recorded to additional paid in capital. See Note 8 for further discussion.

NOTE 6—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contingencies

The Company is not currently a party to any pending or threatened legal proceedings. Based on information currently available, management is not aware of any matters that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 7—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a Promissory note with Doug Brackin, a related party, for a total of $62,500. The promissory note was not paid by the maturity date of July 31, 2011, and accordingly, the note started to accrue compounding interest at 1.25% per month effective August 1, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid back $50,000 of principal. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid back the remaining $12,500 of principal, leaving a balance due to Mr. Brackin of interest $13,383. Interest expense totaled $750 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Cardiff Partners, LLC, a related party, advanced the Company $1,000, and the Company paid back $15,000 of previous advances to Cardiff Partners. Keith Moore, the Company’s Treasurer, Secretary, and Director, is a managing member and 50% owner of Cardiff Partners. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. The total outstanding advance balance from Cardiff Partners to the Company at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $11,309 and $25,309, respectively. Interest expense and accrued interest totaled $2,447 and $15,899 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and $2,332 and $13,542 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. No interest was paid by the Company to Cardiff Partners during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

F-14

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, Doug Brackin, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, did not advance the Company additional money. The Company paid back $8,818 of previous advances owed to Mr. Brackin in 2014, leaving a principal balance due to Mr. Brackin of $0 and interest due of $4,469. The advance bears interest at a rate of 1% per month. Interest expense totaled $0 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, Cardiff Partners, LLC contributed $15,000 as additional paid in capital to the Company in exchange for services provided by the Company to Cardiff Partners, a related party. Keith Moore, the Company’s Treasurer, Secretary, and Director, is a managing member and 50% owner of Cardiff Partners. Management believes the services provided were at fair value.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, Keith Moore the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, advanced the Company $4,641. The Company paid back $0 of previous advances owed to Mr. Moore in 2015, leaving a balance due to Mr. Moore of $4,641. The advance does not bear interest.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC, including Doug Brackin, the Company’s CEO. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the Company were segregated in the balance sheet and appropriately labeled as discontinued. The net amount of the components of the discontinued assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $17,835 and were record to additional paid in capital. See Note 8 for further discussion.

NOTE 8—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On April 25, 2015, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the membership interests in Brackin O’Connor, LLC to the original members of Brackin O’Connor, LLC (“Brackin”), a related party, for $25,000 which was used to pay the remaining Note Payable principal balance and reduce the accrued interest on the Promissory Note to $13,383.

The assets and liabilities of the Company were segregated in the balance sheet and appropriately labeled as discontinued. The components of the discontinued assets and liabilities as of April 25, 2015 were as follows:

Cash	$	4,413
Fixed Assets	$	23,243
Less: Accumulated Depreciation	$	(20,491	)
Reduction in Note Payable and Accrued Interest	$	25,000

The net amount of the components of the discontinued assets and liabilities as of April 25, 2015 totaled $17,835 and were record to additional paid in capital.

As of the Company’s sale, income and expenses are netted in the income statement and appropriately labeled as discontinued operations. The results of discontinued operations are presented in the schedule below:

	Twelve Months Ending
	December 31,
	2015		2014
Gain (loss) from Discontinued Operations
Revenue	$	2,200	$	6,600
Less: Depreciation		1,487		4,656
Less: Operating Expenses		684		2,847
Gain (loss) from Discontinued Operations	$	29	$	(903	)

F-15

NOTE 9—MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND CREDIT CONCENTRATION

The Company’s customers are marketing and website developers. There were two significant customers who accounted for 69% and 29% of total sales for the year ended December 31, 2015. There was no concentration of accounts receivable at December 31, 2015. There were no sales or accounts receivable during 2014.

NOTE 10—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

There have been no subsequent events as of the date of this filing.

F-16