UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by Registrantx
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
¨ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
¨ | Soliciting Material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:______________________________ |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: _____________________________ |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):____________________________________________________________________ |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:_____________________________________ |
| (5) | Total fee paid: __________________________________________________________________ |
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form of Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount previously paid:__________________________________________________________ |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: ________________________________________ |
| (3) | Filing party:____________________________________________________________________ |
| (4) | Date filed: _____________________________________________________________________ |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/DEF 14A/0001193125-12-151517/g324178cm2.jpg)
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120
Ladera Ranch, California 92694
PROXY STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held June 11, 2012
To the Stockholders of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc.:
I am pleased to invite you to the annual meeting of stockholders of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. The annual meeting will be held on June 11, 2012 at 10:00 A.M. (PDT), at the offices of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694, for the following purposes:
| 1. | to elect three directors, each for a term of one year; |
| 2. | to ratify the appointment of Reznick Group, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012; and |
| 3. | to approve an amendment to our charter to clarify certain language. |
Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 30, 2012 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only record holders of common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.
For further information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting, I urge you to carefully read the accompanying proxy statement. If you have questions about these proposals or would like additional copies of the proxy statement, please contact Paula Mathews, our Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary, via mail at 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694 or via telephone at (877) 327-3485.
Whether you own a few or many shares and whether you plan to attend in person or not, it is important that your shares be voted on matters that come before the annual meeting.None of our stockholders own more than 10% of our outstanding shares, soevery stockholder’s vote is important to us. To make voting easier for you, you may vote your shares by proxy in one of three ways: (1) by marking your votes on the enclosed proxy card, signing and dating it, and mailing it in the envelope provided; (2) by completing a proxy card atwww.eproxy.com/ssti; or (3) by telephone at 1-866-977-7699. If you sign and return your proxy card without specifying your choices, it will be understood that you wish to have your shares voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors.
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. Your vote is very important. Please vote by proxy using one of the three prescribed methods.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
/s/ H. Michael Schwartz |
H. Michael Schwartz |
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Ladera Ranch, California
April 23, 2012
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120
Ladera Ranch, California 92694
PROXY STATEMENT
Introduction
The accompanying proxy, mailed together with this proxy statement, is solicited by and on behalf of the board of directors of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. (which we refer to in this proxy statement as the “Company”) for use at the annual meeting of our stockholders and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. References in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our” or like terms also refer to the Company. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694. We expect to mail this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy to our stockholders on or about April 23, 2012. Our 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders will be mailed on the same date.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q: | When and where will the annual meeting be held? |
A: | Our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders will be held on June 11, 2012 at 10:00 A.M. (PDT). The meeting will be held at the Company’s offices at 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694. |
Q: | What is the purpose of the meeting? |
A: | At the meeting, you will be asked to: |
| • | | elect three directors for one-year terms expiring in 2013; |
| • | | ratify the appointment of Reznick Group, P.C. (“Reznick”) as our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| • | | approve an amendment to our charter to clarify language related to the payment of disposition fees; and |
| • | | conduct such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
Our board of directors is not aware of any matters that may be acted upon at the meeting other than the matters set forth in the first three bullet points listed above.
Q: | What are the NASAA REIT Guidelines? |
A: | The NASAA REIT Guidelines are promulgated by an association of state securities regulators, and are used by those states to govern the practices of non-traded REITs with respect to their fundraising and operations. |
Q: | Who can vote at the meeting? |
A: | Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 30, 2012, or the record date, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of common stock that they hold on that date. As of the record date, we had 36,486,624 shares of common stock issued, outstanding and eligible to vote. |
1
Q: | How many votes do I have? |
A: | Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to cast one vote with respect to each matter to be voted upon at the annual meeting. |
A: | You may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. Stockholders have the following three options for submitting their votes by proxy: |
| • | | via mail, by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope; |
| • | | via the Internet atwww.eproxy.com/ssti; or |
| • | | via telephone at 1-866-977-7699. |
Regardless of whether you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to vote by proxy in accordance with one of the methods described above.None of our stockholders own more than 10% of our outstanding shares, soevery stockholder’s vote is important to us. If you vote by proxy, you may still attend the annual meeting and vote in person. If you do so, any previous votes that you submitted, whether by mail, the Internet or telephone, will be superseded by the vote that you cast at the annual meeting.
Q: | How will my proxy be voted? |
A: | Shares represented by valid proxies will be voted in accordance with the directions given on the relevant proxy card. If a proxy card is signed and returned without any directions given, the individuals named on the card as proxy holders will vote in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors as to (1) the election of directors, (2) the ratification of the appointment of Reznick as our independent registered public accounting firm, and (3) the approval of an amendment to our charter. |
If other matters requiring the vote of our stockholders come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy card to vote the proxies held by them in accordance with their best judgment in such matters.
Q: | What are the board of directors’ voting recommendations? |
A: | Our board of directors recommends that you vote: |
| • | | “FOR ALL” of the nominees to our board of directors; |
| • | | “FOR”the ratification of Reznick as our independent registered public accounting firm; and |
| • | | “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our charter. |
2
Q: | How can I change my vote or revoke my proxy? |
A: | You have the unconditional right to revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof by submitting a later-dated proxy (via mail, the Internet or telephone), by attending the annual meeting and voting in person or by written notice addressed to: Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., Attention: Paula Mathews, 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694. |
To be effective, a proxy revocation must be received by us at or prior to the annual meeting.
Q: | What vote is required to approve each proposal? |
A: | Election of Directors. Each director is elected by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding a majority of shares entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present. Votes are cast either in person or by proxy. There is no cumulative voting in the election of our directors. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) have no impact on the vote. |
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Accounting Firm. The appointment of Reznick as our independent registered public accounting firm is ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on the proposal at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present. Votes are cast either in person or by proxy. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) have no impact on the vote. In the event this matter is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain our independent registered public accounting firm at its next scheduled meeting.
Approval of an Amendment to Our Charter. An amendment to our charter is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present. Votes are cast either in person or by proxy. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) have no impact on the vote.
Q: | What constitutes a “quorum”? |
A: | The presence at the annual meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast fifty percent (50%) of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for the purpose of establishing a quorum; however, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast. |
Q: | Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the meeting? |
A: | We will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies from our stockholders. We have retained Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. to assist us in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the annual meeting. Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. will be paid fees of approximately $45,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, for its basic solicitation services, which include printing and review of proxy materials, dissemination of broker search cards, distribution of proxy materials, solicitation of brokers, banks, and institutional holders, and delivery of executed proxies. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by our directors and officers who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We also expect to incur approximately $25,000 in expenses related to printing of these proxy |
3
| materials and our annual report. We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy solicitation materials to our stockholders. |
Q: | What if I receive only one set of proxy materials although there are multiple stockholders at my address? |
A: | The SEC has adopted a rule concerning the delivery of documents filed by us with the SEC, including proxy statements and annual reports to stockholders, which allows us to send a single annual report or proxy statement to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they share the same last name or we reasonably believe they are members of the same family. This procedure is referred to as “householding.” This rule benefits both you and us. It reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and helps us reduce expenses. Each stockholder subject to householding will continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card. |
We will promptly deliver, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of our annual report or proxy statement, as applicable, to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy was previously delivered. If you received a single set of disclosure documents this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, you may direct requests for separate copies to Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., Attention: Paula Mathews, 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694 or call us at (877) 327-3485. Also, if your household currently receives multiple copies of disclosure documents and you would like to receive just one set, please contact us at the same address and phone number.
Q: | How do I submit a stockholder proposal for next year’s annual meeting or proxy materials, and what is the deadline for submitting a proposal? |
A: | In order for a stockholder proposal to be properly submitted for presentation at our 2013 annual meeting, we must receive written notice of the proposal at our executive offices during the period beginning on December 24, 2012 and ending January 23, 2013. If you wish to present a proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting, we must receive written notice of your proposal at our executive offices no later than December 24, 2012. All proposals must contain the information specified in, and otherwise comply with, our bylaws. Proposals should be sent via registered, certified or express mail to: Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., Attention: Paula Mathews, 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694. For additional information, see the “Stockholder Proposals” section in this proxy statement. |
4
CERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors
General
We operate under the direction of our board of directors, the members of which are accountable to us and our stockholders as fiduciaries. Our board of directors is responsible for the management and control of our affairs. Our board of directors consists of H. Michael Schwartz, Harold “Skip” Perry and Timothy S. Morris, each of whom have been nominated by our board of directors for re-election to serve until our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders or until his successor is elected and qualified. For more detailed information on our directors, see the “Executive Officers and Directors” section below. Our board of directors has formed the following three committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.
Leadership Structure
H. Michael Schwartz serves as the Chairman of our board of directors, as well as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Our board of directors periodically monitors the potential benefits and consequences of splitting the roles of Chairman and principal executive officer, but has determined that, as of the time of this filing, it is appropriate and in our best interest for such roles to remain vested in one person due to our current size, the size of our board of directors and the participation of our two independent directors in the oversight of our operations and strategy. Our board of directors does not have a lead independent director, as we believe that the current size our board of directors permits both of our independent directors to actively participate in this oversight role. As we grow in size, our board of directors will continue to evaluate the appropriateness of splitting the roles of Chairman and principal executive officer and creating a lead independent director position.
Meetings of our Board of Directors
During 2011, our board of directors held 15 meetings, and each of our three directors attended all 15 meetings.
Director Independence
While our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, as required by our charter, a majority of the members of our board of directors and each committee of our board of directors are “independent” as determined by our board of directors by applying the definition of “independent” adopted by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), consistent with the North American Securities Administrators Association’s Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Perry and Morris both meet the relevant definition of “independent.”
Stockholder Communications with Directors
We have established several means for stockholders to communicate concerns to our board of directors. If the concern relates to our financial statements, accounting practices or internal controls, the concerns should be submitted in writing to the Chairman of the Audit Committee of our board of directors in care of our Secretary at our headquarters address. If the concern relates to our governance practices, business ethics or corporate conduct, the concern should be submitted in writing to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors in care of our Secretary at our headquarters address. If a stockholder is uncertain as to which category his or her concern relates, he
5
or she may communicate it to any one of the independent directors in care of our Secretary. All concerns submitted in care of our Secretary will be delivered to the appropriate independent director based upon our Secretary’s determination.
Though we have no formal policy on the matter, we encourage all of the members of our board of directors to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended our 2011 annual meeting.
Risk Management Role
As part of its oversight role, our board of directors actively supervises the members of our management that are directly responsible for our day-to-day risk management, including our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. The Board’s risk management role has no impact on its leadership structure. The Audit Committee of our board of directors, which consists of our two independent directors, annually reviews with management our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, particularly in the areas of insurance, regulatory compliance, financial risk management, investments and due diligence, and capital flow.
Code of Ethics
Our board of directors adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct on May 20, 2008 (the “Code of Ethics”), which contains general guidelines applicable to our executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, our directors and employees and officers of our advisor, Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC (“Advisor”), and its affiliates who perform material functions for us. We adopted our Code of Ethics with the purpose of promoting the following: (1) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (2) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with or submit to the SEC and in other public communications made by us; (3) compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; (4) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to our Code of Ethics Compliance Officer; and (5) accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on our website atwww.strategicstoragetrust.com.
Audit Committee
General
Our board of directors adopted a charter for the Audit Committee on May 12, 2008 (the “Audit Committee Charter”), a copy of which is included as Appendix “A” to this proxy statement. The Audit Committee assists our board of directors by: (1) selecting an independent registered public accounting firm to audit our annual financial statements; (2) reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement; (3) approving the audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm; (4) reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm; and (5) considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee fulfills these responsibilities primarily by carrying out the activities enumerated in the Audit Committee Charter and in accordance with current laws, rules and regulations.
The members of the Audit Committee are our two independent directors, Harold “Skip” Perry and Timothy S. Morris, with Mr. Perry serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held five meetings during 2011, and Messrs. Perry and Morris attended all five meetings. Our board of
6
directors has determined that Mr. Perry satisfies the requirements for an “audit committee financial expert” and has designated Mr. Perry as the Audit Committee financial expert in accordance with applicable SEC rules.
Relationship with Principal Auditor
Overview
During the year ended December 31, 2011, Reznick served as our independent auditor and provided certain tax and other services. Reznick has served as our independent auditor since our formation. The Audit Committee currently anticipates that it will engage Reznick as our independent auditor to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2012, subject to agreeing on fee estimates for the audit work. The Audit Committee reserves the right, however, to select a new auditor at any time in the future in its discretion if it deems such decision to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Any such decision would be disclosed to the stockholders in accordance with applicable securities laws.
A representative of Reznick is expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he so desires. The representative also will be available to respond to appropriate questions from the stockholders.
Pre-Approval Policies
The Audit Committee Charter imposes a duty on the Audit Committee to pre-approve all auditing services performed for the Company by our independent auditor, as well as all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. In determining whether or not to pre-approve services, the Audit Committee considers whether the service is permissible under applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee may, in its discretion, delegate one or more of its members the authority to pre-approve any services to be performed by our independent auditor, provided such pre-approval is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
All services rendered by Reznick in the year ended December 31, 2011 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies set forth above.
Fees Paid to Principal Auditor
The Audit Committee reviewed the audit and non-audit services performed by Reznick, as well as the fees charged by Reznick for such services. In its review of the non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Reznick. The aggregate fees billed to us for professional accounting services provided by Reznick, including the audits of our annual financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are set forth in the table below.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 234,500 | | | $ | 180,160 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | | 68,800 | | | | 122,150 | |
Tax Fees | | | 121,400 | | | | 134,380 | |
All Other Fees | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 424,700 | | | $ | 436,690 | |
| | | | | | | | |
7
For purposes of the preceding table, the professional fees are classified as follows:
| • | | Audit Fees – These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and the required review of our quarterly financial statements and other procedures performed by the independent auditors to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements. These fees also cover services that are normally provided by independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and services that generally only an independent auditor reasonably can provide, such as services associated with filing registration statements, periodic reports and other filings with the SEC. |
| • | | Audit-Related Fees – These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by an independent auditor, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, audits related to acquisitions, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, internal control reviews and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. |
| • | | Tax Fees – These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent auditor’s tax division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice, including federal, state and local issues. Such services may also include assistance with tax audits and appeals before the IRS and similar state and local agencies, as well as federal, state and local tax issues related to due diligence. |
| • | | All Other Fees – These are fees for other permissible work performed that do not meet one of the above-described categories, including assistance with internal audit plans and risk assessments. |
Audit Committee Report
Pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter adopted by the board of directors of the Company, the Audit Committee’s primary function is to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by overseeing the independent auditors, the audit and financial reporting process and the system of internal control over financial reporting that management has established and by reviewing the financial information to be provided to the Company’s stockholders and others. The Audit Committee is composed of two independent directors and met five times during the year ended December 31, 2011. Management of the Company has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting. Membership on the Audit Committee does not call for the professional training and technical skills generally associated with career professionals in the field of accounting and auditing. In addition, the independent auditors devote more time and have access to more information than does the Audit Committee. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s role does not provide any special assurances with regard to the financial statements of the Company, nor does it involve a professional evaluation of the quality of the audits performed by the independent auditors.
In this context, in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year-ended December 31, 2011 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality and acceptability of the financial reporting and controls of the Company, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally
8
accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality and acceptability of the financial and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent auditor required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent auditor the independent auditor’s independence. In addition, the Audit Committee considered the compatibility of non-audit services provided by the independent auditors with the auditors’ independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee meets periodically with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and the overall quality of the financial reporting of the Company.
In reliance on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to our board of directors that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the SEC. Our board of directors subsequently accepted the Audit Committee’s recommendation and approved the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the SEC.
Harold “Skip” Perry (Chairman)
Timothy S. Morris
March 21, 2012
The preceding Audit Committee Report to stockholders is not “soliciting material” and is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
General
Our board of directors ratified the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s adoption of its charter on May 20, 2008 (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter”), a copy of which is included as Appendix “B” to this proxy statement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s primary focus is to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to director nominations, corporate governance, board of directors and committee evaluations and conflict resolutions. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our board of directors in this regard by: (1) identifying individuals qualified to serve on our board of directors, consistent with criteria approved by our board of directors, and recommending that our board of directors select a slate of director nominees for election by our stockholders at the annual meeting of our stockholders; (2) developing and implementing the process necessary to identify prospective members of our board of directors; (3) determining the advisability of retaining any search firm or consultant to assist in the identification and evaluation of candidates for membership on our board of directors; (4) overseeing an annual evaluation of our board of directors, each of the committees of our board of directors and management; (5) developing and recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance principles and policies; (6) periodically reviewing our corporate governance principles and policies and suggesting improvements thereto to our board of directors; and (7) considering and acting on
9
any conflicts-related matter required by our charter or otherwise permitted by Maryland law where the exercise of independent judgment by any of our directors, who is not an independent director, could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving our Advisor or its affiliates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee fulfills these responsibilities primarily by carrying out the activities enumerated in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and in accordance with current laws, rules and regulations.
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are our two independent directors, Harold “Skip” Perry and Timothy S. Morris, with Mr. Morris serving as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings during 2011, and Messrs. Perry and Morris attended both meetings.
Board of Directors Membership Criteria and Director Selection
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews with our board of directors the appropriate experience, skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the current membership of our board of directors. This assessment includes, in the context of the perceived needs of our board of directors at the time, issues of knowledge, experience, judgment and skills such as an understanding of the real estate industry or brokerage industry or accounting or financial management expertise. Other considerations include the candidate’s independence from conflict with the Company and the ability of the candidate to attend board of directors meetings regularly and to devote an appropriate amount of effort in preparation for those meetings. It also is expected that independent directors nominated by our board of directors shall be individuals who possess a reputation and hold or have held positions or affiliations befitting a director of a publicly held company and are or have been actively engaged in their occupations or professions or are otherwise regularly involved in the business, professional or academic community.
Though we do not have a formal policy regarding diversity with respect to identifying nominees and overall board composition, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the impact of diverse backgrounds and experiences of potential nominees on the effectiveness and quality of our board of directors. As part of its annual review process discussed below, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews its own effectiveness in recommending director nominees with diverse backgrounds and experiences relative to any perceived needs in the composition of our board of directors.
While our full board of directors remains responsible for selecting its own nominees and recommending them for election by our stockholders, our board of directors has delegated the screening process necessary to identify qualified candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with our President. Pursuant to our charter, however, the directors must nominate replacements for any vacancies among the director positions.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews director suitability and the continuing composition of our board of directors; it then recommends director nominees who are voted on by our full board of directors. In recommending director nominees to our board of directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits candidate recommendations from its own members, other directors and management of the Company. The Committee will also consider suggestions made by stockholders and other interested persons for director nominees who meet the established director criteria. In order for a stockholder to make a nomination, the stockholder must satisfy the procedural requirements for such nomination as provided in the Company’s bylaws, which include, among other things, providing the nominee’s name, age, address, and ownership of the
10
Company’s stock. Such nominations must also be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
In evaluating the persons nominated as potential directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider each candidate without regard to the source of the recommendation and take into account those factors that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines are relevant.
With respect to the current nominees to our board of directors, whose backgrounds and experience are described in greater detail on pages 15-17, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered all of the factors set forth above in its determination to recommend them for nomination. In particular, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered H. Michael Schwartz’s active participation in the management of our operations and his experience in the self storage industry, Harold “Skip” Perry’s decades of experience in the financial and operational aspects of the real estate industry and the nearly 30 years of financial and management experience of Timothy S. Morris in determining to recommend each of them for nomination to our board of directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered these particular aspects of the backgrounds of Messrs. Perry and Morris relative to the needs of the committees of our board of directors in determining to recommend them for nomination.
Corporate Governance
Pursuant to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee developed and recommended a set of formal, written guidelines for corporate governance, which were adopted by our full board of directors.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also, from time to time, reviews the governance structures and procedures of the Company and suggests improvements thereto to our full board of directors. Such improvements, if adopted by the full board of directors, shall be incorporated into the written guidelines.
Periodic Evaluations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual evaluation of its own performance and oversees the annual evaluations of our Board Directors, each of the other committees of our board of directors and management.
Conflicts of Interest
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and acts upon any conflicts of interest-related matter required by our charter or otherwise permitted by Maryland law where the exercise of independent judgment by any of our directors, who is not an independent director, could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving our Advisor or its affiliates. Our independent directors must approve such transactions as fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties, based upon standards set forth in our charter and Code of Ethics, as well as applicable laws, rules and regulations.
Conflicts of interest-related matters that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has acted upon or expects to act upon include, but are not limited to, the following:
| • | | the continuation, renewal or enforcement of agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates, including the following significant agreements: |
11
| ¡ | an amended and restated advisory agreement (“Advisory Agreement”) with our Advisor; |
| ¡ | property management agreements (“Property Management Agreements”) with our property manager, Strategic Storage Property Management, LLC (“Property Manager”); and |
| ¡ | a dealer manager agreement (“Dealer Manager Agreement”) with our dealer manager, Select Capital Corporation (“Dealer Manager”); |
| • | | property acquisitions; and |
| • | | other transactions with affiliates. |
Compensation Committee
General
The Compensation Committee’s primary focus is to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to officer and director compensation. The Compensation Committee assists our board of directors in this regard when necessary by: (1) reviewing and approving our corporate goals with respect to compensation of officers and directors; (2) recommending to our board of directors compensation for all non-employee directors, including Board and committee retainers, meeting fees and equity-based compensation; (3) administering and granting equity-based compensation to our Advisor, employees of our Advisor and affiliates based upon recommendations from our Advisor; and (4) setting the terms and conditions of such equity-based compensation in accordance with our Employee and Director Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Compensation Committee fulfills these responsibilities in accordance with current laws, rules and regulations. The Compensation Committee has concluded that, because the Compensation Committee will only need to address issues related to director compensation while we are an externally advised REIT, a charter is not necessary at the present time. The Compensation Committee will periodically review the need for a charter and, if adopted, will disclose a copy of such charter to our stockholders pursuant to applicable SEC rules.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee are our two independent directors, Harold “Skip” Perry and Timothy S. Morris, with Mr. Morris serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee held one meeting during 2011, and Messrs. Perry and Morris attended the meeting.
No member of the Compensation Committee served as an officer, director or employee of any of our affiliates during 2011 or formerly served in such capacity.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation
We do not directly compensate our executive officers, including H. Michael Schwartz, the Chairman of our board of directors and our President and Chief Executive Officer, for services rendered to us. We do not currently intend to pay any compensation directly to our executive officers. As a result, we do not have, and the Compensation Committee has not considered, a compensation policy or program for our executive officers. If we determine to compensate our executive officers directly in the future, the Compensation Committee will review all forms of compensation and approve all equity-based awards.
12
Our executive officers also are officers of our Advisor and its affiliates, and are compensated by such entities for their services to us. We pay these entities fees and reimburse expenses pursuant to our Advisory Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these reimbursements to our Advisor include reimbursements of a portion of the salaries of our executive officers for time they spent on matters connected to our public offerings totaling approximately $160,500. At the present time, we intend to continue to reimburse a portion of the salaries of our executive officers for time they spend on matters connected to the public offering of our shares.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation be included in this proxy statement.
|
Timothy S. Morris (Chairman) |
Harold “Skip” Perry |
March 21, 2012
The preceding Compensation Committee Report to stockholders is not “soliciting material” and is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
Director Compensation
Summary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | | Stock Awards | | | Option Awards | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation | | | All Other Compensation (1) | | | Total | |
H. Michael Schwartz | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | |
Harold “Skip” Perry | | $ | 51,750 | | | $ | 12,500 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 1,553 | | | $ | 65,803 | |
Timothy S. Morris | | $ | 49,250 | | | $ | 12,500 | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | – | | | $ | 1,523 | | | $ | 63,273 | |
| (1) | All other compensation includes the value of shares received by each independent director pursuant to the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan. |
As noted above, the Compensation Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to employee, officer and director compensation. Because we do not have any employees and our executive officers do not receive any compensation directly from us, these responsibilities are limited to setting director compensation and administering the Plan. Our non-director officers have no role in determining or recommending director compensation. Directors who are also officers of the Company do not receive any special or additional remuneration for services on our board of directors or any of its committees. Each non-employee independent director received compensation for services on our board of directors and its committees as provided below.
13
Cash Compensation to Directors
We paid each of our independent directors a retainer of $30,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 plus $1,000 for each board of directors or committee meeting the independent director attended in person ($2,000 for attendance by the Chairman of the Audit Committee at each meeting of the Audit Committee and $1,500 for attendance by the Chairman of any other committee at each of such committee’s meetings) and $1,000 for each regularly scheduled meeting the independent director attended by telephone ($250 for special board of directors meetings conducted by telephone). In the event there were multiple meetings of our board of directors and one or more committees in a single day, the fees were limited to $2,000 per day ($2,500 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee if there was a meeting of such committee).
All directors received reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors.
Employee and Director Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards to Independent Directors
Pursuant to the Plan, we issued 2,500 shares of restricted stock to each independent director on January 27, 2009, which vest ratably over a period of four years from the date such independent director was appointed to our board of directors (the “Initial Restricted Stock Awards”). We also issued additional awards of 1,250 shares of restricted stock to each independent director upon each of their re-elections to our board of directors, which vest ratably over a period of four years from the date of re-election (the “Annual Restricted Stock Awards”). Both independent directors have received a total of 6,250 shares of restricted stock, 2,813 of which have vested to each independent director as of December 31, 2011. Both the Initial Restricted Stock Awards and the Annual Restricted Stock Awards are subject to a number of other conditions set forth in such awards.
The Plan was approved and adopted prior to the commencement of our ongoing initial public offering in order to (1) provide incentives to individuals who are granted awards because of their ability to improve our operations and increase profits; (2) encourage selected persons to accept or continue employment with us or with our Advisor or its affiliates that we deem important to our long-term success; and (3) increase the interest of our independent directors in our success through their participation in the growth in value of our stock. Pursuant to the Plan, we may issue options, stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights and other equity-based awards, including, but not limited to, restricted stock.
The total number of shares of our common stock (or common stock equivalents) reserved for issuance under the Plan is equal to 10% of our outstanding shares of stock at any time, but not to exceed 10,000,000 shares. As of March 30, 2012, there were 3,636,162 shares remaining for issuance under the Plan. The term of the Plan is ten years. Upon our earlier dissolution or liquidation, upon our reorganization, merger or consolidation with one or more corporations as a result of which we are not the surviving corporation, or upon sale of all or substantially all of our properties, the Plan will terminate, and provisions will be made for the assumption by the successor corporation of the awards granted or the replacement of the awards with similar awards with respect to the stock of the successor corporation, with appropriate adjustments as to the number and kind of shares and exercise prices. Alternatively, rather than providing for the assumption of awards, the Compensation Committee may either (1) shorten the period during which awards are exercisable, or (2) cancel an award upon payment to the participant of an amount in cash that the Compensation Committee determines is equivalent to the amount of the fair market value of the consideration that the participant would have received if the participant exercised the award immediately prior to the effective time of the transaction.
14
In the event that the Compensation Committee determines that any distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reorganization, merger, liquidation, dissolution or sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan or with respect to an award, then the Compensation Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust the number and kind of shares or the exercise price with respect to any award.
Executive Officers and Directors
Included below is certain information regarding our executive officers and directors. All of our directors, including our two independent directors, have been nominated for re-election at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders. All of our executive officers serve at the pleasure of our board of directors.
| | | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | | Position(s) | | Period with Company |
H. Michael Schwartz | | | 45 | | | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President | | 8/2007 -present |
Paula Mathews | | | 60 | | | Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary | | 8/2007 -present |
Michael S. McClure | | | 49 | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | | 1/2008 -present |
Wayne Johnson | | | 54 | | | Senior Vice President — Acquisitions | | 8/2007 -present |
James L. Berg | | | 59 | | | Secretary | | 6/2011 -present |
Harold “Skip” Perry | | | 65 | | | Independent Director | | 2/2008 -present |
Timothy S. Morris | | | 51 | | | Independent Director | | 2/2008 -present |
H. Michael Schwartz. Mr. Schwartz is the Chairman of our board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Schwartz has been an officer and director since our initial formation in August 2007. Mr. Schwartz is also President of our Advisor. Mr. Schwartz owns a 15% beneficial non-voting equity interest in Select Capital Corporation, our dealer manager. He was appointed President of Strategic Capital Holdings, LLC (our “Sponsor”) in July 2004 and is primarily responsible for the commercial office, retail and self storage programs. He has more than 20 years of real estate, securities and corporate financial management experience. His real estate experience includes international investment opportunities, including self storage acquisitions in Canada. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Schwartz was the Managing Director of Private Structured Offerings for Triple Net Properties, LLC (now an indirect subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Company). In addition, he served on the board of their affiliated broker-dealer, NNN Capital Corp. (now Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc.). From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Schwartz was Chief Financial Officer for Futurist Entertainment, a diversified entertainment company. From 1995 to 2000, he was President and Chief Financial Officer of Spider Securities, Inc. (now Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.), a registered broker-dealer that developed one of the first online distribution outlets for fixed and variable annuity products. From 1990 to 1995, Mr. Schwartz served as the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Western Capital Financial (an affiliate of Spider Securities), and from 1994 to 1998 Mr. Schwartz was also President of Palladian Advisors, Inc. (an affiliate of Spider Securities). Mr. Schwartz holds a B.S. in Business Administration with an emphasis in Finance from the University of Southern California.
Paula Mathews. Ms. Mathews is our Assistant Secretary and an Executive Vice President. Ms. Mathews has been an Executive Vice President since our initial formation in August 2007 and previously served as our Secretary from our initial formation until June 2011. Ms. Mathews is also Executive Vice President of our Advisor. Ms. Mathews joined our Sponsor in 2005 as Vice President — Commercial Operations. She is responsible for pre-acquisition due diligence and post-acquisition management and
15
leasing of all commercial assets. Prior to joining our Sponsor, Ms. Mathews was a private consultant from 2003 to 2005 providing due diligence services on the acquisition and disposition of assets for real estate firms. Prior to that, Ms. Mathews held senior level executive positions with several pension investment advisors, including the following: a real estate company specializing in 1031 transactions from 2002 to 2003 where she was the Director of Operations; KBS Realty Advisors from 1995 to 2001 where she was responsible for the management of $600 million in “value added” commercial assets in seven states; TCW Realty Advisors (now CBRE Investors) from 1985 to 1992 as a Senior Vice President where her focus was retail assets within closed end equity funds; and PMRealty Advisors from 1983 to 1985 in a portfolio management role. She began her real estate career in 1977 with The Irvine Company, the largest land holder in Orange County, California, where she held several positions within the Commercial/Industrial Division structuring industrial build-to-suits, ground leases and land sales. Ms. Mathews holds a B.S. degree from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Michael S. McClure. Mr. McClure is our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and an Executive Vice President. Mr. McClure has been our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since January 2008 and an Executive Vice President since June 2011. Mr. McClure is also the Chief Financial Officer of our Advisor. He joined our Advisor in January 2008. Mr. McClure is responsible for overseeing our budgeting, forecasting and financial management policies, along with directing all SEC and regulatory reporting. Prior to joining our Advisor, from 2004 to June 2007, Mr. McClure held various positions, including Vice President of Finance, at the North Inland Empire Division of Pulte Homes, Inc. At Pulte Homes, he was responsible for all finance, accounting, human resources and office administration functions. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. McClure was a Director in the Audit Business Advisory Services practice for PricewaterhouseCoopers. From 1985 to 2002, Mr. McClure was with Arthur Andersen LLP, holding various positions including Partner. In his 20 years of experience in the public accounting field, Mr. McClure had extensive experience in the real estate industry working with REITs, homebuilders and land development companies and worked on numerous registration statements and public offerings. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. McClure holds a B.S.B.A. degree from California State University, Fullerton.
Wayne Johnson. Mr. Johnson is our Senior Vice President — Acquisitions. Mr. Johnson has been our Senior Vice President — Acquisitions since our initial formation in August 2007. Mr. Johnson is also Senior Vice President — Acquisitions for our Advisor. He joined our Sponsor in June 2006 to focus on self storage acquisitions. Prior to joining our Sponsor, from 2002 to June 2006, Mr. Johnson developed and managed LaPlaza Self Storage in McAllen, Texas and three American Home Self Storage facilities in Dallas, Texas and Carrollton, Texas. He has been involved in all aspects of commercial development and leasing, including office, office warehouse, retail and self storage facilities. Mr. Johnson previously developed, managed and operated 14 self storage facilities and other commercial properties over the past 23 years. His experience includes the development and management of various facilities representing in excess of one million square feet. Currently, Mr. Johnson serves on the board and is the past President of the Texas Self Storage Association (TSSA), which is the trade organization for self storage development, ownership and management in Texas which has approximately 3,100 members consisting of storage owners, developers, operators and vendors throughout Texas. Mr. Johnson entered the commercial real estate business in 1979 after graduating from Southern Methodist University with a B.B.A. in Finance and Real Estate.
James L. Berg. Mr. Berg has been our Secretary since June 2011. Mr. Berg became General Counsel of Strategic Storage Holdings, LLC, the sole member of our Advisor and our Property Manager, in April 2011. Mr. Berg has over 25 years of experience in general business, corporate, securities, venture capital and intellectual property law. From November 2004 to April 2011, he was General Counsel of U.S. Advisor, LLC. From March 2004 until November 2004, Mr. Berg was Senior Vice
16
President and General Counsel of LoanCity.com, a wholesale mortgage lender based in San Jose, California. Prior to that, Mr. Berg was a partner in several laws firms in Oakland, California. Mr. Berg received a J.D. (magna cum laude) from the University of Michigan Law School in 1978 and a B.S. (with high distinction) from the University of Michigan Business School in 1975. He is a member of the State Bar of California, Business Law Section.
Harold “Skip” Perry.Mr. Perry has been one of our independent directors since February 2008 and is the Chairman of our Audit Committee of our board of directors and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Mr. Perry has over 35 years of financial accounting, management and consulting experience for domestic and international organizations in the real estate industry. He is currently the Executive Managing Director of Real Globe Advisors, LLC, a commercial real estate advisory firm which he founded. Mr. Perry also held the same position with Real Globe Advisors, LLC from July 2007 to June 2009 as well. From June 2009 to March 2011, he was the Managing Director of Alvarez & Marsal Real Estate Advisory Services. From 1995 to June 2007, Mr. Perry was a national partner in Ernst & Young LLP’s Transactional Real Estate Advisory Services Group and held a number of leadership positions within Ernst & Young. While at Ernst & Young, he handled complex acquisition and disposition due diligence matters for private equity funds and corporate clients, complex real estate portfolio optimization studies, and monetization strategies within the capital markets arena, including valuation of self storage facilities. Prior to 1995, Mr. Perry headed the Real Estate Consulting Practice of the Chicago office of Kenneth Leventhal & Co. Prior to his time with Kenneth Leventhal & Co., Mr. Perry was a senior principal with Pannell Kerr Forester, a national accounting and consulting firm specializing in the hospitality industry. Mr. Perry is a CPA and holds an MAI designation with the Appraisal Institute and a CRE designation with the Counselors of Real Estate. He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Russian and Economics from the University of Illinois, and has a Masters of Business Administration with a concentration in finance from Loyola University in Illinois.
Timothy S. Morris. Mr. Morris has been one of our independent directors since February 2008 and is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors and a member of our Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Mr. Morris has more than 29 years of financial and management experience with several international organizations. In May 2008, Mr. Morris founded AMDG Worldwide Ltd., a consultancy business for the philanthropic sector. From June 2007 to April 2008, Mr. Morris was the Chief Financial Officer for Geneva Global, Inc., a philanthropic advisor and broker which invests funds into developing countries. Prior to joining Geneva Global, Inc., from 2002 to June 2007, Mr. Morris was the Director of Corporate Services for Care International UK Ltd. where he was responsible for the finance, internal audit, risk management, human resources, legal insurance and information technology functions during the financial turnaround period of that organization. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Morris was the Controller for Royal Society Mencap, a learning disability charity. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Morris was the head of global management reporting for Adidas Group AG in Germany and was later the International Controller for Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Adidas Group AG. Prior to 1996, Mr. Morris held various management and senior finance roles within organizations such as the International Leisure Group, Halliburton/KBR and the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Mr. Morris has his Bachelor of Science in Economics from Bristol University in the United Kingdom, his MBA from the Cranfield School of Management in the United Kingdom, and he is a Chartered Management Accountant (ACMA).
17
STOCK OWNERSHIP
Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s Stock
The following table sets forth, as of March 30, 2012, the amount of our common stock beneficially owned by: (1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (2) each of our directors; (3) each of our executive officers; and (4) our directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 36,486,624 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 30, 2012.
| | | | | | |
| | Common Stock Beneficially Owned(2) |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Number of Shares of Common Stock | | Percentage of Class |
H. Michael Schwartz, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer | | | | 116(3) | | * |
Paula Mathews, Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary | | | | — | | * |
Michael S. McClure, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | | | | — | | * |
Wayne Johnson, Senior Vice President — Acquisitions | | | | — | | * |
James L. Berg, Secretary | | | | — | | * |
Harold “Skip” Perry, Independent Director | | | | 3,296(4) | | * |
Timothy S. Morris, Independent Director | | | | 3,249(4) | | * |
| | | | | | |
All directors and executive officers as a group | | | | 6,661 | | * |
| | | | | | |
* | Represents less than 1% of our outstanding common stock as of March 30, 2012. |
(1) | The address of each beneficial owner listed is 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694. |
(2) | Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities and shares issuable pursuant to options, warrants and similar rights held by the respective person or group that may be exercised within 60 days following March 30, 2012. Except as otherwise indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock show as beneficially owned by them. |
(3) | Includes 100 shares owned by Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC, which is indirectly owned and controlled by Mr. Schwartz. |
(4) | Each independent director was awarded 2,500 shares of restricted stock on January 27, 2009, which vest ratably over a period of four years from the date such independent director was appointed to our board of directors, and was awarded 1,250 shares of restricted stock upon each of his re-elections to our board of directors, which vest ratably over a period of four years from the date of re-election. The amounts listed include all shares of restricted stock that have vested as of March 30, 2012 or will vest within 60 days of such date plus shares purchased by the independent directors pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires each director, officer, and individual beneficially owning more than 10% of a registered security to file with the SEC, within specified time frames, initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and statements of changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 and 5). These specified time frames require the reporting of changes in ownership within two business days of the transaction giving rise to the reporting obligation. Reporting persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed with the SEC. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us during and with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 or written representations that no additional forms were required, to the best of our knowledge, all required Section 16(a) filings were timely and correctly made by reporting persons for 2011.
18
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
General
Certain of our executive officers and one of our directors hold ownership interests in and are officers of our Sponsor, our Advisor, our Property Manager, our Dealer Manager and other affiliated entities. As a result, these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their owners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to our stockholders and us. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment objectives. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to: (1) allocation of new investments and management time and services between us and the other entities; (2) our purchase of properties from, or sale of properties to, affiliated entities; (3) the timing and terms of the investment in or sale of an asset; (4) development of our properties by affiliates; (5) investments with affiliates of our Advisor; (6) compensation to our Advisor; and (7) our relationship with our Dealer Manager and Property Manager.
We are currently a party to three types of agreements giving rise to material transactions between us and our affiliates, including our Advisory Agreement, our Property Management Agreements and our Dealer Manager Agreement. Our independent directors reviewed the material transactions between us and our affiliates arising out of these agreements during the year ended December 31, 2011. Set forth below is a description of the relevant transactions with our affiliates, which we believe have been executed on terms that are fair to the Company.
Advisory Agreement
Strategic Storage Advisor, LLC, our Advisor, is owned by Strategic Storage Holdings, LLC (“Strategic Storage Holdings”). Our Sponsor owns a controlling interest in Strategic Storage Holdings, and certain executives of our Sponsor and our Advisor, and other individuals, own a minority interest in Strategic Storage Holdings. H. Michael Schwartz, the Chairman of our board of directors and our President and Chief Executive Officer, and the President of our Advisor, owns a controlling interest in our Sponsor and a minority interest in Strategic Storage Holdings. Certain of our executives, including Mr. Schwartz, serve as officers of our Advisor, our Sponsor and Strategic Storage Holdings.
Our Advisor and its affiliates perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of our shares and the selection, acquisition and management of our properties pursuant to our Advisory Agreement. The term of our Advisory Agreement is one year and will end on September 22, 2012, but may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods. Under our Advisory Agreement, our Advisor is entitled to fees that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our Advisor to perform in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our Advisor and its officers, employees and affiliates expect to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our Advisor will be required to devote sufficient resources to our administration to discharge its obligations.
19
Many of the services performed by our Advisor in managing our day-to-day activities are summarized below. This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions that our Advisor performs for us as our Advisor, and it is not intended to include all of the services that may be provided to us by third parties. Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, our Advisor undertakes to use its commercially reasonable best efforts to present to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by our board of directors. In its performance of this undertaking, our Advisor, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate, performs the following, among other duties and subject to the authority of our board of directors:
| • | | finding, evaluating, presenting and recommending to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives; |
| • | | serving as our investment and financial advisor and providing research and economic and statistical data in connection with our assets and our investment policies; |
| • | | acquiring properties and making investments on our behalf in compliance with our investment objectives and policies; |
| • | | structuring and negotiating the terms and conditions of our real estate acquisitions, sales or joint ventures; |
| • | | reviewing and analyzing each property’s operating and capital budget; |
| • | | arranging, structuring and negotiating financing and refinancing of properties; |
| • | | performing all operational functions for the maintenance and administration of our assets, including the servicing of mortgages; |
| • | | consulting with our officers and board of directors and assisting the board of directors in formulating and implementing of our financial policies; |
| • | | preparing and reviewing on our behalf, with the participation of one designated principal executive officer and principal financial officer, all reports and returns required by the SEC, IRS and other state or federal governmental agencies; |
| • | | providing the daily management and performing and supervising the various administrative functions reasonably necessary for our management and operations; and |
| • | | investigating, selecting, and, on our behalf, engaging and conducting business with such third parties as our Advisor deems necessary to the proper performance of its obligations under the Advisory Agreement. |
Our Advisor will be entitled to receive various fees and expenses under the terms of the Advisory Agreement. Generally, we are required under the Advisory Agreement to reimburse our Advisor for organization and offering costs up to 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the primary offering portion of our ongoing public offering (the “Primary Offering”); provided, however, our Advisor must reimburse us within 60 days after the end of the month in which our public offering terminates to the extent we paid or reimbursed organization and offering costs (excluding sales commissions and dealer manager fees) in excess of 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds from the Primary Offering. The Advisory Agreement also requires our Advisor to reimburse us at the end of an offering to the extent that offering expenses, including sales commissions, Dealer Manager fees and organization and offering expenses, are in excess of 15% of gross proceeds from such completed offering. Our Advisor receives acquisition fees equal to 2.5% of the contract purchase price of each property we acquire plus reimbursement of acquisition expenses. Our Advisor also receives a monthly asset management fee for managing our assets equal to 0.0833% of the aggregate asset value of our assets. Once the aggregate asset value of our assets, excluding the assets acquired in the mergers with REIT I and REIT II, as defined below, exceeds $500 million, we will reduce the monthly asset management fee to 0.0625% on the aggregate asset value that
20
exceeds $500 million unless our modified funds from operations (MFFO) including payment of the fee is greater than 100% of our distributions in any month. Under the Advisory Agreement, our Advisor receives disposition fees in an amount equal to up to one-half of the total real estate commission paid but in no event to exceed an amount equal to 3% of the contract sale price for each property we sell as long as our Advisor provides substantial assistance in connection with the sale. The total real estate commissions paid (including the disposition fee paid to our Advisor) may not exceed the lesser of a competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6% of the contract sale price of the property. Payment of such disposition fee is subordinated to receipt by our stockholders of cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non-compounded return. There were no such fees for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our Advisor may also be entitled to various subordinated fees if we (1) list our shares of common stock on a national exchange, or (2) in the alternative we terminate the Advisory Agreement or liquidate our portfolio. There were no such fees for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The Advisory Agreement provides for reimbursement of our Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. Commencing four fiscal quarters after the acquisition of our first real estate asset, our operating expenses shall (in the absence of a satisfactory showing to the contrary) be deemed to be excessive, and our Advisor must reimburse us in the event our total operating expenses for the 12 months then ended exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income, unless a majority of our independent directors has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors.
Property Management Agreements
Similar to our Advisor, Strategic Storage Property Management, LLC, our Property Manager, is wholly owned by Strategic Storage Holdings.
Our Property Manager manages our properties pursuant to separate Property Management Agreements for each property. The Property Management Agreements have one year terms and automatically renew unless notice is given by either us or our Property Manager. Our Property Manager derives substantially all of its income from the property management services it performs for us. Our Property Manager may enter into Sub-Property Management Agreements with third party management companies and pay part of its management fee to such Sub-Property Managers.
Our Property Manager (or Sub-Property Manager) is responsible for hiring, directing and establishing policies for employees who have direct responsibility for the operations of each property we acquire, which may include but not be limited to on-site managers and building and maintenance personnel. Certain employees of the Property Manager may be employed on a part-time basis and also may be employed by our Advisor or certain companies affiliated with it. Our Property Manager is also responsible for directing the purchase of equipment and supplies and supervising all maintenance activity.
Our Property Manager is entitled to receive a fee for its services in managing our properties, except for those properties acquired in the merger with Self Storage REIT, LLC (f/k/a Self Storage REIT, Inc.) (“REIT I”) on September 24, 2009 and the USA Self Storage I, DST acquisition on February 15, 2011, generally equal to 6% of the gross revenues from the properties plus reimbursement of the direct costs of managing the properties. The properties acquired in the merger with REIT I and the USA Self Storage I, DST acquisition are managed by an affiliate of our Sponsor and a portion of those property management fees were paid to a third party property manager. As a condition of the merger with Self Storage REIT II, LLC (f/k/a Self Storage REIT II, Inc.) (“REIT II”) on September 24, 2009 the monthly property management fees for properties acquired through the merger with REIT II have been waived until the FFO, as defined in the merger agreement, relating to the REIT II properties reaches $0.70 per share. In the event that the Property Manager assists with development or redevelopment of a property, we may pay a separate market-based fee for such services. The Property Manager will only provide these services if it does not
21
cause any of our income from the applicable property to be treated as other than rents from real property for purposes of the applicable REIT requirements.
Dealer Manager Agreement
Our President, H. Michael Schwartz, owns a 15% beneficial non-voting equity interest in Select Capital Corporation, our Dealer Manager.
Our Dealer Manager serves as our Dealer Manager pursuant to our Dealer Manager Agreement. The Dealer Manager Agreement will terminate upon the termination of our initial public offering or upon 60 days’ written notice by either party. Our Dealer Manager provides wholesaling, sales promotional and marketing services to us in connection with our initial public offering. Specifically, our Dealer Manager ensures compliance with SEC rules and regulations and FINRA rules relating to the sale process and participating broker-dealer relationships, assists in the assembling of prospectus kits, assists in the due diligence process and ensures proper handling of investment proceeds.
Our Dealer Manager is entitled to receive a sales commission of up to 7% of gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering and a Dealer Manager fee equal to up to 3% of gross proceeds from sales in the Primary Offering. Our Dealer Manager has entered into participating dealer agreements with certain other broker-dealers authorizing them to sell our shares. Upon sale of our shares by such broker-dealers, our Dealer Manager re-allows all of the sales commissions paid in connection with sales made by these broker-dealers. Our Dealer Manager may also re-allow to these broker-dealers a portion of the 3% Dealer Manager fee as marketing fees, reimbursement of certain costs and expenses of attending training and education meetings sponsored by our Dealer Manager, payment of attendance fees required for employees of our Dealer Manager or other affiliates to attend retail seminars and public seminars sponsored by these broker-dealers, or to defray other distribution-related expenses.
In accordance with FINRA rules, in no event will our total underwriting compensation, including, but not limited to, sales commissions, the dealer manager fee and expense reimbursements to our dealer manager and participating broker-dealers, exceed 10% of our gross offering proceeds, in the aggregate. We expect to pay an additional amount of gross offering proceeds for bona fide accountable due diligence expenses; however, to the extent these due diligence expenses cannot be justified, any excess over actual due diligence expenses will be considered underwriting compensation subject to the above 10% limitation and, when aggregated with all other non-accountable expenses may not exceed 3% of gross offering proceeds. We may also reimburse our Advisor for all expenses incurred by our Advisor, our dealer manager and their affiliates in connection with this offering and our organization. FINRA and many states also limit our total organization and offering expenses to 15% of gross offering proceeds.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements described above, the following summarizes the related party costs incurred for the year ended December 31, 2011:
| | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |
Expensed | | | | |
Reimbursement of operating expenses (including organizational costs) | | $ | 330,993 | (1) |
Asset management fees | | | 3,019,429 | |
Property management fees | | | 2,683,492 | |
Acquisition expenses | | | 5,706,838 | |
22
| | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |
| |
Additional Paid-in Capital | | | | |
Selling commissions | | | 5,798,197 | (2) |
Dealer Manager fee | | | 2,484,942 | (2) |
Reimbursement of offering costs | | | 555,839 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 20,579,730 | |
| | | | |
| (1) | During the year ended December 31, 2011, our Advisor permanently waived certain reimbursable indirect costs, primarily payroll and related overhead costs, related to administrative and management series, totaling approximately $0.7 million. Such amounts were waived permanently and accordingly, will not be paid to our Advisor. |
| (2) | All of the selling commissions and approximately $0.8 million of the Dealer Manager fee were reallowed to participating broker-dealers. |
As of December 31, 2011, we had amounts due to affiliates totaling $2,065,615.
Tenant Reinsurance Program
Affiliates of our Sponsor, including our President, H. Michael Schwartz, are participating in a tenant reinsurance program whereby tenants of our self storage facilities can purchase insurance to cover damage or destruction to their property while stored at our facilities. Such affiliates have invested in a Cayman Islands company (the “Reinsurance Company”) that will reinsure a portion of the insurance required by the program insurer to cover the risks of loss at participating facilities in the program. The program insurer provides fees (approximately 50% of the tenant premium paid) to us as owner of the facilities. The Reinsurance Company may be required to fund additional capital or entitled to receive distributions of profits depending on actual losses incurred under the program. In 2011, we earned approximately $0.4 million in fees in connection with the tenant reinsurance program.
PROPOSALS ON WHICH YOU MAY VOTE
WHETHER YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON OR NOT, WE URGE YOU TO HAVE YOUR VOTE RECORDED. STOCKHOLDERS MAY SUBMIT THEIR PROXIES VIA MAIL USING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND ENVELOPE, VIA THE INTERNET ATwww.eproxy.com/ssti OR VIA TELEPHONE AT 1-866-977-7699.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT AND YOUR IMMEDIATE RESPONSE WILL HELP AVOID POTENTIAL DELAYS AND MAY SAVE US SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH SOLICITING STOCKHOLDER VOTES.
23
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the annual meeting, you and the other stockholders will vote on the election of all three members of our board of directors. Each person elected will serve as a director until our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified. Our board of directors has nominated the following people for re-election as directors:
Each of the nominees is a current member of our board of directors. Detailed information on each nominee is provided on pages 15-17.
If any nominee becomes unable or unwilling to stand for re-election, our board of directors may reduce its size or designate a substitute. If a substitute is designated, proxies voting on the original nominee will be cast for the substituted nominee.
Vote Required
Each director is elected by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding a majority of shares entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present. Votes are cast either in person or by proxy. There is no cumulative voting in the election of our directors. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) have no impact on the vote.
Recommendation
Each of the three nominees for re-election as a director will be elected at the annual meeting if a quorum is present at the annual meeting and a majority of shares entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at such meeting vote in favor of such director for re-election. A properly executed proxy marked “FOR ALL” will be considered a vote in favor of all nominees for re-election as director. A properly executed proxy marked “FOR ALL EXCEPT” will be considered a vote in favor of all nominees EXCEPT those nominees you specifically list in the space provided. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD ALL” will be considered a vote against all director nominees.
Our board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR ALL” nominees listed for re-election as directors.
24
PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF REZNICK GROUP, P.C. AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of our board of directors has appointed Reznick to be our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012. A representative of Reznick is expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he so desires. The representative also will be available to respond to appropriate questions from the stockholders.
Although it is not required to do so, our board of directors is submitting the Audit Committee’s appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting in order to ascertain the view of the stockholders regarding such appointment.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on the proposal at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present, will be required to approve this proposal. Votes are cast either in person or by proxy. Any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote, or otherwise) have no impact on the vote. In the event this matter is not ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain our independent registered public accounting firm at its next scheduled meeting.
Recommendation
Our board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Reznick as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012.
25
PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER
In order to clarify certain language in our charter regarding the payment of disposition fees, we are proposing to amend our charter to revise Section 8.5 as shown below. Our board of directors believes this change is important as the current language implies that we must pay a real estate commission to a third party in order to pay a disposition fee to one of our affiliates. This current language is based upon language contained in the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts promulgated by the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA REIT Guidelines”). Since that time, new non-traded REITs have drafted more workable language that complies with the spirit of the NASAA REIT Guideline provision. The language we are proposing is based upon, and consistent with, the provisions being adopted by the new non-traded REITs. In considering this proposal to clarify the disposition fee language consistent with new non-traded REITs, please note that, in connection with our follow-on public offering, we voluntarily amended our Advisory Agreement to make the payment of the disposition fee subordinated to the receipt by our stockholders of cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non-compounded return. This subordination provision will not change upon approval of this amendment.
Below, we show the change to our charter that is part of the proposed amendment by including the relevant section of our charter with a single line through text we propose to delete and a double line underneath text we propose to add:
Section 8.5.Disposition Fee on Sale of Property. If the Advisor or a director or Sponsor or any Affiliate thereof provides a substantial amount of the services in the effort to sell the property of the Corporation, that Person may receive an amount up tothe lesser of one-half of thetotal real estate commissions paid but in no event to exceed Competitive Real Estate Commission or an amount equal to 3% of the sales price of such property or properties; provided, however, that the amount paid when added to all other real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated parties in connection with such sale shall not exceed the lesser of the Competitive Real Estate Commission or an amount equal to 6% of the sales price of such property or properties.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting, if a quorum is present, will be required to approve this proposal. In the event this matter is not approved by our stockholders, we will continue to operate under our current charter.
Recommendation
Our board of directors unanimously recommends a vote“FOR” the approval of the amendment to our current charter.
26
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any proposal by a stockholder for inclusion in proxy solicitation materials for the next annual meeting of stockholders must be received by our Assistant Secretary, Paula Mathews, at our offices no later than December 24, 2012 and must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. If a stockholder desires to present a proposal at the 2013 annual meeting, whether or not the proposal is intended to be included in the 2013 proxy materials, our bylaws require that the stockholder give advance written notice to our Assistant Secretary, Paula Mathews, no earlier than December 24, 2012 and no later than January 23, 2013. Stockholders desiring to submit a proposal are advised to examine the Company’s bylaws, as they contain additional submission requirements.
OTHER MATTERS
As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, proxies in the enclosed form returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of our board of directors or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holder.
27
Appendix A
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
OF
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
Adopted as of May 12, 2008
I. PURPOSE
The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to (A) assist the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and other financial information to be provided to the stockholders and others; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the system of internal controls which management of the Company has established; (iv) the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditor; (v) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors; and (vi) the Company’s audit and financial reporting processes; and (B) prepare the audit committee reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) rules require to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement or other disclosure documents. In performing these functions, the Audit Committee shall maintain free and open communications among the Board of Directors, the Company’s independent auditors and the Company’s management.
The Audit Committee will fulfill this purpose primarily by carrying out the activities enumerated in Section IV of this Charter.
II. COMPOSITION
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of at least two of the independent members of the Company’s Board (as defined in the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement), each of whom must satisfy any applicable laws, rules and regulations governing independence, as determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors.
All members of the Audit Committee shall satisfy the SEC requirement regarding their level of financial “literacy” or “sophistication.” At least one member of the Audit Committee shall have the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the SEC rules and as determined in the judgment of the Board with reference to applicable law.
The members of the Audit Committee are appointed by the Board and shall serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board shall, or shall delegate to the members of the Audit Committee the responsibility to, designate one member of the Audit Committee to serve as chairman of the Audit Committee. Any member of the Audit Committee must inform the Board if he or she serves on the audit committee of two or more public companies (other than this company and its subsidiaries), and the Board must affirmatively determine that such service does not impair the ability of such member to serve effectively on the Audit Committee in order for that member to continue to serve on the Audit Committee.
A-1
III. MEETINGS
The Audit Committee shall meet on a regular basis no less frequently than four times a year, on a quarterly basis, and shall hold such special meetings as circumstances may require. A majority of the members of the Audit Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Minutes of each meeting of the Audit Committee should be recorded by the secretary to the Committee. Approval by a majority of the members present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall constitute approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may also act by unanimous written consent without a meeting.
IV. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Audit Committee’s authority and responsibilities are set forth below.
Regarding its relationship with the independent auditors, the Audit Committee shall:
| 1. | Appoint, compensate, oversee, retain, discharge and replace the independent auditors of the Company, or any other registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company. The independent auditor and any other such registered public accounting firm shall report directly to the Audit Committee. |
| 2. | Preapprove all auditing services performed for the Company by the independent auditors, as well as all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) as such services are defined by applicable law. |
| 3. | Have the authority to form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members of the Audit Committee, including the authority to grant preapprovals of audit and permitted non-audit services; provided however, that decisions of subcommittees to grant preapprovals shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. |
| 4. | Establish policies for the Company’s hiring of employees or former employees of the independent auditors. |
| 5. | Provide sufficient opportunity for the independent auditors to meet with the members of the Audit Committee without members of management present. Among the items to be discussed in these meetings are the independent auditors’ evaluation of the Company’s financial, accounting, and auditing personnel, and the cooperation that the independent auditors received during the course of their audits. |
| 6. | Ensure that less than 50% of the audit work (by percentage of hours) by the independent auditors for the most recent fiscal year was performed by persons who were not the auditor’s full-time, permanent employees (if this percentage is greater than 50%, then disclosure is required in the Company’s proxy statement). |
| 7. | Review with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties, and management’s response thereto, and resolve any disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting. |
| 8. | Obtain and review an annual report from the independent auditors describing (i) the auditor’s internal quality control procedures, (ii) any material issues raised by the most recent internal |
A-2
| quality control review, or by a peer review, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the last five years, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the independent auditor, and any steps taken to deal with such issues, and (iii) all relationships between the auditor and the Company. This evaluation shall include the review and evaluation of the lead partner of the independent auditor and shall ensure the rotation of partners in accordance with federal securities laws. |
Regarding financial reporting and disclosure matters, the Audit Committee shall:
| 9. | Ensure that the independent auditor files a report with the Audit Committee (prior to the filing of the audit report with the SEC in the Annual Report on Form 10-K), which states (i) all critical accounting policies to be used by the Company, (ii) all alternative treatments of financial information within GAAP that have been discussed with management of the Company, the ramifications of these disclosures, and the treatment preferred by the auditor, and (iii) any other material written communications between the auditor and Company management. |
| 10. | Review the Company’s annual audited financial statements and discuss such audited financial statements with management and the independent auditor. |
| 11. | Discuss at least annually with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61. |
| 12. | On an annual basis, obtain a formal written statement from the independent auditors delineating all relationships between the auditors and the Company consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and review and discuss with the auditors all significant relationships the auditors have with the Company to determine the independence of the auditors. |
| 13. | Based upon the review and discussion of the financial statements with the independent auditor, recommend to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC. |
| 14. | Review and discuss with management (and personnel responsible for the internal audit function) and the independent auditors the Company’s disclosures under the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Company’s Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. |
| 15. | Review and discuss with management (and personnel responsible for the internal audit function) and the independent auditors the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K prior to filing with the SEC. |
| 16. | Review and discuss with management (and personnel responsible for the internal audit function) and the independent auditors the Company’s quarterly financial statements, including the matters described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, and each of the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q prior to filing with the SEC. |
| 17. | Review and discuss with management the Company’s earnings and dividend press releases, as well as financial information, earnings or dividend guidance provided to the analysts and rating agencies (if applicable). Such discussion may be done generally, consisting of discussing the types of information to be disclosed and the types made. |
A-3
| 18. | Review and discuss with management and the independent auditors significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, including any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles. |
| 19. | Review and approve the table in the Company’s annual meeting proxy statement disclosing the audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered by the independent auditor. |
| 20. | Meet separately and periodically with management, personnel responsible for the internal audit function and the independent auditors in performance of the oversight function of the Audit Committee. |
| 21. | Prepare an Audit Committee Report to be included in the Company’s annual meeting proxy statement on an annual basis as required by federal securities laws. |
| 22. | Review disclosures made to the Audit Committee by the Company’s President and CFO during their certification process for the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q about any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of disclosure controls and procedures and any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls. |
| 23. | Obtain quarterly assurances from management that the Company’s system of internal controls is adequate and effective. When required by applicable SEC rules, obtain annually a report from the independent auditor, with attestation, regarding management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| 24. | Approve appropriate amounts payable (i) to the independent auditors or any other registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for the Company, (ii) to any advisers employed by the Audit Committee, and (iii) for ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that maybe necessary or appropriate to carry out its duties. |
| 25. | Report regularly to the Board on any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of the Company’s independent auditors, or the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. |
| 26. | The Committee should also review: |
| • | | major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles, and major issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies; |
| • | | analyses prepared by management and/or the independent auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements; |
| • | | the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company; and |
A-4
| • | | the type and presentation of information to be included in earnings press releases (paying particular attention to any use of “pro forma,” or “adjusted” non-GAAP, information), as well as review any financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies. |
Regarding ethical and legal compliance, internal audit function, and other issues, the Audit Committee shall:
27. | Review the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics periodically and discuss with management the procedures in place to enforce it. |
28. | Establish appropriate processes and procedures surrounding the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and the confidential anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
29. | Review and discuss with management of the Company, Company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. |
30. | Review and approve in advance all related-party transactions. |
31. | At least annually, evaluate the performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Company’s internal audit function and review the internal audit plan to determine whether the Company’s internal audit function provides management and the Audit Committee with ongoing assessments of the Company’s risk management and procedures and systems of internal controls. |
32. | Have the authority to retain independent counsel, accountants and other advisers, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties. |
33. | Have the authority and power to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to the books, records and personnel necessary to carry out its responsibilities. |
34. | Perform at least annually a self-evaluation of the Audit Committee to ensure that it is functioning properly and otherwise carrying out its responsibilities. |
35. | Perform any other activities consistent with this Charter, the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company’s Bylaws, SEC Rules and other governing law, as the Audit Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate. |
36. | Review this Charter at least annually and recommend any changes to the Board of Directors. If a revision to the Charter is proposed, such revision shall be presented to the Board after consultation and review with the Company’s corporate counsel. |
37. | Invite, and hear from time to time, a report from the Company’s general counsel or outside counsel on legal issues and actions involving the Company and any material reports or inquiries received from regulators or governmental agencies that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, compliance policies and practices. |
A-5
V. LIMITATION ON AUDIT COMMITTEE’S RESPONSIBILITIES
It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to prepare financial statements, to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosure are complete and accurate and are in accordance with GAAP and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibilities of management and the independent auditor. Furthermore, while the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the Company’s policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and management, it is the responsibility of senior management of the Company to determine the appropriate level of the Company’s exposure to risk.
A-6
Appendix B
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER
Adopted as of May 20, 2008
PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Committee”) is intended to assist the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities under Maryland law. As such, the Committee shall have four primary responsibilities.
First, the Committee shall be responsible for identifying individuals qualified to serve on the Board, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommending that the Board select a slate of director nominees for election by the stockholders of the Company at the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company, in accordance with the Company’s articles of amendment and restatement (the “Charter”) and bylaws (the “Bylaws”) and with Maryland law.
Second, the Committee shall be responsible for developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance policies and principles to be applicable to the Company. It shall also be the task of the Committee to periodically re-evaluate such policies and guidelines for the purpose of suggesting amendments to them if appropriate.
Third, the Committee shall oversee an annual evaluation of the Board and each of the committees of the Board.
Fourth, the Committee shall be responsible for considering and acting upon any conflicts of interest-related matter as required by the Company’s Charter or otherwise permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) where the exercise of independent judgment by any of the Company’s directors (who is not an independent director) could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving the Company’s advisor or its affiliates.
COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE
The membership of the Committee shall consist of two or more directors, each of whom shall be an independent director, qualifying as such under the Charter. Each member of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board on the recommendation of the then current Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The chairperson of the Committee shall be designated by the Board or if such designation is not made, the Members may designate a chairperson by majority vote of the full Committee. The Board may, at any time, remove one or more directors as members of the Committee and may fill any vacancy on the Committee. Members of the Committee shall be elected annually by the Board and shall hold office until the earlier of (i) the election of their respective successors, (ii) the end of their service as a director of the Company (whether through resignation, removal, expiration of term or death) or (iii) their resignation from the Committee. The Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees as appropriate.
B-1
OPERATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE
Nominating Function
At least annually, the Committee shall review with the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members. The full Board shall remain responsible for selecting nominees and recommending them for election by the stockholders. The Committee is responsible for developing and implementing the screening process necessary to identify qualified candidates. As a part of its screening process, the Committee shall:
| • | | evaluate the qualifications of candidates for the Board, in light of the criteria approved by the Board; |
| • | | evaluate a candidate’s independence from the Company’s management and other principal service providers and the effect of any relationships that might impair independence, e.g., business, financial or family relationships with the Company’s management or other service providers; and |
| • | | consider candidates proposed by management of the Company, by directors or by stockholders, in accordance with procedures established by the Committee from time to time. |
The Committee may determine, from time to time, the advisability of retaining any search firm or consultant to assist in the identification and evaluation of candidates for membership on the Board. The Committee has the sole authority to retain, at Company expense, and terminate any such search firm or consultant, including sole authority to approve the fees to be paid to such firm or consultant and all other retention terms.
On an annual basis, the Committee shall evaluate the membership of the committees of the Board. The Committee shall provide to the full Board the results of its evaluation, together with the Committee’s recommendation as to committee membership during the upcoming year, for consideration by the Board in connection with the annual committee appointment process. In the event of a vacancy on any of the committees of the Board, the Committee shall provide its recommendation regarding a replacement committee member to the full Board.
Corporate Governance Function
Simultaneous with the adoption of this charter, the Committee shall, with the assistance of the Company’s outside counsel, develop and recommend a set of formal, written guidelines for corporate governance, which shall be presented to the full Board for consideration and adoption.
The Committee shall, from time to time, review the governance structures and procedures of the Company and suggest improvements thereto to the full Board of Directors. Such improvements, if adopted by the full Board, shall be incorporated into the written guidelines.
Annual Evaluation Function
The Committee shall conduct an annual evaluation of its performance. Additionally, the Committee shall oversee an annual evaluation of the Board and each of the other committees of the Board.
B-2
Conflict Resolution Function
The Committee shall consider and act upon any conflicts of interest-related matter required by the Company’s Charter or otherwise permitted by the MGCL where the exercise of independent judgment by any of the Company’s directors (who is not an independent director) could reasonably be compromised, including approval of any transaction involving the Company’s advisor or its affiliates.
Among the conflicts of interest-related matters that the Committee is expected to act upon are:
| • | | the continuation, renewal or enforcement of agreements with the Advisor and its Affiliates, including the advisory agreement and the dealer manager agreement; |
| • | | public offerings of securities; |
| • | | transactions with Affiliates; |
| • | | whether and when the Company seeks to list its shares of common stock on a national stock exchange or for quotation on a national market system; |
| • | | whether and when the Company seeks to sell its properties and liquidate; |
| • | | whether and when the Company or its assets are merged, reorganized or otherwise transferred to another entity; and |
| • | | whether and when the Company seeks to otherwise create a liquidity event for its stockholders. |
Other Activities
The Committee shall perform any other activities consistent with this charter, the Company’s Charter and Bylaws and governing law as the Board deems appropriate.
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The Committee shall meet at least two times per year. Other meetings may be held at the discretion of the chairperson of the Committee. Minutes of each of these meetings shall be kept.
B-3
STRATEGIC STORAGE TRUST, INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD JUNE 11, 2012
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Please vote by June 9, 2012
The undersigned stockholder of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, hereby appoints Michael S. McClure and Paula Mathews, and each of them as proxies, for the undersigned with full power of substitution in each of them, to attend the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. to be held on June 11, 2012 at 10:00 A.M. (PDT), at the offices of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., 111 Corporate Drive, Suite 120, Ladera Ranch, California 92694, and any and all adjournments and postponements thereof, with all power possessed by the undersigned as if personally present and to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and of the accompanying proxy statement, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such meeting.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. Board of Directors. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting, including matters incident to its conduct.
When properly executed, this proxy will be voted as specified by the undersigned stockholder. If no voting instruction is given as to any item, this proxy will be voted “FOR ALL” the nominees named in Item 1, “FOR” Item 2 and “FOR” Item 3.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR ALL” THE NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1, “FOR” ITEM 2 AND “FOR” ITEM 3. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, SUCH PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE RECOMMENDATIONS.
1. | For the election of H. Michael Schwartz, Harold “Skip” Perry and Timothy S. Morris to serve as directors until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc. to be held in the year 2013 and until their successors are elected and qualified. |
| | | | |
¨ H. Michael Schwartz | | ¨ Harold “Skip” Perry | | ¨ Timothy S. Morris |
| | |
¨ For All Nominees | | ¨ Withhold All | | ¨ Exceptions* |
*Exceptions_____________________________
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “Exceptions” box and write that nominee’s name in the space provided.
2. | For ratification of the appointment of Reznick Group, P.C. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. |
| | | | |
¨ For | | ¨ Against | | ¨ Abstain |
3. | For the approval of the amendment to charter to clarify certain language relating to payment of disposition fees. |
| | | | |
¨ For | | ¨ Against | | ¨ Abstain |
SIGN, DATE AND RETURN:
Note: Signature(s) should agree with the name(s) printed herein. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give your full name as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
If the stock is jointly owned, both parties must sign.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!
You can authorize the proxies to cast your vote and otherwise represent you at the Annual Meeting in one of three ways:
MAIL:Return the completed proxy card in the accompanying self-addressed postage-paid return envelope. Completed proxy cards must be received by June 9, 2012.
INTERNET: You may vote online atwww. eproxy.com/ssti until June 10, 2012 at 11:59pm (PDT).
TELEPHONE:You may vote via telephone at 1-866-977-7699 until June 10, 2012 at 11:59pm (PDT).