LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES | Following is a summary of loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015: December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Construction and land development $ 79,738 $ 64,702 Commercial real estate: Non-farm, non-residential 365,569 307,722 Owner occupied 186,892 147,017 Multifamily, nonresidential and junior liens 89,191 79,170 Total commercial real estate 641,652 533,909 Consumer real estate: Home equity lines 87,489 78,943 Secured by 1-4 family residential, secured by first deeds of trust 195,343 167,053 Secured by 1-4 family residential, secured by second deeds of trust 4,289 3,711 Total consumer real estate 287,121 249,707 Commercial and industrial loans (except those secured by real estate) 170,709 153,669 Consumer and other 11,542 13,539 Total loans 1,190,762 1,015,526 Deferred loan (fees) costs 518 630 Allowance for loan losses (7,909 ) (7,641 ) Net loans $ 1,183,371 $ 1,008,515 A further breakdown of the make-up of the construction and development and commercial real estate portfolios at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows: December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Construction and land development: Land $ 12,595 $ 16,026 Residential 36,253 29,864 Commercial 30,890 18,812 Total construction and land development $ 79,738 $ 64,702 Commercial real estate: Non-farm, non-residential: Office $ 108,228 $ 92,991 Industrial 36,264 38,518 Hotel/motel 28,453 18,935 Retail 165,434 135,200 Special purpose/Other 27,190 22,078 365,569 307,722 Owner occupied : Office 60,500 51,775 Industrial 46,876 40,337 Retail 31,085 12,157 Special purpose/Other 48,431 42,748 186,892 147,017 Multifamily, nonresidential and junior liens 89,191 79,170 Total commercial real estate $ 641,652 $ 533,909 Loans are primarily made in the Research Triangle and Charlotte areas of North Carolina. Real estate loans can be affected by the condition of the local real estate market. Commercial and installment loans can be affected by the local economic conditions. Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: Commercial & Industrial Construction Consumer Loans Not and Land Commercial Real Secured By Consumer Total (In thousands) Development Real Estate Estate Real Estate & Other Loans 2016 Balance at beginning of the year $ 509 $ 3,156 $ 2,046 $ 1,786 $ 144 $ 7,641 Provision for loan losses (326 ) 492 (153 ) 656 (78 ) 591 Loans charged off — (27 ) — (927 ) — (954 ) Recoveries 303 98 7 213 10 631 Net (chargeoffs) recoveries 303 71 7 (714 ) 10 (323 ) Balance at end of the year $ 486 $ 3,719 $ 1,900 $ 1,728 $ 76 $ 7,909 2015 Balance at beginning of the year $ 960 $ 2,510 $ 1,594 $ 1,662 $ 143 $ 6,869 Provision for loan losses (510 ) 902 408 (51 ) 1 750 Loans charged off (14 ) (275 ) — — — (289 ) Recoveries 73 19 44 175 — 311 Net (chargeoffs) recoveries 59 (256 ) 44 175 — 22 Balance at end of the year $ 509 $ 3,156 $ 2,046 $ 1,786 $ 144 $ 7,641 2014 Balance at beginning of the year $ 2,021 $ 1,184 $ 1,540 $ 2,150 $ 44 $ 6,939 Provision for loan losses (317 ) 1,287 104 (635 ) 99 538 Loans charged off (898 ) (1 ) (64 ) (99 ) — (1,062 ) Recoveries 154 40 14 246 — 454 Net (chargeoffs) recoveries (744 ) 39 (50 ) 147 — (608 ) Balance at end of the year $ 960 $ 2,510 $ 1,594 $ 1,662 $ 143 $ 6,869 The balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment are based on the impairment method as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and were as follows: Commercial & Industrial Construction Consumer Loans Not and Land Commercial Real Secured By Consumer Total (in thousands) Development Real Estate Estate Real Estate & Other Loans December 31, 2016 Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ — $ — $ 223 $ 286 $ — $ 509 Collectively evaluated for impairment 486 3,719 1,677 1,442 76 7,400 Total ending allowance $ 486 $ 3,719 $ 1,900 $ 1,728 $ 76 $ 7,909 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 125 $ 836 $ 1,121 $ 1,139 $ — $ 3,221 Collectively evaluated for impairment 79,613 640,816 286,000 169,570 11,542 1,187,541 Total ending loans $ 79,738 $ 641,652 $ 287,121 $ 170,709 $ 11,542 $ 1,190,762 December 31, 2015 Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4 $ 72 $ 115 $ 297 $ 21 $ 509 Collectively evaluated for impairment 505 3,084 1,931 1,489 123 7,132 Total ending allowance $ 509 $ 3,156 $ 2,046 $ 1,786 $ 144 $ 7,641 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 238 $ 2,619 $ 411 $ 602 $ 21 $ 3,891 Collectively evaluated for impairment 64,464 531,290 249,296 153,067 13,518 1,011,635 Total ending loans $ 64,702 $ 533,909 $ 249,707 $ 153,669 $ 13,539 $ 1,015,526 Loans are charged down or off as soon as the Company determines that the full principal balance due under any loan becomes uncollectible. The amount of the charge is determined as follows: ● If unsecured, the loan must be charged off in full. ● If secured, the outstanding principal balance of the loan should be charged down to the net realizable value of the collateral. Loans are considered uncollectible when: ● No regularly scheduled payment has been made within four months unless fully secured and in the process of collection. ● The collateral value is insufficient to cover the outstanding indebtedness and it is unlikely the borrower will have the ability to pay the debt in a timely manner. ● The loan is unsecured, the borrower files for bankruptcy protection and there is no other (guarantor, etc.) support from an entity outside of the bankruptcy proceedings. Impaired loans totaled $3.2 million and $3.9 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Included in the $3.2 million at December 31, 2016 is $1.3 million of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Included in the $3.9 million at December 31, 2015 is $2.8 million of loans classified as TDRs. A modification of a loan’s terms constitutes a TDR if the creditor grants a concession to the borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties that it would not otherwise consider. All TDRs are considered impaired. The following table provides information on performing and nonperforming TDRs as of December 31, 2016 and 2015: December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 Performing TDRs: Commercial real estate $ 520 $ 2,220 Consumer real estate 338 346 Commercial and industrial loans 297 47 Total performing TDRs 1,155 2,613 Nonperforming TDRs: Construction and land development 125 104 Consumer real estate 58 65 Consumer and other — 21 Total nonperformingTDRs 183 190 Total TDRs $ 1,338 $ 2,803 As of December 31, 2016 there were six loans totaling $1.3 million identified as TDRs, including two loans totaling $422,000 which were added during 2016. Three loans totaling $1.4 million considered TDRs as of December 31, 2015 were subsequently paid in full, and one loan for $46,000 went into default and was subsequently charged off in 2016. Of the two new loans considered TDRs during 2016, the largest was a $297,000 C&I loan due to changes in payment terms in response to the borrower’s short term cash flow shortage. The other loan for $125,000 is a real estate development loan that was modified to extend the term of the loan in response to slow sales. Payments are current on both loans that were classified as TDRs in 2016. Interest is not typically accrued on loans where impairment exists. For loans classified as TDRs, the Company further evaluates the loans as performing or non-performing. If, at the time of restructure, it is determined that no impairment exists, the loan will be classified as performing. Interest income recognized on performing TDRs was $71,000 and $161,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In order to quantify the value of any impairment, the Company evaluates loans individually. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $3.2 million of impaired loans. The detail of loans evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2016 is presented below: Unpaid Contractual (in thousands) Recorded Principal Allocated December 31, 2016 Investment Balance Allowance Loans without a specific valuation allowance: Construction and land development $ 125 $ 195 $- Commercial real estate 836 836 - Loans with a specific valuation allowance: Consumer real estate 1,121 1,152 223 Commercial and industrial loans (except those secured by real estate) 1,139 1,382 286 Total $ 3,221 $ 3,565 $509 At December 31, 2015, the Company had $3.9 million of impaired loans. The detail of loans evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2015 is presented below: Unpaid Contractual (in thousands) Recorded Principal Allocated December 31, 2015 Investment Balance Allowance Loans without a specific valuation allowance: Construction and land development $ 234 $ 397 $ — Commercial real estate 2,220 2,319 — Loans with a specific valuation allowance: Construction and land development 4 29 4 Commercial real estate 399 480 72 Consumer real estate 411 474 115 Commercial and industrial loans (except those secured by real estate) 602 895 297 Consumer and other 21 26 21 Total $ 3,891 $ 4,620 $ 509 The average recorded investment balance of impaired loans during 2016 and 2015 is as follows: 2016 2015 Average Interest Average Interest (in thousands) Balance Income Balance Income Construction and land development $ 156 $ — $ 285 $ 1 Commercial real estate 1,244 46 5,241 181 Consumer real estate 629 26 728 26 Commercial and industrial loans 1,594 62 642 24 Consumer and other 9 — 23 — $ 3,632 $ 134 $ 6,919 $ 232 When the Company cannot reasonably expect full and timely repayment of a loan, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. The Company will continue to track the contractual interest for purposes of customer reporting and any potential litigation or later collection of the loan but accrual of interest for financial statement purposes is to be discontinued. Subsequent payments of interest can be recognized as income on a cash basis provided that full collection of principal is expected. Otherwise, all payments received are to be applied to principal only. At the time of nonaccrual, past due or accrued interest is reversed from income. Loans over 90 days past due will automatically be placed on nonaccrual status. Loans that are less delinquent may also be placed on nonaccrual status if full collection of principal and interest is unlikely. The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans by portfolio segment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015: Nonaccrual (in thousands) 2016 2015 Construction and land development $ 125 $ 238 Consumer real estate 783 65 Commercial and industrial loans 60 189 Consumer and other — 21 Total $ 968 $ 513 There were no loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest at December 31, 2016 and 2015. If interest had been earned on non-accrual loans, such income would have approximated $46,000 and $28,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 by portfolio segment: Greater 30 - 59 60 - 89 than 90 Days Days Days Total (in thousands) Past Past Past Non- Past Total December 31, 2016 Due Due Due Accrual Due Current Loans Construction and land development $ $ $ $ 125 $ 125 $ 79,613 $ 79,738 Commercial real estate - - - - - 641,652 641,652 Consumer real estate - - - 783 783 286,338 287,121 Commercial and industrial loans - - - 60 60 170,649 170,709 Consumer and other - - - - - 11,542 11,542 Total $ - $ - $ - $ 968 $ 968 $ 1,189,794 $ 1,190,762 Greater 30 - 59 60 - 89 than 90 Days Days Days Total (in thousands) Past Past Past Non- Past Total December 31, 2015 Due Due Due Accrual Due Current Loans Construction and land development $ $ $ $ 238 $ 238 $ 64,464 $ 64,702 Commercial real estate - - - - - 533,909 533,909 Consumer real estate - - - 65 65 249,642 249,707 Commercial and industrial loans - - - 189 189 153,480 153,669 Consumer and other - - - 21 21 13,518 13,539 Total $ - $ - $ - $ 5 13 $ 513 $ 1,015,013 $ 1,015,526 Credit Quality Indicators The Company utilizes a nine point grading system in order to evaluate the level of inherent risk in the loan portfolio as part of its allowance for loan losses methodology. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped by loan type and by risk rating. Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on risk grade, historical loss experience, economic conditions, overall portfolio quality including delinquency rates and commercial real estate loan concentrations (as applicable). As risk grades increase, additional reserves are applied in order to account for the added inherent risk. The Company categorizes all business and commercial purpose loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by setting the risk grade at the inception of a loan through the approval process. A certain percentage of loan dollars is reviewed each year by a third party loan review function. The risk rating process is inherently subjective and based upon management’s evaluation of the specific facts and circumstances for individual borrowers. As such, the assigned risk ratings are subject to change based upon changes in borrower status and changes in the external environment affecting the borrower. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings: ● Risk Grade 1 – Minimal ● Risk Grade 2 – Modest ● Risk Grade 3 – Average ● Risk Grade 4 – Acceptable - ● Risk Grade 5 - Acceptable with Care ● Risk Grade 6 - Special Mention or Critical - o Repayment performance has not been demonstrated to prudent standards; o Repayment performance is inconsistent and highly sensitive to business and operating cycle swings; o Fatal documentation errors and; o Performing as agreed without documented capacity or collateral protection. ● Risk Grade 7 – Substandard - ● Risk Grade 8 – Doubtful - o Injection of capital; o Alternative financing; o Liquidation of assets or the pledging of additional collateral. The ability of the borrower to service the debt is extremely weak, overdue status is constant, the debt has been placed on nonaccrual status and no definite repayment schedule exists. Doubtful is a temporary grade where a loss is expected but is presently not quantified with any degree of accuracy. Once the loss position is determined, the amount is charged off. There were no loans rated as doubtful as of December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015. ● Risk Grade 9 – Loss Loans classified Loss are considered uncollectable and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the worthless loan even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of unimpaired loans by class of loans is as follows: Risk Grade (in thousands) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total December 31, 2016 Construction and land development $ $ 1,005 $ 911 $ 22,901 $ 54,601 $ 195 $ 125 $ 79,738 Commercial real estate - 539 223,459 311,711 87,443 18,500 - 641,652 Consumer real estate 50 19,247 130,748 102,137 33,013 1,143 783 287,121 Commercial and industrial loans 2,133 1,525 32,304 104,019 29,035 556 1,137 170,709 Consumer and other 1,160 730 1,086 7,392 1,174 - - 11,542 Total $ 3,343 $ 23,046 $ 388,508 $ 548,160 $ 205,266 $ 20,394 $ 2,045 $ 1,190,762 Risk Grade (in thousands) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total December 31, 2015 Construction and land development $ 26 $ 200 $ 2,545 $ 14,318 $ 47,133 $ 242 $ $ 64,464 Commercial real estate - 619 195,935 243,771 87,492 3,473 - 531,290 Consumer real estate 53 10,933 111,123 92,127 34,346 714 - 249,296 Commercial and industrial loans 2,168 1,909 24,675 96,900 26,802 612 - 153,066 Consumer and other 980 1,069 960 8,392 1,936 182 - 13,519 Total $ 3,227 $ 14,730 $ 335,238 $ 455,508 $ 197,709 $ 5,223 $ - $ 1,011,635 Loans with a carrying value of $997.6 million and $689.0 million were pledged as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to secure lines of credit with the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank. |