The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Organization and basis of presentation
Basis of Presentation and Organization
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of National Automation Services, Inc., (the "Company") should be read in conjunction with the Company's Registration Report on Form 10/A-2 for the period ended June 30, 2009 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Significant accounting policies disclosed therein have not changed (except as noted below).
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the "Codification"). The Codification became the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the literature. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and the Company adopted the Codification during the three months ended September 30, 2009. The Company has begun to use the new Codification when referring to GAAP in its quarterly and annual reports filed on Forms 10-Q and 10-K respectively. This guidance does not have an impact on the consolidated results of the Company.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations or the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The information furnished in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Although management believes the disclosures and information presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Registration Repo rt on Form 10/A-2 for the period ended June 30, 2009 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Income Taxes
As required by the Income Tax Topic of FASB ASC, income taxes are provided for using the liability method of accounting in accordance with the new codification standards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The computation of limitations relating to the amount of such tax assets, and the determination of appropriate valuation allowances relating to the realizing of such assets, are inherently complex and require the exercise of judgment. As additional information becomes available, we continually assess the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets.
Original Incorporation
National Automation Services, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated on January 27, 1997 in Nevada as E-Biz Solutions, Inc. On March 27, 1998, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation changing its name to Jaws Technologies, Inc. On July 7, 2000, the Company reincorporated in Delaware and on September 29, 2000 changed its name to Jawz Inc.
7
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On July 13, 2007, Jawz, Inc. changed its name to Ponderosa Lumber, Inc. Ponderosa Lumber, Inc. was a Delaware non-reporting public “shell” company with nominal assets whose sole business was to identify, evaluate and acquire through a reverse merger a target company with an operating business with the intent of continuing the acquired company’s business as a publicly held entity.
On October 2, 2007, Ponderosa Lumber, Inc. changed its name to National Automation Services, Inc, a Colorado corporation (“NASV Colorado”).
October 2, 2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Intuitive System Solutions, Inc. (“ISS”), a Nevada corporation headquartered in Henderson, Nevada. To acquire ISS we issued an aggregate of 39,999,999 shares of our common stock, which shares represented approximately 99.6% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis. Accordingly, pursuant to the Stock Purchase and Plan of Reorganization Agreement among us, ISS, Messrs. Jody R. Hanley (“Hanley”), Robert W. Chance (“Chance”) and Manuel Ruiz (“Ruiz”) (collectively, the “ISS Owners”), TBeck Capital, Inc. (“TBeck”), a Florida corporation, and 3 JP Inc., a California corporation, we issued to the ISS Owners an aggregate of 21,999,999 “restricted” shares of our common stock.
In addition, we issued to TBeck and its designees an aggregate of 18,000,000 shares of our common stock (4,000,000 shares were “restricted” and 14,000,000 shares were “free trading”). TBeck (1) was the owner, in escrow, of 1,126,745 shares of ISS common stock issued in consideration for T-Beck having paid to ISS an aggregate of $506,000 in cash and agreeing verbally to pay to ISS after the closing an additional $244,000 in cash to be used for working capital, and (2) paid the $250,000 required to effectuate the transaction. (T-Beck never executed a promissory note to memorialize this future funding obligation, and it never paid us or ISS the promised $244,000.) For consideration of 18,000,000 shares of NAS stock, TBeck delivered to us the 1,126,745 shares of ISS for the value of cash paid for ISS common stock of $506,000, the amount of $250,000 (to effectuate the transact ion as noted above) and a verbal agreement to pay NAS cash in the amount of $244,000, for a total consideration of the reverse merger acquisition in the amount of $1,000,000. The 18 million shares issued in the ISS reverse merger to T-Beck and its designees were valued at $506,000 (being the value of the cash ISS received for the 1,126,745 ISS shares which were exchanged for the 18 million NAS shares). Per FAS 141, par. 23, the remaining 21,999,999 shares were valued at $32,521, which represented the fair market value of the public shell (125,082 shares outstanding after giving effect to such Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, multiplied by the $0.26 average closing price per share over the six days preceding the closing), since the shell had no cash and the acquirer paid no cash. As this was a reverse merger without the recognition of goodwill and no cash was used to purchase the shell, the $32,521 was expensed. For accounting purposes the acquisition has been treated as a recapitalization of ISS with ISS as the acquirer in this reverse merger. The historical financial statements prior to October 2, 2007 are those of ISS.
On December 28, 2007, National Automation Services, Inc. changed its state of incorporation from Colorado to Nevada by merging with and into National Automation Services, Inc., a new Nevada corporation, formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Upon consummation of the merger and reincorporation in the State of Nevada, the Colorado Corporation ceased to exist. National Automation Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation, was the surviving entity and continues to act as the holding company for its two wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, ISS and Intecon, Inc.
Business Overview
National Automation Services, Inc. is a holding company formed to acquire and operate specialized automation control companies located in the Southwestern United States. Currently, the Company owns 100% of the capital stock of two operating subsidiaries: (1) ISS, a Nevada corporation, based in Henderson, Nevada and (2) Intecon, an Arizona corporation, based in Tempe, Arizona.
We conduct our business and operations through these two wholly-owned subsidiaries. Overall, the Company serves a diverse set of industries which utilize automation systems and controls, including water valley waste and treatment facilities, entertainment, hospitality, mining, medical, and manufacturing.
8
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Since the acquisition of its current operating subsidiaries, the Company has strived to position itself as a leading system integrator and certified Underwriters Laboratories panel fabrication facility. The Company currently focuses on two distinct lines of business: (1) industrial automation and control and (2) automation manufacturing, which comprises the bulk of contracts that the Company currently maintains under its building contracts. The Company’s management runs the company as one unit and does not have two distinct business segments.
NOTE 2: Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
Adopted
Business Combination: On January 1, 2009, NAS adopted changes issued by the FASB to accounting for business combinations. While retaining the fundamental requirements of accounting for business combinations, including that the purchase method be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination, these changes define the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control instead of the date that the consideration is transferred. These changes require an acquirer in a business combination, including business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisition), to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. T his guidance also requires the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from certain contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. Additionally, these changes require acquisition-related costs to be expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred and the services are received instead of including such costs as part of the acquisition price.
Other: On June 30, 2009, NAS adopted changes issued by the FASB to accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, otherwise known as “subsequent events.” Specifically, these changes set forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Financial Statements as management already followed a similar approach prior to the adoption of this new guidance (see Note 12 Subsequent events)
Issued
In August 2009, the FASB issued changes to fair value accounting for liabilities. These changes clarify existing guidance that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using either a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of either a similar liability or a quoted price of an identical or similar liability when traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements, such as an income approach (e.g., present value technique). This guidance also states that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability and a quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. Management is currently eva luating the potential impact of adopting these changes on the Financial Statements.
9
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for variable interest entities. These changes require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity; to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to add an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performanc e; and to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting these changes on the Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. These changes remove the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and remove the exception from the application of variable interest accounting to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities; limits the circumstances in which a transferor derecognizes a portion or component of a financial asset; defines a participating interest; requires a transferor to recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer accounted for as a sale; and requires enhanced disclosure; among others. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting these changes on the Financial Statements.
NOTE 3: Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. Our operating revenues are insufficient to fund our operations and our assets already are pledged to Trafalgar as collateral for our outstanding $3,200,000 of indebtedness. The Company has experienced reoccurring net losses, had a net loss of $(2,891,542) (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and $(6,181,424) for the year ended December 31, 2008, and a working capital deficiency of $(3,366,542) (unaudited) at September 30, 2009.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company assessed its overall financial position, noting our cash on hand, our receivables at December 31, 2008 and our operational budget for 2009, removing all noncash items such as depreciation, amortization and stock based compensation, with a view to projecting our 2009 net income. Our operational cash flow was projected to increase during 2009 from increases in awarded contracts while we anticipated maintaining our expenses at a static level with 2008, plus we expected to obtain additional cash flow by closing one acquisition (to be paid for with shares of our common stock) and projecting that our new subsidiary would leverage our core competency in the field of wastewater automation and obtain new business in its market, and we likewise would be able to use the competency of the new subsidiary to provide revenue growth in our current regional areas.
In February 2009, Trafalgar ceased to provide funding to the Company. In April 2009, the Company commenced a lawsuit against Trafalgar (see Note 9 Commitments – Legal) alleging that Trafalgar had breached the credit agreements and that the agreements were criminally usurious and therefore was unlawful and unenforceable. In the 60 days following our lawsuit, we received no correspondence from Trafalgar concerning the status of our debt obligations; and the Company proceeded to seek institutional funding to replace Trafalgar’s credit facility, and our efforts were unsuccessful. On July 7, 2009, Trafalgar issued a default notice (see Note 9 Commitments – legal) to us. Management then reviewed the Company’s operating performance against its 2009 operational budget and evaluated our prospects of obtaining additional outside funding and determined that we had not met and would not be abl e to meet our operating budget due to circumstances outside of our control; for example our customers were paying 90-120 days instead of 45-60 days as in 2008 and our outside funding needs were not being met. Based on the above facts, management determined that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
10
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We continue to seek sources of additional capital. We intend to try to improve our cash and cash flow from operations by encouraging faster payments, and if necessary granting discounts for prompt payment, of our receivables while simultaneously delaying payments to our vendors. Also we plan to increase our revenue by increasing our visibility and the awareness of our Company, and our products and services, by engaging in more aggressive sales, marketing and advertising activity. We intend to develop and implement strategies to market ongoing maintenance and service contracts to our current as well as our past customers, and we plan to package these continuing services as part of our industrial automation design and manufacturing services. We also intend to implement cost reduction synergies such as centralizing procurement and estimating activit ies at our corporate hub using dedicated teams of trained employees, rather than having these tasks performed at our branch offices.
NOTE 4: Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment consists of the following:
| | | | | | |
| | Period Ended September 30, 2009 | Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
| | (unaudited) | (audited) |
Vehicles | $ | 106,825 | $ | 106,825 |
Computer and office equipment | | 89,780 | | 50,096 |
Furniture and fixtures | | 14,910 | | 8,614 |
UL Machinery and equipment | | 22,289 | | 22,289 |
Total property and equipment | | 233,804 | | 187,824 |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | (101,720) | | (57,026) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 132,084 | $ | 130,798 |
Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $57,551 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $79,998.
NOTE 5: Loans and capital leases
The following tables represent the outstanding balance of loans and capital leases for the Company as of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008.
| | | | |
| | Period Ended | | Year Ended |
| | September 30, | | December 31, |
| | 2009 | | 2008 |
| | (unaudited) | | (audited) |
Promissory note payable in monthly installments of $511, Non-interest bearing, collateralized by a vehicle due August 2009. | $ |
— | $ | 4,090 |
Promissory note payable in monthly installments of $364 at an interest rate of 2.9%, collateralized by a vehicle due June 2010. | |
3,202 | | 6,401 |
Promissory note payable in monthly installments of $367 at an interest rate of 2.9%, collateralized by a vehicle due August 2010. | |
3,285 | | 6,466 |
Capital lease | | 32,012 | | 16,220 |
Auto loans and capital lease sub total | | 38,499 | | 33,177 |
Less: current portion loans and capital leases | | (15,641) | | (16,859) |
Total | $ | 22,858 | $ | 16,318 |
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into a fair market value capital lease with Konika copiers. The lease is over a 60 month period, with present lease payments exceeding 90% of fair market value of the property.
11
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6: Lines of credit
On April 1, 2009, the Company acquired a revolving line of credit with Dell Financial in the amount of $25,000. The Company’s current outstanding balance on the line of credit as of September 30, 2009, was $8,003, in our purchase of office/computer assets.
On July 7, 2009, we received a notice of default from Trafalgar that we have violated the terms of our secured loan and credit facility agreements by failing to make certain payments when due and breaching certain covenants (See Note 9 Commitments – legal). Due to this notice we have reclassified all Trafalgar debt to current.
NOTE 7: Secured redeemable debentures
On March 26, 2008, the Company entered into a secured redeemable debenture agreement with Trafalgar, for a total financing package of redeemable debentures up to $10,000,000. On March 26, 2008, the Company borrowed $1,500,000 and on July 21, 2008 the Company borrowed $750,000.
Upon entering into the agreements with Trafalgar, the Company has capitalized the financing fees over the life of the loans. The $775,353 is the sum of the value of the warrants ($10,353), the value of the stock issued ($540,000) and the value of the 15% principal redemption/repayment premium on the $1,500,000 loan ($225,000). On December 19, 2008, the Company entered into the ABL agreement which restructured the debenture agreements and reduced certain terms over the life of the loans without triggering debt extinguishment.
As of the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company had total deferred financing fee in the amount of $266,576, net of accumulated amortization $293,678, and for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had deferred financing fees in the amount of $481,895, net of accumulated amortization $82,163.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had not requested additional debt under this agreement which has not triggered the Company to obtain the remaining $7,750,000 in debentures from Trafalgar. The Trafalgar debenture agreements have a premium and discount term associated. Debt premiums/discounts, typically fees paid by the debtor to the creditor(s) as part of the issuance of debt, are accounted for as a direct reduction of or addition to the face amount of the debt (valuation account) as the discount or premium is inseparable from the debt giving rise to it.
The debt premium/discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt. The following table represents the remaining current and long term portion of the total debt as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
12
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On July 7, 2009, we received a notice of default from Trafalgar that we have violated the terms of our secured loan and credit facility agreements by failing to make certain payments when due and breaching certain covenants (See Note 9 Commitments – legal). Due to this notice we have reclassified all Trafalgar debt to current.
NOTE 8: Related party transactions
On February 12, 2008, a director of the Board entered into a verbal loan agreement with the Company in the amount of $35,000. Per the terms of the verbal agreement no interest was to be accumulated. As of December 31, 2008, $20,000 of the debt still remained outstanding. On February 4, 2009, the Company repaid the remaining balance of its loan to the Board member in the amount of $20,000.
On June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a verbal loan agreement in which it borrowed $130,000 from a director. On July 23, 2008, the Company paid $30,000 cash to the independent director as partial payment of the loan. On September 22, 2008, the Company issued 357,153 shares of restricted common stock valued at $57,142, to satisfy the outstanding interest of the loan at August 31, 2008. On November 12, 2008, the Company issued an additional 1,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock valued at $100,000 in order to satisfy the additional interest accumulated for the $100,000 loan. On December 19, 2008, the Company paid $50,000 to reduce the total balance of the loan to $50,000 as of December 31, 2008. On April 1, 2009 we modified the verbal loan agreement entered into on June 30, 2008 with a director of the company balance of $50,000 as of December 31, 2008, by making it a form al promissory note, capitalizing accrued interest into the principal ($36,000) and including an annual interest rate of 10%. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $86,000 plus accrued interest in the amount of $4,300.
On November 5, 2008, the Company entered into agreement promissory note with a director of the Board, for $77,000. The terms of the loan were to repay of the loan in the amount of $72,000 with the addition of a $5,000 fee for interest or incur a $250 a day late fee if paid after December 5, 2008. On April 1, 2009 we modified the loan agreement to remove the $250 a day late fees and add an annual interest rate of 10%. As of September 30, 2009, we owed $77,000 plus accrued interest in the amount of $32,861.
On September 11, 2009, the Company entered into agreement promissory note with an executive officer of the Company, for $10,000. The terms of the loan were to repay of the loan in the amount of $10,000 with a 10% annual interest to start as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009 the balance has not been repaid.
NOTE 9: Commitments
Operating Leases
On February 1, 2009, the Company entered into an operating lease for machinery and equipment located at our subsidiary in Henderson, Nevada. This operating lease is with a principal shareholder, executive officer and director of the Company. The operating lease is a month-to-month lease for $600 per month with no annual increase.
On February 10, 2009, the Company entered into an operating lease for our corporate offices located in Henderson, Nevada. This operating lease is a three (3) year lease with a non-related third party for $2,635 per month with a 4% annual increase.
On October 7, 2009, the Company amended the operating lease agreement for our corporate offices located in Henderson, Nevada. The operating lease restarts the (3) three year leasing period as of December 1, 2009 with a non related third party for $3,735 per month with no annual increase for (24) twenty four months (see Note 12 Subsequent events).
Total rental expense for all operating leases for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $69,981.
13
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Loans
On July 25, 2008, the Company entered into a loan agreement with South Bay Capital in the amount of $75,926. Per the terms of the verbal agreement no interest was to be accumulated. On December 19, 2008 the Company repaid South Bay in the amount of $65,000. On September 15, 2009, the Company secured the remaining balance of the loan with a written promissory note. The note bears an interest rate of 12% for the remaining balance of $10,926, and will be applied retrospectively to the note as of January 1, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, $10,926 of the debt still remains outstanding with total interest as of September 30, 2009 of $991.
Legal
On April 23, 2009, the Company entered into a lawsuit against Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, FIS (”Trafalgar”).
The Company is the Plaintiff, charging Trafalgar with usurious lending practices. We noted that the pending litigation is estimatable; however, as the litigation is still in the pre-discovery stages we are not able to indicate the outcome. On July 7, 2009 we received a notice of default from Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, FIS (”Trafalgar”) that we have violated the terms of our secured loan and credit facility agreements by failing to make certain payments when due and breaching certain covenants.
The lender has accelerated our outstanding indebtedness, and accordingly it has the right to execute and foreclose on all of our assets, including the stock in our subsidiaries, and/or the personal guarantee executed in favor of the lender by Robert Chance, our CEO.
We reclassified all Trafalgar related debt to current due to the default notice. The Company has not made any payments to Trafalgar before March 31, 2009 due to the pending litigation against Trafalgar.
In November 2009 we were served with the Complaint Trafalgar filed on October 30, 2009 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, against us, our two subsidiaries and Robert Chance, our CEO. Trafalgar’s complaint seeks repayment of the amounts we allegedly owe under these same agreements, plus interest and attorneys fees, and foreclosure on all of our assets (we had pledged such assets as collateral pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement we executed in connection with such agreements). The Complaint also alleges that we fraudulently induced Trafalgar to extend to us the approximately $3 million in total financing we received. Our April 2009 complaint was filed in the same Court and alleges that the agreements under which Trafalgar had extended financing to us, and under which it now is suing us, are unenforceable. We believe Trafalgar’s all egations are without merit. We intend to mount a vigorous defense and move the Court to consolidate these two actions.
NOTE 10: Income taxes
At September 30, 2009, the Company’s federal and state net operating loss carry forwards were approximately $4,120,000, which begin to expire in 2027. Due to our continued net losses, the Company allowed for its deferred tax asset from December 31, 2008 resulting in a provision for income taxes of $14,950 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively; and $14,950 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE 11: Stockholders’ deficit
Preferred Stock
Our wholly owned subsidiary, ISS, has 125,000 shares of preferred stock authorized with a par value of $1.00; these shares have no voting rights and no dividend preferences.
14
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Common Stock
On January 19, 2009, The Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $32,500 for services to the Company. The Company valued at market value on January 2, 2009 which was $0.13 per share.
On January 24, 2009, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $240,000 for advisory services to the Board of Directors. The shares were valued at market value on January 23, 2009 which was $0.12 per share.
On February 4, 2009, the Company issued 312,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $12,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.04 per share.
On February 4, 2009, the Company issued 312,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $12,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.04 per share.
On February 20, 2009, the Company issued 1,125,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $67,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On February 20, 2009, the Company issued 312,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $18,750 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On February 20, 2009, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $7,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On February 20, 2009, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $7,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On March 24, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $26,000 for services to the Company. The shares were valued at market value on March 24, 2009 which was $0.13 per share.
On March 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $90,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share. The Company issued the shares as a stock receivable on March 30, 2009 and received the cash on April 12, 2009.
On April 14, 2009, we issued To Knightsbridge Capital 112,500 shares to replace the same number of shares transferred to Knightsbridge Capital on December 18, 2008 by our CEO, after Knightsbridge returned his former shares to him in January 2009 for the new certificate issued in April. The stock was valued on December 18, 2008; at $0.12 per share for services rendered value at $13,500 in connection with our financing from Trafalgar.
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $15,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $26,000 in consideration for investment services to the Company. The Company valued the shares at $0.13 per share.
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $15,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 75,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $4,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $12,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
15
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On May 28, 2009, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $66,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.06 per share.
On May 29, 2009, the Company issued 230,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $24,150 in consideration for services to the Company. The Company valued the shares on May 29, 2009 for the fair market value at $0.11 per share.
On May 29, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $25,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 136,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $6,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 105,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $5,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 21,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $1,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 21,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $1,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 105,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $5,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $10,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 71,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $9,940 in consideration for investment services to the Company in the amount of $0.14 per share. In October, the shares were returned to the Company and cancelled as they were issued in error (see Note 12 Subsequent events).
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 294,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $14,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 21,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $1,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 52,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $2,500 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 5, 2009, the Company issued 105,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $5,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 9, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $50,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 18, 2009, the Company issued 4,704,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $224,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On June 23, 2009, the Company issued 522,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $25,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
16
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On June 23, 2009, we authorized the issuance of 244,750 shares of common stock valued at $34,265 based on service fees of $0.14 per share, for services rendered; the shares were issued on June 25, 2009. In October, the shares were returned to the Company and cancelled as they were issued in error (see Note 12 Subsequent events).
On July 1, 2009, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $25,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.10 per share.
On July 3, 2009, the Company issued the stock payable in the amount of 779,163 shares of restricted stock common stock valued at $77,916 in consideration for salary compensation to the Company in the amount of $0.10 per share.
On July 16, 2009, The Company issued 350,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $17,500 in consideration for salary compensation to an officer of the Company. The Company valued for services rendered in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 42,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $2,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 210,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $10,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 42,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $2,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 120,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $6,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $5,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $60,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $5,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 1,575,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $75,000 in consideration for cash to the Company in the amount of $0.05 per share.
On September 10, 2009, the Company issued 66,750 shares of restricted common stock valued at $7,343 for services to the Company. The Company valued for services rendered in the amount of $0.11 per share. In October, the shares were returned to the Company and cancelled as they were issued in error (see Note 12 Subsequent events).
On September 30, 2009, the Company received $9,700 in cash, for 197,400 shares of its restricted common stock valued at $0.05 per share. The stock was issued in October 2009.
17
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12: Subsequent Events
In satisfaction of the stock payable noted on September 30, 2009, the Company issued to three individuals an aggregate of 137,400 shares of common stock in consideration for $6,700 in cash, or $0.05 per share. The shares were issued on October 2, 2009.
On October 2, 2009, the Company issued 5,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $650 for services to the Company. The Company valued for services rendered in the amount of $0.13 per share. In October 2009 the recipient agreed to return their shares for cancellation after we were advised we could not pay finder’s fees to any person who was not a registered broker-dealer.
In satisfaction of the stock payable noted on September 30, 2009, the Company issued to one individual 60,000 shares of common stock in consideration for $3,000 in cash, or $0.05 per share. The shares were issued on October 5, 2009.
On October 5, 2009, the Company issued 3,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $330 for services to the Company. The Company valued for services rendered in the amount of $0.11 per share. In October 2009 the recipient agreed to return their shares for cancellation after we were advised we could not pay finder’s fees to any person who was not a registered broker-dealer.
On October 7, 2009, the Company amended the operating lease agreement for our corporate offices located in Henderson, Nevada. The operating lease restarts the (3) three year leasing period as of December 1, 2009 with a non related third party for $4,950 per month with no annual increase for (24) twenty four months after the 24 month period, the increase to rent is 4.63%. Future payments to office rent are:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From | | | Through | | | Sq. footage | | | $ per sq. ft | | | Estimated Annual rent | | | Monthly rent | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/1/2009 | | | 11/30/2010 | | | 3,200 | | | 1.54 | | $ | 59,400 | | $ | 4,950 | |
12/1/2010 | | | 11/30/2011 | | | 3,200 | | | 1.54 | | $ | 59,400 | | $ | 4,950 | |
12/1/2011 | | | 11/30/2012 | | | 3,200 | | | 1.61 | | $ | 61,824 | | $ | 5,152 | |
On October 27, 2009, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock valued at $0.11 per share based upon fair market value on October 23, 2009. The Company issued the shares for services per consulting agreement.
On October 27, 2009, the Company issued to four individuals an aggregate of 447,500 shares of common stock in consideration for $21,500 in cash, or $0.05 per share.
On October 29, 2009, the Company received a return of 382,500 shares from a service provider which was issued in error. These shares were returned to the Company treasury (see Note 11 Stockholders’ deficit).
18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following is a summary of all transactions involving our sales during the period covered by this report of our securities that were not registered under the Securities Act. Shares issued for cash consideration paid to us are valued at the purchase price per share; all other shares are valued as stated. All shares issued were issued as “restricted” shares of our common stock except as otherwise expressly stated.
On July 1, 2009, we issued to one individual 250,000 shares of common stock in consideration of $25,000 in cash, or $0.10 per share.
On July 3, 2009, we issued to 26 of our employees an aggregate of 779,163 shares of common stock as salary compensation valued at $77,916 based on the closing market price of our common stock on that day of $0.10 per share (including shares to our Management, as follows: Robert Chance: 80,000 shares; Jody Hanley: 80,000 shares; David Marlow: 80,000 shares; Manuel Ruiz: 80,000 shares; Brandon Spiker: 80,769 shares, and Jeremy Briggs: 26,154 shares (which shares Mr. Briggs gifted to immediate family members)).
On July 16, 2009, we authorized the issuance to Jeremy Briggs (our vice president and principal accounting officer) of 350,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,500, or $0.05 per share, in lieu of a salary increase; the shares were issued on July 17, 2009.
On September 10, 2009, we issued to eight individuals an aggregate of 3,389,000 shares of common stock in consideration of $165,000 in cash, or $0.05 per share.
On September 15, 2009, we issued to David Gronski and Mary Margrave 6,750 and 60,000 shares of common stock, respectively, valued at $0.12 per share, or $810 and $7,200, respectively, for services rendered as a finder’s fee. In October 2009 these persons agreed to return their shares for cancellation after we were advised we could not pay finder’s fees to any person who was not a registered broker-dealer.
On October 2, 2009, we issued to three individuals an aggregate of 137,400 shares of common stock in consideration for $6,700 in cash, or $0.048 per share.
On October 2, 2009, we issued 5,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $650 for services to the Company. The Company valued for services rendered in the amount of $0.13 per share. In October 2009, the recipient agreed to return the shares for cancellation after we advised we could not pay finder’s fees to any person who was not a registered broker-dealer.
On October 5, 2009, we issued to one individual 60,000 shares of common stock in consideration for $3,000 in cash, or $0.05 per share.
On October 5, 2009, we issued 3,000 shares of common stock valued at $330, or $0.11 per share, for services rendered; and thereafter, in October 2009, the recipient agreed to return the shares for cancellation after we advised we could not pay finder’s fees to any person who was not a registered broker-dealer.
On October 27, 2009, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock valued at $0.11 per share based upon fair market value on October 23, 2009. The Company issued the shares for services per consulting agreement with Selective Consulting. Per the consulting agreement Selective Consulting is to provide financial services to the Company.
On October 27, 2009, the Company issued to four individuals an aggregate of 447,500 shares of common stock in consideration for $21,500 in cash, or $0.048 per share.
Except as stated above, we have had no recent sales of unregistered securities within the past three fiscal years. There were no underwritten offerings employed in connection with any of the transactions described above. Except as stated above, the above issuances were deemed to be exempt under Rule 504 or 506 of Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) or 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to information about our company and their investment, the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and we took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.
19
Item 6. Exhibits.
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description of Exhibit |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NATIONAL AUTOMATION SERVICES INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
January 29, 2010
By: /s/ Robert W. Chance
Name: Robert W. Chance
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
By: /s/ Jeremy W. Briggs
Name: Jeremy W. Briggs
Title: Chief Accounting Officer
21