Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. Investments held at fair value consist of Available for Sale Investments. The Available for Sale Investments may consist of corporate debt securities, commercial paper, U.S. Treasury securities, Treasury bills, agency bonds and short term bond funds. When available, Prosper uses quoted prices in active markets to measure the fair value of securities available for sale. When utilizing market data and bid-ask spreads, Prosper uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of investment assets. Prosper's primary independent pricing service provides prices based on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the same or similar securities. Prosper compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. Prosper does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts. The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 13 for further details. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 606,799 $ 606,799 Loans Held for Sale — — 114,962 114,962 Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value — 1,499 — 1,499 Servicing Assets — — 13,387 13,387 Total Assets $ — $ 1,499 $ 735,148 $ 736,647 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 253,425 $ 253,425 Servicing Liabilities — — 4 4 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value — — 44,090 44,090 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 166,559 166,559 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,249 3,249 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 467,327 $ 467,327 December 31, 2018 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 263,522 $ 263,522 Loans Held for Sale — — 183,788 183,788 Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value — 22,173 — 22,173 Servicing Assets — — 14,687 14,687 Total Assets $ — $ 22,173 $ 461,997 $ 484,170 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 264,003 $ 264,003 Servicing Liabilities — — 12 12 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability — — 143,679 143,679 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,118 3,118 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 410,812 $ 410,812 As Prosper’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Notes, and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper’s level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 4.9% - 12.9% 4.7% - 13.8% Default rate 2.0% - 16.6% 2.0% - 15.8% Servicing Rights: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.6% - 17.6% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.3% - 26.1% 15.5% - 25.1% Market servicing rate 0.625 % 0.625 % Loan Trailing Fee Liability: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.6% - 17.6% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.3% - 26.1% 15.5% - 25.1% At June 30, 2019, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. The following tables present additional information about level 3 Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ (264,003) $ — $ 183,788 $ 183,307 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 348,629 (86,713) (51,595) 1,161,237 1,371,558 Transfers in (Transfers out) 147,773 — — (147,773) — Principal repayments (134,031) 85,728 4,272 (26,529) (70,560) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,886) — — (1,053,308) (1,055,194) Other changes 91 603 (603) 89 180 Change in fair value (17,299) 10,960 3,836 (2,542) (5,045) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 606,799 $ (253,425) $ (44,090) $ 114,962 $ 424,246 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2018 $ 293,005 $ (293,948) $ 49 $ (894) Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 91,075 (90,693) 1,324,100 1,324,482 Principal repayments (88,947) 91,525 (14,265) (11,687) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (2,016) — (1,193,651) (1,195,667) Other changes (338) 633 796 1,091 Change in fair value (15,418) 15,058 (212) (572) Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 116,817 $ 116,753 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at April 1, 2019 $ 448,710 $ (258,722) $ (19,134) $ 106,640 $ 277,494 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 213,370 (41,774) (30,979) 670,382 810,999 Transfers in (Transfers out) 33,457 — — (33,457) — Principal repayments (77,402) 41,611 3,139 (11,790) (44,442) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (912) — — (615,835) (616,747) Other changes (48) 2 (436) 255 (227) Change in fair value (10,376) 5,458 3,320 (1,233) (2,831) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 606,799 $ (253,425) $ (44,090) $ 114,962 $ 424,246 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at April 1, 2018 $ 285,584 $ (285,095) $ 82,803 $ 83,292 Purchase of Borrower Loans/Issuance of Notes 44,799 (44,468) 728,901 729,232 Principal repayments (43,990) 44,423 (10,416) (9,983) Borrower Loans sold to third parties (950) — (683,547) (684,497) Other changes (202) 86 255 139 Change in fair value (7,880) 7,629 (1,179) (1,430) Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 116,817 $ 116,753 The following tables present additional information about level 3 servicing assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 14,687 Additions 6,378 Derecognition (1,049) Less: Changes in fair value (6,629) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 13,387 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2018 14,711 Additions 7,502 Less: Changes in fair value (6,569) Fair Value at June 30, 2018 15,644 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2019 13,814 Additions 3,636 Derecognition (685) Less: Changes in fair value (3,378) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 13,387 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2018 14,754 Additions 4,163 Less: Changes in fair value (3,273) Fair Value at June 30, 2018 15,644 The following table presents additional information about level 3 Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2019 $ 143,679 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 17,553 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability 5,327 Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 166,559 Preferred Stock Balance as of January 1, 2018 $ 116,366 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 35,912 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (8,602) Balance as of June 30, 2018 $ 143,676 Preferred Stock Balance as of April 1, 2019 $ 163,483 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 7,805 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (4,729) Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 166,559 Preferred Stock Balance as of April 1, 2018 $ 127,041 Add Issuances of Preferred Stock Warrant 20,633 Change in Fair Value of the Preferred Stock Warrant Liability (3,998) Balance as of June 30, 2018 $ 143,676 Loan Trailing Fee The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates using a discounted cash flow model. The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Balance at January 1, 2019 3,118 Issuances 1,297 Cash Payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,298) Change in Fair Value 132 Balance at June 30, 2019 3,249 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2019 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages): Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale Notes Fair Value as of June 30, 2019 $721,761 $253,425 Discount rate assumption: 7.44 % * 7.87 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 715,006 $ 251,050 200 basis point increase 708,411 248,730 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 728,682 $ 255,859 200 basis point decrease 735,775 258,354 Default rate assumption: 12.19 % * 12.55 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 713,132 $ 250,379 200 basis point increase 704,794 247,437 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 730,554 $ 256,527 200 basis point decrease 739,384 259,643 * Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades. The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper’s estimated fair value of servicing assets and liabilities, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as of June 30, 2019 (in thousands, except percentages). Servicing Assets Fair Value as of June 30, 2019 $13,387 Market servicing rate assumptions 0.625 % Resulting fair value from: Market servicing rate increase to 0.65% $ 12,560 Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60% $ 14,214 Weighted average prepayment assumptions 20.59 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 13,220 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate $ 13,556 Weighted average default assumptions 11.72 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate $ 13,237 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate $ 13,541 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. Financial Instruments, Assets and Liabilities not Recorded at Fair Value The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for financial instruments, assets, and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2019 Carrying Amount Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Balance at Fair Value Assets: Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 68,124 $ 68,124 $ — $ — $ 68,124 Restricted Cash 160,990 — 160,990 — 160,990 Accounts Receivable 1,270 — 1,270 — 1,270 Total Assets $ 230,384 $ 68,124 $ 162,260 $ — $ 230,384 Liabilities: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $ 20,349 $ — $ 20,349 $ — $ 20,349 Payable to Investors 114,811 — 114,811 — 114,811 Notes Issued by Securitization Trust 313,111 — $ 318,304 — 318,304 Warehouse Lines 101,406 — 101,406 — 101,406 Total Liabilities $ 549,677 $ — $ 554,870 $ — $ 554,870 |
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities | Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Prosper Funding measures the fair value of assets and liabilities in accordance with its fair value hierarchy which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. We apply this framework whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value: Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation methodologies for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar methodologies, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair values of assets or liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation methodologies are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands): June 30, 2019 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 254,070 $ 254,070 Servicing Assets — — 15,461 15,461 Total Assets — — 269,531 269,531 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 253,425 $ 253,425 Servicing Liabilities — — 4 4 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,249 3,249 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 256,678 $ 256,678 December 31, 2018 Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs Total Assets: Borrower Loans $ — $ — $ 263,522 $ 263,522 Servicing Assets — — 15,550 15,550 Total Assets — — 279,072 279,072 Liabilities: Notes $ — $ — $ 264,003 $ 264,003 Servicing Liabilities — — 12 12 Loan Trailing Fee Liability — — 3,118 3,118 Total Liabilities $ — $ — $ 267,133 $ 267,133 As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. Significant Unobservable Inputs The following tables present quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018: Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 4.9% - 12.9% 4.7% - 13.8% Default rate 2.0% - 16.6% 2.0% - 15.8% Servicing Assets and Liabilities: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.6% - 17.6% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.3% - 26.1% 15.5% - 25.1% Market servicing rate 0.625 % 0.625 % Loan Trailing Fee Liability: Range Unobservable Input June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 Discount rate 15.0% - 25.0% 15.0% - 25.0% Default rate 1.6% - 17.6% 1.6% - 16.7% Prepayment rate 16.3% - 26.1% 15.5% - 25.1% The changes in the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, which are level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2019 $ 263,522 $ (264,003) $ — $ (481) Originations 86,062 (86,713) 1,161,237 1,160,586 Principal repayments (82,414) 85,728 — 3,314 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (1,723) — (1,161,237) (1,162,960) Other changes (200) 603 — 403 Change in fair value (11,177) 10,960 — (217) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 254,070 $ (253,425) $ — $ 645 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at January 1, 2018 $ 293,005 $ (293,948) $ 49 $ (894) Originations 91,075 (90,693) 1,324,100 1,324,482 Principal repayments (88,947) 91,525 (14) 2,564 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (2,016) — (1,324,100) (1,326,116) Other changes (338) 633 — 295 Change in fair value (15,418) 15,058 (4) (364) Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 31 $ (33) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at April 1, 2019 $ 259,899 $ (258,722) $ — $ 1,177 Originations 41,839 (41,774) 670,382 670,447 Principal repayments (41,215) 41,611 — 396 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (749) — (670,382) (671,131) Other changes (115) 2 — (113) Change in fair value (5,589) 5,458 — (131) Balance at June 30, 2019 $ 254,070 $ (253,425) $ — $ 645 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Borrower Loans Notes Loans Held for Sale Total Balance at April 1, 2018 $ 285,584 $ (285,095) $ 41 $ 530 Originations 44,799 (44,468) 728,901 729,232 Principal repayments (43,990) 44,423 (6) 427 Borrower Loans sold to third parties (950) — (728,901) (729,851) Other changes (202) 86 — (116) Change in fair value (7,880) 7,629 (4) (255) Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 277,361 $ (277,425) $ 31 $ (33) The following table presents additional information about level 3 servicing assets recorded at fair value (in thousands): Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2019 15,550 Additions 6,796 Less: Changes in fair value (6,885) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 15,461 Servicing Assets Fair Value at January 1, 2018 14,598 Additions 8,147 Less: Changes in fair value (6,583) Fair Value at June 30, 2018 16,162 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2019 15,174 Additions 3,830 Less: Changes in fair value (3,543) Fair Value at June 30, 2019 15,461 Servicing Assets Fair Value at April 1, 2018 15,023 Additions 4,452 Less: Changes in fair value (3,313) Fair Value at June 30, 2018 16,162 Loan Trailing Fee The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates using a discounted cash flow model. The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): Loan Trailing Fee Liability Fair Value at January 1, 2019 3,118 Issuances 1,297 Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee (1,298) Change in fair value 132 Fair Value at June 30, 2019 3,249 Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2019 for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes funded are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages): Borrower Loans Notes Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 254,070 $ 253,425 Discount rate assumption: 7.87 % * 7.87 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 251,692 $ 251,050 200 basis point increase 249,371 248,730 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 256,507 $ 255,859 200 basis point decrease 259,004 258,354 Default rate assumption: 12.55 % * 12.55 % * Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point increase $ 251,033 $ 250,379 200 basis point increase 248,098 247,437 Resulting fair value from: 100 basis point decrease $ 257,166 $ 256,527 200 basis point decrease 260,274 259,643 * Represents weighted average assumptions considering all credit grades. The following table presents the estimated impact on Prosper Funding’s estimated fair value of servicing assets, calculated using different market servicing rates and different default rates as of June 30, 2019 (in thousands, except percentages). Servicing Assets Fair Value at June 30, 2019 $ 15,461 Market servicing rate assumptions 0.625 % Resulting fair value from: Market servicing rate increase to 0.65% 14,506 Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60% 16,415 Weighted average prepayment assumptions 20.59 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate 15,267 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate 15,655 Weighted average default assumptions 11.72 % Resulting fair value from: Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate 15,287 Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate 15,638 These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects. |