Prosper Marketplace 10-K 2019 FY Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

333-179941-01 333-204880 333-225797-01	PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. a Delaware corporation 221 Main Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 593-5400	73-1733867
333-179941 333-204880-01 333-225797	PROSPER FUNDING LLC a Delaware limited liability company 221 Main Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 593-5479	45-4526070
Commission File Number	Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code Registrant's Telephone Number (Including Area Code)	I.R.S. Employer Identification Number

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	None	None	None
Prosper Funding LLC	None	None	None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	None	None	None
Prosper Funding LLC	None	None	None

Indicate by check mark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	Yes ¨ No ý
Prosper Funding LLC	Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark if each registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	Yes ¨ No ý
Prosper Funding LLC	Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	Yes ý No ¨
Prosper Funding LLC	Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	Yes ý No ¨
Prosper Funding LLC	Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large  Accelerated  Filer	Accelerated  Filer	Non-accelerated Filer	Smaller  Reporting  Company	Emerging Growth Company
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	☐	☐	x	☐	☐
Prosper Funding LLC	☐	☐	x	☐	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if each registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	¨
Prosper Funding LLC	¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	Yes ☐ No ý
Prosper Funding LLC	Yes ☐ No ý

Prosper Funding LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

	Aggregate Market Value of Voting and Non-Voting Common Equity Held by Non-Affiliates of the Registrant at	Number of Shares of Common Stock of the Registrant Outstanding at
	June 30, 2019	March 15, 2020
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.	(a)	68,455,641
			($0.01 par value)
Prosper Funding LLC	(a)(b)	NaNne
(a) Not applicable
(b) All voting and non-voting common equity is owned by Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

THIS COMBINED FORM 10-K IS SEPARATELY FILED BY PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. AND PROSPER FUNDING LLC. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL REGISTRANT IS FILED BY SUCH REGISTRANT ON ITS OWN BEHALF. EACH REGISTRANT MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE OTHER REGISTRANT.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM		Page
PART I
ITEM 1	Business	6
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	16
ITEM 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	33
ITEM 2	Properties	34
ITEM 3	Legal Proceedings	34
ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	34
PART II
ITEM 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	34
ITEM 6	Selected Financial Data	36
ITEM 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	39
ITEM 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	59
ITEM 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	61
ITEM 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	61
ITEM 9A	Controls and Procedures	61
ITEM 9B	Other Information	62
PART III
ITEM 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	63
ITEM 11	Executive Compensation	67
ITEM 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	78
ITEM 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	82
ITEM 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	84
PART IV
ITEM 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	86
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
XBRL Content

3

Except as the context requires otherwise, as used herein, “Registrants” refers to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”), a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), a Delaware limited liability company; “we,” “us,” “our,” “Prosper,” and the “Company” refer to PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries, PFL, BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), a Delaware corporation, Prosper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), a Delaware limited liability company, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1”), a Delaware statutory trust, Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2”), a Delaware statutory trust and Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4”), a Delaware statutory trust, on a consolidated basis; and “Prosper Funding” refers to PFL and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis. PAH was dissolved on November 28, 2018. As a result, references to Prosper Funding do not include PAH for periods subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, the unsecured, consumer loans originated through our marketplace are referred to as “Borrower Loans,” and the borrower payment dependent notes issued through our marketplace, whether issued by PMI or PFL, are referred to as “Notes.” Investors currently invest in Borrower Loans through two channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on the payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited and institutional investors to purchase Borrower Loans in their entirety directly from PFL. The Notes available to Note Channel investors are distinguishable from notes held by certain third party investors pursuant to Prosper’s securitization transactions, which are referred to herein as “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust.” Finally, although historically the Company has referred to investors as “lender members,” PFL calls them “investors” herein to avoid confusion since WebBank is the lender for Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue” or similar expressions. These statements may appear throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the sections titled “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, PMI or PFL expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of our respective managements, is expressed in good faith, and is believed to have a reasonable basis. Nevertheless, management can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by these forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them does occur, what impact they will have on Prosper or Prosper Funding’s results of operations and financial condition.

There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things:

•the performance of the Notes, which, in addition to being speculative investments, are special, limited obligations that are not guaranteed or insured;

•PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes, including in the event that borrowers fail to make payments on the corresponding Borrower Loans;

•our ability to attract potential borrowers and investors to our marketplace;

•the reliability of the information about borrowers that is supplied by borrowers including actions by some borrowers to defraud investors;

•our ability to service the Borrower Loans, and our ability or the ability of a third party debt collector to pursue collection against any borrower, including in the event of fraud or identity theft;

•credit risks posed by the credit worthiness of borrowers and the effectiveness of our credit rating systems;

•potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to impose liability that could affect PFL’s (or any subsequent assignee’s) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their loans;

•the impact of future economic conditions on the performance of the Notes and the loss rates for the Notes;

4

•our compliance with applicable local, state and federal law, including the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other laws;

•our compliance with applicable regulations and regulatory developments or court decisions affecting our business;

•potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to characterize PFL or PMI, rather than WebBank, as the lender of the loans originated through our marketplace;

•the application of federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws to borrowers and to PFL and PMI;

•the impact of borrower delinquencies, defaults and prepayments on the returns on the Notes;

•the lack of a public trading market for the Notes and the current lack of any trading platform on which investors can resell the Notes;

•the federal income tax treatment of an investment in the Notes and the PMI Management Rights;

•our ability to prevent security breaches, disruptions in service, and comparable events that could compromise the personal and confidential information held on our data systems, reduce the attractiveness of the platform or adversely impact our ability to service Borrower Loans; and

•the other risks discussed under the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  

There may also be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause PMI or PFL’s actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date hereof and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. PMI and PFL undertake no obligation to update or revise such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

5

PART I

Item 1.  Business

Overview

Prosper is a pioneer of online marketplace lending that connects borrowers and investors. Our goal is to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return. Our marketplace facilitated $2.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations during 2019 and $16.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations since it first launched in 2006.

We believe our online marketplace model has key advantages relative to traditional banks, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) data and technology driven automation that improves the borrower and investor experience through increased efficiency. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure like traditional banks or consumer finance institutions do; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operations. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.

To consumer borrowers, we believe that we offer generally better pricing, on average, than the pricing those borrowers would pay on outstanding credit card balances or unsecured installment loans from a traditional finance company. We also believe that we offer faster decisions and loan originations, and greater transparency, resulting in a better customer experience than that provided by traditional consumer finance lenders.

To individual and institutional investors, we offer an asset class that we believe has attractive risk adjusted returns, transparency, access to consumer loans, and lower duration risk.

Our marketplace offers fixed rate, fully amortizing, unsecured consumer loans ranging from $2,000 to $40,000 with no prepayment penalty. Loan terms of three and five years are available, depending upon the rating assigned to the borrower at issuance and loan amount being sought. All Borrower Loans are originated and funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank organized under the laws of Utah. WebBank retains certain loans, which are not available for investment through the marketplace. After origination, WebBank sells the Borrower Loans to PFL, which either holds them or sells them to accredited institutional investors.

Investors invest in Borrower Loans through two channels – (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows accredited institutional investors to purchase a Borrower Loan in its entirety directly from PFL. PFL continues to own the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel. Prosper services all of the Borrower Loans made through the marketplace.

Company Background and History

PMI was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. PFL was formed as a limited liability company in the state of Delaware on February 17, 2012, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PMI.

PMI developed our marketplace and, until February 1, 2013, owned the proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible. On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred the marketplace to PFL. PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended (i) to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or similar proceeding, and (ii) to minimize the likelihood that, in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI and thus have its assets subjected to claims of PMI’s creditors. We believe we have achieved this by imposing through PFL’s organizational documents and covenants in the Amended and Restated Indenture (as defined below in Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence”) certain restrictions on PFL’s activities and certain formalities designed to reinforce PFL’s status as a distinct entity from PMI. In addition, under the Administration Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, between PMI and PFL (as amended to date, the “Administration Agreement”), PMI has agreed, in its dealings with PFL and with third parties, to observe certain “separateness covenants” related to its corporate formalities. PMI has also adopted resolutions limiting its own activities and interactions with PFL in order to further reduce the likelihood that PFL would be substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy.  

PFL has retained PMI, pursuant to the Administration Agreement, to provide certain administrative services relating to our marketplace. Specifically, the Administration Agreement contains a license granted by PFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing, and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance

6

of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license is terminable in whole or in part upon the failure by PMI to pay PFL the licensing fee, or upon PMI’s termination as the provider of some or all of the aforementioned services. See Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Agreements with PFL” for more information.

How our Marketplace Works

Our marketplace is an online marketplace that matches individuals who wish to obtain unsecured consumer loans with individuals and institutions who are willing to commit funds to those loans. A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through our marketplace must apply and, if accepted, post a loan listing to our marketplace. Each time we post a group of listings on our marketplace, we determine the relative proportions of such listings that will be allocated to the Note Channel and the Whole Loan Channel, respectively, based on our estimate of the relative overall demand in each channel. We then use a random allocation methodology to allocate individual listings between the two channels based on those proportions. If a listing receives enough investor commitments, WebBank will originate the Borrower Loan requested and then sell it to PFL.  

Borrowers

Any natural person at least 18 years of age who is a U.S. resident in a state where loans through our marketplace are available with a U.S. bank account and a social security number may apply to become a borrower. All potential borrowers are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential borrower cannot obtain a loan without passing those processes.

When a borrower requests a loan, we first evaluate whether the borrower meets the underwriting criteria required by WebBank. The underwriting criteria apply to all loans originated through our marketplace and may not be changed without WebBank's consent. For the Note Channel, all borrowers who request a loan are subject to the following minimum eligibility criteria: (1) have at least a 640 FICO score, (2) have fewer than five credit bureau inquiries (after excluding duplicate inquiries) within the last 6 months, (3) have an annual income greater than $0, (4) have a debt-to-income ratio of no more than 50%, (5) have at least three open trades reported on their credit report, and (6) have not filed for bankruptcy within the last 12 months.

Prosper also allows two borrowers to apply together as joint applicants for a co-borrower loan. Each borrower applicant is held jointly and severally liable for the obligations under the loan. In the case of co-borrower loans, the primary (or “specified”) borrower must satisfy the above credit criteria (except the debt-to-income ratio for joint loans is calculated using the combined debt-to-income ratio of the primary and secondary borrowers without duplication of combined debt). The secondary borrower must also satisfy certain additional credit criteria, including a minimum FICO score of at least 600, at least one open trade reported on the secondary borrower’s credit report, and no bankruptcy filings within the last 12 months.

In addition, a borrower may have up to two loans through Prosper outstanding at one time, provided that (1) the first loan is current, (2) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of both loans does not exceed the then-current maximum allowable loan amount for loans (currently $40,000), and (3) the borrower complies with the prior-borrower constraints above.

From time to time, we have, with WebBank’s consent, tested new products that include features which are outside the standard eligibility criteria discussed above. These products are available on a limited basis, exclusively through our Whole Loan Channel and did not have a material impact on our business or our financial statements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.    

Investors

Investors are individuals and institutions that have the opportunity to buy Notes or Borrower Loans. An individual investor must be a natural person at least 18 years of age and a U.S. resident, must provide his or her social security number, and may be required to provide his or her state driver’s license or state identification card number. An institutional investor must provide its taxpayer identification number and entity formation documentation. All potential investors are subject to anti-fraud, anti-terrorism and identity verification processes and a potential investor cannot invest in Notes or Borrower Loans without passing those processes.  

At the time an individual investor registers to participate in the Note Channel, such investor must satisfy any minimum financial suitability standards established for the Note Channel by the state in which the investor resides. Investors who participate in the Note Channel must enter into an investor registration agreement, which governs all sales of Notes to such investors.

Only investors who are approved by us are eligible to participate in the Whole Loan Channel. At a minimum, to participate in the Whole Loan Channel, an investor must meet the definition of an “accredited investor” set forth in Regulation D under the Securities Act. Investors who participate in the Whole Loan Channel must enter into loan purchase and loan servicing agreements with us. 

7

Relationship with WebBank

WebBank is an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank that originates all Borrower Loans made through our marketplace. WebBank and PMI are parties to an agreement under which PMI manages the operations of our marketplace that relate to the submission of loan applications by borrowers and the making of related Borrower Loans by WebBank in exchange for a fee. WebBank makes each Borrower Loan with its own funds. A joint WebBank-Prosper Credit Policy, which can be changed only with WebBank’s approval, constitutes the policy Prosper must follow in reviewing, approving and administering Borrower Loans made by WebBank through the marketplace. WebBank, PMI and PFL are parties to a Loan Sale Agreement, under which WebBank sells and assigns the promissory notes evidencing the Borrower Loans to PFL. As consideration for WebBank's agreement to sell and assign the promissory notes, PFL pays WebBank the purchase price of the promissory notes, as well as a monthly fee, which is partially tied to the terms and performance of the loans. PMI receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities it undertakes on WebBank's behalf.

Risk Management

Each loan listing is assigned a Prosper Rating, which is a letter grade that indicates the expected level of risk associated with the listing. Each letter grade corresponds to an estimated average annualized loss rate range. The Prosper Rating associated with a loan listing reflects the loss expectations for that listing as of the time the rating is given. This means that otherwise similar borrowers may have different Prosper Ratings at different points in time as the Prosper Rating is updated to incorporate more recent information.

The estimated average annualized loss rate for each loan listing is based primarily on the historical performance of Borrower Loans with similar characteristics and is primarily determined by two scores: (i) a custom Prosper Score, and (ii) a credit score obtained from a credit reporting agency. The custom Prosper Score is updated periodically to include new information that is predictive of borrower risk as such information becomes available or as the evidence supporting a particular datum becomes strong enough to merit its inclusion in the custom Prosper Score.

The Prosper Score predicts the probability of a Borrower Loan going “bad,” where “bad” is defined as going more than 60 days past due within twelve months of the application date. To create the Prosper Score, we have developed and refined a custom risk model using our historical data as well as a data archive from a consumer credit bureau. We built the model on our borrower population, and included as variables information provided directly by the borrowers as well as included in their credit reports, so that the model would incorporate behavior that is unique to that population. In addition to the Prosper Score, another major element used to determine the Prosper Rating for a loan listing is a credit score from a consumer reporting agency. We currently use either or both of TransUnion’s FICO08 score and VantageScore. We obtain a borrower’s credit score at the time the loan listing is created, unless we already have a credit score on file that is not more than thirty days old.

Sale of Notes and Borrower Loans

If an investor successfully bids on a loan listing, the principal amount of the loan will be set aside in the investor’s account and may not be used for other bids. In the event a listing does not result in a loan being originated, the funds are made available for bidding by the investor.

For loan listings allocated to the Note Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase a Note from PFL. PFL generally issues and sells a series of Notes for each Borrower Loan that is originated through the Note Channel. The Notes are sold to the investors who successfully bid on the corresponding loan listing in the principal amounts of their respective bids. Each series of Notes is dependent for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan. PFL uses the proceeds of each series of Notes to purchase the corresponding Borrower Loan from WebBank on the second business day after WebBank has originated the Borrower Loan. Each Note comes attached with an inseparable PMI Management Right issued by PMI. Each PMI Management Right constitutes an "investment contract," a concept under federal securities law that refers to an arrangement where investors invest money in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits, primarily from the efforts of others.

For listings allocated to the Whole Loan Channel, a bid on a listing is an investor’s commitment to purchase the Borrower Loan from PFL after origination by WebBank and sale to PFL. On the second business day after WebBank has originated the Borrower Loan, PFL purchases the Borrower Loan from WebBank and re-sells the Borrower Loan that same day to the corresponding investor. PFL records the investor as the owner of the Borrower Loan.

Loan Servicing and Collection

We are responsible for servicing the Borrower Loans made through our marketplace. We will pay each Note holder principal and interest on the Note in an amount equal to each such Note’s pro-rata portion of the principal and interest payments, if any, which we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay Note holders their pro-rata portion of any other amounts we receive on the corresponding Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee; provided, that we will not pay Note holders any non-sufficient funds fees we receive

8

for failed borrower payments. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Notes will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the corresponding Borrower Loan. We will have no further obligation to make payments on any Note after its final maturity date.

We will pay each investor who has purchased a Borrower Loan through the Whole Loan Channel principal and interest on the Borrower Loan purchased in an amount equal to the principal and interest payments, if any, that we receive, net of our servicing fee. We will also pay these investors any other amounts we receive on the Borrower Loans, including late fees and prepayments, subject to our servicing fee, provided that we will not pay these investors any non-sufficient funds fees we receive for failed borrower payments or any payment processing fees we may collect. In addition, the funds available for payment on the Borrower Loans will be reduced by the amount of any attorneys' fees or collection fees we, a third-party servicer or a collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts related to the Borrower Loan.

If a Borrower Loan becomes past due, we may collect on it directly or refer it to a third-party collection agency. Our in-house collections department and third-party collection agencies are compensated by keeping a portion of the payments they collect based on a predetermined schedule.  

Customers

A relatively small number of investors provide the funding commitments for a large percentage of all listings that result in Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2019, the largest party purchased a total of 9.4% of those loans.

Industry Background and Trends

According to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as of December 2019, the balance of outstanding consumer credit (excluding mortgages) in the United States totaled $4.2 trillion. This amount included $1.1 trillion of revolving consumer credit, which many consumers seek to refinance for a lower interest rate.

The market for consumer lending is competitive and rapidly evolving, and there is an opportunity for the online marketplace model to transform the traditional lending process. We believe our marketplace offers a superior solution for both borrowers and investors.

For borrowers, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: better pricing versus other alternatives; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; a fast and efficient process; and trust and transparency.

For investors, we believe our marketplace offers the following principal competitive factors: attractive risk adjusted returns; low duration risk; diversification from other asset classes; a simple, easy and intuitive customer experience; and trust and transparency.

Competition

We compete for borrowers and investors against other financial products and companies. For borrowers, our competition includes banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies. For investors, our competition includes other investment vehicles such as consumer lending funds and asset classes such as equities, bonds and commodities. Our competition for borrowers and investors also includes other online consumer lending companies, such as LendingClub Corporation, Social Finance Inc. and other marketplace lending platforms. We may also face potential competition from new market entrants, or business expansion from established companies, such as Goldman Sachs. These companies may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their offerings. 

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe the following strengths differentiate us from our competitors and provide us with sustainable competitive advantages:

•Leading Online Marketplace. Since inception, our marketplace has facilitated $16.7 billion in loan originations, of which $2.7 billion was for the year-ended December 31, 2019. As our business grows, our brand, reputation and scale strengthens. This allows us to attract top talent, speed up product innovation, attract market place participants and drive down our cost structure, all of which further benefit borrowers and investors.

•Robust Network Effect. The attractiveness of our marketplace increases as the number of participants on our marketplace increases, yielding a classic network effect. Our marketplace offers consumer borrowers access to affordable credit, and allows individual and institutional investors to invest in an asset class with attractive risk-adjusted returns. The diversity of investors brings scale and breadth of funding to our marketplace and makes credit more affordable. As both sides of the equation grow, the advantages (reduced risk, lower cost) scale accordingly,

9

attracting even more borrowers and investors. The increased participant pool reduces costs and generates more data which we use to improve the effectiveness of our credit decisioning and scoring models. This enhances our aggregate loan performance and builds increased trust in our marketplace, which in turn attracts more borrowers and investors.

•Technology Platform. Our technology platform automates key aspects of our operations, including the borrower application process, data gathering, underwriting, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection. This provides a significant time and cost advantage over traditional consumer lending business models and, we believe, enables us to provide a superior user experience to our borrowers and investors. Using our accumulated performance data, we continually invest in incremental improvements in our algorithms thus extending our technological advantage.

•Proprietary Risk Management Capabilities. We have developed a proprietary risk model based on consumer loan performance data, which we believe allows us to accurately assess the credit risk profile of borrowers and which we believe also allows investors to earn attractive risk adjusted returns. We leverage the results from our growing data stream to continually refine this risk model and more accurately predict loan performance.

•Unique Corporate Structure. Our corporate structure was designed to offer our investors extra protection. The organization and operation of PFL and PMI as separate and distinct entities should serve to protect our Note investors in the event of a bankruptcy filing by or against PMI.  This organizational structure, along with the federal and state registration process, is expensive and time consuming to undertake, and is not easily duplicated by competitors.

•Efficient and Attractive Financial Model. We have multiple revenue streams and an efficient cost model. We generate revenue from transaction fees from our marketplace’s role in matching borrowers with investors to enable loan originations, servicing fees related to Borrower Loans for which we retain the servicing rights, net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, credit referral fees and other ancillary revenue sources. Additionally, our technology platform significantly reduces the need for physical infrastructure and therefore allows our business to grow with a lower cost operating model, providing us with significant operating leverage.

Sources of Revenues

We have three primary sources of revenues: transaction fees, servicing fees, and net interest income. Prosper earns transaction fees from WebBank by facilitating the origination of Borrower Loans through the marketplace. Prosper earns servicing fees from investors for processing principal and interest payments made by borrowers and passing such payments on to investors and also earns net interest income from Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to attract individuals and institutions to our marketplace, encourage their enrollment and participation as users, and facilitate and enhance their understanding and utilization of the services for borrowing or investing. We employ a wide range of marketing channels to reach potential customers and build our brand and value proposition. These channels include referrals, online marketing, direct mail, partner and affiliate introductions, and email. We are constantly seeking new methods to reach more potential members, while testing and optimizing the end to end customer experience.

Origination and Servicing

We have efficient and scalable systems for credit risk assessment, loan underwriting, and servicing. Our risk model takes borrowers’ supplied information and combines that information with public and proprietary data to make real time decisions. Our verification agents use automated tools to confirm credit eligibility. Our loan servicing platform calculates a loan’s amortization and processes payments received from borrowers and passes such payments on to investors.  In addition, we have a back-up servicing agreement with First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC (“First Associates”), a loan servicing company that is willing and able to assume servicing responsibilities in the event that we are no longer able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes. First Associates is a financial services company that has entered into numerous successor loan servicing agreements.

Technology

We have made substantial investment in our customer acquisition capability, customer experience, and credit underwriting, loan servicing and payment systems. Our marketplace utilizes proprietary software to process electronic cash movements, record book entries and calculate cash balances in users’ funding accounts. Electronic deposits and payments are mostly done via Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transactions. The technology platform allows us to economically acquire and service Borrower Loans and Notes, and allows WebBank to efficiently originate and fund Borrower Loans.

The system hardware for our marketplace is located in hosting facilities in Scottsdale, Arizona, Las Vegas, Nevada, The Dalles, Oregon and Council Bluffs, Iowa. We own the hardware deployed in support of our marketplace. We continuously

10

monitor the performance and availability of our marketplace. The infrastructure is scalable and utilizes standard techniques such as load-balancing and redundancies.

Key aspects of our technology include:

•Scalability. Our marketplace is designed and built as a highly scalable, multi-tier, redundant system. It incorporates technologies designed to prevent any single point of failure within the data center from taking the entire system offline. This is achieved by utilizing load-balancing technologies at the front end and business layer tiers and clustering technologies in the back-end tiers to allow scaling both horizontally and vertically depending on marketplace utilization. 

•Data Integrity and Security. We are committed to protecting our users' information and we take the integrity and security of the data provided by them very seriously. To that end, we have established data protection policies which are implemented and enforced using the latest technologies. All sensitive information is transmitted on secure channels using SSL technology, with SSL certificates issued by Symantec or DigiCert. We employ principles of least privilege and layered security to protect stored sensitive information. Sensitive information at rest is encrypted using the industry level encryption technologies with appropriate controls to access the data. We protect the network perimeter using the latest technologies including but not limited to firewall and anti-virus threat management techniques. We use strong multi-factor authentication to protect and monitor remote access. We back up all data securely and would expect to recover operations in a short period of time in the event of a disaster. Logging and monitoring of the systems and security controls enables us to ensure that the controls are functional and that alerts are triggered on security violations.

•Fraud Detection. We employ a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies and solutions to prevent and detect fraud. These include knowledge-based authentication, behavioral analytics and digital fingerprinting to prevent identity fraud. We use services from third-party vendors for user identification, credit checks and for checking customer names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals and other lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In addition, we use specialized third-party software to augment the identity fraud detection systems. We also have a dedicated team which conducts additional investigations of cases flagged for high fraud risk. Finally, we enable users to report suspicious activity, which we may then evaluate further.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark, and other rights, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology, processes and other intellectual property. We enter into confidentiality and other written agreements with our employees, consultants and service providers, and through these and other written agreements, attempt to control access to and distribution of the software, documentation and other proprietary technology and information. Despite these efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may, in an authorized or unauthorized manner, attempt to use, copy or otherwise obtain and market or distribute our intellectual property rights or technology or otherwise develop a product with the same functionality. Policing all unauthorized use of intellectual property rights is nearly impossible. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken or will take in the future will prevent misappropriations of our technology or intellectual property rights.

We have registered several trademarks in the United States, including “Prosper,” “Prosper Healthcare Funding,” “Prosper.com,” and the Prosper and Prosper Healthcare Funding logos.

Employees and Contractors

As of December 31, 2019, we employed 404 full-time employees. The following table shows a breakdown by function:

Origination and Servicing	145
Sales and Marketing	17
General and Administrative - Research and Development	101
General and Administrative – Other	141
	404

None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.

11

Government Regulation

Overview

The lending and securities industries are highly regulated. The marketplace, Notes and Borrower Loans are all subject to extensive and complex rules and regulations. We also are subject to licensing and examination by various federal, state and local government authorities. These authorities impose obligations and restrictions on our activities, WebBank’s activities and the Borrower Loans acquired and Notes issued through our marketplace. In particular, these rules may limit the fees that may be assessed on the Borrower Loans, require extensive disclosure to, and consents from, borrowers, prohibit discrimination and impose multiple qualification and licensing obligations on marketplace activities. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, voiding of loan contracts, indemnification liabilities to contract counterparties, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions and civil and criminal liabilities. While compliance with such requirements is at times complicated by our novel business model, we believe we are in substantial compliance with these rules and regulations. These rules and regulations are subject to continuous change, however, and a material change could have an adverse effect on our compliance efforts and ability to operate.

State and Federal Laws and Regulations

State Licensing Requirements. In most states we believe that WebBank, as originator of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, satisfies any relevant licensing requirements with respect to the origination of such Borrower Loans. In addition, as needed, we seek licenses and/or authorizations of various types so that we may conduct activities such as servicing and marketing in all states and the District of Columbia, with the exceptions of Iowa and West Virginia. We are subject to supervision and examination by the state regulatory authorities that administer these state lending laws. The licensing statutes vary from state to state and prescribe or impose different requirements, including: restrictions on loan origination and servicing practices, including limits on finance charges and the type, amount and manner of charging fees; disclosure requirements; requirements that licensees submit to periodic examination; surety bond and minimum specified net worth requirements; periodic financial reporting requirements; notification requirements for changes in principal officers, stock ownership or corporate control; restrictions on advertising; and requirements that loan forms be submitted for review.

State Usury Laws. Section 521 of the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (12 U.S.C. § 1831d) (“DIDA”) and Section 85 of the National Bank Act (“NBA”) (12 U.S.C. § 85), federal case law interpreting the NBA such as Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri and Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First Omaha Service Corporation, and FDIC advisory opinion 92-47 permit FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as WebBank, to “export” the interest rate permitted under the laws of the state where the bank is located, regardless of the usury limitations imposed by the state law of the borrower’s state of residence unless the state has chosen to opt out of the exportation regime. WebBank is located in Utah, and Title 70C of the Utah Code does not limit the amount of fees or interest that may be charged by WebBank on loans of the type offered through our marketplace. Only Iowa and Puerto Rico have opted out of the exportation regime under Section 525 of DIDA and we do not operate in either jurisdiction. However, we believe that if a state in which we did operate opted out of rate exportation, judicial interpretations support the view that such opt outs only apply to loans “made” in those states.  

In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC that interpreted the scope of federal preemption under the NBA and held that a nonbank assignee of a loan originated by a national bank was not entitled to the benefits of federal preemption of claims of usury. On November 10, 2015, the defendant in the Madden case filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for further review of the Second Circuit’s decision. On June 27, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition and refused to review the case, leaving the decision of the Second Circuit intact and binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont. If applied to any of the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace, the Second Circuit’s decision could adversely impact our business.  

In January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claims that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. We have been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law regarding certain terms of Borrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation is intended to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the litigation against each of Marlette and Avant, but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.

12

If a Borrower Loan made through our marketplace was deemed to be subject to the usury laws of a state that has opted-out of the exportation regime or becomes bound by the Second Circuit’s or a similar judicial decision, we could become subject to fines, penalties, and possible forfeiture of amounts charged to borrowers, and we may decide not to originate Borrower Loans through our marketplace in that applicable jurisdiction, which may adversely impact our growth. For more information, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors—If our marketplace were found to violate a state’s usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.”

State Securities Laws. We are subject to the securities laws of each state in which the registration or qualification to offer and sell the Notes and PMI Management Rights has been approved. Certain of these state laws require us to renew the registration or qualification of Notes and PMI Management Rights on an annual basis.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) created many new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for the financial services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protections by creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which has broad authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth-in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions, such as our issuing bank, for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority. We are subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority and may become subject to their supervisory authority, as a servicer and acquirer of consumer credit. The CFPB may request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities, and also conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis.

Truth-in-Lending Act. The federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, which implements TILA, require creditors to provide consumers with uniform, understandable information concerning certain terms and conditions of their loan and credit transactions. These rules apply to WebBank as the creditor for Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace, but because the transactions are carried out on our hosted website, we facilitate compliance at WebBank’s direction. For closed-end credit transactions of the type provided through our marketplace, these disclosures include providing the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the number of payments and the amount of the monthly payment. The creditor must provide the disclosures before the Borrower Loan is closed. TILA also regulates the advertising of credit and gives borrowers, among other things, certain rights regarding updated disclosures and the treatment of credit balances. Our marketplace provides borrowers with a TILA disclosure prior to the time a Borrower Loan is originated. We also seek to comply with TILA’s disclosure requirements related to credit advertising.

Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, or the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law. Regulation B, which implements ECOA, restricts creditors from requesting certain types of information from applicants and from making statements that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application. These requirements apply both to a lender such as WebBank as well as to a party such as Prosper that regularly implements and communicates a credit decision. Investors may also be subject to the ECOA in their capacity as purchasers of Notes, if they are deemed to regularly participate in credit decisions. In the underwriting of Borrower Loans on our marketplace, both WebBank and we seek to comply with ECOA’s provisions prohibiting discouragement and discrimination. ECOA also requires creditors to provide consumers with timely notices of adverse action taken on credit applications. WebBank and we provide prospective borrowers who apply for a Borrower Loan through our marketplace but are denied credit with an adverse action notice in compliance with applicable requirements (see also below regarding “Fair Credit Reporting Act”).

Fair Credit Reporting Act. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. FCRA requires a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer credit report, and requires persons to report loan payment information to credit bureaus accurately. FCRA also imposes disclosure requirements on creditors who take adverse action on credit applications based on information contained in a credit report. WebBank and we have a permissible purpose for obtaining credit reports on potential borrowers and WebBank and we also obtain explicit consent from borrowers to obtain such reports. As the servicer for the Borrower Loan, we have systems in place to report Borrower Loan payment and delinquency information to appropriate reporting agencies. We provide an adverse action notice to a rejected borrower on WebBank’s behalf at the time the borrower is rejected that includes all the required disclosures. We have also implemented an identity theft prevention program as required by law.  

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) provides guidelines and limitations on the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts. The FDCPA limits certain communications with third parties, imposes notice and debt validation requirements, and prohibits threatening, harassing or abusive conduct in the course of debt collection. While the FDCPA applies to third-party debt collectors, debt

13

collection laws of certain states impose similar requirements on creditors who collect their own debts. Our agreement with our investors prohibits investors from attempting to collect directly on the Borrower Loan. We use our internal collection team and professional external debt collection agents to collect delinquent accounts. They are required to comply with all other applicable laws in collecting delinquent accounts of our borrowers.  

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties. The SCRA, as well as certain state laws with similar protections for military members, require us to adjust the interest rate of borrowers who qualify for and request relief. If a borrower with an outstanding Borrower Loan qualifies for protection under the SCRA or similar state laws, we will reduce the interest rate on the Borrower Loan to 6% for the duration of the borrower’s active duty. During this period, the investors who have invested in such Borrower Loan will not receive the difference between 6% and the Borrower Loan’s original interest rate. For a borrower to obtain an interest rate reduction on a Borrower Loan due to military service, we require the borrower to send us a written request and written documentation of active duty. We do not take military service into account in assigning Prosper Ratings to borrower loan requests and we do not disclose the military status of borrowers to investors.  

Military Lending Act. The federal Military Lending Act (“MLA”) provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions. Although originally enacted in 2006, the MLA applies to persons engaged in the business of extending consumer credit subject to the disclosure requirements of the TILA and Regulation Z with respect to loans made on or after October 3, 2016. The MLA prohibits creditors from imposing a Military Annual Percentage Rate (“MAPR”) greater than 36% in any consumer credit transaction involving a covered borrower. It also requires certain oral and written disclosures to be provided to covered borrowers. Additionally, the MLA prohibits creditors from requiring covered borrowers to waive rights to legal recourse, submit to arbitration, or pay a prepayment penalty or fee. Both Prosper and WebBank have ensured that the loan program complies with the MLA requirements for covered borrowers, including but not limited to the restriction on MAPR, the delivery of required disclosures and the prohibition of mandatory arbitration and waiver of legal recourse.

Other Lending Regulations. We are subject to and seek to comply with other state and federal laws and regulations applicable to consumer lending, including additional requirements relating to loan disclosure, credit discrimination, credit reporting, debt collection and unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices. These laws and regulations may be enforced by state consumer credit regulatory agencies, state attorneys general, the CFPB and private litigants, among others. Given our novel business model and the subjective nature of some of these laws and regulations, particularly laws regulating unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, we may become subject to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenge with respect to our compliance with these requirements.

Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), and Regulation E, which implements it, provide guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts. In addition, transfers performed by ACH electronic transfers are subject to detailed timing and notification rules and guidelines administered by the National Automated Clearinghouse Association (“NACHA”). Most transfers of funds in connection with the origination and repayment of the Borrower Loans are performed by ACH. We obtain necessary electronic authorization from borrowers and investors for such transfers in compliance with such rules. Transfers of funds through our marketplace are currently executed by Wells Fargo and conform to the EFTA, its regulations and NACHA guidelines.  

Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act/Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“ESIGN”) and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures. ESIGN and UETA require businesses that want to use electronic records or signatures in consumer transactions to obtain the consumer’s consent to receive information electronically. When a borrower or individual investor registers with our marketplace, we obtain his or her consent to transact business electronically and maintain electronic records in compliance with ESIGN and UETA requirements.  

Privacy and Data Security Laws. The federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) limits the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information. Additional state and federal privacy and data security laws require safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personally identifiable information, require notification to affected customers in the event of a breach, and restrict certain sharing of nonpublic personal information about a consumer with affiliated entities. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by businesses that are a certain size or that generate at least half of their revenue by selling personal information. In turn, the CCPA requires subject businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for timely responding to consumer requests submitted in exercise of their rights under the statute. We maintain a detailed privacy policy,

14

which complies with GLBA and the CCPA and is accessible from our website. We maintain participants’ personal information securely, and we do not sell, rent or share such information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes unless previously agreed to by the participant or otherwise permitted by applicable law. In addition, we take a number of measures to safeguard the personal information of our borrowers and investors and to protect it against unauthorized access.  

Bank Secrecy Act. In cooperation with WebBank, we have implemented an anti-money laundering policy and various anti-money laundering procedures to comply with applicable federal law. With respect to new borrowers and investors, we apply the customer identification and verification program rules and screen names against the list of Specially Designated Nationals maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (“OFAC”) pursuant to the USA PATRIOT Act amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and its implementing regulation.

New Laws and Regulations. From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation are proposed and new regulations are introduced that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions on, the business of consumer lending. We cannot predict whether any such legislation or regulations will be adopted or how this would affect our business or our important relationships with third parties. In addition, the interpretation of existing legislation may change or may prove different than anticipated when applied to our novel business model. Compliance with such requirements could involve additional costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial lending in the United States, our business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal and state legislation and regulations that may increase the cost of doing business.

Foreign Laws and Regulations

We do not permit non-U.S. based individuals to register as borrowers on our marketplace and the marketplace does not operate outside the United States. Therefore, we do not believe that our marketplace is subject to foreign laws or regulations.

Recent Developments

HELOC. In November 2018, we announced our intent to launch a new digital Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) product in 2019, including our plan to partner with banks to improve the HELOC application process and reduce the time from application to closing for eligible borrowers. In November 2019, we announced our collaboration with BBVA USA, the U.S. subsidiary of Madrid-based BBVA, in offering HELOCs through our website. HELOCs are currently available to borrowers in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, and Texas. HELOCs will not be available on the Prosper marketplace for investment purposes.

Investor Mobile App. In August 2019, we publicly launched our new mobile app, Prosper Invest. The mobile app is designed to allow Note investors an on-the-go option for managing their Prosper accounts, including initiating cash transfers, checking the status of their Notes, and setting up the Auto Invest tool. Prosper Invest is available for both iOS and Android devices.

Available Information

The following filings are available for download free of charge at www.prosper.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such filings are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC’s website, at www.sec.gov. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when evaluating our business. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. While we believe the risks and uncertainties described below include all material risks currently known by us, it is possible that these may not be the only ones we face.

RISKS RELATED TO BORROWER DEFAULT

The Notes are risky and speculative investments for suitable investors only.

Investors should be aware that the Notes offered through our marketplace are risky and speculative investments. The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL and depend entirely for payment on PFL’s receipt of payments under the corresponding Borrower Loans. Notes are suitable only for investors of adequate financial means. If an investor cannot afford to lose the entire amount of such investor’s investment in the Notes, the investor should not invest in the Notes.

15

Payments on the Notes depend entirely on payments PFL receives on corresponding Borrower Loans. If a borrower fails to make any payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan related to a Note, payments on such Note will be correspondingly reduced.

PFL will only make payments pro-rata on a series of Notes after it receives a borrower’s payment on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fees. PFL also will retain from the funds received from the relevant borrower and otherwise available for payment on the Notes any non-sufficient funds fees and the amounts of any attorneys’ fees or collection fees our in-house collections department, a third-party servicer or collection agency imposes in connection with collection efforts. Under the terms of the Notes, if PFL does not receive any or all payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, payments on the Note will be correspondingly reduced in whole or in part. If the relevant borrower does not make a payment on a specific monthly loan payment date, no payment will be made on the Note on the corresponding succeeding Note payment date.

The Borrower Loans are not secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by any third party, and investors must rely on us or a third-party collection agency to pursue collection against any borrower.

Borrower Loans are unsecured obligations of borrowers. They are not secured by any collateral, and they are not guaranteed or insured by PFL, PMI or any third party, or backed by any governmental authority in any way. We and our third-party collection agencies will, therefore, be limited in our ability to collect on Borrower Loans. Moreover, Borrower Loans are obligations of borrowers to PFL as successor to WebBank, not obligations to the holders of Notes. Holders of the Notes will have no recourse to the borrowers and no ability to pursue borrowers to collect payments under Borrower Loans. Holders of the Notes may look only to PFL for payment of the Notes.

The credit information of an applicant may be inaccurate or may not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness, which may cause an investor to lose all or part of the price paid for a Note.

We obtain applicant credit information from consumer reporting agencies, and assign Prosper Ratings to listings based in part on the applicant’s credit score. A credit score that forms a part of the Prosper Rating assigned to a listing may not reflect the applicant’s actual creditworthiness because the credit score may be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. Similarly, the credit data taken from the applicant’s credit report and displayed in listings may also be based on outdated, incomplete or inaccurate consumer reporting data. We do not verify the information obtained from the applicant’s credit report. Moreover, investors do not, and will not, have access to financial statements of applicants or to other detailed financial information about applicants.

The Prosper Rating may not accurately set forth the risks of investing in the Notes, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will come within the estimated average annualized loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating, and investors have limited rights to cause Prosper to repurchase the Notes.

The Prosper Rating assigned to a loan listing may not accurately reflect the risks of investing in the Notes, and is not a recommendation by us to buy, sell or hold a Note. For example, the Prosper Rating for a listing could be inaccurate because the applicant’s credit report contained incorrect information. Similarly, although most of the information provided by applicants that is relevant to the Prosper Rating is verified by us before calculating the Prosper Rating, we do not verify all such information. For example, we do not verify the income information on all applications. Further, the Prosper Rating does not reflect PFL’s credit risk as a debtor (such credit risk exists even though, as the debtor on the Notes, PFL’s only obligation is to pay to the Note holders their pro-rata shares of collections received on the related Borrower Loans net of applicable fees). In addition, no assurances can be provided that actual loss rates for the Notes will fall within the expected loss rates indicated by the Prosper Rating. The interest rates on the Notes might not adequately compensate Note investors for these additional risks.

If we include in a listing a Prosper Rating that is different from the Prosper Rating calculated by us or calculate the Prosper Rating for a listing incorrectly, and such error materially and adversely affects a holder’s interest in the related Note, PFL will indemnify the holder or repurchase the Note. PFL will not, however, have any indemnity or repurchase obligation under the Amended and Restated Indenture, the Notes, the Investor Registration Agreement or any other agreement associated with the Note Channel as a result of any other inaccuracy with respect to a listing’s Prosper Score or Prosper Rating. PFL’s contractual repurchase obligations do not affect a Note holder’s rights under federal or state securities laws.

16

Investors who use the Recurring Investment or Auto Invest tools may face additional risk of funding Borrower Loans that have been erroneously selected by the tool.

Since it was first implemented in July 2011 through December 31, 2019, the Recurring Investment tool (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) tool has experienced programming errors that affected 8,630 Notes and PMI Notes out of the 11,534,093 Notes and PMI Notes purchased. The Auto Invest tool was first implemented on June 2, 2016. Since such time through December 31, 2019, the Auto Invest tool has experienced programming errors that affected 2 Notes out of the 6,522,117 Notes purchased.

In the event of any errors in Recurring Investment or Auto Invest that cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note such investor would have purchased had there been no error, PFL will either repurchase the Note, indemnify the investor against losses suffered on that Note or cure such error. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PFL and PMI, Our Marketplace and Our Ability to Service the Notes” for more information.

Some borrowers may use our marketplace to defraud investors, which could adversely affect investors’ ability to recoup their investment.

We use identity and fraud checks with external databases to authenticate each borrower’s identity. There is a risk, however, that these checks could fail and fraud may occur. In addition, applicants may misrepresent their intentions regarding loan purpose or other information contained in listings, and we do not verify the majority of this information. While PFL will indemnify an investor or repurchase Notes in limited circumstances (including, e.g., a material payment default on the Borrower Loan resulting from verifiable identity theft), it is not obligated to indemnify an investor or repurchase a Note from an investor if the investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud (other than verifiable identity theft) in connection with a loan listing, or due to false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, a borrower’s representations, similar indicators of borrower intent and ability to repay the Borrower Loan. If PFL repurchases a Note, the repurchase price will be equal to the Note's outstanding principal balance and will not include accrued interest. If PFL repurchases any Notes, PMI will concurrently repurchase the related PMI Management Rights for zero consideration.

The fact that we have the exclusive right and ability to investigate claims of identity theft in the origination of Borrower Loans creates a significant conflict of interest between us and our investors.

We have the exclusive right to investigate claims of identity theft and determine, in our sole discretion, whether verifiable identity theft has occurred. Such a determination of verifiable identity theft may trigger an obligation by PFL to either repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans or indemnify the applicable Note holders. The denial of a claim under PFL’s identity theft guarantee would save PFL from its indemnification or repurchase obligation. Because investors rely solely on us to investigate incidents that might require PFL to indemnify the applicable Note holders or repurchase the related Notes or Borrower Loans, a conflict of interest exists between us and such investors.

If payments on the Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note become more than 30 days overdue, such investor will be unlikely to receive the full principal and interest payments that were expected on the Note, and such investor may not recover the original purchase price on the Note.

We may refer Borrower Loans that become past due to a third party collection agency for collection or we may collect on such Borrower Loans directly. If a borrower fails to make a required payment on a Borrower Loan within 30 days of the due date, we will pursue reasonable collection efforts in respect of the Borrower Loan. Referral of a delinquent Borrower Loan to a collection agency within five business days after it becomes 30 days past due will be considered reasonable collection efforts. If payment amounts on a delinquent Borrower Loan are received from a borrower after the loan has been referred to our in-house collections department or an outside collection agency, we or that collection agency may retain a percentage of that payment as a fee before any principal or interest becomes payable to an investor. Collection fees may be up to 40% of recovered amounts, in addition to any legal fees and transaction fees associated with accepting payments incurred in the collection effort.

For some non-performing Borrower Loans, we may not be able to recover any of the unpaid loan balance and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive little, if any, of the unpaid principal and interest payable under the Note. In all cases, investors must rely on our collection efforts or the applicable collection agency to which such Borrower Loans are referred, and are not permitted to collect or attempt collection of payments on the Borrower Loans in any manner.

Loss rates on the Borrower Loans may increase as a result of economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of the borrower.

Borrower Loan loss rates may be significantly affected by economic downturns or general economic conditions beyond our control and beyond the control of individual borrowers. In particular, loss rates on Borrower Loans may increase due to factors such as prevailing interest rates, the rate of unemployment, the level of consumer confidence, residential real

17

estate values, the value of the U.S. dollar, energy prices, changes in consumer spending, the number of personal bankruptcies, disruptions in the credit markets and other factors.

The Borrower Loans do not restrict borrowers from incurring additional unsecured or secured debt, nor do they impose any financial restrictions on borrowers during the term of the Borrower Loan, which may reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the full principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a Note.

If a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted, the additional debt may impair the ability of that borrower to make payments on his or her Borrower Loan and, as such, reduce the likelihood that an investor will receive the principal and interest payments that such investor expects to receive on a corresponding Note. Moreover, the additional debt may adversely affect the borrower’s creditworthiness generally, and could result in the financial distress, insolvency, or bankruptcy of the borrower. To the extent that the borrower has or incurs other indebtedness and cannot pay all of his or her indebtedness, the borrower may choose to make payments to other creditors, rather than to PFL.

To the extent borrowers incur other indebtedness that is secured, such as a mortgage, a home equity line or an auto loan, the ability of the secured creditors to exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the borrower’s ability to repay the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment. Borrowers may also choose to repay obligations under secured indebtedness or other unsecured indebtedness before repaying Borrower Loans because there is no collateral securing the Borrower Loans. An investor will not be notified if a borrower incurs additional debt after the date a loan listing is posted.

Marketplace lending is a new lending method and our marketplace has a limited operating history. Borrowers may not view or treat their obligations to PFL as having the same significance as loans from traditional lending sources.

The investment return on the Notes depends on borrowers fulfilling their payment obligations in a timely and complete manner under the corresponding Borrower Loan. Borrowers may not view marketplace lending obligations originated through our marketplace as having the same significance as other credit obligations arising under more traditional circumstances. If a borrower neglects his or her payment obligations on a Borrower Loan upon which payment of an investor’s Note is dependent or chooses not to repay his or her Borrower Loan entirely, such investor may not be able to recover any portion of the investment in a Note.

Our marketplace may fail to comply with applicable law, which could limit our ability to collect on Borrower Loans.

The Borrower Loans are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws. Our marketplace may not always be, and may not always have been, in compliance with these laws. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements applicable to our marketplace may, among other things, limit our or a collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal of or interest on Borrower Loans.

We regularly review the requirements of these laws and take measures aimed at ensuring that the Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace meet the requirements of all applicable laws. However, determining compliance with all applicable laws is a complex matter and it is possible that our determination may be inaccurate or incorrect. Also, changes in law, either due to court decisions, regulatory interpretations or rulings, or new legislation, may adversely affect the collectability of a Borrower Loan.

In general, the Borrower Loans do not contain any cross-default or similar provisions. If a borrower defaults on any of his or her other debt obligations, our ability to collect on the Borrower Loan on which an investor’s Note is dependent for payment may be substantially impaired.

The Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions. A cross-default provision makes a default under certain debt of a borrower an automatic default on other debt of that borrower. Because the Borrower Loans do not contain cross-default provisions, a Borrower Loan will not be placed automatically in default upon that borrower’s default on any of the borrower’s other debt obligations. If a borrower defaults on debt obligations owed to a third party and continues to satisfy the payment obligations under the Borrower Loan, the third party may seize the borrower’s assets or pursue other legal action against the borrower before the borrower defaults on the Borrower Loan, which may affect our ability to collect from the borrower when or if the Borrower Loan becomes delinquent.

Borrowers may seek the protection of debtor relief under federal bankruptcy or state insolvency laws, which may result in the nonpayment of an investor’s Notes.

Borrowers may seek protection under federal bankruptcy law or similar laws. If a borrower files for bankruptcy (or becomes the subject of an involuntary petition), a stay will go into effect that will automatically put any pending collection actions on the Borrower Loan on hold and prevent further collection action absent bankruptcy court approval. If we receive notice that a borrower has filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or has become the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition, we will put the borrower’s account into “bankruptcy status.” When this occurs, we terminate automatic monthly ACH debits on the Borrower Loan and we will not undertake collection activity without bankruptcy court approval.

18

Whether any payment will ultimately be made or received on a Borrower Loan after a bankruptcy status is declared depends on the borrower’s particular financial situation. In most cases, however, unsecured creditors such as PFL receive nothing, or only a fraction of their outstanding debt and, as a result, an investor who has purchased a corresponding Note may receive none or very little of the unpaid principal and interest payable on the Note.

Federal law entitles borrowers who enter active military service to an interest rate cap and certain other rights that may inhibit the ability to collect on Borrower Loans and reduce the amount of interest paid on the corresponding Notes.

Federal law provides borrowers on active military service with rights that may delay or impair our ability to collect on a Borrower Loan corresponding to an investor’s Note. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) and other similar state laws require that the interest rate on preexisting debts, such as Borrower Loans, be set at no more than 6% while the qualified service member or reservist is on active duty. A holder of a Note that is dependent on such a Borrower Loan for payment will not receive the difference between 6% and the original stated interest rate for the Borrower Loan during any such period. The SCRA also permits courts to stay proceedings and the execution of judgments against service members and reservists on active duty, which may delay recovery on any Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.

Beginning October 3, 2016, the Military Lending Act (“MLA”) prohibits requiring covered borrowers, which include active military servicemembers and their dependents, to waive the right to legal recourse or to submit to arbitration. This may delay recovery on any relevant Borrower Loans in default, and, accordingly, payments on the corresponding Notes.

If there are any amounts under such a Borrower Loan still due and owing to PFL after the final maturity of the corresponding Notes, PFL will have no further obligation to make payments on such Notes, even if it receives payments on the Borrower Loan after the final maturity of such Notes. We do not take military service into account in assigning a Prosper Rating to loan listings. In addition, as part of the borrower registration process, we do not request borrowers to confirm if they are qualified service members or reservists within the meaning of the SCRA or the MLA. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.

As of December 31, 2019, 106 Borrower Loans, with a total outstanding balance of $788 thousand are subject to the SCRA.

The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.

The Federal Trade Commission's Holder in Due Course Rule, which in certain circumstances permits borrowers to assert any claims and defenses that they would have had against a seller of goods or services obtained with the proceeds of a loan against an originator or subsequent purchaser of the loan, could allow certain borrowers to raise such defenses against PFL to the extent of the outstanding loan balance. If such defenses are successfully raised, PFL will be unable to collect on the loan and it is unlikely that any further payment will be made on the corresponding Notes.

The death of a borrower may substantially impair an investor’s ability to recoup the full purchase price of a Note or to receive the interest payments that such investor expects to receive on the Note.

If a borrower dies with a Borrower Loan still outstanding, PFL is required, upon receiving notice of the death, to stop accepting automatic loan payments and to refund any payments that were automatically debited after the borrower's date of death. Though we may seek to work with the executor of the borrower’s estate to obtain repayment of the loan, the borrower’s estate may not contain sufficient assets to repay the loan, or its executor may prioritize repayment of other creditors. In addition, if a borrower dies near the end of the term of his or her Borrower Loan, it is unlikely that any further payments will be made on the corresponding Notes because the time required for the probate of the borrower’s estate will likely extend beyond the final maturity date of the Notes, after which date PFL will cease to have any obligation to make payments on the Notes.

RISKS INHERENT IN INVESTING IN THE NOTES

The Notes are special, limited obligations of PFL only and are not directly secured by any collateral or guaranteed or insured by PMI or any third party.

The Notes will not represent an obligation of borrowers, PMI or any other party except PFL, and are special, limited obligations of PFL. The Notes are not guaranteed or insured by PMI, any governmental agency or instrumentality, or any third party. Although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in the Borrower Loans corresponding to the Notes, the payments and proceeds that PFL receives on such Borrower Loans, the bank account in which such Borrower Loan payments are deposited, and the accounts in which investors’ funding amounts are deposited, the Note holders do not themselves have a direct security interest in the Borrower Loans or the right to payment thereunder. If an event of default under the Amended and Restated Indenture were to occur, the Note holders would be dependent on the indenture trustee’s ability to realize on the collateral and make payments on the Notes in the manner contemplated by the Amended and Restated Indenture. In addition, although PFL will take all actions that it believes are required under applicable

19

law to perfect the security interest of the indenture trustee in the collateral, if its analysis of the required actions is incorrect or if it fails to take any required action in a timely manner, the indenture trustee’s security interest may not be effective and holders of the Notes could be required to share the collateral (and any proceeds thereof) with PFL’s other creditors, or, if a bankruptcy court were to order the substantive consolidation of PMI and PFL (as described below), PMI’s creditors.

PFL is not obligated to indemnify Note holders or repurchase Notes except in limited circumstances.

PFL is only obligated to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes in limited circumstances. These circumstances include if (i) a material payment default under the corresponding Borrower Loan occurs as a result of verifiable identify theft; (ii) we include a Prosper Rating in a listing that is different from the Prosper Rating we calculated, or we calculate the Prosper Rating incorrectly; or (iii) any errors in Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, or Auto Invest cause an investor to purchase a Note from PFL that such investor would not otherwise have purchased or that differs materially from the Note, in which cases PFL also has the option to cure such error. PFL is not required to repurchase Notes or indemnify holders of Notes, however, if the Note holder’s investment is not realized in whole or in part due to fraud other than identity theft, or due to other false or inaccurate statements or omissions of fact in a listing, whether in credit data, borrower representations or similar indicia of borrower intent and ability to repay the loan. Further, PFL is under no obligation to repurchase a Note or indemnify any holder of Notes if a correctly-determined Prosper Rating fails to accurately predict the actual losses on a Borrower Loan.

PFL might incur indemnification and repurchase obligations that exceed its projections, in which case it may not have sufficient liquidity to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations.

PFL believes its liquidity will be sufficient to meet its reasonably anticipated indemnification and repurchase obligations. In determining its expected liquidity needs with respect to indemnification and repurchase obligations, PFL considers the history of such obligations incurred by it and PMI. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that if PFL is obligated to repurchase a Note or indemnify a Note holder, that it will be able to meet its repurchase or indemnification obligations. If PFL is unable to meet its indemnification and repurchase obligations with respect to a Note, the investor in such Note may lose all of such investor’s investment in the Note.

Our marketplace allows a borrower to prepay a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. Borrower Loan prepayments will extinguish or limit an investor’s ability to receive additional interest payments on a Note.

Borrower Loan prepayment occurs when a borrower decides to pay some or all of the principal amount on a Borrower Loan earlier than originally scheduled. Borrowers may decide to prepay all or a portion of the remaining principal amount due under a Borrower Loan at any time without penalty. In the event of a prepayment of the entire remaining unpaid principal amount of a Borrower Loan, each of the holders of the Notes corresponding to the Borrower Loan will receive his or her share of such prepayment but further interest will not accrue on such Borrower Loan or on such Note after the date on which the payment is made. If the borrower prepays a portion of the remaining unpaid principal balance, the term of the Borrower Loan will not change, but interest will cease to accrue on the prepaid portion. If a borrower prepays a Borrower Loan in whole or in part, an investor will not receive all of the interest payments that such investor originally expected to receive on the Note corresponding to such Borrower Loan. In addition, such investor may not be able to find a similar rate of return on another investment at the time at which the Borrower Loan is prepaid. Prepayments are subject to PFL’s servicing fee, even if the prepayment occurs immediately after issuance of a Note.

Prevailing interest rates may change during the term of the Notes. If this occurs, investors may receive less value from the purchase of Notes in comparison to other ways they may invest their money. Additionally, borrowers may prepay their Borrower Loans due to changes in interest rates, and investors may not be able to redeploy the amounts received from prepayments in a way that offers the return expected from the Notes.

The Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment bear fixed, not floating, rates of interest. If prevailing interest rates increase, the interest rates on Notes investors purchase might be less than the rate of return they could earn if they had invested the purchase price in a different investment.

We may not set appropriate interest rates for Borrower Loans.

We set interest rates for all Borrower Loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors such as Borrower Loan terms, the economic environment and competitive conditions. If we set interest rates for Borrower Loans too low, investors may not be compensated appropriately for the level of risk that they are assuming in purchasing Notes, while setting the interest rate too high may increase the risk of non-payment. In either case, a failure by us to set rates appropriately may adversely impact the ability of investors to receive returns on their Notes that are commensurate with the risks they have assumed in acquiring such Notes.

20

The Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange and can be held only by registered Prosper investors. Further, no trading platform for the transfer of Notes exists and there can be no assurance a trading platform for the transfer of Notes will develop in the future. Therefore, investors should be prepared to hold the Notes they purchase until maturity.

The Notes and PMI Management Rights will not be listed on any securities exchange and all Notes and PMI Management Rights must be held by registered Prosper investors. Further, in connection with Prosper’s termination of its relationship with FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. in October 2016, a trading platform for the transfer of Notes and PMI Management Rights no longer exists. While we may, in our sole discretion, permit the establishment of another platform on which a secondary market may be made with respect to the Notes, there can be no assurance a trading platform for the Notes and PMI Management Rights will develop in the future. Therefore, Note purchasers must be prepared to hold their Notes and PMI Management Rights to maturity.

The U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Notes are uncertain.

There are no statutory provisions, regulations, published rulings or judicial decisions that directly address the characterization of the Notes or instruments similar to the Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, although the matter is not free from doubt because payments on the Notes are dependent on payments on the corresponding Borrower Loan, PFL treats the Notes as debt instruments that have original issue discount (“OID”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Where required, PFL intends to file information returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in accordance with such treatment unless there is a change or clarification in the law, by regulation or otherwise, that would require a different characterization of the Notes. Investors should be aware, however, that the IRS is not bound by PFL’s characterization of the Notes and the IRS or a court may take a different position with respect to the Notes’ proper characterization. For example, the IRS could determine that, in substance, each investor owns a proportionate interest in the corresponding Borrower Loan for U.S. federal income tax purposes or, for example, the IRS could instead treat the Notes as a different financial instrument (including an equity interest or a derivative financial instrument). Any different characterization could significantly affect the amount, timing, and character of income, gain or loss recognized in respect of a Note. For example, if the Notes are treated as PFL’s equity, (i) PFL would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on income, including interest, accrued on the corresponding Borrower Loans but would not be entitled to deduct interest or OID on the Notes, and (ii) payments on the Notes would be treated by the Note holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes as dividends (that may be ineligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income taxation or the dividends-received deduction) to the extent of PFL’s earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A different characterization may significantly reduce the amount available to pay interest on the Notes. Investors are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Notes (including any possible differing treatments of the Notes).

PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability to match the timing of its income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Investors should be aware that PFL’s ability to pay principal and interest on a Note may be affected by its ability, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to match the timing of income it receives from a corresponding Borrower Loan that it holds and the timing of deductions that it may be entitled to in respect of payments made on the Notes that it issues. For example, if the Notes are treated as contingent payment debt instruments for U.S. federal income tax purposes but the corresponding Borrower Loans are not, there could be a potential mismatch in the timing of PFL’s income and deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and PFL’s resulting tax liabilities could affect its ability to make payments on the Notes.

Our participation in the funding of Borrower Loans could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest.

As is the practice with other marketplace lending companies, from time to time, we may fund portions of qualified loan requests in our marketplace and hold any Notes purchased as a result of such funding for our own individual accounts. Even though we will participate in funding Borrower Loans listed in our marketplace under the same terms and conditions and through the use of the same information that is made available to other potential investors in our marketplace, such participation may be perceived as involving a conflict of interest. For example, our funding of a Borrower Loan may cause the loan to fund, and in some cases, fund faster, than it would fund in the absence of our participation, which could benefit us to the extent that it ensures that Prosper generates the revenue associated with the loan.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we purchased $389 thousand in Notes for investment.  

RISKS RELATED TO PFL AND PMI, OUR MARKETPLACE AND OUR ABILITY TO SERVICE THE NOTES

We have experienced errors on our platform that have resulted in incorrect reporting of performance returns to Note investors. If we are unable to prevent the reoccurrence of similar errors, investors could be adversely impacted.

21

In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors, which resulted from errors in the code forming part of our calculation framework. On average, the error resulted in Note investors being shown annualized net return information that was approximately 260 basis points higher than the actual performance of Notes in their accounts. The error did not affect any other part of Note investors’ accounts, nor did it affect any other aspects of the platform, including the receipt and distribution of loan payments, deposits, monthly statements or tax documentation, or the Note and loan level information provided to investors. Following an SEC investigation, Prosper and the SEC came to a settlement to resolve the matter on April 19, 2019. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a negligence-based violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. PFL paid the penalty in full on April 24, 2019.

The error reveals a risk associated with the complex programs, algorithms and inputs that support our platform. We depend on these programs, algorithms and inputs to store, retrieve, process and manage data, as well as to provide marketplace features such as our credit assessments and underwriting, the Prosper Rating, historical returns, and individual Note, Note portfolio and platform-wide performance data. Errors or other design defects within these programs, algorithms and inputs may result in a negative experience for borrowers and investors, delay introductions of new features or enhancements, or impact the information displayed on our website. They could also result in negative publicity and unfavorable media coverage, harm to our reputation, litigation, regulatory inquiries or proceedings, loss of or damage to our relationships with borrowers or investors, or loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Arrangements for back-up servicing are limited. If PMI fails to maintain operations or the Administration Agreement is rejected or terminated (in bankruptcy or otherwise), investors may experience a delay and increased cost in respect of their expected principal and interest payments on Notes, and PFL may be unable to collect and process repayments from borrowers.

If the Administration Agreement (or the loan servicing provisions thereof) are terminated for any reason (whether as a result of PMI’s bankruptcy, non-performance or otherwise), PFL would attempt to transfer the loan servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and Notes to a third party pursuant to its contractual agreements with investors.

PFL has entered into a back-up servicing agreement with a loan servicing company that is willing and able to transition servicing responsibilities from PMI. There can be no assurance, however, that this back-up servicer will be able to adequately perform the servicing of the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes. If this back-up servicer assumes the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the back-up servicer may impose additional servicing fees (up to the maximums we have negotiated), reducing the amounts available for payments on the Notes. Additionally, transferring these servicing obligations to the back-up servicer may result in delays in the processing of collections on Borrower Loans and information with respect to amounts owed on Borrower Loans. If the back-up servicer is not able to service the Borrower Loans and Notes effectively, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on their Notes may be substantially impaired, even if their portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the corresponding Borrower Loans are paying on schedule.

In addition, it is unlikely that the back-up servicer would be able to perform functions other than servicing the outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, such as facilitating the creation of new Borrower Loans through our marketplace, or managing PFL’s marketing efforts. PFL believes that it could find one or more other parties who could perform these and any other functions necessary to fully operate our marketplace in the absence of PMI. However, this process, and any related onboarding of such party or parties, will take time. Any such delay or impairment that did not affect existing Note holders, because PFL or its back-up servicer proves able to continue servicing outstanding Borrower Loans and Notes, could nonetheless delay PFL’s ability to facilitate the origination of new Borrower Loans and issue new Notes through our marketplace, which could adversely affect PFL’s finances and user relationships.

A decline in economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, which may negatively impact our business and results of operations.

As a lending marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace.

A relatively small number of investors provide the funding for a large percentage of all Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace. If these investors cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our

22

marketplace and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our business could be adversely affected by a weakening market for securities backed by consumer assets.

PFL is involved in the securitization market through its business of selling loans to investors who, in turn, sell asset backed securities based on accumulated loan portfolios. If the market for asset backed securities based on consumer assets weakens, investors may cease or significantly decrease their funding of Borrower Loans through our marketplace and if PFL has been unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, then our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, if this were to occur, the rights of holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.

Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it will become subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if this were to occur, the recovery, if any, of a holder of a Note may be substantially delayed in time (for example, due to the imposition of a stay on payments by the bankruptcy court) and may be substantially less in amount than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note even if a Note holder’s portfolio of Notes is well diversified and the Borrower Loans are paying on schedule. Further, although PFL has granted the indenture trustee, for the benefit of the Note holders, a security interest in all of the Borrower Loans, in all payments and proceeds it receives on the corresponding Borrower Loans and in the bank account in which the Borrower Loan payments are deposited, the holders of the Notes would still be subject to risks associated with PFL’s insolvency, bankruptcy or a similar proceeding.

In addition, the commencement of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may, as a matter of law, prevent PFL from making regular payments on the Notes, even if the funds to make such payments are available. Because the Indenture trustee would be required to enforce its security interest in the Borrower Loans in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, the Indenture trustee's ability to make payments under the Notes would be delayed, which may effectively reduce the value of any recovery that a holder of a Note may receive (and no such recovery can be assured) by the time any recovery is available.

If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, borrowers may delay payments or cease making payments at all.

Borrowers may delay or suspend making payments to PFL because of the uncertainties occasioned by its becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, even if the borrowers have no legal right to do so, and such delay would reduce, at least for a time, the funds that might otherwise be available to pay the Notes corresponding to those Borrower Loans.

If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, interest accruing on the Notes upon and following such bankruptcy or similar proceeding may not be paid.

In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding for PFL, interest accruing on the Notes during the proceeding may not be part of the allowed claim of a holder of a Note. If the Note holder receives a recovery on the Note (and no such recovery can be assured), any such recovery may be based on, and limited to, the Note holder’s claim for principal and for interest accrued up to the date of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding, but not thereafter. Because a bankruptcy or similar proceeding may take months or years to complete, a claim based on principal and on interest only up to the start of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding may be substantially less than a claim based on principal and on interest through the end of the bankruptcy or similar proceeding.

If PFL becomes subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, a holder of a Note may not have any priority right to payment from the corresponding Borrower Loan, may not have any right to payment from funds in the deposit account, and may not have any ability to access funds in the investors’ funding accounts (the “FBO Funding accounts”).

In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding, if PFL has failed to perfect the security interest in Borrower Loans, investors may be required to share the proceeds of the Borrower Loans upon which their Notes are dependent for payment with PFL’s other creditors, including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans. To the extent that proceeds of the Borrower Loans would be shared with PFL’s other creditors, any secured or priority rights of such other creditors may cause the proceeds to be distributed to such other creditors before any distribution is made to investors on the corresponding Notes.

If a payment is made on a Borrower Loan corresponding to a Note before PFL’s bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, and those funds are held in the deposit account PFL maintains with Wells Fargo to collect borrower payments and have not been used by PFL to make payments on the Note as of the date the bankruptcy or similar proceeding is commenced, there can be no assurance that PFL will or will be able to use such funds to make payments on such Note. Other creditors of PFL (including holders of other Notes or Borrower Loans) may be deemed to have rights to such funds or interests in the deposit account and monies credited thereto that are equal to or greater than the rights of the holder of such Note.

23

Although PFL believes that amounts funded by investors into the FBO Funding accounts should not be subject to claims of its creditors other than the investors for whose benefit the funds are held, the legal title to the FBO Funding accounts, and the attendant right to administer the FBO Funding accounts, would be property of PFL’s bankruptcy estate. As a result, if PFL were to file for bankruptcy protection, the legal right to administer the funds in the FBO Funding accounts would vest with the bankruptcy trustee or debtor in possession. In that case, while neither PFL nor its creditors should be able to reach those funds, the indenture trustee or the investors may have to seek a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay and permitting them to withdraw their funds. Investors may suffer delays in accessing their funds in the FBO Funding accounts as a result. Moreover, U.S. Bankruptcy Courts have broad powers at law and in equity and, if PFL has failed to properly segregate or handle investors’ funds, a bankruptcy court could determine that some or all of such funds were beneficially owned by PFL and should therefore be made available to PFL’s creditors generally.

In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, a holder of a Note may be delayed or prevented from enforcing PFL’s repurchase obligations with respect to such Note.

In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PFL, any right of a Note holder to require PFL to repurchase the Note or indemnify such Note holder under the circumstances set forth in the Investor Registration Agreement or the Note might not be enforceable, and such holder’s claim for such repurchase may be treated less favorably than a general unsecured obligation of PFL.

Although PFL has been organized in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PFL were substantively consolidated in this manner, the rights of the holders of the Notes could be uncertain, and payments on the Notes may be limited, suspended or stopped. The recovery, if any, of a holder on a Note may therefore be substantially delayed and substantially less than the principal and interest due and to become due on the Note.

Although PFL has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to prevent it from being substantively consolidated with PMI in the event of PMI’s bankruptcy, if PMI became subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding and PFL were substantively consolidated with PMI, the risks described in the immediately preceding risk factors regarding (i) payment delays, (ii) uncollectability of interest accrued during the bankruptcy proceeding, (iii) being subordinated to the interests of PFL’s other creditors, and (iv) the indenture trustee’s inability to access funds in the deposit account or the FBO Funding accounts, would all be present and, in addition, the same considerations would apply in relation to the claims of creditors of PMI, including that such creditors of PMI may be determined to have perfected security interests or unsecured claims that take precedence over or are at least equal in priority to those of creditors of PFL (including holders of Notes).

In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar proceeding of PMI, (i) the implementation of back-up servicing arrangements may be delayed or prevented, and (ii) PMI’s ability to transfer its servicing obligations to a back-up servicer, or to transfer its other corporate and marketplace administration and marketing services to third parties may be limited and subject to the approval of the bankruptcy court or other presiding authority. The bankruptcy process may delay or prevent the implementation of back-up servicing, which may impair the collection on Borrower Loans to the detriment of holders of the Notes.

PMI owns and did not transfer to PFL ownership of the computer hardware that it uses to host and maintain the website or agreements with third parties relating to the hosting and maintenance of the website. Although PMI’s retention of such hardware and agreements should not bear on a bankruptcy court’s analysis of the legal separateness of PMI and PFL (or their respective assets and liabilities), the cessation of or substantial reduction of the day-to-day operations of PMI (because of or during its bankruptcy or otherwise) would materially impair and delay the ability of PFL or a back-up service provider to retrieve data and information in the possession of PMI and to operate our marketplace or elements thereof relevant to Borrower Loan and Note servicing.

PMI, in its capacity as servicer, has the authority to waive or modify the terms of a Borrower Loan without the consent of the Note holders.

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PMI is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to service and collect on the Borrower Loans in accordance with industry standards. Subject to that obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to (i) waive or modify any non-material term of a Borrower Loan, (ii) consent to the postponement of strict compliance with any such term, and (iii) in any manner grant a non-material indulgence to any borrower. In addition, if a Borrower Loan is in default, or PMI determines a default is reasonably foreseeable or that such action is consistent with its servicing obligation, the Administration Agreement grants PMI the authority to waive or modify a material term of a Borrower Loan, to accept payment of an amount less than the principal balance in final satisfaction of a Borrower Loan and to grant any indulgence to a borrower, provided that PMI has reasonably and prudently determined that such action will not be materially

24

adverse to the interests of the relevant Note holders. If PMI approves a modification to the terms of any Borrower Loan, it must promptly notify the corresponding Note holders in each Note holder's account.

There can be no assurance that PMI, in its capacity as servicer, will be able to collect the principal amount or interest rate agreed to and/or sell charged off Borrower Loans in the future as a result of business, regulatory or other considerations.

Prosper has incurred operating losses since inception and may continue to incur net losses in the future.

Prosper has incurred operating losses since its inception and it may continue to incur net losses in the future. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, Prosper incurred losses of $13.7 million and $39.9 million, respectively. Additionally, from its inception through December 31, 2019, Prosper had an accumulated deficit of $434.5 million.

Prosper has financed its operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of equity securities. At December 31, 2019, Prosper had approximately $64.6 million unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. PMI is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan if it cannot generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations. Prosper's failure to achieve positive cash flow from operations or sufficient debt and equity financing, could adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.

Although our business has grown, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively and meet the demands that such growth places on our facilities, employees and infrastructure.  

As the number of borrowers, investors and Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace increases, PMI will need to increase its facilities, personnel and infrastructure in order to continue performing effectively its obligations under the Administration Agreement and to accommodate the effects that such growth will have on our servicing and marketplace needs. PMI must constantly add new hardware and update its software and our marketplace, expand customer support services, and add new employees to maintain the operations of our marketplace as well as to satisfy its servicing obligations on the Borrower Loans and the Notes and its other obligations under the Administration Agreement. If PMI is unable to increase the capacity of our marketplace and maintain the necessary infrastructure to perform its duties under the Administration Agreement, PFL, or one or more other third-party service providers engaged by PFL, will have to perform the duties otherwise performed by PMI, and investors may experience delays in receipt of payments on their Notes and periodic downtime of our marketplace.

PFL has a limited operating history.

PFL was formed in 2012 as a limited purpose vehicle. Under the Administration Agreement, PFL receives a license fee from PMI for granting PMI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to access and use our marketplace. In addition, PFL earns servicing fees in relation to the servicing of the Borrower Loans and Notes that it retains from collections on the Borrower Loans. PFL believes this fee income is sufficient to cover its reasonably anticipated obligations. While PFL believes that it is adequately capitalized to meet its foreseeable obligations, and that its fee income is sufficient to meet its ongoing operating costs, its financial resources are limited and could prove to be insufficient. In addition, PFL has no employees and relies on PMI, as servicer, or other third-party service providers, to perform most of its day-to-day operations. The lack of PFL’s own employees, its limited operating history, and capitalization that is less than that of PMI could make it difficult for PFL to operate at a level that will be sustainable. Absent the services to be provided to PFL by PMI pursuant to the Administration Agreement, PFL's risk management process, ability to predict loss rates and the general operation of our marketplace would have a thinner margin for error than does PMI.

The market in which we participate is competitive and, if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.

The consumer lending market is competitive and rapidly changing. With the introduction of new technologies and the influx of new entrants, we expect competition to persist and intensify in the future, which could harm our ability to increase volume in our marketplace.

Our principal competitors include major banking institutions, credit unions, credit card issuers and other consumer finance companies, as well as LendingClub and other marketplace lending platforms. Competition could result in reduced volumes, reduced fees or the failure of our marketplace to achieve or maintain more widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business. In addition, in the future we may experience new competition including companies possessing large, existing customer bases, substantial financial resources and established distribution channels. If any of these companies or any major financial institution decided to enter our marketplace lending business, acquire one of our existing competitors or form a strategic alliance with one of our competitors, our ability to compete effectively could be significantly compromised and operating results could be harmed.

Most of our current or potential competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources than Prosper does and may be able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, sale and support of their marketplaces and distribution channels. Our potential competitors may also have longer operating histories, more extensive

25

customer bases, greater brand recognition and broader customer relationships than we have. These competitors may be better able to develop new products, to respond quickly to new technologies and to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns. Our industry is driven by constant innovation. If we are unable to compete with such companies and meet the need for innovation, the use of our marketplace could stagnate or substantially decline.

If Prosper fails to promote and maintain its brand in a cost-effective manner, it may lose market share and its revenue may decrease.

To succeed, Prosper must increase transaction volumes in our marketplace by attracting a large number of borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner, many of whom have not previously participated in marketplace lending. If we are not able to attract qualified borrowers and sufficient investor purchase commitments, we will not be able to increase our transaction volumes. PFL believes that developing and maintaining awareness of its brand in a cost-effective manner is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our marketplace and attracting new borrower and investors. Furthermore, we believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in the marketplace lending industry increases. Successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on the effectiveness of marketing efforts and the user experience on our marketplace. These brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenues. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand, we may lose our existing users to competitors or be unable to attract new users, which would cause our revenue to decrease and may impair our ability to maintain our marketplace.

The proprietary technology that makes operation of our marketplace possible is not protected by any patents. It may be difficult and costly for PFL to protect its intellectual property rights in relation thereto, or to continue to develop or obtain new technologies, which could adversely affect its ability to operate competitively.

On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the marketplace, including the proprietary technology and all of the rights related to the operation of the marketplace, to PFL. PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace depends, in part, upon this proprietary technology. We intend to vigorously protect our proprietary interests in such technology. Despite our best efforts, however, we may not protect the proprietary technology effectively, which would allow competitors to duplicate our products and adversely affect our ability to compete. A third party may attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use the proprietary technology without PFL’s consent. In addition, our marketplace may infringe upon claims of third-party patents and PFL or PMI may face intellectual property challenges from such other parties. PFL or PMI may not be successful in defending against any such challenges or in obtaining licenses to avoid or resolve any intellectual property disputes. Furthermore, the technology may become obsolete, and there is no guarantee that PFL will be able to successfully develop, obtain or use new technologies to adapt our marketplace to compete with other marketplace lending companies. If PFL cannot protect the proprietary technology embodied in and used by our marketplace from intellectual property challenges, or if our marketplace becomes obsolete, PFL’s ability to maintain our marketplace and perform its servicing obligations could be adversely affected and, in such event, its ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.

PFL relies on a third-party commercial bank to process transactions. If PFL is unable to continue utilizing these services, its business and ability to service the Notes may be adversely affected.

Because PFL is not a bank, it cannot belong to or directly access the Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment network. As a result, it currently relies on an FDIC-insured depository institution to process its transactions. If PFL cannot continue to obtain such services from this institution or elsewhere, or if it cannot transition to another processor quickly, its ability to process payments will suffer and investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes will be delayed or impaired.

If the security of PFL's investors' and borrowers' confidential information stored in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, users' secure information may be stolen, our reputations may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.

As with any entity with a significant Internet presence, we and the third parties that Prosper uses for website hosting occasionally have experienced cyber-attacks, breaches of our and their systems and other similar incidents, which to-date have not had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. Future attacks are likely to occur. Our marketplace stores PFL’s investors’ and borrowers’ bank information and other personally identifiable sensitive data. Any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access could cause users’ secure information to be stolen and used for criminal purposes. Security breaches or unauthorized access to secure information could also expose us to liability related to the loss of the information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative publicity. If security measures are breached because of third-party action, employee or contractor error, malfeasance, faulty password management or otherwise, or if design flaws in the relevant software are exposed and exploited, and, as a result, a third party or disaffected employee obtains unauthorized access to any investors’ or borrowers’ data, PFL’s relationships with its users could be severely damaged, and PFL (or PMI) could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we and PMI’s third-party hosting facilities may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. In addition, many states have

26

enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach are costly to implement and often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our users to lose confidence in the effectiveness of PFL’s and PMI’s data security measures. Further, California has recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, a comprehensive bill that affords individuals in the state affected by data breaches a private right of action against companies that have allegedly been the target of such breaches due to a failure to implement and maintain appropriate cybersecurity policies and procedures. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm our reputations, and we could lose users.

Any significant disruption in service in our marketplace or in PMI’s computer systems could adversely affect PMI’s ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement.

PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement could be materially and adversely affected by events outside of its control. The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of PMI's technology and its underlying network infrastructure are important to our respective operations, level of customer service, reputation and ability to attract new users and retain existing users. PMI's system hardware is hosted in several hosting facilities located across the United States. Our hosting facilities service providers do not guarantee that access to our marketplace or to PMI's own systems will be uninterrupted, error-free or secure. The operation of our marketplace and PMI's operation of its own systems depend on our service providers' ability to protect the relevant systems in their facilities against damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality, temperature, humidity or other environmental concerns, computer viruses or other attempts to harm them, criminal acts and similar events. If PMI's arrangement with any hosting facilities service provider is terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such provider's facilities, PMI could experience interruptions in providing its services under the Administration Agreement, PFL could experience interruptions in the operations of our marketplace, and both could experience delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities. Any interruptions or delays in PMI’s performance of its services or in the functioning of and accessibility of our marketplace, whether as a result of a hosting facility service provider or other third-party error, PMI's error, natural disasters or security breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm PFL’s relationships with users and its reputation. Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, PMI's insurance policies may not be sufficient for PMI to adequately compensate PFL for any losses that it may incur. PMI's disaster recovery plan has not been tested under actual disaster conditions, and PMI may not have sufficient capacity to recover all data and services in the event of an outage at one or more hosting facilities. These factors could prevent PMI from processing or posting payments on the Borrower Loans or the Notes, damage PFL's brand and reputation, divert the attention of PMI's employees, reduce PFL's revenue, subject PMI or PFL to liability and cause users to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely affect our respective businesses, financial condition and results of operations. 

Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions.

Our marketplace may be vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If a “hacker” were able to infiltrate our marketplace, users would be subject to the increased risk of fraud or borrower identity theft and may experience losses on, or delays in the recoupment of amounts owed on, a fraudulently induced purchase of a Note. Additionally, if a hacker were able to access our secure files, he or she might be able to gain access to users’ personal information. While we have taken steps to prevent such activity from affecting our marketplace, if we are unable to prevent such activity, the value of investors’ investment in the Notes could be adversely affected.

Competition for Prosper's employees is intense, and Prosper may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees it needs to perform under the Administration Agreement.

Competition for highly skilled technical and financial personnel is extremely intense. Prosper may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at compensation levels consistent with its existing compensation and salary structure. Many of the companies with which Prosper competes for experienced employees have greater resources than Prosper has and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.

In addition, Prosper invests significant time and expense in training its employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. If Prosper fails to retain its employees, it could incur significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements and the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrower and investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect on PMI's ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and, in such event, PFL’s ability to continue to make payments on the Notes could be materially impaired.

Purchasers of Notes will have no control over us and will not be able to influence our corporate matters.

PFL is not offering and will not offer equity interests in its company. Investors who purchase Notes offered through our marketplace will have no equity interest in either of us and no ability to vote on or influence our decisions. As a result, PMI, which owns all of PFL's outstanding equity interests, will continue to have sole control over PFL's governance matters, subject

27

to the presence of PFL's independent directors, whose consent will be required before PFL can take certain extraordinary actions, and subject to the limitations specified in PFL's organizational documents and the Amended and Indenture.

PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, fail to achieve their strategic objectives, disrupt our business or divert management attention.

PMI completed its first two acquisitions in 2015, and in the future PMI may continue to enter into acquisitions of businesses, technologies and products that it intends to complement its existing business, solutions, services and technologies. PMI cannot provide assurance that the acquisitions it has made or will make in the future will provide it with the benefits or achieve the results anticipated in entering into the transaction. Acquisitions are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including: difficulties assimilating and retaining the management and other personnel, culture and operations of the acquired businesses; potential disruption of ongoing business and distraction of management; difficulties in maintaining acceptable standards, controls, procedures and policies, including integrating financial reporting and operating systems, particularly with respect to foreign and/or public subsidiaries; potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners, users and customers following an acquisition; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and products into our solutions and services; and unexpected costs and expenses resulting from the acquisition, and potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses.

In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, acquisition-related costs and expenses, restructuring charges and write-offs. Acquisitions may also result in goodwill and other intangible assets that are subject to impairment tests, which could result in future impairment charges.

PMI may enter into negotiations for acquisitions that are not ultimately consummated. Those negotiations could result in diversion of management time and significant out-of-pocket costs. If PMI fails to evaluate and execute acquisitions successfully, PMI may not be able to achieve its anticipated level of growth and its business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Events beyond our control may damage our ability to maintain adequate records, maintain our marketplace or perform the servicing obligations. If such events result in a system failure, investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the Notes would be substantially harmed.

If a catastrophic event resulted in a marketplace outage and physical data loss and/or affected our electronic data storage and back-up storage systems, PFL’s ability (and PMI’s ability as servicer under the Administration Agreement) to perform its servicing obligations would be materially and adversely affected. Such events include, but are not limited to, fires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, computer viruses and telecommunications failures. In the event of any marketplace outage or physical data loss described in this paragraph, PFL cannot guarantee that investors would be able to recoup their investment in the Notes.

Public health emergencies and other events beyond our control may damage our ability to continue operations without disruptions, including our ability to attract new borrowers and investors, retain existing investors, as well as the ability of existing borrowers to repay their loans. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our business is subject to the risk that external events could disrupt our day-to-day operations and impair the activities of borrowers and investors on our marketplace. For example, the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) has spread to the point that the World Health Organization declared it a global pandemic in March 2020. Locally, the outbreak of COVID-19 has forced many companies, including Prosper, to adopt wide-scale remote work protocols in an attempt to protect workforce health and slow community spread of the disease. While we have business continuity procedures in place to guide our response to a crisis, our attention may be diverted away from normal operations and our resources may be constrained. Likewise, borrowers and investors living in areas impacted by COVID-19 or other crises may also experience work slowdowns or stoppages, diminishing their capacity to apply for loans or invest through our marketplace. For existing borrowers, work slowdowns or stoppages may directly result in the inability to make loan payments, and may impair investors’ ability to receive principal and interest payments on the corresponding Notes. Additionally, a potential recession or volatility in capital markets as a result of public health emergencies may cause existing investors to cease or significantly decrease their investment in Borrower Loans through our marketplace. If such events continued for an extended period of time and PFL is unable to attract sufficient investor purchase commitments from new and existing investors, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

28

RISKS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE AND REGULATION

Our marketplace represents a novel program that must comply with regulatory regimes applicable to consumer credit transactions as well as with regulatory regimes applicable to securities transactions. The novelty of our marketplace means compliance with various aspects of such laws is untested. Certain state laws generally regulate interest rates and other charges and require certain disclosures, and also require licensing for certain activities. In addition, other state laws, public policy and general principles of equity relating to the protection of consumers, unfair and deceptive practices and debt collection practices may apply to the origination, servicing and collection of Borrower Loans in our marketplace. Our marketplace is also subject to other laws, such as:

•the federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms of their loans;

•the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit on the basis of age, race, color, sex, religion, marital status, national origin, receipt of public assistance or the exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act;

•the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, which regulates the use, reporting and disclosure of information related to each applicant’s credit history;

•the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which regulates debt collection practices by “debt collectors” and prohibits debt collectors from engaging in certain practices in collecting, and attempting to collect, outstanding consumer loans;

•state counterparts to the above consumer protection laws;

•state and federal securities laws, which require that any non-exempt offers and sales of the Notes be registered;

•Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any consumer financial product or service;

•the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which includes limitations on financial institutions’ disclosure of nonpublic personal information about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;

•the California Consumer Privacy Act, which provides consumers in the state with extensive rights to know about the use, to request deletion, and to opt out of the sale of their personal information by certain businesses, and which obligates such businesses to notify consumers of their data collection practices and to implement procedures for addressing consumer requests regarding their personal data;

•the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;

•the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which allows military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties;

•the federal Military Lending Act, which provides specific protections for active duty service members and their dependents (or covered borrowers) in consumer credit transactions;

•the federal Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;

•the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures; and

•the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures.

We may not always be in compliance with these laws. Borrowers may make counterclaims regarding the enforceability of their obligations under borrower or consumer protection laws after collection actions have commenced, or otherwise seek damages under these laws. Investors may attempt to rescind their Note purchases under securities laws, and PFL or PMI’s failure to comply with such laws could also result in civil or criminal liability. Compliance with these requirements is also

29

costly, time-consuming and limits operational flexibility. See Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation” for more information.

There continues to be uncertainty as to how the actions of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or any other new agency could impact our business or that of our issuing bank.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which commenced operations in July 2011, has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. This includes authority to write regulations under federal consumer financial protection laws, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and to enforce those laws against and examine large financial institutions for compliance. The CFPB is authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices through its regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement authority. To assist in its enforcement, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including the loan products we facilitate. This system could inform future CFPB decisions with respect to its regulatory, enforcement or examination focus.

We are subject to the CFPB's jurisdiction, including its enforcement authority. The CFPB may therefore request reports concerning our organization, business conduct, markets and activities. In addition, the CFPB may conduct on-site examinations of our business on a periodic basis if the CFPB were to determine, based on, for example, consumer complaints, judicial opinions, or administrative decisions, that we are engaging in activities that pose risks to consumers. In addition, the CFPB has announced that it plans to make a rule for the direct supervision of nonbank installment lenders, which may permit the CFPB to conduct periodic examinations of our business.

There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB's strategies and priorities, including in both its examination and enforcement processes, will impact our businesses and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected loan products and services, making them less attractive and restricting our ability to offer them.

Although we have committed resources to enhancing our compliance programs, actions by the CFPB or other regulators against us, our issuing bank or our competitors that discourage the use of the marketplace model or suggest to consumers the desirability of other loan products or services could result in reputational harm and a loss of borrowers or investors. Our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially if the CFPB or other regulators enact new regulations, change regulations that were previously adopted, modify, through supervision or enforcement, past regulatory guidance, or interpret existing regulations in a manner different or stricter than have been previously interpreted.

Noncompliance with laws and regulations may impair our ability to facilitate the origination of or service Borrower Loans.

Generally, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may, among other things, limit our or a third party collection agency's ability to collect all or part of the principal amount of or interest on the Borrower Loans on which the Notes are dependent for payment. In addition, non-compliance could subject us to damages, revocation of required licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm PFL's business and ability to maintain our marketplace and may result in borrowers rescinding their Borrower Loans.

Where applicable, we seek to comply with state lending, servicing and similar statutes, and we continually evaluate our licensing needs. In U.S. jurisdictions with licensing or other requirements that we believe may be applicable to our marketplace, we have obtained necessary licenses or comply with the relevant requirements. Nevertheless, if we are found to not comply with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or face other sanctions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to facilitate the origination of Borrower Loans through our marketplace, and on our ability to perform servicing obligations or make our marketplace available to borrowers in particular states, which may impair investors' ability to receive the payments of principal and interest on the Notes that they expect to receive.

If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed.

If our marketplace were found to violate a state's usury laws, we may have to alter our business model and our business could be harmed. The interest rates that are charged to borrowers and that form the basis of payments to investors through our marketplace are based upon the ability under federal law of the issuing bank that originates the loan to export the interest rates of the state where it is located and on Prosper's ability to assist the bank in arranging such loans. WebBank, the bank that issues loans through our marketplace, exports the interest rates of Utah, which allows parties to generally agree by contract to any interest rate. The interest rates offered by WebBank through our marketplace for Borrower Loans as of December 31, 2019 range from 5.31% to 31.82%, which equate to interest rates for Note investors that range from 4.31% to 30.82%. Some states where borrowers are located, including Utah, have no statutory interest rate limitations on personal loans, while other jurisdictions have a maximum rate less than the current maximum rate offered by WebBank through our marketplace. If a borrower were to successfully bring claims against us for state usury or other state law violations, we could be subject to fines and penalties. Further, if the current structure under which WebBank makes loans through our marketplace were

30

successfully challenged, we may have to substantially modify our business operations and may be required to maintain state-specific licenses and only provide a limited range of interest rates for Borrower Loans, all of which may substantially reduce our operating efficiency and attractiveness to investors and possibly result in a decline in our operating results. Recent litigation has successfully challenged lending arrangements in which banks or other exempt entities make loans and sell those loans to a third party charged with servicing the loans.

In addition, it is possible that state usury laws may impose liability that could affect an assignee's (i.e., PFL's and/or an investor who purchases Borrower Loans from PFL) ability to continue to charge to borrowers the interest rates that they agreed to pay at origination of their Borrower Loans.

As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Business—Government Regulation—State Usury Laws” above, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that the debt buyer of a charged off credit card account could not rely on the National Bank Act's preemption of state interest rate limits for interest at rates imposed by the debt buyer after charge-off. The decision, which is binding on federal courts in Connecticut, New York and Vermont, has created some uncertainty as to whether non-bank entities purchasing loans originated by a bank may rely on federal preemption of state usury laws, and may create an increased risk of litigation by plaintiffs challenging our ability to collect interest in accordance with the terms of Borrower Loans. While the Madden decision specifically addressed preemption under the National Bank Act, it could support future challenges to federal preemption for other institutions, including an FDIC-insured, state chartered industrial bank like WebBank. However, although there can be no assurances as to the outcome of any potential litigation, or the possible impact of the litigation on our marketplace, we believe the Madden case addressed facts that are not presented by our marketplace lending platform and thus would not apply to Borrower Loans.

More recently, in January 2017, the Administrator of the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code filed suits against online loan platforms Marlette Funding, LLC and Avant, Inc. The Administrator claims that loans to Colorado residents facilitated through these platforms were required to comply with Colorado laws regarding interest rates and fees, and that such laws were not preempted by the federal laws that apply to loans originated by Cross River Bank and WebBank, the federally regulated issuing banks that originate loans through the platforms operated by Marlette and Avant, respectively. In response to the Colorado regulator's lawsuits, Cross River Bank and WebBank have each intervened in the state court case filed against Marlette and Avant, respectively. We have been in discussions with the Colorado Department of Law regarding certain terms of Borrower Loans offered to Colorado residents. Effective as of July 30, 2019, we and the Administrator entered into a stipulation for the continued operation of the loan program in Colorado, subject to certain financing charge and late fee restrictions during the period that the stipulation is in effect. The stipulation is intended to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the litigation against each of Marlette and Avant, but may be terminated with 21 days’ notice by either party. No further assurance can be provided as to the timing or outcome of these matters.

We and our counsel are monitoring these matters closely and, as developments warrant, we will consider any necessary changes to our marketplace required to avoid the impact of these cases on our business model. Because of investor demand, the maximum annual percentage rates offered through our marketplace may be lower in some states than others.

We rely on agreements with WebBank, pursuant to which WebBank originates loans on a uniform basis to qualified borrowers throughout the United States and sells and assigns those loans to PFL. If our relationships with WebBank were to end, we may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans.

Borrower Loan requests take the form of an application to WebBank submitted through our marketplace. WebBank currently makes all loans to borrowers through our marketplace, which allows our marketplace to be available to borrowers on a uniform basis throughout the United States. If our relationships with WebBank were to end or if WebBank were to cease operations, one or both of PMI and PFL may need to rely on individual state lending licenses to originate Borrower Loans. Because neither of us currently possesses all required licenses to lend in every state, we might be forced to limit the rates of interest charged on Borrower Loans in some states and we might not be able to originate loans in some states altogether. We also may face increased costs and compliance burdens if the agreements with WebBank are terminated.

Several lawsuits have sought to recharacterize certain loan marketers and other originators as lenders. If litigation or a regulatory enforcement action on similar theories were successful against one or both of PMI and PFL, Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace could be subject to state consumer protection laws and licensing requirements in a greater number of states.

Several lawsuits in the lending industry primarily involving high-interest “payday loan” marketers have brought under scrutiny the association between those firms and out-of-state banks. These lawsuits assert the loan marketers use out-of-state lenders in order to evade the consumer protection laws imposed by the states where they do business. Such litigation has sought to re-characterize the loan marketer as the lender for purposes of state consumer protection law and usury restrictions. Similar civil actions have been brought in the context of gift cards and retail purchase finance. Although we believe that our activities are generally distinguishable from the activities involved in these cases, a court or regulatory authority could disagree.

31

Additional state consumer protection laws would be applicable to the Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace if one or both of us were re-characterized as a lender, and the Borrower Loans could be voidable or unenforceable. In addition, we could be subject to claims by borrowers, as well as enforcement actions by regulators. Even if we were not required to cease doing business with residents of certain states or to change our business practices to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could be required to register or obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us.

As Internet commerce develops, federal and state governments may draft and propose new laws to regulate Internet commerce, which may negatively affect our businesses.

As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal and state governments becomes more likely. Our businesses could be negatively affected by the application of existing laws and regulations or the enactment of new laws applicable to marketplace lending. The cost to comply with such laws or regulations could be significant and would increase our operating expenses, and we may be unable to pass along those costs to our users in the form of increased fees. In addition, federal and state governmental or regulatory agencies may decide to impose taxes on services provided over the Internet. These taxes could discourage the use of the Internet as a means of consumer lending, which would adversely affect the viability of our marketplace.

If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Company Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.

The Investment Company Act of 1940, or the “Investment Company Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment companies” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL and PMI believe each has conducted its business in a manner that does not result in being characterized as an investment company. If, however, PFL is deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, it may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and its activities may be restricted, which would materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. Any determination that PMI is an investment company under the Investment Company Act similarly could impair its ability to perform its obligations under the Administration Agreement and thereby impair PFL’s ability to make payments on the Notes. If PFL or PMI were deemed to be an investment company, PFL or PMI may also attempt to seek exemptive relief from the SEC, which could impose significant costs and delays on their businesses.

If one or both of PMI and PFL is required to register under the Investment Advisers Act, either of our ability to conduct business could be materially adversely affected.

The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the “Investment Advisers Act,” contains substantive legal requirements that regulate the manner in which “investment advisers” are permitted to conduct their business activities. PFL believes that its business consists of providing a platform for marketplace lending for which investment adviser registration and regulation do not apply under applicable federal or state law, and does not believe that it is required to register as an investment adviser with either the SEC or any of the various states. The SEC or a state securities regulator could reach a different conclusion, however. Registration as an investment adviser could adversely affect PFL’s method of operation and revenues. For example, the Investment Advisers Act requires that an investment adviser act in a fiduciary capacity for its clients. Among other things, this fiduciary obligation requires that an investment adviser manage a client’s portfolio in the best interests of the client, have a reasonable basis for its recommendations, fully disclose to its client any material conflicts of interest that may affect its conduct and seek best execution for transactions undertaken on behalf of its client. It could be difficult for PFL to comply with these obligations without meaningful changes to its business operations, and there is no guarantee that it could do so successfully. If PFL were ever deemed to be in non-compliance with applicable investment adviser regulations, it could be subject to various penalties, including administrative or judicial proceedings that might result in censure, fine, civil penalties (including treble damages in the case of insider trading violations), the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or other adverse consequences. Similarly, any determination by regulators that PMI must register as an investment adviser could materially adversely affect PMI and impair its ability to continue to administer our marketplace on PFL’s behalf.

PMI's administration of Quick Invest under its previous offering and PFL’s administration of Quick Invest, Recurring Investment, and Auto Invest under its current offering, could create additional liability for PFL and such liability could be material.

Quick Invest was a loan search tool that allowed investors to identify Notes that met their investment criteria. An investor using Quick Invest was asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or she wished to use as search criteria, (ii) the total amount he or she wished to invest, and (iii) the amount he or she wished to invest per Note. Quick Invest then compiled a basket of Notes for his or her consideration that met his or her search criteria.

Recurring Investment (formerly known as Auto Quick Invest) is an automated loan search tool that allows investors to easily invest in Notes that meet their specific investment criteria by automatically bidding any available funds in their account on Notes that match their selected parameters, in accordance with their specified instructions. An investor using Recurring

32

Investment is asked to indicate (i) the Prosper Rating or Ratings he or she wishes to use as search criteria, and (ii) the amount he or she wishes to invest per Note. If he or she wishes, the investor can further customize his or her investment criteria by applying one or more of several dozen additional search criteria, such as loan amount, debt-to-income ratio and credit score. The investor can also set aside a specific amount of his or her funds as a cash reserve that will not be invested by the Recurring Investment tool. After the investor has entered and saved the parameters of his or her search, Recurring Investment automatically (i) runs searches on the designated criteria as new listings are posted on the marketplace, and (ii) places bids on any Notes identified by each such search.

Auto Invest is an automated loan search tool that makes it easier for investors to build their desired portfolio of Notes by automatically investing any available funds in an investor’s account in Notes that match the investor’s specified investment criteria and allocation targets. An investor using Auto Invest is asked to select (i) a loan allocation target, or a target mix of loans based on Prosper Ratings, and (ii) the amount he or she wishes to invest per Note. The investor has the option of selecting a target from Prosper’s series of preset loan allocations based on the recent historical loan inventory on the marketplace, any of which may be customized by changing the individual allocation targets for each Prosper Rating, or he or she can create a custom loan allocation target across Prosper Ratings based on his or her specific risk tolerance. If he or she wishes, the investor can further customize his or her investment criteria by applying additional filters, such as loan term and employment status. The investor can also set aside a percentage of his or her portfolio as a cash reserve that will not be invested by Auto Invest. Investors may update their target allocations, cash reserve and other investment criteria, and pause and restart Auto Invest, at any time. Once the investor turns on Auto Invest, the tool may immediately begin placing orders for Notes in accordance with the investor’s current and target allocations and other criteria. The mix of Notes in any particular order may not match the investor’s individual loan allocation targets, but over time Auto Invest will place orders so that the aggregate holdings in the investor’s portfolio will approximate, to the extent possible, the allocation specified in his or her investment criteria.

Since the Notes purchased through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest and Quick Invest are the same as Notes purchased manually, they present the same risks of non-payment as all Notes that may be purchased through our marketplace. For example, there is a risk that a Borrower Loan identified through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest may become delinquent or default, and that the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for that loan individually, or the estimated return or historical return (as applicable) for the allocation target or the basket of Notes selected by Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest as a whole, may not accurately reflect the actual return on such loan or Notes. If this were to occur, an investor who purchased a Note from PFL through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest could pursue a claim against PFL in connection with its representations regarding the performance of the Borrower Loans bid upon through Recurring Investment, Auto Invest or Quick Invest, respectively. An investor could pursue such a claim under various anti-fraud theories under federal and state securities law.

We may face liability under state and federal securities law for statements in our prospectus and in other communications that could be deemed to be an offer to the extent that such statements are deemed to be false or misleading.

Loan listings and other borrower information available on PFL's website as well as in sales and listing reports are statements made in connection with the purchase and sale of securities that are subject to the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. In general, these liability provisions provide a purchaser of the Notes with a right to bring a claim against one or both of us for damages arising from any untrue statement of material fact or failure to state a material fact necessary to make any statements made not misleading. Even though PFL and PMI have advised investors of what they believe to be the material risks associated with an investment in the Notes and PMI management rights, the SEC or a court could determine that they have not advised investors of all of the material facts regarding an investment in the Notes and PMI Management Rights, which could give investors the right to rescind their investment and obtain damages, and could subject PFL and PMI to civil fines or criminal penalties in addition to any such rescission rights or damages.

PMI and PFL’s activities in connection with the offer and sale of securities through our marketplace could result in potential violations of federal securities law and result in material liability to PFL and PMI.

PFL and PMI’s respective businesses are subject to federal and state securities laws that may limit the kinds of activities in which PFL and PMI may engage and the manner in which they engage in such activities. For example, changes to the manner in which PFL offers and sells Notes or other securities through our marketplace could be viewed by the SEC or a state securities regulator as involving the creation or sale of new, unregistered securities. In such circumstances, the failure to register such securities could subject PFL to liability and the amount of such liability could be meaningful. In addition, in 2008, PMI entered into a settlement with the SEC pursuant to which PMI agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations or any future violations of Sections 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act. Failure to comply with that order could result in material civil or criminal liability, which could materially adversely affect PMI’s business and PFL’s offering of Notes.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

33

Item 2. Properties

Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, technical support and engineering functions, is located in San Francisco, California, where we lease approximately 50,000 square feet of office space under leases that will expire February 28, 2023. We also have entered into leases for approximately 46,000 square feet of office space located in Arizona and Utah. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Prosper's disclosure set forth under Note 19, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

Prosper Funding's disclosure set forth under Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies—West Virginia Matter, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

On April 21, 2009, PMI and the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) reached agreement on the terms of a model consent order between PMI and the states in which PMI, under its initial platform structure, offered promissory notes for sale directly to investor members prior to November 2008. The consent order involves payment by PMI of up to an aggregate of $1 million in penalties, which have been allocated among the states based on PMI’s promissory note sale transaction volume in each state prior to November 2008. A state that enters into a consent order receives its portion of the $1 million in exchange for its agreement to terminate, or refrain from initiating, any investigation of PMI’s promissory note sale activities prior to November 2008. Penalties are paid promptly after a state enters into a consent order. NASAA has recommended that each state enter into a consent order; however, no state is obliged to do so, and there is no deadline by which a state must make its decision. PMI is not required to pay any portion of the penalty to those states that do not elect to enter into a consent order. If a state does not enter into a consent order, it is free to pursue its own remedies against PMI, subject to any applicable statute of limitations. As of December 31, 2019, PMI has entered into consent orders with 34 states and the District of the Columbia and has paid an aggregate of $0.78 million in associated penalties. PMI has not entered into any such consent orders since 2016.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information; Holders of Record

There is no established public trading market for PMI's or PFL's common equity. As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 346 holders of record of PMI’s common stock. As of December 31, 2019, PMI owns 100% of PFL's membership interests.

Dividend Policy

PMI has not paid cash dividends since inception, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

See Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report for information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

In September 2017, PMI issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of PMI's Series G convertible preferred stock. Please see PMI's Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2017 for details regarding the sale.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, PMI issued 8,200 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants for an aggregate exercise price per share of $0.02. During the year ended December 31, 2019, PMI issued 173,356 shares of

34

common stock upon the exercise of stock options for an aggregate exercise price per share of $0.15. These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet by Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1 to October 31	—	$	—	—	$	—
November 1 to November 31	—	—		—	—
December 1 to December 31	—	—		—	—
	—	$	—	—	$	—

35

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

The following selected historical consolidated financial data of Prosper Marketplace Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our consolidated financial statements, and the related notes under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

The following table presents a five year comparison of revenues, expenses and net income (in thousands) and Net Loss Per Share and weighted average number of shares outstanding:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net	$	119,282	$	123,373	$	130,174	$	95,130	$	161,708
Servicing Fees, Net	23,406		29,025		27,206		28,903		17,238
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	10,946		13,147		11,431		3,637		14,151
Loss in Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	(17,553)		(72,316)		(60,122)		—		—
Other Revenues	5,953		4,697		4,806		5,245		7,687
Total Operating Revenues	142,034		97,926		113,495		132,915		200,784
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	100,786		57,716		47,208		44,649		41,606
Interest Expense on Notes	(63,736)		(45,886)		(43,954)		(41,187)		(38,174)
Net Interest Income	37,050		11,830		3,254		3,462		3,432
(Loss) Gain in Fair Value of Financial Instruments	(25,514)		(5,395)		(514)		(372)		59
Total Net Revenues	153,570		104,361		116,235		136,005		204,275
Expenses
Origination and Servicing	34,915		35,116		34,881		33,944		31,139
Sales and Marketing	73,824		77,997		83,462		70,146		112,284
General and Administrative	71,588		72,371		75,686		102,735		86,480
Restructuring Charges	34		1,762		1,340		17,027		—
(Gain) Loss in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(11,235)		(45,003)		29,140		7		—
Other Expenses, Net	(1,945)		1,891		7,392		30,341		—
Total Expenses	167,181		144,134		231,901		254,200		229,903
Net Loss Before Taxes	(13,611)		(39,773)		(115,666)		(118,195)		(25,628)
Income Tax Expense	100		172		(508)		546		340
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)	$	(118,741)	$	(25,968)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted	($0.18)		($0.57)		($1.65)		($1.85)		($0.47)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted	70,511,605		70,384,501		69,687,836		64,196,537		55,547,408

36

Stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations data above was as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
Origination and Servicing	$	417	$	911	$	996	$	2,004	$	1,231
Sales and Marketing	243		451		553		$	2,914	$	2,561
General and Administrative	3,868		7,039		10,689		14,824		9,219
	$	4,528	$	8,401	$	12,238	$	19,787	$	13,011

Select consolidated balance sheet information is presented as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	64,635	$	57,945	$	45,795	$	22,337	$	66,295
Restricted Cash	$	155,773	$	149,114	$	152,668	$	163,907	$	151,223
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	$	—	$	22,173	$	53,147	$	32,769	$	73,187
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value	$	634,019	$	263,522	$	293,005	$	315,627	$	297,273
Total Assets	$	1,084,828	$	753,631	$	623,735	$	623,846	$	685,624
Notes at Fair Value	$	244,171	$	264,003	$	293,948	$	316,236	$	297,405
Total Liabilities	$	1,068,335	$	728,304	$	567,357	$	512,781	$	477,056
Total Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit	$	16,493	$	25,327	$	56,378	$	111,065	$	208,568

37

Prosper Funding LLC

The following table presents a five year comparison of revenues, expenses and net income (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party	$	49,818	$	105,709	$	101,500	$	36,630	$	57,919
Servicing Fees, Net	26,368		27,943		25,963		28,604		16,218
(Loss) Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	(5,058)		(58,027)		(48,691)		3,637		14,151
Other Revenues	155		270		170		478		1,500
Total Operating Revenues	71,283		75,895		78,942		69,348		89,788
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	41,146		43,569		47,208		44,649		41,380
Interest Expense on Notes	(38,492)		(40,656)		(43,954)		(41,187)		(38,174)
Net Interest Income	2,654		2,913		3,254		3,462		3,206
(Loss) Gain in Fair Value on Financial Instruments, Net	(375)		(701)		(514)		(372)		59
Total Net Revenues	73,562		78,107		81,682		72,439		93,053
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party	62,575		70,491		70,359		62,203		62,786
Servicing	5,012		6,140		6,103		5,395		3,705
General and Administrative	33		597		379		1,321		1227
Other Expenses, Net	—		—		—		30704		—
Total Expenses	67,620		77,228		76,841		99,623		67,718
Net Income (Loss)	$	5,942	$	879	$	4,841	$	(27,184)	$	25,335

Select consolidated balance sheet information is presented as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	7,462	$	11,163	$	8,223	$	6,929	$	15,026
Restricted Cash	$	110,399	$	136,018	$	140,092	$	147,983	$	139,937
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value	$	245,137	$	263,522	$	293,005	$	315,627	$	297,273
Total Assets	$	386,184	$	433,002	$	464,045	$	495,185	$	475,691
Notes at Fair Value	$	244,171	$	264,003	$	293,948	$	316,236	$	297,405
Total Liabilities	$	357,997	$	401,757	$	433,679	$	463,860	$	439,386

38

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with historical financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.

Overview

Prosper is a pioneer of online marketplace lending that connects borrowers and investors. Our goal is to enable borrowers to access credit at affordable rates and provide investors with attractive risk-adjusted rates of return.

We believe our online marketplace model has key advantages relative to traditional bank lending, including (i) an innovative marketplace model that efficiently connects qualified supply and demand of capital, (ii) online operations that substantially reduce the need for physical infrastructure and improve convenience, and (iii) data and technology driven automation that improves the borrower and investor experience through increased efficiency. We do not operate physical branches or incur expenses related to that infrastructure; instead, we use data and technology to drive automation and efficiency in our operations. As part of operating our marketplace, we verify the identity of borrowers and assess borrowers’ credit risk profile using a combination of public and proprietary data. Our proprietary technology automates several loan origination and servicing functions, including the borrower application process, data gathering, credit scoring, loan funding, investing and servicing, regulatory compliance and fraud detection.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, our marketplace facilitated $2.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $2.5 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 94% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, our marketplace facilitated $588 million in Borrower Loan originations, of which $545 million were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 93% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period. From inception through December 31, 2019 our marketplace has facilitated $16.7 billion in Borrower Loan originations, of which $14.9 billion were originated through our Whole Loan Channel, representing 90% of the total Borrower Loans originated through our marketplace during this period.

As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate on our marketplace as borrowers or investors and, consequently, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

39

Key Operating and Financial Metrics

The following table displays our key operating and financial metrics for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Loan Originations	$	2,666,085	$	2,836,720	$	2,876,055
Transaction Fees, Net	$	119,282	$	123,373	$	130,174
Whole Loans Outstanding (1)	$	3,659,601	$	3,738,692	$	3,717,825
Servicing Fees, Net	$	23,406	$	29,025	$	27,206
Total Net Revenue	$	153,570	$	104,361	$	116,235
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Core Revenue (2)	$	171,123	$	176,677	$	176,357
Adjusted EBITDA (2)	$	3,920	$	9,448	$	5,460
(1) Balance as of December 31
(2) Core Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP Financial measures. For more information regarding these measures and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.

Loan Originations

Total loan originations on the platform decreased 6% for the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, which resulted in a decrease in Transaction Fees of 3%, or $4.1 million. The decrease in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily due to the impact of credit tightening actions taken in the middle of 2018 to reduce borrower defaults across its platform.

Total loan originations on the platform decreased 1% for the year ended December 31, 2018 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, which resulted in a decrease in Transaction Fees of $6.8 million, or 5%. The decrease in originations Prosper experienced during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to the impact of credit tightening actions focused on borrowers' ability to pay and borrower rate increases in a rising interest rate environment.

From inception through December 31, 2019, a total of 1,291,445 Borrower Loans, totaling $16.7 billion, were originated through our marketplace. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 195,656 Borrower Loans totaling $2.7 billion were originated through our marketplace as compared to 211,084 Borrower Loans totaling $2.8 billion originated in 2018, which represented a unit decrease of 7% and a dollar decrease of 6%. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 211,084 Borrower Loans totaling $2.8 billion were originated through our marketplace as compared to 223,002 Borrower Loans totaling $2.9 billion originated in 2017, which represented a unit decrease of 5% and a dollar decrease of 1%.

Loan origination volume by Prosper Rating was as follows (dollars in millions):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019						2018						2017
	Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%
AA	$	348	13	%	$	351	12	%	$	197	7	%
A	639		24	%	578		20	%	365		13	%
B	669		25	%	708		25	%	641		22	%
C	606		22	%	732		26	%	872		30	%
D	227		9	%	317		11	%	501		17	%
E	63		2	%	122		5	%	236		9	%
HR	17		1	%	29		1	%	64		2	%
Other (1)	97		4	%	—		—		—		—
Total	$	2,666	100	%	$	2,837	100	%	$	2,876	100	%
(1) Represents loans funded through the Whole Loan Channel but not assigned Prosper Ratings. These loans are sold only to institutional investors.

40

The mix of 2019 originations on the Prosper platform was of relatively higher credit quality when compared to 2018, as Prosper tightened its credit underwriting to reduce borrower defaults across its platform.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our net loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Total Net Revenues	$	153,570	$	104,361	47	%	$	104,361	$	116,235	(10)	%
Total Expenses	167,181		144,134		16	%	144,134		231,901		(38)	%
Net Loss Before Income Taxes	(13,611)		(39,773)		66	%	(39,773)		(115,666)		66	%
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	100		172		(42)	%	172		(508)		(134)	%
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	66	%	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)	65	%

Total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $49.2 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to a decrease of $54.8 million of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans that occurred in connection with the expiration of the Consortium Purchase Agreement in May 2019. Refer to Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Consortium Purchase Agreement. Total expenses for 2019 as compared to 2018 increased $23.0 million primarily due to the $33.8 million increase of Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $26.2 million, primarily due to the increase in net revenue explained above.

Total net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $11.9 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to an increase of $12.2 million of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans as a result of issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants that vested during 2018. Total expenses for 2018 decreased $87.8 million, a 38% decrease from 2017, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability of $45.0 million in 2018 compared to a $29.1 million increase in 2017 and a $5.5 million decrease in other expenses for 2018 as compared to 2017. The $5.5 million decrease in other expense was partially driven by impairment charges which we incurred in 2017 (see below for further details). Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $75.2 million, or 65%, when compared to 2017 primarily due to the decrease in expenses explained above.

Revenues

The following table summarizes our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Operating Revenues:
Transaction Fees, Net	$	119,282	$	123,373	(3)	%	$	123,373	$	130,174	(5)	%
Servicing Fees, Net	23,406		29,025		(19)	%	29,025		27,206		7	%
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	10,946		13,147		(17)	%	13,147		11,431		15	%
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	(17,553)		(72,316)		76	%	(72,316)		(60,122)		(20)	%
Other Revenues	5,953		4,697		27	%	4,697		4,806		(2)	%
Total Operating Revenues	142,034		97,926		45	%	97,926		113,495		(14)	%
Interest Income:
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale	100,786		57,716		75	%	57,716		47,208		22	%
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments	(63,736)		(45,886)		39	%	(45,886)		(43,954)		4	%
Net Interest Income	37,050		11,830		213	%	11,830		3,254		264	%
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net	(25,514)		(5,395)		373	%	(5,395)		(514)		950	%
Total Net Revenues	$	153,570	$	104,361	47	%	$	104,361	$	116,235	(10)	%

41

Transaction Fees, Net

We earn a transaction fee upon the successful origination of all Borrower Loans facilitated through our marketplace. Prosper receives payments from WebBank as compensation for the activities we perform on behalf of WebBank. Our fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loans that Prosper facilitates on its marketplace and WebBank originates. We record the transaction fee revenue net of any fees paid by us to WebBank.  

Transaction Fees decreased by $4.1 million, or 3%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower origination volumes.

Transaction Fees decreased by $6.8 million, or 5%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, primarily due to a lower average transaction fee of 4.35% for the year ended 2018, a decrease from 4.53% for 2017. The decrease in the average transaction fee was due to the higher proportion of loans with a Prosper rating of AA originating on the platform during 2018. These loans have a transaction fee rate that is lower on average.

Servicing Fees, Net

Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received. The 19% decrease in Servicing Fees during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to a lower principal balance of whole loans serviced, which was primarily due to lower loan originations as a result of credit tightening as described above and an increase in the principal balance of loans held in consolidated warehouse and securitization trusts. Refer to Note 7 and 11 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information on those warehouse and securitization transactions. The 7% increase in Servicing Fees for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was due to the increase in collection fees and higher overall average whole loan balance.

Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans

Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net gains on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The $2.2 million decrease in gain, or 17%, during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to an increase in rebates and a decrease in the volume of whole loans sold due to lower loan originations as a result of credit tightening as described above and an increase in the principal balance of loans held in consolidated warehouse and securitization trusts.

The $1.7 million increase in gains, an increase of 15%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to $3.2 million less of cash rebates that were issued in 2018 when compared to 2017.  

Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans

Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans relates to the fair value estimate of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants issued to the Consortium that vested when the Consortium purchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements) that was signed in February 2017 and expired in May 2019. The $54.8 million decrease during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was due to a decrease in the number of warrants vested in 2019 as compared to 2018 consistent with the expiration of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. The increase of $12.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily related to an increase in the number of warrants that vested in 2018.

Other Revenues

Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for referrals of customers from our platform. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of Borrower Loans. The changes in Other Revenues were not significant for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The increase of Other Revenues in 2019 was due to an amended referral partner contract.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments

We recognize Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent we believe it to be collectible. We record interest expense on the corresponding Notes, Notes Issued by Securitization Trust, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Warehouse Lines based on the contractual interest rates. The interest rate on Notes is generally 1% lower than the interest rate on the corresponding Borrower Loans to compensate us for servicing the underlying Borrower Loans.

42

The increase of $25.2 million in Net Interest Income during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was due to net interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale and Borrower Loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts. Overall, the increase in Net Interest Income of $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was due to the net interest earned on the Loans Held for Sale purchased by Prosper with funding from the PWIT Warehouse Line (as defined in Note 11 of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements).

Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net

Prosper records Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust at fair value. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the Notes due to their borrower payment-dependent structure. Prosper's obligation to pay principal and interest on Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance.

In 2018, Prosper began using Warehouse Lines to finance the purchase of Loans Held for Sale for the purpose of earning Net Interest Income and contributing to securitization transactions. Loans Held for Sale consist primarily of loans held in warehouse trusts. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are not offset by changes in fair value of Warehouse Lines because Warehouse Lines are carried at amortized cost. See Note 11 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for more details on Warehouse Lines. During 2019, Prosper co-sponsored and consolidated three securitization transactions. Refer to Note 7 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information on those securitization transactions. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by the Securitization Trusts. Changes in fair value of loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts are generally negative due to actual charge-offs and changes in fair value adjustments that are attributable to changes in expected credit performance. We earn interest income on loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts during the period we own the loans, which partially offsets changes in fair value of those loans. The following tables illustrate the composition of the loans held in warehouse and securitization trusts by Prosper Rating, which is an indicator of the credit quality (in thousands except ratios):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018
Loans Held for Sale(1):
AA	13	%	15	%
A	38	%	20	%
B	37	%	25	%
C	8	%	24	%
D	3	%	11	%
E	1	%	4	%
HR	—	%	1	%
Grand Total	100	%	100	%
Borrower Loans - Securitization(2):
AA	8	%
A	18	%
B	24	%
C	31	%
D	14	%
E	4	%
HR	1	%
Grand Total	100	%
(1) The percentages are calculated as the weighted average of month-end principal balances of Loans Held for Sale by Prosper Rating. (2) The percentages are calculated as the weighted average of transaction date principal balances of Borrower Loans by Prosper Rating.

Fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The key assumptions used include default

43

rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics.

The following table details the change in fair value of our financial instruments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Assets:
Borrower Loans	$	(50,845)	$	(31,265)	$	(25,552)
Loans Held for Sale	(6,894)		(4,616)		7
Liabilities:
Notes	22,812		30,574		25,031
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust	7,621		—
	$	(27,306)	$	(5,307)	$	(514)

Expenses

The following table summarizes our expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Origination and Servicing	$	34,915	$	35,116	(1)	%	$	35,116	$	34,881	1	%
Sales and Marketing	73,824		77,997		(5)	%	77,997		83,462		(7)	%
General and Administrative - Research and Development	17,246		17,066		1	%	17,066		16,383		4	%
General and Administrative - Other	54,342		55,305		(2)	%	55,305		59,303		(7)	%
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(11,235)		(45,003)		75	%	(45,003)		29,140		(254)	%
Restructuring Charges, Net	34		1,762		(98)	%	1,762		1,340		31	%
Other Expense (Income), Net	(1,945)		1,891		(203)	%	1,891		7,392		(74)	%
	$	167,181	$	144,134	16	%	$	144,134	$	231,901	(38)	%

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we had 404, 415 and 377 full-time employees, respectively.  The following table reflects full-time employees as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 by department:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019	2018	2017
Origination and Servicing	145	160	163
Sales and Marketing	17	17	13
General and Administrative - Research and Development	101	97	81
General and Administrative - Other	141	141	120
	404	415	377

Origination and Servicing

Origination and Servicing costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our capital markets, collections, customer support and payment processing employees and vendor costs associated with facilitating and servicing Borrower Loans. The decrease in Origination and Servicing costs in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was not significant.

The increase in the expense in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was not significant.

44

Sales and Marketing

Sales and Marketing costs consist primarily of affiliate marketing, search engine marketing, online and offline campaigns, email marketing, public relations and direct mail marketing, as well as the compensation expenses such as wages, benefits and stock based compensation for the employees who support these activities. For the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018, the decrease of $4.2 million, or 5%, was largely driven by a 14.2 million, or 36%, decrease in direct mailing costs as Prosper decreased the size of its direct mail campaigns. This was partially offset by a $8.3 million or 33% increase in partnership costs as Prosper simultaneously increased its Sales and Marketing efforts through the partnership channel.

For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, the decrease in expense of $5.5 million, or 7%, was largely due to decreased variable costs. These decreases included a $20.2 million, or 34%, decrease in direct mailing costs as we decreased the volume of our direct mail campaigns. This was partially offset by a $12.2 million, or 92%, increase in partnership costs as we significantly increased partnership activities, as well as a $1.4 million, or 18%, increase in online marketing costs.

General and Administrative – Research and Development

General and Administrative – Research and Development costs consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our engineering and product development employees and related vendor costs. The increase in General and Administrative – Research and Development in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was not significant.

The increase in expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 of $0.7 million, or 4%, was primarily due to an increase in research and development compensation costs of $0.3 million as a result of an increase in headcount.

General and Administrative – Other

General and Administrative – Other expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense related to our accounting and finance, risk, legal, human resources and facilities employees, professional fees related to legal and accounting and facilities expenses. The decrease in General and Administrative - Other cost in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was not significant.

The decrease General and Administrative - Other expenses in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 of $4.0 million was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation expense of $1.9 million, a decrease in depreciation of Property and Equipment of $1.2 million and a decrease in amortization of intangibles of $1.0 million. Compensation costs decreased primarily because of a decrease in stock based compensation.

Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants increased $33.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 primarily as a result of a decrease in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock compared to the decrease in 2018. Gain in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants of $29.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 became losses of $45.0 million in 2018 due to a decrease in the fair value of the underlying Convertible Preferred Stock in 2018.

Restructuring Charges, Net

Restructuring Charges, Net consist of personnel and facilities related costs related to the strategic restructuring of the business that were announced on May 3, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, costs were $34 thousand, $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The expenses primarily consist of adjustments to fair value of restructuring liability in 2018 and 2017.

Other Expense (Income), Net

Other Income, Net was $1.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 and primarily consists of interest income on Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Other Expenses, Net were $1.9 million and largely consisted of the $3.0 million of expense for the settlement with the SEC related to the annualized net return matter, offset by interest income on Available for Sale Investments securities. For more information on the SEC settlement costs, please refer to Note 19, Commitments and Contingencies of the accompanying notes to PMI's consolidated financial statements. In the year ended December 31, 2017, Other Expenses were $7.4 million. We recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million related to the Intangible Assets associated with the former Prosper Daily application and we settled

45

certain rebates related to the purchase of whole loans by members of the Consortium prior to the closing of the Consortium transaction via the issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants at a loss of $1.5 million over the cash settlement amount.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Core Revenue

Core Revenue is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as our Total Net Revenue adjusted to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans. We believe it is useful to exclude the Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans from Total Net Revenue to derive a better measurement of our business performance. We believe that this adjustment also affords greater comparability to other marketplace lenders.

The underlying Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans relates to the Consortium Purchase Agreement. This agreement expired in May 2019 and we currently do not expect to sign a similar agreement to replace it. As a result, we believe that providing the Core Revenue metric that excludes the impact of Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans is useful to investors.

Core Revenue has limitations as a financial measure, should be considered as supplemental in nature, and is not meant as a substitute for Total Net Revenue which has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These limitations include the following:

•Core Revenue excludes Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans, which is our largest contra revenue item; and

•Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Core Revenue differently or not at all, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, you should consider Core Revenue alongside other financial performance measures, including Total Net Revenue and our financial results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of Total Net Revenue to Core Revenue for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Total Net Revenues	$	153,570	$	104,361	$	116,235
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	(17,553)		(72,316)		(60,122)
Core Revenue	$	171,123	$	176,677	$	176,357

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as Net Loss adjusted for interest income on Available for Sale Investments and Cash and Cash Equivalents, SEC Settlement Costs, Income Tax Expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of Intangible Assets, stock based compensation expense, Fair Value of Warrants Vested on the Sale of Borrower Loans, Restructuring Charges, and Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a helpful indicator of the operational strength and performance of our business and a good measure of our historical operating trends. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA to, among other things, understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, evaluate our operations and financial performance and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. Inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide investors insight into the manner in which management views the performance of the Company, enhance investors’ evaluation of our operating results, and to facilitate meaningful comparisons of our results between periods. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, the GAAP financial information provided herein.

Our use of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;

•Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

46

•Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based charges;

•Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and

•Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

The major non-GAAP adjustments, and our basis for excluding them, are outlined below:

•Fair value of warrants vested on the sale of Borrower Loans and changes in the fair value of Convertible Preferred Stock warrants liability - We exclude these charges primarily because they are non-cash charges and the fair value varies based on the fair value of the underlying preferred stock, varying valuation methodologies and subjective assumptions. Their inclusion makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate.

•Stock-based compensation expense - This consists of expenses for equity awards under our equity incentive plans. Although stock-based compensation is an important aspect of the compensation paid to our employees, the grant date fair value varies based on the stock price at the time of grant, varying valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types. This makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to evaluate; therefore, we believe it is useful to exclude stock-based compensation. We also excluded these expenses because they are non-cash.

•Amortization or impairment of acquired Intangible Assets and impairment of Goodwill - We incur amortization or impairment of acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill in connection with acquisitions and therefore exclude these amounts from our non-GAAP measures. We exclude these items because management does not believe they are reflective of our ongoing operating results.

•Restructuring Charges - We have incurred Restructuring Charges that are included in our GAAP financial statements, related to workforce reductions and estimated costs of existing facility lease commitments due to our May 2016 restructuring. We exclude these items from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such these costs do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these costs do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.

•SEC settlement costs. Our GAAP financial statements include settlement costs incurred for our settlement with the SEC related to the annualized net return matter. We exclude this item from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such items do not reflect expected future operating expenses. In addition, these charges do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or historical operations of our business.

47

The following table presents a reconciliation of Net Loss to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	17,553		72,316		60,122
Depreciation expense:
Servicing and Origination	5,111		5,664		5,853
General & Administrative - Other	2,286		3,926		5,110
Amortization of Intangibles	279		378		1,385
Impairment of Intangibles	—		—		6,399
Stock-based Compensation	4,528		8,401		12,238
Restructuring Charges	34		1,762		1,340
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(11,235)		(45,003)		29,140
Interest Income on Available for Sale Securities, Cash and Cash Equivalents	(1,025)		(1,223)		(461)
SEC Settlement Costs			3,000		—
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	100		172		(508)
Adjusted EBITDA	$3,920		$	9,448	$	5,460

Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations include the following amount of stock-based compensation for the periods presented (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Servicing and Origination	$	417	$	911	$	996
Sales and Marketing	243		451		553
General & Administrative	3,868		7,039		10,689
Total Stock-Based Compensation	$	4,528	$	8,401	$	12,238

48

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2019. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		June 30, 2019		March 31, 2019
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net	$	26,646	$	32,466	$	33,876	$	26,294
Servicing Fees, Net	5,866		6,165		5,172		6,202
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	2,112		2,577		3,559		2,697
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	—		—		(7,805)		(9,747)
Other Revenues	1,121		1,608		2,188		1,036
Total Operating Revenues	35,745		42,816		36,990		26,482
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale	29,702		29,113		23,543		18,428
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments	(17,632)		(17,339)		(15,645)		(13,120)
Net Interest Income	12,070		11,774		7,898		5,308
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net	(10,613)		(11,229)		(1,958)		(1,713)
Total Net Revenues	37,202		43,361		42,930		30,077
Expenses
Origination and Servicing	8,863		8,464		9,427		8,161
Sales and Marketing	15,549		20,484		21,450		16,341
General and Administrative	16,702		18,195		17,908		18,768
Restructuring Charges, Net	(45)		7		5		82
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(2,346)		(14,217)		(4,729)		10,058
Other Expense, Net	(337)		(370)		(591)		(648)
Total Expenses	38,386		32,563		43,470		52,762
Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes	(1,184)		10,798		(540)		(22,685)
Income Tax Expense	13		29		29		29
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,197)	$	10,769	$	(569)	$	(22,714)
Plus: Return from shareholders on share repurchase	1,066		—		—		—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(131)	$	10,769	$	(569)	$	(22,714)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic	$	—	$	0.04	$	(0.01)	$	(0.32)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted	—		0.01		(0.01)		(0.32)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic	70,449,182		70,606,805		70,502,797		70,487,006
Weighted-Average Shares - Diluted	70,449,182		285,810,755		70,502,797		70,487,006

49

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2018		September 30, 2018		June 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net	$	25,806	$	28,225	$	37,988	$	31,354
Servicing Fees, Net	7,017		7,339		7,487		7,184
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	2,496		3,139		4,163		3,350
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	(16,844)		(19,561)		(20,633)		(15,279)
Other Revenues	878		1,453		1,015		1,352
Total Operating Revenues	19,353		20,595		30,020		27,961
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale	15,711		15,088		14,556		12,360
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments	(11,914)		(11,772)		(11,471)		(10,729)
Net Interest Income	3,797		3,316		3,085		1,631
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net	(1,595)		(3,229)		(1,430)		858
Total Net Revenues	21,555		20,682		31,675		30,450
Expenses
Origination and Servicing	8,790		8,313		9,192		8,821
Sales and Marketing	14,849		23,415		20,907		18,828
General and Administrative	17,439		18,066		18,151		18,715
Restructuring Charges, Net	950		218		271		323
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(27,119)		(9,283)		(3,998)		(4,604)
Other Expenses (Income), Net	2,668		(276)		(258)		(242)
Total Expenses	17,577		40,453		44,265		41,841
Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes	3,978		(19,771)		(12,590)		(11,391)
Income Tax Expense	145		8		9		10
Net Income (Loss)	3,833		(19,779)		(12,599)		(11,401)
Less: Net Income Allocated to Participating Securities	$	(3,234)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders	$	599	$	(19,779)	$	(12,599)	$	(11,401)
Net Income Per Share – Basic	$	0.01	$	(0.28)	$	(0.18)	$	(0.16)
Net Income Per Share – Diluted	$	0.01	$	(0.28)	$	(0.18)	$	(0.16)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic	70,384,501		70,394,269		70,362,716		70,302,910
Weighted-Average Shares - Diluted	110,584,811		70,394,269		70,362,716		70,302,910

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity needs are generally met through cash generated from Transaction Fees, Servicing Fees, proceeds from the sales of loans and investments, and draws on our Warehouse Lines.

The following table sets forth our liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):

50

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(68,078)	$	(176,482)	$	(10,789)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	96,480		23,611		(27,454)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(15,053)		161,467		50,462
Net increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	13,349		8,596		12,219
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period	207,059		198,463		186,244
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period	$	220,408	$	207,059	$	198,463

Net cash increased by $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, based on the following components:

Operating Activities. $68.1 million in cash was used in operating activities primarily driven by $79.0 million net purchase of Loans Held for Sale. The net loss of $13.7 million was offset by $24.6 million of non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Investing Activities. $96.5 million in cash was provided by investing activities primarily due to principal payment of Borrower Loans in the amount of $254.8 million, which was offset by purchase of Borrower Loans of $170.3 million.

Financing Activities. $15.1 million in cash was used in financing activities and primarily represents net proceeds from Warehouse Lines of $128.1 million, which was offset by payments on Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust.

Net cash increased by $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, based on the following components:

Operating Activities. $176.5 million in cash was used in operating activities primarily driven by $186.9 million net purchase of Loans Held for Sale. The net loss of $39.9 million was offset by $50.4 million of non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Investing Activities. The $23.6 million in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the maturities of Available for Sale Investments exceeding purchases of $31.5 million, offset by property plant and equipment purchases of $5.9 million.

Financing Activities. The $161.5 million in cash provided by financing activities was primarily the result of proceeds from the PWIT Warehouse Line.

Net cash increased by $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, based on the following components:

Operating Activities. $10.8 million of cash used in operating activities primarily due to cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.

Investing Activities. $27.5 million in cash was used in investing activities primarily due to a net purchase of Available for Sale Investments of $20.4 million and Property and Equipment purchased of $4.2 million.

Financing Activities. $50.5 million in cash was provided by financing activities primarily as the result of $47.9 million raised through the sale of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock.

Prosper did not hold Available for Sale Investments for the year ended December 31, 2019. As a result, total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments available to Prosper at December 31, 2019 for its liquidity needs was $64.6 million.

We believe our liquidity needs are generally met through transaction fees, servicing fees, proceeds from sales of loans and securitization transactions, draws on Warehouse Lines, and Cash and Cash Equivalents. However, if the financial results anticipated are not achieved, our sources of liquidity may not be sufficient to meet our operating and liquidity requirements without obtaining additional liquidity which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our future operating and liquidity requirements will depend on numerous factors, including without limitation, future results of operations and our continued ability to attract borrowers and investors to our platform. If we are unable to generate positive cash flow from operations or to obtain funds from additional sources, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

51

Income Taxes

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying the statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on the weight of available evidence, which includes our historical operating performance and the reported cumulative net losses in prior years, we have provided a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.

We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. We are required to make subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As such, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, we are an interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary. Other than these special purpose entities, as of December 31, 2019, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other purposes.

Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2019, the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		3 - 5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations	$	19,633	$	5,236	$	10,144	$	2,433	$	1,820
WebBank purchase obligations	18,617		18,617		—		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	38,250	$	23,853	$	10,144	$	2,433	$	1,820

WebBank Purchase Obligations

Under our loan account program with WebBank, a Utah-charted industrial bank that serves as our primary issuing bank, WebBank retains ownership of loans facilitated through our marketplace for two business days after origination. As part of this arrangement, we have committed to purchase the loans at the conclusion of the two business days.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting policies discussed below reflect our most significant judgments, assumptions and estimates which we believe are critical in understanding and evaluating our reported financial results including: (i) fair value measurement of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust; (ii) Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities and (iii) fair value measurement of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, and the differences could be material. For a full description of all accounting policies adopted by us, please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

Valuation of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust

Borrower Loans are funded through either the Note Channel or the Whole Loan Channel. Through the Note Channel, we issue Notes and purchase Borrower Loans from WebBank, and hold the associated Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans.

In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions, which issued senior notes, risk retention interests, and residual certificates. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”), and as a result the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, notes sold to third party investors in “Notes Issued by Securitization

52

Trust”, and the risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7 - Securitization of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Prosper uses Warehouse Lines to purchase Loans Held for Sale that may subsequently be contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors through the Whole Loan Channel. Loans Held for Sale are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 11 - Debt of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements for more details on Warehouse Lines.

Prosper has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the Notes due to their borrower payment-dependent structure. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are not offset by changes in the carrying value of Warehouse Lines as they are carried at amortized cost. Prosper earns interest income from loans held in securitization and warehouse trusts and record changes in their fair value through earnings. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in the valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

Valuation of Loan Servicing Asset and Liability

We record loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values when we sell Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in “Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing fee is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We have elected to adopt the fair value method to measure the Servicing Assets and Liabilities for all classes of Servicing Assets and Liabilities subsequent to initial recognition.

We use a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that we earn on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market Servicing Fees to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates, discount rate and the current principal balances of the loans.

Valuation of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants primarily consist of warrants to purchase Series F Convertible Preferred Stock issued to the Consortium that vested when the Consortium purchased whole loans under the Consortium Purchase Agreement, which ended in May 2019. On vesting of the Series F Warrants, Prosper records a liability as Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and a corresponding amount as “Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the vested warrants are recorded in “Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We estimate the fair value of the Series F Warrants using valuation methods appropriate for the circumstances at the time of vesting. Generally, this includes determining the business enterprise value of the Company using methods that may include discounted cash flow model, comparable public company analysis, and comparable acquisition analysis. Once the business enterprise value has been estimated, an option pricing model is used to allocate the value to the various classes of Prosper's equity. The concluded per share value for the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant is then determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.

53

PROSPER FUNDING LLC

Overview

Prosper Funding was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with PMI as its sole equity member. Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and issue related Notes. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and by implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct corporate entity from PMI.

As a credit marketplace, we believe our customers are more highly susceptible to uncertainties and negative trends, real or perceived, in the markets driven by, among other factors, general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These external economic conditions and resulting trends or uncertainties could adversely impact our customers’ ability or desire to participate in our marketplace as borrowers or investors, and consequently could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s net income for the years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Total Net Revenue	$	73,562	$	78,107	(6)	%	$	78,107	$	81,682	(4)	%
Total Expenses	67,620		77,228		(12)	%	77,228		76,841		1	%
Net Income	$	5,942	$	879	576	%	$	879	$	4,841	(82)	%

Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $4.5 million, a 6% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the decreased number of loan listings on the marketplace during the period, which resulted in decreased administration fee revenue for the listing driven portion of such fee. Total expenses for 2019 decreased $9.6 million, a 12% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the decreased origination volume of Borrower Loans and lower administration fee per loan listing during the current period. Net income for 2019 increased $5.1 million, an 576% increase from 2018, primarily due to the decreased expenses described above.

Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $3.6 million, a 4% decrease from the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the decreased number of loan listings on the marketplace during 2018, which resulted in decreased administration fee revenue for the listing-driven portion of the administration fee. Total expenses for 2018 increased $0.4 million, a 1% increase from 2017, primarily due to an increase in administration fee expenses. Net income for 2018 decreased $4.0 million, a 82% decrease from 2017, primarily due to the decreased revenue described above.

54

Revenues

The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollars in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party	$	49,818	$	105,709	(53)	%	$	105,709	$	101,500	4	%
Servicing Fees, Net	26,368		27,943		(6)	%	$	27,943	25,963		8	%
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans	(5,058)		(58,027)		91	%	$	(58,027)	(48,691)		(19)	%
Other Revenues	155		270		(43)	%	$	270	170		59	%
Total Operating Revenues	71,283		75,895		(6)	%	75,895		78,942		(4)	%
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	$	41,146	$	43,569	(6)	%	$	43,569	47,208		(8)	%
Interest Expense on Notes	$	(38,492)	$	(40,656)	5	%	$	(40,656)	(43,954)		(8)	%
Net Interest Income	2,654		2,913		(9)	%	2,913		3,254		(10)	%
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net	(375)		(701)		47	%	$	(701)	(514)		36	%
Total Revenues	$	73,562	$	78,107	(6)	%	$	78,107	$	81,682	(4)	%

Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party

Prosper Funding primarily generates revenue through license fees it earns under its Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by PFL to PMI that entitles PMI to use the marketplace for, and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank under the Loan Account Program Agreement. The Administration Agreement requires PMI to pay PFL a monthly license fee that is partially based on the number of loan listings posted on the marketplace in that month, as well as a rebate fee based on rebates given to investors as an incentive to purchase Borrower Loans from PFL. The decrease in Administrative Fee Revenue of $55.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to fewer Consortium warrants vesting as the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17 of the accompanying notes to PMI’s consolidated financial statements) ended in May 2019. The increase of $4.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily due to the increased compensation for rebates in 2018, partially offset by a decrease in the listing driven portion of the administration fee due to lower listings on the platform.  

Servicing Fees, Net

Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper Funding through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay Prosper Funding a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper Funding for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper Funding records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received. The decrease in Servicing Fees of $1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to a lower outstanding Borrower Loan balance in the servicing pool. The increase in fees of $2.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was due to an increase in collection fees during the period and growth in the average unpaid balance of Borrowers Loans being serviced.

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans consists of net losses on Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan Channel. The $53.0 million lower loss in the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to fewer Consortium warrants vesting as the Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019. The $9.3 million higher loss in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was primarily due to PMI issuing more warrants to the Consortium.

55

Other Revenues

Other Revenues consists primarily of fees earned from facilitating securitizations for whole loan purchasers. Other Revenues in the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were not significant.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes

Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes them to be collectable. Prosper Funding records interest expense on the corresponding Notes based on the contractual interest rates to the extent Prosper Funding believes they will be collectable. The interest rate charged on the Borrower Loans is generally 1% higher than the interest rate paid on the corresponding Notes in order to compensate Prosper Funding for servicing the Borrower Loans.

Overall, the decreases in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 2018, and 2018 compared to 2017, were primarily driven by the decrease in volume of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel.

Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net

Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net captures losses from a change in fair value estimates using discounted cash flow methodologies that are based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in other financial instruments with similar characteristics. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the corresponding Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent structure. Loans Held for Sale are primarily comprised of Borrower Loans held for short durations and their valuation uses the same approach as the Borrower Loans.

The following table summarizes the fair value adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Borrower Loans	$	(23,185)	$	(31,265)	$	(25,552)
Loans Held for Sale	—		(10)		7
Notes	22,810		30,574		25,031
	$	(375)	$	(701)	$	(514)

Expenses

The following table summarizes Prosper Funding’s expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
Administration Fee Expense – Related Party	$	62,575	$	70,491	(11)	%	$	70,491	$	70,359	—	%
Servicing	5,012		6,140		(18)	%	6,140		6,103		1	%
General and Administrative	33		597		(94)	%	597		379		58	%
	$	67,620	$	77,228	(12)	%	$	77,228	$	76,841	1	%

Administration Fee Expense - Related Party

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI (a) a corporate administration fee of $500,000 per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. The decrease of Administration Fee expense of $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to the decreased origination volume of Borrower Loans and lower administration fee per loan listing during the current period. The change for the year ended December 31, 2018 was not significant compared to 2017.

Servicing

Servicing costs consist primarily of vendor costs and depreciation of internal use software costs associated with servicing Borrower Loans. The decrease in Servicing costs of $1.1 million, or 18% for the year ended December 31, 2019

56

compared to 2018 was primarily due to a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense. The change in servicing costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 was not significant.

General and Administrative

General and Administrative costs consist primarily of bank service charges and professional fees. General and Administrative costs decreased in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 by $0.6 million, or 94%, primarily due to a reduction in bank charges. Costs increased in the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to 2017 by $0.2 million, or 58%, primarily due to an increase in outsourced costs.

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for each of the eight quarters ended December 31, 2019. The unaudited quarterly statement of operations data set forth below have been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are necessary for a fair statement of the unaudited quarterly statement of operations data. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future operating results. The following quarterly consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		June 30, 2019		March 31, 2019
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party	$	7,349	$	8,854	$	16,640	$	16,975
Servicing Fees, Net	7,019		6,473		6,231		6,645
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans	2,667		3,155		(4,053)		(6,827)
Other Revenues	56		56		(14)		57
Total Operating Revenues	17,091		18,538		18,804		16,850
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	10,108		10,304		10,403		10,331
Interest Expense on Notes	(9,461)		(9,647)		(9,735)		(9,649)
Net Interest Income	647		657		668		682
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net	(36)		(120)		(131)		(87)
Total Net Revenues	17,702		19,075		19,341		17,445
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party	14,730		16,079		16,773		14,991
Servicing	1,462		1,178		1,304		1,067
General and Administrative	(133)		38		34		96
Total Expenses	16,059		17,295		18,111		16,154
Net Income	$	1,643	$	1,780	$	1,230	$	1,291

57

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2018		September 30, 2018		June 30, 2018		March 31, 2018
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party	$	23,956	$	27,135	$	30,836	$	23,783
Servicing Fees, Net	6,826		7,098		7,209		6,812
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans	(13,892)		(16,379)		(16,181)		(11,574)
Other Revenues	65		70		73		63
Total Operating Revenues	16,955		17,924		21,937		19,084
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	10,771		10,939		10,907		10,951
Interest Expense on Notes	(10,059)		(10,209)		(10,177)		(10,211)
Net Interest Income	712		730		730		740
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net	(87)		(250)		(255)		(109)
Total Net Revenues	17,580		18,404		22,412		19,715
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party	15,454		16,864		20,285		17,887
Servicing	1,628		1,036		1,663		1,814
General and Administrative	135		97		182		183
Total Expenses	17,217		17,997		22,130		19,884
Net Income (Loss)	$	363	$	407	$	282	$	(169)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table sets forth Prosper Funding's liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Net Income	$	5,942	$	879	$	4,841
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(12,819)	$	3,041	$	3,285
Net cash used in investing activities	(11,219)		(5,245)		(6,645)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(5,282)		1,070		(3,237)
Net decrease in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	(29,320)		(1,134)		(6,597)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the beginning of the period	147,181		148,315		154,912
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at the end of the period	$	117,861	$	147,181	$	148,315

Net Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash decreased by $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, based on the following components:

Operating Activities. $12.8 million in cash was used in operating activities, primarily driven by less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.

Investing Activities. $11.2 million net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to purchase of Property and Equipment of $6.4 million and Borrower Loans of $170.3 million, which was offset by $165.5 million principal payment of Borrower Loans.

Financing Activities. $5.3 million net cash was used in financing activities, primarily due to cash distributions to PMI in the amount of $9.0 million and payments on Notes of $167.4 million, which was partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of Notes of $171.1 million.

Net cash and cash equivalents decreased by $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, based on the following components:

58

Operating Activities. $3.0 million in cash was provided by operating activities primarily driven by less cash held on the platform by investors that is classified as Restricted Cash.

Investing Activities. $5.2 million in cash was used in investing activities primarily from the purchase of Property and Equipment of $3.3 million. Principal payments received on Borrower Loans exceeded purchases by $2.0 million.

Financing Activities. $1.1 million in cash was provided by proceeds from issuance of Notes of $176.8 million offset by $175.8 million payments on Notes.

Net cash and cash equivalents decreased by $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, based on the following components:

Operating Activities. $3.3 million in cash was provided by operating activities primarily driven by $4.8 million net income.

Investing Activities. $6.6 million in cash was used in investing activities, primarily from the purchase of Property and Equipment of $5.1 million and purchases of Borrower Loans exceeding principal payments by $2.8 million. These investing activities were offset by the maturation of $1.3 million of short-term investments.

Financing Activities. $3.2 million in cash was used in financing activities, primarily in the form of a $5.8 million cash distribution to PMI, offset by proceeds from the issuance of Notes exceeding payments thereon by $2.6 million.

Income Taxes

Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Prosper Funding is a U.S. disregarded entity and the income and loss is included in the return of parent PMI. Given PMI’s history of operating losses, it is difficult to accurately forecast how Prosper’s and Prosper Funding’s results will be affected by the realization and use of net operating loss carry forwards.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As a result of retaining servicing rights on the sale of Borrower Loans, Prosper Funding is an interest holder in certain special purpose entities that purchase these Borrower Loans. None of these special purpose entities are consolidated as Prosper Funding is not the primary beneficiary.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.

Through the Warehouse Lines we invest in Borrower Loans classified as held for sale. Investments in interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the market value of these Borrower Loans held on our balance sheet. Our future investment income may fall short of expectations, or we may suffer a loss in principal if we are forced to sell Borrower Loans, which have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates as stated above. Changes in the market value of Borrower Loans classified as held for sale are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of Loans Held for Sale was $142.0 million and $183.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by the Securitization Trust are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions such as default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate. Default rate, prepayment rate and discount rate may change due to expected loan performance or changes in the expected returns of similar financial instruments available in the market. We are exposed to the risk of decrease in the fair value of loans held in the warehouse and securitization trusts. For Borrower Loans and Notes presented on our Balance Sheet on behalf of our Note Channel investors, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.

We are also exposed to variable interest rate risk under the debt from the Warehouse Lines, which had an outstanding balance of $131.6 million and $162.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. To reduce the impact of large fluctuations in interest rates, we hedged a portion of our interest rate risk by entering into a derivative agreement with a financial institution, which is currently out of the money. The derivative agreement that we use to manage the risk associated

59

with fluctuations in interest rates may not be able to eliminate the exposure to these changes. Interest rates are sensitive to numerous factors outside of our control, such as government and central bank monetary policy in the United States. Depending on the size of the exposures and the relative movements of interest rates, if we choose not to hedge or fail to effectively hedge our exposure, we could experience a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Prosper had cash and cash equivalents of $64.6 million and $57.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short-term, highly liquid marketable securities which may include money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, and U.S. agency securities. Cash and Cash Equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper believes that it does not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments as a result of changes in interest rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will moderately reduce interest income on these Cash and Cash Equivalents. Increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the interest income earned on the Cash and Cash Equivalents.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Prosper may hold Available for Sale Investments. The fair value of Prosper’s Available for Sale Investment portfolio was zero and $22.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These investments consisted of U.S. Treasury Bills and U.S. Treasury securities. To mitigate the risk of loss, Prosper’s investment policy and strategy is focused first on the preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity requirements, and then to maximizing returns. To manage this risk, Prosper limits and monitors maturities, credit ratings and concentrations within the investment portfolio. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on Prosper’s Available for Sale Investments and the market value of those investments.

The fair value of Available for Sale Investments is zero and $22.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in no change in the fair value of Prosper’s Available for Sale Investments as of December 31, 2019 and a decrease of approximately $40 thousand as of December 31, 2018. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in no change in the fair value of Prosper’s Available for Sale Investments of December 31, 2019 and an increase of approximately $40 thousand as of December 31, 2018. Any realized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate changes would only be recorded if Prosper sold the investments prior to maturity and the investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

As more fully described in Note 8 - Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities of Prosper's financial statements attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the combined fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale is $776.0 million as of December 31, 2019, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 7.00%. The combined fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale was $447.3 million as of December 31, 2018, determined using a weighted-average discount rate of 8.34%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would result in a decrease of approximately $7.1 million and $4.2 million in the fair value of Prosper’s investment in Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an increase of approximately $7.3 million and $4.4 million in the fair value of Prosper’s investment in Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from such interest rate change would be recorded in our statement of operations so long as we hold these Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on our balance sheet.

Prosper Funding LLC

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, values, or future cash flows that may result from changes in financial market prices and interest rates.

Because balances, interest rates, and maturities of Borrower Loans are matched and offset by an equal balance of Notes with the exact same interest rates (net of our servicing fee) and initial maturities, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the net fair value of the combined Borrower Loan and Note portfolios as a result of changes in interest rates.

The fair values of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and the related Notes are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans are largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and due to the total principal balances of the Borrower Loans being very close to the total principal balances of the Notes.

Prosper Funding had Cash and Cash Equivalents of $7.5 million and $11.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts were held in various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions and short term, highly liquid marketable securities which may include money market funds, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes. Due to their short-term nature, Prosper Funding believes that it does not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of these liquid investments as a result of changes in interest

60

rates. Decreases in short-term interest rates will moderately reduce interest income on these Cash and Cash Equivalents, while increases in short-term interest rates will moderately increase the interest income earned on these Cash and Cash Equivalent balances.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Prosper Funding LLC

The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in Item 7 under the caption “Quarterly Results of Operations.”

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, each Registrant’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of such Registrant’s Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and Principal Financial Officer (PFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of such Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2019. Based upon this evaluation, the PEO and the PFO of each Registrant have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to each Registrant and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its PEO and PFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), each Registrant’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Management of each Registrant is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Each Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of such Registrant’s financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, internal control over financial reporting determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

61

The Registrants’ management has assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment the Registrants used the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).” These criteria are in the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Each Registrant’s assessment included documenting and evaluating the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the person serving as each Registrant’s PEO and PFO has concluded that such Registrant’s internal controls were effective as of December 31, 2019.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the fourth quarter of 2019, there were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act exempts any company that is not a “large accelerated filer” or an “accelerated filer” (as defined by SEC rules) from the requirement that such company obtain an external audit of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, the Registrants are exempt from the requirement that they include in their Annual Report on Form 10-K an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting by an independent registered public accounting firm; however, management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is still required with respect to the Registrants.

Item 9B. Other Information

Kunal Kaul resigned as Executive Vice President, Operations of the Company, effective March 13, 2020.

62

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Executive Officers, Directors and Key Employees

The following table sets forth information about PMI’s executive officers and directors as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Name	Age	Position(s)
David Kimball	49	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Usama Ashraf	43	Chief Financial Officer
Nasos Topakas	55	Chief Technology Officer
Julie Hwang	42	General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Rajeev V. Date	48	Director
Patrick W. Grady	37	Director
Claire A. Huang	57	Director
Nigel W. Morris	61	Director
Mason D. Haupt	64	Director

David Kimball has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PMI since December 2016. From March 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Kimball served as PMI's Chief Financial Officer. In May 2019, Mr. Kimball was appointed Chairman of the Board. He also currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, Mr. Kimball was Senior Financial Officer of United Services Automobile Association's (USAA) Chief Operating Office, with financial responsibility for the real estate unit, the bank, the P&C and life insurance companies, the investment management company, and the call centers/distribution functions. Before his position as Senior Financial Officer of USAA's Chief Operating Office, Mr. Kimball spent eight years in various finance roles at USAA, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance; Corporate Treasurer; Chief Financial Officer of USAA Federal Savings Bank; and Assistant Vice President of Capital Markets. Prior to his time at USAA, Mr. Kimball spent ten years at Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Credit Company in both the U.S. and U.K., working on their securitization programs, debt issuance, and a variety of financial planning and analysis positions. Mr. Kimball holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in English from Brigham Young University. PMI believes that Mr. Kimball's financial and business expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Usama Ashraf has served as Chief Financial Officer of PMI since February 2017. He is currently responsible for Prosper's finance, capital markets, risk and business intelligence functions. He also currently serves as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director of PFL. Prior to joining PMI, from February 2016 to February 2017, Mr. Ashraf served as Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer at Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“Annaly”). Prior to his time at Annaly, Mr. Ashraf worked at United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”), where he served as Corporate Treasurer from November 2014 to February 2016 and Assistant Corporate Treasurer from January 2014 to October 2014. Before joining USAA, Mr. Ashraf spent 13 years at CIT Group, where he held various positions in the Treasury and Corporate M&A departments, most recently serving as Deputy Treasurer with responsibility for the firm’s Treasury activities in the United States. He started his career in the investment banking division of Salomon Smith Barney/Citigroup focused on M&A. Mr. Ashraf received a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Finance and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Nasos Topakas has served as Chief Technology Officer since April 2017. Prior to joining PMI, from June 2010 to February 2017, Mr. Topakas served as Chief Technology Officer at Art.com, Inc., an online wall art and contemporary decor retailer, where he was head of all technology and product departments, with responsibility for the overall technology vision, strategy, engineering execution, and architectural direction. Prior to his time at Art.com, Inc., Mr. Topakas worked at SendMe, Inc., where he served as Chief Technology Officer from November 2007 to May 2010. As Chief Technology Officer of SendMe, Inc., Mr. Topakas was head of all technology departments, including Engineering, Architecture, Technical Project Office, QA, Technical Ops and Corporate IT. Mr. Topakas participated in the M.B.A. executive program from Golden Gate University and holds a B.S. in Computer Science from San Francisco State University.

63

Julie Hwang has served as PMI’s Secretary and General Counsel since April 2018. Ms. Hwang previously served as PMI’s Deputy General Counsel from January 2017 to April 2018 and Assistant General Counsel from August 2015 to January 2017. Ms. Hwang also currently serves as PFL’s Secretary, a position she has held since April 2018. Before joining PMI in August 2015, Ms. Hwang served as Associate General Counsel at One Kings Lane, Inc., a home décor and luxury furniture retailer, from May 2014 to August 2015. Prior to One Kings Lane, Ms. Hwang worked as an attorney at the law firms of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP for 7 years and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. for 3 years. Ms. Hwang has a J.D. from UCLA and a B.A. in International Relations from Stanford University.

Rajeev V. Date has served as one of PMI’s directors since July 2013. Mr. Date previously served as one of PMI’s directors from January 2009 to September 2010, and he is currently a director of Megalith Financial Acquisition Corp. and Green Dot Corporation. Mr. Date currently serves as the Managing Partner of Fenway Summer LLC, a U.S. financial advisory and investment firm. From January 2012 to January 2013, Mr. Date served as the Deputy Director of the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). Before being appointed Deputy Director, Mr. Date was appointed the Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the CFPB, and, in that capacity, acted as the interim leader of the CFPB. From October 2010 to August 2011, Mr. Date served as Associate Director of Research, Markets, and Regulations of the CFPB. Prior to joining the CFPB, Mr. Date served as Chairman & Executive Director of Cambridge Winter Center for Financial Institutions Policy, a non-profit nonpartisan think tank focused on financial institutions policy, from March 2009 to September 2010. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Date served as a Managing Director in the Financial Institutions Group at Deutsche Bank Securities, where his key responsibility was acting as a coverage officer for specialty finance firms and regional banks. Before that, Mr. Date was Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Development at Capital One Financial, where he led M&A development efforts across the U.S. banking and specialty finance markets. He began his business career in the financial institutions practice of the consulting firm McKinsey & Company. He has also served as an attorney, in both private practice and government. Mr. Date received a J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School and a B.S. (highest honors) from University of California, Berkeley. PMI believes that Mr. Date’s financial, business and regulatory expertise give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Date qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines.

Patrick W. Grady has served as one of PMI’s directors since January 2013. Mr. Grady is a Partner of Sequoia Capital, a private investment partnership, which he joined in 2007. Prior to joining Sequoia Capital, Mr. Grady was an Associate at Summit Partners from 2004 to 2007. He is also a current director of Okta, Inc. Mr. Grady holds a B.S. in Economics and Finance from Boston College. PMI believes that Mr. Grady’s experience as a venture capital investor with a focus on financial technologies and his overall management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director. Mr. Grady qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC guidelines.

Claire A. Huang has served as a director of PMI since December 2017. Ms. Huang is currently a member of the board of directors of PODS, a leading storage and moving company, and she previously served as a director of Mirador Financial, Inc., a small business lending platform, from 2017 to 2018, and Scottrade, a leading online brokerage firm, from 2015 to 2017. Ms. Huang has extensive experience in marketing and brand management. She served as the first global Chief Marketing Officer of JP Morgan Chase from 2012 to 2014, where she worked with the marketing teams across all Chase retail and JP Morgan wholesale businesses to build brands and businesses with a customer focus. Before joining JP Morgan Chase, from 2008 to 2012, Ms. Huang held global head of marketing positions at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, where she was responsible for a number of high profile marketing initiatives, including the integration of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America and the launch of Merrill Edge, the company’s brokerage platform. Prior to her time at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Ms. Huang held marketing leadership positions at Fidelity Investments, American Express Company, Wise Foods, and The Haagen-Dazs Company. Ms. Huang received a B.A. in Economics from De La Salle University in Manila, Philippines. PMI believes that Ms. Huang’s marketing and brand management expertise, as well as her experience at several leading financial institutions, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Nigel W. Morris has served as one of PMI’s directors since June 2014. Mr. Morris previously served as one of PMI’s directors from December 2009 to January 2013. Mr. Morris is the managing partner of QED Investors, an investment firm he founded in 2008. Mr. Morris was also the co-founder of Capital One Financial Services, where he served as President and Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman from 1994 until his retirement in 2004. Mr. Morris has a BSc in Psychology from University of East London in London, England and an MBA with distinction from London Business School. PMI believes that Mr. Morris’s financial and business expertise, including his diversified background of managing and directing public companies, his experience with financial services firms, as well as his general operational and management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

64

Mason D. Haupt has served as one of PMI’s directors since February 2018. He has more than 30 years of experience working in the investment management business. Mr. Haupt served as a Portfolio Manager at Soros Fund Management, LLC, a private investment management firm, from August 2008 to March 2014, and prior to that, from 2006 to 2008, he engaged in private investment activities. From June 2003 to March 2006, Mr. Haupt was a Partner at Five Mile Capital Partners, LLC, an alternative investment and asset management company. During his time at Five Mile Capital Partners, Mr. Haupt served as Portfolio Manager of the company’s Housatonic Fund, a relative value, fixed income hedge fund. Mr. Haupt served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MortgageSight, an electronic platform for mortgage securities, from 2000 to 2001. Previously, he spent more than a decade with Salomon Brothers, culminating in the position of Managing Director of the Mortgage Securities Department. Mr. Haupt received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.S. in Economics, with concentrations in Management and Accounting, from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. PMI believes that Mr. Haupt’s financial and business expertise, including his extensive investment management experience, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Board Composition and Election of Directors

PMI’s board of directors currently consists of eight seats, with one vacancy to be filled by a designee of the Series A-1 Holders and one vacancy to be filled by a designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P. All of the current members of PMI's board of directors were elected as directors pursuant to the terms of a voting rights agreement entered into among certain of PMI’s stockholders. In selecting the composition of its board of directors, PMI seeks to ensure that its board of directors collectively has a balance of expertise in the following areas: internet-based business, consumer financial products and experience directing public and start-up companies. Based on these criteria, PMI believes that its board of directors has been effective in identifying diverse directors. The board of directors’ composition provisions of PMI’s voting rights agreement are still in effect. For more information regarding the terms of the voting rights agreement, see Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.” Holders of the Notes offered through our marketplace, and the accompanying PMI Management Rights, will have no ability to elect or influence PMI’s directors or approve significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of PMI or its assets.

Board Leadership

Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national exchange, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors, or to maintain an audit, nominating or compensation committee. PMI does not have a lead independent director.

Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors is committed to a high standard of corporate governance practices and, through its oversight role, believes that it has encouraged and promoted a requisite culture of ethical business conduct among PMI’s officers and employees. To memorialize its commitment to these standards, the Board of Directors of PMI adopted a “Code of Ethics and Business Conduct” that applies to all of PMI's employees, directors and officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.prosper.com/plp/legal. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, certain provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on Prosper's website or in public filings.

Director Independence

Because PMI’s common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities, PMI is not required to maintain a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors or to maintain an audit committee, nominating committee or compensation committee consisting solely of independent directors. Nevertheless, PMI’s board of directors has determined the independence of each director based on the independence criteria set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). In making its determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with Prosper and all other facts and circumstances the board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including any transactions between each director or any member of his or her family, and Prosper, its senior management or our independent registered public accounting firm. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, the board of directors determined that Ms. Huang and each of Messrs. Date, Grady, Haupt and Morris do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE.

65

Board Committees

Nominating Committee

PMI is not a “listed issuer” as defined under Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Therefore, PMI is not required to have a nominating committee comprised of independent directors. PMI currently does not have a standing nominating committee and accordingly, there are no charters for such committee. PMI believes that a nominating committee is not necessary for a company of its size with its type of business. PMI also believes that its directors collectively have the requisite background, experience, and knowledge to fulfill the limited duties and obligations that a nominating committee may have.

Compensation Committee

PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of a Compensation Committee in August 2011. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Patrick W. Grady (Chair), Mason D. Haupt, and Claire A. Huang. The Compensation Committee oversees PMI’s executive officer compensation arrangements, plans, policies and programs maintained by PMI and administers PMI’s equity-based compensation plan for employees generally (including issuance of stock options, RSUs and other equity-based awards granted other than pursuant to a plan). The Compensation Committee meets at such times as determined appropriate by the Chair of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI's Compensation Committee is independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NYSE.

Audit Committee

PMI’s board of directors approved the formation of an Audit Committee in January 2010. The current members of the Audit Committee are Rajeev V. Date (Chair) and Patrick W. Grady. The Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and the independence of PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee receives internal control related assessments and reviews and discusses PMI’s annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements with management. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to compliance matters, the Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with management, PMI’s Independent Registered Public Accounting firm and PMI’s internal legal counsel to discuss risks related to PMI’s financial reporting function.

The Audit Committee is exempt from independence listing standards because PMI's common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or listed in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association or to issuers of such securities. Nevertheless, the board of directors of PMI has determined that each of the current members of PMI's Audit Committee is independent under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, and also satisfies the independence requirements of Section 10(m)(3) of the Exchange Act. Additionally, PMI's board of directors has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined under SEC regulations and the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE.

Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements

As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that limit or eliminate the personal liability of its directors for breaches of duty to the corporation. PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws limit the liability of directors to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

•any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to PMI or PMI’s stockholders;

•any act or omission not in good faith, believed to be contrary to the interests of PMI or its shareholders, involving reckless disregard for the director’s duty, for acts that involve an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of duty, or that involves intentional misconduct or knowing or culpable violation of law;

•any unlawful payments related to dividends, unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions, loans, guarantees or other distributions; or

•any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

These limitations do not affect the availability of equitable remedies, including injunctive relief or rescission. As permitted by Delaware law, PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that:

•PMI will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law;

66

•PMI may indemnify its other employees and other agents to the same extent that PMI indemnifies its officers and directors; and

•PMI will advance expenses to its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding, and may advance expenses to any employee or agent; provided, however, that such advancement of expenses shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by the person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that the person was not entitled to be indemnified.

The indemnification provisions contained in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not exclusive.

In addition to the indemnification provided for in PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, PMI has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and officers. The indemnification agreements require PMI, among other things, to indemnify such persons for all expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by PMI) (collectively, “Expenses”), actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the investigation, defense or appeal of any proceeding to which such person may be made a party, a potential party, a non-party witness, or otherwise by reason of: (i) such person’s service as a director or officer of PMI; (ii) any action or inaction taken by such person or on such person’s part while acting as director, officer, employee or agent of PMI; or (iii) such person’s actions while serving at the request of PMI as a director, officer, employee, trustee, general partner, managing member, agent or fiduciary of PMI or any other entity, in each case, whether or not serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is or was incurred. In addition, PMI is required to indemnify against any Expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any action establishing or enforcing a right to indemnification or advancement of expenses under the indemnification agreement or under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by PMI to the extent that such person is successful in such action. The indemnification agreements also provide that PMI agrees to indemnify such persons to the fullest extent permitted by law, even if such indemnification is not specifically authorized by the other provisions of the agreement or PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws. Moreover, the indemnification agreements provide that any future changes under Delaware law that expand the ability of a Delaware corporation to indemnify its officers and directors are automatically incorporated into the agreements.

Under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification on account of any proceeding unless such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of PMI, and with respect to criminal proceedings, such person had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of a proceeding by judgment, settlement, or conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent does not, by itself, create the presumption that such person did not satisfy the above standards. In addition, under the indemnification agreements, PMI is not obligated to provide indemnification for: (i) any proceedings or claims initiated or brought voluntarily by such person and not by way of defense, unless such indemnification is authorized by PMI, other than a proceeding to establish such person’s right to indemnification; (ii) any expenses incurred by such person with respect to any proceeding instituted by such person to enforce and interpret the terms of his indemnification agreement, unless such person is successful in such action; (iii) which payment has actually been made to or on behalf of such person under any statute, insurance policy, indemnity provision, vote or otherwise, except with respect to any excess beyond the amount paid; (iv) an accounting or disgorgement of profits pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, as amended, or similar provisions of federal, state or local statutory law or common law, if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements); and (v) any reimbursement of PMI by such person of any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation or of any profits realized by such person from the sale of securities of PMI, as required in each case under the Exchange Act, as amended (including any such reimbursements that arise from an accounting restatement of PMI pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the payment to PMI of profits arising from the purchase and sale by such person of securities in violation of Section 306 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), if such person is held liable therefor (including pursuant to any settlement arrangements).

PMI also maintains an insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of its directors and officers arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.

PMI believes that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. To the extent these provisions permit PMI to indemnify its officers and directors for liabilities arising under the Securities Act, however, PMI has been informed by the SEC that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

67

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Prosper Marketplace, Inc. - Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This section describes PMI's executive compensation objectives, compensation-setting process, executive compensation components and significant 2019 compensation decisions for PMI's named executive officers (“NEOs”). The compensation provided to PMI's NEOs for 2019 is set forth in detail in the Summary Compensation Table and other tables and the accompanying footnotes and narrative that follow this section.

PMI's named executive officers for 2019 are as follows:

•David Kimball, our Chief Executive Officer;

•Usama Ashraf, our Chief Financial Officer;

•Nasos Topakas, our Chief Technology Officer;

•Julie Hwang, our General Counsel and Secretary;

•Kunal Kaul, our Executive Vice President, Operations; and

•Justine Metz, our Executive Vice President, Marketing through November 1, 2019.

Executive Compensation Objectives

The objectives of PMI's executive compensation are to:

•attract, retain and motivate senior leaders who are capable of advancing PMI's mission and strategy and ultimately, creating and maintaining its long-term equity value;

•align the interests of PMI's executive officers with its stockholders’ long-term interests; and

•reward executive officers for their contributions to PMI's overall performance as well as for their individual performance.

Compensation-Setting Process

Role of Our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing all aspects of our executive compensation program, including evaluating and approving executive salaries, annual bonus awards and the size and structure of equity awards for PMI's executive officers, including the NEOs.

Role of Management. In setting 2019 compensation, PMI's Chief Executive Officer worked closely with the Compensation Committee in making recommendations and attending Committee meetings. Because of his daily involvement with PMI's executive team, the Chief Executive Officer was involved in the determination of compensation for all of PMI's executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee also delegated to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to make compensation decisions for senior management and executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer), subject to certain compensation limits set by the Compensation Committee.

Executive Compensation Components

PMI's 2019 Named Executive Officer compensation packages include: (1) base salary; (2) cash bonuses; and (3) equity-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). PMI believes that this compensation mix supports its objective of attracting, motivating and retaining a talented and entrepreneurial executive team who will provide leadership for Prosper’s success in dynamic and competitive markets. PMI's compensation program is balanced among all three components in order to attract top talent and maximize retention, while ensuring that an appropriate portion of the executives’ compensation is tied to the Company's and its stockholders’ long-term interests.

Base Salary. Base salary is a fixed amount, and is not tied to any metric relating to the performance of PMI's business as a whole. The base salary of each executive officer is initially established in the executive officer's offer letter, and reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. In determining base salaries for 2019, PMI's Compensation Committee together with the Chief Executive Officer considered the individual executive officer's scope of responsibilities, contributions, prior salary level and position (in case of a promotion), and financial and market conditions.

68

The following table summarizes information regarding the base salaries for PMI's named executive officers for 2019:

	2019 Base Salary
David Kimball (1)	$	500,000
Usama Ashraf (2)	$	430,000
Nasos Topakas (3)	$	370,000
Julie Hwang (4)	$	335,000
Kunal Kaul (5)	$	335,000
Justine Metz (6)	$	335,000

1.In March 2019, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to keep Mr. Kimball’s annual base salary at $500,000, the same level as the previous year.

2.In March 2019, PMI’s Compensation Committee reviewed executive base salaries and decided to increase Mr. Ashraf's annual base salary from $420,000 to $430,000.

3.In March 2019, Mr. Topakas' annual base salary was increased from $360,000 to $370,000.

4.In March 2019, Ms. Hwang's annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.

5.In March 2019, Mr. Kaul’s annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.

6.In March 2019, Ms. Metz's annual base salary was increased from $325,000 to $335,000.

Cash Bonuses. The Company uses cash bonuses primarily to motivate and retain senior management leaders that are critical to advancing the Company's short- and long-term strategic goals. In 2019, we based annual NEO bonuses on both the achievement of certain Board-approved financial, operational and strategic performance objectives as well as other factors, including the NEO’s contribution toward PMI’s growth initiatives and performance toward individual goal achievement.

In February 2020, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s performance and progress towards the established 2019 objectives, and approved a bonus award of 90% of the annual target bonus amount for each NEO.

The amounts and terms of the bonuses awarded to each of the NEOs in 2019 are disclosed below, in the sections titled “Summary Compensation Table” and “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”

Equity Compensation. PMI has used stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as the principal components of its executive equity compensation. Consistent with its compensation objectives, PMI believes this approach aligns the interests of its grantees with the long-term interests of PMI’s stockholders. PMI believes that stock options and RSUs also serve as effective retention tools due to vesting requirements that are based on continued service with the company. In granting equity awards, PMI has customarily considered, among other things, the executive officers' cash compensation, the need to retain and motivate executive officers and to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value, PMI's financial results, and each executive officer's individual contributions and responsibilities. In 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock options to certain of its NEOs for performance compensation, retention and motivational purposes. The amounts and terms of the awards granted to each such NEO in 2019 are disclosed in the 2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and accompanying footnotes to the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End.

Employment Agreements

PMI has entered into employment arrangements with each of its NEOs, which are comprised of an offer letter and an At Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment and Arbitration Agreement. Each of these arrangements was approved or authorized on PMI’s behalf by the Compensation Committee or, in certain instances, its Board of Directors.

Each of the offer letters provided for “at will” employment and sets forth the initial compensation arrangements for the NEO, generally including an initial base salary, an annual cash bonus opportunity, and an equity award. Certain of the offer letters provide for payments or an acceleration of the executive's equity award grant upon termination of their employment in specified situations, including following a change in control. These arrangements (including potential payments and terms) are discussed in more detail in the “Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” and the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change In Control of PMI” sections and related tables below.

69

Other Compensation Information

Benefits Programs

PMI's employee benefit programs, including its 401(k) plan, health and welfare programs, Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan and 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to PMI's employees generally, including its executive officers and their families. PMI's executive officers are entitled to participate in the same employee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other full-time employees.

PMI's 401(k) plan covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. PMI's contributions to the 401(k) plan are discretionary. During the year ended December 31, 2019, PMI contributed $2.3 million to the 401(k) plan.

All full-time employees, including PMI's named executive officers, may participate in its health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage, disability insurance and life insurance.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Currently, PMI does not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of its compensation. Accordingly, PMI does not generally provide perquisites, such as company cars and paid parking spaces, to its executive officers. PMI does reimburse its executive officers for certain relocation expenses, subject to the terms and conditions prescribed by the Compensation Committee.

In the future, PMI may provide additional perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances, such as where PMI believes it is appropriate to assist an individual executive in the performance of his or her duties and for recruitment, motivation or retention purposes.

Post-Employment Compensation

The Compensation Committee recognizes that a possible, threatened, or pending change of control transaction could result in the departure or distraction of PMI’s executives. To establish a meaningful financial incentive for PMI’s executive officers to work diligently through and beyond a proposed transaction that may involve a change in control of the company, certain of the stock options and restricted stock units granted to PMI’s NEOs will fully vest upon a change in control of PMI, while others will fully vest in the event that such officer is subject to a termination of employment without cause within 12 months after a change in control of PMI.

In addition, during 2017 and 2018, PMI entered into severance arrangements with each of Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf and Topakas, and with each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, as part of their offer letters and amendment to offer letter (with respect to Mr. Ashraf). The severance arrangements provide that each of Messrs. Kimball, Ashraf and Topakas, and each of Mses. Hwang and Metz, would be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to six months’ of annual base salary (less applicable deductions and withholdings) in the event that the respective officer’s employment is terminated by PMI without cause or by the applicable executive officer for good reason (each as defined in the applicable offer letter). Receipt of these severance benefits is conditioned on the officer’s signing a release of claims in favor of PMI. Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing effective November 1, 2019.

For additional information regarding these severance and change in control arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change in Control of PMI.”

Compensation Risk Assessment

PMI's management evaluates and mitigates any risk that may exist relating to its compensation plans, practices and policies for all employees, including PMI's NEOs. PMI's management has concluded that PMI's compensation policies and practices do not create or promote inappropriate or excessive risk taking.

70

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 by each of PMI’s named executive officers (in thousands):  

	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)	Option Awards ($)(1)	All Other Compensation ($)(2)		Totals ($)
Name and Principal Position
David Kimball	2019	$	500	$	450	—	—	$	14	$	964
Chief Executive Officer	2018	500		450		—	629	14		1,593
	2017	500		542		—	2,572	14		3,628
Usama Ashraf (3)	2019	428		289		—	40	14		771
Chief Financial Officer	2018	401		279		964	185	14		1,843
	2017	294		283		—	472	64		1,113
Nasos Topakas (4)	2019	368		249		—	—	14		631
Chief Technology Officer	2018	358		251		964	—	14		1,587
	2017	248		197		—	943	8		1,396
Julie Hwang (5)	2019	333		195		—	276	14		818
General Counsel and Secretary	2018	285		174		—	315	11		785
Kunal Kaul	2019	333		195		—	—	14		542
Executive Vice President,	2018	323		230		—	64	14		631
Operations	2017	313		236		—	119	12		680
Justine Metz (6)	2019	279		—		—	—	237		516
Former Executive Vice President, Marketing	2018	323		230		—	484	44		1,081

1.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

2.“All Other Compensation” consists of compensation received from employer matching contributions to PMI’s 401(k) plan and relocation reimbursement paid by PMI for each named executive officer.  

3.Mr. Ashraf joined PMI in February 2017 as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Ashraf's total compensation for 2017 includes relocation expenses of $50,052 and a signing bonus of $20,000.

4.Mr. Topakas joined PMI in April 2017 as its Chief Technology Officer.

5.Ms. Hwang was promoted to General Counsel and Secretary of PMI in June 2018. Ms. Hwang's total compensation for 2018 includes a one-time retention bonus of $66,354.

6.Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing effective November 1, 2019. Ms. Metz's total compensation for 2019 includes a cash severance payment of $223,332. Ms. Metz's total compensation for 2018 includes relocation expenses of $29,900.

71

2019 Grants of Plan-Based Awards (1)(2)

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the listed PMI named executive officers during 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share information):

	Grant Date (2)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(3)
Usama Ashraf	11/5/19	500,000	$	0.17	$	40
Julie Hwang	5/7/19	1,398,198	0.30		196
	11/5/19	1,000,000	0.17		80

1.The following columns are intentionally omitted from this table: Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards, and Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards.

2.The equity awards granted to NEOs in 2019 were granted under, and governed by the terms of, PMI's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements. See the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year-End table below for a description of the vesting schedule of the equity awards granted in 2019 and reported in the table above.

3.The amounts reported represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the named executive officers as calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Board’s Topic ASC 718, Compensation –Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”) using a Black-Scholes model to purchase shares of PMI’s common stock.  The key assumptions used in PMI’s ASC 718 calculation are discussed in Note 2 of PMI’s consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

CEO Pay Ratio

In accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, PMI is providing the following information for the year ended December 31, 2019:

•The median of total compensation of all employees, excluding our CEO: $128,827;

•The annual total compensation of our CEO: $964,000; and

•The ratio of CEO total compensation to median employee total compensation: 7.48 to 1.

Our CEO pay ratio information is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the SEC pay ratio rules and methods for disclosure. In order to determine the median employee from a compensation perspective, PMI examined cash compensation (salary, wages and cash bonuses) paid in the 2019 calendar year for all employees, excluding our CEO, employed as of December 31, 2019 (the “Determination Date”). On the Determination Date, Prosper’s employee population consisted of 404 individuals, all of whom were located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, and temporary employees. We did not include any contractors or workers employed through a third-party provider in our employee population.

To identify the “median employee,” we utilized the amount of base salary, wages and cash bonus our employees received, as reflected in our payroll records through the Determination Date and annualized such amounts for any individual hired during 2019. Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2019 to determine the median employee total compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and compared such total compensation to the total compensation of PMI’s CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

72

Narrative Discussion of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Offer Letters and Arrangements

David Kimball. In November 2016, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Kimball in connection with his appointment as its Chief Executive Officer. In addition to his initial base salary, Mr. Kimball's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 100% of his base salary, payable on a quarterly basis; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. PMI also committed to grant Mr. Kimball an equity award of options exercisable into shares of PMI common stock representing up to 5% of PMI’s capitalization on a fully diluted basis, subject to the terms and conditions of the offer letter. In addition, the offer letter included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.

Mr. Kimball's November 2016 offer letter replaced the offer letter PMI entered into with Mr. Kimball in March 2016 in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to the severance, reimbursement and benefits arrangements included in the November 2016 offer letter, Mr. Kimball's March 2016 offer letter included his initial base salary and equity grant as CFO and provided for a one-time sign-on bonus of $125,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Kimball’s termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment.

Usama Ashraf. In February 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Ashraf in connection with his appointment as its Chief Financial Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Ashraf's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $20,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Ashraf's termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 50% of his base salary; (iii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; (iv) reimbursement of certain short-term housing expenses and (v) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. In July 2018, PMI and Mr. Ashraf executed an amendment to his offer letter that provides for certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.

In addition to the terms of Mr. Ashraf's amended offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary. In August 2018, in connection with Mr. Ashraf's expanded scope of responsibilities in the role of Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee increased his annual performance bonus target from 50% to 60% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Ashraf's annual performance bonus target to 75% of his annual base salary.

Nasos Topakas. In April 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Topakas in connection with his appointment as its Chief Technology Officer. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Topakas's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of his base salary in his first year of employment and 50% of his base salary in subsequent years; and (ii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.

In addition to the terms of Mr. Topakas' amended offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus payment in an amount equal to 25% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Topakas’s annual performance bonus target to 75% of his annual base salary.

Julie Hwang. In June 2018, PMI entered into an offer letter with Ms. Hwang in connection with her appointment as its General Counsel and Secretary. In addition to her initial base salary and equity grant, Ms. Hwang's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time retention bonus of $66,354, payable during the first quarter of March 2019; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 40% of her annual base salary; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.

In addition to the terms of Ms. Hwang's offer letter (including the one-time retention bonus set forth therein), in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Ms. Hwang's annual performance bonus target to 65% of her annual base salary.

Kunal Kaul. In December 2015, PMI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Kaul in connection with his appointment as its Executive Vice President, Operations. In addition to his initial base salary and equity grant, Mr. Kaul's offer letter provided for (i) a one-time sign-on bonus of $40,000, subject to certain repayment requirements in the event of Mr. Kaul's termination from PMI within 12 months of his employment; (ii) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 40% of his base salary; (iii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iv) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI.

73

In addition to the terms of Mr. Kaul's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of his base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Kaul’s annual performance bonus target to 65% of his annual base salary.

Justine Metz. In November 2017, PMI entered into an offer letter with Ms. Metz in connection with her appointment as its Executive Vice President, Marketing. In addition to her initial base salary and equity grant, Ms. Metz's offer letter provided for (i) eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus in a target amount of 75% of her annual base salary for calendar year 2018 and 40% of her annual base salary in subsequent years; (ii) reimbursement of certain relocation expenses; and (iii) eligibility to participate in the benefit programs generally available to employees of PMI. The offer letter also included certain severance arrangements, the terms of which are described under “Post-Employment Compensation” above.

In addition to the terms of Ms. Metz's offer letter, in January 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time retention bonus in an amount equal to 35% of her base salary. In March 2019, the Compensation Committee increased Ms. Metz’s annual performance bonus target to 65% of her annual base salary. Ms. Metz departed from her role as Executive Vice President, Marketing and exercised the severance arrangement, effective November 1, 2019.

Equity Incentive Plans 

PMI grants equity awards primarily through its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by PMI's Board of Directors on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, and Amendment No. 3, which were approved by PMI's Board of Directors on February 15, 2016, May 19, 2016, and January 23, 2018, respectively (as amended, the “2015 Plan”). PMI also previously granted equity awards through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010, and expired in March 2015. The 2005 Plan and 2015 Plan are collectively referred to in this Annual Report as the “Equity Plans.”

Any awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. Unless sooner terminated by PMI’s Board of Directors, the 2015 Plan will expire ten years from the date of its adoption. All stock options granted to NEOs are incentive stock options, to the extent permissible under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. All equity awards to PMI’s employees and directors were granted at no less than the fair market value of its common stock on the date of each award. In the absence of a public trading market for PMI common stock, PMI’s Board of Directors, acting on its own or through the Compensation Committee, has determined the fair market value of its common stock in good faith based upon consideration of a number of relevant factors including the status of its development efforts, financial status and market conditions. See Item 15, “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

The 2005 Plan provided for grants in the form of non-qualified stock options and stock purchase rights, which were available for grant to PMI’s directors, consultants or employees, including officers, and incentive stock options, which were available for grant solely to its employees, including officers. The 2015 Plan provides for grants in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and unrestricted stock. Under the 2015 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted solely to PMI’s employees, including officers. Awards other than incentive stock options may be granted to its directors, consultants or employees, including officers. The Equity Plans are administered by PMI’s Board of Directors, which in turn has delegated authority to administer the plans to the Compensation Committee.

Shares of PMI’s common stock subject to options that have expired or otherwise terminate under the 2015 Plan or the 2005 Plan without having been exercised in full will become available for grant under the 2015 Plan. Shares of PMI’s common stock issued under the 2015 Plan may include previously unissued shares or reacquired shares bought on the market or otherwise.

As of December 31, 2019, an aggregate of 95,037,086 options to purchase our common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Of such authorized options, as of December 31, 2019, a total of 75,280,973 options were outstanding under the 2015 Plan and 19,756,113 options were available for grant. As of December 31, 2019, an aggregate of 60,140,838 options granted under the 2015 Plan were forfeited. As of December 31, 2019, 45,172,464 options under the 2015 Plan were vested and outstanding and 345,127 were exercised. As of December 31, 2019, there were zero stock options available for grant under the 2005 Plan.

The NEOs identified herein have been granted equity awards upon employment with PMI, for merit increases, and for retention purposes.

74

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards granted to PMI’s named executive officers (“NEOs”) that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2019:

	Grant Date		Vesting Commencement Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)
David Kimball	5/3/2016	(2)	3/18/2016	1,322,742	88,183	0.22	5/3/2026	—
	5/3/2016	(3)	3/18/2016	—	—	—	—	705,465
	6/17/2016	(4)	4/28/2016	2,115,703	—	0.22	6/17/2026	—
	3/17/2017	(5)	12/1/2016	21,156,579	—	0.22	3/17/2027	—
	3/20/2018	(2)	3/1/2018	1,109,190	1,426,102	0.54	3/20/2028	—
Usama Ashraf	3/17/2017	(6)	2/27/2017	2,406,379	990,863	0.22	3/17/2027	—
	11/7/2017	(6)	2/27/2017	285,286	117,472	0.53	11/7/2027	—
	3/20/2018	(7)	3/1/2018	—	—	—	—	1,784,793
	8/8/2018	(6)	7/1/2018	296,692	541,027	0.48	8/8/2028	—
	11/5/2019	(6)	11/5/2019	—	500,000	0.17	11/5/2029
Nasos Topakas	11/7/2017	(6)	4/17/2017	2,533,333	1,266,667	0.53	11/7/2027	—
	3/20/2018	(7)	3/1/2018	—	—	—	—	1,784,793
Julie Hwang	11/4/2015	(8)	8/31/2015	150,000	—	0.22	11/4/2025	—
	5/3/2016	(9)	4/28/2016	60,650	—	0.22	5/3/2026	—
	3/17/2017	(8)	1/1/2017	44,843	16,657	0.22	3/17/2027	—
	3/20/2018	(8)	3/1/2018	95,615	122,935	0.54	3/20/2028	—
	8/8/2018	(6)	6/1/2018	444,276	740,462	0.48	8/8/2028	—
	5/7/2019	(6)	3/1/2019	—	1,398,198	0.30	5/7/2029	—
	11/5/2019	(6)	11/5/2019	—	1,000,000	0.17	11/5/2029	—
Kunal Kaul	3/15/2016	(7)	12/28/2015	—	—	—	—	125,000
	5/3/2016	(6)	12/28/2015	250,000	—	0.22	5/3/2026	—
	6/17/2016	(10)	4/28/2016	1,043,916	—	0.22	6/17/2026	—
	3/20/2018	(6)	3/1/2018	112,228	144,294	0.54	3/20/2028	—
Justine Metz (11)	3/20/2018	(6)	12/31/2017	802,083	947,917	0.54	3/20/2028	—
	3/20/2018	(6)	3/1/2018	85,282	119,395	0.54	3/20/2028	—

1.Represents restricted stock units (“RSUs”), in each case that remained unvested as of December 31, 2019.

2.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable vesting commencement date set forth in the table above (the “Vesting Commencement Date”) and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a change in control of PMI, a sale of all or substantially all of PMI's assets, or a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI (each, a “Corporate Transaction”).

3.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, when PMI files for an initial public offering and the lock-up period expires or there is a Corporate Transaction (which, as defined in the RSU grant notice, does not include a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PMI), whichever occurs first (each, a “Triggering Event”). The RSUs will immediately and fully vest in connection with the occurrence of such Triggering Event.

4.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of a Corporate Transaction.

5.This option vests over three years, with 1/2 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, provided that, any unvested options will vest in full immediately prior to the effective time of the Corporate Transaction.

75

6.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.

7.These RSUs initially vest, if at all, upon the occurrence of a Triggering Event. The number of RSUs that vest upon a Triggering Event will be equal to the number of RSUs that would have vested had the RSUs been subject to the four-year Time-Based Vesting Schedule (1/4 vesting on first-year anniversary of applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting monthly thereafter). If the NEO provides continuous service through the Triggering Event, the remaining RSUs will vest pursuant to the Time-Based Vesting Schedule until the RSUs are fully vested.

8.This option vests over four years, with 1/4 vesting on the first anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/48 vesting each month thereafter for the following three years.

9.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years.

10.This option vests over three years, with 1/36 vesting on the one month anniversary of the applicable Vesting Commencement Date and 1/36 vesting each month thereafter for the following two years, except that, in the event the NEO is terminated without cause within 12 months of a Corporate Transaction, any unvested options will vest in full immediately.

11.Exercisable and unexercisable option amounts shown as of NEO's termination date of November 1, 2019. All then-unexercisable options were unvested and cancelled effective as of such termination date.

The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards held by PMI's named executive officers that were exercised, vested or settled during 2019 (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Option Awards			Stock Awards
	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized on Exercise ($)	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting/Settlement ($)
David Kimball	—	—	—		—
Usama Ashraf	—	—	—		—
Nasos Topakas	—	—	—		—
Julie Hwang	—	—	—		—
Kunal Kaul	—	—	—		—
Justine Metz	—	—	—		—

Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change In Control of PMI

The following table provides the estimated value of the payments that PMI would provide to its named executive officers in connection with a change in control of PMI and/or a termination of employment. In determining amounts payable, we have assumed in all cases that the change in control or termination of employment, as applicable, occurred on December 31, 2019. With respect to a termination of employment, we have assumed in all cases that the termination was without cause.

76

Name	Cash Severance ($)		Number of Unvested Options (#)		Estimated Value of Unvested Options at December 31, 2019 ($)		Number of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards (#)		Estimated Value of Unvested RSUs and Stock Awards at December 31, 2019 ($)		Total Estimated Value ($)
	(dollar amounts in thousands)
David Kimball
Involuntary Termination	$	250	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	250
Change in Control	—		1,514,285		—		705,465		106		106
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Usama Ashraf
Involuntary Termination	215		—		—		—		—		215
Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		2,149,362		—		1,784,793		268		268
Nasos Topakas
Involuntary Termination	185		—		—		—		—		185
Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		1,266,667		—		1,784,793		268		268
Julie Hwang
Involuntary Termination	168		—		—		—		—		168
Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		3,278,252		—		—		—		—
Kunal Kaul
Involuntary Termination	—		—		—		—		—		—
Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		144,294		—		125,000		19		19
Justine Metz
Involuntary Termination	168		—		—		—		—		168
Change in Control	—		—		—		—		—		—
Involuntary Termination following Change in Control	—		1,067,312				—		—		—

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Mason Haupt, Claire A. Huang and Patrick W. Grady served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of these directors is or has been an officer or employee of PMI at any time or had any relationship with PMI requiring disclosure by PMI under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, none of PMI's executive officers served as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function) of any unrelated entity that had one or more of its executive officers serving on PMI’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other board committee serving an equivalent function).

77

Director Compensation

The following table shows compensation for the year ended December 31, 2019 to PMI’s directors who were not also named executive officers at the time they received compensation as directors (in thousands):

	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)		Equity awards ($)	Total
Patrick W. Grady	—		—	—
Rajeev V. Date (1)	$	75	—	$	75
David R. Golob (2)	—		—	—
Nigel W. Morris	$	75	—	$	75
Mason Haupt	—		—	—
Claire A. Huang (3)	$	75	—	$	75

1.Mr. Date held 58,780 unvested stock options at December 31, 2019.

2.Mr. Golob resigned as a director of PMI effective October 1, 2019.

3.Ms. Huang held 500,000 unvested stock options at December 31, 2019.

From time to time, PMI reimburses certain of its non-employee directors for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending board of directors meetings.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of PMI has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to PMI's Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Patrick W. Grady, Chair

Mason D. Haupt

Claire A. Huang

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of PMI’s Common Stock as of March 1, 2020, by:

•each of PMI’s directors;

•each of PMI’s named executive officers;

•each person, or group of affiliated persons, who is known by PMI to beneficially own more than 5% of PMI’s Common Stock; and

•all of PMI’s directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, all of the shares reflected in the table are shares of Common Stock and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

78

Percentage ownership calculations are based on 269,081,297 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2020, assuming the conversion of all of PMI’s convertible preferred stock, but excluding any outstanding stock options or warrants. Each share of PMI preferred stock is convertible at any time at the discretion of the holder. Shares of PMI’s Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI Common Stock at a ratio of 1 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI Common Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000 to 1. Shares of PMI’s Series G Preferred Stock convert into shares of PMI common stock at a ratio of 1 to 1.36.

In computing the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by a person or entity and the percentage ownership of that person or entity, PMI deemed outstanding all shares of Common Stock subject to options and warrants held by that person or entity that are currently exercisable or vesting within 60 days of March 1, 2020. PMI did not deem these shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1.0% is denoted with an asterisk (*). Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table below, addresses of named beneficial owners and officers are in care of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., 221 Main Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105.

	Number of Shares Owned (1)	Number of Shares Underlying Options, and Warrants Exercisable Currently or Within 60 Days (2)	Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (3)	Beneficial Ownership Percentage
Directors and Executive Officers
Rajeev V. Date (4)	26,115	1,101,184	1,127,299	*
Patrick W. Grady (5)	51,247,915	—	51,247,915	19.05	%
Nigel W. Morris (6)	1,073,970	1,080,349	2,154,319	*
Claire A. Huang	—	583,333	583,333	*
Mason D. Haupt (7)	—	137,033	137,033	*
David Kimball	—	26,644,185	26,644,185	9.01	%
Usama Ashraf	—	3,392,387	3,392,387	1.24	%
Nasos Topakas	—	2,850,000	2,850,000	1.05	%
Julie Hwang	—	1,428,871	1,428,871	*
Kunal Kaul	—	1,795,758	1,795,758	*
Justine Metz	—	—	—	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (8)	52,348,000	39,013,100	91,361,100	29.65	%
5% Shareholders
Francisco Partners (9)	17,413,325	35,544,141	52,957,466	17.38	%
Sequoia Capital (10)	51,247,915	—	51,247,915	19.05	%
LPG Capital GP Limited (11)	50,776,886	—	50,776,886	18.87	%
Soros Fund Management LLC (12)	723,902	52,081,959	52,805,861	16.44	%
Accel Partners (13)	24,320,667	—	24,320,667	9.04	%
IDG Capital Partners (14)	24,320,667	—	24,320,667	9.04	%
JPF LLC (15)	—	41,833,904	41,833,904	13.46	%
New Residential Investment Corp. (16)	1	41,833,904	41,833,905	13.46	%
Third Point Ventures LLC (17)	—	41,833,904	41,833,904	13.46	%
* Less than 1%

1.Includes shares of Common Stock (including Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock) owned directly or indirectly, but does not include shares subject to options and warrants.

2.Includes shares subject to options or warrants owned directly or indirectly that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2020.

3.The amounts and percentages of Common Stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Commission, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares

79

“voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities for which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

4.Consists of 1,101,184 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and 26,115 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Mr. Date or his affiliate.  

5.Consists of 51,247,915 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Grady is a partner of Sequoia Capital and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Grady disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

6.Consists of 1,005,935 shares of Common Stock, 68,035 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 1,080,349 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by QED Investors through certain of its affiliates. Mr. Morris is a partner of QED Investors and therefore may be deemed to share voting and investment power over these shares. Mr. Morris disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

7.Consists of 137,033 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by Mr. Haupt.

8.Consists of 1,005,935 shares of Common Stock, 51,342,065 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, 37,795,618 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, 1,080,349 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 137,033 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants.

9.Represents 17,413,325 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates and 35,544,141 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Francisco Partners through certain of its affiliates. Francisco Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over these shares. The address for Francisco Partners is One Letterman Drive, Building C – Suite 410, San Francisco, CA 94129

10.Represents 51,247,915 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Sequoia Capital through certain of its affiliates. Sequoia Capital is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for Sequoia Capital is 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 101, Menlo Park, California 94025.

11.Represents 50,776,886 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by LPG Capital through certain of its affiliates. LPG Capital l is deemed to have voting and investment power over the shares. The address for LPG Capital is 199-203 Hennessy Road, Flat 1002, Hong Kong, China.

12.Consists of (i) 2 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and 51,838,421 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants, in each case, held by QPL Holdings (PF) LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “QPL Shares”); (ii) 243,538 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrants held by QPB Holdings Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “QPB Shares”); and (iii) 723,900 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Quantum Strategic Shares”). 

Soros Fund Management LLC (“SFM LLC”) serves as principal investment manager for QPL Holdings (PF) LP, QPB Holdings Ltd., and Quantum Strategic Partners Ltd. As such, SFM LLC has been granted investment discretion over the QPL Shares, the QPB Shares and the Quantum Strategic Shares. George Soros serves as Chairman of SFM LLC and has sole discretion to replace FPR Manager LLC, the Manager of SFM LLC. The business address of SFM LLC is 250 West 55th Street, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

13.Represents 5,703,470 shares of Common Stock and 7,245,859 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); 3,498,765 shares of Common Stock and 4,722,733 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (the “IDG Shares”); and 877,185 shares of Common Stock and 2,272,655 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). Accel Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Accel Partners is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners and therefore Accel Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer

80

Shares. Accel Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the IDG Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address of Accel Partners is 428 University Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301.

14.Represents 3,498,765 shares of Common Stock and 4,722,733 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by IDG Capital Partners through certain of its affiliates (“IDG Shares”); 5,703,470 shares of common stock and 7,245,859 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred held by Accel Partners through certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Accel Shares”); and 877,185 shares of Common Stock and 2,272,655 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock held by Breyer Capital, LLC and James W. Breyer 2005 Trust dated 2/25/2005 (collectively, the “Breyer Shares”). IDG Capital Partners is deemed to have voting and investment power over the IDG Shares. IDG Capital Partners is an affiliate of Accel Partners and may also therefore be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Accel Shares. Mr. Breyer is a partner of Accel Partners, which is an affiliate of IDG Capital Partners, and therefore IDG Capital Partners may also be deemed to share voting and investment power over the Breyer Shares. IDG Capital Partners disclaims beneficial ownership of the Accel Shares and Breyer Shares except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. The address for IDG Capital Partners is 99 Queen’s Road Central, Unit 1509, The Center, Hong Kong, China.

15.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by JPF LLC. JPF LLC has shared voting power and shared investment power with its parent, Jefferies Funding LLC, Jefferies Funding LLC’s parent, Jefferies Group LLC, and Jefferies Group LLC’s parent, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. The address for JPF LLC is 520 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022.

16.Consists of (i) 1 share of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock, held directly by New Residential Investment Corp.; and (ii) 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by NRZ PRO Warrant LLC (the “NRZ Shares”). NRZ Pro Warrant LLC is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of New Residential Investment Corp. New Residential Investment Corp. is deemed to have voting and investment power over the NRZ Shares. The address for New Residential Investment Corp. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 45th Floor, New York, NY 10105.

17.Represents 41,833,904 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise and conversion of the preferred stock warrant held by Third Point Ventures LLC. Third Point LLC, as investment manager of Third Point Ventures LLC, has voting power over such shares. The address for Third Point Ventures LLC is 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2019, with respect to shares of PMI Common Stock that may be issued under PMI’s existing equity compensation plans.

	Number of shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, RSUs and rights (1)	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Number of shares of common stock remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated	5,520,920	$	0.14	—
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended	75,280,973	0.35			19,756,113
	80,801,893	$	0.34	19,756,113
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders:
Outstanding Common Stock Warrants	1,080,349	0.22			—
All non-stockholder approved plans	1,080,349	0.22			—
	81,882,242	$	0.34	19,756,113

81

1.Includes option and RSU issuances to employees, directors and certain consultants, advisors or vendors; however it does not include warrants granted to outside individuals, consultants, advisors and vendors.

Prosper Funding LLC

PMI is the sole member of, and holds a 100% equity interest in, PFL. PFL does not have any equity compensation plans.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Agreements with PFL

On January 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with PFL (as amended to date, the “PMI Administration Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide certain administrative services relating to the marketplace. Under the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an amount equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of the specified annual Corporate Administration Fees equal to 50% of finance and legal personnel costs, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 90% of all Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of PFL. As of the most recent amendment of the PMI Administration Agreement, PFL is required to pay PMI (a) an Corporate Administration Fees of $500 thousand per month, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan originated through the marketplace, (c) 62.5% of all Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) all nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding.

Also on January 22, 2013, PFL and PMI entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”) pursuant to which PMI, effective February 1, 2013 (i) transferred the marketplace and substantially all of PMI’s assets and rights related to the operation of the marketplace to PFL, and (ii) made a capital contribution to PFL in excess of $3 million. Under the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI also transferred substantially all of its remaining assets to PFL, including (i) all outstanding Notes issued by PMI under the Indenture dated June 15, 2009 between PMI and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee (the “Indenture”), (ii) all Borrower Loans corresponding to such Notes, (iii) all registration agreements related to such Notes and Borrower Loans, and (iv) all documents and information related to the foregoing. Certain hardware and agreements relevant to the development, maintenance and use of the marketplace, including in relation to the origination, funding and servicing of Borrower Loans, and the issuance, funding and payment of the Notes, were not transferred or assigned to PFL by PMI. In addition, PMI did not transfer to PFL (i) agreements with PMI’s directors, officers or employees and PMI’s financial, legal or other advisors or consultants, (ii) certain agreements with vendors to provide PMI with goods or services in the ordinary course of business (including software licensed pursuant to any “shrink wrap” or “click wrap” license), and (iii) certain cash and short-term investments.

In the Asset Transfer Agreement, PMI agreed, among other things, to:

i.fund any repurchase obligation with respect to the transferred Notes, and indemnify PFL for any other losses that arise out of any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans, including as a result of a breach by PMI of any of its representations or warranties made therein;

ii.fund any arbitration filing or administrative fees or arbitrator fees payable under any registration agreement related to the transferred Notes or Borrower Loans; and

iii.fund any indemnification obligations that arise under any registration agreement entered into by PMI prior to the date of the asset transfer.

Holders of the transferred Notes are third party beneficiaries under the Asset Transfer Agreement and the Administration Agreement.

Under Section 4.1 of the Indenture, PMI could transfer substantially all of its assets to any person without the consent of the holders of the existing Notes, provided that the transferee expressly assumed all of PMI’s obligations under the Indenture and the existing Notes. In that case, the transferee would succeed to and be substituted for PMI, and PMI would be discharged from all of its obligations and covenants, under the Indenture and the existing Notes. Accordingly, on January 22, 2013, PMI, PFL and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee entered an Amended and Restated Indenture (the “Amended and Restated Indenture”), effective February 1, 2013, which (i) effected such assumption, substitution and discharge (the “Note Assumption”), and (ii) amended and restated the Indenture to reflect the Note Assumption and to make certain other amendments to the Indenture as permitted therein. Following the Note Assumption, PFL became the obligor with respect to the transferred Notes and the Amended and Restated Indenture, and PMI no longer has any obligations with respect thereto.

82

Agreements with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC

On November 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Administration Agreement with Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a wholly owned subsidiary of PFL (the “PAH Administration Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI agreed to provide PAH certain administrative services related to PAH’s operations. Under the PAH Administration Agreement, PAH was required to pay PMI an annual fee in the amount of $150,000.

Also on November 22, 2013, PMI and PAH entered into a Loan Servicing Agreement, pursuant to which PMI agreed to service certain Borrower Loans acquired by PAH under a Loan Sale Agreement entered into on the same date between PAH and PFL. In exchange for servicing these Borrower Loans, PAH agreed to pay PMI the servicing fee identified in the loan listing for each loan purchased by PAH.

On November 28, 2018, the sole member and board of directors of PAH executed a written consent approving the termination of PAH's LLC Agreement and dissolution and winding up of PAH. In connection with PAH's dissolution, the sole member and board of directors of PAH further approved the termination of the PAH Administration Agreement, the Loan Servicing Agreement, and the Loan Sale Agreement. PAH was dissolved on November 29, 2018.

Agreements with Significant Shareholders

On February 27, 2017, PFL entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with PF LoanCo Funding LLC, a Cayman limited liability company (the “Beneficiary”), and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as trustee of PF LoanCo Trust, a New York common law trust (the “Trust”). The Purchase Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions pursuant to which PFL will sell eligible consumer loans in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 billion to the Purchaser for the benefit of the Beneficiary. As of December 31, 2019, an aggregate of $3.3 billion of loans were purchased under the Purchase Agreement, which does not include $0.3 billion of Whole Loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Purchase Agreement. The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, on February 27, 2017, PMI entered into a Warrant Agreement with PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP (“PF WarrantCo”), a Delaware limited partnership and an entity related to the Beneficiary, and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp. (the “Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to PF WarrantCo three warrant certificates to purchase up to in aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant Shares”).

During the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PF WarrantCo was a beneficial owner of more than 5% of PMI’s Common Stock as a result of the Warrant Shares vesting. The Beneficiary is an affiliate under common control with PF WarrantCo.

For more information regarding these transactions, please see Note 17, Consortium Purchase Agreement, of Prosper's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain Relationships Among Directors and Officers

None.

Participation in the Marketplace

PMI’s executive officers, directors and certain affiliates, have opened investor accounts on the marketplace and have made deposits to and withdrawals from their accounts, and invested in portions of borrowers’ loan requests from time to time in the past via purchases of Notes, and may do so in the future. The Notes and Borrower Loans were obtained on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by other investors.

Financing Arrangements with Significant Shareholders, Directors and Officers

For further information regarding stock ownership for executive officers, directors and security holders owning greater than 5% ownership of all PMI classes of voting securities please see Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.”

Under the terms of the amended and restated voting agreement, dated April 7, 2015, certain investors in PMI’s Convertible Preferred Stock, have each agreed, subject to maintaining certain ownership levels, to exercise their voting rights so as to elect one designee of Francisco Partners III, L.P., one designee of SC Prosper Holdings LLC, one designee of QPL Holdings (PF) LP, one designee of the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock holders, PMI’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), one common director designated by the CEO, and two independent directors.

Under the terms of the amended and restated investor rights agreement, dated February 27, 2017, the holders of a majority of the registrable securities of PMI have the right to demand that PMI file a registration statement under the Securities Act, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $20

83

million. These registration rights are subject to specified conditions and limitations. In addition, PMI is promptly required to give written notice to all holders of registrable securities prior to the filing of any registration statement under the Securities Act for purposes of a public offering of securities of PMI. The amended and restated investor rights agreement also provides that if PMI registers any of its shares for public sale, stockholders with registration rights will have the right to include their shares in the registration statement, subject to specified conditions and limitations. Further, in the amended and restated investor rights agreement, if PMI receives from any holders of registrable securities a written request that PMI effect a registration on Form S-3 (or any successor to Form S-3) or any similar short-form registration statement, PMI is required to use reasonable best efforts to file a Form S-3 registration statement and to effect such registration as would permit or facilitate the sale and distribution of all or such portion of such holder’s registrable securities as are specified in the request, so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, would exceed $2.5 million.

Indemnification Agreements

PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that it will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, PMI has entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of its directors and executive officers. For more information regarding these agreements, see Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Limitations on Officers’ and Directors’ Liability and Indemnification Agreements” for more information.

Policies and Processes for Transactions Involving Related Parties

PMI’s board of directors has not adopted a formal policy or procedure that must be followed prior to any transaction, arrangement or relationship with a related person, as defined by SEC regulations.

PMI has adopted a corporate Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance (the “Code”) that is enforced throughout all levels of management and deals with conflicts of interest, among other things. The Code requires PMI’s directors, officers and employees to avoid any conduct or activities that conflict, or appear to conflict, with Prosper’s interests, or that may make it difficult for the individual to perform his or her duties objectively. The Code also requires directors and executive officers to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest to PMI’s Chief Compliance Officer, who will report such conflicts to PMI’s Audit Committee for review.

PMI’s directors and executive officers are required each year to respond to a questionnaire regarding their independence. The questionnaire also requires each director and executive officer to identify if they or an immediate family member have been indebted to, or have been a participant in any material transactions with, PMI or any of its subsidiaries. Additionally, PMI’s directors and executive officers are required to disclose on a quarterly basis whether they or an immediate family member had made any direct or indirect investments on Prosper’s platform.

The standards applied pursuant to the above-described procedures are to provide comfort that potential conflicts of interest or related party transactions are identified and receive appropriate oversight and review.

Director Independence

For information regarding director independence, see Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Prosper Marketplace, Inc.—Director Independence.”

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC

Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) served as PMI and PFL’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and is serving in such capacity for the current fiscal year. Deloitte was engaged in October 2014.

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services to PMI and PFL were $2,045 thousand and $1,969 thousand in December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional services rendered for PMI and PFL for the audit of annual financial statements, the review of the quarterly financial statements, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $1,666 thousand and $1,824 thousand in 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

Audit Related Fees 

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for professional assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the PMI and PFL’s financial statements, but not included under Audit Fees were $347 thousand and

84

$143 thousand in 2019 and 2018, respectively. These fees include the service organization control readiness assessment and service organization control assessment.  

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte for 2019 and 2018 for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $0 and $10 thousand in 2019 and 2018. 

All Other Fees

Deloitte billed $32 thousand and $2 thousand, in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to fees not included in “Audit”, “Audit Related Fees” or “Tax Fees.”

85

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

(a1) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for PMI

(a2) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Prosper Funding LLC

(b) Documents List

Financial Statements
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018	2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	4
Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	5
Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Prosper Funding LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018	48
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	49
Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	50
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017	51
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	52

86

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Marketplace Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, other comprehensive loss, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA

March 20, 2020

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014.

F-1

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	December 31,
	2019		2018
ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	64,635	$	57,945
Restricted Cash (1)	155,773		149,114
Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	—		22,173
Accounts Receivable (1)	1,695		5,119
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value (1)	142,026		183,788
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value(1)	634,019		263,522
Property and Equipment, Net	31,296		15,273
Prepaid and Other Assets (1)	5,694		4,643
Servicing Assets	12,602		14,687
Goodwill	36,368		36,368
Intangible Assets, Net	720		999
Total Assets	$	1,084,828	$	753,631
LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIT
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	19,937	$	19,967
Payable to Investors	101,092		127,538
Notes, at Fair Value	244,171		264,003
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust (1)	347,662		—
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value (1)	52,168		—
Warehouse Lines (1)	131,583		162,488
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability	149,996		143,679
Other Liabilities	21,726		10,629
Total Liabilities	$	1,068,335	$	728,304
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 18)
Convertible Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value; 444,760,848 shares authorized; 209,613,570 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019; 214,637,925 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Aggregate liquidation preference of $370,456 and $375,952 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively	322,748		323,793
Stockholders' Deficit
Common Stock – $0.01 par value; 625,000,000 shares authorized; 69,387,836 shares issued and 68,451,901 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019; 71,411,145 shares issued and 70,475,210 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2018	208		229
Additional Paid-In Capital	151,416		145,486
Less: Treasury Stock	(23,417)		(23,417)
Accumulated Deficit	(434,462)		(420,751)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	—		(13)
Total Stockholders' Deficit	(306,255)		(298,466)
Total Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit	$	1,084,828	$	753,631
(1) Includes amounts in consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) presented separately in the table below.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

The following table presents the assets and liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets above. The assets in the table below may only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. See Note 7 - Securitizations and Note 11 - Debt, to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Assets and Liabilities of VIEs, Included in Consolidated Balance Sheets	December 31,
	2019		2018
Assets
Restricted Cash	$	39,118	$	—
Accounts Receivable	73		3,902
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value	142,026		183,788
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value	388,882		—
Prepaid and Other Assets	2,928		1,393
	$	573,027	$	189,083
Liabilities
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust	$	347,662	$	—
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value	52,168		$	—
Warehouse Lines	131,583		162,488
	$	531,413	$	162,488

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
REVENUES
Operating Revenues
Transaction Fees, Net	$	119,282	$	123,373	$	130,174
Servicing Fees, Net	23,406		29,025		27,206
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	10,946		13,147		11,431
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	(17,553)		(72,316)		(60,122)
Other Revenues	5,953		4,697		4,806
Total Operating Revenues	142,034		97,926		113,495
Interest Income
Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale	100,786		57,716		47,208
Interest Expense on Financial Instruments	(63,736)		(45,886)		(43,954)
Net Interest Income	37,050		11,830		3,254
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net	(25,514)		(5,395)		(514)
Total Net Revenues	153,570		104,361		116,235
EXPENSES
Origination and Servicing	34,915		35,116		34,881
Sales and Marketing	73,824		77,997		83,462
General and Administrative	71,588		72,371		75,686
Restructuring Charges, Net	34		1,762		1,340
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(11,235)		(45,003)		29,140
Other Expense (Income), Net	(1,945)		1,891		7,392
Total Expenses	167,181		144,134		231,901
Net Loss Before Income Taxes	(13,611)		(39,773)		(115,666)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	100		172		(508)
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted	($0.18)		($0.57)		($1.65)
Weighted-Average Shares - Basic and Diluted	70,511,605		70,384,501		69,687,836

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Change in Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	13		60		(74)
Realized Gain on Sale of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	—		—		9
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax	13		60		(65)
Income Tax Effect	—		—		—
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax	13		60		(65)
Comprehensive Loss	$	(13,698)	$	(39,885)	$	(115,223)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficit

(in thousands, except share amounts)

	Convertible Preferred Stock				Common Stock					Treasury Stock						Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Accumulated Deficit	Total
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount
Balance January 1, 2017	177,388,425	$	275,938	75,084,344	$	212	(5,177,235)	$	(23,417)	$	123,988	$	(8)	$	(265,648)	$	(164,873)
Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G, net of issuance costs	37,249,497	47,855		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Exercise of vested stock options	—	—		606,284	6		—	—		97		—		—		103
Repurchase of restricted stock	—	—		(266,130)	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Restricted stock vested	—	—		—	10		—	—		31		—		—		41
Exercise of warrants	3	—		43,736	—		—	—		5		—		—		5
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		12,532		—		—		12,532
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(65)		—		(65)
Net Loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(115,158)		(115,158)
Balance December 31, 2017	214,637,925	323,793		75,468,234	228		(5,177,235)	(23,417)		136,653		(73)		(380,806)		(267,415)
Exercise of vested stock options	—	—		176,011	1		—	—		27		—		—		28
Restricted stock vested	—	—		—	—		—	—		13		—		—		13
Exercise of warrants	—	—		8,200	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		8,793		—		—		8,793
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		60		—		60
Net Loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(39,945)		(39,945)
Balance December 31, 2018	214,637,925	323,793		75,652,445	229		(5,177,235)	(23,417)		145,486		(13)		(420,751)		(298,466)
Repurchase of Common Stock	—	—		(2,196,665)	(22)		—	—		22		—		—		—
Repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock	(5,024,355)	(1,045)		—	—		—	—		1,045		—		—		1,045
Exercise of vested stock options	—	—		173,356	1		—	—		24		—		—		25
Restricted stock vested	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Exercise of warrants	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		—	—		—	—		4,839		—		—		4,839
Change in net unrealized loss on Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		13		—		13
Net Loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(13,711)		(13,711)
Balance December 31, 2019	209,613,570	$	322,748	73,629,136	$	208	(5,177,235)	$	(23,417)	$	151,416	$	—	$	(434,462)	$	(306,255)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net	27,306		5,307		514
Depreciation and Amortization	7,676		9,968		12,348
Amortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset	3,494		—		—
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	(11,924)		(13,171)		(14,138)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights	12,476		13,148		12,074
Stock-Based Compensation Expense	4,529		8,401		12,238
Restructuring Liability	—		1,576		1,343
Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans	17,552		72,317		61,605
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants	(11,235)		(45,004)		29,140
Other, Net	1,118		(1,281)		377
Impairment Losses on Assets Held for Sale	—		—		6,399
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value	(2,320,560)		(2,365,431)		(2,619,130)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale at Fair Value	2,241,569		2,178,498		2,619,709
Accounts Receivable	3,424		(4,435)		74
Prepaid and Other Assets	1,350		4,581		(3,208)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	(106)		7,566		(2,268)
Payable to Investors	(26,446)		(4,894)		(10,212)
Other Liabilities	(4,590)		(3,683)		(2,496)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(68,078)		(176,482)		(10,789)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value	(170,328)		(177,101)		(194,887)
Principal Payments of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value	254,845		175,117		192,054
Purchases of Property and Equipment	(10,312)		(5,889)		(4,174)
Maturities of Short Term Investments	—		—		1,280
Purchases of Short Term Investments	—		—		(1,262)
Purchases of Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value	(1,488)		(23,266)		(68,297)
Proceeds from Sale of Available for Sale Securities	—		—		31,232
Maturities of Available for Sale Securities	23,763		54,750		16,600
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities	96,480		23,611		(27,454)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value	171,138		176,830		194,391
Payments of Notes Held at Fair Value	(167,419)		(175,760)		(191,828)
Principal Payments on Notes Issued by Securitization Trust	(134,250)		—		—
Principal Payments on Certificate Issued by Securitization Trust	(13,770)		—		—
Proceeds from Securitization Issuance	8,962		—		—
Proceeds from Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock, Net	—		—		47,855
Proceeds from Warehouse Lines	186,010		161,797		—
Principal payments on Warehouse Lines	(57,899)		—		—
Payment for Debt Issuance Costs	(7,850)		(1,428)		—
Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants and Stock Options	25		28		123
Repurchase of Common Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock and Restricted Stock	—		—		(64)
Taxes Paid for Awards Vested Under Equity Incentive Plans	—		—		(15)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities	(15,053)		161,467		50,462
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	13,349		8,596		12,219
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period	207,059		198,463		186,244
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period	$	220,408	$	207,059	$	198,463
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash Paid for Interest	$	60,642	$	45,320	$	43,776
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net	$	707	$	630	$	171
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Consolidation of Third Party Borrower Loans	$	(391,383)	$	—	$	—
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Issuance of Securitization Notes and Certificates	$	554,892	$	—	$	—
Non-Cash Financing Activity- Derecognition of Warehouse Line Debt	$	(158,857)	$	—	$	—
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	64,635	$	57,945	$	45,795
Restricted Cash	155,773		149,114		152,668
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	$	220,408	$	207,059	$	198,463

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Business

Prosper Marketplace, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. Except as the context requires otherwise, as used in these notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., “Prosper”, “PMI”, and the "Company" refer to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

PMI developed a peer-to-peer online credit marketplace (the “marketplace”), and in February 2013, transferred ownership of the marketplace to Prosper Funding LLC (“PFL”), its wholly-owned subsidiary. All of the borrower payment dependent notes (“Notes”) issued and sold through the marketplace today are issued and sold by PFL. PFL also operates the marketplace and facilitates the origination of unsecured, consumer loans by WebBank (“Borrower Loans”), an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank, through the marketplace. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace as agent of WebBank in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers. PMI also manages the origination of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. On February 1, 2013, PFL entered into an Administration Agreement with PMI in its capacity as licensee, corporate administrator, loan marketplace administrator and loan and Note servicer, pursuant to which PMI provides certain back office support, loan platform administration and loan servicing to PFL.

The marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in an open, transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper believes marketplace lending represents a model of consumer lending where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.

A borrower who wishes to obtain a Borrower Loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. Listings are allocated to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from PFL, the payments of which are dependent on PFL’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper.

As of December 31, 2019, the marketplace is open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019, the marketplace is open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently our marketplace does not operate internationally.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries including PFL, Prosper Healthcare Lending LLC (“PHL”), BillGuard, Inc. (“BillGuard”), and its consolidated VIEs including Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-1 (“PMIT 2019-1”), Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-2 (“PMIT 2019-2”) and Prosper Marketplace Issuance Trust, Series 2019-4 (“PMIT 2019-4”). All intercompany balances and transactions between PMI and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. PMI and PFL’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures, including contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include but are not limited to the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, valuation of servicing rights and loan trailing fee liability, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation expense, Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, Repurchase Obligations and contingent liabilities. These judgments, estimates and assumptions are inherently subjective in nature and actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

F-9

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

A variable interest entity (VIE) is a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the entity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Prosper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Prosper accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale include the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Prosper uses fair value measurements in its fair value disclosures and to record Available for Sale Investments, Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, and Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability at fair value on a recurring basis.

The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:

Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.

When developing fair value measurements, Prosper maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust and Servicing Assets are considered level 3 financial instruments. Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value, and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. The

F-10

effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.

Refer to Note 8 for additional fair value disclosures.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with investment-grade rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, US treasury securities and US agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

At times, our cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these balances based on its assessment of the creditworthiness of these financial institutions.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificate of deposit accounts held as collateral as required for long term leases, loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper have on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.

Short Term Investments

Short Term Investments which are included in Prepaid and Other Assets consist of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.

Available for Sale Investments

Available for Sale Investments are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of taxes, in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) included in stockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.   

Management evaluates whether impairment of Available for Sale debt securities is other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. Debt securities with unrealized losses are considered OTTI if Prosper intends to sell the investment or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell such investment before any anticipated recovery. If management determines that an investment is OTTI under these circumstances, the impairment recognized in earnings is measured as the entire difference between the amortized cost and then-current fair value.

An investment is also OTTI if management does not expect to recover all of the amortized cost of the investment. In this circumstance, the impairment recognized in earnings represents estimated credit losses and is measured by the difference between the present value of expected cash flows and the amortized cost of the investment. Management utilizes cash flow models to estimate the expected future cash flow from the securities to estimate the credit loss. Expected cash flows are discounted using the investment's effective interest rate. The evaluation of whether Prosper expects to recover the amortized cost of an investment is inherently judgmental. The evaluation includes the assessment of several bond performance indicators, including the current price and magnitude of the unrealized loss and whether Prosper has received all scheduled principal and interest payments. There were 0 impairment charges recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust

Borrower Loans are funded either through the Note Channel or through the Whole Loan Channel. Through the Note Channel, Prosper purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues Notes to investors and holds the Borrower Loans until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of Notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower Loans funded and Notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 

In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions, which issued senior notes, risk retention interests, and residual certificates. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated VIEs, and as a result the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, senior notes sold to third party investors in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7 - Securitization for additional disclosures.

F-11

Prosper uses Warehouse Lines to purchase Loans Held for Sale that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors. Loans Held for Sale are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 11 - Debt for more details on Warehouse Lines.

Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale are purchased from WebBank. Prosper places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 or more days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.

Prosper has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans funded through the Note Channel are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans held in consolidated securitization trusts are partially offset by changes in fair value of the Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. Changes in fair value of Loans Held for Sale are recorded through Proper's earnings and Prosper collects interest on Loans Held for Sale. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust are included in “Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities

Prosper records Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets and Liabilities is recognized in Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market servicing rate is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Prosper uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets or Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper earns on the Borrower Loans, the estimated market servicing rates to service such loans, the prepayment rates, the default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.

Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, leasehold improvements, software purchased or developed for internal use and web site development costs. Property and Equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and is computed using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives of the assets are as follows:

Furniture and fixtures			7 years
Office equipment			5 years
Computers and equipment			3 years
Leasehold improvements	5	-	8 years
Software and website development costs	1	-	5 years

The costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and when it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software and website development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants and salaries and payroll-related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.

Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in Property and Equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software and website development assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in

F-12

circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development asset group.

Leases

Management determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Property and Equipment, Net and in Other Liabilities, respectively. For certain leases with original terms of twelve months or less, PMI recognizes the lease expense as incurred and does not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities.

If a contract contains a lease, management evaluates whether it should be classified as an operating or finance lease. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. As most of PMI's leases do not provide an implicit rate, management uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The operating lease ROU assets are evaluated for impairment utilizing the same impairment model used for Property and Equipment.

Goodwill and Intangibles

Goodwill associated with business combinations is computed by recognizing the portion of the purchase price that is not tied to individually identifiable and separately recognizable assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or whenever indications of impairment exist. Annual impairment testing occurs on October 1. Impairment exists whenever the carrying value of Goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Adverse changes in impairment indicators such as loss of key personnel, increased regulatory oversight or unplanned changes in operations could result in impairment. PMI did not recognize any Goodwill impairments during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Costs of internally developing any intangibles is expensed as incurred. Intangible Assets identified through the acquisitions of American Healthcare Lending and BillGuard include customer relationships, technology and a brand name. The customer relationship Intangible Assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over three to ten year periods. The technology and brand name Intangible Assets are amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively.  

Payable to Investors

Payable to Investors primarily represents the obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.

Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust

Warehouse Lines and Notes Issued by Securitization Trust are carried at amortized cost. Prosper defers specific incremental costs directly related to entering into the Warehouse Lines and issuing Notes Issued by Securitization Trust and subsequently amortizes them into interest expense over the life of the arrangements.

Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

Freestanding warrants to acquire shares that may be redeemable are accounted for in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”). Under ASC 480, vested freestanding warrants to purchase the Company’s convertible redeemable preferred stock are classified as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and carried at fair value because the warrants may conditionally obligate the Company to transfer assets at some point in the future. The Company records the warrants at fair value on issuance. The warrants are subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date, and any change in their fair value is recognized as “Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company will continue to adjust the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants, the completion of a deemed liquidation event or the conversion of convertible redeemable preferred stock into Common Stock.

F-13

Loan Trailing Fee Liability

On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements became effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue primarily results from transaction and Servicing Fees and net interest income earned. Fees include Transaction Fees for our services performed on behalf of WebBank to originate a loan. PMI also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues, including referral fees, and securitization fees.

Transaction Fees

Prosper has a customer contract with WebBank to facilitate the origination of all Borrower Loans through Prosper’s marketplace. In exchange for these services, Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank that is recognized when performance is complete and upon the successful origination of a Borrower Loan. The transaction fee Prosper earns is determined by the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan that is facilitated on Prosper’s marketplace, and ranges from 1.00% to 5.00% of the original principal amount of each Borrower Loan that WebBank originates.  Prosper records the transaction fee net of any fees paid to WebBank because Prosper does not receive an identifiable benefit from WebBank other than the borrower loan that has been recognized at fair value.  

Servicing Fees

Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the borrower loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the borrower loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.

Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans

Prosper recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on a sale less the carrying amount of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Financial Instruments

Prosper recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper believes it to be collectable. Similarly, Prosper recognizes interest income on Loans Held for Sale and interest expense on the Warehouse Line using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper believes it to be collectable.

Other Revenues

Other Revenues consist primarily of securitization fees and credit referral fees. Credit referral fees are where partner companies pay us an agreed upon amount for successful referrals of customers from our marketplace. The transaction price is a fixed amount per referral and is recognized by the Company upon a successful referral. Securitization fees represent fees Prosper earns to facilitate securitizations for purchasers of Borrower Loans and is recognized as “Other Revenues” when the

F-14

securitization is completed. In some instances Prosper may also provide a guarantee, which requires a determination of the fair value of the guarantee and an allocation of the remaining transaction price to the securitization performance obligation.

As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had no contract assets, contract liabilities or deferred contract costs. As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had no unsatisfied performance obligations related to Transaction Fees or Other Revenues.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in “Sales and Marketing” expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper incurred advertising costs of $32.8 million, $48.0 million and $66.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

Management determines the fair value of the Company's stock options issued to employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is impacted by the fair value of Common Stock as well as by changes in assumptions that include, but are not limited to, the expected Common Stock price volatility over the term of the option awards, the expected term of the awards, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield.

PMI recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award (the vesting period of the award). Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards expected to vest. PMI estimates future forfeitures at the date of grant and revises the estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from estimates.

Stock-based awards issued to non-employees are marked-to-market up until the point that the awards measurement period has been achieved. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is recorded over the vesting period of the award.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The functional currency of Prosper's international subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. For this subsidiary, foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates and foreign currency denominated nonmonetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement and settlements are included in “General and Administrative” expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock

Upon repurchase of Convertible Preferred Stock, Prosper recognizes the difference between repurchase price and the carrying amount of the Convertible Preferred Stock in Additional Paid-In Capital. Additionally, if Common Stock is repurchased for constructive retirement, the difference between the repurchase price and par value of the Common Stock is recorded through Additional Paid-In Capital.

Income Taxes

The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Prosper’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes. U.S. Federal, Israel, California and other state income tax returns are filed. Prosper is not currently undergoing any income tax examinations. Due to the cumulative the net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.

Prosper recognizes benefits from uncertain tax positions only if management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.

Other Expense (Income), Net

Other Expense, Net includes interest income from Available for Sale Investments, sublease income, SEC settlement costs and contract termination costs that are expected to be non-recurring and not part of restructuring activities.

F-15

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring Charges consist of severance costs and contract termination-related costs and impairment charges associated with the severance actions. A liability for severance costs is typically recognized when the plan of termination has been communicated to the affected employees and is measured at its fair value at the communication date. Contract termination costs consist primarily of costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases for their remaining terms without economic benefit to the Company. A liability for contract termination costs is recognized at the date the Company ceases using the rights conveyed by the lease contract and is recorded at fair value, which is determined based on the remaining contractual lease rentals reduced by estimated sublease rentals.

Comprehensive Income

Marketable debt securities are generally considered available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices or other readily available market information. Gains and losses are recognized when realized using the specific identification method and included in “Other Expense (Income)”, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which is reflected as a separate component of Stockholders’ Deficit in Prosper's Consolidated Balance Sheets. If management has determined that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred, the amount of the decline that is related to an identified loss is recognized in earnings. Prosper monitors its investment portfolio for potential impairment on a quarterly basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Adopted In The Current Period

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The ASU is intended to reduce the cost and complexity and to improve financial reporting for nonemployee share-based payments. The ASU expands the scope of Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which currently only includes share-based payments to employees, to include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for goods or services. Consequently, the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees and employees will be substantially aligned. Prosper adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on Prosper’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. Prosper adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. In accordance with ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842), Target Improvements”, Prosper has elected not to restate prior periods and has presented the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2019. The standard had a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, but did not materially impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The most significant impact is the recognition of ROU assets and lease obligation liabilities for operating leases. Additionally, Prosper recorded an impairment charge to its ROU asset upon adoption due to existing sublease arrangements that were entered into at a loss. The impairment charge did not have a material impact as it will be offset by a reduction of the existing restructuring liability for those leases.

In the adoption of the various accounting standards associated with Topic 842, Prosper has elected the package of practical expedients, which allows the Company not to reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts as of the adoption date are or contain a lease, (2) lease classification for any expired or existing leases as of the adoption date and (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the adoption date. Prosper did not elect to apply the hindsight practical expedient when determining lease term and assessing impairment of right-of-use assets. Prosper also elected a practical expedient that allowed the Company to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for each lease and non-lease component as a single lease component. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 resulted in the recognition of ROU assets of approximately $16.2 million, lease liabilities for operating leases of approximately $21.7 million, a reduction in existing Other Liabilities of $5.5 million related to deferred rent and restructuring liabilities, and no cumulative-effect adjustment on retained earnings on Prosper's Consolidated Balance Sheets, with no material impact to its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted by the Company in Future Periods

In June 2016, the FASB amended guidance related to impairment of financial instruments as part of ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. For loans accounted for at amortized cost, the guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with an expected credit loss model for which a company recognizes an allowance based on the estimate of expected credit loss. Because Prosper accounts for Borrower Loans at fair

F-16

value, Prosper expects no impact on its loan portfolios upon adoption. For certain Available for Sale Investments, the guidance will require recognition of expected credit losses through recording an allowance for credit losses. As Prosper has no Available for Sale Investments at the effective date of Topic 326, Prosper does not expect the targeted amendments to the Available for Sale Investments debt securities impairment model to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements. Based on the composition of Prosper's Accounts Receivable and historical collection activity, we do not expect the adoption of Topic 326 would have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The standard eliminates Step 2 from the Goodwill impairment test which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Prosper will continue to have the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual Goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The standard should be applied on a prospective basis. Prosper does not expect the adoption of this guidance to impact its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. The guidance only affects disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and will not affect Prosper’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. Prosper will prospectively capitalize all eligible costs related to cloud computing arrangements starting January 1, 2020.

In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements.” This ASU aligns the fair value treatment of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers as defined under Topic 842, presentation on the Statement of Cash Flows for sales and direct financing leases, and a clarification of interim disclosure requirements in the year of adoption, among other things. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year and early adoption is permitted. Prosper does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and Equipment, Net consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Operating lease right-of-use assets	16,213		—
Computer equipment	13,420		15,193
Internal-use software and website development costs	28,904		22,505
Office equipment and furniture	2,999		3,015
Leasehold improvements	7,158		7,157
Assets not yet placed in service	2,445		2,745
Property and equipment	71,139		50,615
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(39,843)		(35,342)
Total Property and Equipment, Net	$	31,296	$	15,273

Depreciation and amortization expense for Property and Equipment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $7.4 million, $9.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively. These expenses are included in "General and Administrative" expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prosper capitalized internal-use software and website development costs in the amount of $9.3 million, $5.7 million and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018

F-17

and 2017, respectively. Impairment charges were not material for years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Additionally, disclosures around the operating lease right-of-use assets are included in Note 18.

4. Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, at Fair Value

The fair value of the Borrower Loans originated and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates and recoveries derived from historical performance, market conditions and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of notes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the note holders. The effective interest rate associated with any series of notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding borrower loan due to the servicing fee.

In 2019, Prosper began financing the purchase of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel through securitization transactions. Associated securitization trusts are deemed consolidated VIEs, and as a result the Borrower Loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 7 - Securitization for additional information. At December 31, 2019, $388.9 million in Borrower Loans at fair value are held in the consolidated securitization trusts.

The fair value of Borrower Loans is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such borrower loans include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

In 2018, Prosper Warehouse I Trust (“PWIT”), a consolidated VIE, began purchasing Loans Held for Sale from the Company through a warehouse arrangement with a national banking association. Similarly, Prosper Warehouse II Trust (“PWIIT”) began purchasing such loans in 2019 (collectively “Warehouse Loans”). See Note 11 - Debt for more details. Prosper utilizes Warehouse Lines to finance Loans Held for Sale that may be subsequently contributed to securitization transactions or sold to investors. The fair value of the Loans Held for Sale is estimated using the same methodology as the one utilized for Borrower Loans valuation.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, both at fair value, were as follows (in thousands):

	Borrower Loans						Loans Held for Sale
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding	$	647,209	$	269,093	$	143,261	$	185,657
Fair value adjustments	(13,190)		(5,571)		(1,235)		(1,869)
Fair value	$	634,019	$	263,522	$	142,026	$	183,788

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Notes, at Fair Value, was as follows (in thousands):

	Notes
	2019		2018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding	$	250,281	$	272,430
Fair value adjustments	(6,110)		(8,427)
Fair value	244,171		$	264,003

Borrower Loans

At December 31, 2019, outstanding Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 months or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, outstanding Borrower Loans had original terms between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2023.

As of December 31, 2019, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $6.5 million and a fair value of $1.9 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million and a fair value of $1.1 million. We place loans on non-

F-18

accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Loans Held for Sale

At December 31, 2019, outstanding Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various maturity dates through December 2024. Fair value adjustments recorded in earnings on loans invested in by Prosper during 2019 was a net loss of $1.2 million. Interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale by the Company during 2019 was $19.0 million.

As of December 31, 2019, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.7 million and a fair value of $0.2 million. PMI places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2019, Loans Held for Sale in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.1 million.

At December 31, 2018, outstanding Loans Held for Sale had original maturities between 36 months and 60 months had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.82% and had various maturity dates through December 2023. Fair value adjustments recorded in earnings on loans invested in by Prosper during 2018 was a net loss of $1.9 million. Interest income earned on Loans Held for Sale by the Company during 2018 was $14.1 million.

As of December 31, 2018, Loans Held for Sale that were 90 days or more delinquent, had an aggregate principal amount of $0.8 million and a fair value of $0.3 million. PMI places loans on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due.

5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities

Prosper accounts for Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in Servicing Fees. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The Servicing Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value throughout the servicing period. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2019 were a gain of $10.9 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $17.6 million recognized in “Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2018 were a gain of $13.1 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $72.3 million recognized in “Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The total gains and losses recognized on the sale of such Borrower Loans for the year ended December 31, 2017 were a gain of $11.4 million recognized in Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans and a loss of $60.1 million recognized in Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

As of December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.1 billion, original terms of either 36 months or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92%, and various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.6 billion, original terms of either 36 months or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52%, and various maturity dates through December 2023.

$38.4 million, $43.1 million and $39.0 million of contractually specified Servicing Fees and ancillary fees are included on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in “Servicing Fees, Net” for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  

Fair Value Valuation Method

Prosper uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounts those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.

Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 8 below are those that Prosper considers significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3 Servicing Assets and liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.   

Market Servicing Rate

Management estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Management estimates market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and on observing bids from sub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan

F-19

attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper sells and services, and from information from backup service providers.

Discount Rate

The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. Management uses a range of discount rates for the Servicing Assets and Liabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper’s Servicing Assets.

Default Rate

The default rate presented in Note 8 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.

Prepayment Rate

The prepayment rate presented in Note 8 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e. risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or Borrower Loan category. Each point on a particular Borrower Loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which PFL expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.

6. Available for Sale Investments, at Fair Value

Available for sale investments are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are reported, net of taxes, in "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss " included in stockholders' equity unless management determines that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.

Prosper did not hold Available for Sale Investments as of the year ended December 31, 2019, nor did Prosper sell any Available for Sale Investments during the year ended December 31, 2019.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of Available for Sale Investments for the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2018
Fixed maturity securities:
Treasury Bills	$	17,940	$	—	$	(3)	$	17,937
US Treasury securities	$	4,246	$	—	$	(10)	$	4,236
	$	22,186	$	—	$	(13)	$	22,173

7. Securitizations

During 2019, Prosper co-sponsored securitizations of unsecured personal whole loans facilitated through our marketplace with outstanding principal balance of $573.0 million through three securitization trusts (PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4). Each securitization trust issued senior notes, a risk retention interest and residual certificates to finance the purchase of Borrower Loans. The risk retention interest represents the right to receive 5.0% of all amounts collected on the Borrower Loans held by the securitization trusts. The resulting senior notes were sold to third party investors. Prosper retained 65.5%, 16.4%, and 19.6% of the residual certificates issued by PMIT 2019-1, PMIT 2019-2, and PMIT 2019-4, respectively. The remaining residual certificates and all the risk retention interests are held by third-party investors. In addition to the retained residual certificates, Prosper's continued involvement includes loan servicing responsibilities over the life of the underlying loans.

F-20

PMIT 2019-1, 2019-2 and 2019-4 are deemed VIEs. Prosper consolidated the VIEs as the primary beneficiary because Prosper, through its role as the servicer, has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the VIEs' economic performance and a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the VIEs through holding the retained residual certificates. In evaluating whether Prosper is the primary beneficiary, management considers both qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size and form of our involvement with the VIEs. Management assesses whether Prosper is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs on an on-going basis. For these VIEs, the creditors have no recourse to the general credit of Prosper and the liabilities of the VIEs can only be settled by the respective VIEs' assets. Additionally, the assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs. Because Prosper consolidates the securitization trusts, the loans held in the securitization trusts are included in “Borrower Loans, at Fair Value”, the notes sold to third party investors recorded in “Notes Issued by Securitization Trust”, and the risk retention interests and residual certificates held by third party investors in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

PMIT 2019-1

The notes under the PMIT 2019-1 securitization were issued in three classes: Class A in the amount of $127.3 million, Class B in the amount of $25.0 million, and Class C in the amount of $19.3 million (collectively, the “2019-1 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.54%, 4.03% and 5.27%, respectively. Principal and interest payments began in March 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $2.3 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $94.2 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $104.2 million as of December 31, 2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $9.8 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.

PMIT 2019-2

The notes under the PMIT 2019-2 securitization were issued in three classes: Class A in the amount of $110.1 million, Class B in the amount of $31.4 million and Class C in the amount of $32.7 million (collectively, the “2019-2 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.20%, 3.69% and 5.05%, respectively. Principal and interest payments began in July 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $1.9 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $122.0 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $138.5 million as of December 31, 2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $21.5 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.

PMIT 2019-4

The notes under the PMIT 2019-4 securitization were issued in three classes: Class A in the amount of $102.6 million, Class B in the amount of $19.5 million and Class C in the amount of $16.8 million (collectively, the “2019-4 Notes”). The Class A, Class B and Class C notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.48%, 3.20% and 4.95% respectively. Principal and interest payments began in December 2019 and are payable monthly. These notes are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The associated debt issuance costs of $1.2 million are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the contractual life of the notes. The notes held by third-party investors and the unamortized debt issuance costs are included in Notes Issued by Securitization Trust with a balance of $131.4 million and are secured by Borrower Loans with a fair value of $146.1 million as of December 31, 2019. The risk retention interest and residual certificates held by third party investors at fair value of $20.8 million are included in “Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, at Fair Value” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.

8. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2019 or 2018.

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

The fair value of the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, servicing rights and loan trailing fee liability are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of

F-21

valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model include default and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates applied to each credit grade based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade.

Investments held at fair value consist of Available for Sale Investments. When available, management uses quoted prices in active markets to measure the fair value of Available for Sale Investments. When utilizing market data and bid-ask spreads, Prosper uses the price within the bid-ask spread that best represents fair value. When quoted prices do not exist, Prosper uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of investment assets. Prosper's primary independent pricing service provides prices based on observable trades and discounted cash flows that incorporate observable information, such as yields for similar types of securities (a benchmark interest rate plus observable spreads) and weighted-average maturity for the same or similar securities. The Company compares the prices obtained from its primary independent pricing service to the prices obtained from the additional independent pricing services to determine if the price obtained from the primary independent pricing service is reasonable. The Company does not adjust the prices received from independent third-party pricing services unless such prices are inconsistent with the definition of fair value and result in a material difference in the recorded amounts.

The Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability is valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Refer to Note 13 for additional information.

The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):

December 31, 2019	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total
Assets:
Borrower Loans	$	—	$	—	$	634,019	$	634,019
Loans Held for Sale	—		—		142,026		142,026
Available for Sale Investments	—		—		—		—
Servicing Assets	—		—		12,602		12,602
	—		—		788,647		788,647
Liabilities:
Notes	$	—	$	—	$	244,171	$	244,171
Servicing Liabilities	—		—		—		—
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust	—		—		52,168		52,168
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability	—		—		149,996		149,996
Loan Trailing Fee Liability	—		—		2,997		2,997
	$	—	$	—	$	449,332	$	449,332

December 31, 2018	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total
Assets:
Borrower Loans	$	—	$	—	$	263,522	$	263,522
Loans Held for Sale	—		—		183,788		183,788
Available for Sale Investments	—		22,173		—		22,173
Servicing Assets	—		—		14,687		14,687
	—		22,173		461,997		484,170
Liabilities:
Notes	$	—	$	—	$	264,003	$	264,003
Servicing Liabilities	—		—		12		12
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability	—		—		143,679		143,679
Loan Trailing Fee Liability	—		—		3,118		3,118
	$	—	$	—	$	410,812	$	410,812

As Prosper’s Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, the Company uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external

F-22

sources. As a result, gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about the range of significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2019:

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes
Discount rate	4.4	%	—	12.2	%	4.7	%	—	13.8	%
Default rate	2.1	%	—	18.6	%	2.0	%	—	15.8	%

	December 31,
	2019
Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Discount rate	4.0	%	—	15.0	%
Default rate	2.0	%	—	17.0	%
Prepayment rate	14.5	%	—	33.0	%

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Servicing Rights
Discount rate	15.0	%	—	25.0	%	15.0	%	—	25.0	%
Default rate	1.7	%	—	18.8	%	1.6	%	—	16.7	%
Prepayment rate	16.5	%	—	28.1	%	15.5	%	—	25.1	%
Market servicing rate (1)			0.625		%				0.625		%
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points and 70.5 basis points respectively.

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Discount rate	15.0	%	—	25.0	%	15.0	%	—	25.0	%
Default rate	1.7	%	—	18.8	%	1.6	%	—	16.7	%
Prepayment rate	16.5	%	—	28.1	%	15.5	%	—	25.1	%

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans.

F-23

Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Assets						Liabilities
	Loans Held for Sale		Borrower Loans		Notes		Total
Fair Value at January 1, 2018	$	49	$	293,005	$	(293,948)	$	(894)
Additions - Purchases, Issuances	2,365,431		177,101		(176,830)		2,365,702
Principal repayments	(43,169)		(171,427)		175,760		(38,836)
Borrower Loans sold to third parties	(2,135,329)		(3,690)		—		(2,139,019)
Other changes	1,422		(202)		441		1,661
Change in fair value	(4,616)		(31,265)		30,574		(5,307)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018	183,788		263,522		(264,003)		183,307
Additions - Purchases, Issuances	2,320,560		561,711		(171,138)		2,711,133
Transfers in (Transfers out)	(178,924)		178,924		—		—
Principal repayments	(68,857)		(313,909)		167,419		(215,347)
Borrower Loans sold to third parties	(2,108,231)		(5,417)		—		(2,113,648)
Other changes	584		33		739		1,356
Change in fair value	(6,894)		(50,845)		22,812		(34,927)
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	142,026	$	634,019	$	(244,171)	$	531,874

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Servicing Assets
Fair Value at January 1, 2018	$	14,711
Additions	13,171
Loss in fair value	(13,195)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018	$	14,687
Additions	11,925
Derecognition	(1,522)
Loss in fair value	(12,488)
Fair Value at Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	12,602

The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Fair Value at December 31, 2018	—
Additions - Purchases, Issuances	72,917
Principal repayments	(13,770)
Borrower Loans sold to third parties	—
Other changes	642
Change in fair value	(7,621)
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	52,168

F-24

The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability
Fair Value at January 1, 2018	$	116,366
Issuance of Stock Warrants	72,316
Change in fair value	(45,003)
Fair Value at December 31, 2018	$	143,679
Issuance of Stock Warrants	17,552
Change in fair value	(11,235)
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	149,996

Loan Trailing Fee

The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and default rates using a discounted cash flow model.

The following table presents additional information about level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

	Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Balance as of January 1, 2018	$	2,595
Issuances	2,524
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee	(2,494)
Change in fair value	493
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	3,118
Issuances	2,254
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee	(2,660)
Change in fair value	285
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	2,997

F-25

Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Assumptions and Input Sensitivity

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale, Notes and Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust that are presented in the table below. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Borrower Loans combined with Loans Held for Sale and for Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):

	Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale			Notes
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:	$	776,045		$	244,171
Weighted-average discount rate	7.00		%	6.43		%
Weighted-average default rate	12.63		%	13.68		%
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in discount rate	$	768,924		$	241,927
200 basis point increase in discount rate	$	761,971		$	239,737
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	783,344		$	246,471
200 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	790,823		$	248,828
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in default rate	$	765,894		$	240,958
200 basis point increase in default rate	$	756,007		$	237,831
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in default rate	$	786,541		$	247,489
200 basis point decrease in default rate	$	797,065		$	250,817

F-26

The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):

	Certificates Issued by Securitization Trust
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:	$	52,168
Weighted-average discount rate	9.59		%
Weighted-average default rate	10.12		%
Weighted-average prepayment rate	21.41		%
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in discount rate	$	51,813
200 basis point increase in discount rate	$	51,466
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	52,533
200 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	52,909
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in default rate	$	48,986
200 basis point increase in default rate	$	45,926
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in default rate	$	55,369
200 basis point decrease in default rate	$	58,613
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in prepayment rate	$	52,085
200 basis point increase in prepayment rate	52,008
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in prepayment rate	$	52,253
200 basis point decrease in prepayment rate	$	52,340

F-27

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Servicing Assets and are presented in the table below. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):

	Servicing Assets
Fair value at December 31, 2019, using the following assumptions:	$	12,602
Market servicing rate	0.625		%
Weighted-average prepayment rate	20.99		%
Weighted-average default rate	12.67		%
Fair value resulting from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%	$	11,825
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%	$	13,387
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate	$	12,348
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate	$	12,868
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate	$	12,377
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate	$	12,840

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.

Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value

The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value (in thousands):

December 31, 2019	Carrying Amount		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Fair Value
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	64,635	$	64,635	$	—	$	—	$	64,635
Restricted Cash	155,773		—		155,773		—		155,773
Accounts Receivable	1,695		—		1,695		—		1,695
	222,103		64,635		157,468		—		222,103
Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	19,937	—		19,937		—		$	19,937
Payable to Investors	101,092		—		101,092		—		101,092
Notes Issued by Securitization Trust	347,662		—		353,028		—		353,028
Warehouse Lines	131,583		—		131,090		—		131,090
	$	600,274	$	—	$	605,147	$	—	$	605,147

F-28

December 31, 2018	Carrying Amount		Level 1 Inputs	Level 2 Inputs	Level 3 Inputs	Fair Value
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	57,945	57,945	—	—	$	57,945
Restricted Cash	149,114		—	149,114	—	149,114
Accounts Receivable	5,119		—	5,119	—	5,119
	212,178		57,945	154,233	—	212,178
Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	19,967	—	19,967	—	$	19,967
Payable to Investors	127,538		—	127,538	—	127,538
Warehouse Lines	162,488		—	162,488	—	162,488
	$	309,993	—	309,993	—	$	309,993

The estimated fair values of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and Payable to Investors approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.

9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net

Goodwill

Prosper’s Goodwill balance of $36.4 million at December 31, 2019 did not change during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company recorded 0 Goodwill impairment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Other Intangible Assets, Net

The following table presents the detail of other Intangible Assets subject to amortization for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value		Remaining Useful Life (In Years)
December 31, 2019
Developed technology	$	3,060	$	(3,060)	$	—	$	—
User base and customer relationships	5,050		(4,330)		720		5.3
Brand name	60		(60)		—		—
	$	8,170	$	(7,450)	$	720

	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value		Remaining Useful Life (In Years)
December 31, 2018
Developed technology	$	3,060	$	(3,060)	$	—	—
User base and customer relationships	5,050		(4,051)		999		6.3
Brand name	60		(60)		—		—
	$	8,170	$	(7,171)	$	999

The Company recorded 0 additional intangibles for the year ended December 31, 2019 or 2018.

The user base and customer relationship Intangible Assets are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a three to ten year period. The technology and brand name Intangible Assets are being amortized on a straight line basis over three to five years and one year, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded 0 intangible asset impairment. For the year ended December 31, 2017, certain Intangible Assets were made available for sale and as a result they were written down to fair value. This resulted in a $6.4 million impairment loss, which is recorded in “Other Expense (Income), Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

F-29

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of purchased Intangible Assets for future periods is as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
2020	$	220
2021	172
2022	136
2023	107
2024	85
	$	720

10. Other Liabilities

Other Liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Loan trailing fee liability	$	2,997	$	3,118
Deferred revenue	241		396
Loan servicing liabilities	—		12
Deferred income tax liability	405		373
Deferred rent	—		3,408
Operating lease liabilities	17,507		—
Restructuring liability	—		2,106
Other	576		1,216
Total Other Liabilities	$	21,726	$	10,629

11. Debt

Prosper Warehouse Trust Agreements

Prosper’s consolidated VIEs, PWIT and PWIIT (together, “Warehouse VIEs”), each entered into an agreement (together, “Warehouse Agreements”) with certain lenders for committed revolving lines of credit (“Warehouse Lines”) during 2019 and 2018. In connection with the Warehouse Agreements, the Warehouse VIEs each entered into a security agreement with a bank as administrative agent and a national banking association as collateral trustee and paying agent. Proceeds under the Warehouse Lines may only be used to purchase certain unsecured consumer loans and related rights and documents from Prosper and to pay fees and expenses related to the Warehouse Lines. Both Warehouse VIEs are consolidated because Prosper is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs. The creditors of the Warehouse Lines have no recourse to the general credit of Prosper. Additionally, the assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs. The loans held in the Warehouse VIEs are included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” and Warehouse Lines are in “Warehouse Lines” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Both Warehouse Agreements contain the same certain covenants including restrictions on each Warehouse VIE's ability to incur indebtedness, pledge assets, merge or consolidate and enter into certain affiliate transactions. Each Warehouse Agreement also requires Prosper to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $25 million, minimum net liquidity of $15 million and a maximum leverage ratio of 5:1. Tangible net worth is defined as the sum of (i) (A) Convertible Preferred Stock, (B) total Stockholders’ Deficit and (C) Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, less the sum of (ii) (A) goodwill and (B) intangible assets. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of cash, cash equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total consolidated indebtedness other than non-recourse securitization indebtedness, non-recourse or limited recourse warehouse indebtedness and borrower dependent notes, to tangible net worth. As of December 31, 2019, Prosper was in compliance with the covenants under each Warehouse Agreement.

PWIT Warehouse Line

On January 19, 2018, through PWIT, Prosper entered into a Warehouse Agreement for a Warehouse Line. Effective June 12, 2018, the Warehouse Agreement was amended. The amendments included increasing the committed line of credit from $100 million to $200 million, extending the term of the PWIT Warehouse Line (including the final maturity date), amending the monthly unused commitment fee and reducing the rate at which the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest.

F-30

Subsequently the Warehouse Agreement was amended on June 20, 2019 to extend the facility, to reduce the interest rate and unused commitment fee and to expand the eligibility criteria for unsecured consumer loans that can be financed through the PWIT Warehouse Line.

Under the amended agreement, proceeds of loans made under the PWIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until the earlier of June 20, 2021 and at the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending June 20, 2023, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.

Under the amended agreement, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.9% and has an advance rate of 89%. Additionally, the PWIT Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee, depending on utilization, of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the PWIT Warehouse Line.

As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had $81.4 million in debt and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $85.7 million included in “Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2019 the undrawn portion available under the Warehouse Line was $119.0 million. Prosper incurred $1.8 million of deferred debt issuance costs, which are included in “Prepaids and Other Assets” and amortized to interest expense over the term of the revolving arrangement.

Prosper purchased a swaption to limit the Company's exposure to increases in LIBOR. The swaptions are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in Prepaids and Other Assets. Any changes in the fair value are recorded in the Change in Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the swaption was not material at December 31, 2019.

PWIIT Warehouse Line

On March 28, 2019, through PWIIT, Prosper entered into a second Warehouse Agreement for a $300 million Warehouse Line with a national banking association different than that of PWIT. Under the PWIIT Warehouse Agreement, proceeds of loans made under the PWIIT Warehouse Line may be borrowed, repaid, and reborrowed until the earlier of March 28, 2021 and at the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default. Repayment of any outstanding proceeds will be made over the 24 month period ending March 28, 2023, excluding the occurrence of any accelerated amortization event or event of default.

Under the agreement, the PWIIT Warehouse Line bears interest at a rate of LIBOR, or the lender's asset-backed commercial paper rate, plus a spread of 2.9%. The spread increases by 0.375% during the first twelve months immediately following the termination of the revolving period with an additional increase of 0.375% one year later. The PWIIT Warehouse Line has an advance rate of 90%. Additionally, the PWIIT Warehouse Line bears a monthly unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the PWIIT Warehouse Line.

As of December 31, 2019, Prosper had $50.2 million in debt and accrued interest outstanding under the PWIIT Warehouse Line. This debt is secured by an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $56.5 million included in Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2019 the undrawn portion available under the PWIIT Warehouse Line was $250.0 million. Prosper incurred $2.1 million of deferred debt issuance costs, which are included in “Prepaids and Other Assets” and amortized to interest expense over the term of the revolving arrangement.

12. Net Loss Per Share

Prosper computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC Topic 260”). Under ASC Topic 260, basic Net Loss Per Share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any potentially dilutive securities.

Proper computes its earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) using the two-class method in ASC Topic 260. The two-class method allocates earnings that otherwise would have been available to common shareholders to holders of participating securities. Management considers all series of our Convertible Preferred Stock to be participating securities due to their rights to participate in dividends with Common Stock. As such, earnings allocated to these participating securities, which include participation rights in undistributed earnings, are subtracted from net income to determine total undistributed earnings to be allocated to common stockholders.

All participating securities are excluded from basic weighted-average common shares outstanding. Prior to any conversion to common shares, each series of Prosper’s Convertible Preferred Stock was entitled to participate on an if-converted basis in distributions of earnings, when and if declared by the board of directors, that were made to common stockholders and consequently, these shares were considered participating securities. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, certain shares issued as a result of the early exercise of stock options which are subject to a repurchase

F-31

right by PMI were entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period and consequently, are considered participating securities.

The weighted average shares used in calculating basic and diluted Net Loss Per Share excludes certain shares that are disclosed as outstanding shares in the Consolidated Balance Sheets because such shares are restricted as they were associated with options that were early exercised and continue to remain unvested.

Basic and diluted Net Loss Per Share was calculated as follows (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Numerator:
Net Loss	$	(13,711)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Plus: Return from shareholders on share repurchase	1,066		—		—
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	(12,645)	$	(39,945)	$	(115,158)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted Net Loss Per Share	70,511,605		70,384,501		69,687,836
Net Loss Per Share - basic and diluted	$(0.18)		$(0.57)		$(1.65)

The following Common Stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted Net Loss Per Share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive (number of shares):

	December 31,
	2019	2018	2017
Excluded Securities
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding	209,613,570	214,637,925	214,637,925
Stock options issued and outstanding	73,851,862	69,023,373	46,722,408
Unvested stock options exercised	—	—	11,565
Warrants issued and outstanding	1,080,349	1,081,630	1,166,145
Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock warrants	35,544,141	35,544,141	35,544,141
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants	177,720,704	177,720,704	177,720,704
	497,810,626	498,007,773	475,802,888

13. Convertible Preferred Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability and Common Stock

Convertible Preferred Stock

Under PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, preferred stock is issuable in series and the Board of Directors is authorized to determine the rights, preferences, and terms of each series.

In January 2013, PMI issued and sold 69,340,760 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.29 per share for $19.8 million, net of issuance costs. In connection with that sale, PMI issued 25,585,910 shares at par value $0.01 per share of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock to the holders of shares of PMI’s Convertible Preferred Stock that was outstanding immediately prior to the sale (“Old Preferred Shares”) in consideration for such stockholders participating in the sale. In connection with the Series A sale, Old Preferred Shares were converted into shares of Common Stock at a ratio of 1:1 if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares participated in the Series A sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the Old Preferred Shares did not so participate. In addition, each such participating holder received a share of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock for every dollar of liquidation preference associated with an Old Preferred Share held by such holder. Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 and converts into Common Stock at a ratio of 1,000,000:1. The Series A and Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In September 2013, PMI issued and sold 41,443,670 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.60 per share for approximately $24.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set

F-32

forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In May 2014, PMI issued and sold 24,404,770 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $2.87 per share for approximately $69.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the Series C private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the tender offer discussed below.

On June 18, 2014, PMI issued a Tender Offer Statement to purchase up to 6,963,785 shares, in the aggregate, of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at a price equal to $2.87 per share. Upon closure of the tender offer on July 16, 2014, 782,540 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 5,667,790 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were purchased for an aggregate price of $18.5 million.

In April 2015, PMI issued and sold 23,888,640 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $6.91 per share for proceeds of approximately $164.8 million, net of issuance costs. The Series D Convertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the Series D private placement was to raise funds for general corporate needs and for the share repurchase discussed below.  

In December 2016, PMI authorized 40,000,000 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. These shares are reserved for the Convertible Preferred Stock warrants that were also issued in December 2016

On December 16, 2016, PMI issued a warrant to purchase 20,267,135 shares of Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock of PMI at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “First Series E-1 Warrant”) to Pinecone Investments LLC (“Pinecone”), an affiliate of Colchis Capital Management, L.P. (“Colchis”).

On February 27, 2017, PMI issued to Pinecone Investments LLC a second warrant (the “Second Series E-1 Warrant,” and together with the First Series E-1 Warrant, the “Series E-1 Warrants”) to purchase 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series E-1 Warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, by paying in cash the full purchase price payable in respect of the number of shares purchased. The Series E-1 Warrants were issued pursuant to the Warrant Agreement dated December 16, 2016 between PMI and Colchis, as previously described in PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 22, 2016.

In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17) entered into with affiliates of the Consortium (as defined in Note 17, such affiliates, “Warrant Holders”) a warrant agreement was signed (the “Series F Warrant Agreement”). Pursuant to the Series F Warrant Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium 3 warrants (together, the “Series F Warrant”) to purchase up to an aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Series F Warrant Shares”).

The Warrant Holders' right to exercise the Series F Warrant was subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium elected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for sale in subsequent periods. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Series F Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in the Warrant Agreement.

The Series F Warrant will be exercisable with respect to vested Series F Warrant Shares, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the tenth anniversary of its date of issuance. The number of shares underlying the Series F Warrant may be adjusted following certain events such as stock splits, dividends, reclassifications and certain other issuances by PMI.

On September 20, 2017, Prosper issued and sold 37,249,497 shares of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $1.34 per share for proceeds of approximately $47.9 million, net of issuance costs. The Series G Convertible Preferred Stock was sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering. The purpose of the Series G private placement was to raise funds for general corporate purposes.

On December 23, 2019, Prosper entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement with an investor to repurchase 7,221,020 shares, in the aggregate, of Series A, Series A-1, and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock for nominal consideration. Upon execution of the Agreement, 2,130,035 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 2,245,600 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, 648,720 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock were repurchased.

F-33

The number of authorized, issued and outstanding shares, their par value and liquidation preference for each series of Convertible Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2019 are disclosed in the table below (amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

	Par Value		Authorized Shares	Issued and Outstanding Shares	Liquidation Preference (Outstanding Shares)
Series A	$	0.01	68,558,220	66,428,185	$	19,160
Series A-1	$	0.01	24,760,915	22,515,315	45,031
Series B	$	0.01	35,775,880	35,127,160	21,190
Series C	$	0.01	24,404,770	24,404,770	70,075
Series D	$	0.01	23,888,640	23,888,640	165,000
Series E-1	$	0.01	35,544,141	—	—
Series E-2	$	0.01	16,858,078	—	—
Series F	$	0.01	177,720,707	3	—
Series G	$	0.01	37,249,497	37,249,497	50,000
			444,760,848	209,613,570	$	370,456

Dividends

Dividends on shares of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, and Series G Convertible Preferred Stock are payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors. NaN dividends will be paid with respect to the Common Stock until any declared dividends on the Convertible Preferred Stock have been paid or set aside for payment to the preferred stockholders. After payment of any such dividends, any additional dividends or distributions will be distributed among all holders of Common Stock and preferred stock in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock that would be held by each such holder if all shares of preferred stock were converted to Common Stock at the then effective conversion rate. The Series A-1 convertible preferred shares have no dividend rights. To date, no dividends have been declared on any of the PMI’s preferred stock or Common Stock.

Conversion

Under the terms of PMI’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the holders of preferred stock have the right to convert such preferred stock into Common Stock at any time. In addition, all preferred stock automatically converts into Common Stock (x) immediately prior to the closing of an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) that values Prosper at least at $2 billion and that results in aggregate proceeds to Prosper of at least $100 million or (y) upon a written request from the holders of at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding preferred stock (on an as-converted basis, provided that: (i) the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock shall not be converted without at least 14% of the voting power of the outstanding Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) the Series D shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series D; (iii) the Series E-1 and Series E-2 shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series E-1 and Series E-2, voting together as a single class; (iv) the Series F shall not be converted without at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Series F, and (v) the shares of Series G Preferred Stock will not be automatically converted unless the holders of at least 60% of the outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock approve such conversion). In addition, if a holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has converted any of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, then all of such holder’s shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock also will be converted upon a liquidation event. In lieu of any fractional shares of Common Stock to which a holder would otherwise be entitled, PMI shall pay such holder cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional shares, as determined by its Board of Directors. At present, each of the Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock converts into PMI Common Stock at a 1:1 ratio. Meanwhile, the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock converts into Common Stock at a 1,000,000:1 ratio and the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock converts into Common Stock at a 1:1.36 ratio. The Series G Convertible Preferred Stock conversion ratio reflects the Series G true-up that occurred at end of the vesting period for the Series E-2 and Series F Preferred Stock warrants.

For the Series G true-up, the conversion price of the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock was reduced to a number equal to the Series G Preferred Stock original issuance price, divided by the quotient obtained by dividing the Series G true-up amount by the total number of Series G Preferred Stock issued as of the Series G closing date. The Series G true-up amount means the aggregate number of shares of Series G Preferred Stock that would have been issued to the purchasers of the Series G Preferred Stock on the Series G closing date, if warrants to purchase shares of Series E-2 Preferred Stock or Series F Preferred Stock that were exercisable or exercised as of the true-up time (end of vesting period) had been exercisable or exercised as of such Series G closing date.

F-34

Liquidation Rights

PMI’s Convertible Preferred Stock has been classified as temporary equity on the consolidated balance sheet. The preferred stock is not redeemable at the option of holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock; however, in the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, change in control or winding up of PMI, holders may have the right to receive its liquidation preference under the terms of PMI’s certificate of incorporation.

Each holder of Series E-1, Series E-2 and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series G and Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock or Common Stock, an amount per share for (i) each share of Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, (ii) each share of Series E-2 Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (iii) each share of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of two-thirds of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.

After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series E-1, Series E-2, and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock each holder of Series A, Series B, Series C and Series D, Series E-2, Series F and Series G Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, on a pari passu basis, prior to and in preference to any distribution of proceeds from a liquidation event to the holders of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock or Common Stock, (i) an amount per share for each share of Series E-2 and Series F Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of one-third of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share, and (ii) an amount per share for each share of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series G Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.

After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F and Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, the holders of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution of proceeds to the holders of Common Stock, an amount per share for each such share of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for such share and all declared but unpaid dividends, if any, on such share.

After the payment or setting aside for payment to the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E-1, Series E-2, Series F, Series G and Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, the entire remaining proceeds legally available for distribution will be distributed pro-rata to the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them assuming the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has been converted into shares of Common Stock at the then effective conversion rate, provided that the maximum aggregate amount per share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock which the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive is three times the original issue price for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

At present, the liquidation preferences are equal to $0.29 per share for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.00 per share for the Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.60 per share for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.87 per share for the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, $6.91 per share for the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series E-2 Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.84 per share for the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock and $1.34 per share for the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock.

Voting

Each holder of shares of Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock into which such shares of Convertible Preferred Stock could be converted and each has voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the Common Stock. The holders of Convertible Preferred Stock and the holders of Common Stock vote together as a single class (except with respect to certain matters that require separate votes or as required by law), and are entitled to notice of any stockholders’ meeting in accordance with the bylaws of PMI. 

Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

Series E-1 Warrants

In connection with the Settlement and Release Agreement dated November 17, 2016 among PMI, PFL and Colchis, on December 16, 2016, PMI issued the First Series E-1 Warrant. A Second Series E-1 Warrant for an additional 15,277,006 shares of Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock was granted on the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as defined in Note 17) on February 27, 2017. The warrants expire ten years from the date of issuance. Prosper recognized $1.1 million and $9.2 million of income from the change in the fair value of the warrants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,

F-35

respectively. The income or expense resulted from changes in the fair value of the warrant is recorded through Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

To determine the fair value of the Series E-1 Warrants, the Company first determined the value of a share of a Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company first derived the business enterprise value (“BEV”) of the Company using a variety of valuation methods, including recent transactions in the Company's stock, discounted cash flow models and market based methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the option pricing method ("OPM") was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of our equity, including our preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series E-1 Convertible Preferred Stock was utilized as an input to the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding convertible Series E-1 preferred stock warrants utilizing the following assumptions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

	December 31,
	2019	2018
Volatility	46.0%	40.0%
Risk-free interest rate	1.60%	2.62%
Expected term (in years)	2.75	3.00
Dividend yield	0%	0%

Volatility: The volatility is derived from historical volatilities of several unrelated publicly listed peer companies over a period approximately equal to the term of the warrant as the Company has limited information on the volatility of its preferred stock since there is currently no trading history. When making the selections of industry peer companies to be used in the volatility calculation, the Company considered the size, operational, and economic similarities to the Company’s principal business operations.

Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect as of December 31, 2019, and for zero coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the term of the warrant. 

Expected Term: The expected term is the period of time for which the warrants are expected to be outstanding.

Dividend Yield: The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy.

Series F Warrants

In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement (as described in Note 17), PMI issued warrants to purchase 177,720,706 of PMI's Series F Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.01 per share. Prosper recognized $10.1 million and $35.8 million of income from the re-measurement of the fair value of the warrants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The income or expense resulting from changes in the fair value of the warrant is recorded through Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

To determine the fair value of the Series F Warrants, we first determined the value of a share of a Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. To determine the fair value of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company first derived the BEV using valuation methods, including a combination of methods, as deemed appropriate under the circumstances applicable at the valuation date. Once the Company determined an estimated BEV, the OPM was used to allocate the BEV to the various classes of Prosper's equity, including our preferred stock. The concluded per share value for the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock warrants utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The Company determined the fair value of the outstanding Series F Warrants utilizing the following assumptions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

	December 31,
	2019	2018
Volatility	46.0%	40.0%
Risk-free interest rate	1.60%	2.63%
Expected term (in years)	2.75	3.00
Dividend yield	0%	0%

F-36

The above assumptions were determined using the same criteria described above for the Series E-1 Warrants.

The combined activity of the Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):

Balance at January 1, 2018	116,366
Warrants vested	72,316
Gain recognized	(45,003)
Balance at January 1, 2019	$	143,679
Warrants Vested	17,552
Gain recognized	(11,235)
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	149,996

Common Stock

PMI, through its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, is the sole issuer of Common Stock and related options, RSUs and warrants. On February 16, 2016, PMI amended and restated its Certificate of Incorporation to, among other things, effect a 5-for-1 forward stock split. On September 20, 2017, PMI further amended its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance. The total number of shares of stock which PMI has the authority to issue is 1,069,760,848, consisting of 625,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 444,760,848 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As described above, the Company repurchased 2,196,665 shares of Common Stock on December 23, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, 69,387,836 shares of Common Stock were issued and 68,451,901 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. As of December 31, 2018, 71,411,145 shares of Common Stock were issued and 70,475,210 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held.  

Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Stock Options

During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, PMI issued 173,356 and 176,011 shares of Common Stock, respectively, upon the exercise of vested options for cash proceeds of $26 thousand and $30 thousand, respectively. 

Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Warrants

For the year ended December 31, 2018, PMI issued 8,200 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of warrants, for $0.02 per share. No such warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2019.

14. Share Based Compensation

PMI grants equity awards primarily through its Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which was approved as amended and restated by its stockholders on December 1, 2010; and its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by its stockholders on April 7, 2015 and subsequently amended by an Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2, which were approved by PMI's stockholders on February 15, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively (as amended, the “2015 Plan” and together with the 2005 Plan, “Stock Plans”). In March 2015, the 2005 Plan expired, except that any awards granted under the 2005 Plan prior to its expiration remain in effect pursuant to their terms. As of December 31, 2019, under the 2015 Plan, options to purchase up to 95,037,086 shares of PMI's Common Stock are reserved and may be granted to employees, directors, and consultants by PMI’s Board of Directors and stockholders to promote the success of Prosper’s business. Options generally vest 25% one year from the vesting commencement date and 1/48th per month thereafter or vest 50% two years from

F-37

the vesting commencement date and 1/48 per month thereafter or vest 1/36th per month from the vesting commencement date. In no event are options exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.

Stock Options

Stock Option Reprice

On May 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s Common Stock. On March 17, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PMI approved a stock option repricing program (together with the 2016 repricing program, the “Repricings”), authorizing PMI’s officers to reprice certain outstanding stock options held by employees and directors that had exercise prices above the current fair market value of PMI’s Common Stock. 

Prosper believes that Repricings encourage the continued service of valued employees and directors and motivate them to perform at high levels, both of which are critical to Prosper’s continued success. Prosper has incurred and expects to incur additional share based compensation charges as a result of the Repricings. The financial statement impact of the above Repricings was $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $1.9 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the unamortized Repricings amount (net of forfeitures) was immaterial and will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 0.3 years.

Stock Option Activity

Stock option activity under the Stock Plans is summarized for the year ended December 31, 2019 as follows:

	Options Issued and Outstanding	Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Contractual Term (in years)	Aggregate intrinsic value(1) (in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2019	71,021,698	$	0.33	8.20
Options granted	14,792,348	$	0.24
Options exercised	(173,356)	$	0.15
Options forfeited	(9,350,233)	$	0.38
Option expirations	(53,700)	$	0.30
Balance as of December 31, 2019	76,236,757	$	0.31	7.41	$	169
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2019	62,647,818	$	0.31	7.41	$	139
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 2019	50,693,384	$	0.28	6.68	$	169

(1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the excess of the fair value of our Common Stock as of December 31, 2019 over the exercise price of the outstanding in-the-money options.

Additional information pertaining to PMI's Common Stock option activities is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Year ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted (per share)	$	0.11	$	0.52	$	0.28

Valuation

The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model for share based compensation expense requires Prosper to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the fair value of PMI’s Common Stock, the expected term (the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of PMI’s Common Stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. Given the absence of a publicly traded market, Prosper considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of PMI’s Common Stock at each grant date. These factors included, but were not limited to: (i) contemporaneous valuations of Common Stock performed by unrelated third-party specialists, (ii) the prices for PMI’s preferred stock sold to outside investors, (iii) the rights, preferences and privileges of PMI’s preferred stock relative to PMI’s

F-38

Common Stock; (iv) the lack of marketability of PMI’s Common Stock, (v) developments in the business, (vi) secondary transactions of PMI’s common and preferred shares, and (vii) the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a merger or acquisition of Prosper, given prevailing market conditions. As PMI’s stock is not publicly traded volatility for stock options is based on an average of the historical volatilities of the Common Stock of several entities with characteristics similar to those of Prosper. The expected term assumptions were determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options using the simplified method. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. Prosper uses an expected dividend yield of zero as it does not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Prosper also estimates forfeitures of unvested stock options. Expected forfeitures are based on Prosper’s historical experience. To the extent actual forfeitures differ from estimates, the difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. NaN compensation cost is recorded for options that do not vest.

The fair value of PMI’s stock option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Volatility of Common Stock	46.70	%	44.04	%	49.24	%
Risk-free interest rate	1.95	%	2.78	%	2.12	%
Expected life	6.0 years		6.0 years		6.0 years
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%	0	%

PMI did not grant any performance-based options in 2019, 2018, or 2017.

Restricted Stock Units

During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, PMI granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees that are subject to three-year vesting terms or four-year vesting terms and the occurrence of a liquidity event. The aggregate fair value of the RSUs PMI granted in 2018 and 2017 was $1.9 million and $3 thousand, respectively. PMI did not grant any RSUs to employees during 2019.

The following table summarizes the activities for PMI’s RSUs during 2019:

	Number of Shares	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2019	4,856,141	$	0.96
Granted	—	$	—
Vested	—	$	—
Forfeited	(53,000)	$	1.90
Unvested at December 31, 2019	4,803,141	$	0.95

Share Based Compensation

The following table presents the amount of share based compensation related to awards granted to employees recognized in Prosper’s Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Origination and Servicing	$	417	$	911	$	996
Sales and Marketing	243		451		553
General and Administrative	3,868		7,039		10,689
	$	4,528	$	8,401	$	12,238

During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Prosper capitalized $310 thousand, $392 thousand and $294 thousand, respectively, of share based compensation as internal use software and website development costs. As of December 31, 2019, the unamortized share based compensation expense adjusted for forfeiture estimates related to Prosper's

F-39

employees’ unvested share based awards was approximately $3.4 million, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 2.2 years.

15. Restructuring

During 2016, Prosper adopted a strategic restructuring of its business. The restructuring was intended to streamline our operations and support future growth efforts. Under this restructuring, Prosper closed its Salt Lake City, Utah and Tel Aviv, Israel locations.

In the year ended December 31, 2019, Prosper's restructuring costs relate to accretion and changes in sublease loss estimates for properties no longer in use. Other than accretion and changes in sublease loss estimates, Prosper does not expect any additional restructuring charges related to this restructuring.

The following table summarizes the activities related to Prosper's restructuring plan (in thousands):

	Facilities Related
Balance as of January 1, 2018	$	3,244
Adjustments to expense	1,486
Sublease cash receipts	370
Less: Cash paid	(3,126)
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	1,974

Upon adoption of Topic 842 Leases on January 1, 2019, the restructuring liability related to the properties no longer in use was transferred to right-of-use (ROU) asset in accordance with ASC 842-10-65-1. The ROU asset will be depreciated over the useful life of the asset in accordance with ASC 842-20-25-7(a).

16. Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted resulting in significant changes to tax law, including a reduction to the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, immediate expensing of certain depreciable assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017 and uncertainties around the tax accounting for debt instrument income under IRC Section 451. The Act did not give rise to any material impact on Prosper's consolidated financial statements.

The components of income tax are as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Current:
Federal	$	—	$	—	$	—
State	—		—		—
Foreign	—		24		—
Total Current Income Tax (Benefit) Expense	—		24		—
Deferred:
Federal	47		47		(579)
State	52		33		37
Foreign	1		68		34
Total Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	100		148		(508)
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	$	100	$	172	$	(508)

F-40

The Income Tax Expense (benefit) differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pretax loss as a result of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Federal tax at statutory rate	21	%	21	%	34	%
State tax at statutory rate (net of federal benefit)	9	%	8	%	7	%
Change in U.S. Tax Rate Applied to Deferred Taxes	—	%	—	%	(31)	%
Incentive Stock Options	(4)	%	(3)	%	(1)	%
Preferred Stock Warrants	8	%	5	%	(21)	%
Change in valuation allowance	(33)	%	(32)	%	11	%
Other	(1)	%	1	%	1	%
	—	%	—	%	—	%

Temporary items that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	87,834	$	82,510
Research & other credits	602		668
Fixed assets	42		463
Stock compensation	10,261		9,237
Accrued liabilities	1,858		3,256
Restructuring liability	—		615
Other	—		4
Lease Obligation	5,182		—
Deferred tax assets	105,779		96,753
Fair value of loans	—		(248)
Net servicing rights	(2,843)		(3,375)
Intangible assets	(1,067)		(721)
Foreign Earnings	(69)		(68)
Right of Use Asset	(3,816)		—
Deferred tax liabilities	(7,795)		(4,412)
Net deferred tax asset	97,984		92,341
Valuation allowance	(98,458)		(92,714)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(474)	$	(373)

Prosper has determined that its net deferred tax asset did not satisfy the recognition criteria set forth in ASC Topic 740 and, accordingly, established a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2019, increased by $5.8 million to $98.5 million from $92.7 million in the prior fiscal year. Under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740”), a valuation allowance must be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The amount of valuation allowance would be based upon management’s best estimate of Prosper’s ability to realize the net deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance can subsequently be reduced when management believes that the assets are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.

The Internal Revenue Code imposes substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an “ownership change” of a corporation. Accordingly, Prosper’s ability to utilize net operating losses and credit carryforwards may be limited in the future as the result of such an “ownership change.”

Prosper files federal and various state income tax returns. Prosper has net operating loss carryforwards for both federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $326.6 million and $360.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019, available to reduce future income subject to income taxes. The federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2026. The state net operating loss carryforwards began expiring in 2019. All net operating loss carryforwards are subject to a full valuation allowance. Prosper has federal and California research and development tax credits of approximately $428.5 thousand and $449.5 thousand, respectively. The federal research credits will begin to expire in 2034 and the California

F-41

research credits have no expiration date. Prosper also has California enterprise zone credits of $1.1 million that will begin to expire in 2024.

The following table summarizes Prosper’s activity related to its unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):

Balance as of January 1, 2018	$	112
Decrease related to 2018 tax year position	—
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	112
Decrease related to 2019 tax year position tax year position	—
Balance as of December 31, 2019	$	112

NaN of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect Prosper’s effective tax rate if these amounts are recognized due to the full valuation allowance. 

Prosper’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of Income Tax Expense. As of December 31, 2019, Prosper has 0t incurred any interest or penalties.

All tax returns will remain open for examination by federal and most state taxing authorities for three and four years, respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards or research and development credits.

17. Consortium Purchase Agreement

On February 27, 2017, Prosper entered into a series of agreements (the “Consortium Purchase Agreement”) with a consortium of investors (the “Consortium”), pursuant to which the Consortium agreed to purchase Borrower Loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $5.0 billion (including certain loans purchased by one of the investors prior to the date of the Consortium Purchase Agreement). PFL was obligated to offer for purchase minimum monthly volumes of eligible loans to the Consortium, for the Consortium to elect to purchase. The Consortium Purchase Agreement ended in May 2019.

In connection with the Consortium Purchase Agreement, PMI issued to the Consortium 3 warrant certificates to purchase an aggregate 177,720,706 shares of PMI’s Series F Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share (the “Warrant Shares”).

The Consortium’s right to exercise the Series F Warrant was subject to monthly vesting during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement based upon the volume of loans the Consortium elected to purchase (if any) in each month, subject to certain cure rights such as offering additional loans for sale in subsequent periods. Pursuant to these cure rights, if the Consortium failed to respond to offers for allocation, purchase or funding, the Consortium could take advantage of a designated period of time to cure such failure. There were no such failures by the Consortium during the term of the Consortium Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Series F Warrant Agreement, the Warrant Shares may also vest in full upon a change of control of PMI, insolvency of PMI or PFL, certain breaches of contract by PMI or PFL that are not cured within a defined cure period and upon the occurrence of certain other events set forth in the Series F Warrant Agreement.

On vesting of the Series F Warrants, Prosper recorded a liability as Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and a corresponding amount as Fair Value of Warrants Vested on Sale of Borrower Loans on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the vested warrants are recorded in Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, in connection with the execution of the Consortium Purchase Agreement, certain previously issued rebates were settled by an issuance of vested Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants. The difference in fair value of these warrants over the cash settlement price was recorded in Change in Fair Value of Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following represents the loans purchased and warrants vested under the Consortium Purchase Agreement (dollars in thousands):

	Loans Acquired		Warrants Vested
Balance January 1, 2018	$	1,826,527	75,186,002
Loans purchased by the consortium during the year ended December 31, 2018	1,240,805		79,726,978
Balance as of December 31, 2018	3,067,332		154,912,980
Loans purchased by the consortium during the year ended December 31, 2019	235,951		22,807,726
Balance December 31, 2019	$	3,303,283	177,720,706

F-42

The aggregate warrants vested balance of 177,720,706 in the table above includes vested warrants issued to settle certain rebates on $0.3 billion of whole loan purchases by members of the Consortium prior to the signing of the Consortium Purchase Agreement in February 2017. As such, aggregate loan purchases by the Consortium under the Consortium Purchase Agreement including the $0.3 billion of whole loan purchases were $3.6 billion.

18. Leases

Prosper has operating leases for corporate offices and datacenters. Our leases have remaining lease terms of 3 months to 7 years. Some of the lease agreements include options to extend the lease term for up to an additional 5 years. Rental expense under operating lease arrangements was $4.5 million, $4.2 million and $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Additionally, Prosper subleases certain leased office space to third parties when it determines there is excess leased capacity. Sublease revenue from operating lease arrangements was $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Operating Lease Right-of-Use (“ROU”) Assets

The following represents the operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets as of December 31, 2019, which are included in "Property and Equipment, Net" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	December 31, 2019
	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
ROU assets - office buildings	$	15,921	$	3,262	$	12,659
ROU assets - other	292		232		60
	$	16,213	$	3,494	$	12,719

Lease Liabilities

Prosper has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases for certain offices with contractual lease periods expiring between 2020 and 2026.

The table below presents the present value of Prosper's future minimum rental payments for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):

	December 31, 2019
2020	$	5,236
2021	5,130
2022	5,014
2023	1,562
2024	871
Thereafter	1,820
Total future minimum lease payments	19,633
Less: Imputed interest	(2,126)
Present value of future minimum lease payments	$	17,507

The table below presents future minimum rental payments at December 31, 2018, net of minimum sublease rentals of $5.3 million, for the remaining terms of the operating leases (in thousands):

F-43

	December 31, 2018
2019	$	4,536
2020	4,683
2021	4,456
2022	4,319
2023	847
Thereafter	387
Total future operating lease obligations	$	19,228

Because the rate implicit in each lease is not readily determinable, we use our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments. Values used to determine present value of leases is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	December 31, 2019
Cash paid for operating leases year-to-date	$	5,228
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations (1)	$	21,706
Weighted average remaining lease term	4.16 years
Weighted average discount rate	5.54		%
(1) Consists of $21.7 million for operating leases existing on January 1, 2019.

19. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of its operations, Prosper becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. Prosper does not believe it is probable that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on Prosper's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Operating Commitments

Prosper has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made under WebBank's bank charter. On February 1, 2019, Prosper and WebBank extended the terms of their Agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143.5 thousand, Prosper is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.1 million for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.

Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2019, Prosper was in compliance with the covenant.

Loan Purchase Commitments

Under the terms of Prosper's agreement with WebBank, Prosper is committed to purchase $18.6 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2019.

Repurchase Obligation

Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or

F-44

verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under the repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channels, which at December 31, 2019 is $3.1 billion. Prosper has accrued $0.4 million and $0.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to this obligation.      

Regulatory Contingencies

Prosper accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper can estimate a range of outcomes, an amount is recorded which management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then the low end of the range of the potential losses is recorded.

Securities Law Compliance

In 2017, Prosper paid the fourth and final annual installment of $3.0 million in a settlement of a class action lawsuit that was agreed to in 2013.

SEC Inquiry

In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.

West Virginia Matter

In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that, without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

20. Related Parties

Since Prosper’s inception, it has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of its voting securities, and with immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders. Prosper believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

F-45

Prosper’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes. The aggregate amount of the Notes purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of Prosper as of are summarized below (in thousands):

	Aggregate Purchases						Interest Earned
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Executive officers and management	$	23	$	29	$	5	$	2
Directors	464		421		56		45
	$	487	$	450	$	61	$	47

The balance of Notes held by officers, directors who are not executive officers and certain affiliates are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Executive officers and management	$	35	$	32
Directors	682		569
	$	717	$	601

21. Postretirement Benefit Plans

Prosper has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Prosper’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Prosper contributed $2.3 million, $2.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the 401(k) plan.

22. Significant Concentrations  

Prosper is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers, and investment funds to provide the funds to allow WebBank to originate Borrower Loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2019, the largest party purchased a total of 9.4% of those loans. This compares to 43.7% for the largest party for the year ended December 31, 2018. Further, a significant portion of our business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel, for which 94% and 94% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

Prosper receives all of its transaction fee revenue from WebBank. Prosper earns a transaction fee from WebBank for our services in facilitating originations of Borrower Loans issued by WebBank. The rate of the transaction fee for each individual Borrower Loan is based on the term and credit grade of the Borrower Loan. No individual borrower or investor accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue for any of the periods presented.    

23. Segments

Our chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has a single reporting and operating segment.

24. Subsequent Events

        The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.

F-46

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Prosper Funding LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosper Funding LLC and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, member’s equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Emphasis of a Matter

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company earns significant amounts of revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Francisco, CA

March 20, 2020

We have served as the Company's Auditor since 2014

F-47

Prosper Funding LLC

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	7,462	$	11,163
Restricted Cash	110,399		136,018
Borrower Loans, at Fair Value	245,137		263,522
Property and Equipment, Net	7,549		6,426
Servicing Assets	14,888		15,550
Other Assets	749		323
Total Assets	$	386,184	$	433,002
Liabilities and Member's Equity
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	2,133	$	4,690
Payable to Related Party	2,679		1,283
Payable to Investors	105,287		127,253
Notes, at Fair Value	244,171		264,003
Other Liabilities	3,727		4,528
Total Liabilities	357,997		401,757
Member's Equity
Member's Equity	15,904		24,904
Retained Earnings	12,283		6,341
Total Member's Equity	28,187		31,245
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity	$	386,184	$	433,002

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-48

Prosper Funding LLC

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Revenues
Operating Revenues
Administration Fee Revenue – Related Party	$	49,818	$	105,709	$	101,500
Servicing Fees, Net	26,368		27,943		25,963
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans	(5,058)		(58,027)		(48,691)
Other Revenues	155		270		170
Total Operating Revenues	71,283		75,895		78,942
Interest Income on Borrower Loans	41,146		43,569		47,208
Interest Expense on Notes	(38,492)		(40,656)		(43,954)
Net Interest Income	2,654		2,913		3,254
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net	(375)		(701)		(514)
Total Net Revenues	73,562		78,107		81,682
Expenses
Administration Fee – Related Party	62,575		70,491		70,359
Servicing	5,012		6,140		6,103
General and Administrative	33		597		379
Total Expenses	67,620		77,228		76,841
Net Income	$	5,942	$	879	$	4,841

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-49

Prosper Funding LLC

Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity

(in thousands)

	Member’s Equity		Retained Earnings		Total
Balance January 1, 2017	$	30,704	$	621	$	31,325
Distributions to Parent	(5,800)		—		(5,800)
Net Income	—		4,841		4,841
Balance December 31, 2017	24,904		5,462		30,366
Distributions to Parent	—		—		—
Net Income	—		879		879
Balance December 31, 2018	24,904		6,341		31,245
Distributions to Parent	(9,000)		—		(9,000)
Net Income	—		5,942		5,942
Balance December 31, 2019	$	15,904	$	12,283	$	28,187

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-50

Prosper Funding LLC

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	5,942	$	879	$	4,841
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net	374		701		514
Other Non-Cash Changes in Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes	(694)		(239)		86
Gain on Sale of Borrower Loans	(13,033)		(14,315)		(14,138)
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights	13,682		13,316		11,862
Depreciation and Amortization	4,397		5,664		5,853
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Purchase of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value	(2,320,560)		(2,365,431)		(2,619,130)
Proceeds from Sales and Principal Payments of Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value	2,320,560		2,365,470		2,619,709
Other Assets	(426)		(198)		61
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	(2,557)		3,945		(1,478)
Payable to Investors	(21,966)		(4,859)		(9,513)
Net Related Party Receivable/Payable	2,251		(2,482)		2,371
Other Liabilities	(789)		590		2,247
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities	(12,819)		3,041		3,285
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchase of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value	(170,326)		(177,101)		(194,887)
Principal Payment of Borrower Loans, at Fair Value	165,481		175,117		192,054
Maturities of Short Term Investments	—		—		1,280
Purchases of Property and Equipment	(6,374)		(3,261)		(5,092)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(11,219)		(5,245)		(6,645)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes, at Fair Value	171,138		176,830		194,391
Payments of Notes, at Fair Value	(167,420)		(175,760)		(191,828)
Cash Distributions to Parent	(9,000)		—		(5,800)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities	(5,282)		1,070		(3,237)
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents	(29,320)		(1,134)		(6,597)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of the Period	147,181		148,315		154,912
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of the Period	$	117,861	$	147,181	$	148,315
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash Paid for Interest	$	39,229	$	41,098	$	43,776
Non-Cash Investing Activity- Accrual for Property and Equipment, Net	246		1,101		225
Reconciliation to Amounts on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	7,462	$	11,163	$	8,223
Restricted Cash	110,399		136,018		140,092
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	$	117,861	$	147,181	$	148,315

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-51

Prosper Funding LLC

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Business

Prosper Funding LLC was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) as its sole equity member. Except as the context otherwise requires, as used in these Notes to consolidated financial statements of Prosper Funding LLC, “PFL”, ”Prosper Funding” and the “Company” refer to Prosper Funding LLC and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Prosper Asset Holdings LLC (“PAH”), a Delaware limited liability company, and Prosper Depositor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on a consolidated basis.

Prosper Funding did not have any items of other comprehensive income (loss) during any of the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes through the marketplace. Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly. Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct entity from PMI.

Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the marketplace are issued, sold and serviced by Prosper Funding. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the marketplace, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of Borrower Loan applications by potential borrowers, the origination of related Borrower Loans by WebBank and the funding of such Borrower Loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. As a result Prosper Funding earns significant revenues and incurs significant expenses with a related party, its direct parent company, PMI.

A borrower who wishes to obtain a loan through the marketplace must post a loan listing on the marketplace. Prosper Funding allocates listings to one of two investor funding channels: (i) the “Note Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase Notes from Prosper Funding, the payments of which are dependent on Prosper Funding’s receipt of payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan; and (ii) the “Whole Loan Channel,” which allows investors to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper Funding.

All loans requested and obtained through the marketplace are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of December 31, 2019. All loans made through the marketplace are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.

Prosper Funding’s marketplace is designed to allow investors to invest in Borrower Loans in a transparent marketplace, with the aim of allowing both investors and borrowers to benefit financially as well as socially. Prosper Funding believes marketplace lending represents a new model of consumer lending, where individuals and institutions can earn the interest spread of a traditional consumer lender but must also assume the credit risk of a traditional consumer lender.

As of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to investors in 30 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019, Prosper Funding’s marketplace was open to borrowers in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Currently, the marketplace does not operate internationally.

F-52

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Prosper Funding and its wholly-owned subsidiary PAH. All intercompany balances and transactions between Prosper Funding and PAH have been eliminated in consolidation. Prosper Funding’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of Prosper Funding’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following: valuation of Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans and associated Notes, valuation of servicing rights, valuation of loan trailing fee liability, repurchase obligations, and contingent liabilities. Prosper Funding bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from estimates.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

A variable interest entity (VIE) is a legal entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Prosper’s variable interest arises from contractual, ownership or other monetary interests in the entity, which change with fluctuations in the fair value of the entity’s net assets. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Prosper consolidates a VIE when it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Prosper assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Prosper accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the transferred assets. Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when the transferred assets have been legally isolated from Prosper, the transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets without any significant constraints, and Prosper has not entered into a repurchase agreement, does not hold unconditional call options and has not written put options on the transferred assets. In assessing whether control has been surrendered, Prosper considers whether the transferee would be a consolidated affiliate and the impact of all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of the transfer, even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer. Prosper measures gain or loss on sale of financial assets as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and recourse obligations.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Prosper uses fair value measurements in its fair value disclosures and to record Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Servicing Assets, Notes, and Loan Trailing Fee Liability at fair value on a recurring basis.

The fair value hierarchy includes a three-level classification, which is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable:

Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs.

When developing fair value measurements, Prosper maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. However, for certain instruments Prosper must utilize unobservable inputs in determining fair value due to

F-53

the lack of observable inputs in the market, which requires greater judgment in measuring fair value. In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets, or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper believes the Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, Notes, and Servicing Assets should be considered level 3 financial instruments. Prosper primarily uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate their fair value and key assumptions used in valuation include default rates and prepayment rates derived from historical performance and discount rates based on estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of our servicing fee which is generally 1.0% of the outstanding balance. The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to investors that are dependent upon borrower payments. As such, the fair value of a series of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, adjusted for the 1.0% servicing fee and the timing of loan purchase, Note issuance and borrower payments subsequently disbursed to such Note holders. As a result, the valuation of the Notes uses the same methodology and assumptions as the Borrower Loans, except that the Notes incorporate the 1.0% servicing fee and any differences in timing in payments. Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations. The effective interest rate associated with a group of Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding Borrower Loan due to the 1.0% servicing fee.

Refer to Note 7 for additional fair value disclosures.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. agency securities. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

Restricted Cash

Restricted Cash consists primarily of cash deposits and short term certificates of deposit accounts for loan funding and servicing activities, and cash that investors or Prosper Funding has on the marketplace that has not yet been invested in Borrower Loans or disbursed to the investor.

Short Term Investments

Short term investments consists of certificates of deposit with a term greater than three months but less than a year that are held as collateral as required for loan funding and servicing activities.

Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes

Through the Note Channel, Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank then issues notes, and holds the Borrower Loans as a receivable until maturity. The obligation to repay a series of notes issued through the Note Channel is dependent upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans. Borrower loans funded and notes issued through the Note Channel are carried on Prosper Funding’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively. 

Prosper Funding places Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale on non-accrual status when they are 120 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, Prosper stops accruing interest and reverses all accrued but unpaid interest as of such date. Additionally, Prosper charges-off Borrower Loans and Loans Held for Sale when they are 120 days past due. The fair value of loans 120 days past due generally consists of the expected recovery from debt sales in subsequent periods.

Management has elected the fair value option for Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale, and Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans are largely offset by the changes in fair value of Notes due to the borrower payment-dependent design of the Notes. Changes in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes are included in “Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes, Net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies. The key assumptions used in valuation include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.  

F-54

Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities

Prosper Funding records Servicing Assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values for servicing rights retained when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers. The change in fair value of Servicing Assets and liabilities is recognized in revenue as Servicing Fees, Net. The gain or loss on a loan sale is recorded in Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans while the fair value of the servicing rights, which is based on the degree to which the contractual loan servicing fee is above or below an estimated market loan servicing rate, is recorded in Servicing Assets or Liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are recorded in Servicing Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loan Servicing Assets or Liabilities which considers the contractual projected servicing fee revenue that Prosper Funding earns on the Borrower Loans, estimated market Servicing Fees to service such loans, prepayment rates, default rates and the current principal balances of the Borrower Loans.  

Software and Website Development

Software and website development represents the software and website development costs that PMI transferred to Prosper Funding. Prosper Funding does not develop any of its own software or its website. Software and website development re included in Property and Equipment, Net and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives which is generally one to five years. Prosper Funding evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of software and website development assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such software and website development assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software and website development assets.

Payable to Investors

Payable to Investors primarily represents the Company's obligation to investors related to cash held in an account for the benefit of investors and payments-in-process received from borrowers.

Loan Trailing Fee Liability

On July 1, 2016, Prosper signed a series of agreements with WebBank which, among other things, includes an additional program fee (the “Loan Trailing Fee”) paid to WebBank in connection with the performance of each loan sold to Prosper. These agreements were effective as of August 1, 2016. The Loan Trailing Fee is dependent on the amount and timing of principal and interest payments made by borrowers of the underlying loans, irrespective of whether the loans are sold by Prosper, and gives WebBank an ongoing financial interest in the performance of the loans it originates. This fee is paid by Prosper to WebBank over the term of the respective loans and is a function of the principal and interest payments made by borrowers of such loans. In the event that principal and interest payments are not made with respect to any loan, Prosper is not required to make the related Loan Trailing Fee payment. The obligation to pay the Loan Trailing Fee for any loan sold to Prosper is recorded at fair value at the time of the origination of such loan within Other Liabilities and recorded as a reduction of “Transaction Fees, net”. Any changes in the fair value of this liability are recorded in “Servicing Fees, Net” on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Loan Trailing Fee represents the present value of the expected monthly Loan Trailing Fee payments, which takes into consideration certain assumptions related to expected prepayment rates and defaults rates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue primarily results from fees, net interest earned and gains on the sale of Borrower Loans. Fees consist of related party administrative fees and Servicing Fees paid by investors. The Company also has other smaller sources of revenue reported as Other Revenues including fees charged in relation to securitizations by outside investors.

Administration Agreement License Fees

Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI. The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and Note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding. The license fees are based on the number of listings that are posted to the platform.

F-55

Service Fees

Investors who purchase Borrower Loans from Prosper through the Whole Loan Channel typically pay Prosper a servicing fee which is currently set at 1.075% per annum of the outstanding principal balance of the Borrower Loan prior to applying the current payment. The servicing fee compensates Prosper for the costs incurred in servicing the Borrower Loan, including managing payments from borrowers, managing payments to investors and maintaining investors’ account portfolios. Prosper records Servicing Fees from investors as a component of operating revenue when received.

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Borrower Loans

PFL recognizes gains or losses on the sale of Borrower Loans when it sells Borrower Loans to third parties. PFL measures gain or loss on sale of Borrower Loans as the net proceeds received on the sale less the carrying amount of the Borrower Loans sold. The net proceeds of the sale represent the fair value of any assets obtained or liabilities incurred as part of the transaction, including, but not limited to Servicing Assets, retained securities, and repurchase obligations.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes

Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel and interest expense on the corresponding Notes using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.

Administration Fee Expense - Related Party

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the marketplace on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly each month, Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI an administration fee that is based on PMI’s (a) finance and legal personnel costs, (b) number of Borrower Loans originated through the Marketplace, (c) Servicing Fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and (d) nonsufficient funds fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding. In addition, under a second Administration Agreement between PMI and PAH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prosper Funding, PAH is required to pay PMI an annual fee for PMI being the administrator of PAH’s operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Adopted in the Current Period

No accounting standards were adopted in the current period for Prosper Funding LLC.

Accounting Standards Issued, to be Adopted in Future Periods

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, but entities are permitted to early adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. The guidance only affects disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and will not affect Prosper’s Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations.

3. Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Internal-use software and web site development costs	$	24,930	$	22,505
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(17,381)		(16,079)
	$	7,549	$	6,426

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $4.4 million, $5.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively. Internal-use software and web site development additions of $5.5 million, $4.1 million and $3.7 million were purchased from PMI in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.  

F-56

4. Borrower Loans and Notes, at Fair Value

The fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes issued through the Note Channel is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any series of Notes is equal to the payments, if any, received on the corresponding borrower loan, net of the servicing fee. As such, the fair value of Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of Borrower Loans originated through the Note Channel, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the note holders. The effective interest rate associated with a series of notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the corresponding borrower loan due to the servicing fee.

Borrower Loans

The fair values of Borrower Loans were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding	$	248,702	$	269,093
Fair value adjustments	(3,565)		(5,571)
	$	245,137	$	263,522

At December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans had original maturities of either 36 or 60 months, had monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and had various maturity dates through December 2023.

Within the change in fair value of Borrower Loans, Prosper Funding recorded a loss of approximately $2.9 million and $0.8 million that is attributable to changes in the credit risks related to Borrower Loans during the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

As of December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.6 million and a fair value of $0.8 million. As of December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were 90 days or more delinquent had an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 million and a fair value of $1.1 million. Prosper Funding places loans on non-accrual status when they are over 120 days past due. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Borrower Loans in non-accrual status had a fair value of $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Notes

The fair values of Notes were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Aggregate principal balance outstanding	$	250,281	$	272,430
Fair value adjustments	(6,110)		(8,427)
	$	244,171	$	264,003

5. Loan Servicing Assets and Liabilities

Prosper Funding accounts for Servicing Assets and Liabilities at their estimated fair values with changes in fair values recorded in Servicing Fees, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The initial asset or liability is recognized when Prosper Funding sells Borrower Loans to unrelated third-party buyers through the Whole Loan Channel and the servicing rights are retained. The total recognized gains and losses on the sale of such Borrower Loans were a $5.1 million loss, a $58.0 million loss and a $48.7 million loss for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

At December 31, 2019, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed

F-57

interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 31.92% and various maturity dates through December 2024. At December 31, 2018, Borrower Loans that were sold, but for which Prosper Funding retained servicing rights, had a total outstanding principal balance of $3.7 billion, original terms of either 36 or 60 months, monthly payments with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.31% to 35.52% and various maturity dates through December 2023.

$43.4 million, $44.0 million and $38.5 million of contractually specified Servicing Fees, late charges and ancillary fees are included in our Statement of Operations in Servicing Fees, Net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Fair Value Valuation Method

Prosper Funding uses a discounted cash flow valuation methodology generally consisting of developing an estimate of future cash flows that are expected to occur over the life of a financial instrument and then discounting those cash flows at a rate of return that results in the fair value amount.

Significant unobservable inputs presented in the table within Note 7 are those that Prosper Funding considers significant to the estimated fair values of the Level 3 Servicing Assets and Liabilities. The following is a description of the significant unobservable inputs provided in the table.  

Market Servicing Rate

Prosper Funding estimates adequate market servicing rates that would fairly compensate a substitute servicer should one be required, which includes the profit that would be demanded in the marketplace. This rate is stated as a fixed percentage of outstanding principal balance on a per annum basis. Prosper Funding estimates these market servicing rates based on observable market rates for other loan types in the industry and bids from sub-servicing providers, adjusted for the unique loan attributes that are present in the specific loans that Prosper Funding sells and services and information from a backup service providers.

Discount Rate

The discount rate is a rate of return used to discount future expected cash flows to arrive at a present value, which represents the fair value of the loan servicing rights. Management used a range of discount rates for the Servicing Assets and liabilities based on comparable observed valuations of similar assets and publicly available disclosures related to servicing valuations, with comparability adjustments made to account for differences with Prosper Funding’s Servicing Assets.

Default Rate

The default rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all Borrower Loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional default rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to default per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. The assumption regarding defaults directly reduces servicing revenues because the amount of servicing revenues received is based on the amount collected each period.

Prepayment Rate

The prepayment rate presented in Note 7 is an annualized, average estimate considering all borrower loan categories (i.e., risk ratings and duration), and represents an aggregate of conditional prepayment rate curves for each credit grade or borrower loan category. Each point on a particular borrower loan category’s curve represents the percentage of principal expected to prepay per period based on the term and age of the underlying Borrower Loans. Prepayments reduce servicing revenues as they shorten the period over which Prosper Funding expects to collect fees on the Borrower Loans, which is used to project future servicing revenues.

6. Income Taxes

Prosper Funding incurred 0 income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Prosper Funding is a U.S. disregarded entity and its income and loss are included in the income tax reporting of its parent, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Since Prosper Marketplace, Inc. is in a loss position, is not currently subject to income taxes, and has fully reserved against its deferred tax asset, the net effective tax rate for Prosper Funding is 0%.

F-58

7. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Prosper Funding has elected to record certain financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet. Prosper Funding classifies Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Sale and Notes as financial instruments and assesses their fair value each on a quarterly basis for financial statement presentation purposes. Gains and losses on these financial instruments are shown separately on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the discounted cash flow methodology used to estimate the Note fair values used the same projected cash flows as the related Borrower Loans. As demonstrated in the following table, the fair value adjustments for Borrower Loans were largely offset by the fair value adjustments of the Notes due to the borrower payment dependent design of the Notes and because the principal balances of the Borrower Loans approximated the principal balances of the Notes.

For a description of the fair value hierarchy and Prosper Funding’s fair value methodologies, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Prosper Funding did not transfer any assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

The fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The primary cash flow assumptions used to value such Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates derived from historical performance and discount rates that reflect estimates of the rates of return that investors would require when investing in financial instruments with similar characteristics.

The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):

December 31, 2019	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Fair Value
Assets
Borrower Loans	$	—	$	—	$	245,137	$	245,137
Servicing Assets	—		—		14,888		14,888
	—		—		260,025		260,025
Liabilities
Notes	$	—	$	—	$	244,171	$	244,171
Servicing Liabilities	—		—		—		—
Loan Trailing Fee Liability	—		—		2,997		2,997
	$	—	$	—	$	247,168	$	247,168

December 31, 2018	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Fair Value
Assets
Borrower Loans	$	—	$	—	$	263,522	$	263,522
Servicing Assets	—		—		15,550		15,550
	—		—		279,072		279,072
Liabilities
Notes	$	—	$	—	$	264,003	$	264,003
Servicing Liabilities	—		—		12		12
Loan Trailing Fee Liability	—		—		3,118		3,118
	$	—	$	—	$	267,133	$	267,133

As Prosper Funding’s Borrower Loans, Notes and loan servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices, Prosper Funding uses significant unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of these assets and liabilities. Financial instruments are categorized in the Level 3 valuation hierarchy based on the significance of unobservable factors in the overall fair value measurement. These fair value estimates may also include observable, actively quoted components derived from external sources. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

F-59

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about the range of significant unobservable inputs used for Prosper Funding’s Level 3 fair value measurements:

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Borrower Loans and Notes
Discount rate	4.4	%	—	12.1	%	4.7	%	—	13.8	%
Default rate	2.4	%	—	17.7	%	2.0	%	—	15.8	%

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Servicing Assets
Discount rate	15.0	%	—	25.0	%	15.0	%	—	25.0	%
Default rate	1.7	%	—	18.8	%	1.6	%	—	16.7	%
Prepayment rate	16.5	%	—	28.1	%	15.5	%	—	25.1	%
Market servicing rate (1)			0.625		%				0.625		%
(1) Excludes collection fees that would be passed on to a hypothetical third-party servicer. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the market rate for collection fees and non-sufficient fund fees was assumed to be 6 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively, for a weighted-average total market servicing rate of 68.5 basis points and 70.5 basis points respectively.

	December 31,
	2019								2018
Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Discount rate	15.0	%	—	25.0	%	15.0	%	—	25.0	%
Default rate	1.7	%	—	18.8	%	1.6	%	—	16.7	%
Prepayment rate	16.5	%	—	28.1	%	15.5	%	—	25.1��	%

F-60

Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Assets and Liabilities on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Loans Held for Sale, Borrower Loans, and Notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Assets						Liabilities
	Loans Held for Sale		Borrower Loans		Notes		Total
Fair value at January 1, 2018	$	49	$	293,005	$	(293,948)	$	(894)
Originations	2,365,431		177,101		(176,830)		2,365,702
Principal repayments	(20)		(171,427)		175,760		4,313
Borrower Loans sold to third parties	(2,365,450)		(3,690)		—		(2,369,140)
Other changes	—		(202)		441		239
Change in fair value	(10)		(31,265)		30,574		(701)
Fair value at December 31, 2018	$	—	$	263,522	(264,003)		$	(481)
Originations	2,320,560		170,326		(171,138)		2,319,748
Principal repayments	—		(162,082)		167,420		5,338
Borrower Loans sold to third parties	(2,320,560)		(3,399)		—		(2,323,959)
Other changes	—		(45)		739		694
Change in fair value	—		(23,185)		22,811		(374)
Fair value at December 31, 2019	$	—	$	245,137	$	(244,171)	$	966

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 Servicing Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands): 

	Servicing Assets
Fair value at January 1, 2018	$	14,598
Additions	14,315
Loss in fair value	(13,363)
Fair value at December 31, 2018	$	15,550
Additions	13,032
Loss in fair value	(13,694)
Fair value at December 31, 2019	$	14,888

The following tables present additional information about Level 3 Loan Trailing Fee Liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

	Loan Trailing Fee Liability
Fair Value at January 1, 2018	$	2,595
Issuances	2,524
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee	(2,494)
Loss in fair value	493
Fair Value at December 31, 2018	$	3,118
Issuances	2,254
Cash payment of Loan Trailing Fee	(2,660)
Loss in fair value	285
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	2,997

Significant Recurring Level 3 Fair Value Asset and Liability Input Sensitivity

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Borrower Loans and Notes funded through the Note Channel are presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):

F-61

	Borrower Loans			Notes
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	245,137		$	244,171
Weighted-average discount rate	6.43		%	6.43		%
Weighted-average default rate	13.68		%	13.68		%
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in discount rate	$	242,888		$	241,927
200 basis point increase in discount rate	240,691			239,737
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in discount rate	$	247,442		$	246,471
200 basis point decrease in discount rate	249,805			248,828
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point increase in default rate	$	241,930		$	240,958
200 basis point increase in default rate	238,807			237,831
Fair value resulting from:
100 basis point decrease in default rate	$	248,453		$	247,489
200 basis point decrease in default rate	251,777			250,817

Key economic assumptions are used to compute the fair value of Servicing Assets. The sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate changes in assumptions at December 31, 2019 for Servicing Assets is presented in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):

	Servicing Assets
Fair Value at December 31, 2019	$	14,888
Market servicing rate	0.625		%
Weighted-average prepayment rate	20.99		%
Weighted-average default rate	12.67		%
Fair value resulting from:
Market servicing rate increase to 0.65%	13,966
Market servicing rate decrease to 0.60%	15,811
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to prepayment rate	14,583
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to prepayment rate	15,197
Fair value resulting from:
Applying a 1.1 multiplier to default rate	14,618
Applying a 0.9 multiplier to default rate	15,165

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be evaluated with care. The effect on fair value of a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be determined because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the fair value may not be linear. Additionally, the impact of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value is calculated while holding other assumptions constant. In reality, changes in one factor may lead to changes in other factors, which could impact the above hypothetical effects.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of its operations, Prosper Funding becomes involved in various legal actions. Prosper Funding maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. The Company does not believe it is probable that the ultimate

F-62

liability, if any, arising out of any such matters will have a material effect on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Operating Commitments

Prosper Funding has entered into an agreement with WebBank, under which all Borrower Loans originated through the marketplace are made under WebBank's bank charter. On February 1, 2019, Prosper Funding and WebBank extended the terms of their agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, the marketing fee that Prosper Funding receives in connection with the origination of each loan is partially reduced by an amount (the “Designated Amount”) calculated as a percentage of the principal amount of such loan based on the aggregate principal amount of loans originated for the applicable month. To the extent the aggregate Designated Amount for all loans originated during any month is less than $143.5 thousand, Prosper Funding is required to pay WebBank an amount equal to such deficiency. Accordingly, the minimum fee is $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $0.1 million for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Additionally, under the agreement with WebBank, Prosper Funding is required to maintain minimum net liquidity of $15 million at all times during the term of the agreement. Net liquidity is defined as the sum of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Available for Sale Investments. Violation of this covenant can result in termination of the contract with WebBank. At December 31, 2019 the Company was in compliance with the covenant.

Loan Purchase Commitments

Under the terms of Prosper Funding's agreement with WebBank, Prosper Funding is committed to purchase $18.6 million of Borrower Loans that WebBank originated during the last two business days of the year ended December 31, 2019.

Repurchase Obligation

Under the terms of the loan purchase agreements between Prosper and investors that participate in the Whole Loan Channel, Prosper Funding may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Borrower Loan from an investor. Generally, these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols or a violation of the applicable federal, state or local lending laws. Prosper Funding recognizes a liability at fair value for the repurchase obligation when the Borrower Loans are sold. The fair value of the repurchase obligation is estimated based on historical experience. Repurchased Borrower Loans associated with violations of federal, state or local lending laws or verifiable identity theft are written off at the time of repurchase. The maximum potential amount of future payments associated under the repurchase obligation is the outstanding balances of the Borrower Loans sold through the Whole Loan channels, which at December 31, 2019 was $3.7 billion. Prosper Funding had accrued $0.4 million and $0.9 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively in regard to this obligation.

Regulatory Contingencies

Prosper Funding accrues for contingencies when a loss from such contingencies is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss is probable and if it is possible to quantify the amount of the estimated loss, Prosper Funding reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on at least a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If Prosper Funding determines that an unfavorable outcome is not probable or that the amount of a loss cannot be reasonably estimated, Prosper Funding does not accrue for a potential litigation loss. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and Prosper Funding can estimate a range of outcomes, PFL records the amount management considers to be the best estimate within the range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if management cannot quantify the amount of the estimated loss, then PFL records the low end of the range of those potential losses.

SEC Inquiry

In April 2017, we became aware of an error in the annualized net return and seasoned annualized net return numbers displayed to Note investors. Prosper was advised by the SEC that it was investigating whether violations of federal securities laws had occurred in connection with the error. On April 19, 2019, the SEC accepted an offer of settlement from PFL to resolve the matter. Under the settlement, the SEC alleged a violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and ordered PFL to cease and desist from any future violations of that provision. PFL neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, and agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $3.0 million. The penalty of $3.0 million was paid in full in April 2019.

West Virginia Matter

In January 2018, the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia (the “Attorney General”) initiated discussions regarding certain acts and practices of PMI and PFL that the Attorney General asserts may have violated the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act (the “Consumer Act”), to which Prosper responded with such information as was requested by the Attorney General. Following a period of more than a year with limited to no communication, in February 2020, Prosper received a proposed Assurance of Discontinuance (an “AOD”) from the Attorney General requesting that,

F-63

without in any way admitting that any of its prior practices were in violation of the Consumer Act, Prosper agree to certain terms and conditions regarding its past and potential future conduct of its business with respect to customers in West Virginia, including a release by the Attorney General of any claims it may have related to the matters identified in the AOD. Prosper is evaluating and intends to discuss the proposed terms in the AOD with the Attorney General.

We cannot predict the outcome of the matter and any potential fines or penalties, if any, that may arise from the matter. Further, we are unable to estimate a range of outcomes and as a result no accrual has been made.

No loans have been originated through the Prosper platform to West Virginians since June 2016.

9. Related Parties

Since inception, Prosper Funding has engaged in various transactions with its directors, executive officers, sole member, and immediate family members and other affiliates of its directors, executive officers and sole member. Prosper Funding believes that all of the transactions described below were made on terms no less favorable to Prosper Funding than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Prosper Funding’s executive officers and directors who are not executive officers participate in its marketplace by placing bids and purchasing Notes and Borrower Loans. The aggregate amount of the notes and Borrower Loans purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be related parties of Prosper Funding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are summarized below (in thousands):

	Aggregate Purchases						Interest Earned
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Executive officers and management	$	23	$	29	$	5	$	2
Directors	—		—		—		—
	$	23	$	29	$	5	$	2

The balance of Notes held by officers and directors who are not executives officers are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2019		2018
Executive officers and management	$	35	$	32
Directors	—		—
	$	35	$	32

10. Significant Concentrations

Prosper Funding is dependent on third party funding sources such as banks, asset managers and investment funds to provide the funding to allow WebBank to originate loans that the third party funding sources will later purchase. Of all Borrower Loans originated in the year ended December 31, 2019, the largest party purchased a total of 9.4% of those loans. This compares to 43.7% for the year ended December 31, 2018. Further, a significant portion of our business is dependent on funding through the Whole Loan Channel. 94.0% and 94.0% of Borrower Loans were originated through the Whole Loan Channel in the years ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

11. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, other than as recorded or disclosed within these consolidated financial statements and related notes, the Company has determined no additional subsequent events were required to be recognized or disclosed.

F-64

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
2.1	Asset Transfer Agreement, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
2.2	Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 23, 2015 by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., American HealthCare Lending, LLC (“AHL”), Prosper Healthcare Lending, LLC and Shaun Sorensen, solely in his capacity as agent for AHL’s members and option holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2015)
2.3	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 23, 2015, by and among Prosper Marketplace, Inc., BillGuard, Inc., Beach Merger Sub, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, solely in its capacity as the Stockholders’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of PMI’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 15, 2015)
3.1	Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Prosper Funding LLC, dated October 21, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-179941), filed on October 23, 2013 by PFL and PMI)
3.2	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PMI, as further amended on October 15, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2018)
3.3	Certificate of Formation of Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed April 23, 2012 by PFL)
3.4	Bylaws of Prosper Marketplace, Inc., dated March 22, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-147019), filed October 30, 2007)
4.1	Form of PFL Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.5)
4.2	Form of PMI Borrower Payment Dependent Note (included as Exhibit A in Exhibit 4.4)
4.3	Supplemental Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
4.4	Indenture, dated June 15, 2009, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-147019), filed on June 26, 2009)
4.5	Amended and Restated Indenture, dated January 22, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
4.6	First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 10, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI and PFL's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2013)
10.1	Form of PFL Borrower Registration Agreement (2)
10.2	Form of PFL Investor Registration Agreement (2)
10.3	Asset Sale Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)
10.4	First Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
10.5	Second Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2017, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
10.6	Third Amendment to Asset Sale Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019)

93

Exhibit Number	Description
10.7	Marketing Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on March 7, 2017) (1)
10.8	First Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated October 7, 2016, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
10.9	Second Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated November 17, 2017, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 22, 2019) (1)
10.10	Third Amendment to Marketing Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between PMI and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019) (1)
10.11	Administration Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013)
10.12	Amendment No. 1 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2014)
10.13	Amendment No. 2 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2015, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 6, 2015)
10.14	Amendment No. 3 to Administration Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016 and made effective as of July 1, 2016, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 20, 2017)
10.15	Amendment No. 4 to Administration Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 26, 2018)
10.16	Amendment No. 5 to Administration Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 and made effective as of October 1, 2018, between Prosper Funding LLC and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 29, 2019)
10.17	Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, among Global Securitization Services, LLC, Kevin Burns, Bernard Angelo, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to PFL and PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-179941 and 333-179941-01), filed on November 21, 2012) (3)
10.18	Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, among WebBank, Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Prosper Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
10.19	Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan Sale Agreement, dated October 27, 2015, between PMI, PFL and WebBank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 9, 2015)
10.20	Second Amended and Restated Loan Account Program Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
10.21	Stand By Loan Purchase Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2013) (1)
10.22	Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2016, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 8, 2016) (1)
10.23	First Amendment to Stand By Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2019, between WebBank and Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of PMI and PFL's Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on April 24, 2019) (1)

94

Exhibit Number	Description
10.24	Director Indemnification Agreement, dated January 15, 2013, between Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Patrick (Pat) Grady (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 31, 2014) (3)
10.25	Form of Indemnification Agreement for PMI’s directors (other than Patrick Grady), officers and key employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of PMI and PFL's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
10.26	Back-Up Servicing Agreement (Note Channel), dated as of February 24, 2017, among Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., and First Associates Loan Servicing, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)
10.27	Amended and Restated Services and Indemnity Agreement, dated May 30, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Global Securitization Services, LLC, Bernard J. Angelo and David V. DeAngelis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PMI and PFL’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 5, 2013) (3)
10.28	Amended and Restated Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 29, 2014) (3)
10.29	Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 12, 2015) (3)
10.30	Amendment No. 1 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 13, 2016) (3)
10.31	Amendment No. 2 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 15, 2016) (3)
10.32	Amendment No. 3 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of PMI’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 26, 2018) (3)
10.33	Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
10.34	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of PMI and PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 18, 2016) (3)
10.35	Warrant Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2017, among PMI, PF WarrantCo Holdings, LP, and, for certain limited purposes, New Residential Investment Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of PMI and PFL’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2017) (1)
21.1	Subsidiaries of Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (2)
21.2	Subsidiaries of Prosper Funding LLC (2)
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm (2)
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
31.3	Certification of Principal Executive Officer of PFL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.4	Certification of Principal Financial Officer of PFL pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PMI pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2)
32.2	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PFL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2)

95

(1) Certain portions of this exhibit have been, as applicable, (i) omitted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 of the Securities Act or (ii) marked by brackets and omitted because the information is (a) not material and (b) would be competitively harmful if disclosed.

(2) Filed herewith.

(3) Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.  

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 20th day of March 2020.

PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
By:	/s/ David Kimball
	David Kimball
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer); Chairman of the Board

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Julie Hwang, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/ David Kimball	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer); Chairman of the Board	March 20, 2020
David Kimball
/s/ Usama Ashraf	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 20, 2020
Usama Ashraf
*	Director	March 20, 2020
Claire A. Huang
*	Director	March 20, 2020
Rajeev V. Date
*	Director	March 20, 2020
Patrick W. Grady
*	Director	March 20, 2020
Nigel W. Morris
*	Director	March 20, 2020
Mason D. Haupt
*By: /s/ Julie Hwang		March 20, 2020
Julie Hwang
Attorney-in-Fact

96

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 20th day of March 2020.

PROSPER FUNDING LLC
By:	/s/ David Kimball
	David Kimball
	Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); Director

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Usama Ashraf and Julie Hwang, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title
/s/ David Kimball	Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer); Director	March 20, 2020
David Kimball
/s/ Usama Ashraf	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer); Director	March 20, 2020
Usama Ashraf
/s/ Bernard J. Angelo	Director	March 20, 2020
Bernard J. Angelo
/s/ David V. DeAngelis	Director	March 20, 2020
David V. DeAngelis

97