Commitments and Contingencies | 6. Commitments and Contingencies Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company limits its credit risk associated with its cash and cash equivalents by placing them with financial institutions it believes are highly creditworthy. Bank accounts in the United States are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $ 250 thousand. The Company’s cash accounts significantly exceed FDIC limits. Indemnifications As permitted under Delaware law, the Company indemnifies its officers, directors, and employees for certain events and occurrences while the officer, employee or director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. As of December 31, 2023, the Company did not have any material indemnification claims that were probable or reasonably possible and consequently has not recorded any related liabilities. Lease Agreement The Company has entered into month-to-month lease agreements for certain office and laboratory space. The lease agreements are cancellable by the Company at any time with a 30-day notice. Total rent expense was $ 129 thousand and $ 19 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Clinical and Preclinical Services The Company has entered into various agreements with third party vendors for preclinical and clinical services. The estimated remaining commitments as of December 31, 2023 under these agreements were approximately $ 451 thousand. The Company entered i nto agreements with a clinical research organization ("CRO") in the fourth quarter of 2023 for Phase 1 clinical trials of FB-101, its product candidate. The Company has agreed to pay third-party costs associated with those agreements. The CRO agreements are subject to termination at any time, with or without cause, by the Company, in which case only costs earned or non-cancellable to date of termination would remain subject to reimbursement. Legal Proceedings Camac Fund L.P. v. Forte Biosciences Inc. , C.A. No. 2022-1075-NAC (Del. Ch.) In November 2022, a stockholder of the Company, Camac Fund LP, filed a complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking to access certain books and records of the Company pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as well as to seek attorney fees (the “Books and Records Action”). The Books and Records Action, which is captioned Camac Fund L.P. v. Forte Biosciences Inc., C.A. No. 2022-1075-NAC, remains pending. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted in the Books and Records Action and intends to vigorously defend against it. Camac Fund, LP v. Paul A. Wagner, et al. , C.A. No. 2023-0817-MTZ (Del. Ch.) On August 10, 2023 , Camac Fund LP filed a complaint (the “Complaint”), captioned Camac Fund, LP v. Paul A. Wagner, et al., C.A. No. 2023-0817-MTZ, in the Delaware Court of Chancery, against the members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Directors”) and entities affiliated with certain of the Company’s investors (the “Investors”) and naming the Company as nominal defendant. The Complaint alleged that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to enter into a July 31, 2023 private placement (the “Private Placement”), which raised approximately $ 25 million for the Company from the Investors and certain of the Company’s executives and directors, and by scheduling the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) for more than thirteen months after its 2022 annual meeting. The Complaint also alleged the Investors aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the Directors. Plaintiff also filed a motion for preliminary injunction and motion to expedite seeking a hearing on its preliminary injunction motion on an expedited basis. The Complaint and motions sought declarations that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties and that the Investors aided and abetted them, to enjoin defendants from counting votes cast by the Investors’ shares obtained through the private placement at the Annual Meeting or any subsequent director election, and money damages in an unspecified amount. On August 15, 2023, the Company, the Directors, and certain Investors filed oppositions to Plaintiff’s motion to expedite. On August 16, 2023, the Company, the Directors, and certain Investors filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. On August 17, 2023, the Court held a hearing at which it granted the motion to expedite in part but declined to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing prior to the Annual Meeting and determined that Defendants could brief their motions to dismiss and be heard on an expedited schedule. The Court determined that discovery could proceed while the motions to dismiss are pending and directed the parties to confer regarding a schedule for further proceedings. On September 1, 2023, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against the Investors. On September 7, 2023, the parties agreed to a schedule for briefing the motion to dismiss filed by the Directors and the Company (together, hereinafter, “Defendants”), with the understanding that the schedule would change if Plaintiff amended its Complaint rather than file a brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and the parties also agreed to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. On September 19, 2023, the Company held its Annual Meeting at which, among other things, the Company’s two director nominees were re-elected and Plaintiff’s two director nominees were not elected. On September 21, 2023, Defendants filed their opening brief in support of their motion to dismiss. On October 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended class action and derivative complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) against the Directors and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The Amended Complaint makes many of the same allegations as the original Complaint. The Amended Complaint also purports to bring a claim on behalf of a class of holders of the Company’s common stock as of August 10, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting. The class claim alleges the Directors breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to enter into the Private Placement, setting the Annual Meeting record date for a date after the Private Placement closed, and holding the Annual Meeting more than thirteen months after the 2022 annual meeting. The Amended Complaint purports to bring a second claim for “wrongful dilution” derivatively on behalf of the Company. The derivative claim alleges the Directors “wrongfully diluted” Plaintiff and other stockholders by causing the Company to enter into the Private Placement in bad faith and for the purpose of entrenchment and not permitting Plaintiff and other stockholders to participate. The Amended Complaint seeks declarations that the Directors breached their fiduciary duties, that the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the shares acquired in the Private Placement should be excluded from the final voting results, that Plaintiff’s two director nominees at the Annual Meeting were elected and that the Company’s nominees were not elected, as well as an order requiring the Company’s board of directors to recognize Plaintiff’s nominees as validly elected and remove the Company’s nominees from their positions on the board of directors. The Amended Complaint also seeks an order that the Company hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2024 within thirteen months of the 2023 Annual Meeting, that the shares acquired in the Private Placement are enjoined from voting at the 2024 annual meeting, and awarding money damages in an unspecified amount. On November 3, 2023, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint. The Company believes the Plaintiff’s claims are baseless and intend to vigorously defend against them. On January 17, 2024, Plaintiff filed its brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. On February 8, 2024, Defendants filed their reply brief in further support of their motion to dismiss. On February 14, 2024, the Court held a hearing on the motion to dismiss, which is currently pending. Forte Biosciences, Inc. v. Camac Fund, LP, et al. , Case No. 3:23-cv-02399-N (N.D. Tex.) On October 28, 2023 , the Company filed a complaint (the “Complaint”), captioned Forte Biosciences , Inc. v. Camac Fund, LP, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-02399-N, against Camac Fund, LP , Camac Partners, LLC, Camac Capital, LLC, and Eric Shahinian (collectively, “Camac”), as well as against Michael G. Hacke, Chris McIntyre, McIntyre Partnerships, LP, McIntyre Capital GP, LLC, McIntyre Capital Management, LP, McIntyre Capital Management GP, LLC, ATG Fund II LLC, ATG Capital Management, LLC, Gabriel Gliksberg, Funicular Funds, LP, The Funicular Fund, LP, Cable Car Capital LLC, Jacob Ma-Weaver, BML Investment Partners, L.P., BML Capital Management, LLC, and Braden M. Leonard (collectively with Camac, “Defendants”). The Complaint alleges that Defendants have been and are engaged in a campaign of deceit and misinformation in an attempt to force the Company to liquidate for Defendants’ benefit and to the detriment of the Company and other stockholders. The Company brings claims against Camac and certain other Defendants for issuing false and misleading proxy statements in connection with their attempts to elect two members of Forte’s board at the Company’s 2023 annual meeting in violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The Company also brings claims against Defendants under Exchange Act Section 13(d) for failure to file and for filing misleading Schedule 13Ds, including because Defendants failed to disclose that they were coordinating as a group. The Company further alleges that Defendants tortiously interfered with Forte’s prospective business relationships, including by smearing the Company and manipulating the market for its stock to dissuade prospective investors from investing in the Company. The Complaint seeks declarations that Defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 13(d) of the Exchange Act, an order directing Defendants to file true and correct proxy statements and Schedule 13Ds, an injunction prohibiting Defendants from issuing future materially misleading and false public filings, and money damages to compensate the Company for Defendants’ violations of law. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on January 16, 2024. On February 6, 2024, the Company filed an Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint makes many of the same allegations as the original Complaint and alleges two additional federal claims, one brought under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act for recovery of short swing profits of the Defendants, and the other for declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. On February 15, 2024, the Company also filed a Motion for Relief from the PSLRA Discovery Stay and Speedy Hearing on Declaratory Judgment Act Claim, asking the Court to allow the Company to conduct limited, targeted discovery of documents and communications that demonstrate the full scope of the relationship between all Defendants and for an accounting of all short swing profits and trading records for all shares purchased or sold during the relevant time frame so the Company can fully account for short swing profits. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on March 5, 2024, and on March 7, 2024, Defendants also filed a response in opposition to the Company’s Motion for Relief from the PSLRA Discovery Stay and Speedy Hearing on Declaratory Judgment Act. The Company believes its claims are meritorious and intends to pursue them vigorously to remedy Defendants’ violations of the law. |