U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission file number 000-52965
MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
| | |
Wyoming | | Applied For |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
c/o Wyoming Corporate Services Inc., 2710 Thomes Ave., Cheyenne, WY | | 82001 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Issuer’s telephone number: (307) 632-3333
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC.
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
1
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Check whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
At August 10, 2008, 13,000,000 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock and 0 shares of the Registrant’s Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X]
2
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC.
(N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PAGE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
F1
Statement of Operations for three months ended June 30, 2008 and the
period from inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
F2
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the period from inception (November 19,
F3
2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
Statement of Cash Flows for three months ended June 30, 2008 and the
period from inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
F4
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F5 – F10
3
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheet
As at June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
| | | | | | |
| | | June 30, 2008 |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | $ - |
| | | |
LIABILITIES | | | |
CURRENT | | | |
Director loan | | | $ 3,191 |
Accounts Payable | | | 1,000 |
| | | 4,191 |
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICT | | | |
Preferred stock – no par value; | | | |
30,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding | | | - |
Common stock – no par value; | | | |
70,000,000 shares authorized; 6,000,000 issued and | | | |
outstanding | | | 300 |
Additional paid-in capital | | | - |
Deficit accumulated during development stage | | | (4,491) |
| | | |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | | (4,191) |
| | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | | $ - |
(Going Concern)
(Subsequent Events)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F1
4
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and the Period from Inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
| | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | Period from Inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
| | |
REVENUE | $ - | $ - |
| | |
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | 1,000 | 4,491 |
| | |
NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD | ($1,000) | ($4,491) |
| | |
| | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION: | | |
| | |
Net loss per common share | (Less than .01) | (Less than .01) |
| | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F2
5
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit
For the Period from Inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | Additional | | |
| Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | |
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Total |
| | | | | |
Balance, inception (November 19, 2007) | - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - |
| | | | | |
Stock issued as compensation for | | | | | |
reimbursement of incorporation | | | | | |
expenses on November 21, | | | | | |
2007 - no par value | 6,000,000 | 300 | - | - | 300 |
| | | | | |
Net loss for the period | - | - | | (2,491) | (2,491) |
| | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2007 | 6,000,000 | $300 | $ - | ($2,491) | ($2,191) |
| | | | | |
Net loss for the period | - | - | | (2,000) | (2,000) |
| | | | | |
Balance, June 30, 2008 | 6,000,000 | $300 | $ - | ($4,491) | ($4,191) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F3
6
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and the Period from Inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
| | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | Period from Inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
| | |
| | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | |
Net loss for the period Stock issued as payment on expenses | ($1,000) | ($4,491) 300 |
Increase in accounts payable | - | 1,000 |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS | (1,000) | (3,191) |
| | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | |
Proceeds from director loan | 1,000 | 3,191 |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | 1,000 | 3,191 |
| | |
| | |
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH BALANCE, END OF PERIOD | $ - | $ - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F4
7
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
1.
THE COMPANY
Hillholm Acquisition, Inc. (n/k/a Major Gold Corporation) (“the Company”), a company incorporated in the State of Wyoming on November 19, 2007, had been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting (“public”) company whose securities are qualified for trading in the United States secondary market. On July 17, 2008 the Company changed its name to Major Gold Corporation.
On July 15, 2008, the Company acquired (the “Acquisition”) a 100 percent undivided interest in two mineral claims, subject to Net Smelter Returns, near Neilson Lake in the Kenora Mining District, Ontario, Canada from Neilson Lake Exploration, Inc. (an Ontario, Canada corporation related the Company by virtue of directors in common) for a total consideration of $7,500. Prior to the Acquisition, the Company was a defined as a “blank check” company. With the Acquisition, the Company intends to become engaged in business activities in the mineral exploration industry. (See note 5.)
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s accounting policies conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of financial statements.
The financial statements included herein have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but include all adjustments (including normal, recurring entries), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when earned in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.”
F5
8
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Comprehensive Income
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (“SFAS 130”), “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. The Company did not have any items of comprehensive income during the period from inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008
Net Loss per Share
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” specifying the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements of earnings per share information. Basic earnings per share have been calculated based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Advertising
The Company follows a policy of charging the costs of advertising to expenses incurred. The Company incurred advertising expenses of $Nil during the period from inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method to measure and record deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
F6
9
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 addresses the measurement of fair value by companies when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP. SFAS 157 provides a common definition of fair value to be used throughout GAAP, which is intended to make the measurement of fair value more consistent and comparable and improve disclosures about those measures. SFAS 157 clarifies the principal that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The provisions of FAS 157 are effective for fair value measurements made in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In November 2007, th e FASB announced an option to defer implementation of some of the requirements of this standard for certain non-financial assets and liabilities.
Beginning January 1, 2008, the Company partially applied FAS 157 as allowed by FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. As of January 1, 2008 the Company has applied the provisions of FAS 157 to its financial instruments and the impact was not material. Under FSP 157-2, the Company will be required to apply FAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities beginning January 1, 2009. Management is currently reviewing the applicability of FAS 157 to the Company’s nonfinancial assets and liabilities and the potential impact that application will have on its consolidated statements.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (Topic 1N),Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB 108”), which addresses how the effect of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. The provisions of SAB 108 become effective as of the end of the 2007 fiscal year. SAB 108 requires SEC registrants (i) to quantify misstatements using a combined approach which considers both the balance sheet and income statement approaches; (ii) to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors; and (iii) to adjust their financial statements if the new combined approach results in a conclusion that a n error is material. SAB No. 108 addresses the mechanics of correcting misstatements that include effects from prior years. It indicates that the current year correction of a material error that includes prior year effects may result in the need to correct prior year financial statements even if the misstatement in the prior year or years is considered immaterial. Any prior year financial statements found to be materially misstated in years subsequent to the issuance of SAB 108 would be restated in accordance with FAS No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 did not have a material effect on the Company's reported financial position or results of operations.
F7
10
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“FAS 159”). This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions of FAS 159 apply only to entities that elect the fair value option. However, the amendment to FAS 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. FAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FAS 157,Fair Value Measure ments. As of January 1, 2008 the Company has applied the provisions of FAS 159 to its financial instruments and the impact was not material.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),Business Combinations(“SFAS No. 141R”), replacing SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”). This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called thepurchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement also establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and c) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the fina ncial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This Statement clarifies that acquirers will be required to expense costs related to any acquisitions. SFAS No. 141(R) will apply prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after fiscal years beginning December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact, if any, that SFAS No. 141(R) will have on its financial statements. Determination of the ultimate effect of this pronouncement will depend on the Company’s structure at the date of adoption.
F-8
11
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No.160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No.160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial i nterest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No.160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No.160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with retrospective presentation and disclosure for all periods presented. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company currently has no entities or arrangements that will be affected by the adoption of SFAS No. 160. However, determination of the ultimate effect of this pronouncement will depend on the Company’s structure at the date of adoption.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411,The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 162 will have a material effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
F9
12
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
3.
GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, during the period from inception (November 19, 2007) to June 30, 2008, the Company incurred a loss of $4,491. In addition, the Company has an accumulated deficit of the same amount. It is the intention of the Company’s stockholders to fund capital shortfalls for the foreseeable future.
As discussed in note 1, the Company intends to become engaged in business activities in the mineral exploration industry (See note 5). Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to raise capital in order to finance its business activities. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.
4.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company issued 6,000,000 common shares to stockholders as reimbursement of incorporation expenses.
Since inception the sole director has advanced the Company $3,191 to pay for operating expenses. These funds have been advanced interest free, are unsecured, and are due on demand.
F10
13
HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 (unaudited)
5.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 10, 2008, the Company capitalized a dormant shelf company, 1754857 Ontario, Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation for $400. This company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
On July 15, 2008, the Company acquired (the “Acquisition”) a 100 percent undivided interest in two mineral claims, subject to Net Smelter Returns, near Neilson Lake in the Kenora Mining District, Ontario, Canada from Neilson Lake Exploration, Inc. (an Ontario, Canada corporation related the Company by virtue of directors in common) for a total consideration of $7,500. Prior to the Acquisition, the Company was defined as a “blank check” company. With the Acquisition, the Company intends to become engaged in business activities in the mineral exploration industry.
In order to retain title to the mining claims, the Company is required to perform and file exploration work totaling $11,200 CDN by March 12, 2010. In addition, the Company anticipates incurring surveying and assaying costs of $25,000 for phases one and two of the exploration programs, to be paid to the Company’s geological consultant.
On July 12, 2008, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock to two of its directors in anticipation of these directors assuming the $7,500 purchase price.
On July 17, 2008 the Company changed its name to Major Gold Corporation.
F11
14
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
Plan of Operation.
Hillholm Acquisition, Inc. (n/k/a Major Gold Corporation) (“we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company”) has not realized any revenues from operations since November 19, 2007 (inception).
Our plan of operation for the foreseeable future is to complete the following objectives within the time periods specified, subject to our obtaining any additional funding necessary for the continued exploration of our mining claim. We do not have enough funds to complete our Phase Three or Phase Four programs which we would plan to start in the spring of 2009. If the results of our phase one and phase two exploration program are encouraging. The following is a brief summary of our four phase exploration program:
1.
In order to keep the claim in good standing we must perform and register exploration work with the province of Ontario of at least $4,800 CDN on mining claim 4218108 by August 29, 2009 and $6,400 CDN on mining claim 3013719 by March 12, 2010, we plan to conduct the first phase of our four phase exploration program starting late summer 2008, weather permitting. This Phase One exploration program is expected to cost approximately $17,500. Robert Major, our geological consultant, will cover the property taking rock samples then ship to a laboratory for assay in addition to staking additional claims.
2.
The results obtained during the Phase One exploration program will be assembled, interpreted and we will review the results.
3.
With respect to our Phase Two program, our geological consultant has indicated that we should budget approximately $10,000 for our Phase Two program. Our Phase two program is scheduled to proceed between October 2008 and November 2008. A field crew will mobilize onto our claim and perform localized geophysical surveys and then demobilize from the area.
15
4.
In the case of our Phase Two program, the results obtained during the Phase Two program will be assembled, interpreted and we will review the results of the Phase Two program. We will then engage our geological consultant to interpret the results of Phase Two and develop a summary report.
5.
If the Phase Three program were to proceed, our geological consultant has indicated that we should budget approximately $12,500 for our Phase three program. If we proceed with a Phase Three program we would do so in November 2008. A field crew will mobilize onto our claim and perform a significant amount of geological Mapping, geochemical sampling, as well as localized sampling over the alteration zone of the Neilson Lake property
6.
In the case that the Phase Four program takes place, the results obtained during the Phase Three program will be assembled, interpreted and we will review the results of the Phase three program between October and December 2008 We will engage our geological consultant to interpret the results of Phase Three and develop a summary report. At this stage we will have a significantly better understanding of any mineralization on our claim and be in a position to commence Diamond Drilling in 2009.
If the results of the Phase One, Phase Two, and Phase Three exploration program are encouraging, we will have to raise additional funds starting in December 2008 so that Phase Four exploration could commence in 2009.
During the next 12 months, we do not anticipate generating any revenue. If additional funds become required, the additional funding will come from equity financing from the sale of our common stock or sale of part of our interest in our mining claim. If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of their interest in our company. We do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our Phase Two and Phase Three programs. In the absence of such financing, our business will fail.
We may consider entering into a joint venture partnership by linking with a major resource company to provide the required funding to complete our Phase Four exploration program. We have not undertaken any efforts to locate a joint venture partner for Phase Four. If we enter into a joint venture arrangement, we will assign a percentage of our interest in our mining claim and/or Neilson Lake to the joint venture partner.
Based on the nature of our business, we anticipate incurring operating losses in the foreseeable future. We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that very few mining claim in the exploration stage ultimately develop into producing, profitable mines. Our future financial results are also uncertain due to a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:
Our ability to raise additional funding;
16
·
The market price for gold and silver;
·
The results of our proposed exploration programs on the mineral property; and
·
Our ability to find joint venture partners for the development of our property interests
·
Due to our lack of operating history and present inability to generate revenues, our auditors have stated their opinion that there currently exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Even if we complete our current exploration program and it is successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral reserve.
Exploration Cost Review
The costs described which include the proposed budget of our exploration program as recommended by our geological consultant. The table below summarizes the cost estimate for the programs.
| | | |
Phase One Exploration Items | Cost Estimate $ |
Geological Mapping and sampling | 2,500 |
Additional Claims | 15,000 |
Total | 17,500 |
Phase Two Exploration Items |
Cost Estimate $ |
Localized Geophysical Surveys VLF-EM | 10,000 |
Total | 10,000 |
Phase Three Exploration Items |
Cost Estimate $ |
Additional Geological Mapping, Sampling, Localized Sampling over the alteration zone of the Neilson Lake property | 12,500 |
Total | 12,500 |
17
| | | |
Phase Four Exploration Items | Cost Estimate$ |
Diamond Drilling of Prime Targets | 150,000 |
Total Four Phase Program | 150,000 |
Results of Operations.
The Company has not conducted any active operations since inception, except for its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates. No revenue has been generated by the Company from November 19, 2007 (inception) to June 30, 2008. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues. The Company incurred expenses of $1,000 relating to professional fees for the 3 month period ended June 30, 2008.
On July 10, 2008, we capitalized a dormant shelf company 1754857 Ontario, Inc., an Ontario corporation for $400 and is now a wholly-owned subsidiary.
On July 12, 2008, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock (3,500,000 shares each to Shawn Pecore and Jonathan Hagen) as a result of Messer’s Pecore and Hagen assigning a promissory note (the “Note”) between them and Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.) to the Company. This Note was valued for $7,500. Please refer to our Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 17, 2008 for a more complete description of the transaction.
On July 14, 2008, the Company issued a demand letter to Major Gold Corporation to pay the Note. In consideration of payment from Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.), on July 15, 2008 Neilson Lake Exploration Inc. (an Ontario corporation) transferred its 100% undivided interest, subject a pre-existing NSR to Robert Major, of the Neilson Lake Claims to the Company.
On July 14, 2008, we entered into a series of agreements to acquire (the “Acquisition”) the above claims from Neilson Lake Exploration Inc. and Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.) for a total consideration of $7,500 CDN. As part of the Acquisition we will assume the responsibility of an agreement between Robert Major and Neilson Lake Exploration Inc.. Please refer to our Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 17, 2008 for a more complete description of the transaction.
Mr. Major does not own any interest in our claims, except for 1% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) and 2% Gross Rock Royalty (“GRR”), and is not a shareholder or affiliate of our Company. The Company has the right to acquire the 1% NSR from Mr. Major for $1,000,000 CDN within 12 months from commencement of commercial production.
Immediately prior to the Acquisition, Shawn Pecore, our director, and Jonathan Hagen, our director and sole officer were affiliates of Neilson Lake Exploration Inc. and Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.). Shawn Pecore was a 50% shareholder in Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.) and Jonathan Hagen was a 50% shareholder, sole director and officer of Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.). Jonathan Hagen was sole director and officer of Neilson Lake Exploration, a wholly owned subsidiary of Major Gold Corporation (a Wyoming corporation, n/k/a Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.).
On July 15, 2008, Shawn Pecore resigned as sole officer of the Company, and Jonathan Hagen was appointed as director and sole officer of the Company.
On July 16, 2008, the board of directors of Major Gold Corporation approved an amendment to Major Gold's articles of incorporation to change the name of the Company from "Major Gold Corporation" to "Devonshire Opportunities III Corp.". The name change amendment was approved by the board of directors. The name change amendment was filed with the Secretary of State of Wyoming and became effective on July 16, 2008.
On July 17, 2008, the board of directors of Hillholm Acquisition, Inc. approved an amendment to Hillholm's articles of incorporation to change the name of the Company from "Hillholm Acquisition, Inc." to "Major Gold Corporation". The name change amendment was approved by the board of directors and by a majority of the shareholders. The name change amendment was filed with the Secretary of State of Wyoming and became effective on July 17, 2008. Please refer to our Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 29, 2008 for a more complete description of the transaction.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item. However, we do not consider the effects of interest rate movements to be a material risk to our financial condition. We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules, regulations and related forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our sole officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of June 30, 2008, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our sole officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our sole officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in internal controls.
There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors during our most recent fiscal quarter that could significantly affect these controls and procedures during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008.
18
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
19
To the best knowledge of the officers and directors, the Company is not a party to any legal proceeding or litigation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None.
Item 5. Other Information. None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B.
| | |
Exhibit | | Description |
| | |
*3.1 | | Certificate of Incorporation. |
*3.2 | | By-laws. |
**3.3 | | Articles of Amendment – name change to Major Gold Corporation |
31.1 | | Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
31.2 | | Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
32.1 | | Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
* | Filed as an exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form 10-SB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2007, and incorporated herein by this reference. |
** | Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2008, and incorporated herein by this reference |
20
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | |
Date: August 19, 2008 | HILLHOLM ACQUISITION, INC. (N/K/A MAJOR GOLD CORPORATION) |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Jonathan Hagen |
| Name: |
Jonathan Hagen |
| Title: | President |
| |
| |
21