Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Polices [Abstract] | |
Basis of Consolidation | Basis of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Team Sports Superstore. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of the Company’s products to its customers, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title to the Company’s products is transferred to the customer once the product is shipped from the Company’s warehouse. Products are not shipped until there is a purchase agreement signed by the customer with a specified payment arrangement. The Company’s sales are primarily customized, made to order apparel, where after a deposit is made there are no refunds after the customer has committed to the sale through a signed contract. Therefore, the company has not recorded an allowance for returned products. |
Loss per Share Calculations | Loss per Share Calculations |
|
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The Company’s diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, as the inclusion of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect due to the Company generating a loss. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company periodically issues common stock to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock payments to employees by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost recognized as compensation expense in the Company’s financial statements over the vesting period of the awards. The Company accounts for stock grants to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date. |
Advertising Costs | Advertising Costs |
|
The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs included within selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $31,530 and $60,036 for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are used in valuing our allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuations and common stock issued for services, among others. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company’s assessment of the collectibility of customer accounts. The Company regularly reviews the allowance by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable balances, economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay and expected default frequency rates. Trade receivables are written off at the point when they are considered uncollectible. Bad debt expenses were $71,512 for the year ended June 30, 2014. There were no bad debt expenses for the year ended June 30, 2013. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $63,953 and $9,400 as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Inventories | Inventories |
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company provides inventory write-downs based on excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily by future demand forecasts. The write-down is measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and market based upon assumptions about future demand and charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of cost of sales. |
|
At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. During the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $331,000 relating to the mark down of inventories to net realizable value at June 30, 2014. The mark downs related to inventories that management felt had become obsolete or in excess of future estimated sales of those products over the next year, particularly fabric and prior year products. |
Shipping and handling costs | Shipping and handling costs |
|
The Company’s shipping and handling costs are reported as selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated Statements of Operations. These costs primarily relate to outbound freight. The Company classifies amounts billed to customers for shipping fees as revenues. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes |
|
Income tax expense is based on pretax financial accounting income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. |
|
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company classifies the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as current to the extent that the Company anticipates payment (or receipt) of cash within one year. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized in the provision for income taxes. |
Customer Deposits | Customer Deposits |
|
In many of its customer agreements, the Company requires its customers pay a 50 percent deposit upon signing the agreement. At June 30, 2013, there was $14,034 in outstanding customer deposits. There were no customer deposits at June 30, 2014. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk. |
|
In addition to defining fair value, the standard expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are: |
|
Level 1 – inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. |
|
Level 2 – inputs are based upon significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
Level 3 – inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. |
As of June 30, 2014, the balances reported for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of their short maturities. Debt balances are stated at historical amounts less principal payments, which approximate fair market value. The Company believes interest rates in its debt agreements are commensurate with lender risk profiles for similar companies. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. |
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements. |