Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 6 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Polices [Abstract] | |
Basis of Consolidation | Basis of Consolidation |
|
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Team Sports Superstore. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of the Company’s products to its customers, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Management assesses the business environment, the customer's financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging and customer disputes to whether collectibility is reasonably assured. If collectibility is not considered reasonably assured at the time of sales, the company does not recognize revenue until collection occurs. Title to the Company’s products is transferred to the customer once the product is shipped from the Company’s warehouse. Products are not shipped until there is a purchase agreement signed by the customer with a specified payment arrangement. The Company’s sales are primarily customized, made to order apparel, where after a deposit is made there are no refunds after the customer has committed to the sale through a signed contract. Therefore, the company has not recorded an allowance for returned products. |
|
Loss per Share Calculations | Loss per Share Calculations |
|
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The Company’s diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, as the inclusion of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect due to the Company generating a loss. |
|
Concentration of sales and accounts receivable | Concentration of sales and accounts receivable |
|
For the six months ended December 31, 2014, the Company sold $198,360 of its products to a company owned by the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and a current member of the Board of Directors (see Note 4). This amount represented 56% of the Company’s sales during six months ended December 31, 2014. There were no other customers with sales representing more than 10% of the Company’s total sales during this period. At December, 31, 2014, there was one customer with an accounts receivable balance that represented 51% of the Company’s total accounts receivable. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the condensed financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are used in valuing our allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuations, convertible notes, fair value of common stock issued upon settlement of accounts payable and fair value of common stock issued for services, among others. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
|
Inventories | Inventories |
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company’s inventories consist of finished goods as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Fair Value of Financial Instruments requires disclosure of fair value information, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, where it is practicable to estimate that value. As of December 31, 2014, the balances reported for cash, accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of their short maturities. Debt balances are stated at historical amounts less principal payments, which approximate fair market value. The Company believes interest rates in its debt agreements are commensurate with lender risk profiles for similar companies. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). This guidance amends the requirements for reporting for discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and has not determined the effect of the standard on our ongoing financial reporting. |
|
|
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. |
|
|
|
In November 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 (ASU 2014-16), Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the current criteria in U.S. GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. The amendments clarify that an entity should consider all relevant terms and features, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract. The ASU applies to all entities that are issuers of, or investors in, hybrid financial instruments that are issued in the form of a share and is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. |
|
|
|
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements. |
|