Commitments and Contingencies | Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies Letters of Credit In connection with the execution of certain facility leases, the Company had bank issued irrevocable letters of credit for $4.7 million as of April 30, 2020 and January 31, 2020. No draws have been made under such letters of credit. Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company may be subject to legal proceedings, as well as demands, claims and threatened litigation. Other than the matters described below, we are not currently party to any material legal proceedings or claims, nor are we aware of any pending or threatened litigation or claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, or financial condition should such litigation or claim be resolved unfavorably. The outcomes of our legal proceedings and other contingencies are inherently unpredictable, subject to significant uncertainties, and could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular period. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors. Securities Class Actions In June 2019, a securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California naming the Company and certain of its officers as defendants. The complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of stockholders who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities between April 12, 2018 and May 30, 2019. The complaint alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and costs. In November 2019, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting the same claims. In April 2020, the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss. In April and May 2020, two putative securities class action lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, naming as defendants the Company and certain of its current and former officers, its directors and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO. The complaints purport to bring suit on behalf of stockholders who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities pursuant or traceable to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the Company’s IPO and allege claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The suits seek unspecified damages and other relief. Given the procedural posture and the nature of such litigation matters, including that the proceedings are in the early stages, the Company is unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from these matters. Derivative Litigation In September 2019, two stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The derivative actions allege claims based on events similar to those in the securities class action and assert causes of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, and for making false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects in violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. Plaintiffs seek corporate reforms, unspecified damages and restitution, and fees and costs. In November 2019, the stockholder derivative lawsuits, which are related to the securities class action, were assigned to the same judge who is overseeing the securities class action lawsuit. In February 2020, the court entered an order consolidating the two derivative lawsuits. In May and June 2020, two stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against certain of the Company’s directors and current and former executive officers. The derivative actions allege claims based on events similar to those in the securities class action and the derivative action pending in the Northern District of California and assert causes of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, waste of corporate assets, contribution, and for making false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects in violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. Plaintiff seeks corporate reforms, unspecified damages and restitution, and fees and costs. Given the procedural posture and the nature of such litigation matters, including that the proceedings are in the early stages, the Company is unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from these matters. Other Contractual Obligations As of April 30, 2020, the Company had a contractual obligation to make $4.3 million in purchases, primarily for cloud computing services provided by one of its vendors by September 30, 2020. |