Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Use Of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosure in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to the valuation of indium inventory, share-based compensation, income tax, and revenue recognition. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. |
| | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. |
| | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Inventory of the Metal Indium |
|
As of December 31, 2014, the Company exited the indium business. Prior to that time, the Company’s inventory or “stockpile” of the metal indium was carried at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined by the specific-identification (including all associated costs of delivering the indium to the bonded storage warehouse on the date the Company takes delivery of the physical metal). Market was determined by the net realizable value based on the spot price of indium obtained from Metal Bulletin PLC, as posted on Bloomberg L.P., a real time financial information service data platform. The Company charged against earnings an inventory write-down on an interim basis for the amount by which the spot price of indium was less than cost on a specific-identification basis. Increases or decreases in the spot price of the same lots of indium held in inventory in later interim periods within the fiscal year were recognized in such interim periods. Increases in value recognized on an interim basis do not exceed the previously recognized diminution in value within that fiscal year. There was no write down of inventory in 2014 or 2013 as the spot price of indium was higher than the Company’s accounting cost. As of December 31, 2014, the Company sold its entire indium stockpile. |
| | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share |
|
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period including stock options and warrants, using the treasury-stock method. If anti-dilutive, the effect of potentially dilutive common shares is ignored. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock option or warrants. For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, potential shares of common stock that resulted from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options, with exercise prices less than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for each year, were calculated using the treasury stock method. All other potentially issuable shares of common stock have been excluded from the calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive. |
| | | | | | | |
Accounting For Direct Sales And Lending Transactions [Policy Text Block] | Accounting for Direct Sales, Lease and Lending Transactions |
|
The stockpile of indium was used for “direct sales”, “lease” and/or “lending” transactions. Under a “direct sale” transaction, the Company recorded revenue when there was pervasive evidence that an arrangement existed, delivery had occurred, the price was fixed or determinable and collectibility was reasonably assured. Cost of sales was recorded for the indium carrying value based on specific-identification method. There were no uncollectible accounts and no right of return. Approximately 87% and 72% of the Company’s direct sales were sold outside the United States primarily in Asia in 2014 and 2013 respectively. |
|
Under indium “lending” transactions, the Company would exchange a specified tonnage and purity of indium for cash. Title and the risks and rewards of such indium ownership would pass to the purchaser/counterparty in the lending transaction. The Company would simultaneously enter into an agreement with such counterparty in which it would unconditionally commit to purchase and the counterparty would unconditionally commit to sell a specified tonnage and purity of indium that would be delivered to the Company at a fixed price and at a fixed future date in exchange for cash (the Unconditional Sale and Purchase Agreement or “USPA”). The USPA would also contain terms providing the counterparty with disincentives (“penalty fees”) for nonperformance of the return of indium to the Company as a means to assure its future supply of indium. The Company accounted for any USPA transaction on a combined basis (sale and purchase) and evaluated whether, and in what period, other income was recognized based on the specific terms of any arrangements. In 2013, the Company disclosed an unconditional purchase obligations under this arrangement. The cost of inventory-indium under an open USPA was reported as “indium repurchase obligation” in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2013. In 2014, we sold the indium to the counterparty in the USPA at a negotiated price. |
|
Income arising from leasing transactions was reported as other income. Indium “lease” transactions were generally for a period of less than one year. Under the lease, a specified amount of indium was leased to the customer for a period of time. At the end of the lease, the lessee was obligated to return the equivalent quantity and purity of the indium that was delivered to the lessee at the beginning of the lease. The monthly rental income was recorded as other income over the term of the lease. In certain circumstances, we sold the indium to the lessee at a negotiated price. |
| | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income Taxes |
|
Income taxes are accounted under the asset-and-liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and the respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The portion of any deferred tax asset for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized must then be offset by recording a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance has been established against all of the deferred tax assets, as it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized due to the fact that there is uncertainty as to whether these assets will be realized due to the fact they we cannot predict when the Company will return to profitability, if at all. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions as a component of the provision for income taxes on the statements of operations in any future periods in which the Company must record a liability. |
| | | | | | | |
Share-Based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | Share-Based Payment Arrangements |
|
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments (share-based payments or “SBP”) based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the SBP award—the requisite service period (vesting period). For SBP awards subject to conditions, compensation is not recognized until the performance condition is probable of occurrence. The grant-date fair value of share options is estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Compensation expense for SBP awards granted to nonemployees is remeasured each period as the underlying options vest. The Company recorded non-cash charges for SBP of approximately $5 thousand and $6 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fair value of each option granted during 2014 and 2013 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the weighted average assumptions in the following table: |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | |
Expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | 0 | % |
Expected option term (years) | | | 5 | | | 5 | |
Expected volatility | | | 9 | % | | 11 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 1.66-1.73 | % | | 0.75-1.41 | % |
|
The weighted average fair value at the date of grant for options granted during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0.26 and $0.30, respectively, per share. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Because of the Company’s limited history of trading volume, the expected volatility was calculated based on the five-year volatility of indium. The assumed discount rate was the default risk-free interest rate provided by Bloomberg L.P. |
| | | | | | | |
Common Stock Purchase Contracts [Policy Text Block] | Common Stock Purchase Contracts |
|
The Company classifies as equity any common stock purchase contracts that: (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement) and (ii) are indexed to the Company’s common stock. The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any common stock purchase contracts that: (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and that event is outside the control of the Company), (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or (iii) are not indexed to the Company’s common stock. The Company assesses classification of its equity-classified contracts at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required. The Company’s outstanding common stock purchase contracts were accounted for as equity through December 31, 2014. |
| | | | | | | |
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposure, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
The Company maintains cash deposits with banks that at times exceed applicable Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company reduces its exposure to credit risk by maintaining such deposits with high-quality financial institutions. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. At December 31, 2014, the Company had cash on deposit of approximately $4.5 million in excess of federally insured limits of $250 thousand. |
|
The Company granted credit, without collateral, to specialty metals companies creating a credit risk with third parties that it sold, lent or leased indium. The Company sought to reduce its credit risk by reviewing the third party’s credit portfolio, and, when necessary, obtained third party guarantees. To reduce its market risks for changes in the price of indium, the USPA and lease agreements contained terms providing the third-party with disincentives (“penalty fees”) for nonperformance of the return of indium to the Company. |
| | | | | | | |
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value |
|
The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. For cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and prepaid expenses and other current assets, the carrying amount approximated the fair value because of the immediate or short-term nature of those instruments. For inventory, the carrying amount was based on lower of cost or market calculated on a specific-identification method with market being determined by the spot price of indium published by Metal Bulletin as posted on Bloomberg L.P. (a Level 2 fair value measurement). |
| | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carry-forward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carry-forward Exists.” This ASU will eliminate the diversity in practice in presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry-forward exists at the reporting date. This new guidance requires the netting of unrecognized tax benefits against a deferred tax asset for a loss or other carry-forward that would apply in settlement of the uncertain tax positions. Under the new guidance, unrecognized tax benefits will be netted against all available same-jurisdiction loss or other tax carry-forward that would be utilized, rather than only against carryforwards that are created by the unrecognized tax benefits. This guidance is effective prospectively, but allows optional retrospective adoption (for all periods presented), for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. As this guidance relates to presentation only, the adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
|
The FASB recently issued ASU “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) Liquidation Basis of Accounting” (ASU 2013-07) that requires an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent, as defined in ASU 2013-7. ASU 2013-7’s objective is to eliminate diverse practices by providing guidance about when and how to apply the model. The guidance applies to all entities except for investment companies regulated under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Since there is no imminent plan to liquidate the Company, this ASU does not apply. |
|
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating strategic options and, subsequent to December 31, 2014, has no revenue stream. The Company will evaluate the effect that ASU 2014-09 has on its financial statements and related disclosures and select a transition method when and if the Company has future revenues. |
| | | | | | | |