Fortress Biotech 10Q 2020 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


	☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020


	☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-35366

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware	20-5157386
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2 Gansevoort Street, 9th Floor

New York, New York 10014

(Address including zip code of principal executive offices)

(781) 652-4500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Exchange Name
Common Stock	FBIO	Nasdaq Capital Market
9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock	FBIOP	Nasdaq Capital Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:


Large accelerated filer	◻	Accelerated filer	⌧
Non-accelerated filer	◻	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒



Class of Stock		Outstanding Shares as of November 5, 2020
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		93,702,861
9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value		3,427,138

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands except for share and per share amounts)


	September 30,		December 31,
	2020		2019
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	218,389	$	136,858
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $147 and $100 at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively)		15,653		13,539
Inventory		1,052		857
Other receivables - related party		939		865
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,704		4,133
Total current assets		237,737		156,252

Property and equipment, net		12,114		12,433
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net		20,265		21,480
Restricted cash		1,645		16,574
Long-term investment, at fair value		11,723		11,148
Intangible asset, net		11,039		7,377
Other assets		1,356		1,158
Total assets	$	295,879	$	226,422

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	32,542	$	35,451
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		19		0
Interest payable		23		1,042
Interest payable - related party		0		92
Notes payable, short-term		0		7,220
Operating lease liabilities – short-term		1,697		1,784
Derivative warrant liability		0		27
Other current liabilities		3,000		0
Total current liabilities		37,281		45,616

Notes payable, long-term (net of debt discount of $8,607 and $5,086 at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively)		51,393		77,436
Operating lease liabilities – long-term		22,855		23,712
Other long-term liabilities		8,205		7,126
Total liabilities		119,734		153,890

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands except for share and per share amounts)


	September 30,		December 31,
	2020		2019
	(Unaudited)
Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 15,000,000 authorized, 5,000,000 designated Series A shares, 3,427,138 and 1,341,167 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively; liquidation value of $25.00 per share		3		1
Common stock, $.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 93,748,374 and 74,027,425 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively		94		74
Common stock issuable, 5,451 and 251,337 shares as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively		18		500
Additional paid-in-capital		574,461		461,874
Accumulated deficit		(477,465)		(436,234)
Total stockholders' equity attributed to the Company		97,111		26,215

Non-controlling interests		79,034		46,317
Total stockholders' equity		176,145		72,532
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	295,879	$	226,422

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

($ in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	9,447	$	9,492	$	30,808	$	23,816
Revenue - related party		28		280		1,042		1,683
Net revenue		9,475		9,772		31,850		25,499

Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold - product revenue		3,379		2,702		10,313		6,972
Research and development		13,298		14,571		43,868		56,355
Research and development - licenses acquired		458		700		2,278		1,350
General and administrative		15,383		14,339		45,358		41,260
Total operating expenses		32,518		32,312		101,817		105,937
Loss from operations		(23,043)		(22,540)		(69,967)		(80,438)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		265		738		1,228		1,955
Interest expense and financing fee		(6,958)		(3,168)		(13,142)		(8,743)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(803)		0		(1,189)		0
Change in fair value of investments		575		0		575		0
Gain on deconsolidation of Caelum		0		0		0		18,521
Total other income (expense)		(6,921)		(2,430)		(12,528)		11,733
Net loss		(29,964)		(24,970)		(82,495)		(68,705)

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		14,417		12,208		41,264		44,237
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(15,547)	$	(12,762)	$	(41,231)	$	(24,468)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.39)	$	(0.44)	$	(1.19)	$	(1.29)
Net loss per common share attributable to non - controlling interests - basic and diluted	$	(0.19)	$	(0.21)	$	(0.59)	$	(0.83)
Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted	$	(0.20)	$	(0.22)	$	(0.59)	$	(0.46)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted		76,093,211		56,856,821		69,404,499		53,060,565

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020


																	Total
	Series A																Stockholders’
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Shares		Treasury		Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Equity
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Issuable		Stock		Capital		Deficit		Interests		(Deficit)
Balance at June 30, 2020	2,693,806	$	3	86,113,331	$	86	$	813	$	—	$	521,493	$	(461,918)	$	56,381	$	116,858
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		—		—		3,171		—		—		3,171
Issuance of common stock related to equity plans	—		—	268,800		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering, net	—		—	7,064,214		7		—		—		21,110		—		—		21,117
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		—		(1,719)		—		—		(1,719)
Issuance of Series A preferred stock for cash, net	733,332		—	—		—		—		—		11,965		—		—		11,965
Partner company’s offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		18,774		—		—		18,774
Partner company’s at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		23,053		—		—		23,053
Partner company’s preferred stock offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		7,088		—		—		7,088
Issuance of common stock under partner company’s ESPP	—		—	—		—		—		—		180		—		—		180
Partner company’s dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		—		(50)		—		—		(50)
Reclass partner company's warrants from liability to equity	—		—	—		—		—		—		1,216		—		—		1,216
Issuance of partner company’s common shares for research and development expenses	—		—	—		—		—		—		21		—		—		21
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	302,029		1		(500)		—		810		—		—		311
Write off common shares issuable for 2019 Notes interest expense	—		—	—		—		(313)		—		—		—		—		(313)
Common shares issuable for service	—		—	—		—		18		—		—		—		—		18
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with Oaktree Note	—		—	—		—		—		—		4,419		—		—		4,419
Non-controlling interest in partner companies	—		—	—		—		—		—		(37,070)		—		37,070		—
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(14,417)		(14,417)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(15,547)		—		(15,547)
Balance at September 30, 2020	3,427,138	$	3	93,748,374	$	94	$	18	$	—	$	574,461	$	(477,465)	$	79,034	$	176,145

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019


	Series A														Total
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Shares		Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Issuable		Capital		Deficit		Interests		Equity
Balance at June 30, 2019	1,000,000	$	1	68,138,203	$	68	$	490	$	439,295	$	(407,980)	$	57,946	$	89,820
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		—		3,741		—		—		3,741
Issuance of restricted stock	—		—	177,292		—		—		—		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering, net	—		—	1,213,643		1		—		1,930		—		—		1,931
Issuance of preferred A for at-the-market offering, net	26,111		—	—		—		—		523		—				523
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		(601)		—		—		(601)
Partner company’s offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		52		—		—		52
Partner company’s at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		3,341		—		—		3,341
Common shares issuable for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	—		—		500		—		—		—		500
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	317,804		1		(490)		489		—		—		—
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes interest expense	—		—	91,767		—		—		165		—		—		165
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes debt repayment	—		—	396,825		—		—		500		—		—		500
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries	—		—	—		—		—		(3,467)		—		3,467		—
Write off of partner company note receivable	—		—	—		—		—		(2)		—		—		(2)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(12,208)		(12,208)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		—		(12,762)		—		(12,762)
Balance at September 30, 2019	1,026,111	$	1	70,335,534	$	70	$	500	$	445,966	$	(420,742)	$	49,205	$	75,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020


																	Total
	Series A																Stockholders’
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Shares		Treasury		Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Equity
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Issuable		Stock		Capital		Deficit		Interests		(Deficit)
Balance at December 31, 2019	1,341,167	$	1	74,027,425	$	74	$	500	$	—	$	461,874	$	(436,234)	$	46,317	$	72,532
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		—		—		10,319		—		—		10,319
Issuance of common stock related to equity plans	—		—	2,307,231		2		—		—		(2)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock under ESPP	—		—	53,268		—		—		—		90		—		—		90
Issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering, net	—		—	16,378,234		17		—		—		43,183		—		—		43,200
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		—		(4,507)		—		—		(4,507)
Repurchase of Series A preferred stock, net	(5,000)		—	—		—		—		(70)		(2)		—		—		(72)
Retirement of Series A preferred stock	—		—	—		—		—		70		(70)		—		—		—
Issuance of Series A preferred stock for cash, net	2,090,971		2	—		—		—		—		35,466		—		—		35,468
Partner company’s offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		53,698		—		—		53,698
Partner companies' at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		33,500		—		—		33,500
Partner company’s preferred stock offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		—		7,088		—		—		7,088
Issuance of common stock under partner company’s ESPP	—		—	—		—		—		—		349		—		—		349
Partner company’s dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		—		(50)		—		—		(50)
Partner company’s exercise of warrants for cash	—		—	—		—		—		—		13		—		—		13
Reclass partner company's warrants from liability to equity	—		—	—		—		—		—		1,216		—		—		1,216
Issuance of partner company’s common shares for research and development expenses	—		—	—		—		—		—		42		—		—		42
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	982,216		1		(500)		—		1,816		—		—		1,317
Common shares issuable for service	—		—	—		—		18		—		—		—		—		18
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with Oaktree Note	—		—	—		—		—		—		4,419		—		—		4,419
Non-controlling interest in partner companies	—		—	—		—		—		—		(73,981)		—		73,981		—
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(41,264)		(41,264)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(41,231)		—		(41,231)
Balance at September 30, 2020	3,427,138	$	3	93,748,374	$	94	$	18	$	—	$	574,461	$	(477,465)	$	79,034	$	176,145

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019


	Series A						Common		Additional						Total
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Shares		Paid-In		Accumulated		Non-Controlling		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Issuable		Capital		Deficit		Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2018	1,000,000	$	1	57,845,447	$	58	$	659	$	397,408	$	(396,274)	$	17,891	$	19,743
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—	—		—		—		10,423		—		—		10,423
Issuance of restricted stock	—		—	1,842,034		2		—		(2)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock under ESPP	—		—	54,221		—		—		60		—		—		60
Issuance of subsidiaries’ common shares for license expenses	—		—	—		—		(164)		164		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering, net	—		—	8,604,469		9		—		15,789		—		—		15,798
Issuance of Series A preferred stock for at-the-market offering, net	26,111		—	—		—		—		523		—		—		523
Preferred A dividends declared and paid	—		—	—		—		—		(1,773)		—		—		(1,773)
Partner company’s offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		61,036		—		—		61,036
Partner company’s at-the-market offering, net	—		—	—		—		—		29,680		—		—		29,680
Issuance of partner company warrants in conjunction with Horizon Notes	—		—	—		—		—		888		—		—		888
Common shares issuable for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	—		—		500		—		—		—		500
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	—		—	1,330,450		1		(495)		1,468		—		—		974
Common shares issuable for 2019 Notes interest expense	—		—	—		—		281		—		—		—		281
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes interest expense	—		—	262,088		—		(281)		506		—		—		225
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes debt repayment	—		—	396,825		—		—		500		—		—		500
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries	—		—	—		—		—		(70,702)		—		70,702		—
Write off of partner company note receivable	—		—	—		—		—		(2)		—		—		(2)
Deconsolidation of Caelum non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		4,849		4,849
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(44,237)		(44,237)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—	—		—		—		—		(24,468)		—		(24,468)
Balance at September 30, 2019	1,026,111	$	1	70,335,534	$	70	$	500	$	445,966	$	(420,742)	$	49,205	$	75,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(82,495)	$	(68,705)
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation expense		1,676		1,414
Bad debt expense		47		250
Amortization of debt discount		5,319		2,459
Non-cash interest		492		0
Amortization of product revenue license fee		1,065		820
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets		1,214		1,150
Stock-based compensation expense		10,319		10,423
Issuance of partner company’s common shares for research and development expenses		42		0
Common shares issuable for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense		0		500
Common shares issued for 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense		1,317		974
Common shares issuable for 2019 Notes interest expense		0		281
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes interest expense		0		225
Common shares issuable for service		18		0
Change in fair value of derivative liability		1,189		0
Change in fair value of investment		(575)		0
Gain on deconsolidation of Caelum		0		(18,521)
Research and development-licenses acquired, expense		2,236		1,350
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(2,161)		111
Inventory		(195)		(263)
Other receivables - related party		(74)		852
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,429		1,812
Other assets		(198)		(903)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,686)		(3,841)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		19		(149)
Interest payable		(1,019)		5
Interest payable - related party		(92)		(8)
Lease liabilities		(943)		(940)
Other long-term liabilities		(140)		795
Net cash used in operating activities		(63,196)		(69,909)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of research and development licenses		(3,369)		(850)
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,228)		(1,455)
Purchase of intangible asset		(1,000)		(2,400)
Purchase of short-term investment (certificates of deposit)		0		(5,000)
Redemption of short-term investment (certificates of deposit)		0		17,604
Deconsolidation of Caelum		0		(1,201)
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities		(5,597)		6,698
Net cash provided by discontinued investing activities		0		13,089
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(5,597)		19,787

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Payment of Series A preferred stock dividends	$	(4,507)	$	(1,773)
Purchase of treasury stock		(70)		0
Payment of costs related to purchase of treasury stock		(2)		0
Proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred stock		39,075		0
Payment of costs related to issuance of Series A preferred stock		(3,407)		0
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering		44,796		16,099
Payment of costs related to issuance of common stock for at-the-market offering		(1,506)		(301)
Proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred stock for at-the-market offering		0		539
Payment of costs related to issuance of Series A preferred stock for at-the-market offering		0		(16)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under ESPP		90		60
Proceeds from partner companies' ESPP		349		0
Partner company’s dividends declared and paid		(50)		0
Proceeds from partner companies' sale of stock		57,729		66,623
Payment of costs related to partner companies' sale of stock		(3,642)		(4,754)
Proceeds from partner companies' at-the-market offering		34,254		30,419
Payment of costs related to partner companies' at-the-market offering		(754)		(739)
Proceeds from partner company's preferred stock offering		8,000		0
Payment of costs related to partner company's preferred stock offering		(912)		0
Proceeds from exercise of partner company’s warrants		13		0
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with 2017 Subordinated Note Financing		(93)		(79)
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with 2018 Venture Notes		(58)		(126)
Proceeds from partner company's Horizon Notes		0		15,000
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with partner company's Horizon Notes		0		(1,393)
Proceeds from Oaktree Note		60,000		0
Payment of debt issuance costs associated with Oaktree Note		(4,239)		0
Repayment of 2017 Subordinated Note Financing		(28,356)		0
Repayment of 2018 Venture Notes		(21,707)		0
Repayment of 2019 Notes		(9,000)		0
Repayment of partner company's Horizon Notes		(15,750)		0
Repayment of IDB Note		(14,858)		0
Net cash provided by financing activities		135,395		119,559

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash		66,602		69,437
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		153,432		81,582
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	220,034	$	151,019

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	6,669	$	3,976
Cash paid for interest - related party	$	463	$	342

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
Settlement of restricted stock units into common stock	$	2	$	2
Common shares issuable for license acquired	$	0	$	164
Issuance of partner company warrants in conjunction with Horizon Notes	$	0	$	888
Issuance of warrants in conjunction with Oaktree Note	$	4,419	$	0
Common shares issued from 2017 Subordinated Note Financing interest expense	$	500	$	0
Common shares issued for 2019 Notes	$	0	$	500
Unpaid fixed assets	$	317	$	288
Partner company's previous paid offering cost	$	0	$	833
Partner company's unpaid intangible assets	$	3,727	$	4,734
Reclass partner company's warrants from liability to equity	$	1,216	$	0
Unpaid debt offering cost	$	57	$	0
Unpaid at-the-market offering cost	$	96	$	0
Unpaid partner company’s offering cost	$	457	$	0
Unpaid Series A preferred stock offering cost	$	203	$	0
Unpaid research and development licenses acquired	$	117	$	0
Retirement of Series A preferred stock	$	70	$	0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Description of Business

Fortress Biotech, Inc. (“Fortress” or the “Company”) is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to acquiring, developing and commercializing pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and product candidates, which the Company does at the Fortress level, at its majority-owned and majority-controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and at entities the Company founded and in which it maintains significant minority ownership positions. Fortress has a talented and experienced business development team, comprising scientists, doctors and finance professionals, who identify and evaluate promising products and product candidates for potential acquisition by new or existing partner companies. Fortress through its partner companies has executed such arrangements in partnership with some of the world’s foremost universities, research institutes and pharmaceutical companies, including City of Hope National Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and AstraZeneca plc.

Following the exclusive license or other acquisition of the intellectual property underpinning a product or product candidate, Fortress leverages its business, scientific, regulatory, legal and finance expertise to help the partners achieve their goals. Partner companies then assess a broad range of strategic arrangements to accelerate and provide additional funding to support research and development, including joint ventures, partnerships, out-licensings, and public and private financings; to date, three partner companies are publicly-traded, and two have consummated strategic partnerships with industry leaders Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“InvaGen”)(a subsidiary of Cipla Limited).

Several of our partner companies possess licenses to product candidate intellectual property, including Aevitas Therapeutics, Inc. (“Aevitas”), Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. (“Avenue”), Baergic Bio, Inc. (“Baergic”), Caelum Biosciences, Inc. (“Caelum”), Cellvation, Inc. (“Cellvation”), Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (“Checkpoint”), Cyprium Therapeutics, Inc. (“Cyprium”), Helocyte, Inc. (“Helocyte”), Journey Medical Corporation (“Journey” or “JMC”), Mustang Bio, Inc. (“Mustang”) and Oncogenuity, Inc. (“Oncogenuity”).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, the Company’s operations have been financed primarily through the sale of equity and debt securities, from the sale of partner companies, and the proceeds from the exercise of warrants and stock options. The Company has incurred losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception and expects to continue to incur substantial losses for the next several years as it continues to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for its existing and new product candidates. The Company’s current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next 12 months. However, the Company will need to raise additional funding through strategic relationships, public or private equity or debt financings, sale of a partner company, grants or other arrangements to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for the existing and new product candidates, fund operating losses, and, if deemed appropriate, establish or secure through third parties manufacturing for the potential products, sales and marketing capabilities. If such funding is not available or not available on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company’s current development plan and plans for expansion of its general and administrative infrastructure may be curtailed. The Company also has the ability, subject to limitations imposed by Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 and other applicable laws and regulations, to raise money from the sale of common stock of the public companies in which it has ownership positions. In addition to the foregoing, the Company does not expect any material impact on its development timelines, revenue levels and its liquidity due to the worldwide spread of COVID-19 (except as may be implicated by the Material Adverse Effect claimed by InvaGen in connection with their agreement with Avenue). However, the Company is continuing to assess the impact the spread of COVID-19 may have on its operations. Avenue will also continue to assess the alleged Material Adverse Effect claimed by InvaGen.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the balances and results for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statement results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any future period.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year for each of the companies: Avenue, Checkpoint and Mustang. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 16, 2020, from which the Company derived the balance sheet data at December 31, 2019, as well as Checkpoint’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2020, Mustang’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020, and Avenue’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2020.

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s subsidiaries. For consolidated entities where the Company owns less than 100% of the subsidiary, the Company records net loss attributable to non-controlling interests in its consolidated statements of operations equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interest retained in such entities by the respective non-controlling parties. The Company also consolidates subsidiaries in which it owns less than 50% of the subsidiary but maintains voting control. The Company continually assesses whether changes to existing relationships or future transactions may result in the consolidation or deconsolidation of partner companies.

The preparation of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.

Use of Estimates

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include certain amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. The Company’s significant estimates include, but are not limited to, useful lives assigned to long-lived assets, fair value of stock options and warrants, stock-based compensation, common stock issued to acquire licenses, investments, accrued expenses, provisions for income taxes and contingencies. Due to the uncertainty inherent in such estimates, actual results may differ from these estimates.

Significant Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies to those previously disclosed in the 2019 Annual Report.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which makes a number of changes meant to add, modify or remove certain disclosure requirements associated with the movement amongst or hierarchy associated with Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. On January 1, 2020, the Company’s adoption of this guidance to did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) (“ASU 470-20”) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 815-40”), which simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception and it also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. The ASU is effective for public business entities that meet the definition of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filer and will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years, for the Company as it is a smaller reporting company. Early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses”. The ASU sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (CECL) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Recently, the FASB issued the final ASU to delay adoption for smaller reporting companies to calendar year 2023. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3. Discontinued Operations

The table below depicts the cash flows from the sale of the Company’s investment in National Holdings Corporation, a diversified independent brokerage company (together with its subsidiaries, herein referred to as “NHLD” or “National”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2019:


	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
($ in thousands)	2019
Investing activities
Proceeds from sale of National	$	13,089
Total cash provided by discontinued investing activities	$	13,089

At September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had 0 ownership interest in National.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

4. Collaboration and Stock Purchase Agreements

Caelum

Agreement with Alexion

In January 2019, Caelum entered into a Development, Option and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “DOSPA”) and related documents by and among Caelum, Alexion Therapeutics, Inc. (“Alexion”), the Company and Caelum security holders as parties thereto (such security holders, including Fortress, the “Sellers”). Under the terms of the agreement, Alexion purchased a 19.9% minority equity interest in Caelum for $30 million. Additionally, Alexion has agreed to make potential payments to Caelum upon the achievement of certain developmental milestones, in exchange for which Alexion obtained a contingent exclusive option to acquire the remaining equity in Caelum. The agreement also provides for potential additional payments, in the event Alexion exercises the purchase option, for up to $500 million, which includes an upfront option exercise payment and potential regulatory and commercial milestone payments.

In December 2019, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) feedback which resulted in the redesign and expansion of Caelum’s planned clinical development program for its lead product candidate, CAEL-101, Caelum entered into an Amended and Restated DOSPA, which amended the terms of the existing agreement with Alexion. The amendment modified the terms of Alexion’s option to acquire the remaining equity in Caelum based on data from the expanded Phase 2/3 trials. The amendment also modified the development-related milestone events associated with the initial $30 million in contingent payments, provided for an additional $20 million in upfront funding, as well as funding of $60 million in exchange for an additional equity interest in Caelum at fair value upon achievement of a specific development-related milestone event.

In September 2020, following its Phase 2 open-label dose escalation study, Caelum announced the initiation of its Cardiac Amyloid Reaching for Extended Survival (“CARES”) Phase 3 clinical program to evaluate CAEL-101 a first-in-class amyloid fibril targeted therapy, in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in AL amyloidosis. The CARES clinical program includes two parallel Phase 3 studies – one in patients with Mayo stage 3a disease and one in patients with Mayo stage 3b disease – and will collectively enroll approximately 370 patients globally. Enrollment is underway in both studies. The primary objective of the clinical program is to assess overall survival. The Phase 2 program continues with the addition of a study arm to evaluate CAEL-101 in combination with SoC therapy plus daratumumab.

Avenue

Agreement with InvaGen

On November 12, 2018, the Company’s partner company, Avenue, entered into a Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (“Avenue SPMA”) with InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) and Madison Pharmaceuticals Inc., a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of InvaGen. Pursuant to the Avenue SPMA, and following approval by Avenue’s stockholders on February 8, 2019, InvaGen purchased a number of shares of Avenue common stock representing 33.3% of Avenue’s fully diluted capital stock for net proceeds to Avenue of $31.5 million (after deducting fees and other offering-related costs).

Upon the achievement of certain closing conditions (including most notably FDA approval for IV Tramadol, Avenue’s product candidate), InvaGen will be obligated to acquire Avenue via reverse subsidiary merger (the “Merger Transaction”). Under the Merger Transaction, InvaGen will pay $180 million (subject to certain potential reductions) to the holders of Avenue’s capital stock (other than InvaGen itself). In October 2020, InvaGen communicated to Avenue that it believes a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Avenue SPMA) has occurred, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which means that it is possible that InvaGen is attempting to avoid their obligations to consummate the second stage closing under the Avenue SPMA. Avenue disagrees with InvaGen’s assertion that a Material Adverse Effect has occurred, and Avenue has advised InvaGen of this position.

Subject to the terms and conditions described in the Avenue SPMA, InvaGen may also provide interim financing to Avenue in an amount of up to $7.0 million during the time period between February 8, 2019 and the Merger Transaction. Any amounts drawn on the interim financing will be deducted from the aggregate consideration payable to Company stockholders by virtue of the Merger Transaction.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction, Avenue will enter into a Contingent Value Rights Agreement (the “CVR Agreement”) with a trust company as rights agent, pursuant to which holders of common shares of Avenue, other than InvaGen (each, a “Holder”), will be entitled to receive on Contingent Value Right (“CVR”) for each share held immediately prior to the Merger Transaction.

Each CVR represents the right of its holder to receive a contingent cash payment pursuant to the CVR Agreement upon the achievement of certain milestones. If, during the period commencing on the day following the closing of the Merger Transaction until December 31, 2028, IV Tramadol generates at least $325 million or more in Net Sales (as defined in the CVR Agreement) in a calendar year, each Holder shall be entitled to receive their pro rata share of (i) if the product generated less than $400 million in Net Sales during such calendar year, 10% of Gross Profit (as defined in the CVR Agreement), (ii) if the product generated between $400 million and $500 million in Net Sales during such calendar year, 12.5% of Gross Profit, or (iii) if the product generated more than $500 million in Net Sales during such calendar year, 15% of Gross Profit. Additionally, at any time beginning on January 1, 2029 that IV Tramadol has generated at least $1.5 billion in aggregate Net Sales, then with respect to each calendar year in which IV Tramadol generates $100 million or more in Net Sales, each Holder shall be entitled to receive their pro rata share of an amount equal to 20% of the Gross Profit generated by IV Tramadol. These additional payments will terminate on the earlier of December 31, 2036 and the date (which may be extended by up to 6 months) that any person has received approval from the FDA for an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“NDA”) or an FDA AP-rated 505(b)(2) NDA using IV Tramadol.

On October 12, 2020, Avenue announced that it had received a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) from the FDA regarding Avenue’s NDA for IV Tramadol. The CRL cited deficiencies related to the terminal sterilization validation and stated that IV Tramadol, intended to treat patients in acute pain who require an opioid, is not safe for the intended patient population. Avenue requested a meeting with the FDA to resolve the issues described in the CRL and the meeting has been scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2020.

Also in October 2020, InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) communicated to Avenue that it believes a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (“Avenue SPMA”)) has occurred, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which means that it is possible that InvaGen is attempting to avoid their obligations to consummate the second stage closing under the Avenue SPMA. Avenue disagrees with InvaGen’s assertion that a Material Adverse Effect has occurred, and Avenue has advised InvaGen of this position.

5. Property and Equipment

Fortress’ property and equipment consisted of the following:


	Useful Life		September 30,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	(Years)		2020		2019

	(Unaudited)
Computer equipment		3	$	662	$	648
Furniture and fixtures		5		1,199		1,162
Machinery & equipment		5		5,014		4,594
Leasehold improvements		5-15		10,580		9,358
Construction in progress ¹		N/A		821		1,157
Total property and equipment				18,276		16,919
Less: Accumulated depreciation				(6,162)		(4,486)
Property and equipment, net			$	12,114	$	12,433

Note 1:

Relates to the Mustang cell processing facility.

Fortress' depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was approximately $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and was recorded in both research and development expense and general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Fortress' depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was approximately $1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and was recorded in both research and development expense and general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

6. Fair Value Measurements

Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are recorded at amounts that approximate their fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

Fair Value of Caelum

As of September 30, 2020, the Company valued its investment in Caelum in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and estimated the fair value to be $11.7 million based on a per share value of $1.62. As of September 30, 2020, the following inputs were utilized to derive the value: risk free rate of return of 0.12%, volatility of 70% and a discount for lack of marketability of 28.6%.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company valued its investment in Caelum in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and estimated the fair value to be $11.1 million based on a per share value of $1.54. As of December 31, 2019, the following inputs were utilized to derive the value: risk free rate of return of 1.6%, volatility of 70% and a discount for lack of marketability of 28.7%.

Cyprium Warrant Liability

During the quarter ended September 30, 2020, Cyprium raised approximately $8.0 million in Perpetual Preferred Shares (“Cyprium Offering,” see Note 14). The Cyprium Offering coupled with the repayment of the 2018 Venture Debt (see Note 10), triggered the issuance of the Cyprium Warrant, in that a price per share could be established. As such these events resulted in Cyprium recording the Cyprium Warrant as issued rather than contingently issuable.

The fair value of the Cyprium Warrants in connection with the 2018 Venture Debt was determined by applying management’s estimate of the probability of issuance of the Contingently Issuable Warrants together with an option-pricing model, with the following key assumptions:


	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Risk-free interest rate	0.69	%	1.92	%
Expected dividend yield	0		0
Expected term in years	10.0		10.0
Expected volatility	85	%	93	%
Probability of issuance of the warrant	100	%	5	%


	Cyprium
	Contingently
	Issuable Warrant
($ in thousands)	Liability
Beginning balance at January 1, 2020	$	27
Change in fair value		1,189
Reclass partner company's warrants from liability to equity		(1,216)
Ending balance at September 30, 2020	$	-

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following tables classify into the fair value hierarchy of Fortress’ financial instruments, measured at fair value as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:


	Fair Value Measurement as of September 30, 2020
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Fair value of investment in Caelum	$	0	$	0	$	11,723	$	11,723
Total	$	0	$	0	$	11,723	$	11,723


	Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Fair value of investment in Caelum	$	0	$	0	$	11,148	$	11,148
Total	$	0	$	0	$	11,148	$	11,148


	Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Warrant liabilities	$	0	$	0	$	27	$	27
Total	$	0	$	0	$	27	$	27

The table below provides a roll-forward of the changes in fair value of Level 3 financial instruments as of September 30, 2020:



	Investment in			Warrant
($ in thousands)	Caelum		Liabilities		Total
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	11,148	$	27	$	11,175
Change in fair value		—		1,189		1,189
Reclass partner company's warrants from liability to equity		—		(1,216)		(1,216)
Change in fair value of investments		575		—		575
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	11,723	$	0	$	11,723

As of September 30, 2020, no transfers occurred between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 instruments.

7. Licenses Acquired

In accordance with ASC 730-10-25-1, Research and Development, costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged to research and development expense if the technology licensed has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. The licenses purchased by Fortress and its partner companies require substantial completion of research and development, and regulatory and marketing approval efforts in order to reach technological feasibility. As such, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the purchase price of licenses acquired was classified as research and development-licenses acquired in the condensed consolidated Statements of operations as reflected in the table below:

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Partner companies:
Mustang	$	287	$	700	$	1,837	$	1,350
Aevitas		162		—		162		—
Baergic		8		—		8		—
Oncogenuity		1		—		271		—
Total	$	458	$	700	$	2,278	$	1,350

Mustang

SIRION Biotech GmbH - LentiBOOST^TM (MB-207)

On September 30, 2020, Mustang entered into an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement with SIRION Biotech (“SIRION”) for the rights to SIRION’s LentiBOOST^TM technology for the development of MB-207, Mustang’s lentiviral gene therapy for the treatment of previously transplanted patients with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (the “SIRION Technology License”). Pursuant to the SIRION Technology License, which requires payment in Euro, the Company paid SIRION a one-time upfront fee of $0.1 million (€0.1 million) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. In addition, five future development milestone payments totaling up to approximately $5.6 million (€4.7 million) in the aggregate are due upon achievement of certain milestones. Additional milestone payments totaling up to $4.1 million (€3.5 million) in the aggregate are due in connection with the achievement of three commercial milestones and low- to mid-single digit royalties are due on aggregate cumulative worldwide net sales of licensed products.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, Mustang recorded the following expense in research and development for licenses acquired:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
City of Hope National Medical Center
CD123 (MB-102)³	$	0	$	0	$	334	$	250
IL13Rα2 (MB-101)³		0		0		333		0
HER2 (MB-103)¹		0		0		250		0
CS1 (MB-104)		0		0		0		200
PSCA (Spacer)³		0		200		333		200
Fred Hutch - CD20 (MB-106)²		0		0		300		0
Nationwide Children’s Hospital - C134 (MB-108)		0		0		0		200
CSL Behring (Calimmune)		170		200		170		200
UCLA		0		300		0		300
SIRION LentiBOOST^TM		117		0		117		0
Total	$	287	$	700	$	1,837	$	1,350

Note 1:

Represents a non-refundable milestone payment in connection with the twelth patient treated in the Phase 1 clinical study of MB-103 at COH, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Note 2:

Represents a non-refundable milestone payment in connection with the twelth patient treated in the Phase 1 clinical study of MB-106 at Fred Hutch, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Note 3:

Represents a milestone payment to COH in connection with Mustang’s public underwritten offerings, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Oncogenuity

Effective May 6, 2020, Oncogenuity entered into a license agreement with the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (“Columbia”) to develop novel oligonucleotides for the treatment of genetically driven cancers (the “Columbia License”). The proprietary platform produces oligomers, known as “ONCOlogues.”

As consideration for the Columbia License, Oncogenuity paid an upfront fee of $0.3 million, and Fortress transferred to Columbia 1,000,000 shares of Oncogenuity common stock, representing 10.00% ownership of Oncogenuity. In connection with the share transfer, Oncogenuity also provided Columbia with limited anti-dilution protection. Oncogenuity valued the stock grant to Columbia utilizing a discounted cash flow model to determine the weighted market value of invested capital, discounted by a lack of marketability of 41.7%, weighted average cost of capital of 20.5%, and net of debt utilized, resulting in a value of $0.021 per share or $21,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. Since a portion of the acquisition of the license was settled through the transfer of shares of Oncogenuity's common stock, this transaction fell within the scope of ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, since equity was transferred in exchange for goods (the license). Specifically, Oncogenuity recorded the cost of the license as a non-employee share based payment, measured at the grant date fair value of the common stock. The common shares were equity-classified. The anti-dilution provision was concluded to represent a performance condition tied to a future liquidity event, which was not considered as probable to occur at September 30, 2020, because it was deemed outside of Oncogenuity’s control.

Development milestone payments totaling up to approximately $18.0 million in the aggregate are due upon achievement of certain milestones in connection with the initial indication. Additional milestone payments totaling up to $15.3 million in the aggregate are due in connection with product development milestones for subsequent indications. A $15.0 million sales milestone is due upon the achievement of a licensed product sales threshold, and low- to mid-single digit royalties are due on aggregate cumulative worldwide net sales of licensed products.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, Oncogenuity recorded expense of NaN and $0.3 million in research and development - licenses acquired in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

8. Sponsored Research and Clinical Trial Agreements

Aevitas

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, Aevitas recorded the following expense in connection with its sponsored research and clinical trial agreements:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
UMass - adeno-associated virus ("AAV")		163		0		218		0
UPenn - AAV		0		255		567		755
Duke - AAV		0		17		0		17
Total	$	163	$	272	$	785	$	772

Cellvation

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 0 expenses were incurred. For the three and nine months ended September 30 2019, Cellvation recorded expense of $0.1 million, in connection with its sponsored research arrangement with the University of Texas. The expense was recorded in research and development expense in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Mustang

CS1(MB-104) Clinical Research and Support Agreement with COH

In June 2020, Mustang entered into a clinical research and support agreement with COH in connection with an Investigator-sponsored study conducted under an Institutional Review Board-approved, investigator-initiated protocol entitled: "Phase I Study to Evaluate Cellular Immunotherapy Using Memory-Enriched T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express a CS1-Targeting, Hinge-Optimized, 41BB-Costimulatory Chimeric Antigen Receptor and a Truncated EGFR Following Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy in Adult Patients with CS1+ Multiple Myeloma." The CAR T being studied under this protocol has been designated by Mustang as MB-104. Under the terms of the agreement Mustang paid COH $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2020 for costs incurred and will reimburse COH for costs associated with this trial, when incurred, not to exceed $2.4 million. The agreement will expire upon the delivery of the final study report or earlier. Expense of $0.1 million an $0.8 million was incurred for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

XSCID (MB-107) Data Transfer Agreement with St. Jude

In June 2020, Mustang entered into a Data Transfer Agreement with St. Jude under which Mustang will reimburse St. Jude for costs associated with St. Jude’s clinical trial for the treatment of infants with X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (“XSCID”). Pursuant to the terms of this agreement Mustang paid an upfront fee of $1.1 million on July 1, 2020 and will continue to reimburse St. Jude for costs incurred in connection with this trial.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, Mustang recorded the following expense in research and development for sponsored research and clinical trial agreements:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
City of Hope National Medical Center	$	0	$	500	$	500	$	1,500
CD123 (MB-102)		48		269		344		1,028
IL13Rα2 (MB-101)		96		244		422		811
Manufacturing		0		114		0		343
CS1 (MB-104)		65		0		835		0
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - CRISPR		0		0		0		69
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital - XSCID (MB-107)		107		0		1,665		0
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center - CD20 (MB-106)		418		49		1,134		690
Total	$	734	$	1,176	$	4,900	$	4,441

Oncogenuity

Pursuant to the terms of the Columbia License, Oncogenuity will pay up to $4.8 million to Columbia semiannually for five years ending in November 2024.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, Oncogenuity recorded expense of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in research and development in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. NaN expense was recorded in 2019.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

9. Intangibles, net

On July 29, 2020 Journey entered into a license and supply agreement with a third party for an oral acne treatment. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the License and Supply Agreement (“LSA”), Journey agreed to pay $5.0 million, comprised of an upfront payment of $1.0 million paid upon execution with remaining payments due as follows: $1.0 million upon achievement of 2 marketing milestones and $3.0 million due in $1.0 million installments, commencing on the 18-month anniversary, the 24-month anniversary and the 36-month anniversary of execution of the LSA. NaN additional milestone payments totaling $17.0 million are due upon the achievement of certain net sales milestones. Royalties in the mid, single digits based on net sales, subject to specified reductions are also due.

In accordance with ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, Journey determined the conditions of the LSA did not constitute the purchase of a business, and therefore recorded the consideration as an asset, to be amortized over the expected life of the product, which is deemed to be five years. In addition, Journey determined pursuant to ASC 450, Contingencies, that royalty payments in connection with the LSA will be recorded when they become payable with a corresponding charge to cost of goods sold.

In accordance with the installment payment terms of the LSA, Journey recorded a discount for imputed interest per ASC 835-30 Interest-Imputed Interest of $0.3 million. As of September 30, 2020, Journey recorded a net intangible asset related to this transaction of $4.7 million which was recorded on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The table below provides a summary of the Journey intangible assets as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively:


	Estimated Useful
($ in thousands)	Lives (Years)	September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
		(Unaudited)
Total Intangible assets – asset purchases	3 to 7	$	14,661	$	9,934
Accumulated amortization			(3,622)		(2,557)
Net intangible assets		$	11,039	$	7,377

The table below provides a summary for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, of Journey’s recognized expense related to its product licenses, which was recorded in costs of goods sold on the condensed consolidated statement of operations:


	Intangible
($ in thousands)	Assets, Net
Beginning balance at January 1, 2020	$	7,377
Additions:
Oral acne treatment license acquisition¹		4,727
Amortization expense		(1,065)
Ending balance at September 30, 2020	$	11,039

Note 1: As of September 30, 2020, this asset has not yet been placed in service, therefore no amortization expense was recognized on this asset for the quarter ended September 30, 2020. The Company expects the asset to be placed in service in the first half of 2021. Once the asset is placed in service the Company will amortize the asset over five years, which represents its expected useful life.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The future amortization of these intangible assets is as follows:


					Total
($ in thousands)	Ximino®		Exelderm®		Amortization
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020	$	254	$	100	$	354
Year Ended December 31, 2021		1,019		267		1,286
Year Ended December 31, 2022		1,019		0		1,019
Year Ended December 31, 2023		1,019		0		1,019
Year Ended December 31, 2024		1,019		0		1,019
Thereafter		1,615		0		1,615
Sub-total	$	5,945	$	367	$	6,312
Asset not yet placed in service						4,727
Total	$	5,945	$	367	$	11,039

10. Debt and Interest

Debt

During the quarter ended September 30, 2020 the Company entered into a new credit facility with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC, as the administrative agent (in such capacity, the “Agent”), and the lenders from time to time party thereto (each a “Lender” or “Oaktree” and collectively, the “Lenders”), as described below (the “Oaktree Note”). The Company utilized the proceeds from the Oaktree Note to repay the 2017 Subordinated Notes, the 2018 Venture Notes and the 2019 Notes. The Company also repaid the IDB Note utilizing the cash collateral securing the IDB Note, which was classified as restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated condensed balance sheet. In addition, on September 30, 2020 Mustang repaid the Mustang Horizon Notes.

Total debt consists of the following as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:


	September 30,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		Interest rate		Maturity
IDB Note	$	0	$	14,929	2.25	%	Aug - 2021
2017 Subordinated Note Financing³		0		3,254	8.00	%	March - 2022
2017 Subordinated Note Financing³		0		13,893	8.00	%	May - 2022
2017 Subordinated Note Financing³		0		1,820	8.00	%	June - 2022
2017 Subordinated Note Financing³		0		3,018	8.00	%	August - 2022
2017 Subordinated Note Financing		0		6,371	8.00	%	September - 2022
2018 Venture Notes⁴		0		6,517	8.00	%	August - 2021
2018 Venture Notes⁴		0		15,190	8.00	%	September - 2021
2019 Notes¹		0		9,000	12.00	%	September - 2021
Mustang Horizon Notes²		0		15,750	9.00	%	October - 2022
Oaktree Note		60,000		—	11.00	%	August - 2025
Total notes payable		60,000		89,742
Less: Discount on notes payable		8,607		5,086
Total notes payable	$	51,393	$	84,656

Note 1:

Formerly the Opus Credit Facility (see Note 16.)

Note 2:

Interest rate was 9.0% plus one-month LIBOR Rate in excess of 2.5%.

Note 3:

As a result of a one-year maturity date extension effective 2020, the interest rate increased by 1% to 9.0%.

Note 4:

At December 31, 2019, $6.0 million is included in Notes payable, short-term on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Interest Expense

The following table shows the details of interest expense for all debt arrangements during the periods presented. Interest expense includes contractual interest; fees include amortization of the debt discount and amortization of fees associated with loan transaction costs, amortized over the life of the loan:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2020						2019
($ in thousands)	Interest		Fees		Total		Interest		Fees		Total
IDB Note	$	77	$	0	$	77	$	86	$	0	$	86
2017 Subordinated Note Financing¹		694		1,374		2,068		1,072		326		1,398
2019 Notes		172		0		172		275		104		379
2018 Venture Notes¹		387		638		1,025		438		166		604
LOC Fees		14		0		14		14		0		14
Mustang Horizon Notes^1,3		895		1,792		2,687		345		234		579
Oaktree Note¹		624		108		732		0		0		0
Note Payable²		187		0		187		0		108		108
Other		(4)		0		(4)		0		0		0
Total Interest Expense and Financing Fee	$	3,046	$	3,912	$	6,958	$	2,230	$	938	$	3,168


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020						2019
($ in thousands)	Interest		Fees		Total		Interest		Fees		Total
IDB Note	$	246	$	0	$	246	$	254	$	-	$	254
2017 Subordinated Note Financing¹		2,870		1,890		4,760		3,148		1,081		4,229
2019 Notes		710		0		710		840		336		1,176
2018 Venture Notes¹		1,253		1,000		2,253		1,299		468		1,767
LOC Fees		45		0		45		45		0		45
Mustang Horizon Notes^1,3		1,585		2,321		3,906		698		466		1,164
Oaktree Note¹		624		108		732		0		0		0
Note Payable²		492		0		492		0		108		108
Other		(2)		0		(2)		0		0		0
Total Interest Expense and Financing Fee	$	7,823	$	5,319	$	13,142	$	6,284	$	2,459	$	8,743

Note 1:

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, $1.2 million expense of unamortized debt discount fees for the 2017 Subordinated Note Financing, $0.3 million for the 2018 Venture Notes and $1.8 million for the Mustang Horizon Notes.

Note 2:

Imputed interest expense related to Journey’s agreements for Ximino and oral acne treatment.

Note 3:

Included in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $0.6 million of prepayment penalties included in interest expense for the Mustang Horizon Notes.

Oaktree Note

On August 27, 2020 (the “Closing Date”), Fortress, as borrower, entered into a $60.0 million senior secured credit agreement (the “Agreement”) with Oaktree. The Company borrowed the full $60.0 million in connection with the terms of the Oaktree Note on the Closing Date and used the bulk of the proceeds to repay its outstanding debt to other lenders (2017 Subordinated Notes, 2018 Venture Notes and 2019 Notes (previously the “Opus Credit Facility”)).

The Oaktree Note bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 11.0%, payable quarterly and maturing on the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date, August 27, 2025, the (“Maturity Date”). The Company is required to make quarterly interest-only payments until the Maturity Date, at which point the outstanding principal amount is due. The Company may voluntarily prepay the Oaktree Note at any time subject to a Prepayment Fee as defined in the Terms section. The Company is required to make mandatory prepayments of the Oaktree Note under various circumstances as defined in the Terms section. No amounts paid or prepaid may be reborrowed without Oaktree consent.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers, dispositions, prepayment of permitted indebtedness, and dividends and other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, the Agreement contains certain financial covenants, including, among other things, (i) maintenance of minimum liquidity by the Company, and (ii) a minimum revenue test that is subject to certain exclusions. Failure by the Company to comply with the financial covenants will result in an event of default, subject to certain cure rights of the Company.

The Agreement contains customary events of default, in certain circumstances subject to customary cure periods. Following an event of default and any cure period, if applicable, the Agent will have the right upon notice to accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Agreement, in addition to other remedies available to the lenders as secured creditors of the Company. The Agreement grants a security interest in favor of the Agent, for the benefit of the lenders, in substantially all of the Company’s assets as collateral securing the Company’s obligations under the Agreement, except for: (i) certain interests in controlled foreign corporation subsidiaries of the Company; (ii) the Company’s holdings in Avenue; and (iii) those portions of the Company’s holdings in certain subsidiaries (plus Caelum) that are encumbered by pre-existing equity pledges to certain of the Company’s officers.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement on the Closing Date the Company paid Oaktree an upfront commitment fee equal to 3% of the $60.0 million, or $1.8 million. In addition, the Company paid a $35,000 Agency fee to the Agent which was due on the Closing Date and will be due annually, together with fees of $2.5 million directly to third parties involved in the transaction.

In connection with the Oaktree Note, the Company issued warrants to Oaktree and certain of its affiliates to purchase up to 1,749,450 shares of common stock (see Note 14) with a relative fair value of $4.4 million.

As of September 30, 2020, the Company recorded the fees totaling $8.7 million ($1.8 million to Oaktree, $2.5 million of expenses paid to third-parties and $4.4 million representing the relative fair value of the Oaktree Warrants) to debt discount. These costs will be amortized over the term of the Oaktree Note.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

11. Accrued Liabilities and other Long-Term Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:




		September 30,		December 31,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees	$	1,672	$	1,153
Salaries, bonus and related benefits		5,677		6,683
Accrued expense - related party		19		0
Research and development		4,604		4,215
Research and development - manufacturing		0		1,017
Research and development - license maintenance fees		629		361
Research and development - milestones		600		0
Accrued royalties payable		1,908		2,320
Accrued coupon expense		5,476		8,391
Other		547		1,259
Total accrued expenses	$	21,132	$	25,399

Other long-term liabilities:
Deferred rent and long-term lease abandonment charge¹	$	1,996	$	2,136
Long-term notes payable, net (Journey)
Ximino agreement²		3,456		4,990
Oral acne treatment agreement³		2,753		0
Total other long-term liabilities	$	8,205	$	7,126

Note 1:

As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the balance consists of deferred charges related to build-out of the New York facility.

Note 2:

As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the imputed interest discount was $1.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively, in connection with its acquisition of Ximino in July 2019. Amortization of interest discount was $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. As of September 30, 2020, $2.0 million of note payable was classified as short-term.

Note 3:

As of September 30, 2020, the imputed discount balance was $0.2 million. The imputed interest discount was calculated utilizing a 4.00% effective rate, which represents the market rate for an asset-backed three year loan, secured by receivables. As of September 30, 2020, $1.0 million of note payable was classified as short-term.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

12. Non-Controlling Interests

Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities are as follows:


			For the nine months ended
	As of September 30, 2020		September 30, 2020		As of September 30, 2020
			Net loss attributable to		Non-controlling interests		Non-controlling
($ in thousands)	NCI equity share		non-controlling interests		in consolidated entities		ownership
Aevitas	$	(2,297)		(680)		(2,977)	39.0	%
Avenue ²		5,709		(3,206)		2,503	77.4	%
Baergic		(1,605)		(68)		(1,673)	40.0	%
Cellvation		(1,072)		(145)		(1,217)	22.6	%
Checkpoint¹		37,963		(9,000)		28,963	80.0	%
Coronado SO		(290)		0		(290)	13.0	%
Cyprium		784		(843)		(59)	28.4	%
Helocyte		(4,890)		(236)		(5,126)	18.8	%
JMC		123		257		380	6.9	%
Mustang ²		86,572		(27,035)		59,537	77.9	%
Oncogenuity		(47)		(268)		(315)	25.3	%
Tamid		(652)		(40)		(692)	22.8	%
Total	$	120,298	$	(41,264)	$	79,034


			For the twelve months ended
	As of December 31, 2019		December 31, 2019		As of December 31, 2019
			Net loss attributable to		Non-controlling interests		Non-controlling
($ in thousands)	NCI equity share		non-controlling interests		in consolidated entities		ownership
Aevitas	$	(1,249)	$	(694)	$	(1,943)	35.8	%
Avenue ²		24,269		(19,011)		5,258	77.3	%
Baergic		23		(1,162)		(1,139)	33.0	%
Cellvation		(732)		(158)		(890)	20.6	%
Checkpoint ¹		29,389		(14,687)		14,702	78.0	%
Coronado SO		(290)		0		(290)	13.0	%
Cyprium		(320)		(99)		(419)	10.6	%
Helocyte		(4,322)		(402)		(4,724)	19.3	%
JMC		(211)		325		114	6.9	%
Mustang ²		62,025		(25,727)		36,298	70.3	%
Tamid		(565)		(85)		(650)	22.8	%
Total	$	108,017	$	(61,700)	$	46,317

Note 1:

Checkpoint is consolidated with Fortress’ operations because Fortress maintains voting control through its ownership of Checkpoint’s Class A Common Shares which provide super-majority voting rights.

Note 2:

Avenue and Mustang are consolidated with Fortress’ operations because Fortress maintains voting control through its ownership of Preferred Class A Shares which provide super-majority voting rights.

13. Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for Common Stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of Common Stock and Common Stock equivalents outstanding for the period.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following shares of potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding, as the effect of including such securities would be anti-dilutive for the nine months ended September 30, 2020:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020	2019
Warrants to purchase Common Stock	3,026,693	2,745,364
Options to purchase Common Stock	1,187,600	1,169,293
Unvested Restricted Stock	14,305,949	12,622,881
Unvested Restricted Stock Units	434,215	791,610
Total	18,954,457	17,329,148

14. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

At the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 17, 2020, its stockholders approved an amendment to its certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock available to issue by 50,000,000 to 150,000,000 with a par value of $0.001 per share. The amendment was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 18, 2020.

Stock-based Compensation

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense from stock option, employee stock purchase programs and restricted Common Stock awards and warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Employee awards	$	1,200	$	936	$	3,732	$	2,791
Executive awards of Fortress Companies' stock		369		358		1,136		1,065
Non-employee awards		31		15		136		84
Warrants		32		97		97		97
Partner Companies:
Avenue		161		298		592		1,585
Checkpoint		725		833		2,095		2,444
Mustang		606		1,120		2,368		2,174
Other		47		84		163		183
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	3,171	$	3,741	$	10,319	$	10,423

For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, approximately $0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense was included in research and development expenses in connection with equity grants made to employees and consultants and approximately $2.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, was included in general and administrative expenses in connection with grants made to employees, members of the board of directors and consultants.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, approximately $2.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense was included in research and development expenses in connection with equity grants made to employees and consultants and approximately $7.8 million and $7.8 million, respectively, was included in general and administrative expenses in connection with grants made to employees, members of the board of directors and consultants.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Equity Compensation Plans

At the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting on June 30, 2020, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (“Stock Plan”) to increase common shares issuable under the Stock Plan by 3.0 million to 13.0 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 4.2 million shares remain to be issued under the Stock Plan.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes Fortress stock option activities excluding activity related to Fortress partner companies:


						Weighted average
				Total		remaining
		Weighted average		weighted average		contractual life
	Number of shares	exercise price		intrinsic value		(years)
Options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2019	1,410,501	$	4.30	$	684,752	2.33
Exercised	(100,000)		1.18		0	—
Forfeited	(247,011)		2.55		0	—
Options vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2020	1,063,490	$	5.00	$	1,044,218	2.87

As of September 30, 2020, Fortress had no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to options.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes Fortress restricted stock awards and restricted stock units activities, excluding activities related to Fortress Companies:


		Weighted
		average grant
	Number of shares	price
Unvested balance at December 31, 2019	13,768,014	$	2.46
Restricted stock granted	1,873,072		2.57
Restricted stock vested	(1,549,564)		2.69
Restricted stock units granted	630,126		3.82
Restricted stock units forfeited	(106,250)		2.71
Restricted stock units vested	(368,290)		3.13
Unvested balance at September 30, 2020	14,247,108	$	2.49

As of September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards of approximately $17.5 million and $12.7 million, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 3.9 years and 5.0 years, respectively.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Warrants

The following table summarizes Fortress warrant activities, excluding activities related to Fortress Companies:


				Total weighted		Weighted average
				average		remaining
	Number of	Weighted average		intrinsic		contractual life
	shares	exercise price		value		(years)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019	2,741,180	$	3.19	$	111,000	2.73
Granted	1,849,450		3.14		1,657,538	—
Forfeited	(9)		3.00		0	—
Outstanding as of September 30, 2020	4,590,621	$	3.17	$	4,111,018	5.10
Exercisable as of September 30, 2020	4,430,621	$	3.21	$	3,816,818	5.05

In connection with the Oaktree Note (see Note 10), the Company issued warrants to Oaktree and certain of its affiliates to purchase up to 1,749,450 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $3.20 per share (the “Oaktree Warrants”). Oaktree is entitled to additional warrants if at any time prior to the expiration of the Oaktree Warrants in event the Company issues equity, warrants or convertible notes (collectively known as “Security Instruments”) at a price that is less than 95% of the market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the trading day prior to the issuance of the Security Instruments. The Warrants expire on August 27, 2030 and may be net exercised at the holder’s election. The Company also agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-3 to register for resale the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants.

The Company evaluated the accounting treatment of the Oaktree Warrants and determined that the Oaktree warrants met the scope exception of ASC 815-10-15-74(a) Derivatives and Hedging and therefore the warrants should be classified in stockholders’ equity. As such the Company used a Black-Scholes model to value the Oaktree Warrants. Utilizing the following inputs: term of 10 years, volatility of 86.8%, risk-free rate of return of 0.74% yielding a value of $4.8 million. ASC 470-20-25-2 Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options dictates that debt or stock issued with detachable warrants requires the proceeds to be allocated to the 2 instruments based on their relative fair values. The relative fair value of the warrants was determined to be $4.4 million and was recorded as a component of Stockholders’ Equity in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2020.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Eligible employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at the end of a predetermined offering period at 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning or end of the offering period. The ESPP is compensatory and results in stock-based compensation expense.

As of September 30, 2020, 507,783 shares have been purchased and 492,217 shares are available for future sale under the Company’s ESPP. Share-based compensation expense recorded was approximately $38,000 and $18,000, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, and approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.

Capital Raises

9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock Offering

On August 26, 2020, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering whereby it sold 666,666 shares of its 9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (Nasdaq: FBIOP) (the "Preferred Stock"), (plus a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 66,666 shares, which was exercised in August 2020) at a price of $18.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $13.2 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $1.1 million.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On May 29, 2020, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering whereby it sold 555,556 shares of its 9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (Nasdaq: FBIOP) (the "Preferred Stock"), (plus a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 83,333 shares, which was exercised in May 2020) at a price of $18.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $11.5 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $1.1 million.

On February 14, 2020, the Company announced the closing of an underwritten public offering, whereby it sold 625,000 shares of its Preferred Stock, (plus a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 93,750 shares, which was exercised in February 2020) at a price of $20.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $14.4 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $1.3 million.

Cyprium 9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock Offering

On August 28, 2020, Cyprium closed on an underwritten public offering whereby it sold 255,400 shares of its 9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Cyprium Perpetual Preferred Stock” or “Cyprium PPS”), plus an overallotment of an additional 64,600 shares, which was exercised on September 18, 2020, at a price of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $8.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of approximately $0.9 million (the “Cyprium Offering”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Cyprium PPS, shareholders on the record date are entitled to receive a monthly cash dividend of $0.19531 per share which yields an annual dividend of $2.34375 per share. The Cyprium PPS will automatically be redeemed upon the first (and only the first) bona fide, arm’s-length sale of a Priority Review Voucher (a “PRV”) issued by the FDA in connection with the approval of CUTX-101, Cyprium’s lead product candidate. Upon the P R V Sale, each share of Cyprium PPS will be automatically redeemed in exchange for a payment equal to twice (2x) the $25.00 liquidation preference, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to, but excluding, the redemption date.

An optional exchange to Company Preferred Stock is available after 24 months from the issuance date so long as a sale of the PRV has not occurred. Additionally, if a PRV Sale has not occurred by September 30, 2024 the Cyprium PPS is either automatically exchanged for Company Preferred Stock or cash at the discretion of Fortress. The Cyprium PPS is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Fortress.

Cyprium paid an initial dividend of $49,883 ($0.19531 per share) to shareholders of record on September 30, 2020.

Checkpoint Underwritten Offering

In September 2020, Checkpoint completed an underwritten public offering in which it sold 7,321,429 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.80 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $20.5 million. Total net proceeds from the offering were approximately $18.9 million, net of underwriting discounts and offering expenses of approximately $1.6 million. The shares were sold under a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that Checkpoint filed in November 2017 and was declared effective in December 2017 (“the Checkpoint S-3”).

Mustang Underwritten Offering

In June 2020, Mustang completed an underwritten public offering in which it sold 11,455,604 shares of its common stock at a price of $3.25 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $37.2 million. Total net proceeds from the offering were approximately $34.9 million, net of underwriting discounts and offering expenses of approximately $2.3 million. The shares were sold under Mustang’s S-3.

At-the-Market Offering

On June 28, 2019, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("2019 Common ATM"), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., H.C. Wainwright & Co. Inc., Jones Trading Institutional Services LLC and B. Riley, as selling agents, governing potential sales of the Company's common stock.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The shares of common stock were sold under the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 originally filed on July 6, 2018 and declared effective July 23, 2019 (the “2019 Shelf”) through May 27, 2020.

On May 18, 2020, the Company filed a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective on May 26, 2020 (the "2020 Shelf"). In connection with the 2020 Shelf, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement ("2020 Common ATM"), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., H.C. Wainwright & Co. Inc., B. Riley and Dawson James Securities, Inc., as selling agents, governing potential sales of the Company's common stock. ATM sales commencing on June 1, 2020 were made under the 2020 Shelf.

For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued approximately 16.4 million shares of common stock at an average price of $2.74 per share for gross proceeds of $44.8 million. In connection with these sales, the Company paid aggregate fees of approximately $1.6 million. Approximately $29.5 million of securities remain available for sale under the 2020 Shelf at September 30, 2020.

Mustang At-the-Market Offering

On July 13, 2018, Mustang filed a shelf registration statement No. 333-226175 on Form S-3, as amended on July 20, 2018 (the "2018 Mustang S-3"), which was declared effective in August 2018. Under the 2018 Mustang S-3, Mustang may sell up to a total of $75.0 million of its securities. In connection with the 2018 Mustang S-3, Mustang entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the "Mustang ATM") with B. Riley FBR, Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., National Securities Corporation, and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (each an "Agent" and collectively, the "Agents"), relating to the sale of shares of common stock. Under the Mustang ATM, Mustang pays the Agents a commission rate of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of any shares of Mustang common stock.

On August 16, 2019, Mustang filed a shelf registration statement No. 333-233350 on Form S-3, (the "2019 Mustang S-3"), which was declared effective on September 30, 2019. Under the 2019 Mustang S-3, Mustang may sell up to a total of $75.0 million of its securities. On July 20, 2020, Mustang entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Mustang ATM with the Agents to reflect the new registration statement.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Mustang issued approximately 7.2 million shares of common stock at an average price of $3.56 per share for gross proceeds of $25.6 million under the Mustang ATM. In connection with these sales, Mustang paid aggregate fees of approximately $0.5 million for net proceeds of approximately $25.1 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, Mustang issued approximately 3.5 million shares of common stock at an average price of $6.42 per share for gross proceeds of $22.5 million under the Mustang ATM. In connection with these sales, Mustang paid aggregate fees of approximately $0.5 million for net proceeds of approximately $22.0 million. Pursuant to the Founders Agreement, Mustang issued 117,405 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $3.56 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 for the Mustang ATM offering noted above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, Mustang issued 87,656 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $6.42 per share in connection with the Mustang ATM.

Approximately $32.6 million of the Mustang shelf remains available for sale under the 2019 Mustang S-3, following the offerings noted above. As of September 30, 2020, the 2018 Mustang S-3 is no longer available for sales of securities.

Checkpoint At-the-Market Offering

Under the Checkpoint S-3, Checkpoint may sell up to a total of $100 million of its securities. In connection with the Checkpoint S-3, Checkpoint entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the "Checkpoint ATM") with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (each a "Checkpoint Agent" and collectively, the "Checkpoint Agents"), relating to the sale of shares of common stock. Under the Checkpoint ATM, Checkpoint pays the Checkpoint Agents a commission rate of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of any shares of Checkpoint common stock.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, Checkpoint sold a total of 3,614,344 shares of common stock under the Checkpoint ATM for aggregate total gross proceeds of approximately $8.7 million at an average selling price of $2.40 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $8.4 million after deducting commissions and other transaction costs.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Pursuant to the Founders Agreement, Checkpoint issued 273,379 shares of common stock to Fortress at a weighted average price of $2.92 per share for the Checkpoint ATM offerings and the Checkpoint Underwritten Offering, both noted above.

Approximately $12.3 million of the Checkpoint shelf remains available for sale under the Checkpoint S-3, following the offerings noted above.

Share Repurchase Program

On March 23, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program of the Company's outstanding Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of up to $5.0 million. Repurchases under the program were made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions until the earlier to occur of the repurchase of $5.0 million of the Company's Preferred Stock or the close of trading on May 31, 2020, subject to applicable laws and regulations. The program did not commit the Company to repurchase any shares of Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2020, 5,000 Preferred Stock shares were repurchased and retired under this program for total consideration of $0.1 million, net of fees of approximately $2,000.

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Most of the Company's lease liabilities result from the lease of its New York City, NY office, which expires in 2031, and Mustang's Worcester, MA cell processing facility lease, which expires in 2026. Such leases do not require any contingent rental payments, impose any financial restrictions, or contain any residual value guarantees. Certain of the Company's leases include renewal options and escalation clauses; renewal options have not been included in the calculation of the lease liabilities and right of use assets as the Company is not reasonably certain to exercise the options. The Company does not act as a lessor or have any leases classified as financing leases. On September 30, 2020, the Company had operating lease liabilities of $24.6 million and right of use assets of $20.3 million, which were included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded the following as lease expense, which was recorded in general and administrative expense on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
($in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Lease Cost
Operating lease cost	$	816	$	798	$	2,436	$	2,397
Shared lease costs		(469)		(479)		(1,409)		(1,408)
Variable lease cost		178		160		411		575
Total lease expense	$	525	$	479	$	1,438	$	1,564

The following tables summarize quantitative information about the Company's operating leases, under the adoption of Topic 842, Leases:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
($in thousands)	2020			2019
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	(2,127)		$	(2,185)
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (years)		5.9			6.4
Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases		6.2	%		6.2	%

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)


	Future Lease
($ in thousands)	Liability
Three Months Ended December 31, 2020	$	839
Year Ended December 31, 2021		3,114
Year Ended December 31, 2022		3,084
Year Ended December 31, 2023		3,137
Year Ended December 31, 2024		3,190
Other		20,273
Total operating lease liabilities		33,637
Less: present value discount		(9,085)
Net operating lease liabilities, short-term and long-term	$	24,552

Indemnification

In accordance with its certificate of incorporation, bylaws and indemnification agreements, the Company has indemnification obligations to its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they are serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. There have been no claims to date, and the Company has director and officer insurance to address such claims. Pursuant to agreements with clinical trial sites, the Company provides indemnification to such sites in certain conditions.

Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be subject to both insured and uninsured litigation. Suits and claims may be brought against the Company by customers, suppliers, partners and/or third parties (including tort claims for personal injury arising from clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates and property damage) alleging deficiencies in performance, breach of contract, etc., and seeking resulting alleged damages.

16. Related Party Transactions

The Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, individually and through certain trusts over which he has voting and dispositive control, beneficially owned approximately 10.1% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock as of September 30, 2020. The Company’s Executive Vice Chairman, Strategic Development owns approximately 10.9% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock as of September 30, 2020.

Shared Services Agreement with TG Therapeutics, Inc

TG Therapeutics, Inc. ("TGTX") and the Company entered into an arrangement to share the cost of certain research and development employees. The Company’s Executive Vice Chairman, Strategic Development, is also the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TGTX. Under the terms of the Agreement, TGTX will reimburse the Company for the salary and benefit costs associated with these employees based upon actual hours worked on TGTX related projects. For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company invoiced TGTX $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company invoiced TGTX $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. On September 30, 2020, the amount due from TGTX related to this arrangement approximated $69,000.

Desk Space Agreements with TGTX and OPPM

In connection with the Company’s Desk Space Agreements with TGTX and Opus Point Partners Management, LLC (“OPPM”), for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had paid $0.7 million and $0.7 million in rent under the Desk Space Agreements. For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company invoiced TGTX approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and invoiced OPPM NaN and approximately $24,000, respectively, for their prorated share of the rent base. On September 30, 2020, the amount due related to this arrangement from TGTX was NaN and the amount due from OPPM approximated $0.4 million.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

2019 Notes (formerly the Opus Credit Facility)

On September 13, 2019, the Company and Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP (“OPHIF”) extended the maturity date of the 2019 Notes (formerly the “A&R Opus Credit Facility) from September 14, 2019 by two years to September 14, 2021. Terms of the 2019 Notes allows for the Company to make portions of interest and principal repayments in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock and/or in common stock of the Company’s publicly-traded subsidiaries, subject to certain conditions. Fortress retained the ability to prepay the Notes at any time without penalty. The notes payable under the A&R Opus Credit Facility bear interest at 12% per annum.

Effective December 31, 2019, OPHIF dissolved and distributed it assets among its limited partners. Following the distribution, the $9.0 million facility comprised of separate notes (collectively, the “2019 Notes”) held by DAK Capital Inc. ($3.8 million); Fortress’ Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D. ($0.3 million); Fortress's Executive Vice President, Strategic Development Michael S. Weiss ($2.0 million); and various entities and individuals affiliated with Dr. Rosenwald and Mr. Weiss ($2.9 million). The terms of the 2019 Notes did not change in connection with such reallocations.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2020, the Company used certain proceeds from the Oaktree Note to pay off the $9.0 million balance previously outstanding under the 2019 Notes (see Note 10).

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, in connection with the 2019 Notes, the Company paid $0.5 million in interest on the portion of the 2019 Notes held by the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Executive Vice President, Strategic Development. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company paid $0.2 million in common stock consisting of 91,767 shares at $1.80 per share.

Avenue Credit Facility Agreement

On June 12, 2020, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen entered into a Facility Agreement (“Avenue Facility Agreement”), under which, beginning on October 1, 2020, Avenue may borrow up to $2 million collectively from the Company and InvaGen, subject to certain conditions set forth therein. The Company’s commitment amount is $0.8 million, and InvaGen’s is $1.2 million , and a 7% per annum interest rate applies (payable on the last day of each fiscal quarter). Repayment of the loan is due upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the Second Stage Closing Date, as defined in the SPMA; (ii) April 29, 2021; and (iii) the date that is 30 days following the termination of the Avenue SPMA. As of September 30, 2020, there have been 0 amounts drawn by Avenue on the Avenue Facility Agreement.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Founders Agreements

The Company has entered into Founders Agreements and, in some cases, Exchange Agreements with certain of its subsidiaries as described in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020. The following table summarizes, by partner company, the effective date of the Founders Agreements and PIK dividend or equity fee payable to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Founders Agreements, Exchange Agreements, and the subsidiaries' certificates of incorporation:


		PIK Dividend as
		a % of fully
		diluted
		outstanding		Class of Stock
Fortress Partner Company	Effective Date ¹	capitalization		Issued
Helocyte	March 20, 2015	2.5	%	Common Stock
Avenue	February 17, 2015	0.0	%²	Common Stock
Mustang	March 13, 2015	2.5	%	Common Stock
Checkpoint	March 17, 2015	0.0	%³	Common Stock
Cellvation	October 31, 2016	2.5	%	Common Stock
Caelum	January 1, 2017	0.0	%⁴	Common Stock
Baergic	December 17, 2019⁵	2.5	%	Common Stock
Cyprium	March 13, 2017	2.5	%	Common Stock
Aevitas	July 28, 2017	2.5	%	Common Stock
Oncogenuity	April 22, 2020 ⁵	2.5	%	Common Stock

Note 1:

Represents the effective date of each subsidiary’s Founders Agreement. Each PIK dividend and equity fee is payable on the annual anniversary of the effective date of the original Founders Agreement or has since been amended to January 1 of each calendar year.

Note 2:

Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (“Avenue SPMA”) entered into between, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) (together, the “ SPMA Parties”), the SPMA Parties entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company irrevocably waived its right to receive the annual dividend of Avenue’s common shares under the terms of the Class A preferred stock and any fees, payments, reimbursements or other distributions under the management services agreement between the Company and Avenue and the Founders Agreement, for the period from the effective date of the Waiver Agreement to the termination of InvaGen’s rights under the Avenue SPMA. Pursuant to the Waiver Agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction contemplated under the Avenue SPMA, the Company will convert all of its preferred shares into common shares pursuant to the terms of the certificate of incorporation of Avenue, as amended from time to time.

Note 3:

Instead of a PIK dividend, Checkpoint pays the Company an annual equity fee in shares of Checkpoint’s common stock equal to 2.5% of Checkpoint’s fully diluted outstanding capitalization.

Note 4:

Effective January 31, 2019 the Caelum Founders Agreement and MSA with Fortress were terminated in conjunction with the execution of the DOSPA between Caelum and Alexion (See Note 4).

Note 5:

Represents the Trigger Date, the date that the Fortress partner company first acquires, whether by license or otherwise, ownership rights in a product.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Management Services Agreements

The Company has entered in Management Services Agreements (the “MSAs”) with certain of its partner companies as described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020. The following table summarizes the effective date of the MSA and the annual consulting fee payable by the partner company to the Company in quarterly installments:


		Annual MSA Fee
Fortress partner company	Effective Date	(Income)/Expense
Helocyte	March 20, 2015	$	500
Avenue ¹	February 17, 2015		—
Mustang	March 13, 2015		500
Checkpoint	March 17, 2015		500
Cellvation	October 31, 2016		500
Baergic	March 9, 2017		500
Cyprium	March 13, 2017		500
Aevitas	July 28, 2017		500
Oncogenuity	February 10, 2017		500
Fortress			(4,000)
Consolidated (Income)/Expense		$	—

Note 1:

Concurrently with the execution and delivery of the Avenue SPMA entered into among, Avenue, the Company and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) (together, the “SPMA Parties”), the SPMA Parties entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company irrevocably waived its right to receive the annual dividend of Avenue’s common shares under the terms of the Class A preferred stock and any fees, payments, reimbursements or other distributions under the management services agreement between the Company and Avenue and the Founders Agreement, for the period from the effective date of the Waiver Agreement to the termination of InvaGen’s rights under the Avenue SPMA. Pursuant to the Waiver Agreement, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction contemplated under the Avenue SPMA, the Company will convert all of its preferred shares into common shares pursuant to the terms of the certificate of incorporation of Avenue, as amended from time to time. (See Note 4).

17. Segment Information

The Company operates in 2 reportable segments, Dermatology Product Sales and Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Product Development. The accounting policies of the Company’s segments are the same as those described in Note 2. The following tables summarize, for the periods indicated, operating results from continued operations by reportable segment:


			Pharmaceutical
			and
($in thousands)	Dermatology		Biotechnology
	Products		Product
Three Months Ended September 30, 2020	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	9,447	$	28	$	9,475
Direct cost of goods		(3,379)		0		(3,379)
Sales and marketing costs		(4,649)		0		(4,649)
Research and development		0		(13,756)		(13,756)
General and administrative		(1,254)		(9,480)		(10,734)
Other expense		(113)		(6,808)		(6,921)
Segment income (loss)	$	52		(30,016)	$	(29,964)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		11,039		0		11,039
Tangible assets		21,108		263,732		284,840
Total segment assets	$	32,147	$	263,732	$	295,879

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)


			Pharmaceutical
			and
	Dermatology		Biotechnology
($ in thousands)	Products		Product
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	9,492	$	280	$	9,772
Direct cost of goods		(2,702)		0		(2,702)
Sales and marketing costs		(4,370)		0		(4,370)
Research and development		0		(15,271)		(15,271)
General and administrative		(669)		(9,300)		(9,969)
Other expense		(108)		(2,322)		(2,430)
Segment income (loss)	$	1,643	$	(26,613)	$	(24,970)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		7,731		0		7,731
Tangible assets		10,966		202,891		213,857
Total segment assets	$	18,697	$	202,891	$	221,588


			Pharmaceutical
			and
	Dermatology		Biotechnology
($in thousands)	Products		Product
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	30,808	$	1,042	$	31,850
Direct cost of goods		(10,313)		—		(10,313)
Sales and marketing costs		(12,728)		—		(12,728)
Research and development		—		(46,146)		(46,146)
General and administrative		(3,556)		(29,074)		(32,630)
Other expense		(492)		(12,036)		(12,528)
Segment income (loss)	$	3,719		(86,214)	$	(82,495)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		11,039		—		11,039
Tangible assets		21,108		263,732		284,840
Total segment assets	$	32,147	$	263,732	$	295,879


			Pharmaceutical
			and
	Dermatology		Biotechnology
($in thousands)	Products		Product
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019	Sales		Development		Consolidated
Net revenue	$	23,816	$	1,683	$	25,499
Direct cost of goods		(6,972)		—		(6,972)
Sales and marketing costs		(12,064)		—		(12,064)
Research and development		—		(57,705)		(57,705)
General and administrative		(1,808)		(27,388)		(29,196)
Other expense		(108)		11,841		11,733
Segment income (loss)	$	2,864	$	(71,569)	$	(68,705)
Segment assets
Intangible assets, net		7,731		—		7,731
Tangible assets		10,966		202,891		213,857
Total segment assets	$	18,697	$	202,891	$	221,588

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

18. Revenues from Contracts and Significant Customers

Disaggregation of Total Revenue

Product revenue is comprised of Journey’s five marketed products: Targadox®, Luxamend®, Ceracade®, Exelderm® and Ximino®. Substantially all of the product revenue is recorded in the U.S. The Company’s related party revenue is from Checkpoint’s collaboration with TGTX. The table below summarizes the Company’s revenue for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2020 and 2019:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	9,447	$	9,492	$	30,808	$	23,816
Revenue – related party		28		280		1,042		1,683
Net revenue	$	9,475	$	9,772	$	31,850	$	25,499

Significant Customers

For the three months ended September 30, 2020, none of the Company’s Dermatology Products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total gross product revenue.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s Dermatology Products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total gross product revenue.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, gross product revenue under the 3PL Title Model accounted for approximately 60% and 76%, respectively.

At September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s Dermatology Products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total accounts receivable balance at 14.5%.

At September 30, 2019, two of the Company’s Dermatology Products customers accounted for more than 10% of its total accounts balance in the amounts of $3.5 million and $2.8 million.

19. Income taxes

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The CARES Act, among other things, includes tax provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer's social security payments, net operating loss utilization and carryback periods and modifications to the net interest deduction limitations. At this time, the Company does not believe that the CARES Act will have a material impact on its income tax provision for 2020. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the CARES Act on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to US federal and state income taxes. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of Management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Table of Contents

FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Company files a consolidated income tax return with subsidiaries for which the Company has an 80% or greater ownership interest. Subsidiaries for which the Company does not have an 80% or more ownership are not included in the Company’s consolidated income tax group and file their own separate income tax return. As a result, certain corporate entities included in these financial statements are not able to combine or offset their taxable income or losses with other entities’ tax attributes.

Income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “plan”, “seek” or similar language. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. For such forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially, from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In evaluating our business, you should carefully consider the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to acquiring, developing and commercializing pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and product candidates, which we do at the Fortress level, at our majority-owned and majority-controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and at entities we founded and in which we maintain significant minority ownership positions. Fortress has a talented and experienced business development team, comprising scientists, doctors, and finance professionals, who identify and evaluate promising products and product candidates for potential acquisition by new or existing partner companies. Through our partner companies, we have executed such arrangements in partnership with some of the world’s foremost universities, research institutes and pharmaceutical companies, including City of Hope National Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and AstraZeneca plc.

Following the exclusive license or other acquisition of the intellectual property underpinning a product or product candidate, we leverage our business, scientific, regulatory, legal and finance expertise to help our partners achieve their goals. Our partner companies then assess a broad range of strategic arrangements to accelerate and provide additional funding to support research and development, including joint ventures, partnerships, out-licensings, and public and private financings; to date, three partner companies are publicly-traded, and two have consummated strategic partnerships with industry leaders Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Cipla Limited).

Recent Events

Marketed Dermatology Products

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, through our partner company Journey Medical Corporation (“Journey” or “JMC”), our marketed products generated net revenue of $9.4 million and $30.8 million, respectively.

Late Stage Product Candidates

Intravenous (IV) Tramadol

IV Tramadol is currently in development with our partner company, Avenue Therapeutics, Inc. (“Avenue”) (NASDAQ: ATXI). Avenue submitted a new drug application (“NDA”) for IV Tramadol to treat moderate to moderately severe postoperative pain pursuant to Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) in December 2019. On October 12, 2020, Avenue announced it received a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) from the U.S Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regarding its New Drug Application (“NDA”) for IV tramadol. The CRL cited deficiencies related to the terminal sterilization validation and stated that IV Tramadol, intended to treat patients in acute pain who require an opioid, is not safe for the intended patient population. Avenue has a meeting scheduled with the FDA for the fourth quarter of 2020 to discuss the issues cited in the CRL.

Table of Contents

In October 2020, InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) communicated to Avenue that it believes a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement (“Avenue SPMA”)) has occurred, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which means that it is possible that InvaGen is attempting to avoid their obligations to consummate the second stage closing under the Avenue SPMA. Avenue disagrees with InvaGen’s assertion that a Material Adverse Effect has occurred, and Avenue has advised InvaGen of this position.

CUTX-101 (Copper Histidinate)

In July 2020, Cyprium announced that the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products issued a positive opinion on Cyprium’s application for Orphan Drug Designation for Copper Histidinate, also referred to as CUTX-101, a potential treatment for Menkes disease. Menkes disease is a rare X-linked recessive pediatric disease caused by genetic mutations of the copper transporter, ATP7A. The FDA previously granted Orphan Drug and Fast Track Designations to CUTX-101 for the treatment of Menkes disease. The FDA grants Rare Pediatric Disease Designation for serious and life-threatening diseases that primarily affect children ages 18 years or younger and fewer than 200,000 people in the United States.

In August 2020, Cyprium reported positive topline clinical efficacy results for CUTX-101. The study demonstrated statistically significant improvement in overall survival for Menkes disease subjects who received early treatment (ET) with CUTX-101, compared to an untreated historical control (HC) cohort, with a nearly 80% reduction in the risk of death (Hazard Ratio = 0.21, p<0.0001). Median survival for the ET cohort was 14.8 years (177.1 months) compared to 1.3 years (15.9 months) for the untreated HC cohort.

Cyprium intends to begin the rolling submission of the NDA for CUTX-101 to the FDA by the first quarter of 2021. If Cyprium’s NDA is approved, it may be eligible to receive a priority review voucher, which can be redeemed to obtain priority review for any subsequent marketing application and may be sold or transferred.

MB-107/MB-207 (Ex vivo Lentiviral Therapies for X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (XSCID))

In August 2020, Mustang announced that the FDA granted Rare Pediatric Disease Designation to MB-107, a lentiviral gene therapy for the treatment of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (“XSCID”), also known as bubble boy disease, in newly-diagnosed infants, and to MB-207, a lentiviral gene therapy for the treatment of patients with XSCID who were previously treated with a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (“HSCT”) and for whom re-treatment is indicated.

In September 2020, Mustang announced that the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to MB-107 for the treatment of XSCID in newly-diagnosed infants and to MB-207 for the treatment of patients with XSCID who were previously treated with a HSCT and for whom re-treatment is indicated.

Mustang had previously received Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (“ATMP”) classification from the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) for MB-107 in April 2020, as well as Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) designation from the FDA for MB-107 in August 2019.

In October 2020, Mustang licensed LentiBOOST™ technology from SIRION Biotech GmbH (“SIRION”) for the development of MB-207.

In May 2020, Mustang submitted an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application with the FDA to initiate a registrational multicenter Phase 2 clinical trial of MB-107 in newly diagnosed infants with XSCID who are under the age of two. The trial is expected to enroll 10 patients who, together with 15 patients enrolled in the current multicenter trial led by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, will be compared with 25 matched historical control patients who have undergone HSCT. The primary efficacy endpoint will be event-free survival. The initiation of this trial is currently on hold pending CMC clearance by the FDA, and this clearance is expected in the first quarter of 2021. We are targeting topline data from the trial in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Mustang expects to file an IND in the first quarter of 2021 for a registrational multi-center Phase 2 clinical trial of its lentiviral gene therapy in previously transplanted XSCID patients (MB-207). Mustang anticipates enrolling 20 patients and comparing them to matched historical control patients who have undergone a second HSCT. Mustang is targeting topline data for this trial in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Table of Contents

Cosibelimab (anti-PD-L1 antibody (formerly CK-301))

In September 2020, Checkpoint announced updated interim results from the ongoing global, open-label, multicohort, Phase 1 clinical trial of its anti-PD-L1 antibody, cosibelimab, in patients with advanced cancers, including the registration-enabling cohort of patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (“mCSCC”). Cosibelimab demonstrated a 51.4% objective response rate (“ORR”) and 13.5% complete response rate, which is nearly double the complete response rate observed at the time of previous analysis.

The registration-enabling study in mCSCC is currently over 50% enrolled, with full enrollment anticipated in early 2021. Checkpoint is on track to report full top-line results in the second half of 2021. Additional information on the Phase 1 trial can be found on www.ClinicalTrials.gov using identifier NCT03212404.

CAEL-101 (light chain fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody for AL amyloidosis)

In September 2020, Caelum announced the initiation of two Phase 3 studies of CAEL-101 for AL amyloidosis. The Phase 2 study met its primary objective, supporting initiation of the two parallel Phase 3 studies that will enroll ~370 AL amyloidosis patients. The Phase 2 program continues with the addition of a study arm to evaluate CAEL-101 in combination with SoC therapy plus daratumumab.

Positive long-term Phase 1a/1b data presented at the International Symposium on Amyloidosis (ISA) 2020 demonstrated prolonged overall survival (78 percent at 37 months) and durable organ response. CAEL-101 is currently in development at Caelum in collaboration with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Early Stage Product Candidates

MB-102 (CD123-targeted CAR T cell therapy)

In October 2020, Mustang announced that the first patient was been dosed in an open label, multicenter Phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MB-102 (CD123-targeted CAR T cell therapy) in patients with relapsed or refractory blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (“BPDCN”), acute myeloid leukemia (“AML”) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (“hrMDS”). Study sites include City of Hope, where the CAR T cell therapy was initially developed and where the clinical data were generated to support Mustang’s current multicenter trial, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Duke University and MD Anderson Cancer Center. Additional information on the Phase 1/2 trial can be found on www.ClinicalTrials.gov using identifier NCT04109482.

ONCOlogues (proprietary platform technology using PNA oligonucleotides)

In May 2020, we entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement with Columbia University to develop novel oligonucleotides for the treatment of genetically driven cancers. The proprietary platform produces oligomers, known as “ONCOlogues,” which are capable of binding gene sequences 1,000 times more effectively than complementary native DNA. ONCOlogues invade a DNA double helix and displace native mutated strands. This prevents the mRNA that antisense binds to from ever being created. It is active higher upstream than traditional antisense approaches as well as potentially more potent and broader in its utility.

In addition, we are exploring the potential of the platform to treat novel coronaviruses, such as COVID-19.

The ONCOlogues platform is currently in development at our partner company, Oncogenuity, Inc.

General Corporate

In August 2020, Fortress closed an underwritten public offering of 666,666 shares of its 9.375% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), (plus a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 66,666 shares, which was exercised in August 2020) at a price of $18.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $13.2 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses of $1.1 million.

Coupled with the February and May 2020 underwritten offerings of Series A Preferred Stock, Fortress has raised gross proceeds of approximately $39.1 million as of September 30, 2020 through the sale of its Series A Preferred Stock.

On June 28, 2019, Fortress entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (“2019 Common ATM”), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., H.C. Wainwright & Co. Inc., Jones Trading Institutional Services LLC and B. Riley, as selling agents, governing potential sales of the Company’s common stock. From January 1, 2020 through November 5, 2020 the Company issued approximately 16.4 million shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $44.8 million at an average selling price of $2.74.

Table of Contents

Also in August 2020, Fortress announced a $60 million loan agreement with Oaktree Capital Management (“Oaktree Note”). The proceeds from this loan were used to pay off the balances outstanding under the 2017 Subordinated Note Financing, the 2018 Venture Notes, and the 2019 Notes. The loan agreement will mature in August 2025.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

General

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, we generated $9.5 million and $31.9 million, respectively, of net revenue, of which $9.4 million and $30.8 million, respectively, relates primarily to the sale of Journey branded and generic products and approximately $28,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, relates to Checkpoint’s collaborative agreements with TG Therapeutics Inc. (“TGTX”). As of September 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $477.5 million. While we may in the future generate revenue from a variety of sources, including license fees, milestone payments, research and development payments in connection with strategic partnerships and/or product sales, our and our subsidiaries’ current product candidates are at an early stage of development and may never be successfully developed or commercialized. Accordingly, we expect to continue to incur substantial losses from operations for the foreseeable future, and there can be no assurance that we will ever generate significant revenues.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, we had $3.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of costs of goods sold in connection with the sale of Journey’s marketed products, compared to $2.7 million and $7.0 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. The increase is as a result of the amortization of license fees including the drug user fee related to the expansion of the marketed product portfolio as well as higher royalty fees attributed directly to the increase in net sales.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs primarily consist of personnel related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel, and other related expenses, stock-based compensation, payments made to third parties for license and milestone costs related to in-licensed products and technology, payments made to third party contract research organizations for preclinical and clinical studies, investigative sites for clinical trials, consultants, the cost of acquiring and manufacturing clinical trial materials, costs associated with regulatory filings and patents, laboratory costs and other supplies.

For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, research and development expenses were approximately $13.3 million and $14.6 million, respectively. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, we expensed approximately $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in costs related to the acquisition of licenses. Noncash, stock-based compensation expense included in research and development for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, was $0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

The table below provides a summary of research and development costs associated with the development of our licenses by entity, for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, by entity:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				% of total
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
Research & Development
Fortress	$	364	$	707	3	%	5	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		466		1,706	4	%	12	%
Checkpoint		2,543		3,894	19	%	27	%
Mustang		7,925		7,247	60	%	50	%
Other¹		2,000		1,017	14	%	6	%
Total Research & Development Expense	$	13,298	$	14,571	100	%	100	%

Note 1:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic (2020 only), Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity (2020 only) and Tamid (2019 only).

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist principally of sales and marketing costs, personnel-related costs, professional fees for legal, consulting, audit and tax services, rent and other general operating expenses not otherwise included in research and development expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, general and administrative expenses were approximately $15.4 million and $14.3 million, respectively. Noncash, stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses for the three months September 30, 2020 and 2019, was $2.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

The table below provides a summary of general and administrative costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, by entity:



		Three Months Ended September 30,			% of Total
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		2020		2019
General & Administrative
Fortress	$	5,289	$	4,994	34	%	35	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		571		617	4	%	4	%
Checkpoint		1,573		1,403	10	%	10	%
JMC¹		5,829		5,038	38	%	35	%
Mustang		1,640		1,924	11	%	13	%
Other²		481		363	3	%	3	%
Total General & Administrative Expense	$	15,383	$	14,339	100	%	100	%

Note 1:

Includes cost of outsourced sales force for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 of $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

Note 2:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic (2020 only), Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity (2020 only) and Tamid (2019 only).

Comparison of three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	9,447	$	9,492	$	(45)	0	%
Revenue – related party		28		280		(252)	(90)	%
Net revenue		9,475		9,772		(297)	(3)	%

Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold – product revenue		3,379		2,702		677	25	%
Research and development		13,298		14,571		(1,273)	(9)	%
Research and development – licenses acquired		458		700		(242)	(35)	%
General and administrative		15,383		14,339		1,044	7	%
Total operating expenses		32,518		32,312		206	1	%
Loss from operations		(23,043)		(22,540)		(503)	2	%

Other income (expense)
Interest income		265		738		(473)	(64)	%
Interest expense and financing fee		(6,958)		(3,168)		(3,790)	120	%
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(803)		—		(803)	100	%
Change in fair value of investment		575		—		575	100	%
Gain on deconsolidation of Caelum		—		—		—	100	%
Total other expense		(6,921)		(2,430)		(4,491)	185	%
Net Loss		(29,964)		(24,970)		(4,994)	20	%

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		14,417		12,208		2,209	18	%
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(15,547)	$	(12,762)	$	(2,785)	22	%

Table of Contents

Net revenues decreased $0.3 million or 3% from the three months ended September 30, 2019 to the three months ended September 30, 2020 due to a temporary supply shortage for Ximino in September 2020, which resulted in flat net revenue for Journey, as well as a decrease in collaboration revenue between Checkpoint and TGTX. Related party revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019 included $0.2 million from TGTX for the purchase of clinical material of cosibelimab not replicated in the current quarter.

Cost of goods sold increased by $0.7 million or 25% from the three months ended September 30, 2019 to the three months ended September 30, 2020 due to the increase in the amortization of license fees including the drug user fee related to the expansion of Journey’s marketed product portfolio.

Research and development expenses decreased $1.3 million or 9% from the three months ended September 30, 2019 to the three months ended September 30, 2020. The following table shows the change in research and development spending by Fortress and its partner companies:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	September 30,				Change
($in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
Research & Development
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	207	$	158	$	49	31	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		62		140		(78)	(56)	%
Checkpoint		156		179		(23)	(13)	%
Mustang		258		731		(473)	(65)	%
Other¹		15		3		12	400	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		698		1,211		(513)	(42)	%
Other Research & Development
Fortress		157		549		(392)	(71)	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		404		1,566		(1,162)	(74)	%
Checkpoint		2,388		3,715		(1,327)	(36)	%
Mustang		7,667		6,516		1,151	18	%
Other¹		1,984		1,014		970	96	%
Total Research & Development Expense	$	13,298	$	14,571	$	(1,273)	(9)	%

Note 1:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic (2020 only), Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity (2020 only) and Tamid (2019 only).

The decrease in stock-based compensation for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 is primarily due to the effect of fully vested and forfeited equity grants to key employees and non-employees at Mustang.

The decrease in research and development expense of $1.2 million at Avenue is mainly due to NDA preparation costs and the completion of Avenue’s abdominoplasty and safety studies; the decreased spending at Checkpoint of $1.3 million is attributable primarily to reduced manufacturing and clinical costs related to Checkpoint’s product candidates. Mustang’s increase in research and development spending of $1.2 million is attributable to increased costs associated with third-party vector manufacturing and personnel related expenses. The increase in “Other” of $0.1 million is attributable to increased spend in the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2019 Cyprium, as Cyprium prepares to file for its rolling NDA.

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 7%, from the three months ended September 30, 2019 to the three months ended September 30, 2020. The following table shows the change in general and administrative spending by Fortress and its partner companies:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
($in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
General & Administrative
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	1,425	$	1,248	$	177	14	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		99		158		(59)	(37)	%
Checkpoint		569		654		(85)	(13)	%
Mustang		348		389		(41)	(11)	%
Other²		32		81		(49)	(60)	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		2,473		2,530		(57)	(2)	%
Other General & Administrative
Fortress		3,864		3,746		118	3	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		472		459		13	3	%
Checkpoint		1,004		749		255	34	%
JMC¹		5,797		5,038		759	15	%
Mustang		1,292		1,535		(243)	(16)	%
Other²		481		282		199	71	%
Total General & Administrative Expense	$	15,383	$	14,339	$	1,044	7	%

Note 1:

Includes cost of outsourced sales force for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 of $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

Note 2:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic (2020 only), Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity (2020 only) and Tamid (2019 only). “Other” with regards to stock-based compensation expense includes JMC.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2020, the increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.0 million or 7% is primarily attributable to Journey’s increase in sales headcount, with 35 sales reps in the quarter ended September 30, 2019 vs. 40 in the quarter ended September 30, 2020, as well as Checkpoint’s increase in expenses related to professional fees and investor relations.

Total other expense increased $4.5 million, or 185%, from $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 to $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, primarily due to the interest expense and financing fee associated with the Oaktree Note and the debt payoff, and the change in fair value of derivative liabilities related to the warrants issued by Cyprium of $0.8 million recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2020.

Table of Contents

Net loss attributable to common stockholders increased $2.9 million, or 22%, from a net loss of $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 to a net loss of $15.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020.

Comparison of nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019


	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Change
($in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
Revenue
Product revenue, net	$	30,808	$	23,816	$	6,992	29	%
Revenue – related party		1,042		1,683		(641)	(38)	%
Net revenue		31,850		25,499		6,351	25	%

Operating expenses
Cost of goods sold – product revenue		10,313		6,972		3,341	48	%
Research and development		43,868		56,355		(12,487)	(22)	%
Research and development – licenses acquired		2,278		1,350		928	69	%
General and administrative		45,358		41,260		4,098	10	%
Total operating expenses		101,817		105,937		(4,120)	(4)	%
Loss from operations		(69,967)		(80,438)		10,471	(13)	%

Other income (expense)
Interest income		1,228		1,955		(727)	(37)	%
Interest expense and financing fee		(13,142)		(8,743)		(4,399)	50	%
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(1,189)		—		(1,189)	100	%
Change in fair value of investment		575		—		575	100	%
Gain on deconsolidation of Caelum		—		18,521		(18,521)	(100)	%
Total other (expense) income		(12,528)		11,733		(24,261)	(207)	%
Net loss		(82,495)		(68,705)		(13,790)	20	%

Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		41,264		44,237		(2,973)	(7)	%
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(41,231)	$	(24,468)	$	(16,763)	69	%

Net revenues increased $6.4 million or 25% from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase in net revenue is related to an increase in product revenue of $7.0 million associated with Journey’s marketed products driven by the expansion of its product lines and overall sales growth, offset by a decrease of $0.6 million in collaboration revenue between Checkpoint and TGTX.

Cost of goods sold increased by $3.3 million or 48% from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2020 due to the increase in Journey marketed products revenue in the current nine-month period as compared to the prior period.

Table of Contents

Research and development expenses decreased $12.5 million or 22% from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The following table shows the change in research and development spending by Fortress and its partner companies:



	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
Research & Development
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	611	$	447	$	164	37	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		231		505		(274)	(54)	%
Checkpoint		462		559		(97)	(17)	%
Mustang		1,156		1,116		40	4	%
Other¹		26		8		18	225	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		2,486		2,635		(149)	(6)	%
Other Research & Development
Fortress		775		1,454		(679)	(47)	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		2,151		17,834		(15,683)	(88)	%
Checkpoint		7,745		12,036		(4,291)	(36)	%
Mustang		25,788		19,789		5,999	30	%
Other¹		4,923		2,607		2,316	89	%
Total Research & Development Expense	$	43,868	$	56,355	$	(12,487)	(22)	%

Note 1:

Includes the following partner companies: Aevitas, Baergic (2020 only), Cellvation, Cyprium, Helocyte, Oncogenuity (2020 only) and Tamid (2019 only).

The increase in stock-based compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 is primarily due to additional equity grants to key employees and non-employees at Fortress and Mustang.

The decrease in research and development expense of $15.7 million at Avenue is due to the completion of Avenue’s abdominoplasty and safety studies; the decreased spending at Checkpoint of $4.3 million is attributable primarily to manufacturing costs related to cosibelimab incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and were not replicated in the current nine month period and a reduction in clinical costs for CK-101. Mustang’s increase in research and development spending of $6.0 million is attributable to personnel costs due to increased headcount and increased spending on third-party vector manufacturing, third-party contract research organizations, as well as consulting and sponsored research and clinical trial agreements. The increase in “Other” of $2.3 million is attributable to increased spend in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily attributable to development costs associated with our partner company Cyprium, as Cyprium prepares to file for its rolling NDA.

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased $4.1 million, or 10%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The following table shows the change in general and administrative spending by Fortress and its partner companies:



	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
($ in thousands)	2020		2019		$		%
General & Administrative
Stock-based compensation
Fortress	$	4,490	$	3,590	$	900	25	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		361		1,079		(718)	(67)	%
Checkpoint		1,633		1,885		(252)	(13)	%
Mustang		1,212		1,058		154	15	%
Other²		137		176		(39)	(22)	%
Sub-total stock-based compensation expense		7,833		7,788		45	1	%
Other General & Administrative
Fortress		11,639		10,165		1,474	15	%
Partner Companies:
Avenue		1,471		1,373		98	7	%
Checkpoint		2,989		2,623		366	14	%
JMC¹		16,284		13,872		2,412	17	%
Mustang		4,119		4,613		(494)	(11)	%
Other²		1,023		826		197	24	%
Total General & Administrative Expense	$	45,358	$	41,260	$	4,098	10	%

Note 1:

Includes cost of outsourced sales force for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 of $7.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

Note 2:

For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the increase in general and administrative expenses of $4.1 million or 10% is primarily attributable to Journey’s sales and marketing cost increases due to the increased sales headcount as well as the product portfolio, and Fortress’ increase due to increased headcount-related costs, professional fees for ongoing business development activities as well as legal expenses, accounting fees, and costs associated with investor relations.

Total other income (expense) decreased $24.3 million, or 207%, from income of $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to expense of $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, primarily due to the gain on deconsolidation of Caelum of $18.5 million recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as well as an increase in financing fees of $4.4 million attributable to the repayment of debt.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders increased $16.8 million, or 69%, from a net loss of $24.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 to a net loss of $41.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We will require additional financing to fully develop and prepare regulatory filings and obtain regulatory approvals for our existing and new product candidates, fund operating losses, and, if deemed appropriate, establish or secure through third parties manufacturing for our potential products, and sales and marketing capabilities. We have funded our operations to date primarily through the sale of equity and debt securities. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents is sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies. We may seek funds through equity or debt financings, collaborative or other arrangements with corporate sources, sales of stakes in partner companies, the contingent acquisitions of Avenue and Caelum, or through other sources of financing.

Table of Contents

In addition to the foregoing, based on the Company’s current assessment, the Company does not expect any material impact on its long-term development timeline and its liquidity due to the worldwide spread of the COVID-19 virus. However, the Company is continuing to assess the effect on its operations by monitoring the spread of COVID-19 and the actions implemented to combat the virus throughout the world.

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)	2020		2019
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(63,196)	$	(69,909)
Investing activities		(5,597)		19,787
Financing activities		135,395		119,559
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	66,602	$	69,437

Components of cash flows from publicly-traded partner companies are comprised of:


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
($ in thousands)	Fortress¹		Avenue		Checkpoint		Mustang		Total
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(20,315)	$	(3,420)	$	(11,617)	$	(27,844)	$	(63,196)
Investing activities		(1,649)		(1,000)		—		(2,948)		(5,597)
Financing activities		63,196		—		27,569		44,630		135,395
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	41,232	$	(4,420)	$	15,952	$	13,838	$	66,602


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
($ in thousands)	Fortress¹		Avenue		Checkpoint		Mustang		Total
Statement of cash flows data:
Total cash (used in)/provided by:
Operating activities	$	(7,911)	$	(21,263)	$	(16,644)	$	(24,091)	$	(69,909)
Investing activities		9,487		(5,000)		—		15,300		19,787
Financing activities		14,401		32,333		7,709		65,116		119,559
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	15,977	$	6,070	$	(8,935)	$	56,325	$	69,437

Note 1:

Includes Fortress and non-public partner companies, with the exception of Caelum, which was deconsolidated in the quarter ended March 31, 2019. Operating activities are offset by a gain of $18.5 million related to the deconsolidation of Caelum for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities decreased $6.7 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease is due to the decrease of $18.5 million in the gain recognized on the deconsolidation of Caelum, offset by the $2.6 million increase in cash used from the changes in operating assets and liabilities as well as the $13.8 million increase in net loss.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 of $19.8 million, as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 is a $25.4 million change in cash flows from investing activities. The change is primarily due to $17.4 million decrease in the redemption of certificates of deposit, an increase in the purchase of research and development licenses of $2.5 million, offset by the $13.1 million decrease in cash from discontinued investing activities due to the deconsolidation of Caelum.

Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $119.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to $135.4 million of net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, an increase of $15.9 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net proceeds the issuance of Series A preferred stock was $35.7 million, net proceeds from at-the-market offerings for both the Company and its partners was $76.8 million, and net proceeds from partner company sale of stock was $54.1 million, offset by $4.5 million paid in Series A Preferred dividends. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, net proceeds from partners’ offerings were $61.0 million, net proceeds from partner companies’ at-the-market offerings were $29.7 million, and net proceeds from Mustang’s Horizon Notes was $13.6 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not party to any off-balance sheet transactions. We have no guarantees or obligations other than those which arise out of normal business operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may result from the change in value of financial instruments due to fluctuations in their market price. Market risk is inherent in all financial instruments. Market risk may be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to derivatives, debt and equity linked instruments related to our financing activities.

Our assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars. Consequently, we have not considered it necessary to use foreign currency contracts or other derivative instruments to manage changes in currency rates. We do not know, nor do we plan to, use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. However, these circumstances might change.

The primary quantifiable market risk associated with our financial instruments is sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk represents the potential loss from adverse changes in market interest rates. We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive financial instruments will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period. The sensitivity is based upon the hypothetical assumption that all relevant types of interest rates that affect our results would increase instantaneously, simultaneously and to the same degree. We do not believe that our cash and equivalents have significant risk of default or illiquidity.

The sensitivity analyses of the interest rate sensitive financial instruments are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 1% or 2% variation in an estimate generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the estimate to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular estimate on the fair value of financial instruments is calculated independent of changes in any other estimate; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another factor, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analyses do not consider any action that we may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key estimates.

Based on our analysis, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, and for the interim period through September 30, 2020, we determined the effect of a 100+1- basis point change in interest rates on the value of our financial instruments and the resultant effect on our net loss to be immaterial.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness, as of September 30, 2020, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent quarter with respect to our operations, which materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our Common Stock, Series A Preferred Stock or any other type of equity or debt securities (together our “Securities”) involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes, as well as the risks, uncertainties and other information set forth in the reports and other materials filed or furnished by our partners and affiliates Checkpoint, Mustang, and Avenue with the SEC, before deciding to invest in our Securities. If any of the following risks or the risks included in the public filings of Checkpoint, Mustang or Avenue were to materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Securities could decline, and you could lose part of or all of your investment in our Securities. In addition, you should be aware that the below stated risks should be read as being applicable to our partners and affiliates such that, if any of the negative outcomes associated with any such risk is experienced by one of our partners or affiliates, the value of Fortress’ holdings in such partner or affiliate (if any) may decline.

The below risks are grouped into nine broad categories:

(1)

Risks Inherent in Drug Development

(2)

Risks Pertaining to the Need for and Impact of Existing and Additional Financing Activities

(3)

Risks Pertaining to Our Existing Revenue Stream from Journey Medical

(4)

Risks Pertaining to our Business Strategy, Structure and Organization

(5)

Risks Pertaining to Reliance on Third Parties

(6)

Risks Pertaining to Intellectual Property and Potential Disputes with Licensors Thereof

(7)

Risks Pertaining to the Commercialization of Product Candidates

(8)

Risks Pertaining to Legislation and Regulation Affecting the Biopharmaceutical and Other Industries

(9)

General Risks

The above categories are broadly stated, and you should review each of the individual sub-headings and detailed descriptions thereunder for a more comprehensive understanding of the risks posed by investing in our Securities.

Table of Contents

Risks Inherent in Drug Development

Most of our product candidates are at early stages of development and may not be successfully developed or commercialized; the product candidates that we do advance into clinical trials may not receive regulatory approval.

Most of our existing product candidates remain in the early stages of development and will require substantial further capital expenditures, development, testing and regulatory clearances/approvals prior to commercialization. The development and regulatory approval processes take several years, and it is not likely that our product candidates, even if successfully developed and approved by the FDA and/or foreign equivalent regulatory bodies, would be commercially available for several years. Of the large number of drugs in development, only a small percentage successfully obtain regulatory approval and are commercialized. Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the requisite financing to fund development programs, we cannot assure you that any of our product candidates will be successfully developed or commercialized, which could result in the failure of our business and a loss of your investment in our Company.

Pharmaceutical development has inherent risks. We will be required to demonstrate through well-controlled clinical trials that product candidates are effective with a favorable benefit-risk profile for use in their target indications before seeking regulatory approvals for their commercial sale. Success in early clinical trials does not mean that later clinical trials will be successful, as product candidates in later-stage clinical trials may fail to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy despite having progressed through initial clinical testing. Also, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials that are not currently anticipated. Companies frequently suffer significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after earlier clinical trials have shown promising results. As a result, product candidates that we advance into clinical trials may not receive regulatory approval.

In addition, even if our product candidates were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any such product candidates or any future product candidate for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve the price we intend to charge for our products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. The regulatory authority may also require the label to contain warnings, contraindications, or precautions that limit the commercialization of the product. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Agency (or foreign equivalent) may classify one or more of our product candidates in scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act (or its foreign equivalent) that could impede such product’s commercial viability. Any of these scenarios could compromise the commercial prospects for one or more of our current or future product candidates.

Our product candidates currently under clinical development are subject to extensive regulation, which can be costly and time consuming, cause unanticipated delays and/or prevent the receipt of the required approvals to commercialize product candidates.

The clinical development, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing and distribution of any product candidate, including our product candidates, is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by comparable health authorities in foreign markets. In the United States, we are not permitted to market a product candidate until such product candidate’s Biologics License Application (“BLA”) or New Drug Application (“NDA”) is approved by the FDA. The process of obtaining approval is expensive, often takes many years, and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the products involved. In addition to significant clinical testing requirements, our ability to obtain marketing approval for product candidates depends on obtaining the final results of required non-clinical testing, including characterization of the manufactured components of our product candidates and validation of our manufacturing processes. The FDA may determine that our product manufacturing processes, testing procedures or facilities are inadequate to justify approval. Approval policies or regulations may change, and the FDA has substantial discretion in the pharmaceutical approval process, including the ability to delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons. Despite the time and expense invested in the clinical development of product candidates, regulatory approval is never guaranteed.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies can delay, limit or deny approval of a product candidate for many reasons, including, but not limited to:

●

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

●

our inability to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA that a product candidate is safe and effective for an indication;

Table of Contents

●

the FDA may not accept clinical data from trials conducted by individual investigators or in countries where the standard of care is potentially different from that of the United States;

●

the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA for approval;

●

the FDA may disagree with the interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

●

the FDA may not approve the manufacturing processes or facilities or those of third-party manufacturers with which we or our respective collaborators currently contract for clinical supplies and plan to contract for commercial supplies; or

●

the approval policies or regulations of the FDA may significantly change in a manner rendering the clinical data insufficient for approval or the product characteristics or benefit-risk profile unfavorable for approval.

With respect to foreign markets, approval procedures vary among countries and, in addition to the aforementioned risks, can involve additional product testing, administrative review periods and agreements with pricing authorities. In addition, recent events raising questions about the safety of certain marketed pharmaceuticals may result in increased cautiousness by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities in reviewing new pharmaceuticals based on safety, efficacy or other regulatory considerations and may result in significant delays in obtaining regulatory approvals. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approvals would prevent us from commercializing our product candidates.

Delays in the commencement of our clinical trials (or suspensions or terminations of such trials) could result in increased costs and/or delay our ability to pursue regulatory approvals.

The commencement or resumption of clinical trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including, but not necessarily limited to, delays in:

●

obtaining regulatory clearance/approval to commence a clinical trial;

●

identifying, recruiting and training suitable clinical investigators;

●

reaching and preserving agreements on acceptable terms with prospective clinical research organizations (“CROs”) and trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation, may be subject to modification from time to time and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

●

obtaining sufficient quantities of a product candidate for use in clinical trials;

●

obtaining Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) or ethics committee approval to conduct a clinical trial at a prospective site;

●

developing and validating companion diagnostics on a timely basis, if required;

●

adding new clinical sites once a trial has begun;

●

the death, disability, departure or other change to the principal investigator or other staff overseeing the clinical trial at a given site;

●

identifying, recruiting and enrolling patients to participate in a clinical trial; or

●

retaining (or replacing) patients who have initiated a clinical trial but who may withdraw due to adverse events from the therapy, insufficient efficacy, fatigue with the clinical trial process, personal issues, or other reasons.

Any delays in the commencement of our clinical trials will delay our ability to pursue regulatory approval for product candidates. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

Table of Contents

Additionally, unacceptable adverse safety events caused by any of our product candidates that we advance into clinical trials could cause regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or stop clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications and markets. This, in turn, could prevent us from commercializing the affected product candidate and generating revenues from its sale. If any of our product candidates causes unacceptable adverse safety events in clinical trials, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize such products, or, if such product candidates are approved for marketing, future adverse events could cause us to withdraw such products from the market.

Suspensions or delays in the completion of clinical testing could result in increased costs and delay or prevent our ability to complete development of that product or generate product revenues.

Once a clinical trial has begun, patient recruitment and enrollment may be slower than we anticipate. Clinical trials may also be delayed as a result of ambiguous or negative interim results or difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of product manufactured in accordance with regulatory requirements and on a timely basis. Further, a clinical trial may be modified, suspended or terminated by us, an IRB, an ethics committee or a data safety monitoring committee overseeing the clinical trial, any clinical trial site with respect to that site, or the FDA or other regulatory authorities, due to a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols;

●

inspection of the clinical trial operations or clinical trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold;

●

stopping rules contained in the protocol;

●

unforeseen safety issues or any determination that the clinical trial presents unacceptable health risks; and

●

lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.

Changes in regulatory requirements and guidance also may occur, and we may need to amend clinical trial protocols to reflect these changes. Amendments may require us to resubmit clinical trial protocols to IRBs for re-examination, which may in turn impact the costs and timing of, and the likelihood of successfully completing, a clinical trial. If we experience delays in the completion of, or if we must suspend or terminate, any clinical trial of any product candidate, our ability to obtain regulatory approval for that product candidate will be delayed, and the commercial prospects, if any, for the product candidate may suffer as a result. In addition, many of these factors may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of a product candidate.

If our competitors develop treatments for any of the target indications for which our product candidates are being developed and those competitor products are approved more quickly, marketed more successfully or demonstrated to be more effective, the commercial opportunity with respect to that product candidate will be reduced or eliminated.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are subject to rapid and intense technological change. We face, and will continue to face, competition in the development and marketing of our product candidates from academic institutions, government agencies, research institutions and biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. There can be no assurance that developments by others will not render one or more of our product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive. Furthermore, new developments, including the development of other drug technologies and methods of preventing the incidence of disease, occur in the pharmaceutical industry at a rapid pace. These developments may render one or more of our product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive.

Competitors may seek to develop alternative formulations that do not directly infringe on our in-licensed patent rights. The commercial opportunity for one or more of our product candidates could be significantly harmed if competitors are able to develop alternative formulations outside the scope of our in-licensed patents. Compared to us, many of our potential competitors have substantially greater:

●

capital resources;

●

development resources, including personnel and technology;

●

clinical trial experience;

Table of Contents

●

regulatory experience;

●

expertise in prosecution of intellectual property rights; and

●

manufacturing, distribution and sales and marketing experience.

As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than we are able to or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, safe, useful and less costly than ours and may be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. We will also face competition from these third parties in establishing clinical trial sites, in patient registration for clinical trials, and in identifying and in-licensing new product candidates.

Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of the therapies that underpin many of our product candidates may damage public perception of our product candidates or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates.

Public perception may be influenced by claims that one or more of the therapies underpinning our product candidates, including without limitation gene therapy, is unsafe, and such therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. In particular, the success of our gene therapy platforms will depend upon physicians specializing in the treatment of those diseases that our product candidates target prescribing treatments that involve the use of our product candidates in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments with which they are already familiar and for which greater clinical data may be available. More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion would have a negative effect on our business or financial condition and may delay or impair the development and commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any products we may develop. Adverse events in our clinical trials, even if not ultimately attributable to our product candidates, and the resulting publicity, could lead to increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our potential product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that do obtain approval and/or a decrease in demand for any such product candidates. Concern about environmental spread of our products, whether real or anticipated, may also hinder the commercialization of our products.

Regulatory approval for any approved product is limited by the FDA to those specific indications and conditions for which clinical safety and efficacy have been demonstrated.

Any regulatory approval is limited to those specific diseases and indications for which a product is deemed to be safe and effective by the FDA. In addition to the FDA approval required for new formulations, any new indication for an approved product also requires FDA approval. If we are not able to obtain FDA approval for any desired future indications for our products, our ability to effectively market and sell our products may be reduced and our business may be adversely affected.

While physicians may choose to prescribe drugs for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from those tested in clinical studies and approved by the regulatory authorities, our ability to promote the products is limited to those indications that are specifically approved by the FDA. These “off-label” uses are common across medical specialties and may constitute an appropriate treatment for some patients in varied circumstances. Regulatory authorities in the US generally do not regulate the behavior of physicians in their choice of treatments. Regulatory authorities do, however, restrict communications by pharmaceutical companies on the subject of off-label use. If our promotional activities fail to comply with these regulations or guidelines, we may be subject to warnings from, or enforcement action by, these authorities. In addition, our failure to follow FDA rules and guidelines relating to promotion and advertising may cause the FDA to suspend or withdraw an approved product from the market, require a recall or institute fines, or could result in disgorgement of money, operating restrictions, corrective advertising, injunctions or criminal prosecution, any of which could harm our business.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to the Need for and Impact of Existing and Additional Financing Activities

We have historically financed a significant portion of our growth and operations in part through the assumption of debt; should an event of default occur under any applicable loan documents, our business would be materially adversely affected. Also, our current credit arrangement with Oaktree Capital contains restrictive covenants that inhibit our and certain of our partner companies’ abilities to take certain actions.

At September 30, 2020, the total amount of debt outstanding, net of the debt discount was $51.4 million. If we default on our obligations, the holders of our debt may declare the outstanding amounts immediately payable together with accrued interest, and/or take possession of pledged collateral, if any. If an event of default occurs, we may not be able to cure it within any applicable cure period, if at all. If the maturity of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available for repayment or we may not have the ability to borrow or obtain sufficient funds to replace the accelerated indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, current or future debt obligations may limit our ability to finance future operations or satisfy capital needs or to engage in, expand or pursue our business activities. Such restrictive covenants may also prevent us from engaging in activities that could be beneficial to our business and our stockholders unless we repay the outstanding debt, which may not be desirable or possible.

On August 27, 2020, we entered into a $60.0 million senior secured credit agreement with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC and the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, “Oaktree”). The Oaktree credit agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants restricting our and certain of our partner companies’ abilities to take certain actions, especially as pertains indebtedness, liens, investments, affiliate transactions, dispositions, prepayment of other indebtedness, dividends and other distributions (subject in each case to exceptions). The Oaktree credit agreement also contains financial covenants obligating us to maintain a minimum liquidity amount and a minimum amount of revenue, in both cases subject to exceptions. The breach of any such provisions (even, potentially, in an immaterial manner) could result in an event of default under the Oaktree credit agreement, and the restrictions imposed by such provisions may inhibit our and certain of our partner companies’ ability to enter into certain transactions or arrangements that management otherwise believes would be in our or such partner companies’ best interests.

We have a history of operating losses that is expected to continue, and we are unable to predict the extent of future losses, whether we will generate significant or any revenues or whether we will achieve or sustain profitability.

We are an early-stage company and our prospects must be considered in light of the uncertainties, risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of operations. We continue to generate operating losses in all periods including losses from continuing operations of approximately $101.7 million and $130.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and a loss from continuing operations of $70.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. At September 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $477.5 million. We expect to make substantial expenditures and incur increasing operating costs and interest expense in the future, and our accumulated deficit will increase significantly as we expand development and clinical trial activities for our product candidates and finance investments in certain of our existing and new partners and affiliates in accordance with our growth strategy. Our losses have had, and are expected to continue to have, an adverse impact on our working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if:

●

one or more of our product candidates is approved for commercial sale, due to our ability to establish the necessary commercial infrastructure to launch this product candidate without substantial delays, including hiring sales and marketing personnel and contracting with third parties for warehousing, distribution, cash collection and related commercial activities;

●

we are required by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, to perform studies in addition to those currently expected;

●

there are any delays in completing our clinical trials or the development of any of our product candidates;

●

we execute other collaborative, licensing or similar arrangements and the timing of payments we may make or receive under these arrangements;

●

there are variations in the level of expenses related to our future development programs;

Table of Contents

●

there are any product liability or intellectual property infringement lawsuits in which we may become involved;

●

there are any regulatory developments affecting product candidates of our competitors; and

●

one or more of our product candidates receives regulatory approval.

Our ability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. To date, we have not generated any revenue from our development stage products, and we do not know when, or if, we will generate any revenue. Our ability to generate revenue depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to:

●

obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, or any future product candidate that we may license or acquire;

●

manufacture commercial quantities of one or more of our product candidates or any future product candidate, if approved, at acceptable cost levels; and

●

develop a commercial organization and the supporting infrastructure required to successfully market and sell one or more of our product candidates or any future product candidate, if approved.

Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our product offerings or even continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

To fund our operations and service our debt securities, which may be deemed to include our Series A Preferred Stock, we will be required to generate a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, and any failure to meet our debt obligations would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock and/or preferred stock to decline.

Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, may affect our ability to make payments on our debt. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. Alternatively, as we have done in the past, we may also elect to refinance certain of our debt, for example, to extend maturities. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. If we are unable to access the capital markets, whether because of the condition of those capital markets or our own financial condition or reputation within such capital markets, we may be unable to refinance our debt. In addition, any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock and/or debt securities to decline.

Repayment of our indebtedness is dependent in part on the generation of cash flow by Journey and its ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Journey may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments in respect of our indebtedness. Each of our subsidiaries, including Journey, is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries.

Our ability to continue to reduce our indebtedness will depend upon factors including our future operating performance, our ability to access the capital markets to refinance existing debt and prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We can provide no assurance of the amount by which we will reduce our debt, if at all. In addition, servicing our debt will result in a reduction in the amount of our cash flow available for other purposes, including operating costs and capital expenditures that could improve our competitive position and results of operations.

Table of Contents

If we cannot continue to fund our research and development programs, we may be required to reduce product development, which will adversely impact our growth strategy.

Our research and development (“R&D”) programs will require substantial additional capital to conduct research, preclinical testing and clinical trials, establish pilot scale and commercial scale manufacturing processes and facilities, and establish and develop quality control, regulatory, marketing, sales, and administrative capabilities to support these programs. We expect to fund our R&D activities from a combination of cash generated from royalties and milestones from our partners in various past, ongoing, and future collaborations, and through additional equity or debt financings from third parties. These financings could depress the stock prices of our securities. If additional funds are required to support our operations and such funds cannot be obtained on favorable terms, we may not be able to develop products, which will adversely impact our growth strategy.

We may not be able to generate returns for our investors if our partners, several of which have limited or no operating history, no commercialized revenue generating products, and are not yet profitable, cannot obtain additional third-party financing.

As part of our growth strategy, we have made and will likely continue to make substantial financial and operational commitments in our partners, which often have limited or no operating history, no commercialized revenue generating products, and require additional third-party financing to fund product and services development or acquisitions. Our business depends in large part on the ability of one or more of our partner companies to innovate, in-license, develop or acquire successful biopharmaceutical products and/or acquire companies in increasingly competitive and highly regulated markets. If certain of our partner companies do not successfully obtain additional third-party financing to commercialize products or successfully acquire companies, as applicable, the value of our businesses and our ownership stakes in our partner companies may be materially adversely affected.

We may need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which may force us to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our R&D programs, commercialization efforts or planned acquisitions and potentially change our growth strategy.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 we incurred R&D expenses of approximately $75.2 million and $83.3 million, respectively, and $43.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. We expect to continue to spend significant amounts on our growth strategy. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents will enable us to continue to fund operations in the normal course of business for at least the next 12 months. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate a sufficient amount of product revenue and achieve profitability, we expect to seek to finance potential cash needs. Our ability to obtain additional funding when needed, changes to our operating plans, our existing and anticipated working capital needs, the acceleration or modification of our planned R&D activities, expenditures, acquisitions and growth strategy, increased expenses or other events may affect our need for additional capital in the future and require us to seek additional funding sooner or on different terms than anticipated. In addition, if we are unable to raise additional capital when needed, we might have to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our R&D programs and commercialization efforts and potentially change our growth strategy.

Raising additional funds by issuing securities or through licensing or lending arrangements may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.

To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing common stock (or preferred stock that is convertible into common stock), the share ownership of existing stockholders will be diluted. Any future debt financings may involve covenants that restrict our operations, including limitations on our ability to incur liens or additional debt, pay dividends, redeem our stock, make certain financial commitments and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions, among other restrictions. In addition, if we raise additional funds through licensing or sublicensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish potentially valuable rights to our product candidates or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Our Existing Operating Revenue Stream

Future revenue based on sales of our dermatology products, especially Ximino, Targadox and Exelderm, may be lower than expected or lower than in previous periods.

The vast majority of our operating income for the foreseeable future is expected to come from the sale of dermatology products through our partner company Journey Medical Corporation. Any setback that may occur with respect to such products, in particular Ximino, Targadox and Exelderm, could significantly impair our operating results and/or reduce our revenue and the market prices of our Securities. Setbacks for such products could include, but are not necessarily limited to, problems with shipping, distribution, demand, manufacturing, product safety, marketing, government regulation or reimbursement, licenses and approvals, intellectual property rights, competition with existing or new products, physician or patient acceptance of the products, as well as higher than expected total rebates, returns or recalls. These products also are or may become subject to third party generic competition.

Any disruptions to the capabilities, composition, size or existence of Journey’s sales force may have a significant adverse impact on our existing revenue stream. Also, with respect to future potential product candidates, if we are unable to establish and/or maintain sales and marketing capabilities or fail to enter into agreements with third parties to market, distribute and sell products that may be successfully developed, we may not be able to effectively market and sell such products and generate product revenue.

Journey’s sales force has been and is expected to continue to be an important contributor to its commercial success; any disruptions to Journey’s relationship with such sales force or the third-party contractor through which they are engaged could materially adversely affect Journey’s product sales.

Apart from Journey, we do not currently have the infrastructure for the sales, marketing and distribution of any of our product candidates, and we must build and maintain such infrastructures or make arrangements with third parties to perform these functions in order to commercialize any products that we may successfully develop. The establishment and development of a sales force, either by us or certain of our partners, or the establishment of a contract sales force, to market any products for which we may receive marketing approval is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any such product launch or compromise the successful commercialization of such products. If we are unable to establish and maintain sales and marketing capabilities or any other non-technical capabilities necessary to commercialize any products that may be successfully developed, we will need to contract with third parties to market and sell such products. We may not be able to establish arrangements with third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Failure to be included in formularies developed by managed care organizations and coverage by other organizations may negatively impact the utilization of our products, which could harm our market shares and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Managed care organizations and other third-party payors try to negotiate the pricing of medical services and products to control their costs. Managed care organizations and pharmacy benefit managers typically develop formularies to reduce their cost for medications. Formularies can be based on the prices and therapeutic benefits of the available products. Due to their lower costs, generic products are often favored. The breadth of the products covered by formularies varies considerably from one managed care organization to another, and many formularies include alternative and competitive products for treatment of particular medical conditions. Failure to be included in such formularies or to achieve favorable formulary status may negatively impact the utilization and market share of our products. If our products are not included within an adequate number of formularies or adequate reimbursement levels are not provided, or if those policies increasingly favor generic products, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Reimbursement may be limited or unavailable in certain market segments for our product candidates, which could make it difficult for us to sell our products profitably.

We intend to seek approval to market our future products in both the United States and in countries and territories outside the United States. If we obtain approval in one or more foreign countries, we will be subject to rules and regulations in those countries relating to such products. In some foreign countries, particularly in the European Union, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals and biologics is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product candidate. In addition, market acceptance and sales of our product candidates will depend significantly on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors for any of our product candidates and may be affected by existing and future healthcare reform measures.

Table of Contents

Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which pharmaceuticals they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. Reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is:

●

a covered benefit under its health plan;

●

safe, effective and medically necessary;

●

appropriate for the specific patient;

●

cost-effective; and

●

experimental or investigational.

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time consuming and costly process that could require that we provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to the payor. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement. If reimbursement of our future products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability. Additionally, while we may seek approval of our products in combination with each other, there can be no guarantee that we will obtain coverage and reimbursement for any of our products together, or that such reimbursement will incentivize the use of our products in combination with each other as opposed to in combination with other agents which may be priced more favorably to the medical community.

In both the United States and certain foreign countries, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could impact our ability to sell our products profitably. In particular, the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 revised the payment methodology for many products reimbursed by Medicare, resulting in lower rates of reimbursement for many types of drugs, and added a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program that involves commercial plans negotiating drug prices for their members. Since 2003, there have been a number of other legislative and regulatory changes to the coverage and reimbursement landscape for pharmaceuticals.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively, the “Affordable Care Act” or “ACA,” was enacted in 2010 and made significant changes to the United States’ healthcare system. The ACA and any revisions or replacements of that Act, any substitute legislation, and other changes in the law or regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Among the provisions of the ACA of importance to our potential product candidates are:

●

an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures, or imports specified branded prescription drugs and biologic agents, apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain government healthcare programs;

●

an increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to 23.1% and 13.0% of the average manufacturer price for branded and generic drugs, respectively;

●

expansion of healthcare fraud and abuse laws, including the federal False Claims Act and the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, new government investigative powers and enhanced penalties for non-compliance;

●

a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for a manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;

●

extension of a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;

Table of Contents

●

expansion of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to additional individuals and by adding new mandatory eligibility categories for certain individuals with income at or below 138% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability;

●

expansion of the entities eligible for discounts under the 340B Drug Pricing Program;

●

new requirements under the federal Open Payments program and its implementing regulations;

●

a new requirement to annually report drug samples that manufacturers and distributors provide to physicians;

●

a new regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilar biological products, all of which will impact existing government healthcare programs and will result in the development of new programs; and

●

a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research.

The Supreme Court upheld the ACA in the main challenge to the constitutionality of the law in 2012. Specifically, the Supreme Court held that the individual mandate and corresponding penalty was constitutional because it would be considered a tax by the federal government. The Supreme Court also upheld federal subsidies for purchasers of insurance through federally facilitated exchanges in a decision released in June 2015.

President Trump ran for office on a platform that supported the repeal of the ACA, and one of his first actions after his inauguration was to sign an Executive Order instructing federal agencies to waive or delay requirements of the ACA that impose economic or regulatory burdens on states, families, the health-care industry and others.

In January 2017, Congress voted to adopt a budget resolution for fiscal year 2017, or the Budget Resolution, that authorizes the implementation of legislation that would repeal portions of the ACA. The Budget Resolution is not a law. However, it is widely viewed as the first step toward the passage of legislation that would repeal certain aspects of the ACA. In March 2017, following the passage of the budget resolution for fiscal year 2017, the United States House of Representatives passed legislation known as the American Health Care Act of 2017, which, if enacted, would amend or repeal significant portions of the ACA. Attempts in the Senate in 2017 to pass ACA repeal legislation, including the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017, were unsuccessful.

At the end of 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which repealed the penalty for individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential health coverage as required by the ACA. Following this legislation, Texas and 19 other states filed a lawsuit alleging that the ACA is unconstitutional as the individual mandate was repealed, undermining the legal basis for the Supreme Court’s prior decision. On December 14, 2018, a Texas federal district court judge issued a ruling declaring that the ACA in its entirety is unconstitutional. Upon appeal, the Fifth Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling that the individual mandate is unconstitutional. However, the Fifth Circuit remanded the case back to the district court to conduct a more thorough assessment of the constitutionality of the entire ACA despite the individual mandate being unconstitutional. While this decision has no immediate legal effect on the ACA and its provisions, this lawsuit is ongoing and the outcome may have a significant impact on our business.

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, the “BBA,” which set government spending levels for Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019, revised certain provisions of the ACA. Specifically, beginning in 2019, the BBA increased manufacturer point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs in the Medicare Part D coverage gap from 50% to 70%, ultimately increasing the liability for brand drug manufacturers. Further, this mandatory manufacturer discount applies to biosimilars beginning in 2019.

The 116th Congress has explored legislation intended to address the cost of prescription drugs. Notably, the major committees of jurisdiction in the Senate (Finance Committee, Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, and Judiciary Committee), have marked up legislation intended to address various elements of the prescription drug supply chain. Proposals include a significant overhaul of the Medicare Part D benefit design, addressing patent “loopholes”, and efforts to cap the increase in drug prices. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved drug-related legislation intended to increase transparency of drug prices and also curb anti-competitive behavior in the pharmaceutical supply chain. In addition, the House Ways & Means Committee approved legislation intended to improve drug price transparency, including for drug manufacturers to justify certain price increases. While we cannot predict what proposals may ultimately become law, the elements under consideration could significantly change the landscape in which the pharmaceutical market operates.

Table of Contents

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) advanced the Lower Health Care Costs Act of 2019. Among other things, the bill is intended to reduce costs in the United States health sector. The bill revises certain requirements to expedite the approval of generics and biosimilars. It also limits prices that pharmacy benefit managers may charge health insurers or enrollees for prescription drugs. Although this bill still needs to pass the full Senate and House of Representatives, it is worth noting the wide-ranging effects it could have on the health care sector.

On December 12, 2019, the House of Representatives passed broad legislation (H.R. 3, the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act) that would, among other provisions, require HHS to negotiate drug prices and impose price caps and restructure the Medicare Part D benefit, imposing more financial responsibility on certain drug manufacturers. Failure by a manufacturer to reach an agreement with HHS on the negotiated price could result in significant penalties for prescription drug manufacturers. In addition, S. 2543, the Prescription Drug Pricing Reduction Act would also, among other provisions, restructure the Medicare Part D benefit, but it would not authorize direct negotiation by the federal government. While we cannot predict what proposals may ultimately become law, the elements under consideration could significantly change the landscape in which the pharmaceutical market operates.

The Trump Administration has also taken several regulatory steps to redirect ACA implementation. The Department of Health and Human Services, the HHS, finalized a Medicare hospital payment reduction for Part B drugs acquired through the 340B Drug Pricing Program. The courts have since overturned this payment reduction, but the lawsuit is ongoing on appeal and HHS continues to implement the payment cuts. HHS also has signaled its intent to continue to pursue reimbursement policy changes for all Medicare Part B drugs that likely would reduce hospital and physician reimbursement for these drugs.

HHS has made numerous other proposals aimed at lowering drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries and increasing price transparency. While many of the proposals have been withdrawn or struck down by the courts, it appears the Trump Administration will continue to explore its authority to make regulatory changes to the pharmaceutical industry. For example, the Trump Administration released an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to an international price index model. It is unclear what eventually will be proposed, but the President has alluded to the concept of most favored nation pricing with regard to U.S. drug purchasing. In addition, HHS, in conjunction with the FDA, released two pharmaceutical importation models in December 2019: (1) a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to permit importation of pharmaceuticals from Canada, and (2) draft FDA guidance permitting manufacturers to import their own pharmaceuticals that were originally intended for marketing in other countries.

HHS also has taken steps to increase the availability of cheaper health insurance options, typically with fewer benefits and less generous coverage. The Administration has also signaled its intention to address drug prices and to increase competition, including by increasing the availability of biosimilars and generic drugs. As these are regulatory actions, a new administration could undo or modify these efforts.

There likely will continue to be legislative and regulatory proposals at the federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare products and services. We cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare may adversely affect:

●

the demand for any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval;

●

our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products;

●

our ability to generate revenues and achieve or maintain profitability;

●

the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and

●

the availability of capital.

In addition, governments may impose price controls, which may adversely affect our future profitability. In January 2020, President Trump signed into law the U.S.-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade deal into law. As enacted, there are no commitments with respect to biologic product intellectual property rights or data protection, which may create an unfavorable environment across these three countries.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to our Business Strategy, Structure and Organization

We have in the past and are likely in the future to undergo collaborations and/or divestitures with respect to certain of our assets and subsidiaries, some of which may be material and/or transformative, which could adversely affect our business, prospects and opportunities for growth.

We have in the past completed a number of partnerships and/or contingent sales of our assets and subsidiaries, including an equity investment and contingent sale between Avenue and InvaGen and an equity investment and contingent option transaction between Caelum and Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Each of these transactions has been time-consuming and has diverted management’s attention. As a result of these contingent sales (and other similar transactions we may in the future complete), we may experience a reduction in the size or scope of our business, our market share in particular markets, our opportunities with respect to certain markets, products or therapeutic categories or our ability to compete in certain markets and therapeutic categories. For example, in connection with execution of the Avenue SPMA, we signed a Restrictive Covenant Agreement, which prohibits us from, directly or indirectly, engaging in the business of hospital administered pain management anywhere in the world other than Canada, Central America or South America for a period of five years after the earlier of the termination of the Avenue SPMA or consummation of the Merger Transaction (as defined in the Avenue SPMA).

In addition, in connection with any such transaction that involves a (contingent or non-contingent) sale of one of our assets or subsidiaries, we may surrender our ability to realize long-term value from such asset or subsidiary, in the form of foregone royalties, milestone payments, sublicensing revenue or otherwise, in exchange for upfront and/or other payments. In the event, for instance, that a product candidate underpinning any such asset or subsidiary is granted FDA approval for commercialization following the execution of documentation governing the sale by us of such asset or subsidiary, the transferee of such asset or subsidiary may realize tremendous value from commercializing such product, which we would have realized for ourselves had we not executed such sale transaction and been able to achieve applicable approvals independently.

Should we seek to enter into collaborations or divestitures with respect to other assets or subsidiaries, we may be unable to consummate such arrangements on satisfactory or commercially reasonable terms within our anticipated timelines. In addition, our ability to identify, enter into and/or consummate collaborations and/or divestitures may be limited by competition we face from other companies in pursuing similar transactions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Any collaboration or divestiture we pursue, whether we are able to complete it or not, may be complex, time consuming and expensive, may divert the management’s attention, have a negative impact on our customer relationships, cause us to incur costs associated with maintaining the business of the targeted collaboration or divestiture during the transaction process and also to incur costs of closing and disposing the affected business or transferring the operations of the business to other facilities. In addition, if such transactions are not completed for any reason, the market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that such transactions will occur, and a failure to complete such transactions could result in a negative perception by the market of us generally and a decline in the market price of our common stock. For example, consummation of the Avenue-InvaGen merger contemplated by the Avenue SPMA is conditioned on, inter alia: (i) final FDA approval of IV tramadol (Avenue’s lead product candidate); (ii) labeling for IV tramadol containing an indication as moderate to moderately severe (post-operative) pain, not restricted to any specific type of surgery; (iii) classification of IV tramadol by the DEA as a Schedule IV drug; and (iv) there being no Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy from the FDA applicable to IV tramadol. If one or more of these conditions is not satisfied, InvaGen will not be obligated to consummate the Avenue-InvaGen merger, which could materially adversely affect our business.

On October 12, 2020, Avenue announced that it had received a Complete Response Letter (the “CRL") from the FDA regarding Avenue’s New Drug Application for IV Tramadol. The CRL cited deficiencies related to the terminal sterilization validation and stated that IV Tramadol, intended to treat patients in acute pain who require an opioid, is not safe for the intended patient population. Avenue’s ability to potentially commercialize IV Tramadol, and the timing of potential commercialization, is dependent on the FDA's review of Avenue’s response to the CRL and its NDA for IV Tramadol, and other items such as timely and successful completion of the terminal sterilization validation, ultimate FDA approval, and potentially additional capital.

In October 2020, InvaGen communicated to Avenue that it believes a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the SPMA) has occurred due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential commercialization and projected sales of IV Tramadol, which means it is possible InvaGen could attempt to avoid its obligation to consummate the second stage closing under the SPMA. Avenue disagrees with InvaGen’s assertion that a Material Adverse Effect has occurred and has advised InvaGen of this position.

Table of Contents

As a result of these factors, any collaboration or divestiture (whether or not completed) could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations and could cause the market value of our common stock and/or preferred stock to decline.

We have in the past acted, do currently act, and are likely to continue in the future to act as guarantor and/or indemnitor of the obligations, actions or inactions of certain of our subsidiaries and affiliated companies; depending on the terms of such arrangements, we may be contractually obligated to pay substantial amounts to third parties based on the actions or inactions of our subsidiaries and/or affiliates.

We have in the past acted, do currently act, and are likely to continue in the future to act as guarantor of the debt obligations of several of our subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including Aevitas, Baergic, Cellvation and Cyprium. Depending on the terms of such guaranty arrangements, we may be contractually obligated to pay substantial amounts to third party lenders based on the actions or inactions of such subsidiaries and/or affiliates, which would result in a reduction of the amount of our cash available for other purposes and may have a material adverse effect on the price of our Securities.

We also have in the past acted, do currently act, and are likely to continue in the future to act as indemnitor of potential losses that may be experienced by one or more of our affiliated companies and/or their partners or investors. In particular, under that certain Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 (the “Indemnification Agreement”), we indemnify InvaGen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“InvaGen”) and its affiliates for any losses they may sustain in connection with inaccuracies that may appear in the representations and warranties that our partner company Avenue made to InvaGen in that certain Stock Purchase and Merger Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2018 (the “Avenue SPMA”). The maximum amount of indemnification we may have to provide under the Indemnification Agreement is $35.0 million, and such obligation terminates upon the consummation of the Merger Transaction (as defined in the Avenue SPMA). In the event of payment by us of any such indemnification amount, we would be able to recoup such amounts (other than our pro rata share of the indemnification as a shareholder in Avenue) from the Merger Transaction proceeds, but if the Merger Transaction never occurs, we would have no means of recouping such previously-paid indemnification amounts. If we become obligated to pay all or a portion of such indemnification amounts (regardless of whether or not we are partially reimbursed out of the proceeds of the Merger Transaction), our business and the market value of our common stock and/or debt securities may be materially adversely impacted.

Our future growth depends in part on our ability to identify and acquire or in-license products and product candidates, and if we are unable to do so, or to integrate acquired products into our operations, we may have limited growth opportunities.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to develop a pipeline of product candidates by acquiring or in-licensing products, businesses or technologies. Future in-licenses or acquisitions, however, may entail numerous operational and financial risks, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

exposure to unknown liabilities;

●

disruption of our business and diversion of our management’s time and attention to develop acquired products or technologies;

●

difficulty or inability to secure financing to fund development activities for such acquired or in-licensed technologies in the current economic environment;

●

incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of securities to pay for acquisitions;

●

higher than expected acquisition and integration costs;

●

increased amortization expenses;

●

difficulty and cost in combining the operations and personnel of any acquired businesses with our operations and personnel;

●

impairment of relationships with key suppliers or customers of any acquired businesses due to changes in management and ownership; and

●

inability to retain key employees of any acquired businesses.

Table of Contents

We have limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure. In particular, we may compete with larger pharmaceutical companies and other competitors in our efforts to establish new collaborations and in-licensing opportunities. These competitors likely will have access to greater financial resources than us and may have greater expertise in identifying and evaluating new opportunities. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts.

Certain of our officers and directors serve in similar roles at our partners, affiliates, related parties and/or other entities with which we transact business or in which we hold significant minority ownership positions; ongoing and future relationships and transactions between these parties could result in conflicts of interest.

We share directors and/or officers with certain of our partners, and other entities with which we transact business or in which we hold significant minority ownership positions, and such arrangements could create conflicts of interest in the future, including with respect to the allocation of corporate opportunities. While we believe that we have put in place policies and procedures to identify and mitigate such conflicts, and that any existing agreements that may give rise to such conflicts and any such policies or procedures were negotiated at arm’s length in conformity with fiduciary duties, such conflicts of interest may nonetheless arise. The existence and consequences of such potential conflicts could expose us to lost profits, claims by our investors and creditors, and harm to our results of operations.

Some of our executives, directors and principal stockholders can control our direction and policies, and their interests may be adverse to the interests of our other stockholders.

At September 30, 2020, Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D., our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned 10.1% of our issued and outstanding capital stock. At September 30, 2020, Michael S. Weiss, our Executive Vice Chairman, Strategic Development, beneficially owned 10.9% of our issued and outstanding capital stock. By virtue of their holdings and membership on our Board of Directors, Dr. Rosenwald and Mr. Weiss may individually influence our management and our affairs and may make it difficult for us to consummate corporate transactions such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets that may be favorable from our standpoint or that of our other stockholders.

If we acquire, enter into joint ventures with or obtain a controlling interest in companies in the future, it could adversely affect our operating results and the value of our Securities, thereby diluting stockholder value, disrupting our business and/or diminishing the value of our holdings in our partner companies.

As part of our growth strategy, we might acquire, enter into joint ventures with, or obtain significant ownership stakes in other companies. Acquisitions of, joint ventures with and investments in other companies involve numerous risks, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

risk of entering new markets in which we have little to no experience;

●

diversion of financial and managerial resources from existing operations;

●

successfully negotiating a proposed acquisition or investment timely and at a price or on terms and conditions favorable to us;

●

the impact of regulatory reviews on a proposed acquisition or investment;

●

the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted with respect to the proposed acquisitions or investment;

●

with respect to an acquisition, difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services and personnel; and

●

potential inability to maintain relationships with customers of the companies we may acquire or invest in.

If we fail to properly evaluate potential acquisitions, joint ventures or other transaction opportunities, we might not achieve the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, we might incur higher costs than anticipated, and management resources and attention might be diverted from other necessary or valuable activities.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Reliance on Third Parties

We currently rely predominantly on third parties to manufacture our preclinical and clinical pharmaceutical supplies and expect to continue to rely heavily on them and other contractors to produce commercial supplies of our products, and our dependence on third-party suppliers could adversely impact our businesses. We also rely solely on third parties to manufacture Journey’s commercialized products, which dependence may also adversely impact our businesses.

We depend heavily on third party manufacturers for product supply. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to applicable specifications and with FDA regulatory requirements, we will not be able to secure and/or maintain FDA approval for those products. Our third-party suppliers will be required to maintain compliance with cGMPs and will be subject to inspections by the FDA and comparable agencies and authorities in other jurisdictions to confirm such compliance. In the event that the FDA or such other authorities determine that our third-party suppliers have not complied with cGMPs or comparable regulations, the relevant clinical trials could be terminated or subjected to a clinical hold until such time as we are able to obtain appropriate replacement material and/or applicable compliance, and commercial product could be unfit for sale, or if distributed, could be recalled from the market. Any delay, interruption or other issues that arise in the manufacture, testing, packaging, labeling, storage, or distribution of our products as a result of a failure of the facilities or operations of our third-party suppliers to comply with regulatory requirements or pass any regulatory agency inspection could significantly impair our ability to develop and commercialize our products and product candidates. In addition, several of our currently commercialized products, sold through our partner company Journey, are produced by a single manufacturer, and, although we closely monitor inventory prophylactically, disruptions to such supply arrangements could adversely affect our ability to meet product demand and therefore diminish revenues.

We also rely on third-party manufacturers to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to produce product candidates for anticipated clinical trials. There are a small number of suppliers for certain capital equipment and raw materials that are used to manufacture those products. We do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these raw materials by our third-party manufacturers. Moreover, we currently do not have any agreements for the commercial production of these raw materials. Any significant delay in the supply of raw material components related to an ongoing clinical trial could considerably delay completion of our clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval.

We do not expect to have the resources or capacity to commercially manufacture our product candidates internally, if approved, and would likely continue to be heavily dependent upon third-party manufacturers. Our dependence on third parties to manufacture and supply clinical trial materials, as well as our planned dependence on third party manufacturers for any products that may be approved, may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize products in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all.

We rely heavily on third parties for the development and manufacturing of products and product candidates.

Certain our partner companies, on whose successes we largely rely, are early-stage biopharmaceutical companies with limited operating histories. To date, we have engaged primarily in acquisition, evaluative and R&D activities and have not generated any revenues from product sales (except through Journey). We have incurred significant net losses since our inception. As of September 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $477.5 million. We may need to rely on third parties for activities critical to the product candidate development process, including but not necessarily limited to:

●

identifying and evaluating product candidates;

●

negotiating, drafting and entering into licensing and other arrangements with product development partners; and

●

continuing to undertake pre-clinical development and designing and executing clinical trials.

We have also not demonstrated the ability to perform the functions necessary for the successful commercialization of any of our pre-market product candidates, should any of them be approved for marketing. If we were to have any such product candidates approved, the successful commercialization of such products would require us to perform or contract with third parties for performance of a variety of critical functions, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

advising and participating in regulatory approval processes;

●

formulating and manufacturing products for clinical development programs and commercial sale; and

Table of Contents

●

conducting sales and marketing activities.

Our operations have been limited to acquiring, developing and securing the proprietary rights for, and undertaking pre-clinical development and clinical trials of, product candidates, both at the Fortress level and via our partner companies. These operations provide a limited basis for our stockholders and prospective investors to assess our ability to develop and commercialize potential product candidates, as well as for you to assess the advisability of investing in our securities.

We rely on third parties to conduct clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet agreed-upon deadlines or otherwise conduct the trials as required, our clinical development programs could be delayed or unsuccessful, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates when expected or at all.

We rely on third-party contract research organizations and site management organizations to conduct most of our preclinical studies and all of our clinical trials for our product candidates. We expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, site management organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and clinical investigators, to conduct some of our preclinical studies and all of our clinical trials. These CROs, investigators, and other third parties will and do play a significant role in the conduct of our trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data from the clinical trials.

There is no guarantee that any CROs, investigators and other third parties upon which we rely for administration and conduct of our clinical trials will devote adequate time and resources to such trials or perform as contractually required. If any of these third parties fails to meet expected deadlines, or fails to adhere to our clinical protocols or otherwise perform in a substandard manner, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated. If any of the clinical trial sites terminates for any reason, we may lose follow-up information on patients enrolled in our ongoing clinical trials unless the care of those patients is transferred to another qualified clinical trial site. In addition, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisers or consultants to us from time to time and receive cash or equity compensation in connection with such services. If these relationships and any related compensation result in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site, or the FDA’s willingness to accept such data, may be jeopardized.

Our reliance on these third parties for research and development activities will reduce our control over these activities but will not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials are conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial and for ensuring that our preclinical studies are conducted in accordance with good laboratory practice (“GLP”) as appropriate. Moreover, the FDA requires us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices (“GCPs”) for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical investigators and trial sites. If we or any of our clinical research organizations fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials complies with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process. We also are required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within specified timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.

If any of our relationships with these third-party contract research organizations or site management organizations terminates, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative contract research organizations or site management organizations or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional contract research organizations or site management organizations involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new contract research organization or site management organization commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could compromise our ability to meet our desired development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our contract research organizations or site management organizations, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future.

Table of Contents

We rely on clinical and pre-clinical data and results obtained by third parties that could ultimately prove to be inaccurate or unreliable.

As part of the strategy we implement to mitigate development risk, we seek to develop product candidates with well-studied mechanisms of action, and we intend to utilize biomarkers to assess potential clinical efficacy early in the development process. This strategy necessarily relies upon clinical and pre-clinical data and other results produced or obtained by third parties, which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate or unreliable. If the third-party data and results we rely upon prove to be inaccurate, unreliable or not applicable to our product candidates, we could make inaccurate assumptions and conclusions about our product candidates, and our research and development efforts could be compromised or called into question during the review of any marketing applications that we submit.

Collaborative relationships with third parties could cause us to expend significant resources and incur substantial business risk with no assurance of financial return.

We anticipate substantial reliance upon strategic collaborations for marketing and commercializing our existing product candidates and we may rely even more on strategic collaborations for R&D of other product candidates. We may sell product offerings through strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. If we are unable to establish or manage such strategic collaborations on terms favorable to us in the future, our revenue and drug development may be limited.

If we enter into R&D collaborations during the early phases of drug development, success will, in part, depend on the performance of research collaborators. We may not directly control the amount or timing of resources devoted by research collaborators to activities related to product candidates. Research collaborators may not commit sufficient resources to our R&D programs. If any research collaborator fails to commit sufficient resources, the preclinical or clinical development programs related to the collaboration could be delayed or terminated. Also, collaborators may pursue existing or other development-stage products or alternative technologies in preference to those being developed in collaboration with us. Finally, if we fail to make required milestone or royalty payments to collaborators or to observe other obligations in agreements with them, the collaborators may have the right to terminate or stop performance of those agreements.

Establishing strategic collaborations is difficult and time-consuming. Our discussions with potential collaborators may not lead to the establishment of collaborations on favorable terms, if at all. Potential collaborators may reject collaborations based upon their assessment of our financial, regulatory or intellectual property positions. Even if we successfully establish new collaborations, these relationships may never result in the successful development or commercialization of product candidates or the generation of sales revenue. To the extent that we enter into collaborative arrangements, the related product revenues that might follow are likely to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold products. Such collaborators may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on, and such collaborations could be more attractive than the one with us for any future product candidate.

Management of our relationships with collaborators will require:

●

significant time and effort from our management team;

●

coordination of our marketing and R&D programs with the respective marketing and R&D priorities of our collaborators; and

●

effective allocation of our resources to multiple projects.

Table of Contents

Risks Pertaining to Intellectual Property and Potential Disputes with Licensors Thereof

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be impaired.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to obtain patent protection for product candidates and their formulations and uses. The patent application process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we or our partners will be successful in obtaining patents or what the scope of an issued patent may ultimately be. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

●

patent applications may not result in any patents being issued, or the scope of issued patents may not extend to competitive product candidates and their formulations and uses developed or produced by others;

●

our competitors, many of which have substantially greater resources than us or our partners, and many of which have made significant investments in competing technologies, may seek, or may already have obtained, patents that may limit or interfere with our abilities to make, use, and sell potential product candidates, file new patent applications, or may affect any pending patent applications that we may have;

●

there may be significant pressure on the U.S. government and other international governmental bodies to limit the scope of patent protection both inside and outside the United States for disease treatments that prove successful as a matter of public policy regarding worldwide health concerns; and

●

countries other than the United States may have patent laws less favorable to patentees than those upheld by U.S. courts, allowing foreign competitors a better opportunity to create, develop and market competing products.

In addition, patents that may be issued or in-licensed may be challenged, invalidated, modified, revoked, circumvented, found to be unenforceable, or otherwise may not provide any competitive advantage. Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the US Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our US patent positions. An adverse determination in any such submission, patent office trial, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, render unenforceable, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technologies or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates. Third parties are often responsible for maintaining patent protection for our product candidates, at our and their expense. If that party fails to appropriately prosecute and maintain patent protection for a product candidate, our abilities to develop and commercialize products may be adversely affected, and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competing products. Such a failure to properly protect intellectual property rights relating to any of our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, U.S. patent laws may change, which could prevent or limit us from filing patent applications or patent claims to protect products and/or technologies or limit the exclusivity periods that are available to patent holders, as well as affect the validity, enforceability, or scope of issued patents.

We and our licensors also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how to protect product candidates. Although we have taken steps to protect our and their trade secrets and unpatented know-how, including entering into confidentiality and non-use agreements with third parties, and proprietary information and invention assignment agreements with employees, consultants and advisers, third parties may still come upon this same or similar information independently. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may also breach the agreements and may unintentionally or willfully disclose our or our licensors’ proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to identify such breaches or obtain adequate remedies. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. Moreover, if any of our or our licensors’ trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we and our licensors would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our or our licensors’ trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive positions would be harmed.

Table of Contents

The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify any patentable aspects of our research and development output and methodology, and, even if we do, an opportunity to obtain patent protection may have passed. Given the uncertain and time-consuming process of filing patent applications and prosecuting them, it is possible that our product(s) or process(es) originally covered by the scope of the patent application may have changed or been modified, leaving our product(s) or process(es) without patent protection. If our licensors or we fail to obtain or maintain patent protection or trade secret protection for one or more product candidates or any future product candidate we may license or acquire, third parties may be able to leverage our proprietary information and products without risk of infringement, which could impair our ability to compete in the market and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and achieve profitability. Moreover, should we enter into other collaborations we may be required to consult with or cede control to collaborators regarding the prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of licensed patents. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. In addition, no consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in pharmaceutical or biotechnology patents has emerged to date in the US. The patent situation outside the US is even more uncertain. The laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the US, and we may fail to seek or obtain patent protection in all major markets. For example, European patent law restricts the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more than US law does. We might also become involved in derivation proceedings in an event that a third party misappropriates one or more of our inventions and files their own patent application directed to such one or more inventions. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention (or that a third party derived an invention from us) would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our US patent position. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the US and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. For example, the federal courts of the US have taken an increasingly dim view of the patent eligibility of certain subject matter, such as naturally occurring nucleic acid sequences, amino acid sequences and certain methods of utilizing same, which include their detection in a biological sample and diagnostic conclusions arising from their detection. Such subject matter, which had long been a staple of the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry to protect their discoveries, is now considered, with few exceptions, ineligible in the first instance for protection under the patent laws of the US. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed and remain enforceable in our patents or in those licensed from a third party.

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These include changes to transition from a “first-to-invent” system to a “first inventor-to-file” system and to the way issued patents are challenged. The formation of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board now provides a less burdensome, quicker and less expensive process for challenging issued patents. The PTO recently developed new regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first inventor-to-file provisions, only became effective on March 16, 2013. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Even if our patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that will provide us with any meaningful protection, prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. Our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner.

We also may rely on the regulatory period of market exclusivity for any of our biologic product candidates that are successfully developed and approved for commercialization. Although this period in the United States is generally 12 years from the date of marketing approval (depending on the nature of the specific product), there is a risk that the U.S. Congress could amend laws to significantly shorten this exclusivity period. Once any regulatory period of exclusivity expires, depending on the status of our patent coverage and the nature of the product, we may not be able to prevent others from marketing products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable with our products, which would materially adversely affect our business.

Table of Contents

If we or our licensors are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, it will be costly and time consuming, and an unfavorable outcome in that litigation would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success also depends on our ability, and the abilities of any of our respective current or future collaborators, to develop, manufacture, market and sell product candidates without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing products, some of which may be directed at claims that overlap with the subject matter of our or our licensors’ intellectual property. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications, unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates or proprietary technologies may infringe. Similarly, there may be issued patents relevant to our product candidates of which we or our licensors are not aware. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the US and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after a first filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we or such licensors were the first to make the inventions claimed in patents or pending patent applications that we own or licensed, or that we and our licensors were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. In the event that a third party has also filed a US patent application relating to our product candidates or a similar invention, depending upon the priority dates claimed by the competing parties, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the PTO to determine priority of invention in the US. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that our efforts to establish priority of invention would be unsuccessful, resulting in a material adverse effect on our U.S. patent position. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our or any of our licensors’ patent rights are highly uncertain.

There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industries generally. If a third party claims that we or any of our licensors, suppliers or collaborators infringe the third party’s intellectual property rights, we may have to, among other things:

●

obtain additional licenses, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all;

●

abandon an infringing product candidate or redesign products or processes to avoid infringement, which may demand substantial funds, time and resources and which may result in inferior or less desirable processes and/or products;

●

pay substantial damages, including the possibility of treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if a court decides that the product or proprietary technology at issue infringes on or violates the third party’s rights;

●

pay substantial royalties, fees and/or grant cross-licenses to our product candidates; and/or

defend litigation or administrative proceedings which may be costly regardless of outcome, and which could result in a substantial diversion of financial and management resources.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of licensors, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our or our licensors’ patents. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. Any claims we assert against accused infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging invalidity of our or our licensors’ patents or that we infringe their patents; or provoke those parties to petition the PTO to institute inter partes review against the asserted patents, which may lead to a finding that all or some of the claims of the patent are invalid. In addition, in a patent infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensor’s is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, construe the patent’s claims narrowly or refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our or our licensors’ patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, found to be unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could likewise put pending patent applications at risk of not issuing. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.

Table of Contents

Because we in-license the intellectual property needed to develop and commercialize products and product candidates from third parties, any dispute with the licensors or the non-performance of such license agreements may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize the applicable product candidates.

The patents, patent applications and other intellectual property rights underpinning all of our existing product candidates were in-licensed from third parties. Under the terms of such license agreements, the licensors generally have the right to terminate such agreements in the event of a material breach. The licenses require us to make annual, milestone or other payments prior to commercialization of any product and our ability to make these payments depends on the ability to generate cash in the future. These license agreements also generally require the use of diligent and reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize product candidates.

If there is any conflict, dispute, disagreement or issue of non-performance between us or one of our partners, on the one hand, and the respective licensing partner, on the other hand, regarding the rights or obligations under the license agreements, including any conflict, dispute or disagreement arising from a failure to satisfy payment obligations under such agreements, the ability to develop and commercialize the affected product candidate may be adversely affected.

The types of disputes that may arise between us and the third parties from whom we license intellectual property include, but are not necessarily limited to:

●

the scope of rights granted under such license agreements and other interpretation-related issues;

●

the extent to which our technologies and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to such license agreements;

●

the scope and interpretation of the representations and warranties made to us by our licensors, including those pertaining to the licensors’ right title and interest in the licensed technology and the licensors’ right to grant the licenses contemplated by such agreements;

●

the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our license agreements and/or collaborative development relationships, and the rights and obligations associated with such sublicensing, including whether or not a given transaction constitutes a sublicense under such license agreement;

●

the diligence and development obligations under license agreements (which may include specific diligence milestones) and what activities or achievements satisfy those diligence obligations;

●

whether or not the milestones associated with certain milestone payment obligations have been achieved or satisfied;

●

the applicability or scope of indemnification claims or obligations under such license agreements;

●

the permissibility and advisability of, and strategy regarding, the pursuit of potential third-party infringers of the intellectual property that is the subject of such license agreements;

●

the calculation of royalty, milestone, sublicense revenue and other payment obligations under such license agreements;

●

the extent to which rights, if any, are retained by licensors under such license agreements;

●

whether or not a material breach has occurred under such license agreements and the extent to which such breach, if deemed to have occurred, is or can be cured within applicable cure periods, if any;

●

disputes regarding patent filing and prosecution decisions, as well as payment obligations regarding past and ongoing patent expenses;

●

intellectual property rights resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property (including improvements made to licensed intellectual property) by our and our partners’ licensors and us and our partners; and

●

the priority of invention of patented technology.

Table of Contents

In addition, the agreements under which we currently license intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations or may conflict in such a way that puts us in breach of one or more agreements, which would make us susceptible to lengthy and expensive disputes with one or more of such third-party licensing partners. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreements, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Pertaining to the Commercialization of Product Candidates

If any of our product candidates that may be successfully developed do not achieve broad market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community, the revenues that any such product candidates generate from sales will be limited.

Even if our product candidates receive regulatory approval, they may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community. Coverage and reimbursement of our product candidates by third-party payors, including government payors, generally would also be necessary for commercial success. The degree of market acceptance of any approved products would depend on a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

the efficacy and safety as demonstrated in clinical trials;

●

the timing of market introduction of such product candidate as well as competitive products;

●

the clinical indications for which the product is approved;

●

acceptance by physicians, major operators of hospitals and clinics and patients of the product as a safe and effective treatment;

●

the potential and perceived advantages of product candidates over alternative treatments;

●

the safety of product candidates in a broader patient group (i.e., based on actual use);

●

the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;

●

the availability of adequate reimbursement and pricing by third parties and government authorities;

●

changes in regulatory requirements by government authorities for our product candidates;

●

relative convenience and ease of administration;

●

the prevalence and severity of side effects and adverse events;

●

the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts; and

●

unfavorable publicity relating to the product.

If any product candidate is approved but does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, hospitals, healthcare payors and patients, we may not generate sufficient revenue from these products and in turn we may not become or remain profitable.

Table of Contents

Even if approved, any product candidates that we may develop and market may be later withdrawn from the market or subject to promotional limitations.

We may not be able to obtain the labeling claims or scheduling classifications necessary or desirable for the promotion of our marketed products (or our product candidates if approved). We may also be required to undertake post-marketing clinical trials. If the results of such post-marketing studies are not satisfactory or if adverse events or other safety issues arise after approval, the FDA or a comparable regulatory authority in another jurisdiction may withdraw marketing authorization or may condition continued marketing on commitments from us that may be expensive and/or time consuming to complete. In addition, if we or others identify adverse side effects after any of our products are on the market, or if manufacturing problems occur, regulatory approval may be withdrawn and reformulation of our products, additional clinical trials, changes in labeling of our products and additional marketing applications may be required. Any reformulation or labeling changes may limit the marketability of such products if approved.

We face potential product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability for one or more of our product candidates or a future product candidate we may license or acquire and may have to limit their commercialization.

The use of one or more of our product candidates and any future product candidate we may license or acquire in clinical trials and the sale of any products for which we obtain marketing approval expose us to the risk of product liability claims. For example, we may be sued if any product we develop allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability or a breach of warranties. Product liability claims might be brought against us by consumers, health care providers or others using, administering or selling our products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against these claims, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

●

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

●

suspension or termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

●

decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop;

●

initiation of investigations by regulators;

●

impairment of our business reputation;

●

costs of related litigation;

●

substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;

●

loss of revenues;

●

reduced resources of our management to pursue our business strategy; and

●

the inability to commercialize our product candidate or future product candidates.

We will obtain limited product liability insurance coverage for any and all of our upcoming clinical trials. However, our insurance coverage may not reimburse us or may not be sufficient to reimburse us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability. When needed we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates in development, but we may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products approved for marketing. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could cause our stock price to fall and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash and adversely affect our business.

Table of Contents

Additionally, we have entered into various agreements under which we indemnify third parties for certain claims relating to product candidates. These indemnification obligations may require us to pay significant sums of money for claims that are covered by these indemnifications.

Any product for which we obtain marketing approval could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with products, when and if any of them are approved.

Any product for which we obtain marketing approval, along with the manufacturing processes and facilities, post-approval clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities for such product, will be subject to continual requirements of, and review by, the FDA and comparable regulatory authorities. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration requirements, cGMP requirements relating to quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, requirements regarding the distribution of samples to physicians and recordkeeping, and requirements regarding company presentations and interactions with healthcare professionals. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or subject to conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. We also may be subject to state laws and registration requirements covering the distribution of drug products. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in actions such as:

●

restrictions on product manufacturing, distribution or use;

●

restrictions on the labeling or marketing of a product;

●

requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials;

●

warning letters;

●

withdrawal of the products from the market;

●

refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit;

●

recalls;

●

fines;

●

suspension or withdrawal of marketing or regulatory approvals;

●

refusal to permit the import or export of products;

●

product seizure or detentions;

●

injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties; and

●

adverse publicity.

If we or our suppliers, third-party contractors, clinical investigators or collaborators are slow to adapt, or are unable to adapt, to changes in existing regulatory requirements or adoption of new regulatory requirements or policies, we or our collaborators may be subject to the actions listed above, including losing marketing approval for products when and if any of them are approved, resulting in decreased revenue from milestones, product sales or royalties.

Table of Contents

We will need to obtain FDA approval of any proposed product brand names, and any failure or delay associated with such approval may adversely impact our business.

A pharmaceutical product cannot be marketed in the US or other countries until it has completed a rigorous and extensive regulatory review processes, including approval of a brand name. Any brand names we intend to use for our product candidates will require approval from the FDA regardless of whether we have secured a formal trademark registration from the PTO. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product brand names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. The FDA may also object to a product brand name if it believes the name inappropriately implies medical claims. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed product brand names, we may be required to adopt an alternative brand name for our product candidates. If we adopt an alternative brand name, we would lose the benefit of our existing trademark applications for such product candidate and may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable product brand name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA. We may be unable to build a successful brand identity for a new trademark in a timely manner or at all, which would limit our ability to commercialize our product candidates.

Risks Pertaining to Legislation and Regulation Affecting the Biopharmaceutical and Other Industries

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of how government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action taken by the U.S. presidential administration may impact our business and industry. In particular, the U.S. President has taken several executive actions, specifically through rulemaking and guidance, that could impact the pharmaceutical business and industry. A few of the major administrative actions include:

On October 9, 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a proposed rule entitled, Modernizing and Clarifying the Physician Self-Referral Regulations and on the same day the HHS Office of Inspector General issued a similar rule, entitled Revisions to Safe Harbors Under the Anti-Kickback Statute, and Civil Monetary penalty Rules Regarding Beneficiary Inducements. The proposed rules are an effort to reform regulations dealing with anti-kickback and self-referral laws. The proposals are attempting to allow certain financial arrangements that would otherwise violate anti-kickback and self-referral laws for providers that are participating in value-based payment arrangements. The proposed rule could impact drug purchasing behavior to ensure providers are within their budget and/or restructure existing payment structures between providers and manufacturers.

On October 30, 2019, the Administration issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPRM”) entitled, International Pricing Index Model for Medicare Part B Drugs. This ANPRM is soliciting feedback on a potential proposal to align United States drug prices in the Medicare Part B program with international prices. It also solicits public feedback on a policy that would allowing private-sector vendors to negotiate prices, take title to drugs, and improve competition for hospital and physician business. Although this is only a notice for a potential rule, it signals the Administration’s desire to regulatorily influence the United States drug pricing system that could adversely affect the industry.

On November 15, 2019, CMS issued a proposed rule entitled, Transparency in Coverage and finalized the Calendar Year (“CY”) 2020 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (“OPPS”) & Ambulatory Surgical Center Price Transparency Requirements for Hospitals to Make Standard Charges Rule. Together the rules would increase price transparency through health plans and in hospitals. The affects may influence consumer purchasing habits in the health care sector as a whole. Although the transparency provisions are not yet in effect and the hospital price transparency requirements are subject to litigation, there could be implications for the industry related to drug pricing if or when it is enacted.

On November 18, 2019, CMS issued a proposed rule entitled, Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Regulation (“MFAR”). The proposed rule would significantly impact states’ ability to finance their Medicaid programs. If finalized, the MFAR could force states to restructure their Medicaid financing that could disincentivize or change state prescription drug purchasing behavior that would adversely impact the industry.

Table of Contents

On December 18, 2019, the FDA issued a proposed rule entitled, Importation of Prescription Drugs. The proposed rule would allow the importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada. If finalized, states or other non-federal government entities would be able to submit importation program proposals to FDA for review and authorization. This proposed rule could also influence pricing practices in the United States.

On January 30, 2020, CMS issued a state waiver option entitled, Health Adult Opportunity (“HAO”). The HAO would allow states to restructure benefits and coverage policies for their Medicaid programs. The HAO will provide states administrative flexibilities in exchange for a capped federal share. The cap on the federal share is commonly referred to as a “block grant.” Importantly, the HAO allows states to set formularies that align with Essential Health Benefit requirements while still requiring manufacturers to participate in the Medicaid Rebate Program. Depending on utilization of the HAO by states, it could impact the industry – especially if states elect to use a formulary.

It is also possible that the Trump Administration will include drug pricing proposals in annual rulemaking throughout the year. As noted above, it is impossible to predict whether these policies will be included in future rulemaking; however, it is possible and worth noting.

Our current and future relationships with customers and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere may be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, transparency, health information privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors in the U.S. and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to transparency laws and patient privacy regulation by the federal and state governments and by governments in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not necessarily limited to:

●

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid;

●

federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which impose criminal and civil penalties, including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;

●

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose obligations on covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, as well as their business associates that create, receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health information for or on behalf of a covered entity, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

Table of Contents

●

the federal Open Payments program, which requires manufacturers of certain drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to “covered recipients,” which include physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors, and teaching hospitals) and applicable manufacturers. Applicable group purchasing organizations also are required to report annually to CMS the ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members. The SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act added to the definition of covered recipient practitioners including physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives effective in 2022. Data collection began on August 1, 2013 with requirements for manufacturers to submit reports to CMS by March 31, 2014 and 90 days after the end of each subsequent calendar year. Disclosure of such information was made by CMS on a publicly available website beginning in September 2014; and

●

analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including, without limitation, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our businesses. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business, including our collaborators, is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, it may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from participation in government healthcare programs, which could also materially affect our businesses.

As we continue to execute our growth strategy, we may be subject to further government regulation which could adversely affect our financial results, including without limitation the Investment Company Act of 1940.

If we engage in business combinations and other transactions that result in holding minority or non-control investment interests in a number of entities, we may become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). If we do become subject to the Investment Company Act, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs in the future.

General Risks

Major public health issues, and specifically the pandemic caused by the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak, could have an adverse effect on the clinical trials of our partner companies, and as a result, have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations and other aspects of our business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus which causes a disease referred to as COVID-19, was first detected in Wuhan, China, and has since spread worldwide. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared that the rapidly spreading COVID-19 outbreak had evolved into a pandemic. In response to the pandemic, many governments around the world are implementing a variety of control measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions and bans, instructions to residents to practice social distancing, quarantine advisories, shelter-in-place orders and required closures of non-essential businesses.

Table of Contents

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, and created significant volatility and disruption of financial markets. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the virus and the actions to contain it or treat its impact, among others.

Some factors from the COVID-19 outbreak that may delay or otherwise adversely affect our or our partner companies’ clinical trial programs, as well as adversely impact our business generally, include:

●

delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical sites, and delays enrolling patients in our clinical trials or increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of contracting COVID-19, being forced to quarantine, or not otherwise being able to complete study assessments, particularly for older patients or others with a higher risk of contracting COVID-19;

●

missed study visits or study procedures which could lead to an abundance of protocol deviations that have the potential to interfere with the interpretability of trial results;

●

impacts to clinical results, including an increased number of observed adverse events, as a result of participants enrolled in our clinical trials contracting COVID-19;

●

diversion of healthcare resources, including clinical trial investigators and staff, away from the conduct of clinical trials to focus on pandemic concerns which could result in delays to our partner companies’ clinical trials;

●

limitations on travel, including limitations on domestic and international travel, and government-imposed quarantines or restrictions imposed by key third parties that could interrupt key trial activities, such as clinical trial site initiations and monitoring;

●

interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of our product candidates from our contract manufacturing organizations due to staffing shortages, or production slowdowns or stoppages;

●

disruptions and delays caused by potential workplace, laboratory and office closures and an increased reliance on employees working from home across the healthcare system; and

●

disruptions in or delays to regulatory approvals, inspections, reviews or other regulatory activities, including review of NDAs and approvals of protocol changes or amendments to SPAs, as a result of the spread of COVID-19 affecting the operations of the FDA or other regulatory authorities.

The disruptions discussed above and other consequences of COVID-19 pandemic could result in missed study visits or study procedures in our clinical trials, which could lead to an abundance of protocol deviations that impact the interpretability of the trial results. A significant number of deviations may call into question whether the execution of a clinical trial was consistent with the protocol, which is of particular importance where study designs were agreed to as part of a Special Protocol Assessment (SPA). In extreme cases, significant deviations from the protocol may be considered a violation of a SPA and result in potential rescindment of an SPA agreement.

We and our partner companies currently rely on third parties for certain functions or services in support of our clinical trials and key areas of our operations. These third parties include contract research organizations (CROs), medical institutions and clinical investigators, contract manufacturing organizations, suppliers, and external business partners supporting our preparations for commercialization. If these third parties themselves are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak, we will likely experience delays and/or realize additional costs. As a result, our or our partner companies’ efforts to obtain regulatory approvals for, and to commercialize, our or our partner companies’ product candidates may be delayed or disrupted.

In addition, as a result of government directives on social distancing and to protect the health of our workforce, we have asked our office-based employees to work remotely and have restricted domestic and international travel indefinitely.

Table of Contents

We restricted on-site staff to only those personnel and contractors who must perform essential activities that must be completed on-site. Third parties on which we rely may also increase their use of remote working arrangements in response to COVID-19. Our increased reliance on personnel working remotely may negatively impact productivity, including our ability to monitor clinical trials, prepare regulatory applications, and conduct data analysis, or disrupt, delay, or otherwise adversely impact our business. In addition, remote working could increase our cybersecurity risk, create data accessibility concerns, and make us more susceptible to communication disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations or delay necessary interactions with local and federal regulators, ethics committees, manufacturing sites, research or clinical trial sites and other important agencies and contractors.

The ability of the Company’s employees and consultants to work may be significantly impacted by the coronavirus.

The Company’s employees and consultants are being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Substantially all of our office and management personnel are working remotely, and the Company may need to enact further precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of our employees being exposed to the coronavirus. COVID-19 may also compromise the ability of independent contractors who perform consulting services for us to deliver services or deliverables in a satisfactory or timely manner. Further, our management team is focused on mitigating the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has required and will continue to require a large investment of time and resources, thereby diverting their attention from other priorities that existed prior to the outbreak of the pandemic. If these conditions worsen, or last for an extended period of time, the Company’s ability to manage its business may be impaired, and operational risks, cybersecurity risks and other risks facing the Company even prior to the pandemic may be elevated.

We may not be able to hire or retain key officers or employees needed to implement our business strategy and develop products and businesses.

Our success depends on the continued contributions of our executive officers, financial, scientific, and technical personnel and consultants, and on our ability to attract additional personnel as we continue to implement growth strategies and acquire and invest in companies with varied businesses. During our operating history, many essential responsibilities have been assigned to a relatively small number of individuals. However, as we continue to implement our growth strategy, the demands on our key employees will expand, and we will need to recruit additional qualified employees. The competition for such qualified personnel is intense, and the loss of services of certain key personnel, or our inability to attract additional personnel to fill critical positions, could adversely affect our business.

We currently depend heavily upon the efforts and abilities of our management team and the management teams of our partners. The loss or unavailability of the services of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results. In addition, we have not obtained, do not own, and are not the beneficiary of key-person life insurance for any of our key personnel. We only maintain a limited amount of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage. There can be no assurance that this coverage will be sufficient to cover the costs of the events that may occur, in which case, there could be a substantial impact on our ability to continue operations.

Our employees, consultants, or third-party partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including but not necessarily limited to noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements or internal procedures, policies or agreements to which such employees, consultants and partners are subject, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees, consultants, or third-party partners could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA, comply with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”), comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately, comply with internal procedures, policies or agreements to which such employees, consultants or partners are subject, or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee, consultant, or third-party misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation, as well as civil and criminal liability. The precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of significant fines or other civil and/or criminal sanctions.

Table of Contents

We receive a large amount of proprietary information from potential or existing licensors of intellectual property and potential acquisition target companies, all pursuant to confidentiality agreements. The confidentiality and proprietary invention assignment agreements that we have in place with each of our employees and consultants prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of such information, but such employees or consultants may nonetheless disclose such information through negligence or willful misconduct. Any such unauthorized disclosures could subject us to monetary damages and/or injunctive or equitable relief. The notes, analyses and memoranda that we have generated based on such information are also valuable to our businesses, and the unauthorized disclosure or misappropriation of such materials by our employees and consultants could significantly harm our strategic initiatives – especially if such disclosures are made to our competitor companies.

We may be subject to claims that our employees and/or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed to us alleged trade secrets of their former employers or other clients.

As is common in the biopharmaceutical industry, we rely on employees and consultants to assist in the development of product candidates, many of whom were previously employed at, or may have previously been or are currently providing consulting services to, other biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We may become subject to claims related to whether these individuals have inadvertently or otherwise used, disclosed or misappropriated trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers or their former or current clients. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and/or the employees or consultants that are implicated.

The market price of our securities may be volatile and may fluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to our operating performance.

The stock prices of our securities may experience substantial volatility as a result of a number of factors, including, but not necessarily limited to:

●

announcements we make regarding our current product candidates, acquisition of potential new product candidates and companies and/or in-licensing through multiple partners/affiliates;

●

sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock;

●

issuance of debt or other securities;

●

our delay or failure in initiating or completing pre-clinical or clinical trials or unsatisfactory results of any of these trials;

●

announcements about us or about our competitors, including clinical trial results, regulatory approvals or new product introductions;

●

developments concerning our licensors and/or product manufacturers;

●

litigation and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary rights or those of our competitors;

●

conditions in the pharmaceutical or biotechnology industries;

●

governmental regulation and legislation;

●

unstable regional political and economic conditions;

●

variations in our anticipated or actual operating results; and

●

change in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations.

Table of Contents

Many of these factors are beyond our control. The stock markets in general, and the market for pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies in particular, have historically experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry factors could reduce the market prices of our securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, may adversely impact the price of our Common Stock.

Almost all of the 99.7 million outstanding shares of our Common Stock, inclusive of outstanding equity awards, as of September 30, 2020 are available for sale in the public market, either pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or an effective registration statement. In addition, pursuant to our current shelf registration statement on Form S-3, from time to time we may issue and sell shares of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $29.5 million as of September 30, 2020. Any sale of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock or our Preferred Stock could cause a drop in the trading price of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

We may not be able to manage our anticipated growth, which may in turn adversely impact our business.

We will need to continue to expend capital on improving our infrastructure to address our anticipated growth. Acquisitions of companies or products could place a strain on our management, and administrative, operational and financial systems. In addition, we may need to hire, train, and manage more employees, focusing on their integration with us and corporate culture. Integration and management issues associated with increased acquisitions may require a disproportionate amount of our management’s time and attention and distract our management from other activities related to running our business.

The occurrence of a catastrophic disaster could damage our facilities beyond insurance limits or we could lose key data which could cause us to curtail or cease operations.

We are vulnerable to damage and/or loss of vital data from natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, power loss, fire, health epidemics and pandemics, floods and similar events, as well as from accidental loss or destruction. If any disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our businesses could be seriously impaired. We have property, liability and business interruption insurance that may not be adequate to cover losses resulting from disasters or other similar significant business interruptions, and we do not plan to purchase additional insurance to cover such losses due to the cost of obtaining such coverage. Any significant losses that are not recoverable under our insurance policies could seriously impair our business, financial condition and prospects. Any of the aforementioned circumstances, including without limitation the COVID-19 virus, may also impede our employees’ and consultants’ abilities to provide services in-person and/or in a timely manner; hinder our ability to raise funds to finance our operations on favorable terms or at all; and trigger effectiveness of “force majeure” clauses under agreements with respect to which we receive goods and services, or under which we are obligated to achieve developmental milestones on certain timeframes. Disputes with third parties over the applicability of such “force majeure” clauses, or the enforceability of developmental milestones and related extension mechanisms in light of such business interruptions, may arise and may become expensive and time-consuming.

Our ability to use our pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset post-change taxable income or taxes may be subject to limitation.

We may, from time to time, carry net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) as deferred tax assets on our balance sheet. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50-percentage- point cumulative change (by value) in the equity ownership of certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. We may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of shifts in our stock ownership, some of which changes are outside our control. As a result, our ability to use our pre-change NOLs and other pre-change tax attributes to offset post-change taxable income or taxes may be subject to limitation.

Table of Contents

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could harm our business.

We, and/or third parties on our behalf, may use hazardous materials, including chemicals and biological agents and compounds that could be dangerous to human health and safety or the environment. Our operations may also produce hazardous waste products. Federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the use, generation, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials and wastes. Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental laws and regulations may impair our product development efforts. In addition, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of accidental injury or contamination from these materials or wastes. We do not carry specific biological or hazardous waste insurance coverage, and our property and casualty and general liability insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for damages and fines arising from biological or hazardous waste exposure or contamination. Accordingly, in the event of contamination or injury, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines in an amount exceeding our respective resources, and clinical trials or regulatory approvals could be suspended.

Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover costs and expenses incurred due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted in connection with the storage or disposal of biological or hazardous materials.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

We have never paid and currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the near future, except for the dividend we pay on our Series A Preferred Stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, will be the sole source of gain for our Common Stockholders.

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, or made stock dividends, except for the dividend we pay on shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and we currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our businesses, and retain our stock positions. In addition, the terms of existing and future debt agreements may preclude us from paying cash or stock dividends. Equally, each of our partners is governed by its own board of directors with individual governance and decision-making regimes and mandates to oversee such entities in accordance with their respective fiduciary duties. As a result, we alone cannot determine the acts that could maximize value to you of such partners in which we maintain ownership positions, such as declaring cash or stock dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our Common Stock will be the sole source of gain for our Common Stockholders for the foreseeable future.

Changes in funding for the FDA and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could negatively impact our business or the business of our partners.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel, ability to accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business or the business of our partners. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough nonessential FDA employees and stop routine activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If the timing of FDA’s review and approval of new products is delayed, the timing of our or our partners’ development process may be delayed, which could result in delayed milestone revenues and materially harm our operations or business.

Table of Contents

We will continue to incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives. Also, if we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, investors’ views of us and, as a result, the value of our Securities.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”), as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. These rules impose various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and appropriate corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel have devoted and will continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

SOX requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As a result, we are required to periodically perform an evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of those controls, as required by Section 404 of SOX. Additionally, our independent auditors are required to perform a similar evaluation and report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. These efforts to comply with Section 404 and related regulations have required, and continue to require, the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. While we anticipate maintaining the integrity of our internal controls over financial reporting and all other aspects of Section 404, we cannot be certain that a material weakness will not be identified when we test the effectiveness of our control systems in the future. If a material weakness is identified, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources, costly litigation or a loss of public confidence in our internal controls, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our Company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock or other Securities.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law may have the effect of deterring unsolicited takeovers and/or delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then-current market prices. In addition, these provisions may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests. These provisions include:

●

the inability of stockholders to call special meetings; and

●

the ability of our Board of Directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could include the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control or could be used to institute a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our Board of Directors.

In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder, generally a person which together with its affiliates owns, or within the last three years has owned, 15% of our voting stock, for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our Company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you would receive a premium for your ownership of our Securities through an acquisition.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Index


Exhibit Number		Exhibit Title

10.1		Credit Agreement entered into by and among Fortress Biotech, Inc., the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC on August 27, 2020. (*+)

31.1		Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document.(*)

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(*)

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(*)

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(*)

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(*)

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(*)
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

* Filed herewith.

+ Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


November 9, 2020	FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC.

	By:	/s/ Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
		Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

November 9, 2020	By:	/s/ Robyn M. Hunter
		Robyn M. Hunter Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. sophomore Avg

Fortress Biotech (FBIO) 10-Q2020 Q3 Quarterly report

Content analysis