Loans, Notes, Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure [Text Block] | NOTE 5 – LOANS Our customers are primarily located in Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Tuolumne, Inyo, and Mono Counties. As of June 30, 2016, approximately 78% of the Company’s loans are commercial real estate loans which include construction loans. Approximately 12% of the Company’s loans are for general commercial uses including professional, retail, and small business. Additionally, 6% of the Company’s loans are for residential real estate and other consumer loans. The remaining 4% are agriculture loans. Loan totals were as follows: (in thousands) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Commercial real estate: Commercial real estate- construction $ 16,459 $ 19,363 Commercial real estate- mortgages 371,393 363,644 Land 9,478 10,239 Farmland 56,260 29,801 Commercial and industrial 65,359 63,776 Consumer 910 774 Consumer residential 35,275 32,588 Agriculture 24,640 20,847 Total loans 579,774 541,032 Less: Deferred loan fees and costs, net (2,426 ) (3,282 ) Allowance for loan losses (7,680 ) (7,356 ) Net loans $ 569,668 $ 530,394 Loan Origination/Risk Management. Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Once it is determined that the borrower’s management possesses sound ethics and solid business acumen, our management examines current and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. This diversity helps reduce the Company’s exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Company avoids financing single-purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. The Company also utilizes third-party experts to provide insight and guidance about economic conditions and trends affecting market areas it serves. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, commercial real estate loans equal to approximately 42.8% and 44.3%, respectively, of the outstanding principal balance of our commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties. With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties that the Company may originate from time to time, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing. Agricultural production, real estate and development lending is susceptible to credit risks including adverse weather conditions, pest and disease, as well as market price fluctuations and foreign competition. Agricultural loan underwriting standards are maintained by following Company policies and procedures in place to minimize risk in this lending segment. These standards consist of limiting credit to experienced farmers who have demonstrated farm management capabilities, requiring cash flow projections displaying margins sufficient for repayment from normal farm operations along with equity injected as required by policy, as well as providing adequate secondary repayment and sponsorship including satisfactory collateral support. Credit enhancement obtained through government guarantee programs may also be used to provide further support as available. The Company originates consumer loans utilizing common underwriting criteria specified in policy. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by line and staff personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for 1-4 family, home equity lines and loans follow bank policy, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, a maximum housing and total debt ratio of 36% and 42%, respectively and other specified credit and documentation requirements. The Company maintains an independent loan review department that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Bank’s policies and procedures. Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) Loans. For acquired loans not considered credit-impaired, the difference between the contractual amounts due (principal amount) and the fair value is accounted for subsequently through accretion. We recognize discount accretion based on the acquired loan’s contractual cash flows using an effective interest rate method. The accretion is recognized through the net interest margin. The following table presents the fair value of purchased credit-impaired and other loans acquired from Mother Lode Bank as of the acquisition date: December 23, 2015 (in thousands) Purchased credit-impaired loans Other purchased loans Total Contractually required payments including interest $ 1,982 $ 44,007 $ 45,989 Less: nonaccretable difference (1,103 ) 0 (1,103 ) Cash flows expected to be collected (undiscounted) 879 44,007 44,886 Accretable yield (14 ) (2,041 ) (2,055 ) Fair value of purchased loans $ 865 $ 41,966 $ 42,831 The following table reflects the outstanding balance and related carrying value of PCI loans as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015: (in thousands) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Commercial real estate: Unpaid principal balance Carrying value Unpaid principal balance Carrying value Commercial real estate- construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial real estate- mortgages 0 0 196 118 Land 795 286 795 269 Farmland 0 0 0 0 Commercial and industrial 529 529 794 478 Consumer 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 Total purchased credit-impaired loans $ 1,324 $ 815 $ 1,785 $ 865 For the PCI loans, the accretable yield represents the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition over the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date, and is accreted into interest income over the estimated remaining life of the purchased credit-impaired loans using the effective yield method, provided that the timing and amount of future cash flows is reasonably estimable. The cash flows expected to be collected are updated each quarter based on current assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. Probable decreases in expected cash flows after acquisition result in the recognition of impairment as a specific allowance for loan losses or a charge-off to the allowance. The accretable yield balance for PCI loans was $14,000 at December 31, 2015, all of which was accreted to interest income during the first quarter of 2016, as each of the PCI loans had short-term maturities. The nonaccretable difference represents the difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the undiscounted expected cash flows, and also reflects the estimated credit losses in the acquired loan portfolio at the acquisition date and can fluctuate due to changes in expected cash flows during the life of the PCI loans. Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans. Non-accrual loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows: (in thousands) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Commercial real estate: Land $ 2,340 $ 2,739 Farmland 0 51 Commercial and industrial 314 322 Agriculture 0 2,704 Total non-accrual loans $ 2,654 $ 5,816 Excluded from the above non-accrual loan table are the carrying values of Purchased Credit Impaired loans acquired in the MLB Acquisition. Had non-accrual loans performed in accordance with their original contract terms, we would have recognized additional interest income of approximately $38,000 and $79,000 in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to $71,000 and $153,000 in the same periods of 2015. The following table analyzes past due loans including the non-accrual loans in the above table, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands): June 30, 2016 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Current Purchased Credit Impaired Loans Total Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,459 $ 0 16,459 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 371,393 0 371,393 0 Land 0 0 2,047 2,047 7,145 286 9,478 0 Farmland 0 0 0 0 56,260 0 56,260 0 Commercial and industrial 994 0 307 1,301 63,529 529 65,359 0 Consumer 0 0 0 0 910 0 910 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 35,275 0 35,275 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 24,640 0 24,640 0 Total $ 994 $ 0 $ 2,354 $ 3,348 $ 575,611 $ 815 579,774 $ 0 The following table analyzes past due loans including the non-accrual loans in the above table, segregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands): December 31, 2015 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Current Purchased Credit Impaired Loans Total Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 19,363 $ 0 $ 19,363 $ 0 Commercial R.E. – mortgages 0 0 0 0 363,526 118 363,644 0 Land 0 0 2,261 2,261 7,709 269 10,239 0 Farmland 1,182 0 51 1,233 28,568 0 29,801 0 Commercial and industrial 352 0 312 664 62,634 478 63,776 0 Consumer 0 0 0 0 774 0 774 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 32,588 0 32,588 0 Agriculture 0 2,704 0 2,704 18,143 0 20,847 0 Total $ 1,534 $ 2,704 $ 2,624 $ 6,862 $ 533,305 $ 865 $ 541,032 $ 0 Impaired Loans. Impaired loans as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are set forth in the following tables. PCI loans are excluded from the tables below, as they have not experienced post acquisition declines in cash flows expected to be collected. (in thousands) Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance Recorded Investment With No Allowance Recorded Investment With Allowance Total Recorded Investment Related Allowance June 30, 2016 Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 Land 2,712 292 2,048 2,340 0 Farmland 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial and Industrial 355 314 0 314 680 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 3,067 $ 606 $ 2,048 $ 2,654 $ 680 December 31, 2015 Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 Land 3,856 0 2,739 2,739 722 Farmland 63 51 0 51 0 Commercial and Industrial 357 322 0 322 0 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 2,704 2,704 0 2,704 0 Total $ 6,980 $ 3,077 $ 2,739 $ 5,816 $ 722 Average recorded investment in impaired loans outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 is set forth in the following table. Average Recorded Investment for the (in thousands) Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Six Months Ended Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 324 Land 2,498 2,964 2,396 2,976 Farmland 0 64 0 67 Commercial and Industrial 318 1,360 316 1,105 Consumer 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 Total $ 2,816 $ 4,388 $ 2,712 $ 4,472 Troubled Debt Restructurings – At June 30, 2016, there were 5 loans that were considered to be troubled debt restructurings, all of which are considered non-accrual totaling $2,654,000. At December 31, 2015, there were 5 loans that were considered to be troubled debt restructurings, all of which are considered non-accrual totaling $3,060,000. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there were no unfunded commitments on loans classified as a troubled debt restructures. We have allocated $680,000 and $722,000 of specific reserves to loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The modification of the terms of such loans typically includes one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan; an extension of the maturity date; or a temporary payment modification in which the payment amount allocated towards principal was reduced. In some cases, a permanent reduction of the accrued interest on the loan is conceded. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, one loan was modified as troubled debt restructuring by extending the maturity date. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015, the terms of two loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings by extending the maturity dates. The following tables presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: (dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Number of Loans Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land 0 0 0 1 570 570 Farmland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial and industrial 0 0 0 1 24 24 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 $ 0 $ 0 2 $ 594 $ 594 (dollars in thousands) Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Number of Loans Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land 1 473 473 1 570 570 Farmland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial and industrial 0 0 0 1 24 24 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 $ 473 $ 473 2 $ 594 $ 594 The troubled debt restructuring during the six months ended June 30, 2016 did not increase the allowance for loan losses as a result of loan modifications. There were no charge-offs as a result of loan modifications, as the contractual balances outstanding were determined to be collectible. There were no loans modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months and for which there was a payment default during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is ninety days contractually past due under the modified terms. Loan Risk Grades – We grade loans using the following letter system: 1 Exceptional Loan 2 Quality Loan 3A Better Than Acceptable Loan 3B Acceptable Loan 3C Marginally Acceptable Loan 4 (W) Watch Acceptable Loan 5 Other Loans Especially Mentioned 6 Substandard Loan 7 Doubtful Loan 8 Loss 1. Exceptional Loan - A high level of liquidity and whose debt-servicing capacity exceeds expected obligations by a substantial margin. - Where leverage is below average for the industry and earnings are consistent or growing without severe vulnerability to economic cycles. - Also included in this rating (but not mandatory unless one or more of the preceding characteristics are missing) are loans that are fully secured and properly margined by our own time instruments or U.S. blue chip securities. To be properly margined cash collateral must be equal to, or greater than, 110% of the loan amount. 2. Quality Loan - Unquestionable debt-servicing capacity to cover all obligations in the ordinary course of business from well-defined primary and secondary sources. - Consistent strong earnings. - A solid equity base. 3A. Better than Acceptable Loan - Strong earnings with no loss in last three years and ample cash flow to service all debt well above policy guidelines. - Long term experienced management with depth and defined management succession. - The loan has no exceptions to policy. - Loan-to-value on real estate secured transactions is 10% to 20% less than policy guidelines. - Very liquid balance sheet that may have cash available to pay off our loan completely. - Little to no debt on balance sheet. 3B. Acceptable Loan - Are those where the borrower has average financial strengths, a history of profitable operations and experienced management. - Are those where the borrower can be expected to handle normal credit needs in a satisfactory manner. 3C. Marginally Acceptable Requires collateral. A credit facility where the borrower has average financial strengths, but usually lacks reliable secondary sources of repayment other than the subject collateral. Other common characteristics can include some or all of the following: minimal background experience of management, lacking continuity of management, a start-up operation, erratic historical profitability (acceptable reasons-well identified), lack of or marginal sponsorship of guarantor, and government guaranteed loans. 4W Watch Acceptable 5 Other Loans Especially Mentioned (Special Mention) - The lending officer may be unable to properly supervise the credit because of an inadequate loan or credit agreement. - Questions exist regarding the condition of and/or control over collateral. - Economic or market conditions may unfavorably affect the obligor in the future. - A declining trend in the obligor’s operations or an imbalanced position in the balance sheet exists, but not to the point that repayment is jeopardized. 6 Substandard Loan 7 Doubtful Loan A proper classification of such a credit would show 40 percent substandard, 25 percent doubtful, and 35 percent loss. A credit classified as doubtful should be resolved within a ‘reasonable’ period of time. Reasonable is generally defined as the period between examinations. In other words, a credit classified doubtful at an examination should be cleared up before the next exam. However, there may be situations that warrant continuation of the doubtful classification a while longer. 8 Loss As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there are no loans that are classified with a risk grade of 8- Loss. The following table presents weighted average risk grades of our loan portfolio: June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Weighted Average Risk Grade Weighted Average Risk Grade Commercial real estate: Commercial real estate - construction 3.17 3.72 Commercial real estate - mortgages 3.10 3.16 Land 2.35 4.58 Farmland 3.09 3.12 Commercial and industrial 3.16 3.57 Consumer 1.62 1.99 Consumer residential 2.97 3.01 Agriculture 3.00 3.39 Total gross loans 3.08 3.25 The following table presents risk grade totals by class of loans as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Risk grades 1 through 4 have been aggregated in the “Pass” line. (in thousands) Commercial R.E. Construction Commercial R.E. Mortgages Land Farmland Commercial and Industrial Consumer Consumer Residential Agriculture Total June 30, 2016 Pass $ 16,459 $ 369,914 $ 6,144 $ 56,260 $ 63,255 $ 882 $ 34,857 $ 24,640 $ 572,411 Special mention - 994 - - 300 - 37 - 1,331 Substandard - 484 3,055 - 1,804 29 380 - 5,752 Doubtful - - 280 - - - - - 280 Total loans $ 16,459 $ 371,392 $ 9,479 $ 56,260 $ 65,359 $ 911 $ 35,274 $ 24,640 $ 579,774 December 31, 2015 Pass $ 18,312 $ 357,339 $ 6,358 $ 28,568 $ 55,957 $ 745 $ 32,532 $ 18,143 $ 517,954 Special mention - 4,389 110 - 6,153 - - - 10,652 Substandard 1,051 1,916 3,283 1,233 1,416 29 56 2,704 11,688 Doubtful - - 488 - 250 - - - 738 Total loans $ 19,363 $ 363,644 $ 10,239 $ 29,801 $ 63,776 $ 774 $ 32,588 $ 20,847 $ 541,032 Allowance for Loan Losses. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Company’s loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications. The Company’s allowance for loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 310 based on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Bank and the Company. The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligor’s ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When a loan has a calculated grade of 5 or higher, a special assets officer analyzes the loan to determine whether the loan is impaired and, if impaired, the need to specifically allocate a portion of the allowance for loan losses to the loan. Specific valuation allowances are determined by analyzing the borrower’s ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower’s industry, among other things. Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans and the internal risk grade of such loans at the time they were charged-off. The Company calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off experience. A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and the total dollar amount of the loans in the pool. The Company’s pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans. General valuation allowances are based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Bank and the Company. In general, such valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, among other things: (i) the experience, ability and effectiveness of the Bank’s lending management and staff; (ii) the effectiveness of the Bank’s loan policies, procedures and internal controls; (iii) changes in asset quality; (iv) changes in loan portfolio volume; (v) the composition and concentrations of credit; (vi) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (vii) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function; (viii) the impact of environmental risks on portfolio risks; and (ix) the impact of rising interest rates on portfolio risk. Management evaluates the degree of risk that each one of these components has on the quality of the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. Each component is determined to have either a high, moderate or low degree of risk. The results are then input into a “general allocation matrix” to determine an appropriate general valuation allowance. Included in the general valuation allowances are allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management. Concentration risk limits have been established, among other things, for certain industry concentrations, large balance and highly leveraged credit relationships that exceed specified risk grades, and loans originated with policy exceptions that exceed specified risk grades. Loans identified as losses by management, internal loan review and/or bank examiners are charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory requirements. The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories. Allowance for Loan Losses For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Commercial Real Estate Commercial and Industrial Consumer Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 5,998 $ 720 $ 44 $ 398 $ 302 $ 95 $ 7,557 Charge-offs 0 0 (4 ) 0 0 0 (4 ) Recoveries 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Provision for (reversal of) loan losses 135 (49 ) 13 (11 ) 129 (92 ) 125 Ending balance $ 6,133 $ 671 $ 55 $ 387 $ 431 $ 3 $ 7,680 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Beginning balance $ 5,920 $ 627 $ 38 $ 426 $ 309 $ 36 $ 7,356 Charge-offs - - (7 ) - - - (7 ) Recoveries 3 - 3 - - - 6 (Reversal of) provision for loan losses 210 44 21 (39 ) 122 (33 ) 325 Ending balance $ 6,133 $ 671 $ 55 $ 387 $ 431 $ 3 $ 7,680 (in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Commercial Real Estate Commercial and Industrial Consumer Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 5,810 $ 685 $ 50 $ 555 $ 181 $ 128 $ 7,409 Charge-offs 0 0 (21 ) 0 0 0 (21 ) Recoveries 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 Provision for (reversal of provision) loan losses 73 (102 ) 15 (75 ) 82 7 0 Ending balance $ 5,884 $ 583 $ 45 $ 480 $ 263 $ 135 $ 7,390 Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Beginning balance $ 5,963 $ 720 $ 42 $ 388 $ 286 $ 135 $ 7,534 Charge-offs 0 0 (24 ) 0 0 0 (24 ) Recoveries 2 0 3 0 0 0 5 (Reversal of) provision for loan losses (81 ) (137 ) 24 92 (23 ) 0 (125 ) Ending balance $ 5,884 $ 583 $ 45 $ 480 $ 263 $ 135 $ 7,390 The following table details the allowance for loan losses and ending gross loan balances as of June 30, 2016, December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 summarized by collective and individual evaluation methods of impairment. (in thousands) June 30, 2016 Commercial Real Estate Commercial and Industrial Consumer Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 680 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 680 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,453 671 55 387 431 3 7,000 $ 6,133 $ 671 $ 55 $ 387 $ 431 $ 3 $ 7,680 Ending gross loan balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 2,340 $ 314 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,654 Individually evaluated purchased credit impaired loans 286 529 0 0 0 0 815 Collectively evaluated for impairment 450,964 64,516 910 35,275 24,640 0 576,305 $ 453,590 $ 65,359 $ 910 $ 35,275 $ 24,640 $ 0 $ 579,774 December 31, 2015 Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 722 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 722 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,198 627 38 426 309 36 6,634 $ 5,920 $ 627 $ 38 $ 426 $ 309 $ 36 $ 7,356 Ending balances of loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 2,790 $ 322 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,704 $ 0 $ 5,816 Individually evaluated purchased credit impaired loans 387 478 0 0 0 0 865 Collectively evaluated for impairment 419,870 62,976 774 32,588 18,143 0 534,351 $ 423,047 $ 63,776 $ 774 $ 32,588 $ 20,847 $ 0 $ 541,032 June 30, 2015 Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 854 $ 95 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 949 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,030 488 45 480 263 135 6,441 $ 5,884 $ 583 $ 45 $ 480 $ 263 $ 135 $ 7,390 Ending gross loan balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 3,006 $ 1,357 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,363 Collectively evaluated for impairment 382,967 42,405 787 20,173 12,768 0 459,100 $ 385,973 $ 43,762 $ 787 $ 20,173 $ 12,768 $ 0 $ 463,463 Changes in the reserve for off-balance-sheet commitments were as follows: THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Balance, beginning of period $ 264 $ 227 $ 238 $ 218 (Recovery) Provision to Operations for Off Balance Sheet Commitments (7 ) 7 19 16 Balance, end of period $ 257 $ 234 $ 257 $ 234 The method for calculating the reserve for off-balance-sheet loan commitments is based on a reserve percentage which is less than other outstanding loan types because they are at a lower risk level. This reserve percentage, based on many factors including historical losses and existing economic conditions, is evaluated by management periodically and is applied to the total undisbursed loan commitment balance to calculate the reserve for off-balance-sheet commitments. Reserves for off-balance-sheet commitments are recorded in interest payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, loans carried at $579,774,000 and $541,032,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral on advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. |