Loans, Notes, Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure [Text Block] | NOTE 4 – LOANS The Company’s customers are primarily located in Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Tuolumne, Inyo, and Mono Counties. As of September 30, 2018, 77% 12% 5% 6% (in thousands) September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 Commercial real estate: Commercial real estate- construction $ 17,785 $ 31,265 Commercial real estate- mortgages 419,690 417,138 Land 10,062 10,072 Farmland 60,866 58,675 Commercial and industrial 80,932 69,610 Consumer 1,056 689 Consumer residential 35,765 37,161 Agriculture 37,039 37,934 Total loans 663,195 662,544 Less: Deferred loan fees and costs, net (1,065 ) (1,389 ) Allowance for loan losses (8,135 ) (8,166 ) Net loans $ 653,995 $ 652,989 Loan Origination/Risk Management. Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Once it is determined that the borrower’s management possesses sound ethics and solid business acumen, the Company’s management examines current and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not may may may may Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may third September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017, 44% 43%, With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties that the Company may may may Agricultural production, real estate and development lending is susceptible to credit risks including adverse weather conditions, pest and disease, as well as market price fluctuations and foreign competition. Agricultural loan underwriting standards are maintained by following Company policies and procedures in place to minimize risk in this lending segment. These standards consist of limiting credit to experienced farmers who have demonstrated farm management capabilities, requiring cash flow projections displaying margins sufficient for repayment from normal farm operations along with equity injected as required by policy, as well as providing adequate secondary repayment and sponsorship including satisfactory collateral support. Credit enhancement obtained through government guarantee programs may The Company originates consumer loans utilizing common underwriting criteria specified in policy. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by line and staff personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for 1 4 not 80%, 36% 42%, The Company maintains an independent loan review department that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Bank’s policies and procedures. Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans. not may may not Non-accrual loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows: (in thousands) September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 Commercial real estate: Land $ 906 $ 993 Commercial and industrial 0 302 Consumer residential 14 16 Total non-accrual loans $ 920 $ 1,311 Had non-accrual loans performed in accordance with their original contract terms, the Companywould have recognized additional interest income of approximately $16,000 $53,000 three nine September 30, 2018, $27,000 $95,000 2017. The following table analyzes past due loans including the past due non-accrual loans in the above table, segregated by class of loans, as of September 30, 2018 ( September 30, 2018 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Current Total Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 17,785 $ 17,785 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 419,690 419,690 0 Land 0 0 906 906 9,156 10,062 0 Farmland 0 0 0 0 60,866 60,866 0 Commercial and industrial 0 0 0 0 80,932 80,932 0 Consumer 0 1 0 1 1,055 1,056 0 Consumer residential 48 0 0 48 35,717 35,765 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 37,039 37,039 0 Total $ 48 $ 1 $ 906 $ 955 $ 662,240 $ 663,195 $ 0 The following table analyzes past due loans including the past due non-accrual loans in the above table, segregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2017 December 31, 2017 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Current Total Greater Than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 31,265 $ 31,265 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 417,138 417,138 0 Land 0 0 993 993 9,079 10,072 0 Farmland 0 0 0 0 58,675 58,675 0 Commercial and industrial 19 0 302 321 69,289 69,610 0 Consumer 0 0 0 0 689 689 0 Consumer residential 0 0 0 0 37,161 37,161 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 37,934 37,934 0 Total $ 19 $ 0 $ 1,295 $ 1,314 $ 661,230 $ 662,544 $ 0 Impaired Loans. no three nine September 30, 2018 2017. Impaired loans as of September 30, 2018 (in thousands) Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance Recorded Investment With No Allowance Recorded Investment With Allowance Total Recorded Investment Related Allowance September 30, 2018 Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 Land 1,222 0 906 906 680 Farmland 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial and Industrial 32 0 0 0 0 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 15 14 0 14 0 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 1,269 $ 14 $ 906 $ 920 $ 680 Average recorded investment in impaired loans outstanding as of September 30, 2018 2017 (in thousands) Average Recorded Investment for the Average Recorded Investment for the 2018 2017 2018 2017 Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 Land 942 1,518 2,018 2,273 Farmland 0 0 0 0 Commercial and Industrial 105 302 304 305 Consumer 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 14 75 96 107 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 Total $ 1,061 $ 1,895 $ 2,418 $ 2,685 Impaired loans as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands) Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance Recorded Investment With No Allowance Recorded Investment With Allowance Total Recorded Investment Related Allowance Average Recorded Investment December 31, 2017 Commercial real estate: Commercial R.E. - construction $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Commercial R.E. - mortgages 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land 1,309 0 993 993 680 1,760 Farmland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial and Industrial 334 302 0 302 0 303 Consumer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Consumer residential 16 16 0 16 0 76 Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 1,659 $ 318 $ 993 $ 1,311 $ 680 $ 2,139 Troubled Debt Restructurings – At September 30, 2018, 4 $920,000. December 31, 2017, 4 $1,311,000. September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 no $680,000 September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017. The modification of the terms of such loans typically includes one During the three nine September 30, 2018 2017, no no twelve three nine September 30, 2018 2017. ninety Loan Risk Grades– The Company grades loans using the following letter system: 1 2 3A 3B 3C 4 5 6 7 8 1. Exceptional Loan 1 -A high level of liquidity and whose debt-servicing capacity exceeds expected obligations by a substantial margin. -Where leverage is below average for the industry and earnings are consistent or growing without severe vulnerability to economic cycles. -Also included in this rating (but not one 110% 2. Quality Loan No 2 -Unquestionable debt-servicing capacity to cover all obligations in the ordinary course of business from well-defined primary and secondary sources. -Consistent strong earnings. -A solid equity base. 3A. Better than Acceptable Loan 3 three three 3 3A third not 2 -Strong earnings with no three -Long term experienced management with depth and defined management succession. -The loan has no -Loan-to-value on real estate secured transactions is 10% 20% -Very liquid balance sheet that may -Little to no 3B. Acceptable Loan 3B 3A 3C not -Are those where the borrower has average financial strengths, a history of profitable operations and experienced management. -Are those where the borrower can be expected to handle normal credit needs in a satisfactory manner. 3C. Marginally Acceptable 3C 3Bs -Requires collateral. -A credit facility where the borrower has average financial strengths, but usually lacks reliable secondary sources of repayment other than the subject collateral. -Other common characteristics can include some or all of the following: minimal background experience of management, lacking continuity of management, a start-up operation, erratic historical profitability (acceptable reasons-well identified), lack of or marginal sponsorship of guarantor, and government guaranteed loans. 4W Watch Acceptable may -Any unexpected short-term adverse financial performance from budgeted projections or a prior period’s results (i.e., declining profits, sales, margins, cash flow, or increased reliance on leverage, including adverse balance sheet ratios, trade debt issues, etc.). -Any managerial or personal problems of company management, decline in the entire industry or local economic conditions, or failure to provide financial information or other documentation as requested. -Issues regarding delinquency, overdrafts, or renewals. -Any other issues that cause concern for the company. -Loans to individuals or loans supported by guarantors with marginal net worth and/or marginal collateral. -Weakness identified in a Watch credit is short-term in nature. -Loans in this category are usually accounts the Bank would want to retain providing a positive turnaround can be expected within a reasonable time frame. Grade 4 5 Other Loans Especially Mentioned (Special Mention) may, -The lending officer may -Questions exist regarding the condition of and/or control over collateral. -Economic or market conditions may -A declining trend in the obligor’s operations or an imbalanced position in the balance sheet exists, but not 6 Substandard Loan not not 7 Doubtful Loan one may may may not 40 65 25 40 65 A proper classification of such a credit would show 40 25 35 may 8 Loss not not no not may not As of September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017, no 8 The following table presents weighted average risk grades of the Company’s loan portfolio: September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 Weighted Average Risk Grade Weighted Average Risk Grade Commercial real estate: Commercial real estate - construction 3.00 3.08 Commercial real estate - mortgages 3.02 3.01 Land 3.63 3.71 Farmland 3.00 3.14 Commercial and industrial 3.09 3.09 Consumer 2.21 2.34 Consumer residential 3.01 3.01 Agriculture 3.19 3.19 Total gross loans 3.04 3.05 The following table presents risk grade totals by class of loans as of September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017. 1 4 (in thousands) Commercial R.E. Commercial R.E. Land Farmland Commercial and Industrial Consumer Consumer Residential Agriculture Total September 30, 2018 Pass $ 17,785 $ 416,114 $ 9,156 $ 60,866 $ 75,054 $ 1,030 $ 35,708 $ 34,589 $ 650,302 Special mention - 2,889 - - 5,878 - - 2,450 11,217 Substandard - 687 906 - - 26 57 - 1,676 Doubtful - - - - - - - - - Total loans $ 17,785 $ 419,690 $ 10,062 $ 60,866 $ 80,932 $ 1,056 $ 35,765 $ 37,039 $ 663,195 December 31, 2017 Pass $ 30,008 $ 416,437 $ 8,901 $ 58,675 $ 65,313 $ 662 $ 37,100 $ 37,934 $ 655,030 Special mention 1,257 - - - 3,762 - - - 5,019 Substandard - 701 1,171 - 535 27 61 - 2,495 Doubtful - - - - - - - - - Total loans $ 31,265 $ 417,138 $ 10,072 $ 58,675 $ 69,610 $ 689 $ 37,161 $ 37,934 $ 662,544 Allowance for Loan Losses. 310, 450, not The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may The Company’s allowance for loan losses consists of three 310 450 450 not The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligor’s ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When a loan has a calculated grade of 5 Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans and the internal risk grade of such loans at the time they were charged-off. The Company calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off experience. A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and the total dollar amount of the loans in the pool. The Company’s pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans. General valuation allowances are based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Bank and the Company. In general, such valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, among other things: (i) the experience, ability and effectiveness of the Bank’s lending management and staff; (ii) the effectiveness of the Bank’s loan policies, procedures and internal controls; (iii) changes in asset quality; (iv) changes in loan portfolio volume; (v) the composition and concentrations of credit; (vi) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (vii) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function; (viii) the impact of environmental risks on portfolio risks; and (ix) the impact of rising interest rates on portfolio risk. Management evaluates the degree of risk that each one Included in the general valuation allowances are allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management. Concentration risk limits have been established, among other things, for certain industry concentrations, large balance and highly leveraged credit relationships that exceed specified risk grades, and loans originated with policy exceptions that exceed specified risk grades. Loans identified as losses by management, internal loan review and/or bank examiners are charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory requirements. The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three nine September 30, 2018 2017. one not Allowance for Loan Losses For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 2017 (in thousands) Commercial Commercial Consumer Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Real Estate and Industrial Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 6,022 $ 873 $ 22 $ 304 $ 698 $ 243 $ 8,162 Charge-offs 0 0 (11 ) (17 ) 0 0 (28 ) Recoveries 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Provision for (reversal of) loan losses 83 82 19 22 (16 ) (190 ) 0 Ending balance $ 6,105 $ 955 $ 31 $ 309 $ 682 $ 53 $ 8,135 (in thousands) Commercial Commercial Consumer Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Real Estate and Industrial Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 6,331 $ 813 $ 27 $ 300 $ 693 $ 2 $ 8,166 Charge-offs 0 0 (22 ) (17 ) 0 0 (39 ) Recoveries 0 0 7 1 0 0 8 Provision for (reversal of) loan losses (226 ) 142 19 25 (11 ) 51 0 Ending balance $ 6,105 $ 955 $ 31 $ 309 $ 682 $ 53 $ 8,135 (in thousands) Commercial Commercial Consumer Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Real Estate and Industrial Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 6,247 $ 746 $ 30 $ 321 $ 453 $ 57 $ 7,854 Charge-offs - - (9 ) - - - (9 ) Recoveries - - 2 - - - 2 Provision for (reversal of) loan losses 3 15 - (7 ) 100 (41 ) 70 Ending balance $ 6,250 $ 761 $ 23 $ 314 $ 553 $ 16 $ 7,917 (in thousands) Commercial Commercial Consumer Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Real Estate and Industrial Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Beginning balance $ 6,185 $ 697 $ 51 $ 325 $ 504 $ 70 $ 7,832 Charge-offs - - (26 ) - - - (26 ) Recoveries - - 5 1 - - 6 Provision for (reversal of) loan losses 65 64 (7 ) (12 ) 49 (54 ) 105 Ending balance $ 6,250 $ 761 $ 23 $ 314 $ 553 $ 16 $ 7,917 The following table details the allowance for loan losses and ending gross loan balances as of September 30, 2018, December 31, 2017 September 30, 2017 (in thousands) Commercial Commercial Consumer September 30, 2018 Real Estate and Industrial Consumer Residential Agriculture Unallocated Total Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 680 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 680 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,425 955 31 309 682 53 7,455 $ 6,105 $ 955 $ 31 $ 309 $ 682 $ 53 $ 8,135 Ending gross loan balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 906 $ 0 $ 0 $ 14 $ 0 $ 0 $ 920 Collectively evaluated for impairment 507,497 80,932 1,056 35,751 37,039 0 662,275 $ 508,403 $ 80,932 $ 1,056 $ 35,765 $ 37,039 $ 0 $ 663,195 December 31, 2017 Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 680 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 680 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,651 813 27 300 693 2 7,486 $ 6,331 $ 813 $ 27 $ 300 $ 693 $ 2 $ 8,166 Ending gross loans balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 993 $ 303 $ 0 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,311 Collectively evaluated for impairment 516,157 69,307 689 37,146 37,934 0 661,233 $ 517,150 $ 69,610 $ 689 $ 37,161 $ 37,934 $ 0 $ 662,544 September 30, 2017 Allowance for loan losses for loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 680 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 680 Collectively evaluated for impairment 5,570 761 23 314 553 16 7,237 $ 6,250 $ 761 $ 23 $ 314 $ 553 $ 16 $ 7,917 Ending gross loan balances: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 993 $ 303 $ 0 $ 15 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,311 Collectively evaluated for impairment 501,680 65,141 607 37,821 30,049 0 635,298 $ 502,673 $ 65,444 $ 607 $ 37,836 $ 30,049 $ 0 $ 636,609 Changes in the reserve for off-balance-sheet commitments were as follows: THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Balance, beginning of period $ 372 $ 302 $ 305 $ 284 Provision (Recovery) to Operations for Off Balance Sheet Commitments 19 (4 ) 86 14 Balance, end of period $ 391 $ 298 $ 391 $ 298 The method for calculating the reserve for off-balance-sheet loan commitments is based on a reserve percentage which is less than other outstanding loan types because they are at a lower risk level. This reserve percentage, based on many factors including historical losses and existing economic conditions, is evaluated by management periodically and is applied to the total undisbursed loan commitment balance to calculate the reserve for off-balance-sheet commitments. Reserves for off-balance-sheet commitments are recorded in interest payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017, $663,195,000 $662,544,000, |