Significant Accounting Policies | These financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. a) Principles of Consolidation The condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of American Sands Energy Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary Green River Resources Inc. (GRI). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. b) Mineral Leases In certain cases, the Company capitalizes costs related to investments in mineral lease interests. Such costs include mineral lease acquisition costs. Costs are deferred until such time as the extent of proved developed reserves has been determined and mineral lease interests are either developed, the property sold or the mineral lease rights are allowed to lapse. To date, all exploration and lease costs have been expensed. c) Other Assets During the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company capitalized $25,049 and $73,159 of costs, respectively, associated with mine permitting. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had $432,674 of mine permitting costs capitalized. d) Research and Development The Company continues to develop additional technology related to its proprietary bitumen extraction process. To date, the Company has expensed costs associated with developing its technology as research and development costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred costs of $73,417 and $104,328, respectively, for research and development of its technologies. e) Stock-based Compensation The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options and warrants granted. For employee stock options, the Company records the grant-date fair value as expense over the period in which it is earned, typically the vesting period. For consultants, the fair value of the stock-based award is recorded as expense over the term of the service period, and unvested amounts are revalued using the Black-Scholes model at each reporting period. For warrants issued to lenders, the Company records the grant-date fair value of the warrants, and any resulting beneficial conversion feature for convertible debt, as a debt discount. The discount is then amortized over the term of the convertible debt as non-cash interest expense. f) Net Loss Per Common Share Basic earnings or loss per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings or loss per common share is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of dilutive common share equivalents during the period. Common share equivalents include preferred stock, outstanding stock options and warrants and convertible debt instruments. For periods in which a net loss is reported, common share equivalents are excluded because they are antidilutive. Therefore, basic loss per common share is the same as diluted loss per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had cumulative, undeclared dividends that had not been accrued related to its preferred stock of $495,160 and $170,358, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had accrued preferred stock dividends of $86,245 and $96,758, respectively, which were added to net loss in the consolidated statements of operations in order to calculate net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders. g) Recent Accounting Pronouncements From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements upon adoption. In May 2014, the FASB Revenue from Contracts with Customers Revenue Recognition Revenue from Contracts with Customers The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: Step 1: Identify the contracts with a customer. Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contracts. Step 3: Determine the transaction price. Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contracts. Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. Until the Company begins to recognize revenue, its financial statements will not be affected by the adoption of ASU 2014-09. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entitys Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is More Akin to Debt or to Equity The Company adopted ASU 2014-16 effective April 1, 2015. The Company conducted an evaluation of its preferred stock offering and the related conversion feature. The Company concluded that the conversion feature is clearly and closely related to the preferred stock and that the preferred stock is more akin to equity. As a result of adopting ASU 2014-16, the Company reclassified the embedded derivative liability related to the preferred stock conversion feature to additional paid-in capital. See Note 5. |