Noble Medical (NBLM) 10-Q 2010 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number  333-150483

Noble Medical Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	20-0587718
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 410, Los Angeles, CA 90067

(Address of principal executive offices)

310-601-2500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former address and telephone number, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether  the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES x NO ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 4,188,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, as of November 19, 2010.

NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Table of Contents

	Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.     Financial Statements
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	F-1
Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)	F-2
Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)	F-3
Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)	F-4 to F-9
Item 2.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1
Item 3.      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3
Item 4T.   Controls and Procedures	3
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.      Legal Proceedings	4
Item 1A.   Risk Factors	4
Item 2.      Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4
Item 3.      Defaults upon Senior Securities	4
Item 4.      (Removed and Reserved)	4
Item 5.      Other Information	4
Item 6.      Exhibits	4
SIGNATURES	5

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	-		$	-
Total Current Assets		-			-
Total Assets	$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued expenses	$	16,821		$	9,535
Total Current Liabilities		16,821			9,535
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
Preferred stock at $0.0001 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock at $0.0001 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized, 4,188,000 shares issued and outstanding		419			419
Additional paid-in capital		94,090			79,090
Accumulated deficit		(111,330	)		(89,044	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(16,821	)		(9,535	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-1

NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	For the  Three Months			For the  Three Months			For the  Nine Months			For the  Nine Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Professional fees	$	7,500		$	2,000		$	22,286		$	6,000
Total operating expenses		7,500			2,000			22,286			6,000
LOSS BEFORE TAXES		(7,500	)		(2,000	)		(22,286	)		(6,000	)
INCOME TAXES		-			-			-			-
NET LOSS	$	(7,500	)	$	(2,000	)	$	(22,286	)	$	(6,000	)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED:	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted Common Shares Outstanding - basic and diluted		4,188,000			4,188,000			4,188,000			4,188,000

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-2

NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	For the  Nine Months			For the  Nine Months
	Ended			Ended
	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(22,286	)	$	(6,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued expenses		7,286			(15,667	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(15,000)			(21,667	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Capital contribution		15,000			21,296
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		15,000			21,296
NET CHANGE IN CASH		-			(371)
Cash at beginning of period		-			371
Cash at end of period	$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

F-3

NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

September 30, 2010 and 2009

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS

Noble Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on July 25, 2007 under the laws of the State of Delaware.  A substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved developing a business plan and establishing contacts and visibility in the marketplace.  Due to the recent economic downturn, the Company was unable to receive sufficient funds to commence operations and the Company has not generated any revenue to date. Therefore, the Company abandoned its plan to engage in developing and marketing enhancements to electrocardiogram (“EKG”) equipment and is currently inactive and is seeking a suitable candidate for a business combination.

Recent Developments

On February 9, 2010, the Company and GoldSail Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporation (“GoldSail”) mutually agreed to enter into a Termination Agreement, pursuant to which the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 5, 2009 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between the Company, GoldSail and Noble Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GoldSail, was terminated.

In connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement, on April 9, 2010, George Elliott (“Elliott”), entered into an Agreement with Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Trinad”), pursuant to which Elliott agreed to assign and transfer to Trinad an aggregate of 3,978,600 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), representing 95% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company as of April 9, 2010 (the “Closing”). At Closing, Trinad exchanged one share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of GoldSail in consideration for the Shares. At the time of the change in control, Trinad became the beneficial owner of 3,978,600 shares of Common Stock of the Company. This amount represents 95% of the total voting securities of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2010.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Due to the limited level of operations, the Company has not had to make material assumptions or estimates other than the assumption that the Company is a going concern.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

F-4

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  

Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.    

Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, nor are gains or losses reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 or 2009.

Revenue recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of income and comprehensive income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

F-5

Net loss per common share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period.  There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of September 30, 2010 or 2009.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies.  Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Cash flows reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash,” which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)).  Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification.  The amendments in this update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification.  The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the overview and background section to the definition of a stock dividend in the master glossary.  That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the shareholders.  It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification,” which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:

1. A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity.

2. A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture.

3. An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).

The amendments in this update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:

1. Sales of in substance real estate. Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (property, plant, and equipment) and 976-605 (retail/land) to such transactions.

2. Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights. Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (oil and gas-property, plant, and equipment) to such transactions.

If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that require new disclosures as follows:

1. Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.

2. Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number ).

F-6

This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:

1. Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities.

2. Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.

This update also includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (Subtopic 715-20). The conforming amendments to Subtopic 715-20 change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to the guidance in Subtopic 820-10 on how to determine appropriate classes to present fair value disclosures. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

In February 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” which provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 as follows:

1. An entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.

2. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements.

3. The scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only. The term revised financial statements is added to the glossary of Topic 855. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP.

All of the amendments in this update are effective upon issuance of the final update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.

In April 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17 “Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (Topic 605) Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition,” which provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive.

Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment made at the inception of the arrangement. The following criteria must be met for a milestone to be considered substantive. The consideration earned by achieving the milestone should:

1. Be commensurate with either of the following:

a. The vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone; or

b. The enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone;

2. Relate solely to past performance; and

3. Be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.

A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety. An individual milestone may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated separately to determine whether the milestone is substantive. Accordingly, an arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones.

F-7

A vendor’s decision to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of the amendments in this update is a policy election. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.

A vendor that is affected by the amendments in this update is required to provide all of the following disclosures:

1. A description of the overall arrangement;

2. A description of each milestone and related contingent consideration;

3. A determination of whether each milestone is considered substantive;

4. The factors that the entity considered in determining whether the milestone or milestones are substantive; and

5. The amount of consideration recognized during the period for the milestone or milestones.

The amendments in this update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity's fiscal year, the entity should apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. Additionally, a vendor electing early adoption should disclose the following information at a minimum for all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption:

1. Revenue;

2. Income before income taxes;

3. Net income;

4. Earnings per share; and

5. The effect of the change for the captions presented.

A vendor may elect, but is not required, to adopt the amendments in this update retrospectively for all prior periods.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $111,330 at September 30, 2010, a net loss from operations of $22,286 and net cash used in operating activities of $15,000 for the interim period ended September 30, 2010, with no revenues earned since inception.

F-8

The Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  The Company’s development activities since inception have been financially sustained through equity financing. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to find a suitable acquisition or merger candidate, raise additional capital from the sale of stock, receive additional paid in capital and ultimately, the achievement of significant positive results.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Additional paid-in capital

Net accrued expenses of $21,296, as of February 6, 2009, were assumed by certain stockholders of the Company and have been reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

For the period from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the majority stockholder of the Company paid $11,213 of professional fees on behalf of the Company. The payments were recorded as a contribution to capital.

On March 18, 2010, the majority stockholder of the Company paid $8,000 of professional fees on behalf of the Company. The payment was recorded as a contribution to capital.

During the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, the majority stockholder of the Company paid $7,000 of professional fees on behalf of the Company. The payment was recorded as a contribution to capital.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

Free office space

The Company has been provided office space by its principal stockholder at no cost.  Management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.

NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued, to determine if they must be reported.  Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

F-9

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) are “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements are based on various factors and were derived using numerous assumptions. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. In addition, the forward-looking statements contained herein represent our estimate only as of the date of this filing and should not be relied upon as representing our estimate as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

References to “Company,” “we” or “us” refer to Noble Medical Technologies, Inc., unless the context requires otherwise.

Overview

The Company was incorporated on July 25, 2007 under the laws of the State of Delaware. A substantial portion of the Company’s activities has involved developing a business plan and establishing contacts and visibility in the marketplace. Due to the recent economic downturn, the Company was unable to receive sufficient funds to commence operations and the Company has not generated any revenue to date. Therefore, the Company abandoned its plan to engage in developing and marketing enhancements to electrocardiogram equipment and is currently inactive and is seeking a suitable candidate for a business combination.

Recent Developments

On February 9, 2010, we and GoldSail Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporation (“GoldSail”) mutually agreed to enter into a Termination Agreement, pursuant to which the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 5, 2009 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between us, GoldSail and Noble Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GoldSail, was terminated.

In connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement, on April 9, 2010, George Elliott (“Elliott”), entered into an Agreement with Trinad Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Trinad”), pursuant to which Elliott agreed to assign and transfer to Trinad an aggregate of 3,978,600 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), representing 95% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company as of April 9, 2010 (the “Closing”). At Closing, Trinad exchanged one share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of GoldSail in consideration for the Shares. At the time of the change in control, Trinad became the beneficial owner of 3,978,600 shares of Common Stock of the Company. This amount represents 95% of the total voting securities of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.

On April 9, 2010, Elliott resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary and as a director. In addition, the total number of members to serve on the board of directors of the Company was increased to two and Messrs. Robert S. Ellin and Jay Krigsman were appointed as members of the board of directors.

In addition, on April 14, 2010, the board of directors of the Company appointed Robert S. Ellin as our Chief Executive Officer.

1

A Blank Check Company

At present, the Company has no sources of revenue and we are an inactive company. The Company’s business plan is to seek a business combination. As a result, the Company is a “blank check” or “shell” company. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of shell companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in the Company’s securities or undertake any offering of the Company’s securities, either debt or equity, until such time as the Company has successfully implemented its business plan and closed on a suitable business combination.

The Company’s common stock is a “penny stock,” as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that the broker-dealer, not otherwise exempt from such rules, must make a special written determination that the penny stock is suitable for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure rules have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. So long as the common stock of the Company is subject to the penny stock rules, it may be more difficult to sell the Company’s common stock.

Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

We have not had any operating income since our inception. We do not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. For the period from July 25, 2007 (inception) through September 30, 2010, we recognized net losses of $111,330, resulting from expenses mainly associated with legal and accounting fees. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be paid with additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our principal stockholder, management or other investors, or assumed by our principal stockholder.

During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

(i) filing of Exchange Act reports; and

(ii) costs relating to consummating a business combination.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds to be loaned by or invested in us by our principal stockholder, management or other investors.

We may consider a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital, but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks.

We anticipate that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking even the limited additional capital which we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

2

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have a history of losses that are likely to continue in the future. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in their report in our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in Note 3 to our financial statements included herein to the effect that our losses from operations and our negative cash flows from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. We may be required to cease operations which could result in our stockholders losing almost all of their investment.

Results of Operations

The Company has not conducted any active operations since its inception. No revenues have been generated by the Company for the period from July 25, 2007 (inception) through September 30, 2010. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2010, we had no assets or cash on hand and current liabilities of $16,821. Consequently, our current position is extremely illiquid. Our limited resources will affect the extent of our activities in the future unless we are successful in realizing financing. Management is seeking debt or equity financing or alternatively to acquire an operating business with liquidity. There can be no assurance that we will obtain financing or complete a business combination.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2010, we have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Reference is made to Note 2 to our financial statements included herein.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable as we are a smaller reporting company.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at the reasonable assurance level due to the two material weaknesses described below:

(i) We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the year ended December 31, 2009. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

3

(ii) We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings

There are no material legal proceedings to which we are a party, or of which any of our property is subject, and we are not aware of any threatened legal proceedings against us.

Item 1A – Risk Factors

Not applicable as we are a smaller reporting company.

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4 – (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5 – Other Information

None.

Item 6 – Exhibits

Exhibits:

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

* Filed herewith.

† Furnished herewith.

4

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		NOBLE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date:          November 22, 2010	By:	/s/ Robert S. Ellin
		Robert S. Ellin
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)
Date:         November 22, 2010	By:	/s/ Charles Bentz
		Charles Bentz
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

5