EXHIBIT 99.1
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS
BOB STUMP - Chairman GARY PIERCE BRENDA BURNS BOB BURNS SUSAN BITTER SMITH |
THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VALENCIA WATER COMPANY–TOWN DIVISION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
| DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 | |||
DOCKET NO. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||||
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GLOBAL WATER-PALO VERDE UTILITIES COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
| ||||
DOCKET NO. W-03720A-12-0311 | ||||
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WATER UTILITY OF NORTHERN SCOTTSDALE FOR APPROVAL OF A RATE INCREASE.
| ||||
DOCKET NO. W-02450A-12-0312 | ||||
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF WATER UTILITY OF GREATER TONOPAH FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
| ||||
DOCKET NO. W-02451 A-12-0313 | ||||
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF VALENCIA WATER COMPANY – GREATER BUCKEYE DIVISION FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
|
1 | Decision No. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF GLOBAL WATER – SANTA CRUZ WATER COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
| DOCKET NO. W-20446A-12-0314 | |||
DOCKET NO. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||||
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF JUST AND REASONABLE RATES AND CHARGES FOR UTILITY SERVICE DESIGNED TO REALIZE A REASONABLE RATE OF RETURN ON THE FAIR VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
|
DECISION NO. 74364
OPINION AND ORDER |
DATES OF HEARING: | July 15, 2013 (Public Comment); September 4, 2013 (Pre-Hearing Conference); September 5, 6, 9, 12, and 19, 2013 (Evidentiary Hearing) | |
PLACE OF HEARING: | Phoenix, Arizona | |
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: | Dwight D. Nodes | |
APPEARANCES: | Mr. Timothy Sabo and Mr. Michael W. Patten, ROSHKA, DeWULF & PATTEN, P.L.C., on behalf of Applicants and Global Intervenors; | |
Ms. Michelle Wood and Mr. Daniel W. Pozefsky on behalf of the Residential Utility Consumer Office; | ||
Ms. Michele Van Quathem, RYLEY, CARLOCK & APPLEWHITE, on behalf of the Maricopa Area Homeowners Associations; | ||
Mr. Robert J. Metli, MUNGER CHADWICK, on behalf of Sierra Negra Ranch, L.L.C.; | ||
Mr. Lawrence V. Robertson, Jr., MUNGER CHADWICK, and Mr. Denis M. Fitzgibbons, Maricopa City Attorney, on behalf of the City of Maricopa, Arizona; | ||
Mr. Jeffrey W. Crockett, BROWNSTEIN, HYATT, FARBER, SCHRECK, L.L.P. and Mr. Garry D. Hayes, LAW OFFICES OF GARRY D. HAYES, on behalf of New World Properties, Inc.; | ||
Mr. William P. Sullivan, CURTIS, GOODWING, SULLIVAN, UDALL & SCHWAB, P.L.C., on behalf of Willow Valley Club Association; and |
2 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Ms. Maureen A. Scott, Senior Staff Counsel, Mr. Wesley C. Van Cleve and Mr. Brian E. Smith, Staff Attorneys, Legal Division, on behalf of the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission. |
BY THE COMMISSION:
Procedural History
On July 9, 2012, Valencia Water Company – Town Division (“VWCT”), Global Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”), Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale (“WUNS”), Water Utility of Greater Tonopah (“WUGT”), Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division (“VWCGB”), Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”), and Willow Valley Water Company (“Willow Valley”) (collectively “Global Water,” “Company,” or “Applicants”) filed with the Arizona Corporation Commission (“Commission”) applications in the above-captioned cases for the establishment of just and reasonable rates and charges for utility service designed to realize a reasonable rate of return on the fair value of their property throughout the State of Arizona. The test year for the applications is the year ending December 31, 2011.
On July 12, 2012, a Motion to Consolidate was filed by Global Water in the above-captioned dockets. The Company stated that common issues of law and fact existed for each of the applications, common testimony had been filed in the dockets, and in the previous Global Water rate cases, all of the individual dockets were consolidated.
On July 17, 2012, New World Properties, Inc. (“NWP”) filed an Application for Leave to Intervene in the WUGT docket. NWP stated that it is the developer of a residential housing project located in an area in which WUGT holds a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (“CC&N”).
On August 27, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in all seven dockets.
On September 26, 2012, WUGT filed a Response in Opposition to NWP’s intervention request.
On September 26, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in the WUNS, WUGT, and VWCGB dockets.
On September 26, 2012, the Commission’s Utilities Division (“Staff”) filed Letters of Sufficiency in the WUNS, WUGT, and VWCGB dockets, indicating that Global Water satisfied the requirements of Arizona Administrative Code (“A.A.C.”) R14-2-103 for those cases. Staff classified
3 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WUNS as a Class D utility, and WUGT and VWCGB as Class C utilities.
On September 26, 2012, Staff filed Letters of Deficiency for the VWCT, Palo Verde, Santa Cruz, and Willow Valley applications.
On October 1, 2012, WUGT filed a letter indicating that it had inadvertently filed confidential information with its Response in Opposition to NWP’s intervention request. WUGT provided a substitute attachment with the confidential information redacted from the document.
On October 1, 2012, the Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”) filed Applications to Intervene in the WUNS, WUGT, and VWCGB dockets.
On October 10, 2012, VWCT and Willow Valley filed revised schedules.
On October 11, 2012, NWP filed a Reply in Support of its Application for Leave to Intervene.
On October 15, 2012, Global Water filed Notices of Errata in the VWCT and Willow Valley dockets.
On October 19, 2012, Staff filed Letters of Sufficiency in the VWCT and Willow Valley dockets.
On October 24, 2012, Palo Verde filed revised schedules.
On October 26, 2012, Staff filed a Letter of Sufficiency in the Palo Verde docket.
On October 31, 2012, RUCO filed an Application to Intervene in the Palo Verde docket.
On November 2, 2012, Santa Cruz filed revised schedules.
On November 7, 2012, Staff filed a Letter of Sufficiency in the Santa Cruz docket.
On November 8, 2012, RUCO filed an Application to Intervene in the Santa Cruz docket.
On November 14, 2012, Staff filed a Request for Procedural Schedule and Response to Global Water’s Motion to Consolidate in each of the dockets. Staff stated that it supported the Company’s consolidation request, and proposed a procedural schedule. In addition to proposed dates for filing testimony, the parties agreed to commence settlement discussions on May 13, 2013, to conclude settlement discussions on May 21, 2013, and to file a settlement agreement, if any, by May 31, 2013.
On November 19, 2012, RUCO filed a Response to the Company’s Motion to Consolidate and Staff’s Proposed Procedural Schedule. RUCO stated that it did not oppose the request for
4 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
consolidation and that, with a minor modification, it supported Staff’s proposed schedule.
By Procedural Order issued November 20, 2012, the above-captioned dockets were consolidated, a hearing was scheduled, the Company was directed to publish notice, and other procedural deadlines were established. The Procedural Order also granted intervention to RUCO and NWP.
On November 27, 2012, Global Water filed a Request to Amend Customer Notice Language in the Global Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company’s customer language notice. Global Water stated that the notice could be confusing to its customers because the phrase “56.3 percent” increase did not reflect current revenues, but rather revenues from the 2011 test year. The Company therefore requested that the public notice be modified.
On November 30, 2012, a Procedural Order was issued granting the Company’s request to amend the customer notice language.
On December 17, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in the VWCGB, WUGT, and VWCT dockets.
On December 18, 2012, Global Water filed a 2nd Request to Amend Customer Notice Language. The Company stated that the three West Valley notices did not include a description of the proposal to consolidate the West Valley utilities; and that since Global Water had prepared a rate case website, a reference to the website should also be included in the customer notice.
On December 19, 2012, Global Water filed revised and updated consolidated schedules in the VWCGB, WUGT, and VWCT dockets.
On December 21, 2012, the Company filed a complete set of revised and updated schedules for each of the above-captioned dockets.
By Procedural Order issued December 28, 2012, the Company’s 2nd Motion to Amend was granted and the requested notice modifications were approved.
On February 22, 2013, the City of Maricopa (“City” or “Maricopa”) filed an Application for Leave to Intervene.
On February 28, 2013, a group of Maricopa Area Homeowners Associations (“Maricopa
5 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
HOAs”)1 filed a Motion for Leave to Intervene.
On February 28, 2013, Steven P. Tardiff filed a Motion to Intervene.
On March 1, 2013, the Willow Valley Club Association (“WVCA”) filed a Motion to Intervene.
On March 1, 2013, Dana L. Jennings filed a Motion to Intervene.
By Procedural Order issued March 12, 2013, intervention was granted to the City, the Maricopa HOAs, Steven P. Tardiff, WVCA, and Dana J. Jennings.
On March 18, 2013, Andy and Marilyn Mausser filed a Motion to Intervene.
On March 20, 2013, the Mayor and Council of the City of Maricopa filed a Request to Hold a Public Comment in Maricopa.
On April 9, 2013, the Commission voted at a Staff Open Meeting to schedule a local public comment session on the application to be held on May 30, 2013, in Maricopa, Arizona.
On April 16, 2013, a Procedural Order was issued scheduling a public comment session on May 30, 2013, in Maricopa, and directing Global Water to publish notice of the public comment session. The Procedural Order also granted intervention to Andy and Marilyn Mausser.
On April 19, 2013, Staff filed a Request for Modification of the Procedural Schedule. Staff requested a 60-day extension of time to file its direct testimony due to “the complexity of the issues raised in this case,” and requested that the remainder of the procedural schedule be extended by 60 days as well. Staff represented that the Company agreed to the extension request and that RUCO, NWP, the City, and the Maricopa HOAs did not oppose the requested extension.
On April 26, 2013, Sierra Negra Ranch (“SNR”) filed an Application for Leave to Intervene in the above-captioned matter. SNR stated that it is a residential property developer that has properties located in Global Water’s CC&N area.
1The represented HOAs are: Acacia Crossings Homeowners Association (“Acacia”), Alterra Homeowners Association (“Alterra”), Cobblestone Farms Homeowners Association (“Cobblestone”), Desert Cedars Homeowners Association (“Desert Cedars”), Desert Passage Community Association (“Desert Passage”), Glennwilde Homeowners’ Association (“Glennwilde”), Homestead North Homeowners’ Association (“Homestead North”), Maricopa Meadows Homeowners Association (“Maricopa Meadows”), Province Community Association (“Province”), Rancho El Dorado Homeowners Association (“Rancho El Dorado”), Rancho El Dorado Phase III Homeowners Association (“Rancho El Dorado III”), Rancho Mirage Master Planned Community Homeowners Association (“Rancho Mirage”), Senita Community Association (“Senita”), and Sorrento Community Master Association (“Sorrento”).
6 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
By Procedural Order issued April 30, 2013, the hearing was rescheduled to commence on September 5, 2013, other procedural dates were amended in accordance with Staff’s proposal, and the applicable time clock was extended accordingly.
On May 30, 2013, the Commission conducted a public comment session in Maricopa, as scheduled.
By Procedural Order issued June 13, 2013, SNR was granted intervention.
On July 12, 2013, Staff filed a second Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule. Staff requested that the filing date for Staff and Intervenor rate design testimony be changed from July 15, 2013 to July 26, 2013; and that the Company be permitted to file rate design rebuttal testimony on August 19, 2013.
On July 12, 2013, Global Water Resources, Inc., Hassayampa Utilities Company (“Hassayampa”), Picacho Cove Water Company, and Picacho Cove Utilities Company (Jointly “Global Intervenors”) filed a Motion to Intervene in response to Staff’s direct testimony which recommended that those entities be added as parties to these consolidated dockets.
On July 15, 2013, the hearing previously scheduled and noticed for that date was convened for the purpose of taking public comment only.
By Procedural Order issued July 18, 2013, Staff’s Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule was granted, and the Global Intervenors were granted intervention.
On July 25, 2013, Staff filed a third Request to Modify Procedural Schedule to allow additional time for settlement discussions. Staff stated that the parties were in the process of negotiating a settlement agreement and that if the parties reached a settlement, they planned to file it on August 12, 2013, as specified by the April 30, 2013 Procedural Order. Staff therefore requested that the July 26, 2013, filing date be suspended.
By Procedural Order issued July 26, 2013, Staffs Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule was granted.
On August 13, 2013, a Proposed Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement,” “Settlement,” or “Agreement”) was filed in this matter, signed by the Global Water Companies (i.e., Palo Verde, Santa Cruz, VWCT, WUNS, WUGT, VWCGB, and Willow Valley), the Global
7 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Intervenors, Staff, RUCO, and Maricopa HOAs Province, Rancho El Dorado III, and Cobblestone.
On August 16, 2013, Staff filed a Notice of Errata making corrections to the H-3 Schedules attached to the Settlement Agreement.
On August 20, 2013, Global Water filed a Motion to Establish Schedule for SIB [System Improvement Benefit mechanism] Testimony. In its Motion, the Company requested that testimony regarding the SIB mechanism be scheduled to be filed by Global Water on August 21, 2013; by Staff on August 28, 2013; and that responsive testimony be filed by Global Water or other intervenors by September 3, 2013. The Company stated that Staff, RUCO, and WVCA were in agreement with the proposed schedule, and although RUCO did not object to establishment of a procedural process for submitting testimony, “RUCO does not waive its right to object to the timeliness of the application for the SIB and what they believe is a late-filed request.” (Global Motion, at 1-2.)
On August 21, 2013, Staff filed Attachment E to the Settlement Agreement.
On August 21, 2013, additional signatures to the Settlement were filed by the City of Maricopa, and Maricopa HOAs Alterra, Desert Cedars, Homestead North, Maricopa Meadows, Rancho El Dorado, Senita, and Sorrento.
On August 21, 2013, testimony in support of the Settlement Agreement was filed by: the Company (Ron Fleming, Paul Walker, and Matthew Rowell); Staff (Steve Olea); RUCO (Patrick Quinn); Maricopa (Paul Jepsen); and the Maricopa HOAs (Pam Hilliard).
On August 21, 2013, testimony in opposition to the Settlement Agreement was filed by: NWP (Richard Jellies); and SNP (John O’Reilly).
On August 27, 2013, a Procedural Order was issued establishing a procedural schedule for the proposed SIB mechanism, with Staff testimony due by September 6, 2013; Global Water and Intervenor responsive testimony due by September 13, 2013; and a hearing on the SIB proposal on September 19, 2013.
On September 3, 2013, Global Water filed a Notice of Filing Revised Willow Valley Water Co. SIB Engineering Report.
Hearings were conducted regarding the Settlement Agreement on September 5, 6, 9, and 12, 2013.
8 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
On September 6, 2013, Staff filed the supplemental testimony of Jian Liu regarding the SIB mechanism.
On September 13, 2013, RUCO filed the responsive testimony of Robert Mease regarding the SIB proposal.
On September 13, 2013, the WVCA filed a letter signed by its president, Gary McDonald, expressing opposition to the Company’s SIB mechanism proposal. The letter indicated that the WVCA, which was granted intervention in this proceeding, did not have funding to participate in the hearing;2 however, the letter contained detailed criticism of the SIB proposal and included several recommendations for the Commission’s consideration. Mr. McDonald requested that “the letter be entered into evidence...” at the September 19, 2013, SIB hearing.
By Procedural Order issued September 16, 2013, Mr. McDonald was directed to appear at the September 19, 2013, hearing if he wished his comments to be considered part of the evidentiary record.
On September 18, 2013, Mr. McDonald filed a letter requesting that he be permitted to appear telephonically to undergo cross-examination regarding his comments.
On September 19, 2013, a hearing regarding the proposed SIB was conducted.3
On October 1, 2013, RUCO filed a Notice of Reassignment of counsel.
On October 4, 2013, Staff filed a Notice of Filing Rate Schedules Including Systems Benefits Charge.
On October 18, 2013, Initial Post-Hearing Briefs were filed by Global Water and Global Intervenors; NWP; SNP; City of Maricopa; the Maricopa HOAs; RUCO; and Staff.
On October 31, 2013, Reply Post-Hearing Briefs were filed by Global Water and Global Intervenors; NWP; SNP; City of Maricopa; RUCO; and Staff.
Application
As described in Global Water’s last rate case, in Decision No. 71878, the Global Water
2 At the September 4, 2013, prehearing conference, counsel for the WVCA entered an appearance but indicated that the WVCA would not be participating in the hearings.
3 Mr. McDonald’s request was granted and he was permitted to testify telephonically at the September 19, 2013, SIB hearing.
9 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
utilities are organized as Arizona C corporations, and were all previously owned by Global Water Resources, LLC, (“GWR”) a Delaware limited liability company, through its direct subsidiary Global Water, Inc., a Delaware C corporation. (Decision No. 71878 (September 15, 2010), at 4.)
Subsequent to the last rate case, Global Water Resources, LLC, its utility company subsidiaries, and Global Water Management, LLC, were reorganized as Global Water Resources, Inc. (“GWRI” or “Global Parent”), a Delaware C corporation. (SNR Ex. 4, at 5.) 48.1% of the shares of GWRI are held by GWR Global Water Resources Corp. (“GWRC”), a Canadian corporation incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia).(Id.)
The consolidated rate applications include Palo Verde, which is a wastewater utility, and five water utilities: Valencia Water Company (which has two divisions, VWCT and VWCGB); Santa Cruz; Willow Valley; WUNS; and WUGT.
Santa Cruz and Palo Verde operate in the Maricopa area and serve approximately 17,145 water customers and 15,831 wastewater customers, respectively. VWCT provides water service to approximately 5,751 metered connections in a service area located approximately 40 miles west of downtown Phoenix, in Maricopa County. VWCGB provides water service to approximately 626 customers in an area approximately 40 miles west of downtown Phoenix, in Maricopa County. WUNS provides water service to approximately 78 connections in a service area approximately 40 miles northeast of downtown Phoenix, in Maricopa County. WUGT provides water service to approximately 324 customers in a service area located approximately 60 miles west of downtown Phoenix, in Maricopa County. Willow Valley provides water service to approximately 1500 customers within Mohave County.
Summary of Original Revenue Recommendations
By utility/division, the Applicants’ original proposed revenue requirements were as follows:
Palo Verde
Prior to settlement, Palo Verde proposed a revenue requirement of $16,769,746, an increase of $3,662,218, or 27.9 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $13,107,528. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $15.72 increase for the average 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch water meter residential customers, from $62.91 per month to $78.63 per month, or
10 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
approximately 25 percent. (Updated Schedules filed December 21, 2012.)
Valencia-Greater Buckeye
Prior to settlement, VWCGB proposed a revenue requirement of $497,654, an increase of $35,611, or 7.7 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $462,043. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $3.78 increase for the average usage (approximately 9,000 gallons per month) 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter residential customer, from $54.27 per month to $58.05 per month, or approximately 6.97 percent. (Id.)
Willow Valley
Prior to settlement, Willow Valley proposed a revenue requirement of $1,209,660, an increase of $507,008, or 72.2 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $702,652. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $20.01 increase for the average usage (approximately 4,000 gallons per month) 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter residential customer, from $26.87 per month to $46.88 per month, or approximately 74.47 percent. (Id.)
Santa Cruz
Prior to settlement, Santa Cruz proposed a revenue requirement of $13,192,940, an increase of $2,729,480, or 26.1 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $10,463,460. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $7.87 increase for the average usage (approximately 6,000 gallons per month) 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter residential customer, from $32.13 per month to $40.00 per month, or approximately 24.49 percent. (Id.)
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale
Prior to settlement, WUNS proposed a revenue requirement of $148,244, an increase of $731, or 0.5 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $147,513. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $3.50 increase for the average usage (approximately 15,000 gallons per month) l-inch meter residential customer, from $148.00 per month to $151.50 per month, or approximately 2.36 percent. (Id.)
WUGT
Prior to settlement, WUGT proposed a revenue requirement of $886,054, an increase of $678,348, or 326.6 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $207,706. Applicants’
11 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $127.64 increase for the average 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch water meter residential customers (approximately 8,000 gallons per month), from $40.36 per month to $168.00 per month, or approximately 316 percent.(Id.)
Valencia-Town
Prior to settlement, VWCT proposed a revenue requirement of $5,765,465, an increase of $825,150, or 16.7 percent, over its adjusted test year revenues of $4,940,315. Applicants’ recommendation would have resulted in an approximate $10.15 increase for the average 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch water meter residential customers (approximately 8,000 gallons per month), from $48.45 per month to $58.60 per month, or approximately 20.95 percent.(Id.)
Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements (“ICFAs”)
Prior to discussing the Settlement Agreement, and in order to provide background regarding the primary issue in dispute regarding the Settlement Agreement, a brief description of ICFAs follows.
As described in Decision No. 71878 (September 15, 2010), Global Parent had, at that time, entered into 157 ICFAs with developers in the service areas of Global Utilities. (Decision No. 71878, at 12.) Under the ICFAs, Global Parent collected funds from developers in exchange for Global Parent’s agreement to provide utility service to the developments through its subsidiaries, the Global Utilities companies. Applicants’ witness in the prior case, Trevor Hill, President and CEO of Global Parent, described the ICFAs as follows:
An ICFA (Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreement) is a voluntary contract between Global Parent and a landowner. These contracts provide for Global Parent to coordinate the planning, financing and construction of off-site water, wastewater and recycled water plant. The Global Utilities will own and operate this plant when construction is complete. Under the ICFAs, Global Parent is responsible for funding both the planning and construction of water, wastewater and recycled water plant. This is a significant investment for Global Parent. The landowners who enter into the ICFAs agree to cooperate with Global Parent’s plant planning and construction process. ICFAs formalize the cooperation between the landowner and Global, but also provide fees which allow Global Parent to impress conservation and consolidation into the regional planning initiatives. These fees are intended to recover a portion of the carrying costs for the very expensive facilities required to implement effective water conservation and, in some cases, to fund Global Parent’s acquisition of existing utilities.
12 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
(Id.) After considering all of the evidence and arguments presented in Global Water’s prior case, the Commission agreed with Staff, RUCO, and Maricopa, that the ICFA funds received by Global parent should be imputed to the utilities as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”) because “[a]llowing developer contributed funds to remain in rate base would require captive ratepayers to pay Applicants a return on developer-provided ICFA funds, which would violate fundamental ratemaking principles and would unjustly and unreasonably enrich Applicants at ratepayers expense.” (Id. at 30.) The Commission also directed the commencement of a generic investigation and workshops to consider the use of ICFAs, or other mechanisms, for encouraging acquisition of troubled water companies and other Commission objectives, such as promoting regional water and wastewater infrastructure. (Id. at 30-31.)
Settlement Agreement
The signatory parties (Palo Verde, Santa Cruz, VWCT, WUNS, WUGT, VWCGB, Willow Valley, the Global Intervenors, Staff, RUCO, City of Maricopa, and Maricopa HOAs) entered into a Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as “Attachment A.”4
Global Water filed a Notice of Settlement Discussions on July 11, 2013, and a Revised Notice of Settlement Discussions on July 15, 2013. All parties to this docket were notified of the settlement discussions. Settlement discussions began on July 18, 2013, and continued on July 19, 2013. According to the Settlement Agreement, the settlement discussions were open, transparent, and inclusive of all parties to this docket who desired to participate. Participants in the settlement discussions included Global Water, the Global Intervenors (i.e., Global Parent, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities), Staff, RUCO, Maricopa, the Maricopa HOAs, NWP, SNR, and WVCA.
On August 13, 2013, a Proposed Settlement Agreement was filed in this matter, signed by Global Water, the Global Intervenors, Staff, RUCO, and HOAs Province, Rancho El Dorado III, and Cobblestone. On August 21, 2013, additional signatures to the Settlement Agreement were filed by
4 Attachment A hereto includes the Settlement Agreement and exhibits filed on August 13, 2013, and incorporates the following: revised H-3 Schedules for each of the Global Water utilities, filed on August 16, 2013; additional signature pages to the Agreement filed on August 21, 2013 and September 4, 2013; Attachment E to the Settlement filed on August 21, 2013; and a revised Schedule A-1 for WUGT filed on September 3, 2013. The schedule of estimated SIB surcharges that would be applied to Willow Valley customers only, between 2015-2019, is attached hereto as “Attachment B”.
13 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Maricopa, Alterra, Desert Cedars, Homestead North, Maricopa Meadows, Rancho El Dorado, Senita, and Sorrento.
On August 21, 2013, testimony in support of the Settlement Agreement was filed by: Global Water (Ron Fleming, Paul Walker, and Matthew Rowell); Staff (Steve Olea); RUCO (Patrick Quinn); Maricopa (Paul Jepsen); and the Maricopa HOAs (Pam Hilliard). On August 21, 2013, testimony in opposition to the Settlement Agreement was filed by: NWP (Richard Jellies); and SNP (John O’Reilly).
Terms and Conditions of the Settlement Agreement
The major Sections of the Settlement Agreement are as follows:5
I. | Recitals – This Section identifies the benefits of the Settlement Agreement as: |
• | A phase-in of rates with no rate increase in year one of the phase-in for any of the Global Water utilities; |
• | A rate phase-in for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde over a period of eight years; |
• | A rate phase-in for VWCT, VWCGB, Willow Valley, and WUGT over a period of three years; |
• | A phase-in of the rate increases attributable to recovery of expenses in years two and three of the phase-in; |
• | No change in the revenue requirement for WUNS; |
• | VWCT, VWCGB, Willow Valley, WUGT, and WUNS agree to a rate stay-out until May 31, 2016; and Santa Cruz and Palo Verde agree to a rate stay-out until May 31, 2017; |
• | Continuing bill assistance for low income customers in existing Global Water utilities with such programs, and expansion of the low income bill assistance program into WUNS; |
• | The rate design will continue to allow customers an opportunity to reduce their bill by providing a rebate when customers use less than the Conservation Rebate Threshold (“CRT”);6 and |
• | Resolution of issues regarding Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements. |
This Section also requests that the Commission find the Settlement Agreement’s terms and conditions are just and reasonable and in the public interest and approve the Settlement Agreement and order
5This is a summary of some, but not all provisions contained in the Settlement Agreement.
6 To the extent that the CRT could be considered a prohibited rebate or refund, pursuant to A.R.S § 40-374, we will waive the application of that statute as it applies to the terms of the Settlement.
14 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
that it and its rates become effective on January 1, 2014.
II.Revenue Requirement and Rate Increase Provisions– This Section provides that VWCT, VWCGB, Willow Valley, WUGT, and WUNS will not file a rate application before May 31, 2016, using a test year that may not end before December 31, 2015; Santa Cruz and Palo Verde will not file a rate application before May 31, 2017, using a test year that may not end before December 31, 2016; the revenue requirements and rate increases for all years of the phase-in for each of the Global Water utilities are shown in Attachment A; there will be no change in the revenue requirement for WUNS; the original cost rate base of each Global Water utility will be used as the fair value rate base for purposes of setting rates; and the rate bases set forth on Attachment A exclude Post Test Year Plant as recommended by Staff, except for the (1) Palo Verde Lagoon Clean Closure and Conversion Project, (2) VWCT Bales Fill Line, and (3) VWCT Buena Vista Fill Line. This Section also adopts the expense levels proposed by Staff, except the modified depreciation expense discussed in Section V of the Settlement Agreement.
III.Bill Impact and Rate Design – This Section provides that the rate increase for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde will be phased-in over eight years; the rate increase for the remaining Global Water utilities, except WUNS, will be phased-in over three years; WUNS revenue requirements will remain unchanged, but the rates will be redesigned and be implemented with no phase-in; there will be no rate increase in the first year for all Global Water utilities; Global Water waives the right to recover the revenues forgone or lost and carrying costs under the phase-ins; and Global Water agrees to withdraw its consolidation proposal for the three West Valley Systems. This Section also provides that the recycled and nonpotable water rate for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde will be $1.6380 per 1,000 gallons, to be phased-in over eight years as shown on Attachment A; and for all other Global Water utilities with no existing recycled or nonpotable customers, the rate will be $1.6380 per 1,000 gallons with no phase-in. In addition, this Section adopts a rate design that includes six tiers and a CRT that will not take effect until January 1, 2015; this rate design follows the rate design approved in Decision No. 71878.
IV.Cost of Capital – This Section adopts a capital structure of 57.80 percent long term debt and 42.20 percent common equity; adopts a return on common equity of 9.5 percent and an
15 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
embedded cost of debt of 6.1 percent; and adopts a fair value rate of return of 7.5 percent.
V.Depreciation/Amortization – This Section adopts the depreciation and amortization rates proposed by Staff until further order of the Commission, except that a 10-year life will be used for Account Nos. 348 and 398. This Section also adopts the reclassifications of assets proposed by Staff.
VI.Treatment of Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreements – With respect to future ICFAs, this Section provides that Global Parent will not enter into any new ICFAs or any other ICFA type agreements, except that Global Parent may amend existing ICFAs as long as the amendments do not increase the dollar amount of the ICFA funds to be paid to Global Parent or any of its affiliates; Global Water, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will establishhook-up fees as set forth in Section VII of the Settlement Agreement; Global Water, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will continue to use main extension agreements in accordance with Commission rules and any associated funds or infrastructure used to provide water or wastewater service will be segregated to or owned by Global Water, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, or Picacho Utilities.
With respect to past funds received under existing ICFAs, this Section provides that the total amounts imputed as CIAC against the active rate base of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde in Decision No. 71878 will be reversed and restored to rate base, with the revenue requirement impact phased-in over an eight year period; the $32,391,318 attributed to the Southwest Plant Held For Future Use (“PHFFU”) of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde in Decision No. 71878 will no longer be reflected as CIAC, but will continue to be treated as PHFFU until it is placed into service; the Southwest Plant will not be included in rate base until it is found used and useful by the Commission in a future rate case; the total amounts imputed as CIAC against the active rate base of WUGT in Decision No. 71878 will be reversed and restored to rate base, the effect of which will have no revenue impact because Tonopah’s rates will be set on an operating margin basis in this case; the ICFA funds allocated to Hassayampa in Decision No. 71878 and accounted for as “CIAC Reserve” will be reversed, the effect of which will not impact rates because Hassayampa has no customers and no rate base; the $8,897,600 in ICFA funds received since December 31, 2008 (the test year of the last Global Water rate case) through December 31, 2012, will not be imputed or treated as CIAC.
16 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
With respect to future ICFA fees received under existing ICFAs, this Section provides that for ICFA fees received after December 31, 2013, a portion of the funds received by Global Parent will be paid to the associated utility as a hook-up fee (“HUF”) in accordance with Section VII of the Settlement Agreement, and the remaining portion of the funds will be available to Global Parent to be used only in accordance with the terms of the applicable ICFA; Global Parent will accept separate checks for the ICFA fees, with one check payable to the applicable water or wastewater utility in the amount of the HUF, and another check payable to Global Parent for the remainder of the ICFA fee; Global Parent is prohibited from using HUF monies for any purpose; Global Water, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will use the HUF monies solely for the purposes set forth in the Commission approved HUF tariffs; 70 percent of each ICFA fee payment received by Global Parent must go toward payment of the HUF and the remaining payment will be allocated to Global Parent; and Global Parent is responsible for ensuring that the entire HUF is paid no later than the time the ICFA payment is received for (1) final plat, (2) the start work date, or (3) the date required by the HUF tariffs, whichever is earliest.
This Section further provides that Staff and RUCO reserve the right to monitor the compliance of Global Water and Global Intervenors with this Settlement Agreement and review all ICFA related transactions in future rate applications, and take appropriate steps, if necessary, to ensure that compliance.
VII.Hook-Up Fees – This Section establishes hook-up fees in the following amounts:
• | Santa Cruz: $1,250 |
• | Palo Verde: $1,250 |
• | Picacho Water: $1,250 |
• | Picacho Utilities: $1,250 |
• | VWCT: $1,750 |
• | VWCGB: $1,750 |
• | WUGT: $1,750 |
• | Willow Valley: $1,750 |
• | WUNS: $1,750 |
17 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
• | Hassayampa: $1,750 |
This Section provides that Global Water will maintain a separate, segregated bank account for all funds received under the hook-up fee tariff and file annual reports as outlined in the tariffs.
VIII.Tariffs and Code of Conduct – This Section provides that Global Water’s existing low income tariffs will remain in effect, and will apply to WUNS upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in this case; the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (“CAGRD”) adjustor mechanism be approved subject to the same requirements of the adjustor mechanism approved in Decision No. 71854; Global Water will retain its existing Best Management Practices (“BMP”) tariffs and WUNS agrees to file a BMP tariff as recommended by Staff; the Signatories agree to Global Water’s Terms and Conditions tariff, as modified by Staff, as shown in Attachment E; Global Water agrees to withdraw its request for an Individual Case Basis (“ICB”) tariff; and Global Water will work with Staff to adopt a Code of Conduct to apply to transactions that are between or involve the Applicants and their unregulated affiliates and to assure confidential treatment of customer information.
IX.Water Loss – This Section provides that Global Water agrees to file the water loss reports recommended by Staff.
X.Commission Evaluation of Proposed Settlement – This Section provides that if the Commission fails to issue an order adopting all material terms of the Settlement Agreement, any or all of the signatories may withdraw from the agreement and pursue without prejudice their respective remedies at law; for purposes of the Settlement Agreement, whether a term is material is in the discretion of the signatory choosing to withdraw from the Settlement Agreement, and if a signatory withdraws from the Settlement Agreement and files an application for rehearing, the other signatories except for Staff, shall support the application for rehearing.
XI.Miscellaneous Provisions – This Section provides that the signatories shall support and defend the Settlement Agreement and shall make reasonable and good faith efforts to obtain a Commission order approving the Settlement Agreement; and to the extent that any provision of the Settlement Agreement is inconsistent with any existing Commission order, rule, or regulation, the Settlement Agreement shall control and that each term is in consideration of all other terms and the
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
terms are not severable.
Arguments of Settlement Agreement Proponents
Global Water
Global Water asserts the Settlement Agreement should be approved as it is widely supported and resolves complex issues involving ICFAs. (Tr. 191.) The Company argues the Settlement Agreement aids individual parties and consumers alike, and includes benefits that could not be reached through litigation. (Ex. S-5 at 14; Tr. 482-484.) Global Water claims the benefits passed on to customers through the approval of the Settlement Agreement would include the lengthy phase-in of rate increases, a stay-out period for requesting new rate increases, a reduced revenue requirement based on normalized expenses from 2009-2011, and improvement of the Company’s financial condition.
Per the Settlement Agreement, the Company’s rates in the Maricopa area are to be phased in over an eight-year period in order to reduce the rate increase used to repair Global Parent’s balance sheet through the de-imputation of ICFA fees. (Ex. A-17 at § 3.4; Ex. A-24; Tr. 692.) The Settlement provides that the non-Maricopa systems will have rate increases phased in over a three-year period. (Ex. A-17 at §§ 3.4 and 3.6; see also Ex. A-24.) Global Water states there will be no rate increase during the first year of the phase-in for any of the systems, and none of the revenue lost as a result of the phase-ins will be recovered by the Company. (Ex. A-17 at § 3.4.) The Company adds that the Settlement Agreement also requires that Global Water to refrain from filing new rate applications until May 31, 2016 for areas outside of Maricopa, and until May 31, 2017 for the Maricopa area utilities. (Id. at § 2.1.1.)
Global Water contends that the reduced revenue requirement advanced in the Settlement Agreement is due to the use of Staff’s expense levels, which are based on the Company’s expenses from the period of 2009-2010, which it claims is a major concession and a benefit to customers. (Tr. 21, 34, 38, 483, 691; Ex. R-5 at 5; City Ex. 2, App. A; Ex. A-24.) Global Water points out that the Settlement Agreement proposes to reduce the Company’s cost of equity from the requested 11.44 percent to 9.5 percent, which provides a revenue increase of less than 15 percent for the largest of the
19 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Company’s individual utilities (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde). (Ex. A-14 at 52-53; Ex. A-17 at § 4.2; Ex. A-26 at 6.)
According to the Company, there is no dispute that the Settlement Agreement will improve the Global Parent’s financial condition by repairing its balance sheet and reversing an “imputation” of CIAC by the Commission in the Company’s last rate case. (Ex. A-17 at § 6.3.) Global Water asserts that improving the balance sheet of GWRI is also a benefit to consumers and the Commission, because restoring the financial condition of Global Parent will provide easier access to debt and equity which, in turn, will allow the Global utilities to continue providing quality service to customers. (Ex. A-19 at 4-5.) Global Water contends that the Settlement Agreement will limit the rate impact on ratepayers because most of the CIAC de-imputation is for plant that is not yet in rate base, and due to the lengthy phase-in of rates. (Ex. A-30 at 5; Ex. A-17 at §§ 6.3.2.3 (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde active rate base), 6.3.3.3 (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde Plant Held for Future Use); and 6.3.4.4 (WUGT).) Global Water cites other benefits of the Settlement including: the continuation of its low income program; and customers’ ability to earn rebates on their water bills through the CRT. (Tr. 690; Ex. A-17 at § 1.5.)
Global Water asserts that its commitment to refrain from entering into any new ICFAs, and to adhere to Staffs requested Code of Conduct, are additional benefits of the Settlement. (Tr. 191, 199, 693, 698.) Global Water adds that ICFA holders will benefit from the Settlement by insuring that the contracts they entered into are honored, Global Parent’s improved financial condition will increase confidence that it will comply with its contractual obligations. (Tr. 710-711, 726.) Global Water states that the Settlement dictates portions of payments under the ICFAs will be segregated in bank accounts, and a substantial sum will be used to pay HUFs. (Ex. A-17 at §§ 6.4.1 and 7.3.)
Global Water argues that SNR’s and NWP’s main objection to the Settlement derives from their desire to modify the contracts that they entered into with Global Parent to provide water and wastewater utility services. The Company maintains that the ICFAs between the parties were of considerable benefit to SNR and NWP because the ICFAs solved their problem of finding a regional water and wastewater solution. (See Ex. A-37.) Global Water contends that SNR’s and NWP’s request for changes to the ICFAs should be rejected given that the developers are sophisticated
20 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
businesspeople, expertly represented in the negotiation of the ICFA contracts, and, as such, SNR and NWP should be bound by the terms of the ICFAs. The Company claims that Global Parent has performed in compliance with the ICFA contracts, and any request for modification of the ICFA is not properly before the Commission. (citing General Cable Corp v. Citizens Utilities Co., 27 Ariz. App. 381, 555 P.2d 350 (1976); Application of Trico Elec. Co-op., 92 Ariz. 373, 377 P.2d 309 (1962).) Global Water also states that the developer parties were under no obligation to enter into these agreements with Global Parent, as they had options for obtaining water service from other providers or by forming their own utilities. (Ex. A-20 at 2-4.)
Global Water refutes SNR’s and NWP’s claims that the ICFAs place them at a competitive disadvantage, arguing that the groundwater in the area has already been spoken for by SNR and NWP (and other ICFA holders), and that any developer in the area would find it difficult and/or expensive to obtain water, thereby providing SNR and NWP with a substantial competitive advantage overnon-ICFA developers. (Ex. A-35 at 41; Tr. 644.) Global Water also opposes SNR’s and NWP’s request to have the CPI factor removed from their ICFAs, stating the provision is standard in all ICFAs to account for inflation because of the contracts’ indefinite length, which is due to the developers’ uncertain construction timeframes. (Ex. A-20 at 4-5; Tr. 255-257, 640-650, 669-670.) The Company states that removing the CPI factor would constitute a material change to the contract, raising policy and legal issues. (Tr. 670.)
Global Water opposes the developers’ request for any supplemental regulation given the existing affiliate interest rules and newly agreed to Code of Conduct standards. (Tr. 252.) The Company states that the Settlement Agreement provides for sufficient safeguards relating to the use of ICFA funds, by requiring a portion of the funds to be used for HUFs and placed in separate accounts, subject to detailed reporting. Finally, Global Water argues that the rates proposed for the Water Utility of Greater Tonopah are appropriate, despite NWP’s objection, as they are based on an operating margin which significantly reduced the revenue requirement, and which will also be phased-in over three years. (Ex. A-27 at 2.)
. . .
. . .
21 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Staff
Staff supports approval of the Settlement Agreement given the multitude of benefits: gradual phase-in of rate increases with no increase during the first year; the agreement by Global Water to a rate stay-out until May 31, 2016 for non-Maricopa areas, and until May 31, 2017 for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde; continuation and expansion of low income bill assistance programs; a rate design that allows for customers to earn a rebate for low water consumption; and the resolution of issues related to ICFAs. (Ex. A-17.) Staff asserts that the Agreement requires Global Water to adopt a Code of Conduct which will apply to transactions between the Company and its affiliates, allowing for more transparent operations. (Ex. A-17 at 16.) Staff does not oppose NWP’s request to require Global Water to file an annual affidavit declaring compliance with the Settlement Agreement. (Staff Reply Brief at 12.)
According to Staff, SNR’s and NWP’s main opposition to the Agreement pertains to issues arising under the ICFAs they freely entered into with Global Parent. Staff cites to General Cable, supra, for the premise that modification of an agreement voluntarily entered into by two private parties falls outside the Commission’s purview. (27 Ariz. App. 381, 555 P.2d 350 (1976).) Staff argues that several sections within the Settlement Agreement address both developers’ concerns with regard to the stability of Global Parent in performing under its contracts, and how the funds from the ICFAs will be paid. (Ex. A-17 at 7, 9.) Staff also states that it is amenable to including specific language in the Agreement allowing developers to pay HUF fees directly to the utility. (Staff Reply Brief at 11.)
Maricopa
Maricopa supports the Settlement Agreement given the Company’s compromise to a substantial reduction in revenue requirements which, in turn, would provide for “just and reasonable” rates. (City’s Initial Brief at 2-3.) The City also cites to: Global Water’s concession to an extended phase-in of rate increases; no rate increases imposed in 2014; waiver of recovery of lost revenues under the rate phase-in; agreement to rate increase stay-out provisions; and the “capping” of the increase in the rate for effluent and recycled water; as reasons for approving the agreement. (Id. at 3-7.)
22 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Maricopa states the Settlement Agreement seeks to improve the Global companies’ financial conditions by de-imputing the CIAC treatment of ICFA fees previously ordered by the Commission, which is designed to provide the Global companies with adequate funds to construct facilities so they can continue to provide reliable and safe water and wastewater service through the receipt of HUF funds. According to the City, improving the stability of the Company that provides Maricopa with safe water and wastewater service is in Maricopa’s best interests.
Maricopa argues that NWP’s request for WUGT to have an eight-year phase-in of increased rates is misplaced because the only two utilities that were intended to receive that advantage are the Maricopa area utilities (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde), whose rates are impacted in this case due to the de-imputation of the CIAC. Maricopa also contends that SNR’s request for the Commission to assert jurisdiction over Global Parent to ensure compliance with the Agreement is unnecessary, as it is in Global entities’ best interest to adhere to the Settlement’s terms, given the Commission’s ongoing regulation of Global Water’s day-to-day operations.
Maricopa HOAs
The Maricopa HOAs argue that the Commission should adopt the Settlement Agreement because the Agreement serves the public interest by: proposing reasonable rate increases; creating a lengthy eight-year phase-in of increased rates, with no increase in the first year and no recovery of foregone revenues; no new rate cases before May 31, 2017; allowing for a more gradual rate increase for effluent and nonpotable groundwater; and resolving longstanding regulatory issues relating to ICFAs. (Maricopa HOAs Initial Brief at 4-7.)
The Maricopa HOAs urge the Commission to adopt the Settlement Agreement, as written, because each stakeholder carefully negotiated its terms, and alteration to any clause could risk the stakeholders’ support for the Agreement as a whole. (Id. at 7-8.)
RUCO
RUCO also recommends that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement because it resolves a myriad of issues and is in the public interest. RUCO claims that the benefits of the Settlement include: a three-year phase-in of authorized expenses, with no increase in the first year; an eight-year phased-in rate increase for ICFA related issues, with no rate increase in the first year; a
23 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
substantially decreased revenue requirement; resolution of all ICFA issues; stay-out provisions prohibiting a rate case until at least May 31, 2016; Global Water’s future investments will be funded with debt, equity, HUFs, and main extension agreements; and the implementation of a Code of Conduct to allow for more transparency for Global entity transactions. (RUCO’s Initial Brief at 3.)
Opposition to Settlement Agreement
Sierra Negra Ranch
SNR contends that, under the terms of the ICFAs, GWRI is essentially providing utility services that require the Commission to either regulate GWRI as a utility, or to regulate GWRI’s transactions and operations related to performance under the ICFA. (Tr. 233.) According to SNR, the ICFAs allow Global Parent to evade the Commission’s oversight by “facilitating” utility services. (SNR Ex. 1 at 10.) SNR claims that the ICFAs function to bind a landowner to an unregulated utility with an unregulated financing agreement, a problem that would attach to the approximately 180 ICFAs GWRI has entered into throughout Arizona. (Ex. A-17, Attach. B; SNR Ex. 1 at 10.) According to SNR, a lack of regulation of GWRI and the ICFAs will jeopardize future development in those areas controlled by GWRI. (SNR Ex.1 at 10.)
SNR argues that the Commission has the authority to prescribe the content of the ICFAs because SNR and NWP had no choice but to enter the agreements if they wanted utility service, and because the ICFAs and Settlement Agreement place SNR and NWP at a competitive disadvantage. (SNR Reply Br. at 7-8.) By offering to provide utility services, SNR asserts that Global Parent placed itself within the purview of the Commission’s oversight. (Id. at 9-10.) SNR also argues that the Commission has an interest in the regulatory treatment of CPI adjuster funds that could be used to fund utility infrastructure, and would ultimately end up in rate base. (Id. at 11.) Moreover, SNR asserts that GWRl consented to the Commission’s jurisdiction by intervening in this rate case. SNR argues that, at a minimum, the Commission has the authority to require GWRI to modify the ICFA as a condition of the Settlement Agreement. (Id. at 8).
SNR also contends that the financial condition of GWRI raises concerns that monies paid to it or its subsidiaries will not properly be used to construct infrastructure. (SNR Ex. 1 at 4-5, Tr. 27, 233, 702.) As evidence of this concern, SNR points out that the Settlement Agreement disregards
24 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
past payments in calculating payments to be applied to HUFs. (SNR Ex. 1 at 14.) SNR also claims that prior funds placed in ICFA bank accounts were immediately transferred out of the accounts by GWRI and combined with GWRI’s general bank account. (See Ex. S-2 at 19). SNR asserts that, in spite of significant funds paid by SNR and NWP under the ICFAs, no utility infrastructure has yet been constructed in those areas. (Tr. 96.)
SNR argues that these issues can be avoided if the Commission takes jurisdiction over GWRI and the ICFAs to ensure that developer funds are properly used for the construction of infrastructure. Specifically, SNR requests that the Commission require sequester of the monies paid under the ICFAs, including such monies pledged to Regions Bank. (SNR Reply Br. at 18.) To further protect ICFA funds, SNR requests that the Commission order that Staff and RUCO monitoring of GWRI required under the Settlement Agreement should also include monitoring of GWRC, the ultimate Canadian parent holding company of GWRI. Similarly, SNR requests that GWRC, and the affiliates of GWRI, be subject to the annual affidavit of compliance required under Section 7.3 of the Settlement Agreement. (SNR Initial Br. at 19-20). SNR also requests the Commission to impose a requirement that GWRI and the regulated utilities guarantee the monies paid under the ICFA are used to construct the contracted infrastructure, even if the parent goes bankrupt. (SNR Ex. 1 at 16.)
SNR asserts that the ICFAs and HUFs will place it, and similarly situated developers, at a disadvantage to those developers who have not signed ICFAs with GWR. (SNR Ex. 1 at 15). SNR cites to the disparity between the $3,500 for water and wastewater services future developers will pay as HUFs under the Settlement, as opposed to the $5,500 it must pay under the ICFA, plus the CPI adjustor. (Ex. A-17 at 10; SNR Ex. 1 at 15.) SNR also contends that the Settlement Agreement would effectively eviscerate the “Most Favored Nation” clause within the ICFA. (SNR Initial Br. at 17). SNR contends that these issues may be avoided if the Commission, at a minimum, would increase the HUF in WUGT’s service area to align with the ICFA payments due, and compel GWRI to remove the requirement of paying a CPI adjustor in addition to the $5,500 per EDU under the ICFA. (SNR Ex. 1 at 15-16).
. . .
. . .
25 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
New World Properties
NWP contends that the Settlement Agreement is not in the public interest without additional requirements being imposed upon GWRI and its affiliates. NWP asserts that the Commission has jurisdiction and authority to modify the CPI adjustor as a condition of approving the Settlement Agreement, and that GWRI acknowledged the Commission’s jurisdiction through the testimony of Mr. Walker, and by GWRI’s intervention in the case. (NWP Reply Br. at 4). Further, NWP asserts that the Commission’s jurisdiction is already evident by the numerous obligations imposed upon GWRI through the Settlement Agreement, including compliance monitoring, prohibition of entering into new lCFAs or amending existing ICFAs to increase the dollar amount of ICFA funds, segregation of funds, establishment of the HUFs, and mandates on the use of HUF monies.(Id. at 5-6).
NWP seeks modification of the ICFAs, as it alleges that the application of a CPI adjustor to ICFA fees that are treated as HUFs places developers with ICFAs at a competitive disadvantage to those without ICFAs. (NWP Initial Br. at 7-10; NWP Reply Br. at 1, 6-7.) Specifically, NWP asserts the Settlement Agreement creates a competitive disadvantage as new developers will simply pay a HUF with no CPI adjustor. NWP argues that it is further placed at a disadvantage because NWP helped fund the acquisition of WUGT by GWRI, through payment of landowner fees under the ICFA, which will also benefit developers without ICFAs. (NWP Reply Br. at 3.) NWP contends that while this disadvantage is not addressed by the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement serves to give GWRI a restored balance sheet. NWP argues that such an outcome is unfair in light of NWP having had no practical alternative but to sign an ICFA with GWR if NWP wanted to develop its property. Further, NWP notes that GWRI created the problems associated with the ICFAs by failing to seek Commission approval of the agreements, and NWP argues that the Settlement Agreement would promote the economic principle of “moral hazard.”(Id. at 15-16).
NWP denies Staff’s assertion that NWP is simply trying to escape its contractual obligations, and notes that changed circumstances require modification of the ICFAs. Specifically, NWP cites changes under the Settlement Agreement including Staff’s prior rejection of GWRI’s ICFAs, the introduction of HUFs, recharacterization of landowner fees, and a formerly level playing field for
26 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
developers. NWP also questions the impact on rates of the implementation of the de-imputation of CIAC, a factor that NWP contends has not been fully analyzed by Staff or RUCO.(Id. at 12-14).
NWP further alleges that modification of the ICFAs is appropriate because NWP did not have the option of a traditional main extension agreement. Additionally, NWP argues that the recharacterization of the ICFA Landowner Payment to HUFs under the Settlement Agreement removes these payments from the financing requirements of the ICFA, and therefore avoids any inconsistency a modification order would have with the ICFA on this point. (NWP Initial Br. at 11-12). NWP further asserts that an order of the Commission would also prevent the CPI adjustor from eviscerating the “Most Favored Nation” clause within the ICFA, thereby maintaining the spirit of the ICFA.
NWP also contends that the public interest requires segregation and tracking of future landowner payments received by GWRI in excess of the HUFs paid under lCFAs. (NWP Initial Br. at 13; NWP Reply Br. at 7). According to NWP, the Settlement Agreement contains no mechanism to ensure that the funds paid, and to be paid by NWP, for the coordination and financing of construction of substantial regional infrastructure will actually be used in accordance with the terms of the ICFA. NWP argues that the public interest requires the Commission, at a minimum, to ensure these funds are ready and available to the utility that will provide the infrastructure when that becomes needed. (NWP Ex. 4 at 9-10.) However, NWP contends that the Settlement Agreement fails to include necessary safeguards to protect that portion of the Landowner Payments which exceeds the HUFs. Supporting the need for safeguards, NWP cites Global Parent’s failure to perform detailed calculations or undertake detailed cash-flow analysis regarding what a reasonable landowner payment would be under each agreement. (Ex. S-2 at 12-13.) NWP also points to the inadequacy of GWRI establishing separate ICFA bank accounts in Global Water’s last rate case, Docket No. SW-20445A-09-0077. (NWP Initial Br. at 15). NWP advocates alleviating these concerns by requiring: a segregated fund for all ICFA monies; an annual report to Utilities Division Staff of cash flow from these accounts; and an amendment to NWP’s ICFA to clarify that Landowner payments which are allocated as HUFs to WUGT and Hassayampa can be made directly to those utilities, and that the HUFs belong to those utilities and not GWRI.(Id. at 16).
27 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
NWP requests that the Commission order, as a condition to the Settlement Agreement, that NWP and SNR can fully fund the applicable HUFs of WUGT and Hassayampa in the combined amount of $3,500 out of the Landowner Payments due to GWRI under the ICFA.(Id. at 18). NWP cites the testimony of Global Water witness Mr. Walker as acquiescence to this amendment. (Tr. 467-468.) NWP also seeks amendment of the ICFAs to expressly permit direct payment of HUFs to the applicable utility providers. NWP again cites the testimony of Mr. Walker as indicating GWRI’s consent to such an amendment. (Tr. 590.)
NWP further expresses concerns that the Settlement Agreement contains inadequate enforcement mechanisms. NWP contends that the Settlement Agreement’s requirement that GWRI submit an affidavit attesting to compliance for the preceding year may be insufficient. NWP requests that the annual affidavits certify compliance by GWRI and all Global Water affiliates. (NWP Initial Br. at 21). NWP also seeks the addition of a provision clarifying that all GWRI affiliates are under the jurisdiction of the Commission as it relates to the Settlement Agreement and the ICFAs. NWP also requests an 8-year phase-in of the rate increase for WUGT, matching the gradual period provided by the Settlement Agreement for customers of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde, and sparing WUGT customers from a 96 percent rate increase as contemplated in the Settlement Agreement. (NWP Initial Br. at 21; NWP Reply Br. at 15, 18-19).
Discussion and Resolution of Settlement Agreement Issues
As described by the signatory parties through their testimony, exhibits, and briefs, the proposed Settlement Agreement offers a number of creative solutions to issues that would likely be unrealized in a fully litigated case. Among the terms negotiated by the parties are:
• | The Company’s rates in the Maricopa area (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde) are to be phased in over an eight-year period in order to reduce the rate increase used to repair Global Parent’s balance sheet through the de-imputation of ICFA fees.7 |
• | The non-Maricopa systems will have rate increases phased in over a three-year period. |
7 Mr. Walker testified that the imputation of ICFA funds as CIAC in the Company’s last rate case caused an $85 million net loss for Global Parent in 2010, and also created significant deferred tax assets for Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, and WUGT. He stated that de-imputation of the CIAC, as proposed by the Settlement, would mitigate the financial harm experienced by Global Parent and the affected utilities as a result of the last rate Decision. (Ex. A-13, at 17-18.)
28 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
• | No rate increase during the first year of the phase-in for any of the systems, and none of the revenue lost as a result of the phase-ins will be recovered by the Company. |
• | Global Water will not file any new rate applications until May 31, 2016 for systems outside of the Maricopa area, and not until May 31, 2017 for the Maricopa area utilities. |
• | The reduced revenue requirement in the Settlement Agreement, compared to the Company’s original request, is based on the use of Staff’s recommended expense levels, which are based on the Company’s expenses from the period of 2009-2010. |
• | The Settlement Agreement would reduce the Company’s cost of equity from the requested 11.44 percent to 9.5 percent, which would result in a revenue increase of less than 15 percent for the largest of the Company’s individual utilities (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde). |
• | The Settlement Agreement will help improve Global Parent’s financial condition by repairing its balance sheet and reversing an imputation of ICFA revenues as CIAC by the Commission in the Company’s last rate case. |
• | Global Water would be prohibited from entering into any new ICFAs, and would be required to adhere to Staff’s requested Code of Conduct; ICFA holders will benefit by helping ensure that the contracts they entered into are honored; and portions of payments under the ICFAs will be segregated in bank accounts, with a substantial sum being used to pay HUFs. |
• | Continuation and expansion of low income bill assistance programs. |
• | A rate design that allows for customers to earn a rebate for low water consumption. |
• | A “capping” of the increase in the rate for effluent and recycled water. |
Conditions to Settlement Agreement
Given the original litigation positions taken by the signatory parties, the various terms discussed above reflect compromises by those parties during the course of the negotiations, leading to a Settlement Agreement that the signatories could support. We find that the terms of the Agreement will produce rates that are just and reasonable in the context of this case, as long as several additional requirements are imposed as a condition of approval of the Settlement.
The first additional condition is that Global Water will be required to permit developers that are parties to ICFAs to fully fund the applicable HUFs out of the developer payments that are due under the ICFAs. Mr. Walker, on behalf of Global Water, testified during the hearing that this additional condition is acceptable to the Company and that Global Parent is willing to modify the ICFAs to reflect this change. (See Tr. 467-468.)
29 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
The second condition is that developers that are parties to ICFAs will be permitted to pay the HUF amounts directly to the applicable water or wastewater utilities, rather than to Global Parent, as is currently required under the ICFAs. At the hearing, Mr. Walker also agreed to this condition, and stated that Global Parent is willing to amend the ICFAs accordingly to allow payment directly to the utilities.(Id. at 468, 590.)
The next condition is that all of the Global Water entities, including GWRI, will be required to submit annual affidavits, signed by the highest officer of each entity, attesting that each of those signatory entities was compliant with the terms of the Settlement Agreement for the prior calendar year. Mr. Walker testified that the Company is agreeable to this additional condition, stating that it was a “great idea.”(Id.at 517.) The affidavits should be filed beginning February 1, 2015, and should continue to be filed by February 1 each successive year for the prior calendar year, until further order of the Commission.
Other Issues Raised by NWP and SNR
NWP and SNR contend, among other things, that the rate increase proposed in the Settlement will disproportionately affect the approximately 324 customers served by WUGT, who will experience an increase of approximately 96 percent over current rates, phased in over three years with no increase the first year. NWP and SNR requested that the increase be phased in over 8 years, as is proposed for the Santa Cruz and Palo Verde customers. We believe the Settlement’s rate treatment of different systems is reasonable given the circumstances of this case. As explained by the Company’s witness, if the WUGT rates had been based on the fair value of assets in rate base, the overall increase for WUGT would have been approximately $560,000, rather than the $199,983 proposed in the Settlement, which is based on an operating margin approach. (Ex. A-27, at 2.) Further, the 8-year phase-in for the Maricopa area utilities (Santa Cruz and Palo Verde) is applicable only to the part of the increase related to the “de-imputation��� of CIAC, which only affects rates in the Santa Cruz and Palo Verde systems at this time.
NWP and SNR also raised the issue of the Commission’s jurisdiction over GWRI, and whether the Commission could exercise enforcement authority over GWRI. Mr. Walker agreed that the Commission could enforce the terms of the Settlement for GWRI, and Mr. Olea stated that if any
30 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
of the Global entities, including Global Parent, failed to comply with the Settlement, Staff would initiate an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) proceeding to seek enforcement.(Id. at 699.) We find that by intervening in this proceeding and executing the Settlement Agreement, all of the Global entities, including GWRI, have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Commission for purposes of enforcement of the Settlement. We expect Staff to take appropriate actions in the event that any of the Global entities fails to comply with the terms of the Agreement, including the additional terms and conditions adopted in this Decision.
NWR and SNR further proposed that future ICFA payments to GWRI in excess of the HUF fees should be segregated and tracked to ensure that the funds designated to support the construction of utility infrastructure are available to the utilities when the infrastructure is needed. As described in Section 6.4.4 of the Settlement Agreement, after December 31, 2013, 70 percent of the ICFA payments are to be allocated to payment of the HUFs and the remaining 30 percent will go to Global Parent. (Ex. A-17, at § 6.4.4.) Although we understand the Developers’ concerns, we will not require the requested segregation and tracking of the funds paid in excess of the HUFs, as we believe appropriate terms are included in the Settlement to enable compliance enforcement and provide assurance that the underlying utilities will have the necessary funds to construct needed infrastructure. Moreover, as the Settlement Agreement recognizes, restoring the financial health of Global Parent is a critical component of the compromise reached by the parties and will ultimately benefit not only the Global Water utilities, but present and future customers and developers as well. We expect Global Parent to use the terms of the Settlement Agreement to restore its financial health, and ensure that the utility subsidiaries also remain financially healthy.
We agree with NWP and SNR that Global Parent’s unilateral decision to pursue ICFA financing invited the possibility that ICFA funds could be treated as contributions, as was determined in Decision No. 71878. At the same time, NWP and SNR are sophisticated developers that retained expert analysts and experienced regulatory counsel in negotiating the terms of the ICFAs, and entered into those agreements of their own volition. We believe that, with the additional conditions described above, adoption of the Settlement Agreement properly balances the interests of all stakeholders in a manner that will ensure just and reasonable rates, financially sound utility providers, and non-
31 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
discriminatory treatment of developers. The Settlement Agreement is therefore approved, with the conditions in the discussion above.
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Based on our adoption of the Settlement Agreement, as modified by the discussion herein, revenue increases for each of the utilities/divisions are authorized as follows:
Santa Cruz
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Santa Cruz’s gross revenue should increase by $1,556,046, or 14.87 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | 37,918,570 | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | 1,908,343 | |||
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | 7.50% | |||
Required Operating Income | $2,843,893 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | 935,550 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.663243 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $1,556,046 |
Palo Verde
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Palo Verde’s gross revenue should increase by $1,888,939, or 14.41 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | 60,156,756 | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | 3,393,928 | |||
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | 7.50% | |||
Required Operating Income | $4,512,507 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | 1,118,579 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.688694 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $1,888,939 |
Valencia-Town
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Valencia-Town’s gross revenue should increase by $252,554, or 5.11 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | 2,251,949 | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | 17,649 | |||
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | 7.50% | |||
Required Operating Income | $168,896 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | 151,247 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6698 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $252,554 |
32 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia-Greater Buckeye
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Valencia-Greater Buckeye’s gross revenue should increase by $9,289, or 2.01 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $634,979 | |||
Adjusted Operating Income | 42,015 | |||
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | 7.50% | |||
Required Operating Income | $47,623 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | 5,608 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6563 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $9,289 |
WUNS
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale’s gross revenue should not be increased.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | (181,978) | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | 23,472 | |||
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | N/A | |||
Current Operating Margin | 15.91% | |||
Required Operating Income | $23,472 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | - | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.629 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | - |
WUGT
Based on our findings herein, we determine that the WUGT’s gross revenue should increase by $199,983, or 96.28 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | 2,206,817 | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | (78,593) | |||
Operating Margin | 10.0% | |||
Required Operating Income | $40,786 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | $119,379 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6752 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $199,983 |
Willow Valley
Based on our findings herein, we determine that Willow Valley’s gross revenue should increase by $404,269, or 57.53 percent.
Fair Value Rate Base | $ | 2,278,955 | ||
Adjusted Operating Income | (71,868) |
33 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Required Fair Value Rate of Return | 7.50% | |||
Required Operating Income | $170,922 | |||
Operating Income Deficiency | 242,790 | |||
Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.665100 | |||
Gross Revenue Increase | $404,269 |
Summary of Rates By System
Set forth below is a summary of the rates proposed by the Settlement Agreement, on a system-by-system basis, as contained in the H Schedules attached to the Settlement.
Santa Cruz
Currently, a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter water customer in the Santa Cruz system with median usage of 5,000 gallons per month receives a bill of $31.10 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, but would experience an increase of $1.36, to $32.46 (4.4 percent), in 2015; an increase of $2.11, to $33.21 (6.8 percent), in 2016;8 an increase of $2.34, to $33.44 (7.5 percent), in 2017; an increase of $2.58, to $33.68 (8.3 percent), in 2018; an increase of $2.81, to $33.91 (9.0 percent), in 2019; an increase of $3.05, to $34.16 (9.8 percent), in 2020; and an increase of $3.07, to $34.18 (9.9 percent), in 2021.
Palo Verde
Currently, a wastewater customer with a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch water meter in the Palo Verde system receives a bill of $62.91 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same wastewater customer would receive no increase in 2014, but would experience an increase of $1.43, to $64.34 (2.3 percent), in 2015; an increase of $2.97, to $65.88 (5.9 percent), in 2016; an increase of $3.70, to $66.61 (5.9 percent), in 2017; an increase of $4.43, to $67.34 (7.0 percent), in 2018; an increase of $5.15, to $68.06 (8.2 percent), in 2019; an increase of $5.88, to $68.79 (9.3 percent), in 2020; and an increase of $6.62, to $69.53 (10.5 percent), in 2021.
Valencia-Town
Currently, a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter water customer in the Valencia-Town Division system with median usage of 5,500 gallons per month receives a bill of $35.16 per month. Under the rates
8 | All of the listed dollar and percentage increases are cumulative, compared to current rates. |
34 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, but would experience an increase of $1.40, to $36.56 (4.0 percent), in 2015; and an increase of $1.93, to $37.09 (5.5 percent), in 2016.
Valencia-Greater Buckeye
Currently, a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter water customer in the Valencia-Greater Buckeye Division system with median usage of 6,500 gallons per month receives a bill of $37.17 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, and would experience a decrease of $(0.36), to $36.81 (1.0 percent decrease), in 2015; and an increase of $0.07, to $37.24 (0.2 percent), in 2016.
WUNS
Currently, a 1-inch meter water customer in the WUNS system with median usage of 10,500 gallons per month receives a bill of $116.50 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, and would experience a decrease of $(6.34), to $110.16 (0.5 percent decrease), in 2015.
WUGT
Currently, a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter water customer in the WUGT system with median usage of 5,000 gallons per month receives a bill of $27.58 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, but would experience an increase of $10.05, to $37.63 (36.5 percent), in 2015; and an increase of $22.49, to $50.07 (81.6 percent), in 2016.
Willow Valley
Currently, a 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter water customer in the Willow Valley system with median usage of 2,500 gallons per month receives a bill of $24.40 per month. Under the rates approved herein, by adoption of the Settlement Agreement, the same median usage customer would receive no increase in 2014, but would experience an increase of $6.17, to $30.57 (25.3 percent), in 2015; and an increase of $12.63, to $37.03 (51.8 percent), in 2016.
System Improvement Benefit Mechanism
The System Improvement Benefit (“SIB”) mechanism is the only issue in this case that was
35 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
not addressed in the Settlement Agreement. The SIB mechanism is supported by the Company and Staff and opposed by RUCO and WVCA.9 The Company and Staff request that the Commission authorize the Company to implement the SIB mechanism only for the Willow Valley system. The Company and Staff further request that the SIB mechanism authorized in this case follow the same requirements as the SIB mechanisms authorized in the recent Arizona Water – Northern Group10 and Arizona Water – Eastern Group11 rate cases (Decision Nos. 74081 and 73938, respectively).12
Positions of the Parties
Global Water
The Company asserts that the Commission should approve its requested SIB mechanism because Willow Valley’s pipeline distribution system is in need of urgent and substantial repairs. The Company has developed a 20-year plan to repair the system which will result in replacing most of the distribution system. During the first five years of that plan, the Company is proposing to utilize the requested SIB mechanism to repair the area with the most urgent need. According to the Company, the Willow Valley system suffers from numerous and recurring line breaks; the pipes in this area are 50 years old; the pipes are inadequately sized, four-inch, asbestos cement pipes; the pipes are located in backyards, making them difficult to access; and, in at least one case, the pipes are located near septic systems, creating health and safety concerns.
The Company believes that the SIB mechanism is an appropriate vehicle for addressing these repairs because of the benefits associated with implementing that mechanism. Specifically, the Company maintains that the SIB mechanism will benefit customers by improving system reliability and water quality as well as promoting rate gradualism. According to the Company, the SIB mechanism will allow the Company to replace and upgrade its aging infrastructure in a timely and efficient manner, while providing more gradual and smaller rate impacts on those customers. The Company also maintains that the SIB mechanism will reduce regulatory lag which will improve the Company’s cash flow and enhance its capability to attract the equity and debt investment needed to
9 | The remaining parties to this case did not take a position on whether the Commission should implement a SIB mechanism for the Willow Valley system. |
10 | Docket No. W-01445A-12-0348. |
11 | Docket No. W-01445A-ll-0310. |
12 | The SIB mechanisms approved in these Decisions contain, and are subject to, the same conditions and requirements. |
36 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
fund these projects. The Company states that it is in agreement with all requirements of the SIB mechanism approved by the Commission in the Arizona Water – Northern Group rate case (Decision No. 74081).
In response to RUCO’s legal arguments, the Company claims that the proposed SIB mechanism complies with all applicable legal requirements regarding ratemaking, including the fair value requirement of the Arizona Constitution. The Company asserts that the SIB mechanism is an adjustor mechanism that is designed to provide for the timely recovery of plant costs. Contrary to RUCO’s position, the Company contends that adjustor mechanisms are not limited to expenses, but may also include plant costs. The Company claims that there are numerous examples of other adjustor mechanisms approved by the Commission that involve plant costs including the Arsenic Cost Recovery Mechanism (“ACRM”) and Arizona Public Service Company’s renewable energy, energy efficiency/demand side management, and environmental improvement surcharge adjustors. The Company also notes that many ratemaking authorities and treatises recognize that adjustors may be utilized for costs, not just expenses. In addition, the Company notes that Pennsylvania courts have recognized that distribution system improvement charges (“DSICs”) are adjustor mechanisms.
The Company disputes RUCO’s assertion that Scates requires adjustor mechanisms to relate to “narrowly defined, operating expenses.” (Scates v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 118 Ariz. 531, 535, 578 P.2d 612, 616 (App. 1978)). According to the Company, the cited language relied upon by RUCO is dicta because Scates did not involve a plant-based adjustor mechanism. The Company contends that the holding of Scates is that the Commission is required to ascertain the fair value of a utility’s property in setting just and reasonable rates. The Company asserts that the Commission will be able to ascertain fair value in a manner consistent with Scates because each SIB surcharge filing is required to include an analysis of the impact of the SIB plant on the fair value rate base, revenue, and the fair value rate of return. In addition, the Company notes that each SIB filing is required to provide: the most current balance sheet at the time of the filing; the most current income statement; an earnings test schedule; a rate review schedule (including the incremental and pro forma effects of the proposed increase); a revenue-requirement calculation; a surcharge calculation; an adjusted rate base schedule; a Construction Work In Progress (“CWIP”) ledger (for each project showing
37 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
accumulation of charges by month and paid vendor invoices); a calculation of the three-factor formula (as requested by Staff); and a typical bill analysis under present and proposed rates.
The Company asserts that even if the Commission were to determine that the SIB mechanism is not an adjustor mechanism, it is still a lawful surcharge authorizing rate increases based on a determination of the Company’s rate base, pursuant to the holding in Residential Utility Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 199 Ariz. 588, 20 P.3d 1169 (App. 2001) (“Rio Verde”).The Company claims that contrary to RUCO’s contention, the Arizona Constitution does not require that the Commission take all ratemaking elements into consideration as would be done in a general rate case, but rather only requires that the fair value of a utility’s property be ascertained when setting rates. The Company contends that once fair value is ascertained, as would be done each time a SIB surcharge adjustment is approved, the Commission has ample discretion to use the fair value in setting rates or adjusting a surcharge.
The Company notes that RUCO’s arguments against the SIB are similar to arguments raised in other cases. The Company contends that RUCO’s arguments should be rejected for the same reasons the Commission rejected them in the Arizona Water – Eastern Group and Arizona Water – Northern Group cases.
Staff
According to Staff, the Company has produced sufficient evidence to justify approval of a SIB mechanism for Willow Valley in this case. Staff cites current problems with the Willow Valley system, including: aged, fragile and corroded pipes; absence of looping; pipes located in customer backyards, impeding access and raising public health concerns due to nearby septic systems; inoperable valves; inadequate fire hydrants; high level of line breaks; and high level of water loss. Staff believes that the Company’s proposed five-year infrastructure replacement plan, at a cost of $878,233 (proposed to be recovered under the SIB mechanism), is both reasonable and appropriate.
Staff states that the Company is requesting that the SIB be governed by all of the conditions and requirements that are set forth in Decision No. 73938. Staff further states that the Company has agreed to codify the SIB mechanism, if authorized, in a Plan of Administration that would tailor the SIB for Willow Valley to the specifics of this case. Staff cites some of the key provisions of the SIB
38 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
mechanism, as set forth in Decision No. 73938, as follows:
• | Approval of SIB-Eligible Projects – All SIB-eligible projects must be reviewed by Staff and approved by the Commission prior to being included in the SIB surcharge. All of the projects must be completed and placed into service prior to being included in the SIB surcharge. Willow Valley must file a report with the Commission every six months summarizing the status of all SIB-eligible projects. |
• | Costs Eligible for SIB Recovery – Cost recovery under the SIB mechanism is allowed for the pre-tax return on investment and depreciation expense associated with those projects, net of associated plant retirements. The rate of return, depreciation rates, gross revenue conversion factor and tax multiplier are to be the same as established in this case. |
• | Efficiency Credit – The SIB surcharge will include an efficiency credit equal to five percent of the SIB revenue requirement. |
• | Surcharge Cap – The amount that can be collected annually by each SIB surcharge filing is limited to 5 percent of the revenue requirement established. |
• | Timing of SIB Surcharge Filing – The Company: may file up to five SIB surcharge requests between rate case decisions; may make no more than one SIB surcharge filing every 12 months; may not make an initial SIB surcharge filing prior to 12 months following the effective date of a decision in this case; must make an annual SIB surcharge filing to true-up its surcharge collections; and, must file a new rate case application no later than June 30, 2018, with a test year ending no later than December 31, 2017, at which time any SlB surcharge then in effect would be reviewed for inclusion in base rates in that proceeding and the surcharge would be reset to zero. |
• | SIB Rate Design – The SIB surcharge will be a fixed monthly charge on customers’ bills, with the surcharge and efficiency credit listed as separate line items. The surcharge will increase proportionately based on customer meter size. |
• | Commission Approval of SIB Surcharge – Each SIB surcharge must be approved by the Commission prior to implementation. Upon filing of the SIB surcharge application, Staff and RUCO would have 30 days to review the filing and dispute and/or file a request for the Commission to alter the surcharge or true-up surcharge/credit. |
• | Public Notice – At least 30 days prior to a SIB surcharge becoming effective, the Company is required to provide public notice to customers in the form of a bill insert or customer letter. The notice must include: the individual surcharge amount by meter size; the individual efficiency credit by meter size; the individual true-up surcharge/credit by meter size; and, a summary of the project included in the current surcharge filing, including a description of each project and its cost. |
39 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
According to Staff, the SIB also requires that the Company file the following information with each SIB adjustment: the most current balance sheet at the time of the filing; the most current income statement; an earnings test schedule; a rate review schedule (including the incremental and pro forma effects of the proposed increase; a revenue requirement calculation; a surcharge calculation; an adjusted rate base schedule; a CWIP ledger (for each project showing accumulation of charges by month and paid vendor invoices); calculation of the three-factor formula; and a typical bill analysis under present and proposed rates.
Staff also notes that the SIB requires the Company to perform an earnings test calculation for each initial filing and annual report filing to determine whether the actual rate of return reflected by the operating income for the Willow Valley system for the relevant 12-month period exceeded the most recently authorized fair value rate of return. Staff explains that the earnings test is to be: based on the most recent available operating income, adjusted for any operating revenue and expense adjustments adopted in the most recent general rate case; and, based on the rate base adopted in the most recent general rate case, updated to recognize changes in plant, accumulated depreciation, CIAC, Advances In Aid of Construction (“AIAC”), and accumulated deferred income taxes through the most recent available financial statement (quarterly or longer). According to Staff, if the earnings test calculation shows that the Company will exceed its authorized rate of return with the implementation of the surcharge, the surcharge may not go into effect. However, Staff further explained that if the earnings test calculation shows that the Company will exceed its authorized rate of return with the implementation of the full surcharge, then the Company may request that the Commission authorize a lesser surcharge amount provided that lesser amount does not exceed the Company’s authorized rate of return.
Staff provided estimated revenue and customer bill impacts associated with the SIB mechanism under the assumption that Willow Valley will not over-earn during the five-year pendency of the SIB mechanism. With respect to revenues, Staff estimates that Willow Valley will collect through the SIB surcharge, after deduction of the efficiency credit, total additional revenue of $316,603. With respect to the impact on customer bills, Staff estimates that a median use 5/8-inch x 3⁄4-inch meter customer would pay, as the applicable SIB surcharge amount, an additional $1.21 in
40 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
2015, $2.17 in 2016, $2.95 in 2017, $3.65 in 2018, and $4.80 in 2019.(See Attachment B hereto for a summary of estimated surcharges for Willow Valley, by year and meter size.)
Staff contends that the SIB mechanism comports with the requirements of the Arizona Constitution because it provides ample opportunity for the Commission to ascertain the Company’s fair value rate base. Staff points out that the SIB mechanism requires the Company to provide updated financial information (including a balance sheet, income statement, earnings test schedule, rate review schedule, revenue requirement calculation, surcharge calculation, and adjusted rate base schedule) as part of the filing package every time it seeks Commission authorization to enact a SIB surcharge. According to Staff, this information will enable the Commission to update the fair value rate base finding and determine the impact of the revenues (with the addition of the proposed SIB surcharge) on the Company’s fair value rate of return. Staff asserts that it is not reasonable to suggest that the Commission would not use the updated fair value information “to aid it in the proper discharge of its duties...” as required by the Constitution. (Arizona Constitution, Article 15, § 14). Staff also notes that the SIB surcharge cannot go into effect without a Commission order and, ultimately, the Commission may terminate the SIB at any time.
Staff argues that the Commission has broad discretion in employing appropriate rate setting methodologies. Staff cites Simms v. Round Valley Light & Power Co., wherein the Arizona Supreme Court stated that “[t]he commission in exercising its rate-making power of necessity has a range of legislative discretion and so long as that discretion is not abused, the court cannot substitute its judgment as to what is fair value or a just and reasonable rate.” (80 Ariz. 145, 154, 294 P.2d 378, 384, internal citation omitted.) Staff claims that the SIB mechanism would allow the Commission to implement a series of step rate increases, only after making an updated fair value finding, as a means of enabling the Company to undertake substantial infrastructure replacements without having to file a series of rate cases – which the courts have found would not be in the public interest.(Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Ariz. Public Service Co., 113 Ariz. 368, 371, 555 P.2d 326, 329 (1976).) Staff also citesArizona Community Action Assoc. v. Ariz. Corporation Comm’n, wherein the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the Commission’s approval of step increases associated with CWIP additions (although the court rejected using APS’ return on equity as the sole criterion for triggering an increase). (123 Ariz.
41 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
228, 229-231, 599 P.2d 184, 186-187.) In that case, the court stated that it did not find fault with the Commission’s attempt to avoid a constant series of extended rate hearings by allowing step increases based upon the updated CWIP adjustments.(Id.)Staff contends that the SIB mechanism does not suffer from the “sole criterion” deficiency rejected by the court because the SIB does not employ an earnings test, or any other test, that would be subject to control by the Company.
Staff disputes RUCO’s “single issue ratemaking” arguments, claiming that contrary to RUCO’s assertions, the Arizona Constitution does not include that terminology, and under the holding in Scates, a full rate case is not required for every rate adjustment given the court’s statement that “[t]here may well be exceptional situations in which the Commission may authorize partial rate increases without requiring entirely new submissions.”(Scates, 118 Ariz. at 537, 578 P.2d at 618.) The court in Scates stated that it was not deciding “whether the Commission could have referred to previous submissions with some updating or whether it could have accepted summary financial information.”(Id.)Staff claims that the SIB mechanism requires updated information to be submitted by the Company and there is no reason to assume that the Commission would not consider that information in its evaluation of each SIB surcharge filing.
Staff points out that the SIB mechanism has a number of protections built in, including that: it was developed within the context of a full rate case; it is limited to replacement projects used to serve existing customers; the surcharge would be capped at five percent of the approved revenue requirement, subject to true-up; the Company would be required to file a full rate case within five years from the date of the order; each step increase can only be implemented after approval by the Commission and only after a fair value finding and earnings test which indicates that the Company will not be earning more than its authorized rate of return; the SIB mechanism may be suspended by the Commission; and the Company will be required to perform the same earnings test approved in Decision No. 73938.
Staff disputes RUCO’s statement that “[r]atepayers are likely to pay higher rates over time because of the failure to consider all of the rate case elements at each SIB filing.” (Staff Reply Br. at 20). According to Staff, this statement is anecdotal in nature and is not based upon any evidence in the record. In addition, Staff disputes RUCO’s contention that rate gradualism will come at the
42 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
expense of rate stability. According to Staff, the amount of the annual rate change each year is small and its implementation over time will prevent rate shock at the Company’s next rate case.
Staff also disputes RUCO’s claim that the record evidence is insufficient to determine how the SIB mechanism will operate and asserts that the record is clear that the same requirements and conditions applicable to the SIB that were adopted in the Arizona Water – Eastern Group and Arizona Water – Northern Group rate cases apply to the SIB in this case. Staff points out that, under the SIB proposal in this case, the Company will file a Plan of Administration which contains all of the requirements and conditions on the SIB’s operation in this case.
Staff further disputes RUCO’s claim that there was insufficient time for Staff to do an adequate analysis of the SIB mechanism in this case. According to Staff, it performed a thorough review of the proposed SIB mechanism. Staff cites the testimony of Staff Witness Jian Liu who testified that he worked with the Company on the SIB mechanism for several months before the Company filed their schedules on September 4, 2013. Staff claims that the Company responded to all of Staff’s concerns prior to filing its final SIB schedules.
RUCO
RUCO contends that the SIB mechanism inappropriately shifts risk from the Company to ratepayers without adequate financial consideration to the ratepayer. RUCO asserts that the SIB mechanism is inequitable because it reduces regulatory lag in favor of the Company without adjusting for (and flowing through to ratepayers) any actual cost savings attributable to the new plant. According to RUCO, this creates a mismatch that works against the ratepayers’ interests and assures that ratepayers will not pay their actual cost of service, and will more than likely pay more over time. RUCO claims that, to the extent that ratepayers receive a benefit through the efficiency credit component of the SIB mechanism, that “paltry benefit” will only inure to ratepayers in the Company’s next rate case filing. (RUCO Br. at 4).
RUCO disputes that the SIB mechanism promotes rate gradualism. According to RUCO, ratepayers are likely to pay higher rates over time because the SIB filings do not provide enough information for the Commission to consider every element of a full rate case. RUCO also claims that the concept of rate gradualism is at odds with the concept of rate stability in that ratepayers’ rates will
43 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
change yearly as a result of each SIB filing.
RUCO argues that the SIB is not an adjustor mechanism or an interim rate, which it claims are the only exceptions recognized by the courts to the constitutional requirement of ascertaining and employing a company’s fair value rate base in setting rates. RUCO cites the Scates and Rio Verdedecisions by the Court of Appeals to support its contention that adjustor mechanisms may only be used to adjust narrowly defined operating expenses, such as fuel costs, and that an adjustor clause may only be implemented as part of a full rate hearing.(Scates, 118 Ariz. 531, 535, 578 P.2d 612, 616; Rio Verde, 199 Ariz. 588, 592, 20 P.3d 1169, 1173.) RUCO also cites the following excerpt from Decision No. 56450 (April 13, 1989) to support its claim that the Commission has defined adjustor mechanisms as applying to expenses that routinely fluctuate widely:
The principal justification for a fuel adjustor is volatility in fuel prices. A fuel adjustor allows the Commission to approve changes in rates for a utility in response to volatile changes in fuel or purchased power prices without having to conduct a rate case.
(Decision No. 56450 at 6). RUCO claims that the proposed SIB mechanism is not an adjustor mechanism because its purpose is not to make automatic adjustments for fluctuating operating expenses, but instead only serves to increase the Company’s rate base and thus, its operating income. RUCO asserts that the SIB only allows rates to adjust upwards as a result of permitting recovery of SIB-eligible plant costs, and that the SIB is not the type of adjustment mechanism contemplated by the court in Scates.
According to RUCO, the only other exception to a fair value finding is when interim rates are implemented, which would require the Commission find the existence of an emergency; the posting of a bond by the utility; and an undertaking by the Commission to determine final rates after a valuation of the utility’s property.(Rio Verde, 199 Ariz. at 591, 20 P.3d at 1172.) RUCO points out that the Company has neither asserted an emergency, nor requested interim rates in this case. RUCO cites Arizona Attorney General Opinion No. 71-17, which defined an emergency as when “sudden change brings hardship to a company, when a company is insolvent, or when the condition of the company is such that its ability to maintain service pending a formal rate determination is in serious
44 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
doubt.” RUCO asserts that the Company cannot claim an emergency in this case because there is no evidence of a sudden change that has brought hardship, no evidence of insolvency, and no evidence that the Company has an inability to maintain service in the interim. RUCO argues that the Commission should not use the “emergency exception” or the adjustor mechanism liberally as an excuse to set aside the rule of finding fair value when setting rates. (RUCO Br. at 8).
RUCO asserts that the Arizona Constitution’s fair value requirement would not be satisfied if rate increases were granted under the proposed SIB mechanism. RUCO claims that the SIB mechanism is a cost recovery mechanism designed to side step the fair value requirement. According to RUCO, such cost recovery mechanisms should only be allowed in extraordinary circumstances and there is nothing extraordinary about this case.
RUCO argues that there is no evidence as to how the SIB mechanism will be employed and whether it meets the fair value requirement. RUCO points out that no Plan of Administration has been filed. RUCO concedes that there is testimony in the record from Mr. Walker, Mr. Fleming, and Mr. Liu as to how the SIB mechanism will work, but asserts that none of these witnesses “explain the mechanics of the mechanism.” (RUCO Br. at 10). RUCO states its assumption that the proposed SIB in this case will follow the SIB approved in the Arizona Water – Eastern Group rate case, but asserts that the parties have not had enough time to do an adequate analysis of the SIB mechanism in this case. RUCO contends that when the Company ultimately files its request to implement the SIB surcharge, the Commission will not be making a fair value determination that is meaningful. RUCO asserts that the absence of a meaningful fair value determination renders the SIB constitutionally deficient, effectively making it illegal in Arizona.
In response to the Company’s assertion that the SIB will allow the Company to repair and replace Willow Valley’s aging infrastructure, RUCO claims that the Company has had that infrastructure for 50 years and criticizes the Company for failing to take earlier action. RUCO also disputes the urgency of these repairs, noting that the Company has developed a 20-year plan to repair and replace most of Willow Valley’s distribution system. According to RUCO, the Company should make the repairs and recover the costs associated with these repairs utilizing traditional ratemaking procedures over time.
45 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
RUCO asserts that the benefits of the SIB are far greater to the Company than the ratepayer. According to RUCO, the SIB will allow the Company to recover and earn a return on plant placed into rate base in between rate cases; this plant will be considered alone outside of a rate case and not along with all the other rate case elements; and the plant being considered is routine infrastructure. RUCO recognizes a possible benefit to the ratepayer of more frequent and smaller rate increases, but contends that this benefit will be offset because the SIB removes the Company’s incentive to effectively manage its costs in between rate cases; the five percent efficiency credit is not a quid pro quo benefit to the ratepayer; and the SIB results in inflated rates since it does not recognize the actual operational efficiencies associated with the replacement of old plant with new plant.
RUCO contends that the underlying purpose of the SIB has evolved since the Commission first considered (but rejected) the implementation of a DSIC mechanism in Arizona Water’s 2008 rate case (Decision No. 71845).13 According to RUCO, one of the concerns of the Commission in that rate case was for Arizona Water to achieve a water loss of less than 10 percent in a cost effective manner. RUCO contends that granting a SIB in this case is at odds with the spirit of Decision No. 71845 because: the SIB is not addressing water loss; and the SIB is not cost effective for ratepayers and will result in inflated rates.
RUCO criticizes the Company’s citation to the ACRM to support the proposition that the SIB mechanism is a valid adjustor mechanism. RUCO points out that the legality of the ACRM has never been challenged or reviewed by Arizona courts. Therefore, according to RUCO, the ACRM is irrelevant to the issue of whether the SIB mechanism is lawful under Arizona law.
RUCO disputes Staff’s assertion that the financial updates filed by the Company as part of the SIB surcharge filings would satisfy the fair value requirement. According to RUCO, Staff’s premise is misguided because it is not supported by case law and suggests that utilities may provide yearly updates to its rate base in lieu of filing an actual rate case.
WVCA
WVCA agrees that there is a need for system improvements and that the improvements
13 | Docket No. W-01445A-08-0440. |
46 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley has identified should be made. However, WVCA argues that a SIB mechanism is an extraordinary mechanism that is neither appropriate nor warranted for the Willow Valley system. According to WVCA, the purpose of the SIB mechanism is to encourage a utility to invest in water infrastructure where the normal ratemaking process has proved to be inadequate and to help alleviate rate shock. WVCA argues that there is no evidence to demonstrate that a SIB mechanism is needed for the Willow Valley system. As a result, WVCA maintains that Willow Valley should make the needed improvements and seek to recover a rate of return thereon under the traditional ratemaking process.
WVCA contends that a SIB mechanism is not justified in this case because the condition of the Willow Valley system should have been considered by the Company when it acquired the system in 2006; there is no evidence that the Company is financially unable to make the necessary improvements without the SIB mechanism; the depreciation expense collected by Willow Valley over the next five years (approximately $1,069,140) is sufficient to cover the estimated costs of the projects Willow Valley has identified for the SIB mechanism (approximately $876,233); and the SIB mechanism will not alleviate rate shock. Although WVCA acknowledges that rate shock will be softened by phasing in the rates requested in this case, WVCA argues that the benefit of phasing in rates will be tempered if the SIB surcharges are added to rates during the phase-in. WVCA also argues that it will be impossible for the Commission to evaluate the need and appropriateness of the SIB mechanism because there is no evidence as to the estimated level of the SIB surcharge; no evidence as to how those surcharges will impact Willow Valley’s customers; and no evidence as to how inclusion of the specific projects in the SIB mechanism will help to avoid rate shock for Willow Valley customers. WVCA also expresses concern that Willow Valley customers will not understand the purpose or mechanics of the SIB mechanism because the Company has not submitted a corresponding tariff or Plan of Administration.
In the event the Commission grants the Company’s request to implement a SIB mechanism for Willow Valley, WVCA alternatively argues that the following conditions be imposed: (1) the SIB mechanism should be set forth in a separate tariff, together with a Plan of Administration; (2) the SIB surcharge should be implemented no earlier than 2016; (3) the estimated cost submitted for a project
47 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
should be the maximum amount Willow Valley can recover under the SIB surcharge for that project; (4) Willow Valley should be required to demonstrate that the dollars received as depreciation expense are being placed back into plant, or held in reserve for that purpose as part of the SIB evaluation; and (5) Willow Valley not seek another rate increase, other than the SIB mechanism, until 2017 based upon a test year no later than December 31, 2016. (WVCA Ex. 1 at 3-4).
Discussion of SIB Issue
The Commission generally must determine a fair value rate base and apply a rate of return to that rate base when it develops rates. The case law interpreting the Commission’s constitutional duties state that the Commission may diverge from this ratemaking method when authorizing interim rates in the event of an emergency(i.e., interim rates), and when the Commission authorizes (in a rate case) an automatic adjustor mechanism to address specific costs occurring subsequent to the rate case. Scates suggests that there may be exceptional situations that warrant a departure from the usual method. RUCO takes issue with the Company’s comparison of its current situation to ACRMs, and asserted that Willow Valley’s current infrastructure replacement needs do not rise to the level of an exceptional situation.
Legal Issues
The Company, Staff, and RUCO discussed in their post-hearing briefs the legality of a SIB under Arizona law. Arizona Constitution, Article XV, § 14 provides: “The Corporation Commission shall, to aid it in the proper discharge of its duties, ascertain the fair value of the property within the State of every public service corporation doing business therein . . . .” This language has been interpreted to require the Commission to establish a utility’s authorized rates by applying a fair rate of return to the fair value of the utility’s property devoted to the public use at the time of the inquiry (or as near as possible thereto), as determined by the Commission based upon all available relevant evidence.(See, e.g., Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Arizona Water Co., 85 Ariz. 198, 203-04, 335 P.2d 412, 415 (Ariz. 1959)).
The Arizona Supreme Court has clarified that “the Commission in its discretion can consider matters subsequent to the historic year” when establishing fair value rate base in a rate case.(Arizona Public Service, 113 Ariz. 368, 371, 555 P.2d 326, 328-29 (1976)), and has specifically approved the
48 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
portion of a Commission decision that allowed inclusion of CWIP for plant that was under construction during the test year and would go into service within two years after the effective date of a Step II increase, when the step increase methodology had been created in a full permanent rate case that included a determination of fair value.(Arizona Cmty. Action, 123 Ariz. 228, 230, 599 P.2d 184, 186.)
In Arizona Public Service, the Arizona Supreme Court held that although the Commission must ascertain fair value, it was not prohibited from taking into consideration in its fair value determination the addition of CWIP after the end of the test year. In so finding, the court stated:
A plant under construction is at least a relevant factor which the Commission could consider in determining fair value. The attorney general’s opinion would cut off consideration of any facts subsequent to the historic year. In Simms v. Round Valley, supra, we said: ‘Fair value means the value of properties at the time of inquiry (citing cases),’ and ‘(t)his is necessary for the reason that the company is entitled to a reasonable return upon the fair value of its properties at the time the rate is fixed.’ From the foregoing, it is obvious that the Commission in its discretion can consider matters subsequent to the test year, bearing in mind that all parties are entitled to a reasonable opportunity to rebut evidence presented. Construction projects contracted for and commenced during the historical year may certainly be considered by the Commission upon the cutoff time previously indicated. We would not presume to instruct the Commission as to how it should exercise its legislative functions. However, it appears to be in the public interest to have stability in the rate structure within the bounds of fairness and equity rather than a constant series of rate hearings.
(113 Ariz. at 371,555P.2d at 329 (internal citations omitted).) The Arizona Supreme Court reinforced this view in Arizona Community Action, by affirming the Commission’s decision to allow inclusion of CWIP in APS’ rate base within two years of a Step II rate increase. (123 Ariz. 228, 230- 231, 599 P. 2d 184, 186-187.) In that case, the court considered whether it was permissible for the Commission to authorize a rate of return based on plant construction in progress but not yet in service, which would result in five percent step increases over a three-year time period (1977-1979). Although the court struck down the tying of step increases solely to APS’ return on equity, it found
49 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
the Commission’s inclusion of funds expended on CWIP to be “entirely reasonable.” (Id.) With respect to the legality of the step increase approved by the Commission, the court stated:
In view of [Arizona Public Service], supra, we find entirely reasonable that portion of the Commission’s decision allowing the inclusion of [CWIP] to go on line within two years from the effective date of the Step II increase. Nor do we find fault with the Commission’s attempt to comply with our indication in [Arizona Public Service], supra, that a constant series of rate hearings are not necessary to protect the public interest. The hearing culminating in the order of August 1, 1977, resulted in a determination of fair value.The adjustments ordered by the Commission in adding the CWIP to that determination of fair value were adequate to maintain a reasonable compliance with the constitutional requirements if used only for a limited period of time.
((Id.)(emphasis added.)
As a general proposition, we recognize that the courts have consistently required that the Commission find fair value before allowing an adjustment in rates. As indicated above, exceptions to the requirement to base rates on a monopolistic utility’s fair value rate base have typically been recognized for interim rate increases when an emergency exists, and for rate increases caused by automatic adjustment clauses, when the automatic adjustment clause itself is created in a permanent rate case that meets all legal requirements and the clause is designed to ensure that the utility’s profit or rate of return is unchanged by application of the clause. (See Rio Verde, supra, 199 Ariz. 588, 20 P.3d 1169; Scates, supra, 118 Ariz. 531, 578 P.2d 612; Arizona Attorney General Opinion No. 71- 17.)
However, in Scates, the Court of Appeals indicated that in exceptional circumstances the Commission may adjust rates outside of a full rate case. Although the court found the Commission did not have authority to allow increases between rate cases to certain of a telephone company’s charges without a consideration of the impact on the company’s rate of return and financial condition, the court suggested that updated submissions may be permitted to adjust rates between full rate cases. Thus, in Scates, the appellate court suggested a third exception to the general rule:
We do not need to decide in this case whether as a matter of law there must be a de novo compliance with all provisions of the order in connection with every increase in rates. The Commission here not only failed to require any submissions, but also failed to make any
50 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
examination whatsoever of the company’s financial condition, and to make any determination of whether the increase would affect the utility’s rate of return. There may well be exceptional situations in which the Commission may authorize partial rate increases without requiring entirely new submissions. We do not decide in this case, for example, whether the Commission could have referred to previous submissions with some updating or whether it could have accepted summary financial information.
(118 Ariz. 531, at 537, 578 P.2d 612, at 618.)
In Rio Verde, the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether the Commission properly approved a surcharge to recover increased CAP water expenses between rate cases without ascertaining the utility company’s fair value. The court, citing Simms and Arizona Public Service,held that the Arizona Constitution requires the Commission to determine the company’s fair value, and the justness and reasonableness of the rates must be related to this fair value. (199 Ariz. 588, at 591, 20 P.3d 1169, at 1172.)
However, the courts have also consistently upheld the Commission’s broad discretion to use fair value in a manner that recognizes changing regulatory circumstances. For example, in US West II, supra, the Arizona Supreme Court recognized that although a fair value finding is required under the Constitution, the Commission was not bound by a “rigid formula” in setting just and reasonable rates. (201 Ariz. at 246, 34 P.3d at 355.) Although the court in US West II was considering fair value in the context of competitive telecommunications services, and not for a monopoly water company such as Global Water, the court’s discussion of the fair value requirement is instructive.
Because neither this court nor the corporation commission possesses the power to ignore plain constitutional language, we hold that a determination of fair value is necessary with respect to a public service corporation. But what is to be done with such a finding? In the past, fair value has been the factor by which a reasonable rate of return was multiplied to yield, with the addition of operating expenses, the total revenue that a corporation could earn. That revenue figure was then used to set rates....But while the constitution clearly requires the Arizona Corporation Commission to perform a fair value determination, only our jurisprudence dictates that this finding be plugged into a rigid formula as part of the rate-setting process. Neither section 3 nor section 14 of the constitution requires the corporation commission to use fair value as the exclusive “rate basis.”...We still believe that when a monopoly exists, the rate-of-return method is proper. Today, however, we must consider our case law interpreting
51 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
the constitution against a backdrop of competition. In such a climate, there is no reason to rigidly link the fair value determination to the establishment of rates. We agree that our previous cases establishing fair value as the exclusive rate base are inappropriate for application in a competitive environment.... Thus, fair value, in conjunction with other information, may be used to insure that both the corporation and the consumer are treated fairly. In this and any other fashion that the corporation commission deems appropriate, the fair value determination should be considered. The commission has broad discretion, however, to determine the weight to be given this factor in any particular case.
(Id. at 245-246, 34 P.3d at 354-355.)(internal citations omitted, emphasis original.) The Court of Appeals reinforced this finding in Phelps Dodge, stating that:
...our reading of the court’s ruling [inUS West II]...is consistent with the pronouncement...that the Commission should consider fair value when setting rates within a competitive market, although the Commission has broad discretion in determining the weight to be given that factor in any particular case.
(207 Ariz. 95, at 106, 83 P.3d 573, at 584.)
The Commission has also previously employed mechanisms such as the ACRM to address extraordinary regulatory challenges for which traditional ratemaking methods were deemed inadequate. In Decision No. 66400, in which the Commission first adopted the ACRM, the Commission determined that the proposed ACRM was within the Commission’s constitutional and statutory authority and permitted under applicable case law.(See Decision No. 66400 at 17, 19-20, 22.) AWC’s ACRM included a requirement that the Company file with each adjustment filing:
(1)the most current balance sheet at the time of the filing; (2) the most current income statement; (3) an earnings test schedule; (4) a rate review schedule (including the incremental and pro forma effects of the proposed increase); (5) a revenue requirement calculation; (6) a surcharge calculation; (7) an adjusted rate base schedule; (8) a CWIP ledger (for each project showing accumulation of charges by month and paid vendor invoices); (9) calculation of the three factor formula; and (10) a typical bill analysis under present and proposed rates.
(Id. at 14.)
52 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
The Commission further agreed that the ACRM step increase procedure was based on the approach for CWIP discussed by the Arizona Supreme Court in both Arizona Public Service andArizona Community Action.The Commission stated that in both cases the court acknowledged the Commission’s authority to consider post-test year matters as long as the Commission complied with its constitutional duty to determine fair value. The Commission also cited Scates as supporting the Commission’s authority to approve step rate increases, although only in “exceptional situations.” The Commission found that the ACRM:
specifically require[s] that [AWC] file updated financial information to verify the actual expenditures incurred for installing arsenic treatment plant, as well as schedules verifying that the requested step increase will not result in a return in excess of the Company’s “fair value” rate base return....We disagree with RUCO’s contention that inclusion of the recoverable O&M expenses violates the tenets of theScates decision.14 As the Arizona court explained in that decision, automatic adjustment mechanisms may be approved in the context of a general rate proceeding as long as the expenses are specific and narrowly defined. The modified ACRM proposed by Staff and Arizona Water satisfies theArizona Community ActionandScates requirements because it is an automatic adjustment mechanism that is being considered in a rate proceeding which includes a “fair value” analysis of the Company’s utility plant. Moreover, the expenses that are eligible for recovery under the ACRM adjustor mechanism are narrowly defined costs that will be incurred by direct payments to third party contactors. We believe these components satisfy the requirements delineated in both theScates andArizona Community Actiondecisions.15
The Commission concluded that approval of step increases under the ACRM, as described in Decision No. 66400, was consistent with the Commission’s authority under the Arizona Constitution, ratemaking statutes, and applicable case law. (ld. at 22.)
Recently, in Phase 2 of a rate case involving AWC’s Eastern Group, we approved a SIB mechanism that is virtually identical to the SIB being requested by Global Water in this proceeding.
14 RUCO had objected to inclusion of O&M expense adjustments in the ACRM, arguing thatArizona CommunityAction had only authorized rate base updates and that the inclusion of O&M adjustments presented matching problems.
15Id. at 19-20.
53 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
(Decision No. 73938 (June 27, 2013), at 50-54.)16 Even more recently, in AWC’s Northern Group rate case, we adopted a settlement that included the same SIB mechanism approved in the Eastern Group case.(See,Decision No. 74081 (September 23, 2013), at 58-62.)
Conclusion on SIB Issue
Consistent with our findings in Decision Nos. 73938 and 74081, we believe that the proposed SIB mechanism incorporated therein, together with the financial information and analysis required herein, satisfies the fair value concerns addressed by various court decisions. Although RUCO asserts that the proposed SIB does not require a fair value finding by the Commission when the SIB surcharge is adjusted, consistent with the prior AWC Decisions the information that Global Water will be required to file at the time a surcharge adjustment request is made requires “an analysis of the impact of the SIB Plant on the fair value rate base, revenue, and the fair value rate of return as set forth in Decision No. 73736.”(See Decision No. 73938, at 50.)
As stated in Decision No. 73938, from a practical perspective, the SIB would operate very similarly to existing ACRMs, with which the Commission now has extensive experience, and which the Commission has determined to be lawful. Consistent with the prior AWC SIB Decisions cited above, we will require Global Water to include in each of its surcharge adjustment filings similar financial information required for AWC’s ACRM adjustments, as described in Decision No. 66400. Global Water shall also be required to file the following information: (1) the most current balance sheet at the time of the filing; (2) the most current income statement; (3) an earnings test schedule; (4) a rate review schedule (including the incremental and pro forma effects of the proposed increase); (5) a revenue requirement calculation; (6) a surcharge calculation; (7) an adjusted rate base schedule; (8) a CWIP ledger (for each project showing accumulation of charges by month and paid vendor invoices); (9) calculation of the three factor formula (as requested by Staff); and (10) a typical bill analysis under present and proposed rates.
The Company shall also be required to perform an earnings test calculation for each initial filing and annual report filing to determine whether the actual rate of return reflected by the operating
16 The Commission granted RUCO’s Application for Rehearing of Decision No. 73938, pursuant to A.R.S. $ 40-253, and re-opened Decision No. 73736, pursuant to A.R.S. § 40-252, concerning the determination made regarding cost of equity in that Decision. The rehearing/reopening of those Decisions is currently pending.
54 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
income for the affected system or division for the relevant 12-month period exceeded the most recently authorized fair value rate of return for the affected system or division, with the earnings test to be: based on the most recent available operating income, adjusted for any operating revenue and expense adjustments adopted in the most recent general rate case; and based on the rate base adopted in the most recent general rate case, updated to recognize changes in plant, accumulated depreciation, contributions in aid of construction, advances in aid of construction, and accumulated deferred income taxes through the most recent available financial statement (quarterly or longer). The earnings test results will be considered in the following manner. If the earnings test calculation described herein shows that the Company will not exceed its authorized rate of return with the implementation of the SIB surcharge, the surcharge for the year may go into effect upon issuance of the surcharge approval order and subject to the conditions described herein. But if the earnings test calculation described herein shows that the Company will exceed its authorized rate of return with the implementation of any part of the SIB surcharge, the surcharge for that year may not go into effect. Lastly, if the earnings test calculation described herein shows that the Company will exceed its authorized rate of return with the implementation of the full surcharge, but a portion of the surcharge may be implemented without exceeding the authorized rate of return, then the surcharge may be authorized up to that amount, again upon issuance of the surcharge approval order and subject to the conditions described herein. We reiterate that the proposed SIB surcharges shall be evaluated by the Commission according to all relevant factors, including the results of the earnings test. In any event, the earnings test shall not impact the approval of the SIB mechanism or the possibility of SIB surcharges in future years where authorized in accordance with the SIB mechanism.
With this additional information, the SIB allows for a consideration of all of Global Water’s costs at the time a surcharge adjustment is made, and is therefore permissible under Scates. The SIB mechanism also addresses the concerns cited in Scates in that the SIB: is an adjustment mechanism established within a rate case as part of a company’s rate structure;17 adopts a set formula that would
17 The SIB is a different type of adjustor mechanism than has previously been reviewed by the courts because it allows recovery of plant costs associated with Willow Valley’s substantial distribution system improvement needs, rather than fuel costs. However, even if the SIB is not considered an “adjustment mechanism” under Scates, we believe that it is an exceptional circumstance given the significant capital investment requirements for infrastructure replacements demonstrated for the Willow Valley system.
55 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
allow only readily identifiable and narrowly defined plant to be recovered through the surcharge; and will apply the rate of return authorized herein to SIB plant (less the five percent efficiency credit).
In accordance with the court’s holding in Simms, which states that the Commission must find and use the fair value of the utility company’s property at the time of the inquiry, and the reasonableness and justness of rates established by the Commission “must be related to this finding of fair value” (80 Ariz. at 151, 294 P.2d at 382), the SIB mechanism requires a determination of the Company’s fair value rate base, including the SIB plant, at the time the surcharges are proposed and approved.
As discussed above, the applicable court decisions have found that the express language in Article 15, §14 of the Arizona Constitution requires the Commission to ascertain “fair value.” The courts have consistently recognized, however, that the Commission has broad discretion in the rate setting formulas and techniques that it employs, and the courts will not disturb the Commission’s findings absent an abuse of that discretion. (See, Simms, supra, at 154; Arizona Public Service, supra,at 370.) A line of decisions establishes that, as long as fair value is determined, the Commission does not abuse its discretion in adopting varying ratemaking mechanisms that allow rate recovery for: post-test year plant (Arizona Public Service); CWIP that is not yet in service (Arizona Community Action); interim rates or adjuster mechanisms without a fair value finding (Rio Verde); and use of fair value as only one factor to be considered in setting rates in a competitive regulatory environment (US West II; Phelps Dodge). An examination of these cases suggests that courts have understood that while a fair value determination is always required under the plain constitutional language of Article 15, §14, the Commission must have wide latitude to fashion ratemaking methods necessary to address a number of circumstances that may not have been anticipated when the Arizona Constitution was enacted. As long as the fair value finding is related to the rates set by the Commission, and that “just and reasonable rates” result from the methodologies employed (Article 15, §3), the courts have found that the Commission does not abuse its discretion in regard to its ratemaking powers.
We believe that the SIB mechanism proposed in this proceeding, together with the additional financial information and analysis required herein, is compliant with the Commission’s constitutional requirements, as well as the case law interpreting the Commission’s authority and discretion in
56 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
setting rates. The SIB surcharge would be based on specific, verified, and in-service plant additions that are reviewed by Staff and approved by the Commission prior to being implemented. Global Water will be required to submit annual summary schedules showing the actual cost of the infrastructure, and supporting documentation that will enable Staff and the Commission to determine how the proposed surcharge adjustments would impact the fair value rate of return for each affected system.
The SIB mechanism is analogous to the step increases for CWIP plant that the court found to be a reasonable ratemaking device in Arizona Community Action (except for tying the increases solely to return on equity). Although the SIB-eligible plant differs from CWIP to the extent that the SIB would not necessarily be under construction during the historical test year in the rate case, the requirement that the SIB plant must be fully constructed, and used in the provision of utility service (with verification that such is the case) priortoinclusion in a surcharge, provides the Commission with an even greater assurance (compared with CWIP) that the SIB plant is used and useful and therefore serves as a proper basis for approving just and reasonable rates. And, by allowing up to five surcharge adjustments between full rate case applications, the SIB takes into account the court’s observation in the same case that a constant series of rate hearings is not necessary to protect the public interest. (Id. at 230-231, 599 P.2d at 186-187.) By requiring the filing of a full rate case at least every five years (with a review in the subsequent case of all SIB plant that was included in the surcharge during the interim between rate cases), the SIB also addresses the concern that the interim rate adjustments would only be in place for a limited period of time. In addition to the five percent efficiency credit, the SIB mechanism also includes notice requirements to customers, a review period for Staff and RUCO (and an opportunity for other parties or customers to express opposition), and an Order by the Commission evaluating and approving the appropriateness of the SIB-eligible plant, including Willow Valley’s fair value rate base and rate of return.
With respect to the arguments advanced by WCVA, we believe approval of a SIB mechanism for Willow Valley is appropriate because, as WVCA agreed, the system is in need of substantial improvements. Implementation of the SIB mechanism gives recognition to the fact that Global Water acquired the troubled Willow Valley only within the last decade, significant improvements have
57 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
already been made to the system, and allowing more gradual increases for the additional capital investment needed for Willow Valley will help mitigate the rate shock concerns expressed by WVCA. We also believe adoption of the SIB in this case for Willow Valley is consistent with the Commission’s policy goal of encouraging acquisitions of smaller, troubled water companies by more stable water providers.
Although a SIB mechanism could potentially result in much greater resource demands upon the Commission and Staff than would the current regulatory structure, as noted in Decision No. 73938 (at page 54), the proposed SIB places more of the informational filing burdens on the Company, thus mitigating many of the resource concerns that had previously existed. With these provisions and protections, as well as others discussed herein, we find that proposed SIB mechanism is in accord with Arizona law and, as a whole, is consistent with the public interest.
* * * * * * * * * *
Having considered the entire record herein and being fully advised in the premises, the Commission finds, concludes, and orders that:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On July 9, 2012, Valencia Water Company – Town Division, Global Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company, Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division, Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company, and Willow Valley Water Company filed with the Commission applications in the above-captioned cases for the establishment of just and reasonable rates and charges for utility service designed to realize a reasonable rate of return on the fair value of their property throughout the State of Arizona. The test year for the applications is the year ending December 31, 2011.
2. On July 12, 2012, a Motion to Consolidate was filed by Global Water in the above-captioned dockets.
3. Intervention was granted to RUCO, NWP, SNR, the City of Maricopa, Maricopa Area HOAs, the Willow Valley Club Association, Steven P. Tardiff, Dana J. Jennings, Andy and Marilyn Mausser, Global Water Resources, Inc., Hassayampa Utilities Company, Picacho Cove Water Company, and Picacho Cove Utilities Company.
58 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
4. On August 27, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in all seven dockets.
5. On September 26, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in the WUNS, WUGT, and VWCGB dockets.
6. On September 26, 2012, Staff filed Letters of Sufficiency in the WUNS, WUGT, and VWCGB dockets, indicating that Global Water satisfied the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-103 for those cases. Staff classified WUNS as a Class D utility, and WUGT and VWCGB as Class C utilities.
7. On September 26, 2012, Staff filed Letters of Deficiency for the VWCT, Palo Verde, Santa Cruz, and Willow Valley applications.
8. On October 10, 2012, VWCT and Willow Valley filed revised schedules.
9. On October 15, 2012, Global Water filed Notices of Errata in the VWCT and Willow Valley dockets.
10. On October 19, 2012, Staff filed Letters of Sufficiency in the VWCT and Willow Valley dockets.
11. On October 24, 2012, Palo Verde filed revised schedules.
12. On October 26, 2012, Staff filed a Letter of Sufficiency in the Palo Verde docket.
13. On November 2, 2012, Santa Cruz filed revised schedules.
14. On November 7, 2012, Staff filed a Letter of Sufficiency in the Santa Cruz docket.
15. On November 14, 2012, Staff filed a Request for Procedural Schedule and Response to Global Water’s Motion to Consolidate in each of the dockets. Staff stated that it supported the Company’s consolidation request, and proposed a procedural schedule. In addition to proposed dates for filing testimony, the parties agreed to commence settlement discussions on May 13, 2013, to conclude settlement discussions on May 21, 2013, and to file a settlement agreement, if any, by May 31, 2013.
16. By Procedural Order issued November 20, 2012, the above-captioned dockets were consolidated, a hearing was scheduled, the Company was directed to publish notice, and other procedural deadlines were established.
59 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
17. On November 27, 2012, Global Water filed a Request to Amend Customer Notice Language in the Global Water – Palo Very Utilities Company’s customer language notice. Global Water stated that the notice could be confusing to its customers because the phrase “56.3 percent” increase did not reflect current revenues, but rather revenues from the 2011 test year. The Company therefore requested that the public notice be modified.
18. On November 30, 2012, a Procedural Order was issued granting the Company’s request to amend the customer notice language.
19. On December 17, 2012, Global Water filed revised schedules in the VWCGB, WUGT, and VWCT dockets.
20. On December 18, 2012, Global Water filed a 2nd Request to Amend Customer Notice Language.
21. On December 19, 2012, Global Water filed revised and updated consolidated schedules in the VWCGB, WUGT, and VWCT dockets.
22. On December 21, 2012, the Company filed a complete set of revised and updated schedules for each of the above-captioned dockets.
23. By Procedural Order issued December 28, 2012, the Company’s 2nd Motion to Amend was granted and the requested notice modifications were approved.
24. On March 20, 2013, the Mayor and Council of the City of Maricopa filed a Request to Hold a Public Comment in Maricopa.
25. On April 9, 2013, the Commission voted at a Staff Open Meeting to schedule a local public comment session on the application to be held on May 30, 2013, in Maricopa, Arizona.
26. On April 16, 2013, a Procedural Order was issued scheduling a public comment session on May 30, 2013, in Maricopa, and directing Global Water to publish notice of the public comment session.
27. On April 19, 2013, Staff filed a Request for Modification of the Procedural Schedule. Staff requested a 60-day extension of time to file its direct testimony due to “the complexity of the issues raised in this case,” and requested that the remainder of the procedural schedule be extended by 60 days as well.
60 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
28. By Procedural Order issued April 30, 2013, the hearing was rescheduled to commence on September 5, 2013, other procedural dates were amended in accordance with Staff’s proposal, and the applicable time clock was extended accordingly.
29. On May 30, 2013, the Commission conducted a public comment session in Maricopa, as scheduled.
30. On July 12, 2013, Staff filed a second Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule. Staff requested that the filing date for Staff and Intervenor rate design testimony be changed from July 15, 2013 to July 26, 2013; and that the Company be permitted to file rate design rebuttal testimony on August 19, 2013.
31. On July 15, 2013, the hearing previously scheduled and noticed for that date was convened for the purpose of taking public comment only.
32. By Procedural Order issued July 18, 2013, Staff’s Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule was granted.
33. On July 25, 2013, Staff filed a third Request to Modify Procedural Schedule to allow additional time for settlement discussions. Staff stated that the parties were in the process of negotiating a settlement agreement and that if the parties reached a settlement, they planned to file it on August 12, 2013, as specified by the April 30, 2013 Procedural Order. Staff therefore requested that the July 26, 2013, filing date be suspended.
34. By Procedural Order issued July 26, 2013, Staff’s Request for Modification to the Procedural Schedule was granted.
35. On August 13, 2013, a Proposed Settlement Agreement was filed in this matter, signed by the Global Water Companies(i.e.,Palo Verde, Santa Cruz, VWCT, WUNS, WUGT, VWCGB, and Willow Valley), the Global Intervenors, Staff, RUCO, and HOAs Province, Rancho El Dorado III, and Cobblestone.
36. On August 16, 2013, Staff filed a Notice of Errata making corrections to the H-3 Schedules attached to the Settlement Agreement.
37. On August 20, 2013, Global Water filed a Motion to Establish Schedule for SIB [System Improvement Benefit mechanism] Testimony.
61 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
38. On August 21, 2013, Staff filed Attachment E to the Settlement Agreement.
39. On August 21, 2013, additional signatures to the Settlement were filed by the City of Maricopa, and HOAs Alterra, Desert Cedars, Homestead North, Maricopa Meadows, Rancho El Dorado, Senita, and Sorrento.
40. On August 21, 2013, testimony in support of the Settlement Agreement was filed by: the Company (Ron Fleming, Paul Walker, and Matthew Rowell); Staff (Steve Olea); RUCO (Patrick Quinn); Maricopa (Paul Jepsen); and the Maricopa HOAs (Pam Hilliard).
41. On August 21, 2013, testimony in opposition to the Settlement Agreement was filed by: NWP (Richard Jellies); and SNP (John O’Reilly).
42. On August 27, 2013, a Procedural Order was issued establishing a procedural schedule for the proposed SIB mechanism, with Staff testimony due by September 6, 2013; Global Water and Intervenor responsive testimony due by September 13, 2013; and a hearing on the SIB proposal on September 19, 2013.
43. On September 3, 2013, Global Water filed a Notice of Filing Revised Willow Valley Water Co. SIB Engineering Report.
44. Hearings were conducted regarding the Settlement Agreement on September 5, 6, 9, and 12, 2013.
45. On September 6, 2013, Staff filed the supplemental testimony of Jian Liu regarding the SIB mechanism.
46. On September 13, 2013, RUCO filed the responsive testimony of Robert Mease regarding the SIB proposal.
47. On September 13, 2013, the WVCA filed a letter signed by its president, Gary McDonald, expressing opposition to the Company’s SIB mechanism proposal.
48. By Procedural Order issued September 16, 2013, Mr. McDonald was directed to appear at the September 19, 2013, hearing if he wished his comments to be considered part of the evidentiary record.
49. On September 18, 2013, Mr. McDonald filed a letter requesting that he be permitted to appear telephonically to undergo cross-examination regarding his comments.
62 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
50. On September 19, 2013, a hearing regarding the proposed SIB was conducted.
51. On October 4, 2013, Staff filed a Notice of Filing Rate Schedules Including Systems Benefits Charge.
52. On October 18, 2013, Initial Post-Hearing Briefs were filed by Global Water and Global Intervenors; NWP; SNP; City of Maricopa; the Maricopa HOAs; RUCO; and Staff.
53. On October 31, 2013, Reply Post-Hearing Briefs were filed by Global Water and Global Intervenors; NWP; SNP; City of Maricopa; RUCO; and Staff.
54. The settlement discussions in this docket were open, transparent, and inclusive of all parties who desired to participate. All parties were notified of the settlement proceedings and had the opportunity to be heard and have their issues fairly considered.
55. The Settlement Agreement, with the conditions discussed above, represents a reasonable compromise of contested issues, is in accord with Arizona law and, as a whole, is consistent with the public interest.
56. The Settlement Agreement and its provisions, with the conditions discussed herein, should be approved as discussed herein.
57. For purposes of this proceeding, a capital structure consisting of 57.80 percent long-term debt and 42.20 percent common equity is appropriate for establishing rates in this matter.
58. A return on common equity of 9.50 percent, an embedded cost of long-term debt of 6.10 percent, and a fair value rate of return of 7.50 percent are appropriate estimates of the cost of capital for purposes of this proceeding.
59. For purposes of this proceeding, Santa Cruz’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $37,918,570; its adjusted test year revenues are $10,463,460; its adjusted operating income is $1,908,343; and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $1,556,046 is authorized.
60. For purposes of this proceeding, Palo Verde’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $60,156,756; its adjusted test year revenues are $13,107,528; its adjusted operating income is $3,393,928; and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $1,888,939 is authorized.
61. For purposes of this proceeding, Valencia-Town Division’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $2,251,949; its adjusted test year revenues are $4,940,316; its adjusted operating income is
63 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
$17,649; and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $252,554 is authorized.
62. For purposes of this proceeding, Valencia-Greater Buckeye Division’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $634,979; its adjusted test year revenues are $462,043; its adjusted operating income is $42,015; and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $9,289 is authorized.
63. For purposes of this proceeding, Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $(181,978); its adjusted test year revenues are $147,513; its adjusted operating income is $23,472; and no revenue increase is authorized.
64. For purposes of this proceeding, Water Utility of Greater Tonopah’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $2,206,817; its adjusted test year revenues are $207,705; its adjusted operating income is $(78,593); and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $199,983 is authorized.
65. For purposes of this proceeding, Willow Valley’s adjusted OCRB and FVRB is $2,278,955; its adjusted test year revenues are $702,652; its adjusted operating income is $(71,868); and a phased-in gross revenue increase of $404,269 is authorized.
66. Consistent with prior SIB mechanisms approved for Arizona Water, Global Water’s proposed SIB for its Willow Valley system will require, among other things for: Commission pre-approval of SIB-eligible projects; SIB project eligibility criteria; a limit on SIB surcharge recovery to the pre-tax rate of return and depreciation expense associated with SIB-eligible projects; an “efficiency credit” of five percent; a cap on the SIB surcharge of five percent of the Phase 1 revenue requirement; separate line items on customer bills reflecting the SIB surcharge and the efficiency credit; Commission approval of the SIB surcharge prior to implementation and adjustments; a limit of five SIB surcharge filings between general rate cases; an annual true-up of the SIB surcharge; and notice to customers at least 30 days prior to SIB surcharge adjustments.
67. Cost recovery under the SIB mechanism is allowed for the pre-tax return on investment and depreciation expense for projects meeting the SIB-eligible criteria and for depreciation expense associated with those projects, net of associated plant retirements.
68. The amount that is permitted to be collected annually by each SIB surcharge filing is limited to five percent of the revenue requirement authorized in this Decision.
69. The SIB surcharge will be applicable only for plant replacement investments to
64 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
provide adequate and reliable service to existing customers and that are not designed to serve or promote customer growth.
70. The SIB surcharge will be a fixed monthly charge on Willow Valley customers’ bills, with the surcharge and the efficiency credit listed as separate line items. The surcharge will increase proportionately based on customer meter size.
71. Each SIB surcharge filing must be approved by the Commission prior to implementation. Upon filing of the SIB surcharge application, Staff and RUCO will have 30 days to review the filing and dispute and/or file a request for the Commission to alter the surcharge or true-up surcharge/credit. If no objection is filed to the SIB surcharge request, the request shall be placed on an Open Meeting agenda at the earliest practicable date, based on Staff’s preparation of a Staff Report and Proposed Order for the Commission’s consideration.
72. At least 30 days prior to a SIB surcharge becoming effective, Willow Valley will be required to provide public notice to customers in the form of a bill insert or customer letter. The notice must include: the individual surcharge amount by meter size; the individual efficiency credit by meter size; the individual true-up surcharge/credit by meter size; and a summary of the projects included in the current surcharge filing, including a description of each project and its cost.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, VWCT, VWCGB, WUNS, WUGT, and Willow Valley are public service corporations within the meaning of Article XV of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. §§ 40-250, 40-251, 40-334, 40-374, and 40-367.
2. The Commission has jurisdiction over Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, VWCT, VWCGB, WUNS, WUGT, and Willow Valley, and the subject matter of the applications.
3. Notice of the proceeding was provided in accordance with the law.
4. Adoption of the Settlement Agreement, subject to the revisions discussed herein, is in the public interest.
5. The rates and charges produced by the Settlement Agreement are just and reasonable in this proceeding, for the reasons described herein.
6. The SIB mechanism is compliant with the Commission’s constitutional requirements,
65 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
as well as the case law interpreting the Commission’s authority and discretion in setting rates. The Commission has the constitutional ratemaking authority to approve adjustment mechanisms in a general rate case.
7. The SIB mechanism incorporated therein, with the modifications discussed above, satisfies the fair value concerns addressed by various court decisions.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement filed on August 13, 2013, and attached to this Decision as Attachment A, as supplemented by the conditions in the discussion herein, is hereby approved.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties shall implement and comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, with the conditions discussed herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company, GlobalWater-Palo Verde Utilities Company, Valencia Water-Town Division, Valencia Water Company-Greater Buckeye Division, Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, and Willow Valley Water Company are hereby directed to file with the Commission, on or before February 28, 2014, revised schedules of rates and charges, consistent with the Settlement Agreement and the findings herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the revised schedules of rates and charges showing the phased-in rates, shall be effective for all service rendered on and after March 1, 2014. Thereafter, each annual rate phase will take effect on January 1st of each year, beginning with January 1, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company, GlobalWater-Palo Verde Utilities Company, Valencia Water-Town Division, Valencia Water Company-Greater Buckeye Division, Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, and Willow Valley Water Company, shall notify their affected customers of the revised schedules of rates and charges authorized herein by means of an insert in their next regularly scheduled bills and by posting on Global Water’s website, in a form acceptable to the Commission’s Utilities Division Staff.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the revised Rules and Regulations set forth in the Settlement Agreement are approved.
66 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that developers that are parties to ICFAs may fully fund the applicable HUFs out of the developer payments that are due under the ICFAs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that developers that are parties to ICFAs may pay the HUF amounts directly to the applicable water or wastewater utilities, rather than to Global Parent, as is currently required under the ICFAs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Global Water Resources, Inc., and the Global Water entities, shall submit annual affidavits, signed by the highest officer of each entity, attesting that each of those signatory entities was compliant with the terms of the Settlement Agreement for the prior calendar year.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed SIB mechanism for Willow Valley Water Company, is approved, as discussed herein.
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
67 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Willow Valley Water Company shall comply with all requirements of the SIB filing and compliance requirements outlined by Staff in this proceeding, and consistent with the SIB mechanisms approved for Arizona Water Company in Decision Nos. 73938 and 74081.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Decision shall become effective immediately.
BY ORDER OF THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION.
|
| |||
CHAIRMAN | COMMISSIONER |
|
|
| ||
COMMISSIONER | COMMISSIONER | COMMISSIONER |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, JODI JERICH, Executive Director of the Arizona Corporation Commission, have hereunto set my hand and caused the official seal of the Commission to be affixed at the Capitol, in the City of Phoenix, this 26th day of February 2014.
| ||
JODI JERICH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR |
DISSENT |
DISSENT |
68 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
SERVICE LIST FOR: | VALENCIA WATER COMPANY, INC., GLOBAL WATER – PALO VERDE UTILITIES COMPANY; WATER UTILITY OF NORTHERN SCOTTSDALE; WATER UTILITY OF GREATER TONOPAH, INC.; VALENCIA WATER COMPANY – GREATER BUCKEYE DIVISION; GLOBAL WATER – SANTA CRUZ WATER COMPANY AND WILLOW VALLEY WATER CO., INC.; GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.; HASSAYAMPA UTILITIES COMPANY; PICACHO COVE WATER COMPANY; AND PICACHO COVE UTILITIES COMPANY
| |
DOCKET NOS.: | W-01212A-12-0309; SW-20445A-12-0310; W-03720A-12-0311; W-02450A-12-0312; W-02451A-12-0313; W-20446A-12-0314; and W-01732A-12-0315 |
Timothy Sabo
Michael Patten
ROSHKA, DeWULF & PATTEN PLC
400 E. Van Buren, Suite 800
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Attorneys for Valencia Water Company, Inc., Global
Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company; Water Utility of
Northern Scottsdale; Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc.;
Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division; Global
Water – Santa Cruz Water Company and Willow Valley
Water Co., Inc.; Global Water Resources, Inc.; Hassayampa Utilities Company;
Picacho Cove Water Company; and Picacho Cove Utilities Company
Garry D. Hays
THE LAW OFFICES OF GARRY D. HAYS, PC
1702 East Highland Ave., Suite 204
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Attorneys for New World Properties, Inc.
Jeffrey W. Crockett
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
One East Washington Street, Suite 2400
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Attorneys for New World Properties, Inc.
Daniel W. Pozefsky, Chief Counsel
Residential Utility Consumer Office
1110 West Washington Street, Suite 200
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Lawrence V. Robertson, Jr.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. Box 1448
Tubac, AZ 85646
Attorney for the City of Maricopa, Arizona
69 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Michele Van Quathem
Sheryl A. Sweeney
RYLEY CARLOCK & APPLEWHITE
One N. Central Ave., Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4417
Attorneys for Maricopa Area
Homeowners Associations
Robert J. Metli, Esq.
MUNGER CHADWICK, P.L.C.
2398 E. Camelback Road, Suite 240
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Attorneys for Sierra Negra Ranch
Barry W. Becker
Bryan O’Reilly
SNR MANAGEMENT LLC
50 S. Jones Blvd., Suite 101
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Steven P. Tardiff
44840 W. Paitilla Lane
Maricopa, AZ 85139
William P. Sullivan
CURTIS, GOODWIN, SULLIVAN
UDALL & SCHWAB, P.L.C.
501 E. Thomas Rd.,
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Attorneys for Willow Valley Club Assn.
Willow Valley Club Association
c/o Gary McDonald, Chairman
1240 Avalon Avenue
Havasu City, AZ 86404
Dana L. Jennings
42842 W. Morning Dove Lane
Maricopa, AZ 85138
Andy and Marilyn Mausser
20828 North Madison Dr.
Maricopa, AZ 85138
Janice Alward, Chief Counsel
Legal Division
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
1200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Steve Olea, Director
Utilities Division
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
1200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
70 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE
ADJUSTMENT APPLICATIONS OF
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Town Division
Docket No. W-0l212A-12-0309
Global Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc.
Docket No. 03720A-12-0311
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc.
Docket No. 02450A-12-0312
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Greater Buckeye Division
Docket No. 02451A-12-0313
Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc.
Docket No. 01732A-12-0315
AUGUST 12, 2013
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. | RECITALS | 3 | ||||
II. | REVENUE REQUIREMENT AND RATE INCREASE | 4 | ||||
III. | BILL IMPACT AND RATE DESIGN | 5 | ||||
IV. | COST OF CAPITAL | 5 | ||||
V. | DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION | 6 | ||||
VI. | TREATMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE COORDINATION AND FINANCE AGREEMENTS | 6 | ||||
VII. | HOOK-UP FEES | 10 | ||||
VIII. | TARIFFS AND CODE OF CONDUCT | 11 | ||||
IX. | WATER LOSS | 12 | ||||
X. | COMMISSION EVALUATION OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT | 12 | ||||
XI. | MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS | 13 |
i | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF
GLOBAL WATER UTILITIES RATE CASE
DOCKET NOs. W-01212A-12-309 et al.
The purpose of this Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is to settle disputed issues related to Docket Nos. W-01212A-12-0309, SW-20445A-12-0310, W-03720A-12-0311, W-02450A-12-0312,W-02451A-12-0313, W-20446A-12-0314 and W-01732A-12-0315 (collectively, the “Global Rate Dockets”). This Agreement is entered into by the following entities:
STAFF and RUCO
Arizona Corporation Commission Utilities Division (“Staff ”)
Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”)
Global Applicants
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Town Division (“Valencia – Town”)
Global Water– Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”)
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. (“Northern Scottsdale”)
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. (“Tonopah”)
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Greater Buckeye Division
(“Valencia – Buckeye”)
Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”)
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. (“Willow”)
Global Intervenors
Global Water – Picacho Cove Water Company (“Picacho Water”)
Global Water – Picacho Cove Utilities Company (“Picacho Utilities”)
Hassayampa Utilities Company, Inc. (“Hassayampa”)
Global Water Resources, Inc. (“Global Parent”)
Other Intervenors
Province Community Homeowners Association
Rancho El Dorado Phase III Homeowners Association
Cobblestone Farms Homeowners Association
And such other intervenors or parties that may sign on pursuant to Section 11.7 of the proposed Settlement Agreement.
2 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
These entities will be referred to collectively as “Signatories;” a single entity will be referred to individually as a “Signatory.” Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, Valencia – Town, Willow, Valencia – Buckeye, Tonopah, and Northern Scottsdale will be collectively referred to as the “Applicants” or the “Global Water and Wastewater Utilities.” Picacho Water, Picacho Utilities, Hassayampa, and Global Parent will be collectively referred to as the “Global Intervenors,” and the Global Intervenors and the Applicants will be collectively referred to as “Global.”
I. | RECITALS. |
1.1 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities each filed a separate rate application on July 9, 2012. Staff filed a letter of sufficiency on October 26, 2012, and by Procedural Order dated November 20, 2012, the applications were deemed sufficient as of November 7, 2012. The November 20, 2012 Procedural Order also established a hearing schedule and consolidated all seven of the Global Rate Dockets. The hearing was subsequently rescheduled by a Procedural Order dated April 30, 2013. |
1.2 | By Procedural Orders, the following parties were granted intervention in the Global Rate Dockets: RUCO, New World, Maricopa, the Maricopa HOAs, SNR, Willow Club, the Global Intervenors, Steven P. Tardiff, Dana J. Jennings, and Andy and Marilyn Mausser. |
1.3 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities filed a notice of settlement discussions on July 11, 2013, and a revised notice of settlement discussions on July 15, 2013. Settlement discussions began on July 18, 2013, and continued on July 19, 2013. The settlement discussions were open, transparent, and inclusive of all Parties to this Docket who desired to participate. All Parties to this Docket were notified of the settlement discussion process, were encouraged to participate in the negotiations, and were provided with an equal opportunity to participate. Participants in the settlement discussions included Global, Staff, RUCO, Maricopa, the Maricopa HOAs, New World, SNR, and the Willow Club. |
1.4 | The terms of this Agreement are just, reasonable, fair, and in the public interest in that they, among other things, establish just and reasonable rates for the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities; promote the convenience, comfort and safety, and the preservation of health, of the employees and patrons of the Global Water Utilities; avoid unnecessary litigation expense and delay, and resolve all issues arising from the Global Rate Dockets except the issue of a Distribution System Improvement Charge (“DISC”) type mechanism for Willow. Global is working to provide the necessary information to Staff as soon as possible for a System Improvement Benefit (“SIB”) mechanism so Staff can |
3 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
complete its review prior to the commencement of the hearing in this matter. Global waives the right to request any acquisition premium for any of its existing systems involved in this docket. |
1.5 | The Signatories believe that this Agreement balances the interests of both the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities and their customers. These benefits include: |
● | A phase-in of rates with no rate increase in year one of the phase-in for any of the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities; |
● | A rate phase-in for the Santa Cruz and Palo Verde Companies over a period of eight years; |
● | A rate phase-in for Valencia Town, Valencia Buckeye, Willow, and Tonopah over a period of three years; |
● | A phase-in of the rate increases attributable to recovery of expenses in years two and three of the phase-in; |
● | There will be no change in revenue requirement for Northern Scottsdale as a result of this case; |
● | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities agree to a rate stay-out until May 31, 2016; and if the City of Maricopa signs onto the Agreement, the stay-out will be extended to May 31, 2017 for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde; |
● | Continuing bill assistance for low income customers in existing Global Utilities with such programs, and expansion of the low income bill assistance program into the other Global Utilities; |
● | The rate design will continue to allow customers an opportunity to reduce their bill by providing a rebate when customers use less than the Conservation Rebate Threshold (“CRT”); and |
● | Resolution of issues regarding Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements (“ICFAs”). |
1.6 | The Signatories agree to ask the Commission: (1) to find that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are just and reasonable and in the public interest, along with any and all other necessary findings, and (2) to approve the Agreement such that it and the rates contained herein may become effective on January 1, 2014. |
4 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
II. | REVENUE REQUIREMENT AND RATE INCREASE PROVISIONS. |
2.1 | Rate Stay Out Agreement. |
2.1.1 | None of the Applicants will file a rate application before May 31, 2016. The test year for the next rate application filed by any of the Applicants shall not end before December 31, 2015. However, if the City of Maricopa joins this Agreement as a Signatory, then Santa Cruz and Palo Verde will not file a rate application before May 31, 2017, and the test year for the next rate case for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde may not end before December 31, 2016. |
2.2 | Rate Increase. |
2.2.1 | The revenue requirements and rate increases for all years of the phase-in for each of the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities are shown onAttachment A. |
2.3 | Fair Value Rate Base. |
2.3.1 | The jurisdictional fair value rate base used to establish the rates agreed to herein for each of the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities is shown onAttachment A. The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities agree to the use of original cost rate base as the fair value rate base for each of the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities for purposes of setting rates in this case. |
2.3.2 | The rate bases set forth onAttachment A exclude Post Test Year Plant as recommended by Staff, except for the following projects: (1) Palo Verde Lagoon Clean Closure and Conversion Project; (2) Valencia – Town Bales Fill Line; and (3) Valencia - Town Buena Vista Fill Line. |
2.4 | The rates agreed to herein are based on a test year ending December 31, 2011, with adjustments for known and measurable changes. |
2.5 | The expense levels agreed to herein are based upon the expense levels recommended by Staff, with the exception of the modified depreciation expense discussed in Section 5.1. |
2.6 | There will be no change in the revenue requirement for Northern Scottsdale as a result of this case. |
4 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
III. | BILL IMPACT AND RATE DESIGN. |
3.1 | Upon the effective date of the new rates, the monthly bill for a residential customer, with median usage, for each year of the phase-in is shown onAttachment A. |
3.2 | For the water company Applicants, the rate design includes six tiers and a CRT.1 This follows the rate design approved in Decision No. 71878. The new CRTs will not take effect until January 1, 2015. |
3.3 | For Palo Verde and Santa Cruz, the recycled and nonpotable water rate will be $1.6380 per 1,000 gallons, to be phased-in over eight years as shown onAttachment A. For the other Global Applicants with no existing recycled or nonpotable customers, the rate shall be $1.6380 per thousand gallons with no phase-in. |
3.4 | The rate increase for Santa Cruz and Palo Verde will be phased in over eight years in accordance with Section 6.3.2.3. The rates of the remaining Applicants, except Northern Scottsdale, will be phased-in over three years. For all Applicants, there will be no rate increase in the first year. The Applicants waive their right to recover the revenues forgone or lost and carrying costs under the phase-ins. |
3.5 | Global withdraws its consolidation proposal for the three West Valley Systems. |
3.6 | Northern Scottsdale revenue requirements are unchanged but the rates shall be redesigned and be implemented with no phase-in. |
IV. | COST OF CAPITAL. |
4.1 | Staff’s proposed consolidated capital structure comprised of 57.80% long term debt, 42.20% common equity will be adopted. |
4.2 | A return on common equity of 9.5% will be adopted. |
4.3 | An embedded cost of debt of 6.1 % will be adopted. |
4.4 | A fair value rate of return of 7.5% will be adopted. |
1 The Conservation Rebate is a component of Global’s water utility rate design that promotes water conservation by customers. The Conservation Rebate applies to all customers who use less than the Conservation Rebate Threshold (“CRT”) amount. The CRT amount for each utility is set forth in Settlement Schedule H-3 for each utility. Each Global water utility also has a Conservation Rebate percentage specified in the utility’s Settlement Schedule H-3. For customers that qualify for the Conservation Rebate by using less than the specified CRT amount, the conservation rebate percentage is applied to the otherwise applicable volumetric portion of their bill.
5 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
4.5 | The provisions set forth herein regarding the quantification of cost of capital, fair value rate base, fair value rate of return, and the revenue requirement are made for purposes of settlement only and should not be construed as admissions against interest or waivers of litigation positions related to other or future cases. |
V. | DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION. |
5.1 | The depreciation and amortization rates proposed by Staff and contained in the Direct Testimony of Staff witness Jian W. Liu will be adopted until further order of the Commission, except that a 10 year life will be used for National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners accounts 348 Other Tangible Plant and 398 Other Tangible Plant. The approved depreciation rates are set forth inAttachment A. The reclassifications of assets proposed by Staff (discussed at page 15 in the Direct Testimony of Staff witness Gerald Becker) are adopted. |
VI. | TREATMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE COORDINATION AND FINANCE AGREEMENTS. |
6.1 | General. |
6.1.1 | The provisions of this Agreement regarding ICFAs are divided into three parts: (1) future ICFAs; (2) treatment of past funds received under existing ICFAs; and (3) treatment of future funds received under existing ICFAs. |
6.1.2 | Staff and RUCO reserve the right to monitor Global’s compliance with this Settlement Agreement and review all ICFA related transactions in future rate applications that Global files, and take appropriate steps, if necessary, to ensure the continued resolution of the issues regarding ICFAs as set forth in this Agreement. |
6.1.3 | All future capital requirements will be met with debt, equity, hook-up fees, or through main extension agreements. |
6.2 | Future ICFAs. |
6.2.1 | Global agrees that Global Parent (and any and all affiliates of Global Parent) will not enter into any new ICFAs or any other ICFA type agreements. This provision does not prohibit Global Parent from entering into amendments to existing ICFAs from time to time, as long as the amendments do not increase the dollar amount of the ICFA funds to be paid to Global Parent or any of its affiliates.Attachment B is a list of ICFAs or ICFA type agreements entered into by Global as of the date of this Agreement. |
6 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
6.2.2 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will establish hook-up fees as set forth in Section VII. |
6.2.3 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will continue to use main extension agreements in accordance with Commission rules. Any associated funds or infrastructure (or land associated with the infrastructure which is conveyed to Global) used to provide water or wastewater service will be segregated to or owned by the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities, Hassayampa, Picacho Water or Picacho Utilities. |
6.3 | Past Funds Received Under Existing ICFAs. |
6.3.1 | The Parties agree as follows with respect to the treatment of past ICFA funds received under existing ICFAs: |
6.3.2 | The total amounts imputed as Contributions In Aid of Construction (“CIAC”) against the active rate base of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde in accordance with Exhibit B to Decision No. 71878 will be reversed and restored to rate base upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in this docket. |
6.3.2.1 | The imputed amount to be reversed for Palo Verde is $10,991,128 on a gross basis or $10,323,747 net of amortization. |
6.3.2.2 | The imputed amount to be reversed for Santa Cruz is $6,600,076 on a gross basis or $6,105,227 net of amortization. |
6.3.2.3 | The revenue requirement impact of this restoration will be phased in over time (Years 2-8) limiting the impact to customers. |
6.3.3 | The $32,391,318 attributed to the Southwest Plant Held for Future Use (“PHFFU”) of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde (referred to as excess capacity in Exhibit B of Decision No. 71878) will no longer be reflected as CIAC upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in this docket. (The gross and net CIAC amounts are equal because there has been no amortization associated with this level of CIAC.) |
6.3.3.1 | The reversal of the $32,391,318 from CIAC Reserve for the Southwest Plant has no impact on rates in this case because this plant is not presently used and useful. |
7 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
6.3.3.2 | The Southwest Plant will be treated as PHFFU until it is placed into service, and the Southwest Plant will not be placed into rate base until it is found used and useful by the Commission in a future rate case. |
6.3.3.3 | In the event that Santa Cruz or Palo Verde seeks, during the phase-in period described in Sections 6.3.2.3 and 1.5, to include the Southwest Plant in rates, they will be limited to seeking inclusion of no more than 12.5% of the $32,391,318 per year, with such calculation beginning January 1, 2014. An additional 12.5% will be phased-in each January 1st thereafter until the full 100% of the aforesaid value of such plant has been determined by the Commission to be suitable for inclusion in rate base in one or more future rate proceedings. Notwithstanding, Santa Cruz and Palo Verde may not seek to include such plant prior to May 31, 2016, the end of the agreed upon stay out period. The amount of Southwest Plant to be included in rate base for rate-making purposes in future rate cases shall be the lesser of the above percentages or the amount of plant determined by the Commission to be used and useful. |
6.3.4 | The total amounts imputed as CIAC against the active rate base of Tonopah in accordance with Exhibit B to Decision No. 71878 will be reversed and restored to rate base upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in this docket. |
6.3.4.1 | The imputed amount to be reversed for Tonopah is $7,085,645 on a gross basis or $6,784,409 net of amortization. |
6.3.4.2 | There will be no revenue impact of this restoration in this case because Tonopah’s rates will be set on an operating margin basis in this case. |
6.3.4.3 | For purposes of this case, Tonopah’s rates will be set based upon a 10% operating margin. In subsequent rate cases filed within the 8 year phase-in referred to in Section 1.5 and 6.3.2.3 above, the rates for Tonopah will be reviewed from both a rate of return and 10 percent operating margin perspective. The rates will be set based upon whichever method results in the lowest rates for Tonopah customers. |
6.3.4.4 | In subsequent rate cases filed within the 8 year phase-in referred to above, Tonopah may include no more than |
8 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
12.5% of the $6,784,409 per year, with such calculation beginning January 1, 2014. An additional 12.5% will be phased-in each January 1stthereafter until the full 100% has been recognized. |
6.3.5 | The ICFA funds allocated to Hassayampa by Exhibit B to Decision No. 71878 and accounted for as “CIAC Reserve” will be reversed upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in this docket. |
6.3.5.1 | The imputed amount to be reversed for Hassayampa is $2,140,455 (the gross and net CIAC amounts are equal because there has been no amortization.) |
6.3.5.2 | Hassayampa has no customers and no rate base; and its rates will remain unchanged at this time. |
6.3.6 | The $8,897,600 in ICFA funds received since December 31, 2008, the test year of the last Global Water and Wastewater Utilities rate case through December 31, 2012, will not be imputed or treated as CIAC. |
6.4 | Future ICFA Fees Received Under Existing ICFAs. |
6.4.1 | ICFA fees received after December 31, 2013, will be handled as follows: a portion of funds received by Global Parent will be paid to the associated utility as a hook-up fee (“HUF”) to be established in accordance with this Agreement, and the remaining portion of the funds will be available to Global Parent for use pursuant to the provisions of the applicable ICFA. |
6.4.2 | For amounts due after the effective date of the Commission’s order in this docket, Global Parent will agree to accept separate checks for the ICFA fees owed, as follows: (1) a check payable to the applicable water utility in the amount of the water HUF; (2) a check payable to the applicable wastewater utility in the amount of the wastewater HUF; and (3) a check payable to Global Parent for the remainder of the ICFA fee. |
6.4.2.1 | However, if only one check is received (regardless of the payee) for an ICFA payment, Global Parent will immediately pay the required HUFs to the applicable water and wastewater utilities out of the fees received in the check, with the remaining funds going to Global Parent in accordance with Section 6.4.4. Global Parent is prohibited from using HUF monies for any purpose. The Global Utilities and Global Intervenors shall use the |
9 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
HUF monies solely for the purposes set forth in the Commission approved HUF tariffs. |
6.4.3 | The Global Parent portion (ICFA Fee minus HUFs) is to be used only in accordance with the terms of the applicable ICFA. |
6.4.4 | Because all the ICFA fees due for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (“EDU”) are not due at the same time, it is necessary to allocate any payment received between the HUF and the portion of the payment which will go to Global Parent. The Signatories agree that each payment received under the ICFA shall be allocated on the following basis: 70% of the payment shall go toward payment of the HUF and the remaining payment shall be allocated to Global Parent. However, regardless of the timing of payments that may be required for any particular ICFA, Global Parent shall be responsible for ensuring that the entire HUF is paid no later than the time the ICFA payment is received for: (1) final plat, (2) the start work date, or (3) the date required by the HUF tariffs, whichever is earliest. When constructing facilities required under a HUF or ICFA, Global Utilities shall first use the HUF moneys received, and only after those funds are spent, shall it use debt or equity financing. |
6.4.5 | All ICFA fees that are not otherwise accounted for under this Agreement, will be treated in accordance with Section 6.4.1. This shall not apply to past due amounts due prior to December 31, 2012, that otherwise would have been paid under the existing ICFA. These shall be treated in accordance with Section 6.3.6. |
VII. | HOOK-UP FEES. |
7.1 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, and Picacho Utilities will establish hook-up fees in the following amounts: |
7.1.1 | Santa Cruz: $1,250 |
7.1.2 | Palo Verde: $1,250 |
7.1.3 | Picacho Water: $1,250 |
7.1.4 | Picacho Utilities: $1,250 |
7.1.5 | Valencia – Town: $1,750 |
7.1.6 | Valencia – Greater Buckeye: $1,750 |
10 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
7.1.7 | Tonopah: $1,750 |
7.1.8 | Willow: $1,750 |
7.1.9 | Northern Scottsdale: $1,750 |
7.1.10 | Hassayampa: $1,750 |
7.2 | The HUF will be in the form of Staff’s standard HUF appended hereto asAttachment C. In the case of the Applicants, the HUF tariffs will take effect upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in these consolidated dockets. In the case of Picacho Water, Picacho Utilities, and Hassayampa, those utilities will file, within 30 days of a Commission Decision in this case, separate applications for a HUF tariff for the amounts described in Section 7.1. |
7.3 | As required in Staff’s standard form HUF tariff, each Global water and wastewater utility will maintain a separate, segregated bank account for all funds received under the HUF tariff and file annual reports as outlined in the tariffs. The HUF funds may only be used by the Global water and wastewater utilities for the purposes specified in the HUF tariff. Global’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer shall be required to file an affidavit annually which states that the conditions of this paragraph have been met. |
VIII. | TARIFFS AND CODE OF CONDUCT. |
8.1 | The Global Water Utilities’ existing low income tariff will remain in effect, and will apply to Northern Scottsdale upon the effective date of the Commission’s order in these consolidated dockets. |
8.2 | The Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (“CAGRD”) adjustor mechanism discussed in the Direct Testimony of Global Utilities’ witness Ron Fleming (pages 13-18) and Staff witness Becker (page 27) will be approved subject to the same requirements of the adjustor mechanism approved for Johnson Utilities, L.L.C. in Decision No. 71854 pages 38-44 and appended hereto asAttachment D. |
8.3 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities agree to withdraw their request to eliminate their BMP tariffs. Northern Scottsdale agrees to file a BMP tariff in accordance with the Direct Testimony of Staff witness Liu. |
8.4 | The Signatories agree to the Global Water and Wastewater Utilities’ Terms and Conditions tariff (Attachment 4 to the Direct Testimony of Mr. Fleming), as modified by Staff, inAttachment E. |
11 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
8.5 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities shall file revised tariffs reflecting all of the changes discussed in this agreement within 30 days from the date of the Commission’s decision in this matter. A list of revised tariffs that the Applicants will file for each of the Global Utilities is attached asAttachment F. |
8.6 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities agree to withdraw their request for an Individual Case Basis (“ICB”) tariff. |
8.7 | The Global Water and Wastewater Utilities will work with Staff to adopt a Code of Conduct to apply to transactions that are between or involve the Applicants and their unregulated affiliates and to assure confidential treatment of customer specific information including water and wastewater usage information. This Code of Conduct shall include, at a minimum, the recommendations of Staff Witness Armstrong on page 34 of his Direct Testimony as well as measures designed to ensure that the Global Utilities are independent and stand-alone entities separate and apart from the Global Parent and its other unregulated affiliates and that all transactions between these entities are on an arms-length basis. The Applicants shall file the agreed upon Code of Conduct by May 2, 2014. |
IX. | WATER LOSS. |
9.1 | The Global Water Utilities agree to file the water loss reports recommended in the Direct Testimony of Staff witness Mr. Liu. |
X. | COMMISSION EVALUATION OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. |
10.1 | All currently filed testimony and exhibits will be offered into the Commission’s record as evidence. |
10.2 | The Signatories recognize that Staff does not have the power to bind the Commission. For purposes of proposing a settlement agreement, Staff acts in the same manner as any party to a Commission proceeding. |
10.3 | This Agreement will serve as a procedural device by which the Signatories will submit their proposed settlement of the Global Rate Dockets to the Commission. |
10.4 | The Signatories recognize that the Commission will independently consider and evaluate the terms of this Agreement. If the Commission issues an order adopting all material terms of this Agreement, such action will constitute Commission approval of the Agreement. Thereafter, the Signatories will abide by the terms as approved by the Commission. |
12 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
10.5 | If the Commission fails to issue an order adopting all material terms of this Agreement, any or all of the Signatories may withdraw from this Agreement, and such Signatory or Signatories may pursue without prejudice their respective remedies at law. For purposes of this Agreement, whether a term is material will be left to the discretion of theSignatory choosing to withdraw from the Agreement. If a Signatory withdraws from the Agreement pursuant to this paragraph and files an application for rehearing, the other Signatories, except for Staff, will support the application for rehearing by filing a document with the Commission that supports approval of the Agreement in its entirety. Staff will not be obligated to file any document or take any position regarding the withdrawing Signatory’s application for rehearing. |
XI. | MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. |
11.1 | This case has attracted participants with widely diverse interests. To achieve consensus for settlement, many participants are accepting positions that, in any other circumstances, they would be unwilling to accept. They are doing so because this Agreement, as a whole, is consistent with their long-term interests and with the broad public interest. The acceptance by any Signatory of a specific element of this Agreement will not be considered as precedent for acceptance of that element in any other context. |
11.2 | No Signatory is bound by any position asserted in negotiations, except as expressly stated in this Agreement. No Signatory will offer evidence of conduct or statements made in the course of negotiating this Agreement before this Commission, any other regulatory agency, or any court. |
11.3 | Neither this Agreement nor any of the positions taken in this Agreement by any of the Signatories may be referred to, cited, and/or relied upon as precedent in any proceeding before the Commission, any other regulatory agency, or any court for any purpose except to secure approval of this Agreement and enforce its terms. |
11.4 | To the extent any provision of this Agreement is inconsistent with any existing Commission order, rule, or regulation, this Agreement will control. |
11.5 | Each of the terms of this Agreement is in consideration of all other terms of this Agreement. Accordingly, the terms are not severable. |
11.6 | The Signatories will make reasonable and good faith efforts necessary to obtain a Commission order approving this Agreement. The Signatories will support and defend this Agreement before the Commission. Subject to Paragraph 10.5 above, if the Commission adopts an order approving all material terms of the Agreement, the Signatories will support and |
13 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
defend the Commission’s order before any court or regulatory agency in which it may be at issue. |
11.7 | This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by each Signatory on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered will be deemed an original and all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may also be executed electronically or by facsimile. Further, any party to the Global Rate Dockets may join in this Settlement Agreement as a Signatory by filing a signed signature page for that party with the Commission’s Docket Control in the Global Rate Dockets listed above. |
GLOBAL WATER – PALO VERDE UTILITIES COMPANY |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
GLOBAL WATER – SANTA CRUZ WATER COMPANY |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
VALENCIA WATER COMPANY – TOWN DIVISION |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
VALENCIA WATER COMPANY – GREATER BUCKEYE DIVISION |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
14 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
WATER UTILITY OF GREATER TONOPAH, INC. |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
WILLOW VALLEY WATER CO., INC. |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
WATER UTILITY OF NORTHERN SCOTTSDALE, INC. |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
GLOBAL WATER – PICACHO COVE UTILITIES COMPANY |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
GLOBAL WATER – PICACHO COVE WATER COMPANY |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
HASSAYAMPA UTILITIES COMPANY, INC. |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
15 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC. |
By: | /s/ Ron L. Fleming |
Name: | Ron L. Fleming |
Its: | President |
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION UTILITIES DIVISION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
CITY OF MARICOPA |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
WILLOW VALLEY CLUB ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
NEW WORLD PROPERTIES, INC. |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
16 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC. |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION UTILITIES DIVISION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
CITY OF MARICOPA |
By: | /s/ Christian Price |
Name: | Christian Price |
Its: | Mayor |
WlLLOW VALLEY CLUB ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
NEW WORLD PROPERTIES, INC. |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
16 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC. |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION UTILITIES DIVISION |
By: | /s/ Steve Olea |
Name: | Steve Olea |
Its: | Director |
RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER OFFICE |
By: | /s/ Patrick J Quinn |
Name: | Patrick J Quinn |
Its: | Executive Director |
CITY OF MARICOPA |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
WILLOW VALLEY CLUB ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
NEW WORLD PROPERTIES, INC. |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
16 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
SIERRA NEGRA RANCH, LLC |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
ACACIA CROSSINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
ALTERRA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
COBBLESTONE FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Ryan Atwood |
Name: | Ryan Atwood |
Its: | President |
DESERT CEDARS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
DESERT PASSAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
17 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
SIERRA NEGRA RANCH, LLC |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
ACACIA CROSSINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Chris Eldridge |
Name: | Chris Eldridge |
Its: | President |
ALTERRA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
COBBLESTONE FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
DESERT CEDARS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
DESERT PASSAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
17 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
SIERRA NEGRA RANCH, LLC |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
ACACIA CROSSINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
ALTERRA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Deborah A Cadue |
Name: | Deborah A Cadue |
Its: | President |
COBBLESTONE FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
DESERT CEDARS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
DESERT PASSAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
17 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
SIERRA NEGRA RANCH, LLC |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
ACACIA CROSSINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
ALTERRA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
COBBLESTONE FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
DESERT CEDARS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Linda Huggins |
Name: | Linda Huggins |
Its: | President |
DESERT PASSAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
17 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLENNWILDE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
HOMESTEAD NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Michael Forsum |
Name: | Michael Forsum |
Its: | President |
MARICOPA MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
PROVINCE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
RANCHO EL DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
RANCHO EL DORADO PHASE III HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
Name: |
Its: |
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLENNWILDE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Michelle Yerger |
Name: | Michelle Yerger |
Its: | VP - Board of Directors |
HOMESTEAD NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
MARICOPA MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
PROVINCE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO PHASE III HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLENNWILDE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
HOMESTEAD NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
MARICOPA MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Eric Schmidt |
Name: | Eric Schmidt |
Its: | President |
PROVINCE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO PHASE III HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLENNWILDE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
HOMESTEAD NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
MARICOPA MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
PROVINCE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Ken Edwards |
Name: | Ken Edwards |
Its: | President |
RANCHO EL DORADO PHASE III HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
GLENNWILDE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
HOMESTEAD NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
MARICOPA MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
PROVINCE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Lori L. Crabtree |
Name: | Lori L. Crabtree |
Its: | HOA President |
RANCHO EL DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
RANCHO EL DORADO PHASE III HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Lori L. Crabtree |
Name: | Lori L. Crabtree |
Its: | HOA President |
18 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
RANCHO MIRAGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SENITA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SORRENTO COMMUNITY MASTER ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
19 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
RANCHO MIRAGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Chris Barr |
Name: | Chris Barr |
Its: | President |
SENITA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SORRENTO COMMUNITY MASTER ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
19 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
RANCHO MIRAGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SENITA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Roderick C Campbell |
Name: | Roderick C Campbell |
Its: | President |
SORRENTO COMMUNITY MASTER ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
19 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF RATE ADJUSTMENT APPLlCATIONS
DOCKET NOS. W-01212A-12-0309 et al.
August 12, 2013
RANCHO MIRAGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SENITA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION |
By: |
|
Name: |
|
Its: |
|
SORRENTO COMMUNITY MASTER ASSOCIATION |
By: | /s/ Holly James |
Name: | Holly James |
Its: |
|
19 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Town Division
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement A-1 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 2,323,475 | $ | 2,323,475 | $ | 2,251,949 | $ | 2,251,949 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (263,809) | $ | (263,809) | $ | 17,649 | $ | 17,649 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | -11.35% | -11.35% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | 10.27% | 10.27% | 7.50% | 7.50% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 238,621 | $ | 238,621 | $ | 168,896 | $ | 168,896 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 502,430 | $ | 502,430 | $ | 151,247 | $ | 151,247 | |||||||||||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6389 | 1.6389 | 1.6698 | 1.6698 | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 823,424 | $ | 823,424 | $ | 252,554 | $ | 252,554 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 4,940,316 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 5,763,740 | $ | 5,763,740 | $ | 5,192,870 | $ | 5,192,870 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 16.67% | 16.67% | 5.11% | 5.11% | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | 9.50% | 9.50% | |||||||||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column [A]: Company Schedule A-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Company Schedule A-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Company Schedules A-1, A-2, & D-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Settlement Schedules GRCF, B-1, and C-1 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Schedule: A-1a | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | Settlement Phase In | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT
Year | Revenue Increase
(Relative to Test Year) | Revenue Increase (Relative to Previous Year) | ||||||||
2014 | - | - | ||||||||
2015 | 126,277 | 126,277 | ||||||||
2016 | 252,554 | 126,277 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | GRCF | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor: | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.4052% | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.5948% | ||||||||||||||||
4 | CombinedFederal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 39.7078% | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 59.8870% | ||||||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.669812 | ||||||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor: | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 0.6600% | ||||||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10) | 0.4052% | ||||||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 7, L25) | 1.8060% | ||||||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20 * L21) | 1.1089% | ||||||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 39.7078% | ||||||||||||||||
24 |
Required Operating Income (ScheduleA-1, Line 5) | $ | 168,896 | |||||||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (Schedule C-1, Line 36) | $ | 17,649 | |||||||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 151,247 | |||||||||||||||
27 |
Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 56,626 | |||||||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | (38,453) | |||||||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 95,079 | |||||||||||||||
30 |
Required Revenue Increase (Schedule A-1, Line 8) | $ | 252,554 | |||||||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 0.6600% | ||||||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 1,667 | |||||||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 1,667 | |||||||||||||||
35 |
Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 7, Line 21) | $ | 278,241 | |||||||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 7, Col A, L19) | $ | 273,680 | |||||||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36) | $
| 4,561
|
| ||||||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 252,554 | |||||||||||||||
(A) |
(B) | (C) | ||||||||||||||||
Test Year | Settlement Recommended | |||||||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Schedule C 1) | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 5,192,870 | |||||||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 4,961,119 | $ | 4,967,347 | |||||||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | 78,818 | $ | 78,818 | |||||||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | (99,622) | $ | 146,704 | |||||||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | (6,942) | $ | 10,222 | |||||||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | (92,680) | $ | 136,482 | |||||||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | (31,511) | $ | 46,404 | |||||||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | (31,511) | $ | 46,404 | |||||||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | (38,453) | $ | 56,626 | |||||||||||||
50 |
Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (Schedule B-1) | $ | 2,251,949 | |||||||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | 3.5000% | ||||||||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | 78,818 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | ||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Settlement B-1 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
LINE NO. | (A) COMPANY AS FILED | (B)
SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | (C) SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 53,624,734 | $ | (71,526) | $ | 53,553,208 | |||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | 9,419,952 | - | 9,419,952 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 44,204,782 | $ | (71,526) | $ | 44,133,256 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 1,860,537 | $ | - | $ | 1,860,537 | |||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 272,596 | - | 272,596 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | 1,587,941 | - | 1,587,941 | ||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 39,299,151 | - | 39,299,151 | ||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 1,159,524 | - | | 1,159,524 | | ||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 395,015 | 395,015 | ||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 560,324 | - | 560,324 | ||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||
13 | Prepayments | - | - | - | ||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||
14 | Supplies Inventory | - | - | - | ||||||||||
15 | Projected Capital Expenditures | - | - | - | ||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,323,475 | $ | (71,526) | $ | 2,251,949 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 Column (B): Schedule B-2 Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement B-2 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [C] | [C] | |||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO.
| ACCT. NO.
| DESCRIPTION
| COMPANY AS FILED | Post Test B-2a | Reclassification
ADJ #2 Per Staff Testimony | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTED | ||||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 150,432 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 150,432 | ||||||||||||
2 |
| 304 | Structures and Improvements | 1,037,614 | 1,037,614 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 1,859,615 | 1,859,615 | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | 309 | Supply Mains | 46,790 | 46,790 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 67,508 | 67,508 | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 8,217,566 | 8,217,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 4,091,843 | (4,091,843) | - | |||||||||||||||||
8 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 4,091,843 | 4,091,843 | ||||||||||||||||||
9 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | - | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 4,800,409 | (4,800,409) | - | |||||||||||||||||
11 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 4,255,136 | 4,255,136 | ||||||||||||||||||
12 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 545,273 | 545,273 | ||||||||||||||||||
13 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 21,453,994 | 21,453,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
14 | 333 | Services | 3,278,935 | 3,278,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 1,470,247 | 1,470,247 | ||||||||||||||||||
16 | 335 | Hydrants | 1,981,787 | 1,981,787 | ||||||||||||||||||
17 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 13,916 | 13,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
18 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 177,934 | 177,934 | ||||||||||||||||||
19 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 50,956 | 50,956 | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 319,350 | 319,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
21 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 94,283 | 94,283 | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 42,598 | 42,598 | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 61,507 | 61,507 | ||||||||||||||||||
24 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 790,032 | 790,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 17,310 | 17,310 | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 3,597,358 | (71,526) | 3,525,832 | |||||||||||||||||
27 | 390 | Office Furniture | 2,753 | 2,753 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
28 | Total Plant in Service | 53,624,734 | (71,526) | (0) | 53,553,208 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Accumulated Depreciation | 9,419,952 | - | 9,419,952 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 44,204,782 | $ | (71,526) | $ | (0) | $ | 44,133,256 | |||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
33 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 1,860,537 | $ | - | $ | 1,860,537 | |||||||||||||||
35 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 272,596 | - | 272,596 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
36 | Net CIAC (L63 - L64) | 1,587,941 | - | - | 1,587,941 | |||||||||||||||||
37 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 39,299,151 | - | - | 39,299,151 | |||||||||||||||||
38 | Imputed Reg Advances | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
39 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
40 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 1,159,524 | 1,159,524 | |||||||||||||||||||
41 | Customer Meter Deposits | 395,015 | 395,015 | |||||||||||||||||||
42 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
43 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 560,324 | 560,324 | |||||||||||||||||||
44 | Working Capital Allowance | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
51 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,323,475 | $ | (71,526) | $ | (0) | $ | 2,251,949 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | ||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Settlement B-2a | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Post Test Year Plant |
RATE BASE ADJUSTMENT #1 POST TEST YEAR PLANT
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT | AS | SETTLEMENT | AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | Description | FILED | ADJUSTMENTS | ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
| 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 71,526 | (71,526) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disallowed PTYP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SVWDC Optimization | $ | 71,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 71,526 |
References:
Column [A] : Disallowed Amount reflected in Acct. 348, PTYP, Per Co Schedule B-2.1
Column [B] , Col [C] less Col [A]
Column [C] , Per Staff testimony GWB and Engineering testimony
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement C-1 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
[A]
| [B]
| [C] SETTLEMENT | [D]
| [E]
| ||||||||||||||||||
COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | TEST YEAR | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||
LINE | TEST YEAR | TEST YEAR | AS | RECOMMENDED | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | AS FILED | ADJUSTMENTS | ADJUSTED | CHANGES | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 252,554 | $ | 252,554 | |||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | 4,803,374 | - | 4,803,374 | - | 4,803,374 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 136,942 | - | 136,942 | - | 136,942 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | - | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 252,554 | $ | 5,192,870 | |||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 893,501 | $ | (39,959) | $ | 853,542 | $ | - | $ | 853,542 | |||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 269 | - | 269 | - | 269 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 464,076 | (12,401) | 451,675 | - | 451,675 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 33,613 | (898) | 32,715 | - | 32,715 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 79,398 | (22,096) | 57,302 | - | 57,302 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 62,865 | - | 62,865 | - | 62,865 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 531,316 | (153,707) | 377,609 | - | 377,609 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 14,571 | - | 14,571 | - | 14,571 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Propert | 43,412 | - | 43,412 | - | 43,412 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 88,775 | - | 88,775 | 88,775 | |||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 33,142 | - | 33,142 | - | 33,142 | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 5,460 | - | 5,460 | - | 5,460 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expen | 35,298 | (17,362) | 17,936 | - | 17,936 | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 30,898 | 1,708 | 32,606 | 1,667 | 34,273 | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 79,463 | - | 79,463 | - | 79,463 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 2,832,046 | (247,436) | 2,584,610 | 2,584,610 | |||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC | (63,825) | - | (63,825) | (63,825) | |||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 15,312 | - | 15,312 | - | 15,312 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - | 273,680 | - | 273,680 | 4,561 | 278,241 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | (249,144) | 210,691 | (38,453) | 95,079 | 56,626 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | 5,204,124 | (281,458) | 4,922,666 | 101,307 | 5,023,973 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (263,809) | $ | 281,458 | $ | 17,649 | $ | 151,247 | $ | 168,896 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 Column (B): Schedule C 2 Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) Column (D): Schedules GRCF, Lines 29, 34 and 37 Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement C-2
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division
W-01212A-12-0309
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | [F] | [E] | [H] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO.
| DESCRIPTION
| COMPANY AS FILED | Excess Water Loss ADJ #1
| Bad Debts Exp ADJ #2
| Rate Case Exp ADJ #3
| Expense Normalizations ADJ #4
| Deprec. Exp ADJ #5
| Income Taxes ADJ #6
| SETTLEMENT ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | 4,803,374 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,803,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 136,942 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 136,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,940,316 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 893,501 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (39,959) | $ | - | $ | 853,542 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 269 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 464,076 | (12,401) | - | - | - | - | 451,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 33,613 | (898) | 32,715 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 79,398 | - | - | (22,096) | 57,302 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 62,865 | - | - | 62,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 531,316 | - | - | (153,707) | 377,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 14,571 | - | - | 14,571 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 43,412 | - | - | 43,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 88,775 | - | - | - | 88,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 33,142 | - | - | 33,142 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 5,460 | - | - | 5,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense – 1 | 35,298 | - | - | (17,362) | 17,936 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 30,898 | - | 1,708 | 32,606 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 79,463 | - | - | 79,463 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 2,832,046 | - | - | (247,436) | 2,584,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC Amor | (63,825) | - | - | (63,825) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 15,312 | - | - | 15,312 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Prop | 273,680 | 273,680 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | (249,144) | 210,691 | (38,453) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 5,204,124 | $ | (13,299) | $ | 1,708 | $ | (17,362) | $ | (215,761) | $ | (247,436) | $ | 210,691 | $ | 4,922,666 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income | $ | (263,809) | $ | 13,299 | $ | (1,708) | $ | 17,362 | $ | 215,761 | $ | 247,436 | $ | (210,691) | $ | 17,649 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 1 | |||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Water Loss | |||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - EXCESS WATER LOSS
LINE NO. | ||||||||
1 |
One plus allowable water loss | 110.00% | ||||||
2 | One plus actual water loss | 113.02% | ||||||
3 | Allowable portion | 97.33% | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4 | Disallowable portion | 2.67% | ||||||
5 |
Power Expense | 464,076 | ||||||
6 | Disallowance | $ | 12,401 | |||||
7 |
Chemical Expense | 33,613 | ||||||
8 | Disallowance | $ | 898 | |||||
Line 1: Maximum acceptable level of water losses Line 2: Actual level of water losses Line 3: Line 2 / line 3 Line 4: 1 minus line 4 Line 6: Line 1 times line 5 Lines 1 - 6: See also Staff testimony GWB |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 2 | |||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Bad Debt Expense | |||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED* | ||||||||||||
1 | $ | 30,898 | $ | 1,708 | $ | 32,606 | ||||||||||
|
|
References: Column (A), Company Workpapers Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 |
Adjusted Test Year Revenues C 1 | $ | 4,940,316 | ||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate | 0.0066 | |||||
|
| |||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense | $ | 32,606 | ||||
Co Proposed | $ | 30,898 | ||||
|
| |||||
$ | 1,708 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 35,298 | $ | (17,362) | $ | 17,936 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate Case Expense |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.82% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,652 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,095 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Ultmann & Company P C | $ | 78,809 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10,602 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 643 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 25,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Settlement Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total, by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247) | ||||||||||
References: Column (A), Company Workpapers Column (B): Line 20 for respective system Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 4 | |||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Expense Normalizations | |||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - EXPENSE NORMALIZATIONS
LINE NO. | ACCT / DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||
1 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 893,501 | $ | (39,959) | $ | 853,542 | |||||||||
2 | 620 Materials and Supplies | $ | 79,398 | $ | (22,096) | $ | 57,302 | |||||||||
3 | 630 Outside Services | $ | 531,316 | $ | (153,707) | $ | 377,609 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | 1,504,215 | $ | (215,761) | $ | 1,288,454 | |||||||||||
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Workpapers
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B)
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | Depreciation | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] PLANT BALANCE | [B] DEPRECIATION RATE | [C] DEPRECIATION EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | 150,432 | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
3 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 1,037,614 | 3.33% | 34,553 | |||||||||||
4 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 1,859,615 | 3.33% | 61,925 | |||||||||||
5 | 309 | Supply Mains | 46,790 | 2.00% | 936 | |||||||||||
6 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 67,508 | 5.00% | 3,375 | |||||||||||
7 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 8,217,566 | 12.50% | 1,027,196 | |||||||||||
8 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
9 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 4,091,843 | 3.33% | 136,258 | |||||||||||
10 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | - | 20.00% | - | |||||||||||
11 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | - | - | ||||||||||||
12 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 4,255,136 | 2.22% | 94,464 | |||||||||||
13 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 545,273 | 5.00% | 27,264 | |||||||||||
14 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 21,453,994 | 2.00% | 429,080 | |||||||||||
15 | 333 | Services | 3,278,935 | 3.33% | 109,189 | |||||||||||
16 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 1,470,247 | 8.33% | 122,472 | |||||||||||
17 | 335 | Hydrants | 1,981,787 | 2.00% | 39,636 | |||||||||||
18 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 13,916 | 6.67% | 928 | |||||||||||
19 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 177,934 | 6.67% | 11,868 | |||||||||||
20 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 50,956 | 6.67% | 3,399 | |||||||||||
21 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 319,350 | 20.00% | 63,870 | |||||||||||
22 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 94,283 | 5.00% | 4,714 | |||||||||||
23 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 42,598 | 10.00% | 4,260 | |||||||||||
24 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 61,507 | 5.00% | 3,075 | |||||||||||
25 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 790,032 | 10.00% | 79,003 | |||||||||||
26 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 17,310 | 10.00% | 1,731 | |||||||||||
27 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 3,525,832 | 10.00% | 352,583 | |||||||||||
28 | 390 | Office Furniture | 2,753 | 4.50% | 124 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | Total Plant | 53,553,208 | 2,611,778 | |||||||||||||
30 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
31 | Land and Land Rights | 150,432 | ||||||||||||||
32 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 53,402,776 | $ 2,611,778 | ||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||
35 | Amortization of CIAC | $ | 1,860,537 | 4.8907% | $ 90,994 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
36 | Settlement Depreciation Expense | $ 2,520,785 | ||||||||||||||
37 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ 2,768,221 | ||||||||||||||
38 | Settlement Adjustment | $ (247,436) |
References: | ||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 6 | |||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | Income Taxes | |||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - INCOME TAXES
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | (249,144) | $ | 210,691 | $ | (38,453) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B),
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement ADJ 7 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #7 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | |||||||||
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 4,940,316 | $ | 4,940,316 | |||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 9,880,631 | 9,880,631 | |||||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 4,940,316 | ||||||||||
5 | Settlement Recommended Revenue | 5,192,870 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 14,820,947 | 15,073,501 | |||||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 4,940,316 | 5,024,500 | |||||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 9,880,631 | 10,049,000 | |||||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | 265,232 | 265,232 | |||||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | 43,247 | 43,247 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 10,102,616 | 10,270,985 | |||||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 2,121,549 | 2,156,907 | |||||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 12.9000% | 12.9000% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 273,680 | |||||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 273,680 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | 0 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
20 | Property Tax on Recommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 278,241 | |||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 273,680 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 4,561 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | 4,561 | |||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 252,554 | |||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 1.80600% | ||||||||||
REFERENCES: Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement D-1 | |||||
W-01212A-12-0309 | ||||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Percent of Total | Cost Rate | Weighted Cost | ||||||||||||
Debt | 57.8% | 6.1% | 3.5% | |||||||||||
Equity | 42.2% | 9.5% | 4.0% | |||||||||||
Required Rate of Return | 7.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Valencia Water Company, Town Divisions | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
W-01212A-12-0309 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Meter Size (All Classes*) | Basic Service Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” X 3/4” Meter | $ | 30.88 | $ | 30.88 | $ | 31.34 | $ 31.87 | |||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 30.88 | 30.88 | 31.34 | 31.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 77.20 | 77.20 | 78.34 | 79.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 154.40 | 154.40 | 156.69 | 159.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 247.04 | 247.04 | 250.70 | 254.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 494.08 | 494.08 | 501.39 | 506.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 772.00 | 772.00 | 783.50 | 796.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 1,544.00 | 1,544.00 | 1,586.85 | 1,594.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | 3,086.00 | 2,470.40 | 2,507.20 | 2,549.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Rate Charges (per 1,000 gallons): |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Block | Volumetric Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 1,000 Gallons | 1,000 Gallons | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.10 | $ 1.10 | $ | 1.10 | |||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 5,000 Gallons | 5,000 Gallons | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.98 | ||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | 10,000 Gallons | 10,000 Gallons | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.85 | ||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | 16,000 Gallons | 18,000 Gallons | 3.83 | 3.83 | 3.93 | 4.12 | ||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | 25,000 Gallons | 25,000 Gallons | 4.90 | 4.00 | 5.01 | 5.25 | ||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | Over 25,000 | Over 25,000 | 6.02 | 6.02 | 6.15 | 6.42 | ||||||||||||||||
Conservation Rebate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons | 6,701 | 6,701 | 6,001 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commodity rate rebate: | 59% | 59% | 50% | |||||||||||||||||||
(applied if consumption is below the CRT) |
|
*includes all potable water meters including irrigation meters.
Non-Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | 185.74 | 533.76 | 348.02 | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 1.638 | 1.07 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement Schedule H-3 Page 2 of 2 |
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Charge | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 35.00 | S 35.00 | $ | - | |||||||
Establishment of Service - After Hours | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | $ | - | ||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge Per Hour | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge | NA | 35.00 | ||||||||||
Deposit | (c) | (c) | ||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | $ | - | ||||||||
MeterTest Fee (if Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | $ | - | ||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | $ | - | ||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
|
(a) Number of Months on System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-403(D).
(b) Cost to include parts, labors and overhead and all applicable taxes per A.A.C. R14-2-405(B)(5).
(c) Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B).
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege, sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(D)(5).
Service Line and Meter Installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to AA.C. R14-2-405)
Meter Size | Present Service Line Charges | Total Charges | Proposed Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 x 3/4” Meter | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 495.00 | 315.00 | 610.00 | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Meter | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Turbine Meter | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 630.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Compound Meter | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 630.00 | 1,690.00 | 2,720.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Turbine Meter | 1.045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Compound Meter | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Turbine Meter | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Compound Meter | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Turbine Meter | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Compound Meter | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” and Larger Meters | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 35.16 | $ 35.16 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 30.88 | $ | - | $ | 30.88 | $ | 30.88 | $ | - | $ | 30.88 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 31.98 | (0.65) | 31.33 | 31.98 | (0.65) | 31.33 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 33.96 | (1.82) | 32.14 | 33.96 | (1.82) | 32.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 35.94 | (2.99) | 32.95 | 35.94 | (2.99) | 32.95 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 37.92 | (4.15) | 33.77 | 37.92 | (4.15) | 33.77 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.90 | (5.32) | 34.58 | 39.90 | (5.32) | 34.58 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 42.75 | (7.00) | 35.75 | 42.75 | (7.00) | 35.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 45.60 | - | 45.60 | 45.60 | - | 45.60 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.45 | - | 48.45 | 48.45 | - | 48.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 51.30 | - | 51.30 | 51.30 | - | 51.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 54.15 | - | 54.15 | 54.15 | - | 54.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 73.30 | - | 73.30 | 73.30 | - | 73.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 94.59 | - | 94.59 | 94.59 | - | 94.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 119.09 | - | 119.09 | 119.09 | - | 119.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 269.59 | - | 269.59 | 269.59 | - | 269.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.09 | - | 420.09 | 420.09 | - | 420.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 570.59 | - | 570.59 | 570.59 | - | 570.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 721.09 | - | 721.09 | 721.09 | - | 721.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 871.59 | - | 871.59 | 871.59 | - | 871.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,022.09 | - | 1,022.09 | 1,022.09 | - | 1,022.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,172.59 | - | 1,172.59 | 1,172.59 | - | 1,172.59 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 35.16 | $ 36.56 | $ 1.40 | 4.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 30.88 | $ | - | $ | 30.88 | $ | 31.34 | $ | - | $ | 31.34 | 1.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 31.98 | (0.65) | 31.33 | 32.44 | (0.55) | 31.89 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 33.96 | (1.82) | 32.14 | 34.42 | (1.54) | 32.88 | 2.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 35.94 | (2.99) | 32.95 | 36.40 | (2.53) | 33.87 | 2.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 37.92 | (4.15) | 33.77 | 38.38 | (3.52) | 34.86 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.90 | (5.32) | 34.58 | 40.36 | (4.51) | 35.85 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 42.75 | (7.00) | 35.75 | 43.21 | (5.94) | 37.28 | 4.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 45.60 | - | 45.60 | 46.06 | - | 46.06 | 1.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.45 | - | 48.45 | 48.91 | - | 48.91 | 0.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 51.30 | - | 51.30 | 51.76 | - | 51.76 | 0.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 54.15 | - | 54.15 | 54.61 | - | 54.61 | 0.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 73.30 | - | 73.30 | 74.26 | - | 74.26 | 1.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 94.59 | - | 94.59 | 96.07 | - | 96.07 | 1.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 119.09 | - | 119.09 | 121.12 | - | 121.12 | 1.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 269.59 | - | 269.59 | 274.87 | - | 274.87 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.09 | - | 420.09 | 428.62 | - | 428.62 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 570.59 | - | 570.59 | 582.37 | - | 582.37 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 721.09 | - | 721.09 | 736.12 | - | 736.12 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 871.59 | - | 871.59 | 889.87 | - | 889.87 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,022.09 | - | 1,022.09 | 1,043.62 | - | 1,043.62 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,172.59 | - | 1,172.59 | 1,197.37 | - | 1,197.37 | 2.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 35.16 | $ 37.09 | $ 1.93 | 5.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 30.88 | $ | - | $ | 30.88 | $ | 31.87 | $ | - | $ | 31.87 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 31.98 | (0.65) | 31.33 | 32.97 | (0.55) | 32.42 | 3.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 33.96 | (1.82) | 32.14 | 34.95 | (1.54) | 33.41 | 3.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 35.94 | (2.99) | 32.95 | 36.93 | (2.53) | 34.40 | 4.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 37.92 | (4.15) | 33.77 | 38.91 | (3.52) | 35.39 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.90 | (5.32) | 34.58 | 40.89 | (4.51) | 36.38 | 5.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 42.75 | (7.00) | 35.75 | 43.74 | (5.94) | 37.81 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 45.60 | - | 45.60 | 46.59 | - | 46.59 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.45 | - | 48.45 | 49.44 | - | 49.44 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 51.30 | - | 51.30 | 52.29 | - | 52.29 | 1.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 54.15 | - | 54.15 | 55.14 | - | 55.14 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 73.30 | - | 73.30 | 75.74 | - | 75.74 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 94.59 | - | 94.59 | 98.60 | - | 98.60 | 4.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 119.09 | - | 119.09 | 124.85 | - | 124.85 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 269.59 | - | 269.59 | 285.35 | - | 285.35 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.09 | - | 420.09 | 445.85 | - | 445.85 | 6.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 570.59 | - | 570.59 | 606.35 | - | 606.35 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 721.09 | - | 721.09 | 766.85 | - | 766.85 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 871.59 | - | 871.59 | 927.35 | - | 927.35 | 6.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,022.09 | - | 1,022.09 | 1,087.85 | - | 1,087.85 | 6.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,172.59 | - | 1,172.59 | 1,248.35 | - | 1,248.35 | 6.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 81.48 | $ 81.48 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 77.20 | $ | - | $ | 77.20 | $ | 77.20 | $ | - | $ | 77.20 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 78.30 | (0.65) | 77.65 | 78.30 | (0.65) | 77.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 80.28 | (1.82) | 78.46 | 80.28 | (1.82) | 78.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 82.26 | (2.99) | 79.27 | 82.26 | (2.99) | 79.27 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 84.24 | (4.15) | 80.09 | 84.24 | (4.15) | 80.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 86.22 | (5.32) | 80.90 | 86.22 | (5.32) | 80.90 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 89.07 | (7.00) | 82.07 | 89.07 | (7.00) | 82.07 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 91.92 | - | 91.92 | 91.92 | - | 91.92 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 94.77 | - | 94.77 | 94.77 | - | 94.77 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 97.62 | - | 97.62 | 97.62 | - | 97.62 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 100.47 | - | 100.47 | 100.47 | - | 100.47 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 119.62 | - | 119.62 | 119.62 | - | 119.62 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 140.91 | - | 140.91 | 140.91 | - | 140.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 165.41 | - | 165.41 | 165.41 | - | 165.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 315.91 | - | 315.91 | 315.91 | - | 315.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 466.41 | - | 466.41 | 466.41 | - | 466.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 616.91 | - | 616.91 | 616.91 | - | 616.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 767.41 | - | 767.41 | 767.41 | - | 767.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 917.91 | - | 917.91 | 917.91 | - | 917.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,068.41 | - | 1,068.41 | 1,068.41 | - | 1,068.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,218.91 | - | 1,218.91 | 1,218.91 | - | 1,218.91 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 81.48 | $ 83.56 | $ 2.08 | 2.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 77.20 | $ | - | $ | 77.20 | $ | 78.34 | $ | - | $ | 78.34 | 1.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 78.30 | (0.65) | 77.65 | 79.44 | (0.55) | 78.89 | 1.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 80.28 | (1.82) | 78.46 | 81.42 | (1.54) | 79.88 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 82.26 | (2.99) | 79.27 | 83.40 | (2.53) | 80.87 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 84.24 | (4.15) | 80.09 | 85.38 | (3.52) | 81.86 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 86.22 | (5.32) | 80.90 | 87.36 | (4.51) | 82.85 | 2.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 89.07 | (7.00) | 82.07 | 90.21 | (5.94) | 84.28 | 2.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 91.92 | - | 91.92 | 93.06 | - | 93.06 | 1.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 94.77 | - | 94.77 | 95.91 | - | 95.91 | 1.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 97.62 | - | 97.62 | 98.76 | - | 98.76 | 1.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 100.47 | - | 100.47 | 101.61 | - | 101.61 | 1.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 119.62 | - | 119.62 | 121.26 | - | 121.26 | 1.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 140.91 | - | 140.91 | 143.07 | - | 143.07 | 1.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 165.41 | - | 165.41 | 168.12 | - | 168.12 | 1.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 315.91 | - | 315.91 | 321.87 | - | 321.87 | 1.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 466.41 | - | 466.41 | 475.62 | - | 475.62 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 616.91 | - | 616.91 | 629.37 | - | 629.37 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 767.41 | - | 767.41 | 783.12 | - | 783.12 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 917.91 | - | 917.91 | 936.87 | - | 936.87 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,068.41 | - | 1,068.41 | 1,090.62 | - | 1,090.62 | 2.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,218.91 | - | 1,218.91 | 1,244.37 | - | 1,244.37 | 2.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 81.48 | $ 84.89 | $ 3.41 | 4.2% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 77.20 | $ | - | $ | 77.20 | $ | 79.67 | $ | - | $ | 79.67 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 78.30 | (0.65) | 77.65 | 80.77 | (0.55) | 80.22 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 80.28 | (1.82) | 78.46 | 82.75 | (1.54) | 81.21 | 3.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 82.26 | (2.99) | 79.27 | 84.73 | (2.53) | 82.20 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 84.24 | (4.15) | 80.09 | 86.71 | (3.52) | 83.19 | 3.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 86.22 | (5.32) | 80.90 | 88.69 | (4.51) | 84.18 | 4.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 89.07 | (7.00) | 82.07 | 91.54 | (5.94) | 85.61 | 4.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 91.92 | - | 91.92 | 94.39 | - | 94.39 | 2.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 94.77 | - | 94.77 | 97.24 | - | 97.24 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 97.62 | - | 97.62 | 100.09 | - | 100.09 | 2.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 100.47 | - | 100.47 | 102.94 | - | 102.94 | 2.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 119.62 | - | 119.62 | 123.54 | - | 123.54 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 140.91 | - | 140.91 | 146.40 | - | 146.40 | 3.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 165.41 | - | 165.41 | 172.65 | - | 172.65 | 4.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 315.91 | - | 315.91 | 333.15 | - | 333.15 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 466.41 | - | 466.41 | 493.65 | - | 493.65 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 616.91 | - | 616.91 | 654.15 | - | 654.15 | 6.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 767.41 | - | 767.41 | 814.65 | - | 814.65 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 917.91 | - | 917.91 | 975.15 | - | 975.15 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,068.41 | - | 1,068.41 | 1,135.65 | - | 1,135.65 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,218.91 | - | 1,218.91 | 1,296.15 | - | 1,296.15 | 6.3% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19500 | $ 216.20 | $ 216.20 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 154.40 | $ | - | $ | 154.40 | $ | 154.40 | $ | - | $ | 154.40 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 155.50 | (0.65) | 154.85 | 155.50 | (0.65) | 154.85 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 157.48 | (1.82) | 155.66 | 157.48 | (1.82) | 155.66 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 159.46 | (2.99) | 156.47 | 159.46 | (2.99) | 156.47 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 161.44 | (4.15) | 157.29 | 161.44 | (4.15) | 157.29 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 163.42 | (5.32) | 158.10 | 163.42 | (5.32) | 158.10 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 166.27 | (7.00) | 159.27 | 166.27 | (7.00) | 159.27 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 169.12 | - | 169.12 | 169.12 | - | 169.12 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 171.97 | - | 171.97 | 171.97 | - | 171.97 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 174.82 | - | 174.82 | 174.82 | - | 174.82 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 177.67 | - | 177.67 | 177.67 | - | 177.67 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 196.82 | - | 196.82 | 196.82 | - | 196.82 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 218.11 | - | 218.11 | 218.11 | - | 218.11 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.61 | - | 242.61 | 242.61 | - | 242.61 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 393.11 | - | 393.11 | 393.11 | - | 393.11 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 543.61 | - | 543.61 | 543.61 | - | 543.61 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 694.11 | - | 694.11 | 694.11 | - | 694.11 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 844.61 | - | 844.61 | 844.61 | - | 844.61 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 995.11 | - | 995.11 | 995.11 | - | 995.11 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,145.61 | - | 1,145.61 | 1,145.61 | - | 1,145.61 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,296.11 | - | 1,296.11 | 1,296.11 | - | 1,296.11 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19500 | $ 216.20 | $ 219.51 | $ 3.31 | 1.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 154.40 | $ | - | $ | 154.40 | $ | 156.69 | $ | - | $ | 156.69 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 155.50 | (0.65) | 154.85 | 157.79 | (0.55) | 157.24 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 157.48 | (1.82) | 155.66 | 159.77 | (1.54) | 158.23 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 159.46 | (2.99) | 156.47 | 161.75 | (2.53) | 159.22 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 161.44 | (4.15) | 157.29 | 163.73 | (3.52) | 160.21 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 163.42 | (5.32) | 158.10 | 165.71 | (4.51) | 161.20 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 166.27 | (7.00) | 159.27 | 168.56 | (5.94) | 162.63 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 169.12 | - | 169.12 | 171.41 | - | 171.41 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 171.97 | - | 171.97 | 174.26 | - | 174.26 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 174.82 | - | 174.82 | 177.11 | - | 177.11 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 177.67 | - | 177.67 | 179.96 | - | 179.96 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 196.82 | - | 196.82 | 199.61 | - | 199.61 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 218.11 | - | 218.11 | 221.42 | - | 221.42 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.61 | - | 242.61 | 246.47 | - | 246.47 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 393.11 | - | 393.11 | 400.22 | - | 400.22 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 543.61 | - | 543.61 | 553.97 | - | 553.97 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 694.11 | - | 694.11 | 707.72 | - | 707.72 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 844.61 | - | 844.61 | 861.47 | - | 861.47 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 995.11 | - | 995.11 | 1,015.22 | - | 1,015.22 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,145.61 | - | 1,145.61 | 1,168.97 | - | 1,168.97 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,296.11 | - | 1,296.11 | 1,322.72 | - | 1,322.72 | 2.1 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19500 | $ 216.20 | $ 224.16 | $ 7.96 | 3.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 154.40 | $ | - | $ | 154.40 | $ | 159.34 | $ | - | $ | 159.34 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 155.50 | (0.55) | 154.95 | 160.44 | (0.55) | 159.89 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 157.48 | (1.54) | 155.94 | 162.42 | (1.54) | 160.88 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 159.46 | (2.53) | 156.93 | 164.40 | (2.53) | 161.87 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 161.44 | (3.52) | 157.92 | 166.38 | (3.52) | 162.86 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 163.42 | (4.51) | 158.91 | 168.36 | (4.51) | 163.85 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 166.27 | (5.94) | 160.34 | 171.21 | (5.94) | 165.28 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 169.12 | - | 169.12 | 174.06 | - | 174.06 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 171.97 | - | 171.97 | 176.91 | - | 176.91 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 174.82 | - | 174.82 | 179.76 | - | 179.76 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 177.67 | - | 177.67 | 182.61 | - | 182.61 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 196.82 | - | 196.82 | 203.21 | - | 203.21 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 218.11 | - | 218.11 | 226.07 | - | 226.07 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.61 | - | 242.61 | 252.32 | - | 252.32 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 393.11 | - | 393.11 | 412.82 | - | 412.82 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 543.61 | - | 543.61 | 573.32 | - | 573.32 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 694.11 | - | 694.11 | 733.82 | - | 733.82 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 844.61 | - | 844.61 | 894.32 | - | 894.32 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 995.11 | - | 995.11 | 1,054.82 | - | 1,054.82 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,145.61 | - | 1,145.61 | 1,215.32 | - | 1,215.32 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,296.11 | - | 1,296.11 | 1,375.82 | - | 1,375.82 | 6.1 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 39500 | $ 422.54 | $ 422.54 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 247.04 | $ | - | $ | 247.04 | $ | 247.04 | $ | - | $ | 247.04 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 248.14 | (0.65) | 247.49 | 248.14 | (0.65) | 247.49 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 250.12 | (1.82) | 248.30 | 250.12 | (1.82) | 248.30 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 252.10 | (2.99) | 249.11 | 252.10 | (2.99) | 249.11 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 254.08 | (4.15) | 249.93 | 254.08 | (4.15) | 249.93 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 256.06 | (5.32) | 250.74 | 256.06 | (5.32) | 250.74 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 258.91 | (7.00) | 251.91 | 258.91 | (7.00) | 251.91 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 261.76 | - | 261.76 | 261.76 | - | 261.76 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 264.61 | - | 264.61 | 264.61 | - | 264.61 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 267.46 | - | 267.46 | 267.46 | - | 267.46 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 270.31 | - | 270.31 | 270.31 | - | 270.31 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 289.46 | - | 289.46 | 289.46 | - | 289.46 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 310.75 | - | 310.75 | 310.75 | - | 310.75 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 335.25 | - | 335.25 | 335.25 | - | 335.25 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 485.75 | - | 485.75 | 485.75 | - | 485.75 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 636.25 | - | 636.25 | 636.25 | - | 636.25 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 786.75 | - | 786.75 | 786.75 | - | 786.75 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 937.25 | - | 937.25 | 937.25 | - | 937.25 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,087.75 | - | 1,087.75 | 1,087.75 | - | 1,087.75 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,238.25 | - | 1,238.25 | 1,238.25 | - | 1,238.25 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,388.75 | - | 1,388.75 | 1,388.75 | - | 1,388.75 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 39500 | $ 422.54 | $ 429.66 | $ 7.11 | 1.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 247.04 | $ | - | $ | 247.04 | $ | 250.70 | $ | - | $ | 250.70 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 248.14 | (0.65) | 247.49 | 251.80 | (0.55) | 251.25 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 250.12 | (1.82) | 248.30 | 253.78 | (1.54) | 252.24 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 252.10 | (2.99) | 249.11 | 255.76 | (2.53) | 253.23 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 254.08 | (4.15) | 249.93 | 257.74 | (3.52) | 254.22 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 256.06 | (5.32) | 250.74 | 259.72 | (4.51) | 255.21 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 258.91 | (7.00) | 251.91 | 262.57 | (5.94) | 256.64 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 261.76 | - | 261.76 | 265.42 | - | 265.42 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 264.61 | - | 264.61 | 268.27 | - | 268.27 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 267.46 | - | 267.46 | 271.12 | - | 271.12 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 270.31 | - | 270.31 | 273.97 | - | 273.97 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 289.46 | - | 289.46 | 293.62 | - | 293.62 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 310.75 | - | 310.75 | 315.43 | - | 315.43 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 335.25 | - | 335.25 | 340.48 | - | 340.48 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 485.75 | - | 485.75 | 494.23 | - | 494.23 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 636.25 | - | 636.25 | 647.98 | - | 647.98 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 786.75 | - | 786.75 | 801.73 | - | 801.73 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 937.25 | - | 937.25 | 955.48 | - | 955.48 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,087.75 | - | 1,087.75 | 1,109.23 | - | 1,109.23 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,238.25 | - | 1,238.25 | 1,262.98 | - | 1,262.98 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,388.75 | - | 1,388.75 | 1,416.73 | - | 1,416.73 | 2.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 39500 | $ 422.54 | $ 441.02 | $ 18.48 | 4.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 247.04 | $ | - | $ | 247.04 | $ | 254.95 | $ | - | $ | 254.95 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 248.14 | (0.65) | 247.49 | 256.05 | (0.55) | 255.50 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 250.12 | (1.82) | 248.30 | 258.03 | (1.54) | 256.49 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 252.10 | (2.99) | 249.11 | 260.01 | (2.53) | 257.48 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 254.08 | (4.15) | 249.93 | 261.99 | (3.52) | 258.47 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 256.06 | (5.32) | 250.74 | 263.97 | (4.51) | 259.46 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 258.91 | (7.00) | 251.91 | 266.82 | (5.94) | 260.89 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 261.76 | - | 261.76 | 269.67 | - | 269.67 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 264.61 | - | 264.61 | 272.52 | - | 272.52 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 267.46 | - | 267.46 | 275.37 | - | 275.37 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 270.31 | - | 270.31 | 278.22 | - | 278.22 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 289.46 | - | 289.46 | 298.82 | - | 298.82 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 310.75 | - | 310.75 | 321.68 | - | 321.68 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 335.25 | - | 335.25 | 347.93 | - | 347.93 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 485.75 | - | 485.75 | 508.43 | - | 508.43 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 636.25 | - | 636.25 | 668.93 | - | 668.93 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 786.75 | - | 786.75 | 829.43 | - | 829.43 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 937.25 | - | 937.25 | 989.93 | - | 989.93 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,087.75 | - | 1,087.75 | 1,150.43 | - | 1,150.43 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,238.25 | - | 1,238.25 | 1,310.93 | - | 1,310.93 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,388.75 | - | 1,388.75 | 1,471.43 | - | 1,471.43 | 6.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 215000 | $ 1,726.09 | $ 1,726.09 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 494.08 | $ | - | $ | 494.08 | $ | 494.08 | $ | - | $ | 494.08 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 495.18 | (0.65) | 494.53 | 495.18 | (0.65) | 494.53 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 497.16 | (1.82) | 495.34 | 497.16 | (1.82) | 495.34 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 499.14 | (2.99) | 496.15 | 499.14 | (2.99) | 496.15 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 501.12 | (4.15) | 496.97 | 501.12 | (4.15) | 496.97 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 503.10 | (5.32) | 497.78 | 503.10 | (5.32) | 497.78 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 505.95 | (7.00) | 498.95 | 505.95 | (7.00) | 498.95 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 508.80 | - | 508.80 | 508.80 | - | 508.80 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 511.65 | - | 511.65 | 511.65 | - | 511.65 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 514.50 | - | 514.50 | 514.50 | - | 514.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 517.35 | - | 517.35 | 517.35 | - | 517.35 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 536.50 | - | 536.50 | 536.50 | - | 536.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 557.79 | - | 557.79 | 557.79 | - | 557.79 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 582.29 | - | 582.29 | 582.29 | - | 582.29 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 732.79 | - | 732.79 | 732.79 | - | 732.79 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 883.29 | - | 883.29 | 883.29 | - | 883.29 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,033.79 | - | 1,033.79 | 1,033.79 | - | 1,033.79 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,184.29 | - | 1,184.29 | 1,184.29 | - | 1,184.29 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,334.79 | - | 1,334.79 | 1,334.79 | - | 1,334.79 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,485.29 | - | 1,485.29 | 1,485.29 | - | 1,485.29 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,635.79 | - | 1,635.79 | 1,635.79 | - | 1,635.79 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
alencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 215000 | $ 1,726.09 | $ 1,759.67 | $ 33.58 | 1.9% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 494.08 | $ | - | $ | 494.08 | $ | 501.39 | $ | - | $ | 501.39 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 495.18 | (0.65) | 494.53 | 502.49 | (0.55) | 501.94 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 497.16 | (1.82) | 495.34 | 504.47 | (1.54) | 502.93 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 499.14 | (2.99) | 496.15 | 506.45 | (2.53) | 503.92 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 501.12 | (4.15) | 496.97 | 508.43 | (3.52) | 504.91 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 503.10 | (5.32) | 497.78 | 510.41 | (4.51) | 505.90 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 505.95 | (7.00) | 498.95 | 513.26 | (5.94) | 507.33 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 508.80 | - | 508.80 | 516.11 | - | 516.11 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 511.65 | - | 511.65 | 518.96 | - | 518.96 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 514.50 | - | 514.50 | 521.81 | - | 521.81 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 517.35 | - | 517.35 | 524.66 | - | 524.66 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 536.50 | - | 536.50 | 544.31 | - | 544.31 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 557.79 | - | 557.79 | 566.12 | - | 566.12 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 582.29 | - | 582.29 | 591.17 | - | 591.17 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 732.79 | - | 732.79 | 744.92 | - | 744.92 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 883.29 | - | 883.29 | 898.67 | - | 898.67 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,033.79 | - | 1,033.79 | 1,052.42 | - | 1,052.42 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,184.29 | - | 1,184.29 | 1,206.17 | - | 1,206.17 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,334.79 | - | 1,334.79 | 1,359.92 | - | 1,359.92 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,485.29 | - | 1,485.29 | 1,513.67 | - | 1,513.67 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,635.79 | - | 1,635.79 | 1.667.42 | - | 1,667.42 | 1.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 215000 | $ 1,726.09 | $ 1,822.67 | $ 96.58 | 5.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 494.08 | $ | - | $ | 494.08 | $ | 509.89 | $ | - | $ | 509.89 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 495.18 | (0.65) | 494.53 | 510.99 | (0.55) | 510.44 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 497.16 | (1.82) | 495.34 | 512.97 | (1.54) | 511.43 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 499.14 | (2.99) | 496.15 | 514.95 | (2.53) | 512.42 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 501.12 | (4.15) | 496.97 | 516.93 | (3.52) | 513.41 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 503.10 | (5.32) | 497.78 | 518.91 | (4.51) | 514.40 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 505.95 | (7.00) | 498.95 | 521.76 | (5.94) | 515.83 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 508.80 | - | 508.80 | 524.61 | - | 524.61 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 511.65 | - | 511.65 | 527.46 | - | 527.46 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 514.50 | - | 514.50 | 530.31 | - | 530.31 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 517.35 | - | 517.35 | 533.16 | - | 533.16 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 536.50 | - | 536.50 | 553.76 | - | 553.76 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 557.79 | - | 557.79 | 576.62 | - | 576.62 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 582.29 | - | 582.29 | 602.87 | - | 602.87 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 732.79 | - | 732.79 | 763.37 | - | 763.37 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 883.29 | - | 883.29 | 923.87 | - | 923.87 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,033.79 | - | 1,033.79 | 1,084.37 | - | 1,084.37 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,184.29 | - | 1,184.29 | 1,244.87 | - | 1,244.87 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,334.79 | - | 1,334.79 | 1,405.37 | - | 1,405.37 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,485.29 | - | 1,485.29 | 1,565.87 | - | 1,565.87 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,635.79 | - | 1,635.79 | 1,726.37 | - | 1,726.37 | 5.5 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 6” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 4000 | $ 1,546.89 | $ 1,546.89 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,544.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,545.10 | (0.65) | 1,544.45 | 1,545.10 | (0.65) | 1,544.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,547.08 | (1.82) | 1,545.26 | 1,547.08 | (1.82) | �� | 1,545.26 | 0.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,549.06 | (2.99) | 1,546.07 | 1,549.06 | (2.99) | 1,546.07 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,551.04 | (4.15) | 1,546.89 | 1,551.04 | (4.15) | 1,546.89 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,553.02 | (5.32) | 1,547.70 | 1,553.02 | (5.32) | 1,547.70 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,555.87 | (7.00) | 1,548.87 | 1,555.87 | (7.00) | 1,548.87 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,558.72 | - | 1,558.72 | 1,558.72 | - | 1,558.72 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,561.57 | - | 1,561.57 | 1,561.57 | - | 1,561.57 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,564.42 | - | 1,564.42 | 1,564.42 | - | 1,564.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,567.27 | - | 1,567.27 | 1,567.27 | - | 1,567.27 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,586.42 | - | 1,586.42 | 1,586.42 | - | 1,586.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,607.71 | - | 1,607.71 | 1,607.71 | - | 1,607.71 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,632.21 | - | 1,632.21 | 1,632.21 | - | 1,632.21 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,782.71 | - | 1,782.71 | 1,782.71 | - | 1,782.71 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,933.21 | - | 1,933.21 | 1,933.21 | - | 1,933.21 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 2,083.71 | - | 2,083.71 | 2,083.71 | - | 2,083.71 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,234.21 | - | 2,234.21 | 2,234.21 | - | 2,234.21 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,384.71 | - | 2,384.71 | 2,384.71 | - | 2,384.71 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,535.21 | - | 2,535.21 | 2,535.21 | - | 2,535.21 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,685.71 | - | 2,685.71 | 2,685.71 | - | 2,685.71 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 6” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||
Median Usage | 4000 | $ | 1,546.89 | $ 1,570.37 | $ 23.48 | 1.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | 1,566.85 | $ | - | $ | 1,566.85 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,545.10 | (0.65 | ) | 1,544.45 | 1,567.95 | (0.55 | ) | 1,567.40 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,547.08 | (1.82 | ) | 1,545.26 | 1,569.93 | (1.54 | ) | 1,568.39 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,549.06 | (2.99 | ) | 1,546.07 | 1,571.91 | (2.53 | ) | 1,569.38 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,551.04 | (4.15 | ) | 1,546.89 | 1,573.89 | (3.52 | ) | 1,570.37 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,553.02 | (5.32 | ) | 1,547.70 | 1,575.87 | (4.51 | ) | 1,571.36 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,555.87 | (7.00 | ) | 1,548.87 | 1,578.72 | (5.94 | ) | 1,572.79 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,558.72 | - | 1,558.72 | 1,581.57 | - | 1,581.57 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,561.57 | - | 1,561.57 | 1,584.42 | - | 1,584.42 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,564.42 | - | 1,564.42 | 1,587.27 | - | 1,587.27 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,567.27 | - | 1,567.27 | 1,590.12 | - | 1,590.12 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,586.42 | - | 1,586.42 | 1,609.77 | - | 1,609.77 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,607.71 | - | 1,607.71 | 1,631.58 | - | 1,631.58 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,632.21 | - | 1,632.21 | 1,656.63 | - | 1,656.63 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,782.71 | - | 1,782.71 | 1,810.38 | - | 1,810.38 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,933.21 | - | 1,933.21 | 1,964.13 | - | 1,964.13 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 2,083.71 | - | 2,083.71 | 2,117.88 | - | 2,117.88 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,234.21 | - | 2,234.21 | 2,271.63 | - | 2,271.63 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,384.71 | - | 2,384.71 | 2,425.38 | - | 2,425.38 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,535.21 | - | 2,535.21 | 2,579.13 | - | 2,579.13 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,685.71 | - | 2,685.71 | 2,732.88 | - | 2,732.88 | 1.8 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Town Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 6” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||
Median Usage | 4000 | $ | 1,546.89 | $ 1,597.93 | $ 51.04 | 3.3% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,544.00 | $ | 1,594.41 | $ | - | $ | 1,594.41 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,545.10 | (0.65 | ) | 1,544.45 | 1,595.51 | (0.55 | ) | 1,594.96 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,547.08 | (1.82 | ) | 1,545.26 | 1,597.49 | (1.54 | ) | 1,595.95 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,549.06 | (2.99 | ) | 1,546.07 | 1,599.47 | (2.53 | ) | 1,596.94 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,551.04 | (4.15 | ) | 1,546.89 | 1,601.45 | (3.52 | ) | 1,597.93 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,553.02 | (5.32 | ) | 1,547.70 | 1,603.43 | (4.51 | ) | 1,598.92 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,555.87 | (7.00 | ) | 1,548.87 | 1,606.28 | (5.94 | ) | 1,600.35 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,558.72 | - | 1,558.72 | 1,609.13 | - | 1,609.13 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,561.57 | - | 1,561.57 | 1,611.98 | - | 1,611.98 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,564.42 | - | 1,564.42 | 1,614.83 | - | 1,614.83 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,567.27 | - | 1,567.27 | 1,617.68 | - | 1,617.68 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,586.42 | - | 1,586.42 | 1,638.28 | - | 1,638.28 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,607.71 | - | 1,607.71 | 1,661.14 | - | 1,661.14 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,632.21 | - | 1,632.21 | 1,687.39 | - | 1,687.39 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,782.71 | - | 1,782.71 | 1,847.89 | - | 1,847.89 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,933.21 | - | 1,933.21 | 2,008.39 | - | 2,008.39 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 2,083.71 | - | 2,083.71 | 2,168.89 | - | 2,168.89 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,234.21 | - | 2,234.21 | 2,329.39 | - | 2,329.39 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,384.71 | - | 2,384.71 | 2,489.89 | - | 2,489.89 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,535.21 | - | 2,535.21 | 2,650.39 | - | 2,650.39 | 4.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,685.71 | - | 2,685.71 | 2,810.89 | - | 2,810.89 | 4.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Global Water – Palo Verde Utilities Company
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement A-1 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 60,166,756 | $ | 60,166,756 | $ | 60,166,756 | $ | 60,166,756 | |||||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 3,066,067 | $ | 3,066,067 | $ | 3,393,928 | $ | 3,393,928 | |||||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | 5.10% | 5.10% | 5.64% | 5.64% | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | 8.81% | 8.81% | 7.50% | 7.50% | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 5,300,691 | $ | 5,300,691 | $ | 4,512,507 | $ | 4,512,507 | |||||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 2,234,623 | $ | 2,234,623 | $ | 1,118,579 | $ | 1,118,579 | |||||||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.639005 | 1.639005 | 1.688694 | 1.688694 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 3,662,560 | $ | 3,662,560 | $ | 1,888,539 | $ | 1,888,539 | |||||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 13,107,528 | |||||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 16,770,088 | $ | 16,770,088 | $ | 14,996,467 | $ | 14,996,467 | |||||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 27.94% | 27.94% | 14.41% | 14.41% | |||||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | 9.50% | 9.50% |
References: | ||
Column [A]: Company Schedule A-1 | ||
Column (B): Company Schedule A-1 | ||
Column (C): Company Schedules A-1, A-2, & D-1 | ||
Column (C): Settlement Schedules GRCF, B-1, and C-1 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Schedule: A-1a | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Settlement Phase In | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT
Year | Revenue increase (Relative to Test Year) | Revenue Increase (Relative to Previous Year) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 428,148 | 428,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 856,298 | 428,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 1,062,826 | 206,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 1,269,354 | 206,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 1,475,882 | 206,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 1,682,411 | 206,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 1,888,939 | 206,528 |
DECISION NO.74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | GRCF | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor: | ||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.6202% | ||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.3798% | ||||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 2 | 40.1625% | ||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 59.2173% | ||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.688694 | ||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor: | ||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8 ) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 1.0100% | ||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10) | 0.6202% | ||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 6, L25) | 2.5466% | ||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 1.5636% | ||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 40.1625% | ||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1, Line 5) | $ | 4,512,507 | |||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (ScheduleC-1, Line 36) | $ | 3,393,928 | |||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 1,118,579 | |||||||||||
27 | Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 1,512,917 | |||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | 809,739 | |||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 703,178 | |||||||||||
30 | Required Revenue Increase (Schedule A-1, Line 8) | $ | 1,888,939 | |||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 1.0100% | ||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 19,078 | |||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 19,078 | |||||||||||
35 | Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 6, Line 21) | $ | 1,112,176 | |||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (GWB-18, Col A, L19) | $ | 1,064,073 | |||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36)
| $
| 48,104
|
| ||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 1,888,938 | |||||||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
Test Year | Settlement | |||||||||||||
Recommended | ||||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Sch C-1, Col.(C) L4, A-1, Col. (D), L10) | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 14,996,467 | |||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 8,903,861 | $ | 8,971,043 | |||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | 2,105,836 | $ | 2,105,836 | |||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | 2,097,831 | $ | 3,919,587 | |||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | 146,177 | $ | 273,117 | |||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable income (L42 - L44) | $ | 1,951,654 | $ | 3,646,470 | |||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | 663,562 | $ | 1,239,800 | |||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | 663,562 | $ | 1,239,800 | |||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | 809,739 | $ | 1,512,917 | |||||||||
50 | Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | ||||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (ScheduleB-1) | $ | 60,166,756 | |||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | 3.5000% | ||||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | 2,105,836 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | ||||
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Settlement B-1 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
LINE NO. | (A) COMPANY AS FILED | (B)
SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | (C) SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 109,787,648 | $ | - | $ | 109,787,648 | |||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (19,012,634) | - | (19,012,634) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 90,775,014 | $ | - | $ | 90,775,014 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 30,362 | $ | - | $ | 30,362 | |||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | - | - | - | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | 30,362 | - | 30,362 | ||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 27,839,315 | - | 27,839,315 | ||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | |||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 2,165,735 | - | 2,165,735 | ||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 669,926 | - | 669,926 | |||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||
11 | Deferred Compensation | 49,669 | 49,669 | |||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||
13 | Bad Debt | 32,615 | - | 32,615 | ||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||
14 | CIAC | 11,735 | - | 11,735 | ||||||||||
15 | Projected Capital Expenditures | - | - | - | �� | |||||||||
16 | Deferred Gain | 3,062 | - | 3,062 | ||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 60,166,756 | $ | - | $ | 60,166,756 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement B-2 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [Dl] | ||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT. | SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | Settlement | AS | |||||||||||
AS FILED | ADJUSTMENTS | ADJUSTED | ||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 353 Land and Land Rights | $ | 186,342 | $ | - | $ | 186,342 | |||||||||
2 | 354 Structures and Improvements | 22,916,934 | 22,916,934 | |||||||||||||
3 | 355 Power Generation Equipment | 361,096 | 361,096 | |||||||||||||
4 | 360 Collection Sewers - Force | 3,865,315 | 3,865,315 | |||||||||||||
5 | 361 Collection Sewers - Gravity | 47,785,285 | 47,785,285 | |||||||||||||
6 | 363 Services to Customers | 5,244,342 | 5,244,342 | |||||||||||||
7 | 364 Flow Measuring Devices | 23,636 | 23,636 | |||||||||||||
8 | 370 Receiving Wells | 1,921,877 | 1,921,877 | |||||||||||||
9 | 371 Pumping Equipment | 4,039,011 | 4,039,011 | |||||||||||||
10 | 374 Reuse Distribution Reservoirs | 34,021 | 34,021 | |||||||||||||
11 | 375 Reuse Transmission and Distribution System | 11,089,457 | 11,089,457 | |||||||||||||
12 | 380 Treatment and Disposal Equipment | 5,975,575 | 5,975,575 | |||||||||||||
13 | 381 Plant Sewers | 78,384 | 78,384 | |||||||||||||
14 | 382 Outfall Sewer Lines | 353,645 | 353,645 | |||||||||||||
15 | 389 Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 2,295,565 | 2,295,565 | |||||||||||||
16 | 390 Office Furniture and Equipment | 403,174 | 403,174 | |||||||||||||
17 | 391 Transportation Equipment | 173,522 | 173,522 | |||||||||||||
18 | 393 Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 114,250 | 114,250 | |||||||||||||
19 | 394 Laboratory Equipment | 24,941 | 24,941 | |||||||||||||
20 | 395 Power Operated Equipment | 41,148 | 41,148 | |||||||||||||
21 | 396 Communication Equipment | 76,238 | 76,238 | |||||||||||||
22 | 397 Miscellaneous Equipment | 369,323 | 369,323 | |||||||||||||
23 | 398 Other Tangible Plant | 2,414,565 | - | 2,414,565 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Total Plant in Service | 109,787,648 | - | 109,787,648 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | Accumulated Depreciation | (19,012,634) | - | (19,012,634) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
35 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 90,775,014 | $ | - | $ | 90,775,014 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
36 | ||||||||||||||||
37 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||
38 | Net Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 30,362 | $ | 30,362 | |||||||||||
39 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | - | - | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
40 | Net CIAC (L63-L64) | 30,362 | 30,362 | |||||||||||||
41 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 27,839,315 | 27,839,315 | |||||||||||||
42 | Customer Meter Deposits | 669,926 | 669,926 | |||||||||||||
43 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 2,165,735 | 2,165,735 | |||||||||||||
44 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||
45 | Deferred Tax Assets | - | ||||||||||||||
46 | Deferred Gain | 3,062 | 3,062 | |||||||||||||
47 | Bad Debt | 32,615 | - | 32,615 | ||||||||||||
48 | Deferred Compensation | 49,669 | - | 49,669 | ||||||||||||
49 | CIAC | 11,735 | - | 11,735 | ||||||||||||
50 | Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
51 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 60,166,756 | $ | - | $ | 60,166,756 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement C-1 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | ||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY TEST YEAR AS FILED | SETTLEMENT TEST YEAR ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED CHANGES | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Flat Rate Revenue | 12,423,785 | - | 12,423,785 | 1,888,939 | 14,312,724 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Other Sewer Revenues | 345,001 | - | 345,001 | 345,001 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Metered Reuse Revenue | 338,742 | - | 338,742 | - | 338,742 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | - | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 1,888,939 | $ | 14,996,467 | |||||||||||
5 | 701 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 1,472,381 | $ | (223,764) | $ | 1,248,617 | $ | - | $ | 1,248,617 | |||||||||||
6 | 704 Employee Pensions and Benefit | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 715 Purchased Power | 530,509 | - | 530,509 | - | 530,509 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 716 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 718 Chemicals | 408,431 | 0 | 408,431 | - | 408,431 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 720 Materials and Supplies | 114,852 | - | 114,852 | - | 114,852 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 721 Office Expense | 120,122 | - | 120,122 | - | 120,122 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 731 Contractual Services – Professi | 901,541 | (294,223) | 607,319 | - | 607,319 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 735 Contractual Services - Testing | 40,577 | - | 40,577 | - | 40,577 | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 736 Contractual Services - Other | 197,061 | - | 197,061 | - | 197,061 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 740 Rents | 119,990 | - | 119,990 | - | 119,990 | ||||||||||||||||
16 | 742 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | . | - | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 750 Transportation Expense | 76,568 | - | 76,568 | - | 76,568 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 755 Insurance Expense | 102,147 | - | 102,147 | - | 102,147 | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 759 Insurance - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 765 Regulatory Commission Expens | 112,973 | (59,828) | 53,145 | - | 53,145 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 767 Rate Case Expense | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
22 | 770 Bad Debt Expense | 82,936 | 49,450 | 132,386 | 19,078 | 151,464 | ||||||||||||||||
23 | 775 Miscellaneous Expenses | 485,686 | - | 485,686 | - | 485,686 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 3,520,714 | 73,457 | 3,594,171 | 3,594,171 | |||||||||||||||||
25 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC A | (1,292) | - | (1,292) | (1.292) | |||||||||||||||||
26 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 9,500 | - | 9,500 | 9,500 | |||||||||||||||||
27 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - | 1,064,073 | - | 1,064,073 | 48,104 | 1,112,176 | ||||||||||||||||
28 | 409 Income Taxes | 682,693 | 127,047 | 809,739 | $ | 703,178 | $ | 1,512,917 | ||||||||||||||
Intentionally Left Blank | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
29 | Total Operating Expenses | 10,041,461 | (327,861) | 9,713,600 | 770,360 | 10,483,960 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
30 | Operating income (Loss) | $ | 3,066,067 | $ | 327,861 | $ | 3,393,928 | $ | 1,118,579 | $ | 4,512,507 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): ScheduleC-2 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Column (D): Schedules A-1, ADJ 1, ADJ 5 and ADJ 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement C-2 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | (F] | [H] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bad Debts | Rate Case | Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE | Exp | Exp | Normalizations | Deprec. Exp | Income Taxes | SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | ADJ #1 | ADJ #2 | ADJ #3 | ADJ #4 | ADJ #5 | AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AS FILED |
|
|
|
|
| ADJUSTED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Flat Rate Revenue | $ | 12,423,785 | - | - | - | - | - | $ | 12,423,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Other Sewer Revenues | 345,001 | - | - | - | - | - | 345,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Metered Reuse Revenue | 338,742 | - | - | - | - | - | 338,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,107,528 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 701 Salary and Wages - Employees | 1,472,381 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (223,764) | $ | - | $ | - | 1,248,617 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | 704 Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 715 Purchased Power | 530,509 | - | - | - | - | - | 530,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 716 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | �� | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 718 Chemicals | 408,431 | - | - | 0 | - | - | 408,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 720 Materials and Supplies | 114,852 | - | - | - | - | - | 114,852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 721 Office Expense | 120,122 | - | - | - | - | - | 120,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 731 Contractual Services - Professional | 901,541 | - | - | (294,223) | - | - | 607,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 735 Contractual Services - Testing | 40,577 | - | - | - | - | 40,577 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 736 Contractual Services - Other | 197,061 | - | - | - | - | - | 197,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 740 Rents | 119,990 | - | - | - | - | - | 119,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 742 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 750 Transportation Expense | 76,568 | - | - | - | - | - | 76,568 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 755 Insurance Expense | 102,147 | - | - | - | - | - | 102,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 759 Insurance - Other | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 765 Regulatory Commission Expense | 112,973 | - | (59,828) | - | - | - | 53,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 767 Rate Case Expense | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 770 Bad Debt Expense | 82,936 | 49,450 | - | - | - | - | 132,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 775 Miscellaneous Expenses | 485,686 | - | - | - | - | - | 485,686 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 3,520,714 | - | - | - | 73,457 | - | 3,594,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 403 Depreciation Expense - CIAC Amortization | (1,292) | - | - | - | - | - | (1,292) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 9,500 | - | - | - | - | - | 9,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Property Taxes | 1,064,073 | - | - | - | - | - | 1,064,073 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 409 Income Taxes | 682,693 | - | - | - | - | 127,047 | 809,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Intentionally Left Blank | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
22 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 10,041,461 | $ | 49,450 | $ | (59,828) | $ | (517,986) | $ | 73,457 | $ | 127,047 | $ | 9,713,600 | |||||||||||||||
23 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 3,066,067 | $ | (49,450) | $ | 59,828 | $ | 517,986 | $ | (73,457) | $ | (127,047) | $ | 3,393,928 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 1 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Bad Debt Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||
COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||
PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
$ 82,936 | $ 49,450 | $ 132,386 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||
Column (B): Settlement | ||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted Test Year Revenues (Sch C-2) | $ | 13,107,528 | ||||||||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate | 1.01% | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense | $ | 132,386 | ||||||||||
Co Proposed | $ | 82,936 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
$ | 49,450 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 2 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | See Note | $ | 112,973 | $ | (59.828) | $ | 53.145 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.52% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Desert Mountain Analytical | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,652 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,095 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ | 78,809 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10,602 | $ | 2,960 | $ | 643 | $ | 1.244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35.298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Settlement Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
20 | �� | Adjustment Total by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | ||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
DECISION NO.74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Expense Normalizations | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - EXPENSE NORMALIZATIONS
| [A] | [B] | [C] | |||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||
NO. | ACCT / DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||
1 | 701 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 1,472,381 | $ | (223,764) | $ | 1,248,617 | |||||||||
2 | 731 Contractual Services – Professional | $ | 901,541 | $ | (294,223) | $ | 607,319 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | 2,373,922 | $ | (517,987) | $ | 1,855,936 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB | ||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Depreciation | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] PLANT BALANCE | [B] DEPRECIATION RATE | [C] DEPRECIATION EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 351 | Organization Cost | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
3 | 352 | Franchise Cost | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
4 | 353 | Land and Land Rights | 186,342 | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
5 | 354 | Structures & Improvements | 22,916,934 | 3.33% | 763,134 | |||||||||||
6 | 355 | Power Generating Equipment | 361,096 | 5.00% | 18,055 | |||||||||||
7 | 360 | Collection Sewers - Force | 3,865,315 | 2.00% | 77,306 | |||||||||||
8 | 361 | Collection Sewers - Gravity | 47,785,285 | 2.00% | 955,706 | |||||||||||
9 | 362 | Special Collecting Structures | 2.00% | - | ||||||||||||
10 | 363 | Sevices to Customers | 5,244,342 | 2.00% | 104,887 | |||||||||||
11 | 364 | Flow Measuring Devices | 23,636 | 10.00% | 2,364 | |||||||||||
12 | 365 | Flow Measuring Installations | 10.00% | - | ||||||||||||
13 | 366 | Reuse Services | 2.00% | - | ||||||||||||
14 | 367 | Reuse Meters and Meter Installations | 8.33% | - | ||||||||||||
15 | 370 | Receiving Wells | 1,921,877 | 3.33% | 63,999 | |||||||||||
16 | 371 | Pumping Equipment | 4,039,011 | 12.50% | 504,876 | |||||||||||
17 | 374 | Reuse Distribution Reserviors | 34,021 | 2.50% | 851 | |||||||||||
18 | 375 | Reuse Transmission and Dist. Sys. | 11,089,457 | 2.50% | 277,236 | |||||||||||
19 | 380 | Treatment and Disposal Equipment | 5,975,575 | 5.00% | 298,779 | |||||||||||
20 | 381 | Plant Sewers | 78,384 | 5.00% | 3,919 | |||||||||||
21 | 382 | Outfall Sewer Lines | 353,645 | 3.33% | 11,776 | |||||||||||
22 | 389 | Other Plant and Misc. Equipment | 2,295,565 | 6.67% | 153,114 | |||||||||||
23 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 403,174 | 6.67% | 26,892 | |||||||||||
24 | 390.1 | Computers & Software | 20.00% | - | ||||||||||||
25 | 391 | Transportation Equipment | 173,522 | 20.00% | 34,704 | |||||||||||
26 | 392 | Stores Equipment | 4.00% | - | ||||||||||||
27 | 393 | Tools, Shop & Garage Equipment | 114,250 | 5.00% | 5,713 | |||||||||||
28 | 394 | Laboratory Equipment | 24,941 | 10.00% | 2,494 | |||||||||||
29 | 395 | Power Operated Equipment | 41,148 | 5.00% | 2,057 | |||||||||||
30 | 396 | Communications Equipment | 76,238 | 10.00% | 7,624 | |||||||||||
31 | 397 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 369,323 | 10.00% | 36,932 | |||||||||||
32 | 398 | Other Tangible Plant | 2,414,565 | 10.00% | 241,457 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
33 | 109,787,648 | 3,593,874 | ||||||||||||||
34 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
35 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 186,342 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
36 | Net Depreciable Plant and Dep. Amount | $ | 109,601,306 | $ 3,593,874 | ||||||||||||
37 | ||||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||
39 | Amortization of CIAC at Company’s Rate | $ | 30,362 | 3.2790% | $ 996 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
40 | Settlement Recommended Depreciation Expense | $ 3,592,879 | ||||||||||||||
41 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ 3,519,422 | ||||||||||||||
42 | Settlement Adjustment | $ 73,457 |
References: | ||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Income Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - INCOME TAXES
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] | [B] SETTLEMENT | [C] SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | 682,693 | $ | 127,047 | $ | 809,739 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B),
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement ADJ 6 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | |||||||||
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 13,107,528 | $ | 13,107,528 | |||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 26,215,056 | 26,215,056 | |||||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 13,107,528 | ||||||||||
5 | Settlement Recommended Revenue | 14,996,467 | ||||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 39,322,584 | 41,211,523 | |||||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 13,107,528 | 13,737,174 | |||||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Multiplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 26,215,056 | 27,474,349 | |||||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | 1,648,165 | 1,648,165 | |||||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | 7,190 | 7,190 | |||||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 27,856,031 | 29,115,324 | |||||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 5,849,767 | 6,114,218 | |||||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 18.1900% | 18.1900% | |||||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 1,064,073 | |||||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 1,064,073 | |||||||||
19 | Settlement Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | 0 | |||||||||
20 | Property Tax on Recommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 1,112,176 | |||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 1,064.073 | |||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 48,104 | |||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | 48,104 | |||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 1,888,939 | |||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 2.54660% | ||||||||||
REFERENCES: | ||||||||||||
Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company | ||||||||||||
Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement D-1 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Percent of Total | Cost Rate | Weighted Cost | ||||||||||||
Debt | 57.8% | 6.1% | 3.5% | |||||||||||
Equity | 42.2% | 9.5% | 4.0% | |||||||||||
Required Rate of Return | 7.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes*) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/6” X 3/4” Meter | $ | 62.91 | $ | 62.91 | $ | 64.34 | $ | 65.88 | $ | 66.61 | $ | 67.34 | $ | 68.06 | $ | 68.79 | $ | 69.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 62.91 | 62.91 | 64.34 | 65.88 | 66.61 | 67.34 | 68.06 | 68.79 | 69.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 157.28 | 157.58 | 160.87 | 164.70 | 166.53 | 168.35 | 170.16 | 171.99 | 173.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 314.55 | 314.55 | 321.72 | 329.40 | 333.05 | 336.69 | 340.31 | 343.96 | 347.64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 503.28 | 503.28 | 514.75 | 527.30 | 532.87 | 538.71 | 544.50 | 550.34 | 556.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 1,006.56 | 1,006.56 | 1,029.51 | 1,054.07 | 1,065.75 | 1,077.42 | 1,089.00 | 1,100.67 | 1,112.45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 1,572.75 | 1,572.75 | 1,608.61 | 1,646.98 | 1,665.23 | 1,683.47 | 1,701.56 | 1,719.80 | 1,738.20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5” Meter | 3,154.50 | 3,154.50 | 3,217.00 | 3,294.00 | 3,330.50 | 3,367.00 | 3,403.00 | 3,439.50 | 3,476.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 5,032.80 | 5,032.80 | 5,147.20 | 5,270.40 | 5,328.80 | 5,387.20 | 5,444.80 | 5,503.20 | 5,562.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effluent Charge - All Meter Sizes and Classes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volumetric Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | $ | 185.74 | 185.74 | $ | 260.69 | $ | 338.89 | $ | 378.00 | $ | 417.10 | $ | 456.20 | $ | 495.31 | $ | 533.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
All Gallons (Per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 1.28 | 1.40 | 1.52 | 1.638 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous Service Charges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Establishment of Service (After Hours) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | NA | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge, Per Hour** | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After-Hours Service Charge | NA | $35.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MeterTest Fee (If Correct) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NSF Cheek | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a) Number of Months-off System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-603(D).
(b) Per A.A.C. R14-2-603(B).
*In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege,
sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-608(D)(5).
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 | Page 2 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Note on Phase in of Rates
Rates approved in Palo Verde’s last rate case were phased in per the following schedule:
Effective Date of Phase in Rate | ||||||||||||
8/1/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 1/1/2012 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
5/8“x 3/4” Meter | $42.97 | $52.94 | $62.91 | |||||||||
3/4” Meter | $42.97 | $52.94 | $62.91 | |||||||||
1” Meter | $107.43 | $132.35 | $157.28 | |||||||||
1-1/2” Meter | $214.85 | $264.70 | $314.55 | |||||||||
2” Meter | $343.76 | $423.52 | $503.28 | |||||||||
3” Meter | $687.52 | $847.04 | $1,006.56 | |||||||||
4” Meter | $1,074.25 | $1,323.50 | $1,572.75 | |||||||||
6” Meter | $2,148.50 | $2,647.00 | $3,145.50 | |||||||||
8” Meter | $1,677.60 | $3,355.20 | $5,032.80 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water-Palo Verde Sewer Docket No. SW-20445A-12-0310 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement Schedule H-4 |
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes) | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” X 3/4” Meter | $ 62.91 | $ | 62.91 | 0.0% | $ | 64.34 | 2.3% | $ | 65.88 | 4.7% | $ | 66.61 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 62.91 | 62.91 | 0.0% | 64.34 | 2.3% | 65.88 | 4.7% | 66.61 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 157.28 | 157.28 | 0.0% | 160.87 | 2.3% | 164.70 | 4.7% | 166.53 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 314.55 | 314.55 | 0.0% | 321.72 | 2.3% | 329.40 | 4.7% | 333.05 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 503.28 | 503.28 | 0.0% | 514.75 | 2.3% | 527.30 | 4.8% | 532.87 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 1,006.56 | 1,006.56 | 0.0% | 1,029.51 | 2.3% | 1,054.07 | 4.7% | 1,065.75 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 1,572.75 | 1,572.75 | 0.0% | 1,608.61 | 2.3% | 1,646.98 | 4.7% | 1,665.23 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 3,154.50 | 3,154.50 | 0.0% | 3,217.00 | 2.0% | 3,294.00 | 4.4% | 3,330.50 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | 5,032.80 | 5,032.80 | 0.0% | 5,147.20 | 2.3% | 5,270.40 | 4.7% | 5,328.80 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes) | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | Bill | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” X 3/4” Meter | $ 62.91 | $ | 67.34 | 7.0% | $ | 68.06 | 8.2% | $ | 68.79 | 9.3% | $ | 69.53 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 62.91 | 67.34 | 7.0% | 68.06 | 8.2% | 68.79 | 9.3% | 69.53 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 157.28 | 168.35 | 7.0% | 170.16 | 8.2% | 171.99 | 9.4% | 173.83 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 314.55 | 336.69 | 7.0% | 340.31 | 8.2% | 343.96 | 9.3% | 347.64 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 503.28 | 538.71 | 7.0% | 544.50 | 8.2% | 550.34 | 9.4% | 556.23 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 1,006.56 | 1,077.42 | 7.0% | 1,089.00 | 8.2% | 1,100.67 | 9.3% | 1,112.45 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 1,572.75 | 1,683.47 | 7.0% | 1,701.56 | 8.2% | 1,719.80 | 9.3% | 1,738.20 | 10.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 3,154.50 | 3,367.00 | 6.7% | 3,403.00 | 7.9% | 3,439.50 | 9.0% | 3,476.50 | 10.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | 5,032.80 | 5,387.20 | 7.0% | 5,444.80 | 8.2% | 5,503.20 | 9.3% | 5,562.40 | 10.5% |
*% increases are all relative to present rates.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc.
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement A-1 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | (181,978) | $ | (181,978) | $ | (181,978) | $ | (181,978) | |||||||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 21,301 | $ | 21,301 | $ | 23,472 | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 21,301 | $ | 21,301 | $ | 23,472 | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||||||
Current Operating Margin (Sch.C.1) | 14.44% | 14.44% | 15.91% | 15.91% | ||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||
7
| Gross Revenue Conversion Factor
|
| 1.629
|
|
| 1.629
|
|
| 1.629
|
|
| 1.629
|
| |||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | |||||||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | |||||||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 10.00% | 10.00% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor GRCF |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor. | ||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.06140% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.9386% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 60.7871% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.645086 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor: | ||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8 ) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 1.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10 ) | 0.61401% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate; | ||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 6.968% | ||||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (L19-L20) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 0.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1, Line 5) | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (Schedule C-1) | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
27 |
Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 43,548 | |||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | 14,755 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 28,792 | $ | 28,792 | |||||||||
30 |
Required Revenue Increase (A-1, Line 8) | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 1.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | - | |||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | - | |||||||||||
35 |
Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 5, Line 21) | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 5, Col A, L19) | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
37 |
| $
| -
|
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 28,792 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
Test Year
| Settlement Recommended | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Sch C-1) | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | |||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 109,286 | $ | 34,692 | |||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | 38,228 | $ | 112,821 | |||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | 2,664 | $ | 7,861 | |||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | 35,564 | $ | 104,960 | |||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | 12,092 | $ | 35,686 | |||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | 12,092 | $ | 35,686 | |||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | 14,755 | $ | 43,548 | |||||||||
50
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization; | N/A | |||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (Schedule B-1) | $ | (181,978) | |||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | N/A | 0.0000% | |||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | - |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | ||
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Settlement B-1 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
LINE NO. | (A) COMPANY AS FILED | (B)
SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | (C) SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 1,921,063 | $ | - | $ | 1,921,063 | |||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (424,824) | - | (424,824) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 1,496,239 | $ | - | $ | 1,496,239 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | - | - | - | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 1,824,411 | - | 1,824,411 | ||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 10,765 | 10,765 | ||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 9,246 | - | 9,246 | ||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | 483 | - | 483 | ||||||||||
13 | Deferred Compensation | 232 | - | 232 | ||||||||||
14 | CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
15 | Fixed Asset Depreciation | 146,998 | - | 146,998 | ||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | (181,978) | $ | - | $ | (181,978) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement B-2 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B]
| [I] | ||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | Reclassifications Per Staff | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||
AS FILED | Testimony GWB | ADJUSTED | ||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 30,374 | $ | - | $ | 30,374 | ||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
3 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 130,000 | 130,000 | ||||||||||||
4 | 309 | Supply Mains | - | - | ||||||||||||
5 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
6 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 216,158 | 216,158 | ||||||||||||
7 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 377 | (377) | 0 | |||||||||||
8 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 377 | 377 | ||||||||||||
9 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | - | |||||||||||||
10 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 182,972 | (182,972) | 0 | |||||||||||
11 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 182,972 | 182,972 | ||||||||||||
12 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | - | |||||||||||||
13 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 1,155,497 | 1,155,497 | ||||||||||||
14 | 333 | Services | 60,047 | 60,047 | ||||||||||||
15 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 11,303 | 11,303 | ||||||||||||
16 | 335 | Hydrants | 108,312 | 108,312 | ||||||||||||
17 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 775 | 775 | ||||||||||||
18 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 2,390 | 2,390 | ||||||||||||
19 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
20 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
21 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 515 | 515 | ||||||||||||
22 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
23 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
24 | 346 | Communication Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
25 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
26 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | - | - | ||||||||||||
27 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 2,343 | 2,343 | ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
28 | Total Plant in Service | 1,921,063 | - | 1,921,063 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||
30 | Accumulated Depreciation | (424,824) | - | (424,824) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 1,496,239 | $ | - | 1,496,239 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||
33 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||
34 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
35 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
36 | Net CIAC (L63 - L64) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
37 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 1,824,411 | - | 1,824,411 | ||||||||||||
38 | Customer Meter Deposits | 10,765 | 10,765 | |||||||||||||
39 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||
40 | Meter deposits | 9,246 | 9,246 | |||||||||||||
41 | Bad Debt | 483 | 483 | |||||||||||||
42 | Deferred Compensation | 232 | - | 232 | ||||||||||||
43 | CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
44 | Fixed asset depreciation | 146,998 | - | 146,998 | ||||||||||||
45 | Prepayments | - | - | |||||||||||||
48 | ||||||||||||||||
49 | ||||||||||||||||
50 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
51 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | (181,978) | $ | - | $ | (181,978) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement C-1 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A]
COMPANY | [B]
SETTLEMENT | [C] SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | [D]
SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED CHANGES | [E]
SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | 145,963 | - | 145,963 | - | 145,963 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 1,550 | - | 1,550 | - | 1,550 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 147,513 | $ | - | $ | 147,513 | $ | - | $ | 147,513 | |||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 19,787 | $ | - | $ | 19,787 | $ | - | $ | 19,787 | |||||||||||
6 | 604 Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 615 Purchased Power | 10,050 | - | 10,050 | - | 10,050 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 Chemicals | 1,286 | - | 1,286 | - | 1,286 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 Materials and Supplies | (779) | - | (779) | - | (779) | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 620.08 Materials and Supplies | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 1,494 | - | 1,494 | - | 1,494 | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 630 Outside Services | 4,483 | - | 4,483 | - | 4,483 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 728 | - | 728 | 728 | |||||||||||||||||
16 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 504 | - | 504 | - | 504 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 642 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 1,508 | - | 1,508 | - | 1,508 | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 475 | - | 475 | - | 475 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 659 Insurance - Other | 664 | - | 664 | 664 | |||||||||||||||||
22 | 660 Advertising Expense | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
23 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense – Rate | 502 | - | 502 | - | 502 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 667 Rate Case Expense | - | (247) | (247) | (247) | |||||||||||||||||
25 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | - | 1,003 | 1,003 | 1,003 | |||||||||||||||||
26 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 4,137 | - | 4,137 | 4,137 | |||||||||||||||||
27 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 64,552 | (4,292) | 60,260 | 60,260 | |||||||||||||||||
28 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC Amortizat | 326 | - | 326 | 326 | |||||||||||||||||
29 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 3,104 | - | 3,104 | - | 3,104 | ||||||||||||||||
30 | 408.11 Property Taxes | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
31 | 409 Income Taxes | 13,391 | 1,365 | 14,755 | 14,755 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Total Operating Expenses | 126,212 | (2,171) | 124,041 | - | 124,041 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
33 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 21,301 | $ | 2,171 | $ | 23,472 | $ | - | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule C-2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (D): Schedule A-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement C-2 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
[A] | [B] | [D] | [C] | [F] | [H] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Case | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE | Bad Debts Exp | Exp | Deprec. Exp | Income Taxes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
NO.
| DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | ADJ #1 | ADJ #2 | ADJ #3 | ADJ #4 | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||
AS FILED |
|
|
|
| ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | 145,963 | - | - | - | - | 145,963 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 1,550 | - | - | - | - | 1,550 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 147,513 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 147,513 | |||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | 19,787 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | 19,787 | |||||||||||||||
6 | 604 Employee Pensions and Benef | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 615 Purchased Power | 10,050 | 10,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 Chemicals | 1,286 | - | 1,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 Materials and Supplies | (779) | - | (779) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 620.08 Materials and Supplies | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 1,494 | - | 1,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 630 Outside Services | 4,483 | - | 4,483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 728 | - | - | 728 | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Propert | 504 | - | 504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 642 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 1,508 | - | 1,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 475 | - | 475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 659 Insurance - Other | 664 | - | 664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 660 Advertising Expense | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expen | 502 | - | 502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 667 Rate Case Expense | - | (247) | (247) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | - | 1,003 | 1,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 4,137 | 4,137 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 64,552 | (4,292) | 60,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC | 326 | 326 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 3,104 | - | 3,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 408.11 Property Taxes | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | 409 Income Taxes | 13,391 | - | 1,365 | 14,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
32 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 126,212 | $ | 1,003 | $ | (247) | $ | (4,292) | $ | 1,365 | $ | 124,041 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
33 | Operating income | $ | 21,301 | $ | (1,003) | $ | 247 | $ | 4,292 | $ | (1,365) | $ | 23,472 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement ADJ 1 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Water Loss | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY | [B] SETTLEMENT | [C] SETTLEMENT | ||||||
1 | $ - | $ 1,003 | $ 1,003 | |||||||
| ||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB | ||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 | ||||||||||
Adjusted Test Year Revenues (Sch C-2) | $ 147,513 | |||||||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate | 0.68% | |||||||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense | $ 1,003 | |||||||||
Co Proposed | $ - | |||||||||
$ (1,003) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement ADJ 2 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 502 | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.82% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,652 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,095 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ | 78,809 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10,602 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 643 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Recommended Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total, by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247) | ||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-J2-0311 | Depreciaiton Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] PLANT BALANCE | [B] DEPRECIATION RATE | [C] DEPRECIATION EXPENSE | |||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 30,374 | 0.00% | - | ||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | $ | 20,000 | 3.33% | 666 | ||||||||
3 | 307 | Wells and Springs | $ | 130,000 | 3.33% | 4,329 | ||||||||
4 | 309 | Supply Mains | $ | - | 2.00% | - | ||||||||
5 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | $ | - | 5.00% | - | ||||||||
6 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | $ | 216,158 | 12.50% | 27,020 | ||||||||
7 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | $ | 0 | 0.00% | - | ||||||||
8 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | $ | 377 | - | |||||||||
9 | 320.1 | Solution Chemical Feeders | $ | - | 3.33% | - | ||||||||
10 | 320.2 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | $ | 0 | 20.00% | 0 | ||||||||
11 | 330 | Storage Tanks | $ | 182,972 | - | |||||||||
12 | 330.1 | Pressure Tanks | $ | - | 2.22% | - | ||||||||
13 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | $ | 1,155,497 | 2.00% | 23,110 | ||||||||
14 | 333 | Services | $ | 60,047 | 3.33% | 2,000 | ||||||||
15 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | $ | 11,303 | 8.33% | 942 | ||||||||
16 | 335 | Hydrants | $ | 108,312 | 2.00% | 2,166 | ||||||||
17 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | $ | 775 | 6.67% | 52 | ||||||||
18 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | $ | 2,390 | 6.67% | 159 | ||||||||
19 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | $ | - | 6.67% | - | ||||||||
20 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | $ | - | 20.00% | - | ||||||||
21 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | $ | 515 | 5.00% | 26 | ||||||||
22 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | $ | - | 10.00% | - | ||||||||
23 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | $ | - | 5.00% | - | ||||||||
24 | 346 | Communication Equipment | $ | - | 10.00% | - | ||||||||
25 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | $ | - | 10.00% | - | ||||||||
26 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | $ | - | 5.00% | - | ||||||||
27 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | $ | 2,343 | 5.00% | 117 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
28 | 1,921,063 | 60,586 | ||||||||||||
29 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||
30 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 30,374 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 1,890,689 | $ 60,586 | ||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||
34 | Amortization of CIAC at Company’s Rate | $ | - | 3.2044% | $ - | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
35 | Settlement Depredation Expense | $ 60,586 | ||||||||||||
36 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ 64,878 | ||||||||||||
37 | Settlement Adjustment | $ (4,292) | ||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||||||||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||||||||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Income Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - INCOME TAXES
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | 13,391 | $ | 1,365 | $ | 14,755 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B),
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | |||||||||
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 147,513 | $ | 147,513 | |||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 295,027 | 295,027 | |||||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 147,513 | ||||||||||
5 | Recommended Revenue | 147,513 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 442,540 | 442,540 | |||||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 147,513 | 147,513 | |||||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 295,027 | 295,027 | |||||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | - | - | |||||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 295,027 | 295,027 | |||||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 61,956 | 61,956 | |||||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 5.0100% | 5.0100% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | - | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
20 | Property Tax onRecommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 3,104 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | - | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
23 | increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | - | |||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | - | |||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | |||||||||||
REFERENCES: Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-3 | |
Docket No. W-03720A-12-0311 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes) | 2014 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” by 3/4” Meter | $ 27.00 | $ 27.00 | $ 27.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 27.00 | 27.00 | 27.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 57.00 | 57.00 | 57.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 120.00 | 120.00 | 120.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 128.00 | 128.00 | 128.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 340.00 | 340.00 | 340.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 550.00 | 550.00 | 550.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 1,100.00 | 1,100.00 | 1,100.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | NA | 2,160.00 | 2,160.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Rate Charges:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Present and 2014 | Proposed (2015) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Potable Water | Rate Block (Gallons) | Volumetric Charge | Rate Block | Volumetric Charge (Per 1,000 Gallons) | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” x 3/4”, 3/4, 1”, and 1 1/2” Residential Meters | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 4,000 | $ 5.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 10,000 | 6.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | over 10,000 | 7.00 | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
5/8” x 3/4” and 3/4” Non-residential Meters | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 7,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 7,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
1” Non-residential Meters | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 16,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 16,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Non-residential Meters | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 32,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 32,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
2” Meters - All Classes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 60,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 60,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
3” Meters - All Classes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 120,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 120,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
4” Meters - All Classes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 200,000 | S 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 200,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
6” Meters - All Classes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 400,000 | $ 6.00 | 1,000 | 3.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | over 400,000 | 7.00 | 5,000 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier three Breakover | NA | NA | 10,000 | 5.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | NA | NA | 18,000 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | NA | NA | 25,000 | 7.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | NA | NA | over 25,000 | 8.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Standpipe Rate - per 1,000 gallons | all gallons $ 7.00 | all gallons $ 7.00 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Schedule H-3 | ||
Page 2 of 2 |
Present | Proposed | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
Conservation Rebate Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons | N/A | 7,001 | ||||||||
Commodity rate rebate applied If consumption is below the CRT: | N/A | 20% |
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 30.00 | $ | 30.00 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Establishment of Service (After Hours) | 45.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | ** | ** | ||||||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | N/A | Eliminate | ||||||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | N/A | at cost | ||||||||||||||
After-Hours Service Charge | N/A | 35.00 | ||||||||||||||
Deposit | * | * | ||||||||||||||
Deposit Interest | * | * | ||||||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 25.00 | 25.00 | - | |||||||||||||
Meter Test Fee (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 3.00 | 1.50% | ||||||||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | - | |||||||||||||
Fire Sprinkler, Monthly Service Charge | *** | *** | ||||||||||||||
|
* Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B).
** Number of Months off System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-403(D).
*** One percent (1.00%) of monthly minimum for a comparable sized meter connection, but not less than $5.00 per month. The service charge for fire sprinklers is only applicable for service lines separate and distinct from the primary water service line.
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege, sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(DX5).
Service Line and Meter Installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to A.A.C. R14-2-405)
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size
| Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 x 3/4” Meter | $370.00 | $115.00 | $485.00 | $370.00 | $115.00 | $485.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 375.00 | 145.00 | 520.00 | 375.00 | 145.00 | $520.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 405.00 | 205.00 | 610.00 | 405.00 | 205.00 | $610.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Meter | 440.00 | 415.00 | 855.00 | 440.00 | 415.00 | $855.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Turbine Meter | 615.00 | 900.00 | 1,515.00 | 615.00 | 900.00 | $1,515.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Compound Meter | 615.00 | 1,625.00 | 2,240.00 | 615.00 | 1,625.00 | $2,240.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Turbine Meter | 790.00 | 1,405.00 | 2,195.00 | 790.00 | 1,405.00 | $2,195.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Compound Meter | 830.00 | 2,200.00 | 3,030.00 | 830.00 | 2,200.00 | $3,030.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Turbine Meter | 1,100.00 | 2,260.00 | 3,360.00 | 1,100.00 | 2,260.00 | $3,360.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Compound Meter | 1,155.00 | 3,160.00 | 4,315.00 | 1,155.00 | 3,160.00 | $4,315.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Turbine Meter | 1,655.00 | 4,460.00 | 6,115.00 | 1,655.00 | 4,460.00 | $6,115.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Compound Meter | 1,700.00 | 6,190.00 | 7,890.00 | 1,700.00 | 6,190.00 | $7,890.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” and Larger Meters | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 10500 | 116.50 | 116.50 | - | 0 | % |
Present | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Bill (No CRT) | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||
- | $ | 57.00 | $ | 57.00 | $ | - | $ | 57.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 62.00 | 62.00 | - | 62.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | 67.00 | 67.00 | - | 67.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3,000 | 72.00 | 72.00 | - | 72.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
4,000 | 77.00 | 77.00 | - | 77.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 83.00 | 83.00 | - | 83.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
6,000 | 89.00 | 89.00 | - | 89.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
7,000 | 95.00 | 95.00 | - | 95.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
8,000 | 101.00 | 101.00 | - | 101.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
9,000 | 107.00 | 107.00 | - | 107.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
10,000 | 113.00 | 113.00 | - | 113.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 148.00 | 148.00 | - | 148.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 183.00 | 183.00 | - | 183.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 218.00 | 218.00 | - | 218.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 393.00 | 393.00 | - | 393.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
75,000 | 568.00 | 568.00 | - | 568.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 743.00 | 743.00 | - | 743.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
125,000 | 918.00 | 918.00 | - | 918.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,093.00 | 1,093.00 | - | 1,093.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,268.00 | 1,268.00 | - | 1,268.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,443.00 | 1,443.00 | - | 1,443.00 | 0.00% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 10500 | 116.50 | 110.16 | (6.34 | ) | -5 | % |
Present | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Bill (No CRT) | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||
- | $ | 57.00 | $ | 57.00 | $ | - | $ | 57.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 62.00 | $ | 60.45 | $ | (0.69) | $ | 59.76 | -3.61% | ||||||||||||
2,000 | 67.00 | $ | 65.04 | $ | (1.61) | $ | 63.43 | -5.33% | ||||||||||||
3,000 | 72.00 | $ | 69.63 | $ | (2.53) | $ | 67.10 | -6.80% | ||||||||||||
4,000 | 77.00 | $ | 74.22 | $ | (3.44) | $ | 70.78 | -8.08% | ||||||||||||
5,000 | 83.00 | $ | 78.81 | $ | (4.36) | $ | 74.45 | -10.30% | ||||||||||||
6,000 | 89.00 | $ | 84.40 | $ | (5.48) | $ | 78.92 | -11.33% | ||||||||||||
7,000 | 95.00 | $ | 89.99 | $ | (6.60) | $ | 83.39 | -12.22% | ||||||||||||
8,000 | 101.00 | $ | 95.58 | $ | - | $ | 95.58 | -5.37% | ||||||||||||
9,000 | 107.00 | $ | 101.17 | $ | - | $ | 101.17 | -5.45% | ||||||||||||
10,000 | 113.00 | $ | 106.76 | $ | - | $ | 106.76 | -5.52% | ||||||||||||
15,000 | 148.00 | $ | 140.76 | $ | - | $ | 140.76 | -4.89% | ||||||||||||
20,000 | 183.00 | $ | 176.76 | $ | - | $ | 176.76 | -3.41% | ||||||||||||
25,000 | 218.00 | $ | 259.76 | $ | - | $ | 259.76 | 19.16% | ||||||||||||
50,000 | 393.00 | $ | 479.76 | $ | - | $ | 479.76 | 22.08% | ||||||||||||
75,000 | 568.00 | $ | 699.76 | $ | - | $ | 699.76 | 23.20% | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 743.00 | $ | 919.76 | $ | - | $ | 919.76 | 23.79% | ||||||||||||
125,000 | 918.00 | $ | 1,139.76 | $ | - | $ | 1,139.76 | 24.16% | ||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,093.00 | $ | 1,359.76 | $ | - | $ | 1,359.76 | 24.41% | ||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,268.00 | $ | 1,579.76 | $ | - | $ | 1,579.76 | 24.59% | ||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,443.00 | $ | 1,799.76 | $ | - | $ | 1,799.76 | 24.72% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 13500 | 200.50 | 179.50 | (21.00 | ) | -10 | % |
Present | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Bill (No CRT) | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||
- | $ | 120.00 | $ | 120.00 | $ | - | $ | 120.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 125.00 | 125.00 | - | 125.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | 130.00 | 130.00 | - | 130.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3,000 | 135.00 | 135.00 | - | 135.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
4,000 | 140.00 | 140.00 | - | 140.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 146.00 | 146.00 | - | 146.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
6,000 | 152.00 | 152.00 | - | 152.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
7,000 | 158.00 | 158.00 | - | 158.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
8,000 | 164.00 | 164.00 | - | 164.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
9,000 | 170.00 | 170.00 | - | 170.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
10,000 | 176.00 | 176.00 | - | 176.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 211.00 | 211.00 | - | 211.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 246.00 | 246.00 | - | 246.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 281.00 | 281.00 | - | 281.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 456.00 | 456.00 | - | 456.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
75,000 | 631.00 | 631.00 | - | 631.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 806.00 | 806.00 | - | 806.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
125,000 | 981.00 | 981.00 | - | 981.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,156.00 | 1,156.00 | - | 1,156.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,331.00 | 1,331.00 | - | 1,331.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,506.00 | 1,506.00 | - | 1,506.00 | 0.00% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 13500 | 200.50 | 193.56 | (6.94 | ) | -3 | % |
Present | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Bill (No CRT) | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||
- | $ | 120.00 | $ | 120.00 | $ | - | $ | 120.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 125.00 | 123.45 | (0.69) | 122.76 | -1.79% | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | 130.00 | 128.04 | (1.61) | 126.43 | -2.74% | |||||||||||||||
3,000 | 135.00 | 132.63 | (2.53) | 130.10 | -3.63% | |||||||||||||||
4,000 | 140.00 | 137.22 | (3.44) | 133.78 | -4.45% | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 146.00 | 141.81 | (4.36) | 137.45 | -5.86% | |||||||||||||||
6,000 | 152.00 | 147.40 | (5.48) | 141.92 | -6.63% | |||||||||||||||
7,000 | 158.00 | 152.99 | (6.60) | 146.39 | -7.35% | |||||||||||||||
8,000 | 164.00 | 158.58 | - | 158.58 | -3.30% | |||||||||||||||
9,000 | 170.00 | 164.17 | - | 164.17 | -3.43% | |||||||||||||||
10,000 | 176.00 | 169.76 | - | 169.76 | -3.55% | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 211.00 | 203.76 | - | 203.76 | -3.43% | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 246.00 | 239.76 | - | 239.76 | -2.54% | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 281.00 | 322.76 | - | 322.76 | 14.86% | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 456.00 | 542.76 | - | 542.76 | 19.03% | |||||||||||||||
75,000 | 631.00 | 762.76 | - | 762.76 | 20.88% | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 806.00 | 982.76 | - | 982.76 | 21.93% | |||||||||||||||
125,000 | 981.00 | 1,202.76 | - | 1,202.76 | 22.61% | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,156.00 | 1,422.76 | - | 1,422.76 | 23.08% | |||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,331.00 | 1,642.76 | - | 1,642.76 | 23.42% | |||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,506.00 | 1,862.76 | - | 1,862.76 | 23.69% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 19500 | 250.50 | 250.50 | - | 0 | % |
Present | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Bill (No CRT) | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||
- | $ | 128.00 | $ | 128.00 | $ | - | $ | 128.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 133.00 | 133.00 | - | 133.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
2,000 | 138.00 | 138.00 | - | 138.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.00 | 143.00 | - | 143.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
4,000 | 148.00 | 148.00 | - | 148.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
5,000 | 154.00 | 154.00 | - | 154.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
6,000 | 160.00 | 160.00 | - | 160.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
7,000 | 166.00 | 166.00 | - | 166.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
8,000 | 172.00 | 172.00 | - | 172.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
9,000 | 178.00 | 178.00 | - | 178.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
10,000 | 184.00 | 184.00 | - | 184.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 219.00 | 219.00 | - | 219.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 254.00 | 254.00 | - | 254.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 289.00 | 289.00 | - | 289.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 464.00 | 464.00 | - | 464.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
75,000 | 639.00 | 639.00 | - | 639.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 814.00 | 814.00 | - | 814.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
125,000 | 989.00 | 989.00 | - | 989.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,164.00 | 1,164.00 | - | 1,164.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,339.00 | 1,339.00 | - | 1,339.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,514.00 | 1,514.00 | - | 1,514.00 | 0.00% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | Schedule H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||
Median Usage | 19500 | 250.50 | 244.26 | (6.24) | -2% |
Monthly Consumption | Present | Proposed Bill | Percent | |||||||||||||||||
Bill (No CRT) | Gross |
CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 128.00 | $ | 128.00 | $ | - | $ | 128.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
1,000 | 133.00 | 131.45 | (0.69 | ) | 130.76 | -1.68% | ||||||||||||||
2,000 | 138.00 | 136.04 | (1.61 | ) | 134.43 | -2.59% | ||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.00 | 140.63 | (2.53 | ) | 138.10 | -3.42% | ||||||||||||||
4,000 | 148.00 | 145.22 | (3.44 | ) | 141.78 | -4.21% | ||||||||||||||
5,000 | 154.00 | 149.81 | (4.36 | ) | 145.45 | -5.55% | ||||||||||||||
6,000 | 160.00 | 155.40 | (5.48 | ) | 149.92 | -6.30% | ||||||||||||||
7,000 | 166.00 | 160.99 | (6.60 | ) | 154.39 | -6.99% | ||||||||||||||
8,000 | 172.00 | 166.58 | - | 166.58 | -3.15% | |||||||||||||||
9,000 | 178.00 | 172.17 | - | 172.17 | -3.28% | |||||||||||||||
10,000 | 184.00 | 177.76 | - | 177.76 | -3.39% | |||||||||||||||
15,000 | 219.00 | 211.76 | - | 211.76 | -3.31% | |||||||||||||||
20,000 | 254.00 | 247.76 | - | 247.76 | -2.46% | |||||||||||||||
25,000 | 289.00 | 330.76 | - | 330.76 | 14.45% | |||||||||||||||
50,000 | 464.00 | 550.76 | - | 550.76 | 18.70% | |||||||||||||||
75,000 | 639.00 | 770.76 | - | 770.76 | 20.62% | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 814.00 | 990.76 | - | 990.76 | 21.71% | |||||||||||||||
125,000 | 989.00 | 1,210.76 | - | 1,210.76 | 22.42% | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,164.00 | 1,430.76 | - | 1,430.76 | 22.92% | |||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,339.00 | 1,650.76 | - | 1,650.76 | 23.28% | |||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,514.00 | 1,870.76 | - | 1,870.76 | 23.56% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc.
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. W-02450A -12-0312 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement A-1 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 2,206,816 | $ | 2,206,816 | $ | 2,206,817 | $ | 2,206,817 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (175,170) | $ | (175,170) | $ | (78,593) | $ | (78,593) | |||||||||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | -7.94% | -7.94% | -3.56% | -3.56% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return or Operating Margin | 10.72% | 10.72% | 10.0% | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 236,637 | $ | 236,637 | $ | 40,786 | $ | 220,770 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 411,807 | $ | 411,807 | $ | 119,379 | $ | 299,363 | |||||||||||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6451 | 1.6451 | 1.6752 | 1.6752 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 677,458 | $ | 677,458 | $ | 199,983 | $ | 199,983 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 207,705 | $ | 207,705 | $ | 207,705 | $ | 207,705 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 885,163 | $ | 885,163 | $ | 407,689 | $ | 407,689 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 326.16% | 326.16% | 96.28% | 96.28% | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | NA | NA |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Schedule: A-1a | |||
W-02450A-12-0312 | Settlement Phase In | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||
Year | Revenue Increase (Relative to Test Year) | Revenue Increase Previous Year) | ||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| - |
| - | ||||||||||||||
|
2015 |
| 99,992 | 99,992 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 199,983 | 99,992 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | |||
W-02450A-12-0312 | GRCF | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor: | ||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
2 | Uncollectible Factor (Line 11) | 0.6570% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.3430% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 39.6485% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 59.6945% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.675195 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollectible Factor: | ||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 1.0700% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10) | 0.6570% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 6, L25) | 1.7094% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 1.0496% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 39.6485% | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1, Line 5) | $ | 220,770 | |||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (Schedule C-1) | $ | (78,593) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 299,363 | |||||||||
27 | Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 31,350 | |||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | (43,695) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 75,046 | |||||||||
30 | Required Revenue Increase (Schedule A-1) | $ | 199,983 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 1.0700% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 2,140 | |||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 2,140 | |||||||||
35 | Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 6, Line 21) | $ | 14,673 | |||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 6, Col A, L19) | $ | 11,254 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36) | $ | 3,419 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 379,968 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
(A) |
(B) |
(C) | ||||||||||
Test Year | Settlement Recommended | |||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Sch C-1) | $ | 207,705 | $ 407,689 | ||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 329,994 | $ 335,553 | ||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | (9,085) | $ (9,085) | ||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | (113,204) | $ 81,221 | ||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | (7,888) | $ 5,659 | ||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | (105,316) | $ 75,562 | ||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | (35,807) | $ 25,691 | ||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | (35,807) | $ 25,691 | ||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | (43,695) | $ 31,350 | ||||||||
50 | Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | N/A | |||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (Schedule B-1) | $ 2,206,817 | ||||||||||
52 | SETTLEMENT FACTOR | -0.41% | ||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ (9,085) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | ||
W-02450A-12-0312 | Settlement B-1 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | COMPANY AS FILED | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 5,766,393 | $ | 0 | $ | 5,766,394 | |||||||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | 1,863,416 | - | 1,863,416 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 3,902,977 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,902,978 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 73,118 | $ | - | $ | 73,118 | |||||||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 13,653 | - | 13,653 | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | 59,465 | - | 59,465 | ||||||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 1,619,985 | - | 1,619,985 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 27,797 | - | 27,797 | ||||||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 22,030 | 22,030 | ||||||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 33,116 | - | 33,116 | ||||||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
13 | Prepayments | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||
14 | Supplies Inventory | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
15 | Projected Capital Expenditures | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,206,816 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,206,817 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement B-2 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [I] | ||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT. |
Reassignments | ||||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | per Staff | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||
AS FILED | Testimony GWB | ADJUSTED | ||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 177,430 | $ | - | $ | 177,430 | ||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 47,677 | 47,677 | ||||||||||||
3 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 299,601 | 299,601 | ||||||||||||
4 | 309 | Supply Mains | - | - | ||||||||||||
5 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
6 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 1,787,637 | 1,787,637 | ||||||||||||
7 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 1,626,520 | (1,626,520) | 0 | |||||||||||
320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 1,625,072 | 1,625,072 | |||||||||||||
320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 1,448 | 1,448 | |||||||||||||
8 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 228,655 | (228,655) | - | |||||||||||
330.1 | Storage Tanks | 103,612 | 103,612 | |||||||||||||
330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 125,043 | 125,043 | |||||||||||||
9 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 890,943 | 890,943 | ||||||||||||
10 | 333 | Services | 43,069 | 43,069 | ||||||||||||
11 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 147,178 | 147,178 | ||||||||||||
12 | 335 | Hydrants | 38,386 | 38,386 | ||||||||||||
13 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 5,894 | 5,894 | ||||||||||||
14 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 5,427 | 5,427 | ||||||||||||
15 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
16 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||
17 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 1,977 | 1,977 | ||||||||||||
18 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 663 | 663 | ||||||||||||
19 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 838 | 838 | ||||||||||||
20 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 12,408 | 12,408 | ||||||||||||
21 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 5,210 | 5,210 | ||||||||||||
22 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 446,880 | 446,880 | ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
23 | Total Plant in Service | 5,766,393 | 0 | 5,766,394 | ||||||||||||
24 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | Accumulated Depreciation | 1,863,416 | - | 1,863,416 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
26 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 3,902,977 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,902,978 | |||||||||
27 | ||||||||||||||||
28 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||
29 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (ClAC) | $ | 73,118 | $ | 73,118 | |||||||||||
30 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 13,653 | 13,653 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
31 | Net CIAC (L63 - L64) | 59,465 | - | 59,465 | ||||||||||||
32 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 1,619,985 | - | 1,619,985 | ||||||||||||
33 | Imputed Reg Advances | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
34 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | |||||||||||||
35 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 27,797 | 27,797 | |||||||||||||
36 | Customer Meter Deposits | 22,030 | 22,030 | |||||||||||||
37 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||
38 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 33,116 | 33,116 | |||||||||||||
39 | Working Capital Allowance | - | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
40 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,206,816 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,206,817 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement C-1 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A]
COMPANY AS FILED | [B]
SETTLEMENT | [C] SETTLEMENT | [D]
SETTLEMENT | [E]
SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | $ | 202,202 | $ | - | $ | 202,202 | $ | 199,983 | $ | 402,186 | |||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 5,503 | - | 5,503 | - | 5,503 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 207,705 | $ | - | $ | 207,705 | $ | 199,983 | $ | 407,689 | |||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 75,753 | $ | - | $ | 75,753 | $ | - | $ | 75,753 | |||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 960 | - | 960 | - | 960 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 22,407 | (878) | 21,529 | - | 21,529 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 10,522 | (412) | 10,110 | - | 10,110 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 20,175 | - | 20,175 | - | 20,175 | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 3,591 | - | 3,591 | - | 3,591 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 26,415 | - | 26,415 | - | 26,415 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 5,109 | - | 5,109 | - | 5,109 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Propert | 2,597 | - | 2,597 | - | 2,597 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 5,733 | - | 5,733 | - | 5,733 | ||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 1,557 | - | 1,557 | - | 1,557 | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 269 | - | 269 | - | 269 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expen | 2,140 | (1,052) | 1,088 | - | 1,088 | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 4,769 | (2,546) | 2,222 | 2,140 | 4,362 | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 7,221 | - | 7,221 | - | 7,221 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 380,785 | (245,777) | 135,008 | - | 135,008 | ||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense - CIAC | (2,151) | - | (2,151) | - | (2,151) | ||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 1,553 | - | 1,553 | - | 1,553 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - | 11,254 | - | 11,254 | 3,419 | 14,673 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | (197,785) | 154,089 | (43,695) | 75,046 | 31,350 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | 382,875 | (96,576) | 286,299 | 80,604 | 366,903 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (175,170) | $ | 96,576 | $ | (76,593) | $ | 119,379 | $ | 40,786 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule C-2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (D): Schedule GRCF | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement C-1 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
LINE
| DESCRIPTION
| [A]
COMPANY | [B]
Water Loss | [C]
Bad Debts Exp ADJ #2 | [D] Rate Case ADJ #3
| [E]
Deprec. Exp ADJ #4
| [F]
Income Taxes
| [H]
SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | 202,202 | - | - | - | - | - | 202,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 5,503 | - | - | - | - | - | 5,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 207,705 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 207,705 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 75,753 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 75,753 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 960 | - | - | - | - | - | 960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 22,407 | (878) | - | - | - | 21,529 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 10,522 | (412) | 10,110 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 20,175 | - | - | 20,175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 3,591 | - | - | 3,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 26,415 | - | - | 26,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 5,109 | - | - | 5,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 2,597 | - | - | 2,597 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 5,733 | - | - | - | 5,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 1,557 | - | - | 1,557 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 269 | - | - | 269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense – I | 2,140 | - | - | (1,052) | 1,088 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 4,769 | - | (2,546) | 2,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 7,221 | - | - | 7,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 380,785 | - | - | (245,777) | 135,008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC Amor | (2,151) | - | - | (2,151) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 1,553 | - | - | 1,553 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Prop | 11,254 | - | - | 11,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | (197,785) | - | - | 154,089 | (43,695) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 382,875 | $ | (1,290) | $ | (2,546) | $ | (1,052) | $ | (245,777) | $ | 154,089 | $ | 286,299 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income | $ | (175,170) | $ | 1,290 | $ | 2,546 | $ | 1,052 | $ | 245,777 | $ | (154,089) | $ | (78,593) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 1 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Water Loss | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - WATER LOSS
LINE NO. | ||||||||||||||
1 | One plus allowable water loss | 110.00% | ||||||||||||
2 | One plus actual water loss | 119.91% | ||||||||||||
3 | Allowable portion | 91.74% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Disallowable portion | 8.26% | ||||||||||||
5 |
Power Expense | 22,407 | ||||||||||||
6 | % water pumped in systems greater than 10% loss | 47.40% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
7 | Power Expense, subject to disallowance | 10,621 | ||||||||||||
8 | Disallowance | $ | 878 | |||||||||||
9 |
Chemical Expense | 10,522 | ||||||||||||
10 | % water pumped in systems greater than 10% loss | 47.40% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
11 | Chemical Expense, subject to disallowance | 4,988 | ||||||||||||
12 | Disallowance | $ | 412 | |||||||||||
Allocation of total water and power and chemicals by systems with losses greater than 10%: | ||||||||||||||
13 | Water System, Totals
|
| Gallons Pumped |
|
| Gallons Sold
|
|
| Water loss (%)
|
| ||||
14 | Garden City, PWS 07-037 | 2,848,000 | 1,933,000 | 32.13% | ||||||||||
15 | Roseview, PWS 07-082 | 2,773,000 | 2,432,000 | 12.30% | ||||||||||
16 | WPE #1, PWS N/A | 600,000 | 256,000 | 57.33% | ||||||||||
17 | WPE #6, PWS 07-733 | 1,997,000 | 1,560,000 | 21.88% | ||||||||||
18 | Tufte, PWS 07-617 | 456,000 | 403,000 | 11.62% | ||||||||||
19 | Buckeye Ranch, PWS 07-618 | 10,432,000 | 8,718,000 | 16.43% | ||||||||||
20 | Dixie, PWS 07-030 | 4,047,000 | 3,860,000 | 4.62% | ||||||||||
21 | Sunshine, PWS 07-071 | 17,153,000 | 16,396,000 | 4.41% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
40,306,000 | 35,558,000 | 11.78% | ||||||||||||
22 | Less Systems < 10% : | |||||||||||||
23 | Dixie, PWS 07-030 | 4,047,000 | 3,860,000 | 4.62% | ||||||||||
24 | Sunshine, PWS 07-071 | 17,153,000 | 16,396,000 | 4.41% | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
25 | Net Systems > 10% | 19,106,000 | 15,302,000 | 19.91% | ||||||||||
26 | % Power and Chemicals, | |||||||||||||
27 | Subject to Disallowance | 47.40% | ||||||||||||
Line 1: Maximum acceptable level of water losses | ||||||||||||||
Line 2: Actual level of water losses | ||||||||||||||
Line 3: Line 2 / line 3 | ||||||||||||||
Line 4: 1 minus line 4 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 2 | |||
W-02450A-12-0312 | Bad Debt | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | $ | 4,769 | $ | (2,546) | $ | 2,222 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 |
| |||||||||||||
Adjusted Test Year Revenues | $ | 207,705 | ||||||||||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate | 1.07% | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense | $ | 2,222 | ||||||||||||
Co Proposed | $ | 4,769 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | (2,546) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ 2,140 | $ (1,052) | $ 1,088 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.82% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ 122,062.50 | $ 48,652.28 | $ 49,217.76 | $ | 16,420.26 | $ | 4,615.99 | $ | 995.73 | $ | 1,926.91 | $ | 233.57 | ||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ 216,000.00 | $ 86,094.37 | $ 87,095.02 | $ | 29,057.05 | $ | 8,168.39 | $ | 1,762.02 | $ | 3,409.84 | $ | 413.31 | ||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ 370,302.78 | $ 147,597.14 | $ 149,312.63 | $ | 49,814.39 | $ | 14,003.59 | $ | 3,020.75 | $ | 5,845.71 | $ | 708.57 | ||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ 78,808.75 | $ 31,411.99 | $ 31,777.08 | $ | 10,601.62 | $ | 2,980.28 | $ | 642.88 | $ | 1,244.10 | $ | 150.80 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ 787,174.03 | $ 313,755.78 | $ 317,402.49 | $ | 105,893.32 | $ | 29,768.25 | $ | 6,421.38 | $ | 12,426.56 | $ | 1,506.25 | ||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ 262,391.34 | $ 104,585.26 | $ 105,800.83 | $ | 35,297.77 | $ | 9,922.75 | $ | 2,140.46 | $ | 4,142.19 | $ | 502.08 | ||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ 262,391.34 | $ 104,585.26 | $ 105,800.83 | $ | 35,297.77 | $ | 9,922.75 | $ | 2,140.46 | $ | 4,142.19 | $ | 502.08 | ||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ 262,391.34 | $ 104,585.26 | $ 105,800.83 | $ | 35,297.77 | $ | 9,922.75 | $ | 2,140.46 | $ | 4,142.19 | $ | 502.08 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ 787,174.03 | $ 313,755.78 | $ 317,402.49 | $ | 105,693.32 | $ | 29,768.25 | $ | 6,421.38 | $ | 12,426.56 | $ | 1,506.25 | ||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||
14 | Settlement Amount | $ 400,000.00 | $ 159,434.01 | $ 161,287.07 | $ | 53,809.36 | $ | 15,126.64 | $ | 3,263.00 | $ | 6,314.52 | $ | 765.40 | ||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ 133,333.33 | $ 53,144.67 | $ 53,762.36 | $ | 17,936.45 | $ | 5,042.21 | $ | 1,087.67 | $ | 2,104.84 | $ | 255.13 | ||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ 133,333.33 | $ 53,144.67 | $ 53,762.36 | $ | 17,936.45 | $ | 5,042.21 | $ | 1,087.67 | $ | 2,104.84 | $ | 255.13 | ||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ 133,333.33 | $ 53,144.67 | $ 53,762.36 | $ | 17,936.45 | $ | 5,042.21 | $ | 1,087.67 | $ | 2,104.84 | $ | 255.13 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ 400,000.00 | $ 313,755.78 | $ 317,402.49 | $ | 105,893.32 | $ | 29,768.25 | $ | 6,421.38 | $ | 12,426.56 | $ | 1,506.25 | ||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total, by System | $ (129,058.01) | $ (51,440.59) | $ (52,038.47) | $ | (17,361.32) | $ | (4,880.54) | $ | (1,052.79) | $ | (2,037.35) | $ | (248.95) | ||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Depreciation | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] PLANT BALANCE | [B] DEPRECIATION RATE | [C] DEPRECIATION EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | 177,430 | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
3 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 47,677 | 3.33% | 1,588 | |||||||||||
4 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 299,601 | 3.33% | 9,977 | |||||||||||
5 | 309 | Supply Mains | - | 2.00% | - | |||||||||||
6 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | - | 5.00% | - | |||||||||||
7 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 1,787,637 | 12.50% | 223,455 | |||||||||||
8 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 0 | - | ||||||||||||
320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 1,625,072 | 3.33% | 54,115 | ||||||||||||
320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 1,448 | 20.00% | 290 | ||||||||||||
9 | 330.0 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | - | - | ||||||||||||
330.1 | Storage Tanks | 103,612 | 2.22% | 2,300 | ||||||||||||
330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 125,043 | 5.00% | 6,252 | ||||||||||||
10 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 890,943 | 2.00% | 17,819 | |||||||||||
11 | 333 | Services | 43,069 | 3.33% | 1,434 | |||||||||||
12 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 147,178 | 8.33% | 12,260 | |||||||||||
13 | 335 | Hydrants | 38,386 | 2.00% | 768 | |||||||||||
14 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 5,894 | 6.67% | 393 | |||||||||||
15 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 5,427 | 6.67% | 362 | |||||||||||
16 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | - | 6.67% | - | |||||||||||
17 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | - | 20.00% | - | |||||||||||
18 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 1,977 | 5.00% | 99 | |||||||||||
19 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 663 | 10.00% | 66 | |||||||||||
20 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 838 | 5.00% | 42 | |||||||||||
21 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 12,408 | 10.00% | 1,241 | |||||||||||
22 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 5,210 | 10.00% | 521 | |||||||||||
23 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 446,880 | 5.00% | 22,344 | |||||||||||
24 | 5,766,394 | 355,325 | ||||||||||||||
25 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
26 | Land and Land Rights | 177,430 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
27 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 5,588,964 | $ 355,325 | ||||||||||||
28 | ||||||||||||||||
29 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
30 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 177,430 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 5,411,534 | $ 355,325 | ||||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | Amortization of CIAC | $ | 73,118 | 6.5661% | $ 4,801 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
35 | Settlement Depreciation Expense | $ 350,524 | ||||||||||||||
36 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ 378,634 | ||||||||||||||
37 | Settlement Adjustment | $ (28,111) | ||||||||||||||
38 | ||||||||||||||||
39 | SETTLEMENT FACTOR | $ (217,666) | ||||||||||||||
40 | ||||||||||||||||
50 | Total Adjustment (line 37+39) | $ (245,777) | ||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||||||||||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||||||||||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Income Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - INCOME TAXES
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | (197,785 | ) | $ | 154,089 | $ | (43,695 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B),
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement ADJ 6 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | |||||||
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 207,705 | $ 207,705 | ||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 415,411 | 415,411 | |||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 207,705 | ||||||||
5 | Recommended Revenue | 407.689 | ||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 623,116 | 823,100 | |||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 207,705 | 274.367 | |||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 415,411 | 548,733 | |||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | 23,512 | 23,512 | |||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | - | - | |||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 438,923 | 572,245 | |||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 92,174 | 120,171 | |||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 12.2100% | 12.2100% | |||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 11,254 | |||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 11.254 | |||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | (0) | |||||||
20 | Property Tax onRecommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ 14,673 | ||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ 11,254 | ||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ 3,419 | ||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ 3,419 | ||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ 199,983 | ||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 1.70940% | ||||||||
REFERENCES: | ||||||||||
Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company | ||||||||||
Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement D-1 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Per Settlement Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc’s revenue requirement is determined by an operating margin of 10%.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
W-02450A-12-0312 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes*) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” X 3/4” Meter | $ | 22.55 | $ | 22.55 | $ | 30.00 | $ | 40.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 22.55 | 22.55 | 30.00 | 40.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 56.38 | 56.38 | 75.01 | 100.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 112.75 | 112.75 | 150.00 | 200.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 180.40 | 180.40 | 240.00 | 320.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 360.80 | 360.80 | 480.00 | 640.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 563.75 | 563.75 | 750.00 | 1,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 1,127.50 | 1,127.50 | 1,500.00 | 2,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | 2,255.00 | 2,255.00 | 2,400.00 | 3,200.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Rate Charges (per 1,000 gallons):
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Block | Volumetric Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 1,000 Gallons | 1,000 Gallons | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 2.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 5,000 Gallons | 5,000 Gallons | 1.99 | 1.99 | 3.36 | 4.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | 10,000 Gallons | 10,000 Gallons | 2.89 | 2.89 | 4.88 | 6.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | 18,000 Gallons | 18,000 Gallons | 3.80 | 3.80 | 6.41 | 8.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | 25,000 Gallons | 25,000 Gallons | 4.68 | 4.68 | 7.90 | 10.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | Over 25,000 | Over 25,000 | 5.54 | 5.54 | 9.35 | 12.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservation Rebate
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons |
| 7,401 | 7,401 | 7,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity rate rebate: |
| 45% | 45% | 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(applied if consumption is below the CRT) |
*Includes all potable water meters including irrigation meters.
Non-Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | 185.74 | 533.76 | 348.02 | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 1.638 | 1.07 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement Schedule H-3
Page 2 of 2
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | - | ||||||
Establishment of Service - After Hours | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | - | |||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge, Per Hour | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
After-Hours Service Charge | NA | 35.00 | ||||||||||
Deposit | (c) | (c) | ||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Meter Test Fee (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
|
(a) Number of Months off System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-403(D).
(b) Cost to include parts, labor, overhead and all applicable taxes per A.A.C. R14-2-405(B)(5).
(c) Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B).
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege, sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(D)(5).
Service Line and Meter Installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to A.A.C. R14-2-405)
Meter Size | Service Line Charges | Present Meter Charges | Total Charges | Service Line Charges | Proposed Meter Charges | Total Charges | Change | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 x 3/4” Meter | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Meter | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
2” Turbine Meter | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
2” Compound Meter | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3” Turbine Meter | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
3” Compound Meter | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
4” Turbine Meter | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
4” Compound Meter | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
6” Turbine Meter | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
6” Compound Meter | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
8” and Larger Meters | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 27.58 | $ 27.58 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 22.55 | $ | - | $ | 22.55 | $ | 22.55 | $ | - | $ | 22.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 23.73 | (0.53 | ) | 23.20 | 23.73 | (0.53 | ) | 23.20 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.72 | (1.43 | ) | 24.29 | 25.72 | (1.43 | ) | 24.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 27.71 | (2.32 | ) | 25.39 | 27.71 | (2.32 | ) | 25.39 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 29.70 | (3.22 | ) | 26.48 | 29.70 | (3.22 | ) | 26.48 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 31.69 | (4.11 | ) | 27.58 | 31.69 | (4.11 | ) | 27.58 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 34.58 | (5.41 | ) | 29.17 | 34.58 | (5.41 | ) | 29.17 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 37.47 | (6.71 | ) | 30.76 | 37.47 | (6.71 | ) | 30.76 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 40.36 | - | 40.36 | 40.36 | - | 40.36 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 43.25 | - | 43.25 | 43.25 | - | 43.25 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 46.14 | - | 46.14 | 46.14 | - | 46.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 65.14 | - | 65.14 | 65.14 | - | 65.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 85.90 | - | 85.90 | 85.90 | - | 85.90 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 109.30 | - | 109.30 | 109.30 | - | 109.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 247.80 | - | 247.80 | 247.80 | - | 247.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 386.30 | - | 386.30 | 386.30 | - | 386.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 524.80 | - | 524.80 | 524.80 | - | 524.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 663.30 | - | 663.30 | 663.30 | - | 663.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 801.80 | - | 801.80 | 801.80 | - | 801.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 940.30 | - | 940.30 | 940.30 | - | 940.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,078.80 | - | 1,078.80 | 1,078.80 | - | 1,078.80 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4”Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 27.58 | $ 37.63 | $ 10.05 | 36.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 22.55 | $ | - | $ | 22.55 | $ | 30.00 | $ | - | $ | 30.00 | 33.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 23.73 | (0.53 | ) | 23.20 | 31.82 | (0.91 | ) | 30.91 | 33.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.72 | (1.43 | ) | 24.29 | 35.18 | (2.59 | ) | 32.59 | 34.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 27.71 | (2.32 | ) | 25.39 | 38.54 | (4.27 | ) | 34.27 | 35.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 29.70 | (3.22 | ) | 26.48 | 41.90 | (5.95 | ) | 35.95 | 35.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 31.69 | (4.11 | ) | 27.58 | 45.26 | (7.63 | ) | 37.63 | 36.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 34.58 | (5.41 | ) | 29.17 | 50.14 | (10.07 | ) | 40.07 | 37.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 37.47 | (6.71 | ) | 30.76 | 55.02 | (12.51 | ) | 42.51 | 38.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 40.36 | - | 40.36 | 59.90 | - | 59.90 | 48.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 43.25 | - | 43.25 | 64.78 | - | 64.78 | 49.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 46.14 | - | 46.14 | 69.66 | - | 69.66 | 51.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 65.14 | - | 65.14 | 101.71 | - | 101.71 | 56.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 85.90 | - | 85.90 | 136.74 | - | 136.74 | 59.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 109.30 | - | 109.30 | 176.24 | - | 176.24 | 61.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 247.80 | - | 247.80 | 409.99 | - | 409.99 | 65.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 386.30 | - | 386.30 | 643.74 | - | 643.74 | 66.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 524.80 | - | 524.80 | 877.49 | - | 877.49 | 67.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 663.30 | - | 663.30 | 1,111.24 | - | 1,111.24 | 67.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 801.80 | - | 801.80 | 1,344.99 | - | 1,344.99 | 67.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 940.30 | - | 940.30 | 1,578.74 | - | 1,578.74 | 67.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,078.80 | - | 1,078.80 | 1,812.49 | - | 1,812.49 | 68.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 27.58 | $ 50.07 | $ 22.49 | 81.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 22.55 | $ | - | $ | 22.55 | $ | 40.00 | $ | - | $ | 40.00 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 23.73 | (0.53 | ) | 23.20 | 42.42 | (1.21 | ) | 41.21 | 77.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.72 | (1.43 | ) | 24.29 | 46.85 | (3.43 | ) | 43.43 | 78.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 27.71 | (2.32 | ) | 25.39 | 51.28 | (5.64 | ) | 45.64 | 79.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 29.70 | (3.22 | ) | 26.48 | 55.71 | (7.86 | ) | 47.86 | 80.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 31.69 | (4.11 | ) | 27.58 | 60.14 | (10.07 | ) | 50.07 | 81.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 34.58 | (5.41 | ) | 29.17 | 66.57 | (13.29 | ) | 53.29 | 82.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 37.47 | (6.71 | ) | 30.76 | 73.00 | (16.50 | ) | 56.50 | 83.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 40.36 | - | 40.36 | 79.43 | - | 79.43 | 96.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 43.25 | - | 43.25 | 85.86 | - | 85.86 | 98.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 46.14 | - | 46.14 | 92.29 | - | 92.29 | 100.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 65.14 | - | 65.14 | 134.54 | - | 134.54 | 106.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 85.90 | - | 85.90 | 180.71 | - | 180.71 | 110.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 109.30 | - | 109.30 | 232.76 | - | 232.76 | 113.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 247.80 | - | 247.80 | 541.01 | - | 541.01 | 118.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 386.30 | - | 386.30 | 849.26 | - | 849.26 | 119.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 524.80 | - | 524.80 | 1,157.51 | - | 1,157.51 | 120.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 663.30 | - | 663.30 | 1,465.76 | - | 1,465.76 | 121.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 801.80 | - | 801.80 | 1,774.01 | - | 1,774.01 | 121.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 940.30 | - | 940.30 | 2,082.26 | - | 2,082.26 | 121.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,078.80 | - | 1,078.80 | 2,390.51 | - | 2,390.51 | 121.6% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7000 | $ 64.59 | $ 64.59 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 56.38 | $ | - | $ | 56.38 | $ | 56.38 | $ | - | $ | 56.38 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 57.56 | (0.53 | ) | 57.03 | 57.56 | (0.53 | ) | 57.03 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 59.55 | (1.43 | ) | 58.12 | 59.55 | (1.43 | ) | 58.12 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 61.54 | (2.32 | ) | 59.22 | 61.54 | (2.32 | ) | 59.22 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.53 | (3.22 | ) | 60.31 | 63.53 | (3.22 | ) | 60.31 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 65.52 | (4.11 | ) | 61.41 | 65.52 | (4.11 | ) | 61.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 68.41 | (5.41 | ) | 63.00 | 68.41 | (5.41 | ) | 63.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 71.30 | (6.71 | ) | 64.59 | 71.30 | (6.71 | ) | 64.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 74.19 | - | 74.19 | 74.19 | - | 74.19 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 77.08 | - | 77.08 | 77.08 | - | 77.08 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 79.97 | - | 79.97 | 79.97 | - | 79.97 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 98.97 | - | 98.97 | 98.97 | - | 98.97 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 119.73 | - | 119.73 | 119.73 | - | 119.73 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 143.13 | - | 143.13 | 143.13 | - | 143.13 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 281.63 | - | 281.63 | 281.63 | - | 281.63 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.13 | - | 420.13 | 420.13 | - | 420.13 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 558.63 | - | 558.63 | 558.63 | - | 558.63 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 697.13 | - | 697.13 | 697.13 | - | 697.13 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 835.63 | - | 835.63 | 835.63 | - | 835.63 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 974.13 | - | 974.13 | 974.13 | - | 974.13 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,112.63 | - | 1,112.63 | 1,112.63 | - | 1,112.63 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7000 | $ 64.59 | $ 87.52 | $ 22.93 | 35.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 56.38 | $ | - | $ | 56.38 | $ | 75.01 | $ | - | $ | 75.01 | 33.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 57.56 | (0.53 | ) | 57.03 | 76.83 | (0.91 | ) | 75.92 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 59.55 | (1.43 | ) | 58.12 | 80.19 | (2.59 | ) | 77.60 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 61.54 | (2.32 | ) | 59.22 | 83.55 | (4.27 | ) | 79.28 | 33.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.53 | (3.22 | ) | 60.31 | 86.91 | (5.95 | ) | 80.96 | 34.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 65.52 | (4.11 | ) | 61.41 | 90.27 | (7.63 | ) | 82.64 | 34.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 68.41 | (5.41 | ) | 63.00 | 95.15 | (10.07 | ) | 85.08 | 35.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 71.30 | (6.71 | ) | 64.59 | 100.03 | (12.51 | ) | 87.52 | 35.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 74.19 | - | 74.19 | 104.91 | - | 104.91 | 41.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 77.08 | - | 77.08 | 109.79 | - | 109.79 | 42.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 79.97 | - | 79.97 | 114.67 | - | 114.67 | 43.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 98.97 | - | 98.97 | 146.72 | - | 146.72 | 48.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 119.73 | - | 119.73 | 181.75 | - | 181.75 | 51.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 143.13 | - | 143.13 | 221.25 | - | 221.25 | 54.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 281.63 | - | 281.63 | 455.00 | - | 455.00 | 61.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.13 | - | 420.13 | 688.75 | - | 688.75 | 63.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 558.63 | - | 558.63 | 922.50 | - | 922.50 | 65.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 697.13 | - | 697.13 | 1,156.25 | - | 1,156.25 | 65.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 835.63 | - | 835.63 | 1,390.00 | - | 1,390.00 | 66.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 974.13 | - | 974.13 | 1,623.75 | - | 1,623.75 | 66.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,112.63 | - | 1,112.63 | 1,857.50 | - | 1,857.50 | 66.9% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7000 | $ 64.59 | $ 116.51 | $ 51.92 | 80.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 56.38 | $ | - | $ | 56.38 | $ | 100.01 | $ | - | $ | 100.01 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 57.56 | (0.53 | ) | 57.03 | 102.43 | (1.21 | ) | 101.22 | 77.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 59.55 | (1.43 | ) | 58.12 | 106.86 | (3.43 | ) | 103.43 | 78.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 61.54 | (2.32 | ) | 59.22 | 111.29 | (5.64 | ) | 105.65 | 78.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.53 | (3.22 | ) | 60.31 | 115.72 | (7.86 | ) | 107.86 | 78.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 65.52 | (4.11 | ) | 61.41 | 120.15 | (10.07 | ) | 110.08 | 79.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 68.41 | (5.41 | ) | 63.00 | 126.58 | (13.29 | ) | 113.29 | 79.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 71.30 | (6.71 | ) | 64.59 | 133.01 | (16.50 | ) | 116.51 | 80.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 74.19 | - | 74.19 | 139.44 | - | 139.44 | 87.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 77.08 | - | 77.08 | 145.87 | - | 145.87 | 89.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 79.97 | - | 79.97 | 152.30 | - | 152.30 | 90.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 98.97 | - | 98.97 | 194.55 | - | 194.55 | 96.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 119.73 | - | 119.73 | 240.72 | - | 240.72 | 101.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 143.13 | - | 143.13 | 292.77 | - | 292.77 | 104.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 281.63 | - | 281.63 | 601.02 | - | 601.02 | 113.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 420.13 | - | 420.13 | 909.27 | - | 909.27 | 116.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 558.63 | - | 558.63 | 1,217.52 | - | 1,217.52 | 117.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 697.13 | - | 697.13 | 1,525.77 | - | 1,525.77 | 118.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 835.63 | - | 835.63 | 1,834.02 | - | 1,834.02 | 119.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 974.13 | - | 974.13 | 2,142.27 | - | 2,142.27 | 119.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,112.63 | - | 1,112.63 | 2,450.52 | - | 2,450.52 | 120.2% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5”Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2000 | $ 114.49 | $ 114.49 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 112.75 | $ | - | $ | 112.75 | $ | 112.75 | $ | - | $ | 112.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 113.93 | (0.53 | ) | 113.40 | 113.93 | (0.53 | ) | 113.40 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 115.92 | (1.43 | ) | 114.49 | 115.92 | (1.43 | ) | 114.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 117.91 | (2.32 | ) | 115.59 | 117.91 | (2.32 | ) | 115.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 119.90 | (3.22 | ) | 116.68 | 119.90 | (3.22 | ) | 116.68 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 121.89 | (4.11 | ) | 117.78 | 121.89 | (4.11 | ) | 117.78 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 124.78 | (5.41 | ) | 119.37 | 124.78 | (5.41 | ) | 119.37 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 127.67 | (6.71 | ) | 120.96 | 127.67 | (6.71 | ) | 120.96 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 130.56 | - | 130.56 | 130.56 | - | 130.56 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 133.45 | - | 133.45 | 133.45 | - | 133.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 136.34 | - | 136.34 | 136.34 | - | 136.34 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 155.34 | - | 155.34 | 155.34 | - | 155.34 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 176.10 | - | 176.10 | 176.10 | - | 176.10 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 199.50 | - | 199.50 | 199.50 | - | 199.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 338.00 | - | 338.00 | 338.00 | - | 338.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 476.50 | - | 476.50 | 476.50 | - | 476.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 615.00 | - | 615.00 | 615.00 | - | 615.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 753.50 | - | 753.50 | 753.50 | - | 753.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 892.00 | - | 892.00 | 892.00 | - | 892.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,030.50 | - | 1,030.50 | 1,030.50 | - | 1,030.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,169.00 | - | 1,169.00 | 1,169.00 | - | 1,169.00 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2000 | $ 114.49 | $ 152.59 | $ 38.10 | 33.3% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 112.75 | $ - | $ 112.75 | $ 150.00 | $ - | $ 150.00 | 33.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 113.93 | (0.53) | 113.40 | 151.82 | (0.91) | 150.91 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 115.92 | (1.43) | 114.49 | 155.18 | (2.59) | 152.59 | 33.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 117.91 | (2.32) | 115.59 | 158.54 | (4.27) | 154.27 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 119.90 | (3.22) | 116.68 | 161.90 | (5.95) | 155.95 | 33.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 121.89 | (4.11) | 117.78 | 165.26 | (7.63) | 157.63 | 33.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 124.78 | (5.41) | 119.37 | 170.14 | (10.07) | 160.07 | 34.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 127.67 | (6.71) | 120.96 | 175.02 | (12.51) | 162.51 | 34.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 130.56 | - | 130.56 | 179.90 | - | 179.90 | 37.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 133.45 | - | 133.45 | 184.78 | - | 184.78 | 38.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 136.34 | - | 136.34 | 189.66 | - | 189.66 | 39.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 155.34 | - | 155.34 | 221.71 | - | 221.71 | 42.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 176.10 | - | 176.10 | 256.74 | - | 256.74 | 45.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 199.50 | - | 199.50 | 296.24 | - | 296.24 | 48.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 338.00 | - | 338.00 | 529.99 | - | 529.99 | 56.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 476.50 | - | 476.50 | 763.74 | - | 763.74 | 60.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 615.00 | - | 615.00 | 997.49 | - | 997.49 | 62.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 753.50 | - | 753.50 | 1,231.24 | - | 1,231.24 | 63.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 892.00 | - | 892.00 | 1,464.99 | - | 1,464.99 | 64.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,030.50 | - | 1,030.50 | 1,698.74 | - | 1,698.74 | 64.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,169.00 | - | 1,169.00 | 1,932.49 | - | 1,932.49 | 65.3% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2000 | $ 114.49 | $ 203.43 | $ 88.93 | 77.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 112.75 | $ - | $ 112.75 | $ 200.00 | $ - | $ 200.00 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 113.93 | (0.53) | 113.40 | 202.42 | (1.21) | 201.21 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 115.92 | (1.43) | 114.49 | 206.85 | (3.43) | 203.43 | 77.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 117.91 | (2.32) | 115.59 | 211.28 | (5.64) | 205.64 | 77.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 119.90 | (3.22) | 116.68 | 215.71 | (7.86) | 207.86 | 78.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 121.89 | (4.11) | 117.78 | 220.14 | (10.07) | 210.07 | 78.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 124.78 | (5.41) | 119.37 | 226.57 | (13.29) | 213.29 | 78.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 127.67 | (6.71) | 120.96 | 233.00 | (16.50) | 216.50 | 79.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 130.56 | - | 130.56 | 239.43 | - | 239.43 | 83.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 133.45 | - | 133.45 | 245.86 | - | 245.86 | 84.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 136.34 | - | 136.34 | 252.29 | - | 252.29 | 85.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 155.34 | - | 155.34 | 294.54 | - | 294.54 | 89.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 176.10 | - | 176.10 | 340.71 | - | 340.71 | 93.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 199.50 | - | 199.50 | 392.76 | - | 392.76 | 96.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 338.00 | - | 338.00 | 701.01 | - | 701.01 | 107.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 476.50 | - | 476.50 | 1,009.26 | - | 1,009.26 | 111.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 615.00 | - | 615.00 | 1,317.51 | - | 1,317.51 | 114.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 753.50 | - | 753.50 | 1,625.76 | - | 1,625.76 | 115.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 892.00 | - | 892.00 | 1,934.01 | - | 1,934.01 | 116.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,030.50 | - | 1,030.50 | 2,242.26 | - | 2,242.26 | 117.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,169.00 | - | 1,169.00 | 2,550.51 | - | 2,550.51 | 118.2% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 76000 | $ 549.69 | $ 549.69 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 180.40 | $ - | $ 180.40 | $ 180.40 | $ - | $ 180.40 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 181.58 | (0.53) | 181.05 | 181.58 | (0.53) | 181.05 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 183.57 | (1.43) | 182.14 | 183.57 | (1.43) | 182.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 185.56 | (2.32) | 183.24 | 185.56 | (2.32) | 183.24 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 187.55 | (3.22) | 184.33 | 187.55 | (3.22) | 184.33 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 189.54 | (4.11) | 185.43 | 189.54 | (4.11) | 185.43 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 192.43 | (5.41) | 187.02 | 192.43 | (5.41) | 187.02 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 195.32 | (6.71) | 188.61 | 195.32 | (6.71) | 188.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 198.21 | - | 198.21 | 198.21 | - | 198.21 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 201.10 | - | 201.10 | 201.10 | - | 201.10 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 203.99 | - | 203.99 | 203.99 | - | 203.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 222.99 | - | 222.99 | 222.99 | - | 222.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 243.75 | - | 243.75 | 243.75 | - | 243.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 267.15 | - | 267.15 | 267.15 | - | 267.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 405.65 | - | 405.65 | 405.65 | - | 405.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 544.15 | - | 544.15 | 544.15 | - | 544.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 682.65 | - | 682.65 | 682.65 | - | 682.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 821.15 | - | 821.15 | 821.15 | - | 821.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 959.65 | - | 959.65 | 959.65 | - | 959.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,098.15 | - | 1,098.15 | 1,098.15 | - | 1,098.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,236.65 | - | 1,236.65 | 1,236.65 | - | 1,236.65 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 76000 | $ 549.69 | $ 863.09 | $ 313.40 | 57.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 180.40 | $ - | $ 180.40 | $ 240.00 | $ - | $ 240.00 | 33.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 181.58 | (0.53) | 181.05 | 241.82 | (0.91) | 240.91 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 183.57 | (1.43) | 182.14 | 245.18 | (2.59) | 242.59 | 33.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 185.56 | (2.32) | 183.24 | 248.54 | (4.27) | 244.27 | 33.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 187.55 | (3.22) | 184.33 | 251.90 | (5.95) | 245.95 | 33.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 189.54 | (4.11) | 185.43 | 255.26 | (7.63) | 247.63 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 192.43 | (5.41) | 187.02 | 260.14 | (10.07) | 250.07 | 33.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 195.32 | (6.71) | 188.61 | 265.02 | (12.51) | 252.51 | 33.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 198.21 | - | 198.21 | 269.90 | - | 269.90 | 36.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 201.10 | - | 201.10 | 274.78 | - | 274.78 | 36.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 203.99 | - | 203.99 | 279.66 | - | 279.66 | 37.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 222.99 | - | 222.99 | 311.71 | - | 311.71 | 39.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 243.75 | - | 243.75 | 346.74 | - | 346.74 | 42.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 267.15 | - | 267.15 | 386.24 | - | 386.24 | 44.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 405.65 | - | 405.65 | 619.99 | - | 619.99 | 52.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 544.15 | - | 544.15 | 853.74 | - | 853.74 | 56.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 682.65 | - | 682.65 | 1,087.49 | - | 1,087.49 | 59.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 821.15 | - | 821.15 | 1,321.24 | - | 1,321.24 | 60.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 959.65 | - | 959.65 | 1,554.99 | - | 1,554.99 | 62.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,098.15 | - | 1,098.15 | 1,788.74 | - | 1,788.74 | 62.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,236.65 | - | 1,236.65 | 2,022.49 | - | 2,022.49 | 63.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 76000 | $ 549.69 | $ 1,141.59 | $ 591.90 | 107.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 180.40 | $ - | $ 180.40 | $ 320.00 | $ - | $ 320.00 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 181.58 | (0.53) | 181.05 | 322.42 | (1.21) | 321.21 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 183.57 | (1.43) | 182.14 | 326.85 | (3.43) | 323.43 | 77.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 185.56 | (2.32) | 183.24 | 331.28 | (5.64) | 325.64 | 77.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 187.55 | (3.22) | 184.33 | 335.71 | (7.86) | 327.86 | 77.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 189.54 | (4.11) | 185.43 | 340.14 | (10.07) | 330.07 | 78.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 192.43 | (5.41) | 187.02 | 346.57 | (13.29) | 333.29 | 78.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 195.32 | (6.71) | 188.61 | 353.00 | (16.50) | 336.50 | 78.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 198.21 | - | 198.21 | 359.43 | - | 359.43 | 81.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 201.10 | - | 201.10 | 365.86 | - | 365.86 | 81.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 203.99 | - | 203.99 | 372.29 | - | 372.29 | 82.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 222.99 | - | 222.99 | 414.54 | - | 414.54 | 85.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 243.75 | - | 243.75 | 460.71 | - | 460.71 | 89.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 267.15 | - | 267.15 | 512.76 | - | 512.76 | 91.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 405.65 | - | 405.65 | 821.01 | - | 821.01 | 102.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 544.15 | - | 544.15 | 1,129.26 | - | 1,129.26 | 107.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 682.65 | - | 682.65 | 1,437.51 | - | 1,437.51 | 110.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 821.15 | - | 821.15 | 1,745.76 | - | 1,745.76 | 112.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 959.65 | - | 959.65 | 2,054.01 | - | 2,054.01 | 114.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,098.15 | - | 1,098.15 | 2,362.26 | - | 2,362.26 | 115.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,236.65 | - | 1,236.65 | 2,670.51 | - | 2,670.51 | 115.9% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 18500 | $ 416.69 | $ 416.69 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 360.80 | $ - | $ 360.80 | $ 360.80 | $ - | $ 360.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 361.98 | (0.53) | 361.45 | 361.98 | (0.53) | 361.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 363.97 | (1.43) | 362.54 | 363.97 | (1.43) | 362.54 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 365.96 | (2.32) | 363.64 | 365.96 | (2.32) | 363.64 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 367.95 | (3.22) | 364.73 | 367.95 | (3.22) | 364.73 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 369.94 | (4.11) | 365.83 | 369.94 | (4.11) | 365.83 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 372.83 | (5.41) | 367.42 | 372.83 | (5.41) | 367.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 375.72 | (6.71) | 369.01 | 375.72 | (6.71) | 369.01 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 378.61 | - | 378.61 | 378.61 | - | 378.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 381.50 | - | 381.50 | 381.50 | - | 381.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 384.39 | - | 384.39 | 384.39 | - | 384.39 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.39 | - | 403.39 | 403.39 | - | 403.39 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 424.15 | - | 424.15 | 424.15 | - | 424.15 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 447.55 | - | 447.55 | 447.55 | - | 447.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 586.05 | - | 586.05 | 586.05 | - | 586.05 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 724.55 | - | 724.55 | 724.55 | - | 724.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 863.05 | - | 863.05 | 863.05 | - | 863.05 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,001.55 | - | 1,001.55 | 1,001.55 | - | 1,001.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,140.05 | - | 1,140.05 | 1,140.05 | - | 1,140.05 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,278.55 | - | 1,278.55 | 1,278.55 | - | 1,278.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,417.05 | - | 1,417.05 | 1,417.05 | - | 1,417.05 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 18500 | $ 416.69 | $ 574.15 | $ 157.46 | 37.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 360.80 | $ - | $ 360.80 | $ 480.00 | $ - | $ 480.00 | 33.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 361.98 | (0.53) | 361.45 | 481.82 | (0.91) | 480.91 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 363.97 | (1.43) | 362.54 | 485.18 | (2.59) | 482.59 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 365.96 | (2.32) | 363.64 | 488.54 | (4.27) | 484.27 | 33.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 367.95 | (3.22) | 364.73 | 491.90 | (5.95) | 485.95 | 33.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 369.94 | (4.11) | 365.83 | 495.26 | (7.63) | 487.63 | 33.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 372.83 | (5.41) | 367.42 | 500.14 | (10.07) | 490.07 | 33.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 375.72 | (6.71) | 369.01 | 505.02 | (12.51) | 492.51 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 378.61 | - | 378.61 | 509.90 | - | 509.90 | 34.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 381.50 | - | 381.50 | 514.78 | - | 514.78 | 34.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 384.39 | - | 384.39 | 519.66 | - | 519.66 | 35.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.39 | - | 403.39 | 551.71 | - | 551.71 | 36.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 424.15 | - | 424.15 | 586.74 | - | 586.74 | 38.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 447.55 | - | 447.55 | 626.24 | - | 626.24 | 39.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 586.05 | - | 586.05 | 859.99 | - | 859.99 | 46.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 724.55 | - | 724.55 | 1,093.74 | - | 1,093.74 | 51.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 863.05 | - | 863.05 | 1,327.49 | - | 1,327.49 | 53.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,001.55 | - | 1,001.55 | 1,561.24 | - | 1,561.24 | 55.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,140.05 | - | 1,140.05 | 1,794.99 | - | 1,794.99 | 57.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,278.55 | - | 1,278.55 | 2,028.74 | - | 2,028.74 | 58.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,417.05 | - | 1,417.05 | 2,262.49 | - | 2,262.49 | 59.7% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 18500 | $ 416.69 | $ 764.12 | $ 347.43 | 83.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 360.80 | $ - | $ 360.80 | $ 640.00 | $ - | $ 640.00 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 361.98 | (0.53) | 361.45 | 642.42 | (1.21) | 641.21 | 77.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 363.97 | (1.43) | 362.54 | 646.85 | (3.43) | 643.43 | 77.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 365.96 | (2.32) | 363.64 | 651.28 | (5.64) | 645.64 | 77.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 367.95 | (3.22) | 364.73 | 655.71 | (7.86) | 647.86 | 77.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 369.94 | (4.11) | 365.83 | 660.14 | (10.07) | 650.07 | 77.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 372.83 | (5.41) | 367.42 | 666.57 | (13.29) | 653.29 | 77.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 375.72 | (6.71) | 369.01 | 673.00 | (16.50) | 656.50 | 77.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 378.61 | - | 378.61 | 679.43 | - | 679.43 | 79.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 381.50 | - | 381.50 | 685.86 | - | 685.86 | 79.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 384.39 | - | 384.39 | 692.29 | - | 692.29 | 80.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.39 | - | 403.39 | 734.54 | - | 734.54 | 82.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 424.15 | - | 424.15 | 780.71 | - | 780.71 | 84.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 447.55 | - | 447.55 | 832.76 | - | 832.76 | 86.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 586.05 | - | 586.05 | 1,141.01 | - | 1,141.01 | 94.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 724.55 | - | 724.55 | 1,449.26 | - | 1,449.26 | 100.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 863.05 | - | 863.05 | 1,757.51 | - | 1,757.51 | 103.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,001.55 | - | 1,001.55 | 2,065.76 | - | 2,065.76 | 106.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,140.05 | - | 1,140.05 | 2,374.01 | - | 2,374.01 | 108.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,278.55 | - | 1,278.55 | 2,682.26 | - | 2,682.26 | 109.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,417.05 | - | 1,417.05 | 2,990.51 | - | 2,990.51 | 111.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Valencia Water Company, Inc. – Greater Buckeye Division
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. W-02451A-12-0313 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement A-1 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) ORIGINAL COST | (B) FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 634,979 | $ | 634,979 | $ | 634,979 | $ | 634,979 | |||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 49,158 | $ | 49,158 | $ | 42,015 | $ | 42,015 | |||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | 7.74% | 7.74% | 6.62% | 6.62% | |||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | 11.18% | 11.18% | 7.50% | 7.50% | |||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 70,975 | $ | 70,975 | $ | 47,623 | $ | 47,623 | |||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 21,817 | $ | 21,817 | $ | 5,608 | $ | 5,608 | |||||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.6694 | 1.6694 | 1.6563 | 1.6563 | |||||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 36,423 | $ | 36,423 | $ | 9,289 | $ | 9,289 | |||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 462,043 | $ | 462,043 | $ | 462,043 | $ | 462,043 | |||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 498,466 | $ | 498,466 | $ | 471,331 | $ | 471,331 | |||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 7.88% | 7.88% | 2.01% | 2.01% | |||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | 9.50% | 9.50% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Schedule: A-1a | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Settlement Phase in | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||
Revenue Increase | Revenue Increase | |||||||||||
Year |
(Relative to Test Year) | (Relative to Previous Year) | ||||||||||
2014 | - | - | ||||||||||
2015 | 4,644 | 4,644 | ||||||||||
2016 �� | 9,289 | 4,644 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. W-02451A-12-0313 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor GRCF |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor: | ||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.5096% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.4904% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 39.1155% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 60.3749% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.656318 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor: | ||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 0.8300% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10) | 0.5096% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 6, L25) | 0.8414% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 0.5166% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 39.1155% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1) | $ | 47,623 | |||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (ScheduleC-1) | $ | 42,015 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 5,608 | |||||||||||
27 | Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 15,967 | |||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | 12,441 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 3,525 | |||||||||||
30 | Required Revenue Increase (Schedule A-1) | $ | 9,289 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 0.8300% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 77 | |||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 77 | |||||||||||
35 | Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 6, Line 21) | $ | 11,741 | |||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 6, Col A, L19) | $ | 11,663 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36) | $ | 78 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
38 | Total Required increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 9,289 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
Test Year | Settlement Recommended | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Schedule C-1) | $ | 462,043 | $ | 471,331 | |||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 407,586 | $ | 407,741 | |||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | 22,224 | $ | 22,224 | |||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | 32,233 | $ | 41,366 | |||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | 2,246 | $ | 2,882 | |||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | 29,987 | $ | 38,484 | |||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | 10,195 | $ | 13,084 | |||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | 10,195 | $ | 13,084 | |||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | 12,441 | $ | 15,967 | |||||||||
50 | Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | N/A | |||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (Schedule B-1) | $ | 634,979 | |||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | 3.5000% | ||||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | 22,224 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. W-02451A-12-0313 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement B-1 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
LINE NO. | (A) COMPANY AS FILED | (B)
SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | (C) SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 3,079,206 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,079,206 | |||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | 1,372,116 | - | 1,372,116 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 1,707,090 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,707,090 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 407,979 | $ | - | $ | 407,979 | |||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 171,882 | - | 171,882 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | 236,097 | - | 236,097 | ||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 722,274 | - | 722,274 | ||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 112,475 | - | 112,475 | ||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 43,597 | 43,597 | ||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 42,332 | - | 42,332 | ||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||
13 | Prepayments | - | - | - | ||||||||||
14 | Supplies Inventory | - | - | - | ||||||||||
15 | Projected Capital Expenditures | - | - | - | ||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 634,979 | $ | 0 | $ | 634,979 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 Column (B): Schedule B-2 Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. W-02451A-12-0313 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement B-2 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [I] | ||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. |
DESCRIPTION | COMPANY AS FILED
| Reclassification ADJ #1 Staff Testimony GWB
| SETTLEMENT
| |||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 27,898 | $ | - | $ | 27,898 | ||||||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 39,296 | 39,296 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 115,895 | 115,895 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | 309 | Supply Mains | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
5 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 1,738 | 1,738 | ||||||||||||||||
6 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 543,761 | 543,761 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 844,990 | (844,990) | - | |||||||||||||||
8 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 844,990 | 844,990 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | - | |||||||||||||||||
10 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 588,494 | (588,494) | - | |||||||||||||||
11 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 463,799 | 463,799 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 124,695 | 124,695 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 766,900 | 766,900 | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 333 | Services | 37,406 | 37,406 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 37,332 | 37,332 | ||||||||||||||||
16 | 335 | Hydrants | 40,757 | 40,757 | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 5,432 | 5,432 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 4,284 | 4,284 | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 1,650 | 1,650 | ||||||||||||||||
22 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
23 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 4,751 | 4,751 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 10,089 | 10,089 | ||||||||||||||||
26 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 8,533 | 8,533 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
27 | Total Plant in Service | 3,079,206 | 0 | 3,079,206 | ||||||||||||||||
28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
29 | Accumulated Depreciation | 1,372,116 | - | 1,372,116 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
30 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 1,707,090 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,707,090 | |||||||||||||
31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
32 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||||||
33 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | 407,979 | $ | 407,979 | ||||||||||||||||
34 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 171,882 | - | 171,882 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
35 | Net CIAC (L63-L64) | 236,097 | - | 236,097 | ||||||||||||||||
36 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 722,274 | - | 722,274 | ||||||||||||||||
37 | Imputed Reg Advances | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
38 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
39 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 112,475 | 112,475 | |||||||||||||||||
40 | Customer Meter Deposits | 43,597 | 43,597 | |||||||||||||||||
41 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||||||
42 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 42,332 | 42,332 | |||||||||||||||||
43 | Working Capital Allowance | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
50 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 634,979 | $ | 0 | $ | 634,979 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. W-02451A-12-0313 Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Settlement C-1 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
[A] | [B] | [C] SETTLEMENT | [D] | [E] | ||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY TEST YEAR AS FILED | SETTLEMENT TEST YEAR ADJUSTMENTS | TEST YEAR AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED CHANGES | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 9,289 | $ | 9,289 | |||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | 449,915 | - | 449,915 | - | 449,915 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 12,128 | - | 12,128 | - | 12,128 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 462,043 | $ | - | $ | 462,043 | $ | 9,289 | $ | 471,331 | |||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 108,598 | $ | - | $ | 108,598 | $ | - | $ | 108,598 | |||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 51,353 | - | 51,353 | - | 51,353 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 27,669 | (504) | 27,166 | - | 27,166 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 5,234 | (95) | 5,139 | - | 5,139 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | (2,816) | - | (2,816) | - | (2,816) | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 5,458 | - | 5,458 | - | 5,458 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 36,433 | - | 36,433 | - | 36,433 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 3,252 | - | 3,252 | - | 3,252 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Propert | 4,216 | - | 4,216 | - | 4,216 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 9,090 | - | 9,090 | 9,090 | |||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 2,836 | - | 2,836 | - | 2,836 | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 1,509 | - | 1,509 | - | 1,509 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expen | 4,142 | (2,037) | 2,105 | - | 2,105 | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 11,295 | (7,460) | 3,835 | 77 | 3,912 | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 13,302 | - | 13,302 | - | 13,302 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 137,751 | 10,580 | 148,331 | 148,331 | |||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC | (25,605) | - | (25,605) | (25,605) | |||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 1,722 | - | 1,722 | - | 1,722 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - | 11,663 | - | 11,663 | 78 | 11,741 | ||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | 5,783 | 6,658 | 12,441 | 15,967 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | 412,885 | 7,142 | 420,027 | 3,681 | 423,708 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 49,158 | $ | (7,142) | $ | 42,015 | $ | 5,608 | $ | 47,623 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 Column (B): Schedule C-2 Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) Column (D): Schedules A-1 Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement C-2 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | [F] | [H] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | Excess ADJ #1 | Bad Debts Exp ADJ #2 | Rate Case ADJ #3 | Deprec. Exp ADJ #4 | Income Taxes ADJ #5 | SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AS FILED | ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 461 Metered Water Revenue | 449,915 | - | - | - | - | - | 449,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 460 Unmetered Water Revenue | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 474 Other Water Revenues | 12,128 | - | - | - | - | - | 12,128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 462,043 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 462,043 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 108,598 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 108,598 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 610 Purchased Water | 51,353 | - | - | - | - | - | 51,353 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 615 Purchased Power | 27,669 | (504) | - | - | - | 27,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 618 Chemicals | 5,234 | (95) | 5,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 620 Materials and Supplies | (2,816) | - | - | (2,816) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 5,458 | - | - | 5,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 630 Outside Services | 36,433 | - | - | 36,433 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 3,252 | - | - | 3,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 4,216 | - | - | 4,216 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 9,090 | - | - | - | 9,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 2,836 | - | - | 2,836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 659 Insurance - Other | 1,509 | - | - | 1,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense – | 4,142 | - | - | (2,037) | 2,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 11,295 | - | (7,460) | 3,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 13,302 | - | - | 13,302 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 137,751 | - | - | 10,580 | 148,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC Amor | (25,605) | - | - | (25,605) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 1,722 | - | - | 1,722 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Prop | 11,663 | 11,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 409 Income Taxes | 5,783 | 6,658 | 12,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
26 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 412,885 | $ | (599) | $ | (7,460) | $ | (2,037) | $ | 10,580 | $ | 6,658 | $ | 420,027 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
27 | Operating Income | $ | 49,158 | $ | 599 | $ | 7,460 | $ | 2,037 | $ | (10,580) | $ | (6,658) | $ | 42,015 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 1 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Water Loss | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - EXCESS WATER LOSS
LINE NO. | ||||||||
1 | One plus allowable water loss | 110.00% | ||||||
2 | One plus actual water loss | 112.04% | ||||||
3 | Allowable portion | 98.18% | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4 | Disallowable portion | 1.82% | ||||||
5 | Power Expense | 27,669 | ||||||
6 | Disallowance | $ | 504 | |||||
7 | Chemical Expense | 5,234 | ||||||
8 | Disallowance | $ | 95 |
Line 1: Maximum acceptable level of water losses |
Line 2: Actual level of water losses |
Line 3: Line 2 / line 3 |
Line 4: 1 minus line 4 |
Line 6: Line 1 times line 5 |
Lines 1 - 6: See also Staff testimony GWB |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 2 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Bad Debt Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED* | ||||||||||||
1 | $ | 11,295 | $ | (7,460) | $ | 3,835 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 |
| |||||||||||||||
Adjusted Test Year Revenues |
| $ | 462,043 | |||||||||||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate |
| 0.83% | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense |
| $ | 3,835 | |||||||||||||
Co Proposed |
| $ | 11,295 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | (7,460) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 3 | |||||
W-02451A-12-0313 | Rate Case Expense | |||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 4,142 | $ | (2,037) | $ | 2,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.82% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,852 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,095 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ | 78,809 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10.602 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 643 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,693 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Recommended Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247) | ||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Depreciation | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT. | PLANT | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | DESCRIPTION | BALANCE | RATE | EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | 27,898 | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
3 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 39,296 | 3.33% | 1,309 | |||||||||||
4 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 115,895 | 3.33% | 3,859 | |||||||||||
5 | 309 | Supply Mains | - | 2.00% | - | |||||||||||
6 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 1,738 | 5.00% | 87 | |||||||||||
7 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 543,761 | 12.50% | 67,970 | |||||||||||
8 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
9 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 844,990 | 3.33% | 28,138 | |||||||||||
10 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | - | 20.00% | - | |||||||||||
11 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
12 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 463,799 | 2.22% | 10,296 | |||||||||||
13 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 124,695 | 5.00% | 6,235 | |||||||||||
14 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 766,900 | 2.00% | 15,338 | |||||||||||
15 | 333 | Services | 37,406 | 3.33% | 1,246 | |||||||||||
16 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 37,332 | 8.33% | 3,110 | |||||||||||
17 | 335 | Hydrants | 40,757 | 2.00% | 815 | |||||||||||
18 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 5,432 | 6.67% | 362 | |||||||||||
19 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 4,284 | 6.67% | 286 | |||||||||||
20 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | - | 6.67% | - | |||||||||||
21 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | - | 20.00% | - | |||||||||||
22 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 1,650 | 5.00% | 83 | |||||||||||
23 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | - | 10.00% | - | |||||||||||
24 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | - | 5.00% | - | |||||||||||
25 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 4,751 | 10.00% | 475 | |||||||||||
26 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 10,089 | 10.00% | 1,009 | |||||||||||
27 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 8,533 | 10.00% | 853 | |||||||||||
28 | Totals | 3,079,206 | 141,470 | |||||||||||||
29 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
30 | Land and Land Rights | 27,898 | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
31 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 3,051,308 | $ | 141,470 | |||||||||||
32 | ||||||||||||||||
33 | Amortization of CIAC at Company’s Rate | $ | 407,979 | 4.5944% | $ | 18,744 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
34 | Settlement Depreciation Expense | $ | 122,726 | |||||||||||||
35 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ | 112,146 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
36 | Settlement Adjustment | $ | 10,580 |
References: | ||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Income Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - INCOME TAXES
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ 5,783 | $ | 6,658 | $ | 12,441 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B),
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement ADJ 6 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||
LINE | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | ||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | AS ADJUSTED | RECOMMENDED |
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 462,043 | $ | 462,043 | |||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 924,086 | 924,086 | |||||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 462,043 | ||||||||||
5 | Recommended Revenue | 471,331 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 1,386,129 | 1,395,417 | |||||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 462,043 | 465,139 | |||||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 924,086 | 930,278 | |||||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | (3) | (3) | |||||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | - | - | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 924,083 | 930,275 | |||||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 194,057 | 195,358 | |||||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 6.0100% | 6.0100% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 11,663 | |||||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 11,663 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | (0) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
20 | Property Tax on Recommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 11,741 | |||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 11,663 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 78 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | 78 | |||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 9,289 | |||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 0.84140% | ||||||||||
REFERENCES: Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement D-1 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Percent of Total | Cost Rate | Weighted Cost | ||||||||||||||
Debt | 57.8% | 6.1% | 3.5% | |||||||||||||
Equity | 42.2% | 9.5% | 4.0% | |||||||||||||
Required Rate of Return | 7.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division. | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
W-02451A-12-0313 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Portable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes*) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8” X 3/4” Meter | $ | 27.72 | $ | 27.72 | $ | 27.78 | $ | 28.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 27.72 | 27.72 | 27.78 | 28.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 69.30 | 69.30 | 69.45 | 69.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 136.60 | 138.60 | 138.90 | 140.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 221.76 | 221.76 | 222.24 | 225.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 443.52 | 443.52 | 444.48 | 1,108.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 693.00 | 693.00 | 694.50 | 3,517.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 1,386.00 | 1,386.00 | 1,389.00 | 1,407.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | NA | 2,217.60 | 2,222.40 | 2,251.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Rate Charges (per 1,000 gallons): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Block | Volumetric Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 1,000 Gallons | 1,000 Gallons | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 5,000 Gallons | 5,000 Gallons | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.68 | 2.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | 10,000 Gallons | 10,000 Gallons | 3.75 | 3.75 | 3.94 | 3.98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | 18,000 Gallons | 18,000 Gallons | 4.95 | 4.95 | 5.20 | 5.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | 25,000 Gallons | 25,000 Gallons | 6.15 | 6.15 | 6.46 | 6.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | Over 25,000 | Over 25,000 | 7.35 | 7.35 | 7.72 | 7.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Rebate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons | 9,001 | 9,001 | 8,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity rate rebate: | 45% | 45% | 50% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(applied if consumption is Below the CRT) |
*Includes all potable water meters including irrigation meters.
Non Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | 185.74 | 533.76 | 348.02 | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 1.638 | 1.07 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement Schedule H-3
Page 2 of 2
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 35.00 | $ 35.00 | $ | - | |||||||
Establishment of Service - After Hours | 50.00 | Eliminate | NA | |||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | - | |||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | NA | |||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge, Per Hour | 50.00 | Eliminate | NA | |||||||||
After Hours Service Charge | NA | 35.00 | NA | |||||||||
Deposit | (c) | (c) | ||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Meter Test Fee (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
(a) Number of Months off Systems times the monthly minimum per A.A.C R14-2-403(D).
(b) Cost to include parts, labor, overhead and all applicable taxes per A.A.C. R14-2-405(B)(5).
(c) Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B).
* | For After Hours Service Calls for work performed on the customer’s property; not to be charged in addition to an |
establishment or a reconnection after hours charge. |
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportional share of any privilege,
sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(D)(5).
Service Line and Meter Installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to A.A.C. R14-2-405)
Meter Size | Present Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Proposed Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 x 3/4” Meter | $ | 445.00 | $ | 155.00 | $ | 600.00 | $ | 445.00 | $ | 155.00 | $600.00 | 0.00% | ||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Meter | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Turbine Meter | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Compound Meter | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Turbine Meter | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Compound Meter | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Turbine Meter | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Compound Meter | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Turbine Meter | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Compound Meter | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” and Larger Meters | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 37.17 | $ 37.17 | $ - | 0.0% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.72 | $ | - | $ | 27.72 | $ | 27.72 | $ | - | $ | 27.72 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 29.07 | (0.61 | ) | 28.46 | 29.07 | (0.61 | ) | 28.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.62 | (1.76 | ) | 29.87 | 31.62 | (1.76 | ) | 29.87 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 34.17 | (2.90 | ) | 31.27 | 34.17 | (2.90 | ) | 31,27 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 36.72 | (4.05 | ) | 32.67 | 36.72 | (4.05 | ) | 32.67 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.27 | (5.20 | ) | 34.07 | 39.27 | (5.20 | ) | 34.07 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 43.02 | (6.89 | ) | 36.14 | 43.02 | (6.89 | ) | 36.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 46.77 | (8.57 | ) | 38.20 | 46.77 | (8.57 | ) | 38.20 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 50.52 | (10.26 | ) | 40.26 | 50.52 | (10.26 | ) | 40.26 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 54.27 | (11.95 | ) | 42.32 | 54.27 | (11.95 | ) | 42.32 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 58.02 | - | 58.02 | 58.02 | - | 58.02 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 82.77 | - | 82.77 | 82.77 | - | 82.77 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 109.92 | - | 109.92 | 109.92 | - | 109.92 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 140.67 | - | 140.67 | 140.67 | - | 140.67 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 324.42 | - | 324.42 | 324.42 | - | 324.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 508.17 | - | 508.17 | 508.17 | - | 508.17 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 691.92 | - | 691.92 | 691.92 | - | 691.92 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 875.67 | - | 875.67 | 875.67 | - | 875.67 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,059.42 | - | 1,059.42 | 1,059.42 | - | 1,059.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,243.17 | - | 1,243.17 | 1,243.17 | - | 1,243.17 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,426.92 | - | 1,426.92 | 1,426.92 | - | 1,426.92 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 37.17 | $ 36.81 | $ (0.36) | -1.0% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.72 | $ | - | $ | 27.72 | $ | 27.78 | $ | - | $ | 27.78 | 0.2% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 29.07 | (0.61 | ) | 28.46 | 29.20 | (0.71 | ) | 28.49 | 0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.62 | (1.76 | ) | 29.87 | 31.88 | (2.05 | ) | 29.83 | -0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 34.17 | (2.90 | ) | 31.27 | 34.56 | (3.39 | ) | 31.17 | -0.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 36.72 | (4.05 | ) | 32.67 | 37.24 | (4.73 | ) | 32.51 | -0.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.27 | (5.20 | ) | 34.07 | 39.92 | (6.07 | ) | 33.85 | -0.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 43.02 | (6.89 | ) | 36.14 | 43.86 | (8.04 | ) | 35.82 | -0.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 46.77 | (8.57 | ) | 38.20 | 47.80 | (10.01 | ) | 37.79 | -1.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 50.52 | (10.26 | ) | 40.26 | 51.74 | (11.98 | ) | 39.76 | -1.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | -54.27 | (11.95 | ) | 42.32 | 55.68 | - | 55.68 | 31.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 58.02 | - | 58.02 | 59.62 | - | 59.62 | 2.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 82.77 | - | 82.77 | 85.62 | - | 85.62 | 3.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 109.92 | - | 109.92 | 114.14 | - | 114.14 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 140.67 | - | 140.67 | 146.44 | - | 146.44 | 4.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 324.42 | - | 324.42 | 339.44 | - | 339.44 | 4.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 508.17 | - | 508.17 | 532.44 | - | 532.44 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 691.92 | - | 691.92 | 725.44 | - | 725.44 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 875.67 | - | 875.67 | 918.44 | - | 918.44 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,059.42 | - | 1,059.42 | 1,111.44 | - | 1,111.44 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,243.17 | - | 1,243.17 | 1,304.44 | - | 1,304.44 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,426.92 | - | 1,426.92 | 1,497.44 | - | 1,497.44 | 4.9% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 37.17 | $ 37.24 | $ 0.07 | 0.2% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.72 | $ | - | $ | 27.72 | $ | 28.14 | $ | - | $ | 28.14 | 1.5% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 29.07 | (0.61 | ) | 28.46 | 29.57 | (0.72 | ) | 28.86 | 1.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.62 | (1.76 | ) | 29.87 | 32.27 | (2.07 | ) | 30.21 | 1.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 34.17 | (2.90 | ) | 31.27 | 34.97 | (3.42 | ) | 31.56 | 0.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 36.72 | (4.05 | ) | 32.67 | 37.67 | (4.77 | ) | 32.91 | 0.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 39.27 | (5.20 | ) | 34.07 | 40.37 | (6.12 | ) | 34.26 | 0.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 43.02 | (6.89 | ) | 36.14 | 44.35 | (8.11 | ) | 36.25 | 0.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 46.77 | (8.57 | ) | 38.20 | 48.33 | (10.10 | ) | 38.24 | 0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 50.52 | (10.26 | ) | 40.26 | 52.31 | (12.09 | ) | 40.23 | -0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 54.27 | (11.95 | ) | 42.32 | 56.29 | - | 56.29 | 33.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 58.02 | - | 58.02 | 60.27 | - | 60.27 | 3.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 82.77 | - | 82.77 | 86.52 | - | 86.52 | 4.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 109.92 | - | 109.92 | 115.31 | - | 115.31 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 140.67 | - | 140.67 | 147.91 | - | 147.91 | 5.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 324.42 | - | 324.42 | 342.66 | - | 342.66 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 508.17 | - | 508.17 | 537.41 | - | 537.41 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 691.92 | - | 691.92 | 732.16 | - | 732.16 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 875.67 | - | 875.67 | 926.91 | - | 926.91 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,059.42 | - | 1,059.42 | 1,121.66 | - | 1,121.66 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,243.17 | - | 1,243.17 | 1,316.41 | - | 1,316.41 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,426.92 | - | 1,426.92 | 1,511.16 | - | 1,511.16 | 5.9% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7700 | $ 81.22 | $ 81.22 | $ - | 0.0% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.30 | $ | - | $ | 69.30 | $ | 69.30 | $ | - | $ | 69.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.65 | (0.61 | ) | 70.04 | 70.65 | (0.61 | ) | 70.04 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 73.20 | (1.76 | ) | 71.45 | 73.20 | (1.76 | ) | 71.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 75.75 | (2.90 | ) | 72.85 | 75.75 | (2.90 | ) | 72.85 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 78.30 | (4.05 | ) | 74.25 | 78.30 | (4.05 | ) | 74.25 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 80.85 | (5.20 | ) | 75.65 | 80.85 | (5.20 | ) | 75.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 84.60 | (6.89 | ) | 77.72 | 84.60 | (6.89 | ) | 77.72 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 88.35 | (8.57 | ) | 79.78 | 88.35 | (8.57 | ) | 79.78 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 92.10 | (10.26 | ) | 81.84 | 92.10 | (10.26 | ) | 81.84 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 95.85 | (11.95 | ) | 83.90 | 95.85 | (11.05 | ) | 83.90 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 99.60 | - | 99.60 | 99.60 | - | 99.60 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 124.35 | - | 124.35 | 124.35 | - | 124.35 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.50 | - | 151.50 | 151.50 | - | 151.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 182.25 | - | 182.25 | 182.25 | - | 182.25 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 366.00 | - | 366.00 | 366.00 | - | 366.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 549.75 | - | 549.75 | 549.75 | - | 549.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 733.50 | - | 733.50 | 733.50 | - | 733.50 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 917.25 | - | 917.25 | 917.25 | - | 917.25 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,101.00 | - | 1,101.00 | 1,101.00 | - | 1,101.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,284.75 | - | 1,284.75 | 1,284.75 | - | 1,284.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,468.50 | - | 1,468.50 | 1,468.50 | - | 1,468.50 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7700 | $ 81.22 | $ 80.84 | $ (0.38) | -0.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.30 | $ | - | $ | 69.30 | $ | 69.45 | $ | - | $ | 69.45 | 0.2% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.65 | (0.61 | ) | 70.04 | 70.87 | (0.71 | ) | 70.16 | 0.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 73.20 | (1.76 | ) | 71.45 | 73.55 | (2.05 | ) | 71.50 | 0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 75.75 | (2.90 | ) | 72.85 | 76.23 | (3.39 | ) | 72.84 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 78.30 | (4.05 | ) | 74.25 | 78.91 | (4.73 | ) | 74.18 | -0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 80.85 | (5.20 | ) | 75.65 | 81.59 | (6.07 | ) | 75.52 | -0.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 84.60 | (6.89 | ) | 77.72 | 85.53 | (8.04 | ) | 77.49 | -0.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 88.35 | (8.57 | ) | 79.78 | 89.47 | (10.01 | ) | 79.46 | -0.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 92.10 | (10.26 | ) | 81.84 | 93.41 | (11.98 | ) | 81.43 | -0.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 95.85 | (11.95 | ) | 83.90 | 97.35 | - | 97.35 | 16.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 99.60 | - | 99.60 | 101.29 | - | 101.29 | 1.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 124.35 | - | 124.35 | 127.29 | - | 127.29 | 2.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.50 | - | 151.50 | 155.81 | - | 155.81 | 2.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 182.25 | - | 182.25 | 188.11 | - | 188.11 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 366.00 | - | 366.00 | 381.11 | - | 381.11 | 4.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 549.75 | - | 549.75 | 574.11 | - | 574.11 | 4.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 733.50 | - | 733.50 | 767.11 | - | 767.11 | 4.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 917.25 | - | 917.25 | 960.11 | - | 960.11 | 4.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,101.00 | - | 1,101.00 | 1,153.11 | - | 1,153.11 | 4.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,284.75 | - | 1,284.75 | 1,346.11 | - | 1,346.11 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,468.50 | - | 1,468.50 | 1,539.11 | - | 1,539.11 | 4.8% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye Division | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7700 | $ 81.22 | $ 80.79 | $ (0.43) | -0.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.30 | $ | - | $ | 69.30 | $ | 69.30 | $ | - | $ | 69.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.65 | (0.61 | ) | 70.04 | 70.73 | (0.72 | ) | 70.02 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 73.20 | (1.76 | ) | 71.45 | 73.43 | (2.07 | ) | 71.37 | -0.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 75.75 | (2.90 | ) | 72.85 | 76.13 | (3.42 | ) | 72.72 | -0.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 78.30 | (4.05 | ) | 74.25 | 78.83 | (4.77 | ) | 74.07 | -0.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 80.85 | (5.20 | ) | 75.65 | 81.53 | (6.12 | ) | 75.42 | -0.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 84.60 | (6.89 | ) | 77.72 | 85.51 | (8.11 | ) | 77.41 | -0.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 88.35 | (8.57 | ) | 79.78 | 89.49 | (10.10 | ) | 79.40 | -0.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 92.10 | (10.26 | ) | 81.84 | 93.47 | (12.09 | ) | 81.39 | -0.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 95.85 | (11.95 | ) | 83.90 | 97.45 | - | 97.45 | 16.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 99.60 | - | 99.60 | 101.43 | - | 101.43 | 1.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 124.35 | - | 124.35 | 127.68 | - | 127.68 | 2.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.50 | - | 151.50 | 156.47 | - | 156.47 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 182.25 | - | 182.25 | 189.07 | - | 189.07 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 366.00 | - | 366.00 | 383.82 | - | 383.82 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 549.75 | - | 549.75 | 578.57 | - | 578.57 | 5.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 733.50 | - | 733.50 | 773.32 | - | 773.32 | 5.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 917.25 | - | 917.25 | 968.07 | - | 968.07 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,101.00 | - | 1,101.00 | 1,162.82 | - | 1,162.82 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,284.75 | - | 1,284.75 | 1,357.57 | - | 1,357.57 | 5.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,468.50 | - | 1,468.50 | 1,552.32 | - | 1,552.32 | 5.7% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement A-1 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) SETTLEMENT FAIR VALUE | |||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 38,014,243 | $ | 38,014,243 | $ | 37,918,570 | $ | 37,918,570 | |||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 1,675,030 | $ | 1,675,030 | $ | 1,908,343 | $ | 1,908,343 | |||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | 4.41% | 4.41% | 5.03% | 5.03% | |||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | 8.79% | 8.79% | 7.50% | 7.50% | |||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 3,342,866 | $ | 3,342,866 | $ | 2,843,893 | $ | 2,843,893 | |||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 1,667,836 | $ | 1,667,836 | $ | 935,550 | $ | 935,550 | |||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.637072 | 1.637072 | 1.663243 | 1.663243 | |||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 2,730,367 | $ | 2,730,367 | $ | 1,556,046 | $ | 1,556,046 | |||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 10,463,460 | |||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 13,193,827 | $ | 13,193,827 | $ | 12,019,506 | $ | 12,019,506 | |||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 26.10% | 26.10% | 14.87% | 14.87% | |||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | 9.50% | 9.50% |
References: | ||
Column [A]: | Company Schedule A-1 | |
Column (B): | Company Schedule A-1 | |
Column (C): | Company Schedules A-1, A-2, & D-1 | |
Column (C): Settlement Schedules GRCF, B-1, and C-1 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Schedule: A-1a | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Settlement Phase In | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
| REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT
|
| ||||||||||
Year | Revenue Increase
(Relative to Test | Revenue Increase
(Relative to | ||||||||||
|
2014 |
| - | - | ||||||||
|
2015 |
| 554,487 | 554,487 | ||||||||
|
2016 |
| 912,898 | 358,411 | ||||||||
|
2017 |
| 1,041,528 | 128,630 | ||||||||
|
2018 |
| 1,170,157 | 128,629 | ||||||||
|
2019 |
| 1,298,787 | 128,630 | ||||||||
|
2020 |
| 1,427,416 | 128,629 | ||||||||
|
2021 |
| 1,556,046 | 128,630 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | GRCF | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | ||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.4298% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.5702% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 39.4467% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 60.1235% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.663243 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor | ||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8 ) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 0.7000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10 ) | 0.42981% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | 6.968% | |||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 7, L25) | 1.3808% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 0.8478% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 39.4467% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1, Line 5) | $ | 2,843,893 | |||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (Schedule C-1, Line 34) | $ | 1,908,343 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 935,550 | |||||||||||
27 | Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 953,477 | |||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | 365,358 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 588,119 | |||||||||||
30 | Required Revenue Increase (ScheduleA-1, Line 8) | $ | 1,556,046 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 0.7000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 10,892 | |||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 10,892 | |||||||||||
35 | Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 7, Line 21) | $ | 458,357 | |||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 7, Col A, L19) | $ | 436,871 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36) | $ | 21,486 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 1,556,047 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
Test Year | With | |||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Sch C-1, Col.(C) L4, C-1, Col. (D), L10) | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 12,019,506 | |||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 8,189,759 | $ | 8,222,137 | |||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | 1,327,150 | $ | 1,327,150 | |||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | 946,551 | $ | 2,470,219 | |||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | 65,956 | $ | 172,125 | |||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | 880,595 | $ | 2,298,094 | |||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | 299,402 | $ | 781,352 | |||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | 299,402 | $ | 781,352 | |||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | 365,358 | $ | 953,477 | |||||||||
50 | Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | N/A | |||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (ScheduleB-1) | $ | 37,918,570 | |||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | 3.5000% | ||||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | 1,327,150 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | ||
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Settlement B-1 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | COMPANY AS FILED | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 90,376,391 | $ | (139,161) | $ | 90,237,230 | |||||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | 19,047,719 | (43,488) | 19,004,231 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 71,328,672 | $ | (95,673) | $ | 71,232,999 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 82,949 | $ | - | $ | 82,949 | |||||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 5,655 | - | 5,655 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | 77,294 | - | 77,294 | ||||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 33,414,961 | - | 33,414,961 | ||||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 1,193,499 | 1,193,499 | ||||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 194 | - | 194 | ||||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | 18,800 | - | 18,800 | ||||||||||||
13 | Deferred Compensation | 50,256 | - | 50,256 | ||||||||||||
14 | CIAC | 29,820 | - | 29,820 | ||||||||||||
15 | Fixed Asset Depreciation | 1,272,256 | - | 1,272,256 | ||||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 38,014,243 | $ | (95,673) | $ | 37,918,570 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement B-2 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [B] | [C] | |||||||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT. |
SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | Unsupported | Reclassification | AS | ||||||||||||||||
AS FILED | Plant | ADJUSTMENTS | ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 62,847 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 62,847 | ||||||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 9,566,104 | 9,566,104 | ||||||||||||||||||
3 | 306 | Lake, River and Other Intakes | 1,855 | 1,855 | ||||||||||||||||||
4 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 4,459,478 | 4,459,478 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | 309 | Supply Mains | 2,340,773 | 2,340,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
6 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 324,955 | 324,955 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 6,782,543 | (139,161) | 6,643,382 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 27,095 | (27,095) | - | |||||||||||||||||
9 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 12,553 | 12,553 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 14,541 | 14,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
11 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 1,378,273 | (1,378,273) | - | |||||||||||||||||
12 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 820,301 | 820,301 | ||||||||||||||||||
13 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 557,973 | 557,973 | ||||||||||||||||||
14 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 44,363,056 | 44,363,056 | ||||||||||||||||||
15 | 333 | Services | 4,645,439 | 4,645,439 | ||||||||||||||||||
16 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 3,792,641 | 3,792,641 | ||||||||||||||||||
17 | 335 | Hydrants | 4,340,020 | 4,340,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
18 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 15,144 | 15,144 | ||||||||||||||||||
19 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 769,912 | 769,912 | ||||||||||||||||||
20 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 505,281 | 505,281 | ||||||||||||||||||
21 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 585,195 | 585,195 | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 71,996 | 71,996 | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 103,063 | 103,063 | ||||||||||||||||||
24 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 60,372 | 60,372 | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 640,845 | 640,845 | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 85,226 | 85,226 | ||||||||||||||||||
27 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 5,448,566 | 5,448,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
28 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 5,712 | 5,712 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
29 | Total Plant in Service | 90,376,391 | (139,161) | - | 90,237,230 | |||||||||||||||||
30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | Accumulated Depreciation | 19,047,719 | (43,488) | 19,004,231 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
32 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 71,328,672 | $ | (95,673) | $ | - | $ | 71,232,999 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
34 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||||||||
35 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | 82,949 | $ | - | $ | 82,949 | |||||||||||||||
36 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | 5,655 | $ | - | 5,655 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
37 | Net CIAC (L63 - L64) | 77,294 | - | - | 77,294 | |||||||||||||||||
38 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 33,414,961 | - | 33,414,961 | ||||||||||||||||||
39 | Customer Meter Deposits | 1,193,499 | 1,193,499 | |||||||||||||||||||
40 | ADD: | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 | Deferred Gains | 194 | 194 | |||||||||||||||||||
42 | Bad Debt | 18,800 | 18,800 | |||||||||||||||||||
43 | Deferred Compensation | 50,256 | - | - | 50,256 | |||||||||||||||||
44 | CIAC | 29,820 | - | - | 29,820 | |||||||||||||||||
45 | Fixed Asset depreciation | 1,272,256 | - | - | 1,272,256 | |||||||||||||||||
46 | Prepayments | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
47 | Projected Capital Expenditures | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
48 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
49 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 38,014,243 | $ | (95,673) | $ | - | $ | 37,918,570 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement B-2a | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Adjustment for Unsupported Plant
|
| |||||||||||||
ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | Company as Filed | Settlement Adjustment | Adjusted Amount | ||||||||||
311 | Pumping Equipment | 6,782,543 | (139,161) | 6,643,382 | ||||||||||
Accumulated Depreciation | ######### | (43,488) | 19,004,231 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement C-1 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | ||||||||||||||||||
SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | TEST YEAR | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||
LINE | TEST YEAR | TEST YEAR | AS | RECOMMENDED | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | AS FILED | ADJUSTMENTS | ADJUSTED | CHANGES | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | 10,083,750 | - | 10,083,750 | $ | 1,556,046 | 11,639,796 | |||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 379,710 | - | 379,710 | - | 379,710 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | - | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 1,556,046 | $ | 12,019,506 | |||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 1,268,835 | $ | (157,960) | $ | 1,110,875 | $ | - | $ | 1,110,875 | |||||||||||
6 | 604 Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
8 | 615 Purchased Power | 768,901 | (15,748) | 753,153 | - | 753,153 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 Chemicals | 53,341 | (1,092) | 52,248 | - | 52,248 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 47,783 | (21,656) | 26,127 | - | 26,127 | ||||||||||||||||
12 | 620.08 Materials and Supplies | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
13 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 90,035 | - | 90,035 | - | 90,035 | ||||||||||||||||
14 | 630 Outside Services | 1,053,640 | (346,035) | 707,605 | - | 707,605 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 32,871 | - | 32,871 | 32,871 | |||||||||||||||||
16 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
17 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 121,973 | - | 121,973 | - | 121,973 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 642 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
19 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 67,733 | - | 67,733 | - | 67,733 | ||||||||||||||||
20 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 74,487 | - | 74,487 | - | 74,487 | ||||||||||||||||
21 | 659 Insurance - Other | 26,232 | - | 26,232 | 26,232 | |||||||||||||||||
22 | 660 Advertising Expense | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
23 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense - Rate | 105,801 | (52,038) | 53,762 | - | 53,762 | ||||||||||||||||
24 | 667 Rate Case Expense | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
25 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 53,925 | 19,319 | 73,244 | 10,892 | 84,137 | ||||||||||||||||
26 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 373,190 | - | 373,190 | 373,190 | |||||||||||||||||
27 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 3,617,417 | 75,437 | 3,692,853 | 3,692,853 | |||||||||||||||||
28 | 403 Depreciation Expense - CIAC Amorilzat | (3,770) | - | (3,770) | (3,770) | |||||||||||||||||
29 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 40,010 | - | 40,010 | - | 40,010 | ||||||||||||||||
30 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Property | 897,129 | - | 897,129 | 21,486 | 918,615 | ||||||||||||||||
31 | 408.13 Taxes Other Than Income - Other Ta | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
32 | 409 Income Taxes | 98,898 | 266,460 | 365,358 | $ | 588,119 | 953,477 | |||||||||||||||
Intentionally Left Blank | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
33 | Total Operating Expenses | 8,788,430 | (233,313) | 8,555,117 | 620,497 | 9,175,614 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
34 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 1,675,030 | $ | 233,313 | $ | 1,908,343 | $ | 935,549 | $ | 2,843,892 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
References: Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 Column (B): Schedule C-2 Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) Column (D): Schedule A-1, ADJ 2, ADJ &, ADJ 6 Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement C-2 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
Settlement Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | [F] | [G] | [H] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO.
| DESCRIPTION
| COMPANY AS FILED | Excess Water Loss ADJ #1
| Bad Debts Exp
| Rate Case Exp
| Expense ADJ #4
| Deprec. Exp ADJ #5
| Income Taxes ADJ #6
|
SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | 10,083,750 | - | - | - | - | - | 10,083,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 379,710 | - | - | - | - | - | 379,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 10,463,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | 1,268,835 | - | - | (157,960) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,110,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 604 Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 615 Purchased Power | 768,901 | (15,748 | ) | 753,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 Chemicals | 53,341 | (1,092 | ) | - | 52,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 Materials and Supplies | 47,783 | - | (21,656) | 26,127 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 620.08 Materials and Supplies | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 621 Office Supplies and Expense | 90,035 | - | 90,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 630 Outside Services | 1,053,640 | - | (346,035) | 707,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 635 Contractual Services - Testing | 32,871 | - | - | 32,871 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 636 Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 641 Rental of Building/Real Property | 121,973 | - | 121,973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 642 Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 650 Transportation Expenses | 67,733 | - | 67,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 657 Insurance - General Liability | 74,487 | - | 74,487 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 659 Insurance - Other | 26,232 | - | 26,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 660 Advertising Expense | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 666 Regulatory Commission Expense – Ra | 105,801 | - | (52,038) | 53,762 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 667 Rate Case Expense | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 670 Bad Debt Expense | 53,925 | 19,319 | 73,244 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | 373,190 | 373,190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 403 Depreciation Expense | 3,617,417 | - | - | 75,437 | 3,692,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 403 Depreciation Expense – CIAC Amortiz | (3,770) | (3,770) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 408 Taxes Other Than Income | 40,010 | - | 40,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | 408.11 Taxes Other Than Income - Proper | 897,129 | 897,129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 | 408.13 Taxes Other Than Income - Other | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32 | 409 Income Taxes | 98,898 | 266,460 | 365,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intentionally Left Blank | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
33 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 8,788,430 | $ | (16,840) | $ | 19,319 | $ | (52,038) | $ | (525,651) | $ | 75,437 | $ | 266,460 | $ | 8,555,117 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
34 | Operating Income | $ | 1,675,030 | $ | 16,840 | $ | (19,319) | $ | 52,038 | $ | 525,651 | $ | (75,437) | $ | (266,460) | $ | 1,908,343 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 1 | |||
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Water Loss | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - EXCESS WATER LOSS
| ||||||||
LINE NO. | ||||||||
1 | One plus allowable water loss | 110.00% | ||||||
2 | One plus actual water loss | 112.30% | ||||||
3 | Allowable portion | 97.95% | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4 | Disallowable portion | 2.05% | ||||||
5 | Power Expense | 768,901 | ||||||
6 | Disallowance | $ | 15,748 | |||||
7 | Chemical Expense | 53,341 | ||||||
8 | Disallowance | $ | 1,092 | |||||
Line 1: Maximum acceptable level of water losses |
| |||||||
Line 2: Actual level of water losses | ||||||||
Line 3: Line 2 / line 3 | ||||||||
Line 4: 1 minus line 4 | ||||||||
Line 6: Line 1 times line 5 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 2 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Bad Debt Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||
COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | ||||||
PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED* | ||||||
$ 53,925 | $ 19,319 | $ 73,244 | ||||||
|
References: |
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
Column (B): Settlement |
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 |
Adjusted Test Year Revenues | $ | 10,463,460 | ||
Bad Debt Expense Rate | 0.70% | |||
|
| |||
Expected Bad Debt Expense | $ | 73,244 | ||
|
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY | [B] SETTLEMENT | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 105,801 | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | 53,762 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86% | 40.32% | 13.45% | 3.78% | 0.82% | 1.58% | 0.19% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,652 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,095 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,646 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ | 78,609 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10,602 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 643 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Settlement Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total, by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247 | ) |
References: |
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system |
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Expense Normalizations | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - EXPENSE NORMALIZATIONS
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||
NO. | ACCT / DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | 601 Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 1,268,835 | $ | (157,960 | ) | $ | 1,110,875 | ||||||
2 | 620 Materials and Supplies | $ | 47,783 | $ | (21,656 | ) | $ | 26,127 | ||||||
3 | 630 Outside Services | $ | 1,053,640 | $ | (346,035 | ) | $ | 707,605 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 2,370,258 | $ | (525,651 | ) | $ | 1,844,607 | ||||||||
|
|
References: |
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB |
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Depreciation | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] PLANT BALANCE | [B] DEPRECIATION RATE | [C] DEPRECIATION EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 62,847 | 0.00% | - | ||||||||||
3 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 9,566,104 | 3.33% | 318,551 | |||||||||||
4 | 306 | Lake, River and Other Intakes | 1,855 | 2.50% | 46 | |||||||||||
5 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 4,459,478 | 3.33% | 148,501 | |||||||||||
6 | 309 | Supply Mains | 2,340,773 | 2.00% | 46,815 | |||||||||||
7 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 324,955 | 5.00% | 16,248 | |||||||||||
8 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 6,643,382 | 12.50% | 830,423 | |||||||||||
9 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
10 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 12,553 | 3.33% | 418 | |||||||||||
11 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 14,541 | 20.00% | 2,908 | |||||||||||
12 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | - | 0.00% | - | |||||||||||
13 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 820,301 | 2.22% | 18,211 | |||||||||||
14 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 557,973 | 5.00% | 27,899 | |||||||||||
15 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 44,363,056 | 2.00% | 887,261 | |||||||||||
16 | 333 | Services | 4,645,439 | 3.33% | 154,693 | |||||||||||
17 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 3,792,641 | 8.33% | 315,927 | |||||||||||
18 | 335 | Hydrants | 4,340,020 | 2.00% | 86,800 | |||||||||||
19 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 15,144 | 6.67% | 1,010 | |||||||||||
20 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 769,912 | 6.67% | 51,353 | |||||||||||
21 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 505,281 | 6.67% | 33,702 | |||||||||||
22 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 585,195 | 20.00% | 117,039 | |||||||||||
23 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 71,996 | 5.00% | 3,600 | |||||||||||
24 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 103,063 | 10.00% | 10,306 | |||||||||||
25 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 60,372 | 5.00% | 3,019 | |||||||||||
26 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 640,845 | 10.00% | 64,085 | |||||||||||
27 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 85,226 | 10.00% | 8,523 | |||||||||||
28 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 5,448,566 | 10.00% | 544,857 | |||||||||||
29 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 5,712 | 5.00% | 286 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
30 | Total Utility Plant in Service | 90,237,230 | 3,692,480 | |||||||||||||
31 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
32 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 62,847 | |||||||||||||
33 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 90,174,383 | $ 3,692,480 | ||||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||
35 | Amortization of CIAC | $ | 82,949 | 4.0948% | $ 3,397 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
36 | Settlement Recommended Depreciation Expense | $ 3,689,083 | ||||||||||||||
37 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ 3,613,647 | ||||||||||||||
38 | Settlement Adjustment | $ 75,437 | ||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||||||||||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report for Non Allocated Plant | |||||||||||||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 6 | |||
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Income Taxes | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - INCOME TAXES
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | 98,898 | $ | 266,460 | $ | 365,358 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2 |
| |||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB |
| |||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement ADJ 7 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #7 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||
LINE | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | ||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | AS ADJUSTED | RECOMMENDED |
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 10,463,460 | $ | 10,463,460 | |||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 20,926,920 | 20,926,920 | |||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 10,463,460 | ||||||||
5 | Settlement Recommended Revenue | 12,019,507 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 31,390,379 | 32,946,426 | |||||||
7 �� | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 10,463,460 | 10,982,142 | |||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 20,926,920 | 21,964,284 | |||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | 243,735 | 243,735 | |||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | 77,783 | 77,783 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 21,092,872 | 22,130,236 | |||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 20.0% | 20.0% | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 4,218,574 | 4,426,047 | |||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 10.3559% | 10.3559% | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 436,871 | |||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 897,129 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | (460,258) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
20 | Property Tax onRecommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 458,357 | |||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 436,871 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 21,486 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | 21,486 | |||||||
24 | increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 1,556,047 | |||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 1.38079% | ||||||||
REFERENCES: Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement D-1 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Percent of Total | Cost Rate | Weighted Cost | ||||||||||||||
Debt | 57.8% | 6.1% | 3.5% | |||||||||||||
Equity | 42.2% | 9.5% | 4.0% | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Required Rate of Return | 7.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company (Santa Cruz) | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
Docket No. W-20446A-12-0314 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges:
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes*) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/6” X 3/4” Meter | $ | 27.68 | $ | 27.68 | $ | 28.40 | $ | 29.02 | $ | 29.21 | $ | 29.42 | $ | 29.61 | $ | 29.80 | $ | 29.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 27.68 | 27.68 | 28.40 | 29.02 | 29.21 | 29.42 | 29.61 | 29.80 | 29.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 69.20 | 69.20 | 71.00 | 72.55 | 73.03 | 73.55 | 74.03 | 74.50 | 74.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5” Meter | 138.40 | 138.40 | 142.00 | 145.10 | 146.05 | 147.10 | 148.05 | 149.00 | 149.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2” Meter | 221.44 | 221.44 | 227.20 | 232.16 | 233.68 | 235.36 | 236.88 | 238.40 | 238.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3” Meter | 442.88 | 442.88 | 454.40 | 464.32 | 467.36 | 470.72 | 473.76 | 476.80 | 477.12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4” Meter | 692.00 | 692.00 | 710.00 | 725.50 | 730.25 | 735.50 | 740.25 | 745.00 | 745.50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6” Meter | 1,384.00 | 1,384.00 | 1,420.00 | 1,451.00 | 1,460.50 | 1,471.00 | 1,480.50 | 1,490.00 | 1,491.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8” Meter | 2,766.00 | 2,766.00 | 2,840.00 | 2,902.00 | 2,921.00 | 2,942.00 | 2,961.00 | 2,980.00 | 2,982.00 |
Commodity Rate Charges (per 1,000 gallons):
Rate Block | Volumetric Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 1,000 Gallons | 1,000 Gallons | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.43 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 5,000 Gallons | 5,000 Gallons | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 2.27 | 2.29 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.36 | 2.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | 10,000 Gallons | 10,000 Gallons | 2.94 | 2.94 | 3.05 | 3.15 | 3.18 | 3.21 | 3.24 | 3.27 | 3.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | 18,000 Gallons | 18,000 Gallons | 3.76 | 3.76 | 3.90 | 4.03 | 4.06 | 4.10 | 4.14 | 4.18 | 4.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | 25,000 Gallons | 25,000 Gallons | 4.58 | 4.58 | 4.75 | 4.90 | 4.95 | 5.00 | 5.04 | 5.09 | 5.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | Over 25,000 | Over 25,000 | 5.48 | 5.48 | 5.69 | 5.87 | 5.92 | 5.98 | 6.04 | 6.09 | 6.10 |
Conservation Rebate
Proposed | ||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons | 7,001 | 7,001 | 6,001 | |||||||||
Commodity rate rebate : | 65% | 65% | 60% | |||||||||
(applied if consumption is below the CRT) |
*Includes all potable water meters including irrigation meters.
Non-Potable Raw Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes | Volumetric Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | $ | 185.74 | 185.74 | $ | 260.69 | $ | 338.89 | $ | 378.00 | $ | 417.10 | $ | 456.20 | $ | 495.31 | $ | 533.76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
All Gallons (per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 1.28 | 1.40 | 1.52 | 1.638 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement Schedule H-3 Page 2 of 2 |
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 | $ - | |||||||||
Establishment of Service (After Hours) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | - | |||||||||
Reconnection of Service – After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge, Per Hour | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge | NA | 35.00 | ||||||||||
Deposit | (c) | (c) | ||||||||||
Deposit Interest | NA | (c) | ||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Meter Test Fee (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Deferred Payment (Per Month) | 1.60% | 1.60% | 0.00% | |||||||||
|
(a) Number of Months off System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-403(D).
(b) Cost to include parts, labor, overhead and all applicable taxes per A.A.C. R14-2-405(B)(S).
(c) Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B).
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the Company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege, sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(D)(5). |
Service Line and Meter Installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to A.A.C. R14-2-405) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meter Size | Service Line | Charges | Total Charges | Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 x 3/4” Meter | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/4” Meter | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1” Meter | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2” Meter | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Turbine Meter | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2” Compound Meter | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Turbine Meter | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3” Compound Meter | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Turbine Meter | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4” Compound Meter | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Turbine Meter | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6” Compound Meter | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8” and Larger Meter | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 31.10 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85) | 28.14 | 28.98 | (0.85) | 28.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22) | 28.88 | 31.10 | (2.22) | 28.88 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60) | 29.62 | 33.22 | (3.60) | 29.62 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98) | 30.36 | 35.34 | (4.98) | 30.36 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36) | 31.10 | 37.46 | (6.36) | 31.10 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27) | 32.13 | 40.40 | (8.27) | 32.13 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18) | 33.16 | 43.34 | (10.18) | 33.16 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 32.46 | $ 1.36 | 4.4% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 28.40 | $ | - | $ | 28.40 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 29.75 | (0.81 | ) | 28.94 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 31.95 | (2.13 | ) | 29.82 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 34.15 | (3.45 | ) | 30.70 | 3.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 36.35 | (4.77 | ) | 31.58 | 4.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 38.55 | (6.09 | ) | 32.46 | 4,4% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 41.60 | (7.92 | ) | 33.68 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 44.65 | - | 44.65 | 34.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 47.70 | - | 47.70 | 3.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 50.75 | - | 50.75 | 3.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 53.80 | - | 53.80 | 3.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 73.30 | - | 73.30 | 3.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 94.50 | - | 94.50 | 3.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 118.25 | - | 118.25 | 3.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 260.50 | - | 260.50 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 402.75 | - | 402.75 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 545.00 | - | 545.00 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 687.25 | - | 687.25 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 829.50 | - | 829.50 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 971.75 | - | 971.75 | 3.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,114.00 | - | 1,114.00 | 3.8% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 33.21 | $ 2.11 | 6.8% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.02 | $ | - | $ | 29.02 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 30.41 | (0.83 | ) | 29.58 | 5.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 32.68 | (2.20 | ) | 30.48 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 34.95 | (3.56 | ) | 31.39 | 6.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 37.22 | (4.92 | ) | 32.30 | 6.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 39.49 | (6.28 | ) | 33.21 | 6.8% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 42.64 | (8.17 | ) | 34.47 | 7.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 45.79 | - | 45.79 | 38.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 48.94 | - | 48.94 | 5.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 52.09 | - | 52.09 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 55.24 | - | 55.24 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 75.39 | - | 75.39 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 97.28 | - | 97.28 | 6.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 121.78 | - | 121.78 | 6.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251,30 | - | 251.30 | 268.53 | - | 268.53 | 6.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 415.28 | - | 415.28 | 6.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 562.03 | - | 562.03 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 708.78 | - | 708.78 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 855.53 | - | 855.53 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,002.28 | - | 1,002.28 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,149.03 | - | 1,149.03 | 7.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 33.44 | $ 2.34 | 7.5% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.21 | $ | - | $ | 29.21 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 30.62 | (0.85 | ) | 29.77 | 5.8% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 32.91 | (2.22 | ) | 30.69 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 35.20 | (3.59 | ) | 31.61 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 37.49 | (4.97 | ) | 32.52 | 7.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 39.78 | (6.34 | ) | 33.44 | 7.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 42.96 | (8.25 | ) | 34.71 | 8.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 46.14 | - | 46.14 | 39.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 49.32 | - | 49.32 | 6.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 52.50 | - | 52.50 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 55.68 | - | 55.68 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 75.98 | - | 75.98 | 7.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 98.06 | - | 98.06 | 7.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 122.81 | - | 122.81 | 7.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 270.81 | - | 270.81 | 7.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 418.81 | - | 418.81 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 566.81 | - | 566.81 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 714.81 | - | 714.81 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 862.81 | - | 862.81 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,010.81 | - | 1,010.81 | 8.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,158.81 | - | 1,158.81 | 8.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 33.68 | $ 2.58 | 8.3% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.42 | $ | - | $ | 29.42 | 6.3% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 30.84 | (0.85 | ) | 29.99 | 6.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 33.15 | (2.24 | ) | 30.91 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 35.46 | (3.62 | ) | 31.84 | 7.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 37.77 | (5.01 | ) | 32.76 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 40.08 | (6.40 | ) | 33.68 | 8.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 43.29 | (8.32 | ) | 34.97 | 8.8% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 46.50 | - | 46.50 | 40.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 49.71 | - | 49.71 | 7.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 52.92 | - | 52.92 | 7.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 56.13 | - | 56.13 | 7.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 76.63 | - | 76.63 | 8.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 98.93 | - | 98.93 | 8.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 123.93 | - | 123.93 | 8.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 273.43 | - | 273.43 | 8.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 422.93 | - | 422.93 | 8.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 572.43 | - | 572.43 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 721.93 | - | 721.93 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 871.43 | - | 871.43 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,020.93 | - | 1,020.93 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,170.43 | - | 1,170.43 | 9.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 33.91 | $ 2.81 | 9.0% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.61 | $ | - | $ | 29.61 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 31.04 | (0.86 | ) | 30.18 | 7.3% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 33.37 | (2.26 | ) | 31.11 | 7.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 35.70 | (3.65 | ) | 32.05 | 8.2% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 38.03 | (5.05 | ) | 32.98 | 8.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 40.36 | (6.45 | ) | 33.91 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 43.60 | (8.39 | ) | 35.21 | 9.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 46.84 | - | 46.84 | 41.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 50.08 | - | 50.08 | 8.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 53.32 | - | 53.32 | 8.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 56.56 | - | 56.56 | 8.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 77.26 | - | 77.26 | 8.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 99.76 | - | 99.76 | 9.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 124.96 | - | 124.96 | 9.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 275.96 | - | 275.96 | 9.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 426.96 | - | 426.96 | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 577.96 | - | 577.96 | 10.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 728.96 | - | 728.96 | 10.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 879.96 | - | 879.96 | 10.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,030.96 | - | 1,030.96 | 10.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,181.96 | - | 1,181.96 | 10.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 34.16 | $ 3.05 | 9.8% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.80 | $ | - | $ | 29.80 | 7.7% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 31.25 | (0.87 | ) | 30.38 | 8.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 33.61 | (2.29 | ) | 31.32 | 8.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 35.97 | (3.70 | ) | 32.27 | 8.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 38.33 | (5.12 | ) | 33.21 | 9.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 40.69 | (6.53 | ) | 34.16 | 9.8% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 43.96 | (8.50 | ) | 35.46 | 10.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 47.23 | - | 47.23 | 42.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 50.50 | - | 50.50 | 9.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 53.77 | - | 53.77 | 9.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 57.04 | - | 57.04 | 9.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 77.94 | - | 77.94 | 9.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 100.66 | - | 100.66 | 10.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 126.11 | - | 126.11 | 10.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 278.36 | - | 278.36 | 10.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 430.61 | - | 430.61 | 10.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 582.86 | - | 582.86 | 11.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 735.11 | - | 735.11 | 11.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 887.36 | - | 887.36 | 11.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,039.61 | - | 1,039.61 | 11.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,191.86 | - | 1,191.86 | 11.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8” and 3/4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 31.10 | $ 34.18 | $ 3.07 | 9.9% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 27.68 | $ | - | $ | 27.68 | $ | 29.82 | $ | - | $ | 29.82 | 7.7% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 28.98 | (0.85 | ) | 28.14 | 31.27 | (0.87 | ) | 30.40 | 8.1% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 31.10 | (2.22 | ) | 28.88 | 33.63 | (2.29 | ) | 31.34 | 8.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 33.22 | (3.60 | ) | 29.62 | 35.99 | (3.70 | ) | 32.29 | 9.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 35.34 | (4.98 | ) | 30.36 | 38.35 | (5.12 | ) | 33.23 | 9.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 37.46 | (6.36 | ) | 31.10 | 40.71 | (6.53 | ) | 34.18 | 9.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 40.40 | (8.27 | ) | 32.13 | 43.98 | (8.50 | ) | 35.48 | 10.4% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.34 | (10.18 | ) | 33.16 | 47.25 | - | 47.25 | 42.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 46.28 | - | 46.28 | 50.52 | - | 50.52 | 9.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 49.22 | - | 49.22 | 53.79 | - | 53.79 | 9.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 52.16 | - | 52.16 | 57.06 | - | 57.06 | 9.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 70.96 | - | 70.96 | 77.96 | - | 77.96 | 9.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 91.40 | - | 91.40 | 100.70 | - | 100.70 | 10.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 114.30 | - | 114.30 | 126.20 | - | 126.20 | 10:4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 251.30 | - | 251.30 | 278.70 | - | 278.70 | 10.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 388.30 | - | 388.30 | 431.20 | - | 431.20 | 11.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 525.30 | - | 525.30 | 583.70 | - | 583.70 | 11.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 662.30 | - | 662.30 | 736.20 | - | 736.20 | 11.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 799.30 | - | 799.30 | 888.70 | - | 888.70 | 11.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 936.30 | - | 936.30 | 1,041.20 | - | 1,041.20 | 11.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,073.30 | - | 1,073.30 | 1,193.70 | - | 1,193.70 | 11.2% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-l2-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 72.62 | $ - | 0.0% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85 | ) | 69.66 | 70.50 | (0.85 | ) | 69.66 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22 | ) | 70.40 | 72.62 | (2.22 | ) | 70.40 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60 | ) | 71.14 | 74.74 | (3.60 | ) | 71.14 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98 | ) | 71.88 | 76.86 | (4.98 | ) | 71.88 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36 | ) | 72.62 | 78.98 | (6.36 | ) | 72.62 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27 | ) | 73.65 | 81.92 | (8.27 | ) | 73.65 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18 | ) | 74.68 | 84.86 | (10.18 | ) | 74.68 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 74.55 | $ 1.93 | 2.7% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 71.00 | $ | - | $ | 71.00 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85 | ) | 69.66 | 72.35 | (0.88 | ) | 71.47 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22 | ) | 70.40 | 74.55 | (2.31 | ) | 72.24 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60 | ) | 71.14 | 76.75 | (3.74 | ) | 73.01 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98 | ) | 71.88 | 78.95 | (5.17 | ) | 73.78 | 2.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36 | ) | 72.62 | 81.15 | (6.60 | ) | 74.55 | 2.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27 | ) | 73.65 | 84.20 | (8.58 | ) | 75.62 | 2.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18 | ) | 74.68 | 87.25 | - | 87.25 | 16.8% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 90.30 | - | 90.30 | 2.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 93.35 | - | 93.35 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 96.40 | - | 96.40 | 2.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 115.90 | - | 115.90 | 3.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 137.10 | - | 137.10 | 3.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 160.85 | - | 160.85 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 303.10 | - | 303.10 | 3.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 445.35 | - | 445.35 | 3.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 587.60 | - | 587.60 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 729.85 | - | 729.85 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 872.10 | - | 872.10 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,014.35 | - | 1,014.35 | 3.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,156.60 | - | 1,156.60 | 3.7% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 76.21 | $ 3.59 | 4.9% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 72.55 | $ | - | $ | 72.55 | 4.8% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85 | ) | 69.66 | 73.94 | (0.90 | ) | 73.04 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22 | ) | 70.40 | 76.21 | (2.38 | ) | 73.83 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60 | ) | 71.14 | 78.48 | (3.85 | ) | 74.63 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98 | ) | 71.88 | 80.75 | (5.33 | ) | �� | 75.42 | 4.9% | ||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36 | ) | 72.62 | 83.02 | (6.81 | ) | 76.21 | 4.9% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27 | ) | 73.65 | 86.17 | (8.85 | ) | 77.32 | 5.0% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18 | ) | 74.68 | 89.32 | - | 89.32 | 19.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 92.47 | - | 92.47 | 5.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 95.62 | - | 95.62 | 5.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 98.77 | - | 98.77 | 5.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 118.92 | - | 118.92 | 5.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 140.81 | - | 140.81 | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 165.31 | - | 165.31 | 6.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 312.06 | - | 312.06 | 6.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 458.81 | - | 458.81 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 605.56 | - | 605.56 | 6.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 752.31 | - | 752.31 | 6.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 899.06 | - | 899.06 | 6.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,045.81 | - | 1,045.81 | 7.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,192.56 | - | 1,192.56 | 7.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 76.72 | $ 4.10 | 5.6% |
Monthly Consumption |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 73.03 | $ | - | $ | 73.03 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85 | ) | 69.66 | 74.44 | (0.92 | ) | 73.52 | 5.5% | |||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22 | ) | 70.40 | 76.73 | (2.41 | ) | 74.32 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60 | ) | 71.14 | 79.02 | (3.89 | ) | 75.12 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98 | ) | 71.88 | 81.31 | (5.38 | ) | 75.92 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36 | ) | 72.62 | 83.60 | (6.87 | ) | 76.72 | 5.6% | |||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27 | ) | 73.65 | 86.78 | (8.94 | ) | 77.84 | 5.7% | |||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18 | ) | 74.68 | 89.96 | - | 89.96 | 20.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 93.14 | - | 93.14 | 6.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 96.32 | - | 96.32 | 6.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 99.50 | - | 99.50 | 6.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 119.80 | - | 119.80 | 6.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 141.88 | - | 141.88 | 6.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 166.63 | - | 166.63 | 6.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 314.63 | - | 314.63 | 7.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 462.63 | - | 462.63 | 7.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 610.63 | - | 610.63 | 7.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 758.63 | - | 758.63 | 7.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 906.63 | - | 906.63 | 7.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,054.63 | - | 1,054.63 | 7.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,202.63 | - | 1,202.63 | 7.9% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 77.28 | $ 4.66 | 6.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 73.55 | $ | - | $ | 73.55 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85) | 69.66 | 74.97 | (0.92) | 74.05 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22) | 70.40 | 77.28 | (2.42) | 74.86 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60) | 71.14 | 79.59 | (3.93) | 75.66 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98) | 71.88 | 81.90 | (5.43) | 76.47 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36) | 72.62 | 84.21 | (6.93) | 77.28 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27) | 73.65 | 87.42 | (9.02) | 78.40 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18) | 74.68 | 90.63 | - | 90.63 | 21.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 93.84 | - | 93.84 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 97.05 | - | 97.05 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 100.26 | - | 100.26 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 120.76 | - | 120.76 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 143.06 | - | 143.06 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 168.06 | - | 168.06 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 317.56 | - | 317.56 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 467.06 | - | 467.06 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 616.56 | - | 616.56 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 766.06 | - | 766.06 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 915.56 | - | 915.56 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,065.06 | - | 1,065.06 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,214.56 | - | 1,214.56 | 8.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 77.79 | $ 5.16 | 7.1% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 74.03 | $ | - | $ | 74.03 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85) | 69.66 | 75.46 | (0.93) | 74.53 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22) | 70.40 | 77.79 | (2.44) | 75.34 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60) | 71.14 | 80.12 | (3.96) | 76.16 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98) | 71.88 | 82.45 | (5.47) | 76.97 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36) | 72.62 | 84.78 | (6.99) | 77.79 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27) | 73.65 | 88.02 | (9.09) | 78.92 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18) | 74.68 | 91.26 | - | 91.26 | 22.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 94.50 | - | 94.50 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 97.74 | - | 97.74 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 100.98 | - | 100.98 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 121.68 | - | 121.68 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 144.18 | - | 144.18 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 169.38 | - | 169.38 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 320.38 | - | 320.38 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 471.38 | - | 471.38 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 622.38 | - | 622.38 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 773.38 | - | 773.38 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 924.38 | - | 924.38 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,075.38 | - | 1,075.38 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,226.38 | - | 1,226.38 | 10.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 78.31 | $ 5.69 | 7.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 74.50 | $ | - | $ | 74.50 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85) | 69.66 | 75.95 | (0.94) | 75.01 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22) | 70.40 | 78.31 | (2.48) | 75.83 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60) | 71.14 | 80.67 | (4.01) | 76.66 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98) | 71.88 | 83.03 | (5.54) | 77.49 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36) | 72.62 | 85.39 | (7.08) | 78.31 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27) | 73.65 | 88.66 | (9.20) | 79.46 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18) | 74.68 | 91.93 | - | 91.93 | 23.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 95.20 | - | 95.20 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 98.47 | - | 98.47 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 101.74 | - | 101.74 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 122.64 | - | 122.64 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 145.36 | - | 145.36 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 170.81 | - | 170.81 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 323.06 | - | 323.06 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 475.31 | - | 475.31 | 10.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 627.56 | - | 627.56 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 779.81 | - | 779.81 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 932.06 | - | 932.06 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,084.31 | - | 1,084.31 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,236.56 | - | 1,236.56 | 10.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 1” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 72.62 | $ 78.36 | $ 5.74 | 7.9% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 69.20 | $ | - | $ | 69.20 | $ | 74.55 | $ | - | $ | 74.55 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 70.50 | (0.85) | 69.66 | 76.00 | (0.94) | 75.06 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 72.62 | (2.22) | 70.40 | 78.36 | (2.48) | 75.88 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 74.74 | (3.60) | 71.14 | 80.72 | (4.01) | 76.71 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 76.86 | (4.98) | 71.88 | 83.08 | (5.54) | 77.54 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 78.98 | (6.36) | 72.62 | 85.44 | (7.08) | 78.36 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 81.92 | (8.27) | 73.65 | 88.71 | (9.20) | 79.51 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 84.86 | (10.18) | 74.68 | 91.98 | - | 91.98 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 87.80 | - | 87.80 | 95.25 | - | 95.25 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 90.74 | - | 90.74 | 98.52 | - | 98.52 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 93.68 | - | 93.68 | 101.79 | - | 101.79 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 112.48 | - | 112.48 | 122.69 | - | 122.69 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 132.92 | - | 132.92 | 145.43 | - �� | 145.43 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 155.82 | - | 155.82 | 170.93 | - | 170.93 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 292.82 | - | 292.82 | 323.43 | - | 323.43 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 429.82 | - | 429.82 | 475.93 | - | 475.93 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 566.82 | - | 566.82 | 628.43 | - | 628.43 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 703.82 | - | 703.82 | 780.93 | - | 780.93 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 840.82 | - | 840.82 | 933.43 | - | 933.43 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 977.82 | - | 977.82 | 1,085.93 | - | 1,085.93 | 11.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,114.82 | - | 1,114.82 | 1,238.43 | - | 1,238.43 | 11.1 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 181.68 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 186.90 | $ 5.22 | 2.9% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 142.00 | $ | - | $ | 142.00 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 143.35 | (0.81) | 142.54 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 145.55 | (2.13) | 143.42 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 147.75 | (3.45) | 144.30 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 149.95 | (4.77) | 145.18 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 152.15 | (6.09) | 146.06 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 155.20 | (7.92) | 147.28 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 158.25 | - | 158.25 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 161.30 | - | 161.30 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 164.35 | - | 164.35 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 167.40 | - | 167.40 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 186.90 | - | 186.90 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 208.10 | - | 208.10 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 231.85 | - | 231.85 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 374.10 | - | 374.10 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 516.35 | - | 516.35 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 658.60 | - | 658.60 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 800.85 | - | 800.85 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 943.10 | - | 943.10 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,085.35 | - | 1,085.35 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,227.60 | - | 1,227.60 | 3.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 1500 | $ 181.68 | $ 191.47 | $ 9.79 | 5.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 145.10 | $ | - | $ | 145.10 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 146.49 | (0.83) | 145.66 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 148.76 | (2.20) | 146.56 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 151.03 | (3.56) | 147.47 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 153.30 | (4.92) | 148.38 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 155.57 | (6.28) | 149.29 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 158.72 | (8.17) | 150.55 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 161.87 | - | 161.87 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 165.02 | - | 165.02 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 168.17 | - | 168.17 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 171.32 | - | 171.32 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 191.47 | - | 191.47 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 213.36 | - | 213.36 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 237.86 | - | 237.86 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 384.61 | - | 384.61 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 531.36 | - | 531.36 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 678.11 | - | 678.11 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 824.86 | - | 824.86 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 971.61 | - | 971.61 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,118.36 | - | 1,118.36 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,265.11 | - | 1,265.11 | 6.8 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 192.82 | $ 11.14 | 6.1% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 146.05 | $ | - | $ | 146.05 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 147.46 | (0.85) | 146.61 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 149.75 | (2.22) | 147.53 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 152.04 | (3.59) | 148.45 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 154.33 | (4.97) | 149.36 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 156.62 | (6.34) | 150.28 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 159.80 | (8.25) | 151.55 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 162.98 | - | 162.98 | 13.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 166.16 | - | 166.16 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 169.34 | - | 169.34 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 172.52 | - | 172.52 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 192.82 | - | 192.82 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 214.90 | - | 214.90 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 239.65 | - | 239.65 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 387.65 | - | 387.65 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 535.65 | - | 535.65 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 683.65 | - | 683.65 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 831.65 | - | 831.65 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 979.65 | - | 979.65 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,127.65 | - | 1,127.65 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,275.65 | - | 1,275.65 | 7.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 194.31 | $ 12.63 | 7.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 147.10 | $ | - | $ | 147.10 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 148.52 | (0.85) | 147.67 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 150.83 | (2.24) | 148.59 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 153.14 | (3.62) | 149.52 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 155.45 | (5.01) | 150.44 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 157.76 | (6.40) | 151.36 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 160.97 | (8.32) | 152.65 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 164.18 | - | 164.18 | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 167.39 | - | 167.39 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 170.60 | - | 170.60 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 173.81 | - | 173.81 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 194.31 | - | 194.31 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 216.61 | - | 216.61 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 241.61 | - | 241.61 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 391.11 | - | 391.11 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 540.61 | - | 540.61 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 690.11 | - | 690.11 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 839.61 | - | 839.61 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 989.11 | - | 989.11 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,138.61 | - | 1,138.61 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,288.11 | - | 1,288.11 | 8.8 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 195.70 | $ 14.02 | 7.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 148.05 | $ | - | $ | 148.05 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 149.48 | (0.86) | 148.62 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 151.81 | (2.26) | 149.55 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 154.14 | (3.65) | 150.49 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 156.47 | (5.05) | 151.42 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 158.80 | (6.45) | 152.35 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 162.04 | (8.39) | 153.65 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 165.28 | - | 165.28 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 168.52 | - | 168.52 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 171.76 | - | 171.76 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 175.00 | - | 175.00 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 195.70 | - | 195.70 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 218.20 | - | 218.20 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 243.40 | - | 243.40 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 394.40 | - | 394.40 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 545.40 | - | 545.40 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 696.40 | - | 696.40 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 847.40 | - | 847.40 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 998.40 | - | 998.40 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,149.40 | - | 1,149.40 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,300.40 | - | 1,300.40 | 9.8 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 15000 | $ 181.68 | $ 197.14 | $ 15.46 | 8.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 149.00 | $ | - | $ | 149.00 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 150.45 | (0.87) | 149.58 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 152.81 | (2.29) | 150.52 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 155.17 | (3.70) | 151.47 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 157.53 | (5.12) | 152.41 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 159.89 | (6.53) | 153.36 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 163.16 | (8.50) | 154.66 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 166.43 | - | 166.43 | 15.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 169.70 | - | 169.70 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 172.97 | - | 172.97 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 176.24 | - | 176.24 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 197.14 | - | 197.14 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 219.86 | - | 219.86 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 245.31 | - | 245.31 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 397.56 | - | 397.56 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 549.81 | - | 549.81 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 702.06 | - | 702.06 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 854.31 | - | 854.31 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 1,006.56 | - | 1,006.56 | 10.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,158.81 | - | 1,158.81 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,311.06 | - | 1,311.06 | 10.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5000 | $ 181.68 | $ 197.24 | $ 15.56 | 8.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 138.40 | $ | - | $ | 138.40 | $ | 149.10 | $ | - | $ | 149.10 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 139.70 | (0.85) | 138.86 | 150.55 | (0.87) | 149.68 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 141.82 | (2.22) | 139.60 | 152.91 | (2.29) | 150.62 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 143.94 | (3.60) | 140.34 | 155.27 | (3.70) | 151.57 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 146.06 | (4.98) | 141.08 | 157.63 | (5.12) | 152.51 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 148.18 | (6.36) | 141.82 | 159.99 | (6.53) | 153.46 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 151.12 | (8.27) | 142.85 | 163.26 | (8.50) | 154.76 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 154.06 | (10.18) | 143.88 | 166.53 | - | 166.53 | 15.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 157.00 | - | 157.00 | 169.80 | - | 169.80 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 159.94 | - | 159.94 | 173.07 | - | 173.07 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 162.88 | - | 162.88 | 176.34 | - | 176.34 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 181.68 | - | 181.68 | 197.24 | - | 197.24 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 202.12 | - | 202.12 | 219.98 | - | 219.98 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 225.02 | - | 225.02 | 245.48 | - | 245.48 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 362.02 | - | 362.02 | 397.98 | - | 397.98 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 499.02 | - | 499.02 | 550.48 | - | 550.48 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 636.02 | - | 636.02 | 702.98 | - | 702.98 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 773.02 | - | 773.02 | 855.48 | - | 855.48 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 910.02 | - | 910.02 | 1,007.98 | - | 1,007.98 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,047.02 | - | 1,047.02 | 1,160.48 | - | 1,160.48 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,184.02 | - | 1,184.02 | 1,312.98 | - | 1,312.98 | 10.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 281.40 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 289.40 | $ 8.00 | 2.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 227.20 | $ | - | $ | 227.20 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 228.55 | (0.81) | 227.74 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 230.75 | (2.13) | 228.62 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 232.95 | (3.45) | 229.50 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 235.15 | (4.77) | 230.38 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 237.35 | (6.09) | 231.26 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 240.40 | (7.92) | 232.48 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 243.45 | - | 243.45 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 246.50 | - | 246.50 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 249.55 | - | 249.55 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 252.60 | - | 252.60 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 272.10 | - | 272.10 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 293.30 | - | 293.30 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 317.05 | - | 317.05 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 459.30 | - | 459.30 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 601.55 | - | 601.55 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 743.80 | - | 743.80 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 886.05 | - | 886.05 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,028.30 | - | 1,028.30 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,170.55 | - | 1,170.55 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,312.80 | - | 1,312.80 | 3.6 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 296.39 | $ 14.99 | 5.3% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | �� | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 232.16 | $ | - | $ | 232.16 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 233.55 | (0.83) | 232.72 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 235.82 | (2.20) | 233.62 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 238.09 | (3.56) | 234.53 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 240.36 | (4.92) | 235.44 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 242.63 | (6.28) | 236.35 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 245.78 | (8.17) | 237.61 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 248.93 | - | 248.93 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 252.08 | - | 252.08 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 255.23 | - | 255.23 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 258.38 | - | 258.38 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 278.53 | - | 278.53 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 300.42 | - | 300.42 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 324.92 | - | 324.92 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 471.67 | - | 471.67 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 618.42 | - | 618.42 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 765.17 | - | 765.17 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 911.92 | - | 911.92 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,058.67 | - | 1,058.67 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,205.42 | - | 1,205.42 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,352.17 | - | 1,352.17 | 6.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 298.47 | $ 17.07 | 6.1% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 233.68 | $ | - | $ | 233.68 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 235.09 | (0.85) | 234.24 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 237.38 | (2.22) | 235.16 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 239.67 | (3.59) | 236.08 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 241.96 | (4.97) | 236.99 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 244.25 | (6.34) | 237.91 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 247.43 | (8.25) | 239.18 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 250.61 | - | 250.61 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 253.79 | - | 253.79 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 256.97 | - | 256.97 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 260.15 | - | 260.15 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 280.45 | - | 280.45 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 302.53 | - | 302.53 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 327.28 | - | 327.28 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 475.28 | - | 475.28 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 623.28 | - | 623.28 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 771.28 | - | 771.28 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 919.28 | - | 919.28 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,067.28 | - | 1,067.28 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,215.28 | - | 1,215.28 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,363.28 | - | 1,363.28 | 7.6 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 300.77 | $ 19.37 | 6.9% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 235.36 | $ | - | $ | 235.36 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 236.78 | (0.85) | 235.93 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 239.09 | (2.24) | 236.85 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 241.40 | (3.62) | 237.78 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 243.71 | (5.01) | 238.70 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 246.02 | (6.40) | 239.62 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 249.23 | (8.32) | 240.91 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 252.44 | - | 252.44 | 11.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 255.65 | - | 255.65 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 258.86 | - | 258.86 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 262.07 | - | 262.07 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 282.57 | - | 282.57 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 304.87 | - | 304.87 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 329.87 | - | 329.87 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 479.37 | - | 479.37 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 628.87 | - | 628.87 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 778.37 | - | 778.37 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 927.87 | - | 927.87 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,077.37 | - | 1,077.37 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,226.87 | - | 1,226.87 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,376.37 | - | 1,376.37 | 8.6 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 302.89 | $ 21.49 | 7.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 236.88 | $ | - | $ | 236.88 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 238.31 | (0.86) | 237.45 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 240.64 | (2.26) | 238.38 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 242.97 | (3.65) | 239.32 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 245.30 | (5.05) | 240.25 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 247.63 | (6.45) | 241.18 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 250.87 | (8.39) | 242.48 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 254.11 | - | 254.11 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 257.35 | - | 257.35 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 260.59 | - | 260.59 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 263.83 | - | 263.83 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 284.53 | - | 284.53 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 307.03 | - | 307.03 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 332.23 | - | 332.23 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 483.23 | - | 483.23 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 634.23 | - | 634.23 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 785.23 | - | 785.23 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 936.23 | - | 936.23 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,087.23 | - | 1,087.23 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,238.23 | - | 1,238.23 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,389.23 | - | 1,389.23 | 9.6 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 305.08 | $ 23.68 | 8.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 238.40 | $ | - | $ | 238.40 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 239.85 | (0.87) | 238.98 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 242.21 | (2.29) | 239.92 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 244.57 | (3.70) | 240.87 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 246.93 | (5.12) | 241.81 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 249.29 | (6.53) | 242.76 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 252.56 | (8.50) | 244.06 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 255.83 | - | 255.83 | 12.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 259.10 | - | 259.10 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 262.37 | - | 262.37 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 265.64 | - | 265.64 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 286.54 | - | 286.54 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 309.26 | - | 309.26 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 334.71 | - | 334.71 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 486.96 | - | 486.96 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 639.21 | - | 639.21 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 791.46 | - | 791.46 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 943.71 | - | 943.71 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,095.96 | - | 1,095.96 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,248.21 | - | 1,248.21 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,400.46 | - | 1,400.46 | 10.5 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 2” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 19000 | $ 281.40 | $ 305.26 | $ 23.86 | 8.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 221.44 | $ | - | $ | 221.44 | $ | 238.56 | $ | - | $ | 238.56 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 222.74 | (0.85) | 221.90 | 240.01 | (0.87) | 239.14 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 224.86 | (2.22) | 222.64 | 242.37 | (2.29) | 240.08 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 226.98 | (3.60) | 223.38 | 244.73 | (3.70) | 241.03 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 229.10 | (4.98) | 224.12 | 247.09 | (5.12) | 241.97 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 231.22 | (6.36) | 224.86 | 249.45 | (6.53) | 242.92 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 234.16 | (8.27) | 225.89 | 252.72 | (8.50) | 244.22 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 237.10 | (10.18) | 226.92 | 255.99 | - | 255.99 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 240.04 | - | 240.04 | 259.26 | - | 259.26 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 242.98 | - | 242.98 | 262.53 | - | 262.53 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 245.92 | - | 245.92 | 265.80 | - | 265.80 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 264.72 | - | 264.72 | 286.70 | - | 286.70 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 285.16 | - | 285.16 | 309.44 | - | 309.44 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 308.06 | - | 308.06 | 334.94 | - | 334.94 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 445.06 | - | 445.06 | 487.44 | - | 487.44 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 582.06 | - | 582.06 | 639.94 | - | 639.94 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 719.06 | - | 719.06 | 792.44 | - | 792.44 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 856.06 | - | 856.06 | 944.94 | - | 944.94 | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 993.06 | - | 993.06 | 1,097.44 | - | 1,097.44 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,130.06 | - | 1,130.06 | 1,249.94 | - | 1,249.94 | 10.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,267.06 | - | 1,267.06 | 1,402.44 | - | 1,402.44 | 10.7 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 721.30 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 743.40 | $ 22.10 | 3.1% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 454.40 | $ | - | $ | 454.40 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 455.75 | (0.81) | 454.94 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 457.95 | (2.13) | 455.82 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 460.15 | (3.45) | 456.70 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 462.35 | (4.77) | 457.58 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 464.55 | (6.09) | 458.46 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 467.60 | (7.92) | 459.68 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 470.65 | - | 470.65 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 473.70 | - | 473.70 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 476.75 | - | 476.75 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 479.80 | - | 479.80 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 499.30 | - | 499.30 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 520.50 | - | 520.50 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 544.25 | - | 544.25 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 686.50 | - | 686.50 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 828.75 | - | 828.75 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 971.00 | - | 971.00 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,113.25 | - | 1,113.25 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,255.50 | - | 1,255.50 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,397.75 | - | 1,397.75 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,540.00 | - | 1,540.00 | 3.5 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 768.16 | $ 46.86 | 6.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 467.36 | $ | - | $ | 467.36 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 468.77 | (0.85) | 467.92 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 471.06 | (2.22) | 468.84 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 473.35 | (3.59) | 469.76 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 475.64 | (4.97) | 470.67 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 477.93 | (6.34) | 471.59 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 481.11 | (8.25) | 472.86 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 484.29 | - | 484.29 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 487.47 | - | 487.47 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 490.65 | - | 490.65 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 493.83 | - | 493.83 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 514.13 | - | 514.13 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 536.21 | - | 536.21 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 560.96 | - | 560.96 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 708.96 | - | 708.96 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 856.96 | - | 856.96 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 1,004.96 | - | 1,004.96 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,152.96 | - | 1,152.96 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,300.96 | - | 1,300.96 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,448.96 | - | 1,448.96 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,596.96 | - | 1,596.96 | 7.3 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 774.53 | $ 53.23 | 7.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 470.72 | $ | - | $ | 470.72 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 472.14 | (0.85) | 471.29 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 474.45 | (2.24) | 472.21 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 476.76 | (3.62) | 473.14 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 479.07 | (5.01) | 474.06 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 481.38 | (6.40) | 474.98 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 484.59 | (8.32) | 476.27 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 487.80 | - | 487.80 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 491.01 | - | 491.01 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 494.22 | - | 494.22 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 497.43 | - | 497.43 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 517.93 | - | 517.93 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 540.23 | - | 540.23 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 565.23 | - | 565.23 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 714.73 | - | 714.73 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 864.23 | - | 864.23 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 1,013.73 | - | 1,013.73 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,163.23 | - | 1,163.23 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,312.73 | - | 1,312.73 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,462.23 | - | 1,462.23 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,611.73 | - | 1,611.73 | 8.3 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 780.51 | $ 59.21 | 8.2% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 473.76 | $ | - | $ | 473.76 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 475.19 | (0.86) | 474.33 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 477.52 | (2.26) | 475.26 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 479.85 | (3.65) | 476.20 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 482.18 | (5.05) | 477.13 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 484.51 | (6.45) | 478.06 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 487.75 | (8.39) | 479.36 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 490.99 | - | 490.99 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 494.23 | - | 494.23 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 497.47 | - | 497.47 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 500.71 | - | 500.71 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 521.41 | - | 521.41 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 543.91 | - | 543.91 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 569.11 | - | 569.11 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 720.11 | - | 720.11 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 871.11 | - | 871.11 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 1,022.11 | - | 1,022.11 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,173.11 | - | 1,173.11 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,324.11 | - | 1,324.11 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,475.11 | - | 1,475.11 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,626.11 | - | 1,626.11 | 9.2 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 786.26 | $ 64.96 | 9.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 476.80 | $ | - | $ | 476.80 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 478.25 | (0.87) | 477.38 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 480.61 | (2.29) | 478.32 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 482.97 | (3.70) | 479.27 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 485.33 | (5.12) | 480.21 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 487.69 | (6.53) | 481.16 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 490.96 | (8.50) | 482.46 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 494.23 | - | 494.23 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 497.50 | - | 497.50 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 500.77 | - | 500.77 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 504.04 | - | 504.04 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 524.94 | - | 524.94 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 547.66 | - | 547.66 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 573.11 | - | 573.11 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 725.36 | - | 725.36 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 877.61 | - | 877.61 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 1,029.86 | - | 1,029.86 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,182.11 | - | 1,182.11 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,334.36 | - | 1,334.36 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,486.61 | - | 1,486.61 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,638.86 | - | 1,638.86 | 10.1 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 3” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 65000 | $ 721.30 | $ 787.00 | $ 65.70 | 9.1% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 442.88 | $ | - | $ | 442.88 | $ | 477.12 | $ | - | $ | 477.12 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 444.18 | (0.85) | 443.34 | 478.57 | (0.87) | 477.70 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 446.30 | (2.22) | 444.08 | 480.93 | (2.29) | 478.64 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 448.42 | (3.60) | 444.82 | 483.29 | (3.70) | 479.59 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 450.54 | (4.98) | 445.56 | 485.65 | (5.12) | 480.53 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 452.66 | (6.36) | 446.30 | 488.01 | (6.53) | 481.48 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 455.60 | (8.27) | 447.33 | 491.28 | (8.50) | 482.78 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 458.54 | (10.18) | 448.36 | 494.55 | - | 494.55 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 461.48 | - | 461.48 | 497.82 | - | 497.82 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 464.42 | - | 464.42 | 501.09 | - | 501.09 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 467.36 | - | 467.36 | 504.36 | - | 504.36 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 486.16 | - | 486.16 | 525.26 | - | 525.26 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 506.60 | - | 506.60 | 548.00 | - | 548.00 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 529.50 | - | 529.50 | 573.50 | - | 573.50 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 666.50 | - | 666.50 | 726.00 | - | 726.00 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 803.50 | - | 803.50 | 878.50 | - | 878.50 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 940.50 | - | 940.50 | 1,031.00 | - | 1,031.00 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,077.50 | - | 1,077.50 | 1,183.50 | - | 1,183.50 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,214.50 | - | 1,214.50 | 1,336.00 | - | 1,336.00 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,351.50 | - | 1,351.50 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,488.50 | - | 1,488.50 | 1,641.00 | - | 1,641.00 | 10.2 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 687.08 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 0.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 704.90 | $ 17.82 | 2.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 710.00 | $ | - | $ | 710.00 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 711.35 | (0.81) | 710.54 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 713.55 | (2.13) | 711.42 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 715.75 | (3.45) | 712.30 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 717.95 | (4.77) | 713.18 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 720.15 | (6.09) | 714.06 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 723.20 | (7.92) | 715.28 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 726.25 | - | 726.25 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 729.30 | - | 729.30 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 732.35 | - | 732.35 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 735.40 | - | 735.40 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 754.90 | - | 754.90 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 776.10 | - | 776.10 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 799.85 | - | 799.85 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 942.10 | - | 942.10 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,084.35 | - | 1,084.35 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,226.60 | - | 1,226.60 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,368.85 | - | 1,368.85 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,511.10 | - | 1,511.10 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,653.35 | - | 1,653.35 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,795.60 | - | 1,795.60 | 3.3 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 720.22 | $ 33.14 | 4.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 725.50 | $ | - | $ | 725.50 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 726.89 | (0.83) | 726.06 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 729.16 | (2.20) | 726.96 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 731.43 | (3.56) | 727.87 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 733.70 | (4.92) | 728.78 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 735.97 | (6.28) | 729.69 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 739.12 | (8.17) | 730.95 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 742.27 | - | 742.27 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 745.42 | - | 745.42 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 748.57 | - | 748.57 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 751.72 | - | 751.72 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 771.87 | - | 771.87 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 793.76 | - | 793.76 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 818.26 | - | 818.26 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 965.01 | - | 965.01 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,111.76 | - | 1,111.76 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,258.51 | - | 1,258.51 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,405.26 | - | 1,405.26 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,552.01 | - | 1,552.01 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,698.76 | - | 1,698.76 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,845.51 | - | 1,845.51 | 6.2 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2017 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 724.92 | $ 37.84 | 5.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 730.25 | $ | - | $ | 730.25 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 731.66 | (0.85) | 730.81 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 733.95 | (2.22) | 731.73 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 736.24 | (3.59) | 732.65 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 738.53 | (4.97) | 733.56 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 740.82 | (6.34) | 734.48 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 744.00 | (8.25) | 735.75 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 747.18 | - | 747.18 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 750.36 | - | 750.36 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 753.54 | - | 753.54 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 756.72 | - | 756.72 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 777.02 | - | 777.02 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 799.10 | - | 799.10 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 823.85 | - | 823.85 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 971.85 | - | 971.85 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,119.85 | - | 1,119.85 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,267.85 | - | 1,267.85 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,415.85 | - | 1,415.85 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,563.85 | - | 1,563.85 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,711.85 | - | 1,711.85 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,859.85 | - | 1,859.85 | 7.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2018 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 730.11 | $ 43.03 | 6.3% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 735.50 | $ | - | $ | 735.50 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 736.92 | (0.85) | 736.07 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 739.23 | (2.24) | 736.99 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 741.54 | (3.62) | 737.92 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 743.85 | (5.01) | 738.84 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 746.16 | (6.40) | 739.76 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 749.37 | (8.32) | 741.05 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 752.58 | - | 752.58 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 755.79 | - | 755.79 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 759.00 | - | 759.00 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 762.21 | - | 762.21 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 782.71 | - | 782.71 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 805.01 | - | 805.01 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 830.01 | - | 830.01 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 979.51 | - | 979.51 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,129.01 | - | 1,129.01 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,278.51 | - | 1,278.51 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,428.01 | - | 1,428.01 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,577.51 | - | 1,577.51 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,727.01 | - | 1,727.01 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,876.51 | - | 1,876.51 | 8.0 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2019 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 734.80 | $ 47.72 | 6.9% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 740.25 | $ | - | $ | 740.25 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 741.68 | (0.86) | 740.82 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 744.01 | (2.26) | 741.75 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 746.34 | (3.65) | 742.69 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 748.67 | (5.05) | 743.62 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 751.00 | (6.45) | 744.55 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 754.24 | (8.39) | 745.85 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 757.48 | - | 757.48 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 760.72 | - | 760.72 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 763.96 | - | 763.96 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 767.20 | - | 767.20 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 787.90 | - | 787.90 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 810.40 | - | 810.40 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 835.60 | - | 835.60 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 986.60 | - | 986.60 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,137.60 | - | 1,137.60 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,288.60 | - | 1,288.60 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,439.60 | - | 1,439.60 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,590.60 | - | 1,590.60 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,741.60 | - | 1,741.60 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,892.60 | - | 1,892.60 | 8.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2020 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 739.54 | $ 52.46 | 7.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 745.00 | $ | - | $ | 745.00 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 746.45 | (0.87) | 745.58 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 748.81 | (2.29) | 746.52 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 751.17 | (3.70) | 747.47 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 753.53 | (5.12) | 748.41 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 755.89 | (6.53) | 749.36 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 759.16 | (8.50) | 750.66 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 762.43 | - | 762.43 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 765.70 | - | 765.70 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 768.97 | - | 768.97 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 772.24 | - | 772.24 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 793.14 | - | 793.14 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 815.86 | - | 815.86 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 841.31 | - | 841.31 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 993.56 | - | 993.56 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,145.81 | - | 1,145.81 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,298.06 | - | 1,298.06 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,450.31 | - | 1,450.31 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,602.56 | - | 1,602.56 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,754.81 | - | 1,754.81 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,907.06 | - | 1,907.06 | 9.8 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company | Settlement H-4 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 Typical Bill Analysis Proposed Settlement Rates | ||
2021 |
Rate Schedule: 4” Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 7500 | $ 687.08 | $ 740.04 | $ 52.96 | 7.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 692.00 | $ | - | $ | 692.00 | $ | 745.50 | $ | - | $ | 745.50 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 693.30 | (0.85) | 692.46 | 746.95 | (0.87) | 746.08 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 695.42 | (2.22) | 693.20 | 749.31 | (2.29) | 747.02 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 697.54 | (3.60) | 693.94 | 751.67 | (3.70) | 747.97 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 699.66 | (4.98) | 694.68 | 754.03 | (5.12) | 748.91 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 701.78 | (6.36) | 695.42 | 756.39 | (6.53) | 749.86 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 704.72 | (8.27) | 696.45 | 759.66 | (8.50) | 751.16 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 707.66 | (10.18) | 697.48 | 762.93 | - | 762.93 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 710.60 | - | 710.60 | 766.20 | - | 766.20 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 713.54 | - | 713.54 | 769.47 | - | 769.47 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 716.48 | - | 716.48 | 772.74 | - | 772.74 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 735.28 | - | 735.28 | 793.64 | - | 793.64 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 755.72 | - | 755.72 | 816.38 | - | 816.38 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 778.62 | - | 778.62 | 841.88 | - | 841.88 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 915.62 | - | 915.62 | 994.38 | - | 994.38 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,052.62 | - | 1,052.62 | 1,146.88 | - | 1,146.88 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,189.62 | - | 1,189.62 | 1,299.38 | - | 1,299.38 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,326.62 | - | 1,326.62 | 1,451.88 | - | 1,451.88 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,463.62 | - | 1,463.62 | 1,604.38 | - | 1,604.38 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,600.62 | - | 1,600.62 | 1,756.88 | - | 1,756.88 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,737.62 | - | 1,737.62 | 1,909.38 | - | 1,909.38 | 9.9 | % |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT A
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc.
Schedules
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement A-1 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) COMPANY ORIGINAL COST | (B) COMPANY FAIR VALUE | (C) SETTLEMENT ORIGINAL COST | (D) VALUE | |||||||||||||||
1 | Adjusted Rate Base | $ | 2,359,391 | $ | 2,359,391 | $ | 2,278,955 | $ | 2,278,955 | |||||||||||
2 | Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (58,493) | $ | (58,493) | $ | (71,868) | $ | (71,868) | |||||||||||
3 | Current Rate of Return (L2 / L1) | -2.48% | -2.48% | -3.15% | -3.15% | |||||||||||||||
4 | Required Rate of Return | 10.60% | 10.60% | 7.50% | 7.50% | |||||||||||||||
5 | Required Operating Income (L4 * L1) | $ | 250,024 | $ | 250,024 | $ | 170,922 | $ | 170,922 | |||||||||||
6 | Operating Income Deficiency (L5 - L2) | $ | 308,517 | $ | 308,517 | $ | 242,790 | $ | 242,790 | |||||||||||
7 | Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | 1.645086 | 1.645086 | 1.665100 | 1.665100 | |||||||||||||||
8 | Required Revenue Increase (L7 * L6) | $ | 507,537 | $ | 507,537 | $ | 404,269 | $ | 404,269 | |||||||||||
9 | Adjusted Test Year Revenue | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | |||||||||||
10 | Proposed Annual Revenue (L8 + L9) | $ | 1,210,190 | $ | 1,210,190 | $ | 1,106,922 | $ | 1,106,922 | |||||||||||
11 | Required Increase in Revenue (%) | 72.23% | 72.23% | 57.53% | 57.53% | |||||||||||||||
12 | Rate of Return on Common Equity (%) | 11.44% | 11.44% | 9.50% | 9.50% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Schedule: A-1a | |||
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Settlement Phase In | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
REVENUE PHASE IN PER SETTLEMENT
Year | Revenue Increase (Relative to Test Year) | Revenue Increase (Relative to Previous Year) | ||||||
2014 | - | - | ||||||
2015 | 202,135 | 202,135 | ||||||
2016 | 404,269 | 202,134 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement Gross Revenue Conversion Factor | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | GRCF | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
GROSS REVENUE CONVERSION FACTOR
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | (A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||
Calculation of Gross Revenue Conversion Factor: | ||||||||||||||
1 | Revenue | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
2 | Uncollecible Factor (Line 11) | 0.3561% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
3 | Revenues (L1 - L2) | 99.6439% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
4 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (Line 23) | 39.5874% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
5 | Subtotal (L3 - L4) | 60.0564% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
6 | Revenue Conversion Factor (L1 / L5) | 1.665100 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Uncollecttible Factor: | ||||||||||||||
7 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
8 | Combined Federal and State Tax Rate (Line 17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
9 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L7 - L8 ) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
10 | Uncollectible Rate | 0.5800% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
11 | Uncollectible Factor (L9 * L10) | 0.3561% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Tax Rate: | ||||||||||||||
12 | Operating Income Before Taxes (Arizona Taxable Income) | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
13 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
14 | Federal Taxable Income (L12 - L13) | 93.0320% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
15 | Applicable Federal Income Tax Rate (Line 44) | 34.0000% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
16 | Effective Federal Income Tax Rate (L14 x L15) | 31.6309% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
17 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax Rate (L13 +L16) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Calculation of Effective Property Tax Factor | ||||||||||||||
18 | Unity | 100.0000% | ||||||||||||
19 | Combined Federal and State income Tax Rate (L17) | 38.5989% | ||||||||||||
20 | One Minus Combined Income Tax Rate (L18-L19) | 61.4011% | ||||||||||||
21 | Property Tax Factor (ADJ 8, L25) | 1.6100% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
22 | Effective Property Tax Factor (L20*L21) | 0.9886% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
23 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax and Property Tax Rate (L17+L22) | 39.5874% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
24 | Required Operating Income (Schedule A-1) | $ | 170,922 | |||||||||||
25 | AdjustedTest Year Operating Income (Loss) (Schedule C-1, Line 36) | $ | (71,868) | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
26 | Required Increase in Operating Income (L24 - L25) | $ | 242,790 | |||||||||||
27 | Income Taxes on Recommended Revenue (Col. (C), L48) | $ | 57,306 | |||||||||||
28 | Income Taxes on Test Year Revenue (Col. (A), L48) | $ | (95,321) | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Income Taxes (L27 - L28) | $ | 152,626 | |||||||||||
30 | Required Revenue Increase (Schedule A-1, Line 8) | $ | 404,269 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
31 | Uncollectible Rate (Line 10) | 0.5800% | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Uncollectible Expense on Recommended Revenue (L30 * L31) | $ | 2,345 | |||||||||||
33 | Adjusted Test Year Uncollectible Expense - N/A | $ | - | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
34 | Required Increase in Revenue to Provide for Uncollectible Exp. | $ | 2,345 | |||||||||||
35 | Property Tax with Recommended Revenue (ADJ 8, Line 21) | $ | 40,440 | |||||||||||
36 | Property Tax on Test Year Revenue (ADJ 8, Col A, L19) | $ | 33,931 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
37 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue (L35-L36) | $ | 6,509 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
38 | Total Required Increase in Revenue (L26 + L29 + L34+ L37) | $ | 404,270 | |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
Test Year | ||||||||||||||
Recommended | ||||||||||||||
Calculation of Income Tax: | ||||||||||||||
39 | Revenue (Schedule C-1) | $ | 702,652 | $ | 1,106,923 | |||||||||
40 | Operating Expenses Excluding Income Taxes | $ | 869,841 | $ | 878,695 | |||||||||
41 | Synchronized Interest (L53) | $ | 79,763 | $ | 79,763 | |||||||||
42 | Arizona Taxable Income (L39 - L40 - L41) | $ | (246,952) | $ | 148,464 | |||||||||
43 | Arizona State Income Tax Rate | 6.9680% | 6.9680% | |||||||||||
44 | Arizona Income Tax (L42 x L43) | $ | (17,208) | $ | 10,345 | |||||||||
45 | Federal Taxable Income (L42 - L44) | $ | (229,745) | $ | 138,119 | |||||||||
46 | Federal Tax | $ | (78,113) | $ | 46,961 | |||||||||
47 | Total Federal Income Tax | $ | (78,113) | $ | 46,961 | |||||||||
48 | Combined Federal and State Income Tax (L43 + L47) | $ | (95,321) | $ | 57.306 | |||||||||
50 | Effective Tax Rate | |||||||||||||
Calculation of Interest Synchronization: | N/A | |||||||||||||
51 | Rate Base (Schedule B-1) | $ | 2,278,955 | |||||||||||
52 | Weighted Average Cost of Debt | 3.5000% | ||||||||||||
53 | Synchronized Interest (L50 X L51) | $ | 79,763 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement B-1 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE - ORIGINAL COST
(A) | (B) | (C) | ||||||||||||
LINE NO. | COMPANY AS FILED | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTED | |||||||||||
1 | Plant in Service | $ | 5,113,538 | $ | (80,436) | $ | 5,033,102 | |||||||
2 | Less: Accumulated Depreciation | (1,742,556) | - | (1,742,556) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 3,370,982 | $ | (80,436) | $ | 3,290,546 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
LESS: | ||||||||||||||
4 | Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||
5 | Less: Accumulated Amortization | - | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
6 | Net CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
7 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 610,760 | - | 610,760 | ||||||||||
8 | Imputed Reg AIAC | - | ||||||||||||
9 | Imputed Reg CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
10 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Credits | 391,114 | - | 391,114 | ||||||||||
Customer Meter Deposits | 36,233 | 36,233 | ||||||||||||
ADD: | ||||||||||||||
11 | Accumulated Deferred Income Tax Debits | 26,516 | - | 26,516 | ||||||||||
12 | Cash Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||
13 | Deferred Compensation | - | - | - | ||||||||||
14 | CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||
15 | Fixed Asset Depreciation | - | - | - | ||||||||||
16 | Deferred Debits | - | - | - | ||||||||||
17 | Purchase Wastewater Treatment Charges | - | - | |||||||||||
18 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,359,391 | $ | (80,436) | $ | 2,278,955 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule B-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement B-2 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL COST RATE BASE ADJUSTMENTS
[A] | [B] | [I] | ||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | ACCT. NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY | Reclassification and PTYP ADJ B-2a | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||
AS FILED | ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||
PLANT IN SERVICE: | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 18,293 | $ | - | $ | 18,293 | ||||||||||
2 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 464,273 | 464,273 | ||||||||||||||
3 | 306 | Lake, River and Other Intakes | - | - | ||||||||||||||
4 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 1,623,786 | 1,623,786 | ||||||||||||||
5 | 309 | Supply Mains | 5,441 | 5,441 | ||||||||||||||
6 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 10,751 | 10,751 | ||||||||||||||
7 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 537,335 | 537,335 | ||||||||||||||
8 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | 572,865 | (572,865) | - | |||||||||||||
9 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 303,188 | 303,188 | ||||||||||||||
10 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 269,677 | 269,677 | ||||||||||||||
11 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | 265,900 | (265,900) | - | |||||||||||||
12 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 220,751 | 220,751 | ||||||||||||||
13 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 45,148 | 45,148 | ||||||||||||||
14 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 670,561 | 670,561 | ||||||||||||||
15 | 333 | Services | 96,681 | 96,681 | ||||||||||||||
16 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 533,416 | 533,416 | ||||||||||||||
17 | 335 | Hydrants | 47,803 | 47,803 | ||||||||||||||
18 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 1,024 | 1,024 | ||||||||||||||
19 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 20,318 | 20,318 | ||||||||||||||
20 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 22,646 | 22,646 | ||||||||||||||
21 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 21,527 | 21,527 | ||||||||||||||
22 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 43,388 | 43,388 | ||||||||||||||
23 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 9,508 | 9,508 | ||||||||||||||
24 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 38,925 | 38,925 | ||||||||||||||
25 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 13,877 | 13,877 | ||||||||||||||
26 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 90,659 | (80,436) | 10,223 | |||||||||||||
27 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 3,937 | 3,937 | ||||||||||||||
28 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 625 | 625 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
29 | ||||||||||||||||||
30 | Total Plant in Service | 5,113,538 | (80,436) | 5,033,102 | ||||||||||||||
31 | Accumulated Depreciation | (1,742,556) | - | (1,742,556) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
32 | Net Plant in Service | $ | 3,370,982 | $ | (80,436) | $ | 3,290,546 | |||||||||||
33 | ||||||||||||||||||
34 | LESS: | |||||||||||||||||
35 | Net Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||
36 | Advances in Aid of Construction (AIAC) | 610,760 | - | 610,760 | ||||||||||||||
37 | Customer Meter Deposits | 36,233 | 36,233 | |||||||||||||||
38 | Deferred Income Tax Credits | 391,114 | 391,114 | |||||||||||||||
39 | ||||||||||||||||||
40 | ADD: | |||||||||||||||||
41 | Unamortized Finance Charges | - | - | |||||||||||||||
42 | Deferred Income Tax Assets | - | - | |||||||||||||||
43 | Meter Deposits | 16,555 | 16,555 | |||||||||||||||
44 | Deferred Gain | 794 | 794 | |||||||||||||||
45 | Bad debt | 4,414 | 4,414 | |||||||||||||||
46 | Deferred compensation | 4,754 | - | 4,754 | ||||||||||||||
47 | CIAC | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
48 | Working Capital | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
49 | Utility Plant Acquisition Adjustment | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
50 | - | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
51 | Original Cost Rate Base | $ | 2,359,391 | $ | (80,436) | $ | 2,278,955 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
52 | ||||||||||||||||||
53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supporting Schedules: | Recap Schedules: | |||||||||||||||||
B-2 | A-1 | |||||||||||||||||
B-3 | ||||||||||||||||||
E-1 | ||||||||||||||||||
B-5 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement B-2a | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Post Test Year Plant | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
RATE BASE ADJUSTMENT #1 POST TEST YEAR PLANT
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | ACCT NO. | Description | COMPANY FILED | SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||
1 | 348 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 80,436 | (80,436) | - | |||||||||||||||
Disallowed PTYP | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCADA - WVWC | $ 80,436 |
References:
Column [A] : Disallowed Amount reflected in Acct. 348, PTYP, Per Co Schedule B-2.1
Column [B] , Col [C] less Col [A]
Column [C] , Per Staff testimony GWB and Engineering testimony
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement C-1 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME STATEMENT - TEST YEAR AND SETTLEMENT
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | ||||||||||||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | COMPANY AS FILED | SETTLEMENT TEST YEAR ADJUSTMENTS | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED CHANGES | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | 689,274 | - | 689,274 | 404,270 | 1,093,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 13,378 | - | 13,378 | - | 13,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 702,652 | $ | - | $ | 702,652 | $ | 404,270 | $ | 1,106,923 | |||||||||||||
5 | 601 | Salary and Wages - Employees | $ | 263,312 | $ | (15,369) | $ | 247,943 | $ | - | $ | 247,943 | ||||||||||||
6 | 604 | Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 | Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
8 | 615 | Purchased Power | 43,747 | (4,751) | 38,997 | - | 38,997 | |||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 | Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 | Chemicals | 55,422 | (6,018) | 49,404 | - | 49,404 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 | Materials and Supplies | 36,002 | (15,453) | 20,549 | - | 20,549 | |||||||||||||||||
12 | 621 | Office Supplies and Expense | 27,025 | - | 27,025 | - | 27,025 | |||||||||||||||||
13 | 630 | Outside Services | 97,501 | (17,749) | 79,752 | - | 79,752 | |||||||||||||||||
14 | 635 | Contractual Services - Testing | 20,993 | (5,285) | 15,708 | - | 15,708 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | 636 | Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
16 | 641 | Rental of Building/Real Property | 10,241 | - | 10,241 | - | 10,241 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | 642 | Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
18 | 650 | Transportation Expenses | 24,173 | - | 24,173 | - | 24,173 | |||||||||||||||||
19 | 657 | Insurance - General Liability | 7,125 | - | 7,125 | - | 7,125 | |||||||||||||||||
20 | 659 | Insurance - Other | 4,218 | - | 4,218 | - | 4,218 | |||||||||||||||||
21 | 666 | Regulatory Commission Expense – Rate C | 9,922 | (4,880) | 5,042 | 5,042 | ||||||||||||||||||
22 | 667 | Rate Case Expense | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
23 | 670 | Bad Debt Expense | 8,251 | (4,175) | 4,075 | 2,345 | 6,420 | |||||||||||||||||
24 | 675 | Miscellaneous Expenses | 24,563 | (9,383) | 15,180 | 15,180 | ||||||||||||||||||
25 | 403 | Depreciation Expense | 200,668 | 85,029 | 285,696 | 285,696 | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | 408 | Taxes Other Than Income | 782 | - | 782 | 782 | ||||||||||||||||||
27 | 408 | Taxes Other Than Income - Property Taxes | 33,931 | - | 33,931 | 6,509 | 40,440 | |||||||||||||||||
28 | 409 | Income Taxes | (106,730) | 11,410 | (95,321) | 152,626 | 57,306 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
29 | Total Operating Expenses | 761,145 | 13,375 | 774,521 | 161,480 | 936,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
30 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (58,493) | $ | (13,375) | $ | (71,868) | $ | 242,790 | $ | 170,922 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A): Company Schedule C-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Schedule C-2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (D): Schedule A-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (E): Column (C) + Column (D) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement C-2 | |||
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
SUMMARY OF OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENTS - TEST YEAR
[A] | [B] | [C] | [D] | [E] | [E] | [F] | [H] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess Water | Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE | Loss | Bad Debts Exp | Rate Case Exp | Normalizations | Water Testing | Deprec. Exp | Income Taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | SCRIPTION | COMPANY | ADJ #1 | ADJ #2 | ADJ #3 | ADJ #4 | ADJ #5 | ADJ #6 | ADJ #7 | SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AS FILED | ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Metered Water Sales | $ | 689,274 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 689,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Water Sales - Unmetered | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | Other Operating Revenue | 13,378 | - | - | - | - | - | 13,378 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Total Operating Revenues | $ | 702,652 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 702,652 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 601 | Salary and Wages - Employees | 263,312 | - | - | (15,369) | - | - | 247,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 604 | Employee Pensions and Benefits | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 610 | Purchased Water | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 615 | Purchased Power | 43,747 | (4,751) | - | 38,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 616 | Fuel for Power Production | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 618 | Chemicals | 55,422 | (6,018) | - | - | 49,404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 620 | Materials and Supplies | 36,002 | - | - | (15,453) | 20,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 621 | Office Supplies and Expense | 27,025 | - | - | - | 27,025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 630 | Outside Services | 97,501 | - | - | (17,749) | 79,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | 635 | Contractual Services - Testing | 20,993 | - | - | - | (5,285) | 15,708 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 636 | Contractual Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 641 | Rental of Building/Real Property | 10,241 | - | - | - | 10,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 642 | Rental of Equipment | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | 650 | Transportation Expenses | 24,173 | - | - | - | 24,173 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 657 | Insurance - General Liability | 7,125 | - | - | - | 7,125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 659 | Insurance - Other | 4,218 | - | - | - | 4,218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 666 | Regulatory Commission Expense – Rate Case | 9,922 | - | - | (4,880) | - | 5,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 667 | Rate Case Expense | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 670 | Bad Debt Expense | 8,251 | - | (4,175) | - | 4,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 675 | Miscellaneous Expenses | 24,563 | (9,383) | 15,180 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25 | 403 | Depreciation Expense | 200,668 | 85,029 | 285,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26 | 408 | Taxes Other Than Income | 782 | 782 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27 | 408 | Taxes Other Than Income - Property Taxes | 33,931 | 33,931 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28 | 409 | Income Taxes | (106,730) | (95,321) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | Total Operating Expenses | $ | 761,145 | $ | (10,769) | $ | (4,175) | $ | (4,880) | $ | (57,954) | $ | (5,285) | $ | 85,029 | $ | 11,410 | $ | 774,521 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 | Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (58,493) | $ | 10,769 | $ | 4,175 | $ | 4,880 | $ | 57,954 | $ | 5,285 | $ | (85,029) | $ | (11,410) | $ | (71,868) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 1 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Water Loss | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #1 - EXCESS WATER LOSS
LINE NO. | ||||||||
1 | One plus allowable water loss | 110.00% | ||||||
2 | One plus actual water loss | 123.40% | ||||||
3 | Allowable portion | 89.14% | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4 | Disallowable portion | 10.86% | ||||||
5 | Power Expense | 43,747 | ||||||
6 | Disallowance | $ | 4,751 | |||||
7 | Chemical Expense | 55,422 | ||||||
8 | Disallowance | $ | 6,018 |
Line 1: Maximum acceptable level of water losses |
Line 2: Actual level of water losses |
Line 3: Line 2 / line 3 |
Line 4: 1 minus line 4 |
Line 6: Line 1 times line 5 |
Lines 1 - 6: See also Staff testimony GWB |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 2 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Bad Debt Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | [A] COMPANY PROPOSED | [B] SETTLEMENT ADJUSTMENTS | [C] SETTLEMENT | ||||||||||||
1 | $ | 8,251 | $ | (4,175) | $ | 4,075 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), Per Co Response to Staff DR 5.8 |
| |||||||||||||||
Adjusted Test Year Revenues |
| $ | 702,652 | |||||||||||||
Bad Debt Expense Rate |
| 0.58% | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Expected Bad Debt Expense |
| $ | 4,075 | |||||||||||||
Co Proposed |
| $ | 8,251 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | (4,175) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 3 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-I2-0315 | Rate Case Expense | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #3 - RATE CASE EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 9,922 | $ | (4,880 | ) | $ | 5,042 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company Proposed Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Allocation Percentages | 39.86 | % | 40.32 | % | 13.45 | % | 3.78 | % | 0.82 | % | 1.58 | % | 0.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | Desert Mountain Analytical Services | $ | 122,063 | $ | 48,652 | $ | 49,218 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 4,616 | $ | 996 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Insight Consulting, LLC | $ | 216,000 | $ | 86,094 | $ | 87,065 | $ | 29,057 | $ | 8,168 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 3,410 | $ | 413 | |||||||||||||||||
5 | Roshka Dewulf & Patten, PLC | $ | 370,303 | $ | 147,597 | $ | 149,313 | $ | 49,814 | $ | 14,004 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 5,846 | $ | 709 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Ullmann & Company P C | $ | 78,809 | $ | 31,412 | $ | 31,777 | $ | 10,502 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 643 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 151 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Total | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
8 | Amortization over 3 years: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Year 1 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
10 | Year 2 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
11 | Year 3 | $ | 262,391 | $ | 104,585 | $ | 105,801 | $ | 35,298 | $ | 9,923 | $ | 2,140 | $ | 4,142 | $ | 502 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Totals | $ | 787,174 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlement Rate Case Expense |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | Description | Total | Palo Verde | Santa Cruz | Town Division | Willow Valley | Tonopah | Buckeye | WUNS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Recommended Amount | $ | 400,000 | $ | 159,434 | $ | 161,287 | $ | 53,809 | $ | 15,127 | $ | 3,263 | $ | 6,315 | $ | 765 | |||||||||||||||||
15 | Amortization: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | Year 1 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
17 | Year 2 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
18 | Year 3 | $ | 133,333 | $ | 53,145 | $ | 53,762 | $ | 17,936 | $ | 5,042 | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,105 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Totals | $ | 400,000 | $ | 313,756 | $ | 317,402 | $ | 105,893 | $ | 29,768 | $ | 6,421 | $ | 12,427 | $ | 1,506 | |||||||||||||||||
20 | Adjustment Total, by System | $ | (129,058 | ) | $ | (51,441 | ) | $ | (52,038 | ) | $ | (17,361 | ) | $ | (4,881 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | (2,037 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (B): Line 20 for respective system |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Column (C): Line 16 for respective system |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 4 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Expense Normalizations | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #4 - EXPENSE NORMALIZATIONS
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||||
NO. | ACCT /DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED* | ||||||||||||
1 | 601 Salary andWages - Employees | $ | 263,312 | $ | (15,369 | ) | $ | 247,943 | ||||||||
2 | 620 Materials and Supplies | $ | 36,002 | $ | (15,453 | ) | $ | 20,549 | ||||||||
3 | 630 Outside Services | $ | 97,501 | $ | (17,749 | ) | $ | 79,752 | ||||||||
4 | 675 Miscellaneous Expenses | $ | 24,563 | $ | (9,383 | ) | $ | 15,180 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | 421,378 | $ | (57,954 | ) | $ | 363,424 | ||||||||||
References: |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB |
| |||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 5 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Water Testing | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #5 - WATER TESTING EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||
NO. | ACCT / DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | Contractual Services - Testing | $ | 20,993 | $ | (5,285 | ) | $ | 15,708 | ||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Workpapers | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B) |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 6 | |||
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Depreciation | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #6 - DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||||
LINE | ACCT. | PLANT | DEPRECIATION | DEPRECIATION | ||||||||||||
NO. | NO. | DESCRIPTION | BALANCE | RATE | EXPENSE | |||||||||||
1 | PLANT IN SERVICE: | |||||||||||||||
2 | 303 | Land and Land Rights | $ | 18,293 | 0.00 | % | - | |||||||||
3 | 304 | Structures and Improvements | 464,273 | 3.33 | % | 15,460 | ||||||||||
4 | 306 | Lake, River and Other Intakes | - | 2.50 | % | - | ||||||||||
5 | 307 | Wells and Springs | 1,623,786 | 3.33 | % | 54,072 | ||||||||||
6 | 309 | Supply Mains | 5,441 | 2.00 | % | 109 | ||||||||||
7 | 310 | Power Generation Equipment | 10,751 | 5.00 | % | 538 | ||||||||||
8 | 311 | Pumping Equipment | 537,335 | 12.50 | % | 67,167 | ||||||||||
9 | 320 | Water Treatment Equipment | - | 0.00 | % | - | ||||||||||
10 | 320.1 | Water Treatment Plant | 303,188 | 3.33 | % | 10,096 | ||||||||||
11 | 320.2 | Solution Chemical Feeders | 269,677 | 20.00 | % | 53,935 | ||||||||||
12 | 330 | Distribution Reservoirs and Standpipes | - | 0.00 | % | - | ||||||||||
13 | 330.1 | Storage Tanks | 220,751 | 2.22 | % | 4,901 | ||||||||||
14 | 330.2 | Pressure Tanks | 45,148 | 5.00 | % | 2,257 | ||||||||||
15 | 331 | Transmission and Distribution Mains | 670,561 | 2.00 | % | 13,411 | ||||||||||
16 | 333 | Services | 96,681 | 3.33 | % | 3,219 | ||||||||||
17 | 334 | Meters and Meter Installations | 533,416 | 8.33 | % | 44,434 | ||||||||||
18 | 335 | Hydrants | 47,803 | 2.00 | % | 956 | ||||||||||
19 | 336 | Backflow Prevention Devices | 1,024 | 6.67 | % | 68 | ||||||||||
20 | 339 | Other Plant and Miscellaneous Equipment | 20,318 | 6.67 | % | 1,355 | ||||||||||
21 | 340 | Office Furniture and Equipment | 22,646 | 6.67 | % | 1,510 | ||||||||||
22 | 341 | Transportation Equipment | 21,527 | 20.00 | % | �� | 4,305 | |||||||||
23 | 343 | Tools, Shop and Garage Equipment | 43,388 | 5.00 | % | 2,169 | ||||||||||
24 | 344 | Laboratory Equipment | 9,508 | 10.00 | % | 951 | ||||||||||
25 | 345 | Power Operated Equipment | 38,925 | 5.00 | % | 1,946 | ||||||||||
26 | 346 | Communication Equipment | 13,877 | 10.00 | % | 1,388 | ||||||||||
27 | 347 | Miscellaneous Equipment | 10,223 | 10.00 | % | 1,022 | ||||||||||
28 | 348 | Other Tangible Plant | 3,937 | 10.00 | % | 394 | ||||||||||
29 | 390 | Office Furniture & Equipment | 625 | 5.00 | % | 31 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
30 | 5,033,102 | 285,696 | ||||||||||||||
31 | Less: Non Depreciable Plant | |||||||||||||||
32 | Land and Land Rights | 18,293 | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
33 | Net Depreciable Plant and Depreciation Amounts | $ | 5,014,809 | $ | 285,696 | |||||||||||
34 | ||||||||||||||||
35 | ||||||||||||||||
36 | Amortization of CIAC | $ | - | 5.6971 | % | $ | - | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
37 | Settlement Depreciation Expense | $ | 285,696 | |||||||||||||
38 | Company Proposed Depreciation Expense | $ | 200,668 | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
39 | Settlement Adjustment | $ | 85,029 | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||||
Col [A] | Schedule B-2 | |||||||||||||||
Col [B] | Proposed Rates per Staff Engineering Report | |||||||||||||||
Col [C] | Col [A] times Col [B] |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 7 | |||
Docket No. W-01732A-I2-0315 | Income Taxes | |||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #7 - INCOME TAXES
[A] | [B] | [C] | ||||||||||||
LINE | COMPANY | SETTLEMENT | SETTLEMENT | |||||||||||
NO. | DESCRIPTION | PROPOSED | ADJUSTMENTS | RECOMMENDED | ||||||||||
1 | Income Taxes | $ | (106,730) | $ | 11,410 | $ | (95,321) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
References: | ||||||||||||||
Column (A), Company Schedule C-2 | ||||||||||||||
Column (B): Staff Testimony GWB | ||||||||||||||
Column (C): Column (A) + Column (B), |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement ADJ 8 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Property Taxes | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
OPERATING INCOME ADJUSTMENT #8 - PROPERTY TAX EXPENSE GRCF COMPONENT
[A] | [B] | |||||||||||
LINE NO. | DESCRIPTION | SETTLEMENT AS ADJUSTED | SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDED | |||||||||
1 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | |||||||
2 | Weight Factor | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
3 | Subtotal (Line 1 * Line 2) | 1,405,305 | 1,405,305 | |||||||||
4 | Adjusted Test Year Revenues - 2011 | 702,652 | ||||||||||
5 | Recommended Revenue | 1,106,925 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
6 | Subtotal (Line 4 + Line 5) | 2,107,957 | 2,512,230 | |||||||||
7 | Number of Years | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
8 | Three Year Average (Line 5 / Line 6) | 702,652 | 837,410 | |||||||||
9 | Department of Revenue Mutilplier | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
10 | Revenue Base Value (Line 7 * Line 8) | 1,405,305 | 1,674,820 | |||||||||
11 | Plus: 10% of CWIP | 47 | 47 | |||||||||
12 | Less: Net Book Value of Licensed Vehicles | 340 | 340 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
13 | Full Cash Value (Line 10 + Line 11 - Line 12) | 1,405,012 | 1,674,527 | |||||||||
14 | Assessment Ratio | 21.0% | 21.0% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
15 | Assessment Value (Line 13 * Line 14) | 295,052 | 351,651 | |||||||||
16 | Composite Property Tax Rate | 11.5000% | 11.5000% | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
17 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 33,931 | |||||||||
18 | Company Proposed Property Tax | $ | 33,931 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
19 | Test Year Adjustment (Line 17 - Line 18) | $ | 0 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
20 | Property Tax on Recommended Revenue (Line 15 * Line 16) | $ | 40,440 | |||||||||
21 | Test Year Adjusted Property Tax Expense (Line 17) | $ | 33,931 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
22 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 6,509 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
23 | Increase in Property Tax Due to Increase in Revenue Requirement (Line 22) | $ | 6,509 | |||||||||
24 | Increase in Revenue Requirement | $ | 404,272 | |||||||||
25 | Increase in Property Tax Per Dollar Increase in Revenue (Line 23 / Line 24) | 1.61000% | ||||||||||
REFERENCES: Line 15: Composite Tax Rate, per Company Line 18: Company Schedule C-1, Line 36 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement D-1 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL - REQUIRED RATE OF RETURN
Percent of Total | Cost Rate | Weighted Cost | ||||||||||||||
Debt | 57.8% | 6.1% | 3.5% | |||||||||||||
Equity | 42.2% | 9.5% | 4.0% | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Required Rate of Return | 7.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Global Water - Willow Valley Water Company (Willow Valley) | Settlement Schedule H-3 | |
Docket No. W-01732A-12-0315 | Page 1 of 2 | |
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Changes in Representative Rate Schedules
Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes*
Monthly Minimum Charges;
Basic Service Charge | ||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||
Meter Size (All Classes*) | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
5/8" X 3/4" Meter | $ | 21.12 | $ | 21.12 | $ | 26.56 | $ | 32.00 | ||||||||
3/4" Meter | 21.12 | 21.12 | 26.56 | 32.00 | ||||||||||||
1" Meter | 52.80 | 52.80 | 66.40 | 80.00 | ||||||||||||
1.5" Meter | 105.60 | 105.60 | 132.80 | 160.00 | ||||||||||||
2" Meter | 168.96 | 168.96 | 212.48 | 256.00 | ||||||||||||
3" Meter | 337.92 | 337.92 | 424.96 | 512.00 | ||||||||||||
4" Meter | 528.00 | 528.00 | 664.00 | 800.00 | ||||||||||||
6" Meter | 1,056.00 | 1,056.00 | 1,328.00 | 1,600.00 | ||||||||||||
6" Meter | 2,112.00 | 1,689.60 | 2,124.80 | 2,560.00 |
Commodity Rate Charges (per 1,000 gallons):
Rate Block | Volumetric Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Present | Proposed | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Tier One Breakover | 1,000 Gallons | 1,000 Gallons | $ | 1.48 | $ | 1.48 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 2.50 | ||||||||||||||
Tier Two Breakover | 5,000 Gallons | 5,000 Gallons | 2.99 | 2.99 | 4.02 | 5.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Three Breakover | 10,000 Gallons | 10,000 Gallons | 4.51 | 4.51 | 6.07 | 7.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Four Breakover | 16,000 Gallons | 18,000 Gallons | 6.00 | 6.00 | 8.08 | 10.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Five Breakover | 25,000 Gallons | 25,000 Gallons | 7.50 | 7.50 | 10.10 | 12.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier Six Breakover | Over 25,000 | Over 25,000 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 12.11 | 15.17 |
Conservation Rebate
Proposed | ||||||||||||
Present | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter | ||||||||||
Threshold (“CRT”) in Gallons | 6,401 | 6,401 | 6,401 | |||||||||
Commodity rate rebate: | 45% | 45% | 50% | |||||||||
(applied if consumption is below the CRT) |
*Includes all potable water meters including irrigation meters.
Non-Potable Water - All Meter Sizes and Classes | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per Acre Foot) | 185.74 | 533.76 | 346.02 | |||||||||
All Gallons (Per 1,000 Gallons) | 0.57 | 1.64 | 1.07 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Settlement Schedule H-3
Page 2 of 2
Miscellaneous Service Charges | Present | Proposed | Change | |||||||||
Establishment of Service | $ | 35.00 | $ | 35.00 | $ | - | ||||||
Establishment of Service - After Hours | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Re-establishment of Service (Within 12 Months) | (a) | (a) | ||||||||||
Reconnection of Service (Delinquent) | 35.00 | 35.00 | - | |||||||||
Reconnection of Service - After Hours (Delinquent) | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
Meter Move at Customer Request | (b) | (b) | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge, Per Hour | 50.00 | Eliminate | ||||||||||
After Hours Service Charge | NA | 35.00 | ||||||||||
Deposit | (c) | (c) | ||||||||||
Meter Re-Read (If Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Meter Test Fee (if Correct) | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
NSF Check | 30.00 | 30.00 | - | |||||||||
Late Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 0.00% | |||||||||
Deferred Payment Charge (Per Month) | 1.50% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
(a) | Number of Months off System times the monthly minimum per A.A.C. R14-2-403(D). |
(b) | Cost to include parts, labor, overhead and all applicable taxes per A.A.C R14-2-405(B)(5). |
(c) | Per A.A.C. R14-2-403(B). |
In addition to the collection of its regular rates and charges, the company shall collect from customers their proportionate share of any privilege, sales or use tax in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-409(D)(5).
Service Line and Meter installation Charges (Refundable Pursuant to A.A.C. R14-2-405)
Meter Size | Present Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Proposed Service Line Charges | Meter Charges | Total Charges | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
5/8 X 3/4" Meter | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | $445.00 | $155.00 | $600.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/4" Meter | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 445.00 | 255.00 | 700.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
1" Meter | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 495.00 | 315.00 | 810.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 1/2" Meter | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 550.00 | 525.00 | 1,075.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2" Turbine Meter | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 830.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,875.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2" Compound Meter | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 830.00 | 1,890.00 | 2,720.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
3" Turbine Meter | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 1,045.00 | 1,670.00 | 2,715.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
3" Compound Meter | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 1,165.00 | 2,545.00 | 3,710.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
4" Turbine Meter | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 1,490.00 | 2,670.00 | 4,160.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
4" Compound Meter | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 1,670.00 | 3,645.00 | 5,315.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
6" Turbine Meter | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 2,210.00 | 5,025.00 | 7,235.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
6" Compound Meter | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 2,330.00 | 6,920.00 | 9,250.00 | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
8" and Larger Meters | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost | Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8" and 3/4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2500 | $ 24.40 | $ 24.40 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 21.12 | $ | - | $ | 21.12 | $ | 21.12 | $ | - | $ | 21.12 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 22.60 | (0.67) | 21.93 | 22.60 | (0.67) | 21.93 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.59 | (2.01) | 23.58 | 25.59 | (2.01) | 23.58 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 28.58 | (3.36) | 25.22 | 28.58 | (3.36) | 25.22 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 31.57 | (4.70) | 26.87 | 31.57 | (4.70) | 26.87 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 34.56 | (6.05) | 28.51 | 34.56 | (6.05) | 28.51 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 39.07 | (8.08) | 30.99 | 39.07 | (8.08) | 30.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.58 | - | 43.58 | 43.58 | - | 43.58 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.09 | - | 48.09 | 48.09 | - | 48.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 52.60 | - | 52.60 | 52.60 | - | 52.60 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 57.11 | - | 57.11 | 57.11 | - | 57.11 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 87.11 | - | 87.11 | 87.11 | - | 87.11 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 120.11 | - | 120.11 | 120.11 | - | 120.11 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 157.61 | - | 157.61 | 157.61 | - | 157.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 382.61 | - | 382.61 | 382.61 | - | 382.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 607.61 | - | 607.61 | 607.61 | - | 607.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 832.61 | - | 832.61 | 832.61 | - | 832.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,057.61 | - | 1,057.61 | 1,057.61 | - | 1,057.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,282.61 | - | 1,282.61 | 1,282.61 | - | 1,282.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,507.61 | - | 1,507.61 | 1,507.61 | - | 1,507.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,732.61 | - | 1,732.61 | 1,732.61 | - | 1,732.61 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8" and 3/4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2500 | $ 24.40 | $ 30.57 | $ 6.17 | 25.3% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 21.12 | $ | - | $ | 21.12 | $ | 26.56 | $ | - | $ | 26.56 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 22.60 | (0.67) | 21.93 | 28.55 | (1.00) | 27.56 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.59 | (2.01) | 23.58 | 32.57 | (3.01) | 29.57 | 25.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 28.58 | (3.36) | 25.22 | 36.59 | (5.02) | 31.58 | 25.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 31.57 | (4.70) | 26.87 | 40.61 | (7.03) | 33.59 | 25.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 34.56 | (6.05) | 28.51 | 44.63 | (9.04) | 35.60 | 24.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 39.07 | (8.08) | 30.99 | 50.70 | (12.07) | 38.63 | 24.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.58 | - | 43.58 | 56.77 | - | 56.77 | 30.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.09 | - | 48.09 | 62.84 | - | 62.84 | 30.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 52.60 | - | 52.60 | 68.91 | - | 68.91 | 31.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 57.11 | - | 57.11 | 74.98 | - | 74.98 | 31.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 87.11 | - | 87.11 | 115.38 | - | 115.38 | 32.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 120.11 | - | 120.11 | 159.82 | - | 159.82 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 157.61 | - | 157.61 | 210.32 | - | 210.32 | 33.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 382.61 | - | 382.61 | 513.07 | - | 513.07 | 34.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 607.61 | - | 607.61 | 815.82 | - | 815.82 | 34.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 832.61 | - | 832.61 | 1,118.57 | - | 1,118.57 | 34.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,057.61 | - | 1,057.61 | 1,421.32 | - | 1,421.32 | 34.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,282.61 | - | 1,282.61 | 1,724.07 | - | 1,724.07 | 34.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,507.61 | - | 1,507.61 | 2,026.82 | - | 2,026.82 | 34.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,732.61 | - | 1,732.61 | 2,329.57 | - | 2,329.57 | 34.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 5/8" and 3/4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase�� | ||||||||
Median Usage | 2500 | $ 24.40 | $ 37.03 | $ 12.63 | 51.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 21.12 | $ | - | $ | 21.12 | $ | 32.00 | $ | - | $ | 32.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 22.60 | (0.67) | 21.93 | 34.50 | (1.25) | 33.25 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 25.59 | (2.01) | 23.58 | 39.54 | (3.77) | 35.77 | 51.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 28.58 | (3.36) | 25.22 | 44.58 | (6.29) | 38.29 | 51.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 31.57 | (4.70) | 26.87 | 49.62 | (8.81) | 40.81 | 51.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 34.56 | (6.05) | 28.51 | 54.66 | (11.33) | 43.33 | 52.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 39.07 | (8.08) | 30.99 | 62.26 | (15.13) | 47.13 | 52.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 43.58 | - | 43.58 | 69.86 | - | 69.86 | 60.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 48.09 | - | 48.09 | 77.46 | - | 77.46 | 61.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 52.60 | - | 52.60 | 85.06 | - | 85.06 | 61.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 57.11 | - | 57.11 | 92.66 | - | 92.66 | 62.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 87.11 | - | 87.11 | 143.26 | - | 143.26 | 64.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 120.11 | - | 120.11 | 198.92 | - | 198.92 | 65.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 157.61 | - | 157.61 | 262.17 | - | 262.17 | 66.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 382.61 | - | 382.61 | 641.42 | - | 641.42 | 67.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 607.61 | - | 607.61 | 1,020.67 | - | 1,020.67 | 68.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 832.61 | - | 832.61 | 1,399.92 | - | 1,399.92 | 68.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,057.61 | - | 1,057.61 | 1,779.17 | - | 1,779.17 | 68.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,282.61 | - | 1,282.61 | 2,158.42 | - | 2,158.42 | 68.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,507.61 | - | 1,507.61 | 2,537.67 | - | 2,537.67 | 68.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,732.61 | - | 1,732.61 | 2,916.92 | - | 2,916.92 | 68.4% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 4500 | $ 59.37 | $ 59.37 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 52.80 | $ | - | $ | 52.80 | $ | 52.80 | $ | - | $ | 52.80 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 54.28 | (0.67) | 53.61 | 54.28 | (0.67) | 53.61 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 57.27 | (2.01) | 55.26 | 57.27 | (2.01) | 55.26 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 60.26 | (3.36) | 56.90 | 60.26 | (3.36) | 56.90 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.25 | (4.70) | 58.55 | 63.25 | (4.70) | 58.55 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 66.24 | (6.05) | 60.19 | 66.24 | (6.05) | 60.19 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 70.75 | (8.08) | 62.67 | 70.75 | (8.08) | 62.67 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 75.26 | - | 75.26 | 75.26 | - | 75.26 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 79.77 | - | 79.77 | 79.77 | - | 79.77 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 84.28 | - | 84.28 | 84.28 | - | 84.28 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 88.79 | - | 88.79 | 88.79 | - | 88.79 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 118.79 | - | 118.79 | 118.79 | - | 118.79 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.79 | - | 151.79 | 151.79 | - | 151.79 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 189.29 | - | 189.29 | 189.29 | - | 189.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 414.29 | - | 414.29 | 414.29 | - | 414.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 639.29 | - | 639.29 | 639.29 | - | 639.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 864.29 | - | 864.29 | 864.29 | - | 864.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,089.29 | - | 1,089.29 | 1,089.29 | - | 1,089.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,314.29 | - | 1,314.29 | 1,314.29 | - | 1,314.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,539.29 | - | 1,539.29 | 1,539.29 | - | 1,539.29 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,764.29 | - | 1,764.29 | 1,764.29 | - | 1,764.29 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 4500 | $ 59.37 | $ 74.43 | $ 15.06 | 25.4% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 52.80 | $ | - | $ | 52.80 | $ | 66.40 | $ | - | $ | 66.40 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 54.28 | (0.67) | 53.61 | 68.39 | (1.00) | 67.40 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 57.27 | (2.01) | 55.26 | 72.41 | (3.01) | 69.41 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 60.26 | (3.36) | 56.90 | 76.43 | (5.02) | 71.42 | 25.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.25 | (4.70) | 58.55 | 80.45 | (7.03) | 73.43 | 25.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 66.24 | (6.05) | 60.19 | 84.47 | (9.04) | 75.44 | 25.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 70.75 | (8.08) | 62.67 | 90.54 | (12.07) | 78.47 | 25.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 75.26 | - | 75.26 | 96.61 | - | 96.61 | 28.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 79.77 | - | 79.77 | 102.68 | - | 102.68 | 28.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 84.28 | - | 84.28 | 108.75 | - | 108.75 | 29.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 88.79 | - | 88.79 | 114.82 | - | 114.82 | 29.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 118.79 | - | 118.79 | 155.22 | - | 155.22 | 30.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.79 | - | 151.79 | 199.66 | - | 199.66 | 31.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 189.29 | - | 189.29 | 250.16 | - | 250.16 | 32.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 414.29 | - | 414.29 | 552.91 | - | 552.91 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 639.29 | - | 639.29 | 855.66 | - | 855.66 | 33.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 864.29 | - | 864.29 | 1,158.41 | - | 1,158.41 | 34.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,089.29 | - | 1,089.29 | 1,461.16 | - | 1,461.16 | 34.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,314.29 | - | 1,314.29 | 1,763.91 | - | 1,763.91 | 34.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,539.29 | - | 1,539.29 | 2,066.66 | - | 2,066.66 | 34.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,764.29 | - | 1,764.29 | 2,369.41 | - | 2,369.41 | 34.3% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 4500 | $ 59.37 | $ 90.07 | $ 30.70 | 51.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 52.80 | $ | - | $ | 52.80 | $ | 80.00 | $ | - | $ | 80.00 | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | 54.28 | (0.67) | 53.61 | 82.50 | (1.25) | 81.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 57.27 | (2.01) | 55.26 | 87.54 | (3.77) | 83.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 60.26 | (3.36) | 56.90 | 92.58 | (6.29) | 86.29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 63.25 | (4.70) | 58.55 | 97.62 | (8.81) | 88.81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 66.24 | (6.05) | 60.19 | 102.66 | (11.33) | 91.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 70.75 | (8.08) | 62.67 | 110.26 | (15.13) | 95.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 75.26 | - | 75.26 | 117.86 | - | 117.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 79.77 | - | 79.77 | 125.46 | - | 125.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 84.28 | - | 84.28 | 133.06 | - | 133.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 88.79 | - | 88.79 | 140.66 | - | 140.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 118.79 | - | 118.79 | 191.26 | - | 191.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 151.79 | - | 151.79 | 246.92 | - | 246.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 189.29 | - | 189.29 | 310.17 | - | 310.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 414.29 | - | 414.29 | 689.42 | - | 689.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 639.29 | - | 639.29 | 1,068.67 | - | 1,068.67 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 31000 | $ 296.09 | $ 296.09 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 105.60 | $ | - | $ | 105.60 | $ | 105.60 | $ | - | $ | 105.60 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 107.08 | (0.67) | 106.41 | 107.08 | (0.67) | 106.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 110.07 | (2.01) | 108.06 | 110.07 | (2.01) | 108.06 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 113.06 | (3.36) | 109.70 | 113.06 | (3.36) | 109.70 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 116.05 | (4.70) | 111.35 | 116.05 | (4.70) | 111.35 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 119.04 | (6.05) | 112.99 | 119.04 | (6.05) | 112.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 123.55 | (8.08) | 115.47 | 123.55 | (8.08) | 115.47 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 128.06 | - | 128.06 | 128.06 | - | 128.06 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 132.57 | - | 132.57 | 132.57 | - | 132.57 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 137.08 | - | 137.08 | 137.08 | - | 137.08 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 141.59 | - | 141.59 | 141.59 | - | 141.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 171.59 | - | 171.59 | 171.59 | - | 171.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 204.59 | - | 204.59 | 204.59 | - | 204.59 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.09 | - | 242.09 | 242.09 | - | 242.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 467.09 | - | 467.09 | 467.09 | - | 467.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 692.09 | - | 692.09 | 692.09 | - | 692.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 917.09 | - | 917.09 | 917.09 | - | 917.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,142.09 | - | 1,142.09 | 1,142.09 | - | 1,142.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,367.09 | - | 1,367.09 | 1,367.09 | - | 1,367.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,592.09 | - | 1,592.09 | 1,592.09 | - | 1,592.09 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,817.09 | - | 1,817.09 | 1,817.09 | - | 1,817.09 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 31000 | $ 296.09 | $ 389.22 | $ 93.13 | 31.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 105.60 | $ | - | $ | 105.60 | $ | 132.80 | $ | - | $ | 132.80 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 107.08 | (0.67) | 106.41 | 134.79 | (1.00) | 133.80 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 110.07 | (2.01) | 108.06 | 138.81 | (3.01) | 135.81 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 113.06 | (3.36) | 109.70 | 142.83 | (5.02) | 137.82 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 116.05 | (4.70) | 111.35 | 146.85 | (7.03) | 139.83 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 119.04 | (6.05) | 112.99 | 150.87 | (9.04) | 141.84 | 25.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 123.55 | (8.08) | 115.47 | 156.94 | (12.07) | 144.87 | 25.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 128.06 | - | 128.06 | 163.01 | - | 163.01 | 27.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 132.57 | - | 132.57 | 169.08 | - | 169.08 | 27.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 137.08 | - | 137.08 | 175.15 | - | 175.15 | 27.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 141.59 | - | 141.59 | 181.22 | - | 181.22 | 28.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 171.59 | - | 171.59 | 221.62 | - | 221.62 | 29.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 204.59 | - | 204.59 | 266.06 | - | 266.06 | 30.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.09 | - | 242.09 | 316.56 | - | 316.56 | 30.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 467.09 | - | 467.09 | 619.31 | - | 619.31 | 32.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 692.09 | - | 692.09 | 922.06 | - | 922.06 | 33.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 917.09 | - | 917.09 | 1,224.81 | - | 1,224.81 | 33.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,142.09 | - | 1,142.09 | 1,527.56 | - | 1,527.56 | 33.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,367.09 | - | 1,367.09 | 1,830.31 | - | 1,830.31 | 33.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,592.09 | - | 1,592.09 | 2,133.06 | - | 2,133.06 | 34.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,817.09 | - | 1,817.09 | 2,435.81 | - | 2,435.81 | 34.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 1.5" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 31000 | $ 296.09 | $ 481.19 | $ 185.10 | 62.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 105.60 | $ | - | $ | 105.60 | $ | 160.00 | $ | - | $ | 160.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 107.08 | (0.67) | 106.41 | 162.50 | (1.25) | 161.25 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 110.07 | (2.01) | 108.06 | 167.54 | (3.77) | 163.77 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 113.06 | (3.36) | 109.70 | 172.58 | (6.29) | 166.29 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 116.05 | (4.70) | 111.35 | 177.62 | (8.81) | 168.81 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 119.04 | (6.05) | 112.99 | 182.66 | (11.33) | 171.33 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 123.55 | (8.08) | 115.47 | 190.26 | (15.13) | 175.13 | 51.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 128.06 | - | 128.06 | 197.86 | - | 197.86 | 54.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 132.57 | - | 132.57 | 205.46 | - | 205.46 | 55.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 137.08 | - | 137.08 | 213.06 | - | 213.06 | 55.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 141.59 | - | 141.59 | 220.66 | - | 220.66 | 55.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 171.59 | - | 171.59 | 271.26 | - | 271.26 | 58.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 204.59 | - | 204.59 | 326.92 | - | 326.92 | 59.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 242.09 | - | 242.09 | 390.17 | - | 390.17 | 61.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 467.09 | - | 467.09 | 769.42 | - | 769.42 | 64.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 692.09 | - | 692.09 | 1,148.67 | - | 1,148.67 | 66.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 917.09 | - | 917.09 | 1,527.92 | - | 1,527.92 | 66.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,142.09 | - | 1,142.09 | 1,907.17 | - | 1,907.17 | 67.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,367.09 | - | 1,367.09 | 2,286.42 | - | 2,286.42 | 67.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,592.09 | - | 1,592.09 | 2,665.67 | - | 2,665.67 | 67.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,817.09 | - | 1,817.09 | 3,044.92 | - | 3,044.92 | 67.6% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 2" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 180.07 | $ 180.07 | $ | - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 168.96 | $ | - | $ | 168.96 | $ | 168.96 | $ | - | $ | 168.96 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 170.44 | (0.67) | 169.77 | 170.44 | (0.67) | 169.77 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 173.43 | (2.01) | 171.42 | 173.43 | (2.01) | 171.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 176.42 | (3.36) | 173.06 | 176.42 | (3.36) | 173.06 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 179.41 | (4.70) | 174.71 | 179.41 | (4.70) | 174.71 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 182.40 | (6.05) | 176.35 | 182.40 | (6.05) | 176.35 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 186.91 | (8.08) | 178.83 | 186.91 | (8.08) | 178.83 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 191.42 | - | 191.42 | 191.42 | - | 191.42 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 195.93 | - | 195.93 | 195.93 | - | 195.93 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 200.44 | - | 200.44 | 200.44 | - | 200.44 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 204.95 | - | 204.95 | 204.95 | - | 204.95 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 234.95 | - | 234.95 | 234.95 | - | 234.95 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 267.95 | - | 267.95 | 267.95 | - | 267.95 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 305.45 | - | 305.45 | 305.45 | - | 305.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 530.45 | - | 530.45 | 530.45 | - | 530.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 755.45 | - | 755.45 | 755.45 | - | 755.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 980.45 | - | 980.45 | 980.45 | - | 980.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,205.45 | - | 1,205.45 | 1,205.45 | - | 1,205.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,430.45 | - | 1,430.45 | 1,430.45 | - | 1,430.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,655.45 | - | 1,655.45 | 1,655.45 | - | 1,655.45 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,880.45 | - | 1,880.45 | 1,880.45 | - | 1,880.45 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 2" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 180.07 | $ 226.07 | $ 45.99 | 25.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 168.96 | $ - | $ 168.96 | $ 212.48 | $ - | $ 212.48 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 170.44 | (0.67 | ) | 169.77 | 214.47 | (1.00 | ) | 213.48 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 173.43 | (2.01 | ) | 171.42 | 218.49 | (3.01 | ) | 215.49 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 176.42 | (3.36 | ) | 173.06 | 222.51 | (5.02 | ) | 217.50 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 179.41 | (4.70 | ) | 174.71 | 226.53 | (7.03 | ) | 219.51 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 182.40 | (6.05 | ) | 176.35 | 230.55 | (9.04 | ) | 221.52 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 186.91 | (8.08 | ) | 178.83 | 236.62 | (12.07 | ) | 224.55 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 191.42 | - | 191.42 | 242.69 | - | 242.69 | 26.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 195.93 | - | 195.93 | 248.76 | - | 248.76 | 27.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 200.44 | - | 200.44 | 254.83 | - | 254.83 | 27.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 204.95 | - | 204.95 | 260.90 | - | 260.90 | 27.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 234.95 | - | 234.95 | 301.30 | - | 301.30 | 28.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 267.95 | - | 267.95 | 345.74 | - | 345.74 | 29.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 305.45 | - | 305.45 | 396.24 | - | 396.24 | 29.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 530.45 | - | 530.45 | 698.99 | - | 698.99 | 31.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 755.45 | - | 755.45 | 1,001.74 | - | 1,001.74 | 32.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 980.45 | - | 980.45 | 1,304.49 | - | 1,304.49 | 33.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,205.45 | - | 1,205.45 | 1,607.24 | - | 1,607.24 | 33.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,430.45 | - | 1,430.45 | 1,909.99 | - | 1,909.99 | 33.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,655.45 | - | 1,655.45 | 2,212.74 | - | 2,212.74 | 33.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,880.45 | - | 1,880.45 | 2,515.49 | - | 2,515.49 | 33.8% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 2" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 6500 | $ 180.07 | $ 273.03 | $ 92.96 | 51.6% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 168.96 | $ - | $ 168.96 | $ 256.00 | $ - | $ 256.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 170.44 | (0.67 | ) | 169.77 | 258.50 | (1.25 | ) | 257.25 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 173.43 | (2.01 | ) | 171.42 | 263.54 | (3.77 | ) | 259.77 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 176.42 | (3.36 | ) | 173.06 | 268.58 | (6.29 | ) | 262.29 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 179.41 | (4.70 | ) | 174.71 | 273.62 | (8.81 | ) | 264.81 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 182.40 | (6.05 | ) | 176.35 | 278.66 | (11.33 | ) | 267.33 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 186.91 | (8.08 | ) | 178.83 | 286.26 | (15.13 | ) | 271.13 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 191.42 | - | 191.42 | 293.86 | - | 293.86 | 53.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 195.93 | - | 195.93 | 301.46 | - | 301.46 | 53.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 200.44 | - | 200.44 | 309.06 | - | 309.06 | 54.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 204.95 | - | 204.95 | 316.66 | - | 316.66 | 54.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 234.95 | - | 234.95 | 367.26 | - | 367.26 | 56.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 267.95 | - | 267.95 | 422.92 | - | 422.92 | 57.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 305.45 | - | 305.45 | 486.17 | - | 486.17 | 59.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 530.45 | - | 530.45 | 865.42 | - | 865.42 | 63.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 755.45 | - | 755.45 | 1,244.67 | - | 1,244.67 | 64.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 980.45 | - | 980.45 | 1,623.92 | - | 1,623.92 | 65.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,205.45 | - | 1,205.45 | 2,003.17 | - | 2,003.17 | 66.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,430.45 | - | 1,430.45 | 2,382.42 | - | 2,382.42 | 66.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,655.45 | - | 1,655.45 | 2,761.67 | - | 2,761.67 | 66.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 1,880.45 | - | 1,880.45 | 3,140.92 | - | 3,140.92 | 67.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 3" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 9000 | $ 369.40 | $ 369.40 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 337.92 | $ - | $ 337.92 | $ 337.92 | $ - | $ 337.92 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 339.40 | (0.67 | ) | 338.73 | 339.40 | (0.67 | ) | 338.73 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 342.39 | (2.01 | ) | 340.38 | 342.39 | (2.01 | ) | 340.38 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 345.38 | (3.36 | ) | 342.02 | 345.38 | (3.36 | ) | 342.02 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 348.37 | (4.70 | ) | 343.67 | 348.37 | (4.70 | ) | 343.67 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 351.36 | (6.05 | ) | 345.31 | 351.36 | (6.05 | ) | 345.31 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 355.87 | (8.08 | ) | 347.79 | 355.87 | (8.08 | ) | 347.79 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 360.38 | - | 360.38 | 360.38 | - | 360.38 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 364.89 | - | 364.89 | 364.89 | - | 364.89 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 369.40 | - | 369.40 | 369.40 | - | 369.40 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 373.91 | - | 373.91 | 373.91 | - | 373.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.91 | - | 403.91 | 403.91 | - | 403.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 436.91 | - | 436.91 | 436.91 | - | 436.91 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 474.41 | - | 474.41 | 474.41 | - | 474.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 699.41 | - | 699.41 | 699.41 | - | 699.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 924.41 | - | 924.41 | 924.41 | - | 924.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,149.41 | - | 1,149.41 | 1,149.41 | - | 1,149.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,374.41 | - | 1,374.41 | 1,374.41 | - | 1,374.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,599.41 | - | 1,599.41 | 1,599.41 | - | 1,599.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,824.41 | - | 1,824.41 | 1,824.41 | - | 1,824.41 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,049.41 | - | 2,049.41 | 2,049.41 | - | 2,049.41 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 3" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 9000 | $ 369.40 | $ 467.31 | $ 97.91 | 26.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 337.92 | $ - | $ 337.92 | $ 424.96 | $ - | $ 424.96 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 339.40 | (0.67 | ) | 338.73 | 426.95 | (1.00 | ) | 425.96 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 342.39 | (2.01 | ) | 340.38 | 430.97 | (3.01 | ) | 427.97 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 345.38 | (3.36 | ) | 342.02 | 434.99 | (5.02 | ) | 429.98 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 348.37 | (4.70 | ) | 343.67 | 439.01 | (7.03 | ) | 431.99 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 351.36 | (6.05 | ) | 345.31 | 443.03 | (9.04 | ) | 434.00 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 355.87 | (8.08 | ) | 347.79 | 449.10 | (12.07 | ) | 437.03 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 360.38 | - | 360.38 | 455.17 | - | 455.17 | 26.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 364.89 | - | 364.89 | 461.24 | - | 461.24 | 26.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 369.40 | - | 369.40 | 467.31 | - | 467.31 | 26.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 373.91 | - | 373.91 | 473.38 | - | 473.38 | 26.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.91 | - | 403.91 | 513.78 | - | 513.78 | 27.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 436.91 | - | 436.91 | 558.22 | - | 558.22 | 27.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 474.41 | - | 474.41 | 608.72 | - | 608.72 | 28.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 699.41 | - | 699.41 | 911.47 | - | 911.47 | 30.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 924.41 | - | 924.41 | 1,214.22 | - | 1,214.22 | 31.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,149.41 | - | 1,149.41 | 1,516.97 | - | 1,516.97 | 32.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,374.41 | - | 1,374.41 | 1,819.72 | - | 1,819.72 | 32.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,599.41 | - | 1,599.41 | 2,122.47 | - | 2,122.47 | 32.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,824.41 | - | 1,824.41 | 2,425.22 | - | 2,425.22 | 32.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,049.41 | - | 2,049.41 | 2,727.97 | - | 2,727.97 | 33.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 3" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 9000 | $ 369.40 | $ 565.06 | $ 195.66 | 53.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ 337.92 | $ - | $ 337.92 | $ 512.00 | $ - | $ 512.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 339.40 | (0.67 | ) | 338.73 | 514.50 | (1.25 | ) | 513.25 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 342.39 | (2.01 | ) | 340.38 | 519.54 | (3.77 | ) | 515.77 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 345.38 | (3.36 | ) | 342.02 | 524.58 | (6.29 | ) | 518.29 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 348.37 | (4.70 | ) | 343.67 | 529.62 | (8.81 | ) | 520.81 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 351.36 | (6.05 | ) | 345.31 | 534.66 | (11.33 | ) | 523.33 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 355.87 | (8.08 | ) | 347.79 | 542.26 | (15.13 | ) | 527.13 | 51.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 360.38 | - | 360.38 | 549.86 | - | 549.86 | 52.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 364.89 | - | 364.89 | 557.46 | - | 557.46 | 52.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 369.40 | - | 369.40 | 565.06 | - | 565.06 | 53.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 373.91 | - | 373.91 | 572.66 | - | 572.66 | 53.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 403.91 | - | 403.91 | 623.26 | - | 623.26 | 54.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 436.91 | - | 436.91 | 678.92 | - | 678.92 | 55.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 474.41 | - | 474.41 | 742.17 | - | 742.17 | 56.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 699.41 | - | 699.41 | 1,121.42 | - | 1,121.42 | 60.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 924.41 | - | 924.41 | 1,500.67 | - | 1,500.67 | 62.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,149.41 | - | 1,149.41 | 1,879.92 | - | 1,879.92 | 63.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,374.41 | - | 1,374.41 | 2,259.17 | - | 2,259.17 | 64.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,599.41 | - | 1,599.41 | 2,638.42 | - | 2,638.42 | 65.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 1,824.41 | - | 1,824.41 | 3,017.67 | - | 3,017.67 | 65.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,049.41 | - | 2,049.41 | 3,396.92 | - | 3,396.92 | 65.8% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 536.63 | $ 536.63 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 528.00 | $ | - | $ | 528.00 | $ | 528.00 | $ | - | $ | 528.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 529.48 | (0.67) | 528.81 | 529.48 | (0.67) | 528.81 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 532.47 | (2.01) | 530.46 | 532.47 | (2.01) | 530.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 535.46 | (3.36) | 532.10 | 535.46 | (3.36) | 532.10 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 538.45 | (4.70) | 533.75 | 538.45 | (4.70) | 533.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 541.44 | (6.05) | 535.39 | 541.44 | (6.05) | 535.39 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 545.95 | (8.08) | 537.87 | 545.95 | (8.08) | 537.87 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 550.46 | - | 550.46 | 550.46 | - | 550.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 554.97 | - | 554.97 | 554.97 | - | 554.97 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 559.48 | - | 559.48 | 559.48 | - | 559.48 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 563.99 | - | 563.99 | 563.99 | - | 563.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 593.99 | - | 593.99 | 593.99 | - | 593.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 626.99 | - | 626.99 | 626.99 | - | 626.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 664.49 | - | 664.49 | 664.49 | - | 664.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 889.49 | - | 889.49 | 889.49 | - | 889.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,114.49 | - | 1,114.49 | 1,114.49 | - | 1,114.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,339.49 | - | 1,339.49 | 1,339.49 | - | 1,339.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,564.49 | - | 1,564.49 | 1,564.49 | - | 1,564.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,789.49 | - | 1,789.49 | 1,789.49 | - | 1,789.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,014.49 | - | 2,014.49 | 2,014.49 | - | 2,014.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,239.49 | - | 2,239.49 | 2,239.49 | - | 2,239.49 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 536.63 | $ 674.55 | $ 137.92 | 25.7% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 528.00 | $ | - | $ | 528.00 | $ | 664.00 | $ | - | $ | 664.00 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 529.48 | (0.67) | 528.81 | 665.99 | (1.00) | 665.00 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 532.47 | (2.01) | 530.46 | 670.01 | (3.01) | 667.01 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 535.46 | (3.36) | 532.10 | 674.03 | (5.02) | 669.02 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 538.45 | (4.70) | 533.75 | 678.05 | (7.03) | 671.03 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 541.44 | (6.05) | 535.39 | 682.07 | (9.04) | 673.04 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 545.95 | (8.08) | 537.87 | 688.14 | (12.07) | 676.07 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 550.46 | - | 550.46 | 694.21 | - | 694.21 | 26.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 554.97 | - | 554.97 | 700.28 | - | 700.28 | 26.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 559.48 | - | 559.48 | 706.35 | - | 706.35 | 26.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 563.99 | - | 563.99 | 712.42 | - | 712.42 | 26.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 593.99 | - | 593.99 | 752.82 | - | 752.82 | 26.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 626.99 | - | 626.99 | 797.26 | - | 797.26 | 27.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 664.49 | - | 664.49 | 847.76 | - | 847.76 | 27.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 889.49 | - | 889.49 | 1,150.51 | - | 1,150.51 | 29.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,114.49 | - | 1,114.49 | 1,453.26 | - | 1,453.26 | 30.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,339.49 | - | 1,339.49 | 1,756.01 | - | 1,756.01 | 31.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,564.49 | - | 1,564.49 | 2,058.76 | - | 2,058.76 | 31.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,789.49 | - | 1,789.49 | 2,361.51 | - | 2,361.51 | 32.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,014.49 | - | 2,014.49 | 2,664.26 | - | 2,664.26 | 32.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,239.49 | - | 2,239.49 | 2,967.01 | - | 2,967.01 | 32.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 4" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 5500 | $ 536.63 | $ 813.23 | $ 276.60 | 51.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 528.00 | $ | - | $ | 528.00 | $ | 800.00 | $ | - | $ | 800.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 529.48 | (0.67) | 528.81 | 802.50 | (1.25) | 801.25 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 532.47 | (2.01) | 530.46 | 807.54 | (3.77) | 803.77 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 535.46 | (3.36) | 532.10 | 812.58 | (6.29) | 806.29 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 538.45 | (4.70) | 533.75 | 817.62 | (8.81) | 808.81 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 541.44 | (6.05) | 535.39 | 822.66 | (11.33) | 811.33 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 545.95 | (8.08) | 537.87 | 830.26 | (15.13) | 815.13 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 550.46 | - | 550.46 | 837.86 | - | 837.86 | 52.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 554.97 | - | 554.97 | 845.46 | - | 845.46 | 52.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 559.48 | - | 559.48 | 853.06 | - | 853.06 | 52.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 563.99 | - | 563.99 | 860.66 | - | 860.66 | 52.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 593.99 | - | 593.99 | 911.26 | - | 911.26 | 53.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 626.99 | - | 626.99 | 966.92 | - | 966.92 | 54.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 664.49 | - | 664.49 | 1,030.17 | - | 1,030.17 | 55.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 889.49 | - | 889.49 | 1,409.42 | - | 1,409.42 | 58.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,114.49 | - | 1,114.49 | 1,788.67 | - | 1,788.67 | 60.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,339.49 | - | 1,339.49 | 2,167.92 | - | 2,167.92 | 61.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 1,564.49 | - | 1,564.49 | 2,547.17 | - | 2,547.17 | 62.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 1,789.49 | - | 1,789.49 | 2,926.42 | - | 2,926.42 | 63.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,014.49 | - | 2,014.49 | 3,305.67 | - | 3,305.67 | 64.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,239.49 | - | 2,239.49 | 3,684.92 | - | 3,684.92 | 64.5% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2014 |
Rate Schedule: 6" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 0 | $ 1,056.00 | $ 1,056.00 | $ - | 0.0% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,056.00 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,057.48 | (0.67) | 1,056.81 | 1,057.48 | (0.67) | 1,056.81 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,060.47 | (2.01) | 1,058.46 | 1,060.47 | (2.01) | 1,058.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,063.46 | (3.36) | 1,060.10 | 1,063.46 | (3.36) | 1,060.10 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,066.45 | (4.70) | 1,061.75 | 1,066.45 | (4.70) | 1,061.75 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,069.44 | (6.05) | 1,063.39 | 1,069.44 | (6.05) | 1,063.39 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,073.95 | (8.08) | 1,065.87 | 1,073.95 | (8.08) | 1,065.87 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,078.46 | - | 1,078.46 | 1,078.46 | - | 1,078.46 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,082.97 | - | 1,082.97 | 1,082.97 | - | 1,082.97 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,087.48 | - | 1,087.48 | 1,087.48 | - | 1,087.48 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,091.99 | - | 1,091.99 | 1,091.99 | - | 1,091.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,121.99 | - | 1,121.99 | 1,121.99 | - | 1,121.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,154.99 | - | 1,154.99 | 1,154.99 | - | 1,154.99 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,192.49 | - | 1,192.49 | 1,192.49 | - | 1,192.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,417.49 | - | 1,417.49 | 1,417.49 | - | 1,417.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,642.49 | - | 1,642.49 | 1,642.49 | - | 1,642.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,867.49 | - | 1,867.49 | 1,867.49 | - | 1,867.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,092.49 | - | 2,092.49 | 2,092.49 | - | 2,092.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,317.49 | - | 2,317.49 | 2,317.49 | - | 2,317.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,542.49 | - | 2,542.49 | 2,542.49 | - | 2,542.49 | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,767.49 | - | 2,767.49 | 2,767.49 | - | 2,767.49 | 0.0% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2015 |
Rate Schedule: 6" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 0 | $ 1,056.00 | $ 1,328.00 | $ 272.00 | 25.8% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | 1,328.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,328.00 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,057.48 | (0.67) | 1,056.81 | 1,329.99 | (1.00) | 1,329.00 | 25.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,060.47 | (2.01) | 1,058.46 | 1,334.01 | (3.01) | 1,331.01 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,063.46 | (3.36) | 1,060.10 | 1,338.03 | (5.02) | 1,333.02 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,066.45 | (4.70) | 1,061.75 | 1,342.05 | (7.03) | 1,335.03 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,069.44 | (6.05) | 1,063.39 | 1,346.07 | (9.04) | 1,337.04 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,073.95 | (8.08) | 1,065.87 | 1,352.14 | (12.07) | 1,340.07 | 25.7% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,078.46 | - | 1,078.46 | 1,358.21 | - | 1,358.21 | 25.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,082.97 | - | 1,082.97 | 1,364.28 | - | 1,364.28 | 26.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,087.48 | - | 1,087.48 | 1,370.35 | - | 1,370.35 | 26.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,091.99 | - | 1,091.99 | 1,376.42 | - | 1,376.42 | 26.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,121.99 | - | 1,121.99 | 1,416.82 | - | 1,416.82 | 26.3% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,154.99 | - | 1,154.99 | 1,461.26 | - | 1,461.26 | 26.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,192.49 | - | 1,192.49 | 1,511.76 | - | 1,511.76 | 26.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,417.49 | - | 1,417.49 | 1,814.51 | - | 1,814.51 | 28.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,642.49 | - | 1,642.49 | 2,117.26 | - | 2,117.26 | 28.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,867.49 | - | 1,867.49 | 2,420.01 | - | 2,420.01 | 29.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,092.49 | - | 2,092.49 | 2,722.76 | - | 2,722.76 | 30.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,317.49 | - | 2,317.49 | 3,025.51 | - | 3,025.51 | 30.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,542.49 | - | 2,542.49 | 3,328.26 | - | 3,328.26 | 30.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,767.49 | - | 2,767.49 | 3,631.01 | - | 3,631.01 | 31.2% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. | ||
Test Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||
Typical Bill Analysis | ||
2016 |
Rate Schedule: 6" Meters All Classes |
Gallons | Present Bill | Proposed Bill | Increase | % Increase | ||||||||
Median Usage | 0 | $ 1,056.00 | $ 1,600.00 | $ 544.00 | 51.5% |
Present Bill | Proposed Bill | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Consumption | Gross | CRT | Net | Gross | CRT | Net | Percent Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
- | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,056.00 | $ | 1,600.00 | $ | - | $ | 1,600.00 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | 1,057.48 | (0.67) | 1,056.81 | 1,602.50 | (1.25) | 1,601.25 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,060.47 | (2.01) | 1,058.46 | 1,607.54 | (3.77) | 1,603.77 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3,000 | 1,063.46 | (3.36) | 1,060.10 | 1,612.58 | (6.29) | 1,606.29 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,000 | 1,066.45 | (4.70) | 1,061.75 | 1,617.62 | (8.81) | 1,608.81 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | 1,069.44 | (6.05) | 1,063.39 | 1,622.66 | (11.33) | 1,611.33 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6,000 | 1,073.95 | (8.08) | 1,065.87 | 1,630.26 | (15.13) | 1,615.13 | 51.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 1,078.46 | - | 1,078.46 | 1,637.86 | - | 1,637.86 | 51.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | 1,082.97 | - | 1,082.97 | 1,645.46 | - | 1,645.46 | 51.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | 1,087.48 | - | 1,087.48 | 1,653.06 | - | 1,653.06 | 52.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
10,000 | 1,091.99 | - | 1,091.99 | 1,660.66 | - | 1,660.66 | 52.1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | 1,121.99 | - | 1,121.99 | 1,711.26 | - | 1,711.26 | 52.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20,000 | 1,154.99 | - | 1,154.99 | 1,766.92 | - | 1,766.92 | 53.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
25,000 | 1,192.49 | - | 1,192.49 | 1,830.17 | - | 1,830.17 | 53.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 1,417.49 | - | 1,417.49 | 2,209.42 | - | 2,209.42 | 55.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | 1,642.49 | - | 1,642.49 | 2,588.67 | - | 2,588.67 | 57.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 1,867.49 | - | 1,867.49 | 2,967.92 | - | 2,967.92 | 58.9% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000 | 2,092.49 | - | 2,092.49 | 3,347.17 | - | 3,347.17 | 60.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2,317.49 | - | 2,317.49 | 3,726.42 | - | 3,726.42 | 60.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
175,000 | 2,542.49 | - | 2,542.49 | 4,105.67 | - | 4,105.67 | 61.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | 2,767.49 | - | 2,767.49 | 4,484.92 | - | 4,484.92 | 62.1% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT B
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment B
List of ICFA or ICFA Type Agreements
Builder/Owner/GW Reference | Party(ies) to agreement | Date of Execution | Recordation Number | |||||||
Fulton Homes | Fulton Homes | 1/20/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Maracay | Maracay | 2/9/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Centex | Centex | �� | 2/9/2004 | CC&R | ||||||
Hacienda | Hacienda | 1/26/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Engle | Engle | 1/26/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Engle | Engle | 1/26/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Engle | Engle | 10/28/2003 | CC&R | |||||||
Centex | Centex | 1/26/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Ryland | Ryland | 10/28/2003 | CC&R | |||||||
Hacienda | Hacienda | 1/26/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Hacienda | Hacienda | 1/27/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Avante | Avante | 10/28/2003 | CC&R | |||||||
Brown | Brown | 1/30/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Brown | Brown | 1/30/2004 | CC&R | |||||||
Ryland | Ryland | 10/28/2003 | CC&R | |||||||
Avante | Avante | 10/28/2003 | CC&R | |||||||
Meritage/Hacienda Homes | Pecan Valley Investments, LLC | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036883 | |||||||
Engle Homes | Rio Verde/Munich 640, LLC | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036882 | |||||||
DR Horton | Homestead Village North, LLC | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036880 | |||||||
Standard Pacific | Homestead Village South, LLC | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036884 | |||||||
Performance Construction | Santa Rosa Development, Inc. | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036885 | |||||||
Newport Holdings, Inc. | Newport Holdings, Inc. | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036886 | |||||||
Elliott | Elliott Homes, Inc. | 1/28/2004 | 2004-036881 | |||||||
Chandler Boys Ventures, LLC (small commercial) | Chandler Boys Ventures, LLC ; Edison Road Development, LLC | 1/28/2004 | ||||||||
Neely | Pitaco Farms Limited Partnership | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069865 | |||||||
Neely | Pitaco Farms Limited Partnership | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069866 | |||||||
Neely | Pitaco Farms Limited Partnership | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069867 | |||||||
Neely | Pitaco Farms Limited Partnership | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069868 | |||||||
Commercial | JNAN, LLC | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069869 | |||||||
Shea Homes | JNAN, LLC | 7/1/2004 | 2004-069870 | |||||||
Lennar | Mace Holdings, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069871 | |||||||
WestPac | Maricopa 400, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069874 | |||||||
WestPac | Maricopa 32, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069875 | |||||||
Cook/El Dorado, LLC | Cook/El Dorado, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069878 | |||||||
Little/El Dorado, LLC | Little/El Dorado, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069880 | |||||||
Paul Gore | William P. Gore and Margie L. Gore | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069876 | |||||||
Ray Christrian | L&R Contracting, Inc. and Trap King, LLLP, and Sue Flores and Pro Active Remarketing, LLC and Sean Aldous and Guy Gedeon | 7/15/2004 | 2004-069863 | |||||||
Western Pinal | Western Pinal Industrial Park, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069877 | |||||||
Maricopa-Casa Grande Hwy 813 | Maricopa-Casa Grande Highway, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069879 | |||||||
W half of Sec 10 T5S R4E | Kruse Farms | 7/21/2004 | 2004-069864 | |||||||
SWQ Sec 4 T5S R4E | Maricopa 240, LLC | 7/28/2004 | 2004-069873 | |||||||
SWQ and SEQ of NWQ | Desert Sunrise, LLC | 7/23/2004 | 2004-069872 | |||||||
Hallcraft Homes | Bera Ventures, LLC; DAC Maricopa Investment, LLC; JJD Development LLC; Maricopa Investment Group LLC; Jacob/McCaslin/Eden LLC; Mesquite Groves LLC | 7/2/2004 | 2004-069881 | |||||||
MAL, LLC (Bill Lund)/Westpac | MAL, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060416 | |||||||
Trend Homes, Inc. /Westpac | Trend Homes, Inc. | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060408 |
1 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment B
List of ICFA or ICFA Type Agreements
Builder/Owner/GW Reference | Party(ies) to agreement | Date of Execution | Recordation Number | |||||||
Amarillo Creek Unit 1 / Shea Homes | Amarillo Creek South, LLC and Desert Cedars, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060422 | |||||||
Amarillo Creek South, LLC and Desert Cedars, LLC | Amarillo Creek South, LLC and Desert Cedars, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060421 | |||||||
CHI Construction Company | CHI Construction Company | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060411 | |||||||
HAM Maricopa, L.L.C. | HAM Maricopa, L.L.C. | 3/30/2005 | 2005-106216 | |||||||
HAM Papago, L.L.C. | HAM Papago, LLC | 3/30/2005 | 2005-106214 | |||||||
HAM-Mesa, L.L.C. | HAM-Mesa, LLC | 3/30/2005 | 2005-106217 | |||||||
Pecan Woods, LLC | Pecan Woods, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060414 | |||||||
Terrazo/Miller & White 815, LLC | Miller & White 812, LLP | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060413 | |||||||
HAM Maricopa, L.L.C./HAM Queen Creek, LLC | HAM Maricopa, LLC, HAM Queen Creek, LLC | 3/30/2005 | 2005-106213 | |||||||
HAMs and Trusts | Various | 3/30/2005 | 2005-106215 | |||||||
Hidden Valley Ranch 1, LLC | Hidden Valley Ranch I, LLC | 3/30/2005 | 2005-060419 | |||||||
Hidden Valley Ranch 2, LLC | Hidden Valley Ranch II, LLC | 3/30/2005 | 2005-060420 | |||||||
Dennis & Carolyn Peed | Dennis M. Peed and Carolyn Peed | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060409 | |||||||
RJ2, LLC / Maricopa Opus | NF 26 Land, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060412 | |||||||
Vineyards, LLC | Vineyards, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060410 | |||||||
RAJAC Dev Real Estate Partners, LLC | RAJACDEV Real Estate Partners, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060415 | |||||||
Stanfield Holdings, LLC | Stanfield Holdings, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060418 | |||||||
Langley Farms | Langley Farms Investments, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-060417 | |||||||
Pinal 347 | Pinal 347, LLC | 5/17/2005 | 2005-064326 | |||||||
Lennar Communities | Lennar Communities | 10/27/2003 | 2005-090252 | |||||||
Desert Cedars/Alterra | Desert Cedars Equities | 7/6/2005 | 2005-090252 | |||||||
Red Valley | Red Valley Investments, LLC | 7/15/2005 | 2005-106212 | |||||||
Pulte Home | DR Horton-Dietz Crane and Pulte Home Corporation | 7/15/2005 | 2005-099210 | |||||||
KB Homes | KB Home Phoenix, Inc. | 7/15/2005 | 2005-090248 | |||||||
McDavid Office Park | McDavid Business Park, LLC | 7/15/2005 | 2005-099211 | |||||||
Vistoso | Marathon Farming Investments, LLC and Craig D. Scott and Linda J. Scott | 7/15/2005 | 2005-090250 | |||||||
ABCDW, LLC | 7/21/2005 | 2005-090249 | ||||||||
Torrey Pines Development, LLC | 7/21/2005 | 2005-090253 | ||||||||
Maricopa Meadows, LLC | Maricopa Meadows, LLC . | 12/3/2004 | MUA | |||||||
Maricopa Meadows, LLC | Maricopa Meadows, LLC | 12/3/2004 | MUA | |||||||
Maricopa Meadows, LLC | Maricopa Meadows, LLC | 12/3/2004 | MUA | |||||||
Land Solutions Maricopa LLC | Land Solutions Maricopa LLC | 10/15/2003 | MUA | |||||||
Cottonwood Land Group VIII, LLC | Cottonwood Land Group VIII, LLC | 3/16/2004 | MUA | |||||||
Omega/Murphy Land | Omega/Murphy Land | 9/20/2005 | 2005-124524 | |||||||
Carranza Associates / Turner Dunn | Carranza Associates, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022169 | |||||||
Stanfield Estates / Turner Dunn | GKH Limited L.P. and East PAC, LLC and Loren Huweiler | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022196 | |||||||
Dart Property / Terry Button | Dart Properties, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022197 | |||||||
Santa Cruz Land Co / Santa Cruz Ranch / Anderson Val Vista 6 | Anderson & Val Vista 6, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022198 | |||||||
SCR, LLC / Scott Cole & Bryan Hartman | SCR, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022199 | |||||||
JP Holdings LP / Solana Ranch North | JP Holdings Limited Partnership | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022191 |
2 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment B
List of ICFA or ICFA Type Agreements
Builder/Owner/GW Reference | Party(ies) to agreement | Date of Execution | Recordation Number | |||||||
Anderson & Barnes 580 LLP / Solana Ranch South | Anderson and Barnes 580, LLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022193 | |||||||
120 Townsend (Yount) | 120 Townsend, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022187 | |||||||
NS120 (Yount) | NS 120 Limited Partnership | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022175 | |||||||
Montgomery 156 (Yount) | Montgomery 156 Limited Partnership LLLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022179 | |||||||
CG 215 (Yount) | CG 215 Limited Partnership LLLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022188 | |||||||
Casa Grande Montgomery 240 (Yount) | Casa Grande Montgomery 240 Limited Partnership LLLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022177 | |||||||
RRY Casa Grande 320 (Yount) | RRY Casa Grande 320 Limited Partnership LLLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022180 | |||||||
SVVM 80 (Yount) | SVVM 80 Limited Partnership LLLP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022181 | |||||||
VV Monty (Yount) | VV Monty LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022176 | |||||||
RRY Real Estate (Yount) | RRY Real Estate LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022182 | |||||||
Robin R Yount LTD (Yount) | Robin R. Yount, LTD | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022189 | |||||||
Richard and Dana (Yount) | Richard and Dana, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022186 | |||||||
Bruce and Karen (Yount) | Bruce and Karen, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022185 | |||||||
Sacaton BL (Yount) | Sacaton BL, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022178 | |||||||
Trading Post Road LLC (Yount) | Trading Post Road, LLC and SLW Associates LP | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022183 | |||||||
Chartwell Casa Grande (Yount) | Chartwell Casa Grande 40, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022184 | |||||||
Polich - Non Pulte | Gallup Financial, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022194 | |||||||
Polich - Pulte | Gallup Financial, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022192 | |||||||
CRW Holdings, LLC (Mark Williams) | CRW Holdings I, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022203 | |||||||
Val Vista & Montgomery (Mark Williams) | Val Vista & Montgomery, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022202 | |||||||
Williams Trusts (Mark Williams) | Williams Family Revocable Trust, UTA and Lora G. Williams Special Trust, UTA and Lora A. Williams Trust, UTA and Mark C. Williams Revocable Trust, UTA | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022173 | |||||||
Blevins | Brian Blevins and Jessica Blevins | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022201 | |||||||
Kronwald Family Trust | Michael Nothum, Jr. Children’s Irrevocable Trust I and Carol Kronwald Children’s Irrevocable Trust I | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022205 | |||||||
Henry McMillan and Alexander McMillan | Henry McMillan and Alexander McMillan | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022200 | |||||||
Teel 80 (Reinbold) | Teel 80, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022195 | |||||||
Ken Lowman | KEJE Group, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022204 | |||||||
Tim Nyberg / Hampden and Chambers | Hampden and Chambers, LLC and Bevnorm Olive, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022190 | |||||||
ROB-LIN Marketing (Vistoso) | ROB-LIN Marketing, Inc. | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098153 | |||||||
Vistoso Partners / Jorde Hacienda | Jorde Hacienda, Inc. | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098154 | |||||||
ABCDW, LLC (Vistoso Stanfield 1942) | ABCDW, LLC | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098151 | |||||||
Vanderbilt Farms, LLC (Thude/Vistoso) | Vanderbilt Farms, LLC and ABCDW, LLC | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098152 | |||||||
Langley Stanfield Estates (Hay Hollow) | Langley Stanfield Estates, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022209 | |||||||
Langley Properties Stanmar 160) | Langley Stanmar 160, LLC and Robinson Family Farms, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022208 |
3 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment B
List of ICFA or ICFA Type Agreements
Builder/Owner/GW Reference | Party(ies) to agreement | Date of Execution | Recordation Number | |||||||
Langley Properties (CCB Standfield Estates) | CCB Stanfield Estates, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022207 | |||||||
Matt Montgomery/SPD, INC | Matt Montgomery/SPD, INC, Tom-T, L.L.C., T & T Farms, L.L.C., and TTTT Farms, | 6/6/2005 | Not recorded | |||||||
El Dorado: Parker Estates | Parker Estates, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022206 | |||||||
El Dorado: Hondo 640 | Hondo 640, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022170 | |||||||
El Dorado: Rio Lobo, LLC | Rio Lobo, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022174 | |||||||
Terbus Investments | Terbus Investments, LLC | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022172 | |||||||
Douqlas Payne | Douglas Payne | 12/28/2005 | 2006-022171 | |||||||
Ari D’Jong / Vistoso | ABCDW, LLC and De Jon Arie H. Family Trust Dated and Millar Charles & Ide Daniel William and Milky Way Dairy, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068432 | |||||||
JEKE Group (NW parcel) | Wildcat Capital Manager, Inc. | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068435 | |||||||
Southern Dunes | Southern Dunes Golf Club, Inc. | 7/21/2006 | 2006-138949 | |||||||
Hogenes Dairy | Hogenes Farms Limited Partnership | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132111 | |||||||
TOTTR (JCON) | TOTRR Corp. and Redwood Financial Ltd., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust Rollover Dated December 31, 2003 | 7/21/2006 | 2006-138243 | |||||||
J-Con Development, Inc and Redwood Financial Ltd., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust, dated January 1, 1998, The Dale M. and Wanda S. Micetic Family Trust dated 5-29- 1996 | 7/21/2006 | 2007-025647 | ||||||||
Redfield | Redfield Financial, Inc. and Redfield Financial Partners IV, LLC and Redfield Financial Partners II, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068438 | |||||||
Sunset Mountain Dev. Group | Sunset Mountain Development Group, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-139522 | |||||||
Maracay Homes | Maracay Homes Arizona I, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068437 | |||||||
Kelly Anderson | Anderson Palmisano Farms | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068433 | |||||||
Eagle Shadow | Eagle Shadow South East, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132115 | |||||||
Hartman Ranch | Hartman Ranch, LLC and Cole Maricopa 193, LLC and Philip McD Hartman & Shirley Ann Hartman as Co-Trustees of the Philip McD and Shirley Ann Hartman Trust Dated June 15, 2004 | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132119 | |||||||
Legacy Charter School at San Travasa | Redfield Ring, LLC | 7/20/2006 | 2006-132124 | |||||||
San Travasa | John E. Smith & Mary Lou Smith and The Smith Family Irrevocable Trust dated June 23,1989 and The John and Mary Lout Smith Family Trust dated April 29, 2002 | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132125 | |||||||
Central Arizona College (CAC) | 8/17/2011 | 2011-075658 | ||||||||
HBE Farms | Rudolph Lee Echeverria & Helen Biehn Echeverria | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132121 | |||||||
Chris Whitt | Chris Whitt | 7/21/2006 | 2006-139523 | |||||||
Brian Stevenson | Brian R. Stevenson | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068436 | |||||||
KSK Land Ventures (Geddes) | KSK Land Ventures, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132117 | |||||||
Nicholas Toronto | Nicholas J. Toronto & Colette Ann Toronto and NSB Investments, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-046079 | |||||||
Quassey Holdings | Quassey Holdings, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132116 | |||||||
Ivett Aviles | Ivett O. Aviles | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132122 | |||||||
Dana Byron | Dana B. Byron | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132114 |
4 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment B
List of ICFA or ICFA Type Agreements
Builder/Owner/GW Reference | Party(ies) to agreement | Date of Execution | Recordation Number | |||||||
Byron/Tse | Dana B. Byron & Maritza Tse | 7/21/2006 | 2007-027768 | |||||||
Dana Byron | Dana B. Byron | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132113 | |||||||
Byron/Maccllum | Dana B. Byron & Jamie Maccallum | 7/21/2006 | 2007-027767 | |||||||
Walton Cactus Springs | Walton Cactus Springs Limited Partnership | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132126 | |||||||
Beauchene LP (Ray Christian) | Kino Trails, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132120 | |||||||
Gene Montemore | Montemore Family Revocable Trust | 7/21/2006 | 2007-016473 | |||||||
Redfield Financial Partners V | Redfield Financial Partners V, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132129 | |||||||
Rio Blanco | Rio Blanco, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-138242 | |||||||
Redfield Financial | Redfield Financial Partners VII, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-018719 | |||||||
Cando Ranch | Cando Ranch, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2007-068434 | |||||||
Ray Morrow | Ray Morrow | 7/21/2006 | 2006-141209 | |||||||
K Investment Enterprises | K. Investment Enterprises, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132112 | |||||||
Redfield Ring | Redfield Ring, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132124 | |||||||
Redfield Financial | Redfield Financial, Inc. | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132123 | |||||||
DYE Equities | Dye Equities, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132128 | |||||||
Kevin Norby | Kevin G. Norby, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132127 | |||||||
NF 26 Land | NF 26 Land, LLC | 7/21/2006 | 2006-132118 | |||||||
Midway | ABCDW, LLC and Bernadette Wolfswinkel and Grace Holdings, LLC and Vanderbilt Farms, LLC and Sarival Holdings, LLC and New Meridian SPE, LLC and Verde Grande Commercial Building, LLC | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098150 | |||||||
La Osa | ABDCE, LLC and Torry Pines Development, LLC and Riggs/Queen Creek 480, LLC and Ellsworth Road 160, LLC and Vanderbilt Farms, LLC and Irvine Land Partners, LLC | 10/13/2008 | 2008-098149 | |||||||
Citrus Orchards | The Orchard at Picacho, LLC | 1/8/2008 | 2008-004128 | |||||||
Hassayampa Ranch | Hassayampa Ranch Ventures, LLC | 6/24/2005 | 2008-0913586 | |||||||
Silver Water/Springs Ranch (Vegas) | Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC | 7/10/2006 | 2006-0939440 | |||||||
Copperleaf Development | First American Title Insurance Company | 7/10/2006 | 2006-0939366 | |||||||
I10-339th | 339th & I-10, LLC | 5/20/2008 | 2008-0679693 | |||||||
Belmont | Various | 12/20/2007 | 2008-0061205 |
5 | DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
TABLE I
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
FIGURE 15 | SIB PLANT TABLE 1 – GORDON DRIVE (2014) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | |||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Pace 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Supply mains not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM
SIB PLANT TABLE I – GORDON DRIVE (2014)
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 331 T&D Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1 | 331 | 1,626 | 6 | PVC | $66.96 | Gordon Drive | 2014 | $108,876 | Install approximately 1,626 LF of 6-inch water main that will replace the existing water main that is constructed of 4 inch Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Also, 4 new valves will be installed at appropriate locations as to provide adequate system isolation when necessary. There have been seven recorded main line breaks on this section of water main over the last three years. | |||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $108,876
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – GORDON DRIVE (2014) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.*
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 333 Service | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 333
| 47
| 1-inch
| Copper
| $2,099
| Gordon Drive
| 2014
| $98,674
|
Install approximately 6,078 LF of 1” copper services lines to 47 service connections for this project.
| |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
8
| ||||||||||||||||||||
9
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $98,674
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE 1 – GORDON DRIVE (2014) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related Page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 334 Meters | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| Meters not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM SIB PLANT TABLE I – GORDON DRIVE (2014) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 335 Hydrants | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1 | 335 | 2 | 5-1/4 inch | Cast Iron | $1,970 | Gordon Drive | 2014 | $3,941 | Install approximately two new fire hydrants to replace the existing hydrants that are not up to current standards and specifications. | |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $3,941
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
FIGURE 16 | SIB PLANT TABLE 1 – CLEARVIEW DR (2015) | |||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Supply mains not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – CLEARVIEW DR (2015) | ||||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 331 T&D Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1 | 331 | 1,805 | 6 | PVC | $60.99 | Clearview Drive | 2015 | $110,103 | Install approximately 1,805 LF of 6-inch water main that will replace the existing water main that is constructed of 4 inch Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Also, 3 new valves will be installed at appropriate locations as to provide adequate system isolation when necessary. There was one recorded main line break on this section of water main recorded in the year 2013. | |||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $110,103
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – CLEARVIEW DR (2015) | ||||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 333 Service | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 333 | 48 | 1-inch | Copper | $1,269 | Clearview Drive | 2015 | $60,919 | Install approximately 4,647 LF of I” copper services lines to 48 service connections for this project. | |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
8
| ||||||||||||||||||||
9
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $60,919
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – CLEARVIEW DR (2015) | ||||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant)(SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers.The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related Page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 334 Meters | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| Meters not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM SIB PLANT TABLE I – CLEARVIEW DR (2015) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority; Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers; reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 335 Hydrants | Pipe length/Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| Hydrants not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
FIGURE 17 | SIB PLANT TABLE I – A STREET (2016) | |||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant)(SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related Page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| Supply Mains not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – A STREET (2016) | ||||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report. | ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 331 T&D Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 331 | 1,447 | 6 | PVC | $65.21 | A Street | 2016 | $94,370 | Install approximately 1,447 LF of 6-inch water main that will replace the existing water main that is constructed of 4 inch Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Also, 4 new valves will be installed at appropriate locations as to provide adequate system isolation when necessary. There have been three recorded main line breaks on this section of water main over the last two years.
| |||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $94,370 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – A STREET (2016) | ||||
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification |
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 333 Service | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 333 | 39 | 1-inch | Copper | $1,299 | A Street | 2016 | $50,670 | Install approximately 3,894 LF of 1” copper services lines to 39 service connections for this project.
| |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $50,670 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – A STREET (2016) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 334 Meters | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Meters not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – A STREET (2016) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 335 Hydrants | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Hydrants not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
FIGURE 18 | WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | |||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – WELL STREET (2017) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report. | ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Supply mains not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – WELL STREET (2017) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 331 T&D | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 331 | 1,328 | 6 | PVC | $63.33 | Well Street | 2017 | $84,103 |
Install approximately 1,328 LF of 6-inch water main that will replace the existing water main that is constructed of 4 inch Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Also, 2 new valves will be installed at appropriate locations as to provide adequate system isolation when necessary. There have been three recorded main line breaks on this section of water main over the last two years.
| |||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $84,103 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – WELL STREET (2017) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 333 Service | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 333 | 35 | 1-inch | Copper | $1,417 | Well Street | 2017 | $49,598 | Install approximately 3,909 LF of I” copper services lines to 35 service connections for this project. | |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
8
| ||||||||||||||||||||
9
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
| $49,598 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – WELL STREET (2017) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 334 Meters | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Meters not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – WELL STREET (2017) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 335 Hydrants | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Hydrants not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
FIGURE 19 | WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | |||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – KING WAY, BORDER LANE, LARK LANE (2018) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 11 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| Supply mains not included in this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| �� | |||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – KING WAY, BORDER LANE, LARK LANE (2018) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB.Please reference Page 11 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 331 T&D Mains | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1 | 331 | 2,479 | 6 | PVC | $62.43 | King Way, Border Lane, Lark Lane | 2018 | $154,769 | Install approximately 2,479 LF of 6-inch water main that will replace the existing water main that is constructed of 4 inch Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Also, 5 new valves will be installed at appropriate locations as to provide adequate system isolation when necessary. There have been one recorded main line breaks on this section of water main over the last two years. | |||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost | $84,103 |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – KING WAY, BORDER LANE, LARK LANE (2018) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 11 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 333 Service | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
| 333 | 61 | 1-inch | Copper | $987 | King Way, Border Lane, Lark Lane | 2018 | $60,210 | Install approximately 4,176 LF of 1” copper services lines to 61 service connections for this project. | |||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
8
| ||||||||||||||||||||
9
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
$60,210
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – KING WAY, BORDER LANE, LARK LANE (2018) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report.
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 11 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 334 Meters | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Meters not included on this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
WILLOW VALLEY WATER COMPANY - KING STREET WATER SYSTEM | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE I – KING WAY, BORDER LANE, LARK LANE (2018) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Project Notification | ||||||||
NARUC Acct No. (SIB- eligible plant) | Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | 1.Provide narrative why Replacement Plant is necessary: - Replacement of existing plant that has exceeded its designated useful life and has worn out or is in severe deteriorating condition
- Replacement of existing plant to address excessive water loss (greater than 20%)
- Replacement of existing plant for other reasons detailed in SIB Engineering Report
2.Provide narrative explaining why this segment of plant is a priority: Please reference Page 10 in SIB Engineering Report.
3.Provide narrative explaining how replacing this plant will benefit existing customers: reduction in overall system water loss, fewer water outages due to reduction in main line breaks, brings infrastructure to current standards, adds appropriate working valves and hydrants to provide better overall service to customers.
4.Provide affirmation that Replacement Plant does not include the costs for extending or expanding facilities to serve new customers. The detailed engineering drawings in the SIB Engineering Report will prove that all work is to replace existing failing infrastructure, not to provide new service lines for future customers.
5.Provide reference to related page No. in the submitted detailed Engineering Analysis supporting the need for SIB. Please reference Page 11 in SIB Engineering Report.
| ||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 335 Hydrants | Pipe length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (estimated) | Expected In-Service Date | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by NARUC Acct No) | Estimated Subtotal Cost (by project) | ||||||||||||
1
|
Hydrants not included on this project
| |||||||||||||||||||
2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
3
| ||||||||||||||||||||
4
| ||||||||||||||||||||
5
| ||||||||||||||||||||
6
| ||||||||||||||||||||
7
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
TABLE II
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water System Name and PWS ID No. | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE II (Page 1 of 2) Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Completed Project Filings | ||||||||
NARUC
| Replacement Plant Description (new plant) (SIB-eligible plant) | Site (location description) | Replacement Plant | Original Plant (Plant Being Retired) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project No. | 309 Supply Mains
331 T&D Mains
333
334
335
| Description | Pipe Length/ Quantity | Diameter/ Size | Material | Installed Cost/Unit (actual cost) | In-Service Date (provide ADEQ AOC and other related approvals by state and/or federal agencies when applicable; pictures of installed plant) | Subtotal (by | Subtotal Actual Cost (by project) | Actual Retirement Date | Original In- Service Date | Original Cost | Accumulated Depreciation Reserve (as of the actual retirement date) | |||||||||||||||
Total Actual Cost |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Water System Name and PWS ID No. | ||||||||
SIB PLANT TABLE II (Page 2 of 2, Summary)
Information to be included with SIB-Eligible Completed Project Filings | ||||||||
Project No.
| PWS ID No.
| Project Description
| Estimated Cost (from TABLE I)
| Actual Cost
| Detailed explanation of why actual costs have exceeded estimated costs by more than 10% for the project. | |||||||
Total Cost
|
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT C
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Valencia Water Company - Town Division | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKET NO.:W-01212A-12-0309 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toValencia Water Company - Town Division (“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections; and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties. ·
“Company” means Valencia Water Company - Town Division.
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” x 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,750 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $2,625 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $4,375 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $8,750 | ||
2” | 8 | $14,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $28,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $43,750 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $87,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company ashook-up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKET NO.:SW-20445A-12-0310 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE FACILITIES HOOK-UP FEE (WASTEWATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site facilities hook-up fees payable to Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company (“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide wastewater treatment plant facilities among all new service laterals. These charges are applicable to all new service laterals established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Collection Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Collection Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-601 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing sewer utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of wastewater facilities to serve new service laterals, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company.
“Collection Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of wastewater facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service laterals within a development, or installs such wastewater facilities necessary to serve new service laterals and transfer ownership of such wastewater facilities to the Company, which agreement does not require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-606, and shall have the same meaning as “Wastewater Facilities Agreement”.
“Off-site Facilities” means the wastewater treatment plant, sludge disposal facilities, effluent disposal facilities and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include lift stations, transportation mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the Applicant and benefit the entire wastewater system.
“Service Lateral” means and includes all service laterals for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
III. | Off-Site Facilities Hook-up Fee |
For each new service lateral, the Company shall collect an off-site facilities hook-up fee as listed in the following table:
OFF-SITE WASTEWATER HOOK-UP FEE TARIFF TABLE
| ||||
Service Lateral Size | Factor | Fee | ||
4-inch | 1 | $1,250 | ||
6-inch | 2.25 | $2,812.5 | ||
8-inch | 4 | $5,000 | ||
10-inch | 6.25 | $7,812.5 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Facilities Hook-up Fee: The off-site facilities hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service lateral, or lot within a subdivision (similar to a service lateral installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Facilities Hook-up Fee: Off-site facilities hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities, or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
(1) | For those requiring a Collection Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Collection Main Extension Agreement, whereby Applicant agrees to advance the costs of on-site improvements or construct such improvements, payment of the fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant when payment is made for the on-site improvements or 30 days after the Collection Main Extension Agreement is executed, whichever is later. |
(2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Collection Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time wastewater service is requested for the property. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction by Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide wastewater service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company connect service or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and wastewater service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company as hook-up fees pursuant to the off-site facilities hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site facilities hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities.
(I) Off-Site Facilities Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site facilities hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Collection Main Extension Agreement.
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site facilities hook-up fees, or if theoff-site facilities hook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Facilities Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKET NO.:W-03720A-12-0311 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toWater Utility of Northern Scottsdale(“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale.
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” × 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,750 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $2,625 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $4,375 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $8,750 | ||
2” | 8 | $14,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $28,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $43,750 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $87,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company ashook-up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Water Utility of Greater Tonopah | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKET NO.: W-02450A-12-0312 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toWater Utility of Greater Tonopah(“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Water Utility of Greater Tonopah.
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” × 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,750 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $2,625 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $4,375 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $8,750 | ||
2” | 8 | $14,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $28,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $43,750 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $87,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company ashook-up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: | Valencia Water Company - Greater Buckeve | DECISION NO. |
DOCKET NO.: | W-02451A-12-0313 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toValencia Water Company - Greater Buckeve (“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Valencia Water Company - Greater Buckeye.
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” × 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,750 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $2,625 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $4,375 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $8,750 | ||
2” | 8 | $14,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $28,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $43,750 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $87,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company ashook- up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook- up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirement to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12)��month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Santa Cruz Water Company | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKETNO.:W-20446A-12-0314 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toSanta Cruz Water Company (“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
ll. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Santa Cruz Water Company .
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” × 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,250 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $1,875 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $3,125 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $6,250 | ||
2” | 8 | $10,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $20,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $31,250 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $62,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company ashook-up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 1 of 4
TARIFF SCHEDULE
UTILITY: Willow Valley Water Company | DECISION NO. | |||||
DOCKET NO.:W-01732A-12-0315 | EFFECTIVE DATE: |
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE (WATER)
I. | Purpose and Applicability |
The purpose of the off-site hook-up fees payable toWillow Valley Water Company (“the Company”) pursuant to this tariff is to equitably apportion the costs of constructing additional off-site facilities necessary to provide water production, delivery, storage and pressure among all new service connections. These charges are applicable to all new service connections established after the effective date of this tariff undertaken via Main Extension Agreements or requests for service not requiring a Main Extension Agreement. The charges are one-time charges and are payable as a condition to Company’s establishment of service, as more particularly provided below.
II. | Definitions |
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions set forth in R-14-2-401 of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and regulations governing water utilities shall apply in interpreting this tariff schedule.
“Applicant” means any party entering into an agreement with Company for the installation of water facilities to serve new service connections, and may include Developers and/or Builders of new residential subdivisions and/or commercial and industrial properties.
“Company” means Willow Valley Water Company.
“Main Extension Agreement” means any agreement whereby an Applicant agrees to advance the costs of the installation of water facilities necessary to the Company to serve new service connections within a development, or installs such water facilities necessary to serve new service connections and transfer ownership of such water facilities to the Company, which agreement shall require the approval of the Commission pursuant to A.A.C. R-14-2-406, and shall have the same meaning as “Water Facilities Agreement” or “Line Extension Agreement.”
“Off-site Facilities” means wells, storage tanks and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation, including engineering and design costs. Offsite facilities may also include booster pumps, pressure tanks, transmission mains and related appurtenances necessary for proper operation if these facilities are not for the exclusive use of the applicant and will benefit the entire water system.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 2 of 4
“Service Connection” means and includes all service connections for single-family residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, regardless of meter size.
III. | Off-Site Water Hook-up Fee |
For each new service connection, the Company shall collect an off-site hook-up fee derived from the following table:
OFF-SITE HOOK-UP FEE TABLE
| ||||
Meter Size | Size Factor | Total Fee | ||
5/8” × 3/4 “ | 1 | $1,750 | ||
3/4” | 1.5 | $2,625 | ||
1” | 2.5 | $4,375 | ||
1-1/2 “ | 5 | $8,750 | ||
2” | 8 | $14,000 | ||
3” | 16 | $28,000 | ||
4” | 25 | $43,750 | ||
6” or larger | 50 | $87,500 |
IV. | Terms and Conditions |
(A) Assessment of One Time Off-Site Hook-up Fee: The off-site hook-up fee may be assessed only once per parcel, service connection, or lot within a subdivision (similar to meter and service line installation charge).
(B) Use of Off-Site Hook-up Fee: Off-site hook-up fees may only be used to pay for capital items of off-site facilities or for repayment of loans obtained to fund the cost of installation of off-site facilities. Off-site hook-up fees shall not be used to cover repairs, maintenance, or operational costs. The Company shall record amounts collected under this tariff as Contributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”); however, such amounts shall not be deducted from rate base until such amounts have been expended for utility plant.
(C) Time of Payment:
1) | For those requiring a Main Extension Agreement: In the event that the Applicant is required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, whereby the Applicant agrees to advance the costs of installing mains, valves, fittings, hydrants and other on-site improvements or construct such improvements in order to extend service in accordance with R-14-2-406(B), payment of the hook-up fees required hereunder shall be made by the Applicant no later than 15 calendar days after receipt of notification from the Company that the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission has approved the Main Extension Agreement in accordance with R-14-2-406(M). |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 3 of 4
2) | For those connecting to an existing main: In the event that the Applicant is not required to enter into a Main Extension Agreement, the hook-up fee charges hereunder shall be due and payable at the time the meter and service line installation fee is due and payable. |
(D) Off-Site Facilities Construction By Developer: Company and Applicant may agree to construction of off-site facilities necessary to serve a particular development by Applicant, which facilities are then conveyed to Company. In that event, Company shall credit the total cost of such off-site facilities as an offset to off-site hook-up fees due under this Tariff. If the total cost of the off-site facilities constructed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is less than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall pay the remaining amount of off-site hook-up fees owed hereunder. If the total cost of the off-site facilities contributed by Applicant and conveyed to Company is more than the applicable off-site hook-up fees under this Tariff, Applicant shall be refunded the difference upon acceptance of the off-site facilities by the Company.
(E) Failure to Pay Charges; Delinquent Payments: The Company will not be obligated to make an advance commitment to provide or to actually provide water service to any Applicant in the event that the Applicant has not paid in full all charges hereunder. Under no circumstances will the Company set a meter or otherwise allow service to be established if the entire amount of any payment due hereunder has not been paid.
(F) Large Subdivision and/or Development Projects: In the event that the Applicant is engaged in the development of a residential subdivision and/or development containing more than 150 lots, the Company may, in its discretion, agree to payment of off-site hook-up fees in installments. Such installments may be based on the residential subdivision and/or development’s phasing, and should attempt to equitably apportion the payment of charges hereunder based on the Applicant’s construction schedule and water service requirements. In the alternative, the Applicant shall post an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company in a commercially reasonable form, which may be drawn by the Company consistent with the actual or planned construction and hook up schedule for the subdivision and/or development.
(G) Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Non-refundable: The amounts collected by the Company as hook-up fees pursuant to the off-site hook-up fee tariff shall be non-refundable contributions in aid of construction.
(H) Use of Off-Site Hook-Up Fees Received: All funds collected by the Company as off-site hook-up fees shall be deposited into a separate interest bearing bank account and used solely for the purposes of paying for the costs of installation of off-site facilities, including repayment of loans obtained for the installation of off-site facilities that will benefit the entire water system.
(I) Off-Site Hook-up Fee in Addition to On-site Facilities: The off-site hook-up fee shall be in addition to any costs associated with the construction of on-site facilities under a Main Extension Agreement.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Page 4 of 4
(J) Disposition of Excess Funds: After all necessary and desirable off-site facilities are constructed utilizing funds collected pursuant to the off-site hook-up fees, or if the off-sitehook-up fee has been terminated by order of the Arizona Corporation Commission, any funds remaining in the bank account shall be refunded. The manner of the refund shall be determined by the Commission at the time a refund becomes necessary.
(K) Fire Flow Requirements: In the event the Applicant for service has fire flow requirements that require additional facilities beyond those facilities whose costs were included in the off-site hook-up fee, and which are contemplated to be constructed using the proceeds of the off-site hook-up Fee, the Company may require the Applicant to install such additional facilities as are required to meet those additional fire flow requirements, as a non-refundable contribution, in addition to the off-site hook-up fee.
(L) Status Reporting Requirements to the Commission: The Company shall submit a calendar year Off-Site Hook-Up Fee status report each January 31st to Docket Control for the prior twelve (12) month period, beginning January 31, 2015, until the hook-up fee tariff is no longer in effect. This status report shall contain a list of all customers that have paid the hook-up fee tariff, the amount each has paid, the physical location/address of the property in respect of which such fee was paid, the amount of money spent from the account, the amount of interest earned on the funds within the tariff account, and a list of all facilities that have been installed with the tariff funds during the 12 month period.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT D
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS
KRISTIN K. MAYES - Chairman GARY PIERCE PAUL NEWMAN SANDRA D. KENNEDY BOB STUMP |
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOHNSON UTILITIES, L.L.C., DBA JOHNSON UTILITIES COMPANY FOR AN INCREASE IN ITS WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES FOR CUSTOMERS WITHIN PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA. | DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
DECISION NO.71854
OPINION AND ORDER
| |
|
DATES OF HEARING: | January 27, February 26 (Procedural Conferences); April 20, (Pre-Hearing Conference); April 23, 24, 27 (Hearing); July 23 (Procedural Conference/Oral Arguments); September 21, 24, 25, October 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7, 2009 (Hearing). |
PLACE OF HEARING: | Phoenix, Arizona |
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: | Teena Wolfe |
APPEARANCES: | Mr. Jeffrey W. Crockett, Mr. Bradley S. Carroll and Mr. Robert Metli, SNELL & WILMER, on behalf of Johnson Utilities, LLC; |
Mr. Craig A. Marks, CRAIG A. MARKS, PLC, on behalf of Swing First Golf, LLC; |
Ms. Jodi Jerich, Director, Mr. Daniel Pozefsky, Chief Counsel and Ms. Michelle Wood, Staff Attorney, on behalf of the Residential Utility Consumer Office; |
Mr. James E. Mannato, Town Attorney, on behalf of the Town of Florence; and |
Ms. Nancy Scott, Ms. Ayesha Vohra, and Ms. Robin Mitchell, Staff Attorneys, Legal Division, on behalf of the Utilities Division of the Arizona Corporation Commission. |
1 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
closely monitor the Company’s collection of CAGRD fees and the Company’s treatment of monies collected to pay the CAGRD fees. The Company was in favor of the establishment of a CAGRD recovery mechanism, but was unwilling to agree to abide by the conditions that Staff argued are necessary to safeguard the Company’s ratepayers.
1. Staff Proposed Adjustor and Conditions
Staff recommended that the Company recover its CAGRD tax assessment through the use of an adjustor mechanism, subject to specific enumerated conditions. Staff recommended that the CAGRD adjustor mechanism only be authorized with the following conditions attached:
1. | The initial adjuster fee shall apply to all water sold after the date new rates from this case become effective. In order to calculate this initial fee, the Company shall submit the 2008 data, as per condition No. 7 below, within 30 days of the date of the final order in this matter. |
2. | The Company shall, on a monthly basis, place all CAGRD monies collected from customers in a separate, interest bearing account (“CAGRD Account”). |
3. | The only time the Company can withdraw money from the CAGRD Account is to pay the annual CAGRD fee to the CAGRD, which is due on October 15th of each year. |
4. | The Company must provide to Staff a semi-annual report of the CAGRD Account and CAGRD use fees collected from customers and paid to the CAGRD, with reports due during the last week of October and the last week of April each year. |
5. | The Company must provide to Staff, every even-numbered year (first year being 2010) by June 30th, the new firm rates set by the CAGRD for the next two years. |
6. | The CAGRD adjustor fees shall be calculated as follows: The total CAGRD fees for the most current year in the Phoenix AMA shall be divided by the gallons sold in that year to determine a CAGRD fee per 1,000 gallons. Similarly, the total CAGRD fees for the most current year in the Pinal AMA shall be divided by the gallons sold in that year to determine a CAGRD fee per 1,000 gallons. |
7. | By August 25th of each year, beginning in 2010, the Company shall submit for Commission consideration its proposed CAGRD adjustor fees for the Phoenix and Pinal AMAs, along with the calculations and |
38 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
documentation from the relevant state agencies to support the data used in the calculations. Failure to provide such documentation to Staff shall result in the immediate cessation of the CAGRD adjustor fee. Commission-approved fees shall become effective on the following October 1st. |
8. | If the CAGRD changes its current method of assessing fees (i.e. based on the current volume of water used by customers) to some other method, such as, but not limited to, future projection of water usage, or total water allocated to the Company, the Company’s collection from customers of CAGRD fees shall cease. |
9. | As a compliance item, the Company shall submit a new tariff reflecting the initial adjustor fee as per Condition No. 1 above and shall annually submit a new tariff reflecting the reset adjustor fee prior to the fee becoming effective.243 |
2. Company Arguments Against Conditions
The Company opposed, or requested modification of Staff’s recommended Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8. Staff opposed the Company’s requested modifications to Staff’s recommended conditions.244
a. | Condition No. 3 |
The Company stated that it is concerned that Condition No. 3 lacks sufficient flexibility to allow for changes in CAGRD’s payment policies and other policies with regard to the use of CAGRD monies.245 The Company submitted that it should be permitted to withdraw funds from the CAGRD account as necessary to comply with the conditions of its membership in the CAGRD, as those conditions exist now or as they may be modified in the future.246
Staff stated that the Company’s requested modification of Condition No. 3 should be disregarded, as the Company should not be allowed to spend funds in the CAGRD account for any
243 | Staff Br. at 20-21, citing to Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Jeffrey Michlik (Exh. S-43) at 4. |
244 | Staff Reply Br. at 21-23. |
245 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Brian Tompsett (Exh. A-5) at 20. |
246 | Id. |
39 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
purpose other than the CAGRD expense item than has been analyzed in this proceeding and that the proposed adjustor is designed to recover.247
b. | Condition No. 4 |
The Company argued that a single annual report, instead of the semi-annual report required by Condition No. 4, would be sufficient for Staff’s verification of the accounting for CAGRD monies collected and remitted.248 Staff opposed the Company’s requested modification of Condition No. 4 because Staff believes it is important for the Commission to have the ability closely monitor the Company’s collection of CAGRD fees and the state of the CAGRD Account.249
c. | Condition No. 5 |
The Company opposed Condition No. 5, arguing that the information it requires is publicly available and it would be more efficient for Staff to obtain the information directly from CAGRD.250 The Company also argued that compliance with regulatory conditions adds costs that are ultimately borne by the ratepayers and should only be imposed as necessary to achieve important regulatory objectives.251
Staff opposed modification of Condition No. 5 because the rates established by the CAGRD involve calculations with many variables that may or may not be accessible or publicly available on the CAGRD’s website now or in the future.252 Staff stated that because the Company will be in possession of the information as part of its own record keeping and compliance requirements, it will therefore be in the best position to provide the Commission and Staff with the information.253 Staff indicated that as a result of this rate case, it lacks confidence in the Company’s record keeping
247 | Staff Br. at 21. |
248 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Brian Tompsett (Exh. A-5) at 20. |
249 | Staff Br. at 22. |
250 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Brian Tompsett (Exh. A-5) at 20. |
251 | Id. at 20-21. |
252 | Staff Br at 22. |
253 | Id. |
40 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
abilities, and the submittal required by Condition No. 5 is necessary to confirm that the Company is charging its customers the correct rates.254
d. | Condition No. 7 |
The Company stated that it is not clear what consideration or approval the Commission would exercise with regard to the assessment, and therefore opposes Condition No. 7.255 The Company argued that this requirement is unnecessary as the CAGRD assessments are fixed by CAGRD and are not subject to interpretation.256
Staff stated that Condition No. 7 is important because it allows the Company to receive the required documentation first from CAGRD, and Staff and the Commission must have the ability to review the calculations and documentation, including the CAGRD invoice.257 Staff stated that the language “for Commission consideration” should not be changed because it is standard language that allows the Commission to monitor and ultimately approve the exact adjustor fee charged to customers.258 Staff stated that the Commission review and approval process each year would ensure that the Company is submitting data to ADWR that is consistent with annual reports filed with the Commission, that the Company is not misinterpreting the correct assessment rate, and that the Company is calculating the customer fee correctly.259
e. | Condition No. 8 |
The Company opposed Condition No. 8’s requirement that the collection of fees cease should the CAGRD change its current method of assessing fees.260 The Company argued that if the
254 | Staff Reply Br. at 8. |
255 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Brian Tompsett (Exh. A-5) at 21. |
256 | Id. |
257 | Staff Br. at 22; Tr. at 912. |
258 | Staff Br. at 22. |
259 | Staff Reply Br. at 8. |
260 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Brian Tompsett (Exh. A-5) at 21. |
41 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
CAGRD changes its method of assessing fees, that Johnson would likewise change the way it passes through the fee to its customers, consistent with the CAGRD changes.261
Staff stated that Condition No. 8 should be retained because it is unlikely that CAGRD would change the assessment methodology without notice, and if it were changed, the Company could request a modification of the approved methodology.
3. RUCO Proposed Expense Adjustment and Opposition to Adjustor
RUCO asserted that the use of an adjustor mechanism is not a necessary or appropriate means for the recovery of CAGRD expense.262 RUCO argued that the circumstances of the CAGRD assessment do not warrant an adjustor mechanism because it is a routine yearly expense and because its progressive increase is not volatile.263 RUCO stated that rate stability is important in today’s economic environment, and because adjustors lead to changes in residential ratepayers’ rates, they should be’ approved only in extraordinary circumstances.264 RUCO also argued that oversight of Staff’s proposed adjustor would unnecessarily and inappropriately increase the Staff’s workload.265
RUCO recommended that the CAGRD be treated as an expense, and proposed a normalization adjustment to test year expenses based on the known and measurable costs of the Company’s CAGRD assessments through 2010.266 RUCO’s proposed adjustment is based on the Company’s test year water sold and a 2009-2010 composite of Phoenix AMA and Pinal AMA CAGRD fees per thousand gallons.267 RUCO asserted that because the Company has stated an intention to file a new rate case every three years, RUCO’s recommended adjustment would provide
261 | Id. |
262 | RUCO Br. at 8-14; Reply Br. at 5. |
263 | RUCO Br. at 12-13. |
264 | Id. |
265 | Id. |
266 | RUCO Br. at 8; 14; Tr. at 205; Direct Testimony of RUCO witness Rodney Moore (Exh. R-l) at 16-17; RUCO Final Schedules RLM 7 and RLM-16. |
267 | RUCO Final Schedule RLM-16. |
42 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
the Company with complete recovery of the CAGRD expense without requiring extraordinary ratemaking treatment for a routine cost.268
In support of its recommendation that a CAGRD adjustor mechanism be put in place for the Company, Staff stated that the CAGRD assessment represents a significant annual expense for the Company, which is anticipated to progressively increase, and that in order to keep its membership in the CAGRD, the Company must pay the fee.269 Staff asserted that the CAGRD assessment is amenable to an adjustor mechanism because the assessment, unlike a pass-through tax, is not easily calculated and assigned.270 Staff noted that the Commission has approved adjustor mechanisms where appropriate in order to advance important policy concerns that protect the public interest.271 Staff stated that the Commission has approved adjustors for expenses that are not extremely volatile for Demand Side Management and the Renewable Energy Standards Tariff, based on a determination that the advancement of energy conservation programs and the move to renewable sources of energy were necessary policy considerations to advance the public interest.272 Staff opined that it would be appropriate, in the Commission’s support of groundwater conservation, to adopt the Staff’s recommendation regarding an adjustor for the Company’s CAGRD assessment.
4. Conclusion
We agree with Staff that this Commission has in the past approved adjustor mechanisms where appropriate to advance important policy concerns that protect the public interest. The CAGRD adjustor mechanism that Staff designed, inclusive of all eight conditions without modification, appears to be a just and reasonable means of dealing with the costs of the CAGRD. Conservation and wise stewardship of increasingly stressed water supplies is a matter of paramount concern in Arizona, and we believe that it is important to send appropriate, signals to water
268 | RUCO Br. at 14. |
269 | Staff Br. at 20, citing to Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Jeffrey Michlik (Exh. S-43) at 1. |
270 | Id. |
271 | Staff Reply Br. at 7-8. |
272 | Id. |
43 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
DOCKET NO. WS-02987A-08-0180
companies regarding their duty to fully engage in conservation programs administered by the ADWR. The CAGRD assessment fee is not discretionary for Companies such as Johnson Utilities, and the Commission believes that the CAGRD participation represents the kind of investment that is appropriate for timely cost recovery. To not allow the Company to recover its CAGRD costs in real time may threaten the Company’s ability to participate in the CAGRD program and would send a negative signal to water providers regarding this Commission’s support for sound regional approaches to achieving safe yield in Active Management Areas. While we are not satisfied with the Company’s past accounting methodologies, and are supportive of the steps taken in this Order to require Johnson Utilities to come into compliance with NARUC accounting standards, we believe Staff’s adjustor mechanism proposal will accord the Commission maximum oversight over the application of the adjustor mechanism. We will therefore approve the CAGRD adjustor mechanism, inclusive of all eight conditions proposed by Staff.
B. Rate Case Expense
The Company requested recovery of $100,000 in rate case expense for each division.273 There was no disagreement on the amount of expense. Staff recommended normalization of the expense over three years, and the Company agreed.274 RUCO recommended an amortization of five years to reflect the Company’s propensity for not timely filing rate applications.275 The Company pointed out that RUCO’s CAGRD expense normalization assumed that the Company would be filing a rate case in three years.276 We find that the three year normalization period is appropriate, and will adopt it.
. . .
. . .
273 | Rebuttal Testimony of Company witness Thomas Bourassa (Exh. A-2) Vol. II at 23. |
274 | Id. |
275 | RUCO Br. at 7. |
44 | DECISION NO. 71854 |
DECISION NO. 74364 |
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT E
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Town Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-411), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. Rl4-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressure shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. Rl4-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Town Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Town Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Town Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For wastewater service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for wastewater service (A.A.C. R14-2-601 to R14- 2-610), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for recycled water service. |
3.1 “Recycled water service” means the delivery of wastewater that has undergone secondary treatment, filtration, nitrogen removal treatment, and disinfection. The following provisions apply to recycled water service.
3.1.1 Establishment of service. Establishment of recycled water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-603.
3.1.2 Customer information. The Company will provide the information to recycled water customers as required in R14-2-604.
3.1.3 Main extensions. Main extensions for recycled service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-606.
3.1.4 Provision of Service. Recycled water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-607.
3.1.5 Meter reading. Meter reading for recycled water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408.
3.1.6 Billing. Billing and collection for recycled water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-608.
3.1.7 Termination of service. Termination of service for recycled water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-609.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service.
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 | Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees. |
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-411), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressure shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-411), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressure shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-41 1), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressure shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. Rl4-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Valencia Water Company – Greater Buckeye Division | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-411), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressur, shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
1.0 | Applicability. This Terms and Conditions of Service Tariff applies to all services provided by the Company. |
2.0 | Adoption of Rules. For potable water service, the Company adopts the Rules of the Arizona Corporation Commission for water service (A.A.C. R14-2-401 to R14-2-411), as supplemented by this Tariff. |
3.0 | Special provisions for non-potable water service. |
3.1 “Non-potable water service” means the delivery of water, other than water for human consumption or recycled water.
3.2 | The following provisions apply to non-potable water service. |
3.2.1 | Establishment of service. Establishment of non-potable water service will be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-2-403. |
3.2.2 | Customer information. The Company will provide the information to non-potable water customers as required in R14-2-404. |
3.2.3 | Main extensions. Main extensions for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-406. |
3.2.4 | Provision of Service. Non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-407, except that R14-2-407(E), Minimum Deliver Pressure shall not apply because non-potable water is an unpressurized service. |
3.2.5 | Meter reading. Meter reading for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-408. |
3.2.6 | Billing. Billing and collection for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-409. |
3.2.7 | Termination of service. Termination of service for non-potable water service will be subject to the requirements of A.A.C. R14-2-410. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
4.0 | Electronic Billing. Electronic Billing is an optional billing service whereby Customers may elect to receive, view, and pay their bills electronically. The Company may modify its Electronic Billing services from time to time. A Customer electing an electronic billing service may receive an electronic bill in lieu of a paper bill. Customers electing an electronic billing service may be required to complete additional forms and agreements. Electronic Billing may be discontinued at any time by the Company or the Customer. An Electronic Bill will be considered rendered at the time it is electronically sent to the Customer. Failure to receive bills or notices which have been properly sent by an Electronic Billing system does not prevent these bills from becoming delinquent and does not relieve the Customer of the Customer’s obligations therein. Any notices which the Company is required to send to a Customer who has elected an Electronic Billing service may be sent by electronic means at the option of the Company. Except as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of the Company’s tariffs and the Commission’s Rules and Regulations are applicable to Electronic Billing. The Customer must provide the Company with a current email address for electronic bill delivery. If the Electronic Bill is electronically sent to the Customer at the email address that Customer provided to the Company, then the Electronic Bill will be considered properly sent. Further, theCustomer will be responsible for updating the Company with any changes to this email address. Failure to do so will not excuse the Customer from timely paying the Company for utility service. |
5.0 | Liability. |
5.1 Water pressure for Private Fire Service and Public Fire Hydrant Service. The Company will supply only such water at such pressures as may be available from time to time as a result of the normal operation of its water system. The Company does not guarantee a specific water pressure or gallons per minute flow rate at any public fire hydrant or private fire service. In the event service is interrupted or irregular or defective or fails from causes beyond the Company’s control or through ordinary negligence of its employees or agents, the Company will not be liable for any injuries or damages arising therefrom. Ratepayers shall not be required to reimburse through rates, damages from the acts or omissions of the Company, its principals, agents or employees.
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.2 | Limitation of Company responsibility. The Company does not assume the responsibility of inspecting or maintaining any customer’s piping or apparatus and will not be responsible therefor; however, the Company reserves the right to refuse water service unless the customer’s piping or apparatus is installed in such manner as to prevent cross connections or backflow into the Company’s system in compliance with the Company’s Cross-Connection/Backflow Tariff as approved by the Commission. |
5.3 | Third party claims. Company will not be responsible for any third-party claims against Company that arise from Customer’s use of Company’s utility service unless such claims are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
5.4 | Indemnity. Customer will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company (including the costs of reasonable attorney’s fees) against all claims (including, without limitation, claims for damages to any business or property, or injury to, or death of, any person) arising out of any wrongful act or negligent omission of the Customer, or the Customer’s agents, in connection with the Company’s service or facilities. |
5.5 | Limitation of damages. The liability of the Company for damages of any nature arising from errors, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, or delays of the Company, its agents, servants, or employees, in the course of establishing, furnishing, rearranging, moving, terminating, or changing the service or facilities or equipment shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges applicable under the Company’s tariff (calculated on a proportionate basis where appropriate) to the period during which the error, mistake, omission, interruption or delay occurs, except if such damages are caused by the Company’s willful misconduct or gross negligence. |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL. | ||
Company: | Decision No.: | |
Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. | ||
Phone:623-518-4000 | Effective Date: |
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE TARIFF
5.6 | Incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages. In no event will the Company be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, or consequential damages (including lost revenue or profits) of any kind whatsoever regardless of the cause or foreseeability thereof. |
5.7 | Interference with Company facilities. The Company will not be responsible in any occasion for any loss or damage caused by the negligence or wrongful act of the Customer or any of his agents, employees or licensees in installing, maintaining, using, operating or interfering with any Company facilities. |
# # #
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT F
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Attachment F
Tariffs to be filed under the Settlement Agreement
Tariff | Agreement Section | Utility | Due Date | |||
Hook Up Fee Tariffs | 7.2 | All Applicants | Within 30 days of Decision (Takes effect on effective date of order)
| |||
Hook Up Fee Tariffs | 7.2 | Picacho Water, Picacho Utilities, Hassayampa | Within 30 days of Decision
| |||
Low Income Tariff | 8.1 | Northern Scottsdale | Within 30 days of Decision (Takes effect on effective date of order)
| |||
CAGRD Tariff | 8.2 | Greater Tonopah | Within 30 days of Decision
| |||
BMPTariff | 8.3 | Northern Scottsdale | Within 30 days of Decision | |||
Rate Tariffs | 8.5 | All Applicants | Within 30 days of Decision (effective January 1, 2014)
| |||
Terms and Conditions Tariff | 8.4 | All Applicants | Within 30 days of Decision
| |||
Code of Conduct | 8.7 | All Applicants | May 2, 2014
|
List of other filings required by the Agreement
Filing | Agreement Section
| Utility | Due Date | |||
Hook Up Fee Report | 7.3
| All | Annual, per tariffs | |||
Hook Up Fee Compliance Affidavit | 7.3
| All | Annual |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
Filing | Agreement Section
| Utility | Due Date | |||
CAGRD semi-annual reports | 8.2 | Greater Tonopah | Last week of April and October, each year
| |||
CAGRD rates | 8.2 | Greater Tonopah | June 30 of even numbered years
| |||
CAGRD annual rate | 8.2 | Greater Tonopah | August 25, each year
| |||
Water Loss Reports | 9.1 | Valencia-Town; Valencia- Buckeye; Greater Tonopah; Santa Cruz; Willow Valley | May of each year |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
ATTACHMENT B
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
SIB GROSS INVESTMENT | $ | 211,491 | $ | 171,022 | $ | 145,040 | $ | 133,701 | $ | 214,979 | ||||||||||
CUMULATIVE GROSS INVESTMENT | $ | 211,491 | $ | 382,513 | $ | 527,553 | $ | 661,254 | $ | 876,233 | ||||||||||
REV INCREASES SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS, NO SIB | $ | 202,135 | $ | 404,269 | $ | 404,269 | $ | 404,269 | $ | 404,269 | ||||||||||
REV INCREASES SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS, WITH SIB | $ | 229,478 | $ | 453,125 | $ | 470,792 | $ | 486,582 | $ | 512,501 | ||||||||||
OVERALL INCREASE FOR SIB | $ | 27,343 | $ | 48,856 | $ | 66,523 | $ | 82,313 | $ | 108,232 | ||||||||||
LESS EFFICIENCY CREDIT | $ | (1,367) | $ | (2,443) | $ | (3,326) | $ | (4,116) | $ | (5,412) | ||||||||||
ADDITIONAL REV FOR SIB, LESS EFF. CREDIT | $ | 25,976 | $ | 46,413 | $ | 63,197 | $ | 78,197 | $ | 102,820 | ||||||||||
INCREMENTAL REV FOR SIB, LESS EFF. CREDIT | $ | 25,976 | $ | 20,437 | $ | 16,784 | $ | 15,001 | $ | 24,623 | ||||||||||
TEST YEAR REVENUES | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | $ | 702,652 | ||||||||||
INCREASE W/O SIB | 28.77% | 57.53% | 57.53% | 57.53% | 57.53% | |||||||||||||||
INCREASE WITH SIB | 32.46% | 64.14% | 66.53% | 68.66% | 72.17% |
DECISION NO. 74364
DOCKET NO. W-01212A-12-0309 ET AL.
SURCHARGES * | ||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
5/8” Residential | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 2.95 | $ | 3.65 | $ 4.80 | |||||||||||
3/4” Residential | $ | 1.82 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 4.42 | $ | 5.47 | $ 7.20 | |||||||||||
1” Residential | $ | 3.03 | $ | 5.42 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 9.12 | $ 12.00 | |||||||||||
5/8” Commercial | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 2.95 | $ | 3.65 | $ 4.80 | |||||||||||
1” Commercial | $ | 3.03 | $ | 5.42 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 9.12 | $ 12.00 | |||||||||||
1.5” Commercial | $ | 6.06 | $ | 10.83 | $ | 14.75 | $ | 18.25 | $ 23.99 | |||||||||||
2” Commercial | $ | 9.70 | $ | 17.33 | $ | 23.60 | $ | 29.20 | $ 38.39 | |||||||||||
6” Commercial | $ | 60.62 | $ | 108.31 | $ | 147.48 | $ | 182.48 | $ 239.94 | |||||||||||
1” Irrigation | $ | 3.03 | $ | 5.42 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 9.12 | $ 12.00 | |||||||||||
2” Irrigation | $ | 9.70 | $ | 17.33 | $ | 23.60 | $ | 29.20 | $ 38.39 | |||||||||||
4” Irrigation | $ | 30.31 | $ | 54.16 | $ | 73.74 | $ | 91.24 | $ 119.97 | |||||||||||
3” Hydrant | $ | 19.40 | $ | 34.66 | $ | 47.19 | $ | 58.39 | $ 76.78 | |||||||||||
MEDIAN BILL IMPACTS FOR 5/8 X 3/4” CUSTOMERS | ||||||||||||||||||||
TBA’s ** without SIB | $ | 30.57 | $ | 37.03 | $ | 37.03 | $ | 37.03 | $ 37.03 | |||||||||||
Previous Year Bill | $ | 24.40 | $ | 30.57 | $ | 37.03 | $ | 37.03 | $ 37.03 | |||||||||||
increase over previous year | $ | 6.17 | $ | 6.46 | $ | - | $ | - | $ - | |||||||||||
% increase over previous year | 25.3% | 21.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
TBA’s ** without SIB | 30.57 | 37.03 | 37.03 | 37.03 | 37.03 | |||||||||||||||
SIB SURCHARGE | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.17 | $ | 2.95 | $ | 3.65 | $ 4.80 | |||||||||||
TBA’s with SIB | $ | 31.78 | $ | 39.20 | $ | 39.98 | $ | 40.68 | $ 41.83 | |||||||||||
Previous Year Bill | $ | 24.40 | $ | 31.78 | $ | 39.20 | $ | 39.98 | $ 40.68 | |||||||||||
increase over previous year | $ | 7.38 | $ | 7.41 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.70 | $ 1.15 | |||||||||||
% increase over previous year | 30.3% | 23.3% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 2.8% | |||||||||||||||
* | Surcharges represent cumulative amounts, after 2015 |
| ||||||||||||||||||
** | TBA’s are Typical Bill Analyses (in this case, |
| ||||||||||||||||||
for the median customer with a 5/8 x 3/4” meter) |
|
DECISION NO. 74364