Silver Hill Mines (SLVH) 10-K 31 Mar 14 2013 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Jun. 28, 2013
Document and Entity Information	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Silver Hill Mines Inc	'
Document Type	'10-K	'
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-13	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001434994	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--12-31	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	499,234	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'Yes	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'No	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'No	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2013	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'
Entity Public Float	'	$22,500

Silver_Hill_Mines_Inc_Balance_

Silver Hill Mines, Inc. Balance Sheet (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current assets	'	'
Cash and cash equivalents	$0	$0
Total current assets	0	0
Total assets	0	0
Current liabilities	'	'
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	86,311	72,651
Accounts payable - Related party	18,841	13,808
Total current liabilities	105,152	86,459
Stockholders' equity(deficit)	'	'
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized, par value $.001, 10,000,000 shares issued and outstanding for both 2013 and 2012	10,000	10,000
Common stock, 250,000,000 shares authorized, par value $.0001, 499,234 shares issued and outstanding for both 2013 and 2012	50	50
Additional paid-in capital	870,562	870,562
Retained earnings	-985,764	-967,071
Total stockholders' equity(deficit)	-105,152	-86,459
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$0	$0

Statement_of_Financial_Positio

Statement of Financial Position - Parenthetical (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Statement of financial position	'	'
Preferred Stock, Par Value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred Stock, Shares Authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Preferred Stock, Shares Issued	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred Stock, Shares Outstanding	10,000,000	10,000,000
Common Stock, Par Value	$0.00	$0.00
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common Stock, Shares Issued	499,234	499,234
Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	499,234	499,234

Silver_Hill_Mines_Inc_Statemen

Silver Hill Mines, Inc. Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Income statement	'	'
Revenues	$0	$0
General and administrative expenses	18,694	18,572
Loss from operations	-18,694	-18,572
Interest income	0	0
Net loss	($18,694)	($18,572)
Basic gain (loss) per common share	($0.04)	($0.04)
Fully diluted gain (loss) per common share	$0	$0
Weighted average number of common shares used in per share calculations, basic	499,234	499,234
Weighted average number of common shares used in per share calculations, fully diluted	200,499,234	200,499,234

Silver_Hill_Mines_Inc_Statemen1

Silver Hill Mines, Inc. Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (USD $)	Common shares outstanding	Common stock	Preferred shares outstanding	PreferredStockParValueMember	Additional paid-in capital	Retained Earnings	Total
		USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2009	'	$50	'	'	$770,917	($874,517)	($103,550)
Shares issued at Dec. 31, 2009	499,234	'	'	'	'	'	'
Preferred stock issued for repayment of related party loans and advances	'	'	'	10,000	99,645	'	109,645
Preferred stock issued for repayment of related party loans and advances, stock	'	'	10,000,000	'	'	'	'
Net loss	'	'	'	'	'	-6,095	-6,095
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2010	'	50	10,000,000	10,000	870,562	-880,612	'
Shares issued at Dec. 31, 2010	499,234	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net loss	'	'	'	'	'	-67,887	-67,887
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2011	'	50	10,000,000	10,000	870,562	-948,499	-67,887
Shares issued at Dec. 31, 2011	499,234	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net loss	'	'	'	'	'	-18,572	-18,572
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2012	'	50	10,000,000	10,000	870,562	-967,071	-92,459
Shares issued at Dec. 31, 2012	499,234	'	'	'	'	'	'
Net loss	'	'	'	'	'	-18,694	-18,694
Stockholders' Equity at Dec. 31, 2013	'	$50	$10,000,000	$10,000	$870,562	($985,765)	($985,765)
Shares issued at Dec. 31, 2013	499,234	'	'	'	'	'	'

Silver_Hill_Mines_Inc_Statemen2

Silver Hill Mines, Inc. Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Cash flows used for operating activities	'	'
Net loss	($18,694)	($18,572)
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities	'	'
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses	13,661	9.808
Short Term Loan	5,033	13,808
Cash flows used for operating activities	0	5,044
Cash flows from financing activities	'	'
Short Term Loan - Assignment	0	-5,044
Increase in cash and cash equivalents	0	0
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of period	0	0
Cash and cash equivalents - End of period	0	0
Supplemental Disclosures regarding cash flows	'	'
Interest paid	0	0
Income taxes paid	$0	$0

Note_A_Organization_and_Descri

Note A - Organization and Description of Business	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note A - Organization and Description of Business	'
	NOTE A - Organization and Description of Business
	The Company was originally incorporated in the State of Washington on March 27, 1961, for the primary purpose of acquiring and developing mining properties. The Company has not attained commercial mining operations since its inception.
	On May 11, 2007 the shareholders approved changing the corporate domicile Washington to Nevada. On June 21, 2007, Silver Hill Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporation, was organized as the merger partner. On September 5, 2007, the change in domicile was completed by merging Silver Hill Mines, Inc., the Washington corporation into Silver Hill Mines, Inc., the Nevada corporation. Silver Hill Mines, Inc., the Nevada corporation, was the surviving corporation.

Note_B_Preparation_of_Financia

Note B - Preparation of Financial Statements	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note B - Preparation of Financial Statements	'
	NOTE B - Preparation of Financial Statements
	The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and has adopted a year-end of December 31.
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	'
	NOTE C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Cash and cash equivalents
	For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
	Use of estimates
	In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and revenues and expenses in the statement of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Fair Value Measurements
	For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.
	On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
	The Company did not identify any non-recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC 815.
	In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments.” ASC 825-10 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. ASC 825-10 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted ASC 825-10 on January 1, 2008. The Company chose not to elect the option to measure the fair value of eligible financial assets and liabilities.
	The carrying amounts of cash and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these items. These fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it utilize derivative instruments in the management of foreign exchange, commodity price, or interest rate market risks.
	Income taxes
	Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.
	When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
	Applicable interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations.
	Basic and diluted net loss per share
	The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share.” The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the “as if converted” basis.  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, there were 200,000,000 potential dilutive securities related to the preferred shares described in Note G.
	Concentration of Credit Risk
	Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times may exceed the FDIC insurance limit
	Special purpose entities
	The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing activities.
	Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company follows ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which established a “primary asset” approach to determine the cash flow estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the unit of accounting for a long-lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Through December 31, 2013, the Company had not experienced impairment losses on its long-lived assets.
	Stock Based Compensation
	Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this method, stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated financial statements for stock options granted, modified or settled after the adoption date. In accordance with ASC 718, the unamortized portion of options granted prior to the adoption date is recognized into earnings after adoption. Results for prior periods have not been restated, as provided for under the modified-prospective method.
	Under ASC 718, stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the period. Based on this, our stock-based compensation is reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
	The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes models are based upon the following data: (1) The expected life of the option, estimated by considering the contractual term of the option, the vesting period of the option, the employees’ expected exercise behavior and the post-vesting employee turnover rate. (2) The expected stock price volatility of the underlying shares over the expected term of the option, based upon historical share price data. (3) The risk free interest rate, based on published U.S. Treasury Department interest rates for the expected terms of the underlying options. (4) Expected dividends, based on historical dividend data and expected future dividend activity. (5) The expected forfeiture rate, based on historical forfeiture activity and assumptions regarding future forfeitures based on the composition of current grantees.
	In accordance with ASC 718, the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for options exercised during the period are classified as financing cash inflows rather than operating cash inflows.
	The Company did not grant any new employee options and no options were cancelled or exercised during the twelve months periods ended December 31, 2013 or 2012. As of December 31, 2013 there were no options outstanding.
	Business segments
	ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company determined it has one operating segment as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
	Recently issued accounting pronouncements
	In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, an amendment to the accounting guidance for disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. The amendment expands the disclosure requirements in that entities will be required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and shall be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.
	In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-8an amendment to the accounting guidance for goodwill in order to simplify how companies test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.
	In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.
	In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.
	There are no other new accounting pronouncements adopted or enacted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our financial statements.

Note_D_Going_Concern_Uncertain

Note D - Going Concern Uncertainty	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note D - Going Concern Uncertainty	'
	NOTE D - Going Concern Uncertainty
	The Company has had no significant operations, assets or liabilities since 1993 and, accordingly, is fully dependent on either future sales of securities or upon its current management and/or advances or loans from significant stockholders or corporate officers to provide sufficient working capital to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. Because of these factors, our auditors have issued an audit opinion for the Company which includes a statement describing our going concern status. This means, in our auditor's opinion, substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern exists at the date of their opinion.
	The Company's continued existence is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to support its daily operations as well as provide sufficient resources to retire existing liabilities and obligations on a timely basis.
	The Company anticipates offering future sales of equity securities. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding through the sales of additional equity securities or, that such funding, if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to or affordable by the Company.
	If no additional operating capital is received during the next twelve months, the Company will be forced to rely upon additional funds loaned by management and/or significant stockholders to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity at this time. In the event, the Company is unable to acquire advances from management and/or significant stockholders, the Company's ongoing operations would be negatively impacted.
	It is the intent of management and significant stockholders to provide sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. However, no formal commitments or arrangements to advance or loan funds to the Company or repay any such advances or loans exist. There is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholders to provide additional future funding.
	In such a restricted cash flow scenario, the Company would be unable to complete our business plan steps, and would, instead, delay all cash intensive activities. Without necessary cash flow, the Company may become dormant during the next twelve months, or until such time as necessary funds could be raised in the equity securities market.
	While the Company is of the opinion that good faith estimates of the Company's ability to secure additional capital in the future to reach our goals have been made, there is no guarantee that the Company will receive sufficient funding to sustain operations or implement any future business plan steps.

Note_E_Income_Taxes

Note E - Income Taxes	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note E - Income Taxes	'
	NOTE E - Income Taxes
	The components of income tax (benefit) expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are as follows:
			Years ended
			December 31,
			2013		2012
	Federal:
	Current	$	—	$	—
	Deferred		—		—
			—		—
	State:
	Current		—		—
	Deferred		—		—
			—		—
	Total	$	—	$	—
	The Company has a nominal net operating loss carry-forward to offset future taxable income. Subject to current regulations, this carry-forward will begin to expire in 2021. The amount and availability of the net operating loss carry-forwards may be subject to limitations set forth by the Internal Revenue Code. Factors such as the number of shares ultimately issued within a three-year look-back period; whether there is a deemed more than 50 percent change in control; the applicable long-term tax exempt bond rate; continuity of historical business; and subsequent income of the Company all enter into the annual computation of allowable annual utilization of the carry-forwards.
	Because there was a more than 50 percent change in control during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not maintain the prior carry-forward losses reported.

Note_F_Related_Party_Transacti

Note F - Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note F - Related Party Transactions	'
	NOTE F - Related Party Transactions
	During the year ended December 31, 2013, Matthew Maza, as principal shareholder of the Company, contributed $18,841 towards maintenance of the Company.
	On March 31, 2012, pursuant to a board resolution dated March 15, 2012, for fees owed to Cident Law Group PLLC and Matthew Maza, Selva Resources Corp, a Nevada Corporation (“Selva Resources ”), in the best interest of clearing its debt and obligations, signed a stock purchase agreement selling 129,234 common stock shares (post-split shares) and 10,000,000 preferred shares to Matthew Maza.  Selva Resources also had no funds to pay for these maintenance requirements of the Corporation.  Without this transaction, the Corporation would not be able to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in timely fashion, which would have cause damage to the Corporation.  For more information on this transaction, please review the Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2012.  Further, $5,044 that was loaned to the Company from Selva Resources (see next paragraph) was assigned to Matthew Maza for debt owed to him.
	As of December 31, 2012, Selva Resources, as a related party, paid for $5,044 in expenses for the Company.  These paid expenses were for auditing fees and filing fees of the Company and are recorded on the Company’s current liabilities.
	On December 17, 2010, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement between Long Lane Capital, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Gregory M. Wilson (the “Selling Shareholders”), and Selva Resources purchased 12,907,250 common stock shares and 10,000,000 preferred shares (the “ Shares ”) of the Company from Selling Shareholders.  For more information on this transaction, please review the Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2010.
	On September 30, 2010, Gregory M. Wilson converted the remaining $7,677 balance owed to him to contributed capital.
	On May 12, 2010 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to issue Gregory M. Wilson, an affiliate shareholder, 10,000,000 shares of 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock in exchange for all corporate debt owed to Mr. Wilson, which on that date was $101,968.  The preferred shares issued to Mr. Wilson represents voting control of the Company.
	On April 2, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 9,250,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at par value totaling $9,250. Consideration for the shares was a promissory note issued by a corporation controlled by a related party in the amount of $9,250 with interest at 5% per annum until paid. At December 31, 2009 the balance of the note receivable was $-0- and interest receivable totaled $-0-.
	A related party has advanced $6,703 to the Company. As of December 31, 2008, the related party accepted as partial payment, the note receivable and accrued interest receivable, described above. The balance of the note receivable and accrued balance was $5,341. The balance of this related party advance was included in the amount converted to contributed capital on September 30, 2010.
	During the three months period ended September 30, 2010 a related party contributed $804 for payment of operating expenses, the contributed was recorded as additional paid-in capital.  In addition, the related party assumed responsibility for the Company’s remaining accounts payable in the amount of $6,873, the assumption of liabilities was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Note_G_2009_Series_a_Preferred

Note G - 2009 Series "a" Preferred Shares	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note G - 2009 Series "a" Preferred Shares	'
	NOTE G – 2009 Series “A” Preferred Shares
	On March 31, 2012, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement between Matthew Maza and Selva Resources, Corp, Selva Resources sold 10,000,000 to Matthew Maza to settle debt owed to him.
	On December 17, 2010, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement between Long Lane Capital, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Gregory M. Wilson, and Selva Resources Corp, a Nevada Corporation, Mr. Wilson sold 10,000,000 preferred shares of the Company to Selva Resources.
	On May 12, 2010 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to issue Gregory M. Wilson, an affiliate shareholder, 10,000,000 shares of 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock in exchange for all corporate debt owed to Mr. Wilson, which on that date was $101,968.  The preferred shares issued to Mr. Wilson represents voting control of the Company.
	On May 12, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized amending the Certificate of Designation to increase the 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock from 11,500,000 to 12,000,000 and added a convertibility feature permitting the 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock to be convertible into common shares at the rate of 20 shares of common stock for each share of Series “A” Preferred Stock.
	On February 24, 2009, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation authorizing eleven million five hundred thousand (11,500,000) 2009 Series “A” Preferred shares. The 2009 Series “A” Preferred shares have twenty (20) votes per share at any meeting of the shareholders where votes are submitted.

Note_H_Reverse_Split_of_Common

Note H - Reverse Split of Common Stock	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes	'
Note H - Reverse Split of Common Stock	'
	NOTE H – Reverse Split of Common Stock
	On June 20, 2011, the Company filed a certificate of amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State to consolidate the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares on a 100 old for 1 new basis.  There was no effect on the number of authorized common stock shares.  The filing became effective on July 8, 2011. No fractional shares were issued and all fractional shares resulting from the consolidation were rounded up.  The consolidation decreased the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares to 499,234 from 49,918,961.  The number of authorized common stock shares remained 250,000,000.  All historical share and per share amounts except par value have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
	On June 18, 2011, under the laws of Nevada, NRS 78.320(2), the majority of the voting power of the Company waived the notice requirement of the special meeting of shareholders, approved of the Company’s board of directors action without a meeting of the shareholders, and consented to a without meeting for the purpose of performing a reverse split of 100-to-1 to the common stock and keeping the number of authorized shares of the common stock at 250,000,000.  This shall no affect on the 2009 Series “A” Preferred Shares.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_1

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Cash and Cash Equivalents (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Cash and Cash Equivalents	'
	Cash and cash equivalents
	For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_2

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Use of Estimates (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Use of Estimates	'
	Use of estimates
	In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and revenues and expenses in the statement of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_3

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Fair Value Measurements (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Fair Value Measurements	'
	Fair Value Measurements
	For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.
	On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
	The Company did not identify any non-recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC 815.
	In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments.” ASC 825-10 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. ASC 825-10 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted ASC 825-10 on January 1, 2008. The Company chose not to elect the option to measure the fair value of eligible financial assets and liabilities.
	The carrying amounts of cash and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these items. These fair value estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it utilize derivative instruments in the management of foreign exchange, commodity price, or interest rate market risks.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_4

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Income Taxes (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Income Taxes	'
	Income taxes
	Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.
	When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
	Applicable interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_5

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share	'
	Basic and diluted net loss per share
	The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share.” The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the “as if converted” basis.  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, there were 200,000,000 potential dilutive securities related to the preferred shares described in Note G.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_6

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Concentration of Credit Risk (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Concentration of Credit Risk	'
	Concentration of Credit Risk
	Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with high quality financial institutions and at times may exceed the FDIC insurance limit

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_7

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposure, Policy (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposure, Policy	'
	Special purpose entities
	The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing activities.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_8

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Impairment Or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Impairment Or Disposal of Long-lived Assets	'
	Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company follows ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which established a “primary asset” approach to determine the cash flow estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the unit of accounting for a long-lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Through December 31, 2013, the Company had not experienced impairment losses on its long-lived assets.

Note_C_Summary_of_Significant_9

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Stock Based Compensation (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Stock Based Compensation	'
	Stock Based Compensation
	Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this method, stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated financial statements for stock options granted, modified or settled after the adoption date. In accordance with ASC 718, the unamortized portion of options granted prior to the adoption date is recognized into earnings after adoption. Results for prior periods have not been restated, as provided for under the modified-prospective method.
	Under ASC 718, stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the period. Based on this, our stock-based compensation is reduced for estimated forfeitures at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
	The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes models are based upon the following data: (1) The expected life of the option, estimated by considering the contractual term of the option, the vesting period of the option, the employees’ expected exercise behavior and the post-vesting employee turnover rate. (2) The expected stock price volatility of the underlying shares over the expected term of the option, based upon historical share price data. (3) The risk free interest rate, based on published U.S. Treasury Department interest rates for the expected terms of the underlying options. (4) Expected dividends, based on historical dividend data and expected future dividend activity. (5) The expected forfeiture rate, based on historical forfeiture activity and assumptions regarding future forfeitures based on the composition of current grantees.
	In accordance with ASC 718, the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for options exercised during the period are classified as financing cash inflows rather than operating cash inflows.
	The Company did not grant any new employee options and no options were cancelled or exercised during the twelve months periods ended December 31, 2013 or 2012. As of December 31, 2013 there were no options outstanding.

Recovered_Sheet1

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Business Segments (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Business Segments	'
	Business segments
	ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s management organizes segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company determined it has one operating segment as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Recovered_Sheet2

Note C - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Policies	'
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	'
	Recently issued accounting pronouncements
	In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, an amendment to the accounting guidance for disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities and related arrangements. The amendment expands the disclosure requirements in that entities will be required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and shall be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.
	In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-8an amendment to the accounting guidance for goodwill in order to simplify how companies test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. We do not expect the adoption of this accounting pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements when implemented.
	In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05, an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We elected not to early adopt. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.
	In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.
	There are no other new accounting pronouncements adopted or enacted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on our financial statements.

Note_E_Income_Taxes_Schedule_o

Note E - Income Taxes: Schedule of Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Tables/Schedules	'
Schedule of Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	'
			Years ended
			December 31,
			2013		2012
	Federal:
	Current	$	—	$	—
	Deferred		—		—
			—		—
	State:
	Current		—		—
	Deferred		—		—
			—		—
	Total	$	—	$	—

Note_F_Related_Party_Transacti1

Note F - Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Details	'	'
Accounts payable - Related party	$18,841	$13,808
Short Term Loan - Assignment	$0	$5,044

Note_G_2009_Series_a_Preferred1

Note G - 2009 Series "a" Preferred Shares (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2013
Details	'
Preferred Stock, Conversion Basis	'On May 12, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized amending the Certificate of Designation to increase the 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock from 11,500,000 to 12,000,000 and added a convertibility feature permitting the 2009 Series “A” Preferred stock to be convertible into common shares at the rate of 20 shares of common stock for each share of Series “A” Preferred Stock.
Preferred Stock, Voting Rights	'On February 24, 2009, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation authorizing eleven million five hundred thousand (11,500,000) 2009 Series “A” Preferred shares. The 2009 Series “A” Preferred shares have twenty (20) votes per share at any meeting of the shareholders where votes are submitted.