On June 27, 2023, Chinook Therapeutics, Inc. (“Chinook” or the “Company”) filed a Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and on July 10, 2023, Chinook filed a Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) with the SEC, each in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of June 11, 2023, by and among the Company, Novartis AG, a company organized under the laws of Switzerland (“Parent” or “Novartis”), and Cherry Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. The special meeting of Chinook stockholders will be held virtually on August 2, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, to act on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, as disclosed in the Definitive Proxy Statement.
Litigation Related to the Merger
On July 6, 2023 a purported individual stockholder of Chinook filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned O’Dell v. Chinook Therapeutics, Inc., et al., 1:23-cv-05784, naming as defendants the Company and each member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) as of the date of the Merger Agreement (O’Dell). On July 11, 2023, an additional case was filed by a purported individual shareholder of Chinook in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Wang v. Chinook Therapeutics, Inc., et al., 1:23-cv-05945 (Wang). On July 12, 2023, an additional case was filed by a purported individual shareholder of Chinook in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Casey v. Chinook Therapeutics, Inc., et al., 1:23-cv-05986 (Casey). On July 13, 2023, an additional case was filed by a purported individual shareholder of Chinook in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, captioned Johnson v. Chinook Therapeutics, Inc., et al., 1:23-cv-00764-UNA (Johnson). The O’Dell, Wang, Casey and Johnson cases, and any similar subsequently filed cases involving the Company, the Board or any committee thereof and/or any of the Company’s directors or officers relating directly or indirectly to the Merger Agreement, the Merger or any related transaction, are referred to as the “Merger Litigations.”
The Merger Litigations filed to date generally allege that the Preliminary Proxy Statement or the Definitive Proxy Statement is materially incomplete and misleading by allegedly failing to disclose certain purportedly material information. The Merger Litigations assert violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder against Chinook and the Board and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the Board. The Merger Litigations seek, among other things: an injunction enjoining consummation of the Merger; rescission of the Merger Agreement, recission of the Merger if consummated; an accounting of all damages suffered; costs of the action, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees and expenses; an order directing the filing of a proxy statement that does not contain any untrue statements of material fact; a declaratory order that the defendants violated Section 14(a) and/or Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act; and any other relief the court may deem just and proper.
Chinook cannot predict the outcome of each Merger Litigation, nor can Chinook predict the amount of time and expense that will be required to resolve each Merger Litigation. Chinook believes that the O’Dell, Wang, Casey and Johnson cases are without merit and that no supplemental disclosures are required under applicable law. Chinook and its directors intend to vigorously defend against each Merger Litigation and any subsequently filed similar actions. It is possible that additional similar complaints could be filed in connection with the Merger. Chinook cannot estimate the possible loss or range of loss from the Merger Litigations. If any additional complaints are filed, absent new or significantly different allegations, Chinook will not necessarily disclose such additional filings.
In addition, twelve purported stockholders of Chinook sent demand letters regarding the Preliminary Proxy Statement and Definitive Proxy Statement (the “Demand Letters”). Based on the same core allegations as the Merger Litigations, the Demand Letters request that the Company disseminate corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Preliminary Proxy Statement or Definitive Proxy Statement.