Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Policies | ' |
Principal of Consolidation | ' |
The condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary in conformity with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Virtual Currencies Translations and Remeasurements | ' |
The Company accounts for Virtual Currencies, which it considers to be an operating asset, at their initial cost and subsequently remeasures the carrying amounts of Virtual Currencies it owns at each reporting date based on their current fair value. The changes in the fair value of Virtual Currencies are included as a component of income or loss from operations. Though Virtual Currencies behave like a foreign currency the Company currently classifies Virtual Currencies as a current asset. Virtual Currencies are considered a crypto-currency and the Company receives deposits in various kinds of virtual currencies such as Bitcoins, Litecoins and Dogecoins from customer trade transactions. The Company when necessary, will issue refunds in Virtual Currencies and make payments to vendors in Virtual Currencies, if and when such vendors accept Virtual Currencies as payment. |
|
The Company obtains the equivalency rate of Bitcoins to USD from various exchanges including, Bitstamp and BTC-e. The equivalency rate obtained from these sources represents a generally well recognized quoted price in an active market for Bitcoins, which market and related database is accessible to the Company on an ongoing basis. |
|
In March of 2014, the Company began accepting Litecoins and Dogecoins. Currently, the Company determines the value of Litecoins and Dogecoins from GoCoin LLC, the payment processor that enables the Company to accept these virtual currencies as payments from its customers for goods. |
Intangible Asset | ' |
The Company has applied the provision of ASC topic 350-50-50 Intangible - Goodwill and Other/Website Development Costs, in accounting for its costs incurred to develop its website. Capitalized website costs are being amortized by the straight line method an estimated useful life of 3 years. Amortization cost was nominal for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
In preparing condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in these estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include the fair values of virtual currencies, valuing equity securities in share-based payment arrangements, estimating the fair value of equity instrument recorded as derivative liabilities, estimating useful lives of depreciable and amortizable assets and estimating the fair value of long-lived assets as to whether impairment charge may apply. |
Revenue recognition | ' |
The Company follows the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104 for revenue recognition and Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.” Accordingly, the Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the selling price to the customer is fixed or determinable and collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured. |
|
The Company’s sole source of revenue is derived from processing fees and the markup of goods purchased by customers through orders originated through the Company’s website. The Company recognizes revenues from the origination of the orders upon receiving confirmation that the third party vendors’ fulfillment process (delivery to customer) is complete. Customer deposits represents orders originated and Virtual Currency payments received for orders that are not yet fulfilled. |
|
The Company has determined that it is not the primary obligor in any of the sales transactions it originates. The Company does not (i) have general inventory risk with respect to any of the goods that its customers purchase, (ii) take title to, or bear the risk of loss for, any goods that third party vendors ship to its customers, (iii) participate in the fulfillment of the sale, (iv) make representations regarding the suitability of products for its customers purposes, (v) modify any of the products purchased, or (vi) assume credit risk. Accordingly, the Company has determined, based on the weight of available evidence, that it is appropriate to record revenues on a net basis, which is equal to the amount of the processing fees, it earns plus the mark-up. |
|
Income Taxes | ' |
As a result of the Merger, beginning on February 5, 2014, the Company is taxed as a C Corporation. Prior to the Merger, the Company was a limited liability company, whereby the Company elected to be taxed as a partnership and the income or loss was reported by each respective member on their separate income tax returns. Therefore, no provision for income taxes has been provided in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for periods prior to February 5, 2014. |
|
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company estimates the degree to which tax assets and credit carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance for such tax assets and loss carryforwards is provided when it is determined to be more likely than not that the benefit of such deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods. Tax benefits of operating loss carryforwards are evaluated on an ongoing basis, including a review of historical and projected future operating results, the eligible carryforward period, and other circumstances. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used, the related valuation allowance on such assets would be reduced. |
|
Fair Value - Definition and Hierarchy | ' |
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction in the principal or most advantageous market between market participants at the measurement date. |
|
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, a fair value hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The valuation techniques are consistent with the market, cost or income approaches to measuring fair value. If more than one valuation technique is used to measure fair value, the results are evaluated considering the reasonableness of the range of values indicated by those results. The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows: |
|
Level 1 - Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 securities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment. |
|
Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. |
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
|
The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors including, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Those estimated values do not necessarily represent the amounts that may be ultimately realized due to the occurrence of future circumstances that cannot be reasonably determined. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may be materially higher or lower than the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for securities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. |
|
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many securities. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified to a lower level within the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The Company considers transfers between the levels within the fair value hierarchy when circumstances surrounding the fair value for a particular security conform to a different level of the fair value hierarchy than as previously reported. Whenever circumstances occur, whereby there is a transfer within the fair value hierarchy, the Company considers the date the event or change in circumstances occurred which caused the transfer. |
Warrant Liability | ' |
The Company accounts for the 1,875,000 common stock warrants granted in connection with the issuance of 3,750,000 Private Placement Units in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D, "Contracts in Entity's Own Equity" whereby under that provision they do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, the Company classifies the warrant instrument as a liability at its fair value on the date of issuance and adjusts the instrument to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company calculates the fair value of the warrants issued using a probability-weighted Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is comparable to the Binomial Lattice option pricing model. The classification of warrants, including whether the warrants should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Warrant liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Offering costs of $62,000 associated with the Private Placement Units were recorded as component of stockholders’ equity. |
Employee Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
2014 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
The purpose of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) is to promote the success of the Company and to increase stockholder value by providing an additional means through the grant of awards to attract, motivate, retain and reward selected employees and other eligible persons. The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other types of stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants. Pursuant to the terms of the 2014 Plan, either the Board or a board committee is authorized to administer the plan, including by determining which eligible participants will receive awards, the number of shares of common stock subject to the awards and the terms and conditions of such awards. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the Plan shall terminate at the close of business on January 30, 2024. Up to 15,503,680 shares of common stock are issuable pursuant to awards under the 2014 Plan. |
|
Compensation expense for all stock-based awards is measured on the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis, over the employee's requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company estimates pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and reflects the impact of estimated pre-vesting option forfeitures in compensation expense recognized. For options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company recognizes stock compensation costs utilizing the fair value methodology over the related period of benefit. |
|
The grant date fair value of stock options granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 was $17,860,239. The fair value of the Company’s common stock was based upon the publicly quoted price on the date that the final approval of the awards was obtained. The Company does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future so therefore the dividend yield is 0%. The expected term for stock options granted with service conditions represents the average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is based on the expected term calculated using the approach prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 for “plain vanilla” options. The expected term for stock options granted with performance and/or market conditions represents the estimated period estimated by management by which the performance conditions and market conditions will be met. The Company obtained the risk free interest rate from publicly available data published by the Federal Reserve. The volatility rate was computed based on a comparison of average volatility rates of similar companies. The fair value of options granted in 2014 was estimated using the following assumptions – exercise price $0.50, expected stock price volatility 73.9%, effective life 3.5 years, risk free rate 0.69%. |
|
Stock-based compensation expense was as $1,343,794 for the three months ended March 31, 2014: |
|
Stock Option Activity |
|
A summary of stock option activity to employees for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows: |
|
| | Number of Options | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share | | | Avergae Remaining Contractual Life | | | Average Intrinsic Value | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | | | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | |
Granted | | | 6,201,472 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 2.88 | | | | 5 | | | | - | |
Expired | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 | | | 6,201,472 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 2.88 | | | | 4.8 | | | $ | - | |
Exercisable as of March 31, 2014 | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | |
|
The Company’s policy, in the event of exercise, is to issue new shares to fulfill the requirements for options that are exercised. There is $16,516,445 of unrecognized compensation cost as of March 31, 2014. |
Advertising Expense | ' |
Advertisement costs are expensed as incurred and included in marketing expenses. Advertising expenses amounted to $17,897 for the period ended January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014. |
Earnings per Share | ' |
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. |
|
For purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, vested restricted stock awards are considered outstanding. Under the treasury stock method, diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments that are convertible into common stock were exercised or could result in the issuance of common stock. The following financial instruments were not included in the diluted loss per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2014 because their effect was anti-dilutive: |
|
| | As of March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock options | | | 6,201,472 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock warrants | | | 1,875,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series B Convertible Preferred | | | 26,580,600 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Series C Convertible Preferred | | | 3,750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Excluded potentially dilutive securities | | | 38,407,072 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Investment at Cost | ' |
On March 20, 2014, the Company invested $150,000 into Series A preferred units of GoCoin, LLC (“GoCoin”). GoCoin is an international payment processor that enables merchants to accept Bitcoin, Litecoin and Dogecoin payments at the point of checkout in e-commerce transaction. The Company does not maintain significant influence. The investment is carried at cost in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. No gains or losses have been recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
The Company has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements and their adoption has not had or is not expected to have a material impact on Company’s financial position or operations. |
Subsequent events | ' |
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date of this filing. |