Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. |
|
Reclassifications | ' |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. |
|
Use of Estimates | ' |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these financial statements. Management must apply significant judgment in this process. In addition, other factors may affect estimates, including: expected business and operational changes, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates, and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation process often may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future outcomes and management must select an amount that falls within that range of reasonable estimates. This process may result in actual results differing materially from those estimated amounts used in the preparation of the financial statements. |
|
Segment Reporting | ' |
|
Segment Reporting |
|
To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as one segment operating primarily in the United States. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities | ' |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities |
|
All highly liquid securities with maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, cash and cash equivalents are comprised of funds invested in cash and money market accounts. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC. The accounts are monitored by management to mitigate the risk. |
|
Investments with maturities of more than 90 days from the date of purchase are considered marketable securities. Marketable securities are stated at fair value. The Company has classified the entire marketable securities portfolio as available-for-sale securities. Accordingly, any unrealized gain or loss on the investments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The amortized cost of these securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, as applicable. Such amortizations and accretions are included in interest income. The entire marketable securities portfolio is considered available for use in current operations and, accordingly, all such investments are considered current assets although the stated maturity of individual investments may be one year or more beyond the balance sheet date. |
|
Realized gains and losses on sales of marketable securities are determined on a specific identification basis and reported in interest income. When securities are sold, any associated unrealized gain or loss previously reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reclassified out of stockholders' equity and recorded in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the period. Accrued interest and dividends are included in interest income. |
|
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews its available-for-sale securities for other-than temporary declines in fair value below the amortized cost basis. This evaluation is based on a number of factors including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis and any adverse conditions related specifically to the security, including any changes to the credit rating of the security. If the Company concludes that an other-than- temporary impairment exists, it recognizes an impairment charge to reduce the investment to fair value and records the related charge as a reduction of interest income. No impairment charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not have any marketable securities. There were no realized gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities for the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011 and were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
Restricted Cash | ' |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
Restricted cash of $5,602,000 and $15,978,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, represents restricted cash received through the collaboration arrangement with Bayer that will be used to fund certain further global development activities of ATX-101. See Note 8, "Commitments, Collaborations and Contingencies." |
|
Payments the Company received to fund collaboration efforts under the terms of the collaboration agreement with Bayer were recorded as restricted cash and deferred development funds, and are recognized as an offset to development expenses as the restricted cash is utilized to fund such development activities. |
|
Property and Equipment | ' |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are recorded at historical cost and consisted of the following: |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Cameras | | $ | 923,000 | | $ | 923,000 | |
Computer hardware and electronics | | | 182,000 | | | 147,000 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 234,000 | | | 227,000 | |
Software | | | 21,000 | | | 21,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 1,360,000 | | | 1,318,000 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (1,266,000 | ) | | (1,043,000 | ) |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | $ | 94,000 | | $ | 275,000 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|
Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (one to five years). The Company reviews its property and equipment assets for impairment in value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company disposed of $54,000 of computer hardware and electronics for the year ended December 31, 2011, with a recognized loss at disposal of $4,000. No disposals were made during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and no loss on disposal was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
|
Cameras were used in our clinical trials, are fully depreciated as of December 31, 2013 and are being held for disposal. |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk | ' |
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. The primary objectives for the Company's investment portfolio are the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. We do not enter into any investment transaction for trading or speculative purposes. |
|
The Company's investment policy limits investments to certain types of instruments such as certificates of deposit, money market instruments, obligations issued by U.S. government and U.S. government agencies and corporate debt securities and places restrictions on maturities and concentration by type and issuer. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of amounts insured by the FDIC. The accounts are monitored by management to mitigate the risk. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company accounts for all stock-based payments issued to employees and directors using an option pricing model for estimating fair value. Accordingly, stock-based compensation expense is measured based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the date of grant, net of forfeitures. Compensation expense is recognized for the portion that is ultimately expected to vest over the period during which the recipient renders the required services to the Company using the straight-line single option method. |
|
In accordance with authoritative guidance, the fair value of non-employee stock based awards is remeasured as the awards vest, and the resulting increase in fair value, if any, is recognized as expense in the period the related services are rendered. |
|
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants | ' |
|
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants |
|
Prior to the Company's IPO, freestanding warrants that related to the purchase of redeemable convertible preferred stock were classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value each reporting period regardless of the timing of the redemption feature or the redemption price or the likelihood of redemption. The warrants were subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value was recognized as a component of warrant and other income (expense), net. Pursuant to the terms of these warrants, upon the conversion of the class of preferred stock underlying the warrant, the warrants automatically became exercisable for shares of the Company's common stock based upon the conversion ratio of the underlying class of preferred stock. The consummation of the Company's IPO resulted in the conversion of all classes of the Company's preferred stock into common stock. Upon such conversion of the underlying classes of preferred stock, the warrants were reclassified as a component of equity and were no longer subject to remeasurement. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements for accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these accounts. The fair value of cash equivalents, marketable securities and the notes payable are discussed in Note 9, "Fair Value Measurements." |
|
Revenue Recognition | ' |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following four criteria are present: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
For arrangements that involve the delivery of more than one element, each product, service and/or right to use assets is evaluated to determine whether it qualifies as a separate unit of accounting. This determination is based on whether the deliverable has "stand-alone value" to the customer. The consideration that is fixed or determinable is then allocated to each separate unit of accounting based on the relative selling price of each deliverable. The estimated selling price of each deliverable is determined using the following hierarchy of values: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value, (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (TPE) and (iii) best estimate of selling price (BESP). The BESP reflects our best estimate of what the selling price would be if the deliverable was regularly sold by us on a stand-alone basis. In most cases we expect to use TPE or BESP for allocating consideration to each deliverable. The consideration allocated to each unit of accounting is recognized as the related goods or services are delivered, limited to the consideration that is not contingent upon future deliverables. Analyzing the arrangement to identify deliverables requires the use of judgment, and each deliverable may be an obligation to deliver services, a right or license to use an asset, or another performance obligation. |
|
The Company's revenue is related to the license agreement with Bayer executed in 2010. This agreement provided for various types of payments, including non-refundable upfront license fees, milestone payments, and future royalties on Bayer's net product sales of ATX-101. |
|
The Company received a non-refundable upfront license payment of approximately $21,319,000 from Bayer upon execution of the license agreement. The terms of the collaboration arrangement with Bayer included continuing performance obligations and development and clinical manufacturing supply obligations that were conditions to Bayer's decision to pursue continued development and regulatory approval for ATX-101. Due to these ongoing performance obligations, the Company determined that the license did not have stand-alone value. The Company also did not have objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of these undelivered obligations. Accordingly, amounts received upfront under the license agreement were recorded as deferred revenue and were recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of substantial involvement in these collaboration activities, which were completed as of May 31, 2012. The period over which these activities were to be performed was based upon management's estimate of the period to complete the development activities required to be conducted relative to the upfront license fee and development funds received from Bayer. |
|
The Company recognizes revenue from milestone payments when earned, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive in that it can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either the entity's performance or on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the entity's performance and its achievability was not reasonably assured at the inception of the collaboration arrangement and (ii) the Company does not have ongoing performance obligations related to the achievement of the milestone earned and (iii) it would result in additional payments being due to the Company. Milestone payments are considered substantive if all of the following conditions are met: the milestone payment is non-refundable; achievement of the milestone was not reasonably assured at the inception of the arrangement; substantive effort is involved to achieve the milestone; and the amount of the milestone appears reasonable in relation to the effort expended, the other milestones in the arrangement and the related risk associated with the achievement of the milestone. Any amounts received under the collaboration arrangement in advance of performance, if deemed substantive, are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue as the Company completes its performance obligations. |
|
Research and Development Costs | ' |
|
Research and Development Costs |
|
Major components of research and development (R&D) costs include cash compensation, stock-based compensation, pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and related clinical manufacturing, materials and supplies, and fees paid to consultants and other entities that conduct certain research and development activities on the Company's behalf. R&D costs, including upfront fees and milestones paid to collaborators, are expensed as goods are received or services rendered. Costs to acquire technologies to be used in research and development that have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use are also expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in connection with clinical trial activities for which the underlying nature of the activities themselves do not directly relate to active research and development, such as costs incurred for market research and focus groups linked to clinical strategy as well as costs to build the Company's brand, are not included in R&D costs but are reflected as general and administrative expenses. |
|
The Company enters into agreements with various research institutions, contract laboratories, contract manufacturers and consultants. These agreements are generally on a fee-for-service basis and are cancelable. |
|
Clinical Trial Accruals | ' |
|
Clinical Trial Accruals |
|
As part of the process of preparing its financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its expenses resulting from its obligations under contracts with vendors and consultants and clinical site agreements in connection with conducting clinical trials. The financial terms of these contracts are subject to negotiations which vary from contract to contract and may result in payment flows that do not match the periods over which materials or services are provided to us under such contracts. The Company's objective is to reflect the appropriate trial expenses in its financial statements by matching those expenses with the period in which services and efforts are expended. The Company accounts for these expenses according to the progress of the trial as measured by patient progression and the timing of various aspects of the trial. The Company determines accrual estimates through financial models taking into account discussion with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the progress or state of consummation of trials, or the services completed. During the course of a clinical trial, the Company adjusts its rate of clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from its estimates. The Company makes estimates of its accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in its financial statements based on the facts and circumstances known to us at that time. Although the Company does not expect its estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, its understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result in us reporting amounts that are too high or too low for any particular period. Through December 31, 2013, there have been no material adjustments to the Company's prior period estimates of accrued expenses for clinical trials. The Company's clinical trial accrual is dependent in part upon the timely and accurate reporting of contract research organizations and other third-party vendors. |
|
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share | ' |
|
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share |
|
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding the dilutive effects of converting redeemable preferred stock, warrants to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock or common stock and options outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the potential dilutive effects of redeemable convertible preferred stock, warrants to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock or common stock and options outstanding during the period calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method. Because the impact of these items is anti-dilutive during periods of net loss, there was no difference between the weighted average number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The calculation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding excludes the dilutive effect of redeemable convertible preferred stock, warrants to purchase redeemable convertible preferred stock and options to purchase common stock, as the impact of such items are anti-dilutive during periods of net loss. Shares excluded from the calculation, prior to the use of the treasury stock method, unweighted, were 2,335,000, 1,956,000 and 13,334,000 at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
Income Taxes | ' |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires, among other things, that deferred income taxes be provided for temporary differences between the tax bases of the Company's assets and liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management has considered estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, its provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. |
|
Additionally, the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for a particular tax position is based on the largest benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. Accordingly, the Company establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions. |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ' |
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net loss and other comprehensive income (loss). For the year ended December 31, 2013, the only component of other comprehensive income (loss) relates to net unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities. We had no other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. |
|
Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted a new accounting standard that requires increased disclosure regarding amounts that are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income subsequent to January 1, 2013. There were no reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
Collaboration Arrangements | ' |
|
Collaboration Arrangements |
|
From time to time, we enter into certain collaboration arrangements with third parties regarding the research and development, manufacture and/or commercialization of products and product candidates. These collaborations generally provide for non-refundable, upfront license fees, research and development and commercial performance milestone payments, cost sharing and royalty payments. The collaboration agreements with third parties are performed on a "best efforts" basis with no guarantee of either technological or commercial success. The Company evaluates whether an arrangement is a collaboration arrangement at its inception based on the facts and circumstances specific to the arrangement. The Company reevaluates whether an arrangement qualifies or continues to qualify as a collaboration arrangement whenever there is a change in the anticipated or actual ultimate commercial success of the endeavor. See Note 8, "Commitments, Collaborations and Contingencies." |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In July 2013, a new accounting standard was issued that requires companies to present in the financial statements an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. To the extent the tax benefit is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax law or if the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. The standard is required to be adopted prospectively beginning on January 1, 2014 and may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented. The Company does not believe the adoption of this accounting standard will have a material impact on the Company's financial statements and related disclosures. |
|