Document and Entity Information
Document and Entity Information - shares | 3 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | May 11, 2018 | |
Document And Entity Information | ||
Entity Registrant Name | ADVANCED CREDIT TECHNOLOGIES INC | |
Entity Central Index Key | 1,437,517 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Document Period End Date | Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Amendment Flag | false | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer? | No | |
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer? | No | |
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current? | Yes | |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 63,042,181 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q1 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,018 |
Consolidated and Condensed Bala
Consolidated and Condensed Balance Sheets - USD ($) | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Current assets | ||
Cash | $ 46,919 | $ 112,799 |
Advanced Commissions | 40,146 | 16,000 |
Total Current Assets | 87,065 | 128,799 |
Fixed Assets | ||
Software and Computer Equipment, net | 640,717 | 670,728 |
Total Fixed Assets | 640,717 | 670,728 |
Total Assets | 727,782 | 799,527 |
Current Liabilities | ||
Accounts Payable and accrued expenses | 19,978 | 10,128 |
Loans payable- stockholders | 50,000 | 50,000 |
Loans from related parties | 120,000 | 145,000 |
Total Current Liabilities | 189,978 | 205,128 |
Total Liabilities | 189,978 | 205,128 |
Commitments and Contingencies | ||
Stockholders'Equity (deficit) | ||
Common Stock: $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 63,042,181 and 61,982,181 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 respectively | 63,043 | 61,982 |
Preferred Stock $0.001 per value - 30,000 shares authorized; 30,000 shares issued and outstanding | 30 | 30 |
Shares to be issued: 150,000 Common Stock | 12,000 | 12,000 |
Additional paid in capital | 3,288,331 | 3,141,639 |
Accumulated deficit | (2,825,600) | (2,621,252) |
Total Stockholders' Equity (deficit) | 537,804 | 594,399 |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (deficit) | $ 727,782 | $ 799,527 |
Consolidated and Condensed Bal3
Consolidated and Condensed Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract] | ||
Common stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
Common stock, shares issued | 63,042,181 | 61,982,181 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 63,042,181 | 61,982,181 |
Preferred Stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Preferred Stock, shares authorized | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Preferred Stock, shares issued | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Preferred Stock, shares outstanding | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Common stock, subscribed | 150,000 | 150,000 |
Consolidated and Condensed Stat
Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Operations - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Income Statement [Abstract] | ||
Consulting revenue | ||
Total Revenue | ||
Operational Expense | ||
Professional fee | 28,814 | 2,793 |
Research | 1,500 | |
Stock Compensation Expense | 29,751 | |
Officer's compensation | 69,989 | 71,975 |
Travel and entertainment | 15,696 | 2,498 |
Rent | 150 | 150 |
Depreciation | 30,013 | |
Computer and internet | 2,010 | 965 |
Office supplies and expenses | 1,875 | 544 |
Other Operating Expenses | 12,550 | 575 |
Total operating expenses | 192,348 | 79,500 |
Loss from operations | (192,348) | (79,500) |
Other Income/Expense | ||
Loss on Settlement of Debt | (12,000) | |
Interest | (15,030) | |
Total Other Income / Expenses | (12,000) | (15,030) |
Provision for income taxes | ||
Net loss | $ (204,348) | $ (94,530) |
Loss per common share- basic and diluted | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 62,849,907 | 45,104,070 |
Consolidated and Condensed Sta5
Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2017 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||
Net loss | $ (204,348) | $ (94,530) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities | ||
Loss on Settlement of Debt | 12,000 | |
Depreciation | 30,013 | |
Stock Compensation | 29,751 | |
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities | ||
Advanced Commissions | (24,146) | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 15,850 | 6,618 |
Due to related parties | 2,000 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | (140,880) | (85,912) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||
Proceeds from Common Stock Issuance | 100,000 | 65,000 |
Repayment of Note Principal | (25,000) | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 75,000 | 65,000 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents | (65,880) | (20,912) |
Cash and Equivalents at Beginning of the Period | 112,799 | 31,776 |
Cash and Equivalents at End of the Period | 46,919 | 10,864 |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||
Interest paid | ||
Income taxes paid | ||
NON-CASH DISCLOSURES | ||
Company issued 60,000 shares of Stock for payment of accrued expenses | $ 6,000 |
Consolidated and Condensed Sta6
Consolidated and Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Parenthetical) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018shares | |
Statement of Cash Flows [Abstract] | |
Shares for accrued expenses | 60,000 |
Summary of Significant Accounti
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization and Nature of Business ACRT (“ACRT”, “We” or the “Company”) is a development-stage technology company focused on fraud prevention and credit management. The Company offers a proprietary software platform branded as CyberloQ™ . While previously the Company licensed CyberloQ, in the third quarter of 2017, the Company acquired the CyberloQ technology and is now the exclusive owner of CyberloQ. CyberloQ is a banking fraud prevention technology that is offered to institutional clients in order to combat fraudulent transactions and unauthorized access to customer accounts. Through the use of a customer’s smart-phone, CyberloQ uses a multi-factor authentication system to control access to a bank card, transaction type or amount, website, database or digital service. The mobile applications for CyberloQ have been built, and the Company is currently beta-testing the technology in the banking ecosystem. In addition to CyberloQ, the Company offers a web-based proprietary software platform under the brand name Turnscor® which allows customers to monitor and manage their credit from the privacy of their own homes. Although individuals can sign-up for Turnscor on their own, the Company also intends to market Turnscor to certain institutional clients, where appropriate, in conjunction with CyberloQ as a value-added benefit to offer their customers. Moreover, on March 30, 2017 the Company entered into an Agreement with Swiss Venture Trust, a subsidiary of XCELL Security House, S.A. of Lausanne, Switzerland whose President, Lynnwood Farr, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The equity exchange and revenue sharing agreements entered into between the two companies are currently in the process of being renegotiated, and the renegotiated terms of such contracts will be disclosed when finalized. On June 15, 2017, the Company created a private limited company in the United Kingdom named CyberloQ Technologies LTD. CyberloQ Technologies LTD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and any business that the Company has in the United Kingdom will be transacted through CyberloQ Technologies LTD. However, to date CyberloQ Technologies LTD has not had any operating activity or generated any revenue for the Company. Basis of Presentation The financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in U.S. dollars. The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned or controlled operating subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Reclassification Certain reclassifications have been made to conform previously reported data to the current presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on our net income (loss) or financial position as previously reported. Use of Estimates In preparing these financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the year reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company's estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to this concentration of risk. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no in deposits in excess of federally-insured limits. Research and Development, Software Development Costs, and Internal Use Software Development Costs Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic No. 985. Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable. For products where proven technology exists, this may occur very early in the development cycle. Factors we consider in determining when technological feasibility has been established include (i) whether a proven technology exists; (ii) the quality and experience levels of the individuals developing the software; (iii) whether the software is similar to previously developed software which has used the same or similar technology; and (iv) whether the software is being developed with a proven underlying engine. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Capitalized costs for those products that are canceled or abandoned are charged immediately to cost of sales. The recoverability of capitalized software development costs is evaluated on the expected performance of the specific products for which the costs relate. Internal use software development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 which requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. In accounting for website software development costs, we have adopted the provisions of ASC Topic No. 350. ASC Topic No. 350 provides that certain planning and training costs incurred in the development of website software be expensed as incurred, while application development stage costs are to be capitalized. During the periods ending March 31, 2018 and 2017, we expensed $1,500 and $0 in expenditures on research and development, respectively. Of the $1,500 paid in 2018, none was paid to related parties. Fixed Assets The Company records its fixed assets at historical cost. The Company expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Upon disposition of fixed assets, the gross cost and accumulated depreciation are written off and the difference between the proceeds and the net book value is recorded as a gain or loss on sale of assets. The Company depreciates its fixed assets over their respective estimated useful lives ranging from three to fifteen years. Intangible and Long-Lived Assets The Company follows FASB ASC 360-10, "Property, Plant, and Equipment," Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Determining whether some or all of these criteria have been met involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue the Company reports. Fair Value Measurements For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. The Company has adopted FASB ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures." · Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. · Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. · Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. The Company did not identify any other non-recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 815. In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," "Financial Instruments." Segment Reporting FASB ASC 280, "Segment Reporting" Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all-of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Applicable interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations. The Company is not aware of uncertain tax positions. Earnings (Loss) Per Share Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with the FASB ASC 260-10, "Earnings Per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. At March 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company has 1,250,000 and 0 warrants issued (respectively) that can be exercised and could be dilutive to the existing number of shares issued and outstanding. However, due to the Company’s periods of losses, the basic weighted average is equal to the weighted average shares outstanding. The computation of earnings per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding at the date of the financial statements. Stock Based Compensation The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (formerly SFAS 123R), which establishes the use of the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements under which compensation cost is determined using the fair value of stock-based compensation determined as of the date of grant and is recognized over the periods in which the related services are rendered. For stock-based compensation the Company recognizes an expense in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and values the equity securities based on the fair value of the security on the date of grant. Stock option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees where the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which revises the accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The new guidance requires the fair value measurement of investments in equity securities and other ownership interests in an entity, including investments in partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies (collectively, equity securities) that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method. Entities will need to measure these investments and recognize changes in fair value in net income. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities they classify under current guidance as available for sale in other comprehensive income (OCI). They also will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. Instead, for these types of equity investments that do not otherwise qualify for the net asset value practical expedient, entities will be permitted to elect a practicability exception and measure the investment at cost less impairment plus or minus observable price changes (in orderly transactions). The ASU also establishes an incremental recognition and disclosure requirement related to the presentation of fair value changes of financial liabilities for which the fair value option (FVO) has been elected. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to separately present in OCI the portion of the total fair value change attributable to instrument-specific credit risk as opposed to reflecting the entire amount in earnings. For derivative liabilities for which the FVO has been elected, however, any changes in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk would continue to be presented in net income, which is consistent with current guidance. For the Company, this standard is effective beginning January 1, 2018 via a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings, except for guidance relative to equity securities without readily determinable fair values which is applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing this ASU's impacts on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”. The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations by amending certain existing illustrative examples and adding additional illustrative examples to assist in the application of the guidance. The effective date and transition of these amendments is the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. Public entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2014-09 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein. The Company is currently not generating any revenue, however, the Company will report gross revenue and agent considerations as separate line items upon revenue receipt. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company has implemented this effective January 1, 2017. The impact on the financial statements is enhanced disclosure in the statement of cash flows. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies certain accounting aspects for share-based payments to employees including, among other elements, the accounting for income taxes and forfeitures, as well as classifications in the statement of cash flows. With respect to income taxes, under current guidance, when a share-based payment award such as a stock option or restricted stock unit (RSU) is granted to an employee, the fair value of the award is generally recognized over the vesting period. However, the related deduction from taxes payable is based on the award’s intrinsic value at the time of exercise (for an option) or on the fair value upon vesting of the award (for RSUs), which can be either greater (creating an excess tax benefit) or less (creating a tax deficiency) than the compensation cost recognized in the financial statements. Excess tax benefits are recognized in additional paid-in capital (APIC) within equity, and tax deficiencies are similarly recognized in APIC to the extent there is a sufficient APIC amount (APIC pool) related to previously recognized excess tax benefits. Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits/deficiencies would be recognized as income tax benefit/expense in the statement of income. The new ASU’s income tax aspects also impact the calculation of diluted earnings per share by excluding excess tax benefits/deficiencies from the calculation of assumed proceeds available to repurchase shares under the treasury stock method. Relative to forfeitures, the new standard allows an entity-wide accounting policy election either to continue to estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited or to account for forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance also impacts classifications within the statement of cash flows by no longer requiring inclusion of excess tax benefits as both a hypothetical cash outflow within cash flows from operating activities and hypothetical cash inflow within cash flows from financing activities. Instead, excess tax benefits would be classified in operating activities in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxes. Additionally, the new ASU requires cash payments to tax authorities when an employer uses a net-settlement feature to withhold shares to meet statutory tax withholding provisions to be presented as financing activity (eliminating previous diversity in practice). For the Company, this standard was adopted effective January 1, 2017, and has had no accounting effect to date because the Company has no employees. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard provides guidance in a number of situations including, among others, settlement of zero-coupon bonds, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU also provides guidance for classifying cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. For the Company, this ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company has adopted this standard however, currently this ASU has no impact on its results of operations and financial condition. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. Under the ASU, changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included along with those of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities would no longer present transfers between cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In addition, a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows would be disclosed when the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents. For the Company, this ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to apply the standard’s provisions on a retrospective basis. The Company has adopted this standard and this ASU has neither a retrospective nor current material impact on the Company’s condensed results of operations and financial condition, as the Company has no restricted cash. |
Going Concern
Going Concern | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Going Concern | NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN The Company has incurred losses since Inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $2,825,600 as of March 31, 2018 that includes a loss of $559,990 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that could result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Compa ny generating profitable operations in the future and, or, obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management anticipates that the Company will be dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund operating expenses. The Company intends to position itself so that it may be able to raise additional funds through the capital markets. In light of management's efforts, there are no assurances that the Company will be successful in this or any of its endeavors or become financially viable and continue as a going concern. |
Stockholders Deficit
Stockholders Deficit | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Equity [Abstract] | |
Stockholders Deficit | NOTE 3 – STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT Common Stock The Company has 100,000,000 shares of $.001 par value common stock authorized as of March 31, 2018 and December 31 2017. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company received $100,000 in payment for 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Also during the same period, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock in payment of $6,000 of accrued legal fees, recognizing a loss on settlement of debt of $12,000. There were 63,042,181 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the period end. In 2017, the Company received $700,850 in payment for 12,677,000 shares of common stock. Also in 2017, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock to acquire the Cyberloq™ technology, and 350,000 shares of common stock were issued as compensation for services. Furthermore, the company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for the conversion of debt. There were 61,982,181 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017. Preferred Stock The Company did not have any preferred stock prior to 2017. In April of 2017, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to create a new class of stock designated Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock consisting of thirty-thousand (30,000) shares at par value of $0.001 per share. Certain rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions were established for the Series A Preferred Stock as follows: (a) the amount to be represented in stated capital at all times for each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall be its par value of $0.001 per share; (b) except as otherwise required by law, holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall vote together with the common stock as a single class and the holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to five-thousand (5,000) votes per share of Series A Preferred Stock; and (c) in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, either voluntary or involuntary, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution of assets of the Corporation to the holders of the common stock, the original purchase price paid for the Series A Preferred Stock. All 30,000 shares of the Series A Super Voting Preferred Stock were issued in 2017. |
Commitments
Commitments | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Commitments | NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS The Company rents office space on a month to month basis for its main office at 871 Venetia Bay Blvd Suite #202 Venice, FL 34285. Monthly rent for this space is $50. All conditions have been met and paid by the Company. In 2015, in conjunction with a proposed TurnScor Card platform, the Company signed three Investor Royalty and Warrant Agreements with four parties. In exchange for the funds contributed by the four parties, the Company agreed to: 1. Pay the investors monthly residuals of 2.0% to 5% per month on the gross revenue after expenses generated by the Company's primary platform in conjunction with the Company's TurnScor Card; 2. Pay the investors a residual in perpetuity on 2% to 5% of all sub-platform revenue generated; and 3. Issue warrants to investors all of which have either been exercised or expired except for one individual that has two unexercised warrants: one to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at $0.15 per share that expires in November of 2018, and another to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share that expires in November of 2019. The Company does not plan to proceed with the TurnScor Card at this time. |
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related Party Transactions | NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Acquisition of Cyberloq™ During 2017 the Company acquired the CyberloQ™ banking fraud prevention technology. (the “Technology”) Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, the prior license agreement between the Company and CartenTech LLC was terminated, and the Company is now the exclusive owner of the CyberloQ™ banking fraud prevention technology along with all intellectual property rights associated with the Technology which is copyrighted with the United States Copyright Office. The owner of CartenTech LLC is Mark Carten, who is also a director of ACRT and its Chief Technology Officer. On July 28, 2017, the Company purchased the Technology with a value of $720,000. As consideration for the acquisition of and all rights to the Technology, CartenTech LLC received: (a) payment of $50,000, (b) a note for $150,000, and (c) 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The software is being depreciated over its useful life of six-years in conjunction with the Company’s depreciation policy. Issuance of Warrants In 2016 and 2017, Rex Schuette, one of the Company’s directors, was issued two warrants to potentially acquire a total of 1,250,000 additional shares of common stock. One warrant to potentially acquire an additional 625,000 shares of common stock expires on June 19, 2018, and the other warrant to potentially acquire an additional 625,000 shares of common stock expires on June 28, 2019. Both warrants are exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company revalued the warrants based on information that has come forward that caused a recalculation of the 1,250,000 warrants value from the $51,592 (as disclosed in the December 31, 2017 footnote) to the corrected amount $96,643. All Related Party Loans Payable The following is a summary of related party loans payable: For the Periods Ended March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Loans payable - stockholders $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Loans from related parties $ 120,000 $ 145,000 Loans Payable - Stockholders On December 29, 2014, the Company entered into a partially-convertible promissory note with a shareholder in the amount of $35,000. In January of 2015, the shareholder partially-exercised its conversion option, and in May of 2016 the shareholder exercised the remainder of its conversion option. In December 2017, the remaining unpaid principal and interest due on the note was settled in full for a $50,000 note and the Company recognized $151,324 in gain on settlement of debt. The current $50,000 note has a stated interest rate of 0% and an extended due date of March 31, 2019 . On October 26, 2013 the Company issued a promissory note of $150,000. The total amount owed as of September 28, 2017 was $160,900. On September 28, 2017 the total amount of $160,900 was converted to 500,000 shares of stock for a value of $150,000 and recorded other income gain of $10,900 by the Company. Loans from Related Parties As set forth above, during 2017 the Company acquired the intellectual property and ownership rights to CyberloQ™ from Carten Tech, LLC. The owner was the Company’s Chief Technology Officer, Mark Carten. The purchase included $50,000 in cash, a non-interest bearing note payable of $150,000, and 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The balance of this note payable as of March 31, 2018 is $120,000. On January 2, 2018, the Company received an extended maturity date on this note, the new maturity date is June 23, 2018. |
Convertible Notes - Stockholder
Convertible Notes - Stockholders | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Notes Payable | NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES-STOCKHOLDERS On June 26, 2012 the company issued a note to a shareholder for $12,000. Principal and interest were not originally recognized on this note in 2012. On December 29, 2017 this note was converted to 150,000 shares of common stock and the Company recognized the transaction as stock compensation expense upon such conversion. |
Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | |
Subsequent Events | NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In December of 2017, the Company agreed to issue 150,000 shares of common stock in full satisfaction of all principal and interest due pursuant to a note. As of the date of this filing, the shares had not yet been issued. Other than the foregoing, the Company is not aware of any subsequent events through the date of this filing that require disclosure or recognition in these financial statements. |
Summary of Significant Accoun14
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Organization and Nature of Business | Organization and Nature of Business ACRT (“ACRT”, “We” or the “Company”) is a development-stage technology company focused on fraud prevention and credit management. The Company offers a proprietary software platform branded as CyberloQ™ . While previously the Company licensed CyberloQ, in the third quarter of 2017, the Company acquired the CyberloQ technology and is now the exclusive owner of CyberloQ. CyberloQ is a banking fraud prevention technology that is offered to institutional clients in order to combat fraudulent transactions and unauthorized access to customer accounts. Through the use of a customer’s smart-phone, CyberloQ uses a multi-factor authentication system to control access to a bank card, transaction type or amount, website, database or digital service. The mobile applications for CyberloQ have been built, and the Company is currently beta-testing the technology in the banking ecosystem. In addition to CyberloQ, the Company offers a web-based proprietary software platform under the brand name Turnscor® which allows customers to monitor and manage their credit from the privacy of their own homes. Although individuals can sign-up for Turnscor on their own, the Company also intends to market Turnscor to certain institutional clients, where appropriate, in conjunction with CyberloQ as a value-added benefit to offer their customers. Moreover, on March 30, 2017 the Company entered into an Agreement with Swiss Venture Trust, a subsidiary of XCELL Security House, S.A. of Lausanne, Switzerland whose President, Lynnwood Farr, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The equity exchange and revenue sharing agreements entered into between the two companies are currently in the process of being renegotiated, and the renegotiated terms of such contracts will be disclosed when finalized. On June 15, 2017, the Company created a private limited company in the United Kingdom named CyberloQ Technologies LTD. CyberloQ Technologies LTD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and any business that the Company has in the United Kingdom will be transacted through CyberloQ Technologies LTD. However, to date CyberloQ Technologies LTD has not had any operating activity or generated any revenue for the Company. |
Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation The financial statements of the Company have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in U.S. dollars. The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned or controlled operating subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
Reclassification | Reclassification Certain reclassifications have been made to conform previously reported data to the current presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on our net income (loss) or financial position as previously reported. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates In preparing these financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the year reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company's estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to this concentration of risk. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had no in deposits in excess of federally-insured limits. |
Research and Development, Software Development Costs and Internal Use Software Development Costs | Research and Development, Software Development Costs, and Internal Use Software Development Costs Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic No. 985. Software development costs are capitalized once technological feasibility of a product is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable. For products where proven technology exists, this may occur very early in the development cycle. Factors we consider in determining when technological feasibility has been established include (i) whether a proven technology exists; (ii) the quality and experience levels of the individuals developing the software; (iii) whether the software is similar to previously developed software which has used the same or similar technology; and (iv) whether the software is being developed with a proven underlying engine. Technological feasibility is evaluated on a product-by-product basis. Capitalized costs for those products that are canceled or abandoned are charged immediately to cost of sales. The recoverability of capitalized software development costs is evaluated on the expected performance of the specific products for which the costs relate. Internal use software development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 which requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. In accounting for website software development costs, we have adopted the provisions of ASC Topic No. 350. ASC Topic No. 350 provides that certain planning and training costs incurred in the development of website software be expensed as incurred, while application development stage costs are to be capitalized. During the periods ending March 31, 2018 and 2017, we expensed $1,500 and $0 in expenditures on research and development, respectively. Of the $1,500 paid in 2018, none was paid to related parties. |
Fixed Assets | Fixed Assets The Company records its fixed assets at historical cost. The Company expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Upon disposition of fixed assets, the gross cost and accumulated depreciation are written off and the difference between the proceeds and the net book value is recorded as a gain or loss on sale of assets. The Company depreciates its fixed assets over their respective estimated useful lives ranging from three to fifteen years. |
Intangible and Long-Lived Assets | Intangible and Long-Lived Assets The Company follows FASB ASC 360-10, "Property, Plant, and Equipment," |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Determining whether some or all of these criteria have been met involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue the Company reports. |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable, advances payable and notes payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. The Company has adopted FASB ASC 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures." · Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. · Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. · Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. The Company did not identify any other non-recurring assets and liabilities that are required to be presented in the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 815. In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," "Financial Instruments." |
Segment Reporting | Segment Reporting FASB ASC 280, "Segment Reporting" |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all-of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. Applicable interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations. The Company is not aware of uncertain tax positions. |
Earnings per share | Earnings (Loss) Per Share Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with the FASB ASC 260-10, "Earnings Per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. At March 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company has 1,250,000 and 0 warrants issued (respectively) that can be exercised and could be dilutive to the existing number of shares issued and outstanding. However, due to the Company’s periods of losses, the basic weighted average is equal to the weighted average shares outstanding. The computation of earnings per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding at the date of the financial statements. |
Stock Based Compensation | Stock Based Compensation The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (formerly SFAS 123R), which establishes the use of the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements under which compensation cost is determined using the fair value of stock-based compensation determined as of the date of grant and is recognized over the periods in which the related services are rendered. For stock-based compensation the Company recognizes an expense in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and values the equity securities based on the fair value of the security on the date of grant. Stock option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees where the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which revises the accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The new guidance requires the fair value measurement of investments in equity securities and other ownership interests in an entity, including investments in partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies (collectively, equity securities) that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method. Entities will need to measure these investments and recognize changes in fair value in net income. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities they classify under current guidance as available for sale in other comprehensive income (OCI). They also will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. Instead, for these types of equity investments that do not otherwise qualify for the net asset value practical expedient, entities will be permitted to elect a practicability exception and measure the investment at cost less impairment plus or minus observable price changes (in orderly transactions). The ASU also establishes an incremental recognition and disclosure requirement related to the presentation of fair value changes of financial liabilities for which the fair value option (FVO) has been elected. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to separately present in OCI the portion of the total fair value change attributable to instrument-specific credit risk as opposed to reflecting the entire amount in earnings. For derivative liabilities for which the FVO has been elected, however, any changes in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk would continue to be presented in net income, which is consistent with current guidance. For the Company, this standard is effective beginning January 1, 2018 via a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings, except for guidance relative to equity securities without readily determinable fair values which is applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing this ASU's impacts on the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”. The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations by amending certain existing illustrative examples and adding additional illustrative examples to assist in the application of the guidance. The effective date and transition of these amendments is the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. Public entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2014-09 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein. The Company is currently not generating any revenue, however, the Company will report gross revenue and agent considerations as separate line items upon revenue receipt. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company has implemented this effective January 1, 2017. The impact on the financial statements is enhanced disclosure in the statement of cash flows. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies certain accounting aspects for share-based payments to employees including, among other elements, the accounting for income taxes and forfeitures, as well as classifications in the statement of cash flows. With respect to income taxes, under current guidance, when a share-based payment award such as a stock option or restricted stock unit (RSU) is granted to an employee, the fair value of the award is generally recognized over the vesting period. However, the related deduction from taxes payable is based on the award’s intrinsic value at the time of exercise (for an option) or on the fair value upon vesting of the award (for RSUs), which can be either greater (creating an excess tax benefit) or less (creating a tax deficiency) than the compensation cost recognized in the financial statements. Excess tax benefits are recognized in additional paid-in capital (APIC) within equity, and tax deficiencies are similarly recognized in APIC to the extent there is a sufficient APIC amount (APIC pool) related to previously recognized excess tax benefits. Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits/deficiencies would be recognized as income tax benefit/expense in the statement of income. The new ASU’s income tax aspects also impact the calculation of diluted earnings per share by excluding excess tax benefits/deficiencies from the calculation of assumed proceeds available to repurchase shares under the treasury stock method. Relative to forfeitures, the new standard allows an entity-wide accounting policy election either to continue to estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited or to account for forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance also impacts classifications within the statement of cash flows by no longer requiring inclusion of excess tax benefits as both a hypothetical cash outflow within cash flows from operating activities and hypothetical cash inflow within cash flows from financing activities. Instead, excess tax benefits would be classified in operating activities in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxes. Additionally, the new ASU requires cash payments to tax authorities when an employer uses a net-settlement feature to withhold shares to meet statutory tax withholding provisions to be presented as financing activity (eliminating previous diversity in practice). For the Company, this standard was adopted effective January 1, 2017, and has had no accounting effect to date because the Company has no employees. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard provides guidance in a number of situations including, among others, settlement of zero-coupon bonds, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU also provides guidance for classifying cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. For the Company, this ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company has adopted this standard however, currently this ASU has no impact on its results of operations and financial condition. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. Under the ASU, changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included along with those of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities would no longer present transfers between cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In addition, a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows would be disclosed when the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents. For the Company, this ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to apply the standard’s provisions on a retrospective basis. The Company has adopted this standard and this ASU has neither a retrospective nor current material impact on the Company’s condensed results of operations and financial condition, as the Company has no restricted cash. |
Related Party Transactions (Tab
Related Party Transactions (Tables) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related Party loans payable | For the Periods Ended March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Loans payable - stockholders $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Loans from related parties $ 120,000 $ 145,000 |
Summary of Significant Accoun16
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 1) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ||
Research and development | $ 1,500 | $ 0 |
Warrants, Issued and E xercisable | 1,250,000 | 0 |
Summary of Significant Accoun17
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details 2) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | |
Minimum | |
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |
Useful Life of Fixed Assets | 3 years |
Maximum | |
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |
Useful Life of Fixed Assets | 15 years |
Going Concern (Details Narrativ
Going Concern (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Mar. 31, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2017 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |||
Accumulated deficit | $ (2,825,600) | $ (2,621,252) | |
Net loss | $ (204,348) | $ (94,530) | $ (559,990) |
Stockholders Deficit (Details N
Stockholders Deficit (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 | |
Common stock - par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Common stock - shares authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
Common stock - shares issued | 63,042,181 | 61,982,181 |
Stock Issued for Accounts Payable | $ 6,000 | |
Loss on Settlement of Debt | $ 12,000 | |
Shares issued for software, shares | 4,000,000 | |
Preferred Stock, par value | $ 0.001 | $ 0.001 |
Preferred Stock, shares authorized | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Preferred Stock, shares issued | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Votes per preferred shares | 5,000 | |
Common Stock | ||
Proceeds from issuance of stock, shares | 1,000,000 | 12,677,000 |
Proceeds from issuance of stock, amount | $ 700,850 | |
Stock issued for services, shares | 350,000 | |
Shares issued for Conversion of Debt, shares | 60,000 | 500,000 |
Shares issued for software, shares | 4,000,000 |
Commitments (Details Narrative)
Commitments (Details Narrative) | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018USD ($)$ / sharesshares | |
Rent Expense, monthly | $ | $ 50 |
Royalty and Warrant Agreement #1 [Member] | |
Common stock purchase warrants | shares | 250,000 |
Exercise price | $ / shares | $ 0.15 |
Royalty and Warrant Agreement #2 [Member] | |
Common stock purchase warrants | shares | 250,000 |
Exercise price | $ / shares | $ 0.20 |
Minimum | |
Investors monthly residuals | 2.00% |
Maximum | |
Investors monthly residuals | 5.00% |
Related Party Transactions - Re
Related Party Transactions - Related Party loans payable (Details) - USD ($) | Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2017 |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | ||
Loans payable- stockholders | $ 50,000 | $ 50,000 |
Loans from related parties | $ 120,000 | $ 145,000 |
Related Parties (Details Narrat
Related Parties (Details Narrative) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 10 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Oct. 26, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2017 | Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
Acquisition value | $ 720,000 | |||
Payment for acquisition | 50,000 | |||
Note payable issued for acquisition | $ 120,000 | $ 150,000 | ||
Shares issued for software, shares | 4,000,000 | |||
Warrants, Issued and E xercisable | 1,250,000 | 0 | ||
Warrants | $ 96,643 | $ 51,192 | ||
Gain of Settlement of Debt | $ (12,000) | |||
Warrant #1 [Member] | ||||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
Shares available | 625,000 | |||
Date of expiration | Jun. 19, 2018 | |||
Price per share | $ .20 | |||
Warrant #2 [Member] | ||||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
Shares available | 625,000 | |||
Date of expiration | Jun. 19, 2019 | |||
Price per share | $ .20 | |||
Note Payable to Related Parties [Member] | ||||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||
Date of note | Dec. 29, 2014 | |||
Promissory Note | $ 35,000 | |||
Note issued for settlement of debt | 50,000 | |||
Notes payable, Face value | $ 150,000 | |||
Note Payable, date of conversion | $ 160,900 | |||
Shares issued for Conversion of Debt, shares | 500,000 | |||
Shares issued for Conversion of Debt, amount | $ 150,000 | |||
Gain of Settlement of Debt | $ 151,324 | $ 10,900 |
Convertible Notes - Stockhold23
Convertible Notes - Stockholders (Details) - Convertible Note - June 26, 2012 [Member] | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018USD ($)shares | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Issue date | Jun. 26, 2012 |
Issue amount | $ | $ 12,000 |
Maturity date | Dec. 29, 2017 |
Convertible shares | shares | 150,000 |
Subsequent Events (Details)
Subsequent Events (Details) - shares | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2018 | |
Shares for debt | 60,000 | |
Subsequent Event [Member] | ||
Shares for debt | 150,000 |