Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Presentation | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The accompanying financial statements were prepared by Lilis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of the results of operations and financial position. |
Reclassification | ' |
Reclassification |
|
Certain amounts in the 2012 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2013 consolidated financial statement presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net loss. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of oil and gas reserves, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis and base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, we believe that our estimates are reasonable. |
|
Our most significant financial estimates are associated with our estimated proved oil and gas reserves, assessments of impairment imbedded in the carrying value of undeveloped acreage and proven properties, as well as valuation of common stock used in various issuances of common stock, options and warrants, and estimated derivative liabilities. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and highly liquid debt securities which have original maturities of 90 days or less at the purchase date. |
Restricted Cash | ' |
Restricted Cash |
|
Restricted cash consists of severance and ad valorem tax proceeds which are payable to various tax authorities. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the restricted cash balance was $0.50 million and $0.67 million, respectively. |
Accounts Receivable | ' |
Accounts Receivable |
|
The Company records actual and estimated oil and gas revenue receivable from third parties at its net revenue interest. The Company also reflects costs incurred on behalf of joint interest partners in accounts receivable. Management periodically reviews accounts receivable amounts for collectability and records its allowance for uncollectible receivables under the specific identification method. The Company recorded an allowance for uncollectible receivables of $50,000 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. Allowance for doubtful accounts are based primarily on joint interest billings for expenses related to oil and natural gas wells. Receivables which derive from sales of certain oil and gas production are collateral for our Loan Agreements. (See Note 7-Fair Value of Financial Instruments.) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company did not write off any accounts receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company wrote off accounts receivable for $0.03 million as bad debt expense. |
Concentration of Credit Risk | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
The Company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are invested at major financial institutions primarily within the United States. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were maintained in accounts that are insured up to the limit determined by the federal governmental agency. The Company may at times have balances in excess of the federally insured limits. |
|
The Company's receivables are comprised of oil and gas revenue receivables and joint interest billings receivable. The amounts are due from a limited number of entities. Therefore, the collectability is dependent upon the general economic conditions and financial health of a small number purchasers and joint interest owners. The receivables are not collateralized. However, to date the Company has had minimal bad debts. As of December 31, 2013, the Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $50,000. |
Significant Customers | ' |
Significant Customers |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had one customer, Shell Trading (US), which accounted for approximately 83 percent and 67 percent, respectively, of our revenues. |
|
However, the Company does not believe that the loss of a single purchaser, including Shell Trading (US), would materially affect the Company's business because there are numerous other purchasers in the area in which the Company sells its production. |
Reserves | ' |
Reserves |
|
All of the reserves data included herein are estimates. Estimates of our crude oil and natural gas reserves are prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC, including rule revisions designed to modernize the oil and gas company reserves reporting requirements, which we implemented effective December 31, 2010. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Uncertainties include the projection of future production rates and the expected timing of development expenditures. The accuracy of any reserves estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, reserves estimates may be different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. In addition, economic producibility of reserves is dependent on the oil and gas prices used in the reserves estimate. Our reserves estimates are based on 12-month average commodity prices, unless contractual arrangements otherwise designate the price to be used, in accordance with SEC rules. However, oil and gas prices are volatile and, as a result, our reserves estimates will change in the future. |
|
Estimates of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves significantly affect our depreciation, depletion, and amortization “DD&A” expense. For example, if estimates of proved reserves decline, the DD&A rate will increase, resulting in a decrease in net income. A decline in estimates of proved reserves could also result in an impairment charge, which would reduce earnings. |
Oil and Gas Producing Activities | ' |
Oil and Gas Producing Activities |
|
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby all costs related to the exploration, non-production related development and acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves are capitalized. Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling, developing and completing productive wells and/or plugging and abandoning non-productive wells, and any other costs directly related to acquisition and exploration activities. Proceeds from property sales are generally applied as a credit against capitalized exploration and development costs, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such a sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and the proved reserves attributable to these costs. A significant alteration would typically involve a sale of 25% or more of proved reserves. |
|
Depletion of exploration and development costs and depreciation of wells and tangible production assets is computed using the units-of-production method based upon estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Costs included in the depletion base to be amortized include (a) all proved capitalized costs including capitalized asset retirement costs net of estimated salvage values, less accumulated depletion, (b) estimated future development cost to be incurred in developing proved reserves; and (c) estimated decommissioning and abandonment/restoration costs, net of estimated salvage values, that are not otherwise included in capitalized costs. |
|
|
The costs of undeveloped acreage are withheld from the depletion base until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. When proved reserves are assigned to such properties or one or more specific properties are deemed to be impaired, the cost of such properties or the amount of the impairment is added to full cost pool which is subject to depletion calculations. |
|
Under the full cost method of accounting, capitalized oil and gas property costs less accumulated depletion and net of deferred income taxes may not exceed an amount equal to sum of i.) the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net revenues from proved oil and gas reserves, plus ii.) the cost of unproved properties not subject to amortization (without regard to estimates of fair value), or estimated fair value, if lower, of unproved properties that are not subject to amortization. Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, an impairment expense is recognized. |
|
The present value of estimated future net cash flows was computed by applying: a flat oil price to forecast revenues from estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of period-end, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves (assuming the continuation of existing economic conditions), less any applicable future taxes. |
|
The Company recognized impairment expense of $0 and $26.66 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Effective as of December 31, 2013, the Company completed an assessment of impairment related to its inventory of undeveloped acreage, which resulted in a reduction of the carrying value in the amount of $9.58 million. This impairment was recognized by a transfer of the impairment value from undeveloped acreage to developed properties. In assessing impairment, the Company analyzed all of its undeveloped acreage with expiration dates during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, and that are not otherwise renewable, and impaired such acreage in the amount of $6.38 million. In addition to impairment related to near and intermediate term expirations, the Company assessed carrying value of its remaining acreage, and concluded that an additional impairment of $3.20 million was necessary. (See Note 4 – Oil and Gas Properties & Oil and Gas Properties Acquisitions and Divestitures.) |
Wells in Progress | ' |
Wells in Progress |
|
Wells in progress connotes wells that are currently in the process of being drilled or completed or otherwise under evaluation as to their potential to produce oil and gas reserves in commercial quantities. Such wells continue to be classified as wells in progress and withheld from the depletion calculation and the ceiling test until such time as either proved reserves can be assigned, or the wells are otherwise abandoned. Upon either the assignment of proved reserves or abandonment, the costs for these wells are then transferred to the full cost pool and become subject to both depletion and the ceiling test calculations. (See Note 5 – Wells in Progress.) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company evaluated the wells in progress activity and transferred $0.18 million to evaluated properties for projects that were either completed or are no longer being evaluated. |
|
As of December 31, 2013, the Company has $1.15 million in wells in progress compared to $0.19 million in wells in progress as of December 31, 2012. (See Note 5 – Wells in Progress.) |
Deferred Financing Costs | ' |
Deferred Financing Costs |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company recorded unamortized deferred financing costs of approximately $0.03 million and $0.97 million, respectively, related to the closing of its loans and credit agreements. Deferred financing costs include origination (warrants issued and overriding royalty interests assigned to Hexagon), legal and engineering fees incurred in connection with the Company's credit facility, which are being amortized over the term of the credit facility. The Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.71 million and $1.60 million, respectively, in the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. (See Note 8-Loan Agreements.) |
Property and Equipment | ' |
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment range from one to seven years. The Company recorded $0.03 million and $0.02 million of depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
Impairment of Long-lived Assets | ' |
Impairment of Long-lived Assets |
|
The Company accounts for long-lived assets (other than oil and gas properties) at cost. Other long-lived assets include property and equipment, prepaid advisory fees, and identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives (subject to amortization, depletion, and depreciation). The Company may impair these assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount such assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the expected undiscounted future net cash flows generated by the asset. If it is determined that the asset may not be recoverable, and if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent of the difference. |
|
As of December 31, 2013, no impairment has been recorded for long lived assets. As of December 31, 2012, no impairment was recorded for long lived assets other than the impairment of capitalized oil and gas property costs during December 31, 2013 and 2012 as discussed in undeveloped acreage and wells in progress. (See Note 4 – Oil and Gas Properties & Oil and Gas Properties Acquisitions and Divestitures.) |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, interest payable and customer deposits approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such items. The carrying value of the Company’s secured debt is carried at cost as the related interest rate, approximates rates currently available to the Company. Certain other assets and liabilities are measured at fair value. (See Note 7-Fair Value of Financial Instruments.) |
Commodity Derivative Instrument | ' |
Commodity Derivative Instrument |
|
The Company utilizes swaps to reduce the effect of price changes on a portion of our future oil production. On a monthly basis, a swap requires us to pay the counterparty if the settlement price exceeds the strike price and the same counterparty is required to pay us if the settlement price is less than the strike price. The objective of the Company's use of derivative financial instruments is to achieve more predictable cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage its exposure to commodity price risk. While the use of these derivative instruments limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, such use may also limit the Company's ability to benefit from favorable price movements. The Company may, from time to time, add incremental derivative contracts to hedge additional production, restructure existing derivative contracts or enter into new transactions to modify the terms of current contracts in order to realize the current value of the Company's existing positions. (See Note 6-Derivitvies.) |
|
The use of derivatives involves the risk that the counterparties to such instruments will be unable to meet the financial terms of such contracts. The Company's derivative contracts have typically been arranged with one counterparty. The Company has netting arrangements with this counterparty that provide for the offset of payables against receivables from separate derivative arrangements with the counterparty in the event of contract termination. The derivative contracts may be terminated by a non-defaulting party in the event of default by one of the parties to the agreement. The Company periodically enters into various commodity derivative financial instruments intended to hedge against exposure to market fluctuations of oil prices. As of December 31, 2013, the Company maintained an active commodity swap for 100 barrels of oil per day through January 31, 2014 at a price of $99.25 per barrel. (See Note 6-Derivative.) |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
We record revenues from the sales of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids when the product is delivered at a fixed or determinable price, title has transferred and collectability is reasonably assured. |
Asset Retirement Obligation | ' |
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
The Company incurs retirement obligations for certain assets at the time they are placed in service. The fair values of these obligations are recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis. The costs associated with these liabilities are capitalized as part of the related assets and depreciated. Over time, the liabilities are accreted for the change in their present value. (See Note 7-Fair Value of Financial Instruments.) |
|
For purposes of depletion calculations, the Company also includes estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, associated with future development activities that have not yet been capitalized as asset retirement obligations. |
|
Asset retirement obligations incurred are classified as Level 3 (unobservable inputs) fair value measurements. The asset retirement liability is allocated to operating expense using a systematic and rational method. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a related liability of $1.11 million and $0.91 million. (See Note 7-Fair Value of Financial Instruments.) |
|
The information below reconciles the value of the asset retirement obligation for the periods presented (in thousands): |
|
| | For the years ended | |
December 31, |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 912 | | | $ | 613 | |
Liabilities incurred | | | 66 | | | | 198 | |
Accretion expense | | | 91 | | | | 101 | |
Change in estimate | | | 36 | | | | - | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 1,105 | | | $ | 912 | |
Share Based Compensation | ' |
Share Based Compensation |
|
The Company measures the fair value of share-based compensation expense awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchases related to employee stock purchase plans, on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense ratably over the requisite service periods. The measurement of share-based compensation expense is based on several criteria, including but not limited to the valuation model used and associated input factors, such as expected term of the award, stock price volatility, risk free interest rate, dividend rate and award cancellation rate. These inputs are subjective and are determined using management’s judgment. If differences arise between the assumptions used in determining share-based compensation expense and the actual factors, which become known over time, Lilis may change the input factors used in determining future share-based compensation expense. |
|
Lilis accounts for warrant grants to non-employees whereby the fair values of such warrants are determined using the option pricing model at the earlier of the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete or a performance commitment is reached. (See Note 12- Shareholders Equity.) |
Warrant Modification Expense | ' |
Warrant Modification Expense |
|
The Company accounts for the modification of warrants as an exchange of the old award for a new award. The incremental value is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before modification, and is either expensed as a period expense or amortized over the performance or vesting date. We estimate the incremental value of each warrant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model is highly complex and dependent on key estimates by management. The estimate with the greatest degree of subjective judgment is the estimated volatility of our stock price. (See Note 12-Shareholder Equity.) |
Loss per Common Share | ' |
Loss per Common Share |
|
Earnings (losses) per share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period presented. Diluted earnings (losses) per share are computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive securities, such as conversion derivatives and stock purchase warrants, are excluded from the calculation when their effect would be anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2013, a total of 6,773,913 and 3,665,859, respectively, of shares underlying warrants and convertible debentures have been excluded from the diluted share calculations as they were anti-dilutive as a result of net losses incurred. Accordingly, basic shares equal diluted shares for all periods presented. |
Income Taxes | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
Prior to December 31, 2011, the Company filed its tax returns on an April 30 fiscal year end. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company received approval by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to move the Company’s tax year end to December 31 from April. |
|
The Company uses the asset liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is used to reduce deferred tax assets when uncertainty exists regarding their realization. |
|
We recognize tax benefits only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has determined that no liability is required to be recognized. (See Note-11 Income Taxes.) |
|
Our policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. However, we did not accrue interest or penalties at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, because the jurisdiction in which we have unrecognized tax benefits does not currently impose interest on underpayments of tax and we believe that we are below the minimum statutory threshold for imposition of penalties. We do not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease during the next 12 months. The earliest years remaining subject to examination are December 31, 2011, April 30, 2011 and April 30, 2010. (See Note-11 Income Taxes.) |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Various accounting standards updates are issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or were applicable to specific industries, are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |