This Amendment No. 2 amends and supplements the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2019 (together with any amendments and supplements thereto, this“Schedule TO”) and relates to the offer by Cascade Merger Sub Inc. (“Purchaser”), a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (“Parent”), and an indirect subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”), to purchase all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (individually, a “Share” and collectively, the “Shares”), of Immune Design Corp. (“IMDZ”), for $5.85 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated March 5, 2019 (together with any amendments and supplements thereto, the “Offer to Purchase”), and the related Letter of Transmittal, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B), respectively, to the Schedule TO.
Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment No. 2, the information set forth in the Schedule TO remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference to the extent relevant to the items in this Amendment No. 2. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Offer to Purchase.
Item 11. Additional Information.
Item 11 of the Schedule TO is hereby amended and supplemented as set forth below:
Section 16 of the Offer to Purchase titled “Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals” is hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following after the last sentence thereof:
Litigation. Beginning on March 11, 2019, six putative class-action lawsuits were filed on behalf of purported IMDZ stockholders: the first captioned Tullman v. Immune Design Corp., et al., No.2:19-cv-00350 (filed March 11, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington) (the “Tullman Complaint”); the second captionedHutchings v. Immune Design Corp., et al.,No. 2:19-cv-00373 (filed March 14, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington) (the “Hutchings Complaint”); the third captionedWalker v. Immune Design Corp., et al., No.1:19-cv-02391 (filed March 18, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) (the “Walker Complaint”); the fourth captionedReed v. Immune Design Corp., et al., No.1:19-cv-02398 (filed March 18, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) (the “Reed Complaint”); the fifth captionedGray v. Immune Design Corp., et al., No.1:19-cv-02410 (filed March 18, 2019 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) (the “Gray Complaint”); and the sixth captionedWitmer v. Immune Design Corp., et al., No.1:19-cv-00532 (filed March 18, 2019 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Witmer Complaint” and together with the Tullman Complaint, the Hutchings Complaint, and the Gray Complaint, the “Complaints”). IMDZ has not been able to electronically access the Reed Complaint. The Walker Compliant was voluntarily dismissed on March 18, 2019. The Complaints were filed against IMDZ and each member of IMDZ’s board of directors. The Witmer Complaint also names Purchaser and Parent as defendants. The Complaints assert claims for violations of Sections 14(e) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and, in the case of the Gray Complaint and the Witmer Complaint, Section 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and allege, among other things, that certain material information was omitted from IMDZ’s14D-9, which the Complaints allege render the information disclosed materially misleading. The Complaints seek to enjoin the proposed transaction, or in the event the proposed transaction is consummated, to recover money damages.