Following is a summary of financial statement items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014:
There were no transfers of items measured at fair value between fair value hierarchy levels during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The following table presents a roll forward of the assets for which Level 3 inputs were used to determine value for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
*Changes in fair value as a result of changes in instrument-specific credit risk relating to mortgage loans held by the Mortgage Investments totaled $2,540,720 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Most of the Master Fund’s assets are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period results of operations. A substantial portion of those assets are “Level 3” financial statement items which require the use of significant unobservable inputs in the estimation of the assets’ values. Unobservable inputs reflect the Master Fund’s own assumptions about the factors that market participants use in pricing an asset or liability, and are based on the best information available under the circumstances.
The Investment Manager has assigned the responsibility for estimating the fair values of “Level 3” financial statement items to its Financial Analysis and Valuation group (the “FAV group”), which is responsible for valuing and monitoring the Fund’s investment portfolios and maintenance of its valuation policies and procedures.
The FAV group reports to the Investment Manager’s valuation committee, which oversees and approves the valuations. The valuation committee includes the Investment Manager’s chief executive, financial, operating, credit, and asset/liability management officers.
The FAV group monitors the models used for valuation of the Master Fund’s “Level 3” financial statement items, including the models’ performance versus actual results and reports those results to the valuation committee. The results developed in the FAV group’s monitoring activities are used to calibrate subsequent projections used for valuation.
The FAV group is responsible for reporting to the Investment Manager’s valuation committee on a monthly basis on the changes in the valuation of the portfolio, including major factors affecting the valuation and any changes in model methods and assumptions. To assess the reasonableness of its valuations, the FAV group presents an analysis of the effect on the valuation of each of the changes to the significant inputs to the models.
The following describes the methods used to estimate the fair values of Level 3 financial statement items:
The mortgage loans held by the Mortgage Investments are generally not saleable into active mortgage loan markets. Therefore the Master Fund classifies these assets as “Level 3” financial statement items, and their fair values are generally estimated using a discounted cash flow valuation model. Inputs to the model include current interest rates, loan amount, payment status and property type, and forecasts of future interest rates, home prices, prepayment speeds, default and loss severities.
The Investment Manager incorporates lack of liquidity into its fair value estimates based on the type of asset or liability measured and the valuation method used. For example, for mortgage loans where the significant inputs have become unobservable due to illiquidity in the markets for distressed mortgage loans or non-Agency, non-conforming mortgage loans, a discounted cash flow technique is used to estimate fair value. This technique incorporates forecasting of expected cash flows discounted at an appropriate market discount rate that is intended to reflect the lack of liquidity in the market.
The valuation process includes the computation by stratum of the loan population and a review for reasonableness of various measures such as weighted average life, projected prepayment and default speeds, and projected default and loss percentages. The Investment Manager’s FAV staff computes the effect on fair value of changes in input variables such as interest rates, home prices, and delinquency status to assess the reasonableness of changes in the loans’ valuation. The results of the estimates of fair value of the Mortgage Investments’ loans are reported to the Investment Manager’s valuation committee as part of its review and approval of monthly valuation results.
Changes in fair value attributable to investment-specific credit risk are measured by the effect on the loan’s fair value of changes in respective loan’s delinquency status at period-end from the later of the beginning of the period or acquisition date.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Master Fund’s mortgage loans are discount rate, home price projections, voluntary prepayment speeds and default speeds. Significant changes in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significant change to the loans’ fair value measurement. Increases in home price projections are generally accompanied by an increase in voluntary prepayment speeds.
Following is a quantitative summary of key assumptions used in the valuation of mortgage loans at fair value:
| | | | Range |
Valuation Techniques | | Key Inputs | | (Weighted average) |
Discounted cash flow | | Discount rate | | 7.2% - 15.0% |
| | | | (11.6%) |
| | Twelve-month housing price index change | | 2.4% - 5.7% |
| | | | (4.7%) |
| | Voluntary Prepayment speed (Life voluntary CRR) (1) | | 0.0% - 3.3% |
| | | | (2.6%) |
| | Total Prepayment speed (Life total CPR) (2) | | 0.9% - 23.2% |
| | | | (18.6%) |
(1) Prepayment speed is measured using Constant Repayment Rate (“CRR”)
(2) Prepayment speed is measured using Conditional Prepayment Rate (“CPR”)
Real Estate Acquired in Settlement of Loans
Fair value of REO is determined by using a current estimate of value from a broker’s price opinion, a full appraisal or the price given in a pending contract of sale. REO values are reviewed by the Investment Manager’s staff appraisers when the Master Fund obtains multiple indications of fair value and there are significant differences between the fair values received. The Investment Manager’s staff appraisers will attempt to resolve the differences between the indications of fair value. In circumstances where the appraisers are not able to generate adequate data to support a fair value conclusion, the staff appraisers will order an additional appraisal to resolve the property’s fair value.
REO may be subsequently revalued due to the Master Fund receiving greater access to the property, the property being held for an extended period or management receiving indications that the property’s value may not be supported by developing market conditions.
Mortgage-backed Security
The Master Fund’s investment in MBS is a non-Agency MBS backed by distressed non-performing loans. Agency MBS refers to securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and the Government National Mortgage Association.
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
Fair value of non-Agency MBS is determined based on whether the MBS is backed by loans held by the Master Fund or the Mortgage Investments, or by non-affiliates. MBS backed by mortgage loans held by the Master Fund or the Mortgage Investments are valued using the approach described under Mortgage Loans above. The Master Fund and the Mortgage Investments do not hold any MBS backed by loans held by non-affiliates.
Following is a quantitative summary of key inputs used in the valuation of the mortgage-backed security at fair value:
| | | | Range |
Valuation Techniques | | Key Inputs | | (Weighted average) |
Discounted cash flow | | Discount rate | | 7.2% - 15.0% |
| | | | (10.2%) |
| | Twelve-month housing price index change | | 3.3% - 6.2% |
| | | | (4.2%) |
| | Voluntary Prepayment speed (Life voluntary CRR) (1) | | 0.1% - 3.3% |
| | | | (2.9%) |
| | Total Prepayment speed (Life total CPR) (2) | | 0.9% - 23.2% |
| | | | (16.9%) |
(1) Prepayment speed is measured using Constant Repayment Rate (“CRR”)
(2) Prepayment speed is measured using Conditional Prepayment Rate (“CPR”)
Note 4—Mortgage Investments
Following is a summary of the condensed balance sheets of the Master Fund’s investments in the Mortgage Investments as of June 30, 2014:
| | PNMAC | | | PNMAC | | | PNMAC | | | PNMAC | |
| | Mortgage Co. | | | Mortgage Co. | | | Mortgage Co | | | Mortgage Co., | |
| | Funding, LLC | | | Funding II, LLC | | | (FI), LLC | | | LLC | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and short-term investments | | $ | 6,841,514 | | | $ | 2,045,866 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,108,540 | |
Mortgage loans at fair value | | | 99,031,500 | | | | 81,314,375 | | | | 21,955,625 | | | | 8,657,337 | |
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans at fair value | | | 15,004,524 | | | | 10,295,435 | | | | 1,898,757 | | | | 699,583 | |
Other assets | | | 63,777,853 | | | | 43,828,787 | | | | 29,018,852 | | | | 1,373,377 | |
| | | 184,655,391 | | | | 137,484,463 | | | | 52,873,234 | | | | 20,838,837 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized borrowings | | | 6,155,951 | | | | 17,809,933 | | | | - | | | | 5,436,013 | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,034,443 | | | | 609,942 | | | | 149,258 | | | | 1,170,581 | |
| | | 7,190,394 | | | | 18,419,875 | | | | 149,258 | | | | 6,606,594 | |
Members’ equity | | $ | 177,464,997 | | | $ | 119,064,588 | | | $ | 52,723,976 | | | $ | 14,232,243 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Master Fund’s investment in Mortgage Investments at June 30, 2014 | | $ | 177,464,997 | | | $ | 119,064,588 | | | $ | 35,722,580 | | | $ | 14,232,243 | |
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Mortgage Investments have assumed a concentration of credit risk in connection with their investments in mortgage loans and REO. The following is a summary of the distribution of loans included in the Mortgage Investments’ portfolios as measured by fair value at June 30, 2014 and represents the Master Fund’s proportionate interest in such assets:
| | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | Fair | | | % | | | average | |
Loan Type | | Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
ARM / Hybrid | | $ | 82,819,391 | | | | 23.42 | % | | | 5.56 | % |
Fixed | | | 90,367,851 | | | | 25.56 | % | | | 5.73 | % |
Step Rate | | | 28,936,169 | | | | 8.18 | % | | | 2.33 | % |
Balloon | | | 1,554,541 | | | | 0.44 | % | | | 10.29 | % |
Other | | | 54,773 | | | | 0.02 | % | | | 7.00 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | Fair | | | % | | | average | |
Lien Position | | Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
1st Lien | | $ | 202,869,700 | | | | 57.38 | % | | | 5.05 | % |
2nd Lien | | | 863,025 | | | | 0.24 | % | | | 7.46 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | Fair | | | % | | | average | |
Loan Age (1) | | Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
Less than 24 months | | $ | 294,834 | | | | 0.08 | % | | | 4.53 | % |
24-36 months | | | 107,698 | | | | 0.03 | % | | | 5.61 | % |
36-48 months | | | 319,421 | | | | 0.09 | % | | | 2.86 | % |
48-60 months | | | 694,225 | | | | 0.20 | % | | | 3.85 | % |
60 months or more | | | 202,316,547 | | | | 57.22 | % | | | 5.22 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | Fair | | | % | | | average | |
Current Loan-to-Value(2) | | Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
Less than 80% | | $ | 34,352,304 | | | | 9.72 | % | | | 5.32 | % |
80%-99.99% | | | 41,487,799 | | | | 11.73 | % | | | 5.05 | % |
100%-119.99% | | | 56,504,419 | | | | 15.98 | % | | | 5.12 | % |
120% or Greater | | | 71,388,203 | | | | 20.19 | % | | | 5.28 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
| | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | Fair | | | % | | | average | |
Payment Status | | Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
Current (3) | | $ | 59,505,982 | | | | 16.83 | % | | | 3.78 | % |
30 days delinquent | | | 17,266,273 | | | | 4.88 | % | | | 3.99 | % |
60 days delinquent | | | 8,086,140 | | | | 2.29 | % | | | 3.81 | % |
90 days or more delinquent | | | 47,746,095 | | | | 13.50 | % | | | 5.64 | % |
In Forclosure (4) | | | 71,128,235 | | | | 20.12 | % | | | 6.45 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | % | | | average | |
Geographic Distribution | | Fair Value | | | Partners’ capital | | | note rate | |
California | | $ | 33,942,302 | | | | 9.60 | % | | | 3.72 | % |
Florida | | | 30,989,822 | | | | 8.76 | % | | | 6.21 | % |
New York | | | 29,579,432 | | | | 8.37 | % | | | 5.83 | % |
New Jersey | | | 15,384,804 | | | | 4.35 | % | | | 5.51 | % |
Illinois | | | 9,943,521 | | | | 2.81 | % | | | 4.98 | % |
Massachussets | | | 9,019,439 | | | | 2.55 | % | | | 5.16 | % |
Other | | | 74,873,405 | | | | 21.18 | % | | | 5.01 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 203,732,725 | | | | 57.62 | % | | | 5.21 | % |
1 Loan Age reflects the age of the loan as of June 30, 2014.
2 Current loan-to-value measures the ratio of the current balance of the loan and all superior liens (“Loan”) to the estimate of the value of the property securing the liens (“Value”) as of June 30, 2014.
*Not included are $7,837 in unsecured notes at fair value.
Following is a summary of the distribution of REO:
| | | | | | |
| | | | | % | |
Geographic Distribution | | Fair Value | | | Partners’ capital | |
Florida | | $ | 6,840,411 | | | | 1.93 | % |
New York | | | 2,938,374 | | | | 0.83 | % |
New Jersey | | | 1,724,355 | | | | 0.49 | % |
California | | | 2,861,549 | | | | 0.81 | % |
Maryland | | | 1,941,405 | | | | 0.55 | % |
Other | | | 10,086,248 | | | | 2.85 | % |
Total Portfolio | | $ | 26,392,342 | | | | 7.46 | % |
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
Note 5 – Mortgage-Backed Security
The MBS held by the Master Fund as of June 30, 2014 was issued by SWDNSI Trust Series 2010-2, a statutory trust created by PNMAC Mortgage Co, LLC. It is secured by non-agency distressed and non-performing mortgage loans held at PNMAC Mortgage Co, LLC which have a fair value of $5,436,013 and a market yield based on its fair value of 1.07% as of June 30, 2014.
Note 6—Investment Transactions
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Master Fund purchased an additional interest in the PNMAC Mortgage Co (FI), LLC for $102,354.
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Master Fund received dividend distributions from its investment in PNMAC Mortgage Co (FI), LLC totaling $2,904,005.
Note 7—Investment Advisory, Administration and Custodian Fees
The Master Fund has an Investment Management Agreement with PNMAC Capital Management, LLC. Under the terms of the agreement, the Master Fund pays the Investment Manager a fee equal an annual rate of 1.5% of the Master Fund’s net asset value so long as the fee does not exceed 1.5% of the aggregate capital contributions to the Master Fund. The General Partner is not charged a management fee. The only expenses charged to the General Partner are those specifically relating to it.
Investment advisory fees for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $2,316,200, of which $1,168,528 was payable to the Investment Manager at period-end.
The Master Fund has engaged U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC to serve as the Master Fund’s administrator, fund accountant, transfer agent, and dividend paying agent. The Master Fund pays the administrator a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.04% of the first $1,000,000,000 of the Master Fund’s total monthly net assets, 0.03% on the next $1,000,000,000 of the Master Fund’s total monthly net assets, and 0.02% on the balance of the Master Fund’s total monthly net assets subject to an annual minimum fee of $180,000. The administration expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $103,228.
The Master Fund and an affiliated fund have engaged U.S. Bank, N.A. to provide mortgage loan accounting services for the mortgage loans held in the mortgage subsidiaries. The Master Fund and an affiliated fund pay U.S. Bank, N.A. a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.9% of assets subject to an annual minimum fee of $20,000. The loan accounting fee charged to the Master Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $21,664.
U.S. Bank, N.A. serves as the Master Fund’s custodian. The Master Fund pays the custodian a monthly fee computed at an annual rate of 0.01% on the Master Fund’s average daily market value subject to an annual minimum fee of $28,800 across all fund complexes. Custody fees charged to the Master Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $17,525.
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
Note 8—Directors and Officers
The Fund and Master Fund share the same board of directors. The Master Fund’s board of directors has overall responsibility for monitoring and overseeing the investment program of the Master Fund and its management and operations. All directors’ fees and expenses are paid by the Master Fund. Independent directors receive an annual retainer of $64,800 and a fee per meeting of the board of directors or committees of $2,000, subject to a cap of $15,000 per year for all non-regularly-scheduled meetings. The audit committee chair receives an annual retainer of $10,000 in addition to the amounts above. Directors are reimbursed by the Master Fund for their travel expenses related to board meetings. The total director fees and expenses incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were $148,975, of which $67,455 was payable at period-end.
One of the directors is an officer of the advisor and the Master Fund and receives no compensation from the Master Fund for serving as a Director.
Certain officers of the Master Fund are affiliated with the Investment Manager. Such officers receive no compensation from the Master Fund for serving in their respective roles.
Note 9—Transactions with Affiliates
As of June 30, 2014, $40,012,034 in carried interest has been reallocated from the Limited Partners capital account to the General Partner’s capital account of which $2,309,380 was allocated in the six months ended June 30, 2014 (as described in Note 2).
The Master Fund incurred investment advisory fees of $2,316,200 during the six months ended June 30, 2014, of which $1,168,528 was payable to the Investment Manager at period-end.
PLS acts as the primary mortgage servicer for all mortgages owned by the Mortgage Investments. The servicing agreement with the Mortgage Investments generally provides for servicing fees of 50 to 100 basis points of unpaid principal balance per year, depending on the type and quality of the loans being serviced, plus other specified fees and charges. The servicing arrangement also requires that PLS will rebate to the Mortgage Investments an amount equal to 13% of servicing-related fees charged to the Mortgage Investments to approximate overall “at cost” pricing with respect to loan servicing activities for such assets. Total servicing fees charged by PLS to the Mortgage Investments before such waiver amounted to $2,910,537 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. PLS provided to the Mortgage Investments rebates relating to such charges totaling $563,025 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The Master Fund’s short-term investment, the BlackRock Liquidity Funds: TempFund Institutional Shares, is managed by BlackRock Institutional Management Corporation which is a wholly owned subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock Inc. is an affiliate of the Master Fund. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Master Fund received $341 of dividend income from this short-term investment.
Note 10—Risk Factors
The Master Fund’s investment activities expose it to various types and degrees of risk associated with the financial instruments and markets in which it invests.
Investments in MBS and mortgage loans have exposure to risk that includes interest rate risk, market risk, and default risk (the potential non-payment of principal and interest, including default or bankruptcy of
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
the issuer or the intermediary in the case of a mortgage loan participation). Mortgage loans are also subject to prepayment risk, which will affect the maturity of, and yield on, such investments and any MBS into which such mortgage loans have been securitized.
Investments in REO are also subject to various risk factors. Generally, real estate investments could be adversely affected by a recession, natural disaster or general economic downturn in the area where the properties are located as well as the availability of similar properties in such area. Real estate investment performance is also subject to the effectiveness of a particular property manager in managing the property.
The Master Fund is indirectly subject to interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that investments in loans held by the Mortgage Investments will decline in fair value because of changes in market interest rates. Investments in mortgage loans with long-term maturities may experience significant decreases in fair value if long-term interest rates increase.
Market risk represents the potential loss in fair value of financial instruments caused by movements in market factors including, but not limited to, market liquidity, investor sentiment, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Master Fund’s portfolio includes certain investments that are generally illiquid and have a greater amount of market risk than more liquid investments. These investments may trade in limited markets or have restrictions on resale or transfer and may not be able to be liquidated on demand if needed. The fair value assigned to these investments may differ significantly from the fair values that could be realized upon liquidation or that would have been used had a ready market existed. Such differences could be material to the financial statements.
Adverse changes in economic conditions are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of borrowers to make principal interest payments. An economic downturn could severely affect the ability of highly leveraged borrowers to service their debt obligations or to repay their obligations. Under adverse market or economic conditions, the secondary market could contract further as well, increasing the illiquid nature of the loans. As a result, the Mortgage Investments could find it more difficult to sell loans or may be able to sell only at prices lower than if such investments were widely traded.
An investment in the Master Fund is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire investment. An investment in the Master Fund represents an indirect investment in the loans held by the Mortgage Investments. The fair value, like other market investments, may move up or down, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably. An investment in the Master Fund at any point in time may be worth less than the original investment. Investment fair values can fluctuate for several reasons including the general condition of the mortgage market or when political or economic events affecting the issuers occur.
As part of its investment strategy, the Master Fund may utilize borrowings. Master Fund investments may also use borrowings in the ordinary course of their operations. The use of borrowings, and the Master Fund’s ability to service the debt and comply with all of the covenants relating to such borrowings, may materially affect the operations of the Master Fund or its investments, and thus its ultimate fair value. Financing may not always be available on acceptable terms, in the necessary amounts, or for the period needed. This could have a material negative impact on the performance of the Master Fund.
The Master Fund clears substantially all of its investment purchases and sales and maintains substantially all of its investments and cash positions at U.S. Bank, N.A. Credit risk is measured by the loss the Master Fund would record if U.S. Bank, N.A. failed to perform pursuant to the terms of its obligations.
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Notes to Financial Statements As of and for the Six Months ended June 30, 2014 |
Note 11—Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated all events or transactions through the date of issuance of these financial statements. During this period, the Master Fund received dividends and returns of capital from its investments in the mortgage companies totaling $19,601,171 and $65,050,129, respectively, and made distributions to its limited partner of $77,690,182.
****
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Additional Information |
Form N-Q
The Master Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year with the SEC on Form N-Q. The Master Fund’s Form N-Q is available without charge by visiting the SEC’s Website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Proxy Voting
A description of the policies and procedures that the Master Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities owned by the Master Fund and information regarding how the Master Fund voted proxies relating to the portfolio of securities are available to stockholders (i) without charge, upon request by calling the Master Fund collect at (818) 224-7442; and (ii) on the SEC’s Website at www.sec.gov.
Board of Directors
The Master Fund’s Form N-2 includes additional information about the Master Fund’s directors and is available upon request without charge by calling the Master Fund collect at (818) 224-7442 or by visiting the SEC’s Website at www.sec.gov.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains “forward-looking statements,” which are based on current management expectations. Actual future results, however, may prove to be different from expectations. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “attempt,” “seem,” “think,” “ought,” “try,” and other similar terms. The Master Fund’s past investment performance and returns are not predictive of its future investment performance and returns. The Master Fund cannot promise future investment performance or returns. Management’s opinions are a reflection of its best judgment at the time this report is compiled, and it disclaims any obligation to update or alter forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Approval of Investment Management Agreement
On June 2, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Master Fund and the Fund (collectively, the “Funds”), including the “non-interested” Directors (the “Independent Directors”), met in person and voted to approve the continuance of the Investment Management Agreements (including the portions of the Master Fund’s partnership agreement referred to therein) with the Investment Manager for an additional year.
In considering whether to recommend approval of the Investment Management Agreements, the Independent Directors reviewed materials provided by the Investment Manager and counsel to the Independent Directors. The Independent Directors also met with senior personnel of the Investment Manager and discussed a number of topics affecting their determination, including the following:
(i) The nature, extent, and quality of services expected to be provided by the Investment Manager. The Independent Directors reviewed the services that the Investment Manager provided to the Funds since inception in August 2008 and are expected to continue to provide to the Funds. In addition, the Independent Directors considered the size, education, background, and experience of the Investment Manager’s staff, including the mortgage finance and capital markets experience of the Investment Manager’s senior management team. Lastly, the Independent Directors reviewed the Investment Manager’s ability to attract and retain quality and experienced personnel. The Independent Directors concluded that the scope of services provided since inception and expected to be provided by the Investment Manager to the Funds, and the experience and expertise of the personnel performing such
PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LP Additional Information |
services, was consistent with the nature, extent, and quality expected of an investment adviser of investment vehicles such as the Funds.
(ii) The investment performance of the Funds and the Investment Manager. The Independent Directors received information about the performance of the Funds and the Investment Manager in managing the Fund. The Directors also received performance information regarding the Funds compared to certain indexes, benchmarks, and/or registered and non-registered funds managed by other investment advisers that had somewhat comparable investment programs.
(iii) Cost of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Investment Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Independent Directors considered the estimated cost of the services provided by the Investment Manager. As part of their analysis, the Independent Directors gave substantial consideration to the compensation payable to the Investment Manager. The Independent Directors noted that the compensation terms would remain the same. In reviewing the management compensation, the Independent Directors considered the management fees and operating expense ratios of other registered and non-registered funds managed by other investment advisers that had somewhat comparable investment programs. The Independent Directors also reviewed and took into account other relationships between the Funds and the Investment Manager and its related persons, including the shareholder servicing agreement between the Investment Manager and the Fund, the mortgage servicing agreements between the Master Fund and an affiliate of the Investment Manager, and an agreement with BlackRock, which has an investment in the Investment Manager’s parent company, for a portfolio valuation analytic model. The Independent Directors also considered the compensation charged by the Investment Manager to its other clients. Finally, the Independent Directors took those other service agreements into account in the context of evaluating the profitability of the Investment Manager in respect of the overall relationship of the Investment Manager and its related persons to the Funds.
(iv) Economies of Scale. The Independent Directors also considered that possible economies of scale from future growth of the Funds were not relevant inasmuch as the Funds were closed to any new investment and had limited terms.
The Independent Directors had an opportunity to have Executive Session with counsel to the Independent Directors. During the course of their deliberations at the meeting on June 2, 2014, the Independent Directors thoroughly reviewed and evaluated the factors to be considered for approval of the Investment Management Agreements including, but not limited to: the expenses incurred in performance of services by the Investment Manager; the compensation to be received by the Investment Manager under the Investment Management Agreements; the fees charged by the Investment Manager’s peers; the past performance of the Investment Manager; and the range and quality of services provided by the Investment Manager.
The Independent Directors expressed satisfaction with the information provided at the meeting on June 2, 2014 and prior meetings, and acknowledged that they had received sufficient information to consider and approve the continuance of the Investment Management Agreements. No single factor was determinative to the decision of the Independent Directors. Rather, after weighing all of the reasons discussed above, the Independent Directors unanimously approved the continuance of the Investment Management Agreements.
The Independent Directors concluded that the compensation that the Investment Manager would receive under the Investment Management Agreements was reasonable.