UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| |
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 001-34993
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 52-2402079 |
(State or other Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
1166 Avenue of the Americas, 3rd Fl., New York, NY | | 10036 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(212) 588-3500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share | | NYSE MKT |
(Title of each Class) | | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes ý No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes ý No
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý YES ¨ NO
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
|
| | | | | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated Filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-Accelerated Filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller Reporting Company | | ý |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes ý No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter was $43.6 million.
The number of the registrant’s common shares outstanding as of March 19, 2015, was 8,724,356.
Documents incorporated by reference: portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 11, 2015 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| |
| PAGE |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EX-10.2 | |
EX-10.3 | |
EX-21 | |
EX-23.1 | |
EX-24 | |
EX-31.1 | |
EX-31.2 | |
EX-32.1 | |
EX-32.2 | |
EX-101 INS XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 SCH XBRL SCHEMA DOCUMENT | |
|
| |
EX-101 CALC XBRL CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 DEF XBRL DEFINITION LINKBASE DATABASE | |
EX-101 LAB XBRL LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
EX-101 PRE XBRL PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Business Overview
CTPartners Executive Search Inc (CTPartners) is a leading provider of retained executive search services to clients on a global basis. We provide these services through forty-four offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific. We help our clients build stronger leadership teams by facilitating the recruitment and hiring of “C-level” (chief executive officers, chief financial officers, chief legal officers, chief marketing officers and chief human resource officers) executives, other senior executives and board members. Our retained executive search services focus on successfully making placements for our clients in a timely manner. We use a proprietary search process and proprietary technology and communication tools to successfully execute our retained searches. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we were engaged to perform 1,742 searches. We generated consolidated net revenue and an operating income of $172.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The adjusted operating income, as defined in the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures, was $8.7 million.
We are currently facing several challenges. Commencing in December 2014, we began receiving unfavorable publicity regarding a complaint submitted to the EEOC by a former employee. We also withdrew an announced public equity offering in December 2014. In January 2015, we announced preliminary fourth quarter results that fell short of our expectations and then subsequently revised those preliminary results downward. We also withdrew our first quarter and full year 2015 earnings guidance at that time. In light of that revision and withdrawal of guidance, we suspended marketing efforts for another announced public equity offering before completing a significantly downsized offering at the end of January 2015 for $4.2 million in net proceeds after underwriting discounts and expenses. Our stock price declined significantly in December 2014 and January 2015, and several research analysts covering our Company ceased coverage. Several law firms have announced investigations into whether we violated securities laws, and a purported class action on behalf of purchasers of our common stock during the period between February 26, 2014 and January 28, 2015 was filed against us on February 27, 2015 on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We believe these allegations have no merit.
The foregoing events have created significant challenges surrounding our business and, in particular, our ability to retain consultants and customers. Since December 31, 2014, 15 of our consultants have departed the firm, of which 2 were top ten revenue producers. These departures may have a material effect on our ability to generate revenue consistent with historical trends.
On February 6, 2015, we received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from DHR International to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company for $7.00 per share. On February 24, 2015, we announced that the Board of Directors formed a Special Committee, composed solely of independent directors, to review strategic alternatives for the Company, including the proposal from DHR International and a range of other alternatives. The Company announced, effective April 16, 2015, our Chief Operating Officer David C. Nocifora would replace Brian Sullivan as Chief Executive Officer and that we were conducting a search for a new non-executive director to chair the Board. Michael Feiner, an independent director, has agreed to serve as interim Chairman of the Board.
We believe that our proven and proprietary retained executive search process, SearchSigma, differentiates us from our peers. SearchSigma was developed based on analyzing three years of detailed client surveys. In our analysis, we identified the common criteria and timetables our clients expect from a successful search. We then developed a proprietary search process to respond accordingly. Based on our findings, we structured SearchSigma as a workflow process with six distinct segments and milestones, at forty-eight hours, seven days, fourteen days, forty days, seventy-five days and one-hundred days, designed to complete a successful placement within one-hundred days of our engagement. SearchSigma also enables our executive search consultants and our clients to actively monitor the status of each search and make adjustments to the search process as necessary. Our focus on the SearchSigma process enhances our ability to successfully and expeditiously identify and place candidates with our clients within our stated goal of 100 days from our engagement.
We believe that a high level of communication and process transparency with our clients is very important to their level of satisfaction and to the ultimate success of our searches. The cornerstone of our client communication is our proprietary system, ClientNet®. Through ClientNet®, our clients can access password-protected information over the internet to check the status of their search engagements. Another important element of our transparency and accountability is the audit that we offer to conduct at the forty-day milestone. This key process step is executed by one of our executive search consultants who is not otherwise involved in a particular search. This executive search consultant contacts the client to assess the progress of the search and to gather client feedback along with any suggested refinements to the process. We have found the forty-day audit process to be very helpful in ensuring that a search is tracking as planned and that any necessary adjustments are made early in the process.
Our organizational structure is designed to provide high quality, industry-focused executive search services to our clients worldwide. Our executive search consultants are dedicated to specific industry verticals and are leading experts in their given sectors. Our support teams of researchers and associates are organized by industry practice group in various geographic locations. We believe that industry specialization enables us to better understand our clients’ cultures, operations, business strategies and industries. Executive search consultants in our industry practice groups bring an in-depth understanding of the market conditions and strategic and management issues faced by clients within their specific industry. Our six largest industry practice groups are financial services, professional services, life sciences, technology/media/telecom, consumer/retail and industrial.
We have a diverse group of clients located throughout the world and in a variety of industries. From January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2014, we have performed 10,304 searches for over 2,700 clients, including some of the leading Fortune 1000, FTSE 100, DAX and CAC 40 companies as well as private equity and venture capital firms and their portfolio companies.
Historically, we have been successful in both adding new clients and generating repeat business from existing clients. We believe that our disciplined adherence to our proprietary search process has enabled us to develop a strong and loyal client base. Over the past three years, approximately 75% of our retained search engagements came from clients who had previously used our services. At the conclusion of each search, we solicit client feedback with a client satisfaction survey. Our surveys provide us with critical feedback to gauge client satisfaction as well as feedback that we utilize to continually evaluate and improve our processes and performance. In 2014, 228 clients completed client satisfaction surveys, and 91% of such surveys stated that the client planned to use our services in the future.
We believe that our global presence enables us to more effectively serve our clients who have operations throughout the world. We leverage our industry specialization with local geographic knowledge and contacts to provide clients with comprehensive executive search services. We have wholly-owned operations in ten U.S. cities and in twenty-three non-U.S. locations. Our wholly-owned non-U.S. operations are in Australia, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, New Zealand, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Romania, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and Venezuela. In 2014, we placed candidates in 569 U.S. searches and 790 non-U.S. searches.
As of December 31, 2014, we had 157 executive search consultants and 474 other employees, all of whom were full-time employees. Our principal executive offices are located in New York, New York. Our corporate, administrative and research functions are located in our office in Cleveland, Ohio.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 3rd Floor, New York, New York 10036, and our telephone number is (212) 588-3500. Our corporate website address is www.ctnet.com. We do not incorporate the information contained on, or accessible through, our corporate website into this form 10-K, and it should not be considered part of this form 10-K. For convenience in this form 10-K, “CTPartners,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to CTPartners Executive Search Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless otherwise noted.
Executive Search Industry Overview
The executive search business is highly fragmented, consisting of several large global firms and several thousand smaller firms that are generally focused on a specific geographic region or on a specific vertical sector. We believe our most direct competition comes from the following five global retained executive search firms: Egon Zehnder International, Heidrick & Struggles International (NASDAQ: HSII), Korn/Ferry International (NYSE: KFY), Russell Reynolds Associates, Inc. and Spencer Stuart.
Executive search firms are generally separated into two broad categories: retained search firms and contingency search firms. Retained search firms generally operate on an exclusive basis for a specific search and are compensated for their services regardless of whether they are successful in placing a candidate with the client. Retained executive search firms typically focus on “C-level” and other senior level executive and board of director positions, and the fee for such services is typically 33% of the first year total cash compensation for the position being filled. The fee for a retained executive search is typically paid in three installments. Contingency executive search firms are generally not hired on an exclusive basis and are only compensated upon placing a recommended candidate, and the fee for such services is typically 25% of the first year base salary of the position being filled.
Our Services
Retained Executive Search
Our retained executive search services are used to fill executive level positions, such as chief executive officers, chief financial officers, chief operating officers, chief information officers and other senior executive officers, as well as board of directors’ positions. Our executive search consultants work closely with our clients to identify, assess and place qualified candidates. Our clients are primarily from six large industry verticals: financial services, professional services, life sciences, technology/media/telecom, consumer/retail and industrial.
Our retained search engagements are typically led by executive search consultants with vertical market expertise and one-call access to the most sought-after talent in each market. Supporting our executive search consultants is a team of experienced recruiting associates and research professionals, many with decades of experience utilizing executive search industry best practices. We work closely with our clients to understand their business strategy and develop a profile of the ideal candidate. Once the position is defined, the research team identifies appropriate individuals through the use of our proprietary databases and other search media. In addition, the team consults with its established network of sources to help identify individuals with the right backgrounds and professional abilities. Leveraging our network of resources and research capabilities, we strive to develop an extensive list of potential candidates, who are then carefully screened through face-to-face meetings, phone interviews and/or video conferences. The client is then presented with a specified number of qualified candidates to interview. We conduct third-party reference checks throughout the process. Throughout the process, we maintain ongoing communication with our client and actively involve them in the process.
In 2014, we utilized our proprietary SearchSigma process to identify and place 1,359 candidates. Every aspect of our search process is oriented to achieving the desired outcome of placing the right individual at the right firm as swiftly and efficiently as possible. Based on a three-year analysis of client surveys, we have designed SearchSigma, a workflow process with six distinct segments and milestones, described in more detail as follows in this example of a typical search:
Milestone #1 — Forty-eight hours. During the first forty-eight hours, we develop a strategy that includes identification of the internal resources and personnel needed in the search, scoping the necessary geographic reach of the search, determination of the appropriate title of the position offered, creating a description of the ideal candidate and the identification of the top twenty source companies. Identifying the best internal team is largely based on industry expertise. Once the team is in place, the lead partner chooses the breadth of geographic reach based on the title and description of position.
Milestone #2 — Seven days. After seven days, we hold a kick-off meeting with the client at which we present our overarching search strategy, including our research and recruiting approach, as well as a detailed position description that embodies the required leadership characteristics. Clients receive a competitive analysis and an assessment of the market. With a two-way sharing of information, we begin the process by identifying the unique priorities, challenges, and opportunities that characterize a particular client’s search assignment.
Milestone #3 — Fourteen days. After fourteen days, we hold a follow-up meeting with the client to confirm our strategy, present industry research and provide our view on candidate backgrounds reviewed to date. At this point we will have typically identified two benchmark candidates and spoken with at least twenty potential candidates. The client is asked to approve our strategy at this milestone.
Over the next several weeks, the team consults with its established network of resources and searches proprietary databases containing profiles of over 1.5 million executives to assist in identifying individuals with the right background, cultural fit and abilities. An initial list of candidates is carefully screened through face-to-face meetings, phone interviews or video conferences.
Milestone #4 — Forty days. After forty days, we typically have conferred with at least 50% of the identified candidates, interviewed at least five prospects and presented at least three candidates to the client. At this time, we also offer to conduct our forty-day audit which provides us with the opportunity to course-correct our search strategy and target candidate profile, if necessary.
Milestone #5 — Seventy-five days. After seventy-five days, our team has conferred with approximately 90% of the identified candidates, the client has been presented with two qualified candidates, and we have secured two alternative qualified candidates should a final offer not be made or accepted.
Milestone #6 — One-hundred days. At the one-hundred-day mark, we have typically successfully identified and placed the client’s ideal candidate. At the conclusion of each search, we solicit client feedback with a client satisfaction survey. Our surveys provide us with critical feedback to gauge client satisfaction as well as feedback that we utilize to continually evaluate and improve our processes and performance. The survey findings are used to rank our executive search consultants which are then reviewed and posted internally and are considered in making decisions with regard to internal promotions, illustrating our commitment to exceeding the expectations of our clients.
Board Advisory
We approach our board advisory practice with the same rigor, discipline and processes as we apply to our executive search services. This includes utilizing an overarching search strategy, research, regular status reviews, mid-search audit and a methodology where candidates are identified from a formal search process. We are generally paid a flat fee for our board advisory services.
Our board advisory practice is designed to help boards evaluate the strength and diversity of their board as well as their overall effectiveness. Many boards are facing growing regulatory and shareholder pressure to increase their diversity, independence and expertise. Our in-depth assessments help to focus directors on these key priorities and to make them aware of issues that can impact effectiveness. Since establishing this practice in May 2009, we have conducted 24 board assessments.
Our Industry-Focused Practice Areas
Our organizational structure is designed to provide high quality executive search services to our clients worldwide. Our team of executive search consultants is organized by industry practice group in various geographic locations. We believe that industry specialization enables us to better understand our clients’ cultures, operations, business strategies and industries and the respective markets for senior executive candidates. All of our executive search consultants perform searches for specific “C-level” and other senior executives.
We operate our executive search business in six broad industry practice groups: financial services, professional services, life sciences, technology/media/telecom ("TMT"), consumer/retail and industrial. Executive search consultants in our industry practice groups bring an in-depth understanding of the market conditions and strategic and management issues faced by clients within their specific industry. Additionally, our executive search consultants have established networks of sources which often provide one-call access to the most sought after talent. The relative sizes of these industry practice groups, as measured by the percentage of 2014 net revenue and the number of executive search consultants as of December 31, 2014, are as follows:
|
| | | | | |
Industry Practice Group | Percentage of 2014 Net Revenue | | Number of Executive Search Consultants |
Financial services | 35.7 | % | | 56 |
|
Professional services | 10.8 | % | | 17 |
|
Life sciences | 15.3 | % | | 24 |
|
Technology/media/telecom | 13.4 | % | | 21 |
|
Consumer/retail | 10.2 | % | | 16 |
|
Industrial | 14.6 | % | | 23 |
|
Within each broad industry practice group there are a number of industry subsectors. For example, within the financial services practice group our business is diversified among a number of industry subsectors, including asset and wealth management, capital markets, financial technology, hedge funds, investment banking, private equity, commercial banking and insurance. Executive search consultants from
each of these industry practice groups are located across our various offices. We believe this operational structure provides our clients with superior services.
Executive search consultants often focus in one or more subsectors to provide clients with even deeper market intelligence and candidate knowledge specific to their industry. We have integrated domestic and international teams that focus on the following subsectors:
| |
• | Association & Not-for-Profit |
| |
• | Cleantech & Alternative Energy |
| |
• | Federal Consulting, Government Relations & Public Policy |
| |
• | Global Security/Risk Management |
| |
• | Legal, Compliance, Regulatory & Governance |
Our Executive Search Consultants and Other Employees
As of December 31, 2014, we had 631 full-time employees consisting of 157 executive search consultants, 58 associates, 77 researchers and 339 administrative and search support staff. We believe the high caliber, extensive experience and motivation of our professionals are critical factors to our success. We utilize a combination of base salary, revenue and volume bonuses, discretionary bonuses and equity compensation to compensate our employees. We consider relations with our employees to be good.
Our associates and researchers support the efforts of our executive search consultants with candidate sourcing and identification by making initial contact with candidates and performing other search-related functions. We train our associates and researchers, as well as new executive search consultants, in the use of our proprietary retained executive search process and communication systems. Additionally, we periodically hold training and development programs for our associates and researchers. As a result of our strong development culture, we have made a significant number of internal promotions. Over the past five years, we have promoted twenty-one associates to executive search consultant. Promotion to executive search consultant is based on a variety of factors, including demonstrated superior execution and business development skills, the ability to identify solutions to complex issues, personal and professional ethics, a thorough understanding of the market and the ability to develop and build effective teams.
Clients
We have a diverse group of clients located throughout the world in a variety of industries. In 2014 and 2013, no client accounted for more than 5% of our revenue. From January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2014, we have performed 10,304 searches for over 2,700 clients, including some of the leading Fortune 1000, FTSE 100, DAX and CAC 40 companies as well as private equity and venture capital firms and their portfolio companies.
Historically, we have been successful in both adding to our client base and generating repeat business from existing clients. We believe that our dedication to successfully completing our retained searches in a timely and structured manner has enabled us to develop a strong and loyal client base. This has resulted in highly recurring revenue from our existing clients. For example, over the past three years, approximately 75% of our engagements came from clients who had previously used our services. In 2014, we had 326 clients that retained us to perform more than one search for them.
Seasonality
Revenue and operating income have historically varied by quarter and are hard to predict from quarter to quarter. In addition, the volatility in the global economy impacts our quarterly revenue and operating income. On average, the variance between the highest and lowest amount of quarterly net revenue, as expressed as a percentage of annual net revenue, is approximately 5 percentage points.
Marketing
Our executive search consultants market our executive search services through targeted client calling, industry networking and various referral sources. These efforts are assisted by our proprietary databases which provide our executive search consultants with real-time information as to contacts made by their colleagues with particular referral sources, candidates and clients. In addition, we benefit from a
significant number of referrals generated by our reputation for high quality service and successfully completing assignments, as well as repeat business resulting from our ongoing client relationships.
We publicize and build our brand awareness through interviews with the major business and trade publications, sponsor speeches and host presentations before industry and management groups and publish a quarterly digital publication which is distributed to over 30,000 global executives. We regularly participate in relevant conferences and forums and leading roundtable discussions on topics of interest. For example, we host an annual Board of Directors Human Capital Institute to help enhance the quality of board governance and the human resource function. In addition, we consistently distribute publications to existing and potential clients highlighting emerging trends and noteworthy engagements.
Executive search firms frequently are required to refrain from recruiting employees of a client for a specified period of time, typically extending for one year from the initiation of the search assignment. We carefully manage these off-limits conditions by attempting to limit the scope of any such agreement.
Research and Information Management
Our research efforts are maximized through a research department principally based in our office in Cleveland, Ohio. We use our proprietary database and other available technology to conduct research focused on identifying targeted candidates based on client-specific requirements.
Research is largely based on our robust, growing, proprietary candidate database. Our database consists of over 1.5 million unique candidate profiles. The database connects pre-screened candidates to client information offering a concise opportunity for first round due diligence.
A significant value-added benefit of our database is driven by our dynamic client interface, ClientNet®, which enables clients to access candidate-specific details throughout their search process. ClientNet® captures candidate-specific data over time thus ensuring continuous search momentum and providing an efficient process for our clients.
Competition
The executive search industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Our most direct competition comes from the larger executive search firms that compete on a global scale, including Egon Zehnder International, Heidrick & Struggles International (NASDAQ: HSII), Korn/Ferry International (NYSE: KFY), Russell Reynolds Associates, Inc. and Spencer Stuart. We primarily compete with these competitors based upon our relationships with the key decision-makers, as well as our reputation for offering a unique value proposition to our clients. In large part, the genesis of our differentiation is an intense focus on making timely, successful placements that match the needs of our clients. To ensure that we are meeting our clients' expectations, we carefully track our placement rate, average days to placement and stick rate. Furthermore, our size and culture enable us to quickly adapt to current market conditions and demands.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows and results of operations. As a result of the risk set forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and the risk discussed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our inability to attract and retain qualified executive search consultants would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain executive search consultants who possess the skills and experience necessary to fulfill our clients’ needs. Our ability to hire and retain qualified executive search consultants could be impaired by any diminution of our reputation, decrease in compensation levels relative to our competitors, modifications of our compensation philosophy or competitor hiring programs. If we cannot attract, hire and retain qualified executive search consultants, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
If we are unable to maintain our professional reputation and brand name our business would be adversely affected.
We depend on our overall professional reputation and brand name recognition to secure new engagements and hire qualified executive search consultants. In 2007, we changed our brand from Christian & Timbers to CTPartners. While we believe we have established our brand in the market, a number of our competitors have more established and better name recognition than us. Our success also depends on the individual reputations of our executive search consultants and senior management. We obtain many of our new engagements from existing clients or from referrals by those clients. A client who is dissatisfied with our work can adversely affect our ability to secure new engagements. If our reputation is negatively affected because of poor performance, our brand awareness does not continue to increase or as a result of unfavorable publicity, which we have experienced in recent months, we may experience difficulties in competing successfully for both new engagements and qualified executive search consultants, or retaining our consultants. Failure to maintain our professional reputation and brand name could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may not be able to obtain additional funding if a need arises
We believe we can fund our existing operations through cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under our credit facility and note purchase agreement. However, if we incur greater than expected expenses, are subject to additional legal proceedings, encounter difficulties retaining consultants or customers, or any other unforseen unfavorable circumstances arise, we may require additional funding and there can be no assurance that such funding will be available at all or on acceptable terms.
A significant or prolonged economic downturn would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our results of operations are affected by the level of business activity of our clients, which in turn is affected by general economic conditions and the level of economic activity in the industries and markets that they serve. On an aggregate basis, our clients may be less likely to hire as many senior executives during economic downturns and periods of economic uncertainty. To the extent our clients delay or reduce hiring senior executives due to an economic downturn or economic uncertainty, our results of operations will be adversely affected. A continued economic downturn or period of economic uncertainty and a decline in the level of business activity of our clients would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Global economic developments and conditions in the geographic regions and industries from which we derive a significant portion of our revenue could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Demand for our services is affected by global economic conditions and the general level of economic activity in the geographic regions and industries in which we operate. The concentration of our business in certain geographic regions and/or industries exacerbates this risk. For example, 30% of our net revenue in 2014 was derived from providing our services to the financial services industry. When conditions in the global economy, including the credit markets, deteriorate, or economic activity slows, companies may hire fewer permanent employees and some companies, as a cost-saving measure, may choose to rely on their own human resources departments rather than third-party search firms to find talent. Certain of the geographic regions and industries in which we operate have recently deteriorated significantly and may remain depressed for the foreseeable future. If the national or global economy or credit market conditions in general deteriorate, or the demand for our services in a significant industry decreases, our cash flows, business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
We depend substantially on a limited number of key personnel who would be difficult to replace. If we lose the services of these individuals, our business would be adversely affected.
Our continued growth and success depend in large part on the managerial and leadership skills of our senior management team, particularly David C. Nocifora, our incoming chief executive officer and formerly our chief operating officer; and William J. Keneally, our chief financial officer. We rely on our senior management team to market our business, manage our globally dispersed business operations and hire and retain qualified executive search consultants. The success of our growth efforts depends on significant management attention to integration and coordination. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management team would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Board of Directors of the Company determined that, effective April 16, 2015, David C. Nocifora will replace Brian M. Sullivan as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Nocifora will also join the Company's Board of Directors.
If we are unable to prevent our executive search consultants from taking our clients or our executive search consultants with them to a competitor, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
Our success depends upon our ability to develop and maintain strong, long-term relationships with our clients. Although we work on building these relationships between our firm and our clients, in many cases, one or two executive search consultants have primary responsibility for a client relationship. Additionally, a limited number of executive search consultants have primary responsibility for a disproportionate share of our business. In 2014, for example, our top three executive search consultants had primary responsibility for generating business equal to approximately 8% of our net revenues, and our top ten executive search consultants had primary responsibility for generating business equal to approximately 21% of our net revenues. As of December 31, 2014, two of top ten executive search consultants have left the firm.
Although our executive officers are subject to non-compete agreements as part of their employment contracts, we do not generally enter into non-competition agreements with our executive search consultants, our executive search consultants are not contractually prohibited from leaving or joining one of our competitors and some of our clients could choose to use the services of that competitor instead of us. We may also lose clients if the departing executive search consultant has widespread name recognition or a reputation as a specialist in executing searches in a specific industry or management function. Although our employment contracts prohibit former executive search consultants from soliciting any of our employees for a period of one year, we may lose additional executive search consultants if they choose to join the departing executive search consultant at another executive search firm. If we fail to limit departing executive search consultants from moving business or recruiting our executive search consultants to a competitor, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Because existing clients may restrict us from recruiting their employees we may be unable, or be perceived by prospective clients as being unable, to fill existing or prospective executive search assignments, and prospective clients may not engage us, impeding our growth.
Clients frequently require us to refrain from recruiting certain of their employees when conducting executive searches on behalf of other clients. These restrictions generally remain in effect for no more than one year following the commencement of an engagement. However, the specific duration and scope of the off-limits arrangements depend on the length of the client relationship, the frequency with which the client engages us to perform searches and the potential for future business with the client. If a prospective client believes that we are overly restricted by these off-limits arrangements from recruiting the employees of our existing clients, these prospective clients may not engage us to perform their executive searches, and as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We face aggressive competition and if we are unable to compete effectively, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The global executive search industry is extremely competitive and highly fragmented. We compete with other large global executive search firms and smaller specialty firms. Some of our competitors possess greater financial and other resources, greater name recognition and longer operating histories than we do in particular markets or practice areas. Additionally, specialty firms can focus on regional or functional markets or on particular industries. To the extent our competitors are better capitalized and have access to greater financial and other resources, these competitors may be better positioned to attract executive search consultants, expand their business and weather any economic downturns. There are limited barriers to entry into the search industry and new search firms continue to enter the market. Many executive search firms that have a smaller client base may be subject to fewer off-limits arrangements. Our competitors sometimes reduce their fees in order to attract clients and increase market share. Because we typically do not discount our fees, we may experience some loss of net revenue. We may not be able to continue to compete effectively with existing or potential competitors. Our inability to meet these competitive challenges would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Finally, our clients or prospective clients may decide to perform executive searches using in-house personnel.
We rely heavily on information management systems and any interruptions or loss of key client data could adversely effect our business.
Our success depends upon our ability to store, retrieve, process and manage substantial amounts of information. To achieve our goals, we must continue to improve, upgrade and invest in our information management systems. We may be unable to license, design and implement, in a cost-effective and timely manner, improved information systems that allow us to compete effectively. In addition, business process re-engineering efforts may result in a change in software platforms and programs. In addition to the cost of licensing, designing and implementing new information systems, such efforts may present transitional problems. Finally, although our data center is maintained at a third-party location, if we experience any interruptions or loss in our information processing capabilities or loss of key client data, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may experience security breaches that could lead to loss of data privacy that could result in liability and negatively impact our reputation.
Despite our efforts in implementation of security measures, our operating systems are vulnerable to security breaches. Continued occurrences of data breaches across various entities and organizations provides evidence of security breach risk. Such breaches could lead to a disruption of our operations and improper disclosure of confidential information, resulting in legal liability, increased costs and loss of revenue.
We face the risk of liability in the services we perform and significant uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to potential claims with respect to the executive search process. A client could assert a claim for violations of off-limits arrangements, breaches of confidentiality agreements or professional malpractice. In addition, candidates and client employees could assert claims against us. Possible claims include failure to maintain the confidentiality of the candidate’s employment search or for discrimination or other violations of employment laws or professional malpractice. In various countries, we are subject to data protection laws impacting the processing of candidate information. We maintain professional liability insurance in amounts and coverage that we believe are adequate, however, we cannot guarantee that our insurance will cover all claims or that coverage will always be available or sufficient. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our inability to successfully integrate executive search consultants may have an adverse effect on our business.
Much of our net revenue growth since 2004 is due to adding executive search consultants or acquiring established businesses in different geographic locations. We expect to continue to grow by, among other things, selectively adding executive search consultants. We may not, however, be able to identify appropriate executive search consultants, consummate such additions on satisfactory terms or integrate the acquired practices effectively and profitably into our existing operations. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to complete the integration of executive search consultants successfully into our operations. Failure to successfully integrate recently hired executive search
consultants and complementary practices may adversely affect our profitability by creating operating inefficiencies that could increase operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues and reduce operating income. Further, the clients of recently hired executive search consultants may choose not to move their business to us.
We may not be able to manage effectively our expanding operations, which may impede our growth and/or negatively impact our performance.
Since 2004, we have experienced a period of rapid growth. This places a significant strain on our managerial and operational resources. Our number of employees grew from 88 as of December 31, 2004, to 631 as of December 31, 2014, mainly as a result of opening new non-U.S. locations, adding executive search consultants and staff supporting such executive search consultants, and acquisitions. To accommodate our future expected growth, we may need to implement new or upgraded operating and financial systems, procedures and controls throughout many different locations. These efforts may not be successful. Additionally, opening new office locations may strain our financial and management resources. Our failure to expand and integrate these systems, procedures and office locations efficiently could cause our expenses to increase disproportionately and our net revenues to decline or grow more slowly than expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our multinational operations may be adversely affected by economic, social, political and legal risks.
We generate substantial net revenue outside the United States. We offer our services through twenty three countries outside the U.S. We are exposed to the risk of changes in economic, social, political and legal conditions inherent in international operations, which could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, we conduct business in countries where the legal systems, local laws and trade practices are unsettled and evolving. Commercial laws in these countries are sometimes vague, arbitrary and inconsistently applied. If we fail to comply with local laws, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. In addition, the global nature of our operations poses challenges to our management as well as our financial and accounting systems. Failure to meet these challenges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A significant currency fluctuation between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could adversely impact our operating income.
With operations in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific, we conduct business using various currencies. In 2014, 42% of our fee revenue was generated outside of North America. As we typically transact business in the local currency, our profitability may be impacted by the translation of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars. Significant long-term fluctuations in relative currency values, in particular an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and our business, financial condition and results of operations. This risk is offset by payment of expenditures in local currencies, to offset revenue exposure.
The failure to timely align our cost structure with net revenue could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We must ensure that our costs and workforce continue to be in proportion to demand for our services. In particular, local laws in some of the countries we operate in make it more difficult and time consuming to appropriately adjust staffing levels. Failure to timely align our cost structure and headcount with net revenue could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our inability to access credit, or if we are only able to do so at significantly higher costs, could limit our ability to grow and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the current economic environment, banks may strictly enforce the terms of our credit agreement. Although we are currently in compliance with the financial covenants of our revolving credit facility, a further deterioration of economic conditions may negatively impact our business resulting in our failure to comply with these covenants in the future, which could limit our ability to borrow funds under our revolving credit facility. We may not be able to secure alternative financing or may only be able to do so at significantly higher costs, and this could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face the risk of liability arising out of the operation of our business and litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to potential claims with respect to the executive search process. A client could assert a claim for violations of off-limits arrangements, breaches of confidentiality agreements or professional malpractice. In addition, candidates and client employees could assert claims against us. Possible claims include failure to maintain the confidentiality of the candidate’s employment search or for discrimination or other violations of employment laws or professional malpractice. In various countries, we are subject to data protection laws impacting the processing of candidate information. We may also be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings and claims by our employees or former employees, shareholders or other third parties that arise in the regular course of our business or otherwise. We maintain professional liability insurance in amounts and coverage that we believe are adequate. However, we cannot guarantee that our insurance will cover all claims or that coverage will always be available or sufficient. Significant uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Even if we have adequate insurance coverage or we are subject to claims that we do not believe have merit, litigation could result in significant costs and the diversion of management attention. Litigation could also result in unfavorable publicity. For example, a complaint submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Comission by a former employee has recently resulted in media coverage. We are aware of several law firms that has announced they are investigating whether we violated securities laws in connection with events surrounding this claim and our recent announcement of preliminary financial results for 2014. On February 27, 2015 an announcement was made that class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. common stock during the period between February 26, 2014 and January 28, 2015.
While we do not believe that the EEOC claim has merit or that we have violated securities laws, unfavorable media coverage, regardless of the truth of any allegations or the validity of any claim, could further negatively affect our professional reputation and brand name and could result in other current or former employees bringing similar claims in the future, regardless of whether such claims have merit.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance.
Although our common stock is traded on the NYSE MKT exchange, it may remain illiquid, or “thinly traded,” which can increase volatility in the share price and make it difficult for investors to buy or sell shares in the public market without materially affecting the quoted share price. Further, investors seeking to buy or sell a certain quantity of our shares in the public market may be unable to do so within one or more trading days. If limited trading in our stock continues, it may be difficult for holders to sell their shares in the market at any given time at prevailing prices. We currently have one analyst covering our Company, which will likely impact trading volume.
Broad market and industry factors also may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. Factors that could cause wide fluctuations in our stock price may include, among other things:
| |
• | general economic conditions; |
| |
• | actual or anticipated variations in our financial condition and operating results; |
| |
• | overall conditions or trends in our industry; |
| |
• | addition or loss of significant clients; |
| |
• | changes in the market valuations of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us; |
| |
• | announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships or divestitures; |
| |
• | announcements of lawsuits filed against us; |
| |
• | additions or departures of key personnel; |
| |
• | changes in the estimates of our operating results or changes in recommendations by any securities or industry analysts that elect to follow our common stock; and |
| |
• | sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders, including sales by our directors and officers. |
In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our common stock. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. One action has been instituted against us, and we may be the target of more of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources, whether or not we are successful in such litigation.
Sales of outstanding shares of our common stock into the market in the future could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly.
As of December 31, 2014, there were 7,270,297 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales will occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for us to raise funds through securities offerings in the future. The shares sold in our initial public offering in 2010 and February 2015 offering are eligible for sale in the public market without restriction by persons other than our affiliates. The restricted shares that were issued to existing equity holders when we converted from a limited liability company to a corporation at the time of our initial public offering are also eligible for sale in the public market without restriction by persons other than our affiliates. Because our shares are relatively thinly-traded and we have a relatively small public float relative to the total number of shares of our common stock that are issued and outstanding, any adverse effect of such sales could be significant. We have also filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act registering the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. As a result of such registration, any such shares issued to persons other than our affiliates pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan are or will be freely tradable in the public market.
Our principal stockholders may exert substantial influence over us and may exercise their control in a manner adverse to your interests.
Collectively, our executive officers, directors and significant employee shareholders own 1.8 million shares, or 24.2%, of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2014. Because a limited number of persons may exert substantial influence over us, transactions could be difficult or impossible to complete without the support of those persons. It is possible that these persons will exercise control over us in a manner adverse to your interests.
We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, as a result, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates.
We currently do not expect to declare or pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our earnings in the foreseeable future will be used in the operation and growth of our business. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. In addition, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is currently limited by the covenants of our credit facility and may be further restricted by the terms of any future debt or preferred securities. Accordingly, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in our company may be if the market price of our common stock appreciates and you sell your shares at a profit. The market price for our common stock may never exceed, and may fall below, the price that you pay for our common stock.
Anti-takeover provisions in our rights agreement, charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
On March 4, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights agreement that is designed to prevent a stockholder from acquiring 15% or more of the Company's common stock without approval from the Board of Directors. In additions, provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition of us or a change in our management. These provisions include:
| |
• | a board of directors whose members can only be dismissed for cause; |
| |
• | the right of the board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors; |
| |
• | the ability of the board of directors to alter our bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval; |
| |
• | the prohibition on actions by written consent of our stockholders; |
| |
• | the limitation on who may call a special meeting of stockholders; |
| |
• | the establishment of advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings; |
| |
• | the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which would increase the number of outstanding shares and could thwart a takeover attempt; |
| |
• | the requirement of at least 75% of the outstanding common stock to amend any of the foregoing provisions; and |
| |
• | shareholder rights agreement adopted on March 4, 2015. |
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. Although we believe these provisions collectively provide for an opportunity to obtain greater value for stockholders by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, they would apply even if an offer rejected by our board were considered beneficial by some stockholders. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Offices
Our principal executive offices are located in New York, New York, and our corporate, administrative and research functions are located in our office in Cleveland, Ohio. Our operations are based in the following locations:
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
U.S. Locations | | Non-U.S. Locations |
Boston, MA | | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | | Bogota, Colombia |
Chicago, IL | | Mumbai, India | | Caracas, Venezuela |
Cleveland, OH | | Hong Kong | | Lima, Peru |
Columbia, MD | | London, United Kingdom | | Mexico City, Mexico |
Houston, TX | | Paris, France | | Panama City, Panama |
Miami, FL | | Shanghai, China | | Santiago, Chile |
New York, NY | | Beijing, China | | Sao Paulo, Brazil |
Silicon Valley, CA | | Singapore | | Sydney, Australia |
San Francisco, CA | | Auckland, New Zealand | | Melbourne, Australia |
Washington, DC | | Bucharest, Romania | | Perth, Australia |
| | Sofia, Bulgaria | | Vienna, Austria |
| | Prague, Czech Republic | | Salzburg, Austria |
| | Cologne, Germany | | Budapest, Hungary |
| | Hamburg, Germany | | Frankfurt, Germany |
| | Heidelberg, Germany | | Munich, Germany |
| | Zurich, Switzerland | | Stuttgart, Germany |
| | Geneva, Switzerland | | Moscow, Russia |
All of our offices are leased. We do not own any real property.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we are involved in litigation incidental to our business. We are aware that a complaint was submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") by a former employee, which has resulted in negative media coverage. Management does not believe there is merit to the allegation stated in the complaint.
On February 27, 2015, a putative class action against CTPartners Executive Search Inc. and certain of its officers and/or directors was filed (Zinno v. CTPartners Executive Search Inc., et al., Southern District of New York, Case No. 15-cv-1476). Plaintiff alleges certain violations of the Federal securities laws, and seeks damages on his own behalf and on behalf of the putative class for general damages, interest, costs, attorneys’ fees, and unspecified equitable and/or injunctive relief. Management believes these allegations are without merit and will defend this action vigorously. We are unable to evaluate the likelihood of an outcome, favorable or unfavorable, to CTPartners or to estimate the amount or range of any potential loss at this time.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT market. The trading symbol is CTP.
Prices
The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices during each calendar quarter for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
|
| | | | | | | |
2014 | High | | Low |
Fourth Quarter | $ | 23.75 |
| | $ | 12.25 |
|
Third Quarter | 20.35 |
| | 9.32 |
|
Second Quarter | 11.45 |
| | 7.66 |
|
First Quarter | 12.01 |
| | 5.26 |
|
2013 | | | |
Fourth Quarter | $ | 6.88 |
| | $ | 4.57 |
|
Third Quarter | 5.40 |
| | 4.15 |
|
Second Quarter | 5.08 |
| | 3.00 |
|
First Quarter | 4.80 |
| | 3.54 |
|
As of March 19, 2015, the closing price was $6.15 and there were 29 stockholders of record of the common stock.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under ��equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 287,733 |
| | $ | 4.88 |
| | 168,863 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | 0 |
| | N/A |
| | 0 |
|
Total | 287,733 |
| | N/A |
| | 168,863 |
|
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
None.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as other sections of this annual report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecasted or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements include, among other things, our expectations regarding our revenues, expenses and operations and our ability to sustain profitability; our ability to recruit and retain qualified executive search consultants to staff our operations appropriately; our ability to expand our customer base and relationships, especially given the off-limit arrangements we are required to enter into with certain of our clients; further declines in the global economy and our ability to execute successfully through business cycles; our anticipated cash needs; our anticipated growth strategies and sources of new revenues; unanticipated trends and challenges in our business and the markets in which we operate; social or political instability in markets where we operate; the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; price competition; the ability to forecast, on a quarterly basis, variable compensation accruals that ultimately are determined based on the achievement of annual results; the mix of profit and loss by country; and our ability to estimate accurately for purposes of preparing our consolidated financial statements. For more information on the factors that could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements, see Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. We caution the reader that the list of factors may not be exhaustive. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of operations has been prepared for the twelve-month periods ending December 31, 2014, and 2013.
Overview
Business Overview
We are a leading performance-driven executive search firm serving clients across the globe. Committed to a philosophy of partnering with our clients, we offer a proven record in C-Suite, senior executive, and board searches, as well as expertise serving private equity and venture capital firms. Our organizational structure is designed to provide high quality, industry-focused executive search services to our clients worldwide. Our executive search consultants are dedicated to specific industry verticals and are leading experts in their given sectors. We believe that industry specialization enables us to better understand our clients' cultures, operations, business strategies and industries. Our six largest industry practice groups are financial services, professional services, life sciences, technology/media/telecom (“TMT”), consumer/retail and industrial.
Recent Events and Challenges
We are currently facing several challenges. Commencing in December 2014, we began receiving unfavorable publicity regarding a complaint submitted to the EEOC by a former employee. We also withdrew an announced public equity offering in December 2014. In January 2015, we announced preliminary fourth quarter results that fell short of our expectations and then subsequently revised those preliminary results downward. We also withdrew our first quarter and full year 2015 earnings guidance at that time. In light of that revision and withdrawal of guidance, we suspended marketing efforts for another announced public equity offering before completing a significantly downsized offering at the end of January 2015 for $4.2 million in net proceeds after underwriting discounts and expenses. Our stock price declined significantly in December 2014 and January 2015, and several research analysts covering our Company ceased coverage. Several law firms have announced investigations into whether we violated securities laws, and a purported class action on behalf of purchasers of our common stock during the period between February 26, 2014 and January 28, 2015 was filed against us on February 27, 2015 on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We believe these allegations have no merit.
The foregoing events have created significant challenges surrounding our business and, in particular, our ability to retain consultants and customers. Since December 31, 2014, mainly due to the impact of the recent negative publicity, 15 of our consultants have departed the firm, two of which were within our top ten revenue producers but not within our top three. These departures could have a material effect on our ability to generate revenue consistent with our historical trends.
On February 6, 2015, we received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from DHR International to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company for $7.00 per share. On February 24, 2015, we announced that the Board of Directors formed a Special Committee, composed solely of independent directors, to review strategic alternatives for the Company, including the proposal from DHR International and a range of other alternatives. The Company announced, effective April 16, 2015, our Chief Operating Officer David C. Nocifora would replace Brian Sullivan as Chief Executive Officer and that we were conducting a search for a new non-executive director to chair the Board. Michael Feiner, an independent director, has agreed to serve as interim Chairman of the Board.
DHR International also proposed to our Board six director nominees.
We recently entered amended our credit agreement and entered into an additional $12.5 million note purchase agreement that we believe will provide sufficient funding to finance our operations. However, if we incur greater than expected expenses, are subject to additional legal proceedings, if we encounter additional difficulties retaining consultants or customers, or any other unforseen events arise, we may require additional funding and there can be no assurance that it will be available at all or on acceptable terms.
Components of Our Statement of Operations
Net Revenue. Our executive search services are provided on a retained basis. Net revenue is comprised of the following two components:
| |
• | Fee Revenue. The vast majority of our revenue for retained executive search and board advisory services is received as retainer fees (which we refer to as “fee revenue”). Our retainer fee is typically equal to 33% of the first year total cash compensation for the position being filled. Generally, our retainer fee is paid in three installments commencing in the month of our engagement by the client. At the time of placement, the total fee is trued up to an amount equal to 33% of the difference between the actual total cash compensation agreed to be paid and the estimate. In the event that a client hires a candidate for a position other than the position identified in the original search assignment, we typically are paid 30% of the first year’s total cash compensation for the position filled. |
| |
• | Indirect Expenses Billed to Clients. For each engagement, we are paid a flat fee, up to $9,000, to cover certain costs associated with the search process. These costs include research and research tools; other outside services; and the development and maintenance of our proprietary database and communication systems. |
In addition to the components of our net revenue, we also track certain performance metrics that drive revenue. In the executive search industry, revenue in any given period is driven by:
| |
• | the number of search assignments; |
| |
• | the number of executive search consultants; |
| |
• | executive search consultant productivity, measured by average annualized net revenue per executive search consultant; and |
| |
• | average revenue per executive search. |
Reimbursements and Reimbursed Expenses. We are generally reimbursed by our clients for the direct expenses associated with our search activity on their behalf. These direct expenses include travel, other out-of-pocket expenses and third-party costs, and we report such reimbursements as a separate component of total revenue. In addition, we record such direct expenses as a separate component of operating expenses when incurred.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses. At the consultant level, we utilize a combination of base salary, revenue and volume bonuses and equity compensation to compensate our employees. Each executive search consultant is paid a tiered bonus based upon the amount of collected revenue that is credited to such consultant. The higher the revenue credited, the higher the percentage of such revenue that is paid to the executive search consultant as a bonus and thus accrued by us as an expense. As a result of this tiered bonus system, the mix of individual consultants’ performance levels can significantly affect the total amount of compensation expense we record. We pay a volume bonus to our executive search consultants based upon the total amount of collected revenue originated by an executive search consultant.
We periodically grant equity compensation to our executive officers and executive search consultants in order to:
| |
• | align our employees’ interest with those of our stockholders; |
| |
• | facilitate ownership of our common stock by our executive officers and executive search consultants; and, |
| |
• | attract and retain talent. |
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of rent, depreciation, business development, professional fees, communications and IT, networking costs and insurance. Incremental increases in revenue do not necessarily result in proportional increases in general and administrative expenses.
2014 Overview
On March 1, 2014, the Company acquired Johnson Executive Search ("Johnson"), an independent executive search and leadership advisory firm based in Sydney, Austria. The firm works with clients in the financial services, legal and professional services, technology and communications, consumer and industrial sector. We paid $2.3 million in cash on the date of acquisition, and recorded a seller note payable valued at $2.5 million, payable over 3 years from the date of acquisition, and subject to adjustment based on certain revenue targets over three years. As of December 31, 2014, the results of operations for Johnson did not meet the Company's projections. As a result, the Company re-measured the fair value of note payable and recorded a reduction to the amount payable of $0.8 million.
On May 2, 2013, the Company acquired a 51% controlling ownership interest in Augmentum Consulting, Ltd. ("Augmentum"), a London based search firm. On September 4, 2014, we acquired remaining 49% ownership in Augmentum for $3.9 million, of which $1.6 million was paid in cash. The reminder will be paid over two years.
On July 1, 2014, we acquired Park Brown International Pty Ltd ("Park Brown"), an executive search firm focusing on the energy, natural resources and infrastructure sectors based in Perth, Australia. We paid $0.9 in cash at closing, and recorded a note payable of $2.1 million, payable over three years from the date of acquisition, and subject to adjustments based on certain revenue targets over three years.
On December 1, 2014, the Company acquired Neumann Leadership Holding GmbH ("Neumann"), an executive search firm based in Austria, with offices in Germany, Hungary, Czech Republic, Romania, and Bulgaria. We paid $0.5 million in cash at closing, and recorded a note payable valued at $1.7 million, payable over 3 years from the date of acquisition.
Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014, increased $42.3 million while operating income improved by $8.4 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.7 million, compared to an operating loss of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Excluding certain non-recurring charges of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, and $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, as defined in the reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures, adjusted operating income improved by $5.5 million, to $8.7 million at December 31, 2014. The increase primarily reflects an increase in net revenues of $42.3 million, offset by an increase in compensation expense of $30.3 million and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $6.3 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, we were engaged to perform 1,742 searches, for the year ended December 31, 2013, we were engaged to perform 1,395 searches. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we placed candidates in 569 U.S. searches and in 790 non-U.S. searches. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013, we placed candidates in 509 U.S. searches and in 522 non-U.S. searches.
Relevant data is set forth below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Metrics | | Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Increase/ Decrease | | Percentage Increase/ Decrease |
| | (in thousands, except number of search assignments and search consultants) |
Number of new search assignments | | 1,742 |
| | 1,395 |
| | 347 |
| | 24.9 | % |
Number of executive search consultants (as of period end) | | 157 |
| | 128 |
| | 29 |
| | 22.7 | % |
Productivity, as measured by average annualized net revenue per executive search consultant (1) | | $ | 1,232 |
| | $ | 1,042 |
| | $ | 190 |
| | 18.2 | % |
Average revenue per executive search | | $ | 101 |
| | $ | 97 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | 4.1 | % |
(1) Productivity calculation is based on full time equivalent consultant headcount.
Adjusted Performance Measure, Excluding Non-Operational Charges
We utilize Adjusted Net Income/(Loss) and Adjusted Income/(Loss) per common share, non-GAAP financial measures, as measures of our results of operations. We calculated Adjusted Net Income/(Loss) as Net Income/(Loss) excluding the following charges which we do not believe are reflective of our operational results:
| |
• | Post-combination compensation expense |
| |
• | Gain or loss on foreign currency related to funding of foreign subsidiaries |
| |
• | Fees and expenses incurred by us in connection with the restatement of our 2012 interim financial statements |
| |
• | Fees and expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions, including non-recurring integration costs |
| |
• | Tax effect of the above adjustments |
We calculate Adjusted earnings/(loss) per common share using the weighted average shares outstanding amounts used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share in accordance with GAAP.
Management evaluates the Company’s performance based on Adjusted Net Income/(Loss), and Adjusted Net Income/(Loss) per share. These measures should not be viewed as substitutes for financial information determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are necessarily comparable to the non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. We believe the presentation of these non-GAAP measures provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance, excluding certain charges that may not be indicative of our core operating results. We include these non-GAAP measures because we believe they are useful to investors in providing more transparency with respect to operational drivers of the business and the supplemental information used by management in evaluation of our ongoing operations.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| | Year ended December 31 |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
CALCULATION OF "AS ADJUSTED" PERFORMANCE MEASURE | | | | |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | 3,395 |
| | $ | (1,770 | ) |
Adjustments: | | | | |
Post-combination compensation and reorganization expense | | 39 |
| | 2,659 |
|
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) on funding of foreign subsidiaries | | 467 |
| | 867 |
|
Costs incurred for acquisition and integration | | 2,443 |
| | 1,748 |
|
Impairment charges | | — |
| | 594 |
|
Tax effect of the adjustments | | (1,121 | ) | | (2,280 | ) |
Adjusted net income | | $ | 5,223 |
| | $ | 1,818 |
|
| | | | |
Interest expense/(income) | | 266 |
| | 179 |
|
Tax expense/(benefit) | | 3,202 |
| | 1,165 |
|
Adjusted operating income | | 8,691 |
| | 3,162 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 2,361 |
| | $ | 1,982 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 11,052 |
| | $ | 5,144 |
|
| | | | |
Adjusted operating margin | | 5.0 | % | | 2.4 | % |
| | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA margin | | 6.4 | % | | 3.9 | % |
| | | | |
Earnings per common share, as adjusted | | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.24 |
|
Use of non-GAAP measures: The table above contains selected financial information calculated other than in accordance with U.S. Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).
Results of Operations
Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2013
Net Revenue. Net revenue increased $42.3 million, or 32.4%, to $172.5 million in 2014 from $130.3 million in 2013. The increase in net revenue is attributed to both acquisitions and organic growth.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses. Compensation and employee benefits expense increased $28.2 million, or 28.0%, to $128.7 million in 2014 from $100.6 million in 2013. As a percentage of net revenue, compensation and benefits decreased to 74.6% in 2014 from 77.2% in 2013. Excluding certain adjustments of $0.5 million and $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as defined in reconciliation of non-GAAP measures, compensation and benefits expense increased $30.3 million, decreased to 74.3% of net revenue in 2014, compared to 75.1% in 2013. The increase in compensation and benefits expenses is due to increased revenues.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $5.6 million, or 17.4%, to $37.5 million in 2014 from $32.0 million in 2013. Excluding non-operational charges of $2.4 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, as defined in the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures, general and administrative expenses increased by $6.3 million, to $35.1 million in 2014. The increase is comprised of $0.7 million in business development, $0.7 million in internal recruiting and $0.6 million in amortization of intangible assets. The remainder of the increase is due to business acquired in 2014.
Operating Income/Loss. Operating income was $5.7 million for the year ended 2014, an increase of $8.4 million compared to an operating loss of $2.7 million in 2013. Excluding certain non-recurring charges, adjusted operating income improved by $5.5 million, to an operating income of $8.7 million in 2014. The improvement primarily reflects an increase in net revenue of $42.3 million, offset by an increase in compensation and benefits of $30.3 million, and an increase in general administrative costs of $6.3 million.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense was $0.3 million in 2014, compared to $0.2 million in 2013. The net interest expense reflects the discount on seller-financed notes issued in acquisitions as well as interest paid on the use of our line of credit.
Income/Loss Before Taxes and Income Tax Expense/Benefit. In 2014 we recorded an income before income taxes of $5.5 million and an income tax expense of $2.1 million, compared to a loss before income taxes of $2.9 million and an income tax benefit of $1.1 million in 2013. The increase in income tax expense is primarily due to a $8.4 million increase in income before income taxes. The Company's effective tax rate was 38.0% and 38.6% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Net Income/Loss. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $3.4 million, as compared to a net loss of $1.8 million for the same period in 2013. Adjusted net income increased $3.4 million, to an adjusted net income of $5.2 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to an adjusted net income of $1.8 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.
Net Income/Loss Attributable to the Company. As fully described in Note 2, we acquired a controlling interest in Augmentum Consulting Ltd. For the year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we allocated $0.1 million of net income and $0.1 million of net loss, respectively, to the redeemable noncontrolling interest. Net income attributable to the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $3.3 million as compared to net loss of $1.6 million for the same period in 2013.
Earnings/Loss per common share. Basic earnings per common share were $0.46, and diluted earnings per share were $0.44 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to basic and diluted loss per common share of $0.23 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Adjusted earnings per share was $0.70 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $0.45 per share as compared to an adjusted earnings per share of $0.24 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash, cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under our credit facilities. On April 8, 2015 we amended our credit facility agreement and entered into a separate note purchase agreement.
We continually evaluate our liquidity requirements, capital needs and availability of capital resources based on our operating needs. We believe that our existing cash balances together with funds expected to be generated from operations and funds available under our new credit facilities will be sufficient to finance our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, if we incur greater than expected expenses, are subject to additional legal proceedings, we encounter difficulties retaining consultants or customers, or any other unforseen circumstances arise, we may require additional funding and there can be no assurance that it will be available at all or on acceptable terms.
The following table summarizes our cash flow for the periods shown:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | $ | (191 | ) | | $ | 2,918 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (11,656 | ) | | (9,735 | ) |
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | 11,273 |
| | (3,745 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | $ | (574 | ) | | $ | (10,562 | ) |
Cash. Cash at December 31, 2014 was $5.2 million, as compared to $5.7 million at December 31, 2013.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities. In 2014, cash used by operating activities was $0.2 million, compared to cash provided by operating activities of $2.9 million in 2013. The difference is primarily due an increase in working capital balances due to growth of the business, both organic and through acquisitions.
Cash from Investing Activities. In 2014, cash used in investing activities was $11.7 million compared to $9.7 million million in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the cash used in investing activity was principally comprised of $3.7 million cash payment related to the acquisition of Johnson Executive Search, Park Brown and Neumann, $4.6 million of notes receivable issued connection with new partner acquisitions, and $2.7 million in capital expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2013, cash used in the investing activity was comprised primarily of $1.0 million of cash payment related to acquisition of Augmentum and Taylor Consultancy, $7.2 million of notes receivable issued in connection with new partner acquisitions, and $1.7 million in capital expenditures.
Financing Activities. In 2014, cash provided by financing activities of $11.3 million was due to draw on the line of credit of $17.2 million, offset by $6.0 million in payments on long term debt. During 2013, cash used for financing activities was $3.7 million, comprised primarily of payments on seller financed notes.
On April 8, 2015, CTPartners Executive Search Inc. ("the Company") amended its existing credit facility agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and entered into a second-lien note purchase agreement "the "Note Purchase Agreement" with a publicly traded insurance company and an affiliate thereof. The notes are issuable in two tranches of $6.25 million with the first tranche closed on before April 14, 2015. The second tranche of $6.25 million is scheduled to close 90 days after the first funding, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement. The notes bear interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) which is currently approximately 12% and mature in April of 2020. The Company must comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants.
Under our credit facility agreement, which expires on August 31, 2016 we have the borrowing capacity to $20.0 million at LIBOR plus 2.75%. We had $17.2 million borrowings outstanding under our credit facility at December 31, 2014, and zero borrowings at December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, we had $2.8 million available to borrow. As of December 31, 2013, we had $14.0 million available to borrow. The Company is required to comply with certain covenants. During 2014 and 2013, and as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the existing line of credit and no events of default existed.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities, trading activities or non-exchange traded contracts.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. If actual amounts are ultimately different from previous estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.
An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect the Company’s more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Substantially all of our revenue is derived from fees for professional services related to executive search services. Revenue before reimbursements of direct expenses (“net revenue”) consists of: retainer fees; indirect expenses billed to clients; and supplemental fees (fees contractually due to the Company if the actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation on which the retainer fee was based or the client hires other candidates presented by the Company for positions not related to the original search assignment). Since retainer fees and indirect expenses are generally not contingent upon placement of a candidate, our assumptions primarily relate to establishing the period over which our services are performed. The period over which we recognize revenue may not directly correspond to the length of a search because revenue recognition is aligned with our assumptions regarding the provision of services during the engagement. These assumptions determine the timing of revenue recognition and profitability for the reported period. If these assumptions do not accurately reflect the period over which revenue is earned, revenue and profit could differ. We annually review our assumptions with regard to the establishment of the period over which our services are performed to ensure that our revenue recognition policy is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Retainer fees and indirect expenses from executive search engagements are recognized over the expected period of performance in proportion to the estimated personnel time incurred to fulfill our obligations under the engagements. Any supplemental fees are recognized upon the occurrence of the event triggering the payment of a supplemental fee.
Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts. Accounts receivable from our clients are recorded at the invoiced amounts and do not bear interest. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established based upon several factors, including the age of the Company’s accounts receivable, historic loss experience, specific account analysis, as well as expectations of future collections based upon trends, financial viability of the client, and historic collection experience. Actual collections of accounts receivable could differ from our estimates due to macro-economic conditions, changes in the executive search industry or a specific client’s financial condition.
Income Taxes. Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred liabilities are recognized for tax temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Business Combinations. Upon acquisition of a business, the reporting entity must recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity, and recognize and measure goodwill or gain on bargain purchase. Contingent consideration is recognized as an asset or liability and recorded at fair value. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at fair values, and the excess of purchase price over the recognized assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. If the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed exceeds the purchase price, gain on bargain purchase is recognized.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a full retrospective or retrospective with cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on the consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
CTPartners Executive Search Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/McGladrey LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
April 15, 2015
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Assets | | | |
Current Assets | | | |
Cash | $ | 5,215 |
| | $ | 5,654 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | 38,742 |
| | 26,381 |
|
Other receivables | 601 |
| | 433 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 4,284 |
| | 3,974 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 4,829 |
| | 3,184 |
|
Other | 5,327 |
| | 4,411 |
|
Total current assets | 58,998 |
| | 44,037 |
|
Non-current assets | | | |
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net | 5,681 |
| | 4,149 |
|
Goodwill | 11,789 |
| | 5,811 |
|
Intangibles, net | 4,882 |
| | 3,746 |
|
Other assets | 7,366 |
| | 5,517 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 3,641 |
| | 5,482 |
|
| $ | 92,357 |
| | $ | 68,742 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 4,280 |
| | $ | 4,762 |
|
Line of credit | 17,207 |
| | — |
|
Accounts payable | 4,965 |
| | 3,813 |
|
Accrued compensation | 32,220 |
| | 25,201 |
|
Accrued business taxes | 3,430 |
| | 2,079 |
|
Income taxes payable | 774 |
| | 710 |
|
Accrued expenses | 2,532 |
| | 5,571 |
|
Total current liabilities | 65,408 |
| | 42,136 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities | | | |
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 3,549 |
| | 1,295 |
|
Deferred rent, less current maturities | 646 |
| | 1,050 |
|
Total long-term liabilities | 4,195 |
| | 2,345 |
|
Noncontrolling redeemable interest | — |
| | 4,088 |
|
Stockholders’ Equity | | | |
Preferred stock: 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, 7,695,635 and 7,540,821 shares issued at December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively. 7,270,297 and 7,110,292 outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively | 8 |
| | 8 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 38,116 |
| | 37,778 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (10,935 | ) | | (14,242 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net of tax | (2,308 | ) | | (1,275 | ) |
Treasury stock at cost 425,338 and 430,529 shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively. | (2,127 | ) | | (2,096 | ) |
| 22,754 |
| | 20,173 |
|
| $ | 92,357 |
| | $ | 68,742 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Revenue | | | |
Net revenue | $ | 172,533 |
| | $ | 130,278 |
|
Reimbursable expenses | 4,290 |
| | 4,002 |
|
Total revenue | 176,823 |
| | 134,280 |
|
Operating expenses | | | |
Compensation and benefits | 128,727 |
| | 100,553 |
|
General and administrative | 37,544 |
| | 31,985 |
|
Reimbursable expenses | 4,810 |
| | 4,448 |
|
Total operating expenses | 171,081 |
| | 136,986 |
|
Operating income (loss) | 5,742 |
| | (2,706 | ) |
Interest expense, net | (266 | ) | | (179 | ) |
Income (loss) before income taxes | 5,476 |
| | (2,885 | ) |
Income tax (expense) benefit | (2,081 | ) | | 1,115 |
|
Net income (loss) | 3,395 |
| | (1,770 | ) |
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest | (88 | ) | | 138 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company | $ | 3,307 |
| | $ | (1,632 | ) |
| | | |
Basic earnings/(loss) per common share | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | (0.23 | ) |
Diluted income (loss) per common share | 0.44 |
| | (0.23 | ) |
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares | 7,213,345 |
| | 7,055,734 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares | 7,489,552 |
| | 7,055,734 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,395 |
| | $ | (1,770 | ) |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (1,033 | ) | | 82 |
|
Other | — |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 2,362 |
| | $ | (1,688 | ) |
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest | (88 | ) | | 138 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company | $ | 2,274 |
| | $ | (1,550 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in | | Accumulated | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive | | Treasury | | Total Stockholders’ |
| Shares | | Amount | | Capital | | Deficit | | Income (Loss) | | Stock | | Equity |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | 6,983,561 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 36,846 |
| | $ | (12,610 | ) | | $ | (1,357 | ) | | $ | (2,075 | ) | | $ | 20,811 |
|
Net loss |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | (1,770 | ) | |
|
| | | | (1,770 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 82 |
| | — |
| | 82 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
| |
|
| | (138 | ) | | 138 |
| |
|
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | — |
| | — |
|
Share-based compensation | 107,107 |
| | 1 |
| | 795 |
| |
|
| |
|
| | — |
| | 796 |
|
Employee stock purchase program | 24,467 |
| |
|
| | 275 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 275 |
|
Treasury Stock | (4,843 | ) | |
|
| | | |
|
| |
|
| | (21 | ) | | (21 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | 7,110,292 |
| | 8 |
| | 37,778 |
| | (14,242 | ) | | (1,275 | ) | | (2,096 | ) | | 20,173 |
|
Net income |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | 3,395 |
| |
|
| |
| | 3,395 |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontroling interest |
|
| |
|
| | 88 |
| | (88 | ) | |
|
| |
| | — |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
| |
|
| | (419 | ) | |
|
| | (1,033 | ) | |
| | (1,452 | ) |
Share-based compensation | 154,814 |
| |
|
| | 669 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 669 |
|
Treasury Stock | 5,191 |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| | (31 | ) | | (31 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | 7,270,297 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 38,116 |
| | $ | (10,935 | ) | | $ | (2,308 | ) | | $ | (2,127 | ) | | $ | 22,754 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | |
Net income (loss) | 3,395 |
| | (1,770 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,361 |
| | 1,982 |
|
Reorganization charges | — |
| | 48 |
|
Share-based compensation | 669 |
| | 796 |
|
Amortization of discount on seller notes | 9 |
| | 116 |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration | (458 | ) | | — |
|
Amortization of post-combination compensation | — |
| | 1,878 |
|
Impairment charges | — |
| | 594 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 98 |
| | (2,736 | ) |
Deferred rent | (313 | ) | | (266 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquired businesses: | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | (11,978 | ) | | (1,104 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | 857 |
| | 423 |
|
Other assets and receivables | (1,683 | ) | | (1,027 | ) |
Accounts payable | 640 |
| | 1,792 |
|
Accrued compensation | 8,049 |
| | 908 |
|
Accrued business taxes | 1,316 |
| | (22 | ) |
Income taxes payable | (75 | ) | | 323 |
|
Accrued expenses | (3,078 | ) | | 983 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (191 | ) | | 2,918 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | |
Acquisition of businesses | (3,740 | ) | | (1,033 | ) |
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest | (1,629 | ) | | — |
|
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment | (2,696 | ) | | (1,665 | ) |
Notes receivable issued | (4,591 | ) | | (7,210 | ) |
Repayment of notes receivable | 1,000 |
| | 173 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (11,656 | ) | | (9,735 | ) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | | |
Principal payments on long-term debt | (5,992 | ) | | (3,745 | ) |
Net proceeds (payments) on revolving credit facility | 17,207 |
| | — |
|
Repurchase of common stock | 58 |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | 11,273 |
| | (3,745 | ) |
Net decrease in cash | (574 | ) | | (10,562 | ) |
Effect of foreign currency on cash | 135 |
| | 269 |
|
Cash: | | | |
Beginning | 5,654 |
| | 15,947 |
|
Ending | 5,215 |
| | 5,654 |
|
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash paid (refunded) during the year for | | | |
Interest | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 273 |
|
Income taxes | $ | (63 | ) | | $ | 461 |
|
| | | |
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Financing Information | | | |
Seller financing of fixed asset additions | $ | 117 |
| | $ | 409 |
|
Employee discount stock purchase award in lieu of cash compensation | $ | — |
| | $ | 275 |
|
Treasury stock acquired in lieu of shareholder receivable | $ | (90 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) |
| | | |
Forgiveness of notes receivable | $ | 833 |
| | $ | 120 |
|
| | | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing Activities | | | |
Acquisition of businesses | | | |
Total identifiable assets acquired | $ | 3,829 |
| | $ | 2,852 |
|
Goodwill | 6,926 |
| | 5,289 |
|
Deferred post-combination compensation | 769 |
| | — |
|
Aggregate purchase price per purchase agreement | $ | 11,524 |
| | $ | 8,141 |
|
Seller note | (6,364 | ) | | (2,592 | ) |
Redeemable noncontrolling interest | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,849 | ) |
Cash paid for acquisition of a business | $ | 5,160 |
| | $ | 1,700 |
|
Less cash acquired | $ | (1,420 | ) | | $ | (667 | ) |
Cash paid for acquisition of a business net of cash acquired | 3,740 |
| | 1,033 |
|
| | | |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest | | | |
Non-controlling interest | 3,852 |
| | — |
|
Seller note | (2,223 | ) | | — |
|
Cash paid for acquisition of non-controlling interest | 1,629 |
| | — |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business — CTPartners Executive Search Inc. along with its subsidiaries (collectively, CTPartners or the Company), is a retained executive search firm with global executive search capabilities. The Company operates in North America, Europe and the Middle East (EMEA), Asia Pacific and Latin America.The Company is subject to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and the relevant provisions of the Securities Acts of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company's common stock trades on the NYSE MKT exchange under the symbol "CTP".
Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Risk — The Company maintains balances at financial institutions which may, at times, exceed amounts federally insured in the U.S. and foreign countries. No losses have been incurred on such deposits.
Revenue Recognition — Substantially all revenue is derived from fees for professional services related to executive search services. Revenue before reimbursements of direct expenses (“net revenue”) consists of: retainer fees; indirect expenses billed to clients; supplemental fees (fees contractually due to the Company if the actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeds the estimated compensation on which the retainer fee was based or the client hires other candidates presented by the Company for positions not related to the original search assignment). Retainer fees and indirect expenses from executive search engagements are recognized when earned and realizable, typically over the expected average period of performance in proportion to the estimated effort incurred to fulfill our obligations under the engagements. Any supplemental fees, resulting from actual compensation of the placed candidate exceeding the estimated compensation, are recognized upon the occurrence of the event triggering the payment of a supplemental fee.
Reimbursements — The Company incurs out-of-pocket expenses that are generally reimbursed by its clients, which are accounted for as revenue in its consolidated statements of operations.
Accounts Receivable — The Company extends credit to customers under normal trade agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established based upon several factors, including the age of the Company’s accounts receivable, historic loss experience, specific account analysis, as well as expectations of future collections based upon trends, financial viability of the client, and historic collection experience. The Company also provides a reserve for billing adjustments based upon historical experience.
Leasehold Improvements and Equipment — Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the useful life of equipment, or in the case of leasehold improvements, the shorter of the life of the improvement or the length of the lease as follows:
|
| |
Leasehold improvements | 3-10 years |
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment | 5-7 years |
Computer equipment and software | 3-5 years |
Leasehold improvements and equipment are carried at cost less allowances for depreciation and amortization. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged against earnings when incurred. Additions and major repairs are capitalized if they extend the useful life of the related asset.
Deferred Rent — The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Deferred rent is recognized for the excess of rental expense over rental payments. The portion of deferred rent which will not be recognized into the consolidated statement of operations within one year is included as a long-term liability on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2014, and 2013.
Share-Based Compensation — The Company has an equity incentive plan under which the Board of Directors may grant restricted stock or stock options to employees and consultants. Share based compensation cost is measured on the grant date fair value of the award, and recognized in the financial statements over the requisite service period.
Income Taxes — The Company’s subsidiaries are subject to entity-level income taxes in their respective foreign jurisdictions. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company has made an election to include the income or loss of its global subsidiaries in the consolidated US tax return, except for Neumann Leadership Holding (Neumann). CTPartners pays US federal income tax on its worldwide income, excluding Neumann, reduced by income tax credits for foreign income taxes incurred. The income tax for Neumann companies is paid in local jurisdictions.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, tax credit carryforwards and deferred liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Management evaluated the Company’s tax positions and concluded that the Company had taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the consolidated financial statements. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to tax examinations by the U.S. federal, state or local tax authorities for years prior to 2010. When and if applicable, potential interest and penalty costs are accrued as incurred, with expenses recognized in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. For non-US locations, the Company is no longer subject to audit examinations prior to 2010, except for the United Kingdom which extends to 2005. When and if applicable, potential interest and penalty costs are accrued as incurred, with expenses recognized in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Foreign Currency Translation — The Company generally designates the local currency for all its foreign subsidiaries as the functional currency, except for Venezuela, as discussed below. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each period. The results of operations are translated at the average monthly rate of exchange. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses from transactions denominated in non-functional currency are included in operating results for the period. For 2014 and 2013, net foreign currency gains (losses) included in net income/loss were :
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Net foreign currency gain/(loss) | $ | (1,093 | ) | | $ | (1,139 | ) |
Venezuela
As further described in Note 2, effective January 2, 2012, the Company purchased its Latin American licensee, including operations in Venezuela. The economy in Venezuela has had significant inflation in the last several years. At the time of the acquisition, the Venezuelan economy was designated as highly inflationary, and is accounted for pursuant to accounting guidance for highly inflationary economies. Therefore, the U.S. dollar is designated to be the functional currency of our Venezuelan operations, and any gain or loss resulting from foreign currency translation is reflected in the general and administrative expenses in Company's results of operations.
The Venezuelan Central Bank is the only institution through which foreign currency-denominated transactions can be brokered. Under the system known as the Foreign Currency Securities Transactions System (SITME), entities domiciled in Venezuela can buy U.S. dollar-denominated securities only through banks authorized by Venezuelan Central Bank to import goods, services, or capital inputs. SITME imposes volume restrictions on an entity's trading activity, limiting such activity to a maximum amount equivalent of $50,000 per day, not exceeding $350,000 in a calendar month. This limitation is non-cumulative. Given the limited availability of alternative exchange mechanisms in Venezuela, the Company used the published SITME rate to re-measure transactions denominated in Bolivars. In February of 2013, the Venezuelan government eliminated the SITME rate and devalued its currency. As of December 31, 2014, the exchange rate was 6.30 Bolivares per U.S. dollar. During the twelve months ending December 31, 2014, the Company's Venezuelan operations generated 2.49% of consolidated net revenue.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net of tax, is comprised of, and related to, the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (2,121 | ) | | (1,088 | ) |
Other | (187 | ) | | (187 | ) |
| $ | (2,308 | ) | | $ | (1,275 | ) |
Financial Instruments — Cash is stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. The carrying value for account receivables, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities reasonably approximates fair market value due to the nature of the financial instruments and the short term nature of the item. In 2014, the Company recorded three notes payable to seller in connection with acquiring Neumann, Park Brown and Johnson. In 2013, the Company recorded two additional notes payable to seller in connection with acquisition of Augmentum and Taylor Consulting. These notes were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition, and re-measured each reporting period.
Fair Value — The Company measures the fair values in accordance with accounting guidance that defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. The guidance also discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
| |
• | Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
| |
• | Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions. |
The inputs used in the fair value measurement should be from the highest level available. In instances where the measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement will fall within the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if any. The goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill of the reporting unit would be considered impaired. To measure the amount of the impairment loss, the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is indicated. The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of December 31, 2014. For this test, the fair value of the Company's relevant reporting unit is determined using a combination of valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, and the appropriate discount rates. The completion of the first step of the goodwill impairment indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no indicators of impairment with respect to the Company's goodwill.
Intangible Assets - Intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships, developed technology and trademarks, and are recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. Customer relationships and developed technology are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 10 years. Certain trademarks are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets, and must be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if the events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.6 million, relating to intangible assets acquired in Cheverny CEO Search, S.A. business combination.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest - On May 2, 2013, the Company acquired a 51% controlling ownership interest in Augmentum. The Company had the right to call the remaining 49% interest, and Augmentum shareholders had the right to put the remaining 49% interest for a limited amount of time after the first anniversary of acquisition, at a pre-determined price, adjustable based on certain revenue targets. The "put" option expired on September 12, 2014, and the call option continues to exist indefinitely. The put option requires the noncontrolling interest to be classified as redeemable, recorded in the mezzanine equity on the Company's consolidated balance sheet, and measured at the greater of estimated redemption value, which approximates fair value, at the end of each reporting period or the historic cost basis. The resulting increases or decreases in the estimated redemption amount are affected by corresponding charges or credits against retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings, additional paid in capital. If the put option becomes no longer exercisable, the redeemable noncontrolling interest will be reclassified to noncontrolling interest and included in the permanent equity on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The Company exercised its call option to acquire remaining 49% of interest in Augmentum in the third quarter of 2014.
Reclassifications — Certain items in the 2013 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation.
Note 2. Acquisitions
Neumann Leadership
On December 1, 2014, the Company acquired Neumann Leadership Holding GmbH ("Neumann"), an executive search firm based in Austria, with offices in Germany, Hungary, Czech Republic, Romania, and Bulgaria. This acquisition expands the Company's presence in Central Europe.
The Company paid $0.5 million in cash on the acquisition date, additional $1.0 million to redeem Neumann's bank debt, and recorded a seller note payable valued at $1.7 million, payable over three years from the date of acquisition. A portion of the purchase price is contingent on continuing employment. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, certain selling shareholders are required to continue employment with the Company through the date of payment in order to receive a portion of the purchase price, totaling $0.8 million. The contingent portion of the purchase price was accounted for as compensation for post-combination services, and will be recognized over three years using graded-vesting method.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed, at acquisition date:
|
| | | |
Fair value of consideration transferred: | |
Cash | $ | 1,525 |
|
Seller note payable for contingent consideration | 1,745 |
|
Total | $ | 3,270 |
|
|
| | | |
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | |
Cash | $ | 706 |
|
Accounts receivable | 1,293 |
|
Other assets | 51 |
|
Trade names and trademarks | 522 |
|
Database content | 447 |
|
Deferred post-combination compensation | 769 |
|
Property and equipment | 233 |
|
Accrued compensation expense | (1,172 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (671 | ) |
Total identifiable net assets | 2,178 |
|
Goodwill | 1,092 |
|
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 3,270 |
|
The weighted average life of total amortizable intangible assets acquired is 10 years.
The fair value of identifiable intangible assets was measured based upon significant inputs that were not observable in the market, and therefore are classified as Level 3. The key assumptions include (i) management's projection of future cash flows based upon past experience and future expectations, and (ii) an assumed discount rate of 19.5%.
The goodwill of $1.1 million is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise in connection with the acquisition. The goodwill relating to the Company's acquisition of Neumann is not deductible for United States federal income tax purposes.
The Company incurred acquisition related costs of $0.6 million, which were recorded as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The total revenues and net income attributable to the acquisition, since the acquisition date, included in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 are as follows:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
Total Revenues | $ | 567 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) | $ | (256 | ) |
The amounts of revenue and net loss related to the acquisition that are included in our consolidated statements of operations and the pro forma financial information as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013, are presented in the following table. This pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what our actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition happened at such time.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Pro forma unaudited total revenues and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31 |
| 2014(1) | | 2013(2) |
Total Revenues | $ | 186,493 |
| | $ | 142,504 |
|
Net Income | $ | 3,038 |
| | $ | (2,921 | ) |
(1) Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 is adjusted to exclude $0.6 million of acquisition costs and to include $0.4 million of amortization costs.
(2) Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 is adjusted to to include $0.8 million of amortization costs.
Park Brown
On July 1, 2014, the Company acquired Park Brown International Pty Ltd ("Park Brown"), an executive search firm focusing on the energy, natural resources and infrastructure sectors based in Perth, Australia.
The Company paid $0.9 million in cash on the acquisition date, and recorded a seller note payable valued at $2.1 million, payable over three years from the date of acquisition, and subject to adjustment based on certain revenue targets over three years.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed, at acquisition date:
|
| | | |
Fair value of consideration transferred: | |
Cash paid | $ | 923 |
|
Seller note payable for contingent consideration | 2,096 |
|
Total | $ | 3,019 |
|
|
| | | |
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | |
Cash | $ | 714 |
|
Accounts receivable | 328 |
|
Other assets | 109 |
|
Trade names and trademarks | 67 |
|
Database content | 141 |
|
Customer relationships | 402 |
|
Property and equipment | 18 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (465 | ) |
Total identifiable net assets | 1,314 |
|
Goodwill | 1,705 |
|
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 3,019 |
|
The weighted average life of total amortizable intangible assets acquired is 9.1 years.
The acquisition of Park Brown includes a contingent consideration arrangement that allows for adjustment of payments based upon achievement of certain revenue targets. The fair value of contingent consideration is based upon the future revenues attributable to the acquired business, and was estimated through the use of the Monte Carlo model. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. These fair value measurements are based on (i) an assumed revenue forecast, (ii) an assumed discount rate of 4.8%, and (iii) assumed market volatility rate range of 10.0%. The fair value of the note payable for contingent consideration recognized on the acquisition date was $2.1 million. The Company made a payment of $0.7 million towards the note in the fourth quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of the note payable was $1.2 million.
The fair value of identifiable intangible assets was measured based upon significant inputs that were not observable in the market, and therefore are classified as Level 3. The key assumptions include (i) management's projection of future cash flows based upon past experience and future expectations, and (ii) an assumed discount rate of 20.5%.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The goodwill of $1.7 million is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise in connection with the acquisition. The goodwill relating to the Company's acquisition of Park Brown is fully deductible for United States federal income tax purposes.
The Company incurred acquisition related costs of $0.3 million, which were recorded as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The total revenues and net income attributable to the acquisition, since the acquisition date, included in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 are as follows:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
Total Revenues | $ | 2,040 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) | $ | 560 |
|
The amounts of revenue and net loss related to the acquisition that are included in our consolidated statements of operations and the pro forma financial information as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013, are presented in the following table. This pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what our actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition happened at such time.
Pro forma unaudited total revenues and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended |
| | 2014(1) | | 2013(2) |
Total Revenues | | $ | 178,470 |
| | $ | 136,788 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) | | $ | 3,815 |
| | $ | (1,270 | ) |
(1) Pro forma net income/loss for the year ended December 31, 2014 is adjusted to exclude $0.3 million of acquisition costs and to include 0.1 million of amortization costs.
(2) Pro forma net income/loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 is adjusted to include 0.2 million of amortization costs.
Johnson Executive Search
On March 1, 2014, the Company acquired Johnson Executive Search ("Johnson"), an independent executive search and leadership advisory firm based in Sydney, Australia. The firm works with clients in the financial services, legal and professional services, technology and communications, consumer and industrial sectors. This acquisition expands the Company's presence in Asia-Pacific region.
The Company paid $2.3 million in cash on the acquisition date, and recorded a seller note payable valued at $2.5 million, payable over 3 years from the date of acquisition, and subject to adjustment based on certain revenue targets over three years.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed, at acquisition date:
|
| | | |
Fair value of consideration transferred: | |
Cash | $ | 2,336 |
|
Seller note payable for contingent consideration | 2,523 |
|
Total | $ | 4,859 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | |
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | |
Accounts receivable | $ | 380 |
|
Other assets | 53 |
|
Trade names and trademarks | 189 |
|
Database content | 321 |
|
Customer relationships | 227 |
|
Property and equipment | 187 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (251 | ) |
Total identifiable net assets | 1,106 |
|
Goodwill | 3,753 |
|
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 4,859 |
|
The weighted average life of total amortizable intangible assets acquired is 8 years.
The acquisition of Johnson includes a contingent consideration arrangement that allows for adjustment of payments based upon achievement of certain revenue targets over the next three years. The fair value of contingent consideration is based upon the future revenues attributable to the acquired business, and was estimated through the use of the Monte Carlo model. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. These fair value measurements are based on (i) an assumed revenue forecast, (ii) an assumed discount rate of 8.5%, and (iii) assumed market volatility rate range of 10%. The fair value of the note payable for contingent consideration recognized on the acquisition date was $2.5 million. As of December 31, 2014, the results of operations for Johnson did not meet the Company's projections. As a result, the Company re-measured the fair value of contingent consideration and recorded an adjustment in the amount $0.8 million. The fair value of the note payable as of December 31, 2014 was $1.4 million.
The fair value of identifiable intangible assets was measured based upon significant inputs that were not observable in the market, and therefore are classified as Level 3. The key assumptions include (i) management's projection of future cash flows based upon past experience and future expectations, and (ii) an assumed discount rate of 13.5%.
The goodwill of $3.8 million is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business and the synergies expected to arise in connection with the acquisition. The goodwill relating to the Company's acquisition of Johnson is fully deductible for United States federal income tax purposes.
The Company incurred acquisition related costs of $0.6 million, which were recorded as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The total revenues and net income attributable to the acquisition, since the acquisition date, included in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 are as follows:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
Total Revenues | $ | 3,547 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) | $ | (917 | ) |
The amounts of revenue and net loss related to the acquisition that are included in our consolidated statements of operations and the pro forma financial information as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013, are presented in the following table. This pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what our actual results of operations would have been had the acquisition happened at such time.
Pro forma unaudited total revenues and net income/loss of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2013 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30 |
| 2014(1) | | 2013(2) |
Total Revenues | $ | 178,224 |
| | $ | 142,656 |
|
Net Income/(Loss) | $ | 3,210 |
| | $ | (1,907 | ) |
(1) Pro forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 is adjusted to exclude $0.6 million of acquisition costs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(2) Pro forma net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 is adjusted to include $0.1 million of amortization costs.
Taylor Executive Consultancy Latam S. de R.L.
On November 5, 2013, the Company acquired Taylor executive Consultancy Latam S. de R.L. ("Taylor Consultancy"), a Mexico-based executive search firm. The purchase price consists of $0.2 million of initial cash payment, and a contingent consideration based on certain revenue targets, ranging from zero to $0.7 million. As a result, the Company recorded $0.1 million, representing the fair value of contingent consideration. As part of purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $0.1 million of identifiable intangible assets, and $0.2 million of goodwill. The acquisition is not considered material, and therefore, pro-forma information has not been presented.
Augmentum Consulting, Ltd.
On May 2, 2013, the Company acquired a 51% controlling ownership interest in Augmentum Consulting, Ltd. ("Augmentum"), a London based search firm. This acquisition complements CTPartners' existing UK business in a variety of practice areas, provides increased competitive advantage and enhances growth opportunity.
The Company paid $1.5 million in cash on the acquisition date, recorded a seller note payable valued at $2.5 million, payable in two installments on August 31, 2014 and 2015, and a redeemable noncontrolling interest of $3.8 million. The aggregate maximum purchase price may be adjusted based on certain revenue targets over three years, not to exceed $8.6 million in total. On September 4, 2014 the Company acquired remaining 49% interest in Augmentum for $3.9 million, of which $1.6 million was paid in cash at closing. The remainder will be paid over two years.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed, at acquisition date:
|
| | | |
Fair value of consideration transferred: | |
Cash | $ | 1,500 |
|
Seller note payable for contingent consideration | 2,490 |
|
Total | 3,990 |
|
Fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interest | 3,849 |
|
| $ | 7,839 |
|
|
| | | |
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | |
Cash | $ | 667 |
|
Accounts receivable | 2,044 |
|
Other assets | 96 |
|
Trade names and trademarks | 204 |
|
Database content | 835 |
|
Customer relationships | 474 |
|
Non-competition agreements | 79 |
|
Property and equipment | 43 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (1,725 | ) |
Total identifiable net assets | 2,717 |
|
Goodwill | 5,122 |
|
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed | $ | 7,839 |
|
The weighted average useful life of total amortizable intangible assets acquired is 8.5 years.
The acquisition of Augmentum includes a contingent consideration arrangement, that allowed for adjustment of payments based upon achievement of certain revenue targets over three years.
The fair value of contingent consideration and the fair value of noncontrolling interest, including the value of the put and the call options, is contingent upon the acquired business revenues, and was estimated through the use of the Monte Carlo model. These fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement. These fair value measurements are based on (i) an assumed revenue forecast, (ii) an assumed discount rate of 6.5%, and (iii) assumed market volatility rate range of 10%-12.5% based on the volatility data for companies similar to Augmentum. The fair value of the note payable for contingent consideration recognized on the acquisition date was $2.5 million. There have been no changes in the assumptions used in the valuing of the contingent consideration.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Cheverny CEO Search, S.A.
On October 10, 2012, the Company completed an acquisition of Cheverny CEO Search, S.A., a Paris, France based search firm focused on executive recruiting. The first payment of $0.5 million was made in cash on the acquisition date, and a non-interest bearing seller note was issued for the remainder of the purchase price. The note was payable in two equal installments of $0.5 million each on July 12, 2013 and July 12, 2014. A portion of the total purchase price was contingent upon the continued employment certain shareholders of the acquiree. Therefore, the contingent portion of the purchase price was accounted for as compensation for post-combination services, recognized over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method.
During the quarter ending March 31, 2013, the Company modified the terms of the Cheverny CEO Search, S.A. acquisition agreement, terminating all employment contingencies. As a result of the amendment, the Company recognized remaining post-combination compensation and incurred a non-recurring charge of $0.8 million relating to Cheverny CEO Search, S.A. post-combination compensation in the first quarter of 2013. The charge is included in compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Latin America
Effective January 2, 2012, the Company acquired CTPartners Latin America Inc., its independently-owned licensee that had been operating under the name of CTPartners in Latin America for the prior five years. The aggregate purchase price in the agreement was $10.5 million, which was paid in cash and the issuance of a non-interest bearing seller note for $5.3 million, due in equal installments of $2.6 million each on January 2, 2013 and January 2, 2014, respectively. A portion of the total purchase price was contingent upon the continued employment of certain key shareholders. The purchase agreement provides that the selling shareholders are required to repay to the Company up to the aggregate amount of $7.2 million if their employment terminates prior to the 36-month anniversary of the closing of the transaction. Therefore, the contingent portion of the purchase price was accounted for as compensation for post-combination services, and initially recognized over three years using the graded-vesting method. After accounting for a portion of the purchase price as post-combination compensation, the fair value of the consideration allocation to the assets and liabilities acquired was $3.0 million.
During the quarter ending March 31, 2013, the Company modified the terms of the Latin America acquisition agreement, terminating all employment contingencies. As a result of the amendment, the Company recognized the remaining post-combination compensation and incurred a non-recurring charge of $1.1 million relating to Latin America post-combination compensation in the first quarter of 2013. The charge is included in compensation and benefits expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note 3. Accounts Receivable
The Company extends credit to customers under normal trade agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established based upon several factors, including the age of the Company’s accounts receivable, historic loss experience, specific account analysis, as well as expectations of future collections based upon trends, financial viability of the client, and historic collection experience. The Company also provides a reserve for billing adjustments based upon historical experience. The allowance for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments amounted to $1.9 million and $1.5 million at December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Note 4. Leasehold Improvements and Equipment
The components of the leasehold improvements and equipment at December 31 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Leasehold improvements | $ | 3,731 |
| | $ | 3,222 |
|
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3,544 |
| | 3,050 |
|
Computer equipment and software | 7,933 |
| | 6,066 |
|
| 15,208 |
| | 12,338 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (9,527 | ) | | (8,189 | ) |
| $ | 5,681 |
| | $ | 4,149 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense relating to leasehold improvements and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.6 million, and for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $1.3 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows: |
| | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | $ | — |
|
Additions | 5,289 |
|
Exchange rate fluctuation | — |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | 5,811 |
|
Additions | 6,926 |
|
Exchange rate fluctuation | (948 | ) |
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 11,789 |
|
Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortizable Lives | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Amortized Intangible assets | | | | | | | | |
Trade names | | 2 years | | $ | 999 |
| | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 679 |
|
Developed technology | | 10 years | | 1,872 | | 225 | | 1,647 |
Customer relationships | | 10 years | | 3,234 | | 781 | | 2,453 |
Non-competition agreements | | 3 years | | 79 | | 44 | | 35 |
| | | | $ | 6,184 |
| | $ | 1,370 |
| | $ | 4,814 |
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | | | | | | 68 |
|
Total Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | $ | 4,882 |
|
The following is a summary of amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortizable Lives | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Amortized Intangible assets | | | | | | | | |
Trade names | | 1 year | | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 131 |
|
Developed technology | | 10 years | | 1,095 | | 101 | | 994 |
Customer Relationships | | 10 years | | 3,040 |
| | 553 |
| | 2,487 |
|
Non-competition agreements | | 3 years | | 84 |
| | 18 |
| | 66 |
|
| | | | $ | 4,494 |
| | $ | 816 |
| | $ | 3,678 |
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | |
Trademarks | | | | | | | | 68 |
|
Total Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | $ | 3,746 |
|
In 2013, due to changes in economic outlook for the acquired business of Cheverny CEO Search, the Company performed an impairment evaluation of its acquired intangible assets. The analysis utilized discounted cash flow methodology, and resulted in an impairment charge of $0.6 million to its intangible assets. Key assumptions used in the determination of fair value include management forecasts and a discount rate of 21%, which are Level 3 inputs.
Total amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Estimated aggregate future amortization expense for the following five years and thereafter is as follows:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | |
Years ending December 31, | | Estimated Aggregate Future Amortization Expense |
2015 | | $ | 929 |
|
2016 | | 800 |
|
2017 | | 507 |
|
2018 | | 507 |
|
2019 | | 507 |
|
Thereafter | | 1,564 |
|
| | $ | 4,814 |
|
Note 6. Long-Term Debt
Line of Credit: The Company is a party to a credit and security agreement (the “Third Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement” or “Credit Agreement”) with a bank which includes a revolving credit facility. The Agreement, as amended, provides for the revolving credit facility to expire on August 31, 2016. Under the terms of the revolving credit facility, the Company may borrow an amount equal to the lesser of $20.0 million or the “Borrowing Base” (the Company’s eligible accounts receivable as defined in the Credit Agreement), with interest calculated at 275 basis points above the LIBOR rate as defined in the revolving credit agreement (the adjusted LIBOR rate), which was 2.9120% at December 31, 2014. The Company had $17.2 million borrowings on the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2014 and no borrowings at December 31, 2013. Additionally, the Company has issued letters of credit related to office lease agreements secured by the Credit Agreement in the amounts of $4.6 million as of December 31, 2014 and $3.3 million as of December 31, 2013. Available borrowings under the revolving credit facility were $2.8 million at December 31, 2014, and $14.0 million at December 31, 2013.
Notes Payable
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31: |
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31 |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Notes payable - redemption of members’ units | $ | 157 |
| | $ | 310 |
|
Notes payable - seller financed acquisitions | 7,581 |
| | 5,637 |
|
Note payable - other | 91 |
| | 110 |
|
| 7,829 |
| | 6,057 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt | 4,280 |
| | 4,762 |
|
| $ | 3,549 |
| | $ | 1,295 |
|
The schedule for future payments to be made on long-term debt as of December 31, 2014, is as follows:
|
| | | |
2015 | $ | 4,279 |
|
2016 | 2,335 |
|
2017 | 1,215 |
|
| $ | 7,829 |
|
Notes Payable — Redemption of Members’ Units: Prior to the conversion from a limited liability company to a corporation, the Company periodically purchased member units from former members, with payment in the form of notes, payable over 5 years. The total due on these notes amounted to $0.2 million and $0.3 million at December 31, 2014, and 2013, respectively. The interest on the notes ranges from 2.66% to 5.00%. The carrying value of notes payable approximates its fair value.
Notes Payable — Seller Financed Acquisitions: During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company completed three acquisitions, and during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company completed two acquisitions, as further described in Note 2. Purchase price for acquisitions was, in part, financed through seller notes.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Neumann, the Company recorded a note payable to the seller. The fair value of the note as of December 31, 2014 is $1.7 million. The note is payable in three annual installments.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Park Brown, the Company recorded a note payable to the seller in connection with contingent consideration. The note was recorded at fair value at acquisition, and is re-measured every reporting period, as further described in Note 2 to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
the consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2014, $1.2 million is outstanding, payable in three installments on July 1 of 2015, 2016 and 2017.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Johnson, the Company recorded a note payable to the seller in connection with the contingent consideration. The note was recorded at fair value at acquisition, and is re-measured every reporting period, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company re-valued contingent consideration based on projected results of Johnson, which resulted in write-down of the note payable. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of the note was $1.4 million, payable in three installments on March 1 of 2015, 2016 and 2017.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Augmentum, in 2013 the Company recorded a note payable to the seller, representing the contingent purchase price. During third quarter of 2014, the Company acquired the remaining 49% interest, and recorded an increase in note payable for the additional interest acquired. The note was recorded at fair value at acquisition, and is re-measured every reporting period, as further described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2014, $3.1 million is outstanding, payable in two installments on August 31, 2015 and August 31, 2016.
The Company recorded a note payable associated with Taylor Consultancy acquisition. The note was recorded at fair value of contingent consideration at acquisition, and revalued every reporting period. Taylor Consultancy outperformed the initial projections, resulting in revaluation of contingent consideration, and an adjustment to increase the fair value of the note payable as of December 31, 2014. A payment of $0.2 million was made in the fourth quarter, resulting in the note payable balance of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2014.
Fair value of seller financed notes payable is estimated by discounting the associated cash flows using the interest rate available to the Company. The fair value of notes payable is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable input used in fair value measurement of the notes payable is projected revenue stream. Significant increases or decreases in revenue generated by acquired companies would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. A change in the revenue assumption is accompanied by a directionally similar change in fair value of notes payable.
Table below summarizes changes in fair value of notes payable.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 12/31/2013 | New notes | Payments | Fair value adjustment (Level 3) | Exchange rate fluctuation | 12/31/2014 Balance |
Seller financing notes | $ | 5,637 |
| $ | 10,213 |
| $ | (7,062 | ) | $ | (500 | ) | $ | (707 | ) | $ | 7,581 |
|
Note 7. Commitments
The Company is obligated under lease arrangements for office space expiring in various years through 2019. Future annual required payments as of December 31, 2014, are as follows:
|
| | | |
| Office Space |
2015 | $ | 10,193 |
|
2016 | 7,880 |
|
2017 | 6,264 |
|
2018 | 3,160 |
|
2019 | 2,548 |
|
Thereafter | 5,659 |
|
| $ | 35,704 |
|
Rent expense is included in the general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and is summarized as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | | Year ended December 31, 2013 |
Rent expense | $ | 10,544 |
| | $ | 8,277 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 8. Share-Based Compensation
Restricted Shares - The purpose of the 2010 equity incentive plan is to promote the interests of the Company and our stockholders by (i) attracting, retaining and motivating employees, non-employee directors and independent contractors (including prospective employees), (ii) motivating such individuals to achieve long-term Company goals and to further align their interest with those of the Company’s stockholders by providing incentive compensation opportunities tied to the performance of the common stock of the Company and (iii) promoting increased ownership of our common stock by such individuals. Subject to adjustment for changes in capitalization, the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the 2010 equity incentive plan is $1.0 million.
A summary of the Company’s common stock subject to vesting provisions as of December 31, 2014, is presented below:
|
| | | | | | |
| Common | | Weighted- Average Grant-Date |
Non-Vested Common Stock | Stock | | Fair Value |
Non-vested common stock at December 31, 2013 | 227,159 |
| | $ | 5.11 |
|
Granted | 12,780 |
| | $ | 11.34 |
|
Vested | (103,849 | ) | | $ | 6.48 |
|
Forfeited | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Non-vested common stock at December 31, 2014 | 136,090 |
| | $ | 4.74 |
|
Total share-based compensation expense related to vested shares was $0.4 million for the year ending December 31, 2014, and $0.6 million for the year ending December 31, 2013.
As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to shares subject to vesting provisions granted under the plan. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.29 years.
In the first quarter of 2013, the Company granted an award subject to recapture provisions. Recapture provisions allow the Company to recapture a portion of stock if certain service conditions are not met. A summary of the Company's common stock subject to recapture provisions as of December 31, 2014 is presented below:
|
| | | | | | |
| Common | | Weighted- Average Grant-Date |
Common Stock Subject to Recapture | Stock | | Fair Value |
Non-vested common stock at December 31, 2013 | 7,019 |
| | $ | 4.70 |
|
Granted | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Expiration of recapture provision | (2,340 | ) | | $ | 4.70 |
|
Forfeited | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Common stock subject to recapture at December 31, 2014 | 4,679 |
| | $ | 4.70 |
|
Total share-based compensation expense related to common stock subject to recapture was $11,000 for the year ending December 31, 2014 and $11,000 for the year ending December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, unrecognized compensation expense related to shares subject to recapture provisions granted under the plan was de minimis.
Non-qualified Stock Options — In April 2014 and 2013 and December 2011, the Company authorized and granted 105,500, 94,100 and 102,500 stock options to various employees under its 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. All options have an exercise price that is equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. Options are subject to ratable vesting over a three year period, and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
A summary of the Company’s non-qualified stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2014, is presented below:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Non- qualified Stock Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding on December 31, 2013 | 195,600 |
| | $ | 4.34 |
| | 8.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
Granted | 105,500 |
| | 10.40 |
| | 9.3 |
| | — |
|
Exercised | (11,867 | ) | | 4.61 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Expired | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Forfeited | (1,500 | ) | | 4.65 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Outstanding on December 31, 2014 | 287,733 |
| | 6.55 |
| | 8.2 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
Exercisable on December 31, 2014 | 119,833 |
| | $ | 4.88 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is based upon the Company’s closing stock price of $15.19 at December 31, 2014. The compensation expense related to the options was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested non-qualified stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 2.1 years.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted | $ | 5.16 |
| | $ | 3.25 |
|
Total grant date fair value of stock options vested | $ | 125 |
| | $ | 79 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised | $ | 190 |
| | $ | — |
|
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions.
|
| | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Expected life (in years) | 6.00 |
| | 6.00 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | 1.87 | % | | 0.93 | % |
Expected volatility | 50.26 | % | | 47.25 | % |
Expected dividend yield | — |
| | — |
|
The expected term of the option life is based on a simplified method calculated as the sum of the vesting term and original contract term divided by two. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life. The expected volatility is based on the average volatility for similar publicly traded companies corresponding to the expected life of the option because the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock does not cover the period equal to the expected life of the options.
Employee Stock Purchase Program - The stock discount purchase program allows selected employees to purchase up to $0.1 million of the Company's stock in lieu of cash bonuses, at a 15% discount to the NYSE MKT trading price of those shares. Shares are subject to ratable vesting over a three-year period, and compensation expense relating to the discount is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. A summary of the Company's employee stock purchase program as of December 31, 2014 is presented below:
|
| | | | | | |
| Common | | Weighted- Average Grant-Date |
Employee Stock Purchase Program | Stock | | Fair Value |
Non-vested common stock at December 31, 2013 | 128,429 |
| | $ | 4.09 |
|
Granted | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Vested | (50,962 | ) | | 4.25 |
|
Forfeited | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Non-vested common stock at December 31, 2014 | 77,467 |
| | 3.98 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Compensation expense relating to the stock purchase discount program was $38,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $31,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, there was $32,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to shares subject to vesting provisions granted under the stock purchase discount program. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.13 years.
Note 9. Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the amounts used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computation is shown in the following table.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31 |
| 2014 | | 2013 (1) |
Numerator | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company | $ | 3,307 |
| | $ | (1,632 | ) |
Denominator | | | |
Basic weighted-average common shares | 7,213,345 |
| | 7,055,734 |
|
Effect of stock options and restricted stock (1) | 276,207 |
| | — |
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares | 7,489,552 |
| | 7,055,734 |
|
Basic income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | (0.23 | ) |
Diluted income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | (0.23 | ) |
| |
(1) | For the year ended December 31, 2013, 296,732 restricted shares and 133,923 stock options are excluded as they are anti-dilutive to the net loss per common share. |
Note 10. Income Taxes
The Company is subject to income taxes in all jurisdictions where it operates. For US tax purposes, with the exception of Neumann the Company has made an election to include the income or loss of its global subsidiaries in the consolidated US tax return. The Company pays US tax on its worldwide income, reduced by income tax credits for foreign income taxes incurred.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred income taxes consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Deferred tax assets: | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 5,278 |
| | $ | 4,147 |
|
Accounts receivable (net) | 712 |
| | 573 |
|
Foreign tax credits | 178 |
| | 932 |
|
Share-based compensation | 233 |
| | 617 |
|
Goodwill | 2,720 |
| | 2,604 |
|
Foreign currency | 739 |
| | 806 |
|
Intangible assets | 350 |
| | 844 |
|
Other | 230 |
| | — |
|
Gross deferred tax assets | 10,440 |
| | 10,523 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
Other current assets | (1,557 | ) | | (1,388 | ) |
Depreciation | (413 | ) | | (469 | ) |
Gross deferred tax liabilities | (1,970 | ) | | (1,857 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 8,470 |
| | $ | 8,666 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The deferred tax amounts have been classified in the December 31, 2014 and 2013 consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Current assets | $ | 4,829 |
| | $ | 3,184 |
|
Long-term assets | 3,641 |
| | 5,482 |
|
| $ | 8,470 |
| | $ | 8,666 |
|
The expense/(benefit) from income taxes is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | | Year ended December 31, 2013 |
Current | | | |
Federal | $ | 1,457 |
| | $ | 1,061 |
|
State and local | 427 |
| | 114 |
|
Deferred | | | |
Federal | 255 |
| | (2,247 | ) |
State and local | (58 | ) | | (43 | ) |
Total expense/(benefit) for income taxes | $ | 2,081 |
| | $ | (1,115 | ) |
A reconciliation of the benefit from income taxes for 2014 and 2013 to income taxes at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 34.0% is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | | Year ended December 31, 2013 |
Income tax benefit at the statutory U.S. federal rate | $ | 1,832 |
| | $ | (981 | ) |
State tax provision, net of federal tax benefit | 243 |
| | 75 |
|
Tax effect of permanent tax differences | 23 |
| | (51 | ) |
Research credits | (100 | ) | | — |
|
Tax effect of earnings in unconsolidated foreign subsidiary | 87 |
| | — |
|
Other | (4 | ) | | (158 | ) |
| $ | 2,081 |
| | $ | (1,115 | ) |
Note 11. Enterprise Geographic Concentrations
The Company operates in four principal geographic regions: North America, EMEA, Asia Pacific and Latin America. The revenue and capital expenditures, by region, for the year ended December 31, 2014, and 2013, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, 2014 | | Year ended December 31, 2013 |
Revenue | | | |
North America | $ | 100,251 |
| | $ | 78,140 |
|
EMEA | 42,830 |
| | 32,610 |
|
Asia Pacific | 13,483 |
| | 6,982 |
|
Latin America | 15,969 |
| | 12,546 |
|
Net revenue before reimbursable expenses | 172,533 |
| | 130,278 |
|
Reimbursable expenses | 4,290 |
| | 4,002 |
|
Total | $ | 176,823 |
| | $ | 134,280 |
|
| | | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Identifiable assets by geographic concentrations are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
|
December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Identifiable Assets | | | |
North America | $ | 34,199 |
| | $ | 34,006 |
|
EMEA | 21,398 |
| | 13,979 |
|
Asia Pacific | 7,937 |
| | 3,562 |
|
Latin America | 10,706 |
| | 6,322 |
|
Global Operations Support | 1,447 |
| | 1,316 |
|
Total | $ | 75,687 |
| | $ | 59,185 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net: | | | |
Latin America | $ | 1,993 |
| | $ | 2,553 |
|
EMEA | 8,709 |
| | 7,004 |
|
Asia Pacific | 5,968 |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 16,670 |
| | $ | 9,557 |
|
Note 12. Reorganization
In the third quarter of 2012, the Company’s management initiated a plan to reorganize its operations resulting in certain organizational changes in its Canadian and EMEA locations. The plan consists of a workforce reorganization, and elimination of redundant or unneeded positions, which will allow the Company to combine business operations in certain geographic locations and serve our clients more efficiently. During 2013, the Company expanded its reorganization efforts globally, eliminating certain functions. The Company recognized $0.8 million of reorganization related charges for the years ended December 31, 2013, which are included in compensation and benefits expense and general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The following table summarizes the major components of the reorganization charge:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Severance and other employee related costs | $ | 553 |
|
Foreign currency translation | 86 |
|
General and administrative costs | $ | 143 |
|
Total | $ | 782 |
|
Reorganization charges by geographic location were as follows:
|
| | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
North America | $ | 471 |
|
EMEA | 281 |
|
Asia Pacific | $ | 30 |
|
Total | $ | 782 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tables in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Changes in reorganization reserves related to the restructuring plan described above for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, are as follows:
|
| | | |
| |
| Severance and other employee related costs |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 152 |
|
Reorganization charges | $ | 782 |
|
Cash payments | $ | (728 | ) |
Non-cash charges | $ | (48 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | 158 |
|
Reorganization charges | — |
|
Cash payments | $ | (158 | ) |
Non-cash charges | $ | — |
|
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | — |
|
Note 13. Subsequent Events
On February 4, 2015, the Company completed a sale of common shares in a public, underwritten offering. The Company sold 1,454,059 shares at $3.44 per share. Net proceeds from the offering totaled approximately $4.2 million.
On April 8, 2015, the Company entered into and amendment of the credit line agreement and a $12.5 million aggregate principal amount second-lien note purchase agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with a publicly traded insurance company and an affiliate thereof. The notes are issuable in two tranches of $6.25 million. The first tranche closed on April 14, 2015, and the second tranche of $6.25 million is scheduled to close 90 days after the first funding, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement. The notes bear interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) which is currently approximately 12%, and mature in 2020.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Securities Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) were effective as of the end of the Company’s 2014 fiscal year.
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework 2013. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014 based on those criteria.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
None.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information required by this Item will be included under the captions “Election of Directors,” “The Board of Directors and its Committees,” “Nominees for Directors,” “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by this Item will be included under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information required by this Item will be included under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Our Common Stock” in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information required by this Item will be included under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Director Independence” in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The information required by this Item will be included under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to its 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
| |
1. | Consolidated Financial Statement: |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Consolidated Balance Sheet s at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. None.
| |
3. | Exhibits: The Exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (asterisk denotes exhibits filed with this report). |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on April 15, 2015.
|
| | |
CTPARTNERS EXECUTIVE SEARCH INC. |
|
|
By: William J. Keneally |
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on April 15, 2015.
|
| | |
Signature | | Title |
| |
* Brian M. Sullivan | | Chief Executive Officer |
(principal executive officer) | | |
| |
William J. Keneally (principal financial officer) | | Chief Financial Officer |
| |
* Scott M. Birnbaum | | Director |
| |
* Michael C. Feiner | | Director |
| |
* Thomas R. Testwuide, Sr. | | Director |
| |
* Betsy L. Morgan | | Director |
| | |
* Ronald C. Parker | | Director |
|
| |
* | William J. Keneally, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this Form 10-K on behalf of each of the above named and designated directors of the Company pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by such persons and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
| |
| |
| /s/William J. Keneally |
| Attorney-in-Fact |
|
| | |
| |
Exhibit No. |
| Description of Document |
| |
2.1 |
| Form of Plan of Conversion of CTPartners Executive Search LLC into CTPartners Executive Search Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 5 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on December 2, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
2.2 |
| Share Sale and Purchase Agreement of Park Brown International Pty Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K/A filed on September 15, 2014) |
| |
3.1 |
| Form of Certificate of Incorporation of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on October 14, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
3.2 |
| Form of Bylaws of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to CTPartners Executive Search Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 7, 2013) |
| |
3.3 |
| Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2012) |
| |
3.4 |
| Certificate of Designation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2015) |
| |
4.1 |
| Form of CTPartners Executive Search Inc.’s Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 4 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on November 24, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
4.2 |
| Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2015) |
| |
10.1 |
| Form of Indemnification Agreement, by and between CTPartners Executive Search Inc. and each of its Directors and Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 2 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on October 14, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
*10.2 |
| Employment Agreement with Brian Sullivan dated December 2, 2013 |
| |
10.3 |
| Employment Agreement with David C. Nocifora dated December 2, 2013 |
| |
10.4 |
| Employment Agreement with William J. Keneally dated April 17, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to CTPartners Executive Seach Inc's Current REport on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 22, 2013) |
| |
10.5 |
| Form of 2010 Equity Incentive Plan of CTPartners Executive Search Inc. to be in effect upon effectiveness of conversion (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 3 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on November 17, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
10.6 |
| Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement by and between JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and Christian & Timbers LLC dated October 17, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 4 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on November 24, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
10.7 |
| Revised Letter Agreement (Affiliation and License Agreement) between CTPartners Executive Search LLC and HS Andean Holding Corporation dated April 26, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on September 3, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
10.8 |
| Share Sale and Purchase Agreement of Neumann Leadership Holding GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2014) |
|
| | |
Exhibit No. | Description of Document |
| |
10.7 |
| Form of Convertible Promissory Note of CTPartners Executive Search LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on October 14, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
10.8 |
| Form of Note Prepayment and Conversion Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to CTPartners Executive Search LLC’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on October 14, 2010 (Registration No. 333-169224)) |
| |
*21 |
| List of Subsidiaries |
| |
*23.1 |
| Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, McGladrey LLP |
| |
*24 |
| Power of Attorney |
| |
*31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) |
| |
*31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) |
| |
*32.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
| |
*32.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
| |
**101 |
| The following financial information from CTPartners Executive Search Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss); (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) related Footnotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulations S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |