Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Principals of Presentation, Consolidation, and Reclassifications |
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by us without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted, as permitted by the SEC, although we believe the disclosures that are made are adequate to make the information presented herein not misleading. |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect, in our opinion, all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position at March 31, 2014, and the results of our operations and cash flows for the periods presented. We derived the December 31, 2013 consolidated balance sheet data from audited financial statements, but did not include all disclosures required by GAAP. |
|
Through July 16, 2013, Quest was deemed to be a separate operating unit and as such, there were no intercompany transactions that required elimination at that time. All other intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation, including transactions between QRHC and Quest subsequent to July 16, 2013. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year presentation. Interim results are subject to seasonal variations, and the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. |
As Quest, Earth911, and YouChange are operating as ecology based green service companies, we did not deem segment reporting necessary. |
Accounting Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. |
We use significant estimates when accounting for the collectability of accounts receivable, depreciable lives of fixed assets, accruals, assumptions used in the valuation and recognition of share-based payments and warrant liability, the realization of goodwill and intangible assets, deferred tax assets, the equity method investment in Quest, and the application of accounting for the senior secured convertible notes, all of which are discussed in their respective notes to the consolidated financial statements. |
Revenue Recognition |
We recognize revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met: |
|
| • | | persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; | | | | | |
|
| • | | delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; | | | | | |
|
| • | | the fee for the arrangement is fixed or determinable; and | | | | | |
|
| • | | collectability is reasonably assured. | | | | | |
Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement – We document all terms of an arrangement in a quote signed or confirmed by the customer prior to recognizing revenue. |
Delivery Has Occurred or Services Have Been Performed – We perform all services or deliver all products prior to recognizing revenue. Services are deemed to be performed when the services are complete. |
The Fee for the Arrangement is Fixed or Determinable – Prior to recognizing revenue, a customer’s fee is either fixed or determinable under the terms of the quote or accepted customer purchase order. |
Collectability Is Reasonably Assured – We assess collectability on a customer by customer basis based on criteria outlined by management. |
Quest provides businesses with management programs to reuse, recycle, and dispose of a wide variety of waste streams and recyclables generated by their business. Quest utilizes third-party subcontractors to execute the collection, transport, and recycling or disposal of used motor oil, oil filters, scrap tires, cooking oil, and expired food products. We evaluate the criteria outlined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 605-45, Revenue Recognition—Principal Agent Considerations, in determining whether it is appropriate to record the gross amount of service revenue and related costs or the net amount earned as management fees. Generally, when we are primarily obligated in a transaction, have latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers, have credit risk, or have several but not all of these indicators, we record revenue gross and record amounts collected from customers for sales tax on a net basis. In a situation where we are not primarily obligated and amounts earned are determined using a fixed percentage, a fixed-payment schedule, or a combination of the two, we would record the net amounts as management fees earned. Currently, we have no contracts accounted for as management fees. |
|
Earth911 revenue primarily represents licensing fees that are recognized ratably over the term of the license. We derive some revenue from advertising contracts, which we recognize ratably, over the term that the advertisement appears on our website. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
We consider all highly liquid instruments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
Fair Value Measurements |
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as follows: |
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and |
Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
Fair value accounting has been applied to the valuation of stock-based compensation, warrants issued, intangible assets, and goodwill. |
Stock Options – We estimate the fair value of stock options on the grant date in accordance with ASC Topic 718 using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. Significant Level 3 assumptions used in the calculation are as follows: |
|
| • | | We determine the expected term using the simplified method for plain vanilla options by averaging the contractual term and vesting period of the award due to the unavailability of appropriate statistical data required to properly estimate the expected term in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107; | | | | | |
|
| • | | We measure expected volatility using the historical changes in the market price of our common stock, disregarding identifiable periods of extraordinarily volatile share prices due to certain events that are not expected to recur during the expected term; | | | | | |
|
| • | | We use the risk-free interest rate to approximate the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards; and | | | | | |
|
| • | | We base forfeitures on the history of cancellations of options granted by us and our analysis of potential future forfeitures. | | | | | |
Net Loss Per Share |
We compute basic net loss per share by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of basic loss per share gives retroactive effect to the recapitalization related to our reverse acquisition of Earth911. We have other potentially anti-dilutive securities outstanding that are not shown in a diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect in both 2014 and 2013 would be dilutive. These potentially dilutive securities include options, warrants, and convertible promissory notes totaled 15,096,948 and 11,782,240 shares at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share: |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Unaudited) | |
Net loss applicable to common stockholders—numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share | | $ | (1,488,423 | ) | | $ | (3,297,604 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted—average common shares outstanding—denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share | | | 95,821,525 | | | | 57,961,106 | |
Net loss per share: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The following table sets forth the anti-dilutive securities excluded from diluted loss per share: |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Unaudited) | |
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from diluted loss per share: | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 4,096,948 | | | | 3,432,115 | |
Warrants | | | — | | | | 1,381,113 | |
Convertible notes | | | 11,000,000 | | | | 6,969,012 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 15,096,948 | | | | 11,782,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investment in Quest |
Investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which we exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Whether or not we exercise significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors, including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company. Prior to July 17, 2013, we accounted for the investment in Quest under the equity method of accounting, in which the investee company’s accounts were not consolidated within our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations. We reflect our share of earnings or losses of the investee company in the caption “Equity in Quest Resource Management Group, LLC income” in our consolidated statement of operations. Subsequent to our acquisition of the Quest Interests, we consolidate the operational activity of Quest with QRHC. |
Income Taxes |
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. We establish valuation allowances to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized. We assess our ability to realize deferred tax assets based on current earnings performance and on projections of future taxable income in the relevant tax jurisdictions. These projections do not include taxable income from the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and do not reflect a general growth assumption but do consider known or pending events, such as the passage of legislation. We review our estimates of future taxable income annually. We first analyze all tax positions to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. After the initial analysis, we measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Our income tax returns are subject to adjustment under audit for approximately the last three years. |
If we are required to pay interest on the underpayment of income taxes, we recognize interest expense in the first period the interest becomes due according to the provisions of the relevant tax law. |
If we are subject to payment of penalties, we recognize an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty in the period when we take the position on the income tax return. If we did not recognize the penalty in the period when we initially took the position, we recognize the expense in the period when we change our judgment about meeting minimum statutory thresholds related to the initial position taken. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
We expense all share-based grants to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their estimated fair values at grant date, in accordance with ASC Topic 718. We record compensation expense for stock options over the vesting period using the estimated fair value on the date of grant, as calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. We classify all share-based awards as equity instruments and recognize the vesting of the awards ratably over their respective terms. See Note 13 for a description of our share-based compensation plan and information related to awards granted under the plan. |