UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO.2 TO FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 1000 | 98-0593835 |
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation | Primary Standard Industrial | IRS Employer |
or organization) | Classification Code Number | Identification Number |
80 S. Court Street | Empire Stock Transfer |
Thunder Bay, Ontario | 2470 Saint Rose Parkway, Suite 304 |
Canada P7B 2X4 | Henderson, Nevada 89074 |
(807) 344 - 2644 | (702) 818 - 5898 |
(Address and telephone number of principal executive | (Name, address and telephone number of agent for |
offices) | service) |
Copies to:
Anslow & Jaclin, LLP
195 Route 9 South, Suite 204
Manalapan, NJ 07726
(732) 409 - 1212
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
as soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement
If any of the securities being registered on the Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: [X]
If this Form is filed to register additional common stock for an offering under Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act, please
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration
statement for the same offering.
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed under Rule 462(c) of the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed under Rule 462(d) of the Securities Act, check the following box and list
the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer [ ] | | Accelerated Filer [ ] |
| | |
Non-accelerated Filer [ ] | (Do not check if a smaller reporting | Smaller reporting company [X] |
| company) | |
Terms of the offering
Following is a brief summary of this offering:
Securities being offered by selling shareholders | 5,700,000 shares of common stock, |
Offering price per share | $ 0.01 |
Net proceeds to us | None |
Number of shares outstanding before the offering | 12,200,000 |
Number of shares outstanding after the offering if all of the shares are sold | 12,200,000 |
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
Securities to be Registered |
Amount To Be Registered | Offering Price Per Share |
Aggregate Offering Price | Registration Fee
|
Common Stock: | Common | 5,700,000 | $0.01 | 57,000 | $ 2.24 |
The offering price has been estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o). Our common stock is not traded on any national exchange and in accordance with Rule 457; the offering price was determined by the price shares were sold to our shareholders in a private placement memorandum. The selling shareholders may sell shares of our common stock at a fixed price of $0.01 per share until our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. The fixed price of $0.01 has been determined as the selling price based upon the original purchase price paid by the selling shareholders of $0.01. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which operates the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved.
2
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, Dated December , 2008
REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALLBECOME EFFECTIVE ON DATES AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING UNDER SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
3
Table Of Contents
4
ITEM 3. Summary Information, Risk Factors and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
About our Company
We are an exploration stage corporation. We own a 100% interest in one mineral claim known as the Bonanza claim. We intend to conduct exploration work on the Bonanza Claim in order to ascertain whether it possesses economic quantities of zinc. We are a company without revenues or operations and have minimal assets and have incurred losses since inception.
Our principal executive office is located at 80 S. Court Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 2X4. Our telephone number is (888) 536-2336 and our registered agent for service of process is Empire Stock Transfer, located at 2470 Saint Rose Parkway, Suite 304, Henderson, Nevada 89074. Our fiscal year end is February 28.
Summary financial data
The following financial information summarizes the more complete historical financial information at the end of this prospectus.
| | As of August 31 2008 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
Balance Sheet | | | |
Total Assets | $ | 35,893 | |
Total Liabilities | $ | 4,088 | |
Stockholders Equity | $ | 31,805 | |
| | Period from | |
| | August 21, 2007 | |
| | (date of inception) | |
| | to August 31, 2008 | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
Income Statement | | | |
Revenue | $ | - | |
Total Expenses | $ | 30,624 | |
Net Loss | $ | (30,624 | ) |
5
Prospectus |
|
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
5,700,000 Shares of Common Stock |
|
The selling shareholders named in this prospectus are offering all of the shares of common stock offered through this prospectus. Our common stock is presently not traded on any market or securities exchange. The 5,700,000 shares of our common stock can be sold by selling security holders at a fixed price of $0.01 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. The fixed price of $0.01 has been determined as the selling price based upon the original purchase price paid by the selling stockholders of $0.01. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), which operates the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved. We have agreed to bear the expenses relating to the registration of the shares for the selling security holders. |
|
THE COMPANY IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN UNSOUND FINANCIAL CONDITION. PERSONS SHOULD NOT INVEST UNLESS THEY CAN AFFORD TO LOSE THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENTS. |
|
THE PURCHASE OF THE SECURITIES OFFERED THROUGH THIS PROSPECTUS INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FACTORS DESCRIBED UNDER THE HEADING “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 3. |
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. |
|
|
The date of this prospectus is December, 2008 |
RISK FACTORS
Please consider the following risk factors before deciding to invest in our common stock.
Risks associated with Supatcha Resources Inc.
Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion and because our officer and director will not loan any additional money to us, we have to complete this offering to commence operations. If we do not complete this offering, we will not start our operations.
Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is doubt that we will be an ongoing business for the next twelve months. As of the date of this prospectus, we have not commenced operations. Because our officers and directors are unwilling to loan or advance any additional capital to us, except to prepare and file reports with the SEC, we will have to complete this offering in order to commence operations.
Because the probability of an individual prospect ever having reserves is extremely remote, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost.
The probability of an individual mineral property prospect ever having reserves is extremely remote. In all probability, our Bonanza claim does not contain any reserves. As such, any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost, which would result in a loss of your investment.
Because we have not yet commenced business operations and have no history of mineral production or mining operations, we face a high risk of business failure.
6
We have not yet begun the initial stages of exploration of the Bonanza claim, and thus have no way to evaluate the likelihood that our business will be successful. We were incorporated on September 22, 2007 and to date have been involved primarily in organizational activities and the acquisition of our mineral property interests. We have not earned any revenues as of the date of this prospectus. Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such enterprises. The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that we plan to undertake. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration, and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates.
We anticipate that we will incur increased operating expenses without realizing any revenues. We therefore expect to incur significant losses into the foreseeable future. We recognize that if we are unable to generate significant revenues from development of the Bonanza claim and the production of minerals from the claim, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations.
There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove successful, and we can provide investors with no assurance that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely fail.
Our net loss since inception is $30,624. The loss was a result of the payment of fees for our claims, incorporation, general and administrative expenses, audit and accounting services. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon:
* | our ability to find mineralized material |
* | our ability to extract the mineralized material |
* | our ability to generate revenues from the sale of mineralized material |
Based upon current plans, we expect to incur operating losses in future periods. This will happen because there are expenses associated with the research and exploration of our mineral properties. As a result, we may not generate revenues in the future. Failure to generate revenues will cause us to suspend or cease operations.
Because of the inherent dangers involved in mineral exploration, there is a risk that we may incur liability or damages as we conduct our business.
The search for valuable minerals involves numerous hazards. As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot insure against or which we may elect not to insure. The payment of such liabilities may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
If we become subject to burdensome Government regulation or other legal uncertainties, our business will be negatively affected.
There are several governmental regulations that materially restrict mineral property exploration and development. Under the British Columbia mining laws and regulations, to engage in certain types of exploration will require work permits, the posting of bonds, and the performance of remediation work for any physical disturbance to the land. Also, to operate a working mine, the legislation may require us to undertake an environmental review process.
In addition, existing laws may be applied to mining that have not as yet been applied. These new laws may increase our cost of doing business with the result that our financial condition and operating results may be harmed.
Estimates of mineralized material are subject to evaluation uncertainties that could result in project failure.
Our exploration and future mining operations, if any, will be subject to risks associated with being able to accurately predict the quantity and quality of mineralized material within the earth using statistical sampling techniques. Estimates of any mineralized material on any of our properties would be made using samples obtained from appropriately placed underground workings and intelligently designed drilling. There is an inherent variability of assays between check and duplicate samples taken adjacent to each other and between sampling points that cannot be reasonably eliminated. Additionally, there also may be unknown geologic details that have not been identified or
7
correctly appreciated at the current level of accumulated knowledge about our properties. This could result in uncertainties that cannot be reasonably eliminated from the process of estimating mineralized material. If these estimates were to prove to be unreliable, we could implement an exploitation plan that may not lead to commercially viable operations in the future.
We may have to deviate from our plan of operation, however, if we do, we will not return any funds to you.
Mining exploration is speculative. If we are not successful in locating mineralized material, we will have to cease operations or seek another exploration project. Whatever the outcome of our current exploration program, our officers and directors are entrusted with our management for the benefit of our stockholders. As such our management is bound to act in the best interests of our shareholders. If it is in the best interests of our shareholders to modify a proposed exploration program, expand operations into new areas, or entirely change our business operations, it must and will be done. If we deviate from our plan of operation, we will not return any funds to you.
Because our Directors have other business interests, they may not be able or willing to devote a sufficient amount of time to our business operations, causing our business to fail.
Our president, Mr. Donald Axent, only spends approximately 15% of his business time providing his services to us, while our Secretary Mr. William Kosoris and Treasurer Mr. Brian Matsun only devote approximately 10% of their time to our affairs. While Mr. Axent, Mr. Kosoris and Mr. Matsun presently possess adequate time to attend to our interests, it is possible that the demands on Mr. Axent, Mr. Kosoris and Mr. Matsun from their other obligations could increase with the result that they would no longer be able to devote sufficient time to the management of our business.
If we do not obtain additional financing, our business will fail.
Our current operating funds are less than necessary to complete the exploration of the optioned mineral claim, and therefore we will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our business plan. As of August 31, 2008, we had cash in the amount of $33,368. We currently do not have any operations and we have no income.
Our business plan calls for significant expenses in connection with the exploration of the Bonanza claim. While we have sufficient funds to conduct phase one of the recommended exploration program on the property, we will require additional financing in order to complete the entire recommended exploration program. We will also require additional financing if the costs of the exploration of the Bonanza claim are greater than anticipated.
We will require additional financing to sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning revenues once exploration is complete. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will be able to find such financing if required. Obtaining additional financing would be subject to a number of factors, including the market prices for zinc, investor acceptance of our property and general market conditions. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financing unavailable to us.
The most likely source of future funds presently available to us is through the sale of equity capital. Any sale of share capital will result in dilution to existing shareholders. The only other anticipated alternative for the financing of further exploration would be our sale of a partial interest in the Bonanza claim to a third party in exchange for cash or exploration expenditures, which is not presently contemplated.
Because our management does not have technical training or experience in exploring for, starting, and operating an exploration program, we will have to hire qualified personnel. If we can’t locate qualified personnel, we may have to suspend or cease operations which will result in the loss of your investment.
Because our management is inexperienced with exploring for, starting, and operating an exploration program, we will have to hire qualified persons to perform surveying, exploration, and excavation of the property. Our management has no direct training or experience in these areas and as a result may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within the industry. Management’s decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches, mineral exploration companies commonly use. Consequently our operations, earnings and ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm due to
8
management’s lack of experience in this industry. As a result we may have to suspend or cease operations which will result in the loss of your investment.
Risks associated with this Offering
Because our directors own more than 50% of the outstanding shares, they are able to decide who will be directors and you will not be able to elect any directors or control operations.
Our directors own 6,500,000 shares of our common stock and will continue to control us. As a result, our directors are able to elect all of our directors and control our operations.
Because there is no public trading market for our common stock, you may not be able to resell your stock and as a result your investment is illiquid.
There is currently no public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is no central place, such as stock exchange or electronic trading system, to resell your shares. If you do want to resell your shares, you will have to locate a buyer and negotiate your own sale, of which there is no assurance. As a result, your investment is illiquid.
If the selling shareholders sell a large number of shares all at once or in blocks, the market price of our shares would most likely decline.
The selling shareholders are offering 5,700,000 shares of our common stock through this prospectus. Our common stock is presently not traded or quoted on any market or securities exchange, but should a market develop, shares sold at a price below the current market price at which the common stock is quoted will cause that market price to decline. Moreover, the offer or sale of a large number of shares at any price may cause the market price to fall. The outstanding shares of common stock covered by this prospectus represent 46.7% of the common shares outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.
Because there is no public trading market for our common stock, you may not be able to resell your shares.
Our Company plans to have its shares quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board. There are no assurances that we will be successful in listing our shares. There is currently no public trading market for our common stock. Therefore there is no central place, like a stock exchange or electronic trading system, to resell your shares. If you do want to resell your shares, you will have to locate a buyer and negotiate your own sale. Therefore, you may not be able to resell your shares. We intend to engage a market maker to apply to have our common stock listed on the OTC Bulletin Board. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with FINRA, which operates the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved. The OTCBB is not an issuer listing service, market or exchange. Although the OTCBB does not have any listing requirements per se, to be eligible for quotation on the OTCBB, issuers must remain current in their filings with the Securities Exchange Commission or applicable regulatory authority. In order to be eligible to be listed on the OTCBB and to maintain such eligibility, we would be required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and we would have to remain current in meeting our periodic securities reporting obligations. If for any reason, however, any of our securities are not eligible for initial or continued quotation on the Bulletin Board or an active public trading market does not develop, purchasers of the shares may have difficulty selling their securities should they desire to do so. If we are unable to satisfy the requirements for quotation on the OTCBB, any trading in our common stock would be conducted in the over-the-counter market in what are commonly referred to as the “pink sheets.” As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of the securities offered hereby.\
Item 4.USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock in this offering. All proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock will be received by the selling shareholders.
9
Item 5.DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
The price of the shares has been determined by our board of directors. We selected the $0.01 price for the sale of our shares of common stock. Currently there is no market for the shares and we wanted to give our shareholders the ability to sell their shares for the price they paid us. If our shares are listed for trading on the Bulletin Board, the price of the shares will be established by the market.
Item 6. DILUTION
The common stock to be sold by the selling shareholders is common stock that is currently issued. Accordingly, there will be no dilution to our existing shareholders.
Item 7. Selling Shareholders
The following table sets forth the name of each selling shareholder, the total number of shares owned prior to the offering, the percentage of shares owned prior to the offering, the number of shares offered, and the percentage of shares owned after the offering, assuming the selling shareholder sells all of his shares and we sell the maximum number of shares.
| | | | Percentage |
| | | | of shares |
| | | | owned after the |
| Total number of | Percentage of | Number of | offering assuming |
| shares owned | shares owned | shares being | all of the share are |
Name | prior to offering | prior to offering | offered | sold in the offering |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Shumaila KShan | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Attiyai Bushra | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Farida Iffat Rizwan | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Bushra Sayal | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Jordan QueyQuep | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Leonel Tinoco | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Dur-E-Aden Awan | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Waqas Taimor | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Tynisia Roach | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Rajnish Bhatia | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Hamid Latif Bhatti | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Nasreen Ahmad | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Amtul Raif | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Shivali Makol | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Farhat Jamal Chaudry | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Nighat Ahmad | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Abdirizak Gabaire | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Christopher Johnson | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Tony Avelar | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Diana Yau | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Maryan Haashi Haayow | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Isadore Johnson | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Rabia Ahmed | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Shaun Jamieson | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Deyon Woon | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Tracey Nicole Walker | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Frank Pucciano | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Fatuma Ismail Elmi | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Lorraine Khan | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Wayne Lalor | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Addison Khan | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
10
Patrick Boodram | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Nesha Khan | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Klimentini Dimakos | 200,000 | 1.6% | 200,000 | 0% |
Alan Henry | 150,000 | 1.2% | 150,000 | 0% |
Mario Boulanger | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Theo Grootelaar | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
MacKenzie Holmwood | 120,000 | 0.98% | 120,000 | 0% |
Mathew Kaustinen | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Irene Grootelaar | 100,000 | 0.81% | 100,000 | 0% |
Except as listed below, to our knowledge, none of the selling shareholders or their beneficial owners:
- | has had a material relationship with us other than as a shareholder at any time within the past three years; or |
| |
- | has ever been one of our officers or directors or an officer or director of our predecessors or affiliates |
| |
- | are broker-dealers or affiliated with broker-dealers. |
Item 8. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION; TERMS OF THE OFFERING
The selling security holders may sell some or all of their shares at a fixed price of $0.01 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and thereafter at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices. Prior to being quoted on the OTCBB, shareholders may sell their shares in private transactions to other individuals. The fixed price of $0.01 has been determined based upon the original purchase price paid by the selling shareholders of $0.01. Although our common stock is not listed on a public exchange, we will attempt to engage a market maker to apply to list our common stock on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) concurrently with the filing of this prospectus. In order to be quoted on the Bulletin Board, a market maker must file an application on our behalf in order to make a market for our common stock. There can be no assurance that a market maker will agree to file the necessary documents with FINRA, which operates the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board, nor can there be any assurance that such an application for quotation will be approved. However, sales by selling security holder must be made at the fixed price of $0.01 until a market develops for the stock.
Once a market has been developed for our common stock, the shares may be sold or distributed from time to time by the selling stockholders directly to one or more purchasers or through brokers or dealers who act solely as agents, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, at negotiated prices or at fixed prices, which may be changed. The distribution of the shares may be effected in one or more of the following methods:
O | ordinary brokers transactions, which may include long or short sales, |
| |
O | transactions involving cross or block trades on any securities or market where our common stock is trading, market where our common stock is trading, |
| |
O | through direct sales to purchasers or sales effected through agents, |
| |
O | through transactions in options, swaps or other derivatives (whether exchange listed of otherwise), or exchange listed or otherwise), or |
| |
O | any combination of the foregoing. |
In addition, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers who may engage in short sales, if short sales were permitted, of shares in the course of hedging the positions they assume with the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers that require the delivery by such broker-dealers of the shares, which shares may be resold thereafter pursuant to this prospectus.
Brokers, dealers, or agents participating in the distribution of the shares may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders and/or the purchasers of shares for whom such
11
broker-dealers may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal, or both (which compensation as to a particular broker-dealer may be in excess of customary commissions). Neither the selling stockholders nor we can presently estimate the amount of such compensation. We know of no existing arrangements between the selling stockholders and any other stockholder, broker, dealer or agent relating to the sale or distribution of the shares. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of the selling security holders pursuant to this prospectus. We have agreed to bear the expenses of the registration of the shares, including legal and accounting fees, and such expenses are estimated to be approximately $20,000.
Notwithstanding anything set forth herein, no FINRA member will charge commissions that exceed 8% of the total proceeds of the offering.
Item 9. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
Common Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share. Currently we have 12,200,000 shares issued and outstanding. The holders of our common stock:
* | have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available if and when declared by our board of directors; |
* | are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs; |
* | do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and |
* | are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote. |
All shares of common stock now outstanding are fully paid for and non-assessable and all shares of common stock that are the subject of this offering, when issued, will be fully paid for and non-assessable. We refer you to our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and the applicable statutes of the State of Nevada for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.
Cash dividends
As of the date of this prospectus, we have not paid any cash dividends to stockholders. The declaration of any future cash dividend will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial position, our general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.
Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.00001 per share. The terms of the preferred shares are at the discretion of the board of directors. Currently no preferred shares are issued and outstanding.
Cash dividends
As of the date of this prospectus, we have not paid any cash dividends to stockholders. The declaration of any future cash dividend will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial position, our general economic conditions, and other pertinent conditions. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather to reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.
Item 10. Interests of Named Experts And Counsel
No expert or counsel named in this prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with
12
the registration or offering of the common stock was employed on a contingency basis, or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, an interest, direct or indirect, in the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries. Nor was any such person connected with the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, or employee.
The financial statements included in this prospectus and the registration statement have been audited by Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere in this document and in the registration statement filed with the SEC, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
Item 11. Information with Respect to the Registrant.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 21, 2007. We are an exploration stage corporation. An exploration stage corporation is one engaged in the search of mineral deposits or reserves which are not in either the development or production stage. We intend to conduct exploration activities on the Bonanza Claim located in British Columbia, Canada. We maintain our statutory registered agent's office at Empire Stock Transfer Inc. at 2470 Saint Rose Pkwy, Suite 304, Henderson, Nevada 89074. Our business office is located at 80 S. Court Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 2X4. Our telephone number is (807) 344 - 2644.
We are an exploration stage company. We are engaged in the acquisition, and exploration of mineral properties with a view to exploiting any mineral deposits we discover that demonstrate economic feasibility. We have an option to acquire a 100% interest in one mineral collectively known as the Bonanza claim. We have not yet commenced exploration. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on the property. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility is determined.
Economic feasibility refers to a formal evaluation completed by an engineer or geologist which confirms that the property can be successfully operated as a mine. Legal feasibility refers to the completion of a survey of the mineral claims comprising the Bonanza claim in order to ensure that the mineralization that we intend to exploit is within the claims boundaries. The cost of such a survey is estimated to be $25,000.
Our plan of operation is to conduct exploration work on the Bonanza claim in order to ascertain whether it possesses economic quantities of zinc. There can be no assurance that economic mineral deposits or reserves, exist on the Bonanza Claim until appropriate exploration work is done and an economic evaluation based on such work concludes that production of minerals from the property is economically feasible.
Our Directors Donald Axent, William Kosoris and Brian Matsun have no professional training or technical credentials in the exploration, development and operation of mines. Management's decisions and choices may not be well thought out and our operations, earnings and ultimate financial success may suffer irreparable harm as a result.
Even if we complete our proposed exploration programs on the Bonanza Claim and they are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit.
Mineral property exploration is typically conducted in phases. Each subsequent phase of exploration work is recommended by a geologist based on the results from the most recent phase of exploration. Once we complete each phase of exploration, we will make a decision as to whether or not we proceed with each successive phase based upon the analysis of the results of that program. Our directors will make this decision based upon the recommendations of the independent geologist who oversees the program and records the results.
13
Bonanza Mineral Claim
On October 22, 2007, we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Ms. Kimberley Sinclair of North Vancouver, British Columbia, whereby she agreed to grant us a 100% undivided right, title and interest in one mineral claim located in the Greenwood Mining District of British Columbia, Canada for US$6,500.
The Bonanza Claim consists of one mineral claim comprised of nine unit grid claim block with an area of 222.8 acres (90.169 hectares) and is located in the Volcanic Creek within nine miles north of Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada and within eleven miles north of the Canada-United States border. Particulars are as follows:
Claim Name | Tenure No. | Expiry Date |
Bonanza (9 units) | 525427 | July 14, 2009 |
The Bonanza claim is owned 100% by Supatcha Resources Inc.
To maintain the ownership of the claim, the company is obligated to either complete exploration work of Cdn$4.00 per hectare per year for the three years after staking thence Cdn$8.00 per hectare per year in the future years or in the alternative of the exploration expenditures, the payment of the equivalent of cash in lieu prior to the Expiry Date.
The property is not subject to any royalties, back-in rights, payments or other agreements or encumbrances. The property is not known to be subject to any environmental liabilities. Permitting would not be required for the initial exploration; however, a permit would be required for exploration that involves surface disturbance such as trenching or diamond drilling; the cost of which would be the charge for the preparation and submission of the permit documents and a security deposit of $1,000.00 (one thousand dollars) which would be refunded upon the reclamation of the disturbed areas.
Location and Access
The Bonanza Claim is located in the Greenwood Mining Division, within NTS 082E018, within nine miles north of Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada and within eleven miles north of the Canada-United States border. It is situated within the northern extension of the Republic Graben, a geological structure which hosts a number of past gold producers.
Access is provided by a paved highway on the east side of Granby River for nine kilometers from Grand Forks, British Columbia. There are also numerous secondary access roads within the property boundaries.
History
There is no reported production from the Bonanza Claim, however prospect pits within the confines of the claim indicates former exploration of mineral zones.
Exploration work on the Bonanza Claim has been conducted off and on since the early 1900’s. In 1901, during underground exploration on the Ruby Claim Group, which included two other claims, one being the Bonanza claim, four shafts and two tunnels were reported. One of the tunnels was twenty-seven metres long and one forty-three metres long. Two shafts, one 21 metres and one 3.6 metres deep were reported and another two shafts, 9 and 7.6 metres deep and one tunnel 12 metres long were also reported. The mineral zones that were explored were quartz/carbonate veins hosting lead, zinc and silver. A small amount of ore of unknown grades from the property was reportedly shipped. In 1969, three drill holes were completed, as well as a bulk sample from the lower entrance of one of the drill holes. Shipments of silver bearing ore were reported but not documented. In 1983, an examination reported mineralization of gold and silver.
Physiography, Climate, Vegetation and Water
The Bonanza Claim is located within the Christina Range of the Monashee Mountains that is characterized by moderate to steep forested slopes to elevations of 5,000 feet. Elevations on the property range between 1,800 feet and 2,825 feet.
14
The region is situated within the dry belt of British Columbia with rainfall between 25 and 30 centimeters per year. Temperatures during the summer months range from 25 to 30 degrees Celsius and from -15 to an average of 8 degrees Celsius during the winter months. Snow covers the property from December to April, making exploration impossible year-round. On lower elevations, the property is free of snow for nine months of the year.
Sufficient water is accessible from Volcanic Creek or Granby River, both adjacent to the property. There are also a number of other variably sized water courses within the boundary of the property.
Electrical power is accessible from a high voltage transmission line that is within one mile of the property.
Geology Definitions
In the following sections discussing the geology of the Bonanza claim, the following technical terms have the indicated meanings:
Pennsylvanian is the time period beginning 320 million years ago and ending approximately 290 million years ago.
Metamorphic complex are metamorphic rocks constituting a whole group closely related on a regional and/or stratigraphic basis. Metamorphic rock is rock that has undergone chemical or structural changes including heat, pressure, or a chemical reaction.
Polymetallic is a substance comprised of a combination of different metals.
Skarn is metamorphic rock that is usually variably colored green or red, occasionally grey, black, brown or white.
Igneous Pluton is an intrusive rock formed by the crystallization of magma (lava) below the surface of the Earth. Plutons are bodies of magma that solidify underground before they reach the surface of the earth. Intrusive refers to rock that cooled and penetrated into or between other rocks beneath the earth’s crust.
Triassic refers to the first period of the Mesozoic era, extending from 225 to 180 million years ago. Conglomerates are rocks made up of fragments of rock or pebbles, cemented together by some other material. Limestone is a sedimentary rock consisting mainly of calcium that was deposited by the remains of marine animals. Chalcopyrite is a sulphide mineral of copper and iron; the most common ore mineral of copper.
Hematite is the most common iron ore, it is a natural iron oxide that is reddish or brown in colour with Quaternary alluvium to the west.
Cherts are a very fine grained rock formed in ancient ocean sediments.
Siliceous argillites are a compact rock derived from siltstone, mudstone, or shale which has been hardened or consolidated by pressure, cementation, or heat. It does not break into thin layers, as do shale and slate. It is regarded as a product of weak metamorphism. Siliceous means the argillites containssilica or a compound of silicon.
Siliclastic Rocks are rock-forming minerals composed of pre-existing rock fragments produced from weathering and erosion that contain silicon, oxygen, and usually one or more other common elements
Devonian is the period from 405 million to 345 million years ago.
Permian is the period from 280 million to 230 million years ago.
Knob Hill Group, locally named, refer to the group of cherts, siliceous argillites and siliclastic rock.
Triassic (225 million years ago) Brooklyn Group includes thick units of sharpstone conglomerate (also known as breccia, a coarse-grained rock composed of angular, broken rock fragments held together by a mineral cement or in a fine-grained matrix) and limestone (a sedimentary rock consisting mainly of calcium that was deposited by the remains of marine animals) as well as thinner beds of siltstone (a sedimentary rock similar in composition to
15
mudstone, but slightly coarser grained), sandstone (sedimentary rock consisting of sand consolidated with some cement) and calcareous (containing calcium carbonate) chert-pebble conglomerate.
Quaternary alluvium is the soil or sediments deposited by a river or other running water. Alluvium is typically made up of a variety of materials, including fine particles of silt and clay and larger particles of sand and gravel. These alluvium deposits consist primarily of sand and gravel and vary from sparse to many meters thick and locally occur in pockets. Quaternary refers to a period consisting of approximately the last 2 million years of earth history, including present time.
Quartz is one of the most common minerals in the Earth's continental crust.
Calcite is a mineral composed of calcium carbonate.
A fault is a break in the Earth's crust caused by tectonic forces which have moved the rock on one side with respect to the other. They may extend many kilometres, or be only a few centimetres in length and similarly, the movement or displacement along the fault may vary widely.
Galena is a metallic, gray mineral containing lead and sulfur. It is the most common lead mineral and the chief source of lead.
Sphalerite (ZnS) is a mineral that is the chief ore of zinc. It consists largely of zinc sulfide in crystalline form but almost always contains variable iron.
Pyrite is a mineral composed of silicon and oxygen that is often mistaken for real gold and is know as “fool’s gold”.
A drift is rock debris overlying the solid bedrock which was transported by glacial and fluvial (such as glaciers or rivers) or by mass movement including landslides.
Regional Geology
A major structure, the Granby River Fault, trends northerly through the property and separates the pre-Pennsylvanian Grand Forks Metamorphic Complex to the east from the Pennsylvanian to Tertiary rocks to the west. The Grand Forks Group is almost completely void of metallic mineral deposits. Pennsylvanian Permean rocks host a number of massive sulfide deposits plus numerous small shear zone polymetallic sulfide lenses.
Metal quartz veins and small skarn type deposits have developed where rocks have been intruded by later igneous plutons.
The Triassic sequence of conglomerates and bedded limestone are host to the major ore deposits of the area. The chalcopyrite gold hematite ore deposits of the Phoenix, B.C., Motherlode, Sunset and Oro Denora all belong to this group.
Property Geology
The Bonanza Claim is indicated to cover a central southerly narrowing formation of cherts, siliceous argillites, and siliclastic rocks of the Devonian to Permian Knob Hill Group in fault contact with the Triassic Brooklyn Formation of undivided sedimentary rocks to the east, and with Quaternary alluvium to the west.
Property Mineralization
On the Bonanza mineral claim, northeast linear trends of faults are indicated as fault contacts between the Knob Hill Group and the Brooklyn Formation. Quartz and calcite veining is common in the intensely fractured zones along the two faults. A narrow quartz vein containing galena, sphalerite and pyrite is exposed in the upper adit, or entrance, the Bonanza fracture strikes 125 degrees and dips 83 degrees north. A random chip sample from this vein contained . gold and silver. The lower adit, or entrance, (now inaccessible) extends 153 feet as a cross cut to intersect the vein and a drift extends 48 feet northeast and 6 feet to the southwest which indicates that this vein is parallel to the
16
bedding of the host rocks and completely separate from the cross fracture exposed in the upper adit. A shipment of sorted ore from the lower adit is reported to have carried values in gold, silver, lead and zinc. A sample of pyritic chert from claim Ruby 5 contained significant gold.
Supplies
Supplies and manpower are readily available for exploration of the property.
Other
Other than our interest in the Bonanza Claim, we own no business or other property.
Summary Report on Properties
Mr. Laurence Sookochoff, P.Eng. was hired by Supatcha to provide an initial Geology Report dated December 12, 2007 on the Bonanza Claim. Mr. Sookochoff has been continuously practicing in his profession as a geologist since 1966, and has been involved in geological research, prospecting and exploration for metals. He graduated from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, with a B.Sc. degree in Geology. He is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia (No. 23572). Mr. Sookochoff is also president of Sookochoff Consultants Inc. He does not have any interest in the Bonanza Claim or the Company. Mr. Sookochoff has not visited the property. His report details the geological and exploration history of the Bonanza Claim, including the land status, climate, geology and mineralization. Based upon previous exploration activity in the area, Mr. Sookochoff recommends the Company conduct a specific exploration program on the Bonanza Claim. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the area of the claim group, and the prior exploration work conducted on the claims, and to recommend an exploration program.
Recommended Exploration Program
Mr. Sookochoff recommends an initial results-based three-phase exploration program. The total estimated cost of the recommended exploration program is US$73,000.
The exploration program proposed by Mr. Sookochoff is designed to determine whether mineralization exists to the extent that further exploration is recommended to outline any such mineralized zones. It is uncertain at this time the precise quantity of minerals in the property that would justify actual mining operations. If we decide to abandon our mineral claim at any stage of our exploration program, we intend to acquire other properties and conduct similar exploration programs. The other properties may be located in the same mining district or we may in the future explore properties located in other jurisdictions, which may include other provinces in Canada, or in the United States. Currently, the Company does not have any other properties or any intentions of acquiring any other properties. Mr. Sookochoff recommends a three-phase exploration program to further evaluate the Bonanza claim.
Phase I would consist of trenching and sampling of rock and soil from the property for metal analysis. Trenching involves removing surface soil using a backhoe or bulldozer. Samples are then taken from the bedrock below and analysed for mineral content. Soil sampling involves gathering dirt from property areas with the most potential to host economically significant mineralization based on past exploration results. Samples are gathered that appear to contain precious metals such as gold and silver, or industrial metals such as copper. All samples gathered are sent to a laboratory where they are crushed and analysed for metal content. It is estimated that Phase I would be completed in the late summer of 2008 and the estimated cost to complete this phase is US$6,500.
Phase II would consist of VLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys to determine the potential for significant mineralization under the property surface as well as sampling and geological mapping of the veins within anomalous zones. It is estimated that Phase II would be completed in the early fall of 2008 and the estimated cost to complete this phase is US$21,500.
VLF-EM surveys consist of two separate surveys: the very low frequency (VLF) survey and the electromagnetic survey. Very low frequency surveys use radio waves to determine whether rocks on a mineral property conduct electricity. Electromagnetic surveys use electricity and magnets to determine conductivity. Almost all of the precious and base metals that the Company seeks are above average conductors of electricity and will affect the
17
VLF and electromagnetic readings. Electromagnetic (EM) surveys involve measuring the strength of the earth's magnetic field. Variations in the magnetic readings on a property may indicate the increased likelihood of precious or base minerals in the area.
Geochemical analysis consists of consists of a geologist and his assistant gathering grab samples with the most potential to host economically significant mineralization based on their observation of any surface rocks. Grab samples are soil samples or pieces of rock that appear to contain precious metals such as gold and silver, or industrial metals such as copper. All samples gathered are sent to a laboratory where they are crushed and analysed for metal content.
Geological mapping involves recording previous exploration data on the property based on the grid area upon which the exploration was conducted in order to determine the best property locations to conduct subsequent exploration work.
Phase III would consist of test drilling for diamonds. It is estimated that Phase III would be completed in the late fall, early winter of 2008 and the estimated cost to complete this phase is US$45,000.
Proposed Budget
Approximate costs for the recommended three phase program are as follows:
Phase One:
Trenching and sampling over known mineralized zones | $ | 6,500.00 | |
| | | |
Total: | $ | 6,500.00 | |
| | | |
Phase Two: | | | |
| | | |
VLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys | $ | 8,500.00 | |
| | | |
Sampling and geological mapping | $ | 13,000.00 | |
| | | |
Total: | $ | 21,500.00 | |
| | | |
Phase Three: | | | |
| | | |
Test diamond drilling of the prime targets | $ | 45,000.00 | |
| | | |
Total Estimated Cost | $ | 73,000.00 | |
Compliance with Government Regulation
The laws of British Columbia govern work on the claim. Title to mineral claims are issued and administered by the Land Title Office and any work on the property must comply with all provisions under the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia). A mineral claim acquires the right to the minerals, which were available at the time of location and as defined in the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia). There are no surface rights included, but the title holder has the right to use the surface of the claim for mining proposes only. All work carried out on a claim that disturbs the surface by mechanical means requires a Notice of Work and must receive written approval from the District Inspector of Mines prior to commencement.
Competitive Factors
The mining industry is fragmented, that is there are many, many mineral prospectors and producers, small and large. We do not compete with anyone. That is because there is no competition for the exploration or removal of minerals from the property. We will either find zinc on the property or not. If we do not, we will cease or suspend operations. We are one of the smallest exploration companies in existence. We are an infinitely small participant in the zinc
18
mining market. Readily available zinc markets exist in Canada, the United States and around the world for the sale of zinc. Therefore, we will be able to sell any zinc that we are able to recover.
Location Challenges
We do not expect any major challenges in accessing the property during the initial exploration stages. However, due to the seasonal winter conditions of the area, we can only access the property between June and October of each year.
Regulations
Our mineral exploration program will comply with the British Columbia Mineral Tenure Act. This act sets forth rules for:
* | locating claims |
* | posting claims |
* | working claims |
* | reporting work performed |
We also have to comply with the British Columbia Mineral Exploration Code which tells us how and where we can explore for minerals. We must comply with these laws to operate our business. Compliance with these rules and regulations will not adversely affect our operations.
In order to explore for minerals on our mineral claim we must submit the plan contained in this prospectus for review. We believe that the plan as contained in this prospectus will be accepted and an exploration permit will be issued to our agent or us. The exploration permit is the only permit or license we will need to explore for precious and base minerals on the mineral claim.
We will be required to obtain additional work permits from the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines for any exploration work that result in a physical disturbance to the land. Accordingly, we may be required to obtain a work permit depending on the complexity and affect on the environment if we proceed beyond the exploration work contemplated by our proposed exploration programs. The time required to obtain a work period is approximately four weeks. We will incur the expense of our consultants to prepare the required submissions to the Ministry of Energy and Mines. We will be required by the Mining Act to undertake remediation work on any work that results in physical disturbance to the land. The cost of remediation work will vary according to the degree of physical disturbance. No remediation work is anticipated as a result of completion of Phases 1, 2 and 3 of the exploration program.
We have budgeted for regulatory compliance costs in the proposed exploration program recommended by the summary report. As mentioned above, we will have to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental remediation for all exploration and other work undertaken. The amount of reclamation and environmental remediation costs are not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program that will be undertaken beyond completion of the recommended exploration program. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any mineral resource at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on earnings or our competitive position in the event a potential mineral deposit is discovered.
If we enter into substantial exploration, the cost of complying with permit and regulatory environment laws will be greater than in Phases 1, 2 and 3 because the impact on the project area is greater. Permits and regulations will control all aspects of any program if the project continues to that stage because of the potential impact on the environment. We may be required to conduct an environmental review process under the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Act if we determine to proceed with a substantial project. An environmental review is not required under the Environmental Assessment Act to proceed with the recommended Phase 1, 2 or 3 exploration programs on our Bonanza Claim.
19
Environmental Factors
We will also have to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental remediation for all work undertaken which causes sufficient surface disturbance to necessitate reclamation work. Both reclamation and environmental remediation refer to putting disturbed ground back as close to its original state as possible. Other potential pollution or damage must be cleaned-up and renewed along standard guidelines outlined in the usual permits. Reclamation is the process of bringing the land back to a natural state after completion of exploration activities. Environmental remediation refers to the physical activity of taking steps to remediate, or remedy, any environmental damage caused, i.e. refilling trenches after sampling or cleaning up fuel spills. Our initial programs do not require any reclamation or remediation other than minor clean up and removal of supplies because of minimal disturbance to the ground. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program we will undertake, beyond completion of the recommended three phases described above. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any resource or reserve at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on our earnings or competitive position in the event a potentially economic deposit is discovered.
Employees; Identification of Certain Significant Employees.
We are a development stage company and we intend to use the services of contractors and consultants for exploration work on our property. At present, we have no paid employees.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Our offices are currently located at 80 S. Court Street, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 2X4. Our telephone number is (807) 344-2644.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not a party to any pending litigation and none is contemplated or threatened.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is presently no public market for our shares of common stock. We anticipate applying for trading of our common stock on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms apart. However, we can provide no assurance that our shares of common stock will be traded on the Bulletin Board or, if traded, that a public market will materialize.
Holders of Our Common Stock
As of the date of this registration statement, we had 42 shareholders of our common stock.
Rule 144 Shares
As of November 25, 2008 the 6,500,000 common shares issued to our President, and Secretary are currently available for resale to the public and in accordance with the volume and trading limitations of Rule 144 of the Act. After October 2008 the 6,500,000 shares issued to our President, and Secretary will become available for resale to the public in accordance with the volume and trading limitations of Rule 144 of the Act. After December 2008 the 5,700,000 shares of our common stock held by the 40 shareholders who purchased their shares in the Regulation S offering by us will become available for resale to the public. Sales under Rule 144 are subject availability of current public information about the company.
Stock Option Grants
To date, we have not granted any stock options.
Registration Rights
We have not granted registration rights to the selling shareholders or to any other persons.
20
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
This section of the prospectus includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.
Plan of Operation
We are an exploration stage company. We have not yet started operations or generated or realized any revenues from our business operations.
Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than the sale of minerals found on the property. Our only other sources for cash at this time are loans from related parties and additional sales of common stock. Our success or failure will be determined by what additional financing we obtain and what we find under the ground.
To meet our need for cash we raised money from our private placement. If we find mineralized material and it is economically feasible to remove the mineralized material, we will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans. If we do not have enough money to complete our exploration of the property, we will have to find alternative sources, like a second public offering, a private placement of securities, or loans from our officers or others.
Our officers and directors are unwilling to make any commitment to loan us any money except to cover expenses relating to reclamation if materialized material is not found at this time. At the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. If we need additional cash and can't raise it, we will either have to suspend activities until we do raise the cash, or cease activities entirely. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.
We own a 100% interest in one property. Even if we complete our current exploration program and it is successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit, a reserve.
We will be conducting research in the form of exploration of the property. Our exploration program is explained in as much detail as possible in the business section of this prospectus. We are not going to buy or sell any plant or significant equipment during the next twelve months. We will not buy any equipment until have located a reserve and we have determined it is economical to extract the minerals from the land.
We do not intend to interest other companies in the property if we find mineralized materials. We intend to try to develop the reserves ourselves.
If we are unable to complete any phase of exploration because we don’t have enough money, we will cease activities until we raise more money. If we can’t or don’t raise more money, we will cease activities. If we cease activities, we don’t know what we will do and we don’t have any plans to do anything.
We do not intend to hire additional employees at this time. All of the work on the property will be conduct by unaffiliated independent contractors that we will hire. The independent contractors will be responsible for surveying, geology, engineering, exploration, and excavation. The geologists will evaluate the information derived from the exploration and excavation and the engineers will advise us on the economic feasibility of removing the mineralized material.
21
Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to complete the recommended phase one, two and three exploration programs on the Bonanza mineral claim consisting of trenching and sampling as well as a VLF-EM survey and soil sampling and diamond drilling of the prime correlative anomalous zones. We anticipate that these exploration programs will cost approximately $83,000.
To date, we have not yet commenced phase one of the exploration program on the Bonanza mineral claim.
We will commence the first phase of the exploration work program, consisting of trenching and sampling over known mineralized zones, in the spring of 2009 and we anticipate this phase should take up to one month to complete.
We will then undertake the phase two work program, consisting of VLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys as well of sampling and geological mapping of the veins within anomalous zones, during the spring of 2009. This program will take approximately two months to complete. We will then undertake the phase three work program, consisting of test diamond drilling of the prime targets, during the summer of 2009. This program will take approximately two months to complete.
We do not have any verbal or written agreement regarding the retention of any qualified engineer or geologist for this exploration program.
As well, we anticipate spending an additional $20,000 over the next twelve months on administrative fees, including fees payable in connection with the filing of this registration statement and complying with reporting obligations.
Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be $103,000.
While we have enough funds to cover anticipated expenses for Phases I and II of the exploration work program, we will require additional funding in order to proceed with Phase III and any additional recommended exploration on the Bonanza mineral claim following the completion of the phase one and two program. We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock or from director loans. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing or loans.
Limited Operating History; Need for Additional Capital
There is no historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are an exploration stage corporation and have not generated any revenues from activities. We cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business activities. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, possible delays in the exploration of our properties, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services.
To become profitable and competitive, we conduct research and exploration of our properties before we start production of any minerals we may find. We are seeking equity financing to provide for the capital required to implement our research and exploration phases.
We have no assurance that future financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have issued 12,500,000 shares of our common stock and received $63,500 in proceeds from these sales.
As of the date of this prospectus, we have yet to begin operations and therefore have not generated any revenues.
In September 2007, we issued 3,500,000 shares of common stock to our President, Mr. Donald Axent and 3,000,000 shares of common stock to our Secretary, Mr. William Kosoris, pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933. The purchase price of the shares was $6,500. This was accounted for as an acquisition of shares. Mr. Donald Axent covered some of our initial expenses by paying $125.00 for incorporation documents. The amount owed to Mr. Axent is non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand. Further the agreement with Mr. Axent is oral and there is no written document evidencing the agreement.
22
As of August 31, 2008, our total assets were $35,893 and our total liabilities were $4,088.
Results of Operations
We did not earn any revenues from our incorporation on August 21, 2007 to August 31, 2008. We have only recently commenced the exploration stage of our business and can provide no assurance that we will discover economic mineralization on our mineral property.
We incurred operating expenses in the amount of $30,624 for the period from our inception on August 21, 2007 to August 31, 2008. These operating expenses were comprised of accounting and audit fees of $15,741, exploration costs and expenses of $9,836, legal fees of $2,475, listing and filing fees of $2,238 and general and administrative expenses of $334.
We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue exploration activities. For these reasons, there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants
We have had no changes in or disagreements with our accountants.
MANAGEMENT
Officers and Directors
The name, address, age and position of our present officers and directors as of December 3, 2008 are set forth below:
Name and Addres | Age | Position |
Donald Axent President, CEO, and a Director
80 S. Court Street Thunder Bay, Ontari Canada P7B 2X4 |
58
|
President, chief executive officer and director |
William Kosoris Secretary and a Director
80 S. Court Street Thunder Bay, Ontari Canada P7B 2X4
|
51
|
Secretary and director |
Brian Matsun Treasurer and a Director
80 S. Court Street Thunder Bay, Ontari Canada P7B 2X4 |
54
| Chief financial officer, treasurer and director
|
The persons named above have held offices/positions since inception of our company and are expected to hold his offices/positions until the next annual meeting of our stockholders.
Our officers and director are involved in other outside business interests. Mr. Don Axent spends 15% of his time working on our corporate matter. Our directors spend 10% of their time working on our corporate matters.
23
Background of officers and directors
Since our inception on August 21, 2007, Donald Axent has been our president, chief executive officer and director, William Kosoris has been our secretary and director, and, Brian Matsun has been our treasurer, chief financial officer and director.
Mr. Axent, since 1994, Mr. Axent has been a self employed owner and operator of Auto-One International, a retail and wholesale auto sale business and of Auto-One Car Care & Service Centre, an auto service and repair business, both businesses located in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. Mr. Axent has acted as President and director of of Tao Minerals Ltd., an OTC Bulletin Board listed company, from September 2003 until March 2006. As well he is President of D.A. Axent Limited, a Holding Company, since 1975.
Mr. William Kosoris is employed as a senior automotive technician and has been owner and operator of Bill Kosoris Automotive Ltd. located in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada since 1997. In 1981, Mr. Kosoris completed the Ontario Automotive Apprentice Program. He is well educated in the automotive industry having taken several courses on automotive systems and diagnostics.
Mr. Brian Matsun has been a Suppression Firefighter for the City of Thunder Bay Fire Department since 1990. Since 2000, Mr. Matsun has been employed part time in the sales and service department of Teleco, a local telephone company in Ontario selling cellular phones. Mr. Matsun received his Tech Diploma at Westgate Collegiate and Vocational Institute in Thunder Bay, Ontario in 1972. He also received his Architectural Engineering Technician Diploma at the Confederation College in Thunder Bay in 1974.
During the past five years, Mr. Axent, Mr. Kosoris and Mr. Matsun have not been the subject of the following events:
1. Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which Mr. Axent, Mr. Kosoris or Mr. Matsun were a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time.
2. Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding.
3. An order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting Mr. Axent, Mr. Kosoris or Mr. Matsun’s involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.
4. Found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Future Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Term of Office
Our directors will serve until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she is removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us for the past fiscal year ending February 29, 2008 for each of our officers. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any. The compensation discussed addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers.
24
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
|
|
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($) |
Option Awards ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other Compens- ation ($) |
Total ($) |
Donald Axent President, CEO, and a Director |
| None None
| None None
| None None
| None None
| None None
| None None
| None None
| None None
|
William Kosoris Secretary and a Director |
| None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None |
Brian Matsun Treasurer and a Director |
| None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None | None None |
We have no employment agreements with any of our officers. We do not contemplate entering into any employment agreements until such time as we begin profitable operations.
The compensation discussed herein addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers.
There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and directors other than as described herein.
Compensation of Directors
The members of our board of directors are not compensated for their services as a director. The board has not implemented a plan to award options to any directors. There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the board of directors. We have no director's service contracts.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards
We do not have any long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance.
Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our company's common stock with respect to each named director and executive officer of our Company, each person known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of said securities, and all directors and executive officers of our Company as a group:
Name and Address | Title of Class | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | Percentage of Class (1) |
Donald Axent Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada President and Director | Common
| 3,500,000
| 28%
|
William Kosoris Director and Secretary | Common
| 3,000,000
| 24%
|
25
Brian Matsun Director and Treasurer | None
| None
| 0%
|
All officers & directors as a group consisting of three people | Common
| 6,500,000
| 52%
|
(1) The percentage of class is based on 12,200,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 3, 2008.
The persons named above have full voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person (or group of persons) is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if he or she, directly or indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security, which that person has the right to acquire within 60 days, such as options or warrants to purchase our common stock.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
We have no equity compensation plans.
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS
In December 2007, we issued a total of 6,500,000 shares of restricted common stock to Donald Axent and William Kosoris, our directors in consideration of $6,500.
Item 12A. Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification of Securities Act Liabilities.
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION OF INDEMNIFICATION OF SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Our director and officer is indemnified as provided by the Nevada Statutes and our Bylaws. We have agreed to indemnify each of our directors and certain officers against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the provisions described above, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than our payment of expenses incurred or paid by our director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
We have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction. We will then be governed by the court’s decision.
26
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedule thereto, certain parts of which are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information regarding our common stock and our company, please review the registration statement, including exhibits, schedules and reports filed as a part thereof. Statements in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, set forth the material terms of such contract or other document but are not necessarily complete, and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference.
We are also subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act which requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such reports, proxy statements and other information along with the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto, may be inspected at public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street N.E , Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at prescribed rates. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. Because we file documents electronically with the SEC, you may also obtain this information by visiting the SEC’s Internet website athttp://www.sec.gov.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our fiscal year end is February 28. We will provide audited financial statements to our stockholders on an annual basis; the statements will be prepared by a firm of Chartered Accountants.
Our audited financial statements from inception to February 28, 2008, as well as unaudited interim financial statements for the six month period ended August 31, 2008 immediately follow, which consist of the following:
27
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
28
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
CONTENTS
29
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/S-1A/0001062993-08-005233/mhmlogo.jpg)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Supatcha Resources, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Supatcha Resources, Inc. (an exploration stage company) as of February 29, 2008, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from August 21, 2007 (Inception) through February 29, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board (United States) and in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Supatcha Resources, Inc. (an exploration stage company) as of February 29, 2008, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period from August 21, 2007 (Inception) through February 29, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred a loss from operations and it is dependent on future exploration and development activities to generate a source of revenues. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
May 28, 2008
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP · Certified Public Accountants
N.W. Expressway Suite 700E · Oklahoma City, OK 73112 · 405.842.4420 · F. 405.842.3776 · www.mhmcpa.com
30
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET
(AUDITED)
AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
ASSETS | | | |
| | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | |
Cash | $ | 53,683 | |
| | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 53,683 | |
| | | |
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
| | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 3,300 | |
Due to related party | | 1,150 | |
| | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 4,450 | |
| | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | �� | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none | | | |
issued and outstanding | | - | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 69,000,000 shares authorized, | | 12,200,000 | |
| | | |
shares issued and outstanding | | 12,200 | |
Additional paid in capital | | 50,229 | |
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage | | (13,196 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | 49,233 | |
| | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 53,683 | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
31
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(AUDITED)
AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | |
Accounting and auditing fees | $ | 3,300 | |
Exploration costs and expenses | | 9,000 | |
General and administrative | | 246 | |
Listing and filing fees | | 650 | |
Total Operating Expenses | | 13,196 | |
| | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | (13,196 | ) |
| | | |
NET LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | | (13,196 | ) |
| | | |
Provision for Income Taxes | | - | |
| | | |
NET LOSS | $ | (13,196 | ) |
| | | |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | $ | (0.00 | ) |
| | | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period | | | |
– basic and diluted | | 6,389,005 | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
32
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(AUDITED)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
| | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Deficit | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Additional | | | During | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | Paid-In | | | Exploration | | | | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Stage | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock issued to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
founders for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 per share) | | 6,500,000 | | $ | 6,500 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 6,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock issued for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
cash ($0.01 per share) | | 5,700,000 | | | 5,700 | | | 51,300 | | | - | | | 57,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount on sale of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
common stock | | - | | | - | | | (1,071 | ) | | - | | | (1,071 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 21, 2007 (inception) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to February 29, 2008 | | - | | | - | | | - | | | (13,196 | ) | | (13,196 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 29,2008 | | 12,200,000 | | $ | 12,200 | | $ | 50,229 | | $ | (13,196 | ) | $ | 49,233 | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
33
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(AUDITED)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Net loss for the period | $ | (13,196 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in | | | |
operating activities: | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | 3,300 | |
Due to related party | | 1,150 | |
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | | (8,746 | ) |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Issuance of common shares | | 62,429 | |
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities | | 62,429 | |
| | | |
NET INCREASE IN CASH | | 53,683 | |
| | | |
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | - | |
| | | |
CASH AT END OF PERIOD | $ | 53,683 | |
| | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | |
| | | |
Cash paid for interest | $ | - | |
Cash paid for taxes | $ | - | |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
34
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
NOTE 1 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION |
| |
| (A) Organization |
| |
| Supatcha Resources Inc. (an exploration stage company) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 21, 2007. The Company is a natural resource exploration company with an objective of acquiring, exploring and if warranted and feasible, developing natural resource properties. |
| |
| The accompanying financial statements included herein have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has accumulated a deficit of $13,196 since inception, has yet to achieve profitable operations and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of common stock. The Company may also seek to obtain short- term loans from the directors of the Company. There are no current arrangements in place for equity funding or short-term loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such financing, or that it will attain positive cash flow from operations. |
| |
| (B) Use of Estimates |
| |
| In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| |
| (C) Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| |
| For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. |
35
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
(D) Mineral Property
Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, the recoverability of the acquisition costs associated with the purchase of mineral rights presumes to be insupportable prior to determining the existence of a commercially minable deposit and have to be expensed. As of February 29, 2008, the Company had expensed $9,000 related to the mineral rights acquisition and exploration costs.
(E) Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” As of February 29, 2008, there were no common share equivalents outstanding.
(F) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. As of February 29, 2008, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $13,196 available to offset future taxable income through 2029. This resulted in a deferred tax asset of $5,278 which is fully reserved for financial statement presentation.
(G) Foreign Currency Translation
In accordance with SFAS 52 "Foreign Currency Translation", the Company has determined that its functional currency is the United States Dollar. For the year ended February 29, 2008, the Company recorded a transaction loss from the settlement of subscriptions receivable received in Canadian Dollars. The loss was determined at the exchange rates on the date of settlement.
(H) Business Segments
The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
36
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
(I) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. The objective of SFAS 157 is to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and to expand disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and does not require any new fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fair value measurements made in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's future reported financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 apply only to entities that elect the fair value option. However, the amendment to SFAS No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2008. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2008, provided the entity also elects to apply the provision of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. When the effect of initial adoption is material, companies will record the effect as a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning of year retained earnings and disclose the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected in the cumulative adjustment. SAB No. 108 was effective beginning January 1, 2007 and the initial adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
37
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which is a revision of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R will apply to all business combinations and will require most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at “full fair value.” At the acquisition date, SFAS No 141R will also require transaction-related costs to be expensed in the period incurred, rather than capitalizing these costs as a component of the respective purchase price. SFAS No. 141R is effective for acquisitions completed after January 1, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption will have a significant impact on the accounting treatment for acquisitions occurring after the effective date.
In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued SAB 110, Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods, which extends the use of the "simplified" method, under certain circumstances, in developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Prior to SAB 110, SAB 107 stated that the simplified method was only available for grants made up to December 31, 2007.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. These recent accounting pronouncements have no current applicability to the Company and have no effect on the financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes where
38
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
interpretation of the law is uncertain. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. This Statement has no current applicability to the Company's financial statements. Management plans to adopt this Statement on March 1, 2008 and it is anticipated that the initial adoption of FIN 48 will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
NOTE 2 | MINERAL PROPERTY |
| |
| Bonanza Property |
| |
| Pursuant to a mineral property purchase and sale agreement dated October 22, 2007, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the 9 Units Mineral Claim, known as the Bonanza Mineral Claim, located in the Greenwood Mining Division of British Columbia, Canada, for a purchase price of $6,500. The Company incurred $2,500 of exploration expenditures for the period ended February 29, 2008. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, the recoverability of the acquisition costs associated with the purchase of mineral rights presumes to be insupportable prior to determining the existence of a commercially minable deposit and have to be expensed. |
| |
NOTE 3 | STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
| |
| On October 15, 2007, the Company issued 6,500,000 shares of common stock at par value to its founders for cash of $6,500 ($0.001 par value per share). |
| |
| On December 12, 2007, the Company issued 5,700,000 shares of common stock for cash of $57,000 which was accounted for as $5,700 par value of stock and the remainder as additional paid in capital ($0.001 par value per share). |
| |
NOTE 4 | RELATED PARTY |
| |
| As of February 29, 2008, the Company’s President paid expenditures of $1,150 on behalf of the Company. |
39
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FEBRUARY 29, 2008
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS)
NOTE 5 | CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK |
| |
| Cash includes deposits at Canadian financial institutions in US currency which is not covered by either the US FDIC limits or the Canadian CDI limits and therefore the entire cash balance of $53,683 is uninsured. The company has placed its cash in a high credit quality financial institution. |
40
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
41
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
|
|
|
CONTENTS |
PAGE | F-1 | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
| | |
PAGE | 43 | BALANCE SHEETS AS OF AUGUST 31, 2008 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2008 |
| | |
PAGE | 44 | STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO AUGUST 31, 2008 |
| | |
PAGE | 45 | STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO AUGUST 31, 2008 |
| | |
PAGE | 46 | STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2008 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO AUGUST 31, 2008 |
| | |
PAGES | 47 - 52 | NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
42
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/S-1A/0001062993-08-005233/indpendentreportx1x1.jpg)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Supatcha Resources Inc.
We have reviewed the balance sheet of Supatcha Resources Inc. as of August 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods then ended and the period from inception to August 31, 2008, the statement of stockholders' equity for the period of inception to August 31, 2008, and the statements of cash flows for the six-month period then ended and the period from inception to August 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred a loss from operations and it is dependent on future exploration and development activities to generate a source of revenues. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The balance sheet as of May 31, 2008 and the related statements of operations, stockholder's equity and cash flows for the three months then ended were reviewed by Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP, who joined Eide Bailly LLP on August 1, 2008.
In addition, Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP, who joined Eide Bailly LLP on August 1, 2008, previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheet of Supatcha Resources, Inc. as of February 29, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period then ended (not presented herein); and whose report dated May 28, 2008, expressed, except for the matter described below, an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed balance sheet as of February 29, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.
The auditors' report as issued by Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP on the financial statements of the Company as described in the preceding paragraph, included an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, as discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/S-1A/0001062993-08-005233/indpendentreportx1x2.jpg)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
November 21, 2008
PEOPLE. PRINCIPLES. POSSIBILITIES.
w w w . e i d e b a i l l y . c o m
1601 Northwest Expressway, Ste. 1900 ] Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 ] Phone 405.478.3334 ] Fax 405.478.5673 ] EOE
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
BALANCE SHEETS |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
| | August 31, | | | February 29, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2008 | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Audited) | |
| | | | | | |
ASSETS | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | |
Cash | $ | 33,368 | | $ | 53,683 | |
Prepaid | | 2,525 | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 35,893 | | $ | 53,683 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 2,938 | | $ | 3,300 | |
Due to related party | | 1,150 | | | 1,150 | |
| | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | 4,088 | | | 4,450 | |
| | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares | | | | | | |
authorized, none issued and outstanding | | - | | | - | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 69,000,000 shares | | | | | | |
authorized, 12,200,000 shares issued and outstanding | | 12,200 | | | 12,200 | |
Additional paid in capital | | 50,229 | | | 50,229 | |
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage | | (30,624 | ) | | (13,196 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | 31,805 | | | 49,233 | |
| | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ | | | | | | |
EQUITY | $ | 35,893 | | $ | 53,683 | |
See accompanying notes and accountant's review report.
43
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(UNAUDITED) |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
| | | | | | | | For the Period | |
| | For the Three | | | For the Six | | | From August 21, | |
| | Months Ended | | | Months Ended | | | 2007 (Inception) | |
| | August 31, | | | August 31, | | | to August 31, | |
| | 2008 | | | 2008 | | | 2008 | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
Accounting and auditing fees | $ | 5,175 | | $ | 12,441 | | $ | 15,741 | |
Exploration costs and expenses | | 836 | | | 836 | | | 9,836 | |
General and administrative | | 47 | | | 87 | | | 334 | |
Listing and filing fees | | 1,589 | | | 1,589 | | | 2,238 | |
Legal fees | | 2,475 | | | 2,475 | | | 2,475 | |
Total Operating Expenses | | 10,122 | | | 17,428 | | | 30,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | (10,122 | ) | | (17,428 | ) | | (30,624 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR | | (10,122 | ) | | (17,428 | ) | | (30,624 | ) |
INCOME TAXES | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Provision for Income Taxes | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | $ | (10,122 | ) | $ | (17,428 | ) | $ | (30,624 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | | (0.00 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of shares | | | | | | | | | |
outstanding during the period – | | | | | | | | | |
basic and diluted | | 12,200,000 | | | 12,200,000 | | | 9,248,138 | |
See accompanying notes and accountant's review report.
44
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 21, 2007 (INCEPTION) TO AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(UNAUDITED) |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
| | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Deficit | | | | |
| | | | | | | Additional | | | During | | | | |
| Common Stock | | | Paid-In | | | Exploration | | | | |
| Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Stage | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock issued to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
founders for cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($0.001 per share) | 6,500,000 | | $ | 6,500 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 6,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock issued for | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
cash ($0.01 per share) | 5,700,000 | | | 5,700 | | | 51,300 | | | - | | | 57,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount on sale of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
common stock | - | | | - | | | (1,071 | ) | | - | | | (1,071 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period from | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 21, 2007 (inception) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to February 29, 2008 | - | | | - | | | - | | | (13,196 | ) | | (13,196 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, February 29, 2008 | 12,200,000 | | | 12,200 | | | 50,229 | | | (13,196 | ) | | 49,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
August 31, 2008 | - | | | - | | | - | | | (17,428 | ) | | (17,428 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008 | 12,200,000 | | $ | 12,200 | | $ | 50,229 | | $ | (30,624 | ) | $ | 31,805 | |
See accompanying notes and accountant's review report.
45
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(UNAUDITED) |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
| | | | | For the Period | |
| | | | | From August | |
| | | | | 21, 2007 | |
| | For the Six | | | (Inception) to | |
| | Months Ended | | | August 31, | |
| | August 31, 2008 | | | 2008 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING | | | | | | |
ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
Net loss for the period | $ | (17,428 | ) | $ | (30,624 | ) |
Changes in operating activities | | | | | | |
Prepaid | | (2,525 | ) | | (2,525 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | (362 | ) | | 2,938 | |
Due to related party | | - | | | 1,150 | |
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Operating | | | | | | |
Activities | | (20,315 | ) | | (29,061 | ) |
| | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING | | | | | | |
ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
Issuance of common shares | | - | | | 62,429 | |
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities | | - | | | 62,429 | |
| | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | | (20,315 | ) | | 33,368 | |
| | | | | | |
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | 53,683 | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
CASH AT END OF PERIOD | $ | 33,368 | | $ | 33,368 | |
| | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |
| | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | - | | | - | |
Cash paid for taxes | | - | | | - | |
See accompanying notes and accountant's review report.
46
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
NOTE 1 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION |
| |
| (A) Organization |
| |
| Supatcha Resources Inc. (an exploration stage company) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 21, 2007. The Company is a natural resource exploration company with an objective of acquiring, exploring and if warranted and feasible, developing natural resource properties. |
| |
| The accompanying financial statements included herein have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has accumulated a deficit of $30,624 since inception, has yet to achieve profitable operations and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of common stock. The Company may also seek to obtain short-term loans from the directors of the Company. There are no current arrangements in place for equity funding or short-term loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining such financing, or that it will attain positive cash flow from operations. |
| |
| (B) Use of Estimates |
| |
| In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| |
| (C) Mineral Property |
| |
| Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, the recoverability of the acquisition costs associated with the purchase of mineral rights presumes to be insupportable prior to determining the existence of a commercially minable deposit and have to be expensed. As of August 31, 2008, the Company had expensed $9,836 related to the mineral rights acquisition and exploration costs. |
47
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
(D) Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” As of August 31, 2008, there were no common share equivalents outstanding.
(E) Foreign Currency Translation
In accordance with SFAS 52 "Foreign Currency Translation", the Company has determined that its functional currency is the United States Dollar.
(F) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. As of August 31, 2008, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $30,624 available to offset future taxable income through 2029. This resulted in a deferred tax asset of $10,826 and $5,278 for the six month period ending August 31, 2008 and the period since inception, respectively, which is fully reserved for financial statement presentation.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes where interpretation of the law is uncertain. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
(G) Business Segments
The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
48
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
(H) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Effective March 1, 2008, management adopted SFAS No. 157 with the exception of certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that were specifically deferred by SFAS No. 157-2. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. SFAS 157-2 (FSP No.157-2), Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 , that defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Management is assessing the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157-2.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. FSP No. 157-3, was effective upon issuance. FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), in a market that is not active. See for a discussion of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 apply only to entities that elect the fair value option. However, the amendment to SFAS No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provision of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. The management did not elect fair value treatment for any assets or liabilities under SFAS 159 as of August 31, 2008.
In September 2006, the Securities Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income statement approach and to evaluate whether either
49
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
(H) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. When the effect of initial adoption is material, companies will record the effect as a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning of year retained earnings and disclose the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected in the cumulative adjustment. SAB No. 108 was effective beginning January 1, 2007 and the adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which is a revision of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R will apply to all business combinations and will require most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at “full fair value.” At the acquisition date, SFAS No 141R will also require transaction-related costs to be expensed in the period incurred, rather than capitalizing these costs as a component of the respective purchase price. SFAS No. 141R is effective for acquisitions completed after January 1, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption will have a significant impact on the accounting treatment for acquisitions occurring after the effective date.
In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued SAB 110, Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods, which extends the use of the "simplified" method, under certain circumstances, in developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Prior to SAB 110, SAB 107 stated that the simplified method was only available for grants made up to December 31, 2007.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
50
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
(I) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. Company is assessing this statement and it is not expected to have any current applicability to the Company and will have no effect on the financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). SFAS No. 161 expands the disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 161 will have on our financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS 162”). FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 directs the GAAP hierarchy to the entity, not the independent auditors, as the entity is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to remove the GAAP hierarchy from the auditing standards. SFAS 162 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 163 “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60” (“FAS 163”). FAS 163 clarifies how FAS 60 “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises” applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. FAS 163 also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. FAS 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies), and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company currently does not provide financial guarantee insurance, and as such does not anticipate any impact on future financial statements due to the adoption of FAS 163.
51
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC. |
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY) |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
AUGUST 31, 2008 |
(STATED IN U.S. DOLLARS) |
NOTE 2 | MINERAL PROPERTY |
| |
| Bonanza Property |
| |
| Pursuant to a mineral property purchase and sale agreement dated October 22, 2007, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the 9 Units Mineral Claim, known as the Bonanza Mineral Claim, located in the Greenwood Mining Division of British Columbia, Canada, for a purchase price of $6,500. As of August 31, 2008, the Company incurred $9,836 of exploration expenditures. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, the recoverability of the acquisition costs associated with the purchase of mineral rights presumes to be insupportable prior to determining the existence of a commercially minable deposit and have to be expensed. |
| |
| |
NOTE 3 | STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
| |
| Upon incorporation of the Company, they authorized 69,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; currently, there are 12,200,000 shares issued and outstanding. In addition, 1,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; currently, there are none issued and outstanding. The terms of the preferred shares are at the discretion of the board of directors. |
| |
| On October 15, 2007, the Company issued 6,500,000 shares of common stock at par value to its founders for cash of $6,500 ($0.001 par value per share). |
| |
| On December 12, 2007, the Company issued 5,700,000 shares of common stock for cash of $57,000 which was accounted for as $5,700 par value of stock and the remainder as additional paid in capital ($0.001 par value per share). |
| |
| |
NOTE 4 | RELATED PARTY |
| |
| As of August 31, 2008, the Company’s President paid expenditures of $1,150 on behalf of the Company. |
| |
NOTE 5 | CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK |
| |
| Cash includes deposits at Canadian financial institutions in US currency which is not covered by either the US FDIC limits or the Canadian CDI limits and therefore the entire cash balance of $33,368 is uninsured. The company has placed its cash in a high credit quality financial institution. |
52
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
5,700,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
PROSPECTUS
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT OR THAT WE HAVE REFERRED YOU TO. WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL COMMON STOCK AND IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY COMMON STOCK IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
Until _____________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities whether or not participating in this offering may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
53
The Date of This Prospectus Is: December , 2008
PART II -- INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
Other Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution
The estimated costs of this offering are as follows:
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee | $ | 2.24 | |
Transfer Agent Fee | $ | 3,000 | |
Listing & Filing Fees | $ | 650 | |
Exploration Costs & Expenses | $ | 9,000 | |
General and Administrative | $ | 286.00 | |
Accounting & Auditing fees | $ | 12,129.00 | |
Legal fees and expenses | | | |
All amounts are estimates other than the Commission's registration fee.
We are paying all expenses of the offering listed above. No portion of these expenses will be borne by the selling shareholders. The selling shareholders, however, will pay any other expenses incurred in selling their common stock, including any brokerage commissions or costs of sale.
Item 14. Indemnification Of Directors And Officers.
Our director and officer is indemnified as provided by the Nevada Statutes and our Bylaws. We have agreed to indemnify each of our directors and certain officers against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the provisions described above, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than our payment of expenses incurred or paid by our director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
We have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction. We will then be governed by the court’s decision.
54
Item 15. Recent Sales Of Unregistered Securities..
On October 15, 2007, we issued 6,500,000 shares of common stock to, to our President and Secretary in consideration of $0.001 per share or a total of $6,500. We issued the foregoing restricted shares of common stock pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. No commissions were paid to anyone in connection with the sale of the shares and general solicitation was not made to anyone. These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the shareholder had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the 1933 Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for this transaction.
On December 31, 2007, we issued 5,700,000 shares of common stock to forty individuals in consideration of $0.01 per share or a total of $57,000. The 5,700,000 shares so issued are being registered in this offering. The foregoing 5,700,000 shares of common stock were issued as restricted securities pursuant to Reg. S of the Securities Act of 1933 in that all of the sales took place outside the United States of America with non-US persons. The following sets forth the identity of the class of persons to whom we sold these shares and the amount of shares for each shareholder:
Shumaila KShan | 100,000 |
Attiyai Bushra | 100,000 |
Farida Iffat Rizwan | |
100,000 | 0.81% |
Bushra Sayal | 100,000 |
Jordan QueyQuep | 200,000 |
Leonel Tinoco | 120,000 |
Dur-E-Aden Awan | 200,000 |
Waqas Taimor | 200,000 |
Tynisia Roach | 150,000 |
Rajnish Bhatia | 100,000 |
Hamid Latif Bhatti | 150,000 |
Nasreen Ahmad | 150,000 |
Amtul Raif | 150,000 |
Shivali Makol | 120,000 |
Farhat Jamal Chaudry | 120,000 |
Nighat Ahmad | 120,000 |
Abdirizak Gabaire | 150,000 |
Christopher Johnson | 200,000 |
Tony Avelar | 200,000 |
Diana Yau | 120,000 |
Maryan Haashi Haayow | 150,000 |
Isadore Johnson | 150,000 |
Rabia Ahmed | 100,000 |
Shaun Jamieson | 150,000 |
Deyon Woon | 120,000 |
Tracey Nicole Walker | 120,000 |
Frank Pucciano | 200,000 |
Fatuma Ismail Elmi | 120,000 |
Lorraine Khan | 200,000 |
Wayne Lalor | 120,000 |
Addison Khan | 200,000 |
55
Patrick Boodram | 150,000 |
Nesha Khan | 200,000 |
Klimentini Dimakos | 200,000 |
Alan Henry | 150,000 |
Mario Boulanger | 100,000 |
Theo Grootelaar | 100,000 |
MacKenzie Holmwood | 120,000 |
Mathew Kaustinen | 100,000 |
Irene Grootelaar | 100,000 |
Regulation S Compliance
Each offer or sale was made in an offshore transaction.
Neither we, a distributor, any respective affiliates nor any person on behalf of any of the foregoing made any directed selling efforts in the United States;
Offering restrictions were, and are, implemented;
No offer or sale was made to a U.S. person or for the account or benefit of a U.S. person;
Each purchaser of the securities certifies that it was not a U.S. person and was not acquiring the securities for the account or benefit of any U.S. person;
Each purchaser of the securities agreed to resell such securities only in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act, or pursuant to an available exemption from registration; and agreed not to engage in hedging transactions with regard to such securities unless in compliance with the Act;
The securities contain a legend to the effect that transfer is prohibited except in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S, pursuant to registration under the Act, or pursuant to an available exemption from registration; and that hedging transactions involving those securities may not be conducted unless in compliance with the Act; and
We are required, either by contract or a provision in its bylaws, articles, charter or comparable document, to refuse to register any transfer of the securities not made in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S pursuant to registration under the Act, or pursuant to an available exemption from registration; provided, however, that if any law of any Canadian province prevents us from refusing to register securities transfers, other reasonable procedures, such as a legend described in paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(B)(3) of Regulation S have been implemented to prevent any transfer of the securities not made in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S.
56
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
* Incorporated by reference to Form S-1 filed on September 2, 2008
** Incorporated by reference to Form S-1 filed on November 26, 2008
Item 17. Undertakings.
(A) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to: To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and Include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.
That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(B) The issuer is subject to Rule 430C (ss. 230. 430C of this chapter): Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(ss. 230. 424(b) of this chapter) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A (ss. 230. 430A of this chapter), shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on this 3rd day of December, 2008.
SUPATCHA RESOURCES INC.
BY:/s/ DONALD AXENT
Donald Axent, President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Director
BY:/s/ WILLIAM KOSORIS
William Kosoris, Secretary and Director
BY:/s/ BRIAN MATSUN
Brian Matsun, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Director
58