Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Unaudited Interim Financial Information The condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The accompanying condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2018 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2018. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments as necessary, for the fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2018, results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 have been made. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Company’s significant accounting policies, which are disclosed in the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the SEC on March 14, 2018. Certain amounts reported in the previous year have been recast as a result of the retrospective adoption of new accounting standards in the first quarter of 2018. Refer to Note 2 - Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, Collaboration Agreement Leases, Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, the accrual for research and development expenses and the valuation of common stock, and the derivative liability. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Revenue Recognition Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers modified retrospective transition method. Under this method, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance The Company enters into licensing agreements which are within the scope of ASC 606, under which it may exclusively license rights to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize its product candidates to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following: nonrefundable, upfront license fees; reimbursement of certain costs; customer option exercise fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales of licensed products. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Company must use significant judgment to determine: a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step (ii) above; b) the transaction price under step (iii) above; and c) the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract for the allocation of transaction price in step (iv) above. The Company uses judgment to determine whether milestones or other variable consideration should be included in the transaction price as described further below. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which the Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied. In developing the stand-alone price for a performance obligation, the Company considers applicable market conditions and relevant entity-specific factors, including factors that were contemplated in negotiating the agreement with the customer and estimated costs. The Company validates the stand-alone selling price for performance obligations by evaluating whether changes in the key assumptions used to determine the stand-alone selling prices will have a significant effect on the allocation of transaction price between multiple performance obligations. The Company records any amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria as deferred revenue. Amounts recognized as revenue, but not yet received or invoiced are recorded as current assets. Exclusive Licenses If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other promises or performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from nonrefundable, upfront fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. In assessing whether a promise or performance obligation is distinct from the other promises, the Company considers factors such as the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization capabilities of the collaboration partner and the availability of the associated expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Company considers whether the collaboration partner can benefit from a promise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining promise, whether the value of the promise is dependent on the unsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that could provide the remaining promise, and whether it is separately identifiable from the remaining promise. For licenses that are combined with other promises, the Company assesses the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. The measure of progress, and thereby periods over which revenue should be recognized, are subject to estimates by management and may change over the course of the research and development and licensing agreement. Such a change could have a material impact on the amount of revenue the Company records in future periods. Research and Development Services The promises under the Company’s collaboration and license agreements generally include research and development services to be performed by the Company on behalf of the collaboration partner. As the provision of research and development services is a part of the Company’s central operations, when the Company is principally responsible for the performance of these services under the agreements, the Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis for research and development services in accordance with the ASC 606 framework described above. Customer Options If an arrangement is determined to contain customer options that allow the customer to acquire additional goods or services, the goods and services underlying the customer options are not considered to be performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement, as they are contingent upon option exercise. The Company evaluates the customer options for material rights, or options to acquire additional goods or services for free or at a discount. If the customer options are determined to represent a material right, the material right is recognized as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Company allocates the transaction price to material rights based on the relative standalone selling price, which is determined based on the identified discount and the probability that the customer will exercise the option. Amounts allocated to a material right are not recognized as revenue until, at the earliest, the option is exercised. Milestone Payments At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial, and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment. Royalties For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on a level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). To date, the Company has not recognized any royalty revenue resulting from any of its licensing arrangements. For a complete discussion of accounting for collaboration revenues, see Note 8 - Collaboration Agreement Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which amends the guidance for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition Revenue from Contracts with Customers As a result of adopting ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the Company has recorded a cumulative-effect decrease to opening accumulated deficit of $1.1 million as of January 1, 2018 and a corresponding decrease to deferred revenue. The remaining impacts related to ASC 606 adoption were as follows (in thousands): September 30, 2018 As Reported under ASC 606 As Determined under ASC 605 Decrease upon Adoption of ASC 606 Balance Sheet: Deferred revenue, current $ — $ 617 $ (617 ) Income Statement: Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2018 1,055 1,751 (696 ) Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 2,840 4,691 (1,851 ) The most significant change related to the Company’s determination of transaction price at inception and each reporting period as well as the revenue recognition pattern for the Astellas Agreement (as defined below) with Astellas Pharma Inc. as well as treatment of variable consideration in the form of milestone payments. Under ASC 605, the research funding support payments, reimbursement of third-party costs, and milestone payments were being recognized by the Company as revenue on a straight-line basis over the 3½ year research term of the agreement, which commenced in January 2015, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research term being recognized at the time any such payments are earned. Under ASC 606, the Company is recognizing the revenue allocated to the one performance obligation measuring progress using the proportional performance method. ASU No. 2016-02 , Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases Due to the Company commencing a new lease in Boston, Massachusetts, in January 2018, the Company elected to early adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018, as permitted by the guidance in order to enhance overall transparency within financial reporting. The Company has implemented the standard using the required modified retrospective approach and has also elected to utilize the package of practical expedients. The expedients used by the Company are as follows: (1) allowing an entity to not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, (2) allowing an entity to not reassess the treatment of initial direct costs as they related to existing leases, and (3) allowing an entity to not reassess whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases. The company also elected the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the appropriate lease term and in assessing impairment of its right-of-use assets. In using the modified retrospective approach, the Company is required to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. During 2017, the Company was deemed the accounting owner of the construction project for the build-to-suit lease in Boston, Massachusetts, because of the Company’s involvement in the build-out of the space. Under the new standard, the Company is no longer considered the accounting owner of the leased space due to (1) not having the right to obtain or control the leased premises during the construction period, (2) having no right of payment for the partially constructed assets, and the leased premises are not of a specialized nature and, thus, could be potentially leased to another tenant, and (3) not legally owning or controlling the land on which the property improvements will be constructed. As such, upon transition, the existing construction-in-progress balance within property and equipment, and the corresponding build-to-suit facility lease financing obligation balance within other liabilities, current and non-current, have been derecognized. Prior period results have been restated to this effect through to the earliest period presented. The adoption of this standard has had a material impact on the Company’s financial position but did not significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. See Impacts on Previously Reported Results Impacts to Previously Reported Results The impact of the adoption of the new leasing standard on the December 31, 2017 balance sheet is as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2017 As Previously Reported New Lease Standard Adjustment As restated Operating lease right-of-use assets, net $ — $ 472 $ 472 Property and equipment, net 16,567 (16,143 ) 424 Deferred rent, current 87 (87 ) — Operating lease liabilities, current — 559 559 Other liabilities, current 902 (902 ) — Other liabilities, net of current 15,315 (15,315 ) — Accumulated deficit (216,882 ) 74 (216,808 ) ASU 2016-15 , Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires a statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of- period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This resulted in the $0.8 million and $2.0 million of restricted cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, being displayed within the overall change in the cash balance on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2017-09 , Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 719): Scope of Modification Accounting In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 719): Scope of Modification Accounting Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2018-07”). The new standard simplifies the accounting for share-based payments to nonemployees by aligning it with the accounting for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. The new standard will be effective beginning January 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2018-07 will have on its results of operations. ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement |