ICON Equipment & Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen 10-Q 14 Aug 17 2017 Q2 Quarterly report Financial data

Document and Entity Information

Document and Entity Information - shares	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Aug. 11, 2017
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	ICON Equipment & Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen, L.P.
Entity Central Index Key	1,446,806
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		258,761
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2,017
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2017

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 19,594,632	$ 19,452,937
Restricted cash	1,334,657	1,500,000
Leased equipment at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $841,967 and $416,254, respectively)	20,158,033	20,583,746
Net investment in notes receivable	9,876,498	11,571,378
Note receivable from joint venture, net	494,930	1,329,483
Investment in joint ventures	7,176,140	9,441,801
Due from General Partner and affiliates, net	30,332	0
Other assets	3,455,140	3,228,015
Total assets	108,092,204	114,131,272
Liabilities:
Non-recourse long-term debt	33,608,322	35,185,385
Deferred revenue	2,509,333	1,467,325
Due to General Partner and affiliates, net	0	204,430
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	811,400	1,216,834
Total liabilities	36,929,055	38,073,974
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Partners' equity:
Limited partners	72,743,536	77,588,121
General Partner	(1,588,036)	(1,539,101)
Total partners' equity	71,155,500	76,049,020
Noncontrolling interests	7,649	8,278
Total equity	71,163,149	76,057,298
Total liabilities and equity	108,092,204	114,131,272
Vessels
Assets
Vessel (less accumulated depreciation of $2,028,158 and $976,088, respectively)	$ 45,971,842	$ 47,023,912

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Vessel - accumulated depreciation	$ 2,028,158	$ 976,088
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease, Accumulated Depreciation	$ 841,967	$ 416,254

Consolidated Statements of Oper

Consolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Revenue and other income:
Finance income	$ 218,568	$ 341,981	$ 576,911	$ 689,642
Rental income	367,847	3,717,671	645,403	8,638,118
Pool revenue	1,188,306	0	2,441,554	0
(Loss) income from investment in joint ventures	(1,602,215)	325,120	(1,366,239)	930,484
Gain on sale of subsidiaries	0	8,721,363	0	8,721,363
Gain on sale of investment in joint ventures	0	291,990	0	291,990
Other income	7,057	60	18,144	8,060
Total revenue and other income	179,563	13,398,185	2,315,773	19,279,657
Expenses:
Management fees	25,769	233,313	216,979	558,847
Administrative expense reimbursements	281,371	358,559	599,713	679,534
General and administrative	486,120	1,123,344	1,124,896	1,605,503
Credit loss, net	834,553	4,518,842	834,553	14,361,159
Depreciation	738,892	1,729,417	1,477,783	4,018,347
Interest	460,429	1,715,048	913,267	3,116,105
Vessel operating expenses	1,213,225	716,581	2,045,428	716,581
Loss on derivative financial instruments	0	45,571	0	1,211,654
Total expenses	4,040,359	10,440,675	7,212,619	26,267,730
Net (loss) income	(3,860,796)	2,957,510	(4,896,846)	(6,988,073)
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(2,706)	1,074,552	(3,326)	1,232,698
Net (loss) income attributable to Fund Fourteen	(3,858,090)	1,882,958	(4,893,520)	(8,220,771)
Net (loss) income attributable to Fund Fourteen allocable to:
Limited partners	(3,819,509)	1,864,129	(4,844,585)	(8,138,563)
General Partner	(38,581)	18,829	(48,935)	(82,208)
Net (loss) income attributable to Fund Fourteen	$ (3,858,090)	$ 1,882,958	$ (4,893,520)	$ (8,220,771)
Weighted average number of limited partnership interests outstanding (in shares)	258,761	258,761	258,761	258,761
Net (loss) income attributable to Fund Fourteen per weighted average limited partnership interest outstanding (in dollars per share)	$ (14.76)	$ 7.20	$ (18.72)	$ (31.45)

Consolidated Statements of Chan

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity - USD ($)	Total	Noncontrolling Interests	Limited Partners	General Partner	Limited Partnership Interests
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016					258,761
Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 76,057,298	$ 8,278	$ 77,588,121	$ (1,539,101)	$ 76,049,020
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Net loss	(1,036,050)	(620)	(1,025,076)	(10,354)	$ (1,035,430)
Balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2017					258,761
Balance at Mar. 31, 2017	75,021,248	7,658	76,563,045	(1,549,455)	$ 75,013,590
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016					258,761
Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	76,057,298	8,278	77,588,121	(1,539,101)	$ 76,049,020
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Net loss	(4,896,846)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2017					258,761
Balance at Jun. 30, 2017	71,163,149	7,649	72,743,536	(1,588,036)	$ 71,155,500
Balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2017					258,761
Balance at Mar. 31, 2017	75,021,248	7,658	76,563,045	(1,549,455)	$ 75,013,590
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Net loss	(3,860,796)	(2,706)	(3,819,509)	(38,581)	$ (3,858,090)
Investment by noncontrolling interests (unaudited)	2,697	2,697
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2017					258,761
Balance at Jun. 30, 2017	$ 71,163,149	$ 7,649	$ 72,743,536	$ (1,588,036)	$ 71,155,500

Consolidated Statements of Cash

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (4,896,846)	$ (6,988,073)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Finance income, net of costs and fees	14,604	36,780
Loss (income) from investment in joint ventures	1,366,239	(930,484)
Depreciation	1,477,783	4,018,347
Credit loss, net	834,553	14,361,159
Interest expense from amortization of debt financing costs	97,937	294,640
Interest expense from amortization of seller's credit	0	234,805
Loss on derivative financial instruments	0	537,861
Gain on sale of subsidiaries	0	(8,721,363)
Gain on sale of investment in joint ventures	0	(291,990)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	165,343	0
Other assets	(227,125)	(332,823)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(405,434)	1,228,891
Deferred revenue	1,042,008	(403,561)
Due to/from General Partner and affiliates, net	(234,762)	(749,994)
Distributions from joint ventures	132,462	780,687
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(633,238)	3,074,882
Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal received on finance leases	0	4,164,553
Investment in joint ventures	0	(56)
Distributions received from joint ventures in excess of profits	766,960	5,396,007
Principal received on notes receivable	1,680,276	88,000
Proceeds from sale of subsidiaries, net of cash transferred	0	49,423,757
Proceeds from sale of investment in joint ventures	0	7,803,189
Net cash provided by investing activities	2,447,236	66,875,450
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of non-recourse long-term debt	(1,675,000)	(10,893,182)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit, recourse	0	1,500,000
Investment by noncontrolling interests	2,697	4,815
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	0	(12,330,838)
Distributions to partners	0	(10,455,010)
Net cash used in financing activities	(1,672,303)	(32,174,215)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	141,695	37,776,117
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	19,452,937	9,281,044
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	19,594,632	47,057,161
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$ 815,139	$ 2,503,142

Organization

Organization	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Organization	Organization ICON Equipment and Corporate Infrastructure Fund Fourteen, L.P. (the “Partnership”) was formed on August 20, 2008 as a Delaware limited partnership. When used in these notes to consolidated financial statements, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms refer to the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. We engaged in one business segment, the business of investing in business-essential equipment and corporate infrastructure (collectively, “Capital Assets”), including, but not limited to, Capital Assets that were already subject to lease, Capital Assets that we purchased and leased to domestic and international businesses, loans secured by Capital Assets and ownership rights to leased Capital Assets at lease expiration. Our general partner is ICON GP 14, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “General Partner”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICON Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ICON Capital”). Our General Partner manages and controls our business affairs, including, but not limited to, our investments in Capital Assets. Our General Partner has engaged ICON Capital as our investment manager (the “Investment Manager”) to, among other things, facilitate the acquisition and servicing of our investments. Our operating period commenced on May 19, 2011 and ended on May 18, 2016. On May 19, 2016, we commenced our liquidation period, during which we have sold and will continue to sell our assets and/or let our investments mature in the ordinary course of business. On May 30, 2017, our Investment Manager retained ABN AMRO Securities (USA) LLC (“ABN AMRO”) as its financial advisor to assist our Investment Manager and us in identifying, evaluating and executing a potential sale of certain shipping and offshore energy assets currently included within our investment portfolio. We, however, cannot assure that the identification or evaluation to be performed will result in any specific sale transaction or series of transactions.

Summary of Significant Accounti

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Consolidation Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. In the opinion of our General Partner, all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These consolidated financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 . The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. Restricted Cash Cash that is restricted from use in operations is generally classified as restricted cash. Classification of changes in restricted cash within the consolidated statements of cash flows depends on the predominant source of the related cash flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 , the predominant cash generated from restricted cash was related to the release of restricted cash sourced from rental receipts associated with our leasing operations that was previously restricted pursuant to certain provisions in the applicable non-recourse long-term debt agreements. As a result, this change in restricted cash was classified within cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 . Credit Quality of Notes Receivable and Finance Leases and Credit Loss Reserve Our Investment Manager monitors the ongoing credit quality of our financing receivables by (i) reviewing and analyzing a borrower’s financial performance on a regular basis, including review of financial statements received on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis as prescribed in the loan or lease agreement, (ii) tracking the relevant credit metrics of each financing receivable and a borrower’s compliance with financial and non-financial covenants, (iii) monitoring a borrower’s payment history and public credit rating, if available, and (iv) assessing our exposure based on the current investment mix. As part of the monitoring process, our Investment Manager may physically inspect the collateral or a borrower’s facility and meet with a borrower’s management to better understand such borrower’s financial performance and its future plans on an as-needed basis. As our financing receivables, generally notes receivable and finance leases, are limited in number, our Investment Manager is able to estimate the credit loss reserve based on a detailed analysis of each financing receivable as opposed to using portfolio-based metrics. Our Investment Manager does not use a system of assigning internal risk ratings to each of our financing receivables. Rather, each financing receivable is analyzed quarterly and categorized as either performing or non-performing based on certain factors including, but not limited to, financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants. A financing receivable is usually categorized as non-performing only when a borrower experiences financial difficulties and has failed to make scheduled payments. Our Investment Manager then analyzes whether the financing receivable should be placed on a non-accrual status, a credit loss reserve should be established or the financing receivable should be restructured. As part of the assessment, updated collateral value is usually considered and such collateral value can be based on a third party industry expert appraisal or, depending on the type of collateral and accessibility to relevant published guides or market sales data, internally derived fair value. Material events would be specifically disclosed in the discussion of each financing receivable held. Financing receivables are generally placed on a non-accrual status when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, our Investment Manager periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with payments outstanding less than 90 days and based upon our Investment Manager’s judgment, these accounts may be placed on a non-accrual status. In accordance with the cost recovery method, payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are applied to principal if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal. If collection of the principal of non-accrual financing receivables is not in doubt, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Financing receivables on non-accrual status may not be restored to accrual status until all delinquent payments have been received, and we believe recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. When our Investment Manager deems it is probable that we will not be able to collect all contractual principal and interest on a non-performing financing receivable, we perform an analysis to determine if a credit loss reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the financing receivable, and/or the collateral value of the asset underlying the financing receivable when financing receivable repayment is collateral dependent. If it is determined that the impaired value of the non-performing financing receivable is less than the net carrying value, we will recognize a credit loss reserve or adjust the existing credit loss reserve with a corresponding charge to earnings. We then charge off a financing receivable in the period that it is deemed uncollectible by reducing the credit loss reserve and the balance of the financing receivable. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging: Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships (“ASU 2016-05”), which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. We adopted ASU 2016-05 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”), which eliminates the retroactive adjustments to an investment upon it qualifying for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence by the investor. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment qualifies for equity method accounting. We adopted ASU 2016-07 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In October 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (“ASU 2016-17”), which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity should treat indirect interests in such entity held by related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that variable interest entity. Under ASU 2016-17, a single decision maker is not required to consider indirect interests held by related parties that are under common control with the single decision maker to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. We adopted ASU 2016-17 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), requiring revenue to be recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for goods and services. This new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year. Under such deferral, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before our original effective date of January 1, 2017. Our evaluation of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements is ongoing and our implementation efforts have included the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance and the evaluation of applicable revenue contracts. We continue to evaluate the timing of recognition of various revenue; however, since a substantial portion of our revenue is recognized from our leasing contracts, which is subject to ASU 2016-02 (as defined below), such revenue is excluded from our evaluation of ASU 2014-09. In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms greater than twelve months on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 implements changes to lessor accounting focused on conforming with certain changes made to lessee accounting and the recently released revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. Based on our preliminary assessment, most, if not all, of our leases are subject to lessor accounting and the accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under current U.S. GAAP. We continue to evaluate the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of credit losses by eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold set forth in current guidance, and instead reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-15 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements. In November 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-18 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-18 on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 sets forth requirements to be met for a set to be deemed a business and establishes a practical way to determine when a set is not a business. To be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output, and removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. In addition, ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of outputs and aligns such definition with how outputs are described within the revenue guidance. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that occur before the issuance date or effective date of ASU 2017-01 to the extent that such transactions have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

Net Investment in Notes Receiva

Net Investment in Notes Receivable	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Receivables [Abstract]
Net Investment in Notes Receivable	Net Investment in Notes Receivable As of June 30, 2017 , we had investment in notes receivable on non-accrual status of $36,894,036 , of which $33,393,546 had been reserved. As of December 31, 2016 , we had investment in notes receivable on non-accrual status of $33,393,546 , which had been fully reserved. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our note receivable related to Jurong Aromatics Corporation Pte. Ltd. (“JAC”) totaled $33,393,546 , which had been fully reserved. On December 22, 2011, a joint venture owned 75% by us and 25% by ICON Leasing Fund Twelve Liquidating Trust (formerly, ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC) (“Fund Twelve”), an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, made a $20,124,000 subordinated term loan to JAC as part of a $171,050,000 term loan facility. The loan initially bore interest at rates ranging between 12.5% and 15% per year and matures in January 2021 . As a result of JAC’s failure to make an expected payment that was due to the joint venture during the three months ended March 31, 2015, the interest rate payable by JAC under the loan increased from 12.5% to 15.5% . The loan is secured by a second priority security interest in all of JAC’s assets, which include, among other things, all equipment, plant and machinery associated with a condensate splitter and aromatics complex. During 2015, JAC experienced liquidity constraints as a result of a general economic slow-down in China and India, which led to lower demand from such countries, as well as the price decline of energy and other commodities. As a result, JAC’s manufacturing facility ceased operations and JAC was not able to service interest payments under the loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, an expected tolling arrangement with JAC’s suppliers that would have allowed JAC’s manufacturing facility to resume operations did not commence as originally anticipated. Accordingly, our Investment Manager determined that there was doubt regarding our ultimate collectability of the loan. Commencing with the three months ended June 30, 2015, our Investment Manager placed the loan on non-accrual status, ceased recognizing finance income and began recording credit losses. Subsequently, discussions among the senior lenders and certain other stakeholders of JAC regarding a restructuring plan ended as the senior lenders did not agree to amendments to their credit facilities as part of the broader restructuring that was being contemplated. As a result, JAC entered receivership on September 28, 2015. In July 2016, the tolling arrangement was implemented and the manufacturing facility resumed operations. Although JAC's manufacturing facility has resumed operations, no debt payments have been made or are expected to be made by JAC to us while operating under the tolling arrangement. As part of the tolling arrangement and the receivership process, JAC incurred additional senior debt, which could be up to $55,000,000 , to fund its operations as well as any receivership-related costs. As a result, as of June 30, 2016, our Investment Manager determined that we should fully reserve the outstanding balance of the loan due from JAC. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Receiver formally commenced the process of marketing JAC's manufacturing facility for sale. Our Investment Manager continues to closely monitor the operations of JAC, the receivership process and the sale process of the manufacturing facility through regular communications with the Receiver and certain other stakeholders. We did no t recognize any finance income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our net investment in note receivable related to JAC was $0 . As of June 30, 2017 , our net investment in note receivable and accrued interest related to four affiliates of Técnicas Maritimas Avanzadas, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, “TMA”) totaled $ 3,500,490 and $ 1,064,668 , respectively, of which an aggregate of $ 1,807,471 was over 90 days past due. As of December 31, 2016 , our net investment in note receivable and accrued interest related to TMA totaled $ 3,500,490 and $ 953,389 , respectively, of which an aggregate of $ 1,380,312 was over 90 days past due. TMA has been in technical default due to its failure to cause all four platform supply vessels to be under contract by March 31, 2015 and in payment default while available cash has been swept by the senior lender and applied to the senior tranche of the facility (the "Senior Loan") in accordance with the secured term loan credit facility agreement. As a result, the principal balance of the Senior Loan was paid down at a faster rate. In January 2016, the remaining two previously unchartered vessels had commenced employment. Based on, among other things, TMA’s payment history and estimated collateral value as of June 30, 2017 , our Investment Manager believes it is likely that all outstanding principal and accrued interest under our tranche of the facility (the "ICON Loan") as of June 30, 2017 are collectible. However, our Investment Manager believes it is prudent to place the note receivable on non-accrual status during the three months ended June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our share of the collateral value, net of the balance of the Senior Loan, was estimated to be approximately $ 1,900,000 and $ 800,000 , respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 , we recognized finance income of $0 and $111,279 , respectively, of which no amount was recognized on a cash basis. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , we recognized finance income of $124,296 and $252,673 , respectively, of which no amount was recognized on a cash basis. Net investment in notes receivable consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Principal outstanding (1) $ 42,019,226 $ 43,699,502 Initial direct costs 2,319,747 2,414,038 Deferred fees (1,068,929 ) (1,148,616 ) Credit loss reserve (2) (33,393,546 ) (33,393,546 ) Net investment in notes receivable (3) $ 9,876,498 $ 11,571,378 (1) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , total principal outstanding related to our impaired loan of $31,788,011 was related to JAC. (2) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the credit loss reserve of $33,393,546 was related to JAC. (3) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , net investment in note receivable related to our impaired loan was $0 . On January 24, 2017 , Asphalt Carrier Shipping Company Limited ("Asphalt") satisfied its obligations in connection with a secured term loan scheduled to mature on December 31, 2018 by making a prepayment of $1,731,830 , comprised of all outstanding principal, accrued interest and a prepayment fee of $81,400 . The prepayment fee was recognized as additional finance income. Credit loss allowance activities for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of March 31, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Provisions — Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the three months ended June 30, 2016 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of March 31, 2016 $ 28,621,458 Provisions 4,772,088 Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2016 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of December 31, 2016 $ 33,393,546 Provisions — Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of December 31, 2015 $ 28,621,458 Provisions 4,772,088 Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2016 $ 33,393,546

Leased Equipment at Cost

Leased Equipment at Cost	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
Leased Equipment at Cost	Leased Equipment at Cost Leased equipment at cost consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Marine - dry bulk vessels $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 Less: accumulated depreciation 841,967 416,254 Leased equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation $ 20,158,033 $ 20,583,746 Depreciation expense was $212,857 and $1,729,417 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Depreciation expense was $425,713 and $4,018,347 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Vessel On July 14, 2016, we entered the Shamrock (f/k/a the Center) into a pooling arrangement, Stena Sonangol Suezmax Pool LLC (the "Stena Pooling Arrangement"), with other crude oil tankers owned by unaffiliated third parties. The term of the pooling arrangement is for at least 12 months , after which the time charter and participation of the vessel in the pool may be terminated by either party at any time. As part of the Stena Pooling Arrangement, we are entitled to receive a monthly distribution, calculated on a time charter equivalent basis, whereby net pool earnings are allocated to each pool participant according to an agreed upon formula based on, among other things, the number of days a vessel operates in the pool and other technical characteristics, such as speed and fuel consumption. The Stena Pooling Arrangement also includes a shortfall provision that will require us to pay back a portion of the monthly distribution received upon certain criteria being met if we remove the vessel from the pool. The shortfall provision expires on July 14, 2018. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the total amount subject to the shortfall provision of $ 2,509,333 and $ 1,467,325 , respectively, was recognized as deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets. Monthly distributions, net of the amount subject to the shortfall provision, are recognized as pool revenue on our consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation expense was $526,035 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Depreciation expense was $1,052,070 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

Vessel

Vessel	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
Vessel	Leased Equipment at Cost Leased equipment at cost consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Marine - dry bulk vessels $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 Less: accumulated depreciation 841,967 416,254 Leased equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation $ 20,158,033 $ 20,583,746 Depreciation expense was $212,857 and $1,729,417 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Depreciation expense was $425,713 and $4,018,347 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Vessel On July 14, 2016, we entered the Shamrock (f/k/a the Center) into a pooling arrangement, Stena Sonangol Suezmax Pool LLC (the "Stena Pooling Arrangement"), with other crude oil tankers owned by unaffiliated third parties. The term of the pooling arrangement is for at least 12 months , after which the time charter and participation of the vessel in the pool may be terminated by either party at any time. As part of the Stena Pooling Arrangement, we are entitled to receive a monthly distribution, calculated on a time charter equivalent basis, whereby net pool earnings are allocated to each pool participant according to an agreed upon formula based on, among other things, the number of days a vessel operates in the pool and other technical characteristics, such as speed and fuel consumption. The Stena Pooling Arrangement also includes a shortfall provision that will require us to pay back a portion of the monthly distribution received upon certain criteria being met if we remove the vessel from the pool. The shortfall provision expires on July 14, 2018. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the total amount subject to the shortfall provision of $ 2,509,333 and $ 1,467,325 , respectively, was recognized as deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets. Monthly distributions, net of the amount subject to the shortfall provision, are recognized as pool revenue on our consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation expense was $526,035 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Depreciation expense was $1,052,070 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , respectively.

Investment in Joint Ventures

Investment in Joint Ventures	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]
Investments in Joint Ventures	Investment in Joint Ventures On December 19, 2011, a joint venture owned 40% by us and 60% by ICON ECI Fund Fifteen, L.P. ("Fund Fifteen"), an entity also managed by our Investment Manager, agreed to purchase an offshore support vessel, the AMC Ambassador (f/k/a the Lewek Ambassador), from Ezram LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ezra Holdings Limited ("Ezra"). The joint venture entered into a bareboat charter with Gallatin Marine Management, LLC ("Gallatin") for a period of nine years to commence on the delivery date of the vessel. Gallatin's obligations under the bareboat charter are guaranteed by Ezra. The vessel was delivered on June 4, 2012 and the purchase price was set at $24,869,000 . The joint venture financed the purchase price through a combination of related party notes payable, non-recourse long-term debt and equity. In May 2016, Gallatin began paying its monthly charter payments late and all charter payments ceased since the payment due in December 2016. In December 2016, Ezra hired a restructuring advisor. In January 2017, our Investment Manager was informed that, following a deterioration of Ezra’s and its affiliated companies’ financial condition during the fourth quarter of 2016, payments under the bareboat charter could no longer be reasonably expected to be made. On February 6, 2017, EMAS Chiyoda Subsea Limited (“EMAS”), the time charterer of the vessel, filed a petition in Singapore to wind up and liquidate the company. In addition, Ezra may become subject to a winding up order in Singapore. On February 27, 2017, both Gallatin and EMAS commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. On March 7, 2017, Gallatin and EMAS filed a motion with the bankruptcy court to reject the bareboat and time charters. On March 18, 2017, Ezra commenced a voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York. Consequently, as of December 31, 2016, our Investment Manager assessed the joint venture’s collectability of the finance lease based on the estimated fair market value of the vessel provided by an independent third party appraiser. As a result, the joint venture recorded a credit loss of $7,271,958 to write down its net investment in finance lease related to the vessel to $ 8,000,000 . We were only allocated $1,306,625 of such credit loss as our investment in the joint venture was written down to zero . During the three months ended December 31, 2016 , the joint venture placed the lease on non-accrual status and ceased to recognize finance income. In April 2017, the bankruptcy court approved the motion filed by Gallatin and EMAS to reject the bareboat and time charters with an effective date of March 12, 2017. As a result, the bareboat and time charters were deemed terminated as of such date. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 , the joint venture repossessed the AMC Ambassador. Our Investment Manager i s currently seeking new charter proposals to re-employ the vessel as well as exploring a potential sale of the vessel. As part of this process, the joint venture obtained an updated third-party appraisal for the vessel, which provided an estimated fair value for the vessel that was below its net book value. As a result, the joint venture recorded an additional impairment loss of $2,000,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 , of which no impairment loss was allocated to us as our investment in the joint venture was previously written down to zero . As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our total net investment in joint venture related to the AMC Ambassador was $0 . For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 , the joint venture recognized finance income of $156,975 , which was recognized on a cash basis. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , the joint venture recognized finance income of $481,964 and $981,370 , respectively, of which no amount was recognized on a cash basis. On June 12, 2014, a joint venture owned 12.5% by us, 75% by Fund Twelve and 12.5% by Fund Fifteen purchased an offshore supply vessel from Pacific Crest Pte. Ltd. (“Pacific Crest”) for $40,000,000 . Simultaneously, the vessel was bareboat chartered to Pacific Crest for ten years. The vessel was acquired for approximately $12,000,000 in cash, $26,000,000 of financing through a senior secured loan from DVB Group Merchant Bank (Asia) Ltd. (“DVB”) and $2,000,000 of financing through a subordinated, non-interest-bearing seller’s credit. In July 2017, Pacific Crest failed to make its monthly charter payment and our Investment Manager was advised that Pacific Crest is engaged in discussions with its lenders regarding a potential restructuring of its outstanding debt obligations. As a result, the joint venture performed an impairment test on the vessel. Based on such test, the joint venture recorded an impairment loss of $14,661,525 , of which we were only allocated $1,758,586 of such impairment loss during the three months ended June 30, 2017 as our investment in the joint venture was written down to zero . Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Revenue $ 1,164,394 $ 1,164,394 $ 2,328,788 $ 2,328,788 Net (loss) income $ (14,432,528 ) $ 212,810 $ (14,191,504 ) $ 423,146 Our share of net (loss) income $ (1,729,548 ) $ 27,070 $ (1,698,951 ) $ 53,831

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt	Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , we had the following non-recourse long-term debt: Counterparty June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Maturity Rate DVB Bank SE $ 34,187,500 $ 35,862,500 2021 LIBOR + 3.50% and LIBOR + 3.85% Less: debt issuance costs 579,178 677,115 Total non-recourse long-term debt $ 33,608,322 $ 35,185,385 As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , our non-recourse long-term debt obligations were $33,608,322 and $ 35,185,385 , respectively. All of our non-recourse long-term debt obligations consist of notes payable in which the lender has a security interest in the underlying assets. If the borrower was to default on the underlying lease or loan, resulting in our default on the non-recourse long-term debt, the assets could be foreclosed upon and the proceeds would be remitted to the lender in extinguishment of that debt. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the total carrying value of assets subject to non-recourse long-term debt was $66,129,875 and $67,607,658 , respectively. As of June 30, 2017 , we were in compliance with the covenants related to our non-recourse long-term debt. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , we recognized interest expense of $49,308 and $133,721 , respectively, related to the amortization of debt financing costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , we recognized interest expense of $97,937 and $294,640 , respectively, related to the amortization of debt financing costs.

Transactions with Related Parti

Transactions with Related Parties	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Transactions with Related Parties	Transactions with Related Parties We did not pay distributions to our General Partner for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 . We paid distributions to our General Partner of $52,275 and $104,550 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. Our General Partner’s interest in the net loss attributable to us was $38,581 and $48,935 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 , respectively. Our General Partner’s interest in the net income (loss) attributable to us was $18,829 and $(82,208) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively. Effective May 1, 2017, our Investment Manager has waived all future management fees. Fees and other expenses incurred by us to our General Partner or its affiliates were as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, Entity Capacity Description 2017 2016 2017 2016 ICON Capital, LLC Investment Manager Management fees (1) $ 25,769 $ 233,313 $ 216,979 $ 558,847 ICON Capital, LLC Investment Manager Administrative expense reimbursements (1) 281,371 358,559 599,713 679,534 $ 307,140 $ 591,872 $ 816,692 $ 1,238,381 (1) Amount charged directly to operations. At June 30, 2017 , we had a net receivable of $30,332 due from our General Partner and affiliates, which primarily consisted of administrative expense reimbursements due from our Investment Manager. At December 31, 2016 , we had a net payable of $204,430 due to our General Partner and affiliates, which primarily consisted of administrative expense reimbursements due to our Investment Manager. We have a note receivable from a joint venture related to the AMC Ambassador. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance of the note receivable was $494,930 , net of an aggregate credit loss reserve of $2,349,051 . As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance of the note receivable was $ 1,329,483 , net of an aggregate credit loss reserve of $1,514,498 . During the three months ended December 31, 2016 , the joint venture wrote down its net investment in finance lease (see Note 6). As a result, our Investment Manager assessed the collectability of the note receivable due from the joint venture by considering the fair market value of the vessel and the balance of the joint venture’s non-recourse long-term debt associated with the vessel, which has priority over our related party note receivable. A credit loss reserve of $1,514,498 was recorded based on such assessment and the related party note receivable was placed on non-accrual status during the three months ended December 31, 2016 . Our Investment Manager reassessed the collectability of the note receivable at each reporting date using the same approach and due to a decrease in the fair market value of the vessel, we recorded an additional credit loss reserve of $834,553 during the three months ended June 30, 2017. No interest income was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as the note receivable was placed on non-accrual status during the three months ended December 31, 2016. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 , we recognized interest income of $ 102,221 and $ 204,590 , respectively, of which no amount was recognized on a cash basis. The interest income is included in finance income on our consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Fair Value Measurements	Fair Value Measurements Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: · Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. · Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. · Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable and are supported by little or no market data. Assets for which Fair Value is Disclosed Our fixed-rate notes receivable, for which fair value is required to be disclosed, were valued using inputs that are generally unobservable and are supported by little or no market data and are therefore classified within Level 3. Under U.S. GAAP, we use projected cash flows for fair value measurements of these financial assets. Fair value information with respect to certain of our other assets and liabilities is not separately provided since (i) U.S. GAAP does not require fair value disclosures of lease arrangements and (ii) the carrying value of financial assets and liabilities, other than lease-related investments, approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities and/or variable interest rates. The estimated fair value of our fixed-rate notes receivable was based on the discounted value of future cash flows related to the loans at inception, adjusted for changes in certain variables, including, but not limited to, credit quality, industry, financial markets and other recent comparables. The fair value of the principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable was derived using discount rates ranging between 8.0% and 25.9% as of June 30, 2017 . June 30, 2017 Carrying Fair Value Value (Level 3) Principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable $ 10,726,145 $ 9,974,586

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies At the time we acquire or divest our interest in Capital Assets, we may, under very limited circumstances, agree to indemnify the seller or buyer for specific contingent liabilities. Our General Partner believes that any liability of ours that may arise as a result of any such indemnification obligations may or may not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. In addition, at times we may seek to enforce our rights under a personal guaranty in order to collect amounts from the guarantor that are owed to us by a defaulting borrower or lessee. Gain contingencies may arise from enforcement of such guaranty, but are not recognized until realizable. We are currently seeking to recover a judgment issued in our favor against a guarantor covering amounts owed to us related to a secured term loan to Kanza Construction, Inc. (“Kanza”). On September 27, 2016, we commenced a legal proceeding against Center Navigation Ltd. (“Center Navigation”) and Geden Holdings Ltd. (“Geden”) seeking monetary damages incurred as a result of their failure to meet their payment and performance obligations under the charter and guaranty, respectively, related to the Center. In connection with certain debt obligations, we are required to maintain restricted cash balances with certain banks. At June 30, 2017 , we had restricted cash of $1,334,657 .

Subsequent Event

Subsequent Event	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Event	Subsequent Event On July 21, 2017, Blackhawk Mining, LLC and its affiliates (collectively, “Blackhawk”) satisfied their remaining lease obligations by making a prepayment of $7,753,666 . As a result, the joint venture recognized finance income of approximately $353,000 , of which our share was approximately $53,000 .

Summary of Significant Accoun18

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation	Basis of Presentation and Consolidation Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. In the opinion of our General Partner, all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These consolidated financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 . The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
Restricted Cash	Restricted Cash Cash that is restricted from use in operations is generally classified as restricted cash. Classification of changes in restricted cash within the consolidated statements of cash flows depends on the predominant source of the related cash flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 , the predominant cash generated from restricted cash was related to the release of restricted cash sourced from rental receipts associated with our leasing operations that was previously restricted pursuant to certain provisions in the applicable non-recourse long-term debt agreements. As a result, this change in restricted cash was classified within cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 .
Credit Quality of Notes Receivable and Finance Leases and Credit Loss Reserve	Credit Quality of Notes Receivable and Finance Leases and Credit Loss Reserve Our Investment Manager monitors the ongoing credit quality of our financing receivables by (i) reviewing and analyzing a borrower’s financial performance on a regular basis, including review of financial statements received on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis as prescribed in the loan or lease agreement, (ii) tracking the relevant credit metrics of each financing receivable and a borrower’s compliance with financial and non-financial covenants, (iii) monitoring a borrower’s payment history and public credit rating, if available, and (iv) assessing our exposure based on the current investment mix. As part of the monitoring process, our Investment Manager may physically inspect the collateral or a borrower’s facility and meet with a borrower’s management to better understand such borrower’s financial performance and its future plans on an as-needed basis. As our financing receivables, generally notes receivable and finance leases, are limited in number, our Investment Manager is able to estimate the credit loss reserve based on a detailed analysis of each financing receivable as opposed to using portfolio-based metrics. Our Investment Manager does not use a system of assigning internal risk ratings to each of our financing receivables. Rather, each financing receivable is analyzed quarterly and categorized as either performing or non-performing based on certain factors including, but not limited to, financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants. A financing receivable is usually categorized as non-performing only when a borrower experiences financial difficulties and has failed to make scheduled payments. Our Investment Manager then analyzes whether the financing receivable should be placed on a non-accrual status, a credit loss reserve should be established or the financing receivable should be restructured. As part of the assessment, updated collateral value is usually considered and such collateral value can be based on a third party industry expert appraisal or, depending on the type of collateral and accessibility to relevant published guides or market sales data, internally derived fair value. Material events would be specifically disclosed in the discussion of each financing receivable held. Financing receivables are generally placed on a non-accrual status when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, our Investment Manager periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with payments outstanding less than 90 days and based upon our Investment Manager’s judgment, these accounts may be placed on a non-accrual status. In accordance with the cost recovery method, payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are applied to principal if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal. If collection of the principal of non-accrual financing receivables is not in doubt, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Financing receivables on non-accrual status may not be restored to accrual status until all delinquent payments have been received, and we believe recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. When our Investment Manager deems it is probable that we will not be able to collect all contractual principal and interest on a non-performing financing receivable, we perform an analysis to determine if a credit loss reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the financing receivable, and/or the collateral value of the asset underlying the financing receivable when financing receivable repayment is collateral dependent. If it is determined that the impaired value of the non-performing financing receivable is less than the net carrying value, we will recognize a credit loss reserve or adjust the existing credit loss reserve with a corresponding charge to earnings. We then charge off a financing receivable in the period that it is deemed uncollectible by reducing the credit loss reserve and the balance of the financing receivable.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging: Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships (“ASU 2016-05”), which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. We adopted ASU 2016-05 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”), which eliminates the retroactive adjustments to an investment upon it qualifying for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence by the investor. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment qualifies for equity method accounting. We adopted ASU 2016-07 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. In October 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Consolidation (“ASU 2016-17”), which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity should treat indirect interests in such entity held by related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that variable interest entity. Under ASU 2016-17, a single decision maker is not required to consider indirect interests held by related parties that are under common control with the single decision maker to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. We adopted ASU 2016-17 on January 1, 2017, which did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), requiring revenue to be recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for goods and services. This new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers implementation of ASU 2014-09 by one year. Under such deferral, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but not before our original effective date of January 1, 2017. Our evaluation of the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements is ongoing and our implementation efforts have included the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance and the evaluation of applicable revenue contracts. We continue to evaluate the timing of recognition of various revenue; however, since a substantial portion of our revenue is recognized from our leasing contracts, which is subject to ASU 2016-02 (as defined below), such revenue is excluded from our evaluation of ASU 2014-09. In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”), which provides guidance related to accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms greater than twelve months on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 implements changes to lessor accounting focused on conforming with certain changes made to lessee accounting and the recently released revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. Based on our preliminary assessment, most, if not all, of our leases are subject to lessor accounting and the accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under current U.S. GAAP. We continue to evaluate the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of credit losses by eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold set forth in current guidance, and instead reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-13 through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-15 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated financial statements. In November 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. An entity will apply the amendments within ASU 2016-18 using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-18 on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (“ASU 2017-01”), which clarifies the definition of a business. ASU 2017-01 sets forth requirements to be met for a set to be deemed a business and establishes a practical way to determine when a set is not a business. To be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create an output, and removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. In addition, ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of outputs and aligns such definition with how outputs are described within the revenue guidance. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 becomes effective for us on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that occur before the issuance date or effective date of ASU 2017-01 to the extent that such transactions have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

Net Investment in Notes Recei19

Net Investment in Notes Receivable (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Receivables [Abstract]
Net investment in notes receivable	Net investment in notes receivable consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Principal outstanding (1) $ 42,019,226 $ 43,699,502 Initial direct costs 2,319,747 2,414,038 Deferred fees (1,068,929 ) (1,148,616 ) Credit loss reserve (2) (33,393,546 ) (33,393,546 ) Net investment in notes receivable (3) $ 9,876,498 $ 11,571,378 (1) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , total principal outstanding related to our impaired loan of $31,788,011 was related to JAC. (2) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the credit loss reserve of $33,393,546 was related to JAC. (3) As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , net investment in note receivable related to our impaired loan was $0 .
Credit Loss Allowance Activities	Credit loss allowance activities for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of March 31, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Provisions — Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the three months ended June 30, 2016 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of March 31, 2016 $ 28,621,458 Provisions 4,772,088 Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2016 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of December 31, 2016 $ 33,393,546 Provisions — Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2017 $ 33,393,546 Credit loss allowance activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were as follows: Credit Loss Allowance Allowance for credit loss as of December 31, 2015 $ 28,621,458 Provisions 4,772,088 Write-offs, net of recoveries — Allowance for credit loss as of June 30, 2016 $ 33,393,546

Leased Equipment at Cost (Table

Leased Equipment at Cost (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
Leased equipment at cost	Leased equipment at cost consisted of the following: June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Marine - dry bulk vessels $ 21,000,000 $ 21,000,000 Less: accumulated depreciation 841,967 416,254 Leased equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation $ 20,158,033 $ 20,583,746

Investment in Joint Ventures (T

Investment in Joint Ventures (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]
Equity Method Investments	Information as to the results of operations of this joint venture is summarized as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Revenue $ 1,164,394 $ 1,164,394 $ 2,328,788 $ 2,328,788 Net (loss) income $ (14,432,528 ) $ 212,810 $ (14,191,504 ) $ 423,146 Our share of net (loss) income $ (1,729,548 ) $ 27,070 $ (1,698,951 ) $ 53,831

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Ta

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of Long-Term Debt	As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , we had the following non-recourse long-term debt: Counterparty June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 Maturity Rate DVB Bank SE $ 34,187,500 $ 35,862,500 2021 LIBOR + 3.50% and LIBOR + 3.85% Less: debt issuance costs 579,178 677,115 Total non-recourse long-term debt $ 33,608,322 $ 35,185,385

Transactions with Related Par23

Transactions with Related Parties (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Fees and expenses paid or accrued	Fees and other expenses incurred by us to our General Partner or its affiliates were as follows: Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, Entity Capacity Description 2017 2016 2017 2016 ICON Capital, LLC Investment Manager Management fees (1) $ 25,769 $ 233,313 $ 216,979 $ 558,847 ICON Capital, LLC Investment Manager Administrative expense reimbursements (1) 281,371 358,559 599,713 679,534 $ 307,140 $ 591,872 $ 816,692 $ 1,238,381 (1) Amount charged directly to operations.

Fair Value Measurements (Tables

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Carrying values and estimated fair values of debt instruments	June 30, 2017 Carrying Fair Value Value (Level 3) Principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable $ 10,726,145 $ 9,974,586

Organization (Details)

Organization (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017segment
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Number of reportable segments	1

Summary of Significant Accoun26

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Accounts in non-accrual status, minimum	90 days
Periodic review of creditworthiness of companies, maximum	90 days

Net Investment in Notes Recei27

Net Investment in Notes Receivable (Narrative) (Details)	Jan. 24, 2017USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2016vessel	Mar. 31, 2015vessel	Jun. 30, 2017USD ($)affiliate	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017USD ($)affiliate	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2017USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 22, 2011USD ($)
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Credit loss reserve				$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 28,621,458
Finance income				218,568	341,981	576,911	689,642
Net investment in notes receivable				9,876,498		9,876,498			11,571,378
Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Notes receivable on non-accrual status				36,894,036		36,894,036
Credit loss reserve									33,393,546
ICON Fund Fourteen
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage											75.00%
Icon Fund Twelve
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage											25.00%
JAC
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Credit loss reserve				33,393,546		33,393,546			33,393,546
Face amount of loans funded											$ 171,050,000
Stated interest rate			15.50%
Senior notes				55,000,000		55,000,000
Finance income				0
JAC | Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Face amount of loans funded											$ 20,124,000
Finance income					0	0	0
Net investment in notes receivable				$ 0		$ 0			0
JAC | Minimum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Stated interest rate											12.50%
JAC | Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Stated interest rate											15.00%
TMA
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Financing receivable, recorded investment, past due									3,500,490
Accrued investment income receivable									953,389
Due past 90 days net investments in notes receivable									1,380,312
Number of under contract supply vessels | vessel			4
Number of unchartered vessels | vessel		2
TMA | Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Number of affiliates | affiliate				4		4
Financing receivable, recorded investment, past due				$ 3,500,490		$ 3,500,490
Accrued investment income receivable				1,064,668		1,064,668
Due past 90 days net investments in notes receivable				1,807,471		1,807,471
TMA | ICON Fund Fourteen
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Senior notes				1,900,000		1,900,000			$ 800,000
Finance income				$ 0	124,296	111,279	252,673
Financing income, cash basis					$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Asphalt Carrier Shipping Company
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Proceeds from loan receivable	$ 1,731,830
Prepayment fee	$ 81,400

Net Investment in Notes Recei28

Net Investment in Notes Receivable (Reconciliation) (Details) - USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Principal outstanding	$ 42,019,226		$ 43,699,502
Initial direct costs	2,319,747		2,414,038
Deferred fees	(1,068,929)		(1,148,616)
Credit loss reserve	(33,393,546)	$ (33,393,546)	(33,393,546)	$ (33,393,546)	$ (28,621,458)
Net investment in notes receivable	9,876,498		11,571,378
JAC
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Credit loss reserve	(33,393,546)		(33,393,546)
Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Credit loss reserve			(33,393,546)
Impaired financing receivable, recorded investment	0		0
Notes Receivable | JAC
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Net investment in notes receivable	0		0
Impaired financing receivable, unpaid principal balance	$ 31,788,011		$ 31,788,011

Net Investment in Notes Recei29

Net Investment in Notes Receivable (Credit Loss Allowance Activity) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Roll Forward]
Beginning balance		$ 33,393,546	$ 28,621,458
Provisions		0	4,772,088
Write-offs, net of recoveries	$ 0	0
Ending balance	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546	$ 33,393,546

Leased Equipment At Cost (Lease

Leased Equipment At Cost (Lease Equipment Reconciliation) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net, by Type [Abstract]
Less: accumulated depreciation	$ 841,967		$ 841,967		$ 416,254
Leased equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation	20,158,033		20,158,033		20,583,746
Depreciation	738,892	$ 1,729,417	1,477,783	$ 4,018,347
Marine - dry bulk vessels
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net, by Type [Abstract]
Leased equipment at cost	21,000,000		21,000,000		21,000,000
Less: accumulated depreciation	841,967		841,967		416,254
Leased equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation	20,158,033		20,158,033		$ 20,583,746
Leased equipment at cost
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net, by Type [Abstract]
Depreciation	$ 212,857	$ 1,729,417	$ 425,713	$ 4,018,347

Vessel (Details)

Vessel (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Pooling arrangement term (at least)			12 months
Deferred revenue	$ 2,509,333		$ 2,509,333		$ 1,467,325
Depreciation	738,892	$ 1,729,417	1,477,783	$ 4,018,347
Vessels
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciation	$ 526,035	$ 0	$ 1,052,070	$ 0

Investment in Joint Ventures (N

Investment in Joint Ventures (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)	Jun. 12, 2014	Jun. 04, 2012	Dec. 20, 2011	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 19, 2011
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Credit loss				$ 834,553	$ 1,514,498
Investment in joint ventures				7,176,140	9,441,801		$ 7,176,140		$ 9,441,801
Finance income				218,568		$ 341,981	576,911	$ 689,642
(Loss) income from investment in joint ventures				(1,602,215)		325,120	(1,366,239)	930,484
Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Lease term period			9 years
Equipment purchase value		$ 24,869,000
Fund Fourteen | Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage										40.00%
Fund Fifteen | Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage										60.00%
Offshore Supply Vessel
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equipment purchase value	$ 40,000,000
Charter period	10 years
Payments to acquire property	$ 12,000,000
Offshore Supply Vessel | Fund Fourteen
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage	12.50%
Offshore Supply Vessel | Fund Fifteen
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage	12.50%
Offshore Supply Vessel | ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage	75.00%
AMC
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Finance income						481,964	156,975	981,370
Financing income, cash basis						0		0
AMC | Vessels | Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net investment in finance leases					8,000,000				8,000,000
Investment in joint ventures					0				0
Capital lease impairment				2,000,000			2,000,000
AMC | Vessels | Fund Fourteen | Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Credit loss									1,306,625
Investment in joint ventures				0	$ 0		0		0
Capital lease impairment				0			0
AMC | Minimum | Vessels | Gallatin Maritime Management
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Credit loss									$ 7,271,958
Pacific Crest
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Property and equipment impairment				14,661,525
Pacific Crest | Fund Fourteen
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Investment in joint ventures				0			0
(Loss) income from investment in joint ventures				(1,729,548)		$ 27,070	$ (1,698,951)	$ 53,831
Property and equipment impairment				$ 1,758,586
Senior Subordinated Loans | Offshore Supply Vessel
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Long term debt	$ 26,000,000
Subordinated Debt | Offshore Supply Vessel
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Long term debt	$ 2,000,000

Investment in Joint Ventures (S

Investment in Joint Ventures (Schedule of Equity Investments) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net (loss) income	$ (1,602,215)	$ 325,120	$ (1,366,239)	$ 930,484
Pacific Crest
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Revenue	1,164,394	1,164,394	2,328,788	2,328,788
Equity Method Investment, Summarized Financial Information, Net Income (Loss)	(14,432,528)	212,810	(14,191,504)	423,146
Pacific Crest | Fund Fourteen
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Net (loss) income	$ (1,729,548)	$ 27,070	$ (1,698,951)	$ 53,831

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Sc

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Schedule of Long-Term Debt) (Details) - USD ($)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Less: debt issuance costs	$ 579,178	$ 677,115
Total non-recourse long-term debt	33,608,322	35,185,385
DVB Bank SE
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long term debt	$ 34,187,500	$ 35,862,500
Minimum | DVB Bank SE
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Basis spread rate	3.50%
Maximum | DVB Bank SE
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Basis spread rate	3.85%

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Na

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt (Narrative) (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Non-recourse long-term debt	$ 33,608,322		$ 33,608,322		$ 35,185,385
Carrying value of underlying assets securing non-recourse debt	66,129,875		66,129,875		$ 67,607,658
Interest expense from amortization of debt financing costs	$ 49,308	$ 133,721	$ 97,937	$ 294,640

Transactions with Related Par36

Transactions with Related Parties (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Net income (loss) allocated to General Partners	$ (38,581)		$ 18,829	$ (48,935)	$ (82,208)
Fees and other expenses paid or accrued [Abstract]
Management fees	25,769		233,313	216,979	558,847
Administrative expense reimbursements	281,371		358,559	599,713	679,534
Due from General Partner and affiliates, net	30,332	$ 0		30,332
Due to General Partner and affiliates, net	0	204,430		0
Note receivable from joint venture, net	494,930	1,329,483		494,930
Credit loss reserve	2,349,051	1,514,498		2,349,051
Credit loss	834,553	$ 1,514,498
Interest income on note receivable	0		102,221	0	204,590
Interest income, cash basis			0		0
General Partner
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Unit Distribution	0		52,275	0	104,550
ICON Capital, LLC
Fees and other expenses paid or accrued [Abstract]
Management fees	25,769		233,313	216,979	558,847
Administrative expense reimbursements	281,371		358,559	599,713	679,534
Total	$ 307,140		$ 591,872	$ 816,692	$ 1,238,381

Fair Value Measurements (Narrat

Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Details) - Fixed Rate Notes Receivable	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017
Minimum
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Fair value inputs, discount rate	8.00%
Maximum
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Fair value inputs, discount rate	25.90%

Fair Value Measurements (FV Of

Fair Value Measurements (FV Of Assets And Liabilities) (Details)	Jun. 30, 2017USD ($)
Carrying Value
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable	$ 10,726,145
Fair Value | Level 3
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Principal outstanding on fixed-rate notes receivable	$ 9,974,586

Commitments and Contingencies (

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Restricted cash	$ 1,334,657	$ 1,500,000

Subsequent Event (Details)

Subsequent Event (Details) - USD ($)	Jul. 21, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Lease revenue				$ 0	$ 4,164,553
Finance income		$ 218,568	$ 341,981	$ 576,911	$ 689,642
Blackhawk Mining | Subsequent Event
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Lease revenue	$ 7,753,666
Finance income	353,000
Blackhawk Mining | ICON Fund Fourteen | Subsequent Event
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Finance income	$ 53,000