| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
| Dec. 31, 2016 |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
| Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals Securities Corporation and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals GmbH. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. |
| Segment Information | Segment Information
Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision‑maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company currently operates in one reportable business segment—human therapeutics. |
| Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. On an on-going basis, the Company’s management evaluates its estimates, judgments and methodologies. Significant estimates and assumptions in the consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, including returns, rebates, and other pricing adjustments; available-for-sale securities; inventory valuation, and related reserves; impairment of long-lived assets; initial valuation procedures for the issuance of convertible notes; fair value of derivatives; balance sheet classification of notes payable and convertible notes; income taxes, including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; research and development expenses; goodwill; contingent consideration; acquired intangible assets; contingencies and share-based compensation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results in the period in which they become known. |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investment instruments with a remaining maturity when purchased of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments qualifying as cash equivalents primarily consist of money market funds and U.S. government‑sponsored securities. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value. The amount of cash equivalents included in cash and cash equivalents was approximately $32.5 million and approximately $258.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
| Restricted Cash | Restricted Cash
The Company is contingently liable under unused letters of credit with a bank, related to the Company’s facility lease and automobile lease agreements, in the amount of approximately $8.2 million and approximately $8.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result, the Company has restricted cash of approximately $8.2 million and approximately $8.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, securing these letters of credit. The cash will be restricted until the termination or modification of the lease arrangements. |
| Available-for-Sale Securities | Available‑for‑Sale Securities
The Company classifies all short‑term investments with a remaining maturity when purchased of greater than three months as available‑for‑sale. Available‑for‑sale securities are recorded at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income (loss). The amortized cost of debt securities in this category is adjusted for the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in interest and investment income. Realized gains and losses, interest, dividends, and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available‑for‑sale securities are included in interest and investment income.
The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method for purposes of recording realized gains and losses. To determine whether an other‑than‑temporary impairment exists, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery, and whether evidence indicating the recoverability of the cost of the investment outweighs evidence to the contrary. There were no other‑than‑temporary impairments for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2014. |
| Inventory | Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined under the first‑in, first‑out basis in accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”).
The Company evaluates inventory levels quarterly and any inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, inventory that becomes obsolete, inventory in excess of expected sales requirements, inventory that fails to meet commercial sale specifications or is otherwise impaired is written down with a corresponding charge to the statement of operations in the period that the impairment is first identified. The Company also assesses, on a quarterly basis, whether it has any excess non-cancelable purchase commitments resulting from its minimum supply agreements with its suppliers. The Company relies on data from several sources to estimate the net realizable value of inventory and non-cancelable purchase commitments, including partner forecasts of projected inventory purchases that are received quarterly, the Company’s internal forecasts and related process, historical sales by geographic region, and the status of and progress toward commercialization of linaclotide in partnered territories.
The Company capitalizes inventories manufactured in preparation for initiating sales of a product candidate when the related product candidate is considered to have a high likelihood of regulatory approval and the related costs are expected to be recoverable through sales of the inventories. In determining whether or not to capitalize such inventories, the Company evaluates, among other factors, information regarding the product candidate’s safety and efficacy, the status of regulatory submissions and communications with regulatory authorities and the outlook for commercial sales, including the existence of current or anticipated competitive drugs and the availability of reimbursement. In addition, the Company evaluates risks associated with manufacturing the product candidate, including the ability of the Company’s third‑party suppliers to complete the validation batches, and the remaining shelf life of the inventories.
Costs associated with developmental products prior to satisfying the inventory capitalization criteria are charged to research and development expense as incurred. |
| Concentrations of Suppliers | Concentrations of Suppliers
The Company relies on third‑party manufacturers and its collaboration partners to manufacture the linaclotide active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”), linaclotide drug product and lesinurad drug product.
Currently, there are two third‑party manufacturers approved for the production of the linaclotide API in three facilities. Each of Allergan and Astellas is responsible for drug product manufacturing of linaclotide into finished product for its respective territory. Under the Company’s linaclotide collaboration with AstraZeneca, the Company is responsible for drug product and finished goods manufacturing for China, Hong Kong and Macau. The Company also has an agreement with another independent third party to serve as a second source of API manufacturing of linaclotide for its partnered territories.
In connection with the Lesinurad License with AstraZeneca, the Company and AstraZeneca entered into a commercial supply agreement (the “Lesinurad CSA”), pursuant to which the Company relies exclusively on AstraZeneca for the commercial manufacture and supply of ZURAMPIC and, if approved, DUZALLO.
If any of the Company’s suppliers were to limit or terminate production or otherwise fail to meet the quality or delivery requirements needed to satisfy the supply commitments, the process of locating and qualifying alternate sources could require up to several months, during which time the Company’s production could be delayed. Such delays could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations. |
| Accounts Receivable and Related Valuation Account | Accounts Receivable and Related Valuation Account
The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides an allowance for receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices and the overall quality and age of those invoices not specifically reviewed. The Company’s receivables primarily relate to amounts reimbursed under its collaboration, license and co-promotion agreements. The Company believes that credit risks associated with these partners are not significant. To date, the Company has not had any write-offs of bad debt, and the Company did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
In connection with the Lesinurad License, the Company and AstraZeneca entered into a transitional service agreement, (“the Lesinurad TSA”), pursuant to which AstraZeneca is providing certain support services, including development, regulatory and commercial services, to the Company for ZURAMPIC until such activities under the Lesinurad TSA are transferred to the Company. Under the Lesinurad TSA, AstraZeneca is facilitating the collections of sales of ZURAMPIC in the U.S. While under the Lesinurad TSA, the receivables due from AstraZeneca for sales of ZURAMPIC in the U.S. are net against payables due to AstraZeneca for costs incurred in connection with the lesinurad activities, resulting in a net payable at December 31, 2016. |
| Concentrations of Credit Risk | Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, available‑for‑sale securities, and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalent balances with high‑quality financial institutions and, consequently, the Company believes that such funds are subject to minimal credit risk. The Company’s available‑for‑sale investments primarily consist of U.S. Treasury securities and certain U.S. government‑sponsored securities and potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk. The Company has adopted an investment policy which limits the amounts the Company may invest in any one type of investment, and requires all investments held by the Company to be at least A+ rated, thereby reducing credit risk exposure.
Accounts receivable, including related party accounts receivable, primarily consist of amounts due under the linaclotide collaboration agreement with Allergan for North America and the linaclotide license agreement with Astellas for Japan (Note 5) for which the Company does not obtain collateral. Accounts receivable or payable to or from Allergan are presented as related party transactions on the consolidated balance sheets as Allergan owns common stock of the Company.
The percentages of revenue recognized from significant customers of the Company in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 as well as the account receivable balances, net of any payables due, at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are included in the following table:
Accounts
Revenue
December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2016
2015
2014
Collaborative Partner:
Linaclotide Agreements:
Allergan (North America and Europe) (1)
%
%
%
%
%
Almirall (Europe) (1)
—
%
—
%
—
%
—
%
%
Astellas (Japan)
—
%
%
%
%
%
(1)
In October 2015, Almirall transferred its exclusive license to develop and commercialize linaclotide in Europe to Allergan.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, no additional customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue. |
| Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are recorded at cost, and are depreciated when placed into service using the straight‑line method based on their estimated useful lives as follows:
Estimated Useful Life
Asset Description
(In Years)
Manufacturing equipment
10
Laboratory equipment
5
Computer and office equipment
3
Furniture and fixtures
7
Software
3
Included in property and equipment are certain costs of software obtained for internal use. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software. The Company also capitalizes costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is probable the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Maintenance and training costs related to software obtained for internal use are expensed as incurred.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. Capital lease assets are amortized over the lease term. However, if ownership was transferred by the end of the capital lease, or there was a bargain purchase option, such capital lease assets would be amortized over the useful life that would be assigned if such assets were owned.
Costs for capital assets not yet placed into service have been capitalized as construction in progress, and will be depreciated in accordance with the above guidelines once placed into service. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. |
| Finite and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets | Finite and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company records the fair value of purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives as of the transaction date of a business combination. Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized to their estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives. The Company evaluates the finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the reduction in the fair value below their respective carrying amounts. If the Company determines that an impairment has occurred, a write-down of the carrying value and an impairment charge to operating expenses in the period the determination is made is recorded. In addition, the remaining estimated useful life of the finite-lived intangible asset would be reassessed.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), during the period that an asset is considered indefinite-lived, such as in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), it will not be amortized. Acquired IPR&D represents the fair value assigned to research and development assets that have not reached technological feasibility. The value assigned to acquired IPR&D is determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting revenue from the projects, and discounting the net cash flows to present value. The revenue and costs projections used to value acquired IPR&D are, as applicable, reduced based on the probability of success of developing a new drug. Additionally, the projections consider the relevant market sizes and growth factors, expected trends in technology, and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the Company and its competitors. The rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value are commensurate with the stage of development of the projects and uncertainties in the economic estimates used in the projections. Upon the acquisition of IPR&D, the Company completes an assessment of whether its acquisition constitutes the purchase of a single asset or a group of assets. Multiple factors are considered in this assessment, including the nature of the technology acquired, the presence or absence of separate cash flows, the development process and stage of completion, quantitative significance and the rationale for entering into the transaction. Indefinite-lived assets are maintained on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet until either the project underlying it is completed or the asset becomes impaired. Indefinite-lived assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the reduction in the fair value of the IPR&D asset below its respective carrying amount. If the Company determines that an impairment has occurred, a write-down of the carrying value and an impairment charge to operating expenses in the period the determination is made is recorded. When development of an IPR&D asset is complete the associated asset is deemed finite-lived and is then amortized based on its respective estimated useful life at that point. |
| Goodwill | Goodwill
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets when accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment. The Company tests its goodwill for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred, by comparing its carrying value to its implied fair value in accordance with ASC 350. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in the performance of the acquired asset, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations and a variety of other circumstances. If the Company determines that an impairment has occurred, a write-down of the carrying value and an impairment charge to operating expenses in the period the determination is made is recorded. In evaluating the carrying value of goodwill, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Changes in strategy or market conditions could significantly impact those judgments in the future and require an adjustment to the recorded balances. |
| Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets
The Company regularly reviews the carrying amount of its long‑lived assets to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist, which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. If indications of impairment exist, projected future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the carrying amount to determine whether the asset’s value is recoverable. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds such projected undiscounted cash flows, the asset will be written down to its estimated fair value. There were no significant impairments of long‑lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, or 2014. |
| Income Taxes | Income Taxes
The Company provides for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to reflect the uncertainty associated with their ultimate realization.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions recognized in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes , by prescribing a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. When uncertain tax positions exist, the Company recognizes the tax benefit of tax positions to the extent that the benefit will more likely than not be realized. The determination as to whether the tax benefit will more likely than not be realized is based upon the technical merits of the tax position as well as consideration of the available facts and circumstances. The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and adjusts the level of the liability to reflect any subsequent changes in the relevant facts surrounding the uncertain positions. Any changes to these estimates, based on the actual results obtained and/or a change in assumptions, could impact the Company’s income tax provision in future periods. Interest and penalty charges, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits would be classified as a provision for income tax in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. |
| Deferred Financing Costs | Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include costs directly attributable to the Company’s offerings of its equity securities and its debt financings. Costs attributable to equity offerings are charged against the proceeds of the offering once the offering is completed. Costs attributable to debt financings are deferred and amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest rate method. A portion of the deferred financing cost incurred in connection with the 2022 Notes was deemed to relate to the equity component and was allocated to additional paid in capital. In accordance with ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ("ASU 2015-03"), the Company presents debt issuance costs on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. The 2026 Notes, 2022 Notes and PhaRMA Notes are more fully described in Note 11, Notes Payable , to these consolidated financial statements. |
| Derivative Assets and Liabilities | Derivative Assets and Liabilities
In June 2015, in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, the Company entered into convertible note hedge transactions (the “Convertible Note Hedges”). Concurrently with entering into the Convertible Note Hedges, the Company also entered into certain warrant transactions in which it sold note hedge warrants (the “Note Hedge Warrants”) to the Convertible Note Hedge counterparties to acquire 20,249,665 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments (Note 11). These instruments are derivative financial instruments under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”).
These derivatives are recorded as assets or liabilities at fair value each reporting period and the fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations. Significant inputs used to determine the fair value include the price per share of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of valuation, time to maturity of the derivative instruments, the strike prices of the derivative instruments, the risk free interest rate, and the volatility of the Company’s Class A common stock. Changes to these inputs could materially affect the valuation of the Convertible Note Hedges and Note Hedge Warrants in future periods. |
| Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenues are generated primarily through collaborative arrangements and licensing related to the research and development and commercialization of linaclotide, as well as co-promotion arrangements in the U.S. and product revenue related to the commercial sale of ZURAMPIC in the U.S. The terms of the collaborative research and development, licensing, and co-promotion agreements contain multiple deliverables which may include (i) licenses, (ii) research and development activities, including participation on joint steering committees, (iii) the manufacture of finished drug product, API, or development materials for a partner which are reimbursed at a contractually determined rate, and (iv) co-promotion activities by the Company’s clinical sales specialists. Non-refundable payments to the Company under these agreements may include (i) up-front license fees, (ii) payments for research and development activities, (iii) payments for the manufacture of finished drug product, API, or development materials, (iv) payments based upon the achievement of certain milestones, (v) payments for sales detailing, promotional support services and medical education initiatives, and (vi) royalties on product sales. Additionally, the Company may receive its share of the net profits or bear its share of the net losses from the sale of linaclotide in the U.S. and for China, Hong Kong and Macau through its collaborations with Allergan and AstraZeneca, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had collaboration agreements with Allergan (North America) and AstraZeneca (China, Hong Kong and Macau), as well as license agreements with Allergan (Europe) and Astellas (Japan) to develop and commercialize linaclotide. The Company also had an exclusive license agreement with AstraZeneca to develop, manufacture, and commercialize products containing lesinurad as an active agreement in the U.S. Additionally, the Company had a co-promotion agreement with Allergan for VIBERZI. Under the terms of the Company’s co-promotion agreement with Exact Sciences, which was terminated in August 2016, the Company will continue to receive royalty payments through July 2017.
The Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.
For certain of the Company’s arrangements, particularly the linaclotide license agreement with Allergan for all countries worldwide other than China, Hong Kong, Macau, Japan, and the countries and territories of North America, it is required that taxes be withheld on payments to the Company. The Company has adopted a policy to recognize revenue net of these tax withholdings.
Agreements Entered into Prior to January 1, 2011
For arrangements that include multiple deliverables and were entered into prior to January 1, 2011, the Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 605-25, Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements (‘‘ASC 605-25’’), in accounting for these agreements. Under ASC 605‑25, the Company was required to identify the deliverables included within the agreement and evaluate which deliverables represent separate units of accounting. Collaborative research and development and licensing agreements that contained multiple deliverables were divided into separate units of accounting when the following criteria were met:
·
Delivered element(s) had value to the collaborator on a standalone basis,
·
There was objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered obligation(s), and
·
If the arrangement included a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) was considered probable and substantially within the Company’s control.
The Company allocated arrangement consideration among the separate units of accounting either on the basis of each unit’s respective fair value or using the residual method, and applied the applicable revenue recognition criteria to each of the separate units. If the separation criteria were not met, revenue of the combined unit of accounting was recorded based on the method appropriate for the last delivered item.
Up‑Front License Fees
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2009-13, the Company recognized revenue from nonrefundable, up-front license fees on a straight-line basis over the contracted or estimated period of performance, which is typically the period over which the research and development is expected to occur or manufacturing services are expected to be provided. Accordingly, the Company was required to make estimates regarding the drug development and commercialization timelines for drugs and drug candidates being developed pursuant to any applicable agreement. The determination of the length of the period over which to recognize the revenue is subject to judgment and estimation and impacted the amount of revenue recognized in each period. Quarterly, the Company reassessed its period of substantial involvement over which the Company amortized its up-front license fees and made adjustments as appropriate. At December 31, 2016, the up-front fees associated with the Company’s license agreement with Astellas were fully amortized as the period of performance had ended. The up-front license fees under the Allergan collaboration for North America and the Allergan collaboration for Europe (previously with Almirall) were fully amortized at December 31, 2015, as the period of performance under those arrangements ended in the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Agreements Entered into or Materially Modified on or after January 1, 2011
The Company evaluates revenue from new multiple element agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2011 under ASU No. 2009‑13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (“ASU 2009‑13”). The Company also evaluates whether amendments to its multiple element arrangements are considered material modifications that are subject to the application of ASU 2009‑13. This evaluation requires management to assess all relevant facts and circumstances and to make subjective determinations and judgments. As part of this assessment, the Company considers whether the modification results in a material change to the arrangement, including whether there is a change in total arrangement consideration that is more than insignificant, whether there are changes in the deliverables included in the arrangement, whether there is a change in the term of the arrangement and whether there is a significant modification to the delivery schedule for contracted deliverables.
When evaluating multiple element arrangements under ASU 2009‑13, the Company considers whether the deliverables under the arrangement represent separate units of accounting. This evaluation requires subjective determinations and requires management to make judgments about the individual deliverables and whether such deliverables are separable from the other aspects of the contractual relationship. In determining the units of accounting, management evaluates certain criteria, including whether the deliverables have standalone value, based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each arrangement. Factors considered in this determination include the research, manufacturing and commercialization capabilities of the partner and the availability of relevant research and manufacturing expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Company considers whether the collaborator can use the license or other deliverables for their intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining elements, and whether the value of the deliverable is dependent on the undelivered items and whether there are other vendors that can provide the undelivered items.
The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units.
The Company determines the estimated selling price for deliverables using vendor‑specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price, if available, third‑party evidence (“TPE”) of selling price if VSOE is not available, or best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Determining the BESP for a deliverable requires significant judgment. The Company uses BESP to estimate the selling price for licenses to the Company’s proprietary technology, since the Company often does not have VSOE or TPE of selling price for these deliverables. In those circumstances where the Company utilizes BESP to determine the estimated selling price of a license to the Company’s proprietary technology, the Company considers market conditions as well as entity‑specific factors, including those factors contemplated in negotiating the agreements as well as internally developed models that include assumptions related to the market opportunity, estimated development costs, probability of success and the time needed to commercialize a product candidate pursuant to the license. In validating the Company’s BESP, the Company evaluates whether changes in the key assumptions used to determine the BESP will have a significant effect on the allocation of arrangement consideration between multiple deliverables.
At December 31, 2016, the Company’s collaboration agreement with AstraZeneca for linaclotide and co-promotion agreements with Allergan for VIBERZI and Exact Sciences for Cologuard in the U.S. are each being accounted for under ASU 2009-13.
Up‑Front License Fees
When management believes the license to its intellectual property has stand-alone value, the Company generally recognizes revenue attributed to the license upon delivery. When management believes the license to its intellectual property does not have stand‑alone value from the other deliverables to be provided in the arrangement, it is combined with other deliverables and the revenue of the combined unit of accounting is recorded based on the method appropriate for the last delivered item.
Milestones
At the inception of each arrangement that includes pre-commercial milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether each pre-commercial milestone is substantive, in accordance with ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method (“ASU 2010-17”), adopted on January 1, 2011. This evaluation includes an assessment of whether (a) the consideration is commensurate with either (1) the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone, or (2) the enhancement of the value of the delivered item(s) as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the entity’s performance to achieve the milestone, (b) the consideration relates solely to past performance and (c) the consideration is reasonable relative to all of the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the respective milestone, the level of effort and investment required and whether the milestone consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement in making this assessment. At December 31, 2016, the Company had no pre-commercial milestones that were deemed substantive. If a substantive pre-commercial milestone were achieved and collection of the related receivable was reasonably assured, the Company would recognize revenue related to the milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone was achieved. If the Company were to achieve milestones that are considered substantive under any of the Company’s collaborations, the Company may experience significant fluctuations in collaborative arrangements revenue from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on the timing of achieving such substantive milestones. In those circumstances where a pre-commercial milestone is not substantive, the Company recognizes as revenue on the date the milestone is achieved an amount equal to the applicable percentage of the performance period that had elapsed as of the date the milestone was achieved, with the balance being deferred and recognized over the remaining period of performance.
Commercial milestones are accounted for as royalties and are recorded as revenue upon achievement of the milestone, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
Net Profit or Net Loss Sharing
In accordance with ASC 808 Topic, Collaborative Arrangements , and ASC 605‑45, Principal Agent Considerations , the Company considers the nature and contractual terms of the arrangement and the nature of the Company’s business operations to determine the classification of the transactions under the Company’s collaboration agreements. The Company records revenue transactions gross in the consolidated statements of operations if it is deemed the principal in the transaction, which includes being the primary obligor and having the risks and rewards of ownership.
The Company recognizes its share of the pre‑tax commercial net profit or net loss generated from the sales of LINZESS in the U.S. in the period the product sales are reported by Allergan and related cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses are incurred by the Company and its collaboration partner. These amounts are partially determined based on amounts provided by Allergan and involve the use of estimates and judgments, such as product sales allowances and accruals related to prompt payment discounts, chargebacks, governmental and contractual rebates, wholesaler fees, product returns, and co‑payment assistance costs, which could be adjusted based on actual results in the future. The Company is highly dependent on Allergan for timely and accurate information regarding any net revenues realized from sales of LINZESS in the U.S. and the costs incurred in selling it, in order to accurately report its results of operations. For the periods covered in the consolidated financial statements presented, there have been no material changes to prior period estimates of revenues, cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative expenses associated with the sales of LINZESS in the U.S. However, if the Company does not receive timely and accurate information or incorrectly estimates activity levels associated with the collaboration at a given point in time, the Company could be required to record adjustments in future periods.
The Company records its share of the net profits or net losses from the sales of LINZESS in the U.S. on a net basis and presents the settlement payments to and from Allergan as collaboration expense or collaborative arrangements revenue, as applicable, as the Company is not the primary obligor and does not have the risks and rewards of ownership in the collaboration agreement with Allergan for North America. The Company and Allergan settle the cost sharing quarterly, such that the Company’s statement of operations reflects 50% of the pre‑tax net profit or loss generated from sales of LINZESS in the U.S.
Royalties on Product Sales
The Company receives or expects to receive in the future royalty revenues under certain of the Company’s license or collaboration agreements. If the Company does not have any future performance obligations under these license or collaborations agreements, the Company records these revenues as earned. To the extent the Company does not have access to the royalty reports from the Company’s partners or the ability to accurately estimate the royalty revenue in the period earned, the Company records such royalty revenues one quarter in arrears.
Product Revenue, Net
Net product revenue is derived from sales of ZURAMPIC in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Lesinurad TSA, the Company sells ZURAMPIC principally to a limited number of major wholesalers and selected regional wholesalers through certain of AstraZeneca’s existing arrangements (the “Distributors”). The Distributors subsequently resell ZURAMPIC to patients and healthcare providers.
The Company recognizes net product revenue from sales of ZURAMPIC in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”), when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and title of the product and associated risk of loss has passed to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection from the customer has been reasonably assured. ASC 605 requires, among other criteria, that future returns can be reasonably estimated in order to recognize revenue. The Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis as it has concluded that it is the principal in the product revenue transactions for ZURAMPIC, as it holds the general inventory risk, latitude in establishing price, physical loss inventory risk and credit risk.
The first units of ZURAMPIC were shipped to Distributors in September 2016 under the Lesinurad TSA. Due to the early stage of the product launch, the Company determined that it was not able to reliably make certain estimates, including returns, necessary to recognize product revenue upon shipment to Distributors. As a result, the Company records net product revenue for ZURAMPIC using a deferred revenue recognition model (sell-through). Under the deferred revenue model, the Company does not recognize revenue until ZURAMPIC is prescribed to an end-user. During the transition services period, pursuant to the Lesinurad TSA, AstraZeneca invoices Distributors upon shipment of ZURAMPIC on behalf of the Company. The Company records deferred revenue upon receipt of the quarterly cash payment from AstraZeneca for shipments of ZURAMPIC to Distributors. No such payments had been received by the Company as of December 31, 2016. The Company recognizes net product revenue when ZURAMPIC is prescribed to the end-user, on a first-in, first-out basis using estimated prescription demand and pharmacy demand from third party sources and the Company’s analysis of third party market research data, as well as other third party information. The Company’s estimates are subject to the inherent limitations of estimates that rely on third party data, as certain third party information is itself in the form of estimates. The Company will continue to evaluate when, if ever, it has sufficient volume of historical activity and visibility into the distribution channel, in order to reasonably make all estimates required under ASC 605 to recognize revenue upon shipment to the Distributor (Note 5).
The Company’s net product revenues for ZURAMPIC represent total revenues less customer credits, including actual returns, rebates, and other discounts. These allowances are recorded for cash consideration given by a vendor to a customer that is presumed to be a reduction of the selling prices of the Company’s products or services and, therefore, characterized as a reduction of revenue.
The cost basis of the product purchased by the Company pursuant to the Lesinurad TSA is included as a component of other current assets. Upon recognition of product revenue, the corresponding product cost is recorded as cost of revenues on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Other
The Company produces linaclotide finished drug product, API and development materials for certain of its partners.
The Company recognizes revenue on linaclotide finished drug product, API and development materials when the material has passed all quality testing required for collaborator acceptance, delivery has occurred, title and risk of loss have transferred to the partner, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. As it relates to development materials and API produced for Astellas, the Company is reimbursed at a contracted rate. Such reimbursements are considered as part of revenue generated pursuant to the Astellas license agreement and are presented as collaborative arrangements revenue. Any linaclotide finished drug product, API and development materials currently produced for Allergan for the U.S. or AstraZeneca for China, Hong Kong and Macau are recognized in accordance with the cost-sharing provisions of the Allergan and AstraZeneca collaboration agreements, respectively. In October 2015, Almirall transferred its exclusive license to develop and commercialize linaclotide in Europe to Allergan, and the Company separately entered into an amendment to the license agreement with Allergan relating to the development and commercialization of linaclotide in Europe. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, Allergan assumed responsibility for the manufacturing of linaclotide API for Europe from the Company, as well as the associated costs (Note 5). |
| Cost of Revenues | Cost of Revenues
Cost of collaborative arrangements revenue related to linaclotide collaboration and license agreements is recognized upon shipment of linaclotide API to certain of the Company’s licensing partners outside of the U.S. and consists of the internal and external costs of producing such API. In addition to the cost of collaborative arrangement revenue related to linaclotide API, the Company records cost of product revenue for sales of ZURAMPIC in the U.S. Cost of product revenue related to the sales of ZURAMPIC includes the cost of producing finished goods that correspond with product revenue for the reporting period, as well as certain period costs related to freight, packaging, stability and quality testing, and customer acquisition.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded expenses of approximately $17.6 million for the write-down of inventory and an accrual for excess non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments related to linaclotide API. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company wrote-down approximately $20.3 million in inventory to an estimated net realizable value of approximately $5.0 million. The write-down of inventory to net realizable value and the loss on non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were recorded as a separate line item in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. These charges are more fully described in Note 8, Inventory , to these consolidated financial statements. |
| Research and Development Costs | Research and Development Costs
The Company expenses research and development costs to operations as incurred. The Company defers and capitalizes nonrefundable advance payments made by the Company for research and development activities until the related goods are received or the related services are performed.
Research and development expenses are comprised of costs incurred in performing research and development activities, including salary, benefits and other employee-related expenses; share-based compensation expense; laboratory supplies and other direct expenses; facilities expenses; overhead expenses; third-party contractual costs relating to nonclinical studies and clinical trial activities and related contract manufacturing expenses, development of manufacturing processes and regulatory registration of third-party manufacturing facilities; licensing fees for the Company’s product candidates; and other outside expenses.
The Company has collaboration agreements with Allergan for the U.S. and AstraZeneca for China, Hong Kong and Macau pursuant to which it shares research and development expenses related to linaclotide. The Company records expenses incurred under the linaclotide collaboration arrangements for such work as research and development expense. Because the collaboration arrangements are cost sharing arrangements, the Company concluded that when there is a period during the collaboration arrangements during which the Company is owed payment from Allergan or AstraZeneca for such territories, the Company records the reimbursement by Allergan or AstraZeneca for their share of the development effort as a reduction of research and development expense. Amounts owed to Allergan or AstraZeneca for such territories are recorded as incremental research and development expense. |
| Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The Company expenses selling, general and administrative costs to operations as incurred. Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation, benefits and other employee-related expenses for personnel in the Company’s administrative, finance, legal, information technology, business development, commercial, sales, marketing, communications and human resource functions. Other costs include the legal costs of pursuing patent protection of the Company’s intellectual property, general and administrative related facility costs, insurance costs and professional fees for accounting and legal services.
Under the linaclotide collaboration agreements with Allergan for the U.S. and AstraZeneca for China, Hong Kong and Macau, the Company is reimbursed for certain selling, general and administrative expenses and it nets these reimbursements against selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. Payments to Allergan or AstraZeneca for such territories are recorded as incremental selling, general and administrative expense. |
| Share-Based Compensation | Share-Based Compensation
The Company’s share-based compensation programs grant awards which have included stock awards, restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and stock options. Share-based compensation is recognized as an expense in the financial statements based on the grant date fair value over the requisite service period. For awards that vest based on service conditions, the Company uses the straight-line method to allocate compensation expense to reporting periods. The grant date fair value of options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions including volatility, expected term, and expected forfeitures, among others. The fair value of the Company’s RSUs is based on the market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense for RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable service period.
The Company records the expense for stock option grants subject to performance‑based milestone vesting using the accelerated attribution method over the remaining service period when management determines that achievement of the milestone is probable. Management evaluates when the achievement of a performance‑based milestone is probable based on the relative satisfaction of the performance conditions as of the reporting date.
The Company records the expense of stock options granted for services rendered by non‑employees based on the estimated fair value of the stock option using the Black‑Scholes option‑pricing model. The fair value of unvested non‑employee stock option awards is remeasured at each reporting period and expensed over the vesting term of the underlying stock options.
While the assumptions used to calculate and account for share-based compensation awards represent management’s best estimates, these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if revisions are made to our underlying assumptions and estimates, the Company’s share-based compensation expense could vary significantly from period to period. |
| Patent Costs | Patent Costs
The Company incurred and recorded as operating expense legal and other fees related to patents of approximately $2.3 million, approximately $2.2 million, and approximately $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These costs were charged to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. |
| Business Combinations | Business Combinations
The Company evaluates acquisitions of assets and other similar transactions to assess whether or not the transaction should be accounted for as a business combination by assessing whether or not the Company has acquired inputs and processes that have the ability to create outputs. If determined to be a business combination, the Company accounts for business acquisitions under the acquisition method of accounting as indicated in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations , (“ASC 805”) which requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, including contingent liabilities and non-controlling interest in the acquiree based on the fair value estimates as of the date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identified net assets acquired.
The consideration for the Company’s business acquisitions includes future payments that are contingent upon the occurrence of a particular event or events. The obligations for such contingent consideration payments are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The contingent consideration obligations are then evaluated each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations, other than changes due to payments, are recognized as a (gain) loss on fair value remeasurement of contingent consideration in the consolidated statements of operations. |
| Net Income (Loss) Per Share | Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company calculates basic net income (loss) per common share and diluted net income (loss) per common share by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the diluted number of shares outstanding during the period. Except where the result would be antidilutive to net income (loss), diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed assuming the conversion of the 2022 Notes, the exercise of outstanding common stock options and the vesting of RSUs and restricted stock (using the treasury stock method), as well as their related income tax effects. The Company allocates undistributed earnings between the classes of common stock on a one‑to‑one basis when computing net income (loss) per share. As a result, basic and diluted net income (loss) per Class A and Class B shares are equivalent. |
| Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions, and other events and circumstances from non‑owner sources and currently consists of net loss and changes in unrealized gains and losses on available‑for‑sale securities. |
| Subsequent Events | Subsequent Events
The Company considers events or transactions that have occurred after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2016, but prior to the filing of the financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional recognition or disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the filing of the financial statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| New Accounting Pronouncements | New Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Except as set forth below, the Company did not adopt any new accounting pronouncements during the year ended December 31, 2016 that had a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, and most industry-specific guidance. The new standard requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The update also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application. Early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within those years. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 , Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing (“ASU 2016-10”), which clarifies certain aspects of identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (“ASU 2016-12”), related to disclosures of remaining performance obligations, as well as other amendments to guidance on collectability, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers. These standards have the same effective date and transition date as ASU 2014-09. The Company is analyzing the potential impact that ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 may have on its financial position and results of operations. This analysis of the Company’s collaborative arrangements and license agreements includes, but is not limited to, reviewing variable consideration as it relates to its agreements, assessing potential disclosures and evaluating the impact of each potential method of adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the Company continues to monitor additional changes, modifications, clarifications or interpretations undertaken by the FASB, which may impact its conclusions.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures, if required. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and applies to annual and interim periods thereafter. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended December 31, 2016. The Company determined there was not substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement , which amends ASC 350. Under this standard, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the software license element of the arrangement should be accounted for consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory . ASU 2015-11 requires that for entities that measure inventory using the first-in, first-out method, inventory should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The standard defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which supersedes the lease accounting requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2016-02 requires the identification of arrangements that should be accounted for as leases by lessees. In general, for lease arrangements exceeding a 12-month term, these arrangements must now be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization and interest expense for financing leases. The balance sheet amount recorded for existing leases at the date of adoption of ASU 2016-02 must be calculated using the applicable incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. In addition, ASU 2016-02 requires the use of modified retrospective method, which will require adjustment to all comparative periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that ASU 2016-02 may have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation , which amends ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). The new standard clarifies certain aspects of the statement of cash flows, including the classification of debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. The new standard also clarifies that an entity should determine each separately identifiable source or use within the cash receipts and cash payments on the basis of the nature of the underlying cash flows. In situations in which cash receipts and payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated by source or use, the appropriate classification should depend on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flows for the item. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 eliminates the ability to defer the tax expense related to intra-entity asset transfers other than Inventory. Under the new standard, entities should recognize the income tax consequences on an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-16 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The standard does not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In October 2016, the FASB issued No. ASU 2016-17, Consolidation Topic 810: Interests held through Related Parties that are under Common Control (“ASU 2016-17”), which amends how a decision maker is required to consider indirect interests in a variable interest entity held through an entity under common control. ASU 2016-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this standard during the three months ended December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the year ended and as of December 31, 2016.
In October 2016, the FASB ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-18 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”), to clarify the definition of a business by adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets versus businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-16 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
No other accounting standards known by the Company to be applicable to it that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standard-setting bodies and that do not require adoption until a future date are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption. |
