Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Policy Text Block [Abstract] | ' |
Comparability of prior year financial data | ' |
For periods prior to June 20, 2011, the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto represent the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and changes in owner’s equity of our Predecessor, which consists of the assets, liabilities and operations of Compressco and its subsidiaries and certain assets, liabilities and operations of certain other subsidiaries of TETRA conducting business primarily in Mexico (together, our Predecessor). For the periods on and after June 20, 2011, the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto represent our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in partners’ capital. |
|
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Regulation S-X, Article 3 “General instructions as to financial statements” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 1-B “Allocations of Expenses and Related Disclosure in Financial Statements of Subsidiaries, Divisions or Lesser Business Components of Another Entity.” Prior to the Offering, certain administrative expenses were incurred by TETRA on behalf of our Predecessor. The portion of TETRA’s cost of providing these services that can be directly or indirectly attributed to our operations has been allocated to our Predecessor and is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such allocations were calculated based on allocation factors, such as the estimated percentage of time and costs spent by TETRA to perform these administrative services on our Predecessor’s behalf, which our management believes is reasonable; however, these allocations may not be indicative of the cost of future operations or the amount of future allocations. Subsequent to the Offering, our general partner and other subsidiaries of TETRA provide services to us pursuant to an Omnibus Agreement, as further described in Note C – “Related Party Transactions.” |
Consolidation policy | ' |
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
Use of estimates policy | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclose contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Reclassifications policy | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
Beginning with the three month period ended September 30, 2013, certain ad valorem tax expenses for operating equipment have been reclassified as cost of revenues instead of being included in general and administrative expense as reported in prior periods. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year period's presentation. The amount of such reclassification is $1.5 million and $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
Certain other previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. The impact of such reclassifications was not significant to the prior year's overall presentation. |
Cash equivalents policy | ' |
Cash Equivalents |
|
We consider all highly liquid cash investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
|
Prior to the Offering, all payments made on behalf of our Predecessor, such as direct costs, indirect costs, and capital expenditures, were made by TETRA and recorded as increases in net parent equity. All payments received on behalf of our Predecessor, including receipts for revenue earned or sales of assets, were received by TETRA and recorded as decreases in net parent equity. Consequently, cash balances, particularly for periods prior to the Offering, are not a meaningful presentation of our liquidity position. |
Financial instruments policy | ' |
Financial Instruments |
|
The fair values of our financial instruments, which may include cash, accounts receivable, amounts outstanding under our variable rate bank credit facility, and accounts payable, approximate their carrying amounts. Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade accounts receivable, which are primarily due from companies of varying size engaged in oil and gas activities in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Argentina. Our policy is to review the financial condition of customers before extending credit and periodically update customer credit information. Payment terms are on a short-term basis. During 2013, PEMEX and BP accounted for 21.7% and 10.0%, respectively, of our revenues. During 2012, PEMEX and BP accounted for 26% and 10.2%, respectively, of our revenues. During 2011, PEMEX and BP accounted for 14.3% and 14.3%, respectively, of our revenues. |
Foreign currencies policy | ' |
Foreign Currencies |
|
We have designated the Canadian dollar as the functional currency for our operations in Canada. We are exposed to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and certain foreign currencies, including the Canadian dollar, the Mexican peso, and the Argentine peso, as a result of our international operations. |
Allowances for doubtful accounts policy | ' |
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts are determined on a specific identification basis when we believe that the collection of specific amounts owed to us is not probable. |
Inventories policy | ' |
Inventories |
|
Inventories consist primarily of compressor unit components and parts, and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories are accounted for using the average cost method. We provide a reserve for estimated unrealizable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated realizable value. |
Property, plant, and equipment policy | ' |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures that increase the useful lives of assets are capitalized. The cost of repairs and maintenance (including compressor package overhaul cost) is charged to operations as incurred. Compressors include compressor packages currently placed in service and available for service. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compressors | 12 – 16 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other equipment | 3 – 8 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vehicles | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Information systems | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the remaining term of the associated building lease or their useful lives. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $14.3 million, $13.2 million, and $12.5 million, respectively. |
Intangible assets other than goodwill policy | ' |
Intangible Assets other than Goodwill |
|
Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 3 to 7 years. Amortization expense related to these intangible assets was $0, $28,000 and $81,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 2013, there are no remaining unamortized intangible assets other than goodwill. |
Goodwill policy | ' |
Goodwill |
|
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired in purchase transactions. We perform a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis or whenever indicators of impairment are present. We perform the annual test of goodwill impairment following the fourth quarter of each year. The annual assessment for goodwill impairment begins with a qualitative assessment of whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of our business is less than its carrying value. This qualitative assessment requires the evaluation, based on the weight of evidence, of the significance of all identified events and circumstances. Based on this qualitative assessment, we determined that it was not “more likely than not” that the fair value of our business was less than its carrying value as of December 31, 2013. If the qualitative analysis indicates that it is “more likely than not” that our business’ fair value is less than its carrying value, the resulting goodwill impairment test would consist of a two-step accounting test being performed. The first step of the impairment test, if required, is to compare the estimated fair value with the recorded net book value (including goodwill) of our business. If the estimated fair value is higher than the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no further testing is required. If, however, the estimated fair value is below the recorded net book value, then a second step must be performed to determine the goodwill impairment required, if any. In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first step is used as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition. Purchase business combination accounting rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation to assets and liabilities. The residual amount of goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase price allocation is compared to the recorded amount of goodwill and the recorded amount is written down to the hypothetical amount, if lower. |
|
Our management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value for purposes of performing the goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available information to make these fair value determinations, including the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets. The resultant fair values calculated are then compared to observable metrics for other companies in our industry or on mergers and acquisitions in our industry, to determine whether those valuations, in our judgment, appear reasonable. We have determined that there is no impairment of the goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2013 or 2012. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, goodwill totaled $72.2 million, and has not changed significantly since our Predecessor was acquired by TETRA in July 2004. |
Impairment of long-lived assets policy | ' |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
|
We determine impairments of long-lived assets periodically, when indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, the determination of the amount of impairment is based on our judgments as to the future undiscounted operating cash flows to be generated from these assets throughout their remaining estimated useful lives. If these undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the related asset, an impairment is recognized for the excess of the carrying value over its fair value. |
Environmental liabilities policy | ' |
Environmental Liabilities |
|
The costs to remediate and monitor environmental matters are accrued when such liabilities are considered probable and a reasonable estimate of such costs is determinable. |
Revenue recognition policy | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
We recognize revenue using the following criteria: (a) persuasive evidence of an exchange arrangement exists; (b) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (c) the buyer’s price is fixed or determinable; and (d) collectability is reasonably assured. Our compressor packages and services are provided pursuant to contract terms ranging from two weeks to one month. Monthly agreements are generally cancellable with 30 days written notice by the customer. |
Operating costs policy | ' |
Operating Costs |
|
Operating costs incurred during customer trial periods are expensed as incurred. |
Income tax policy | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
Prior to the Offering, the financial results of our Predecessor’s operations were included in TETRA’s consolidated U.S. federal tax return. Accordingly, our Predecessor’s results of operations included a provision for federal, state and international income taxes, calculated on a separate return basis, for the period prior to the Offering. |
|
Following the Offering, our operations are not subject to U.S. federal income tax other than the operations that are conducted through a taxable subsidiary. We will incur state and local income taxes in certain of the United States in which we conduct business. We incur income taxes and will be subject to withholding requirements related to certain of our operations in Mexico, Canada, and other foreign countries in which we operate. Furthermore, we will also incur Texas Margin Tax, which, in accordance with FASB ASC 740, is classified as an income tax for reporting purposes. |
Earnings per common and subordinated unit policy | ' |
Earnings per Common and Subordinated Unit |
|
The computations of earnings per common and subordinated unit are based on the weighted average number of common and subordinated units, respectively, outstanding during the applicable period. Our subordinated units meet the definition of a participating security and therefore we are required to use the two-class method in the computation of earnings per unit. Basic earnings per common and subordinated unit are determined by dividing net income allocated to the common units and subordinated units, respectively, after deducting the amount allocated to our general partner (including distributions to our general partner on its incentive distribution rights), by the weighted average number of outstanding common and subordinated units, respectively, during the period. Prior to the Offering, we were wholly owned by TETRA. Accordingly, net income per common unit is not presented for periods prior to the Offering. A reconciliation of the common shares used in the computations of earnings per common and subordinated unit is presented in Note K – “Earnings per Common and Subordinated Unit.” |
Accumulated other comprehensive income policy | ' |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Certain of our international operations maintain their accounting records in the local currencies that are their functional currencies. For these operations, the functional currency financial statements are converted to United States dollar equivalents, with the effect of the foreign currency translation adjustment reflected as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income is included in Partners’ Capital/Net Parent Equity in the accompanying audited consolidated balance sheets and consists of the cumulative currency translation adjustments associated with such international operations. Activity within accumulated other comprehensive income during the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 is as follows: |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | |
| | (In Thousands) | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1,004 | | | $ | 902 | | | $ | 495 | | | | | |
| | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $0 in 2013, $0 in 2012, and $490 in 2011 | | (591 | ) | | 102 | | | 407 | | | | | |
| | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 413 | | | $ | 1,004 | | | $ | 902 | | | | | |
| | | |
Fair value measurements policy | ' |
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date” within an entity’s principal market, if any. The principal market is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity, regardless of whether it is the market in which the entity will ultimately transact for a particular asset or liability or if a different market is potentially more advantageous. Accordingly, this exit price concept may result in a fair value that may differ from the transaction price or market price of the asset or liability. |
|
Under generally accepted accounting principles, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Fair value measurements should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, where possible. Observable inputs are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs may be needed to measure fair value in situations where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which could include the reporting entity’s own judgments about the assumptions market participants would utilize in pricing the asset or liability. |
We utilize fair value measurements to account for certain items and account balances within our consolidated financial statements. Fair value measurements are utilized in the allocation of purchase consideration for acquisition transactions to the assets and liabilities acquired, including intangible assets and goodwill. Fair value measurements may also be utilized on a nonrecurring basis, such as for the impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill. The fair value of our financial instruments, which may include cash, temporary investments, accounts receivable, short-term borrowings, and long-term debt pursuant to our bank credit agreement, approximate their carrying amounts. |
We also utilize fair value measurements on a recurring basis in the accounting for our foreign currency forward sale derivative contracts. For these fair value measurements, we utilize the quoted value as determined by our counterparty financial institution (a Level 1 measurement). A summary of these fair value measurements as of December 31, 2013, is as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurements Using |
Description | | Total as of | | Quoted Prices | | Significant | | Significant |
31-Dec-13 | in Active | Other | Unobservable |
| Markets for | Observable | Inputs |
| Identical | Inputs | (Level 3) |
| Assets | (Level 2) | |
| or Liabilities | | |
| (Level 1) | | |
| | (In Thousands) |
Asset for foreign currency derivative contracts | | $ | 32 | | | $ | 32 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements policy | 'Recently Issued Accounting PronouncementsB In June 2011, the FASB published ASU 2011-05, bComprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Incomeb (ASU 2011-05), with the stated objective of improving the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increasing the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. As part of ASU 2011-05, the FASB eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholdersb equity. The ASU amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholdersb equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The ASU amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and the amendments are applied retrospectively. In December 2011, with the issuance of ASU 2011-12, bDeferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,b the FASB announced that it has deferred certain aspects of ASU 2011-05. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-2, bReporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,b with the stated objective of improving the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this ASU are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of these ASUs regarding comprehensive income has not had a significant impact on the accounting or disclosures in our financial statements.B B In December 2011, the FASB published ASU 2011-11, bBalance Sheet (Topic 210), Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilitiesb (ASU 2011-11), which requires an entity to disclose the nature of its rights of setoff and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The objective of ASU 2011-11 is to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards. The new disclosures will give financial statement users information about both gross and net exposures. In January 2013, the FASB published ASU 2013-01, bBalance Sheet (Topic 210), Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilitiesb (ASU 2013-01), with the stated objective of clarifying the scope of offsetting disclosures and address any unintended consequences of ASU 2011-11. ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2013 and will be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.In July 2013, the FASB published ASU No.B 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" (ASU 2013-11). The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and are expected to reduce diversity in practice and better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after DecemberB 15, 2013, with early adoption and retrospective application permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |