Commitments and Contingencies | 6. Commitments and Contingencies Leases The Company leases its facilities under various noncancelable operating leases with fixed rental payments. Rent expense totaled $1.9 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $3.9 million and $3.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum commitments under these operating leases as of July 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands): Years ending January 31: 2017 (remaining six months) $ 4,240 2018 7,501 2019 6,977 2020 6,979 2021 7,149 Thereafter 6,545 $ 39,391 In July 2014, the Company entered into a facility lease agreement for its North Carolina office. The 84-month lease commenced on August 1, 2014. Total rent, including common area maintenance expense and fixed operating expense, payable over the lease period is $5.0 million. As part of the lease agreement, the Company received an allowance of $1.4 million for tenant improvement during the year ended January 31, 2016. This allowance was included in the calculation of rent expense and related deferred rent balances. In December 2014, the Company amended the lease agreement for its North Carolina office giving the Company access to additional space on February 1, 2016 through the same term as the original facility lease. As part of the lease amendment, the Company will receive an additional allowance of $1.0 million for tenant improvement. In April 2013, the Company entered into a facility lease agreement for its headquarters in San Jose, California. The 96-month lease commenced on November 1, 2013. Total rent, including operating expenses, payable over the lease period is $35.5 million. As part of the lease agreement, the Company received an allowance of $4.9 million for tenant improvement during the year ended January 31, 2014. This allowance was included in the calculation of rent expense and related deferred rent balances. As a condition of the lease agreement, the Company is required to maintain a letter of credit of $3.9 million, with the landlord named as the beneficiary. The Company has the option to extend the term of the lease for an additional period of 60 months. Contingencies From time to time, the Company is party to litigation and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to employment claims and other matters. Although the results of litigation and claims are inherently unpredictable, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. On December 17, 2015, a purported securities class action entitled Vikramkumar v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al. Guardino v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al. Madhani v. Nimble Storage, Inc In re Nimble Storage, Inc. Securities Litigation In re Nimble Sec. Lit In re Nimble Sec. Lit. On February 23, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Schwartz v. Vasudevan, et al. Schwartz Schwartz In re Nimble Sec. Lit. In re Nimble Sec. Lit. Goldstein v. Vasudevan, et al. Goldstein Schwartz Schwartz Goldstein In re Nimble Storage, Inc. Derivative Litigation In re Nimble Deriv. Lit. In re Nimble Sec. Lit. In re Nimble Sec. Lit. On May 19, 2016, a purported shareholder derivative action entitled Chua v. Vasudevan, et al. Chua Schwartz Goldstein Chua Indemnification Some of the Company’s sales contracts require the Company to indemnify its end-customers against third-party claims asserting infringement of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, and to pay judgments entered on such claims. The Company’s exposure under these indemnification provisions is generally limited to the total amount paid by the end-customer under the contract. However, certain contracts include indemnification provisions that could potentially expose the Company to losses in excess of the amount received under the contract. In addition, the Company indemnifies its officers, directors, and certain key employees while they are serving in good faith in their respective capacities. To date, there have been no claims under any indemnification provisions. |