Description of Business and Basis of Presentation (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Oct. 31, 2016 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation | Basis of Presentation and Consolidation The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, and include the consolidated accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited but reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company, the Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, or Annual Report, for the year ended January 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2016. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, the determination of the best estimated selling prices of deliverables included in multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements; the allowance for doubtful accounts; provision for excess or obsolete inventory; the useful lives of property and equipment and intangible asset; the determination of the best estimated achievement of financial performance metrics related to the Company’s performance-based stock awards, and the fair value of the Company’s market-based stock awards. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
Concentrations | Concentrations The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained primarily at one financial institution, and deposits may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Risks associated with cash and cash equivalents are mitigated by banking with a creditworthy institution. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its end-customers’ financial condition whenever deemed necessary and generally does not require collateral. The Company’s policy is to maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectability of its accounts receivable, which takes into consideration specific end-customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. Of all the Company’s customers, which include direct end-customers and channel partners, including value added resellers, or VARs, and distributors, the following distributors individually accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable and revenue at the end of and for each period presented: % of Accounts Receivable % of Revenue As of Nine Months Ended October 31, October 31, 2016 January 31, 2016 2016 2015 Customer A 25 % 41 % 34 % 40 % Customer B 35 % 26 % 31 % 21 % Customer C 14 % * 15 % 17 % * Represents less than 10%. There are no concentrations of business transacted with a particular market that would severely impact the Company’s business in the near term. However, the Company currently relies on one key contract manufacturer and supplier to produce most of its products; any disruption or termination of these arrangements could materially adversely affect the Company’s operating results. |
Warranties | Warranties The Company provides a standard one-year warranty for hardware components covering material defects in materials and workmanship. In addition, the Company provides a 90-day warranty on the embedded software in its products for non-conformance with documented specifications. The Company accrues for estimated warranty costs based upon historical experience, and periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability at the end of each period. These costs are expensed as incurred and included in the cost of product revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, failed parts recovered from customers are submitted to the Company’s suppliers for repair or replacement. These cost recoveries are offset against the Company’s warranty costs. The Company records warranty liability in other current liabilities in its consolidated balance sheet. As of October 31, 2016, the Company’s warranty liability was not material. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation The Company estimates fair value for its stock-based awards, including employee and non-employee director stock options, and purchases under its employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP, using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model requires the input of expected volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock. In prior periods, the expected volatility was based on the historical volatilities of the Company’s publicly traded peer group as the Company did not have a sufficient trading history for its common stock. In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company had over two years of trading history for its common stock and call options. As a result, the Company determined the expected volatility based on a combination of its historical volatility of its common stock price and implied volatility of its call options. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, released an Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for the Company for its first quarter of fiscal 2019, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In March 2016, the FASB released an ASU related to how stock-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements, including income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements. This standard is effective for the Company for its first quarter of fiscal 2018, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating adoption methods and whether this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In February 2016, the FASB released an ASU that requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for operating leases. The standard is effective for the Company for its first quarter of fiscal 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating adoption methods and whether this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2015, the FASB released an ASU, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In July 2015, the FASB issued amendments to simplify the measurement of inventory. Under the amendments, inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The guidance defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation.” No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. The amendments are effective for the Company for its first quarter of fiscal 2018, although early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the updated standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In May 2014, the FASB released an ASU, Revenue from Contracts with Customers Revenue Recognition Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedient |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure the fair value: • Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments. • Level 3—Inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation. |
Inventory | Inventory Inventories consist primarily of raw materials related to component parts, finished goods, which include both inventory held for sale and service inventory held at service depots in support of end-customer service agreements, and end-customer evaluation inventory. |
Commitments and Contingencies | From time to time, the Company is party to litigation and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to employment claims and other matters. Although the results of litigation and claims are inherently unpredictable, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
Segment Reporting | The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its chief executive officer. The chief executive officer reviews consolidated financial information accompanied by information about revenue by product line for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The Company has one business activity and there are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, or operating results for levels or components. In addition, the majority of the Company’s operations and end-customers are located in the United States. As such, the Company has a single reporting segment and a single operating unit structure. |