Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-54371
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT II, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 26-4008719 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4000 MacArthur Boulevard, West Tower, Suite 200, Newport Beach, California | 92660 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(949) 270-9200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes þ No
As of November 2, 2012, there were 102,105,126 shares of common stock of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. outstanding.
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
(A Maryland Corporation)
1
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
| |||||||
Real estate investments, net | $ | 915,252,000 | $ | 369,317,000 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 10,200,000 | 44,682,000 | ||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net | 6,409,000 | 1,763,000 | ||||||
Accounts receivable due from affiliate | — | 121,000 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 8,920,000 | 2,289,000 | ||||||
Real estate and escrow deposits | 1,244,000 | 7,550,000 | ||||||
Identified intangible assets, net | 176,721,000 | 66,115,000 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 17,289,000 | 7,315,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,136,035,000 | $ | 499,152,000 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
| |||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 237,219,000 | $ | 80,466,000 | ||||
Line of credit | 148,100,000 | — | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 17,430,000 | 7,703,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable due to affiliates | 1,190,000 | 1,111,000 | ||||||
Derivative financial instruments | 871,000 | 819,000 | ||||||
Identified intangible liabilities, net | 3,086,000 | 623,000 | ||||||
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | 34,231,000 | 10,950,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities | 442,127,000 | 101,672,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) | ||||||||
Equity: | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 88,604,887 and 48,869,669 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 886,000 | 489,000 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 789,282,000 | 435,252,000 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (96,377,000 | ) | (38,384,000 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 693,791,000 | 397,357,000 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | 117,000 | 123,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total equity | 693,908,000 | 397,480,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,136,035,000 | $ | 499,152,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 27,134,000 | $ | 12,504,000 | $ | 67,670,000 | $ | 27,186,000 | ||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 5,942,000 | 2,664,000 | 14,014,000 | 5,684,000 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,935,000 | 1,563,000 | 7,753,000 | 3,942,000 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase (Note 2) | 4,232,000 | — | 4,232,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 21,174,000 | 913,000 | 32,326,000 | 9,698,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,743,000 | 4,553,000 | 25,707,000 | 10,029,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total expenses | 45,026,000 | 9,693,000 | 84,032,000 | 29,353,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
(Loss) income from operations | (17,892,000 | ) | 2,811,000 | (16,362,000 | ) | (2,167,000 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount and premium): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (3,548,000 | ) | (2,199,000 | ) | (9,747,000 | ) | (4,767,000 | ) | ||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | — | (202,000 | ) | (52,000 | ) | (427,000 | ) | |||||||||
Interest income | 4,000 | 3,000 | 11,000 | 9,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net (loss) income | (21,436,000 | ) | 413,000 | (26,150,000 | ) | (7,352,000 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (2,000 | ) | — | (2,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest | $ | (21,438,000 | ) | $ | 413,000 | $ | (26,152,000 | ) | $ | (7,353,000 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net (loss) income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 78,492,871 | 34,644,097 | 64,418,435 | 26,171,404 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Distributions declared per common share | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.49 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Additional | Preferred | Accumulated | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Stock | Deficit | Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE - December 31, 2011 | 48,869,669 | $ | 489,000 | $ | 435,252,000 | $ | — | $ | (38,384,000 | ) | $ | 123,000 | $ | 397,480,000 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 38,457,986 | 385,000 | 383,195,000 | — | — | — | 383,580,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Offering costs | — | — | (41,281,000 | ) | — | — | — | (41,281,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 1,539,068 | 15,000 | 14,606,000 | — | — | — | 14,621,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (261,836 | ) | (3,000 | ) | (2,538,000 | ) | — | — | — | (2,541,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — | — | 48,000 | — | — | — | 48,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | (10,000 | ) | (10,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | — | (31,841,000 | ) | — | (31,841,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | — | — | — | — | (26,152,000 | ) | 2,000 | (26,150,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
BALANCE - September 30, 2012 | 88,604,887 | $ | 886,000 | $ | 789,282,000 | $ | — | $ | (96,377,000 | ) | $ | 117,000 | $ | 693,908,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Additional | Preferred | Accumulated | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Stock | Deficit | Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE - December 31, 2010 | 15,452,668 | $ | 154,000 | $ | 137,657,000 | $ | — | $ | (12,571,000) | $ | 122,000 | $ | 125,362,000 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 23,946,590 | 240,000 | 238,762,000 | — | — | — | 239,002,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Offering costs | — | — | (25,860,000) | — | — | — | (25,860,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 7,500 | — | 15,000 | — | — | — | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 589,330 | 6,000 | 5,593,000 | — | — | — | 5,599,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (76,513) | (1,000) | (718,000) | — | — | — | (719,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — | — | 38,000 | — | — | — | 38,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | (1,000) | (1,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | — | (12,732,000) | — | (12,732,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | — | — | — | — | (7,353,000) | 1,000 | (7,352,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
BALANCE - September 30, 2011 | 39,919,575 | $ | 399,000 | $ | 355,487,000 | $ | — | $ | (32,656,000) | $ | 122,000 | $ | 323,352,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,150,000) | $ | (7,352,000) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (including deferred financing costs, above/below market leases, leasehold interests, above market leasehold interests, debt discount and premium and deferred rent receivables) | 22,658,000 | 9,433,000 | ||||||
Stock based compensation | 48,000 | 53,000 | ||||||
Acquisition fees paid in stock | 732,000 | — | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 106,000 | 250,000 | ||||||
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration | 12,048,000 | — | ||||||
Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 52,000 | 427,000 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts and other receivables | (2,005,000) | (1,092,000) | ||||||
Accounts receivable due from affiliate | 121,000 | — | ||||||
Other assets | (1,656,000) | (208,000) | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 6,453,000 | 2,809,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable due to affiliates | 423,000 | 306,000 | ||||||
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | (3,194,000) | (361,000) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 9,636,000 | 4,265,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Acquisition of real estate operating properties | (495,944,000) | (206,287,000) | ||||||
Deposit for origination of note receivable | 99,000 | — | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (2,757,000) | (2,755,000) | ||||||
Restricted cash | (6,631,000) | 427,000 | ||||||
Real estate and escrow deposits | 6,306,000 | (3,001,000) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (498,927,000) | (211,616,000) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Borrowings on mortgage loans payable | 22,818,000 | 27,700,000 | ||||||
Payments on mortgage loans payable | (29,194,000) | (55,044,000) | ||||||
Borrowings under the lines of credit | 498,355,000 | 274,116,000 | ||||||
Payments under the lines of credit | (350,255,000) | (240,969,000) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 379,835,000 | 239,002,000 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs | (4,232,000) | (2,561,000) | ||||||
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of real estate | (3,434,000) | — | ||||||
Return of contingent consideration related to acquisition of real estate | 2,000 | — | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (2,541,000) | (719,000) | ||||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interest | 2,000 | — | ||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest | (10,000) | (1,000) | ||||||
Security deposits | 18,000 | 48,000 | ||||||
Payment of offering costs | (41,331,000) | (25,535,000) | ||||||
Distributions paid | (15,224,000) | (5,892,000) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 454,809,000 | 210,145,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (34,482,000) | 2,794,000 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period | 44,682,000 | 6,018,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period | $ | 10,200,000 | $ | 8,812,000 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 8,153,000 | $ | 3,910,000 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 40,000 | $ | 3,000 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Accrued capital expenditures | $ | 982,000 | $ | 650,000 | ||||
Tenant improvement overage | $ | 717,000 | $ | — | ||||
The following represents the increase in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions of operating properties: | ||||||||
Other receivables | $ | 3,000 | $ | 87,000 | ||||
Other assets | $ | 349,000 | $ | 331,000 | ||||
Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 163,808,000 | $ | 33,941,000 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 1,006,000 | $ | 235,000 | ||||
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | $ | 16,631,000 | $ | 7,694,000 | ||||
Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | $ | 14,621,000 | $ | 5,599,000 | ||||
Distributions declared but not paid | $ | 4,635,000 | $ | 2,035,000 | ||||
Accrued offering costs | $ | 195,000 | $ | 950,000 | ||||
Receivable from transfer agent | $ | 2,731,000 | $ | — | ||||
Accrued deferred financing costs | $ | — | $ | 3,000 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
1. Organization and Description of Business
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated as Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. on January 7, 2009 and therefore we consider that our date of inception. We were initially capitalized on February 4, 2009. Our board of directors adopted an amendment to our charter, which was filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation on January 3, 2012, to change our corporate name from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. We intend to invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities. We may also originate and acquire secured loans and real estate-related investments. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2010, and we intend to continue to be taxed as a REIT.
We are conducting a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering of up to $3,285,000,000 of shares of our common stock. Until November 6, 2012, we were offering up to 300,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share in our primary offering and 30,000,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, for $9.50 per share. On November 7, 2012, we began selling shares of our common stock at $10.22 per share and issuing shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. Accordingly, as of November 7, 2012, we are offering to the public up to approximately 295,945,000 shares of our common stock in our primary offering and approximately 29,420,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP. See Note 18, Subsequent Events — Change to Our Initial Offering Price, for a further discussion. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, declared our registration statement effective as of August 24, 2009. We will sell shares of our common stock in our initial public offering until the earlier of February 20, 2013 or the date on which the maximum offering amount has been sold. As of September 30, 2012, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 86,267,222 shares of our common stock, or $860,687,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP.
On June 6, 2012, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-181928) with the SEC with respect to a proposed follow-on public offering, or our follow-on offering, of up to $1,500,000,000 of shares of our common stock and up to $150,000,000 of shares of our common stock to be offered for sale pursuant to the DRIP. We have not issued any shares under this registration statement as it has not yet been declared effective by the SEC.
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership. On January 3, 2012, our operating partnership filed an Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership with the Delaware Department of State to change its name from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP.
Until January 6, 2012, we were externally advised by Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Advisor, LLC, or our former advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, as amended and restated, or the G&E Advisory Agreement, between us and our former advisor. From August 24, 2009 through January 6, 2012, our former advisor supervised and managed our day-to-day operations and selected the properties and real estate-related investments we acquired, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our former advisor also provided marketing, sales and client services on our behalf and engaged affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our former advisor was managed by and was a wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors, LLC, or GEEA, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Company, or Grubb & Ellis, or our former sponsor.
6
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
On November 7, 2011, our independent directors determined that it was in the best interests of our company and its stockholders to transition advisory and dealer manager services rendered to us by affiliates of Grubb & Ellis and to engage American Healthcare Investors LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and Griffin Capital Corporation, or Griffin Capital, as replacement co-sponsors, or our co-sponsors. As a result, on November 7, 2011, we notified our former advisor that we terminated the G&E Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to the G&E Advisory Agreement, either party could terminate the G&E Advisory Agreement without cause or penalty; however, certain rights and obligations of the parties would survive during a 60-day transition period and beyond.
In addition, on November 7, 2011, we notified Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation that we terminated the Amended and Restated Dealer Manager Agreement dated June 1, 2011 between us and Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation, or the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement, in accordance with the terms thereof. Until January 6, 2012, Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation remained a non-exclusive agent of our company and distributor of shares of our common stock.
As a result of the co-sponsorship arrangement, an affiliate of Griffin Capital, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, began serving as our advisor on January 7, 2012 pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, that took effect upon the expiration of the 60-day transition period provided for in the G&E Advisory Agreement. Our advisor delegates advisory duties to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Sub-Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Sub-Advisor, or our sub-advisor. Griffin-American Sub-Advisor is jointly owned by our co-sponsors. Our advisor, through our sub-advisor, uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight, review and approval of our board of directors, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our sub-advisor performs its duties and responsibilities pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement with our advisor and also acts as our fiduciary. Collectively, we refer to our advisor and our sub-advisor as our advisor entities. Griffin Capital Securities, Inc., or Griffin Securities, or our dealer manager, an affiliate of Griffin Capital, serves as our dealer manager pursuant to a dealer manager agreement, or the Dealer Manager Agreement, that also became effective on January 7, 2012. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin-American Advisor or Griffin Securities; however, we are affiliated with Griffin-American Sub-Advisor and American Healthcare Investors.
American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital paid the majority of the expenses we incurred in connection with the transition to our co-sponsors.
We currently operate through four reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. As of September 30, 2012, we had completed 41 acquisitions comprising 121 buildings and approximately 4,499,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,093,366,000.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding our condensed consolidated financial statements. Such condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representations of our management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Basis of Presentation
Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our operating partnership, the wholly owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership and all non-wholly owned subsidiaries and any variable interest entities, or VIEs, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 810,Consolidation, or ASC Topic 810, which we have concluded should be consolidated pursuant to ASC Topic 810. We operate and intend to continue to operate in an
7
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
umbrella partnership REIT structure in which our operating partnership, or wholly owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership, will own substantially all of the properties acquired on our behalf. We are the sole general partner of our operating partnership and as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 we own greater than a 99.99% general partnership interest therein. On January 4, 2012, our advisor contributed $2,000 to acquire 200 limited partnership units of our operating partnership and as such, as of September 30, 2012, owns less than a 0.01% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. Until September 14, 2012, our former advisor was a limited partner of our operating partnership and as of December 31, 2011 owned less than a 0.01% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. On September 14, 2012, we entered into an agreement whereby we purchased all of the limited partnership interests held by our former advisor in our operating partnership. Because we are the sole general partner and a limited partner of our operating partnership and have unilateral control over its management and major operating decisions, the accounts of our operating partnership are consolidated in our condensed consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Interim Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in our view, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year; such full year results may be less favorable.
In preparing our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events through the financial statement issuance date. We believe that although the disclosures contained herein are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are made and evaluated on an on-going basis using information that is currently available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates, perhaps in material adverse ways, and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Tenant receivables and unbilled deferred rent receivables are carried net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. An allowance is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain tenants to meet the contractual obligations under their lease agreements. We also maintain an allowance for deferred rent receivables arising from the straight line recognition of rents. Such allowances are charged to bad debt expense which is included in general and administrative in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Our determination of the adequacy of these allowances is based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the tenant’s financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees and current economic conditions and other relevant factors. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had $209,000 and $112,000, respectively, in allowance for uncollectible accounts which was determined necessary to reduce receivables to our estimate of the amount recoverable. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, none of our receivables were directly written off to bad debt expense. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we did not have an allowance for uncollectible accounts for deferred rent receivables. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $1,000 and $0, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $9,000 and $144,000, respectively, of our deferred rent receivables were directly written off to bad debt expense.
8
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Contingent Consideration
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets is $22,044,000 and $6,058,000, respectively, of contingent consideration obligations in connection with our property acquisitions. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, included in other assets in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets is $0 and $115,000, respectively, of contingent consideration assets in connection with our property acquisitions. Such amounts are due upon certain criteria being met within specified timeframes. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we have recorded a net loss on contingent consideration of $12,446,000 and $11,822,000, respectively, which is included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. We did not record any gains or losses with respect to contingent consideration for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. See Note 13, Fair Value Measurements – Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value – Contingent Consideration, for a further discussion.
Subordinated Distribution Purchase
On September 14, 2012, we and our operating partnership entered into an agreement, or the settlement agreement, with BGC Partners, Inc., or BGC Partners, which held 200 units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and would have been entitled to any subordinated distribution that would have been owed to our former advisor and its affiliates, including our former sponsor. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, BGC Partners transferred certain assets to us, including the 200 units of limited partnership interest held in our operating partnership and any rights to the payment of any subordinated distribution for consideration of $4,300,000. Notwithstanding these transfers to us, in the event of a listing event or other liquidity event, as both terms are defined in the operating partnership agreement, we will calculate a hypothetical deferred termination amount (as defined in the operating partnership agreement and based on assets acquired by us on or before January 10, 2012) for the payment of the subordinated distribution that would have been owed to our former advisor and its affiliates, including our former sponsor. If such calculation results in an amount that is greater than the $4,300,000 paid by us, then we will pay BGC Partners an amount equal to 10.0% of the difference between such calculation and the $4,300,000 paid by us. In connection with the settlement agreement, BGC Partners has agreed to release all known and unknown claims that they may have had against us and our operating partnership.
Of the $4,300,000 paid by us, $4,232,000 is reflected in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $68,000 is in satisfaction of all remaining payments owed by us to our former advisor and its affiliates, including our former sponsor, under the G&E Advisory Agreement.
Segment Disclosure
ASC Topic 280,Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity’s reportable segments. As of September 30, 2012, we operate through four reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. Prior to this, we operated through three reportable business segments; however, with the addition of our first assisted living facilities in August 2012, we felt it was useful to segregate our operations into these four reporting segments to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management intends to review our performance and make operating decisions. See Note 15, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2011-04,Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,or ASU 2011-04, which changes the wording used to describe the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in order to improve consistency in the application and description of fair value between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. Additional disclosure requirements in ASU 2011-04 include: (i) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by an entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (ii) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset
9
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (iii) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (iv) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. We adopted ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, but it does require certain additional footnote disclosures. We have provided the applicable disclosures in Note 13, Fair Value Measurements.
All other issued ASUs that are effective after December 31, 2011 are not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Real Estate Investments, Net
Our investments in our consolidated properties consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Building and improvements | $ | 854,487,000 | $ | 353,839,000 | ||||
Land | 86,642,000 | 26,326,000 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 2,668,000 | 1,070,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
943,797,000 | 381,235,000 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (28,545,000 | ) | (11,918,000 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 915,252,000 | $ | 369,317,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $6,766,000 and $3,120,000, respectively. In addition to the acquisitions discussed below, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had capital expenditures of $1,534,000 and $1,364,000, respectively, on our medical office buildings, $398,000 and $0, respectively, on our skilled nursing facilities and $0 and $300,000, respectively, on our hospitals. We did not have any capital expenditures on our assisted living facilities for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $16,839,000 and $6,688,000, respectively. In addition to the acquisitions discussed below, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had capital expenditures of $3,155,000 and $2,698,000, respectively, on our medical office buildings, $905,000 and $0, respectively, on our skilled nursing facilities and $0 and $300,000, respectively, on our hospitals. We did not have any capital expenditures on our assisted living facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Until January 6, 2012, we reimbursed our former advisor or its affiliates and since January 7, 2012, we reimburse our advisor entities or their affiliates for acquisition expenses related to selecting, evaluating, acquiring and investing in properties. The reimbursement of acquisition expenses, acquisition fees and real estate commissions and other fees paid to unaffiliated parties will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6.0% of the contract purchase price or total development costs, unless fees in excess of such limits are approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors. As of September 30, 2012, such fees and expenses did not exceed 6.0% of the purchase price of our acquisitions, except with respect to our acquisition of Lakewood Ranch Medical Office Building, or the Lakewood Ranch property, and Philadelphia SNF Portfolio, both of which we acquired in 2011 and such excess fees and expenses were approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors. For a further discussion, see footnote (5) and (6) to the table below in – Acquisitions in 2011.
Acquisitions in 2012
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we completed 16 acquisitions comprising 65 buildings from unaffiliated parties. The aggregate purchase price of these properties was $654,741,000 and we incurred $17,274,000 in acquisition fees to our former advisor or its affiliates and to our advisor entities or their affiliates in connection with these acquisitions. The following is a summary of our acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
10
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Property | Location | Type | Date Acquired | Ownership Percentage | Purchase Price | Mortgage Loans Payable(1) | Lines of Credit | Acquisition Fee(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio | Conyers, Covington, Snellville, Gainesville and Atlanta, GA; Memphis and Millington, TN; Shreveport, LA; and Mobile, AL | Skilled Nursing | 01/10/12 | 100 | % | $ | 166,500,000 | $ | 83,159,000 | $ | 58,435,000 | (2) | $ | 4,579,000 | ||||||||||||||
FLAGS MOB Portfolio | Boynton Beach, FL; Austell, GA; Okatie, SC; and Tempe, AZ | Medical Office | | 01/27/12 and 03/23/12 | | 100 | % | 33,800,000 | 17,354,000 | 15,600,000 | (2) | 879,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Spokane MOB | Spokane, WA | Medical Office | 01/31/12 | 100 | % | 32,500,000 | 14,482,000 | 19,000,000 | (2) | 845,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Centre Medical Plaza | Chula Vista, CA | Medical Office | 04/26/12 | 100 | % | 24,600,000 | 11,933,000 | 6,000,000 | (2) | 640,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gulf Plains MOB Portfolio | Amarillo and Houston, TX | Medical Office | 04/26/12 | 100 | % | 19,250,000 | — | 16,000,000 | (2) | 501,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Midwestern MOB Portfolio | Champaign, Lemont, Naperville and Urbana, IL | Medical Office | | 05/22/12, 07/19/12 and 08/14/12 | | 100 | % | 30,060,000 | 17,728,000 | 6,000,000 | (2) | 782,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Texarkana MOB | Texarkana, TX | Medical Office | 06/14/12 | 100 | % | 6,500,000 | — | — | 169,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Greeley MOB | Greeley, CO | Medical Office | 06/22/12 | 100 | % | 13,200,000 | — | — | 343,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Columbia MOB | Columbia, SC | Medical Office | 06/26/12 | 100 | % | 6,900,000 | — | — | 179,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ola Nalu MOB Portfolio | Huntsville, AL; New Port Richey, FL; Hilo, HI; Warsaw, IN; Las Vegas, NM; and Rockwall, San Angelo and Schertz, TX | Medical Office | | 06/29/12 and 07/11/12 | | 100 | % | 71,000,000 | — | 64,000,000 | (3) | 1,846,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Silver Star MOB Portfolio | Killeen, Temple, Rowlett, Desoto and Frisco, TX | Medical Office | | 07/19/12, 09/05/12 and 09/27/12 | | 100 | % | 35,400,000 | — | 32,750,000 | (3) | 920,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Shelbyville MOB | Shelbyville, TN | Medical Office | 07/26/12 | 100 | % | 6,800,000 | — | 6,800,000 | (3) | 177,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jasper MOB | Jasper, GA | Medical Office | | 08/08/12 and 09/27/12 | | 100 | % | 13,800,000 | 6,275,000 | — | 359,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Pacific Northwest Senior Care Portfolio | Bend, Corvallis, Grants Pass, Prineville, Redmond and Salem, OR; and North Bend, Olympia and Tacoma, WA | Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living | 08/24/12 | 100 | % | 58,231,000 | — | 45,000,000 | (3) | 1,514,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
East Tennessee MOB Portfolio | Knoxville, TN | Medical Office | 09/14/12 | 100 | % | 51,200,000 | — | 50,000,000 | (3) | 1,331,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles Hospital Portfolio | Los Angeles, Gardena and Norwalk, CA | Hospital | 09/27/12 | 100 | % | 85,000,000 | — | 86,500,000 | (3) | 2,210,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 654,741,000 | $ | 150,931,000 | $ | 406,085,000 | $ | 17,274,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents the balance of the mortgage loans payable assumed by us on the property at the time of acquisition. |
(2) | Represents borrowings under our secured revolving lines of credit with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America and KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, as defined in Note 8, Line of Credit, at the time of the respective acquisition. We currently have no amounts outstanding and terminated our secured revolving lines of credit with Bank of America and KeyBank as of June 5, 2012. See Note 8, Line of Credit, for a further discussion. |
11
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
(3) | Represents borrowings under our unsecured revolving line of credit, as defined in Note 8, Line of Credit, at the time of acquisition. We periodically advance funds and pay down our unsecured revolving line of credit as needed. See Note 8, Line of Credit, for a further discussion. |
(4) | Our former advisor or its affiliates were paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.75% of the contract purchase price of Southeastern SNF Portfolio. Except with respect to Southeastern SNF Portfolio, our advisor entities and their affiliates were paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.60% of the contract purchase price which was paid as follows: (i) in shares of our common stock in an amount equal to 0.15% of the contract purchase price, at $9.00 per share, the established offering price as of the date of closing, net of selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and (ii) the remainder in cash equal to 2.45% of the contract purchase price. |
Acquisitions in 2011
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we completed 11 acquisitions comprising 30 buildings from unaffiliated parties. The aggregate purchase price of these properties was $237,343,000 and we incurred $6,523,000 in acquisition fees to our former advisor or its affiliates in connection with these acquisitions. The following is a summary of our acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:
Property | Location | Type | Date Acquired | Ownership Percentage | Purchase Price | Mortgage Loans Payable(1) | Lines of Credit(2) | Acquisition Fee(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Long-Term Acute Care Hospital(4) | Columbia, MO | Hospital | 01/31/11 | 100 | % | $ | 12,423,000 | $ | — | $ | 11,000,000 | $ | 336,000 | |||||||||||||||
St. Anthony North Medical Office Building | Westminster, CO | Medical Office | 03/29/11 | 100 | % | 11,950,000 | — | — | 329,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loma Linda Pediatric Specialty Hospital | Loma Linda, CA | Skilled Nursing | 03/31/11 | 100 | % | 13,000,000 | — | 8,700,000 | 358,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Yuma Skilled Nursing Facility | Yuma, AZ | Skilled Nursing | 04/13/11 | 100 | % | 11,000,000 | — | 9,000,000 | 303,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Hardy Oak Medical Office Building | San Antonio, TX | Medical Office | 04/14/11 | 100 | % | 8,070,000 | 5,253,000 | — | 222,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Lakewood Ranch Medical Office Building(5) | Bradenton, FL | Medical Office | 04/15/11 | 100 | % | 12,500,000 | — | 13,800,000 | 344,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dixie-Lobo Medical Office Building Portfolio | Alice, Lufkin, Victoria and Wharton, TX; Carlsbad and Hobbs, NM; Hope, AR; and Lake Charles, LA | Medical Office | 05/12/11 | 100 | % | 30,050,000 | 23,239,000 | 5,000,000 | 826,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Milestone Medical Office Building Portfolio | Jersey City, NJ and Bryant and Benton, AR | Medical Office | 05/26/11 | 100 | % | 44,050,000 | 5,000,000 | 31,115,000 | 1,211,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Philadelphia SNF Portfolio(6) | Philadelphia, PA | Skilled Nursing | 06/30/11 | 100 | % | 75,000,000 | — | 74,870,000 | 2,063,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Maxfield Medical Office Building | Sarasota, FL | Medical Office | 07/11/11 | 100 | % | 7,200,000 | 5,119,000 | — | 198,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Lafayette Physical Rehabilitation Hospital | Lafayette, LA | Hospital | 09/30/11 | 100 | % | 12,100,000 | — | 12,000,000 | 333,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 237,343,000 | $ | 38,611,000 | $ | 165,485,000 | $ | 6,523,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents the balance of the mortgage loans payable assumed by us or newly placed on the property at the time of acquisition. |
12
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
(2) | Represents borrowings under our secured revolving lines of credit with Bank of America and KeyBank, as defined in Note 8, Line of Credit, at the time of the respective acquisition. We currently have no amounts outstanding and terminated our secured revolving lines of credit with Bank of America and KeyBank as of June 5, 2012. See Note 8, Line of Credit, for a further discussion. |
(3) | Our former advisor or its affiliates were paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.75% of the contract purchase price for each property acquired. |
(4) | On January 31, 2011, we purchased Columbia Long-Term Acute Care Hospital, which is the fourth hospital comprising the Monument LTACH Portfolio. |
(5) | We paid a loan defeasance fee of approximately $1,223,000, or the loan defeasance fee, related to the repayment of the seller’s loan that was secured by the Lakewood Ranch property and had an outstanding principal balance of approximately $7,561,000 at the time of repayment. As a result of the loan defeasance fee, the fees and expenses associated with the Lakewood Ranch property acquisition exceeded 6.0% of the contract purchase price of the Lakewood Ranch property. Pursuant to our charter, prior to the acquisition of the Lakewood Ranch property, our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approved the fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of the Lakewood Ranch property in excess of the 6.0% limit and determined that such fees and expenses were commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. |
(6) | We paid a state and city transfer tax of approximately $1,479,000 related to the transfer of ownership in the sale of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio. Also, we paid additional closing costs of $1,500,000 related to the operator’s costs associated with the sale of the portfolio. As a result of the state and city transfer tax and additional closing costs, the fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio exceeded 6.0% of the contract purchase price of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio. Pursuant to our charter, prior to the acquisition of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio, our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approved the fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio in excess of the 6.0% limit and determined that such fees and expenses were commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. |
13
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
4. Identified Intangible Assets, Net
Identified intangible assets, net consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
In place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $9,045,000 and $3,656,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 11 years and 10.5 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | $ | 80,202,000 | $ | 27,957,000 | ||||
Tenant relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $3,576,000 and $1,541,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 21.1 years and 19.6 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 72,515,000 | 22,580,000 | ||||||
Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $331,000 and $141,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 63.4 years and 60.9 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 15,760,000 | 12,148,000 | ||||||
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $1,369,000 and $495,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 6.5 years and 8.9 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 7,276,000 | 2,649,000 | ||||||
Defeasible interest, net of accumulated amortization of $10,000 and $0 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 41.0 years and 0 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 613,000 | — | ||||||
Master leases, net of accumulated amortization of $504,000 and $492,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 0.9 years and 1.5 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 355,000 | 781,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 176,721,000 | $ | 66,115,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $4,451,000 and $1,673,000, respectively, which included $432,000 and $123,000, respectively, of amortization recorded against rental income for above market leases and $69,000 and $52,000, respectively, of amortization recorded against rental expenses for leasehold interests in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $10,034,000 and $3,807,000, respectively, which included $1,042,000 and $298,000, respectively, of amortization recorded against rental income for above market leases and $190,000 and $88,000, respectively, of amortization recorded against rental expenses for leasehold interests in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the identified intangible assets is 19.7 and 22.7 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, estimated amortization expense on the identified intangible assets for the three months ending December 31, 2012 and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter is as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2012 | $ | 4,641,000 | ||
2013 | 17,269,000 | |||
2014 | 14,594,000 | |||
2015 | 13,144,000 | |||
2016 | 11,796,000 | |||
Thereafter | 115,277,000 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 176,721,000 | |||
|
|
14
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
5. Other Assets, Net
Other assets, net consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Deferred rent receivables | $ | 7,914,000 | $ | 3,138,000 | ||||
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $839,000 and $1,397,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 5,754,000 | 2,883,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | 2,701,000 | 755,000 | ||||||
Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $91,000 and $30,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 920,000 | 424,000 | ||||||
Contingent consideration asset | — | 115,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 17,289,000 | $ | 7,315,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on deferred financing costs for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $437,000 and $410,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1,351,000 and $923,000, respectively. Amortization expense on deferred financing costs is recorded to interest expense in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, $31,000 of the $1,351,000 was related to the write-off of deferred financing costs due to the early extinguishment of mortgage loans on Virginia Skilled Nursing Facility Portfolio and Highlands Ranch Medical Pavilion. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $42,000 of the $923,000 was related to the write-off of deferred financing costs due to the early extinguishment of a mortgage loan payable on Surgical Hospital of Humble. See Note 6, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, for a further discussion.
Amortization expense on lease commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $27,000 and $8,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $66,000 and $17,000, respectively.
As of September 30, 2012, estimated amortization expense on deferred financing costs and lease commissions for the three months ending December 31, 2012 and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter is as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2012 | $ | 458,000 | ||
2013 | 1,824,000 | |||
2014 | 1,709,000 | |||
2015 | 937,000 | |||
2016 | 370,000 | |||
Thereafter | 1,376,000 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 6,674,000 | |||
|
|
6. Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
Mortgage loans payable were $225,082,000 ($237,219,000, net of discount and premium) and $80,529,000 ($80,466,000, net of discount and premium) as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
As of September 30, 2012, we had 24 fixed rate and three variable rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 1.32% to 6.60% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.95% per annum. As of September 30, 2012, we had $208,305,000 ($220,688,000, net of discount and premium) of fixed rate debt, or 92.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.14% per annum and $16,777,000 ($16,531,000, net of discount and premium) of variable rate debt, or 7.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 2.61% per annum.
As of December 31, 2011, we had six fixed rate and four variable rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 1.38% to 6.60% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.82% per annum. As of December 31, 2011, we had $53,557,000 ($53,762,000, net of discount and premium) of fixed rate debt, or 66.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.39% per annum and $26,972,000 ($26,704,000, net of discount) of variable rate debt, or 33.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.68% per annum.
15
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain covenants, such as occupancy ratios, leverage ratios, net worth ratios, debt service coverage ratios, liquidity ratios, operating cash flow to fixed charges ratios, distribution ratios and reporting requirements. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.
Mortgage loans payable, net consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
Interest | ||||||||||||||||
Property | Rate(1) | Maturity Date | September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Fixed Rate Debt: | ||||||||||||||||
Highlands Ranch Medical Pavilion | — | — | $ | — | $ | 4,289,000 | ||||||||||
Pocatello East Medical Office Building | 6.00% | 10/01/20 | 7,644,000 | 7,788,000 | ||||||||||||
Monument Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Portfolio | 5.79% | 05/27/18 | 24,311,000 | 15,248,000 | ||||||||||||
Hardy Oak Medical Office Building | 6.60% | 10/10/16 | 5,106,000 | 5,182,000 | ||||||||||||
Maxfield Medical Office Building | 5.17% | 02/28/15 | 4,923,000 | 5,050,000 | ||||||||||||
Milestone Medical Office Building Portfolio | 4.50% | 02/01/17 | 16,000,000 | 16,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Bell Minor) | 4.57% | 08/01/40 | 7,008,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Covington) | 4.60% | 08/01/40 | 11,224,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Mobile) | 4.60% | 08/01/40 | 4,993,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Shreveport) | 4.60% | 08/01/40 | 10,744,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Westminster) | 4.57% | 08/01/40 | 4,544,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Buckhead) | 5.25% | 03/01/45 | 11,831,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Rockdale) | 5.25% | 03/01/45 | 7,983,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Millington) | 4.60% | 08/01/45 | 4,754,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Memphis) | 4.57% | 08/01/45 | 6,707,000 | — | ||||||||||||
FLAGS MOB Portfolio (Okatie) | 5.62% | 07/01/14 | 7,705,000 | — | ||||||||||||
FLAGS MOB Portfolio (Boynton) | 6.31% | 08/01/16 | 4,103,000 | — | ||||||||||||
FLAGS MOB Portfolio (Tempe) | 5.33% | 08/01/15 | 5,335,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Spokane MOB | 5.59% | 03/11/35 | 14,289,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Centre Medical Plaza | 5.95% | 03/01/14 | 11,830,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Midwestern MOB Portfolio (Champaign) | 5.88% | 05/11/21 | 3,680,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Midwestern MOB Portfolio (Naperville) | 5.91% | 06/05/16 | 7,198,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Midwestern MOB Portfolio (Urbana) | 5.46% | 06/01/15 | 6,807,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio (Snellville) | 2.48% | 09/01/47 | 13,318,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Jasper MOB Portfolio | 6.10% | 07/06/17 | 6,268,000 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
208,305,000 | 53,557,000 | |||||||||||||||
Variable Rate Debt: | ||||||||||||||||
Center for Neurosurgery and Spine(2) | 1.32% | 08/15/21 (callable) | 2,791,000 | 2,964,000 | ||||||||||||
Virginia Skilled Nursing Facility Portfolio(3) | — | — | — | 9,771,000 | ||||||||||||
Lawton Medical Office Building Portfolio | 3.10% | 01/01/16 | 7,013,000 | 7,142,000 | ||||||||||||
Muskogee Long-Term Acute Care Hospital | 2.63% | 04/08/18 | 6,973,000 | 7,095,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
16,777,000 | 26,972,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total fixed and variable rate debt | 225,082,000 | 80,529,000 | ||||||||||||||
Less: discount | (255,000) | (291,000) | ||||||||||||||
Add: premium | 12,392,000 | 228,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 237,219,000 | $ | 80,466,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents the per annum interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2012. |
(2) | The mortgage loan payable requires monthly principal and interest payments and is due August 15, 2021; however, the principal balance is immediately due upon written request from the seller confirming that the seller agrees to pay the interest rate swap termination amount, if any. Additionally, the seller guarantors agreed to retain their guaranty obligations with respect to the mortgage loan and the interest rate swap agreement. We, the seller and the seller guarantors have also agreed to indemnify the other parties for any liability caused by a party’s breach or nonperformance of obligations under the loan. |
16
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
(3) | Represents a bridge loan which initially matured on March 14, 2012. In March 2012, we exercised the six-month extension available pursuant to the loan documents, thereby extending the maturity date to September 14, 2012. In May 2012, we repaid the loan in full. |
As of September 30, 2012, the principal payments due on our mortgage loans payable for the three months ending December 31, 2012 and for each of the next four years December 31 and thereafter, is as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2012 | $ | 3,814,000 | ||
2013 | 4,244,000 | |||
2014 | 23,195,000 | |||
2015 | 20,065,000 | |||
2016 | 25,501,000 | |||
Thereafter | 148,263,000 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 225,082,000 | |||
|
|
7. Derivative Financial Instruments
ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging,or ASC Topic 815, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. We utilize derivatives such as fixed interest rate swaps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. Consistent with ASC Topic 815, we record derivative financial instruments in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or a liability measured at fair value. ASC Topic 815 permits special hedge accounting if certain requirements are met. Hedge accounting allows for gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedges to be offset by the change in value of the hedged item or items or to be deferred in other comprehensive income.
As of September 30, 2012, no derivatives were designated as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC Topic 815. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recorded as a component of interest expense in (loss) gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $0 and $(202,000), respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $(52,000) and $(427,000), respectively, as an (increase) decrease to interest expense in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the change in the fair value of our derivative financial instruments.
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments held by us as of September 30, 2012:
Notional Amount | Index | Interest Rate | Fair Value | Instrument | Maturity Date | |||||||||||||
$ | 2,791,000 | one month LIBOR | 6.00 | % | $ | (498,000 | ) | Swap | 08/15/21 | |||||||||
7,013,000 | one month LIBOR | 4.41 | % | (111,000 | ) | Swap | 01/01/14 | |||||||||||
6,973,000 | one month LIBOR | 4.28 | % | (174,000 | ) | Swap | 05/01/14 | |||||||||||
6,784,000 | one month LIBOR | 4.11 | % | (88,000 | ) | Swap | 10/01/15 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
$23,561,000 | $ | (871,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
17
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments held by us as of December 31, 2011:
Notional Amount | Index | Interest Rate | Fair Value | Instrument | Maturity Date | |||||||||||||
$ | 2,964,000 | one month LIBOR | 6.00 | % | $ | (478,000 | ) | Swap | 08/15/21 | |||||||||
7,142,000 | one month LIBOR | 4.41 | % | (139,000 | ) | Swap | 01/01/14 | |||||||||||
7,095,000 | one month LIBOR | 4.28 | % | (202,000 | ) | Swap | 05/01/14 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
$ | 17,201,000 | $ | (819,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
See Note 13, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion of the fair value of our derivative financial instruments.
8. Line of Credit
Bank of America, N.A.
On July 19, 2010, we entered into a loan agreement with Bank of America, or the Bank of America Loan Agreement, to obtain a secured revolving credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $25,000,000, or the Bank of America line of credit. On May 4, 2011, we modified the Bank of America line of credit to increase the aggregate maximum principal amount from $25,000,000 to $45,000,000, subject to certain borrowing base conditions.
The Bank of America Loan Agreement contained various affirmative and negative covenants and financial covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and limitations on distributions by properties that serve as collateral for the Bank of America line of credit in the event of default. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.
Based on the value of the properties securing the Bank of America line of credit, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the Bank of America line of credit was $38,435,000 as of December 31, 2011. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Bank of America line of credit as of December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, $38,435,000 remained available under the Bank of America line of credit. The Bank of America line of credit was secured by Lacombe Medical Office Building, Parkway Medical Center, Livingston Medical Arts Pavilion, St. Vincent Medical Office Building, Sylva Medical Office Building, Ennis Medical Office Building and St. Anthony North Medical Office Building as of December 31, 2011.
On June 5, 2012, we terminated and currently have no additional obligations under the Bank of America line of credit.
KeyBank National Association
On June 30, 2011, we entered into a loan agreement with KeyBank, or the KeyBank Loan Agreement, to obtain a secured revolving credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $71,500,000, or the KeyBank line of credit. On October 6, 2011, RBS Citizens, N.A., d/b/a Charter One, or Charter One, was added as a syndication agent to the KeyBank line of credit, whereby $35,750,000 of the aggregate maximum principal amount of the KeyBank line of credit was assigned to Charter One.
The KeyBank Loan Agreement contained various affirmative and negative covenants and financial covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by our operating partnership and its subsidiaries that own properties that serve as collateral for the KeyBank line of credit. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.
Based on the value of the properties securing the KeyBank line of credit, the aggregate borrowing capacity was $71,500,000 as of December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under the KeyBank line of credit and $71,500,000 remained available under the KeyBank line of credit. The KeyBank line of credit was secured by four facilities of Virginia Skilled Nursing Facility Portfolio, Yuma Skilled Nursing Facility and Philadelphia SNF Portfolio as of December 31, 2011.
18
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
On June 5, 2012, we terminated and currently have no additional obligations under the KeyBank line of credit.
Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit
On June 5, 2012, we, our operating partnership and certain of our subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, entered into a credit agreement, or the Credit Agreement, with Bank of America, as administrative agent, swingline lender and issuer of letters of credit; KeyBank, as syndication agent; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and KeyBanc Capital Markets as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers; and the lenders named therein, to obtain an unsecured revolving line of credit, with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $200,000,000, or the unsecured line of credit. On June 5, 2012 and June 7, 2012, we also entered into separate revolving notes, or the Revolving Notes, with each of Bank of America, KeyBank, Comerica Bank and RBS Citizens, whereby we promised to pay the principal amount of each revolving loan and accrued interest to the respective lender or its registered assigns, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement. The proceeds of loans made under the unsecured line of credit may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes (including, without limitation, property acquisitions and repayment of debt). Our operating partnership may obtain up to 10.0% of the maximum principal amount in the form of standby letters of credit and up to 15.0% of the maximum principal amount in the form of swingline loans. The actual amount of credit available under the unsecured line of credit at any given time is a function of, and is subject to, loan to value and debt service coverage ratios based on net operating income as contained in the Credit Agreement. The unsecured line of credit matures on June 5, 2015, and may be extended by one 12-month period subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee.
The maximum principal amount of the Credit Agreement may be increased by up to $150,000,000, for a total principal amount of $350,000,000, subject to (a) the terms of the Credit Agreement and (b) such additional financing amount being offered and provided by existing lenders or new lenders under the Credit Agreement.
At our option, loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at per annum rates equal to (a) (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus (ii) a margin ranging from 2.00% to 3.00% based on our consolidated leverage ratio, or (b) (i) the greater of: (x) the prime rate publicly announced by Bank of America, (y) the Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 0.50% and (z) the one-month Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 1.00%, plus (ii) a margin ranging from 1.00% to 2.00% based on our consolidated leverage ratio. Accrued interest under the Credit Agreement is payable monthly.
We are required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the Credit Agreement at a per annum rate equal to 0.25% if the average daily used amount is greater than 50.0% of the commitments and 0.35% if the average daily used amount is less than 50.0% of the commitments.
The Credit Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by our operating partnership and its subsidiaries and limitations on secured recourse indebtedness. The Credit Agreement imposes the following financial covenants, which are specifically defined in the Credit Agreement: (a) a maximum consolidated leverage ratio; (b) a maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio; (c) a minimum consolidated tangible net worth covenant; (d) a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio; (e) a maximum dividend payout ratio; (f) a maximum consolidated unencumbered leverage ratio; and (g) a minimum consolidated unencumbered interest coverage ratio. As of September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.
The Credit Agreement requires us to add additional subsidiaries as guarantors in the event the value of the assets owned by the subsidiary guarantors falls below a certain threshold as set forth in the Credit Agreement. In the event of default, Bank of America has the right to terminate its obligations under the Credit Agreement, including the funding of future loans, and to accelerate the payment on any unpaid principal amount of all outstanding loans and interest thereon.
19
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Our aggregate borrowing capacity under the unsecured line of credit was $200,000,000 as of September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, borrowings outstanding under the unsecured line of credit totaled $148,100,000, and $51,900,000 remained available under the unsecured line of credit. The weighted-average interest rate of borrowings as of September 30, 2012 was 3.29% per annum.
9. Identified Intangible Liabilities, Net
Identified intangible liabilities, net consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $299,000 and $135,000 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 9.7 years and 14.6 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | $ | 1,578,000 | $ | 623,000 | ||||
Above market leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $7,000 and $0 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 40.6 years and 0 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively) | 1,508,000 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 3,086,000 | $ | 623,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on below market leases for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $81,000 and $43,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $163,000 and $93,000, respectively. Amortization expense on below market leases is recorded to rental income in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Amortization expense on above market leasehold interests for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $6,000 and $0, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $7,000 and $0, respectively. Amortization expense on above market leasehold interests is recorded to rental expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the identified intangible liabilities is 24.8 and 14.6 years as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, estimated amortization expense on below market leases and above market leasehold interests for the three months ending December 31, 2012 and for each of the next four years ending December 31 and thereafter, is as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2012 | $ | 89,000 | ||
2013 | 318,000 | |||
2014 | 264,000 | |||
2015 | 225,000 | |||
2016 | 187,000 | |||
Thereafter | 2,003,000 | |||
|
| |||
$ | 3,086,000 | |||
|
|
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, which if determined unfavorably to us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
20
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Environmental Matters
We follow a policy of monitoring our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at our properties, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to our properties that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Other Organizational and Offering Expenses
Since January 7, 2012, our other organizational and offering expenses in connection with our initial offering, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, are being paid by our sub-advisor or its affiliates on our behalf. Prior to January 7, 2012, other organizational and offering expenses were paid by our former advisor or its affiliates. Other organizational and offering expenses include all expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee which generally represent 7.0% and 3.0%, respectively, of our gross offering proceeds) to be paid by us in connection with our initial offering. These other organizational and offering expenses will only become our liability to the extent they do not exceed 1.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering, other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our sub-advisor, our former advisor or their affiliates had collectively incurred expenses on our behalf of $1,291,000 and $2,946,000, respectively, in excess of 1.0% of the gross proceeds of our initial offering, and therefore, these expenses are not recorded in our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. To the extent we raise additional funds from our initial offering, these amounts may become our liability.
Our other organizational and offering expenses incurred in connection with our follow-on offering are initially paid by our sub-advisor or its affiliates on our behalf. These other organizational and offering expenses include all expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with our follow-on offering. These expenses will only become our liability to the extent these other organizational and offering expenses do not exceed 1.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our follow-on offering. As of September 30, 2012, our sub-advisor and its affiliates have incurred expenses of $329,000 related to our follow-on offering. As of September 30, 2012, we have not reimbursed our sub-advisor or its affiliates for these expenses incurred in our follow-on offering, and these expenses are not recorded in our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, since such expenses do not become our liability until our follow-on offering is declared effective by the SEC and only to the extent other organizational and offering expenses do not exceed 1.0% of the gross offering proceeds of our follow-on offering.
When recorded by us, other organizational expenses will be expensed as incurred, and offering expenses are charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts are reimbursed to our sub-advisor or their affiliates from the gross proceeds of our initial offering or our follow-on offering. See Note 11, Related Party Transactions — Offering Stage, for a further discussion of other organizational and offering expenses.
Other
Our other commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In our view, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
11. Related Party Transactions
Fees and Expenses Paid to Affiliates
Until January 6, 2012, all of our executive officers and our non-independent directors were also executive officers and employees and/or holders of a direct or indirect interest in our former advisor, our former sponsor, GEEA or other affiliated entities.
21
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Effective as of August 24, 2009, we entered into the G&E Advisory Agreement with our former advisor, and effective as of June 22, 2009, we entered into the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement with Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc., or Grubb & Ellis Securities. Until April 18, 2011, Grubb & Ellis Securities served as the dealer manager of our initial offering pursuant to the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement. Effective as of April 19, 2011, the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement with Grubb & Ellis Securities was assigned to, and assumed by, Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of our former sponsor. Therefore, references to the G&E Dealer Manager shall be deemed to refer to either Grubb & Ellis Securities or Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation, or both, as applicable, unless otherwise specified.
On November 7, 2011, we notified our former advisor of the termination of the G&E Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to the G&E Advisory Agreement, either party may terminate the G&E Advisory Agreement without cause or penalty, subject to a 60-day transition period; however, certain rights and obligations of the parties survived during the 60-day transition period and beyond. As a result of a new advisory agreement that took effect on January 7, 2012 upon the expiration of the 60-day transition period provided for in the G&E Advisory Agreement, Griffin-American Advisor serves as our advisor and delegates advisory duties to Griffin-American Sub-Advisor.
In addition, on November 7, 2011, we notified Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation of the termination of the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement. Pursuant to the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement, either party may terminate the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement, subject to a 60-day transition period. Until January 6, 2012, Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation remained a non-exclusive agent of our company and distributor of shares of our common stock. As a result of the Dealer Manager Agreement that took effect on January 7, 2012 upon the expiration of the 60-day transition period provided for in the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement, Griffin Securities serves as our dealer manager. The terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement are substantially the same as the terms of the terminated G&E Dealer Manager Agreement.
Upon the termination of the G&E Advisory Agreement and G&E Dealer Manager Agreement and corresponding 60-day transition periods, after January 6, 2012, we are no longer affiliated with Grubb & Ellis and its affiliates. The G&E Advisory Agreement and the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement entitled our former advisor, G&E Dealer Manager and their affiliates to specified compensation for certain services, as well as reimbursement of certain expenses. In the aggregate, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $12,592,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $5,481,000 and $35,722,000, respectively, in fees and expenses paid to our former advisor or its affiliates as detailed below.
We are affiliated with Griffin-American Sub-Advisor and American Healthcare Investors; however, we are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin-American Advisor or Griffin Securities. In the aggregate, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $11,642,000 and $22,933,000, respectively, in fees and expenses paid to our affiliates as detailed below. As discussed above, our advisor, which is not our affiliate, delegates certain advisory duties pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement to our sub-advisor, which is our affiliate. Therefore, although certain obligations under the Advisory Agreement are contractually performed by or for our advisor, only such obligations pursuant to the sub-advisory agreement that are performed by or for our sub-advisor or its affiliates are disclosed in this related party transactions note.
Offering Stage
Selling Commissions
Until January 6, 2012, G&E Dealer Manager received selling commissions of up to 7.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. G&E Dealer Manager could have re-allowed all or a portion of these fees to participating broker-dealers. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $6,739,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $512,000 and $16,316,000, respectively, in selling commissions to G&E Dealer Manager. Such commissions were charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts were paid to G&E Dealer Manager from the gross proceeds of our initial offering.
22
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Effective as of January 7, 2012, selling commissions are paid to Griffin Securities, an unaffiliated entity. See Note 12, Equity – Offering Costs, for a further discussion.
Dealer Manager Fee
Until January 6, 2012, G&E Dealer Manager received a dealer manager fee of up to 3.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. G&E Dealer Manager could have re-allowed all or a portion of these fees to participating broker-dealers. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $2,944,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $227,000 and $7,149,000, respectively, in dealer manager fees to G&E Dealer Manager. Such fees were charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts were paid to G&E Dealer Manager from the gross proceeds of our initial offering.
Effective as of January 7, 2012, the dealer manager fee is paid to Griffin Securities, an unaffiliated entity. See Note 12, Equity – Offering Costs, for a further discussion.
Other Organizational and Offering Expenses
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our other organizational and offering expenses are paid by our sub-advisor or its affiliates on our behalf. Our sub-advisor or its affiliates are reimbursed for actual expenses incurred up to 1.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $1,898,000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $3,768,000, respectively, in offering expenses to our sub-advisor.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to the same reimbursement. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $990,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $76,000 and $2,395,000, respectively, in offering expenses to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Other organizational expenses were expensed as incurred, and offering expenses are charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts are paid from the gross proceeds of our intial offering.
Acquisition and Development Stage
Acquisition Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates receive an acquisition fee of up to 2.60% of the contract purchase price for each property we acquire or 2.0% of the origination or acquisition price for any real estate-related investment we originate or acquire. The acquisition fee for property acquisitions is paid with a combination of shares of our common stock and cash as follows: (i) shares of common stock in an amount equal to 0.15% of the contract purchase price of the properties, at the then-established offering price, net of selling commissions or dealer manager fees, and (ii) the remainder in cash in an amount equal to 2.45% of the contract purchase price of the properties. Our sub-advisor or its affiliates are entitled to receive these acquisition fees for properties and real estate-related investments we acquire with funds raised in our initial offering, including acquisitions completed after the termination of the Advisory Agreement, or funded with net proceeds from the sale of a property or real estate-related investment, subject to certain conditions. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $7,212,000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $12,695,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to a similar fee; however, such fee was up to 2.75% of the contract purchase price for each property we acquired or 2.0% of the origination or acquisition price for any real estate-related investment we originated or acquired, payable entirely in cash. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $531,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $4,579,000 and $6,523,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
23
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Acquisition fees in connection with the acquisition of properties are expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations,or ASC Topic 805, and are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Development Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates receive, in the event our sub-advisor or its affiliates provide development-related services, a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered for similar projects in the geographic market where the services were provided; however, we will not pay a development fee to our sub-advisor or its affiliates if our sub-advisor or its affiliates elect to receive an acquisition fee based on the cost of such development. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any development fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates would have been entitled to the same development fee. We did not incur any development fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Reimbursement of Acquisition Expenses
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates are reimbursed for acquisition expenses related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets, which is reimbursed regardless of whether an asset is acquired. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any acquisition expenses to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to similar reimbursements of acquisition expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we did not incur any acquisition expenses to our former advisor or its affiliates, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $19,000, respectively, in acquisition expenses to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Reimbursements of acquisition expenses are expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC Topic 805 and are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The reimbursement of acquisition expenses, acquisition fees and real estate commissions and other fees paid to unaffiliated parties will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6.0% of the purchase price or total development costs, unless fees in excess of such limits are approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction. As of September 30, 2012, such fees and expenses did not exceed 6.0% of the purchase price of our acquisitions, except with respect to our acquisition of Lakewood Ranch property and Philadelphia SNF Portfolio, both of which we acquired in 2011 and such excess fees and expenses were approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors. For a further discussion, see footnote (5) and (6) to the table in Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net – Acquisitions in 2011.
Operational Stage
Asset Management Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates are paid a monthly fee for services rendered in connection with the management of our assets equal to one-twelfth of 0.85% of average invested assets existing as of January 6, 2012 and one-twelfth of 0.75% of the average invested assets acquired after January 6, 2012, subject to our stockholders receiving distributions in an amount equal to 5.0% per annum, cumulative, non-compounded, of average invested capital. For such purposes, average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in real estate properties and real estate-related investments, before deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end
24
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
of each month during the period of calculation; and average invested capital means, for a specified period, the aggregate issue price of shares of our common stock purchased by our stockholders, reduced by distributions of net sales proceeds by us to our stockholders and by any amounts paid by us to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $1,794,000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $4,438,000, respectively, in asset management fees to our sub-advisor.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to a similar monthly asset management fee; however, such asset management fee was equal to one-twelfth of 0.85% of average invested assets. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $902,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $61,000 and $1,998,000, respectively, in asset management fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Asset management fees are included in general and administrative in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Property Management Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates are paid a monthly property management fee of up to 4.0% of the gross monthly cash receipts from each property managed by our sub-advisor or its affiliates. Our sub-advisor or its affiliates may sub-contract its duties to any third-party, including for fees less than the property management fees payable to our sub-advisor or its affiliates. In addition to the above property management fee, for each property managed directly by entities other than our sub-advisor or its affiliates, we pay our sub-advisor or its affiliates a monthly oversight fee of up to 1.0% of the gross cash receipts from the property; provided however, that in no event will we pay both a property management fee and an oversight fee to our sub-advisor or its affiliates with respect to the same property. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $608,000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $1,400,000, respectively, in property management fees and oversight fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to similar property management and oversight fees. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $258,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $16,000 and $571,000, respectively, in property management fees and oversight fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Property management fees and oversight fees are included in rental expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
On-site Personnel and Engineering Payroll
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we incurred $23,000 and $71,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any on-site personnel and engineering payroll to our former advisor or its affiliates, which is included in rental expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any on-site personnel and engineering payroll to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Lease Fees
Effective as of January 7, 2012, we pay our sub-advisor or its affiliates a separate fee for any leasing activities in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. Such fee is generally expected to range from 3.0% to 8.0% of the gross revenues generated during the initial term of the lease. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $103,000 and $558,000, respectively, in lease fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
25
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to similar lease fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we incurred $39,000 and $343,000, respectively, in lease fees to our former advisor or its affiliates, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any lease fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Lease fees are capitalized as lease commissions and included in other assets, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Construction Management Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, in the event that our sub-advisor or its affiliates assist with planning and coordinating the construction of any capital or tenant improvements, our sub-advisor or its affiliates are paid a construction management fee of up to 5.0% of the cost of such improvements. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $27,000 and $74,000, respectively, in construction management fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to similar construction management fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we incurred $49,000 and $62,000, respectively, in construction management fees to our former advisor or its affiliates, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any construction management fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
Construction management fees are capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in operating properties, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Operating Expenses
Effective as of January 7, 2012, we reimburse our sub-advisor or its affiliates for operating expenses incurred in rendering services to us, subject to certain limitations. However, we cannot reimburse our sub-advisor or its affiliates at the end of any fiscal quarter for total operating expenses that, in the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended, exceed the greater of: (i) 2.0% of our average invested assets, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, or (ii) 25.0% of our net income, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, unless our independent directors determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors.
For the 12 months ended September 30, 2012, our operating expenses did not exceed this limitation. Our operating expenses as a percentage of average invested assets and as a percentage of net income were 1.8% and 159.9%, respectively, for the 12 months ended September 30, 2012.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, our sub-advisor or its affiliates did not incur any operating expenses on our behalf.
Until January 6, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were entitled to a similar reimbursement of operating expenses. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, GEEA incurred operating expenses on our behalf of $10,000 and $19,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, GEEA did not incur any operating expenses on our behalf.
Operating expense reimbursements are included in general and administrative in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Related Party Services Agreement
We entered into a services agreement, effective September 21, 2009, or the Transfer Agent Services Agreement, with Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors, Transfer Agent, LLC, formerly known as Grubb & Ellis Investor Solutions, LLC, or our former transfer agent, for transfer agent and investor services. Since our former transfer agent was an affiliate of our former advisor, the terms of the Transfer Agent Services Agreement were approved and determined by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, as fair and reasonable to us and at fees which are no greater than that which would be paid to an unaffiliated party for similar services.
26
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
On November 7, 2011, we provided notice of termination of the Transfer Agent Services Agreement to our former transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Services Agreement, we were required to provide 60 days written notice of termination. Therefore, the Transfer Agent Services Agreement terminated on January 6, 2012. We engaged DST Systems, Inc., an unaffiliated party, to serve as our replacement transfer agent on January 6, 2012.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $0 and $81,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred $10,000 and $210,000, respectively, for investor services that our former transfer agent provided to us, which is included in general and administrative in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, GEEA incurred expenses of $0 and $33,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, GEEA incurred expenses of $2,000 and $80,000, respectively, for subscription agreement processing services that our former transfer agent provided to us. As an other organizational and offering expense, these subscription agreement processing expenses will only become our liability to the extent cumulative other organizational and offering expenses do not exceed 1.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering, other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP.
Compensation for Additional Services
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our sub-advisor and its affiliates are paid for services performed for us other than those required to be rendered by our sub-advisor or its affiliates under the Advisory Agreement. The rate of compensation for these services has to be approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, and cannot exceed an amount that would be paid to unaffiliated parties for similar services. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, our sub-advisor and its affiliates did not perform any additional services for us.
Prior to January 7, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates were also entitled to such compensation for additional services under similar conditions. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we incurred expenses of $26,000 and $46,000, respectively, for internal controls compliance services our former advisor or its affiliates provided to us. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates did not perform any additional services for us.
Liquidity Stage
Disposition Fees
Effective as of January 7, 2012, for services relating to the sale of one or more properties, our sub-advisor or its affiliates are paid a disposition fee up to the lesser of 2.0% of the contract sales price or 50.0% of a customary competitive real estate commission given the circumstances surrounding the sale, in each case as determined by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, upon the provision of a substantial amount of the services in the sales effort. The amount of disposition fees paid, when added to the real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated parties, will not exceed the lesser of the customary competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract sales price. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any disposition fees to our sub-advisor or its affiliates.
Prior to January 7, 2012, our former advisor or its affiliates would have been entitled to similar disposition fees. We did not incur any disposition fees to our former advisor or its affiliates.
27
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Subordinated Participation Interest
Subordinated Distribution of Net Sales Proceeds
Effective as of January 7, 2012, in the event of liquidation, our sub-advisor will be paid a subordinated distribution of net sales proceeds. The distribution will be equal to 15.0% of the net proceeds from the sales of properties, subject to certain reductions relating to properties acquired prior to Griffin-American Advisor’s appointment as our advisor, as set forth in the operating partnership agreement after distributions to our stockholders, in the aggregate, of (i) a full return of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) plus (ii) an annual 8.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock, as adjusted for distributions of net sale proceeds. Actual amounts to be received depend on the sale prices of properties upon liquidation. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not incur any such distributions to our sub-advisor.
Prior to January 7, 2012, our former advisor would have been entitled to a similar subordinated distribution of net sales proceeds. We did not incur any subordinated distribution of net sales proceeds to our former advisor.
Subordinated Distribution upon Listing
Effective as of January 7, 2012, upon the listing of shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, our sub-advisor will be paid a distribution equal to 15.0% of the amount by which (i) the market value of our outstanding common stock at listing plus distributions paid prior to listing exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) and the amount of cash that, if distributed to stockholders as of the date of listing, would have provided them an annual 8.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the date of listing, subject to certain reductions relating to properties acquired prior to Griffin-American Advisor’s appointment as our advisor, as set forth in the operating partnership agreement. Actual amounts to be received depend upon the market value of our outstanding stock at the time of listing among other factors. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we did not incur any such distributions to our sub-advisor.
Prior to January 7, 2012, our former advisor would have been entitled to a similar subordinated distribution upon listing. We did not incur any subordinated distribution upon listing to our former advisor.
Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination
Upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement, our sub-advisor will be entitled to a subordinated distribution from our operating partnership equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (i) the appraised value of our assets on the termination date, less any indebtedness secured by such assets, plus total distributions paid through the termination date, exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) and the total amount of cash that, if distributed to them as of the termination date, will provide them an annual 8.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the termination date, subject to certain reductions relating to properties acquired prior to Griffin-American Advisor’s appointment as our sub-advisor.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had not recorded any charges to earnings related to the subordinated distribution upon termination.
Executive Stock Purchase Plans
On April 7, 2011, our Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey T. Hanson, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Danny Prosky, each executed an executive stock purchase plan, or the G&E Plan, whereby each executive had irrevocably agreed to invest 100% and 50.0%, respectively, of their net after-tax
28
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
cash compensation as employees of our sponsor directly into our company by purchasing shares of our common stock on a regular basis, corresponding to regular payroll periods and the payment of any other net after-tax cash compensation, including bonuses. Their first investment under the G&E Plan began with their regularly scheduled payroll payment on April 29, 2011 and was to terminate on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2011, (ii) the termination of our initial offering, (iii) any suspension of our initial offering by our board of directors or regulatory body, or (iv) the date upon which the number of shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Hanson or Mr. Prosky, when combined with all their other investments in our common stock, exceeds the ownership limits set forth in our charter. The shares were purchased pursuant to our initial offering at a price of $9.00 per share, reflecting the elimination of selling commissions and the dealer manager fee in connection with such transactions.
On November 7, 2011, Messrs. Hanson and Prosky tendered their resignations from our former sponsor. On December 30, 2011, Messrs. Hanson and Prosky, as well as our Executive Vice President, Mathieu B. Streiff, each executed a stock purchase plan effective January 1, 2012, whereby each executive has irrevocably agreed to invest 100%, 50.0% and 50.0%, respectively, of all of their net after-tax salary and cash bonus compensation that is earned on or after February 1, 2012 as employees of American Healthcare Investors directly into our company by purchasing shares of our common stock. In January 2012, our Chief Financial Officer, Shannon K S Johnson; our Senior Vice President of Acquisitions, Stefan Oh; and our Secretary, Cora Lo; also entered into stock purchase plans in which they each irrevocably agreed to invest 15.0%, 15.0% and 10.0%, respectively, of their net after tax base salaries as employees of American Healthcare Investors into shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the stock purchase plans, each individual has directed that the respective portion of their net after-tax salary that is earned on or after February 1, 2012 as employees of American Healthcare Investors directly into our company by purchasing shares of our common stock. Such arrangements shall terminate on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2012, (ii) the termination of our initial offering, (iii) any suspension of our initial offering by our board of directors or a regulatory body, or (iv) the date upon which the number of shares of our common stock owned by any of them, when combined with all their other investments in our common stock, exceeds the ownership limits set forth in our charter. The shares will be purchased pursuant to our initial offering at a price of $9.00 per share, reflecting the elimination of selling commissions and the dealer manager fee in connection with such transactions.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, our executive officers invested the following amounts and we issued the following shares of our common stock pursuant to the applicable stock purchase plan.
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officer’s Name | Title | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey T. Hanson | Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer | $ | 142,000 | 15,814 | $ | 50,000 | 5,593 | $ | 176,000 | 19,531 | $ | 95,000 | 10,606 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Danny Prosky | President and Chief Operating Officer | $ | 76,000 | 8,458 | $ | 65,000 | 7,182 | $ | 98,000 | 10,905 | $ | 82,000 | 9,086 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mathieu B. Streiff | Executive Vice President | $ | 74,000 | 8,245 | $ | — | — | $ | 93,000 | 10,380 | $ | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shannon K S Johnson | Chief Financial Officer | $ | 5,000 | 565 | $ | — | — | $ | 12,000 | 1,296 | $ | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stefan Oh | Senior Vice President of Acquisitions | $ | 4,000 | 499 | $ | — | — | $ | 11,000 | 1,211 | $ | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cora Lo | Secretary | $ | 3,000 | 325 | $ | — | — | $ | 7,000 | 783 | $ | — | — |
Accounts Receivable Due From Affiliate
American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital paid the majority of the expenses we incurred in connection with the transition to our co-sponsors. The portion of the expenses that our co-sponsors agreed to pay was paid by us and then reimbursed by American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital within 120 days of payment. As such, as of December 31, 2011, we had recorded a receivable of $121,000 from American Healthcare Investors, an affiliate, which is included in accounts receivable due from affiliate in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We do not consider Griffin Capital an affiliate and therefore the receivable as of December 31, 2011 of $121,000 from Griffin Capital is included in accounts and other receivables, net in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We have received all outstanding amounts as of September 30, 2012.
29
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Accounts Payable Due to Affiliates
The following amounts were outstanding to our affiliates as of September 30, 2012 and to our former affiliates as of December 31, 2011:
Fee | September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||
Asset and property management fees | $ | 907,000 | $ | 405,000 | ||||
Offering costs | 195,000 | 93,000 | ||||||
Construction management fees | 52,000 | 64,000 | ||||||
Lease commissions | 35,000 | 34,000 | ||||||
Miscellaneous operating expenses | 1,000 | 72,000 | ||||||
Acquisition expenses | — | 2,000 | ||||||
On-site personnel and engineering payroll | — | 7,000 | ||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | — | 434,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
$ | 1,190,000 | $ | 1,111,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
12. Equity
Preferred Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 200,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Common Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of our common stock. Until November 6, 2012, we were offering and selling to the public up to 300,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for $10.00 per share and up to 30,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to be issued pursuant to the DRIP for $9.50 per share. On November 7, 2012, we began selling shares of our common stock at $10.22 per share and issuing shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. Accordingly, as of November 7, 2012, we are offering to the public up to approximately 295,945,000 shares of our common stock in our primary offering and approximately 29,420,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP. See Note 18, Subsequent Events — Change to Our Initial Offering Price, for a further discussion.
On February 4, 2009, our former advisor purchased 20,000 shares of common stock for total cash consideration of $200,000 and was admitted as the initial stockholder. We used the proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock to our former advisor to make an initial capital contribution to our operating partnership. We subsequently repurchased the 20,000 shares of our common stock from our former advisor in February 2012 in connection with our transition to our co-sponsors.
On January 4, 2012, Griffin-American Advisor acquired 22,222 shares of our common stock for $200,000.
On October 21, 2009, we granted an aggregate of 15,000 shares of our restricted common stock to our independent directors. On each of June 8, 2010 and June 14, 2011, in connection with their re-election, we granted an aggregate of 7,500 shares of our restricted common stock to our independent directors. Through September 30, 2012, we had issued 86,267,222 shares of our common stock in connection with our initial offering and 2,676,081 shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP, and we had also repurchased 390,638 shares of our common stock under our share repurchase plan. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had 88,604,887 and 48,869,669 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
As of September 30, 2012, we had a receivable of $2,731,000, net of selling commissions and dealer manager fees, from our transfer agent, which was received on October 1, 2012.
30
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Offering Costs
Selling Commissions
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our dealer manager receives selling commissions of up to 7.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. Our dealer manager may re-allow all or a portion of these fees to participating broker-dealers. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $12,765,000 and $25,502,000, respectively, in selling commissions to our dealer manager. Such commissions are charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts are paid to our dealer manager from the gross proceeds of our initial offering.
Dealer Manager Fee
Effective as of January 7, 2012, our dealer manager receives a dealer manager fee of up to 3.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. Our dealer manager may re-allow all or a portion of these fees to participating broker-dealers. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $5,625,000 and $11,197,000, respectively, in dealer manager fees to our dealer manager. Such fees are charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts are paid to our dealer manager from the gross proceeds of our initial offering.
Noncontrolling Interests
On February 4, 2009, our former advisor made an initial capital contribution of $2,000 to our operating partnership in exchange for 200 partnership units. On January 4, 2012, Griffin-American Advisor contributed $2,000 to acquire 200 limited partnership units of our operating partnership. On September 14, 2012, we entered into an agreement whereby we purchased all of the limited partnership interests held by our former advisor in our operating partnership.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned greater than a 99.99% general partnership interest in our operating partnership. As of September 30, 2012, our advisor and as of December 31, 2011, our former advisor owned less than a 0.01% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. As such, less than 0.01% of the earnings of our operating partnership are allocated to noncontrolling interests, subject to certain limitations.
In addition, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned a 98.75% interest in the consolidated limited liability company that owns the Pocatello East MOB property that was purchased on July 27, 2010. As such, 1.25% of the earnings of the Pocatello East MOB property are allocated to noncontrolling interests.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We adopted the DRIP that allows stockholders to purchase additional shares of our common stock through the reinvestment of distributions, subject to certain conditions. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $5,972,000 and $2,478,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and 628,606 and 260,834 shares of our common stock, respectively, were issued pursuant to the DRIP. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $14,621,000 and $5,599,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and 1,539,068 and 589,330 shares of our common stock, respectively, were issued pursuant to the DRIP. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, a total of $25,423,000 and $10,802,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and 2,676,081 and 1,137,013 shares of our common stock, respectively, were issued pursuant to the DRIP. Effective as of November 7, 2012, we amended the DRIP to issue shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. See Note 18, Subsequent Events — Change to Our Initial Offering Price, for a further discussion.
Share Repurchase Plan
Our board of directors has approved a share repurchase plan that allows for repurchases of shares of our common stock by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors. All repurchases are subject to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan. Subject to the availability of the funds for share repurchases, we will limit the number of shares of our common stock repurchased
31
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year; provided, however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death of a stockholder will not be subject to this cap. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP.
Until December 7, 2012, under our share repurchase plan, repurchase prices range from $9.25, or 92.5% of the price paid per share, following a one year holding period to an amount not less than 100% of the price paid per share following a four year holding period. On November 6, 2012, we amended our share repurchase plan. See Note 18, Subsequent Events — Share Repurchase Plan for a further discussion of this amendment to our share repurchase plan. However, if shares of our common stock are to be repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability, the repurchase price will be no less than 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares of our common stock from us. Furthermore, our share repurchase plan provides that if there are insufficient funds to honor all repurchase requests, pending requests will be honored among all requests for repurchase in any given repurchase period, as follows: first, pro rata as to repurchases sought upon a stockholder’s death; next, pro rata as to repurchases sought by stockholders with a qualifying disability; and, finally, pro rata as to other repurchase requests.
Under our share repurchase plan, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, we received share repurchase requests for 75,396 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $727,000 at an average repurchase price of $9.64 per share, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we received share repurchase requests for 241,836 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $2,341,000 at an average repurchase price of $9.68 per share, respectively, using proceeds we received from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP. Under our share repurchase plan, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, we received share repurchase requests for 23,377 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $218,000 at an average repurchase price of $9.30 per share, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we received share repurchase requests for 76,513 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $719,000 at an average repurchase price of $9.40 per share, respectively, using proceeds we received from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had received share repurchase requests for 390,638 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $3,749,000 at an average price of $9.60 per share and 148,802 shares of our common stock, all of which were repurchased for an aggregate of $1,408,000 at an average price of $9.46 per share, respectively, using proceeds we received from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP.
2009 Incentive Plan
We adopted our incentive plan, pursuant to which our board of directors or a committee of our independent directors may make grants of options, restricted shares of common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our incentive plan is 2,000,000.
On October 21, 2009, we granted an aggregate of 15,000 shares of our restricted common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to our independent directors in connection with their initial election to our board of directors, of which 20.0% vested on the grant date and 20.0% will vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. On each of June 8, 2010 and June 14, 2011, in connection with their re-election, we granted an aggregate of 7,500 shares of our restricted common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to our independent directors, which will vest over the same period described above. The fair value of each share of our restricted common stock was estimated at the date of grant at $10.00 per share, the per share price of shares in our initial offering, and with respect to the initial 20.0% of shares that vested on the grant date, expensed as compensation immediately, and with respect to the remaining shares, amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares of our restricted common stock may not be sold, transferred, exchanged, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered. Such restrictions expire upon vesting. Shares of our restricted common stock have full voting rights and rights to dividends. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recognized compensation expense of
32
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
$15,000 and $15,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recognized compensation expense of $48,000 and $53,000, respectively, related to the restricted common stock grants ultimately expected to vest. ASC Topic 718,Compensation — Stock Compensation, requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we did not assume any forfeitures. Stock compensation expense is included in general and administrative in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there was $97,000 and $145,000, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested shares of our restricted common stock. This expense is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.75 years.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the nonvested shares of our restricted common stock was $135,000 and $165,000, respectively. A summary of the status of the nonvested shares of our restricted common stock as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and the changes for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, is presented below:
Number of Nonvested Shares of our Restricted Common Stock | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||
Balance — December 31, 2011 | 16,500 | $ | 10.00 | |||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||
Vested | (3,000 | ) | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Forfeited | — | — | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Balance — September 30, 2012 | 13,500 | $ | 10.00 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Expected to vest — September 30, 2012 | 13,500 | $ | 10.00 | |||||
|
|
|
|
13. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities | Significant Other Observable Inputs | Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | $ | 871,000 | $ | — | $ | 871,000 | ||||||||
Contingent consideration obligations | — | — | 22,044,000 | 22,044,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — | $ | 871,000 | $ | 22,044,000 | $ | 22,915,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities | Significant Other Observable Inputs | Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration asset | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 115,000 | $ | 115,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets at fair value | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 115,000 | $ | 115,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | $ | — | $ | 819,000 | $ | — | $ | 819,000 | ||||||||
Contingent consideration obligations | — | — | 6,058,000 | 6,058,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — | $ | 819,000 | $ | 6,058,000 | $ | 6,877,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no transfers into and out of fair value measurement levels during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We use interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with floating rate debt. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
To comply with the provisions of ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,or ASC Topic 820, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparty. However, as of September 30, 2012, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our interest rate swaps. As a result, we have determined that our interest rate swaps valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Contingent Consideration
In connection with our property acquisitions, we have accrued $22,044,000 and $6,058,000 as contingent consideration obligations as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Such consideration will be paid upon various conditions being met including our tenants achieving certain rent coverage ratios, completing renovation projects or sellers leasing unoccupied space. Of the amount accrued as of September 30, 2012, $14,497,000 relates to our acquisition of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio on June 30, 2011 and $6,525,000 relates to our acquisition of Pacific Northwest Senior Care Portfolio on August 24, 2012.
34
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
An estimated $13,931,000 of such amount accrued related to Philadelphia SNF Portfolio will be paid upon the computation in the lease agreement and receipt of notification between two and six years after the acquisition date that the tenant has achieved a certain specified rent coverage ratio for the preceding 12 months. There is no minimum or maximum required payment; however, such payment is limited by the tenant’s rent coverage ratio and will result in an increase in the monthly rent charged to the tenant and additional rental revenue to us. We have assumed that the criteria above will be met and based on the tenant’s significant improvement in the specified rent coverage ratio for the three and eight months ended August 31, 2012, we have recorded an increase in the obligation of $12,454,000 and $12,529,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. We have assumed that we will receive notification from the tenant for a payment approximately 2.5 years from the date of acquisition, assumed a market multiplier rate, as such term is used in the lease agreement, of 14.44% and applied a discount factor of 11.0%.
The remaining $566,000 accrued as a contingent consideration obligation as of September 30, 2012 for Philadelphia SNF Portfolio is payable within two years of the acquisition date upon notification that (i) the tenant has achieved a certain specified rent coverage ratio for the three most recent calendar months and (ii) the tenant has completed improvements in an amount up to $2,500,000. The range of payment is between $0 and up to a maximum of $2,500,000; however, such payment will result in an increase in the monthly rent charged to the tenant and additional rental revenue to us. We have assumed that the criteria above will be met and as of September 30, 2012, we have made payments of $1,934,000 towards this obligation.
We could be required to pay up to $6,525,000 in contingent consideration with respect to our acquisition of Pacific Northwest Senior Care Portfolio. The first $4,700,000 of such contingent consideration can be paid immediately following the acquisition date upon notification that improvements up to such dollar amount have been completed by the tenant. The remaining portion of up to $1,825,000 could be paid within three years from the acquisition date provided that (i) the tenant has achieved a certain specified rent coverage ratio computed in the aggregate for the six most recent calendar months and (ii) the tenant has completed additional improvements in an amount up to $1,825,000. The range of payment is between $0 and up to a maximum of $6,525,000; however, such payment will result in an increase in the monthly rent charged to the tenant and additional rental revenue to us. We have assumed that the tenant will use and request the first $4,700,000 for the improvements and that the tenant will achieve the required rent coverage ratios for six consecutive months to qualify for the additional $1,825,000.
The fair value of the contingent consideration is determined based on the facts and circumstances existing at each reporting date and the likelihood of the counterparty achieving the necessary conditions based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow analysis based, in part, on significant inputs which are not observable in the market. As a result, we have determined that our contingent consideration valuations are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Our contingent consideration asset is included in other assets, net and our contingent consideration obligations are included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and any changes in their fair value subsequent to their acquisition date valuations are charged to earnings. Gains and losses recognized on contingent consideration assets and obligations are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
35
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our contingent consideration asset and obligations for three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Contingent Consideration Asset: | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 115,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
Realized/unrealized gains (losses) recognized in earnings | — | — | (113,000 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Settlement of asset | — | — | (2,000 | ) | — | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Ending balance | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Amount of total gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Contingent Consideration Obligations: | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 3,580,000 | $ | 5,402,000 | $ | 6,058,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
Additions to contingent consideration obligations | 7,485,000 | 656,000 | 7,485,000 | 6,058,000 | ||||||||||||
Realized/unrealized (gains) and losses recognized in earnings | 12,446,000 | — | 11,935,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Settlements of obligations | (1,467,000 | ) | — | (3,434,000 | ) | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 22,044,000 | $ | 6,058,000 | $ | 22,044,000 | $ | 6,058,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Amount of total (gains) losses included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized (gains) losses relating to obligations still held | $ | 12,446,000 | $ | — | $ | 12,591,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
ASC Topic 825,Financial Instruments,requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet. Fair value is defined under ASC Topic 820.
Our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, real estate and escrow deposits, accounts and other receivables, net, accounts receivable due from affiliate, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accounts payable due to affiliates, mortgage loans payable, net and borrowings under the unsecured line of credit.
We consider the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, real estate and escrow deposits, accounts and other receivables, net and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. The fair value of accounts receivable due from affiliate and accounts payable due to affiliates is not determinable due to the related party nature of the accounts.
The fair value of the mortgage loans payable and the unsecured line of credit is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using borrowing rates available to us for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the mortgage loans payable was $253,486,000 and $81,028,000, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $237,219,000 and $80,466,000, respectively. The fair value of the unsecured line of credit as of September 30, 2012 was $148,019,000 compared to a carrying value of $148,100,000. The fair value of the lines of credit as of December 31, 2011 was $0 compared to the carrying value of $0. We have determined that the mortgage loans payable and the line of credit valuations are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
14. Business Combinations
2012
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we completed 16 acquisitions comprising 65 buildings and 2,512,000 square feet of GLA. The aggregate purchase price was $654,741,000, plus closing costs and acquisition fees of $20,094,000, which are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a listing of the properties acquired, acquisition dates and the amount of financing initially incurred or assumed in connection with such acquisitions.
36
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Results of operations for the acquisitions are reflected in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for the period subsequent to the acquisition date of each property. For the period from the acquisition date through September 30, 2012, we recognized the following amounts of revenues and net income (loss) for the acquisitions:
Property | Revenues | Net Income (Loss) | ||||||
Southeastern SNF Portfolio | $ | 13,839,000 | $ | 5,158,000 | ||||
FLAGS MOB Portfolio | $ | 2,516,000 | $ | (567,000 | ) | |||
Spokane MOB | $ | 2,632,000 | $ | 344,000 | ||||
Centre Medical Plaza | $ | 1,267,000 | $ | 18,000 | ||||
Gulf Plains MOB Portfolio | $ | 923,000 | $ | 360,000 | ||||
Midwestern MOB Portfolio | $ | 1,098,000 | $ | (153,000 | ) | |||
Texarkana MOB | $ | 261,000 | $ | 87,000 | ||||
Greeley MOB | $ | 479,000 | $ | 94,000 | ||||
Columbia MOB | $ | 239,000 | $ | (27,000 | ) | |||
Ola Nalu MOB Portfolio | $ | 1,827,000 | $ | 301,000 | ||||
Silver Star MOB Portfolio | $ | 358,000 | $ | 161,000 | ||||
Shelbyville MOB | $ | 144,000 | $ | 42,000 | ||||
Jasper MOB Portfolio | $ | 89,000 | $ | 28,000 | ||||
Pacific Northwest Portfolio | $ | 679,000 | $ | 445,000 | ||||
East Tennessee MOB Portfolio | $ | 215,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Los Angeles Hospital Portfolio | $ | 106,000 | $ | 93,000 |
The following summarizes the fair value of our 16 acquisitions at the time of acquisition. We present separately the one individually significant acquisition during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Southeastern SNF Portfolio, and aggregate the rest of the acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Southeastern SNF Portfolio | Other 2012 Acquisitions | |||||||
Building and improvements | $ | 123,175,000 | $ | 373,645,000 | ||||
Land | 15,009,000 | 45,307,000 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 1,578,000 | — | ||||||
In-place leases | 20,919,000 | 37,429,000 | ||||||
Tenant relationships | 15,271,000 | 36,885,000 | ||||||
Leasehold interest | — | 3,803,000 | ||||||
Master leases | — | 42,000 | ||||||
Defeasible interest | — | 623,000 | ||||||
Above market leases | — | 5,670,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets acquired | 175,952,000 | 503,404,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Mortgage loans payable, net | (92,611,000 | ) | (71,197,000 | ) | ||||
Below market leases | — | (1,119,000 | ) | |||||
Above market leasehold interests | — | (1,515,000 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities | — | (11,465,000 | )(1) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liabilities assumed | (92,611,000 | ) | (85,296,000 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net assets acquired | $ | 83,341,000 | $ | 418,108,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
37
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
(1) | Included in other liabilities is $6,525,000 and $960,000 accrued for as contingent consideration in connection with the purchase of Pacific Northwest Senior Care Portfolio and Silver Star MOB Portfolio, respectively. For a further discussion, see Note 13, Fair Value Measurements – Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value – Contingent Consideration. |
Assuming the acquisitions in 2012 discussed above had occurred on January 1, 2011, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, pro forma revenues, net (loss) income, net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest and net (loss) income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted would have been as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 32,691,000 | $ | 28,901,000 | $ | 96,968,000 | $ | 80,695,000 | ||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (10,123,000 | ) | $ | 3,410,000 | $ | 3,985,000 | $ | 4,249,000 | |||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest | $ | (10,125,000 | ) | $ | (3,410,000 | ) | $ | 3,983,000 | $ | 4,248,000 | ||||||
Net (loss) income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.05 |
The pro forma adjustments assume that the debt proceeds and the offering proceeds, at a price of $10.00 per share, net of offering costs were raised as of January 1, 2011. In addition, as acquisition related expenses related to the acquisitions are not expected to have a continuing impact, they have been excluded from the pro forma results. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been obtained had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
2011
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we completed 11 acquisitions comprising 30 buildings and 1,059,000 square feet of GLA. The aggregate purchase price was $237,343,000, plus closing costs and acquisition fees of $12,090,000, $9,342,000 of which are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and $2,748,000 of which is capitalized as part of the measurement of the fair value of the tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities of the properties and included in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a listing of the properties acquired, acquisition dates and the amount of financing initially incurred or assumed in connection with such acquisitions.
Results of operations for the property acquisitions are reflected in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 for the periods subsequent to the acquisition date of each property. For the period from the acquisition date through September 30, 2011, we recognized the following amounts of revenues and net income for the acquisitions:
Property | Revenues | Net Income (Loss) | ||||||
Columbia Long-Term Acute Care Hospital | $ | 981,000 | $ | 610,000 | ||||
St. Anthony North Denver Medical Office Building | $ | 877,000 | $ | (497,000 | ) | |||
Loma Linda Pediatric Specialty Hospital | $ | 792,000 | $ | (416,000 | ) | |||
Yuma Skilled Nursing Facility | $ | 551,000 | $ | (416,000 | ) | |||
Hardy Oak Medical Office Building | $ | 554,000 | $ | (614,000 | ) | |||
Lakewood Ranch Medical Office Building | $ | 819,000 | $ | (828,000 | ) | |||
Dixie-Lobo Medical Office Building Portfolio | $ | 1,305,000 | $ | (2,484,000 | ) | |||
Milestone Medical Office Building Portfolio | $ | 1,596,000 | $ | (2,584,000 | ) | |||
Philadelphia SNF Portfolio | $ | 2,264,000 | $ | (7,876,000 | ) | |||
Maxfield Medical Office Building | $ | 223,000 | $ | (604,000 | ) | |||
Layette Physical Rehabilitation Hospital | $ | 4,000 | $ | (821,000 | ) |
38
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
The following summarizes the fair value of our 11 acquisitions at the time of acquisition. We present separately the three individually significant acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Dixie-Lobo Medical Office Building Portfolio, Milestone Medical Office Building Portfolio and Philadelphia SNF Portfolio, and aggregate the rest of the acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Dixie-Lobo Medical Office Building Portfolio | Milestone Medical Office Building Portfolio | Philadelphia SNF Portfolio | Other 2011 Acquisitions | |||||||||||||
Building and improvements | $ | 22,192,000 | $ | 32,744,000 | $ | 68,418,000 | $ | 70,605,000 | ||||||||
Land | — | 495,000 | 4,747,000 | 6,492,000 | ||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | — | — | 1,065,000 | — | ||||||||||||
In-place leases | 1,682,000 | 2,519,000 | 6,326,000 | 7,111,000 | ||||||||||||
Tenant relationships | 2,808,000 | 2,531,000 | — | 5,894,000 | ||||||||||||
Leasehold interest | 3,449,000 | 5,301,000 | — | 1,521,000 | ||||||||||||
Master lease | — | 580,000 | — | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Above market leases | — | 804,000 | — | 470,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total assets acquired | 30,131,000 | 44,974,000 | 80,556,000 | 92,113,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Mortgage loans payable, net | (23,320,000 | ) | — | — | (10,621,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Below market leases | — | (34,000 | ) | — | (208,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Other liabilities | — | — | (4,056,000 | )(1) | (2,156,000 | )(2) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total liabilities assumed | (23,320,000 | ) | (34,000 | ) | (4,056,000 | ) | (12,985,000 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net assets acquired | $ | 6,811,000 | $ | 44,940,000 | $ | 76,500,000 | $ | 79,128,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Included in other liabilities is $1,402,000 and $2,500,000 accrued for as contingent consideration in connection with the purchase of Philadelphia SNF Portfolio. For a further discussion, see Note 13, Fair Value Measurements – Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value – Contingent Consideration. |
(2) | Included in other liabilities is $1,500,000 and $656,000 accrued for as contingent consideration in connection with the purchase of Yuma Skilled Nursing Facility and Maxfield Medical Office Building, respectively. For a further discussion, see Note 13, Fair Value Measurements – Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value – Contingent Consideration. |
Assuming the property acquisitions in 2011 discussed above had occurred on January 1, 2010, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, pro forma revenues, net income, net income attributable to controlling interest and net income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted would have been as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 12,803,000 | $ | 37,994,000 | ||||
Net income | $ | 1,472,000 | $ | 5,720,000 | ||||
Net income attributable to controlling interest | $ | 1,472,000 | $ | 5,719,000 | ||||
Net income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.12 |
The pro forma adjustments assume that the offering proceeds, at a price of $10.00 per share, net of offering costs were raised as of January 1, 2010. In addition, as acquisition related expenses related to the acquisitions are not expected to have a continuing impact, they have been excluded from the pro forma results. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been obtained had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
39
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
15. Segment Reporting
As of September 30, 2012, we evaluated our business and made resource allocations based on four reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. Our medical office buildings are typically leased to multiple tenants under separate leases in each building, thus requiring active management and responsibility for many of the associated operating expenses (although many of these are, or can effectively be, passed through to the tenants). Our hospital investments are primarily single tenant properties which lease the facilities to unaffiliated tenants under “triple-net” and generally “master” leases that transfer the obligation for all facility operating costs (including maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures) to the tenant. Our skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities are acquired and similarly structured as our hospital investments. The accounting policies of these segments are the same as those described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012. There are no intersegment sales or transfers.
We evaluate performance based upon net operating income of the combined properties in each segment. We define net operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, as total revenues, less rental expenses, which excludes depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, acquisition related expenses, interest expense and interest income. We believe that net income (loss), as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we believe that segment net operating income serves as a useful supplement to net income (loss) because it allows investors and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. Segment net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our financial performance, and, accordingly, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, segment net operating income should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and data included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and other expenses not attributable to individual properties are not allocated to individual segments for purposes of assessing segment performance.
Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets including cash and cash equivalents, real estate and escrow deposits, deferred financing costs and other assets not attributable to individual properties.
40
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Summary information for the reportable segments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
Medical Office Buildings | Hospitals | Skilled Nursing Facilities | Assisted Living Facilities | Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 14,987,000 | $ | 2,303,000 | $ | 9,612,000 | $ | 232,000 | $ | 27,134,000 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 5,000,000 | 212,000 | 708,000 | 22,000 | 5,942,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Segment net operating income | $ | 9,987,000 | $ | 2,091,000 | $ | 8,904,000 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 21,192,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,935,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase | 4,232,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 21,174,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,743,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (17,892,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount and premium): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (3,548,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 4,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (21,436,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Medical Office Buildings | Hospitals | Skilled Nursing Facilities | Assisted Living Facilities | Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 6,529,000 | $ | 1,832,000 | $ | 4,143,000 | $ | — | $ | 12,504,000 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 2,113,000 | 151,000 | 400,000 | — | 2,664,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Segment net operating income | $ | 4,416,000 | $ | 1,681,000 | $ | 3,743,000 | $ | — | $ | 9,840,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,563,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 913,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,553,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 2,811,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount and premium): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (2,199,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (202,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 3,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | 413,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
41
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Medical Office Buildings | Hospitals | Skilled Nursing Facilities | Assisted Living Facilities | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 33,739,000 | $ | 6,700,000 | $ | 26,999,000 | $ | 232,000 | $ | 67,670,000 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 11,382,000 | 621,000 | 1,989,000 | 22,000 | 14,014,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Segment net operating income | $ | 22,357,000 | $ | 6,079,000 | $ | 25,010,000 | $ | 210,000 | $ | 53,656,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 7,753,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase | 4,232,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 32,326,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 25,707,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (16,362,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount and premium): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (9,747,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (52,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 11,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,150,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Medical Office Buildings | Hospitals | Skilled Nursing Facilities | Assisted Living Facilities | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 14,673,000 | $ | 5,368,000 | $ | 7,145,000 | $ | — | $ | 27,186,000 | ||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 4,659,000 | 434,000 | 591,000 | — | 5,684,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Segment net operating income | $ | 10,014,000 | $ | 4,934,000 | $ | 6,554,000 | $ | — | $ | 21,502,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 3,942,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 9,698,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,029,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (2,167,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount and premium): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (4,767,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (427,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 9,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (7,352,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Assets by reportable segments as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Medical office buildings | $ | 569,235,000 | $ | 218,232,000 | ||||
Hospitals | 160,844,000 | 77,081,000 | ||||||
Skilled nursing facilities | 363,392,000 | 151,081,000 | ||||||
Assisted living facilities | 30,661,000 | — | ||||||
All other | 11,903,000 | 52,758,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets | $1,136,035,000 | $499,152,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
16. Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents, escrow deposits, restricted cash and accounts and other receivables. Cash is generally invested in investment-grade, short-term instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. We have cash in financial institutions that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents, escrow deposits and restricted cash accounts in excess of FDIC insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable from tenants is limited. We perform credit evaluations of prospective tenants, and security deposits are obtained upon lease execution.
42
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Based on leases in effect as of September 30, 2012, we owned properties in three states for which each state accounted for 10.0% or more of our annualized base rent. Texas accounted for 13.4%, Georgia accounted for 13.1% and California accounted for 12.5% of our annualized base rent. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each state’s economy.
Based on leases in effect as of September 30, 2012, our four reportable business segments, medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities, accounted for 49.0%, 15.5%, 33.8% and 1.7%, respectively, of our annualized base rent. As of September 30, 2012, one of our tenants at our consolidated properties accounted for 10.0% or more of our annualized base rent, as follows:
Tenant | 2012 Annual Base Rent(1) | Percentage of 2012 Annual Base Rent | Property | GLA (Square Feet) | Lease Expiration Date | |||||||||||||||
Warsaw Road, L.P. (Wellington Healthcare Services, L.P.) | $ | 15,818,000 | 15.7 | % | Southeastern SNF Portfolio | 454,000 | 01/31/27 |
(1) | Annualized base rent is based on contractual base rent from the lease in effect as of September 30, 2012. The loss of this tenant or their inability to pay rent could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. |
17. Per Share Data
We report earnings (loss) per share pursuant to ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest by the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of our common stock and all potentially dilutive securities, if any. Nonvested shares of our restricted common stock give rise to potentially dilutive shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were 13,500 shares and 19,500 shares, respectively, of nonvested shares of our restricted common stock outstanding, but such shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because such shares were anti-dilutive during these periods.
18. Subsequent Events
Status of Our Initial Offering
As of November 2, 2012, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 99,407,963 shares of our common stock, or $991,698,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP.
Share Repurchase Plan
In October 2012, we repurchased 165,501 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate amount of $1,612,000, under our share repurchase plan. On November 6, 2012, our board of directors approved an Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan, whereby all shares repurchased on or after December 7, 2012 would be repurchased at 92.5% to 100% of each stockholder’s repurchase amount depending on the period of time their shares have been held. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan, at any time we are engaged in an offering of shares of our common stock, the repurchase amount for shares repurchased under our share repurchase plan will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per share offering price.
43
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
Change to Our Initial Offering Price
On November 7, 2012, we began selling shares of our common stock in our initial offering at a price of $10.22 per share, and as a result of our board of directors amending the DRIP to state that all shares issued pursuant to the DRIP would be offered at a price equal to 95.0% of the primary offering price of our initial offering, we began issuing shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. Accordingly, as of November 7, 2012, we are offering to the public up to approximately 295,945,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our primary offering for an aggregate of $3,000,000,000 and approximately 29,420,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP for an aggregate of $285,000,000.
On October 31, 2012, our board of directors declared a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing from November 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, a distribution of $0.001863014 per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.65%, assuming a purchase price of $10.22 per share. The distributions will be aggregated and paid in cash or reinvested in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP monthly in arrears. The distributions paid for each record date will be paid only from legally available funds.
Property Acquisitions
Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we completed one acquisition comprising one building from an unaffiliated party. The aggregate purchase price of this property was $23,250,000 and we incurred $605,000 in acquisition fees to our advisor entities or their affiliates in connection with this acquisition. We have not yet measured the fair value of the tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities of the acquisition. The following is a summary of our acquisition subsequent to September 30, 2012:
Property | Location | Type | Date Acquired | Ownership Percentage | Purchase Price | Mortgage Loans Payable(1) | Line of Credit(2) | Acquisition Fee(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bellaire Hospital | Houston, TX | Hospital | 11/09/12 | 100 | % | $ | 23,250,000 | $ | — | $ | 12,000,000 | $ | 605,000 |
(1) | Represents the balance of the mortgage loans payable assumed by us on the property at the time of acquisition. |
(2) | Represents borrowings under the unsecured line of credit at the time of acquisition. We periodically advance funds and pay down the unsecured line of credit as needed. |
(3) | Our advisor entities and their affiliates were paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.60% of the contract purchase price, which was paid as follows: (i) in shares of our common stock in an amount equal to 0.15% of the contract purchase price, at $9.198 per share, the established offering price as of the date of closing, net of selling commissions and dealer manager fees, and (ii) the remainder in cash equal to 2.45% of the contract purchase price. |
Note Receivable
On October 5, 2012, we entered into a loan agreement to loan up to $12,100,000 to Medistar Murray LTACH, LLC, an unaffiliated third party, or the borrower, which is secured by Salt Lake City LTACH, or the Salt Lake City Note. The purpose of the Salt Lake City Note is to provide the borrower with construction financing which will be used to complete the construction of Salt Lake City LTACH. The Salt Lake City Note requires interest only payments payable monthly, in arrears, beginning on November 1, 2012 and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter through and including October 1, 2013. The Salt Lake City Note matures on October 5, 2013 and all unpaid principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, is due in full. The Salt Lake City Note may be extended by one six-month period at our discretion and the payment of a one percent extension fee. Advances under the Salt Lake City Note bear interest at a per annum rate equal to the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal for such day plus 2.00%, subject to a minimum interest rate floor of 5.25% per annum. The Salt Lake City Note may be paid in full as part of the subsequent acquisition of property by us. Our advisor entities and their affiliates were paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the Salt Lake City Note, an acquisition fee of 2.00%, or $79,000, of the total amount advanced under the Salt Lake City Note. As of November 14, 2012, advances outstanding under the Salt Lake City Note totaled $3,946,000 and $8,154,000 remained available.
44
Table of Contents
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — (Continued)
On October 5, 2012, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire Salt Lake City LTACH for a contract purchase price of $12,800,000, subject to adjustment to $13,700,000 pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, plus closing costs. We anticipate closing on the acquisition of Salt Lake City LTACH upon completion of construction and occupancy by the tenant. However, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to acquire the Salt Lake City LTACH property within the anticipated timeframe, or at all.
45
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such condensed consolidated financial statements and information have been prepared to reflect our financial position as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, together with our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Forward-Looking Statements
Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative of future operations. Our statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “expect,” “project,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; legislative and regulatory changes, including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts, or REITs; the availability of capital; changes in interest rates; competition in the real estate industry; the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed market areas; changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, policies and guidelines applicable to REITs; the success of our best efforts initial public offering; the availability of properties to acquire; the availability of financing; and our ongoing relationship with American Healthcare Investors LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and Griffin Capital Corporation, or Griffin Capital, or our co-sponsors, and their affiliates. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
Overview and Background
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated as Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. on January 7, 2009 and therefore we consider that our date of inception. We were initially capitalized on February 4, 2009. Our board of directors adopted an amendment to our charter, which was filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation on January 3, 2012, to change our corporate name from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. We intend to invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities. We may also originate and acquire secured loans and real estate-related investments. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2010 and we intend to continue to be taxed as a REIT.
We are conducting a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, of up to $3,285,000,000 of shares of our common stock. Until November 6, 2012, we were offering up to 300,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share in our primary offering and 30,000,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, for $9.50 per share, for a maximum offering of up to $3,285,000,000. On November 7, 2012, we began selling shares of our common stock at $10.22 per share and issuing shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. Accordingly, as of November 7, 2012, we are offering to the public up to approximately 295,945,000 shares of our common stock in our primary offering and approximately 29,420,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP. See Note 18, Subsequent Events — Change to Our Initial Offering Price, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, for a further discussion. The SEC declared our registration statement effective as of August 24, 2009. We will sell shares of our common stock in our initial offering until the earlier of February 20, 2013 or the date on which the maximum offering amount has been sold. As of September 30, 2012, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 86,267,222 shares of our common stock, or $860,687,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP.
46
Table of Contents
On June 6, 2012, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-181928) with the SEC with respect to a proposed follow-on public offering, or our follow-on offering, of up to $1,500,000,000 of shares of our common stock and up to $150,000,000 of shares of our common stock to be offered for sale pursuant to the DRIP. We have not issued any shares under this registration statement as it has not yet been declared effective by the SEC.
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership. On January 3, 2012, our operating partnership filed an Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership with the Delaware Department of State to change its name from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP.
Until January 6, 2012, we were externally advised by Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Advisor, LLC, or our former advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, as amended and restated, or the G&E Advisory Agreement, between us and our former advisor. From August 24, 2009 through January 6, 2012, our former advisor supervised and managed our day-to-day operations and selected the properties and real estate-related investments we acquired, subject to the oversight and approval of our board of directors. Our former advisor also provided marketing, sales and client services on our behalf and engaged affiliated entities to provide various services to us. Our former advisor is managed by and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Equity Advisors, LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Company, or Grubb & Ellis, or our former sponsor.
On November 7, 2011, our independent directors determined that it was in the best interests of our company and its stockholders to transition advisory and dealer manager services rendered to us by affiliates of Grubb & Ellis and to engage American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital as replacement co-sponsors. As a result, on November 7, 2011, we notified our former advisor that we terminated the G&E Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to the G&E Advisory Agreement, either party could terminate the G&E Advisory Agreement without cause or penalty; however, certain rights and obligations of the parties would survive during a 60-day transition period and beyond.
In addition, on November 7, 2011, we notified Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation that we terminated the dealer manager agreement dated June 1, 2011 between us and Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation, or the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement, in accordance with the terms thereof. Until January 6, 2012, Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation remained a non-exclusive agent of our company and distributor of shares of our common stock.
As a result of the co-sponsorship arrangement, an affiliate of Griffin Capital, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, began serving as our advisor on January 7, 2012 pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, that took effect upon the expiration of the 60-day transition period provided for in the G&E Advisory Agreement. Our advisor delegates advisory duties to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Sub-Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Sub-Advisor, or our sub-advisor. Griffin-American Sub-Advisor is jointly owned by our co-sponsors. Our advisor, through our sub-advisor, uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight, review and approval of our board of directors, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our sub-advisor performs its duties and responsibilities pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement with our advisor and also acts as our fiduciary. Collectively, we refer to our advisor and our sub-advisor as our advisor entities. Griffin Capital Securities, Inc., or Griffin Securities, or our dealer manager, an affiliate of Griffin Capital, serves as our dealer manager pursuant to a dealer manager agreement, or the Dealer Manager Agreement, that also became effective on January 7, 2012. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin-American Advisor or Griffin Securities; however, we are affiliated with Griffin-American Sub-Advisor and American Healthcare Investors.
47
Table of Contents
American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital paid the majority of the expenses we incurred in connection with the transition to our co-sponsors.
We currently operate through four reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. As of September 30, 2012, we had completed 41 acquisitions comprising 121 buildings and approximately 4,499,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,093,366,000.
Critical Accounting Policies
The complete listing of our Critical Accounting Policies was previously disclosed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012, and there have been no material changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as disclosed therein.
Interim Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in our view, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year; such full year results may be less favorable. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Acquisitions in 2012 and 2011
For a discussion of our acquisitions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, see Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of our acquisitions subsequent to September 30, 2012, see Note 18, Subsequent Events — Property Acquisitions, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Factors Which May Influence Results of Operations
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of properties other than those listed in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those Risk Factors previously disclosed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
Rental Income
The amount of rental income generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease currently available space and space available from lease terminations at the then existing rental rates. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect our rental income in future periods.
48
Table of Contents
Offering Proceeds
If we fail to raise substantially more proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering and our follow-on offering, or our offerings, than the amount we have raised to date, we will have limited diversification in terms of the number of investments owned, the geographic regions in which our investments are located and the types of investments that we make. As a result, our real estate portfolio would be concentrated in a small number of properties, which would increase exposure to local and regional economic downturns and the poor performance of one or more of our properties, whereby our stockholders would be exposed to increased risk. In addition, many of our expenses are fixed regardless of the size of our real estate portfolio. Therefore, depending on the amount of proceeds we raise from our offerings, we would expend a larger portion of our income on operating expenses. This would reduce our profitability and, in turn, the amount of net income available for distribution to our stockholders.
Scheduled Lease Expirations
As of September 30, 2012, our consolidated properties were 96.8% occupied. During the remainder of 2012, 0.9% of the occupied GLA is scheduled to expire. Our leasing strategy focuses on negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of the year. In the future, if we are unable to negotiate renewals, we will try to identify new tenants or collaborate with existing tenants who are seeking additional space to occupy.
As of September 30, 2012, our remaining weighted average lease term is 9.4 years.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and related laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and disclosure requirements applicable to public companies have increased the costs of compliance with corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices. These costs may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could impact our ability to pay distributions at current rates to our stockholders. Furthermore, we expect that these costs will increase in the future due to our continuing implementation of compliance programs mandated by these requirements. Any increased costs may affect our ability to distribute funds to our stockholders. As part of our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we have provided management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 and will continue to comply with such regulations.
In addition, these laws, rules and regulations create new legal bases for potential administrative enforcement, civil and criminal proceedings against us in the event of non-compliance, thereby increasing the risks of liability and potential sanctions against us. We expect that our efforts to comply with these laws and regulations will continue to involve significant and potentially increasing costs, and that our failure to comply with these laws could result in fees, fines, penalties or administrative remedies against us.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
Our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are primarily comprised of income derived from our portfolio of properties and acquisition related expenses in connection with the acquisition of such properties.
As of September 30, 2012, we operate through four reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities. Except where otherwise noted, the change in our results of operations is primarily due to our 121 buildings acquired as of September 30, 2012 as compared to 55 buildings as of September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, we owned the following types of properties:
49
Table of Contents
As of September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Buildings | Aggregate Purchase Price | Leased % | Number of Buildings | Aggregate Purchase Price | Leased % | |||||||||||||||||||
Medical office buildings | 69 | $ | 561,740,000 | 94.2 | % | 32 | $ | 208,890,000 | 94.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Hospitals | 12 | 162,895,000 | 100 | % | 7 | 77,895,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Skilled nursing facilities | 35 | 346,731,000 | 100 | % | 16 | 144,000,000 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Assisted living facilities | 5 | 22,000,000 | 100 | % | — | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average | 121 | $ | 1,093,366,000 | 96.8 | % | 55 | $ | 430,785,000 | 97.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, rental income was $27,134,000 and $12,504,000, respectively, and was primarily comprised of base rent of $20,940,000 and $9,723,000, respectively, and expense recoveries of $4,377,000 and $2,006,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, rental income was $67,670,000 and $27,186,000, respectively, and was primarily comprised of base rent of $52,448,000 and $21,251,000, respectively, and expense recoveries of $10,406,000 and $4,138,000, respectively.
Rental income by operating segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Medical office buildings | $ | 14,987,000 | $ | 6,529,000 | $ | 33,739,000 | $ | 14,673,000 | ||||||||
Hospitals | 2,303,000 | 1,832,000 | 6,700,000 | 5,368,000 | ||||||||||||
Skilled nursing facilities | 9,612,000 | 4,143,000 | 26,999,000 | 7,145,000 | ||||||||||||
Assisted living facilities | 232,000 | — | 232,000 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 27,134,000 | $ | 12,504,000 | $ | 67,670,000 | $ | 27,186,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, rental expenses were $5,942,000 and $2,664,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, rental expenses were $14,014,000 and $5,684,000, respectively. Rental expenses consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | $ | 2,738,000 | $ | 1,199,000 | $ | 6,700,000 | $ | 2,484,000 | ||||||||
Utilities | 1,035,000 | 486,000 | 2,194,000 | 965,000 | ||||||||||||
Building maintenance | 907,000 | 480,000 | 2,160,000 | 1,099,000 | ||||||||||||
Property management fees—affiliates | 608,000 | 258,000 | 1,416,000 | 571,000 | ||||||||||||
Administration | 221,000 | 81,000 | 493,000 | 220,000 | ||||||||||||
Insurance | 125,000 | 58,000 | 300,000 | 123,000 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of leasehold interests | 63,000 | 52,000 | 183,000 | 88,000 | ||||||||||||
Other | 245,000 | 50,000 | 568,000 | 134,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 5,942,000 | $ | 2,664,000 | $ | 14,014,000 | $ | 5,684,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Table of Contents
Rental expenses and rental expenses as a percentage of revenue by operating segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical office buildings | $ | 5,000,000 | 33.4 | % | $ | 2,113,000 | 32.4 | % | $ | 11,382,000 | 33.7 | % | $ | 4,659,000 | 31.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Hospitals | 212,000 | 9.2 | % | 151,000 | 8.2 | % | 621,000 | 9.3 | % | 434,000 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Skilled nursing facilities | 708,000 | 7.4 | % | 400,000 | 9.7 | % | 1,989,000 | 7.4 | % | 591,000 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assisted living facilities | 22,000 | 9.5 | % | — | — | % | 22,000 | 9.5 | % | — | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average | $ | 5,942,000 | 21.9 | % | $ | 2,664,000 | 21.3 | % | $ | 14,014,000 | 20.7 | % | $ | 5,684,000 | 20.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, as compared to 2011, the percentage of rental expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2012 remained relatively consistent.
General and Administrative
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, general and administrative was $2,935,000 and $1,563,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, general and administrative was $7,753,000 and $3,942,000, respectively. General and administrative consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Asset management fees—affiliates | $ | 1,794,000 | $ | 902,000 | $ | 4,499,000 | $ | 1,998,000 | ||||||||
Professional and legal fees | 403,000 | 314,000 | 1,458,000 | 777,000 | ||||||||||||
Transfer agent services | 330,000 | — | 765,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Board of directors fees | 82,000 | 85,000 | 250,000 | 218,000 | ||||||||||||
Bank charges | 66,000 | 39,000 | 160,000 | 80,000 | ||||||||||||
Directors' and officers' liability insurance | 54,000 | 35,000 | 138,000 | 123,000 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 29,000 | 5,000 | 106,000 | 250,000 | ||||||||||||
Franchise taxes | 112,000 | 70,000 | 174,000 | 143,000 | ||||||||||||
Postage and delivery | 35,000 | 9,000 | 92,000 | 68,000 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock compensation | 15,000 | 15,000 | 48,000 | 53,000 | ||||||||||||
Transfer agent services — former affiliate | — | 81,000 | 10,000 | 210,000 | ||||||||||||
Other | 15,000 | 8,000 | 53,000 | 22,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 2,935,000 | $ | 1,563,000 | $ | 7,753,000 | $ | 3,942,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative is primarily the result of purchasing additional properties in 2012 and thus incurring higher asset management fees, as well as incurring higher professional and legal fees as a result of our increase in assets.
Subordinated Distribution Purchase
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a charge of $4,232,000, which pertained to a settlement agreement we and our operating partnership entered into on September 14, 2012 with BGC Partners, Inc., or BGC Partners, to transfer certain assets held by BGC Partners to us, including 200 units of limited partnership interest held in our operating partnership and any rights to the payment of any subordinated distribution that may have been owed to our former advisor and its affiliates, including our former sponsor, for consideration of $4,300,000. Of the $4,300,000 paid by us, $4,232,000 is reflected in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $68,000 is in satisfaction of all remaining payments owed by us to our former advisor and its affiliates, including our former sponsor, under the G&E Advisory Agreement.
Acquisition Related Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred acquisition related expenses of $21,174,000 and $913,000, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, acquisition related expenses related primarily to expenses associated with the acquisition of 32 and two buildings, respectively, completed during each period, including acquisition fees of $0 and $531,000, respectively, incurred to our former advisor or its affiliates and acquisition fees of $7,212,000 and $0, respectively, incurred to our sub-advisor or its affiliates. In addition, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded $12,446,000 in acquisition related expenses as a net unrealized loss on contingent consideration obligations as compared to $0 for the three
51
Table of Contents
months ended September 30, 2011. The net unrealized loss on contingent consideration obligations was primarily due to one tenant’s significant improvement in its specified rent coverage ratio for the three and eight months ended August 31, 2012. The increase in acquisition related expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011 is due to purchasing $277,399,000 in acquisitions in 2012 as compared to $19,300,000 in acquisitions in 2011, as well as the $12,446,000 net unrealized loss on contingent consideration obligations.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we incurred acquisition related expenses of $32,326,000 and $9,698,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, acquisition related expenses related primarily to expenses associated with the acquisition of 65 and 30 buildings, respectively, completed during each period, including acquisition fees of $4,579,000 and $6,523,000, respectively, incurred to our former advisor or its affiliates and acquisition fees of $12,695,000 and $0, respectively, incurred to our sub-advisor or its affiliates. In addition, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded $11,822,000 in acquisition related expenses as a net unrealized/realized loss on contingent consideration as compared to $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The net unrealized/realized loss on contingent consideration was primarily due to one tenant’s significant improvement in its specified rent coverage ratio for the three and eight months ended August 31, 2012. The increase in acquisition related expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is due to purchasing $654,741,000 in acquisitions in 2012 as compared to $237,343,000 in acquisitions in 2011, as well as the $11,822,000 net unrealized/realized loss on contingent consideration obligations.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, depreciation and amortization was $10,743,000 and $4,553,000, respectively, and consisted primarily of depreciation on our operating properties of $6,766,000 and $3,120,000, respectively, and amortization on our identified intangible assets of $3,950,000 and $1,425,000, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, depreciation and amortization was $25,707,000 and $10,029,000, respectively, and consisted primarily of depreciation on our operating properties of $16,839,000 and $6,688,000, respectively, and amortization on our identified intangible assets of $8,802,000 and $3,324,000, respectively.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, interest expense including loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments was $3,548,000 and $2,401,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, interest expense including loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments was $9,799,000 and $5,194,000, respectively. Interest expense consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense — mortgage loans payable and derivative financial instruments | $ | 2,880,000 | $ | 1,251,000 | $ | 7,811,000 | $ | 3,146,000 | ||||||||
Interest expense — lines of credit | 518,000 | 570,000 | 1,263,000 | 743,000 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs — lines of credit | 266,000 | 236,000 | 764,000 | 414,000 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs — mortgage loans payable | 157,000 | 172,000 | 556,000 | 465,000 | ||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of our derivative financial instruments | — | 202,000 | 52,000 | 427,000 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt — write-off of deferred financing costs and debt discount | 18,000 | 2,000 | 35,000 | 44,000 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount and (premium), net | (291,000 | ) | (32,000 | ) | (682,000 | ) | (45,000 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | 3,548,000 | $ | 2,401,000 | $ | 9,799,000 | $ | 5,194,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had interest income of $4,000 and $3,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we had interest income of $11,000 and $9,000, respectively, related to interest earned on funds held in cash accounts.
52
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are dependent upon the net proceeds from our offerings to provide the capital required to acquire real estate and real estate-related investments, net of any indebtedness that we may incur. Our ability to raise funds through our offerings is dependent on general economic conditions, general market conditions for REITs and our operating performance. The capital required to purchase real estate and real estate-related investments is obtained primarily from our offerings and from any indebtedness that we may incur.
We expect to experience a relative increase in liquidity as additional subscriptions for shares of our common stock are received and a relative decrease in liquidity as net offering proceeds are expended in connection with the acquisition, management and operation of our real estate and real estate-related investments.
Our sources of funds will primarily be the net proceeds of our initial offering and our follow-on offering, if and when declared effective by the SEC, operating cash flows and borrowings. We believe that these cash resources will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other sources within the next 12 months.
Our principal demands for funds are for acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments, to pay operating expenses and interest on our current and future indebtedness and to pay distributions to our stockholders. We estimate that we will require approximately $4,140,000 to pay interest on our outstanding indebtedness in the remaining three months of 2012, based on interest rates in effect as of September 30, 2012. In addition, we estimate that we will require $3,814,000 to pay principal on our outstanding indebtedness in the remaining three months of 2012. We also require resources to make certain payments to our advisor entities and their affiliates, which during our initial offering includes payments for reimbursement of other organizational and offering expenses, selling commissions and dealer manager fees.
Generally, cash needs for items other than acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related investments are met from operations, borrowings and the net proceeds of our initial offering. However, there may be a delay between the sale of shares of our common stock and our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments, which could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if any, of returns generated from our investment operations.
Our advisor entities evaluate potential additional investments and engage in negotiations with real estate sellers, developers, brokers, investment managers, lenders and others on our behalf. Until we invest the majority of the net proceeds of our offerings in real estate and real estate-related investments, we may invest in short-term, highly liquid or other authorized investments. Such short-term investments will not earn significant returns, and we cannot predict how long it will take to fully invest the proceeds from our offerings in real estate and real estate-related investments. The number of properties we may acquire and other investments we will make will depend upon the number of shares of our common stock sold in our offerings and the resulting amount of net proceeds available for investment.
When we acquire a property, our advisor entities prepare a capital plan that contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements or other major capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include a line of credit or other loans established with respect to the investment, operating cash generated by the investment, additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners or, when necessary, capital reserves. Any capital reserve would be established from the net proceeds of our initial offering, proceeds from sales of other investments, operating cash generated by other investments or other cash on hand. In some cases, a lender may require us to establish capital reserves for a particular investment. The capital plan for each investment will be adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or as necessary to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs.
Other Liquidity Needs
In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to various factors, including, without limitation, the timing of distributions or the timing of the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of secured or unsecured debt financing through one or more third parties, or our advisor
53
Table of Contents
entities or their affiliates. There are currently no limits or restrictions on the use of proceeds from our advisor entities or their affiliates which would prohibit us from making the proceeds available for distribution. We may also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions, including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties.
Based on the properties we owned as of September 30, 2012, we estimate that our expenditures for capital improvements and tenant improvements will require up to $2,901,000 for the remaining three months of 2012. As of September 30, 2012, we had $7,207,000 of restricted cash in loan impounds and reserve accounts available for capital expenditures, some of which may be used to fund our estimated expenditures for capital improvements and tenant improvements. We cannot provide assurance, however, that we will not exceed these estimated expenditure and distribution levels or be able to obtain additional sources of financing on commercially favorable terms or at all.
If we experience lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates, reduced revenues as a result of asset sales, or increased capital expenditures and leasing costs compared to historical levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewal leases, the effect would be a reduction of net cash provided by operating activities. If such a reduction of net cash provided by operating activities is realized, we may have a cash flow deficit in subsequent periods. Our estimate of net cash available is based on various assumptions which are difficult to predict, including the levels of leasing activity and related leasing costs. Any changes in these assumptions could impact our financial results and our ability to fund working capital and unanticipated cash needs.
Cash Flows
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $9,636,000 and $4,265,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, cash flows provided by operating activities primarily related to the cash flows from our property acquisitions, partially offset by the payment of acquisition related expenses and general and administrative expenses. We anticipate cash flows from operating activities to increase as we purchase additional properties.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $498,927,000 and $211,616,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, cash flows used in investing activities related primarily to the acquisition of our properties in the amount of $495,944,000, capital expenditures of $2,757,000 and an increase in restricted cash in the amount of $6,631,000, partially offset by a reduction of $6,306,000 in real estate and escrow deposits which were applied towards the purchase of real estate. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash flows used in investing activities related primarily to the acquisition of our properties in the amount of $206,287,000, capital expenditures of $2,755,000 and an increase in real estate and escrow deposits for the purchase of real estate in the amount of $3,001,000. We anticipate cash flows used in investing activities to increase as we purchase additional properties.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $454,809,000 and $210,145,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, such cash flows related primarily to funds raised from investors in our initial offering in the amount of $379,835,000, net borrowings under our secured revolving credit facilities with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, and KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, and our unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, or the unsecured line of credit, or collectively the lines of credit, in the amount of $148,100,000 and borrowings on our mortgage loans payable in the amount of $22,818,000, partially offset by principal payments on our mortgage loans payable in the amount of $29,194,000, the payment of offering costs of $41,331,000 and distributions of $15,224,000. Additional cash outflows related to deferred financing costs of $4,232,000 in connection with the debt financing for our acquisitions,
54
Table of Contents
share repurchases of $2,541,000 and contingent consideration associated with some of our acquisitions in the amount of $3,434,000. Of the $29,194,000 in payments on our mortgage loans payable, $26,669,000 reflects the early extinguishment of mortgage loans payable on Virginia Skilled Nursing Facility Portfolio and Highlands Ranch Medical Pavilion and the repayment of a bridge loan on Southeastern SNF Portfolio. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, such cash flows related primarily to funds raised from investors in our initial offering in the amount of $239,002,000, borrowings on our mortgage loans payable in the amount of $27,700,000 and net borrowings under our secured revolving credit facilities with Bank of America and KeyBank in the amount of $33,147,000, partially offset by principal payments on our mortgage loans payable in the amount of $55,044,000, the payment of offering costs of $25,535,000 and distributions of $5,892,000. Additional cash outflows related to deferred financing costs of $2,561,000 in connection with the debt financing for our acquisitions. Of the $55,044,000 in payments on our mortgage loans payable, $7,500,000 reflects the early extinguishment of a mortgage loan payable on Surgical Hospital of Humble using excess cash on hand and $17,039,000 reflects an early payment made on a $26,810,000 bridge loan on Virginia Skilled Nursing Facility Portfolio using borrowings from our line of credit with KeyBank. We anticipate cash flows from financing activities to increase in the future as we raise additional funds from investors and incur debt to purchase properties. For a further discussion of our lines of credit, see Note 8, Line of Credit, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Distributions
Our board of directors authorized a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on January 1, 2010 and ending on September 30, 2010, as a result of our former sponsor advising us that it intended to fund these distributions until we acquired our first property. We acquired our first property, Lacombe Medical Office Building, on March 5, 2010. Our former sponsor did not receive any additional shares of our common stock or other consideration for funding these distributions, and we will not repay the funds provided by our former sponsor for these distributions. Subsequently, our board of directors authorized, on a quarterly basis, a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the quarterly periods commencing on July 1, 2010 and ending on December 31, 2012.
For distributions declared for each record date in the January 2010 through December 2011 periods, the distributions were calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and were equal to $0.001780822 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.5%, assuming a purchase price of $10.00 per share. For distributions declared for each record date in the January 2012 through October 2012 periods, the distributions are calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001808219 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.6%, assuming a purchase price of $10.00 per share. For distributions declared for each record date in the November 2012 through December 2012 periods, the distributions are calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001863014 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.65%, assuming a purchase price of $10.22 per share. These distributions are aggregated and paid in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP monthly in arrears. The distributions declared for each record date are paid only from legally available funds.
The amount of the distributions to our stockholders is determined quarterly by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code. We have not established any limit on the amount of offering proceeds that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences; or (iii) jeopardize our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
55
Table of Contents
The distributions paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the DRIP and the sources of our distributions as compared to cash flows from operations are as follows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 15,224,000 | $ | 5,892,000 | ||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested | 14,621,000 | 5,599,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | $ | 11,491,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Sources of distributions: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operations | $ | 9,636,000 | 32.3 | % | $ | 4,265,000 | 37.1 | % | ||||||||
Offering proceeds | 20,209,000 | 67.7 | % | 7,226,000 | 62.9 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | $ | 11,491,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under GAAP, acquisition expenses are expensed, and therefore, subtracted from cash flows from operations. However, these expenses are paid from offering proceeds.
Our distributions of amounts in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits have resulted in a return of capital to our stockholders, and all or any portion of a distribution to our stockholders may be paid from offering proceeds. The payment of distributions from offering proceeds could reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in assets and negatively impact the amount of income available for future distributions.
As of September 30, 2012, we had an amount payable of $943,000 to our sub-advisor or its affiliates for asset and property management fees, lease commissions and miscellaneous operating expenses, which will be paid from cash flows from operations in the future as they become due and payable by us in the ordinary course of business consistent with our past practice.
As of September 30, 2012, no amounts due to our former advisor, our advisor entities or their affiliates have been deferred, waived or forgiven. Our former advisor, our advisor entities and their affiliates have no obligations to defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them. In the future, if our former advisor, our advisor entities or their affiliates do not defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them, this would negatively affect our cash flows from operations, which could result in us paying distributions, or a portion thereof, with net proceeds from our initial offering and our follow-on offering, if and when declared effective by the SEC, funds from our co-sponsors or borrowed funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
The distributions paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the DRIP and the sources of our distributions as compared to funds from operations, or FFO, are as follows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 15,224,000 | $ | 5,892,000 | ||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested | 14,621,000 | 5,599,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | $ | 11,491,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Sources of distributions: | ||||||||||||||||
FFO | $ | — | — | % | $ | 2,669,000 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||
Offering proceeds | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | 8,822,000 | 76.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | $ | 11,491,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. For a further discussion of FFO, see Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations below.
56
Table of Contents
Financing
We anticipate that after an initial phase of operations (prior to the investment of all of the net proceeds of our offerings of shares of our common stock), our aggregate borrowings, both secured and unsecured, will not exceed 45.0% of all of our properties’ and other real estate-related assets’ combined fair market values, as defined, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For these purposes, the fair market value of each asset will be equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the fair market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of September 30, 2012, our borrowings were 30.8% of our properties’ combined fair market values, as defined.
Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300.0% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real estate or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of November 14, 2012 and September 30, 2012, our leverage did not exceed 300.0% of the value of our net assets.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
For a discussion of our mortgage loans payable, net, see Note 6, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Lines of Credit
For a discussion of the lines of credit, see Note 8, Line of Credit, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
REIT Requirements
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to make distributions to our stockholders of at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains. In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to factors including, without limitation, the timing of such distributions or the timing of the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of secured debt financing through one or more unaffiliated parties. We may also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties or from the proceeds of our offerings.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of our commitments and contingencies, see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Debt Service Requirements
Our principal liquidity need is the payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. As of September 30, 2012, we had $208,305,000 ($220,688,000, net of discount and premium) of fixed rate debt and $16,777,000 ($16,531,000, net of discount and premium) of variable rate debt outstanding secured by our properties. As of September 30, 2012, we had $148,100,000 outstanding under the unsecured line of credit.
57
Table of Contents
We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain covenants, such as occupancy ratios, leverage ratios, net worth ratios, debt service coverage ratios, liquidity ratios, operating cash flow to fixed charges ratios, distribution ratios and reporting requirements. As of September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements on our mortgage loans payable and the unsecured line of credit and we expect to remain in compliance with all such requirements for the next 12 months. As of September 30, 2012, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt, factoring in our fixed rate interest rate swaps, was 4.39% per annum.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to (i) the maturity and scheduled principal repayment of our secured mortgage loans payable and the unsecured line of credit, (ii) interest payments on our mortgage loans payable, the unsecured line of credit and fixed rate interest rate swaps, and (iii) obligations under our ground leases, as of September 30, 2012:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||
(2012) | (2013-2014) | (2015-2016) | (after 2017) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Principal payments — fixed rate debt | $ | 938,000 | $ | 26,745,000 | $ | 38,557,000 | $ | 142,065,000 | $ | 208,305,000 | ||||||||||
Interest payments — fixed rate debt | 2,656,000 | 20,365,000 | 16,402,000 | 66,321,000 | 105,744,000 | |||||||||||||||
Principal payments — variable rate debt | 2,876,000 | (1) | 694,000 | 155,109,000 | 6,198,000 | 164,877,000 | ||||||||||||||
Interest payments — variable rate debt (based on rates in effect as of September 30, 2012) | 1,335,000 | 10,503,000 | 3,027,000 | 218,000 | 15,083,000 | |||||||||||||||
Interest payments — fixed rate interest rate swap (based on rates in effect as of September 30, 2012) | 149,000 | 318,000 | 50,000 | — | 517,000 | |||||||||||||||
Ground lease obligations | 113,000 | 762,000 | 787,000 | 24,969,000 | 26,631,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,067,000 | $ | 59,387,000 | $ | 213,932,000 | $ | 239,771,000 | $ | 521,157,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Our variable rate mortgage loan payable in the outstanding principal amount of $2,791,000 ($2,544,000, net of discount and premium) secured by Center for Neurosurgery and Spine as of September 30, 2012 has a fixed rate interest rate swap, thereby effectively fixing our interest rate on this mortgage loan payable to an effective interest rate of 6.00% per annum. This mortgage loan payable is due August 15, 2021; however, the principal balance is immediately due upon written request from the seller confirming that the seller agrees to pay any interest rate swap termination amount, if any. Assuming the seller does not exercise such right, interest payments, using the 6.00% per annum effective interest rate, would be $42,000, $294,000, $221,000 and $217,000 in 2012, 2013-2014, 2015-2016 and thereafter, respectively. |
The table above does not reflect any payments expected under our contingent consideration obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2012, we had no off-balance sheet transactions nor do we currently have any such arrangements or obligations.
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.
58
Table of Contents
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment writedowns, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, which is the case if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. In addition, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist, and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset an impairment charge would be recognized. Testing for impairment charges is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property.
Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization and impairments, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income (loss).
However, FFO and modified funds from operations, or MFFO, as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that were put into effect and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, as items that are expensed as operating expenses under GAAP. We believe these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. As disclosed in the prospectuses for our offerings, we will use the
59
Table of Contents
proceeds raised in our offerings to acquire properties, and we intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger or sale, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another similar transaction) within five years after the completion of our offering stage, which is generally comparable to other publicly registered, non-listed REITs. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association, or the IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered, non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired and that we consider more reflective of investing activities, as well as other non-operating items included in FFO, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering stage has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering stage and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering stage has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition fees and expenses that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income (loss): acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income (loss); gains or losses included in net income (loss) from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income (loss) in calculating cash flows from operations and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. We are responsible for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, and we do not rely on another party to manage such risk. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are based on market fluctuations and may not be directly related or attributable to our operations.
Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses (which includes gains and losses on contingent consideration), amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, gains or losses from the extinguishment of debt, change in deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. The other adjustments included in the IPA’s Practice Guideline are not applicable to us for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Acquisition fees and expenses are paid in cash by us, and we have not set aside or put into escrow any specific amount of proceeds from our offerings to be used to fund acquisition fees and expenses. The purchase of real estate and real estate-related investments, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan in order to
60
Table of Contents
generate operating revenues and cash flows to make distributions to our stockholders. However, we do not intend to fund acquisition fees and expenses in the future from operating revenues and cash flows, nor from the sale of properties and subsequent re-deployment of capital and concurrent incurring of acquisition fees and expenses. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor entities or their affiliates and third parties. Such fees and expenses will not be reimbursed by our advisor entities or their affiliates and third parties, and therefore if there are not further proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock to fund future acquisition fees and expenses, such fees and expenses will need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. Acquisition related expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In the future, if we are not able to raise additional proceeds from our offerings, this could result in us paying acquisition fees or reimbursing acquisition expenses due to our advisor entities and their affiliates, or a portion thereof, with net proceeds from borrowed funds, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or ancillary cash flows. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. Nevertheless, our advisor entities or their affiliates will not accrue any claim on our assets if acquisition fees and expenses are not paid from the proceeds of our offerings.
Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) in determining cash flows from operations. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized or as items which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance.
We use MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures may be useful to investors. For example, acquisition fees and expenses are intended to be funded from the proceeds of our offerings and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition fees and expenses, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations, which is an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in offerings such as ours where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no net asset value determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and MFFO.
61
Table of Contents
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.
In addition, we are presenting Normalized MFFO to adjust MFFO for the purchase of the subordinated distribution for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. We believe that adjusting for the purchase of the subordinated distribution provides useful information because such payment may not be reflective of on-going operations.
The following is a reconciliation of net loss, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO, MFFO and Normalized MFFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (21,436,000 | ) | $ | 413,000 | $ | (26,150,000 | ) | $ | (7,352,000 | ) | |||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization — consolidated properties | 10,743,000 | 4,553,000 | 25,707,000 | 10,029,000 | ||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (2,000 | ) | — | (2,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization related to noncontrolling interests | (3,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | (9,000 | ) | (7,000 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
FFO | $ | (10,698,000 | ) | $ | 4,964,000 | $ | (454,000 | ) | $ | 2,669,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses(a) | $ | 21,174,000 | $ | 913,000 | $ | 32,326,000 | $ | 9,698,000 | ||||||||
Amortization of above and below market leases(b) | 351,000 | 81,000 | 879,000 | 206,000 | ||||||||||||
Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments(c) | — | 202,000 | 52,000 | 427,000 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt(d) | 18,000 | 2,000 | 35,000 | 44,000 | ||||||||||||
Change in deferred rent receivables related to noncontrolling interests(e) | — | — | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Change in deferred rent receivables(e) | (1,805,000 | ) | (806,000 | ) | (4,776,000 | ) | (1,719,000 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
MFFO | $ | 9,040,000 | $ | 5,356,000 | $ | 28,063,000 | $ | 11,326,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase(f) | 4,232,000 | — | 4,232,000 | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Normalized MFFO | $ | 13,272,000 | $ | 5,356,000 | $ | 32,295,000 | $ | 11,326,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
. | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 78,492,871 | 34,644,097 | 64,418,435 | 26,171,404 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
FFO per common share — basic and diluted | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
MFFO per common share — basic and diluted | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Normalized MFFO per common share — basic and diluted | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for publicly registered, non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition related expenses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor entities or their affiliates and third parties, as well as gains and |
62
Table of Contents
losses on contingent consideration in connection with acquisitions. Acquisition related expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. The purchase of real estate and real estate-related investments, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan in order to generate operating revenues and cash flows to make distributions to our stockholders. However, all paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Such fees and expenses will not be reimbursed by our advisor entities or their affiliates and third parties, and therefore if there are not further proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock to fund future acquisition fees and expenses, such fees and expenses will need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. |
(b) | Under GAAP, above and below market leases are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, we believe that by excluding charges relating to the amortization of above and below market leases, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. |
(c) | Under GAAP, we are required to record our derivative financial instruments at fair value at each reporting period. We believe that adjusting for the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments is appropriate because such adjustments may not be reflective of on-going operations and reflect unrealized impacts on value based only on then current market conditions, although they may be based upon general market conditions. The need to reflect the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis in accordance with GAAP. |
(d) | We believe that adjusting for the gain or loss on extinguishment of debt provides useful information because such gain or loss on extinguishment of debt may not be reflective of on-going operations. |
(e) | Under GAAP, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays). This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms. By adjusting for the change in deferred rent receivables, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms, provide insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such lease terms, and align results with our analysis of operating performance. |
(f) | We believe that adjusting for the purchase of the subordinated distribution provides useful information because such payment may not be reflective of on-going operations. |
Net Operating Income
Net operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from properties before general and administrative expenses, subordinated distribution purchase, acquisition related expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense and interest income. We believe that net operating income is useful for investors as it provides an accurate measure of the operating performance of our operating assets because net operating income excludes certain items that are not associated with the management of the properties. Additionally, we believe that net operating income is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate community. However, our use of the term net operating income may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may have different methodologies for computing this amount.
63
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net loss, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to net operating income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (21,436,000 | ) | $ | 413,000 | $ | (26,150,000 | ) | $ | (7,352,000 | ) | |||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,935,000 | 1,563,000 | 7,753,000 | 3,942,000 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated distribution purchase | 4,232,000 | — | 4,232,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Acquisition related expenses | 21,174,000 | 913,000 | 32,326,000 | 9,698,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,743,000 | 4,553,000 | 25,707,000 | 10,029,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,548,000 | 2,401,000 | 9,799,000 | 5,194,000 | ||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | (4,000 | ) | (3,000 | ) | (11,000 | ) | (9,000 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net operating income | $ | 21,192,000 | $ | 9,840,000 | $ | 53,656,000 | $ | 21,502,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events
For a discussion of subsequent events, see Note 18, Subsequent Events, to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
There were no material changes in the information regarding market risk, or in the methods we use to manage market risk, that was provided in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
The table below presents, as of September 30, 2012, the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Expected Maturity Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt — principal payments | $ | 938,000 | $ | 3,901,000 | $ | 22,844,000 | $ | 19,706,000 | $ | 18,851,000 | $ | 142,065,000 | $ | 208,305,000 | $ | 237,603,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt | 5.26 | % | 5.27 | % | 5.71 | % | 5.30 | % | 6.01 | % | 4.91 | % | 5.14 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||
Variable rate debt — principal payments | $ | 2,876,000 | $ | 343,000 | $ | 351,000 | $ | 148,459,000 | $ | 6,650,000 | $ | 6,198,000 | $ | 164,877,000 | $ | 163,902,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt (based on rates in effect as of September 30, 2012) | 1.36 | % | 2.87 | % | 2.86 | % | 3.29 | % | 3.09 | % | 2.63 | % | 3.22 | % | — |
Mortgage loans payable were $225,082,000 ($237,219,000, net of discount and premium) as of September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, we had 24 fixed rate and three variable rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 1.32% to 6.60% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.95% per annum. As of September 30, 2012, we had $208,305,000 ($220,688,000, net of discount and premium) of fixed rate debt, or 92.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.14% per annum and $16,777,000 ($16,531,000, net of discount and premium) of variable rate debt, or 7.5% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average effective interest rate of 2.61% per annum. In addition, as of September 30, 2012, we had $148,100,000 outstanding under the unsecured line of credit, at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.29% per annum.
As of September 30, 2012, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt, factoring in our fixed rate interest rate swaps, was 4.39% per annum. $2,791,000 of our variable rate mortgage loans payable is due August 15, 2021; however, the principal balance is immediately due upon written request from the seller confirming that the seller agrees to pay the interest rate swap termination amount, if any, and as such, the $2,791,000 principal balance is reflected in the 2012 column above.
An increase in the variable interest rate on the unsecured line of credit and our variable rate mortgage loans payable constitutes a market risk. As of September 30, 2012, a 0.50% increase in the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, would have increased our overall interest expense on the unsecured line of credit and variable mortgage loans payables by $9,074,000, or 8.3%
64
Table of Contents
In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our future investments is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a)Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, an evaluation as of September 30, 2012 was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2012, were effective.
(b)Changes in internal control over financial reporting.There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
65
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
None.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
There were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 15, 2012, except as noted below.
We have not had sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions, and, therefore, we have paid distributions from the net proceeds of our initial offering, from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flows or from other sources. Any such distributions may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in assets and negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Distributions payable to our stockholders may include a return of capital, rather than a return on capital. We have not established any limit on the amount of proceeds from our initial public offering, or our initial offering, that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences; or (iii) jeopardize our ability to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust, or REIT. The actual amount and timing of distributions are determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion and typically will depend on the amount of funds available for distribution, which will depend on items such as our financial condition, current and projected capital expenditure requirements, tax considerations and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our qualification as a REIT. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency vary from time to time.
We have used, and in the future may use, the net proceeds from our initial offering, borrowed funds, or other sources, to pay cash distributions to our stockholders, which may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. As a result, the amount of net proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. Further, if the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year exceeds the amount of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess amount will be deemed a return of capital.
Our board of directors authorized a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the period commencing on January 1, 2010 and ending on September 30, 2010, as a result of our former sponsor, Grubb & Ellis Company, advising us that it intended to fund these distributions until we acquired our first property. We acquired our first property, Lacombe Medical Office Building, on March 5, 2010. Our former sponsor did not receive any additional shares of our common stock or other consideration for funding these distributions, and we will not repay the funds provided by our former sponsor for these distributions. Subsequently, our board of directors authorized, on a quarterly basis, a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the quarterly periods commencing on July 1, 2010 and ending on December 31, 2012.
For distributions declared for each record date in the January 2010 through December 2011 periods, the distributions were calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and were equal to $0.001780822 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.5%, assuming a purchase
66
Table of Contents
price of $10.00 per share. For distributions declared for each record date in the January 2012 through October 2012 periods, the distributions are calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001808219 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.6%, assuming a purchase price of $10.00 per share. For distributions declared for each record date in the November 2012 through December 2012 periods, the distributions are calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001863014 per day per share of common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution rate of 6.65%, assuming a purchase price of $10.22 per share. These distributions are aggregated and paid in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, monthly in arrears. The distributions declared for each record date are paid only from legally available funds. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to continue this distribution rate or pay any subsequent distributions.
The distributions paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the DRIP and the sources of our distributions as compared to cash flows from operations are as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 15,224,000 | $ | 5,892,000 | ||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested | 14,621,000 | 5,599,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | $ | 11,491,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Sources of distributions: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operations | $ | 9,636,000 | 32.3 | % | $ | 4,265,000 | 37.1 | % | ||||||||
Offering proceeds | 20,209,000 | 67.7 | % | 7,226,000 | 62.9 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | $ | 11,491,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, acquisition expenses are expensed, and therefore, subtracted from cash flows from operations. However, these expenses are paid from offering proceeds.
For a further discussion of distributions, see Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Distributions.
As of September 30, 2012, we had an amount payable of $943,000 to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Sub-Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Sub-Advisor, or our sub-advisor, or its affiliates for asset and property management fees, lease commissions and miscellaneous operating expenses, which will be paid from cash flows from operations in the future as they become due and payable by us in the ordinary course of business consistent with our past practice.
As of September 30, 2012, no amounts due to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, our sub-advisor, or collectively our advisor entities, Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Advisor, LLC, or our former advisor, or their affiliates have been deferred, waived or forgiven. Our former advisor, our advisor entities and their affiliates have no obligations to defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them. In the future, if our former advisor, our advisor entities or their affiliates do not defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them, this would negatively affect our cash flows from operations, which could result in us paying distributions, or a portion thereof, with the net proceeds from our offerings, funds from our sponsor or borrowed funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
The distributions paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the DRIP and the sources of our distributions as compared to funds from operations, or FFO, are as follows:
67
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 15,224,000 | $ | 5,892,000 | ||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested | 14,621,000 | 5,599,000 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | $ | 11,491,000 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Sources of distributions: | ||||||||||||||||
FFO | $ | — | — | % | $ | 2,669,000 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||
Offering proceeds | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | 8,822,000 | 76.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
$ | 29,845,000 | 100 | % | $ | 11,491,000 | 100 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. For a further discussion of FFO, which includes a reconciliation of our GAAP net loss to FFO, see Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations.
Because not all REITs calculate modified funds from operations the same way, our use of modified funds from operations may not provide meaningful comparisons with other REITs.
We use modified funds from operations, or MFFO, and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. However, not all REITs calculate MFFO the same way. If REITs use different methods of calculating MFFO, it may not be possible for investors to meaningfully compare the performance of certain REITs.
A significant portion of our annual base rent may be concentrated in a small number of tenants. Therefore, non-renewals, terminations or lease defaults by any of these significant tenants could reduce our net income and limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
As of September 30, 2012, one of our tenants, Warsaw Road, L.P. (Wellington Healthcare Services, L.P.), accounted for more than 15.0% of our annual base rent. The success of our investments materially depends upon the financial stability of the tenants leasing the properties we own. Therefore, a non-renewal after the expiration of a lease term, termination, default or other failure to meet rental obligations by a significant tenant, such as Warsaw Road, L.P. (Wellington Healthcare Services, L.P.), would significantly lower our net income. These events could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
We intend to incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to pay distributions and could decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We have financed and will continue to finance a portion of the purchase price of our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments by borrowing funds. We anticipate that, after an initial phase of our operations (prior to the investment of all of the net proceeds of our offerings of shares of our common stock) when we may employ greater amounts of leverage to enable us to purchase properties more quickly, and therefore, generate distributions for our stockholders sooner, our overall leverage will not exceed 45.0% of the combined market value of our real estate and real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
68
Table of Contents
High debt levels may cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flows from a property and the cash flows needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of stockholders’ investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to stockholders will be adversely affected.
We are subject to federal securities laws relating to our public communications. If any of our public communications are held to be in violation of such laws, we could be subject to potential liability. Investors in our initial offering should rely only on the statements made in our prospectus as supplemented to date in determining whether to purchase shares of our common stock.
From time to time, we or our representatives make public statements relating to our business and its prospects. Such communications are subject to federal securities laws. If any of our public communications are held by a court to be in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, we could be required to repurchase the shares sold to persons who received such communications before receiving a copy of our prospectus for a period of one year following the date of any violation determined by a court to have occurred. The repurchase price would be the original purchase price, plus statutory interest from the date of purchase. In the event that one or more of our public communications is claimed to have been made in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we expect that we would contest such claim. Nevertheless, we cannot assure investors that a court would agree with us in such instance. Accordingly, there is a risk that we could be subject to potential liability with respect to any Section 5 claim, and such liability may adversely affect our operating results or financial position. Investors in our initial offering should rely only on the statements made in our prospectus as supplemented to date in determining whether to purchase shares of our common stock.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
Use of Public Offering Proceeds
Our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111), registering our initial public offering of up to $3,285,000,000 of shares of our common stock, was declared effective under the Securities Act on August 24, 2009. Pursuant to our Registration Statement on Form S-11, until November 6, 2012, we were conducting a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, in which we were offering up to 300,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share in our primary offering and 30,000,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, for $9.50 per share. On November 7, 2012, we began selling shares of our common stock at $10.22 per share and issuing shares pursuant to the DRIP for $9.71 per share. Accordingly, as of November 7, 2012, we are offering to the public up to approximately 295,945,000 shares of our common stock in our primary offering and approximately 29,420,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP. Until April 18, 2011, Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc., or Grubb & Ellis Securities, served as the dealer manager of our initial offering. Effective as of April 19, 2011, the G&E Dealer Manager Agreement with Grubb & Ellis Securities was assigned to, and assumed by, Grubb & Ellis Capital Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of our former sponsor. On November 7, 2011, we entered into the Dealer Manager Agreement with Griffin Securities, whereby Griffin Securities began serving as the dealer manager of our initial offering effective January 7, 2012. The terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement with Griffin Securities are substantially the same as the terms of the terminated G&E Dealer Manager Agreement.
As of September 30, 2012, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 86,267,222 shares of our common stock, or $860,687,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the DRIP. As of September 30, 2012, a total of $25,423,000 in distributions were reinvested and 2,676,081 shares of our common stock were issued pursuant to the DRIP.
69
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2012, we had incurred selling commissions of $33,012,000, dealer manager fees of $14,517,000 and other offering expenses of $8,627,000 to our former affiliates or to our sub-advisor in connection with our initial offering. In addition, as of September 30, 2012, we had incurred selling commissions of $25,502,000 and dealer manager fees of $11,197,000 to Griffin Securities, an unaffiliated entity. Such commissions, fees and reimbursements are charged to stockholders’ equity as such amounts are reimbursed from the gross proceeds of our initial offering. The cost of raising funds in our initial offering as a percentage of gross proceeds received in our primary offering was 10.8% as of September 30, 2012 and will not exceed 11.0% in the aggregate. As of September 30, 2012, net offering proceeds were $793,255,000, including proceeds from the DRIP and after deducting offering expenses.
As of September 30, 2012, $195,000 remained payable to our sub-advisor for offering related costs.
As of September 30, 2012, we had used $626,890,000 in proceeds from our initial offering to acquire properties from unaffiliated parties, $29,392,000 to pay acquisition related expenses to affiliated parties, $8,920,000 for lender required restricted cash accounts to unaffiliated parties, $8,670,000 for deferred financing costs to unaffiliated parties, $7,905,000 to pay acquisition related expenses to unaffiliated parties, $84,868,000 to repay borrowings from unaffiliated parties incurred in connection with previous acquisitions and $1,244,000 to pay real estate deposits to unaffiliated parties for proposed future acquisitions.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Our share repurchase plan allows for repurchases of shares of our common stock by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors. All repurchases are subject to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP.
The prices per share at which we will repurchase shares of our common stock will range, depending on the length of time the stockholder held such shares, from 92.5% to 100% of the price paid per share to acquire such shares from us. However, if shares of our common stock are to be repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability, the repurchase price will be no less than 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares of our common stock from us.
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased shares of our common stock as follows:
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program(1) | (d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2012 | 75,396 | $ | 9.64 | 75,396 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
August 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012 | — | $ | — | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
September 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012 | — | $ | — | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average | 75,396 | $ | 9.64 | 75,396 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Our board of directors adopted a share repurchase plan effective August 24, 2009. On November 6, 2012, our board of directors approved an Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan, whereby all shares repurchased on or after December 7, 2012 would be repurchased at 92.5% to 100% of each stockholder’s repurchase amount depending on the period of time their shares have been held. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan, at any time we are engaged in an offering of shares of our common stock, the repurchase amount for shares repurchased under our share repurchase plan will always be equal to or lower than the applicable per share offering price. |
(2) | Subject to funds being available, we will limit the number of shares of our common stock repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year; provided however, shares of our common stock subject to a repurchase requested upon the death of a stockholder will not be subject to this cap. |
70
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures. |
Not applicable.
Item 5. | Other Information. |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
71
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
November 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ JEFFREY T. HANSON | ||||
Date | Jeffrey T. Hanson | |||||
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||||
(principal executive officer) | ||||||
November 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ SHANNON K S JOHNSON | ||||
Date | Shannon K S Johnson | |||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(principal financial officer and | ||||||
principal accounting officer) | ||||||
72
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Following the Registrant’s transition to the co-sponsorship arrangement with Griffin Capital Corporation and American Healthcare Investors LLC, Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. and Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP changed their names to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. and Griffin American Healthcare REIT II Holdings, LP, respectively. The following Exhibit List refers to the entity names used prior to such name changes in order to accurately reflect the names of the parties on the documents listed.
Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
3.1 | Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated July 30, 2009 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111) filed August 5, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment to the Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated September 1, 2009 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.3 | Second Articles of Amendment to the Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated September 18, 2009 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.4 | Third Articles of Amendment to Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated June 15, 2011 (included as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.5 | Fourth Articles of Amendment to Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated January 3, 2012 (included as Exhibit 3.5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111) filed January 4, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.6 | Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111) filed March 19, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
3.7 | Amendment to Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc. dated January 3, 2012 (included as Exhibit 3.7 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111) filed January 4, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
4.1 | Third Amended and Restated Escrow Agreement between Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc., Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc. and CommerceWest Bank, N.A., dated November 24, 2010 (included as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) |
73
Table of Contents
4.2 | Form of Subscription Agreement of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. (included as Exhibit 4.2 to our Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-158111) filed August 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
4.3 | Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. effective for issuances as of November 7, 2012 (included as Exhibit C to Supplement No. 9 dated November 7, 2012 to our Prospectus dated January 9, 2012 (File No. 333-158111) filed November 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
4.4 | Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT II, Inc. effective for shares repurchased on or after December 7, 2012 (included as Exhibit D to Supplement No. 9 dated November 7, 2012 to our Prospectus dated January 9, 2012 (File No. 333-158111) filed November 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
10.1 | Form of Subsidiary Guaranty Joinder Agreement for the benefit of Lenders (included as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed July 27, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2** | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.INS*** | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF*** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
* | Filed herewith. |
** | Furnished herewith. In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
*** | Furnished herewith. XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
74