SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(a) Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries: AAMAC, GAG LLC, Great American Group Advisory & Valuation Services, LLC (“GAAV”), Great American Group Machinery & Equipment, LLC (“GAME”), Great American Group Real Estate, LLC, Great American Venture, LLC, Great American Group Energy Equipment, LLC (GAGEE”), Great American Group Intellectual Property Advisors, LLC, GA Capital, LLC, GA Asset Advisors Limited, GAC Strategic Advisors, LLC, and Great American Group WF, LLC. The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of Great American Global Partners, LLC which is controlled by the Company as a result of its ownership of a 50% member interest, appointment of two of the three executive officers and significant influence over the funding of operations. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. |
|
The accounting guidance requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity; to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE; to eliminate the solely quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE; to add an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. As more fully described in Note 17, the Company determined that its’ equity investment and subordinated financing arrangements with Great American Real Estate, LLC (“GARE”), a joint venture 50% owned by the Company and Kelly Capital, LLC, changes the status of GARE to a VIE that does not require consolidation in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The adoption of these changes had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(b) Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Estimates are used when accounting for certain items such as reserves for slow moving goods held for sale or auction, the fair value of mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests and accounting for income tax valuation allowances. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved with estimates, actual results may differ. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(c) Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenues are recognized in accordance with the accounting guidance when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the related services have been provided, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. |
|
Revenues in the Valuation and Appraisal segment are primarily comprised of fees for valuation and appraisal services. Revenues are recognized upon the delivery of the completed services to the related customers and collection of the fee is reasonably assured. Revenues in the Valuation and Appraisal segment also include contractual reimbursable costs which totaled $2,811, $2,704 and $2,419 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
Revenues in the Auction and Liquidation segment are comprised of (i) commissions and fees earned on the sale of goods at auctions and liquidations; (ii) revenues from auction and liquidation services contracts where the Company guarantees a minimum recovery value for goods being sold at auction or liquidation; (iii) revenue from the sale of goods that are purchased by the Company for sale at auction or liquidation sales events; (iv) fees earned from real estate services and the origination of loans; (v) revenues from financing activities is recorded over the lives of related loans receivable using the interest method; and (vi) revenues from contractual reimbursable expenses incurred in connection with auction and liquidation contracts. |
|
Commission and fees earned on the sale of goods at auction and liquidation sales are recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price has been determined, title has passed to the buyer and the buyer has assumed the risks of ownership, and collection is reasonably assured. The commission and fees earned for these services are included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Under these types of arrangements, revenues also include contractual reimbursable costs which totaled $5,620, $5,295 and $3,791 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. |
|
Revenues earned from auction and liquidation services contracts where the Company guarantees a minimum recovery value for goods being sold at auction or liquidation are recognized based on proceeds received. The Company records proceeds received from these types of engagements first as a reduction of contractual reimbursable expenses, second as a recovery of its guarantee and thereafter as revenue, subject to such revenue meeting the criteria of having been fixed or determinable. Contractual reimbursable expenses and amounts advanced to customers for minimum guarantees are initially recorded as advances against customer contracts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. If, during the auction or liquidation sale, the Company determines that the proceeds from the sale will not meet the minimum guaranteed recovery value as defined in the auction or liquidation services contract, the Company accrues a loss on the contract in the period that the loss becomes known. |
|
The Company also evaluates revenue from auction and liquidation contracts in accordance with the accounting guidance to determine whether to report auction and liquidation segment revenue on a gross or net basis. The Company has determined that it acts as an agent in a substantial majority of its auction and liquidation services contracts and therefore reports the auction and liquidation revenues on a net basis. |
|
Revenues from the sale of goods are recorded gross and are recognized in the period in which the sale of goods held for sale or auction are completed, title to the property passes to the purchaser and the Company has fulfilled its obligations with respect to the transaction. These revenues are primarily the result of the Company acquiring title to merchandise with the intent of selling the items at auction or for augmenting liquidation sales. |
|
Revenues from sales-type leases are recorded as an asset at lease inception. The asset is recorded at the aggregate future minimum lease payments, estimated residual value of the leased equipment, and deferred incremental direct costs less unearned income. Income is recognized over the life of the lease to approximate a level rate of return on the net investment. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the terms of the lease agreement for four oil rigs that was included in leased equipment at December 31, 2012 was amended to, among other things, eliminate the right of the lessor to return the oil rigs to the Company. This amendment changed the classification of the lease from an operating lease to a sales-type lease and resulted in the Company recording revenues from the sale of the oil rigs of $9,280 and cost of goods sold of $7,447 during the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
Fees earned from real estate services and the origination of loans where the Company provides capital advisory services are recognized in the period earned, if the fee is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured. |
|
Revenues from the sale of goods in our UK retail stores segment are recognized as revenue upon the sale of product to retail customers through July 31, 2013. Our net sales represent gross sales invoiced to customers, less certain related charges for discounts, returns, and other promotional allowances and are recorded net of sales or value added tax. Allowances provided for these items are presented in the consolidated financial statements primarily as reductions to sales and cost of sales. |
|
In the normal course of business, the Company will enter into collaborative arrangements with other merchandise liquidators to collaboratively execute auction and liquidation contracts. The Company’s collaborative arrangements specifically include contractual agreements with other liquidation agents in which the Company and such other liquidation agents actively participate in the performance of the liquidation services and are exposed to the risks and rewards of the liquidation engagement. The Company’s participation in collaborative arrangements including its rights and obligations under each collaborative arrangement can vary. Revenues from collaborative arrangements are recorded net based on the proceeds received from the liquidation engagement. Amounts paid to participants in the collaborative arrangements are reported separately as direct costs of revenues. Revenue from collaborative arrangements in which the Company is not the majority participant is recorded net based on the Company’s share of proceeds received. There were revenues of $8,094, $4,238 and $11,739 and direct cost of services of $1,073, $3,331 and $1,301 subject to collaborative arrangements during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Sales, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(e) Direct Cost of Services |
|
Direct cost of services relate to service and fee revenues. The costs consist of employee compensation and related payroll benefits, travel expenses, the cost of consultants assigned to revenue-generating activities and direct expenses billable to clients in the Valuation and Appraisal segment. Direct costs of services include participation in profits under collaborative arrangements in which the Company is a majority participant. Direct costs of services also include the cost of consultants and other direct expenses related to auction and liquidation contracts pursuant to commission and fee based arrangements in the Auction and Liquidation segment. Direct cost of services does not include an allocation of the Company’s overhead costs. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(f) Concentration of Risk |
|
Revenues from one liquidation service contract to a retailer and the sale of four oil rigs to one customer represented 10.7% and 12.2% of total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013. Revenues from one liquidation service contract to a retailer represented 14.4% of total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2012. Revenues from liquidation service contracts and financing activities to two retailers represented 15.2% and 11.7% of total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2011. Revenues in the Valuation and Appraisal segment and the Auction and Liquidation segment are primarily generated in the United States and Europe. |
|
The Company’s activities in the Auction and Liquidation segment are executed frequently with, and on behalf of, distressed customers and secured creditors. Concentrations of credit risk can be affected by changes in economic, industry, or geographical factors. The Company seeks to control its credit risk and potential risk concentration through risk management activities that limit the Company’s exposure to losses on any one specific liquidation services contract or concentration within any one specific industry. To mitigate the exposure to losses on any one specific liquidation services contract, the Company sometimes conducts operations with third parties through collaborative arrangements. |
|
The Company maintains cash in various federally insured banking institutions. The account balances at each institution periodically exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) insurance coverage, and as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company also has substantial cash balances from proceeds received from auctions and liquidation engagements that are distributed to parties in accordance with the collaborative arrangements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(g) Advertising Expense |
|
The Company expenses advertising costs, which consist primarily of costs for printed materials, as incurred. Advertising costs totaled $446, $698 and $465 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Advertising expense is included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(h) Share-Based Compensation |
|
The Company’s share based payment awards principally consist of grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. Share based payment awards also includes grants of membership interests in the Company’s majority owned subsidiaries. The grants of membership interests consist of percentage interests in the Company’s majority owned subsidiaries as determined at the date of grant. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, share based payment awards are classified as either equity or liabilities. For equity-classified awards, the Company measures compensation cost for the grant of membership interests at fair value on the date of grant and recognizes compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations over the requisite service or performance period the award is expected to vest. The fair value of the liability-classified award will be subsequently remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement date. Change in fair value during the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that period. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(i) Income Taxes |
|
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company estimates the degree to which tax assets and credit carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance for such tax assets and loss carryforwards is provided when it is determined to be more likely than not that the benefit of such deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods. Tax benefits of operating loss carryforwards are evaluated on an ongoing basis, including a review of historical and projected future operating results, the eligible carryforward period, and other circumstances. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used, the related valuation allowance on such assets would be reduced. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(j) Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(k) Restricted Cash |
|
The Company maintains deposits in accounts under the control of a financial institution as collateral for letters of credit relating to liquidation engagements in connection with the $100,000 credit facility described in Note 8(a) and the $6,856 note payable described in Note 10. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, restricted cash included $165 of cash collateral for electronic payment processing in the United Kingdom and $6,667 of cash collateral for the letters of credit. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, restricted cash also included $160 and $1,256 of cash collected from the leasing transactions related to four oil rigs that collateralize the related note payable, which had an outstanding principal amount of $6,856 as of December 31, 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(l) Accounts Receivable |
|
Accounts receivable represents amounts due from the Company’s auction and liquidation and valuation and appraisal customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio. In establishing the required allowance, management utilizes a specific customer identification methodology. Management also considers historical losses adjusted for current market conditions and the customers’ financial condition and the current receivables aging and current payment patterns. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers. The Company’s bad debt expense (recoveries of bad debt) totaled $18, $108 and $424 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advances Against Customer Contracts Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(m) Advances Against Customer Contracts |
|
Advances against customer contracts represent advances of contractually reimbursable expenses incurred prior to, and during the term of the auction and liquidation services contract. These advances are charged to expense in the period that revenue is recognized under the contract. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(n) Inventory |
|
Merchandise inventories at December 31, 2012 relate to the operations of Shoon and are stated at the lower of average cost or market. The Company identifies potentially excess and slow-moving inventories and shrinkage by evaluating turn rates, inventory levels, historical results of inventory counts and other factors at its retail and warehouse locations. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a lower of cost or market reserves for excess and slow-moving inventories and shrinkage of $26. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goods Held For Sale Or Auction Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(o) Goods Held for Sale or Auction |
|
Goods held for sale or auction are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the specific-identification method, or market. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and Leases Receivable, Lease Financing, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(p) Lease Finance Receivable |
|
Lease finance receivables consist of the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases for four oil rigs as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, the remaining gross lease payments in accordance with the purchase lease of $8,609 are payable through December 15, 2014. The gross lease payments include a bargain purchase option in the amount of $4,242 that is payable on December 15, 2014. The Company is currently in negotiations with the lessee to modify the terms of the lease. The lease finance receivable is comprised of the following: |
|
| | December 31, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minimum lease payment receivable | | $ | 4,367 | | | | | | | | | | |
Lease purchase option | | | 4,242 | | | | | | | | | | |
Unearned income | | | -510 | | | | | | | | | | |
Total lease finance receivable | | $ | 8,099 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance for Loan Losses Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(q) Loan Receivable |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company collected the loan receivable that had a remaining balance of $8,306 at December 31, 2011. The loan receivable was acquired in 2011 from an investment bank at a discount from face value and provided financing to a retail company with operations in the United Kingdom. Interest income is recognized using the interest method and the discount is amortized to income over the stated term of the loan receivable. Financing revenues earned from the loan receivable totaled $5,030 and $1,471 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Financing revenues included interest income of $641, amortization of discount on the loan receivable of $4,077 and loan monitoring fees of $312 during the year ended December 31, 2012 and interest income of $883 and amortization of discount on the loan receivable of $588 during the year ended December 31, 2011. These revenues from financing activities in included in revenues from services and fees in the auction and liquidation segment in the consolidated statements of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(r) Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Property and equipment held under capital leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Property and equipment under capital leases were stated at the present value of minimum lease payments. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(s) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
|
The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with the accounting guidance which requires that goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives be tested for impairment annually or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of an asset has decreased below its carrying value. |
|
Goodwill includes (i) the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination described in Note 6 and (ii) an increase for the subsequent acquisition of noncontrolling interests during the year ended December 31, 2007 (also see Note 6). The Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment). Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair value. The Company operates two reporting units, which are the same as its reporting segments described in Note 19. Significant judgment is required to estimate the fair value of reporting units which includes estimating future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and other assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment. |
|
When testing goodwill for impairment, the Company may assess qualitative factors for some or all of our reporting units to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. Alternatively, the Company may bypass this qualitative assessment for some or all of our reporting units and perform a detailed quantitative test of impairment (step 1). If the Company performs the detailed quantitative impairment test and the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company would perform an analysis (step 2) to measure such impairment. In 2013, the Company first performed a qualitative assessment to identify and evaluate events and circumstances to conclude whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the Company’s reporting units are less than its carrying amounts. Based on the Company’s qualitative assessments, the Company concluded that a positive assertion can be made from the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded their carrying values and no impairments were identified. |
|
In accordance with the Codification, the Company reviews the carrying value of its amortizable intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If the undiscounted cash flows of such assets are less than the carrying amount, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, if any, exceeds its fair market value. No impairment was deemed to exist as of December 31, 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(t) Fair Value Measurements |
|
The Company records mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that were issued after November 5, 2003 at fair value (see Note 14(b)) with fair value determined in accordance with the Codification. The following table below presents information about the Company’s mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 which are categorized using the three levels of fair value hierarchy. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments that are highly liquid, observable and actively traded in over-the-counter markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable and can be corroborated by market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. |
|
The following tables present information on the liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
|
| | Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a | |
| | Recurring Basis at December 31, 2013, Using | |
| | | | | Quoted prices in | | Other | | Significant | |
| | Fair Value at | | active markets for | | observable | | unobservable | |
| | December 31, | | identical assets | | inputs | | inputs | |
| | 2013 | | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) | |
Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests issued after November 5, 2003 | | $ | 2,273 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 2,273 | |
Total liabilities measured at fair value | | $ | 2,273 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 2,273 | |
|
| | Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a | |
| | Recurring Basis at December 31, 2012, Using | |
| | | | | Quoted prices in | | Other | | Significant | |
| | Fair Value at | | active markets for | | observable | | unobservable | |
| | December 31, | | identical assets | | inputs | | inputs | |
| | 2012 | | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) | |
Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests issued after November 5, 2003 | | $ | 2,246 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 2,246 | |
Total liabilities measured at fair value | | $ | 2,246 | | $ | - | | $ | - | | $ | 2,246 | |
|
The Company determined the fair value of mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests described above based on the issuance of similar interests for cash, references to industry comparables, and relied, in part, on information obtained from appraisal reports and internal valuation models. The change in liabilities measured and recorded at fair value is comprised of an increase of $27 and a decrease of $636 in earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements for cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of the notes payable (including credit lines used to finance liquidation engagements), long-term debt and capital lease obligations approximate fair value because the contractual interest rates or effective yields of such instruments are consistent with current market rates of interest for instruments of comparable credit risk. The adoption of the new accounting guidance for fair value measurements did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(u) Foreign Currency Translation |
|
The Company transacts business in various foreign currencies. In countries where the functional currency of the underlying operations has been determined to be the local country's currency, revenues and expenses of operations outside the United States are translated into United States dollars using average exchange rates while assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into United States dollars using year-end exchange rates. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Transaction gains were $257 and $892 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and transaction losses were $218 during the year ended December 31, 2011. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
(v) Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Other Comprehensive Income”. ASU 2013-02 finalized the reporting for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income, which was previously deferred, as discussed below. The amendments do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, they do require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. An entity is also required to present on the face of the financials where net income is reported or in the footnotes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. Other amounts need only be cross-referenced to other disclosures required that provide additional detail of these amounts. The amendments in this update are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force”. The amendments in this ASU state that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |