Of course, with a $3 billion balance sheet and about 50% leverage, we have a lot of flexibility. Probably one of the biggest things that we can take advantage of right now is the fact that interest rates, they have been low for a long time and they’re expected to remain low for quite a while. We are now able to secure fixed rate financing at about 2.5% on seven year paper. This is going to enable us, and it is, we’re doing it right now, to convert some of our floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. Currently, we’re a bit over 50% floating and we’re going to increase that or reduce that percentage and increase the amount of fixed-rate debt, securing a known interest rate expense for many, many years into the future. I would also add that our REITs do not have many near-term debt maturities. We only have one loan that’s maturing this year that’s in the process of being refinanced and our balance sheet is very sound.
The other thing, of course, along with bringing over the management is that self-managed REITs are historically the most attractive REITs for institutional investors and in the public markets. Although there are exceptions, they’re rare and any company with the size and scale that we have is almost always required or best traded or valued if it has an internalized and dedicated management team.
Lastly, liquidity options. I know this is something that’s of great concern to many of our investors. We are in excess of the size needed for sufficient scale to do a public listing. We know that internally-managed REITs are viewed more favorably, but in the public markets, and as I said, by institutional investors. Frankly, of the size and scale that we are, we will have many options to seek strategic or institutional capital directly into the REIT.
Just a comment here, the multifamily assets have historically traded with the lowest volatility and the highest return along with industrial real estate. As one would expect, retail and office and hotels trade with lower returns and increased volatility. This has only been amplified more recently with COVID-19 where it doesn’t need to be said the amount of stress that’s been endured by hotels and other asset classes such as shopping centers.
In terms of the state of the multifamily apartment supply and demand situation, it’s quite favorable. Many of you who know us and know our strategy and know what we followed and why we did it, this shouldn’t come as a surprise to you, but the U.S. home ownership rate remains relatively low. The number of renters continues to climb and most importantly, the amount of new supply is quite low or remains in check and is only expected to remain that way due to the disruption caused by COVID and some of the skittishness in the financial markets.
Where Resource has always been an investor and is focused on is what we call workforce housing. Workforce housing is the type of housing that serves people who make around the median income, plus or minus, in the United States. That number is about $62,000 for a family. That means an average family can afford about $1,400 a month in rent and that is exactly the type of investments that we are focused on.
Where we stay clear of are the apartments that are typically the brand new, new developments or high-end that rent for $2,000 to $3,000 a month. We find that in any time of stress, those are the apartments that are most likely to succumb to people leaving and trying to find a more affordable option. So, our target investments offer a lot of downside protection, particularly during stressful times.
In terms of what the REITs will look like when they’re combined, you should note that our average rent of the portfolio as shown on this page is about $1,300 a month. As I said, we have 15,000 apartment units and we are about 50% leverage. This is a company of the shape and size that will demand a lot of institutional interest because of its asset base, it’s shape, size and management team.
I wanted to also just summarize that for each of the three REITs, all of the REITs are receiving consideration that is in excess of what the initial offering price was plus the stock dividends received plus the consideration from this transaction is in excess of the initial offering price. Obviously for REITs I and II, which have been performing longer, that differential is the greatest as one would expect because the shareholders have been receiving dividends for many years in those REITs.
Page 3 of 7