Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Aug. 31, 2014 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
|
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Revenue recognition |
|
|
|
The Company’s revenues are derived from management, financial and accounting advisory service fees. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement that the services have been rendered to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
|
|
Net loss per common share |
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were 0 and 314,816 potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013, respectively. Due to the loss for the periods presented, the shares are not included in the calculation as they would be anti-dilutive. |
|
|
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
|
Certain amounts in the prior period presented have been reclassified to conform to the current period classification. These reclassifications have no effect on the previously reported net loss. |
|
|
|
Going Concern |
|
As reflected in the accompanying audited financial statements, the Company has had a net loss and comprehensive loss from continuing operations of $84,912 and $124,888 for the three months ended August 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013, respectively; and an accumulated deficit of $766,245 at August 31, 2014. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. |
|
|
Management believes that the actions presently being taken and the success of future operations will be sufficient to enable the Company to continue as a going concern. These actions include continuing to grow the Company’s revenues to sufficiently support its cost structure through existing and new clients while actively seeking channels to develop business. Management may seek additional financing using equity or debt instruments in the future through additional private placement offerings. |
|
|
|
There can be no assurance that the actions taken and raising of equity will be successful or that the Company’s anticipated financing will be available in the future, at terms satisfactory to the Company. Failure to achieve the equity and financing at satisfactory terms and amounts could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. |
|
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this ASU are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. It is too early to assess the impact of the adoption of this new guidance on the Company’s financial position. |
|
|
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard outlines a five-step model for revenue recognition with the core principle being that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers control of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. Under the modified approach, financial statements will be prepared for the year of adoption using the new standard but prior periods presented will not be adjusted. Instead, companies will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company has not yet made a determination been made as to the method of application (full retrospective or modified retrospective). It is too early to assess whether the impact of the adoption of this new guidance will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flows. |