SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
SSGI, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida as Phage Therapeutics International, Inc. on December 26, 1996. In February 2008, through a share exchange, the company acquired Surge Solutions Group, Inc. (“Surge”). As a consequence of the latter exchange, which qualified as a reverse merger; Surge became the accounting acquirer and the reporting entity prospectively.
On May 13, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common shares of B&M Construction Co., Inc. (“B&M”), a Florida construction company licensed to operate in the Southeastern United States. This newly acquired subsidiary specializes in the design, construction and maintenance of retail petroleum facilities.
The Company specializes in the design and construction of industrial and commercial buildings in the petroleum industry; and in the maintenance of retail petroleum facilities in Florida and Georgia. The Company's work is performed under various fee arrangements including cost plus fee contracts, fixed price contracts, fixed price contracts with incentive and penalty provisions, and straight hourly fee contracts. These contracts are undertaken by the Company alone or in conjunction with other contracts. The length of the Company's contracts typically range from three months or less to one year.
Interim Financial Statements
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules of interim financial statements stipulated in Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, such financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The balance sheet information as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the audited financial statements. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with those statements.
Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
At June 30, 2010, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, had insufficient working capital to fund ongoing operations and expects to incur further losses. These circumstances cast doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations.
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (continued)
obligations and continue its operations. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown in the financial statements and do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Principles of Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements includes the accounts of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary and its 70% majority-owned subsidiary. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated.
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries
FASB ASC 810-10-65, Consolidations, requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. The non-controlling interest represents the minority interests not held by the Company. The Company has recorded a non-controlling interest in its Consolidated Financial Statements to reflect the minority interests.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant management estimate relates to the determination of percentage of completion in connection with the recognition of profit on contracts.
Revenue and Cost Recognition
Revenues from fixed price or modified fixed price construction contracts are recognized on the percentage of completion method, measured by the costs incurred to date relative to estimated total costs for each contract. Where appropriate, certain contracts are segmented into major activities due to the particular scope of work and services to be performed. These methods are used because management considers costs incurred and possible segmentation of specific contracts to be the best available measure of progress. The length of the Company’s contracts varies, but is typically less than one year.
Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs, and those indirect costs related to contract performance such as insurance, employee benefits, supplies, small tools, repairs, and indirect labor. Selling, general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Revenue and Cost Recognition (continued)
losses on uncompleted contracts, if applicable, are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those
arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include money market accounts and investments in a repurchase agreement backed by government securities.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company is subject to some credit risk through short term cash investments which are placed with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company has entered into an overnight repurchase and cash management agreement with a financial institution to invest idle funds in US government securities. The Company maintains its cash accounts in several commercial banks located in Central Florida. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) guarantees accounts in the financial institution up to $250,000. At various times throughout the period, the Company had cash balances that exceeded the FDIC limit.
The Company provides construction services, parts sales and servicing and extends trade credit to the petroleum distribution industry. The customers are primarily to major oil companies and large
independent distributors in Florida and Georgia. The Company grants credit to its customers during the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Management believes that its contract acceptance, billing and collections policies are adequate to minimize potential risk. The Company does not believe that any single customer, industry, or concentration in any geographic area represents significant credit risk.
Contracts Receivable
Contracts receivable are customer obligations due under contractual terms. The Company sells its services to residential, commercial, government and retail customers. On most projects, the Company has liens rights under Florida law which are typically enforced on balances not collected within 90 days. The Company includes any balances that are determined to be uncollectible along with a general reserve in its overall allowance for doubtful accounts.
Net Loss Per Share
The Company follows ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share” in calculating the basic and diluted loss per share. The Company computes basic loss per share by dividing net loss and net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share considers the effect of common share equivalent shares. There were no common share equivalents at June 30, 2010 and 2009.
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Treasury Stock
The Company accounts for treasury stock at par value. Under this method, the treasury stock account is increased by the par value of each share of common stock reacquired. Any excess paid per share over the par value is debited to additional paid-in capital for the amount per share that was originally credited. Any remaining excess is charges to retained earnings.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as stipulated by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities or a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced to estimated amounts to be realized by the use of a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is applied when in management’s view it is more likely than not (50%) that such deferred tax will not be utilized
In January 1, 2009, the Company adopted certain provisions under ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, (“ASC 740”), which provide interpretative guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Effective with the Company’s adoption of these provisions, interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits is recognized in the financial statements as a component of income taxes. The adoption of ASC 740 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
In the unlikely event that an uncertain tax position exists in which the Company could incur income taxes, the Company would evaluate whether there is a probability that the uncertain tax position taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. Reserves for uncertain tax positions would then be recorded if the Company determined it is probable that a position would not be sustained upon examination or if a payment would have to be made to a taxing authority and the amount is reasonably estimable. As of June 30, 2010, the Company does not believe it has any uncertain tax positions that would result in the Company having a liability to the taxing authorities. The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by the federal and state tax authorities for the years ended 2007 through 2009.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, usually from three to forty years. Routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Accelerated depreciation is used for tax reporting and straight-line depreciation is used for financial statement reporting.
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Long-lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the related assets are less than the carrying amount, the carrying amounts are reduced to fair value and an impairment loss is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-05, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Marketing and Advertising Costs
Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Marketing and advertising costs for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $24,056 and $70,411, respectively.
Fair Value Measurements
In January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements”, (“FASB ASC 820”) for its non-financial assets and liabilities and for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. This Standard provides a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The adoption of FASB ASC 820 for the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, contracts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, promissory note payable, due to stockholders, and long-term debt. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, contracts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to their relatively short lives to maturity. The fair value of long-term debt also approximates fair market value, as these amounts are due at rates which are compatible to market interest rates.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company applies the fair value method of ASC 718, Share Based Payment, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS”) No. 123R “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", in accounting for its stock based compensation. This standard states that compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. As the Company does not have sufficient, reliable and readily determinable values relating to its common stock, the Company has used the stock value pursuant to its most recent sale of stock for purposes of valuing stock based compensation.
Common Stock Purchase Warrants
The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants at fair value in accordance with ASC 815-40 Derivatives and Hedging, formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Practically Settled in a Company’s Own Stock”. The Black-Scholes option pricing valuation method is used to determine fair value of these warrants consistent with ASC 718, Share Based Payment, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS”) No. 123R “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. Use of this method requires
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Common Stock Purchase Warrants (continued)
that the Company make assumptions regarding stock volatility, dividend yields, expected term of the warrants and risk-free interest rates.
The Company accounts for transactions in which services are received in exchange for equity instruments based on the fair value of such services received from non-employees, in accordance with ASC 505-50 Equity Based Payments to Non-employees, formerly EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements and which amends Subtopic ASC 855-10 Subsequent Events, removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
NOTE 2 – RESTRICTED CASH DEPOSITS
In some instances the Company is required to post performance bonds on contracts awarded by certain state agencies and municipalities to guarantee performance in accordance with the terms of the contracts. The Company deposits cash equal to a percentage of the contract price with an independent third party bonding agency that holds the deposits for the benefit of the state agency or municipality that has awarded the contract to the Company. The Company also pays a fee to guarantee performance on the percentage of the contract not covered by the cash deposit. Following successful completion of the contract, the bonding agency has up to 90 days to return the deposited cash along with interest in accordance with the contract.
Upon successful completion of the contract, cash deposits are released by the bonding agency. Such proceeds are used to pay the note holders as mentioned in Note 7. If the Company fails to perform, these deposits could be claimed by the party that suffers the loss pursuant to non-performance. At June 30, 2010, the Company had $237,918 on deposit.
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 3 – CONTRACTS RECEIVABLE
Contracts receivable are as follows
| | June 30, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
Contract billings | | $ | 1,813,478 | | | $ | 1,272,788 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (93,225 | ) | | | (181,445 | ) |
Total | | $ | 1,720,253 | | | $ | 1,091,343 | |
Management used the allowance method of recording bad debts and has reviewed all outstanding accounts for collectability. Credit losses have been minimal and have consistently been within management’s expectation. No additional allowance was considered necessary at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 4 – COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following at:
| | June 30, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts | | $ | 4,846,097 | | | $ | 1,072,453 | |
Estimated earnings | | | 490,320 | | | | 269,282 | |
| | | 5,336,417 | | | | 1,341,735 | |
Less billings to date | | | 5,379,480 | | | | 1,536,121 | |
Total | | $ | (43,063 | ) | | $ | (194,386 | ) |
These amounts are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet under the following captions:
| | June 30, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of | | | | | | |
billings on uncompleted contracts | | $ | 704,060 | | | $ | 57,411 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated | | | | | | | | |
earnings on uncompleted contracts | | | (747,123 | ) | | | (251,797 | ) |
Total | | $ | (43,063 | ) | | $ | (194,386 | ) |
NOTE 5– ACQUISITION AND GOODWILL
On May 13, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of B&M.
The following information summarizes the allocation of fair value assigned to the assets and liabilities at the acquisition date:
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 5– ACQUISITION AND GOODWILL (continued)
| | | | |
Current Assets | | $ | 2,221,217 | |
Property and Equipment | | | 265,209 | |
Other Assets | | | 785,798 | |
Goodwill | | | 5,062,144 | |
Liabilities Assumed | | | (2,314,540 | ) |
| | $ | 6,019,838 | |
Consideration paid was comprised of the following:
Warrants | | $ | 171,592 | |
Stock | | | 3,674,773 | |
Cash | | | 1,000,000 | |
Note Payable | | | 1,173,473 | |
| | $ | 6,019,838 | |
The fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired have been determined on a provisional basis and will be completed by August 31, 2010.
In contemplation of the acquisition, the Company and the former Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer entered into a Modification Agreement that required the former officer to surrender to the Company all shares of common stock held with the exception of 4,000,000 shares. The former officer also forgave the Company for all except for $125,000 of remaining principal and accrued interest of previous loans made by the former officer to the Company. The $125,000 not forgiven is evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 5% and payable in full on December 31, 2011. The Modification Agreement also requires the former officer to provide certain transitional consulting services to the Company, on a limited basis, for 12 months in exchange for a consulting fee of $9,333 per month as well as the issuance of 500,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.60 per share exercisable for five years.
In addition, a former officer and director and current employee to the Company was issued 500,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.60 per share exercisable for five years. The Company also agreed, as part of the Modification Agreement, to use its best efforts to repay outstanding credit card indebtedness incurred by the Company and personally guaranteed by the former officer and director. The former officer also forgave the Company for all remaining principal and accrued interest of previous loans made by the employee to the Company.
Total debt forgiveness was $866,055 and has been included as other income in the consolidated statements of operations for the period ended June 30, 2010. The remaining $143,800 of other income resulted from adjustments to outstanding liabilities held by the Company.
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 6– PROMISSORY NOTE PAYABLE
In November of 2007, a financial institution extended the Company a line of credit in the amount of $750,000. In November of 2008, the Company converted the line of credit to a promissory note payable which required monthly principal and interest payments of $35,000 commencing January 2009. The interest rate for the promissory note was 1.5% above the published prime rate. On June 3, 2009, the promissory note was extended until December 2009. On February 26, 2010, the promissory note was extended for an additional year at the same monthly payment with the interest rate fixed at 7% with the first monthly payment due in April 2010.
At June 30, 2010, a financial institution converted an additional line of credit to a promissory note payable due to the bank withdrawing B&M’s line of credit. There is no set principal payment required at the current time, interest only. It is the intent of management to place the balance with another financial institution. The balances on the promissory notes at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $893,160 and $353,691, respectively. The Company paid $39,580 and $63,677 in interest for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 7 –TERM NOTE PAYABLE, RELATED PARTY
In April 2009, the Company borrowed against a line of credit from an existing shareholder in the amount of $500,000. In June 2009, the Company paid the principal amount of the line of credit with proceeds from a new term note from a Nevada limited partnership in the principal amount of $925,000. The term note bears interest at 9% per annum with $425,000 in principal due on October 27, 2009 and $500,000 on April 27, 2010. The Company has not made all payments as required by the terms of note. In April, the Nevada limited partnership extended the term note to April 2011. A director of the company and a stockholder are limited partners in the Nevada limited partnership. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to pay premiums on performance bonds, escrow deposits required by performance bonds and working capital. Once the performance bonds for the government construction contracts are completed, the escrow deposits are returned to the Company with accrued interest. The terms of the note require the Company to use the proceeds from the deposits to repay the term note.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has not paid interest on the term loan. At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the balance due on the term note is $707,116 and $965,458, respectively.
NOTE 8 – LONG TERM DEBT
A summary of long-term debt as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | June 30, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
5.00% note payable to a former stockholder, $9,317 principal and interest payments monthly, through June 2015 | | $ | 491,748 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
5.00% note payable to a former stockholder, $2,097 principal and interest payments monthly, through June 2015 | | | 111,125 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
3.25% note payable to a former stockholder, | | | | | | | | |
$2,357 principal and interest payments monthly, | | | | | | | | |
through January 2016. | | | 144,600 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
4.00% note payable to a former stockholder, $26,496 principal and interest payable monthly, through May 2014. | | | 1,150,889 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
7.99% note payable to Chrysler Financial collateralized by vehicle and guaranteed by founding stockholders. Due in monthly installments of $293 including interest through May 2012. | | | 6,240 | | | | 15,435 | |
| | | | | | | | |
8.75% to 8.99% notes payable to Ford Credit collateralized by vehicles and guaranteed by founding stockholders. Due in monthly installments of $2,918 including interest through 2013. | | | 38,931 | | | | 47,002 | |
| | | | | | | | |
6.50% to 7.15% notes payable to Wachovia Bank collateralized by vehicles and guaranteed by founding stockholders. Due in monthly installments of $5,654 including interest through 2012. | | | 86,509 | | | | 113,170 | |
| | | | | | | | |
7.50% note payable to Wells Fargo collateralized by a vehicle and equipment. Due in monthly installments of $967 including interest through 2012. | | | 22,320 | | | | 28,759 | |
| | | | | | | | |
5.40% note payable to Premium Financing Specialists. Due in monthly installments of $11,952 including interest through 2010 paid in June. | | | - | | | | 23,743 | |
| | | | | | | | |
7.65% note payable to SunTrust Bank collateralized by a vehicle. Due in monthly installments of $349 including interest through 2014. | | | 15,871 | | | | 17,322 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,068,233 | | | | 245,431 | |
Less current portion | | | 491,984 | | | | 111,891 | |
Total | | $ | 1,576,249 | | | $ | 133,540 | |
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 8 – LONG TERM DEBT (continued)
Interest paid on long term debt for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $29,337 and $10,306, respectively.
Maturities of long-term debt for the years subsequent to June 30, 2010 are as follows:
| | | | |
2011 | | $ | 491,984 | |
2012 | | | 494,199 | |
2013 | | | 457,274 | |
2014 | | | 446,134 | |
2015 and thereafter | | | 178,642 | |
| | $ | 2,068,233 | |
NOTE 9 – COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS
During 2008, the Company completed private placements resulting in the issuance of units consisting of one share of Company restricted common stock and one warrant (each warrant is exercisable into one share of Company restricted common stock). As part of the transaction, the Company also issued common stock purchase warrants to certain individuals who assisted with the private placement. There was no value assigned to these warrants when they were granted.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 45,000 warrants in payment for legal fees, 500,000 warrants to the former Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, 500,000 warrants to a founding shareholder, former director, and current employee and 250,000 warrants to employee shareholders of the acquired company which resulted in a total of 4,820,053 warrants outstanding at that date. The Company used the Black Scholes option pricing method to value the warrants.
A summary of the change in common stock purchase warrants for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | Weighted Average | |
| | Number of | | | | | | Remaining | |
| | Warrants | | | Weighted Average | | | Contractual Life | |
| | Outstanding | | | Exercise Price | | | (Years) | |
Balance, December 31, 2009 | | | 3,525,053 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | | 4.47 | |
Warrants Issued | | | 1,295,000 | | | $ | 0.63 | | | | 4.88 | |
Balance, June 30, 2010 | | | 4,820,053 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | | 4.39 | |
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 9 – COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS (continued)
The balance of outstanding and exercisable common stock warrants as at June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Number of | | | Remaining | | | | |
Warrants | | | Contractual Life | | | | |
Outstanding | | | Exercise Price | | | (Years) | |
| | | | | | | |
| 4,820,053 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | | 1.0 – 9.0 | |
The fair value of stock purchase warrants granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was calculated using the following assumptions:
| | June 30, | | | December31, | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Risk free interest rate | | | 1.12% - 1.63 | % | | | .5% - 1.8 | % |
Expected volatility | | | 231% - 297 | % | | | 20% - 86 | % |
Expected term of stock warrant in years | | | 2.5 - 3.5 | | | | 1.5 – 5.0 | |
Expected dividend yield | | | 0 | % | | | 0 | % |
Average value per option | | | .02 - .69 | | | | .13 - .73 | |
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company and other comparable companies. Short Term U.S. Treasury rates were utilized. The expected term of the options was calculated using the alternative simplified method newly codified as ASC 718, formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 107, which defines the expected life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. Since trading volumes and the number of unrestricted shares are very small compared to total outstanding shares, the value of the warrants was decreased for lack of marketability.
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
A reconciliation of the differences between the effective income tax rate and the statutory federal tax rate for June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate | | | 34.00 | % | | | 34.00 | % |
State taxes, net of federal benefit | | | 3.63 | | | | 3.63 | |
Change in valuation allowance | | | (37.63 | ) | | | (37.63 | ) |
| | | - | % | | | - | % |
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:
| | June 30, | | | December 31, | |
Deferred Tax Assets | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | |
Net Operating Loss Carryforward | | $ | 2,365,000 | | | $ | 1,958,000 | |
Other | | | 88,000 | | | | 173,000 | |
Total Deferred Tax Assets | | | 2,453,000 | | | | 2,131,000 | |
Deferred Tax Liabilities | | | ( 313,000 | ) | | | (278,000 | ) |
Net Deferred Tax Assets | | | 2,140,000 | | | | 1,853,000 | |
Valuation Allowance | | | (2,140,000 | ) | | | (1,853,000 | ) |
Total Net Deferred Tax Assets | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES (continued)
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $11,000,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2029. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited. No tax asset has been reported in the financial statements, because the Company believes there is a 50% or greater chance the carry-forwards will expire unused. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the loss carry forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
NOTE 11 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In order to procure vehicle financing and leased facilities, at various times the founding stockholders of the Company have acted as guarantors under such financing arrangements.
The Company has amounts due to the founding stockholders totaling $125,000 and $1,196,486 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The founding stockholders forgave the Company for all except for $125,000 of remaining principal and accrued interest of previous loans as of April 20. The $125,000 not forgiven is evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 5% and payable in full on December 31, 2011.
The Company also has amounts due to the majority stockholder of B&M of $450,000 as of June 30, 2010.
In addition, the Company purchased insurance through the spouse of a stockholder and consultant via an arm’s length transaction.
The Company leases office facilities from three entities related to Company stockholders. The lease payments for the facilities were $130,353 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The leases provide for minimum annual rental payments plus sales tax.
NOTE 12– 401(k) RETIREMENT PLAN
The acquired Company sponsors a 401(k) plan for eligible employees. The Company’s contributions to the Plan are determined annually by the Board of Directors. The allocation of the Company’s contribution to the Plan among eligible employees was based upon formulas stated within the Plan. The contribution for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $10,874. The Company matches up to 3% of compensation that a participant contributes to the Plan.
SSGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE 13 – LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is a party in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. At June 30, 2010, there were no legal proceedings against the Company. The Company has filed a lawsuit against several customers for non-payment of contract revenues and has been awarded summary judgments in various cases. While the outcome of continuing collection efforts is unknown, it is the opinion of management that the Company will be successful in collecting a majority of court ordered awards.
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were available for issuance. There were no other reportable subsequent events.