UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of August, 2017
(Commission File No. 001-34429),
PAMPA ENERGIA S.A.
(PAMPA ENERGY INC.)
Argentina
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Maipú 1
C1084ABA
City of Buenos Aires
Argentina
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)
Form 20-F ___X___ Form 40-F ______
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the
information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes ______ No ___X___
(If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- .)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/asdasdx1x1.jpg)
Pampa Energía S.A. (‘Pampa’ or the ‘Company’), the largest independent energy integrated company in Argentina, which through its subsidiaries participates in the electricity and oil and gas value chain, announces the results for the six-month period and quarter ended on June 30, 2017. |
Buenos Aires,August11, 2017
Stock Information
Buenos Aires Stock Exchange Ticker: PAMP New York Stock Exchange Ticker: PAM 1 ADS = 25 ordinary shares
Share capital in diluted basis: 1,938.4 million ordinary shares / 77.5 million ADSs
Market Capitalization: AR$76,081 million / US$4,265 million For further information, contact: Gustavo Mariani Executive Vice-president Ricardo Torres Executive Vice-president Mariano Batistella Executive Director of Planning, Strategy & Affiliates Lida Wang Investor Relations Officer The Pampa Energía Building Maipú 1 (C1084ABA), Buenos Aires City, Argentina Tel: +54 (11) 4344-6000 investor@pampaenergia.com www.pampaenergia.com/ir |
| Main Results for the First Semester of 2017 (‘1H17’) Consolidated sales revenues of AR$30,801 million1, 267.4% higher than the AR$8,383 million for the first half of 2016 (‘1H16’), explained by increases of AR$2,474 million in power generation, AR$5,412 million in electricity distribution, AR$6,654 million in oil and gas, AR$8,150 million in refining and distribution, AR$3,461 million in petrochemicals and AR$166 million in holding and others segment, partially offset by higher eliminations as a result of intersegment sales for AR$3,899 million. ðPower Generation of 7,768 GWhfrom 9 power plants ðElectricity sales of 10,857 GWhto 2.9 million end-users ðProduction of 70.3 thousand barrels per day of hydrocarbons: 283 million cf/d of gas and 22.4 kb/d of oil ðSales of 953 thousand m3of refined products and 230 thousand tons of petrochemical products Adjusted consolidated EBITDA2of AR$7,699 million, compared to AR$1,775 million for 1H16, mainly due to increases of AR$1,135 million in power generation, AR$1,188 million in electricity distribution, AR$3,061 million in oil and gas, AR$311 million in refining and distribution, AR$190 million in petrochemicals and AR$61 million in intersegment eliminations, partially offset by decreases of AR$21 million in holding and others segment. Consolidated gain of AR$2,346 million, of which AR$1,810 million is attributable to the owners of the Company, higher than the AR$61 million loss attributable to the owners in 1H16, explained by higher reported gains in power generation (AR$ 1,420 million), electricity distribution (AR$1,155 million), oil and gas (AR$1,450 million), refining and distribution (AR$183 million) and intersegment eliminations (AR$61 million), partially offset by losses in petrochemicals (AR$13 million) and higher losses in holding and others segment (AR$2,385 million). |
| |
1Under the International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’), Greenwind, OldelVal, Refinor, Transener and TGS are not consolidated in Pampa’s income statement and balance sheet, its equity incomebeingshown only as ‘Results for participation in associates’ and ‘Results for participation in joint businesses’. For more information, please refer to section 3 of this Earnings Release. |
2Consolidated adjusted EBITDA represents the consolidated results before net financial results, income tax and minimum notional income tax, depreciations and amortizations, non-recurring incomes and expenses and non-controlling interests, and includes other incomes not accrued and other adjustments from the IFRS implementation. For more information, please refer to section 3 of this Earnings Release. |
1
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
Main Results for the Second Quarter of 2017 (‘Q2 17’)3
Consolidated sales revenues of AR$15,635 million, compared to AR$4,156 million recorded in the second quarter 2016 (‘Q2 16’), mainly explained by increases of AR$1,396 million in power generation, AR$3,035 million in electricity distribution, AR$3,234 million in oil and gas, AR$4,159 million in refining and distribution, AR$1,654 million in petrochemicals and AR$79 million in holding and others segment, partially offset by higher eliminations from intersegment sales of AR$2,078 million.
ðPower generation of 3,794 GWhfrom 9 power plants
ðElectricity sales of 5,330 GWhto 2.9 million of end-users
ðProduction of 70.1 kboe/d of hydrocarbons: 285 million cf/d of gas and 21.8 kb/d of oil
ðSales of 480 thousand m3 of refined products and 107 thousand tons of petrochemical products
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA of AR$3,858 million, compared to AR$186 million in Q2 16, due to increases of AR$579 million in power generation, AR$1,240 million in electricity distribution, AR$1,549 million in oil and gas, AR$80 million in refining and distribution, AR$77 million in petrochemicals, AR$113 million in holding and others segment and AR$35 million in intersegment eliminations.
Consolidated gain of AR$51 million, of which AR$91 million of losses are attributable to the owners of the Company, higher than the loss of AR$669 million attributable to the owners of the Company in the Q2 16, explained by reported higher earnings in our segments of power generation (AR$403 million), electricity distribution (AR$608 million), oil and gas (AR$599 million) and intersegment eliminations (AR$35 million), partially offset by losses in refining and distribution (AR$34 million), petrochemicals (AR$77 million) and higher losses in our holding and others segment (AR$956 million).
[3] The financial information presented in this document for the quarters ended on June 30, 2017 and of 2016 are based on unaudited financial statements prepared according to the IFRS accounting standards in force in Argentina corresponding to the six-month period ended on June 30, 2017 and of 2016, and the quarter ended on March 31, 2017 and 2016.
2
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
Table of Contents
3
1. Relevant Events
1.1 Investment Agreement with YPF in Rincón del Mangrullo Block
On August 1, 2017, the operator and licensee of Rincón del Mangrullo block (the 'Block'), YPF, reached an agreement with the authorities of Neuquén province to be granted an unconventional exploitation license (the 'Agreement'). The Block is currently jointly developed with our oil and gas subsidiary Petrolera Pampa S.A. (‘Petrolera Pampa’) and each company holds a 50% stake.
Under the Agreement, Neuquén province grants a 35-year period extension to the exploitation concession in exchange of a US$150 million investment commitment destined to an unconventional gas pilot program, which aims to further develop Mulichinco formation (tight gas) and explore the potential in Las Lajas (tight gas) and Vaca Muerta (shale gas) formations. Pampa, through Petrolera Pampa, only participates in the Block's tight gas development. Thus, 30% of the total amount corresponds to its investment commitment. It is worth highlighting that for the first time horizontal wells will be drilled in the Block, a method our partner YPF has plenty of experience picked up from their operation of other unconventional blocks in Neuquén.
The Rincón del Mangrullo block is located in the mid-east of Neuquén province and accounts for an area of 183 km2. Since 2013 YPF and Petrolera Pampa have been developing the Block, producing natural gas from Mulichinco formation as well as exploring the potential in Las Lajas formation. Currently, there are 116 wells, producing 177 million cubic feet per day of unconventional gas.
1.2 News from Power Generation Segment
1.2.1 Commissioning of a New Turbine in Central Térmica Loma de la Lata (‘CTLL’)
Pursuant to the Wholesale Power Purchase Agreement (the 'PPA') signed between the Wholesale Electricity Market Company ('CAMMESA') and our power generation subsidiary CTLL, which is an awardee to the Tender for New Generation Capacity stipulated in the Secretariat of Electric Energy (‘SEE’) Resolution No. 21/2016, CAMMESA granted the commercial commissioning of the TG05 gas turbine as of August 5, 2017 at 12 am. Thus, commissioning has been achieved in accordance with the PPA terms and conditions, as well as the corresponding supply obligations became effective.
The project, which consisted in installing a new 105 MW high efficiency gas turbine in CTLL, increased the total power capacity of said plant to 750 MW and required an investment of approximately US$90 million. Moreover, this is the second consecutive year that Pampa has been adding capacity to the Argentine Grid.
It is worth highlighting that the new TG05 turbine manufactured by General Electric is the same model as the gas turbines generating in TG04 at CTLL and TG01 at Central Térmica Güemes (‘CTG’), built with the most advanced technology available, allowing a high efficiency and flexibility functioning, reaching full load in only 10 minutes and having reduced maintenance schedules.
1.2.2 Call for New Power Generation Projects
Under SEE Resolution No. 287/17, a tender was opened calling for companies interested in developing co-generation and closing to combined cycle projects over already existing equipment, with no limits to power capacity to be installed. The projects must be highly efficient and new capacity must not demand an increase beyond the existing power transportation capacity; otherwise, the necessary expansions will be at the expense of the bidder.
4
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
The resulting awarded projects will be remunerated with a US$-nominated PPA to be executed with CAMMESA, effective for a 15-year term. In light of this tender, Pampa presented the following projects:
Project | Power Capacity (MW) | Province | Estimated date of commissioning |
Incremental(1) | Tendered(2) |
Closing of Cycle | | | | |
Genelba Thermal Plant | 375 | 361 | Buenos Aires | Q1 2020 |
Loma de la Lata Thermal Plant | 43 | 38 | Neuquén | Q1 2020 |
Co-Generation | | | | |
Puerto General San Martín | 105.5 | 93 | Santa Fe | Q2 2020 |
Total | 524 | 492 | | |
(1) Gross capacity.(2) Net capacity |
According to the tender’s schedule, the opening of economic bids will be carried out on August 30 and the awarded bids will be announced on September 22, 2017.
1.2.3 Execution of PPA Within the Agreement to Increase the Thermal Generation Availability 2014 Framework
On July 14, 2017, under the former Secretariat of Energy (‘SE’) Resolution No. 220/07 CTLL executed a PPA with CAMMESA, which will be remunerating a high efficiency gas turbine of 105 MW commissioned on July 15, 2016.
The PPA provides a capacity charge of US$16,900/MW-month and a variable price of US$7.6/MWh, retroactively since its commissioning, for 79.35 MW (75.6% of the turbine’s capacity). The remaining capacity of 24.4% will continue to be billed under the pricing terms stipulated in SEE Resolution No. 19-E/2017.
1.3 News from Refining and Distribution Segment
1.3.1 Actions Related to Fuel Specifications
Under the Secretariat of Hydrocarbon Resources Resolution No. 5/16 addressing the diesel oil quality, Pampa is currently carrying out a tender process to execute the necessary investments for the construction and commissioning of a hydro-treatment unit, estimated to be operating and dispatching the adequate fuel quality throughout the year 2020. In compliance with said Resolution, this advance was duly informed to the authorities.
1.3.2 Investments for Vertical Integration Between Business Segments
Aiming to facilitate the fuel oil supply to Central Piedra Buena (‘CPB’) and secure a sales channel for the Bahía Blanca Refinery, Pampa has stepped forward on the necessary tender processes for the construction of a pipe to connect both assets fully owned by the Company.
Construction works under the project are estimated to begin during the second half of 2017, and commissioning is expected in the second quarter of 2018.
1.3.3 Increase in Fuel Prices Sold at Gas Stations
Pursuant to the Producers and Refiners’ Agreement encouraged by the Ministry of Energy and Mining (‘MEyM’), in which Pampa pledged along with other leading companies in the sector, on July 1,2017, the Company has adjusted the prices of gasoline and diesel oil sold in our gas stations, rounding an increase of 7% and 6%, respectively.
5
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
1.4 Edenor: Regulatory Assets and Liabilities Status
On April 26, 2017, Edenor was notified that once the Integral Tariff Review (‘RTI’) process ended, the MEyM arranged that the SEE, with the participation of the Under Secretariat of Tariffs Policies’ Coordination and the National Electricity Regulatory Entity (‘ENRE’), together should determine within 120 days the existence of pending obligations regarding the Memorandum of Understanding (Acta Acuerdo) executed on February 13, 2006 until the effectiveness of the new tariff schemes resulting from the RTI in February 2017. In such case, the SEE should determine within the next 60 additional days the approach to these obligations.
On May 11, 2017, Edenor filed a damages report with the values updated as of January 31, 2017, estimating a total amount for all claims arising from the breach of the Memorandum of Understanding, net of the amounts received during the analyzed period (SE Resolution No. 250/12, 32/15 and MEyM 7/16). Furthermore, Edenor details the amount of regulatory liabilities which were incurred because of the tariff freeze as well as the company’s economic and financial deterioration.
As of the date of this Earnings Release, the SEE has not issued any ruling regarding the approach for these regulatory assets and liabilities.
1.5 Instrumental Agreement of Transener and Transba
On June 19, 2017, CAMMESA made its final disbursement under the Loan Agreements executed with Transener and Transba, consequently offsetting all credits from cost variations recognized in the Instrumental Agreement, the Renewal Agreement and its Addendum, as well as the last Agreement executed on December 26, 2016.
1.6 Debt Securities Transactions
1.6.1 CTLL
Aiming to diversify financing sources and optimizing its structure, on July 28, 2017 CTLL executed as a borrower a credit facility with Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Finnish Export Credit Limited for an amount up to US$55 million. This facility is sponsored by the Republic of Finland's Export Agency, known as Finnvera. The credit’s disbursement is subject to the fulfillment of conditions precedent.
The facility will bear an interest rate of six-month Libor plus a margin and a guarantee premium. Principal will be repaid in 14 semi-annual installments, the first installment being due six months after the power plant’s commissioning or November 25, 2017, whatever happens first.
The net proceeds from this facility will be allocated to the financing of the expansion in Bahía Blanca, project carried out under the tender stipulated in SEE Resolution No. 21/16, consisting in the installation of Finnish Wärtsilä 100 MW capacity engines, which commissioning is scheduled on December 31, 2017.
1.6.2 CTG
On August 7, 2017 CTG announced the full redemption of Series 7 Corporate Bond’s outstanding balance, bearing an interest rate of Badlar plus 3.5% margin, face value of AR$173 million and originally maturing on August 10, 2018.
6
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
1.6.3 Petrolera Pampa
Within the actions to optimize financing costs, during May and August 2017 Petrolera Pampa executed loans for an amount of US$50 million maturing in three years and US$20 million due in August 2018, respectively. Moreover, in August 2017 Petrolera Pampa prepaid US$10 million to a loan originally taken for US$45 million and maturing in August 2017. The remaining US$35 million were renewed until August 2018. The average annual fixed interest rate of the aforementioned loans will be 3.9%.
Lastly, on May 18, 2017 Petrolera Pampa fully redeemed the principal balance of Series 2 Corporate Bonds issued under the‘inciso k’regulation, accruing an interest rate of Badlar, face value of AR$525 million and originally maturing on June 6, 2017.
1.6.4 PampaEnergía
Throughout May 2017, Pampa executed loans with different domestic banks for a total amount of US$144 million, maturing between one and two years since disbursement and accruinge an average annual fixed interest rate of 4.4%.
Furthermore, in August 2017 Pampa executed an export pre-financing facility for US$8 million maturing in August 2018.
1.7 Corporate Reorganization
1.7.1 Merger of Pampa, CTG, CTLL, CPB, EG3 Red S.A. (‘EG3’) and Other Subsidiaries of Pampa
As from the acquisition of Petrobras Argentina, Pampa initiated a corporate reorganization process in order to simplify and make the Company’s structure more efficient by getting significant advantages related to higher operating efficiency, optimized use of available resources and better use of technical, administrative and financial structures, among other improvements.
In this regard, on June 26, 2017, the Board of Directors of Pampa instructed the Company’s management to begin the benefits’ assessment from merging Pampa, as the acquiring company, and certain companies within the group as acquired companies, such as CTG, CTLL, CPB and EG3. This reorganization process of merger is scheduled to be effective as from October 1, 2017.
1.7.2 Merger of CTLL, Electricidad Argentina S.A. (‘EASA’) and IEASA S.A. (‘IEASA’)
In the light of CTLL, EASA and IEASA Board of Directors’ decision to begin the merger through absorption between CTLL, as the acquiring company, and EASA and IEASA, as absorbed companies, on May 18, 2017 the extraordinary general shareholders’ meetings took place.
During the general meetings, the involved companies resolved to call for an adjournment in the merger approval discussions until approval was obtained from ENRE. On June 16, 2017 the meeting resumed but was deferred again as still no authorization by ENRE had been obtained.
7
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
1.8 Compensation Agreements for the Senior Management of Pampa
With the objective of efficiently aligning the senior management’s interest with the Company shareholders’ and therefore, creating value for them only if there is also value created for shareholders, on June 2, 2017, the Board of Directors of Pampa approved the execution of compensation agreements with the Company’s senior management, Messrs. Marcelo Mindlin, Gustavo Mariani, Damián Mindlin and Ricardo Torres. The aforementioned agreements mainly consider: |
|
· | An annual, variable and contingent compensation, on an aggregated basis, equivalent to 3% overthe increase of Pampa’s market capitalization. For the 2017 fiscal year, the calculation period started as of June 1; |
| |
· | The annual cashable limit is set to 50% of the accrued amount and 1.5% of the operating income before interest, taxes and other non-cash items (‘Adjusted EBITDA’) of the period to be remunerated; |
| |
· | The accrued amounts that have not been paid by the Company will be cashable by their beneficiaries only if at the moment of realization Pampa’s market capitalization is higher than the maximum amount registered (High-Water Mark provision) and the total annual payable amount by the Company is not higher than 1.5% of the Adjusted EBITDA registered in the remunerating year; and |
| |
· | The payment of the annual compensation will be subject to a previous approval of the Shareholders’ Meeting, which will take place every fiscal year. Moreover, Pampa will deduct from the variable compensation, if any, the amounts that the beneficiaries would have received through bonuses and/or similar items from other subsidiaries of Pampa, adjusted by the Company’s ownership in these companies. |
| |
| The compensation agreements’ guidelines were based on a report prepared by Spencer Stuart, an international well-known consulting firm specialized in the matter, in line with domestic and United States’ standards. |
| |
| Lastly, said agreements were subject to a previous consideration of the Audit Committee, which ruled positively in respect to its rationality. The aforementioned Audit Committee report is available for shareholders, and has been uploaded to the Argentine Securities and Exchange Commission (‘CNV’) website. |
| |
8
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
2. Financial Highlights
2.1 Consolidated Balance Sheet (AR$ Million)
| As of 6.30.17 | As of 12.31.16 |
ASSETS | | |
Participation in joint businesses | 4,431 | 3,699 |
Participation in associates | 791 | 787 |
Property, plant and equipment | 45,131 | 41,090 |
Intangible assets | 1,928 | 2,014 |
Other assets | 13 | 13 |
Financial assets with a results changing fair value | 150 | 742 |
Investments at amortized cost | 5 | 62 |
Deferred tax assets | 1,692 | 1,232 |
Trade receivable and other credits | 5,196 | 4,469 |
Total non-current assets | 59,337 | 54,108 |
| | |
Other Assets | - | 1 |
Inventories | 3,917 | 3,360 |
Financial assets with a results changing fair value | 9,117 | 4,188 |
Investments at amortized cost | 55 | 23 |
Financial derivatives | 38 | 13 |
Trade receivable and other credits | 15,422 | 14,144 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 305 | 1,421 |
Total current assets | 28,854 | 23,150 |
| | |
Non-current assets held for sale | 20 | 19 |
| | |
Total assets | 88,211 | 77,277 |
| As of 6.30.17 | As of 12.31.16 |
EQUITY | | |
Share capital | 1,938 | 1,938 |
Share premium and other reserves | 4,971 | 4,963 |
Repurchased shares | (72) | - |
Statutory reserve | 232 | 232 |
Voluntary reserve | 3,862 | 3,862 |
Retained earnings | 1,799 | (11) |
Other comprehensive result | 170 | 70 |
Equity attributable to owners of the parent | 12,900 | 11,054 |
| | |
Non-controlling interests | 3,566 | 3,020 |
| | |
Total equity | 16,466 | 14,074 |
| | |
LIABILITIES | | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 5,483 | 5,336 |
Borrowings | 31,641 | 15,286 |
Deferred revenues | 198 | 200 |
Salaries and social security payable | 106 | 94 |
Defined benefit plan obligations | 1,032 | 921 |
Deferred tax liabilities | 3,979 | 3,796 |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax liability | 723 | 934 |
Tax payable | 463 | 306 |
Provisions | 5,147 | 6,267 |
Total non-current liabilities | 48,772 | 33,140 |
| | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 14,939 | 12,867 |
Borrowings | 2,767 | 10,686 |
Deferred income | 32 | 1 |
Salaries and social security payable | 1,425 | 1,745 |
Defined benefit plan obligations | 108 | 112 |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax liability | 761 | 1,454 |
Tax payable | 2,149 | 2,392 |
Provisions | 792 | 806 |
Total current liabilities | 22,973 | 30,063 |
| | |
Total liabilities | 71,745 | 63,203 |
| | |
Total liabilities and equity | 88,211 | 77,277 |
9
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
2.2 Consolidated Income Statement (AR$ Million)
| | 1st Half | | 2nd Quarter |
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Sales revenue | | 30,801 | | 8,383 | | 15,635 | | 4,156 |
Cost of sales | | (21,982) | | (7,311) | | (11,491) | | (4,032) |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | | 8,819 | | 1,072 | | 4,144 | | 124 |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling expenses | | (2,431) | | (851) | | (1,235) | | (509) |
Administrative expenses | | (2,365) | | (931) | | (1,166) | | (483) |
Exploration expenses | | (23) | | - | | (10) | | - |
Other operating income | | 2,084 | | 1,339 | | 707 | | 373 |
Other operating expenses | | (1,637) | | (398) | | (648) | | (211) |
Results for participation in joint businesses | | 557 | | (73) | | 274 | | (43) |
Results for participation in associates | | 11 | | (3) | | - | | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | 5,015 | | 155 | | 2,066 | | (749) |
| | | | | | | | |
Financial income | | 682 | | 255 | | 361 | | 156 |
Financial costs | | (2,419) | | (1,420) | | (1,143) | | (774) |
Other financial results | | (791) | | 235 | | (1,468) | | (174) |
Financial results, net | | (2,528) | | (930) | | (2,250) | | (792) |
| | | | | | | | |
Profit before tax | | 2,487 | | (775) | | (184) | | (1,541) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | | (141) | | 349 | | 235 | | 442 |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income for the period | | 2,346 | | (426) | | 51 | | (1,099) |
| | | | | | | | |
Attributable to: | | | | | | | | |
Owners of the Company | | 1,810 | | (61) | | (91) | | (669) |
Non-controlling interests | | 536 | | (365) | | 142 | | (430) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share for the period attributable to the owners of the Company | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted income per share | | 0.9349 | | (0.0360) | | (0.0469) | | (0.3945) |
10
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
2.3 Cash and Financial Borrowings (AR$ Million)
Cash(1) | Consolidated Financial Statements | Ownership Adjusted |
(as of June 30, 2017) |
Power generation | 1,207 | 959 |
Electricity distribution | 1,729 | 891 |
Refining & distribution | 8 | 8 |
Petrochemicals | - | - |
Holding and others | 3,975 | 3,974 |
Oil and gas | 2,558 | 2,286 |
Total | 9,477 | 8,119 |
(1) It includes cash and ST investments from the consolidated financial statements. |
Bank and Financial Debt | Consolidated Financial Statements | Ownership Adjusted |
(as of June 30, 2017) |
Power generation(2) | 2,370 | 2,351 |
Electricity distribution | 2,958 | 1,524 |
Refining & distribution | - | - |
Petrochemicals | - | - |
Holding and others | 23,565 | 23,565 |
Oil and gas | 2,654 | 1,287 |
Total | 31,547 | 28,727 |
(1) It includes cash and short-term investments. (2) It does not include regulatory liability held against CAMMESA for AR$2,862 million.
2.3.1 Summary of Listed Debt Securities (AR$ Million)
Company | Security | Maturity | Amount Issued | Amount Outstanding | Coupon |
In US$ | | | | | |
Transener1 | ON Series 2 | 2021 | 101 | 99 | 9.75% |
Edenor | ON par at fixed rate | 2022 | 300 | 176 | 9.75% |
CTG | ON Series VIII US$-Link2 | 2020 | 1 | 1 | 7% |
CTLL | ON Series 4 US$-Link3 | 2020 | 34 | 34 | 6.25% |
TGS1 | ON par at fixed rate | 2020 | 192 | 192 | 9.625% |
Pampa Energía | ON Series T at discount & fixed rate | 2023 | 500 | 500 | 7.375% |
ON Series I at discount & fixed rate | 2027 | 750 | 750 | 7.5% |
In AR$ | | | | | |
CTLL | ON Series A | 2018 | 282 | 282 | Badlar Privada |
ON Series E | 2020 | 575 | 575 | Badlar Privada |
Note: (1) Affiliates are not consolidated in Pampa’s financial statements, according to the IFRS standards. (2) Bond Note dollar-link, with initial FX rate of AR$14.7908/US$. (3) Bond Note dollar-link, with initial FX rate of AR$8.4917 /US$.
11
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
3. Analysis of the Second Quarter 2017
Consolidated sales revenues of AR$15,635 million, compared to AR$4,156 million recorded in the second quarter 2016 (‘Q2 16’), mainly explained by increases of AR$1,396 million in power generation, AR$3,035 million in electricity distribution, AR$3,234 million in oil and gas, AR$4,159 million in refining and distribution, AR$1,654 million in petrochemicals and AR$79 million in holding and others segment, partially offset by higher eliminations from intersegment sales of AR$2,078 million.
ðPower generation of 3,794 GWhfrom 9 power plants
ðElectricity sales of 5,330 GWhto 2.9 million of end-users
ðProduction of 70.1 kboe/d of hydrocarbons: 285 million cf/d of gas and 21.8 kb/d of oil
ðSales of 480 thousand m3 of refined products and 107 thousand tons of petrochemical products
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA of AR$3,858 million, compared to AR$186 million in Q2 16, due to increases of AR$579 million in power generation, AR$1,240 million in electricity distribution, AR$1,549 million in oil and gas, AR$80 million in refining and distribution, AR$77 million in petrochemicals, AR$113 million in holding and others segment and AR$113 million in intersegment eliminations.
Consolidated gain of AR$51 million, of which AR$91 million of losses are attributable to the owners of the Company, higher than the loss of AR$669 million attributable to the owners of the Company in the Q2 16, explained by reported higher earnings in our segments of power generation (AR$403 million), electricity distribution (AR$608 million), oil and gas (AR$599 million) and intersegment eliminations (AR$35 million), partially offset by losses in refining and distribution (AR$34 million), petrochemicals (AR$77 million) and higher losses in our holding and others segment (AR$956 million).
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Calculation, in AR$ million | | 1H17 | | 1H16 | | Q2 17 | | Q2 16 |
Consolidated operating income | | 5,015 | | 155 | | 2,066 | | (749) |
Consolidated depreciations and amortizations | | 2,530 | | 595 | | 1,300 | | 326 |
Consolidated EBITDA under IFRS standards | | 7,545 | | 750 | | 3,366 | | (423) |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments from generation segment | | (174) | | 5 | | 0 | | 6 |
Adjustments from distribution segment | | (280) | | 906 | | 23 | | 552 |
Adjustments from retroactive penalties | | (333) | | 842 | | - | | 505 |
Late payment interests | | 53 | | 65 | | 23 | | 47 |
Adjustments from oil and gas segment | | 32 | | 12 | | 47 | | 12 |
Devaluation of Senillosa's wells | | 5 | | 12 | | 2 | | 12 |
Recovery reversal of Río Neuquén's post-closing sale of CAPEX and OPEX | | - | | - | | 29 | | - |
Adjustments from OldelVal | | 27 | | - | | 17 | | - |
OldelVal's EBITDA adjusted by 23.1% direct ownership | | 38 | | - | | 26 | | - |
Deletions of results from share in associates | | (11) | | - | | (9) | | - |
Adjustments from refining and distribution segment | | (4) | | - | | 16 | | - |
Adjustments from Refinor | | (4) | | - | | 16 | | - |
Refinor's EBITDA adjusted by 28.5% direct ownership | | (4) | | - | | 7 | | - |
Deletions of results from share in associates | | - | | - | | 9 | | - |
Adjustments from petrochemicals segment | | 147 | | - | | 132 | | - |
Adjustments from holding and others segment | | 434 | | 102 | | 274 | | 39 |
Deletion of profit from tax amnesty | | (128) | | - | | - | | - |
Adjustments from TGS | | 288 | | 3 | | 327 | | - |
TGS's EBITDA adjusted by 25.5% indirect ownership | | 620 | | - | | 327 | | - |
Deletions of results from share in joint ventures/associates | | (332) | | 3 | | - | | - |
Adjustments from Transener | | 248 | | 111 | | (53) | | 39 |
Transener's EBITDA adjusted by 26.3% indirect ownership | | 476 | | 38 | | 223 | | (4) |
Deletions of results from share in joint ventures | | (228) | | 73 | | (276) | | 43 |
Others | | 26 | | (12) | | 0 | | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA | | 7,699 | | 1,775 | | 3,858 | | 186 |
12
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
3.1 Analysis of the Power Generation Segment
Power Generation Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 4,015 | 1,541 | +160.5% | 2,167 | 771 | +181.1% |
Cost of sales | (2,389) | (717) | +233.2% | (1,302) | (374) | +248.1% |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 1,626 | 824 | +97.3% | 865 | 397 | +117.9% |
| | | | | | |
Selling expenses | (36) | (16) | +125.0% | (18) | (9) | +100.0% |
Administrative expenses | (170) | (195) | -12.8% | (89) | (87) | +2.3% |
Other operating income | 337 | 21 | NA | 20 | 17 | +17.6% |
Other operating expenses | (130) | (44) | +195.5% | (30) | (20) | +50.0% |
Results for participation in joint businesses | (2) | - | NA | (2) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | 1,625 | 590 | +175.4% | 746 | 298 | +150.3% |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 396 | 187 | +111.8% | 208 | 110 | +89.1% |
Finance costs | (440) | (297) | +48.1% | (203) | (170) | +19.4% |
Other financial results | (15) | 134 | NA | (2) | 28 | NA |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | 1,566 | 614 | +155.0% | 749 | 266 | +181.6% |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | 312 | (173) | NA | (147) | (86) | +70.9% |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | 1,878 | 441 | NA | 602 | 180 | +234.4% |
| | | | | | |
Attributable to: | | | | | | |
Owners of the Company | 1,801 | 381 | NA | 557 | 154 | +261.7% |
Non-controlling interests | 77 | 60 | +28.3% | 45 | 26 | +73.1% |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | 1,816 | 681 | +166.5% | 931 | 352 | +164.2% |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 3,620 | 667 | NA | 2,430 | 447 | NA |
Depreciation and amortization | 365 | 86 | NA | 185 | 48 | +285.4% |
In Q2 17, power generation gross margin was AR$865 million, 117.9% higher than the same period of 2016, mainly due to the addition as of August 2016 of Pichi Picún Leufú Hydroelectric Plant (‘HPPL’), Genelba Thermal Power Plant (‘CTGEBA’) and EcoEnergía Co-Generation Plant (‘EcoEnergía’), which during Q2 17 contributed sales by 1,646 GWh over the total of 4,102 GWh sold.
Pampa’s power generation during Q2 17 increasedby80% compared to Q2 16, mainly due to the inclusion of former Petrobras Argentina’s assets, as well as higher dispatch at CTLL (+304 GWh) due to the commissioning of the 105 MW TG04 in July 2016 and higher availability of gas in the region, partially offset by lesser generation at CTG due to technical problems in the steam turbines. Additionally, although the dispatch variation quarter over quarter at CPB was marginal, its performance was limited compared with the outlook, due to the extension of programmed maintenance and unavailability at both units.
In operating terms, the joint performance of the assets CTGEBA, HPPL and EcoEnergía was lower compared to the same period of 2016, mainly due to the lower dispatch at HPPL (-22 GWh) and minor maintenance works at EcoEnergía (-5 GWh), partially offset by higher dispatch at CTGEBA’s Combined Cycle (+17 GWh).
13
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
Summary of Electricity Generation Assets | Hydroelectric | Thermal | Total |
HINISA | HIDISA | HPPL1 | CTLL2 | CTG3 | CTP | CPB | CTGEBA1 | Eco- Energía1 |
Installed Capacity (MW) | 265 | 388 | 285 | 645 | 361 | 30 | 620 | 825 | 14 | 3,433 |
New Capacity (MW) | - | - | - | 244 | 100 | 30 | - | 165 | 14 | 553 |
Market Share | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.1% | 1.8% | 2.4% | 0.04% | 9.8% |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Semester | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Generation 1H17 (GWh) | 388 | 260 | 245 | 2,112 | 918 | 87 | 1,042 | 2,671 | 44 | 7,768 |
Market Share | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 3.1% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 3.9% | 0.1% | 11.4% |
Sales 1H17 (GWh) | 388 | 260 | 245 | 2,112 | 1,168 | 87 | 1,042 | 3,030 | 46 | 8,378 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net Generation 1H16 (GWh) | 328 | 266 | - | 1,705 | 862 | 82 | 990 | - | - | 4,234 |
Variation Net Generation 1H17 - 1H16 | +18.2% | -2.3% | na | +23.9% | +6.5% | +6.4% | +5.2% | na | na | +83.5% |
Sales 1H16 (GWh) | 328 | 266 | - | 1,705 | 1,122 | 82 | 991 | - | - | 4,495 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Average Price 1H17 (US$ / MWh) | 21.1 | 28.8 | 27.4 | 27.3 | 30.6 | 47.1 | 20.2 | 33.8 | 70.6 | 29.5 |
Average Price 1H16 (US$ / MWh) | 18.3 | 15.6 | na | 27.4 | 29.4 | 49.9 | 13.4 | na | na | 23.9 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Generation Q2 17 (GWh) | 114 | 82 | 149 | 1,048 | 418 | 41 | 630 | 1,294 | 18 | 3,794 |
Market Share | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 1.9% | 4.0% | 0.1% | 11.7% |
Sales Q2 17 (GWh) | 114 | 82 | 149 | 1,048 | 541 | 41 | 630 | 1,478 | 20 | 4,102 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net Generation Q2 16 (GWh) | 110 | 82 | - | 743 | 493 | 41 | 634 | - | - | 2,103 |
Variation Net Generation Q2 17 v. Q2 16 | +3.0% | +0.5% | na | +41.0% | -15.3% | +1.1% | -0.6% | na | na | +80.4% |
Sales Q2 16 (GWh) | 110 | 82 | - | 743 | 616 | 41 | 634 | - | - | 2,227 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Avg. Price Q2 17 (US$/MWh) | 36.1 | 48.3 | 25.6 | 29.0 | 26.8 | 50.0 | 22.0 | 36.6 | 77.3 | 31.3 |
Avg. Price Q2 16 (US$/MWh) | 29.5 | 21.1 | na | 30.0 | 27.8 | 25.5 | 13.6 | na | na | 24.3 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Gross margin before amortization and depreciation. FX rate of AR$/US$: 1H17 – 15.71; 1H16 – 14.36; Q2 17 – 15.75; Q2 16 – 14.23.
(1) The figures from HPPL, CTGEBA and EcoEnergía accounts from the closing of the acquisition in August 2016. (2) The installed capacity of CTLL includes 105 MW from the new gas turbine that commissioned in July 2016 and 76% corresponds to ‘New Capacity’. (3) CTG’s average gross margin considers results for CTP.
The increase in gross margin is also explained by the update in the legacy remuneration scheme by the application of SEE Resolution No. 19E/17. Pursuant to this resolution, as from February 2017 the remuneration is US$-nominated for power capacity and dispatched energy, gradually increased from a minimum remuneration discriminated by technology and scale, followed by an increase to a base remuneration with availability commitment (‘DIGO’) in May 2017, and reaching to the full and final remuneration scheme as from November 2017. It is worth mentioning that during the entire Q2 17 the legacy capacity was billed under the new remuneration scheme (minimum remuneration in April and base remuneration in May and June, being thermal units subject to DIGO and the real availability for each month); while in the first quarter of 2017 (‘Q1 17’) only two months were under the new scheme and minimum remuneration. During Q2 16, the remuneration scheme for the legacy capacity was AR$-nominated and under a lower pricing, pursuant to SE Resolution No. 22/16.
The increase in gross margin is also explained by the devaluation in the nominal exchange rate with impact on our new capacity contracts (Energy Plus and SE Resolution No. 220/07) as well as our legacy capacity, partially offset by higher labor costs and expenses for programmed maintenance services.
Net operating costs increased by 200% compared to Q2 16, mainly due to higher labor costs and the inclusion of HPPL, CTGEBA and EcoEnergía power plants.
Net financial results had a positive variation of AR$35 million compared to Q2 16, recording a AR$3 million profit in Q2 17, mainly due to higher gains from the holding of financial instruments and the recognition of net interest to the credits held against CAMMESA by the former Petrobras Argentina’s generation assets. These effects were partially offset by higher interest losses on financial liabilities and loan agreements with CAMMESA.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by 164% over Q2 16 to AR$931 million, mainly due to the inclusion of former Petrobras Argentina's generation assets since August 2016, together with a better priceremuneration for legacy capacity, Peso devaluation, recognition of a higher price for assignments of gas, partially offset by higher labor and maintenance costs.
14
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
The following table shows a summary of the committed expansion projects, of which 105 MW from Loma de la Lata is already commissioning:
Project | MW | Equipment Provider | Marketing | Awarded Price | Estimated Capex in US$ million* | Date of Commissioning |
Capacity US$/MW-month | Variable US$/MWh | Total US$/MWh |
Thermal | | | | | | | | |
Loma de la Lata | 15 | MAN | Res. SEE N° 19/17 | na | na | na | 18 | Q4 2017 |
105 | GE | US$ PPA for 10 years | 23,000 | 7.5 | 39 | 90 | August 5, 2017 |
Parque Ind. Pilar | 100 | Wärtsilä | US$ PPA for 10 years | 26,900 | 15 - 16 | 52 | 103 | Q3 2017 |
Piedra Buena | 100 | Wärtsilä | US$ PPA for 10 years | 21,800 | 12 - 15 | 42 - 45 | 90 | Q4 2017 |
Renewable | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Eólico I (Corti) | 100 | Vestas | US$ PPA for 20 years | na | na | 58 | 135 | Q2 2018 |
Total | 420 | | | | | | 436 | |
*Amounts without VAT |
3.2 Analysis of the Electricity Distribution Segment
Electricity Distribution Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 11,119 | 5,707 | +94.8% | 5,752 | 2,717 | +111.7% |
Cost of sales | (8,082) | (5,946) | +35.9% | (4,497) | (3,301) | +36.2% |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 3,037 | (239) | NA | 1,255 | (584) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Selling expenses | (1,019) | (762) | +33.7% | (520) | (473) | +9.9% |
Administrative expenses | (630) | (495) | +27.3% | (307) | (268) | +14.6% |
Other operating income | 41 | 546 | -92.5% | 18 | 20 | -10.0% |
Other operating expenses | (313) | (275) | +13.8% | (149) | (150) | -0.7% |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | 1,116 | (1,225) | NA | 297 | (1,455) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 118 | 91 | +29.7% | 59 | 65 | -9.2% |
Finance costs | (772) | (784) | -1.5% | (370) | (392) | -5.6% |
Other financial results | 84 | (311) | NA | (109) | 19 | NA |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | 546 | (2,229) | NA | (123) | (1,763) | -93.0% |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | (156) | 710 | NA | 78 | 621 | -87.4% |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | 390 | (1,519) | NA | (45) | (1,142) | -96.1% |
| | | | | | |
Attributable to: | | | | | | |
Owners of the Company | 211 | (944) | NA | (20) | (628) | -96.8% |
Non-controlling interests | 179 | (575) | NA | (25) | (514) | -95.1% |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | 1,042 | (146) | NA | 425 | (815) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 1,736 | 1,340 | +29.6% | 976 | 711 | +37.3% |
Depreciation and amortization | 206 | 173 | +19.1% | 105 | 88 | +19.3% |
In Q2 17, net sales increasedbyAR$3,035 million in relation to Q2 16, mainly due to the implementation of the first stage ofthe42% tariff increase as from February 2017, as a result of the new tariff scheme from the RTI, pursuant to ENRE Resolution No. 63/17 and later amended under ENRE Resolution No. 92/17. As of June 30, 2017, the amount generated by the gradual application of the tariff increase amounts to AR$2,316 million approximately, which is recognized by ENRE but, in accordance with the reporting standards, is not recognized in Edenor’s financial statements. This amount is payable in 48 installments as from February 1, 2018 and will be included in the resulting Distribution Added Value at thatdate. Moreover, there was an extension to the Framework Contract (Acuerdo Marco) in Q2 17 for the period between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2018 with the National and Provincial Government, accruing income of AR$203 million as of June 30, 2017.
15
The sales increase was partially offset by a lower income accrual from the Fund for Electricity Distribution Expansion and Consolidation Works Trust (‘FOCEDE’), as a consequence of the RTI implementation, posting an amount of AR$32 million in Q2 17 compared to AR$351 million in Q2 16. Moreover, a lower electricity sales was recorded in Q2 17, which decreased by 7% in GWh terms compared to the same period in 2016. At the same time, Edenor's customers increased by 2%.
Edenor's Sales by Type of Customer | 2017 | 2016 | Variation |
In GWh | Part. % | Clients | In GWh | Part. % | Clients | % GWh | % Clients |
Semester | | | | | | | | |
Residential | 4,674 | 43% | 2,529,708 | 4,990 | 44% | 2,480,236 | -6.3% | +2.0% |
Commercial | 1,781 | 16% | 362,814 | 1,869 | 16% | 359,969 | -4.7% | +0.8% |
Industrial | 1,852 | 17% | 6,872 | 1,872 | 16% | 6,778 | -1.0% | +1.4% |
Wheeling System | 1,973 | 18% | 707 | 2,052 | 18% | 714 | -3.8% | -1.0% |
Others | | | | | | | | |
Public Lighting | 353 | 3% | 21 | 350 | 3% | 21 | +0.9% | - |
Shantytowns and Others | 223 | 2% | 427 | 252 | 2% | 402 | -11.7% | +6.2% |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | 10,857 | 100% | 2,900,549 | 11,385 | 100% | 2,848,120 | -4.6% | +1.8% |
| | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter | | | | | | | | |
Residential | 2,283 | 43% | 2,529,708 | 2,593 | 45% | 2,480,236 | -12.0% | +2.0% |
Commercial | 845 | 16% | 362,814 | 905 | 16% | 359,969 | -6.7% | +0.8% |
Industrial | 893 | 17% | 6,872 | 895 | 16% | 6,778 | -0.1% | +1.4% |
Wheeling System | 976 | 18% | 707 | 990 | 17% | 714 | -1.4% | -1.0% |
Others | | | | | | | | |
Public Lighting | 201 | 4% | 21 | 195 | 3% | 21 | +3.1% | - |
Shantytowns and Others | 132 | 2% | 427 | 141 | 2% | 402 | -6.7% | +6.2% |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | 5,330 | 100% | 2,900,549 | 5,719 | 100% | 2,848,120 | -6.8% | +1.8% |
Net operating costs, excluding energy purchases, decreased by 20% compared to Q2 16, mainly due to a lower penalties charge by ENRE as a result of a change in the valuation criteria, partially offset by higher salary costs, taxes and rates and provision for sales’ credits, caused from a higher billing resulting from the new tariff schemes. Energy purchases increased by 126% compared to Q2 16, due to the increase in electricity prices as subsidies are being removed gradually, partially offset by a decrease in electricity losses, which posted 17.2% of the demanded electricity in Q2 17 in comparison to 18.2% reached in Q2 16.
Operating results increased by AR$1,752 million compared to Q2 16, mainly due to the RTI’s new tariff scheme application set forth in ENRE Resolution No. 63/17 as from February 2017 and a lower penalties charge, partially offset by higher operating expenses.
During Q2 17, losses on net financial results increased by AR$112 million to a loss of AR$420 million, mainly due to higher net foreign exchange rate losses as a result of a higher devaluation of the local currency against the US dollar, currency in which Edenor’s financial liabilities aredenominated, partially offset by a higher profit from the holding of financial instruments.
Adjusted EBITDA in Q2 17 for our electricity distribution segment posted a gain of AR$425 million, which includes late payment penalties collected from our customers for AR$23 million. In Q2 16 the adjusted EBITDA amounted to a loss of AR$815 million and included AR$47 million of late payment penalties and a reclassification of financial interest on the penalties’ balance for AR$505 million.
16
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
3.3 Analysis of the Oil and Gas Segment
Oil & Gas Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 7,784 | 1,130 | NA | 3,886 | 652 | NA |
Cost of sales | (5,297) | (680) | NA | (2,648) | (366) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 2,487 | 450 | NA | 1,238 | 286 | NA |
| | | | | | |
Selling expenses | (328) | (73) | NA | (142) | (27) | NA |
Administrative expenses | (524) | (125) | NA | (265) | (56) | NA |
Exploration expenses | (23) | - | NA | (10) | - | NA |
Other operating income | 1,311 | 752 | +74.3% | 605 | 331 | +82.8% |
Other operating expenses | (381) | (66) | NA | (138) | (31) | NA |
Results for participation in associates | 11 | - | NA | 9 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | 2,553 | 938 | +172.2% | 1,297 | 503 | +157.9% |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 71 | - | NA | 26 | - | NA |
Finance costs | (211) | (371) | -43.1% | (60) | (199) | -69.8% |
Other financial results | (150) | (110) | +36.4% | (230) | (112) | +105.4% |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | 2,263 | 457 | NA | 1,033 | 192 | NA |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | (385) | (159) | +142.1% | (256) | (78) | +228.2% |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | 1,878 | 298 | NA | 777 | 114 | NA |
| | | | | | |
Attributable to: | | | | | | |
Owners of the Company | 1,598 | 148 | NA | 655 | 56 | NA |
Non-controlling interests | 280 | 150 | +86.7% | 122 | 58 | +110.3% |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | 4,346 | 1,285 | +238.3% | 2,252 | 704 | +220.2% |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 1,616 | 682 | +137.0% | 893 | 231 | +286.6% |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,761 | 335 | NA | 908 | 189 | NA |
The total production of this segment of Pampa in Q2 17 increased by 55.6 kboe/day in relation to Q2 16, mainly due to the inclusion of former Petrobras Argentina assets since August 2016, essentially through its activities in the Neuquén Basin, which contributed 50.4 kboe/day out of the 71.7 kboe/day produced in Q2 17.
Only for operating comparison purposes, the production of gas in Q2 17 from these assets including PELSA was 27% lower in comparison to the same period in 2016, mainly due to the divestments in Río Neuquén, Aguada de la Arena and Colpa y Caranda. These decreases were partially offset by higher production as a result of improvements in average sales prices and a larger unconventional production at the Neuquén Basin, resulting in 179 million cf/day in Q2 17 and 247 million cf/day in the comparative period (Q2 16 includes 11 million cf/day from overseas). Moreover, crude oil production decreased to 19.8 kb/day, in comparison to 28.3 kb/day in Q2 16 (it includes 1.6 kb/day and 2.7 kb/day of foreign production in Q2 17 and Q2 16, respectively), mainly due to the heavy snow and rainstorms that affected Chubut province and the cease of operations at Medanito La Pampa in October 2016.
Moreover, Petrolera Pampa’s gas production increased from 95 million cf/day in Q2 16 to 106 million cf/day in Q2 17, while the oil production increased from 0.3 kb/day in Q2 16 to 3.6 kb/day in Q2 17, mainly as a result of our partnership with YPF in the Rincón del Mangrullo block and the service provided in Medanito La Pampa.
As of June 30, 2017, we accounted 1,925 productive wells in Argentina, in comparison to 1,924 as of December 2016.
17
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
Oil & Gas Production | Oil | Gas | NGL | Total |
Petrolera Pampa | Pampa | PELSA | Total | Petrolera Pampa | Pampa | PELSA | Total | Total |
Semester | | | | | | | | | | |
Volume 1H17 | | | | | | | | | | |
In thousand m3/day | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 3,034 | 4,288 | 693 | 8,016 | 0.1 | |
In thousand boe/day | 3.7 | 11.7 | 7.0 | 22.4 | 17.9 | 25.2 | 4.1 | 47.2 | 0.7 | 70.3 |
In million cubic feet/day | | | | | 107 | 151 | 24 | 283 | | |
Avg. Price 1H17 | | | | | | | | | | |
In US$/bbl | 57.7 | 52.1 | 57.5 | 54.7 | | | | | | |
In US$/MBTU | | | | | 7.4 | 5.3 | 5.7 | 6.1 | | |
In US$/ton | | | | | | | | | 333.1 | |
Volume 1H16 | | | | | | | | | | |
In thousand m3/day | 0.0 | - | - | 0.0 | 2,540 | - | - | 2,540 | | |
In thousand boe/day | 0.3 | - | - | 0.3 | 15.0 | - | - | 15.0 | | 15.2 |
In million cubic feet/day | | | | | 89.7 | - | - | 89.7 | | |
Variation 1H17 v. 1H16 | na | na | na | na | +19.5% | na | na | +215.6% | na | +362.6% |
Avg. Price 1H16 | | | | | | | | | | |
In US$/bbl | 65.0 | - | - | 65.0 | | | | | | |
In US$/MBTU | | | | | 7.3 | - | - | 7.3 | | |
Variation 1H17 v. 1H16 | -11.3% | na | na | -15.9% | +0.7% | na | na | -16.1% | na | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Second Quarter | | | | | | | | | | |
Volume Q2 17 | | | | | | | | | | |
In thousand m3/day | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 3,000 | 4,373 | 702 | 8,075 | 0.1 | |
In thousand boe/day | 3.6 | 11.4 | 6.8 | 21.8 | 17.7 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 47.5 | 0.7 | 70.1 |
In million cubic feet/day | | | | | 106 | 154 | 25 | 285 | | |
Avg. Price Q2 17 | | | | | | | | | | |
In US$/bbl | 56.5 | 51.5 | 56.6 | 53.9 | | | | | | |
In US$/MBTU | | | | | 7.4 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 6.2 | | |
In US$/ton | | | | | | | | | 357.9 | |
Volume Q2 16 | | | | | | | | | | |
In thousand m3/day | 0.0 | - | - | 0.0 | 2,689 | - | - | 2,689 | | |
In thousand boe/day | 0.3 | - | - | 0.3 | 15.8 | - | - | 15.8 | | 16.1 |
In million cubic feet/day | | | | | 94.9 | - | - | 94.9 | | |
Variation Q2 17 v. Q2 16 | na | na | na | na | +11.6% | na | na | +200.3% | na | +334.4% |
Avg. Price Q2 16 | | | | | | | | | | |
In US$/bbl | 65.2 | - | - | 65.2 | | | | | | |
In US$/MBTU | | | | | 7.3 | - | - | 7.3 | | |
Variation Q2 17 v. Q2 16 | -13.3% | na | na | -17.3% | +0.3% | na | na | -15.6% | na | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Pampa and PELSA’s volume accounts from the closing of the acquisition of former Petrobras Argentina in August 2016. The production considers the 100% contribution of Medanito La Pampa, a block where Petrolera Pampa is currently providing services. Moreover, the production does not consider 1.6 kb/day of oil from Venezuela in Q2 17. FX rate of AR$/US$: 1H17 – 15.71; 1H16 – 14.36; Q2 17 – 15.75; Q2 16 – 14.23.
In Q2 17 the gross margin from our oil and gas segment increased by AR$952 million compared to Q2 16, mainly due to the inclusion of the former Petrobras Argentina’s assets as from August 2016, in addition to a production increase and the oil and gas price improvements in Argentine Pesos as an effect of the devaluation in the nominal exchange rate. These effects were partially offset by higher fixed assets depreciation costs, higher gas production, transportation and royalties’ costs from higher production and inflation levels in Argentine Pesos, in addition to the effect of the exchange rate variation over the costs denominated in US dollar.
The compensation received through the Natural Gas Surplus Injection Promotion Program SE Resolution No. 1/13 and for the Companies with Natural Gas Reduced Injection SE Resolution No. 60/13 (‘Plan Gas’) was the main reason for other operating income positive variation, increasing by AR$274 million to al total amount of AR$605 million in the Q2 17, Petrolera Pampa’s stake being AR$356 million, in comparison with the AR$331 million posted in Q2 16.
18
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
Losses on net financial results decreased during the Q2 17 by AR$47 million to a loss of AR$264 million, mainly due to lower losses from financial interest offset by a higher accrual of losses as a result of net exchange difference.
The adjusted EBITDA of our oil and gas segment increased by AR$1,549 million, posting an amount of AR$2,252 million in the Q2 17, mainly due to the inclusion of former Petrobras Argentina’s E&P assets as of August 2016, in addition to higher sales volumes and the effect of the exchange rate variation in our sales price. The adjusted EBITDA does not consider the recovery reversal of the investments and operating expenses post-closing of the Río Neuquén assets’ sale to Petrobras Operaciones S.A. and YPF for AR$29 million and wells retirements, and in turn considers the proportional EBITDA of OldelVal, an oil transportation company, in which Pampa holds a direct participation of 23.1%.
3.4 Analysis of the Refining and Distribution Segment
Refining & Distribution Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 8,150 | - | NA | 4,159 | - | NA |
Cost of sales | (7,058) | - | NA | (3,665) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 1,092 | - | NA | 494 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Selling expenses | (928) | - | NA | (493) | - | NA |
Administrative expenses | (36) | - | NA | (23) | - | NA |
Other operating income | 115 | - | NA | 59 | - | NA |
Other operating expenses | (43) | - | NA | (24) | - | NA |
Results for participation in associates | - | - | NA | (9) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | 200 | - | NA | 4 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 7 | - | NA | 4 | - | NA |
Finance costs | (9) | - | NA | (6) | - | NA |
Other financial results | (12) | - | NA | (38) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | 186 | - | NA | (36) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | (3) | - | NA | 2 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | 183 | - | NA | (34) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | 311 | - | NA | 80 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 60 | - | NA | 23 | - | NA |
Depreciation and amortization | 115 | - | NA | 60 | - | NA |
Refining and distribution segment comes from the acquisition of Petrobras Argentina, and was a new business to the original portfolio of assets of Pampa.
In operating terms and not considering Pampa’s consolidation effect, sales volume of refined products totaled 480 thousand m3 in Q2 17, 5% lower than 506 thousand m3 in Q2 16. The amounts corresponding to Pampa are shown below:
Refining & Distribution Operating Summary | Products |
Crude Oil | Diesel Oil | Gasolines | Fuel Oil, IFOs & Asphalts | Other distillates | Total |
Semester | | | | | | |
Volume 1H17 (thousand m3) | 9 | 413 | 227 | 153 | 152 | 953 |
Average Price 1H17 (US$/m3) | 315 | 578 | 674 | 393 | 350 | 544 |
| | | | | | |
Second Quarter | | | | | | |
Volume Q2 17 (thousand m3) | 4 | 225 | 108 | 77 | 67 | 480 |
Average Price Q2 17 (US$/m3) | 312 | 578 | 682 | 397 | 347 | 550 |
| | | | | | |
Note: Pampa’s volume accounts from the closing of the acquisition of Petrobras Argentina in August 2016. FX rate of AR$/US$: 1H17 – 15.71;
Q2 17 – 15.75.
19
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
The gross margin of this segment during Q2 17 decreased to 12% over sales, in comparison to 17% of gross margin reached in Q2 16, mainly explained by larger operating costs and higher costs from the purchase of barrels of crude oil, which began its convergence toward export parity, but was affected by the devaluation of Argentine Peso since prices are denominated in US dollars. This effect was partially offset by the improvements in sales prices of diesel oil and gasoline, which are mainly sold to brokers and gas stations, and IFOs sold to the shipping sector.
The adjusted EBITDA of our refining and distribution segment considers the EBITDA adjusted by ownership of Refinor, a company where Pampa holds 28.5% stake.
3.5 Analysis of the Petrochemicals Segment
Petrochemicals Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 3,461 | - | NA | 1,654 | - | NA |
Cost of sales | (3,128) | - | NA | (1,482) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 333 | - | NA | 172 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Selling expenses | (130) | - | NA | (72) | - | NA |
Administrative expenses | (31) | - | NA | (20) | - | NA |
Other operating income | 21 | - | NA | 4 | - | NA |
Other operating expenses | (204) | - | NA | (166) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | (11) | - | NA | (82) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 6 | - | NA | 3 | - | NA |
Other financial results | (8) | - | NA | 2 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | (13) | - | NA | (77) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | - | - | NA | - | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | (13) | - | NA | (77) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | 190 | - | NA | 77 | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 36 | - | NA | 15 | - | NA |
Depreciation and amortization | 54 | - | NA | 27 | - | NA |
As refining and distribution, petrochemicals segment also comes from the acquisition of Petrobras Argentina and was not a business within the original portfolio of assets of Pampa.
In operating terms and not considering Pampa’s consolidation effect, total sales volume of our petrochemicals segment increased by 9% in Q2 17, totaling 107 thousand tons compared to 98 thousand tons in Q2 16. This increase mainly responds to higher domestic sales of octanes followed by styrene products, in addition to higher exports of styrene because of international prices’ improvement, partially offset by lower sales of SBR in the domestic market. The amounts corresponding to Pampa are shown below:
Petrochemicals Operating Summary | Products |
Styrene & Polystyrene1 | SBR | Other | Total |
Semester | | | | |
Volume 1H17 (thousand ton) | 68 | 16 | 145 | 230 |
Average Price 1H17 (US$/ton) | 1,492 | 2,330 | 551 | 958 |
| | | | |
Second Quarter | | | | |
Volume Q2 17 (thousand ton) | 31 | 8 | 68 | 107 |
Average Price Q2 17 (US$/ton) | 1,558 | 2,501 | 557 | 984 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Note: Pampa’s volume accounts from the closing of the acquisition of Petrobras Argentina in August 2016. FX rate of AR$/US$: 1H17 – 15.71; Q2 17 – 15.75. (1) Includes Propylene, Ethylene and BOPs.
20
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
The gross margin in this segment during Q2 17 increased to 10% over sales in comparison to 8% of gross margin reached in the same period of 2016, mainly driven by the improvement of international commodity prices denominated in US dollars, which along with the Peso devaluation reflected in Q2 17 an increase in sales expressed in Argentine Pesos. This was partially offset by higher operating and raw materials’ costs, denominated in US dollars as well.
3.6 Analysis of the Holding and Others Segment
Holding & Others Segment, Consolidated (AR$ million) | 1st Half | 2nd Quarter |
2017 | 2016 | ∆ % | 2017 | 2016 | ∆ % |
Sales revenue | 216 | 50 | NA | 110 | 31 | +254.8% |
Cost of sales | (3) | (2) | +50.0% | (2) | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Gross profit | 213 | 48 | NA | 108 | 31 | +248.4% |
| | | | | | |
Administrative expenses | (994) | (127) | NA | (475) | (78) | NA |
Other operating income | 259 | 20 | NA | 1 | 5 | -80.0% |
Other operating expenses | (566) | (13) | NA | (141) | (10) | NA |
Results for participation in joint businesses | 559 | (73) | NA | 276 | (43) | NA |
Results for participation in associates | - | (3) | -100.0% | - | - | NA |
| | | | | | |
Operating income | (529) | (148) | +257.4% | (231) | (95) | +143.2% |
| | | | | | |
Finance income | 118 | 4 | NA | 56 | 1 | NA |
Finance costs | (1,021) | 5 | NA | (499) | (33) | NA |
Other financial results | (690) | 522 | NA | (1,091) | (109) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Profit before tax | (2,122) | 383 | NA | (1,765) | (236) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Income tax and minimum expected profit tax | 91 | (29) | NA | 558 | (15) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Net income for the period | (2,031) | 354 | NA | (1,207) | (251) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | (66) | (45) | +47.1% | 58 | (55) | NA |
| | | | | | |
Increases in property, plant and equipment | 32 | - | NA | 15 | - | NA |
Depreciation and amortization | 29 | 1 | NA | 15 | 1 | NA |
During Q2 17, the gross margin from our holding and others segment increased by AR$77 million compared to the same period of 2016, mainly explained by higher income from fees charged to our subsidiaries.
However, not considering the results from our participation in joint businesses (Transener and TGS), the operating income recorded a loss of AR$507 million in comparison to the loss of AR$52 million for the same period in 2016, mainly due to the inclusion of former Petrobras Argentina’s corporate segment since August 2016, which contributed higher operating expenses of AR$396 million.
The losses on net financial results increased by AR$1,393 million, registering AR$1,534 million losses in Q2 17, mainly due to higher losses incurred from interest and exchange rate differences from our financial liabilities. Moreover, in Q2 16 a loss of AR$52 million was registered due to the holding of CIESA’s Trust.
The adjusted EBITDA of our holding and others segment increased by AR$113 million in the Q2 17, recording a profit of AR$58 million. The adjusted EBITDA removes equity income from Transener and TGS, and in turn, considers a consolidation of EBITDAs adjusted by indirect ownership participation in these businesses.
In Q2 17 the EBITDA adjusted by indirect ownership of 25.5% over TGS was AR$327 million, which means an implicit total of AR$1,281 million, a significantly higher amount compared to Q2 16, mainly due to the tariff increase resulting from the RTI for gas transportation business, effective as of April 2017 along with the first out of three installments equivalent to approximately 64%of thetariff increase. Furthermore, the margin improvement in the liquids segment, which was due to prices as well as nominal exchange rate, contributed to the EBITDA’s performance.
21
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
In the case of Transener, the EBITDA adjusted by stake ownership of 26.3% is AR$223 million (implicit total of AR$847 million), which was positively impacted by the implementation of the new tariff scheme resulting from the RTI in only one installment as of February 2017 (1168% and 1596% increases over the tariff scheme of Transener and Transba, respectively, not considering the Instrumental Agreement and the Federal Plan). Furthermore, the adjusted EBITDA includes the difference between collected amounts and accrued sales corresponding to CAMMESA’s credit regarding the Instrumental Agreement. In Q2 17 the outstanding balance was accrued and collected for the acknowledgment of higher costs1, AR$151 million being accrued as principal and AR$7 million as interest; therefore, the total adjustment for Transener was positive for AR$7 million, in comparison to AR$186 million of positive adjustment registered in Q2 16.
[4] For further information, please refer to section 1.5 of this Earning Release.
22
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/6-K/0001292814-17-002017/top.gif)
3.7 Analysis of the Six-Month Period, by Subsidiary (AR$ Million)[5]
| 1st Half 2017 | 1st Half 2016 |
Subsidiary | % Pampa | Adjusted EBITDA | Net Debt4 | Net Income5 | % Pampa | Adjusted EBITDA | Net Debt4 | Net Income5 |
|
Power Generation Segment | | | | | | | | |
Diamante | 56.0% | 45 | (123) | 41 | 56.0% | 5 | (10) | 20 |
Los Nihuiles | 47.0% | 50 | (268) | 80 | 47.0% | 36 | (44) | 72 |
CPB | 100.0% | 70 | 748 | (48) | 100.0% | (61) | 380 | (112) |
CTG | 90.4% | 236 | (298) | 155 | 90.4% | 213 | 42 | 124 |
CTLL1 | 100.0% | 799 | 1,884 | 867 | 100.0% | 494 | 911 | 308 |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 635 | - | 779 | 0% | - | - | - |
Other companies, adjustments & deletions2 | 100.0% | (20) | (779) | (73) | 100.0% | (5) | (409) | (32) |
Subtotal Power Generation | | 1,816 | 1,163 | 1,801 | | 681 | 869 | 381 |
| | | | | | | | |
Electricity Distribution Segment | | | | | | | | |
Edenor1 | 51.5% | 1,035 | 1,229 | 369 | 51.5% | (140) | 1,274 | (1,185) |
EASA1,3 | | - | - | - | 100.0% | 13 | 1,945 | (330) |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 50% | 7 | - | (158) | 50% | (19) | (1,280) | 571 |
Subtotal Electricity Distribution | | 1,042 | 1,229 | 211 | | (146) | 1,939 | (944) |
| | | | | | | | |
Oil & Gas Segment | | | | | | | | |
Petrolera Pampa | 49.5% | 1,566 | 2,170 | 569 | 49.6% | 1,285 | 3,065 | 298 |
PELSA | 58.9% | 643 | (673) | 5 | 0% | - | - | - |
Pampa Energía (Stand-Alone)1 | 100.0% | 2,166 | 874 | 1,348 | 0% | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
OldelVal | 23.1% | 163 | (29) | 63 | | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (126) | 22 | (48) | | - | - | - |
Subtotal OldelVal | 23% | 38 | (7) | 15 | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (67) | (2,275) | (338) | 100% | (0) | - | (150) |
Subtotal Oil & Gas | | 4,346 | 89 | 1,598 | | 1,285 | 3,065 | 148 |
| | | | | | | | |
Refining & Distribution Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 314 | (8) | 183 | 0% | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Refinor | 28.5% | (13) | (203) | (105) | | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | 9 | 145 | 75 | | - | - | - |
Subtotal Refinor | 29% | (4) | (58) | (30) | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | 1 | - | 30 | 100% | - | - | - |
Subtotal Refining & Distribution | | 311 | (66) | 183 | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Petrochemicals Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 191 | - | (13) | 0% | - | - | - |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (1) | - | 0 | 100% | - | - | - |
Subtotal Petrochemicals | | 190 | - | (13) | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Holding & Others Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía (Stand-Alone)1 | 100.0% | (1,141) | 21,459 | (2,546) | 100.0% | (72) | 1,861 | (155) |
| | | | | | | | |
Transener | 26.3% | 1,807 | 315 | 876 | 26.3% | 144 | 1,212 | (271) |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (1,331) | (232) | (645) | | (106) | (893) | 200 |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 0% | - | - | - | 26% | - | (24) | - |
Total Transmission | 26% | 476 | 83 | 231 | | 38 | 295 | (71) |
| | | | | | | | |
TGS | 25.5% | 2,430 | 300 | 1,300 | 0% | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (1,810) | (224) | (969) | | - | - | - |
Total Gas Midstream | 26% | 620 | 77 | 332 | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Other companies, adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (21) | (1,869) | (47) | 100% | (11) | (2,100) | 580 |
Subtotal Holding & Others | | (66) | 19,750 | (2,031) | | (45) | 56 | 354 |
| | | | | | | | |
Deletions | 100% | 61 | (95) | 61 | 100% | - | (295) | - |
Total Consolidated Amounts to the Owners | | 7,699 | 22,070 | 1,810 | | 1,775 | 5,634 | (61) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Adjusted by Ownership | | 6,071 | 20,703 | 1,810 | | 1,163 | 3,691 | (61) |
1 Non - consolidated amounts.2 The deletions in net debt correspond to inter-companies and debt repurchases.3 CTLL is in process of merging EASA by absorption as from January 1, 2017; see section 1.7.2 of this Earnings Release. 4 Net debt includes holding companies and does not consider financing from CAMMESA in the power generation segment. The deletions in net income mainly correspond to non-controlling interest.5 CTLL, EASA and Pampa Energía (stand-alone) do not include results from its subsidiaries.
23
3.8 Analysis of the Quarter, by Subsidiary (AR$ Million)[6]
| 2nd Quarter 2017 | 2nd Quarter 2016 |
Subsidiary | % Pampa | Adjusted EBITDA | Net Debt3 | Net Income4 | % Pampa | Adjusted EBITDA | Net Debt3 | Net Income4 |
|
Power Generation Segment | | | | | | | | |
Diamante | 56.0% | 23 | (123) | 25 | 56.0% | (5) | (10) | 2 |
Los Nihuiles | 47.0% | 25 | (268) | 50 | 47.0% | 22 | (44) | 37 |
CPB | 100.0% | 71 | 748 | (17) | 100.0% | (20) | 380 | (56) |
CTG | 90.4% | 98 | (298) | 71 | 90.4% | 111 | 42 | 51 |
CTLL1 | 100.0% | 395 | 1,884 | 146 | 100.0% | 247 | 911 | 131 |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 325 | - | 317 | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Other companies, adjustments & deletions2 | 100.0% | (6) | (779) | (35) | 100.0% | (3) | (409) | (12) |
Subtotal Power Generation | | 931 | 1,163 | 557 | | 352 | 869 | 154 |
| | | | | | | | |
Electricity Distribution Segment | | | | | | | | |
Edenor1 | 51.5% | 424 | 1,229 | (53) | 51.5% | (815) | 1,274 | (1,060) |
EASA1,3 | 0.0% | - | - | - | 100.0% | 9 | 1,945 | (81) |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 50% | 1 | - | 33 | 50% | (10) | (1,280) | 513 |
Subtotal Electricity Distribution | | 425 | 1,229 | (20) | | (815) | 1,939 | (628) |
| | | | | | | | |
Oil & Gas Segment | | | | | | | | |
Petrolera Pampa | 49.5% | 844 | 2,170 | 295 | 49.6% | 705 | 3,065 | 115 |
PELSA | 58.9% | 289 | (673) | (82) | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Pampa Energía (Stand-Alone)1 | 100.0% | 1,094 | 874 | 583 | 0.0% | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
OldelVal | 23.1% | 111 | (29) | 55 | | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (85) | 22 | (42) | | - | - | - |
Subtotal OldelVal | 23.1% | 26 | (7) | 13 | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (1) | (2,275) | (154) | 100% | (2) | - | (59) |
Subtotal Oil & Gas | | 2,252 | 89 | 655 | | 704 | 3,065 | 56 |
| | | | | | | | |
Refining & Distribution Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 73 | (8) | (32) | 0.0% | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Refinor | 28.5% | 25 | (203) | (33) | | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (18) | 145 | 24 | | - | - | - |
Subtotal Refinor | | 7 | (58) | (10) | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (0) | - | 7 | 100% | - | - | - |
Subtotal Refining & Distribution | | 80 | (66) | (34) | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Petrochemicals Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía | 100.0% | 77 | - | (77) | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | 100% | - | - | - |
Subtotal Petrochemicals | | 77 | - | (77) | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Holding & Others Segment | | | | | | | | |
Pampa Energía (Stand-Alone)1 | 100.0% | (488) | 21,459 | (1,709) | 100.0% | (44) | 1,861 | (241) |
| | | | | | | | |
Transener | 26.3% | 847 | 315 | 453 | 26.3% | (15) | 1,212 | (159) |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (624) | (232) | (334) | | 11 | (893) | 117 |
Adjustments & deletions2 | 26% | - | - | - | 26% | - | (24) | - |
Total Transmission | | 223 | 83 | 119 | | (4) | 295 | (42) |
| | | | | | | | |
TGS | 25.5% | 1,281 | 300 | 636 | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Non-controlling stake adjustment | | (955) | (224) | (474) | | - | - | - |
Total Gas Midstream | | 327 | 77 | 162 | | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
Other companies, adjustments & deletions2 | 100% | (4) | (1,869) | 221 | 100% | (7) | (2,100) | 32 |
Subtotal Holding & Others | | 58 | 19,750 | (1,207) | | (55) | 56 | (251) |
| | | | | | | | |
Deletions | 100% | 35 | (95) | 35 | 100% | - | (295) | - |
Total Consolidated Amounts to the Owners | | 3,858 | 22,070 | (91) | | 186 | 5,634 | (669) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Adjusted by Ownership | | 3,075 | 20,703 | (91) | | 210 | 3,691 | (669) |
1 Non - consolidated amounts.2 The deletions in net debt correspond to inter-companies and debt repurchases.3 CTLL is in process of merging EASA by absorption as from January 1, 2017; see section 1.7.2 of this Earnings Release. 4 Net debt includes holding companies and does not consider financing from CAMMESA in the power generation segment. The deletions in net income mainly correspond to non-controlling interest.5 CTLL, EASA and Pampa Energía (stand-alone) do not include results from its subsidiaries.
24
4. Information about the Conference Call
There will be a conference call to discuss Pampa and Edenor’s second quarter 2017 results on Monday August 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. New York Time / 11:00 a.m. Buenos Aires Time.
The hosts will be Leandro Montero, CFO of Edenor, and Lida Wang, Investor Relations Manager at Pampa. For those interested in participating, please dial 0-800-444-2930 in Argentina, +1 (844) 854-4411 in the United States or +1 (412) 317-5481 from any other country. Participants of the conference call should use the identification password Pampa Energía / Edenor and dial in five minutes before the scheduled time. There will also be a live audio webcast of the conference atwww.pampaenergia.com/ir.
You may find additional information on the Company at:
ü www.pampaenergia.com/ri
ü www.cnv.gob.ar
ü www.sec.gov
25
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 11, 2017
Pampa Energía S.A. |
| | |
| | |
By: | /s/ Marcos Marcelo Mindlin
| |
| Name: Marcos Marcelo Mindlin Title: Chairman and CEO
| |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are statements that are not historical facts, and are based on management's current view and estimates offuture economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results. The words "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "expects", "plans" and similar expressions, as they relate to the company, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the declaration or payment of dividends, the implementation of principal operating and financing strategies and capital expenditure plans, the direction of future operations and the factors or trends affecting financial condition, liquidity or results of operations are examples of forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of management and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. There is no guarantee that the expected events, trends or results will a ctually occur. The statements are based on many assumptions and factors, including general economic and market conditions, industry conditions, and operating factors. Any changes in such assumptions or factors could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.