UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________________________
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-54673
______________________________________________________
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
______________________________________________________
Maryland | 27-0668930 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1300 Newport Beach, California | 92660 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(949) 417-6500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
As of May 4, 2012, there were 7,694,131 outstanding shares of common stock of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc.
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2012
INDEX
PART I. | |||
Item 1. | |||
Item 2. | |||
Item 3. | |||
Item 4. | |||
PART II. | |||
Item 1. | |||
Item 1A. | |||
Item 2. | |||
Item 3. | |||
Item 4. | |||
Item 5. | |||
Item 6. | |||
1
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Real estate: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 11,858 | $ | 4,838 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 50,324 | 30,819 | ||||||
Tenant origination and absorption costs | 2,325 | 1,584 | ||||||
Total real estate, cost | 64,507 | 37,241 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,188 | ) | (2,649 | ) | ||||
Total real estate, net | 61,319 | 34,592 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 41,341 | 23,072 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 489 | 1,143 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, prepaid expenses and other assets | 4,033 | 1,714 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 107,182 | $ | 60,521 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Notes payable: | ||||||||
Mortgage notes payable, net | $ | 52,900 | $ | 23,077 | ||||
Unsecured note payable due to affiliate | — | 1,000 | ||||||
Total notes payable, net | 52,900 | 24,077 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 995 | 1,396 | ||||||
Due to affiliates | 1,663 | 36 | ||||||
Distributions payable | 352 | 234 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 297 | 247 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 56,207 | 25,990 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | ||||||||
Redeemable common stock | 581 | 350 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 6,893,689 and 4,707,212 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 69 | 47 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 57,590 | 39,419 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions and net losses | (7,265 | ) | (5,285 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 50,394 | 34,181 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 107,182 | $ | 60,521 |
See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,814 | $ | 1,301 | ||||
Total revenues | 1,814 | 1,301 | ||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
Operating, maintenance, and management | 484 | 344 | ||||||
Real estate taxes and insurance | 325 | 276 | ||||||
Asset management fees to affiliate | 129 | 89 | ||||||
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses to affiliate | 276 | — | ||||||
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses | 96 | — | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 399 | 293 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 539 | 962 | ||||||
Interest expense | 645 | 495 | ||||||
Total expenses | 2,893 | 2,459 | ||||||
Other income: | ||||||||
Other interest income | 6 | — | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,073 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (2.35 | ) | ||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 5,661,615 | 492,467 | ||||||
Distributions declared per common share | $ | 0.160 | $ | 0.160 |
See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Additional Paid-in Capital | Cumulative Distributions and Net Loss | Total Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amounts | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 | 367,447 | $ | 4 | $ | 3,101 | $ | (2,065 | ) | $ | 1,040 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 4,339,765 | 43 | 43,147 | — | 43,190 | ||||||||||||||
Transfers to redeemable common stock | — | — | (350 | ) | — | (350 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | (1,127 | ) | (1,127 | ) | ||||||||||||
Commissions on stock sales and related dealer manager fees to affiliates | — | — | (3,896 | ) | — | (3,896 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other offering costs | — | — | (2,583 | ) | — | (2,583 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (2,093 | ) | (2,093 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 | 4,707,212 | 47 | 39,419 | (5,285 | ) | 34,181 | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 2,197,584 | 22 | 21,781 | — | 21,803 | ||||||||||||||
Redemptions of common stock | (11,107 | ) | — | (109 | ) | — | (109 | ) | |||||||||||
Transfers to redeemable common stock | — | — | (231 | ) | — | (231 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | (907 | ) | (907 | ) | ||||||||||||
Commissions on stock sales and related dealer manager fees to affiliate | — | — | (1,896 | ) | — | (1,896 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other offering costs | — | — | (1,374 | ) | — | (1,374 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (1,073 | ) | (1,073 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2012 | 6,893,689 | $ | 69 | $ | 57,590 | $ | (7,265 | ) | $ | 50,394 |
See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,073 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 539 | 962 | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 25 | 3 | ||||||
Amortization of premium on notes payable | (395 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 222 | 86 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Restricted cash for operational expenditures | 654 | 707 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (1,801 | ) | (179 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (401 | ) | (764 | ) | ||||
Due to affiliates | 281 | 80 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 50 | (20 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,899 | ) | (302 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Acquisitions of real estate | (27,200 | ) | — | |||||
Improvements to real estate | (66 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (27,266 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable | 52,900 | — | ||||||
Principal payments on mortgage note payable | (22,682 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on unsecured note payable due to affiliate | (1,000 | ) | — | |||||
Payments of deferred financing costs | (765 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 21,463 | 4,215 | ||||||
Payments to redeem common stock | (109 | ) | — | |||||
Payments of commissions on stock sales and related dealer manager fees | (1,896 | ) | (386 | ) | ||||
Payments of other offering costs | (28 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Distributions paid | (449 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 47,434 | 3,682 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 18,269 | 3,252 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 23,072 | 3,125 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 41,341 | $ | 6,377 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 358 | $ | 216 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Transactions: | ||||||||
Increase in other offering costs due to affiliates | $ | 1,346 | $ | 245 | ||||
Increase in distributions payable | $ | 118 | $ | 26 | ||||
Distributions paid to common stockholders through common stock issuances pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan | $ | 340 | $ | 20 |
See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
1. | ORGANIZATION |
KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on July 31, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through KBS Legacy Partners Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership formed on August 4, 2009. The Company is the sole general partner of and owns a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. KBS Legacy Partners Holdings LLC (“REIT Holdings”), a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 4, 2009, owns the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership and is its sole limited partner. The Company is the sole member and manager of REIT Holdings.
Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is externally managed by KBS Capital Advisors LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to an advisory agreement the Company originally entered into with the Advisor on January 25, 2010 and renewed for an additional one-year term on January 25, 2012 (the “Advisory Agreement”).
On August 7, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 shares of its common stock to KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), an affiliate of the Company, at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. As of March 31, 2012, the Sub-Advisor owns 20,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
The Company expects to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. The Company expects that its portfolio will include “core” apartment buildings that are already well positioned and producing rental income, as well as more opportunity oriented properties at various phases of leasing, development, redevelopment or repositioning. The Company may make its investments through the acquisition of individual assets or by acquiring portfolios of assets, other REITs or real estate companies. As of March 31, 2012, the Company owned two apartment complexes.
On August 19, 2009, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 280,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public (the “Offering”), of which 80,000,000 shares would be offered pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared the Company’s registration statement effective on March 12, 2010, and the Company retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (the “Dealer Manager”), an affiliate of the Company, to serve as the dealer manager of the Offering. The Dealer Manager is responsible for marketing the Company’s shares being offered pursuant to the Offering.
As of March 31, 2012, the Company had sold 6,884,796 shares of common stock in the Offering for gross offering proceeds of $68.4 million, including 72,597 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million. Also as of March 31, 2012, the Company had redeemed 11,107 shares sold in the Offering for $0.1 million.
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies since it filed its audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. For further information about the Company’s accounting policies, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
6
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair and consistent presentation of the results for such periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, REIT Holdings, the Operating Partnership and their direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Segments
The Company has invested in two apartment complexes as of March 31, 2012. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue and net loss is from real estate, and therefore, the Company currently operates in one business segment.
Per Share Data
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted‑average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock equals basic net income (loss) per share of common stock as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
Distributions declared per common share assumes each share was issued and outstanding each day during the three months ended March 31, 2012. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, distributions were based on daily record dates and calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day. Each day during the period from January 1, 2012 through February 28, 2012 and March 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012 was a record date for distributions. Each day during the period from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 was a record date for distributions.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Update
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate — a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU No. 2011-10”). ASU No. 2011-10 clarifies when a parent (reporting entity) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of a default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance for Real Estate Sale (Subtopic 360-20). For public companies, the provisions of ASU No. 2011-10 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU No. 2011-10 will have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements.
7
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
3. | REAL ESTATE |
As of March 31, 2012, the Company owned two apartment complexes, containing 700 units and encompassing approximately 631,668 rentable square feet, which were 95% occupied. The following table provides summary information regarding the properties owned by the Company as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Property Name | Date Acquired | Location | Property Type | Land | Building and Improvements | Tenant Origination and Absorption | Total Real Estate at Cost | Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | Total Real Estate, Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Legacy at Valley Ranch | 10/26/2010 | Irving, Texas | Apartment | $ | 4,838 | $ | 30,877 | $ | 1,584 | $ | 37,299 | $ | (2,870 | ) | $ | 34,429 | ||||||||||||||
Poplar Creek | 02/09/2012 | Schaumburg, Illinois | Apartment | 7,020 | 19,447 | 741 | 27,208 | (318 | ) | 26,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,858 | $ | 50,324 | $ | 2,325 | $ | 64,507 | $ | (3,188 | ) | $ | 61,319 |
Recent Acquisitions
Poplar Creek
On February 9, 2012, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, purchased a 196-unit apartment complex encompassing 178,490 rentable square feet located in the northwest Chicago suburb of Schaumburg, Illinois on approximately 12.8 acres of land (“Poplar Creek”). The seller is not affiliated with the Company or its advisors. The purchase price of Poplar Creek was $27.2 million plus closing costs. The Company allocated the purchase price of this property to the fair value of the assets acquired. The Company allocated $7.0 million to land, $19.5 million to building and improvements and $0.7 million to acquired in-place leases. The weighted-average amortization period as of the date of acquisition for the in-place leases was approximately 5.8 months.
The Company recorded the acquisition as a business combination and expensed $0.4 million of acquisition costs related to this property. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized $0.4 million of total revenues and $0.3 million of operating expenses from this property.
4. | NOTES PAYABLE |
As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s notes payable consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Principal as of March 31, 2012 | Principal as of December 31, 2011 | Contractual Interest Rate as of March 31, 2012 (1) | Payment Type | Maturity Date (2) | ||||||||||
Mortgage Note Payable | ||||||||||||||
Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan (3) | $ | 32,500 | $ | 22,682 | 3.9% | Principal & Interest | 04/01/2019 | |||||||
Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan (4) | 20,400 | — | 4.0% | Principal & Interest | 03/01/2019 | |||||||||
Premium on notes payable, net | — | 395 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage note payable, net | 52,900 | 23,077 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Note Payable Due to Affiliate | ||||||||||||||
Advisor Bridge Loan | — | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Total Notes Payable, net | $ | 52,900 | $ | 24,077 |
_____________________
(1) Contractual interest rate represents the interest rate in effect under the loan as of March 31, 2012.
(2) Represents the initial maturity date or the maturity date as extended as of March 31, 2012.
(3) See “— Recent Financings — Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan.”
(4) See “— Recent Financings — Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan.”
8
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred $0.6 million and $0.5 million of interest expense, respectively, which included $0.2 million and $0.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, $0.1 million of interest expense was payable.
The following is a schedule of maturities, including principal amortization payments, for the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 | $ | — | |
2013 | — | ||
2014 | 699 | ||
2015 | 938 | ||
2016 | 971 | ||
Thereafter | 50,292 | ||
$ | 52,900 |
Recent Financings
Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan
On February 9, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Poplar Creek, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Poplar Creek Owner”), entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (the “CBRE Lender”) for borrowings of $20.4 million secured by Poplar Creek (the “Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan”). The Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan matures on March 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.0%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on April 1, 2014, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. The Company has the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium unless the loan is securitized, in which case, the loan cannot be prepaid until six months prior to maturity, but is defeasible subject to certain conditions. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of Poplar Creek.
KBS Legacy Partners Properties LLC (“KBSLPP”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is providing a limited guaranty of the Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Poplar Creek Owner is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Poplar Creek Owner or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under the Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Poplar Creek Owner under the Poplar Creek Mortgage Loan.
9
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan
On March 7, 2012, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, KBS Legacy Partners Dakota Hill LLC (the “Valley Ranch Owner”), refinanced the debt secured by Legacy at Valley Ranch and entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with the CBRE Lender for borrowings of $32.5 million (the “Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan”). The Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan matures on April 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.93%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on May 1, 2014, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. The Company has the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium unless the loan is securitized, in which case, the loan cannot be prepaid until six months prior to maturity, but is defeasible subject to certain conditions. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of Legacy at Valley Ranch. The Company used the proceeds from the Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan to repay in full the original debt secured by Legacy at Valley Ranch with an outstanding principal balance of $22.6 million and to further enhance its liquidity. The Company recognized as interest expense $451,000 in early termination fees related to the initial loan and wrote-off, as a reduction to interest expense, the remaining $381,000 of unamortized premium on notes payable related to the early payoff of the original debt secured by Legacy at Valley Ranch.
KBSLPP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is providing a limited guaranty of the Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Valley Ranch Owner is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Valley Ranch Owner or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under the Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Valley Ranch Owner under the Legacy at Valley Ranch Mortgage Loan.
5. | FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES |
Under the GAAP, the Company is required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, the Company is required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
• | Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities; |
• | Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and |
• | Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available that requires inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
10
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and for which markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments for which markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The following is a summary of the methods and assumptions used by management in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents, rent and other receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities: These balances approximate their fair values due to the short maturities of these items.
Notes payable: The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 3 inputs.
The following were the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Face Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Face Value (1) | Carrying Amount (1) | Fair Value (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable | $ | 52,900 | $ | 52,900 | $ | 54,738 | $ | 22,682 | $ | 23,077 | $ | 23,136 |
(1) Amounts do not include unsecured notes payable due to affiliate as it is not practicable to estimate the fair value due to its related party nature.
Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company at March 31, 2012 and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of value at a future date could be materially different.
6. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The Company has entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor and the Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager. These agreements entitle the Advisor and the Dealer Manager to specified fees upon the provision of certain services with regard to the Offering and the investment of proceeds from the Offering in real estate related investments, among other services, as well as reimbursement of organization and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and the Dealer Manager on behalf of the Company and certain costs incurred by the Advisor in providing services to the Company.
11
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, summarized below are the related-party costs incurred by the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and any related amounts payable as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Incurred | Payable as of | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Expensed | ||||||||||||||||
Asset management fees | $ | 129 | $ | 89 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Reimbursable operating expenses (1) | 13 | 16 | 5 | — | ||||||||||||
Acquisition fees on real properties | 276 | — | 276 | — | ||||||||||||
Related party interest expense (2) | 10 | 213 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Property management fees (3) | 4 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Additional Paid-in Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions | 1,258 | 260 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Dealer manager fees | 638 | 126 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable other offering costs | 1,374 | 249 | 1,382 | 36 | ||||||||||||
$ | 3,702 | $ | 953 | $ | 1,663 | $ | 36 |
____________________
(1) In addition, our Advisor may seek reimbursement for employee costs under the Advisory Agreement. The Company has reimbursed the Advisor for the Company’s allocable portion of the salaries, benefits and overhead of internal audit department personnel providing services to the Company. These were the only employee costs reimbursable under the Advisory Agreement through March 31, 2012. The Company will not reimburse for employee costs in connection with services for which KBS Capital Advisors earns acquisition or disposition fees (other than reimbursement of travel and communication expenses) or for the salaries or benefits the Advisor or its affiliates may pay to the Company’s executive officers.
(2) Related party interest expense relates to the Advisor Bridge Loan. See note 4, “Notes Payable.”
(3) See “— Property Management Agreement.”
From inception through March 31, 2012, the Advisor has incurred organization and offering costs on behalf of the Company of approximately $4.6 million. The Company will be liable for such costs up to an amount that, when combined with selling commissions and dealer manager fees, does not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. Through March 31, 2012, the Company has recognized and paid $6.1 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees and recognized $4.2 million of other organization and offering expenses, of which $4.2 million has been reimbursed or was reimbursable to the Advisor, as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and organization and other offering costs were 15% of the gross offering proceeds.
Property Management Agreement
In connection with its acquisition of Poplar Creek, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a Property Management — Account Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with Legacy Partners Residential L.P. (“LPR”), an affiliate of the Sub-Advisor, pursuant to which LPR will provide certain account maintenance and bookkeeping services related to Poplar Creek. Under the Services Agreement, the Company will pay LPR a monthly fee in an amount equal to 1% of Poplar Creek’s gross monthly collections. Unless otherwise provided for in an approved operating budget, LPR will be responsible for all expenses that it incurs in rendering services pursuant to the Services Agreement. The Services Agreement has an initial term of one year and will continue thereafter on a month-to-month basis unless either party gives 30 days’ prior written notice of its desire to terminate the Services Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may terminate the Services Agreement at any time without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice to LPR. The Company may also terminate the Services Agreement with cause immediately upon notice to LPR and the expiration of any applicable cure period. LPR may terminate the Services Agreement at any time without cause upon 90 days’ prior written notice to the Company.
12
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
7. | PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) |
The following table summarizes, on an unaudited pro forma basis, the combined results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company acquired one apartment complex during the three months ended March 31, 2012, which was accounted for as a business combination. The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared to give effect to the acquisition of Poplar Creek as if the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2011. This pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had this acquisition occurred on these dates, nor do they purport to predict the results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except share and per share amounts).
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,099 | $ | 1,954 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 371 | $ | 1,496 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (502 | ) | $ | (1,596 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (1.24 | ) | ||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 6,461,197 | 1,292,049 |
8. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Economic Dependency
The Company is dependent on the Advisor, the Sub-Advisor and the Dealer Manager for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the sale of the Company’s shares in its ongoing initial public offering; the identification, evaluation, negotiation, origination, acquisition and disposition of investments; management of the daily operations of the Company’s investment portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that these companies are unable to provide the respective services, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Although there can be no assurance, the Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s property, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the property could result in future environmental liabilities.
Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company may become party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management is not aware of any legal proceedings of which the outcome is probable or reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition, which would require accrual or disclosure of the contingency and possible range of loss. Additionally, the Company has not recorded any loss contingencies related to legal proceedings in which the potential loss is deemed to be remote.
13
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
9. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
The Company evaluates subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Status of Offering
The Company commenced its Offering on March 12, 2010. As of May 4, 2012, the Company had sold 7,686,238 shares of common stock in the Offering for gross offering proceeds of $76.4 million, including 88,688 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.8 million. Also as of May 4, 2012, the Company had redeemed 12,107 shares sold in the Offering for $0.1 million.
Distributions Paid
On April 13, 2012, the Company paid distributions of $352,000, which related to distributions declared for each day in the period from March 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012.
Distributions Declared
On May 10, 2012, the Company’s board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from June 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012, which the Company expects to pay in July 2012, and distributions based on daily record dates for the period July 1, 2012 through July 31, 2012, which the Company expects to pay in August 2012. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.
Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day and if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.5% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
Investments and Financings Subsequent to March 31, 2012
Acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone
On April 6, 2012, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Waterstone Owner”), purchased an apartment complex containing 255 units located on approximately 25.2 acres of land in Pikesville, Maryland (“The Residence at Waterstone”). The seller is not affiliated with the Company or its advisors. The purchase price of The Residence at Waterstone was $64.7 million plus closing costs. The Company funded the acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone with proceeds from the The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan (defined below) in the amount of $47.9 million and proceeds from the Offering.
The Residence at Waterstone is in the northwest Baltimore suburb of Pikesville, Maryland and consists of 255 apartment units, encompassing 370,436 rentable square feet, featuring one-, two- and three-bedroom layouts in 29 two- and three-story townhome-style buildings. At acquisition, The Residence at Waterstone was 96% leased.
Financing of The Residence at Waterstone
On April 6, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone, the Waterstone Owner entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with the CBRE Lender for borrowings of $47.9 million secured by The Residence at Waterstone (“The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan”). The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan matures on May 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.79%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on June 1, 2014, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. The Company has the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium, unless the loan is securitized, in which case the loan cannot be prepaid until six months prior to maturity, but is defeasible subject to certain conditions. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of The Residence at Waterstone.
14
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 1. Financial Statements (continued)
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
March 31, 2012
(unaudited)
KBSLPP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is providing a limited guaranty of The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Waterstone Owner is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Waterstone Owner or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Waterstone Owner under The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan.
Acquisition of Legacy Crescent Park
On May 3, 2012, the Company, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, purchased an apartment complex containing 240 units located on approximately 21.7 acres of land in Greer, South Carolina (“Legacy Crescent Park”) and several parcels of undeveloped land adjacent to Legacy Crescent Park totaling approximately 5.3 acres (the “Adjacent Land”). The seller is not affiliated with the Company or its advisors. The purchase price of Legacy Crescent Park was $20.6 million plus closing costs and the purchase price of the Adjacent Land was $0.2 million plus closing costs. The Company funded these acquisitions with proceeds from the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan (defined below) in the amount of $14.6 million and proceeds from the Offering.
Legacy Crescent Park is located in the Greenville-Spartanburg market of Greer, South Carolina and consists of 240 apartment units, encompassing 212,820 rentable square feet. At acquisition, Legacy Crescent Park was 95% occupied.
Financing of Legacy Crescent Park
On May 3, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Legacy Crescent Park, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Legacy Crescent Park Borrower”), entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with Berkeley Point Capital LLC for borrowings of $14.6 million secured by Legacy Crescent Park (the “Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan”). The Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan matures on June 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.47%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on July 1, 2013, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. The Company has the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of Legacy Crescent Park.
KBSLPP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is providing a limited guaranty of the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower under the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan.
Purchase Agreement for Legacy at Martin’s Point
On April 11, 2012, the Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a purchase and sale contract to purchase an apartment complex, containing 256 apartment units located on approximately 13.2 acres of land in Lombard, Illinois (“Legacy at Martin’s Point”). The purchase price of Legacy at Martin’s Point is approximately $35.5 million plus closing costs. The seller is not affiliated with the Company or its advisors. Pursuant to the purchase and sale contract, the Company would be obligated to purchase Legacy at Martin’s Point only after satisfaction of agreed upon closing conditions. There can be no assurance that the Company will complete the acquisition. As of April 12, 2012, the Company had made deposits of $1.0 million, and in some circumstances, if the Company fails to complete the acquisition without legal excuse, it may forfeit up to $1.0 million of earnest money.
Legacy at Martin’s Point is located in the Chicago suburb of Lombard, Illinois and consists of 256 apartment units, encompassing 201,924 rentable square feet. As of April 1, 2012, Legacy at Martin’s Point was 97% occupied.
15
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and, as required by context, KBS Legacy Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as the “Operating Partnership,” and to their subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
• | We are dependent on our advisor and sub-advisor to identify suitable investments and to manage our investments. |
• | All of our executive officers, some of our directors and other key real estate professionals are also officers, managers, directors, key professionals and/or holders of a controlling interest in our advisor, the sub-advisor, our dealer manager and other sponsor-affiliated entities. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including significant conflicts created by our advisor’s compensation arrangements with us and other programs and investors advised by our sponsors. Fees paid to our advisor in connection with transactions involving the acquisition and management of our properties are based on the cost of the property, not on the quality of the investment or services rendered to us. This arrangement could influence our advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us. |
• | There is no assurance that we will raise the maximum offering amount in our initial public offering. If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering amount, we may not be able to invest in as diverse a portfolio of real estate properties as we otherwise would and the value of an investment may vary more widely with the performance of specific assets. There is a greater risk that stockholders will lose money in their investment in us if we have less diversity in our portfolio. |
• | We will pay substantial fees to and expenses of our advisor, affiliates and broker-dealers, which payments increase the risk that our stockholders will not earn a profit on their investment in us. These fees increase our stockholders’ risk of loss. |
• | If we are unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions. |
• | Until the proceeds from our initial public offering are fully invested and from time to time during our operational stage, we expect to use proceeds from financings to fund distributions. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from any source, including offering proceeds, which may constitute a return of capital. We have not established a limit on the amount of distributions that we may fund from sources other than from cash flows from operations. |
• | We may incur debt causing our total liabilities to exceed 75% of the cost of our tangible assets with the approval of the conflicts committee. During the early stages of our initial public offering, we expect that our conflicts committee may approve debt in excess of this limit. Higher debt levels increase the risk of our stockholders’ investment. |
• | Continued disruptions in the financial markets and uncertain economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and generate returns to stockholders. |
• | We depend on tenants for our revenue and, accordingly, our revenue is dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants. Revenues from our single real property investment could decrease due to a reduction in tenants (caused by factors including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, tenant insolvency, early termination of tenant leases and non-renewal of existing tenant leases) and/or lower rental rates, limiting our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. |
16
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Overview
We were formed on July 31, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2010 and intend to operate in such a manner. We conduct our business primarily through our Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.
We intend to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. We expect that our portfolio will include “core” apartment buildings that are already well positioned and producing rental income, as well as more opportunity oriented properties at various phases of leasing, development, redevelopment or repositioning. We may make our investments through the acquisition of individual assets or by acquiring portfolios of assets, other REITs or real estate companies. As of March 31, 2012, we owned two apartment complexes.
KBS Capital Advisors LLC (“KBS Capital Advisors”) is our advisor. As our advisor, KBS Capital Advisors is responsible for managing our day-to-day operations and our portfolio of real estate assets. Subject to the terms of the advisory agreement between KBS Capital Advisors and us, KBS Capital Advisors delegates certain advisory duties to a sub-advisor, KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”), which is a joint venture among KBS Capital Advisors and Legacy Partners Residential Realty LLC. Notwithstanding such delegation to the Sub-Advisor, KBS Capital Advisors retains ultimate responsibility for the performance of all the matters entrusted to it under the advisory agreement. KBS Capital Advisors makes recommendations on all investments to our board of directors. A majority of our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors acting through the conflicts committee, approves our property and real estate-related investments. KBS Capital Advisors, either directly or through the Sub-Advisor, will also provide asset‑management, marketing, investor-relations and other administrative services on our behalf. We have no paid employees.
On August 19, 2009, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to offer a minimum of 250,000 shares and a maximum of 280,000,000 shares of common stock for sale to the public, of which 80,000,000 shares would be offered pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. The SEC declared our registration statement effective on March 12, 2010 and we retained KBS Capital Markets Group LLC (“KBS Capital Markets Group”), an affiliate of our advisor, to serve as the dealer manager of the offering pursuant to a dealer manager agreement. The dealer manager is responsible for marketing our shares in our ongoing initial public offering. We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States as described above.
As of March 31, 2012, we had sold 6,884,796 shares of common stock in our ongoing initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $68.4 million, including 72,597 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million. Also as of March 31, 2012, we had redeemed 11,107 shares sold in our ongoing initial public offering for $0.1 million.
Market Outlook ─ Multi-Family Real Estate and Finance Markets
The Great Recession of 2008 - 2009 resulted in significant job losses, which had an adverse effect on multifamily real estate. Vacancies increased to record highs and rents decreased as owners sought to retain existing residents and attract new residents. Rising capitalization rates, in addition to declining rents, caused values to decline. In contrast, 2010 exhibited positive signs that multifamily real estate had begun a solid recovery. Vacancy declined, rents increased, and capitalization rates decreased. These positive trends have continued throughout 2011.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), approximately 8.7 million jobs were lost in the U.S. from December 2007 through December 2009 as a result of the Great Recession. Since 2009, employment has increased by over 3.5 million jobs (through March 2012). The BLS also reported that the unemployment rate peaked in 2009 at 10.0%. The unemployment rate was down to 9.4% by the end of 2010 and, as of March 2012, it was 8.2%.
REIS, Inc. reported that apartment vacancies in the U.S. were 8.0% at the end of 2009. By the end of 2010, apartment vacancies had declined to 6.6%, and they have continued to decline since then, ending the first quarter of 2012 at 4.9% (REIS, Inc. — “Apartment First Glance,” 2012 Quarter 1). REIS also reported that effective rents for apartments were up by 2.3% in 2010 and 2011, in contrast to the decline in effective rents of 2.9% in 2009. Effective rents continued to grow in the first quarter of 2012 at an annualized rate of 3.6%.
17
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Multifamily capitalization rates in the U.S. averaged 7.2% in December 2009 according to Real Capital Analytics (“RCA Historical Statistics by Month”). According to Witten Advisors, capitalization rates were 5.8% in the fourth quarter of 2011.
In the medium- and long-term, we believe the prospects for multifamily real estate investment are promising. We expect several positive demographic trends, as noted below, will drive the demand for multifamily housing throughout this decade.
• | U.S. population growth — The U.S. Census Bureau projects that the U.S. population will increase by approximately 37 million (12%) between 2008 and 2020, predominantly in the West and South. |
• | Immigration — Foreign-born renters represented 18.9% of all renters in 2010. (U.S. Census Bureau, “2010 American Community Survey”). According to the U.S. Census Bureau, immigration is expected to add about 1.4 million individuals per year to the U.S. population. This immigration-driven increase in population, when combined with the natural U.S. population increase, will increase the demand for all types of housing, including apartments, over the next decade. |
• | Echo Boom — The children of the Baby Boom generation, dubbed the Echo Boomers, will increase the prime rental age group, 20 to 34 year olds, by 4 million, to 68 million and it will remain at that elevated level through 2020 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. |
• | Baby Boom — The population of people aged 50 to 64 is expected to increase by nearly 8.4 million between 2008 and 2018 (U.S. Census Bureau Population Forecast). These Baby Boomers generally have enough income to purchase a home but are increasingly choosing to downsize. Those Baby Boomers who choose to downsize generally prefer the conveniences of apartments, particularly those in urban infill locations. |
• | Housing Shift — More people are choosing to rent, as opposed to own, their home. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the percentage of people that rent their housing in the United States has increased from 31.0% in fourth quarter 2005, to 34.0% in the fourth quarter of 2011. This equates to approximately 3.3 million additional renter households in the U.S., according to Witten Advisors, over that time period. |
Other positive factors for multifamily real estate investment include:
• | Diminished supply — According to Witten Advisors (“U.S. Apartment Markets Forecast,” First Quarter 2012), multifamily rental construction starts in the U.S. were 104,200 units in 2010, a small increase over the 50-year low mark of 97,600 units started in 2009. In 2011, rental construction starts in the U.S. were 167,000 units, still significantly below the approximately 250,000 starts a year average between 1997 and 2006. Multifamily rental construction starts are expected to remain below the number of units needed to support the growing U.S. population and the demands of the Echo and Baby Boomers for several years. |
• | Availability of Debt Capital — Although there has been a tightening of lending standards for multifamily real estate, capital has remained readily available for the multifamily sector, which is in stark contrast to other commercial real estate sectors. This is in part due to the perceived lower risk of multifamily investments as compared to the other primary property types and the continued support of government sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Administration. |
• | Maturing loans — More than $400 billion of multifamily loans are expected to mature from 2011 to 2015 (Marcus & Millichap Research Services June 2011). We believe these loan maturities will provide opportunities to purchase properties from sellers in need of liquidity or those faced with repayment deadlines. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are dependent upon the net proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to conduct our proposed operations. We will obtain the capital required to purchase real estate-related investments and conduct our operations from the proceeds of our ongoing initial public offering and any future offerings we may conduct, from secured or unsecured financings from banks and other lenders and from any undistributed funds from our operations.
18
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
On December 9, 2010, we broke escrow in our ongoing initial public offering and through March 31, 2012 we had sold 6,884,796 shares for gross offering proceeds of $68.4 million, including 72,597 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million. Also as of March 31, 2012, we had redeemed 11,107 shares sold in our ongoing initial public offering for $0.1 million. If we are unable to raise substantially more funds in the offering than the minimum offering amount, we will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in terms of the type, number and size of investments we make and the value of an investment in us will fluctuate more widely with the performance of the specific assets we acquire. Further, we will have certain fixed operating expenses, including certain expenses as a publicly offered REIT, regardless of whether we are able to raise substantial funds in our initial public offering. Our inability to raise substantial funds would increase our fixed operating expenses as a percentage of gross income, reducing our net income and limiting our ability to make distributions. We do not expect to establish a permanent reserve from our offering proceeds for maintenance and repairs of real properties. However, to the extent that we have insufficient funds for such purposes, we may establish reserves from gross offering proceeds, out of cash flow from operations or out of net cash proceeds from the sale of properties.
As of March 31, 2012, we owned two apartment complexes. Our operating cash needs were met through cash flow generated by our real estate investments and proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering.
Our investment in real estate generates cash flow in the form of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, which are reduced by operating expenditures and corporate general and administrative expenses. Cash flow from operations from our real estate investments is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our property, the net effective rental rates on our leases, the collectibility of rent and operating recoveries from our tenants and how well we manage our expenditures. As of March 31, 2012, our real estate property investments were 95% occupied.
Under our charter, we are required to limit our total operating expenses to the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters, as these terms are defined in our charter, unless the conflicts committee has determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Operating expense reimbursements for the four fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2011, September 30, 2011, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 exceeded the charter imposed limitation; however, the conflicts committee determined that the relationship of our operating expenses to our average invested assets was justified for these periods given the costs of operating a public company and the early stage of our operations.
As of March 31, 2012, our total debt outstanding was $52.9 million. Once we have fully invested the proceeds of our initial public offering, we expect that our debt financing and other liabilities will be between 50% and 65% of the cost of our real estate investments (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) plus the value of our other assets. Our charter limits our total liabilities to 75% of the cost (before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves) of all our assets; however, we may exceed that limit if a majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of our charter limitation and we disclose such borrowing to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. As of March 31, 2012, our total liabilities were approximately 53% of the cost (before depreciation or other noncash reserves) of our tangible assets.
In addition to making investments in accordance with our investment objectives, we expect to use our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor and the dealer manager. However, at the termination of our primary offering and at the termination of the offering under our dividend reinvestment plan, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering expenses incurred by us exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds of the respective offering. Further, we are only liable to reimburse organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor up to an amount that, when combined with selling commissions, dealer manager fees and all other amounts spent by us on organization and offering expenses, does not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of our offering as of the date of reimbursement. During our acquisition and development stage, we expect to make payments to our advisor in connection with the selection and origination or purchase of investments, the management of our assets and costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. The advisory agreement has a one-year term but may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of KBS Capital Advisors and our conflicts committee.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
We commenced operations with the acquisition of our first apartment complex on October 26, 2010. As of March 31, 2012, we owned two apartment complexes. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, net cash used in operating activities was $1.9 million. We expect that our cash flows from operating activities will increase in future years as a result of owning the asset acquired in 2012 for an entire period and as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of real estate and the related operations from those real estate acquisitions.
19
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $27.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and consisted of the following:
• | $27.2 million for the acquisition of an apartment complex; and |
• | $0.1 million of improvements to real estate. |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $47.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and consisted primarily of the following:
• | $28.4 million of net cash provided by debt and other financings as a result of proceeds from notes payable of $52.9 million, partially offset by $23.7 million of principal payments on our mortgage note payable and unsecured note payable due to affiliates and payments of deferred financing costs of $0.8 million; |
• | $19.5 million of cash provided by offering proceeds related to our initial public offering, net of payments of commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering expenses of $1.9 million; |
• | $0.4 million of net cash distributions, after giving effect to dividends reinvested by stockholders of $0.3 million; and |
• | $0.1 million of cash used for redemptions of common stock. |
Contractual Commitments and Contingencies
In order to execute our investment strategy, in addition to proceeds from our offering, we primarily utilize secured debt, and, to the extent available, may utilize unsecured debt, to finance a portion of our investment portfolio. Management remains vigilant in monitoring the risks inherent with the use of debt in our portfolio and is taking actions to ensure that these risks, including refinance and interest rate risks, are properly balanced with the benefit of using leverage. We may elect to obtain financing subsequent to the acquisition date on future real estate acquisitions and initially acquire investments without debt financing. Once we have fully invested the proceeds of our initial public offering, we expect our debt financing and other liabilities to be between 50% and 65% of the cost of our tangible assets (before deducting depreciation or other noncash reserves). Our charter limits our total liabilities to 75% of the cost (before deducting depreciation or other noncash reserves) of our tangible assets; however, we may exceed that limit if the majority of the conflicts committee approves each borrowing in excess of our charter limitation and we disclose such borrowings to our stockholders in our next quarterly report with an explanation from the conflicts committee of the justification for the excess borrowing. From time to time, our debt financing and other liabilities may be below 50% of the cost of our tangible assets due to the lack of availability of debt financing or repayment of debt. As of March 31, 2012, our total liabilities were approximately 53% of the cost (before depreciation or other noncash reserves) of our tangible assets. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion.
In addition to using our capital resources for investing purposes and meeting our debt obligations, we expect to use our capital resources to make certain payments to our advisor and the dealer manager. However, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and other offering expenses incurred by us exceed 15% of our gross offering proceeds. During our acquisition and development stage, we expect to make payments to our advisor in connection with the selection and origination or purchase of real estate and real estate-related investments, the management of our assets and costs incurred by our advisor in providing services to us. The advisory agreement is in effect through January 25, 2013 and has a one-year term but may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon the mutual consent of KBS Capital Advisors and our conflicts committee.
20
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Payments Due During the Years Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Remainder of 2012 | 2013-2014 | 2015-2016 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding debt obligations (1) | $ | 52,900 | $ | — | $ | 699 | $ | 1,909 | $ | 50,292 | ||||||||||
Interest payments on outstanding debt obligations (2) | 14,530 | 1,806 | 4,235 | 4,121 | 4,368 |
(1) Amounts include principal payments only.
(2) Projected interest payments are based on the outstanding principal amounts and interest rates in effect at March 31, 2012. We incurred interest expense of $0.4 million excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and premium on notes payable of $0.2 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not indicative of those expected in future periods as we broke escrow in our initial public offering on December 9, 2010 and as of March 31, 2012 had not yet met our capital raise or investment goals. We have not yet invested all of the proceeds from our offering received to date and expect to continue to raise additional capital and make future acquisitions, which would have a significant impact on our future results of operations. We commenced real estate operations on October 26, 2010 after making our first investment.
As of March 31, 2012, we owned two apartment complexes. We expect that rental income, depreciation expense, amortization expense, operating expenses, asset management fees, interest expense and net income will each increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of apartment communities.
Rental income increased from $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect that our rental income will increase in future periods as a result of owning the asset acquired during 2012 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of apartment communities.
Property operating costs and real estate taxes and insurance increased from $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in property operating costs and real estate taxes and insurance was due to the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect that our property operating costs and real estate taxes and insurance will increase in future periods as a result of owning the asset acquired during 2012 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of apartment communities.
Asset management fees with respect to our real estate investments increased from $89,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $129,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as a result of the growth in our real estate portfolio. All asset management fees incurred as of March 31, 2012 have been paid. We expect that our asset management fees will increase in future periods as a result of owning the asset acquired during 2012 for an entire period and anticipated future acquisitions of apartment communities.
Real estate acquisition fees and expenses to affiliate and non-affiliate were $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and relate to the acquisition of one apartment complex. We did not make any real estate investment during the three months ended March 31, 2011. These real estate acquisition fees and expenses will vary based on the level of acquisitions in each period.
General and administrative expenses increased from $0.3 million for the three months March 31, 2011 to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. These general and administrative costs consisted primarily of insurance premiums, professional fees, independent director fees and dividend processing costs. We expect general and administrative costs to increase in the future periods as we acquire additional real estate investments but to decrease as a percentage of total revenue.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased from $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in amortization was due to the intangible assets related to in-place leases that were fully amortized in 2011, partially offset by the increase in depreciation and amortization due to the growth in our real estate portfolio. We expect that our depreciation and amortization expenses will increase in future periods as a result of anticipated future acquisitions of apartment communities.
21
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Interest expense increased from $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in interest expense was due to the increase in average principal outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 and fees incurred related to the early payoff of a mortgage loan, which was partially offset by the write-off of unamortized premium on the loan. Our interest expense in future periods will vary based on our level of future borrowings, which will depend on the amount of proceeds raised in our ongoing initial public offering, the availability and cost of debt financings, and the opportunity to acquire real estate investments meeting our investment objectives; however, we expect it will increase over time due to additional borrowings on future acquisitions.
Organization and Offering Costs
Our organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer manager fees) may be paid by our advisor, the dealer manager or their affiliates on our behalf. Other offering costs include all expenses to be incurred by us in connection with our ongoing initial public offering. Organization costs include all expenses incurred by us in connection with our formation, including but not limited to legal fees and other costs to incorporate. Organization and offering costs, which include selling commissions and dealer manager fees, are charged as incurred as a reduction to stockholders’ equity.
Pursuant to the advisory agreement and the dealer manager agreement, we are obligated to reimburse our advisor, the dealer manager or their affiliates, as applicable, for organization and other offering costs paid by them on our behalf. However, at the termination of our primary offering and at the termination of the offering under our dividend reinvestment plan, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering expenses incurred by us exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds of the respective offering. Further we are only liable to reimburse organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor up to an amount that, when combined with selling commissions, dealer manager fees and all other amounts spent by us on organization and offering expenses, does not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of our offering as of the date of reimbursement. As of March 31, 2012, selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and organization and other offering costs were 15% of the gross offering proceeds. Through March 31, 2012, we had sold 6,884,796 shares for gross offering proceeds of $68.4 million, all of which were sold in the primary offering, and recorded selling commissions and dealer manager fees of $6.1 million and organization and other offering costs of $4.2 million.
Funds from Operations
We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust (“NAREIT”) definition. FFO represents net income, excluding gains and losses from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), impairment losses on real estate assets, depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We believe FFO facilitates comparisons of operating performance between periods and among other REITs. However, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to other REITs that do not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance relative to our competitors and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities.
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and does not represent net income as defined by GAAP. Net income as defined by GAAP is the most relevant measure in determining our operating performance because FFO includes adjustments that investors may deem subjective, such as adding back expenses such as depreciation and amortization. Accordingly, FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance.
22
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Our calculation of FFO, which we believe is consistent with the calculation of FFO as defined by NAREIT, is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,073 | ) | $ | (1,158 | ) | |
Depreciation of real estate assets | 321 | 209 | |||||
Amortization of lease-related costs | 218 | 753 | |||||
FFO | $ | (534 | ) | $ | (196 | ) |
Set forth below is additional information related to certain items included in net loss above, which may be helpful in assessing our operating results. Please see the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows for details of our operating, investing, and financing cash activities.
Significant Items Included in Net Loss:
• | Acquisition fees and expenses related to the purchase of real estate of approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012; |
• | Interest expense from the amortization of deferred financing costs related to notes payable of approximately $0.2 million and $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and |
• | Interest expense from the amortization of the premium on notes payable of $(0.4) million and ($18,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
FFO may also be used to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO, such as tenant improvements, building improvements and deferred leasing costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, our negative FFO was due to limited operations as we owned only two real estate investments. We expect FFO to improve as we continue to grow.
Distributions
Until we have fully invested the proceeds of our primary offering, and for some period after our offering stage, we may not be able to pay distributions solely from our cash flow from operating activities or FFO, in which case distributions may be paid in whole or in part from debt financing and/or proceeds from the issuance of common stock. Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows from (used in) operating activities were as follows for the first quarter of 2012 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Distributions Declared (1) | Distribution Declared Per Share (1) (2) | Distributions Paid (3) | Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period | Cash | Reinvested | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter 2012 | $ | 907 | $ | 0.160 | $ | 449 | $ | 340 | $ | 789 | $ | (1,899 | ) |
_____________________
(1) Distributions for the period from January 1, 2012 through February 28, 2012 and March 1 through March 31, 2012 are based on daily record dates and are calculated at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day.
(2) Assumes shares were issued and outstanding each day during the periods presented.
(3) Distributions are paid on a monthly basis. Distributions for all record dates of a given month are paid approximately 15 days following month end.
For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we paid aggregate distributions of $0.8 million, including $0.5 million of distributions paid in cash and $0.3 million of distributions reinvested through our dividend reinvestment plan. Negative FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.5 million and cash flow used in operations was $(1.9) million. We funded our total distributions paid, which includes cash distributions and dividends reinvested by stockholders, with debt financing. All non-operating expenses (including general and administrative expenses), debt service and other obligations are assumed to be paid from gross offering proceeds as permitted by our offering documents and loan agreement. See the reconciliation of FFO to net loss above.
23
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
From inception through March 31, 2012, we declared aggregate distributions of $2.0 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $5.2 million.
Over the long-term, we expect that a greater percentage of our distributions will be paid from cash flow from operations and FFO (except with respect to distributions related to sales of our assets). However, our operating performance cannot be accurately predicted and may deteriorate in the future due to numerous factors, including those discussed under “Forward‑Looking Statements,” “Market Outlook - Multi-Family Real Estate and Finance Markets” and “Results of Operations” herein, and the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC. Those factors include: the future operating performance of our investments in the existing real estate and financial environment; our ability to identify investments that are suitable to execute our investment objectives; the success and economic viability of our tenants; changes in interest rates on our variable rate debt obligations; and the level of participation in our dividend reinvestment plan. In the event our FFO and/or cash flow from operations decrease in the future, the level of our distributions may also decrease. In addition, future distributions declared and paid may exceed FFO and/or cash flow from operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated interim financial statements and condensed notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. A discussion of the accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2012.
Subsequent Events
We evaluate subsequent events up until the date the consolidated financial statements are issued.
Status of Offering
We commenced our ongoing initial public offering on March 12, 2010. As of May 4, 2012, we had sold 7,686,238 shares of common stock in our ongoing initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $76.4 million, including 88,688 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.8 million. Also as of May 4, 2012, we had redeemed 12,107 shares sold in our ongoing initial public offering for $0.1 million.
Distributions Paid
On April 13, 2012, we paid distributions of $352,000, which related to distributions declared for each day in the period from March 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012.
Distributions Declared
On May 10, 2012, our board of directors declared distributions based on daily record dates for the period from June 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012, which we expect to pay in July 2012, and distributions based on daily record dates for the period July 1, 2012 through July 31, 2012, which we expect to pay in August 2012. Investors may choose to receive cash distributions or purchase additional shares through our dividend reinvestment plan.
Distributions for these periods will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during these periods at a rate of $0.00178082 per share per day and if paid each day for a 365-day period, would equal a 6.5% annualized rate based on a purchase price of $10.00 per share.
24
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Investments and Financings Subsequent to March 31, 2012
Acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone
On April 6, 2012, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, (the “Waterstone Owner”), purchased an apartment complex containing 255 units located on approximately 25.2 acres of land in Pikesville, Maryland (“The Residence at Waterstone”). The seller is not affiliated with us or our advisors. The purchase price of The Residence at Waterstone was $64.7 million plus closing costs. We funded the acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone with proceeds from the The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan (defined below) in the amount of $47.9 million and proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering.
The Residence at Waterstone is in the northwest Baltimore suburb of Pikesville, Maryland and consists of 255 apartment units, encompassing 370,591 rentable square feet, featuring one-, two- and three-bedroom layouts in 29 two- and three-story townhome-style buildings. At acquisition, The Residence at Waterstone was 96% leased.
Financing of The Residence at Waterstone
On April 6, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of The Residence at Waterstone, the Waterstone Owner entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with the CBRE Lender for borrowings of $47.9 million secured by The Residence at Waterstone (“The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan”). The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan matures on May 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.79%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on June 1, 2014, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. We have the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium, unless the loan is securitized, in which case the loan cannot be prepaid until six months prior to maturity, but is defeasible subject to certain conditions. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of The Residence at Waterstone.
KBSLPP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, is providing a limited guaranty of The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Waterstone Owner is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Waterstone Owner or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Waterstone Owner under The Residence at Waterstone Mortgage Loan.
Acquisition of Legacy Crescent Park
On May 3, 2012, we, through indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, purchased an apartment complex containing 240 units located on approximately 21.7 acres of land in Greer, South Carolina (“Legacy Crescent Park”) and several parcels of undeveloped land adjacent to Legacy Crescent Park totaling approximately 5.3 acres (the “Adjacent Land”). The seller is not affiliated with us or our advisors. The purchase price of Legacy Crescent Park was $20.6 million plus closing costs and the purchase price of the Adjacent Land was $0.2 million plus closing costs. We funded these acquisitions with proceeds from the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan (defined below) in the amount of $14.6 million and proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering.
Legacy Crescent Park is located in the Greenville-Spartanburg market of Greer, South Carolina and consists of 240 apartment units, encompassing 212,820 rentable square feet. At acquisition, Legacy Crescent Park was 95% occupied.
Financing of Legacy Crescent Park
On May 3, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Legacy Crescent Park, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary (the “Legacy Crescent Park Borrower”), entered into a seven‑year multifamily note with Berkeley Point Capital LLC for borrowings of $14.6 million secured by Legacy Crescent Park (the “Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan”). The Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan matures on June 1, 2019 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.47%. Monthly payments are initially interest-only. Beginning on July 1, 2013, monthly payments include principal and interest with principal payments calculated using an amortization schedule of 30 years for the balance of the loan, with the remaining principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest due at maturity. We have the right to repay the loan in whole (but not in part) subject to certain conditions and a formula-based yield maintenance premium. The loan is fully assumable by a subsequent purchaser of Legacy Crescent Park.
25
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
KBSLPP, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, is providing a limited guaranty of the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan with respect to certain potential costs, expenses, losses, damages and other sums for which the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower is personally liable under the loan documents, including losses or damages which may result from certain intentional actions committed by the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower or its affiliates in violation of the loan documents. KBSLPP is also providing a guaranty of the principal balance and any interest or other sums outstanding under the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan in the event of certain bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving the Legacy Crescent Park Borrower under the Legacy Crescent Park Mortgage Loan.
Purchase Agreement for Legacy at Martin’s Point
On April 11, 2012, we, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a purchase and sale contract to purchase an apartment complex, containing 256 apartment units located on approximately 13.2 acres of land in Lombard, Illinois (“Legacy at Martin’s Point”). The purchase price of Legacy at Martin’s Point is approximately $35.5 million plus closing costs. The seller is not affiliated with us or our advisors. Pursuant to the purchase and sale contract, we would be obligated to purchase Legacy at Martin’s Point only after satisfaction of agreed upon closing conditions. There can be no assurance that we will complete the acquisition. As of April 12, 2012, we had made deposits of $1.0 million, and in some circumstances, if we fail to complete the acquisition without legal excuse, we may forfeit up to $1.0 million of earnest money.
Legacy at Martin’s Point is located in the Chicago suburb of Lombard, Illinois and consists of 256 apartment units, encompassing 201,924 rentable square feet. As of April 1, 2012, Legacy at Martin’s Point was 97% occupied.
26
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and to fund the acquisition, expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our profitability and the value of our investment portfolio may be adversely affected during any period as a result of interest rate changes. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. We have managed and will continue to manage interest rate risk by maintaining a ratio of fixed rate, long-term debt such that floating rate exposure is kept at an acceptable level. In addition, we may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate caps, floors, and swap agreements, in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. When we use these types of derivatives to hedge the risk of interest-earning assets or interest‑bearing liabilities, we may be subject to certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position will reduce the funds available for payments to holders of our common stock and that the losses may exceed the amount we invested in the instruments.
We intend to borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. At March 31, 2012, the fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt was $54.7 million and the carrying value of our fixed rate debt was $52.9 million. The fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing rates we would expect to pay for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity if the loans were originated at March 31, 2012. As we expect to hold our fixed rate instrument to maturity and the amounts due under such instrument would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instruments, would have a significant impact on our operations.
Conversely, movements in interest rates on variable rate debt would change our future earnings and cash flows, but, generally, not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. However, changes in required risk premiums would result in changes in the fair value of floating rate instruments. At March 31, 2012, we did not have any variable rate debt outstanding.
The weighted-average interest rate of our fixed rate debt at March 31, 2012 was 3.9%. The weighted-average interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect at March 31, 2012 using interest rate indices as of March 31, 2012 where applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
27
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Please see the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
a) | During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. |
b) | On March 12, 2010, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-161449), covering a public offering of up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering and 80,000,000 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. We commenced our initial public offering on March 12, 2010 upon retaining KBS Capital Markets Group LLC, an affiliate of our advisor, as the dealer manager of our offering. We are offering 200,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering at an aggregate offering price of up to $2.0 billion, or $10.00 per share with discounts available to certain categories of purchasers. The 80,000,000 shares offered under our dividend reinvestment plan are initially being offered at an aggregate offering price of $760 million, or $9.50 per share. We expect to sell the shares registered in our primary offering over a two‑year period. Under rules promulgated by the SEC, in some instances we may extend the primary offering beyond that date. We may sell shares under the dividend reinvestment plan beyond the termination of the primary offering until we have sold all the shares under the plan. |
We expect to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of high quality apartment communities located throughout the United States. We may use the net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, the redemption of shares under our share redemption program; development costs; capital expenditures; tenant improvement costs and other funding obligations.
As of March 31, 2012, we had sold 6,884,796 shares of common stock in our ongoing initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $68.4 million, including 72,597 shares of common stock under the dividend reinvestment plan for gross offering proceeds of $0.7 million. Also as of March 31, 2012, we had redeemed 11,107 shares sold in our ongoing initial public offering for $0.1 million.
As of March 31, 2012, organization and offering costs of $4.6 million have been incurred by our advisor on our behalf. However, at the termination of our primary offering and at the termination of the offering under our dividend reinvestment plan, our advisor has agreed to reimburse us to the extent that selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering expenses incurred by us exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds of the respective offering. Further, we are only liable to reimburse organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor up to an amount that, when combined with selling commissions, dealer manager fees and all other amounts spent by us on organization and offering expenses, does not exceed 15% of the gross proceeds of our offering as of the date of reimbursement. As of March 31, 2012, we had incurred selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs in the amounts set forth below, which amounts represent our maximum liability for organization and offering costs as of March 31, 2012. The dealer manager reallowed all of the selling commissions and a portion of the dealer manager fees to participating broker-dealers.
Type of Expense Amount | Amount | Estimated/Actual | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | $ | 6,064 | Actual | |||
Other underwriting compensation | — | Actual | ||||
Other organization and offering costs (excluding underwriting compensation) | 4,197 | Actual | ||||
Total expenses | $ | 10,261 | ||||
Total offering proceeds | $ | 68,410 | Actual | |||
Percentage of offering proceeds used to pay for organization and offering costs to affiliates | 15 | % | Actual |
28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)
From the commencement of our ongoing initial public offering through March 31, 2012, the net offering proceeds to us, after deducting the total expenses incurred as described above, were approximately $58.1 million.
We expect to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our ongoing initial public offering to invest in and manage a diverse portfolio of real estate, real estate-related loans, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments. We may use the net proceeds from the sale of shares under our dividend reinvestment plan for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, the redemption of shares under our share redemption program; reserves required by any financings of our investments; future funding obligations under any real estate loans receivable we acquire; the acquisition or origination of assets, which would include payment of acquisition and origination fees to our advisor; the repayment of debt; and expenses related to our investments, such as purchasing a loan senior to ours to protect our junior position in the event of a default by the borrower on the senior loan, making protective advances to preserve collateral securing a loan, or making capital and tenant improvements or paying leasing costs and commissions related to real property. As of March 31, 2012, we have acquired $64.4 million in real estate, including $1.0 million of acquisition and origination fees and expenses.
c) | We have adopted a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us in limited circumstances. |
Pursuant to the share redemption program, as amended to date, there are several limitations on our ability to redeem shares:
• | Unless the shares are being redeemed in connection with a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” or “determination of incompetence” (each as defined under the share redemption program), we may not redeem shares until the stockholder has held his or her shares for one year. |
• | During each calendar year, the share redemption program limits the number of shares we may redeem to those that we could purchase with the amount of the net proceeds from the issuance of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during the prior calendar year. |
• | During any calendar year, we may redeem no more than 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. |
• | We have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. |
We may amend, suspend or terminate the program upon 30 days’ notice to our stockholders. We may provide this notice by including such information in a Current Report on Form 8-K or in our annual or quarterly reports, all publicly filed with the SEC, or by a separate mailing to our stockholders.
29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (continued)
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we fulfilled all redemption requests and redeemed shares pursuant to our share redemption program as follows:
Month | Total Number of Shares Redeemed (1) | Average Price Paid Per Share (2) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares Available That May Yet Be Redeemed Under the Program | ||||||
January 2012 | 10,107 | $ | 9.77 | (3) | |||||
February 2012 | 1,000 | $ | 10.00 | (3) | |||||
March 2012 | — | $ | — | (3) | |||||
Total | 11,107 |
(1) We announced the adoption and commencement of the program on March 12, 2010.
(2) Pursuant to the program, as amended, we currently redeem shares at prices determined as follows:
• | The lower of $9.25 or 92.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least one year; |
• | The lower of $9.50 or 95.0% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least two years; |
• | The lower of $9.75 or 97.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least three years; and |
• | The lower of $10.00 or 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us for stockholders who have held their shares for at least four years. |
Notwithstanding the above, upon the death, “qualifying disability” or “determination of incompetence” of a stockholder, the redemption price would be the amount paid to acquire the shares from us. Furthermore, once we establish an estimated value per share of our common stock that is not based on the price to acquire a share in our primary offering or a follow-on public offering, the redemption price per share for all stockholders would be equal to the estimated value per share, as determined by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose. We currently expect to establish an estimated value per share no later than the completion of our offering stage. We will consider our offering stage complete when we are no longer publicly offering equity securities - whether through our initial public offering or follow-on public offerings - and have not done so for up to 18 months. “Public equity offering” for this purpose does not include offerings on behalf of selling stockholders or offerings related to a dividend reinvestment plan, employee benefit plan or the redemption of interests in our Operating Partnership.
(3) We limit the dollar value of shares that may be redeemed under the program as described above. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we redeemed $0.1 million of common stock, which represented all redemption requests received in good order and eligible for redemption through the March 31, 2012 redemption date. Based on the amount of net proceeds raised from the sale of shares under the dividend reinvestment plan during 2011 and redemptions through March 31, 2012, we may redeem up to $0.2 million of shares for the remainder of 2012.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None
30
Ex. | Description | |
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement as adopted on January 8, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 Commission File No. 333-161449, filed January 12, 2012 | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed January 12, 2012 | |
4.1 | Form of Subscription Agreement, included as Appendix A to the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
4.2 | Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed October 2, 2009 | |
4.3 | Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.1 | Advisory Agreement dated January 25, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on March 13, 2012 | |
10.2 | Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Poplar LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of February 9, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on March 13, 2012 | |
10.3 | Multifamily Note (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Poplar LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of February 9, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.4 | Guaranty (CME and Portfolio) Multistate by KBS Legacy Partners Properties LLC for the benefit of CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. dated as of February 9, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on March 13, 2012 | |
10.5 | Property Management Agreement dated as of February 9, 2012 by and between RMK Management Corporation and KBS Legacy Partners Poplar LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.6 | Property Management - Account Services Agreement dated as of February 9, 2012 by and between by and between KBS Legacy Partners Poplar LLC and Legacy Partners Residential L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.7 | Purchase and Sale Contract between Avalon Village Green Associates, LLC and KBS Legacy Partners Pikesville LLC dated as of February 16, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.8 | Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Dakota Hill LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of March 7, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.9 | Multifamily Note (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Dakota Hill LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of March 7, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.10 | Guaranty (CME and Portfolio) Multistate by KBS Legacy Partners Properties LLC for the benefit of CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. dated as of March 7, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 |
31
Ex. | Description | |
10.11 | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Crescent Apartments, LLC and KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC, dated as of March 21, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.12 | Purchase and Sale Contract between Avalon Illinois Value III, LLC and KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC, dated March 22, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission file No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.13 | First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC and Crescent Apartments, LLC, dated as of April 4, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.14 | Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Pikesville LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of April 6, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.15 | Multifamily Note (CME) between KBS Legacy Partners Pikesville LLC (as Borrower) and CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. (as Lender) dated as of April 6, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.16 | Guaranty (CME and Portfolio) Multistate by KBS Legacy Partners Properties LLC for the benefit of CBRE Capital Markets, Inc. dated as of April 6, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.17 | Property Management Agreement dated as of April 6, 2012 by and between Kettler Management Inc. and KBS Legacy Partners Pikesville LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.18 | Property Management - Account Services Agreement dated as of April 6, 2012 by and between KBS Legacy Partners Pikesville LLC and Legacy Partners Residential L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 16, 2012 | |
10.19 | Assignment and Assumption of Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, dated as of April 11, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.20 | Assignment and Assumption of Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between KBS Capital Advisors LLC, and KBS Legacy Partners Greer LLC and KBS Legacy Partners Greer Land LLC, dated as of April 11, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.21 | Assignment and Assumption of Purchase and Sale Contract between KBS-Legacy Apartment Community REIT Venture, LLC and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, dated as of April 11, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
10.22 | Assignment and Assumption of Purchase and Sale Contract between KBS Capital Advisors LLC And KBS Legacy Partners Lombard LLC, Dated as of April 11, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 |
32
Ex. | Description | |
10.23 | Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Crescent Apartments, LLC, and KBS Legacy Partners Greer LLC and KBS Legacy Partners Greer Land LLC, dated as of April 12, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed April 23, 2012 | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.1 | Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11, Commission File No. 333-161449, filed February 23, 2010 | |
101.1 | The following information from the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; and (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
KBS LEGACY PARTNERS APARTMENT REIT, INC. | |||
Date: | May 11, 2012 | By: | /s/ C. PRESTON BUTCHER |
C. Preston Butcher | |||
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||
Date: | May 11, 2012 | By: | /s/ DAVID E. SNYDER |
David E. Snyder | |||
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
34