LeapCharger (LCCN) 10-Q/A17 Jun 152015 Q1 Quarterly report (amended)Financial data

Company Profile

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information	Feb. 28, 2015	4-May-15
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	GREENPLEX SERVICES, INC.
Entity Central Index Key	1472998
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	28-Feb-15
Amendment Flag	TRUE
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-19
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		38,022,550
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015
Amendment Description	Amendment #1

Balance_Sheets

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014
Current Assets
Cash	$60	$14,984
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,546	9,959	10,674
Prepaid expenses	1,832	11,750
Total Current Assets	11,851	37,408
Landscaping Equipment
Landscaping equipment	25,921	25,921
Less: accumulated depreciation	25,921	25,387
Landscaping Equipment, net	0	534
Other Assets
Note receivable-Joint venture, including interest	20,929	20,728
Other Assets- JV investment	305,000	305,000
Total Other Assets	325,929	325,728
Total Assets	337,780	363,670
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	116,033	64,021
Notes payable-related party	61,550	61,450
Convertible notes payable	280,000	280,000
Sales tax payable	0	825
Accrued payroll liabilities	1,961	3,096
Total Current Liabilities	459,544	409,392
Total Liabilities	459,544	409,392
Stockholders' Deficit
Common stock, $.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 37,355,883 and 37,355,883 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	37,356	37,356
Additional paid-in capital	420,505	420,505
Accumulated deficit	-579,625	-503,583
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-121,764	-45,722
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$337,780	$363,670

Balance_Sheets_Parenthetical

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014
Common Stock
Common Stock, par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	75,000,000	75,000,000
Common stock, Issued	37,355,883	37,355,883
Common stock, Outstanding	37,355,883	37,355,883
Accounts receivable allowance	$1,546

Statements_of_Operations

Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended
Statements of Operations (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2015	Feb. 28, 2014
Revenues
Revenues	$0	$0
Operating Expenses
Professional fees	28,351	645
Consulting fees	23,768	0
Salaries and compensation	12,000	203
Depreciation	534	2,337
General and administrative	5,179	378
Total Operating Expenses	69,832	3,563
Loss From Operations	-69,832	-3,563
Other Income (Expense)	0	1,316
Interest and Finance Charges	-6,210	-638
Loss Before Income Tax Provision	-76,042	-2,885
Income Tax Provision	0	0
Net Loss	($76,042)	($2,885)
Net Loss per Common Share - Basic and Diluted	$0	($0.01)
Weighted Common Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted	37,355,883	33,822,547

Statements_of_Cash_Flows

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	3 Months Ended
Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2015	Feb. 28, 2014
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Net Loss	($76,042)	($2,885)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation expense	534	2,337
Interest receivable-Joint Venture	-201	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	715	1,956
Prepaid expenses	9,918	0
Accounts Payable and accrued expenses	52,012	-2,571
Sales tax payable	-825	-1,775
Accrued payroll liabilities	-1,135	-3,618
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	-15,024	-6,556
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Proceeds from short term convertible notes	0	5,600
Proceeds from short term notes from related party	100	0
Payments on short term notes from related party	0	-1,200
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	100	4,400
Net Change in Cash	-14,924	-2,156
Cash, Beginning of Period	14,984	3,499
Cash, End of Period	60	1,343
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	0	0
Income tax paid	$0	$0

NOTE_1_ORGANIZATION_AND_OPERAT

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS	3 Months Ended
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS	Feb. 28, 2015
Note 1 - Organization And Operations
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS	Note 1 - Organization and Operations

	GreenPlex Services, Inc. (“GreenPlex” or the “Company”) was incorporated on September 2, 2009 under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of serving both residential and commercial customers in the greater Spokane and Coeur d’ Alene area. Its services include all aspects of lawn care, tree and shrub maintenance, landscape maintenance and a multiphase pest and insect control program. The Company is committed to a “Green Philosophy” and where feasible, utilizing organic and socially responsible products, such as fertilizer and pesticides.

	GreenPlex decided to expand its business and abandon its landscape and property management services at the end of 2014. GreenPlex management decided to redirect its future business and focus on the cannabis industry and provide a variety of services consisting of consulting, infrastructure build out, equipment rental and staffing.

NOTE_2_SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICA

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES	Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

	Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

	The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the transitional period ended November 30, 2014 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2015.

	Fiscal Year End

	On December 21, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company passed a resolution to change the Company's fiscal year end date from December 31 to November 30, effective upon approval of the majority stockholders, which was ratified by the majority of the stockholders of the Company as part of the proxy vote related to the Company's 2012 Annual meeting, held on December 21, 2012.

	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

	Actual results could differ from those estimates.

	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

	The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, sales tax payable, and accrued payroll liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include landscaping equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

	The impairment charges, if any, are included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

	Cash Equivalents

	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

	Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. There was $1,546 allowance for doubtful accounts at February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.

Landscaping Equipment

Landscaping equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of landscaping equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of either three (3) or five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of landscaping equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) ; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; ; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated when services are rendered. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice and service agreement, service rendering is evidenced by a signed service application form by the service technician; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon signing of the service agreement and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum ("PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.


Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.


Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.


Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.


The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended February 28, 2015 or the year ended November 30, 2014.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
		For the Interim Period Ended		For the Interim
		February 28,		Period Ended
		2015		February 28,
				2014
Warrants issued in connection with note payable		550,000		0

Warrants issued in connection with stock sales		699,999		0

Warrants issued in connection with consulting services		5,500,000		0

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares		6,749,999		0


Cash Flows Reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer
2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract
3. Determine the transaction price
4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations


The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

1. Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.


ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.


In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).

The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):

Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”).

The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrument as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”).

This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions.

The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

In February 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”) to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).

All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.
Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).
Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.
Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.
Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.


The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE_3_GOING_CONCERN

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN	3 Months Ended
NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN	Feb. 28, 2015
Note 3 - Going Concern
NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN	Note 3 – Going Concern

	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

	The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

	As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at February 28, 2015, and had a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

	The Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds.

	The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE_4_LANDSCAPING_EQUIPMENT

NOTE 4 - LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015
Landscaping Equipment
NOTE 4 - LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT	Note 4 – Landscaping Equipment

		(i)	Impairment Test

	The Company completed its annual impairment testing of landscaping equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of its landscaping equipment, substantially exceeded their carrying values at November 30, 2014.

	(ii) Depreciation Expense

	Depreciation expense was $534 and $2,337 for the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

NOTE_5_OTHER_ASSETS_JOINT_VENT

NOTE 5 - OTHER ASSETS - JOINT VENTURE INVESTMENT	3 Months Ended
NOTE 5 - OTHER ASSETS - JOINT VENTURE INVESTMENT	Feb. 28, 2015
Deferred Costs, Capitalized, Prepaid, and Other Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
NOTE 5 - OTHER ASSETS - JOINT VENTURE INVESTMENT	Note 5 - Other Assets - Joint Venture Investment

	On March 24, 2014, GreenPlex entered into an Option to Joint Venture agreement with C.S. Analytics LLC, ("CSA") pursuant to which GreenPlex agreed to contribute a total of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars as its capital contribution to a fifty-fifty joint venture to be organized and referred to as the CSA-Greenplex LLC. Greenplex' director, Roy Matthew Haskin, is the Managing Member of CSA, The purpose of the Joint Venture is to operate a cannabis testing facility in Pullman, Washington, and to expand to other states. CSA is based in Temecula, California. CSA is accredited in accordance with the recognized International Standard ISO/IEC 17025-2005 and this accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and operation of a laboratory quality management system. The option agreement called for the contributions to be made in two $750,000 increments by Greenplex prior to August 24, 2014. The first contribution was to be made on or before July 31, 2014. Upon formation of CSA-Greenplex LLC, CSA will contribute certain business assets, know-how, diagnostic testing know-how and proprietary intellectual property to the CSA-Greenplex LLC joint venture. GreenPlex paid a $50,000 option fee with regard to the original option agreement. As a consideration for extending the Option to Joint Venture first contribution deadline to October 1, 2014, Greenplex agreed to pay CSA Analytics LLC an additional $160,000 as a non-refundable deposit which was paid from May through September of 2014. On November 6, 2014, Greenplex paid CS Analytics, LLC an additional $95,000 payment with regard to the original Option to Joint Venture agreement dated March 23, 2014. An aggregate of $305,000 in option fees were paid by Greenplex, plus a loan in the amount of $20,000, for a total of $325,000 which is creditable towards the first tranche of capital contribution due from Greenplex at the closing of the Option to Joint Venture Agreement. These funds would be non-refundable if the joint venture is not formalized. This option was not formalized, but a new agreement was entered into described below.

	On January 16, 2015 GreenPlex Services, Inc. executed an Agreement with C.S. Analytics LLC ("CSA"). Previously, Greenplex and CSA had executed an Option to Enter Into a Joint Venture agreement dated March 24, 2014. Under the terms of the option agreement, GreenPlex had the option to enter into a 50/50 joint venture with CSA upon payment of $1,500,000 for the formation of the proposed joint venture. The Option to Enter Into a Joint Ventures was superseded by a new agreement between GreenPlex and CSA. Pursuant to the new agreement, the $305,000 advanced to CSA as a non-refundable deposit and a note in the amount of $20,000 plus accrued interest was converted to a 25% ownership interest in the operating laboratory located in Pullman, WA. The laboratory located in Pullman, WA has received a license from the Washington State Liquor Control Board and is currently operating and testing cannabis and cannabis related products for growers and processors in the state of Washington. The new contract provides an option to GreenPlex to purchase an additional 25% ownership interest in the Pullman laboratory for $300,000 for a period of 45 days. This option was not executed and has not been extended.

	The Management has evaluated if the investment has become impaired by discussions with management of the Investee Company, review of projections and budgets, and analysis of actual results. Based on this management believes that no valuation for impairment is necessary at this time.

NOTE_6_CONVERTIBLE_NOTES_PAYAB

NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE	3 Months Ended
NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE	Feb. 28, 2015
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE	Note 6 – Convertible Notes Payable

	On April 8, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with an unaffiliated accredited entity and executed a convertible promissory note relating to a loan in the amount of $75,000 at 8% interest per annum due December 31, 2014. The note's principal and interest are convertible at any time for common stock at the price of $0.027 per share. This note was extended to June 30, 2015.

	On June 17, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with an unaffiliated accredited entity and executed a one year convertible promissory note relating to a loan in the amount of $75,000 at 8% interest per annum. The note's principal and interest are convertible at any time for common stock at the price of $0.15 per share and Two Hundred Fifty Thousand (250,000) stock purchase warrants that are exercisable at $.60 per share for a period of three years after issuance. The Warrants are callable at the option of GreenPlex for $0.001 per Warrant at any time after June 30, 2015 when the Common Stock trades at an average closing sales price of $0.75 or more for a period of 20 consecutive trading days, subject to the common stock underlying the warrants being registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

	On October 31, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with an unaffiliated accredited investor and executed a convertible promissory notes relating to a loans in the amount of $50,000 at 8% interest per annum. The note's principal and interest are convertible at any time for common stock at the price of $0.15 per share. The note expired March 31, 2015, and has not been extended.

	On November 4, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with two unaffiliated accredited investors and executed two convertible promissory notes relating to loans in the aggregate amount of $80,000 at 8% interest per annum. The two notes' principal and interest are convertible at any time for common stock at the price of $0.15 per share. The notes expired March 30, 2015 and have not been extended.

	Notes payable with related parties are disclosed in Note 7.

NOTE_7_RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTI

NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	3 Months Ended
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	Feb. 28, 2015
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	Note 7 - Related Party Transactions

	Shares issued to Related Party - 5% Holder

	In August 2013, related party Triax Capital Management, Inc. controlled by Joseph Edington purchased 550,000 shares from the Company at $0.0036 per share for an aggregate of $2,000.

	On March 19, 2014, a creditor of Greenplex Services, Inc., related party Triax Capital Management, Inc. controlled by Joseph Edington, had outstanding loans due to them from Greenplex agreed to convert their loans due plus any accrued interest into common shares of stock at a conversion rate of $0.0068 per share. The total outstanding loans in aggregate were $5,000 and the aggregate interest accrued up to March 19, 2014 was $0. A total of 733,337 shares in aggregate were issued in exchange for the loans due.

	Due to Related Party - Director

	On March 25, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Mr. Manuel Graiwer and executed a ninety day promissory note relating to a loan in the amount of $60,000 at 6% interest per annum. The due date of this was extended to June 30, 2015. This individual became a director of the company and an affiliate on April 30, 2014. As a consideration of the loan, Greenplex issued a three years stock purchase warrant to purchase 550,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.009 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $2,100 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $2,100 as additional paid-in capital.

	Due to Related Party - 5% Holders

	On June 10, 2014, a note payable was signed with related-party Jerod Edington, for the principal amount of $1,200 with no interest thereon and a maturity date of December 31, 2014. It was extended to June 30, 2015. On March 12, 2015, notes payable was returned.

	On July 14, 2014, a note payable was signed with related-party IWJ Consulting Group, LLC, controlled by Jerod Edington, for the principal amount of $1,500 with no interest thereon and a maturity date of December 31, 2014. It was extended to June 30, 2015. $1,250 was paid back on August 21, 2014 and the balance remaining at November 30, 2014 was $250. This remaining $250 was repaid on March 10, 2015.

	On February 25, 2015, a note payable was signed with IWJ Consulting Group, LLC controlled by Jerod Edington for the principal amount of $100 with no interest thereon and a maturity date of February 11, 2016. This was repaid on March 10, 2015.

	Accounting and Tax Services

	Certain accounting and tax services are performed by accounting firm Murray & Josephson, CPAs, LLC, that is owned by Marty Murray, an officer and director of the Company. As of February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014, the Company owes this accounting firm $29,438 and $16,934, respectively, which is included with accounts payable and accrued expenses, and $12,504 was included in the Company’s expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2015.

	Consulting Services

	Key Financial Services, Inc., an entity that is owned by a 5% shareholder of the Company provides consulting services to the Company. As of February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014, the Company owes this firm $5,250 and has a credit of $10,750, respectively, which is included with accounts payable and accrued expenses. $24,000 and $0 were included in the expenses for the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, respectively. This shareholder was also a customer of the Company and received landscaping services totaling $0 and $0 for three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

	Triax Capital Management, Inc., an entity that is owned by a 5% shareholder of the Company provides consulting services to the Company. As of February, 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014, there were no amounts due to this entity. In the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, the amount of consulting services invoiced was $0 and $0, respectively.

	Luminarix Consulting Group, LLC, an entity that is owned by a 5% shareholder of the Company provides consulting services to the Company. As of February, 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014, there were no amounts due to this entity. In the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, the amount of consulting services invoiced was $0 and $0.

	Compensation of officers

	The officers of the company did not receive compensation during the quarter ended February 28, 2014 or the year ended November 30, 2014. Included in the financial statements, accounts payable and accrued expenses is $45,000 for the unpaid salaries at February 28, 2015.

	Warrants Issued for Consulting Services

	On March 3, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive consulting agreement relating to the use of services from IWJ Consulting Group, LLC ("Consultant") a 5% shareholder, that was compensated by the issuance of a two-year option to purchase up to 5,500,000 shares of restricted common stock at $.0036 per share The Company valued these warrants issued at $24,870 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $24,870 as additional paid-in capital on March 25, 2014 when the option to joint Venture agreement with C.S. Analytics LLC was executed. Further disclosure is found in Note 9.
	On March 25, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with affiliate Manuel Graiwer and executed a ninety day promissory note relating to a loan in the amount of $60,000 at 6% interest per annum. This individual became a director of the company and an affiliate on April 30, 2014. As a consideration of the loan, the Company has issued a three years stock purchase warrant to purchase 550,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.0091 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $2,100 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $2,100 as additional paid-in capital.

	Option to Joint Venture agreement with C.S. Analytics LLC

	Greenplex' director, Roy Matthew Haskin, is the Managing Member of C.S. Analytics LLC that executed an Option to Enter Into a Joint Venture with Greenplex on March 25, 2014, as described in Note 5. A second agreement between these parties was executed on January 16, 2015, which is also described in Note 5

	Sales and Accounts Receivable - Related Parties

	For the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, Greenplex had sales to 5% related parties in aggregate of $0 and $0, respectively.

	At February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014, Greenplex had accounts receivable for services to 5% related parties in aggregate of $3,601 and $3,601, respectively.

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	3 Months Ended
NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	Feb. 28, 2015
Equity [Abstract]
NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	Note 8 – Stockholders’ Deficit

	Shares Authorized

	Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.

	Issuance of Common Stock

	On August 16, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $1,000 of its securities through the sale of 275,000 shares of its common stock at $0.0036 per share to an investor.

	On August 30, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $1,000 of its securities through the sale of 275,000 shares of its common stock at $0.0036 per share to an investor.

	On August 30, 2013, note holders converted their notes, in the aggregate amount of $11,000 into common shares of stock at $0.0036 per share. A total of 3,025,000 shares in aggregate were issued in exchange for the notes.

	On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $5,000 of its securities through the sale of 1,375,000 shares of its common stock at $0.0036 per share to an investor.

	On March 11, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,500 of its securities through the sale of 1,100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.0068 per share to an investor.

	On April 15, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 11:1 stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

	All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the April 15, 2014 11:1 forward Stock Split.

	In August 2014, the Company entered into a four definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $110,000 of its securities through the sale of 733,333 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share to an investor. Also issued as consideration for the investment were 366,666 three year callable warrants exercisable at $.60 per share. If at any time after a year the common stock of the Company trades and closes at a price of more than $.75 per share (as adjusted for share splits, recapitalizations or other similar adjustments) for more than 20 consecutive trading days and the resale of the Warrant Stock is covered by a then-current registration statement, then any outstanding Warrants shall become callable, in whole or in part, at $.01 at the discretion of the Company, upon ten (10) days prior written notice (the “Notice Period”) given to the Holder within five business days immediately following the end of such twenty (20) trading day period.

	In September through November 2014, the Company entered into a five definitive agreements relating to the private placement of an aggregate of $100,000 of its securities through the sale of 666,666 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share to an investor. Also issued as consideration for the investment were 333,333 three year warrants exercisable at $.60 per share. If at any time after a year, the common stock of the Company trades and closes at a price of more than $.75 per share (as adjusted for share splits, recapitalizations or other similar adjustments) for more than 20 consecutive trading days and the resale of the Warrant Stock is covered by a then-current registration statement, then any outstanding Warrants shall become callable, in whole or in part, at $.01 at the discretion of the Company, upon ten (10) days prior written notice (the “Notice Period”) given to the Holder within five business days immediately following the end of such twenty (20) trading day period.

	Per a six month consulting agreement with Uptick Capital, LLC, entered into on September 2, 2014, 100,000 common shares for services was issued to them on September 16, 2014, and twenty five thousand dollars worth of restricted shares will be issued to them per month based on the average closing price of the last three days of the prior month. The agreement was terminated and it was agreed by both parties that 200,000 additional shares would be issued to Uptick with no further consideration, for an aggregate of 300,000 shares issued to Uptick. Greenplex recorded $45,000 consulting fee for the period ended November 30, 2014 as a result of the termination.

	Stock Options

	The Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” by unanimous consent on September 4, 2009 (“2009 Stock Option Plan”). This plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and other key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock. 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were authorized under the 2009 Stock Option Plan.

	The Board of Directors did not grant the issuance of any non-statutory stock options from the Company’s Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for the quarter ended February 18, 2014 or the year ended November 30, 2014.

	Warrants

	Warrants Issued for Consulting Services

	On March 3, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive consulting agreement relating to the use of services from IWJ Consulting Group, LLC ("Consultant"). Due to the Company’s lack of operating success since its inception, the Board of Directors authorized retaining a consultant to assist in identifying and screening possible private companies: 1) to be acquired by the Company for stock; 2) to be merged with the Company by an exchange of stock; or 3) to be willing to sell operating assets to the company for stock. The Company has entered into a 90 day agreement with the Consultant whereby the Consultant has agreed to cover their own out-of-pocket expenses in regards to this objective and they will be compensated by the issuance of a two-year option to purchase up to 5,500,000 shares of restricted common stock at $.0036 per share, the current market value, predicated on the Consultant being successful and the Company completing a transaction. The Company valued these warrants issued at $24,870 on March 25, 2014, the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $24,870 as additional paid-in capital.

	The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

			March 25,
			2014
	Expected option life (year)			2

	Expected volatility			100	%

	Risk-free interest rate			0.45	%

	Dividend yield			0	%

	Stock Price		$	0.0068

	Warrants Issued in connection with Note

	On March 25, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with affiliate Manuel Graiwer and executed a ninety day promissory note relating to a loan in the amount of $60,000 at 6% interest per annum. This individual became a director of the company and an affiliate on April 30, 2014. As a consideration of the loan, the Company has issued a three years stock purchase warrant to purchase 550,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.0091 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $2,100 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $2,100 as additional paid-in capital.

	The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

			March 25,
			2014
	Expected option life (year)			3

Expected volatility			100	%

Risk-free interest rate			0.92	%

Dividend yield			0	%

Stock Price		$	0.0068

Warrants Issued with Common Shares

In August 2014, the Company entered into definitive stock purchase agreements with four individuals totaling $110,000. As a consideration of the stock purchases, the Company has issued three years callable stock purchase warrants to purchase 366,666 shares of restricted common stock at $0.60 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $47 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $47 as additional paid-in capital.

In September 2014, the Company entered into definitive stock purchase agreements with four individuals totaling $70,000. As a consideration of the stock purchases, the Company has issued three years callable stock purchase warrants to purchase 233,333 shares of restricted common stock at $0.60 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $0.01 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $1,535 as additional paid-in capital.

In November 2014, the Company entered into definitive stock purchase agreements with one individuals totaling $30,000. As a consideration of the stock purchases, the Company has issued three years callable stock purchase warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.60 per share. The Company valued these warrants issued at $0.01 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded the fair value of warrants of $655 as additional paid-in capital.

The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

		Aug-14				Sep-14			Nov-14
Expected option life (year)			3			3			3

Expected volatility			100	%		51	%		51	%

Risk-free interest rate			0.93-0.98	%		0.99-1.06	%		0.96	%

Dividend yield			0	%		0	%		0	%

Stock Price		$	0.0068		$	0.15		$	0.15


Summary of the Company’s Warrant Activities

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrant activities:

		Number of				Exercise Price				Weighted Average		Fair Value at		Aggregate
		Warrant Shares				Range				Exercise Price		Date of Issuance		Intrinsic
						Per Share								Value

Balance, November 30, 2013			0			$	0			$	0	$	0	$	-
Granted			6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206		882,695
Canceled			0												-
Exercised			0												-
Expired			0												-
Balance, November 30, 2014			6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206	$	882,695
Granted			0												-
Canceled			0												-
Exercised			0												-
Expired			0												-
Balance, February 28, 2015			6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206	$	882,695

Earned and exercisable,			6,749,999			$	0.0036-0.60			$	0.066	$	29,206	$	882,695
28-Feb-15			6,749,999			$	0.0036-0.60			$	0.066	$	29,206	$	882,695

Unvested,			-			$	-			$	-	$	-	$	-
28-Feb-15			-			$	-			$	-	$	-	$	-


The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of February 28, 2015:

		Warrants Outstanding										Warrants Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number				Average Remaining				Weighted Average		Number		Average Remaining		Weighted Average
		Outstanding				Contractual Life				Exercise Price		Exercisable		Contractual Life		Exercise Price
						(in years)								(in years)

$0.01			550,000				2.07			$	0.0091		550,000		2.07	$	0.0091
$0.00			5,500,000				1.07			$	0.00364		5,500,000		1.07	$	0.00364
$0.60			699,999				2.52				0.6		699,999		2.52		0.6

NOTE_9_SUBSEQUENT_EVENTS

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	3 Months Ended
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	Feb. 28, 2015
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	Note 9 – Subsequent Events

	The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:

	Due from Related Party - Director

	On April 7, 2015, the Company loaned C.S. Analytics, LLC $25,000 at 6% interest for a period of 180 days. Our Director Matthew Haskins is the president of C.S. Analytics, LLC.

	Due to Related Party - 5% Holders

	On February 25, 2015, a note payable was signed with IWJ Consulting Group, LLC controlled by Jerod Edington for the principal amount of $100 with no interest thereon and a maturity date of February 11, 2016. This was repaid on March 10, 2015.

	On March 5, 2015, a note payable was signed with IWJ Consulting Group, LLC controlled by Jerod Edington for the principal amount of $3,200 with no interest thereon and a maturity date of March 4, 2016. This was repaid on March 10, 2015.

	Notes Payable

	On March 6, 2015, a note payable was signed with a third-party for the principal amount of $3,545 with 8% annual interest thereon and a maturity date of September 5, 2015.

	Consulting Agreement - Uptick Capital

	Per a six month consulting agreement with Uptick Capital, LLC, entered into on September 2, 2014, 100,000 common shares for services was issued to them on September 16, 2014, and twenty five thousand dollars worth of restricted shares will be issued to them per month based on the average closing price of the last three days of the prior month. The agreement was terminated and in March of 2015, it was agreed by both parties that only 200,000 additional shares will be issued with no further consideration. The total expenses amounted to $45,000 for the 300,000 common shares.

	Consulting Agreement - Walla Walla Grow, LLC

	On April 7, 2015, GreenPlex Services, Inc., ("GreenPlex") entered into an Equipment Rental, Infrastructure Build Out, Staffing Services and Consulting Agreement with Walla Walla Grow LLC, (WWG) an unrelated party. The agreement calls for Greenplex to undertake the construction of a Washington State Initiative 502 Tier 2 outdoor marijuana growing operation near the town of Washtucna, WA. The projected cost of the project is $300,000. $12,000 monthly payment to GreenPlex from WWG will begin in January of 2016 and continue for a period of 120 months. The monthly payment schedule will be finalized when the project has been completed.

	Issuance of Common Stock and Warrants

	On April 9, 2015, GreenPlex entered into a definitive stock purchase agreements with one unaffiliated accredited investors who collectively purchased 666,667 shares of restricted common stock at $0.15 per share for an aggregate of $100,000. In addition to the issuance of the restricted common stock, the company issued 333,333 three year stock purchase warrants which have an exercise price of $0.40 per share.

	If at any time after April 9, 2016, the first anniversary of the close of the private offering in which this Warrant was acquired by Holder, the common stock of the Company trades and closes at a price of more than $.50 per share (as adjusted for share splits, recapitalizations or other similar adjustments) for more than 20 consecutive trading days and the resale of the Warrant Stock is covered by a then-current registration statement, then any outstanding Warrants shall become callable, in whole or in part, at $.01 at the discretion of the Company, upon ten (10) days prior written notice (the “Notice Period”) given to the Holder within five business days immediately following the end of such twenty (20) trading day period.

NOTE_2_SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICA1

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements
Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information	Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

	The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the transitional period ended November 30, 2014 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2015.
Fiscal Year End	Fiscal Year End

	On December 21, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company passed a resolution to change the Company's fiscal year end date from December 31 to November 30, effective upon approval of the majority stockholders, which was ratified by the majority of the stockholders of the Company as part of the proxy vote related to the Company's 2012 Annual meeting, held on December 21, 2012.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;
		(ii)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(iii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.


	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

	Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

	The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, sales tax payable, and accrued payroll liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.


Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include landscaping equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

	The impairment charges, if any, are included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents	Cash Equivalents

	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

	Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

	Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. There was $1,546 and $0 allowance for doubtful accounts at February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014.

	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.

Landscaping Equipment	Landscaping Equipment

	Landscaping equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of landscaping equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of either three (3) or five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of landscaping equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.

Related Parties	Related Parties

	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

	Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) ; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; ; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies

	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition

	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

	The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated when services are rendered. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice and service agreement, service rendering is evidenced by a signed service application form by the service technician; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon signing of the service agreement and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Stock-Based Compensation For Obtaining Employee Services	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

	The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum ("PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

	The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.


	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.


	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.


	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.


	The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision	Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

	The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

	The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

	Uncertain Tax Positions

	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended February 28, 2015 or the year ended November 30, 2014.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

	Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

	The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

	Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
			For the Interim Period Ended	For the Interim
			February 28,	Period Ended
			2015	February 28,
				2014
	Warrants issued in connection with note payable		550,000	0

	Warrants issued in connection with stock sales		699,999	0

	Warrants issued in connection with consulting services		5,500,000	0

	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares		6,749,999	0


Cash Flows Reporting	Cash Flows Reporting

	The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent Events	Subsequent Events

	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

	In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)

	This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

	To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

	1. Identify the contract(s) with the customer
	2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract
	3. Determine the transaction price
	4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
	5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations


	The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

	1. Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
	2. Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
	3. Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.


	ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

	In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).

	The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.

	The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.

	In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):

	Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”).

	The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrument as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract.

	The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

	In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”).

	This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions.

	The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

	In February 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”) to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).

	All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

	Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.
	Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).
	Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.
	Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.
	Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.


	The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE_2_SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICA2

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares	Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
		For the Interim Period Ended	For the Interim
		February 28,	Period Ended
		2015	February 28,
			2014
	Warrants issued in connection with note payable	550,000	0

	Warrants issued in connection with stock sales	699,999	0

	Warrants issued in connection with consulting services	5,500,000	0

	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	6,749,999	0

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT_Ta

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Tables)	12 Months Ended
NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Tables)	Nov. 30, 2014
Equity [Abstract]
Fair Value Assumptions for Warrant Grants		March 25,
		2014
	Expected option life (year)		2

	Expected volatility		100	%

	Risk-free interest rate		0.45	%

	Dividend yield		0	%

	Stock Price	$	0.0068

		March 25,
		2014
	Expected option life (year)		3

	Expected volatility		100	%

	Risk-free interest rate		0.92	%

	Dividend yield		0	%

	Stock Price	$	0.0068

		Aug-14				Sep-14			Nov-14
	Expected option life (year)		3			3			3

	Expected volatility		100	%		51	%		51	%

	Risk-free interest rate		0.93-0.98	%		0.99-1.06	%		0.96	%

	Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%

	Stock Price	$	0.0068		$	0.15		$	0.15



Warrant Activity		Number of				Exercise Price				Weighted Average		Fair Value at		Aggregate
		Warrant Shares				Range				Exercise Price		Date of Issuance		Intrinsic
						Per Share								Value

	Balance, November 30, 2013		0			$	0			$	0	$	0	$	-
	Granted		6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206		882,695
	Canceled		0												-
	Exercised		0												-
	Expired		0												-
	Balance, November 30, 2014		6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206	$	882,695
	Granted		0												-
	Canceled		0												-
	Exercised		0												-
	Expired		0												-
	Balance, February 28, 2015		6,749,999				0.0036-0.60				0.066		29,206	$	882,695

	Earned and exercisable,		6,749,999			$	0.0036-0.60			$	0.066	$	29,206	$	882,695
	28-Feb-15		6,749,999			$	0.0036-0.60			$	0.066	$	29,206	$	882,695

	Unvested,		-			$	-			$	-	$	-	$	-
	28-Feb-15		-			$	-			$	-	$	-	$	-
Schedule Of Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable		Warrants Outstanding										Warrants Exercisable
	Range of Exercise Prices	Number				Average Remaining				Weighted Average		Number		Average Remaining		Weighted Average
		Outstanding				Contractual Life				Exercise Price		Exercisable		Contractual Life		Exercise Price
						(in years)								(in years)

	$0.01		550,000				2.07			$	0.0091		550,000		2.07	$	0.0091
	$0.00		5,500,000				1.07			$	0.00364		5,500,000		1.07	$	0.00364
	$0.60		699,999				2.52				0.6		699,999		2.52		0.6

NOTE_2_SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICA3

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015	Feb. 28, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Warrants issued in connection with note payable	550,000	0
Warrants issued in connection with Stock Sales	699,999	0
Warrants issued in connection with consulting services	5,500,000	0
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	6,749,999	0

NOTE_2_SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICA4

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$1,546	$1,546
Adjustments to income tax liabilities or benefits	$0	$0

NOTE_4_LANDSCAPING_EQUIPMENT_D

NOTE 4 - LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
NOTE 4 - LANDSCAPING EQUIPMENT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Feb. 28, 2015	Feb. 28, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014
Notes to Financial Statements
Depreciation expense	$534	$2,337
Impairment of landscaping assets			$0

NOTE_5_OTHER_ASSETS_JOINT_VENT1

NOTE 5 - OTHER ASSETS - JOINT VENTURE INVESTMENT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	5 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Nov. 06, 2015	4-May-15	Jan. 16, 2015	Aug. 24, 2014	Jul. 31, 2014	Mar. 25, 2014
Option to Joint Venture Agreement with C.S. Analytics
Payment to C.S. Analytics to acquire percent ownership								$1,500,000
Payment amounts due to C.S. Analytics						750,000	750,000
Percent of C.S Analytics interest to acquire								50.00%
Non-refundable deposit paid to C.S. Analytics								50,000
Non-refundable payment to extend the Option with C.S. Analytics		160,000
Non-refundable payment to extend the Option with C.S. Analytics			95,000
New Option expiration date	31-Oct-14
Aggregate non-refundable payments toward C.S. Analytics Option to date				305,000
Percent of ownershipt in Pullman lab purchsed by company from C.S. Analytics LLC					25.00%
Advances converted to percent ownershipt in Pullman lab					305,000
Note receivable converted to percent ownership in Pullman lab					$20,000

NOTE_6_CONVERTIBLE_NOTES_PAYAB1

NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (Details Narrative) (USD $)

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

Apr. 09, 2015

Jul. 14, 2014

Jun. 17, 2014

Jun. 10, 2014

Apr. 15, 2014

Apr. 08, 2014

Mar. 25, 2014

Nov. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2014

Aug. 31, 2014

Nov. 30, 2014

Mar. 11, 2015

Mar. 06, 2015

Mar. 05, 2015

Feb. 25, 2015

Nov. 04, 2014

Oct. 31, 2014

Notes to Financial Statements

Forward stock split ratio

Note payable

$1,500

$1,200

$75,000

$60,000

$3,545

$3,200

$100

Note maturity date

6/30/15

12/31/14

6/30/15

Interest rate of note

0.00%

8.00%

6.00%

8.00%

0.00%

Note payable returned

3,550

3,200

Conversion rate of notes to common stock, price per share

$0.03

Convertible note payable

$75,000

$80,000

$50,000

Interest of convertible note payable

8.00%

Stock Purchase Warrants issued upon conversion of note payable

250,000

Exercise price of stock purchase warrants

$0.60

$0.15

Term of stock purchase warrants after conversion

3 years

Stock purchase warrants callable by company if stock trading above average price

$0.75

Stock purchse warrants callable by the company at price

$0.00

Stock purchase warrants callable after date

9-Apr-16

30-Jun-15

1-Sep-15

Number of days above average trading price to call stock purchase warrants

20 days

NOTE_7_RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTI1

NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended					1 Months Ended				3 Months Ended
	Jul. 14, 2014	Jun. 10, 2014	Apr. 08, 2014	Mar. 25, 2014	Mar. 03, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014	Feb. 28, 2014	Apr. 09, 2015	Mar. 06, 2015	Mar. 05, 2015	Feb. 25, 2015	Mar. 19, 2014	Mar. 11, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Aug. 30, 2013	Aug. 16, 2013
Shares issued for cash, duration						200,000	466,666	733,333	550,000		666,666
Shares issued for cash, instant													666,667				733,337	1,100,000	3,025,000	275,000	275,000
Price per share, duration						$0.15	$0.15	$0.15	$0.00		$0.15
Price per share, instant													$0.15				$0.00	$0.01	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Cash paid for shares, instant													$100,000				$5,000	$7,500	$5,000	$1,000	$1,000
Cash paid for shares, duration								110,000	2,000		100,000
Related party note payable	1,500	1,200	75,000	60,000										3,545	3,200	100
Related party note maturity date	6/30/15	6/30/15	12/31/14	6/30/15
Interest rate of related party note payable	0.00%	0.00%	8.00%	6.00%										8.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Warrants issued in connection with related party note payable				550,000
Related party warrant exercise price per share				$0.01
Related party warrant term				3 years
Accured expenses for unpaid salaries										45,000
Consultant agreement term, in days					90 days
Option shares provided to consultant upon completed objective					5,500,000
Consultant option conversion price, per share					$0.00
Consultant option term, in years					2 years
Sales to related parties										0		0
Related party accounts receivable on sales										3,601		3,601
Luminarix
Owed to related party consulting firm										0		0
Related party expense, consulting services										0		0
Triax
Owed to related party consulting firm										0		0
Related party expense, consulting services										0		0
Accounting
Owed to related party accounting firm										29,438		16,934
Related party expense, accounting services										12,504		0
Key Financial
Owed to related party consulting firm										5,250		-10,750
Related party expense, consulting services										$24,000		$0

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT_FA

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT - FAIR VALUE ASSUMPTIONS FOR WARRANT GRANTS (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended			0 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Mar. 25, 2014
Expected option life (year), duration	3 years	3 years	3 years
Expected volatility, duration	5100.00%	5100.00%	10000.00%
Risk-free interest rate, duration max	96.00%	106.00%	98.00%
Risk-free interest rate, duration min	96.00%	99.00%	93.00%
Dividend yield, duration	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Stock price, duration	$0.15	$0.15	$0.01
Warrants A
Expected volatility				10000.00%
Risk-free interest rate				45.00%
Dividend yield				0.00%
Expected option life (year), duration				2 years
Stock price, instant				$0.01
Warrants B
Expected volatility				10000.00%
Risk-free interest rate				92.00%
Dividend yield				0.00%
Expected option life (year), duration				3 years
Stock price, instant				$0.01

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT_WA

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT - WARRANT ACTIVITY (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014	Nov. 30, 2013
Balance
Number of Warrant Shares, instant		6,749,999	0
Exercise Price Range Per Share Max, instant		$0.60	$0
Exercise Price Range Per Share Min, instant		$0.04	$0
Weighted Average Exercise Price, instant		$0.07	$0
Fair Value at Date of Issuance, instant		$29,206	$0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, instant		882,695	0
Granted
Number of Warrant Shares, duration	0	6,749,999
Exercise Price Range Per Share Max, duration		$0.60
Exercise Price Range Per Share Min, duration		$0.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price, duration		$0.07
Fair Value at Date of Issuance, duration		29,206
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, duration	0	882,695
Canceled
Number of Warrant Shares, duration	0	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, duration	0	0
Exercised
Number of Warrant Shares, duration	0	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, duration	0	0
Expired
Number of Warrant Shares, duration	0	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, duration	0	0
Earned and Exercisable
Number of Warrant Shares, instant	6,749,999
Exercise Price Range Per Share Max, instant	$0.60
Exercise Price Range Per Share Min, instant	$0.04
Weighted Average Exercise Price, instant	$0.07
Fair Value at Date of Issuance, instant	29,206
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, instant	882,695
Unvested
Number of Warrant Shares, instant	0
Exercise Price Range Per Share Max, instant	$0
Exercise Price Range Per Share Min, instant	$0
Weighted Average Exercise Price, instant	$0
Fair Value at Date of Issuance, instant	0
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, instant	$0

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT_SC

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT - SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2015
$0.0091 Exercise price
Warrants - Number Outstanding	550,000
Warrants Outstanding - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 1 month
Warrants Outstanding - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.01
Warrants - Number Exercisable	550,000
Warrants Exercisable - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 1 month
Warrants Exercisable - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.01
$0.00364 Exercise price
Warrants - Number Outstanding	5,500,000
Warrants Outstanding - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	1 year 1 month
Warrants Outstanding - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.00
Warrants - Number Exercisable	5,500,000
Warrants Exercisable - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	1 year 1 month
Warrants Exercisable - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.00
$0.60 Exercise price
Warrants - Number Outstanding	699,999
Warrants Outstanding - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 6 months
Warrants Outstanding - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.60
Warrants - Number Exercisable	699,999
Warrants Exercisable - Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	2 years 6 months
Warrants Exercisable - Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.60

NOTE_8_STOCKHOLDERS_DEFICIT_De

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		1 Months Ended				3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Apr. 09, 2015	Jun. 17, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014	Sep. 16, 2014	Apr. 08, 2014	Mar. 19, 2014	Mar. 11, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Aug. 30, 2013	Aug. 16, 2013	Mar. 25, 2014
Common stock, Authorized			75,000,000				75,000,000	75,000,000	75,000,000
Shares issued for cash, duration			200,000	466,666	733,333	550,000		666,666
Shares issued for cash, instant	666,667											733,337	1,100,000	3,025,000	275,000	275,000
Price per share, duration			$0.15	$0.15	$0.15	$0.00		$0.15
Price per share, instant	$0.15											$0.00	$0.01	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Cash paid for shares, instant	$100,000											$5,000	$7,500	$5,000	$1,000	$1,000
Cash paid for shares, duration					110,000	2,000		100,000
Shares authorized under the stock option plan							1,000,000
Stock options granted							0		0
Conversion rate of notes to common stock, price per share											$0.03
Fair value of warrants granted, duration			655	1,535	47
Warrants issued with Share purchases	333,333		100,000	233,333	366,666			333,333
Exercise price of stock purchase warrants, duration	$0.40		$0.60	$0.60	$0.60			$0.60
Term of stock purchase warrants after conversion	3 years	3 years	3 years	3 years	3 years			3 years
Stock purchase warrants callable by company if stock trading above average price	$0.75		$0.75	$0.75	$0.75			$0.75
Stock purchase warrants callable by the company at price	$0.01		$0.01	$0.01	$0.01			$0.01
Stock purchase warrants callable after date	9-Apr-16	30-Jun-15	1-Sep-15	1-Sep-15	1-Sep-15			1-Sep-15
Number of days above average trading price to call stock purchase warrants	20 days	20 days	20 days	20 days	20 days			20 days
Consulting Agreement with Uptick Capital LLC, shares issued for services			200,000					200,000	200,000	100,000
Monthly shares to be issued to Uptick, value								25,000
Consulting fee recorded from Uptick Capital agreement								45,000
Warrants A
Fair value of warrants granted, instant																	24,870
Warrants B
Fair value of warrants granted, instant																	$2,100

NOTE_9_SUBSEQUENT_EVENTS_Detai

NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended								1 Months Ended				3 Months Ended
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Details Narrative) (USD $)	Apr. 09, 2015	Apr. 07, 2015	Jul. 14, 2014	Jun. 17, 2014	Jun. 10, 2014	Apr. 08, 2014	Mar. 25, 2014	Mar. 03, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013	Nov. 30, 2014	Mar. 11, 2015	Mar. 06, 2015	Mar. 05, 2015	Feb. 25, 2015	Sep. 16, 2014	Mar. 19, 2014	Mar. 11, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Aug. 30, 2013	Aug. 16, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
Consulting Agreement with Uptick Capital LLC, shares issued for services									200,000				200,000					100,000
Note payable			$1,500		$1,200	$75,000	$60,000								$3,545	$3,200	$100
Note maturity date			6/30/15		6/30/15	12/31/14	6/30/15
Interest rate of note			0.00%		0.00%	8.00%	6.00%								8.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Note payable returned														3,550		3,200
Amout loaned to C.S. Analytics, LLC.		25,000
Interest rate of loan to C.S. Analytics, LLC.		6.00%
Term of loan to C.S. Analytics, LLC- duration		180 days
Cost of Walla Walla Grow project		300,000
Monthly lease paid to Greenplex from Walla Walla Grow		12,000
Period of lease payments, months		120 months
Shares issued for cash, duration									200,000	466,666	733,333	550,000	666,666
Shares issued for cash, instant	666,667																		733,337	1,100,000	3,025,000	275,000	275,000
Price per share, duration									$0.15	$0.15	$0.15	$0.00	$0.15
Price per share, instant	$0.15																		$0.00	$0.01	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Cash paid for shares, duration											110,000	2,000	100,000
Cash paid for shares, instant	$100,000																		$5,000	$7,500	$5,000	$1,000	$1,000
Warrants issued with Share purchases	333,333								100,000	233,333	366,666		333,333
Exercise price of stock purchase warrants, duration	$0.40								$0.60	$0.60	$0.60		$0.60
Term of stock purchase warrants after conversion	3 years			3 years					3 years	3 years	3 years		3 years
Stock purchase warrants callable by company if stock trading above average price	$0.75								$0.75	$0.75	$0.75		$0.75
Stock purchase warrants callable by the company at price	$0.01								$0.01	$0.01	$0.01		$0.01
Stock purchase warrants callable after date	9-Apr-16			30-Jun-15					1-Sep-15	1-Sep-15	1-Sep-15		1-Sep-15
Number of days above average trading price to call stock purchase warrants	20 days			20 days					20 days	20 days	20 days		20 days
Conversion rate of notes to common stock, price per share						$0.03
Consultant agreement term, in days								90 days