Derivative Financial Instruments | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Derivative Financial Instruments [Abstract] | ' |
Derivative Financial Instruments | ' |
Note 3 — Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
The Company is exposed to commodity price risk and management believes it prudent to periodically reduce exposure to cash-flow variability resulting from this volatility. Accordingly, the Company enters into certain derivative financial instruments in order to manage exposure to commodity price risk inherent in its oil and gas production. Derivative financial instruments are also used to manage commodity price risk inherent in customer pricing requirements and to fix margins on the future sale of oil and natural gas. Specifically, the Company may utilize futures, swaps and options. |
|
Derivative instruments expose the Company to counterparty credit risk. The Company’s commodity derivative instruments are currently with two counterparties. The Company generally executes commodity derivative instruments under master agreements which allow it, in the event of default, to elect early termination of all contracts with the defaulting counterparty. If the Company chooses to elect early termination, all asset and liability positions with the defaulting counterparty would be net cash settled at the time of election. |
|
The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its counterparties; however, it is not able to predict sudden changes in counterparties’ creditworthiness. In addition, even if such changes are not sudden, it may be limited in its ability to mitigate an increase in counterparty credit risk. Possible actions would be to transfer its position to another counterparty or request a voluntary termination of the derivative contracts resulting in a cash settlement. Should one of these counterparties not perform, the Company may not realize the benefit of some of its derivative instruments under lower commodity prices as well as incur a loss. The Company includes a measure of counterparty credit risk in its estimates of the fair values of derivative instruments in an asset position. At March 31, 2014, the Company was a net obligor with respect to outstanding derivative contracts with both of its counterparties and therefore utilized its own credit risk in estimating the fair value of those derivatives. |
|
The Company does not designate its derivative financial instruments as hedging instruments for financial accounting purposes and, as a result, it recognizes the change in the respective instruments’ fair value currently in earnings. The table below outlines the classification of derivative financial instruments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and their financial impact on the condensed consolidated statements of operations at and for the periods indicated: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | | March 31, | | | | | |
Derivative Financial Instruments | | Balance Sheet location | 2013 | | 2014 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | | Current derivative financial instrument asset | $ | 54 | | $ | 4 | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | | Long-term derivative financial instrument asset | | 652 | | | 469 | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | | Current derivative financial instrument liability | | -1,937 | | | -4,917 | | | | | |
Commodity contracts | | Long-term derivative financial instrument liability | | -1,796 | | | -1,191 | | | | | |
| | | $ | -3,027 | | $ | -5,635 | | | | | |
|
Gains and losses associated with derivative financial instruments related to oil and gas production were as follows for the periods indicated: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2014 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Realized losses | $ | -873 | | $ | -2,507 | | | | | | | |
Unrealized losses | | -6,248 | | | -2,608 | | | | | | | |
Total loss from derivative financial instruments | $ | -7,121 | | $ | -5,115 | | | | | | | |
|
The Company entered into an International Swap Dealers Association Master Agreement (ISDA) with each of its two counterparties for which it holds derivative contracts. The ISDA is a standard contract that governs all derivative contracts entered into between the Company and the respective counterparty. The ISDA allows for offsetting of amounts payable or receivable between the Company and the counterparty, at the election of both parties, for transactions that occur on the same date and in the same currency. The Company has multiple oil swap contracts that could be offset under these provisions but has elected not to offset the fair values of its derivative assets against the fair value of its derivative liabilities on its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The ISDA also includes a master netting arrangement in the event of early termination or default. |
|
The following table discloses and reconciles the gross amounts as presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the net amounts allowed under a master netting arrangement. Amounts not offset on the condensed consolidated balance sheets represent positions that do not meet all the conditions for "a right of offset" or positions for which the Company has elected not to offset. |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | March 31, | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2014 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Derivative Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts of recognized assets | $ | 706 | | $ | 473 | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | | — | | | — | | | | | | | |
Net amounts of assets presented in the balance sheet | | 706 | | | 473 | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts not offset in the balance sheet | | -706 | | | -473 | | | | | | | |
Net amount | $ | — | | $ | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts of recognized liabilities | $ | 3,733 | | $ | 6,108 | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts offset in the balance sheet | | — | | | — | | | | | | | |
Net amounts of liabilities presented in the balance sheet | | 3,733 | | | 6,108 | | | | | | | |
Gross amounts not offset in the balance sheet | | -706 | | | -473 | | | | | | | |
Net amount | $ | 3,027 | | $ | 5,635 | | | | | | | |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated volumes, fixed prices and fair values attributable to all of the Company’s oil and gas derivative contracts at March 31, 2014. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Remainder of | | Year Ending December 31, | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | Total |
| | ($ in thousands, except per unit data) |
Natural Gas Swaps | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract volumes (MMBtu) | | | 7,745,679 | | | 8,983,560 | | | 7,814,028 | | | 24,543,267 |
Weighted-average fixed price per MMBtu | | $ | 4.01 | | $ | 4.01 | | $ | 4.01 | | $ | 4.01 |
Fair value, net | | $ | -3,427 | | $ | -1,579 | | $ | -877 | | $ | -5,883 |
Crude Oil Swaps | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract volumes (Bbl) | | | 87,057 | | | 71,568 | | | 65,568 | | | 224,193 |
Weighted-average fixed price per Bbl | | $ | 95.19 | | $ | 92.73 | | $ | 90.33 | | $ | 92.98 |
Fair value, net | | $ | -219 | | $ | 174 | | $ | 293 | | $ | 248 |
Total fair value, net | | $ | -3,646 | | $ | -1,405 | | $ | -584 | | $ | -5,635 |
|
|