SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 29, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Basis of Presentation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
| | | |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fiscal Year |
|
The Company has a 52/53 week fiscal year. Fiscal years for the consolidated financial statements included herein are for the 52 weeks ended December 29, 2013, the 53 weeks ended December 30, 2012, and the 52 weeks ended December 25, 2011. |
| | | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 financial statements to conform with the 2013 presentation. |
| | | |
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accounts Receivable |
|
The Company extends credit to its customers in the normal course of business. Accounts receivable represent unpaid balances due from customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from customers’ non-payment of balances due to the Company. The Company’s determination of the allowance for uncollectible amounts is based on management’s judgments and assumptions, including general economic conditions, portfolio composition, prior loss experience, evaluation of credit risk related to certain individual customers and the Company’s ongoing examination process. Receivables are written off after they are deemed to be uncollectible after all means of collection have been exhausted. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. |
| | | |
Deferred Charges, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Deferred Financing Charges |
|
Deferred financing charges are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the respective loans payable. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $240,421, $90,337 and $385,536 of amortization expense as a component of interest expense related to deferred financing charges, respectively. At December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, there were $362,960 and $278,171 of unamortized deferred financing charges, respectively. |
| | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Property and Equipment |
|
The Company’s policy is to depreciate the cost of property and equipment over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized over their useful lives, or the applicable lease term, if shorter. |
|
| | Years | |
| | | |
Leasehold improvements | | 5-Jan | |
Furniture and fixtures | | 7-May | |
Computer systems | | 5 | |
Vehicles | | 5 | |
| | | |
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Intangible Assets |
|
The Company does not hold any intangible assets with indefinite lives, with the exception of the InStaff trade name for $1,648,000. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, based on a pattern in which the economic benefit of the respective intangible asset is realized, as shown in the following table: |
|
| | Years | |
| | | |
Customer lists | | 5 | |
Trade names | | 5 | |
Covenant not to compete | | 5-Mar | |
|
Identifiable intangible assets recognized in conjunction with acquisitions are recorded at fair value. Significant unobservable inputs were used to determine the fair value of the identifiable intangible assets based on the income approach valuation model whereby the present worth and anticipated future benefits of the identifiable intangible assets were discounted back to their net present value. Goodwill represents the difference between the enterprise value/cash paid less the fair value of all recognized asset fair values including the identifiable intangible asset values. |
|
The Company evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company determined that there were no impairment indicators for these assets in 2013 or 2012. |
|
The Company annually evaluates the remaining useful lives of the above intangible assets to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. |
| | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Goodwill |
|
Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is measured at the reporting unit level for impairment annually at the end of each fiscal year, or more frequently if conditions indicate an earlier review is necessary. If we have determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value for one or more reporting units is greater than their carrying value, we may use a qualitative assessment for the annual impairment test. |
|
In conducting the qualitative assessment, we assess the totality of relevant events and circumstances that affect the fair value or carrying value of the reporting unit. Such events and circumstances may include macroeconomic conditions, industry and competitive environment conditions, overall financial performance, reporting unit specific events and market considerations. We may also consider recent valuations of the reporting unit, including the magnitude of the difference between the most recent fair value estimate and the carrying value, as well as both positive and adverse events and circumstances, and the extent to which each of the events and circumstances identified may affect the comparison of a reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying value. |
|
For reporting units where the qualitative assessment is not used, goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step process. In the first step, the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined based on discounted cash flow projections. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to a reporting unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further testing is required. |
|
If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, a second step of the impairment test is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to its implied fair value. |
|
Based on our annual testing, we have determined that there was no goodwill impairment in Fiscal 2013, Fiscal 2012 or Fiscal 2011. As of December 29, 2013, we have allocated $4,474,070, $1,073,755, and $305,791 of total goodwill to our three separate reporting units: Light Industrial, Multifamily and IT Staffing, respectively. |
| | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company provides temporary staffing solutions. The Company and its clients enter into agreements that outline the general terms and conditions of the staffing arrangement. Revenue is recognized as services are performed and associated costs have been incurred. Revenues include reimbursements of travel and out-of-pocket expenses with the equivalent amounts of expense recorded in cost of services. The Company considers revenue to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. |
| | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
Until November 3, 2013, the Company was treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes except for BG Personnel Services, LP and B G Staff Services Inc., which are taxed as C corporations. Consequently, federal and state income taxes were not payable, or provided for, by the Company, except for those BG entities that were taxed as C corporations. Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the impact of income taxes for the taxable BG entities. Members were taxed individually on their share of the Company’s earnings, not earned in the C corporations, which were allocated among the members in accordance with the operating agreement of the Parent. |
|
In connection with the Company’s reorganization (see Note 1), as of November 2013, we are treated as a C corporation for federal income tax purposes. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. |
|
The Company also evaluates the need for valuation allowances to reduce the deferred tax assets to realizable amounts. Management evaluates all positive and negative evidence and uses judgment regarding past and future event, including operating results, to help determine when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. When appropriate, a valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets to off set future tax benefits that may not be realized. There was no valuation allowance recorded as of December 29, 2013. |
|
The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements was the largest benefit that had a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company assessed all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remain open. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 29, 2013 or December 30, 2012. The Company is open to examination by tax authorities for federal, state or local income taxes for periods beginning after 2010. The Company recognized any penalties and interest when necessary as tax expense. There were no penalties or interest recorded in Fiscal 2013. |
| | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Stock Based Compensation |
|
The Parent had issued profits interests in the form of Class B Units to employees and directors. Compensation expense arising from the Parent Class B Units granted to the Company’s employees by the Parent was recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, which represents the requisite service period. The fair value of the Class B Units was based on the fair value of the underlying unit. These units were converted to common stock as part of the Company’s conversion to a C corporation. See footnote 11 for further information. |
|
In December 2013, the Company adopted a long term incentive plan. Under the plan various employees, directors and consultants may receive incentive stock options. The Company determines the fair value of options to purchase common stock using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company recognizes compensation expense over the service period for options that are expected to vest and records adjustments to compensation expense at the end of the service period if actual forfeitures differ from original estimates. No incentive stock options have been granted under the plan as of December 29, 1013. |
| | | |
Pro Forma Earnings Loss Per Share [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Pro Forma Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
In connection with the Company’s reorganization (see Note 1), the pro forma earnings (loss) per share have been calculated as if the Company were a C corporation for federal income tax purposes for all periods presented. Pro forma earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding. The weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of options to purchase common shares using the treasury stock method. |
| | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Management Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. |
| | | |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements |
|
The estimated fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of all debt at December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012 approximated the carrying value as the debt bears market rates of interest. These fair values were estimated based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, when quoted market prices were not available. The estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange. |
|
Level 1 measurements consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements include quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 3 measurements include significant unobservable inputs. |
|
In connection with the InStaff acquisition on May 28, 2013, the Company granted a put option liability which is carried at fair market value in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the put option was $1,312,606 at December 29, 2013. The put option liability is revalued at each balance sheet date at the greater of an adjusted EBITDA method or the fair market value. Changes in fair value are recorded as non-cash, non-operating income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The liability is classified within Level 3 as the lack of an active market during 2013 impairs the calculation of fair market value as an unobservable input used to value the put option. There were no changes in fair value during Fiscal 2013. There were no substantive changes to the valuation techniques and related inputs used to measure fair value during fiscal 2013. |
| | | |