Tungsten (TUNG) 10-K 31 Mar 14 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014	Mar. 19, 2014	Jul. 31, 2013
Document and Entity Information:	'	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'Tungsten Corp.	'	'
Document Type	'10-K	'	'
Document Period End Date	31-Jan-14	'	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001475065	'	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--01-31	'	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	73,631,278	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'	'
Entity Current Reporting Status	'Yes	'	'
Entity Voluntary Filers	'No	'	'
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	'No	'	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'FY	'	'
Entity Public Float	'	'	$21,823,321

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013
CURRENT ASSETS:	'	'
Cash	$27,007	$7,163
Prepaid expenses	8,311	'
Total Current Assets	35,318	7,163
OTHER ASSETS	'	'
Mineral properties	174,013	21,291
Total Other Assets	174,013	21,291
Total Assets	209,331	28,454
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	'	'
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	17,141	28,844
Convertible notes, net of discounts of $111,562 and $0	15,938	'
Derivative liability	214,050	'
Advances from stockholders	99,951	23,000
Total Current Liabilities	347,080	51,844
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:	'	'
Preferred stock par value $0.0001: 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock par value $0.0001: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 71,542,799 and 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	7,154	300
Additional paid-in capital	1,359,630	-299
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage	-1,504,533	-23,391
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-137,749	-23,390
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$209,331	$28,454

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets Parentheticals (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013
Balance Sheets Parentheticals	'	'
Discount of Convertible Debenture Payable current,	$111,562	$0
Preferred stock par value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Preferred stock shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock par value	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock shares authorized	300,000,000	300,000,000
Common stock shares issued	71,542,799	3,000,000
Common stock shares outstanding	71,542,799	3,000,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended		15 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2014
Cost of exploration	'	'	'
Exploration costs	$73,565	$22,130	$95,695
Total cost of exploration	73,565	22,130	95,695
Gross margin	-73,565	-22,130	-95,695
Operating expenses	'	'	'
Director's fees	151,875	'	151,875
Officers' compensation	99,067	'	99,067
Professional fees	146,061	1,127	147,188
Loss on impairment	750,000	0	750,000
General and administrative expenses	114,311	134	114,445
Total operating expenses	1,261,314	1,261	1,262,575
Loss from operations	-1,334,879	-23,391	-1,358,270
Other (income) expense	'	'	'
Derivative expense	183,563	0	183,563
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	-54,513	0	-54,513
Interest expense	17,213	0	17,213
Other (income) expense, net	146,263	0	146,263
Loss before income tax provision	-1,481,142	-23,391	-1,504,533
Income tax provision	0	0	0
Net loss	-1,481,142	-23,391	-1,504,533
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	($0.03)	$0	'
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted	56,724,275	3,000,000	'
Revenue	'	'	'
Revenue earned during the exploration stage	$0	$0	$0

Statement_of_Stockholders_Equi

Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $)	Common Stock Number of Shares	Common Stock Amount	Additional Paid-In Capital	Deficit Accumulated During Exploration Stage	Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
			USD ($)	USD ($)	USD ($)
Balance at Oct. 30, 2012	0	'	'	'	'
Common stock issued for cash.	3,000,000	300	-299	'	1
Net loss	'	'	'	($23,391)	($23,391)
Balance at Jan. 31, 2013	3,000,000	300	-299	-23,391	-23,390
Reverse acquisition adjustment	66,000,000	6,600	-52,692	'	-46,092
Issuance of common stock for cash at $0.25 per share on April 8, 2013	2,000,000	200	499,800	'	500,000
Shares returned to treasury and cancelled on April 19, 2013	-6,000,000	-600	600	'	'
Issuance of common shares for acquisition of mineral properties valued at $0.25 per share on April 19, 2013	3,000,000	300	749,700	'	750,000
Common shares issued for future director services on May 13, 2013	750,000	75	607,425	'	607,500
Common shares issued for future director services on May 13, 2013	'	'	-607,500	'	-607,500
Common stock issued for future director services on May 13, 2013 and earned during the period	'	'	151,875	'	151,875
Common stock issued for future public relation services on January 17, 2014	2,000,000	200	179,800	'	180,000
Common stock issued for future public relation services on January 17, 2014	'	'	-180,000	'	-180,000
Common stock issued for future public relation services on January 17, 2014 and earned during the period	'	'	7,500	'	7,500
Common stock issued for investor relations services provided on January 31, 2014	42,799	4	3,496	'	3,500
Common stock issued for future director services on January 31, 2014	750,000	75	56,175	'	56,250
Common stock issued for future director services on January 31, 2014	'	'	-56,250	'	-56,250
Net loss	'	'	'	'	($1,481,142)
Balance at Jan. 31, 2014	71,542,799	7,154	1,359,630	'	-137,749

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		15 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	'	'	'
Net loss	($1,481,142)	($23,391)	($1,504,533)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	'	'	'
Amortization of debt and original issue discount	15,938	'	15,938
Stock based compensation	162,875	'	162,875
Derivative expense	183,563	'	183,563
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	-54,513	0	-54,513
Loss on impairment	750,000	'	750,000
Prepaid expenses	-8,311	'	-8,311
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	-8,203	28,844	20,641
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES	-439,793	5,453	-434,340
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:	'	'	'
Cash used in acquisition	-46,092	'	-46,092
Acquisition of mineral property claims	-152,722	-21,291	-174,013
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	-198,814	-21,291	-220,105
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	'	'	'
Amounts received from (paid to) stockholders	76,951	23,000	99,951
Proceeds from convertible notes	85,000	'	85,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock	496,500	1	496,501
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	658,451	23,001	681,452
NET CHANGE IN CASH	19,844	7,163	27,007
Cash at beginning of period	7,163	'	'
Cash at end of period	27,007	7,163	27,007
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:	'	'	'
Interest paid	0	0	0
Income tax paid	0	0	0
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:	'	'	'
Common stock issued for mineral property claims	$750,000	$0	$750,000

ORGANIZATION_AND_OPERATIONS

ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Consolidated subsidiary	'
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS	'
	Note 1 - Organization and Operations
	Online Tele-Solutions, Inc.
	Online Tele-Solutions, Inc. (“Online Tele-Solutions”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 5, 2008.  Initial operations have included organization and incorporation, target market identification, marketing plans, and capital formation. A substantial portion of the Company’s activities had involved developing a business plan and establishing contacts and visibility in the marketplace. The Company has generated no revenues since inception.
	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
	On March 9, 2012, the Board of Directors and the consenting stockholders adopted and approved a resolution to (i) amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to (a) increase the number of shares of authorized common stock from 50,000,000 to 300,000,000; (b) create 25,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share; (c) change the par value of the common stock from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share; and (ii) effectuate a forward split of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock, at a ratio of thirty-for-one (30:1) (the "Stock Split").
	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
	On November 14, 2012, the Board of Directors of Online Tele-Solutions and two (2) stockholders holding an aggregate of  45,600,000  shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 6, 2012, approved and consented, in writing, to effectuate an amendment to the  Company's  Articles  of  Incorporation  to  change  the  name of  Online Tele-Solutions to "Tungsten Corp." the “Company”).
	Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.
	Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. (“Tungsten”) was incorporated on October 30, 2012 under the laws of the State of Nevada. Tungsten intends to engage in the exploration of certain tungsten interests in the State of Nevada.
	Reverse Acquisition and Change in Scope of Business
	On April 8, 2013, the Company closed a voluntary share exchange transaction pursuant to a stock exchange agreement (“SEA”) with Guy Martin and Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. Pursuant to the terms of the SEA, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.’s common stock from Guy Martin.  The sole asset of Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. is an option to acquire all tungsten rights in regards to 32 patented and unpatented mining claims situated in White Pine Country, Nevada pursuant to an option agreement by and between Viscount Nevada Holdings Ltd. (the “Optionor”) and Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. (the “Option Agreement”).
	Immediately prior to the Share Exchange Transaction on April 8, 2013, the Company had 66,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding. Simultaneously with the Closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company’s then majority stockholder surrendered 3,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock to the Company for cancellation.
	As a result of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company issued 3,000,000 common shares for the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Tungsten.  Even though the shares issued only represented approximately 4.3% of the issued and outstanding common stock immediately after the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement the stockholder of Tungsten completely took over and controlled the board of directors and management of the Company upon acquisition.
	As a result of the change in control to the then Tungsten Stockholder, for financial statement reporting purposes, the merger between the Company and Tungsten has been treated as a reverse acquisition with Tungsten deemed the accounting acquirer and the Company deemed the accounting acquiree under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The reverse acquisition is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of Tungsten (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to the Company (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the acquisition.  The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of Tungsten which are recorded at their historical cost.  The equity of the Company is the historical equity of Tungsten retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by the Company in the transaction.

SIGNIFICANT_AND_CRITICAL_ACCOU

SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies:	'
SIGNIFICANT AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES	'
	Note 2 –Significant and Critical Accounting Policies
	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application.  Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
	(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	(ii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	(iii)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of conversion features: Management estimates expected term of conversion, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value conversion features.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Fiscal Year-End
	The Company elected January 31st as its fiscal year ending date.
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation.  The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiary and/or entity is as follows:
	Name of consolidated		State or other jurisdiction	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity		of incorporation or organization	(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.		The State of Nevada	October 30, 2012 (April 8, 2013)	100%
	These consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company as of January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 8, 2013 (date of acquisition) through January 31, 2014; and Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. as of January 31, 2014 and 2013, for the period ended January 31, 2014, for the period from October 30, 2012 (inception) through January 31, 2013; and for the period from October 30, 2012 (inception) through January 31, 2014.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
	Exploration Stage Company
	The Company has established the existence of mineralized material, however it has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for mineralized material. As a result, the Company remains in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, and will continue to remain in the Exploration Stage until such time proven or probable reserves have been established.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative conversion features
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative warrant liability and derivative liability on the conversion feature at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include mineral properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes.  The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties. Management will take into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mine operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When a determination has been made that a project or property will be abandoned, or its carrying value has been impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
	Mineral Properties
	The Company follows Section 930 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its mineral properties.  Mineral properties and related mineral rights acquisition costs are capitalized pending determination of whether the drilling has found proved reserves.  If a mineral ore body is discovered, capitalized costs will be amortized on a unit-of-production basis following the commencement of production.  Otherwise, capitalized acquisition costs are expensed when it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value.  General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases, including rights of access to lands for geophysical work and salaries, equipment, and supplies for geologists and geophysical crews are expensed as incurred.  When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves, further exploration costs and development costs as well as interest costs relating to exploration and development projects that require greater than six (6) months to be readied for their intended use incurred after such determination will be capitalized.  The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies which indicate whether a property is economically feasible.  Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be transferred to the appropriate asset categories and amortized on a unit-of-production basis.  Capitalized costs, net of salvage values, relating to a deposit which is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off.  The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate.  A gain or loss will be recognized for all other sales of proved properties and will be classified in other operating revenues.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of mineral properties will be calculated on a property-by-property basis using the unit-of-production method.  Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
	To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all general exploration costs, if any, are being expensed.
	Mineral Exploration and Mine Development Costs
	All mineral exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time the Company exits the Exploration Stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Mine development costs incurred to develop mineral deposits, to expand the capacity of mines or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of production are capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist, and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the cost of mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects, including related property and equipment costs, are charged to mining costs.
	Restoration Costs (Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations)
	Various federal and state mining laws and regulations require the Company to reclaim the surface areas and restore underground water quality for its mine projects to the pre-existing mine area average quality after the completion of mining.
	In accordance with ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, the Company capitalizes the measured fair value of asset retirement and environmental obligations to mineral rights and properties. ASC 410 requires the Company to record a liability for the present value of the estimated future site restoration and environmental remediation costs with corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related mineral rights and properties. The asset retirement and environmental obligations are accreted to an undiscounted value until the time at which they are expected to be settled. The accretion expense is charged to earnings and the actual retirement costs are recorded against the asset retirement obligations when incurred. Any difference between the recorded asset retirement obligations and the actual retirement costs incurred will be recorded as a gain or loss in the period of settlement.
	Environmental expenditures that relate to ongoing environmental and reclamation programs will be charged against statements of operations as incurred or capitalized and amortized depending upon their future economic benefits. Future site restoration and environmental remediation costs, which include extraction equipment removal, site restoration and environmental remediation, are accrued at the end of each reporting period based on management's best estimate of the costs expected to be incurred for each project. Such estimates are determined by the Company's engineering studies which consider the costs of future surface and groundwater activities, current regulations, actual expenses incurred, and technology and industry standards.
	On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the assumptions used to estimate the expected cash flows required to settle the asset retirement obligations, including changes in estimated probabilities, amounts and timing of the settlement of the asset retirement and environmental obligations, as well as changes in the legal obligation requirements at each of its mineral projects. Changes in any one or more of these assumptions may cause revision of asset retirement obligations for the corresponding assets.
	The Company does not currently anticipate any material capital expenditures for site restoration costs and considers the estimated future site restoration costs to be minimal and so the present value of the same at October 31, 2013 as all of its mineral properties are at early stages of exploration.
	Derivative Instruments
	The Company evaluates its convertible debt to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
	Related Parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable and, (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum ("PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Income Tax Provision
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended January 31, 2014 or 2013.
Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL.  Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.”  In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.  In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years.  The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants. The total amount of potentially outstanding dilutive common shares from the conversion of the convertible notes plus accrued interest converted would be 3,962,308 and 0 for the reporting period ended January 31, 2014 or 2013.
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date."  This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

GOING_CONCERN

GOING CONCERN	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
GOING CONCERN	'
GOING CONCERN	'
	Note 3 – Going Concern
	The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the exploration stage at January 31, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company is attempting to commence exploration and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.
	The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

MINERAL_PROPERTIES

MINERAL PROPERTIES	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
MINERAL PROPERTIES	'
MINERAL PROPERTIES	'
	Note 4 – Mineral Properties
	Cherry Creek Claim
	Effective January 31, 2013, Tungsten signed an Option Agreement with Viscount Nevada Holdings Ltd. (“Viscount”) to acquire an undivided 100% right, title and interest in and to all Tungsten located in certain mining claims (“Cherry Creek claim”) in the State of Nevada. The Option shall be in good standing and exercisable by Tungsten by paying the following amounts on or before: (i) $150,000 to Viscount on or before April 15, 2013; (ii) $100,000 to Viscount on or before February 15, 2014; (iii) $50,000 to Viscount on or before February 15, 2015; and (iv) paying all such property tax payments as may be required to maintain the mineral claims in good standing.
	In addition, Tungsten shall use commercially reasonable efforts to incur the following annual work commitments as currently recommended and agreed to by the parties: (i) exploration expenditures on the property of $250,000 on or before the first anniversary of the execution of this Agreement; (ii) exploration expenditures on the property of $250,000 on or before the second anniversary of the execution of this Agreement; and (iii) exploration expenditures on the property of $1,000,000 on or before the third anniversary of the execution of the Agreement.
	On April 11, 2013, the Company made the first payment of $150,000.
	On February 11, 2014, the Company and Viscount signed an amendment to the Option Agreement keeping the Option in good standing if $100,000 is paid to Viscount and $250,000 of exploration expenditures is made on or before June 15, 2014.
	Idaho Claim
	On April 19, 2013, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the "Agreement") with Monfort Ventures Ltd. ("Monfort"), pursuant to which the Company acquired title to certain unpatented pacer mining claims located in Custer County, Idaho (the "Property") upon issuance by the Company of 3,000,000 shares of its common stock to Monfort (the "Shares") valued at $0.25 per share, the most recent PPM price, or $750,000.
	Mineral properties consisted of the following:
		31-Oct-13			31-Jan-13
	Cherry Creek Claim	$	174,013		$	21,291
	Idaho Claim		750,000			-
	Less impairment		(750,000	)		-
	Total	$	174,013		$	21,291
	Subsequent to the purchase of the Idaho claim, management decided to impair the value of the acquired unpatented pacer mining claims by $750,000.  This impairment was a consequence of the assets being exploratory in nature and not being supported any ore reserves.  It is not possible to evaluate and establish the real value of the mineral properties until additional work is completed and that may take several years.  With that being stated, the Company’s position is that these acquired mineral assets, which consist of ownership of unpatented mining claims, cannot be truly assessed at this time.  The Company assumes that these assets have been impaired and the exchange price based on $0.25 per share is not supportable as the possible value of these assets in the future.  The Company impaired the stock value exchange of $750,000 as of year end.

Convertible_Note_Payable

Convertible Note Payable	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Convertible Note Payable	'
Convertible Note Payable	'
	Note 5 – Convertible Note Payable
	On January 2, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), Tungsten Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), entered into a convertible note purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Hanover Holdings I, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“Hanover”).  The Purchase Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Hanover shall purchase from the Company on the Closing Date a senior convertible note with an initial principal amount of $127,500 (the “Convertible Note”) for a purchase price of $85,000 (a 33.33% original issue discount).  Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company issued the Convertible Note to Hanover.
	Derivative Analysis
	Because the conversion feature included in the convertible note payable has full reset adjustments tied to future issuances of equity securities by the Company, they are subject to derivative liability treatment under Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“Section 815-40-15”).
	The Company estimated the fair value of the conversion feature on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
		2-Jan-14
	Expected life (year)		0.67
	Expected volatility (*)		190.12	%
	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends		0	%
	Risk-free rate(s)		0.11	%
	(a) Fair Value of Conversion Features
	Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheet at January 31, 2014:
					Fair Value Measurement Using
		Carrying Value					Level 1			Level 2	Level 3			Total
	Derivative conversion features	$	214,050			$	-		$	-	$	214,050	$	214,050
	The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended January 31, 2014:
		Fair Value Measurement Using Level 3 Inputs
			Derivative Liabilities				Total
	Balance, January 31, 2013	$	-			$	-
	Purchases, issuances and settlements		268,563				268,563
	Total (gains) or losses (realized/unrealized) included in consolidated statements of operations		(54,513	)			(54,513	)
	Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-				-
	Balance, January 31, 2014	$	214,050			$	214,050

RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTIONS

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	'
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	'
	Note 6 – Related Party Transactions
	Free Office Space
	The Company has been provided office space by its Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statements.
	Advances from Stockholder
	From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
	Advances from stockholder consisted of the following:
		31-Jan-14		31-Jan-13
	Advances from stockholders	$	99,951	$	23,000
	Total	$	99,951	$	23,000

STOCKHOLDERS_EQUITY_DEFICIT

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	'
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	'
	Note 7 – Stockholders’ Deficit
	Shares authorized
	Upon formation the total number of shares of common stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share.
	On March 9, 2012 the Board of Directors and the consenting stockholders adopted and approved a resolution to effectuate an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to (i) increase the number of shares of authorized common stock from 50,000,000 to 300,000,000; (ii) create 25,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share and (iii) decrease the par value of common stock from $0.001 per share to $0.0001 per share.
	Common stock
	On April 8, 2013, concurrent with the closing of the reverse merger, the Company closed a private placement of 2,000,000 shares at $0.25 per share for an aggregate of $500,000 in subscription receivable, $250,000 of which was received upon closing of the private placement while the remaining $250,000 was received on May 24, 2013 and May 28, 2013.
	Immediately after the reverse merger and the private placement the Company had 71,000,000 issued and outstanding common shares.
	The Company has entered into lock up agreements with each of Messrs. Martin and Oliver in regards to the aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of the common stock that each hold (the “Lock Up Agreements”). Pursuant to the terms of the Lock Up Agreements, in regards to their respective 3,000,000 shares of common stock, 1,000,000 shares have been released concurrent with the closing of the Transaction, and 1,000,000 shares shall be released on each anniversary thereafter.
	On April 19, 2013, the Company cancelled 6,000,000 shares, in the aggregate, of the Company's common stock that was held by two former shareholders.
	On April 19, 2013, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the "Agreement") with Monfort Ventures Ltd. ("Monfort"), pursuant to which the Company acquired title to certain unpatented pacer mining claims located in Custer County, Idaho (the "Property") upon issuance of 3,000,000 shares of its common stock to Monfort (the "Shares").
	On May 13, 2013, the Company entered into a Restricted Stock Award Agreement (the  "Agreement")  with Joseph P. Galda,  pursuant to which Mr. Galda was granted 750,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the "Restricted Shares") in consideration for services to be rendered to the Company by Mr. Galda as a director of the Company. The Restricted Shares will vest over a three (3) year period at the rate of 62,500 shares of common stock per quarter, with the first portion of the Restricted Shares vesting on June 30, 2013 and all the Restricted Shares vesting by March 31, 2016. Under the Agreement, all unvested Restricted Shares shall vest upon a "change in control," as defined in the Agreement.  According to the Agreement, the vesting of the Restricted Shares is subject to Mr. Galda's continuous service to the Company as a director.  In the event that the Board of Directors of the Company determines that Mr. Galda has committed certain acts of misconduct, Mr. Galda will not be entitled to the Restricted Shares. Mr. Galda also made certain representations to the Company in connection with the  restricted  stock award, including  representations  relating to this ability to bear economic risk, the  sufficiency  of  information  received,  his level of sophistication  in financial and business matters, and his purpose for acquiring the Restricted Shares.  These shares were valued at $0.81 per share, the close price on the date of grant, or $607,500 and were amortized over the vesting period, or $50,625 per quarter which was included in Officer/Directors’ compensation. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 the Company recognized $151,875 in equity based compensation under this Agreement.
	On January 17, 2014 the Company entered into an Agreement with Carmel Advisors LLC to provide public relations, communications, advisory and consulting services for a period of twelve (12) months, and be compensated for those services rendered by the issuance of 2,000,000 restricted 144 shares of the Company’s common stock, and that when issued in accordance with the Agreement, such shares are earned ratably over the term of the agreement and the unearned shares are forfeitable in the event of non-performance by Carmel Advisor or terminated by the Company. As of January 31, 2014 the 2,000,000 shares were issued in satisfaction of the terms of the Agreement. These shares were valued at $0.09 per share, the close price on the date of grant, or $180,000, and will be amortized over the twelve (12) month period, or $15,000 per month which will be included in general and administration: advertising and promotion expenses. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 the Company recognized $7,500 in Advertising and Promotion expenses under this Agreement.
	On January 31, 2014 the Restricted Stock Award Agreement with Joseph P. Galda was amended and restated with the effect that the first vesting of the Restricted Shares in the amount of 250,000 shares will take place on April 30, 2014. All other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in force.
	On January 31, 2013, the Company entered into a Restricted Stock Award Agreement (the  "Agreement")  with David Bikerman,  pursuant to which Mr. Bikerman was granted 750,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (the "Restricted Shares") in consideration for services to be rendered to the Company by Mr. Bikerman as a director of the Company. The Restricted Shares will vest over a three (3) year period at the rate of 62,500 shares of common stock per quarter, with the first 187,500 of the Restricted Shares vesting on April 30, 2014 and all the Restricted Shares vesting by June 30, 2016. Under the Agreement, all unvested Restricted Shares shall vest upon a "change in control," as defined in the Agreement.  According to the Agreement, the vesting of the Restricted Shares is subject to Mr. Bikerman's continuous service to the Company as a director.  In the event that the Board of Directors of the Company determines that Mr. Bikerman has committed certain acts of misconduct, Mr. Bikerman will not be entitled to the Restricted  Shares. Mr. Bikerman also made certain representations to the Company in connection with the  restricted  stock award, including  representations  relating to this ability to bear economic risk, the  sufficiency  of  information  received,  his level of sophistication  in financial and business matters, and his purpose for acquiring the Restricted Shares.  These shares were valued at $0.075 per share, the close price on the date of grant, or $56,250 and will be amortized over the vesting period, or $4,687.50 per quarter which will be included in officer/directors’ compensation. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014 the Company recognized $Nil in equity based compensation under this Agreement.
	On January 31, 2014 the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with Crescendo Communications, LLC (“Crescendo”) whereby Crescendo has agreed to accept shares of common stock of the Company as partial payment of fees owed, and that when issued pursuant to the Letter Agreement, such shares shall be fully paid and non-assessable by the Company. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014, in satisfaction of the payment of $3,500 for fees owed, 42,799 restricted 144 shares were issued.

INCOME_TAX

INCOME TAX	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Income Taxes:	'
Income Tax Disclosure	'
	Note 8 – Income Tax Provision
	Deferred Tax Assets
	At January 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $602,092, net of impairment loss, derivative expense and change in the fair value of derivative liabilities that may be offset against future taxable income through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $204,711 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance.
	Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards.  The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realization.  The valuation allowance increased approximately $172,380 and $6,961 for the reporting period ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
		31-Jan-14			31-Jan-13
	Net deferred tax assets – non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards		204,711			32,331
	Less valuation allowance		(204,711	)		(32,331	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
	Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations
	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:
		For the Reporting			For the Reporting
		Period Ended			Period Ended
		31-Jan-14			31-Jan-13
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

COMMITMENTS_AND_CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	'
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	'
	Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies
	Employment Agreements
	On July 9, 2013, Tungsten Corp. (the "Company") entered into employment agreements with Guy Martin and Douglas Oliver (the "Employment Agreements"), effective as of July 1, 2013, which replaced previously existing Consulting Agreements between Messrs. Martin and Oliver and the Company, effective on April 8, 2013 (the “Consulting Agreements").
	The Employment Agreements provide for Mr. Martin's continued employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for a term of two years, subject to certain termination rights, during which time he will receive a monthly base salary at the rate of $5,000; and Mr. Oliver's continued employment as Vice President of Exploration of the Company for a term of two years, subject to certain termination rights, during which time he will receive a monthly base salary at the rate of $4,000. The Employment Agreements shall be automatically extended for additional one year terms unless either the Company or Messrs. Martin and Oliver provide written notice of their intent not to renew the agreement at least sixty days prior to the expiration of a term.
	In addition, Messrs. Martin and Oliver are entitled, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, to receive performance bonuses, which may be based upon a variety of factors. Messrs. Martin and Oliver will also be entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans or programs of the Company to the extent that their positions, title, tenure, salary, age, health and other qualifications make them eligible to participate in accordance with the terms of the applicable plans or programs. The Company intends to implement an employee stock option plan, and Messrs. Martin and Oliver shall be eligible to receive awards of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units and performance shares or other equity awards pursuant to the employee stock option plan or any other arrangements the Company may have in effect from time to time. The Board or the Committee will determine in its discretion the amount of any such award to Messrs. Martin and Oliver in accordance with the terms of the employee stock option plan in effect at the time of grant.
	The Employment Agreements contain a non-competition covenant and non-interference (relating to the Company's customers) and non-solicitation (relating to the Company's employees) provisions effective during the term of their employment and for a period of six months after termination with respect to the non-competition covenant and for a period of twenty four months after termination with respect to the non-interference and non-solicitation provisions of the Employment Agreements.

SUBSEQUENT_EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	'
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS	'
	Note 10 – Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:
	Amendment #2 to the Option Agreement between Viscount Nevada Holdings Ltd. and Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.
	On February 11, 2014 the parties agreed that notwithstanding that the payment contemplated in section 4 (b) (ii) of the Option Agreement, “US$100,000 to the Optionor on or before February 15, 2014,” (the “Payment”), will not be made on or before February 15, 2014, and that the annual work commitment contemplated in section4 (c) (i) of the Option Agreement, “exploration expenditures on the Property of US$250,000 on or before the first anniversary of the execution of this Agreement,” (the “Work”), will not be expended by the first anniversary, that the Option Agreement remains unchanged and in good standing with full force and effect, with the understanding that the Payment will be made, and the Work will be expended, on or before June 15, 2014. For this consideration and upon the execution of this Amendment #2, the Optionee will issue to the Optionor 250,000 shares of common stock in Tungsten Corp.
	Issuance of Common Stock
	On February 18, 2014 we closed a common stock purchase agreement for a $3 million Equity Enhancement Program (“EEP”) with a Magna Group affiliate fund, Hanover Holdings I, LLC (the "Investor"). The EEP allows, but does not obligate the Company to issue and sell up to $3,000,000 worth of the Company’s common stock to the Investor from time to time, over the 24-month term of the purchase agreement.
	We paid to the Investor a commitment fee for entering into the Purchase Agreement equal to $150,000 in the form of 2,065,177 restricted shares of our common stock, issued on February 20, 2014, calculated using a per share price of $0.072633, representing the arithmetic average of the three lowest VWAPs during the 10-trading day period immediately preceding the Closing Date.
	In connection with the execution of the purchase agreement, the parties also entered into a registration rights agreement, whereby, we agreed to file an initial registration statement with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register an agreed upon number of shares of common stock, which shall not exceed 1/3 of the number of shares of our common stock held by non-affiliates of the Company, on or prior to March 28, 2014 (the “Filing Deadline”) and have it declared effective at the earlier of (A) the 90th calendar day after the earlier of (1) the Filing Deadline and (2) the date on which the initial registration statement is filed with the SEC and (B) the fifth business day after the date the Company is notified by the SEC that such Registration Statement will not be reviewed or will not be subject to further review.
	On March 6, 2014, in satisfaction of the payment of $1,750 for fees owed, 23,302 restricted 144 shares were issued to Crescendo Communications, LLC pursuant to the Letter Agreement (Note 7).

SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNTING_POLICIE

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	'
BASIS OF PRESENTATION	'
	Basis of Presentation
	The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
USE OF ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS	'
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
	(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	(ii)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
	(iii)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of conversion features: Management estimates expected term of conversion, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value conversion features.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
FISCAL YEAR-END Policy	'
	Fiscal Year-End
	The Company elected January 31st as its fiscal year ending date.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION	'
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation.  The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiary and/or entity is as follows:
	Name of consolidated		State or other jurisdiction	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity		of incorporation or organization	(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.		The State of Nevada	October 30, 2012 (April 8, 2013)	100%
	These consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company as of January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 8, 2013 (date of acquisition) through January 31, 2014; and Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd. as of January 31, 2014 and 2013, for the period ended January 31, 2014, for the period from October 30, 2012 (inception) through January 31, 2013; and for the period from October 30, 2012 (inception) through January 31, 2014.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY	'
	Exploration Stage Company
	The Company has established the existence of mineralized material, however it has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for mineralized material. As a result, the Company remains in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, and will continue to remain in the Exploration Stage until such time proven or probable reserves have been established.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
CARRYING VALUE, RECOVERABILITY AND IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS	'
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include mineral properties, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
	The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
	The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) regulatory changes.  The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Management periodically reviews the recoverability of the capitalized mineral properties. Management will take into consideration various information including, but not limited to, historical production records taken from previous mine operations, results of exploration activities conducted to date, estimated future prices and reports and opinions of outside consultants. When a determination has been made that a project or property will be abandoned, or its carrying value has been impaired, a provision is made for any expected loss on the project or property.
CASH EQUIVALENTS	'
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents
MINERAL PROPERTIES Policy	'
	Mineral Properties
	The Company follows Section 930 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its mineral properties.  Mineral properties and related mineral rights acquisition costs are capitalized pending determination of whether the drilling has found proved reserves.  If a mineral ore body is discovered, capitalized costs will be amortized on a unit-of-production basis following the commencement of production.  Otherwise, capitalized acquisition costs are expensed when it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value.  General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases, including rights of access to lands for geophysical work and salaries, equipment, and supplies for geologists and geophysical crews are expensed as incurred.  When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves, further exploration costs and development costs as well as interest costs relating to exploration and development projects that require greater than six (6) months to be readied for their intended use incurred after such determination will be capitalized.  The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies which indicate whether a property is economically feasible.  Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be transferred to the appropriate asset categories and amortized on a unit-of-production basis.  Capitalized costs, net of salvage values, relating to a deposit which is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off.  The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate.  A gain or loss will be recognized for all other sales of proved properties and will be classified in other operating revenues.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
	The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of mineral properties will be calculated on a property-by-property basis using the unit-of-production method.  Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
	To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all general exploration costs, if any, are being expensed.
MINERAL EXPLORATION AND MINE DEVELOPMENT COSTS	'
	Mineral Exploration and Mine Development Costs
	All mineral exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time the Company exits the Exploration Stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Mine development costs incurred to develop mineral deposits, to expand the capacity of mines or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of production are capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist, and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the cost of mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects, including related property and equipment costs, are charged to mining costs.
Derivatives, Policy	'
	Derivative Instruments
	The Company evaluates its convertible debt to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
RELATED PARTIES Policy	'
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES Policy	'
	Commitment and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
REVENUE RECONITION	'
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable and, (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION	'
	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
	The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
EQUITY INSTRUMENTS ISSUED TO PARTIES OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES FOR ACQUIRING GOODS OR SERVICES	'
	Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
	The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
	Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum ("PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.
	Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
INCOME TAX PROVISION Policy	'
	Income Tax Provision
	The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
	The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS	'
	Uncertain Tax Positions
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to unrecognized income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended January 31, 2014 or 2013.
Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control	'
	Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control
	Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL.  Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.”  In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.  In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years.  The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE Policy	'
	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants. The total amount of potentially outstanding dilutive common shares from the conversion of the convertible notes plus accrued interest converted would be 3,962,308 and 0 for the reporting period ended January 31, 2014 or 2013.
CASH FLOWS REPORTING Policy	'
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.  The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Policy	'
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS	'
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date."  This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.
	In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated_subsidiary_Table

Consolidated subsidiary ( Table)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Consolidated subsidiary	'
Consolidated subsidiary	'
	The Company's consolidated subsidiary and/or entity is as follows:
	Name of consolidated	State or other jurisdiction	Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity	of incorporation or organization	(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	Nevada Tungsten Holdings Ltd.	The State of Nevada	October 30, 2012 (April 8, 2013)	100%

Mineral_properties_consisted_o

Mineral properties consisted of the following claims (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Mineral properties consisted of the following claims:	'
Mineral properties consisted of the following claims	'
	Mineral properties consisted of the following:
		31-Oct-13			31-Jan-13
	Cherry Creek Claim	$	174,013		$	21,291
	Idaho Claim		750,000			-
	Less impairment		(750,000	)		-
	Total	$	174,013		$	21,291

Derivative_Instruments_Table

Derivative Instruments ( Table)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments	'
Schedule of Fair Value Hedging Instruments, Statements of Financial Performance and Financial Position, Location	'
	The Company estimated the fair value of the conversion feature on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
		2-Jan-14
	Expected life (year)		0.67
	Expected volatility (*)		190.12	%
	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends		0	%
	Risk-free rate(s)		0.11	%
Schedule of Derivative Assets at Fair Value	'
	Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheet at January 31, 2014:
					Fair Value Measurement Using
		Carrying Value					Level 1			Level 2	Level 3			Total
	Derivative conversion features	$	214,050			$	-		$	-	$	214,050	$	214,050
Schedule of Price Risk Derivatives	'
	The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended January 31, 2014:
		Fair Value Measurement Using Level 3 Inputs
			Derivative Liabilities				Total
	Balance, January 31, 2013	$	-			$	-
	Purchases, issuances and settlements		268,563				268,563
	Total (gains) or losses (realized/unrealized) included in consolidated statements of operations		(54,513	)			(54,513	)
	Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		-				-
	Balance, January 31, 2014	$	214,050			$	214,050

ADVANCES_FROM_STOCKHOLDER_Tabl

ADVANCES FROM STOCKHOLDER (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
ADVANCES FROM STOCKHOLDER	'
ADVANCES FROM STOCKHOLDER	'
	Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
	Advances from stockholder consisted of the following:
		31-Jan-14		31-Jan-13
	Advances from stockholders	$	99,951	$	23,000
	Total	$	99,951	$	23,000

Income_Taxes_Tables

Income Taxes (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014
Income Taxes:	'
Schedule of Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)	'
	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
		31-Jan-14			31-Jan-13
	Net deferred tax assets – non-current:
	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards		204,711			32,331
	Less valuation allowance		(204,711	)		(32,331	)
	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-
Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation	'
	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:
		For the Reporting			For the Reporting
		Period Ended			Period Ended
		31-Jan-14			31-Jan-13
	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%
	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)
	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

ORGANIZATION_AND_OPERATIONS_De

ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS (Details) (USD $)	Apr. 08, 2013	Nov. 06, 2012	Mar. 09, 2012
ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS CONSISTS OF:	'	'	'
Increase the number of shares of authorized common stock	'	'	300,000,000
Shares of blank check preferred stock	'	'	25,000,000
Change the par value of the common stock	'	'	$0.00
Shares of common stock issued and outstanding	66,000,000	45,600,000	'
Surrendered shares of common stock for cancellation	3,000,000	'	'
Issued common shares for the acquisition	3,000,000	'	'
Acquisition of issued and outstanding shares of Tungsten	100.00%	'	'

MINERAL_PROPERTIES_As_Follows_

MINERAL PROPERTIES As Follows (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 11, 2014	Apr. 11, 2013	Jan. 31, 2013
MINERAL PROPERTIES As Follows:	'	'	'
Paying amounts on or before April 15, 2013	'	'	$150,000
Paying amounts on or before February 15, 2014	'	'	100,000
Paying amounts on or before February 15, 2015	'	'	50,000
Exploration expenditures on the property on or before first anniversary	'	'	250,000
Exploration expenditures on the property on or before second anniversary	'	'	250,000
Exploration expenditures on the property on or before third anniversary	'	'	1,000,000
First payment made	'	150,000	1,000,000
Company and Viscount signed an amendment to the Option Agreement and paid	100,000	'	'
Exploration expenditures to be made on or before June 15, 2014	$250,000	'	'

Mineral_properties_consisted_o1

Mineral properties consisted of the following (Details) (USD $)	Oct. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2013
Mineral properties consisted of the following:	'	'
Cherry Creek Claim	$174,013	$21,291
Idaho Claim	750,000	0
Less impairment	-750,000	0
Total Mineral properties	$174,013	$21,291

BlackScholes_Option_Pricing_Mo

Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model weighted-average assumptions (Details)	Feb. 02, 2014
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model weighted-average assumptions:	'
Expected life (year)	0.67
Expected volatility (*)	190.12%
Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends	0.00%
Risk-free rate(s)	0.11%

Fair_Value_of_Conversion_Featu

Fair Value of Conversion Features (Details) (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014
Derivative conversion features	$214,050
Derivative conversion features	214,050
Carrying Value	'
Derivative conversion features	214,050
Derivative conversion features	214,050
Level 3	'
Derivative conversion features	214,050
Derivative conversion features	$214,050

Fair_Value_Measurement_Using_L

Fair Value Measurement Using Level 3 Inputs (Details) (USD $)	Derivative Liabilities	Total.
Balance of Derivative liabilities at Jan. 31, 2013	$0	$0
Purchases, issuances and settlements	268,563	268,563
Total (gains) or losses (realized/unrealized) included in consolidated statements of operations	-54,513	-54,513
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3	0	0
Balance of Derivative liabilities, at Jan. 31, 2014	$214,050	$214,050

Advances_from_stockholder_cons

Advances from stockholder consisted of the following (Details) (USD $)	Oct. 31, 2013	Jan. 31, 2013
Advances from stockholder consisted of as Follows:	'	'
Advances from stockholders.	$99,951	$23,000
Total Advances from stockholders	$99,951	$23,000

EQUITY_TRANSACTIONS_Details

EQUITY TRANSACTIONS (Details) (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014	Aug. 19, 2013	Apr. 08, 2013
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS as Follows:	'	'	'
Total number of shares of common stock authorized to issue	50,000,000	'	'
Total number of shares of common stock authorized to issue par value	$0.00	'	'
Number of shares of authorized common stock	300,000,000	'	'
Closed a private placement shares	'	'	2,000,000
Closed a private placement per share	'	'	$0.25
Private placemen aggregate total	'	'	$500,000
Reverse merger and the private placement issued and outstanding common shares	'	'	71,000,000
Lock up agreements shares of the common stock	'	'	3,000,000
Released concurrent with the closing of the Transaction	'	'	1,000,000
The Company cancelled shares, in the aggregate, of the Company's common stock that was held by two former shareholders	'	6,000,000	'
Upon issuance of shares of its common stock to Monfort	'	3,000,000	'

Restricted_Stock_Award_Agreeme

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Details) (USD $)	13-May-13
Restricted Stock Award Agreement	'
Shares of restricted common stock of the Company issued in consideration for services to be rendered to the Company by Mr. Galda	750,000
Shares of common stock per quarter vesting	62,500
Restricted Shares per share value	$0.81
Value of shares amortized over the vesting period	$607,500
Value of shares amortized over the vesting period per quarter	50,625
Company recognized in equity based compensation under this Agreement.	$151,875

Agreement_with_Carmel_Advisors

Agreement with Carmel Advisors (Details) (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 17, 2014
Agreement with Carmel Advisors	'	'
Compensated for the services rendered by the issuance of restricted Shares	'	$2,000,000
Shares of the Company's common stock issued as per agreement	2,000,000	144
Share value of the shares issued to Carmel Advisors LLC	0.09	0.09
The close price on the date of grant and will be amortized over the twelve month period	180,000	'
Amount amortized per month which will be included in general and administration	15,000	'
Company recognized in Advertising and Promotion expenses under this Agreement	$7,500	'

Restricted_Stock_Award_Agreeme1

Restricted Stock Award Agreement with David Bikerman (Details) (USD $)	Oct. 31, 2013
Restricted Stock Award Agreement with David Bikerman	'
Bikerman was granted shares of restricted common stock of the Company	750,000
The Restricted Shares will vest over a three year period at the rate of shares of common stock per quarter	62,500
First of the Restricted Shares vesting on April 30, 2014	$187,500
Amount to amortized over the vesting period	56,250
Restricted Shares were valued at per share issued to Bikerman	$0.08
Amount to amortized per quarter which will be included in officer/directors' compensation	4,687.50
Crescendo has agreed to accept restricted shares of common stock of the Company as partial payment of fees owed	42,799
Crescendo has agreed to accept shares of common stock of the Company as partial payment of fees owed	144
Amount paid in satisfaction of the payment for fees owed	$3,500

Components_of_deferred_tax_ass

Components of deferred tax assets are as follows (Details) (USD $)	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013
Components of deferred tax assets are as follows	'	'
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards	$204,711	$32,331
Less valuation allowance	-204,711	-32,331
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$0	$0

Income_Tax_Provision_in_the_St

Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2013
Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations	'	'
Federal statutory income tax rate	34.00%	34.00%
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards	-34.00%	-34.00%
Effective income tax rate	0.00%	0.00%

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)	Apr. 08, 2013
Employment Agreements:	'
President and Chief Executive Officer receive a monthly base salary	$5,000
Vice President of Exploration he will receive a monthly base salary	$4,000

Subsequent_amended_option_agre

Subsequent amended option agreements (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 11, 2014
Subsequent amended option agreements	'
Paying amounts on or before February 15, 2014 not made	$100,000
Exploration expenditures on the Property on or before the first anniversary of the execution of this Agreement will not be made	$250,000
The Optionee will issue to the Optionor shares of common stock in Tungsten Corp.	250,000

Subsequent_Issuance_of_Common_

Subsequent Issuance of Common Stock (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 06, 2014	Feb. 18, 2014
Subsequent Issuance of Common Stock	'	'
Common stock purchase agreement for Equity Enhancement Program ("EEP") with a Magna Group in millions	'	3
The EEP allows, but does not obligate the Company to issue and sell up to worth of the Company's common stock to the Investor from time to time	'	$3,000,000
We paid to the Investor a commitment fee for entering into the Purchase Agreement in restricted shares	'	2,065,177
We paid to the Investor a commitment fee for entering into the Purchase Agreement in value	'	150,000
Restricted shares of our common stock calculated using a per share price	'	$0.07
Amount paid in satisfaction of the payment of for fees owed.	1,750	'
Total fees owed	$23,302	'
Restricted Shares were issued to Crescendo Communications, LLC pursuant to the Letter Agreement	144	'